Tegaiyou En
-
Upload
jose-correa -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Tegaiyou En
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
1/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN PATENT SYSTEM
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION
Rafael R. Brando (M.Sc Physics, patent examiner)
INPI (National Institute of Industrial Property) - Brazil
January 2012
1 / 5 8
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
2/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
AGENDA
1 Hystorical Background2 Filing a patent application in Brazil (Basic requirements);
3 Workflow of a patent application in Brazil;
4 The Brazilian Patent System and The Japanese Patent System;
5 INPI of 2012
2 / 5 8
http://goforward/http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
3/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
HOW EVERYTHING STARTED:
1809: D. Joo VI set up the
license for inventions of new
machines that could speed up
the economy;1814: One of the first patents
was granted in Brazil for
mining service machines;
1824: the Empire Constitution
guaranteed the rights to
inventors for their inventions;
1830: Brazilian law of 1830 for
patents of invention.
3 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
4/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
WHERE DID IT LEAD TO?
1883: Signing of the Paris Convention;
1945: First Code: 7903/45;
1970: Creation of INPI (Law no5648);
1971: Law no5772 (outdated now);
1996: Law no9279 (current);
2009:INPI began the activities as ISA/IPEA
4 / 5 8
H
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
5/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
ART. 5 (CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL)
Article 5: All persons are equal before the law,
without any distinction whatsoever, Brazilians and
foreigners residing in the country being ensured of
inviolability of the right to life, to liberty, to
equality, to security and to property, on the
following terms:XXI - the law shall ensure the
authors of industrial inventions of a temporary
privilege for their use,as well as protection of
industrial creations, property of trademarks, namesof companies and other distinctive signs, viewing
the social interest and the technological and
economic development of the country;
5 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
6/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
MAKING A SUCESSFUL APPLICATION (BASIC
KNOWLEDGE)
Patents may be granted in Brazil for the protection ofinventionsand utility models.
1 Basic requirements:
Novelty: Brazilian legislation applies the concept of absolute
novelty in determining the state of the art;Industrial Applicability: An invention is considered of industrial
applicability when it can be manufactured or utilized industrially;
Inventive step: For Inventions/Utility Models, the requirement of an
inventive step is also considered.
2 Publication/DisclosureAfter 18 months, following the earliest priority or the date of filing.
3 Protection
A patent of Invention is protected for 20 years (from the date of filling);
A patent of Utility Model is protected for 15 years (from the date of
filling).6 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
7/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
MAKING A SUCESSFUL APPLICATION (BASIC
KNOWLEDGE)
Patents may be granted in Brazil for the protection ofinventionsand utility models.
1 Basic requirements:
Novelty: Brazilian legislation applies the concept of absolute
novelty in determining the state of the art;Industrial Applicability: An invention is considered of industrial
applicability when it can be manufactured or utilized industrially;
Inventive step: For Inventions/Utility Models, the requirement of an
inventive step is also considered.
2 Publication/DisclosureAfter 18 months, following the earliest priority or the date of filing.
3 Protection
A patent of Invention is protected for 20 years (from the date of filling);
A patent of Utility Model is protected for 15 years (from the date of
filling).6 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
8/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
MAKING A SUCESSFUL APPLICATION (BASIC
KNOWLEDGE)
Patents may be granted in Brazil for the protection ofinventionsand utility models.
1 Basic requirements:
Novelty: Brazilian legislation applies the concept of absolute
novelty in determining the state of the art;Industrial Applicability: An invention is considered of industrial
applicability when it can be manufactured or utilized industrially;
Inventive step: For Inventions/Utility Models, the requirement of an
inventive step is also considered.
2 Publication/DisclosureAfter 18 months, following the earliest priority or the date of filing.
3 Protection
A patent of Invention is protected for 20 years (from the date of filling);
A patent of Utility Model is protected for 15 years (from the date of
filling).6 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
9/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
MAKING A SUCESSFUL APPLICATION (BASIC
KNOWLEDGE)
Patents may be granted in Brazil for the protection ofinventionsand utility models.
1 Basic requirements:
Novelty: Brazilian legislation applies the concept of absolute
novelty in determining the state of the art;Industrial Applicability: An invention is considered of industrial
applicability when it can be manufactured or utilized industrially;
Inventive step: For Inventions/Utility Models, the requirement of an
inventive step is also considered.
2
Publication/DisclosureAfter 18 months, following the earliest priority or the date of filing.
3 Protection
A patent of Invention is protected for 20 years (from the date of filling);
A patent of Utility Model is protected for 15 years (from the date of
filling).6 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
10/120
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
THE STRUCTURE OF A PATENT APPLICATION
The structure and format of a patent application are determined by rules
defined byArticle 19 IPLand NA 127/97.
