TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a
Transcript of TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a
![Page 1: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Interference Cancellation as a Mobile Enhancement to Improve Spectral Efficiency
April 2006
Louis Scharf, Chief Scientist
![Page 2: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Narrative Outline
The Shannon Game is to trade power efficiency for spectral efficiency in the wireless network. To score in the game we need to match transmitters and receivers to the channel effects (interference). This impels us to understand:
• Interference: Its sources and its effects
• Interference Cancellers
Then we can analyze:
• Performance of Interference Cancellers
• Economic Impact of Interference CancellersTh
roug
hput
(kbp
s)
Power (watts)
Shannon limit
Lower power at no decrease in data rate
Higher data rate at no increase in power
![Page 3: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Interference is the Key Limiter ofCode-Based Network Performance
•As reported by Morgan Stanley, Feb. 1, 2005. 3G Test conducted in London.
Data rate increase
Dramatic demonstration of the Shannon game:• For increased data rates, only users near cell center have sufficient power, thus reducing effective cell
size. So increase power. But this increases interference, producing no useful effect for power, unless an interference cancellation receiver is matched to channel.
Data rate and capacity reduction; Quality of service degradation• Degraded reception leads to lower data transfer rates• Majority of users effectively at edge of cell• Interference causes base stations to broadcast more power to each terminal• The number of terminals that can be supported simultaneously is reduced• Increase in coverage holes leads to more frequent dropped calls
![Page 4: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Evolution of Interference Cancellation Receivers from CDMA2000 to 1xEV-DO and WCDMA/HSDPA
Historically, interference cancellation for all channels has been considered too complex and costly to deploy. Key breakthrough is an interference cancellation solution that can be implementedwithin a baseband chip.
There has been a belief that a PN-averaged equalizer bounds the performance of an advanced receiver for 1xEV-DO. Recent developments prove that this equalizer bound can be breeched with interference cancellation.
Interference cancellation integrates with receive diversity and extends to MIMO-OFDM.
Interference cancellation for WCDMA/HSDPA is a study item in 3GPP RAN4. TensorComm is a participant and contributor.
![Page 5: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
TensorComm’s technology roadmap continues to improve gains of Interference Cancellation Technology (ICT™)
March: Operator proves substantial capital savings in network capacity and performanceApril: Publicly announce ICTJuly: Extend solution to WCDMA.November: Announce next generation ICT for 1xEV-DO and HSDPA
2004 2005 2006 Future …..
Aug 04: System simulations prove viability of ICTNov 04: ICT gains demonstrated in field trials on commercial CDMA2000 network using integrated FPGA platforms
Jan: ICT 440 data throughput increases of 50%+ proven in system simulationsGains up to 6 dbFeb: Results submitted to 3GPPRequested by operators to conduct network trials
•Improvements to dB gain; size reduction•S-DMB applications•Base station solution•MIMO-OFDM solution
ICT 220 ICT 440
TensorComm continues to fortify its Intellectual Property and toconduct evaluations in cooperation with operators and chipset vendors
![Page 6: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Characterizing Interference
The problem is particularly problematic when coded sub-channels are densely populated and/or the mobile terminal finds itself in an edge of cell condition. The technology challenge is to cancel these effects, at manageable complexity, in order to maintain cell size and/or increase data rates.
Channel effects defeat all attempts to maintain the orthogonality between coded sub-channels in a multi-access system. As a consequence there is interference between sub-channels, and it comes in two varieties:
• intra-cell interference due to multi-path structure• inter-cell interference due to interfering base stations
Ior (1) Ior (2)
Ec Ec
F1F2
Ior (1) Ior (2)
Ec Ec
F1F2
![Page 7: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
A Representation of Advanced Receivers
![Page 8: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Characteristics of Advanced Receivers
Only ICT matches to inter-cell and intra-cell interference, at the symbol rate.ICT removes interference from all channels (not just pilot).ICT fills performance gaps that arise between RAKEs, equalizers and MUDs. ICT subsumes equalizers, and it fits within the architecture of a RAKE receiver, with no impact on RF design.ICT integrates with MRD.
RAKE Equalizer ICT
Matches to intra-cell multi-path
√ √ √
Matches to inter-cell multi-path
√(in soft hand-off) √
Manages intra-cell code correlation
√(@ doppler rate)
√(@ symbol rate)
Manages inter-cell code correlation
√(@ doppler rate)
√(@ symbol rate)
![Page 9: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
ICT Fills Performance Gaps
Brackets represent the performance gaps that ICT fills by riding as close to the MUD
line as possible, at manageable hardware
complexity
Figure not scaled
![Page 10: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
HSET_6 QPSKMid Geometry (Ior/Ioc = 5 dB)2 Basestations, 1 InterferingEc/Ior = -6 dB for HSDPA (10-code)
% Increase in User
Throughput
Current Receiver (RAKE) * 433 595 270%
Type 2 Future Receiver (LMMSE equalizer) 976 988 90%
Type 1 Dual Antenna Receiver (RD) 1181 1220 55%
Type 3 (RD + LMMSE equalizer) 1651 1674
TensorComm ICT ** 1825 1899
Pedestrian BVehicular 30km/hr
Average ICT Gain Over
User Throughput (kbps)
ICT Increases User Data Throughput
* Rake by itself will not provide meaningful data throughputs. For many channel conditions and geometries, advanced receivers will be necessary for any realistic applications beyond voice.
** Interference is modeled as a true node B, per 3GPP 25-101
TensorComm has completed extensive link-level simulations conducted in conjunction with multiple WCDMA chipset vendors.These comparisons are conservative because RAKE, equalizer and RD use AWGN model for interfering base stations.A sample of similar results included in contribution to 3GPP : RAN4 document number R4-060043.
![Page 11: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
1.9dB
ICT Optimized for 1xEV-DO Data Networks
Live data collects from U.S. 1xEV-DO markets indicate opportunity for ICT gain over RAKEs and equalizers in more than 60% of network conditions.When gains are averaged over observed network conditions, the sector throughput gains are increased by more than 40%.
Sample Test: Two-cell; no multi-path, Veh A
![Page 12: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
ICT Gains for CDMA2000 1X
• Test cases are representative of interference-limited network scenarios derived from field data for a near capacity network :
•Moderate to heavy loading•Cell edge•Multi-path and fading•Multiple sectors
Channel Condition DefinitionType I Stationary; non-fadingType II 30 km/hr; Path profile=[0,-3]Type III 100 km/hr; Path profile=[0,-3]
A Cell edge, 44 of 64 users
2 / 2 Type I 4.7 dB
B Cell edge, 64 of 64 users
2 / 2 Type I 2.4 dB
C Mid cell, 44 of 64 users,
unequal pilots (0, -6dB)
2 / 2 Type I 4.8 dB
F Cell edge, 44 of 64 users
4 / 2 Type III 2.1 dB
Test Case Test Environment Description
Interfering Number of Paths / Sectors
Channel Condition
ICT Gain (dB)
D Cell edge, 44 of 64 users
4 / 2 Type II 3.5 dB
E Cell edge, 3 way softhandoff,
44 of 64 users
6 / 3 Type II 2.0 dB
![Page 13: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
F o rw a r d T r a f f ic C h a n n e l P o w e r v s . T im e7 5 % O C N S
1 5
1 8
2 1
2 4
2 7
16:1
1:53
.560
16:1
2:09
.440
16:1
2:25
.320
16:1
2:41
.240
16:1
2:57
.120
16:1
3:13
.000
16:1
3:28
.920
16:1
3:44
.800
16:1
4:00
.680
16:1
4:16
.560
16:1
4:32
.480
16:1
4:48
.360
16:1
5:04
.240
16:1
5:20
.160
16:1
5:56
.400
16:1
6:12
.320
16:1
6:28
.200
16:1
6:44
.079
16:1
6:59
.960
16:1
7:15
.880
16:1
7:31
.760
16:1
7:47
.640
16:1
8:43
.060
16:1
8:58
.980
16:1
9:14
.860
16:1
9:30
.740
16:1
9:46
.620
16:2
0:02
.540
16:2
0:18
.420
16:2
0:34
.300
16:2
0:50
.220
16:2
1:06
.100
16:2
1:21
.980
16:2
1:37
.860
16:2
1:53
.780
16:2
2:09
.660
16:2
2:25
.540
16:2
2:41
.460
16:2
2:57
.340
C a n c e lle r O f f C a n c e lle r O n C a n c e lle r O f f C a n c e lle r O n
Fwd
TCH
Pow
er (d
bm)
ICT Trials Conducted in a Major Operator’s Controlled Laboratory with Live Base Stations
• Operator’s controlled laboratory configuration consisted of a two-sector, live base station and fading simulator.
• ICT 220 prototype manually switched between ICT220-enabled and disabled modes during the call.
• Logs capture the base station power transmitted during the call.