Art.19 IPLA patent application, inaccordance with the conditionsestablished by INPI, shall contain:
Request;
Description;
Claims;
Drawings, if any;
Abstract; and
Proof of payment of the filing fee
7 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
11/120
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)
The patent description shall:
1 Begin with the title (item a);
2 Refer to a single invention, or to a group interrelated inventions(item b and IPL Art. 22);
3 Specify the technical field (item c);
4 Describe the state of the art... pointing out the existing technicalproblems (item d);
5 Define the objects and advantages of the invention (item e);
8 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
12/120
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)
The patent description shall:
1 Begin with the title (item a);
2 Refer to a single invention, or to a group interrelated inventions(item b and IPL Art. 22);
3 Specify the technical field (item c);
4 Describe the state of the art... pointing out the existing technicalproblems (item d);
5 Define the objects and advantages of the invention (item e);
8 / 5 8
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
13/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
14/120
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)
The patent description shall:
1 Begin with the title (item a);
2 Refer to a single invention, or to a group interrelated inventions(item b and IPL Art. 22);
3 Specify the technical field (item c);
4 Describe the state of the art... pointing out the existing technicalproblems (item d);
5 Define the objects and advantages of the invention (item e);
8 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
15/120
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)
The patent description shall:
1 Begin with the title (item a);
2 Refer to a single invention, or to a group interrelated inventions(item b and IPL Art. 22);
3 Specify the technical field (item c);
4 Describe the state of the art... pointing out the existing technicalproblems (item d);
5 Define the objects and advantages of the invention (item e);
8 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
16/120
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)
The patent description shall:
1 Begin with the title (item a);
2 Refer to a single invention, or to a group interrelated inventions(item b and IPL Art. 22);
3 Specify the technical field (item c);
4 Describe the state of the art... pointing out the existing technicalproblems (item d);
5 Define the objects and advantages of the invention (item e);
8 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
17/120
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)
6 Point out the novelty (IPL Article 11) and technical effectachieved (item f and IPL Art. 13);
7 Describe the invention to enable a person skilled in the art torealize the same (item i and IPL Art. 24);
8 Indicate the industrial use when the same is not obvious (item k
and IPL Art. 15).
9 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
18/120
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)
6 Point out the novelty (IPL Article 11) and technical effectachieved (item f and IPL Art. 13);
7 Describe the invention to enable a person skilled in the art torealize the same (item i and IPL Art. 24);
8 Indicate the industrial use when the same is not obvious (item k
and IPL Art. 15).
9 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
19/120
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)
6 Point out the novelty (IPL Article 11) and technical effectachieved (item f and IPL Art. 13);
7 Describe the invention to enable a person skilled in the art torealize the same (item i and IPL Art. 24);
8 Indicate the industrial use when the same is not obvious (item k
and IPL Art. 15).
9 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
20/120
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Claims (NA 127/97 item 15.1.3.1)
1 The quantity should be sufficient to correctly define the subjectmatter (item a);
2 The claims should be numbered consecutively, in Arabic
numerals (item b);
3 The claims can be of one or several categories...provided theyare linked by a single inventive concept (item c);
Claims (IPL)
1 The claims must be based on the description...defining clearlyand precisely the subject matter to be protected (IPL Art. 25);
2 The extension of the protection ... will be determined by thecontent of the claims, interpreted in the light of the descriptionand drawings (IPL Art. 41).
1 0 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
P
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
21/120
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Claims (NA 127/97 item 15.1.3.1)
1 The quantity should be sufficient to correctly define the subjectmatter (item a);
2 The claims should be numbered consecutively, in Arabic
numerals (item b);3 The claims can be of one or several categories...provided they
are linked by a single inventive concept (item c);
Claims (IPL)
1 The claims must be based on the description...defining clearlyand precisely the subject matter to be protected (IPL Art. 25);
2 The extension of the protection ... will be determined by thecontent of the claims, interpreted in the light of the descriptionand drawings (IPL Art. 41).
1 0 / 5 8
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
22/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
23/120
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Claims (NA 127/97 item 15.1.3.1)
1 The quantity should be sufficient to correctly define the subjectmatter (item a);
2 The claims should be numbered consecutively, in Arabic
numerals (item b);3 The claims can be of one or several categories...provided they
are linked by a single inventive concept (item c);
Claims (IPL)
1 The claims must be based on the description...defining clearlyand precisely the subject matter to be protected (IPL Art. 25);
2 The extension of the protection ... will be determined by thecontent of the claims, interpreted in the light of the descriptionand drawings (IPL Art. 41).