ICT-enabled devices draw less power from the base station
![Page 14: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
1 9
2 0
2 1
2 2
2 3
2 4
2 5
2 6
2 7
2 8
2 9
3 0
3 1
3 2
3 3
3 4
3 5
3 6
15:4
7:46
.5
15:4
7:51
.0
15:4
7:55
.5
15:4
7:59
.7
15:4
8:04
.0
15:4
8:08
.3
15:4
8:12
.5
15:4
8:16
.8
15:4
8:21
.0
15:4
8:25
.8
15:4
8:30
.4
15:4
8:34
.8
15:4
8:39
.1
15:4
8:43
.5
15:4
8:48
.1
15:4
8:52
.5
15:4
8:56
.8
15:4
9:01
.1
15:4
9:05
.5
15:4
9:09
.7
15:4
9:14
.0
15:4
9:18
.4
15:4
9:22
.6
15:4
9:27
.1
15:4
9:31
.3
15:4
9:35
.6
15:4
9:40
.0
15:4
9:48
.4
15:4
9:53
.3
15:4
9:57
.8
15:5
0:02
.1
15:5
0:06
.5
15:5
0:10
.8
15:5
0:15
.3
15:5
0:19
.5
15:5
0:23
.8
T im e
Fwd
TCH
Pw
r (db
m)
ICT Proven on a Commercial CDMA2000 NetworkProto 1 -ICT onProto 2 -ICT off50 per Mov. Avg (Proto1)50 per Mov. Avg (Proto2)
• Low to moderate speed (3-30km/hr)
• Base station logs
Evaluated on a major operator’s commercial network on a handset designed by one of the world’s top manufacturers. Base station power reduction when the network needs it the most, with edge case gains, particularly in blocking situations, of up to 6dB.Over 60% gain in network capacity.
![Page 15: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Operators Can Derive Dramatic Economic Benefits with ICT
ICT gain translates into delay of network infrastructure
• Each incremental ICT-enabled terminal provides a benefit to the consumer and operator.• Provides no less than $30 benefit per handset• Additional spectrum expansion delayed or eliminated
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Q0
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q9
Q10
Q11
Q12
Q13
Q14
Q15
Q16
Q17
Q18
Q19
Q20
Q21
Q22
Q23
Q24
Q25
Q26
Q27
Q28
Sup
port
ed D
ata
User
s P
er S
ecto
r
Data User Demand
Sector Capacity (no ICT)
Sector Capacity (ICT)
Sector Capacity w ith CarrierAdd or Cell Split (no ICT)Sector Capacity w ith CarrierAdd or Cell Split (ICT)
Data user Demand @ 20% Annual Growth Rate
Initial state: 55% load
Breakpoint for non-ICT network at Q10
Breakpoint for ICT network at Q21
Additional 103 users/sector and 11 quarter delay in infrastructure deployment
66% increase in users: delta represents 206 additional users/sector with ICT network
*ICT penetration at 5% of all new handsets for first year, increasing to 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% each following year
Second breakpoint for non-ICT network at Q25
Second Carrier Sector Capacity with ICT
Second Carrier Sector Capacity with non-ICT
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Q0
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q9
Q10
Q11
Q12
Q13
Q14
Q15
Q16
Q17
Q18
Q19
Q20
Q21
Q22
Q23
Q24
Q25
Q26
Q27
Q28
Sup
port
ed D
ata
User
s P
er S
ecto
r
Data User Demand
Sector Capacity (no ICT)
Sector Capacity (ICT)
Sector Capacity w ith CarrierAdd or Cell Split (no ICT)Sector Capacity w ith CarrierAdd or Cell Split (ICT)
Data user Demand @ 20% Annual Growth Rate
Initial state: 55% load
Breakpoint for non-ICT network at Q10
Breakpoint for ICT network at Q21
Additional 103 users/sector and 11 quarter delay in infrastructure deployment
66% increase in users: delta represents 206 additional users/sector with ICT network
*ICT penetration at 5% of all new handsets for first year, increasing to 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% each following year
Second breakpoint for non-ICT network at Q25
Second Carrier Sector Capacity with ICT
Second Carrier Sector Capacity with non-ICT
![Page 16: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
ICT Derives Significant Gains for 3G Data Networks
Code-based systems are interference limited.
Gains from interference cancellation are variable with network and channel conditions… in realistic channel conditions, up to 6 dB and an increase in user data throughput no less than 50%.
• Higher data throughput to user • Higher network capacity• Reduced base station power (and interference)• Fewer dropped calls in heavily loaded networks• Wider coverage area
![Page 17: TensorComm Interference Cancellation CDG 04 20 06a](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022051406/627d83beff3faf3771411b41/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
ICT Derives Significant Gains for 3G Data Networks
ICT outperforms equalizers, is comparable to MRD, and approximates MRD plus equalizers, at a fraction of the cost.
ICT is a hardware efficient design, ready for integration and optimized for data networks. ICT has been proven in simulations and commercial drive tests.
Technology roadmap for ICT extends beyond 3G technologies to MIMO-OFDM.