1 0 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
24/120
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
FORMAL REQUIREMENTS
Claims (NA 127/97 item 15.1.3.1)
1 The quantity should be sufficient to correctly define the subjectmatter (item a);
2 The claims should be numbered consecutively, in Arabic
numerals (item b);3 The claims can be of one or several categories...provided they
are linked by a single inventive concept (item c);
Claims (IPL)
1 The claims must be based on the description...defining clearlyand precisely the subject matter to be protected (IPL Art. 25);
2 The extension of the protection ... will be determined by thecontent of the claims, interpreted in the light of the descriptionand drawings (IPL Art. 41).
1 0 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
25/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSNATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
26/120
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
CLAIMS
Preamb Characterized by Characterizing part
Evidentiate the category ofthe claim: products, pro-cesses, methods, etc.
1 1 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSNATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
27/120
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)
FORMAL RULES
CLAIMS
Preamb Characterized by Characterizing part
Evidentiate the category ofthe claim: products, pro-cesses, methods, etc.
Obligatory
expression
1 1 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
28/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
C
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
29/120
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING
Filling of the application
1 2 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
30/120
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING
Filling of the application
Priority document
12m (Art. 16)
1 2 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
31/120
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING
Filling of the application
Priority document
12m (Art. 16)
Prel. formal examinationArt. 20
1 2 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
32/120
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING
Filling of the application
Priority document
12m (Art. 16)
Prel. formal examinationArt. 20
Art. 19 - Ok?
1 2 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
33/120
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING
Filling of the application
Priority document
12m (Art. 16)
Prel. formal examinationArt. 20
Art. 19 - Ok?Formal exigences+ RPI 2.5 No (Art. 21)
Numeration +RPI 2.1
Yes
1 2 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
34/120
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING
Filling of the application
Priority document
12m (Art. 16)
Prel. formal examinationArt. 20
Art. 19 - Ok?Formal exigences+ RPI 2.5 No (Art. 21)
Numeration +RPI 2.1
Yes
Problems solved
30 days
Yes
Dismissal ofthe application
No
1 2 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
35/120
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING
Filling of the application
Priority document
12m (Art. 16)
Prel. formal examinationArt. 20
Art. 19 - Ok?Formal exigences+ RPI 2.5 No (Art. 21)
Numeration +RPI 2.1
Yes
Problems solved
30 days
Yes
Dismissal ofthe application
No
National defence?
Yes
1 2 / 5 8
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
36/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (B )
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
37/120
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)
Anticipated on
request by the
applicant
Publication of
the application
(RPI 3.1)
18 months fromthe date of filing
or of the earliest
priority
1 3 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
38/120
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)
Anticipated on
request by the
applicant
Publication of
the application
(RPI 3.1)
18 months fromthe date of filing
or of the earliest
priority
Art. 30 (1)
Art. 30
1 3 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
39/120
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)
Anticipated on
request by the
applicant
Publication of
the application
(RPI 3.1)
18 months fromthe date of filing
or of the earliest
priority
Art. 30 (1)
Art. 30
Request forexamination?
Art. 33
Within 36 monthscounted from the
date of filing
1 3 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
40/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
41/120
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)
Anticipated on
request by the
applicant
Publication of
the application
(RPI 3.1)
18 months fromthe date of filing
or of the earliest
priority
Art. 30 (1)
Art. 30
Request forexamination?
Art. 33
Within 36 monthscounted from the
date of filing
Dismissal(RPI 11.1)
No
Examination ofthe application
Yes
Documents for aidingexamination (Art. 31)
Art. 31 - At least 60 days from
the publication
1 3 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
42/120
( )
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)
Anticipated on
request by the
applicant
Publication of
the application
(RPI 3.1)
18 months fromthe date of filing
or of the earliest
priority
Art. 30 (1)
Art. 30
Request forexamination?
Art. 33
Within 36 monthscounted from the
date of filing
Dismissal(RPI 11.1)
No
Examination ofthe application
Yes
Documents for aidingexamination (Art. 31)
Art. 31 - At least 60 days from
the publication
Request for rein-
statement of theapplication (60d)Yes
1 3 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
43/120
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)
Anticipated onrequest by the
applicant
Publication of
the application
(RPI 3.1)
18 months fromthe date of filing
or of the earliest
priority
Art. 30 (1)
Art. 30
Request forexamination?
Art. 33
Within 36 monthscounted from the
date of filing
Dismissal(RPI 11.1)
No
Examination of
the application
Yes
Documents for aiding
examination (Art. 31)
Art. 31 - At least 60 days from
the publication
Request for rein-
statement of theapplication (60d)Yes
Definitive dismissal
(RPI11.1.1)
No
1 3 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
44/120
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)
Examination of the application
1 4 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
45/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
46/120
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)
Examination of the application
Requirements regarding formal aspects?
Art. 34
Solved
Yes (60d)
Not solved
1 4 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
47/120
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)
Examination of the application
Requirements regarding formal aspects?
Art. 34
Solved
Yes (60d)
Not solved Dismissal
RPI 11.5
1 4 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
48/120
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)
Examination of the application
Requirements regarding formal aspects?
Art. 34
Solved
Yes (60d)
Not solved
Dismissal
RPI 11.5
Search and Technical reports
1 4 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
49/120
U N O ON
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)
Examination of the application
Requirements regarding formal aspects?
Art. 34
No
Search and Technical reports
1 4 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
50/120
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)
Search and Technical reports
1 5 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
51/120
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)
Search and Technical reports
AllowanceRPI 9.1
Request for amendmentRPI 6.1
Opinion for non-patenteability RPI 7.1
Art.36 Art.37
Art.36
1 5 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
52/120
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
53/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
54/120
M OST IMPORTANT LAW S ARTICLES
REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT
Request for amendmentRPI 6.1
1 6 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
55/120
M OST IMPORTANT LAW S ARTICLES
REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT
Request for amendmentRPI 6.1
(i) division (Art. 35 (III))(ii) technical (Art. 35 (IV))
1 6 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
56/120
M OST IMPORTANT LAW S ARTICLES
REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT
Request for amendmentRPI 6.1
(i) division (Art. 35 (III))(ii) technical (Art. 35 (IV))
Answered -
Art.36 (2) 90d
Not answered - Art.36
(1) 90d
1 6 / 5 8
http://goforward/http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
57/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
58/120
REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT
Request for amendmentRPI 6.1
(i) division (Art. 35 (III))(ii) technical (Art. 35 (IV))
Answered -
Art.36 (2) 90d
Not answered - Art.36
(1) 90d
Definitive dismissalRPI 11.2
Not okOk Remarks
1 6 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
http://goforward/http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
59/120
REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT
Request for amendmentRPI 6.1
(i) division (Art. 35 (III))(ii) technical (Art. 35 (IV))
Answered -
Art.36 (2) 90d
Not answered - Art.36
(1) 90d
Definitive dismissalRPI 11.2
Not okOk Remarks
Allowance RPI 9.1
Art. 37
Examination continues
1 6 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
60/120
OPINION FOR NON-PATENTEABILITY
Opinion for non-patenteabilityRPI 7.1
1 7 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
61/120
OPINION FOR NON-PATENTEABILITY
Opinion for non-patenteabilityRPI 7.1
(i) Patenteability (Art. 35 (I))(ii) Adaptation to the nature of protection claimed (Art. 35 (II))
1 7 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
62/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
63/120
OPINION FOR NON-PATENTEABILITY
Opinion for non-patenteabilityRPI 7.1
(i) Patenteability (Art. 35 (I))(ii) Adaptation to the nature of protection claimed (Art. 35 (II))
Contested -
Art.36 (2) 90d
Not contested - Art.36
(2o) 90d
Patent rejectedRPI 9.2
1 7 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
64/120
OPINION FOR NON-PATENTEABILITY
Opinion for non-patenteabilityRPI 7.1
(i) Patenteability (Art. 35 (I))(ii) Adaptation to the nature of protection claimed (Art. 35 (II))
Contested -
Art.36 (2) 90d
Not contested - Art.36
(2o) 90d
Patent rejectedRPI 9.2
Not acceptedAccepted
1 7 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
65/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
66/120
OPINION FOR NON-PATENTEABILITY
Opinion for non-patenteabilityRPI 7.1
(i) Patenteability (Art. 35 (I))(ii) Adaptation to the nature of protection claimed (Art. 35 (II))
Contested -
Art.36 (2) 90d
Not contested - Art.36
(2o) 90d
Patent rejectedRPI 9.2
Not acceptedAccepted Art. 37
Allowance RPI 9.1
Art. 37
Request for amendmentRPI 6.1
1 7 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
67/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
Substantive
examinationYes (even for utility models) Yes
Term of right
Patents for Inventions/Utility
Models are granted for 20/15
years. Art. 40
20 years from the filing dateArt. 67
Subjects of
protection
Specially what is "defined" by
the law articles 8, 9 and 24Art. 8, Art. 9 and Art. 24
Highly advanced creations of atechnical idea using a natural
law Art. 1 and Art. 2
1 8 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
68/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
Substantive
examination
Yes (even for utility models) Yes
Term of right
Patents for Inventions/Utility
Models are granted for 20/15
years. Art. 40
20 years from the filing dateArt. 67
Subjects of
protection
Specially what is "defined" by
the law articles 8, 9 and 24Art. 8, Art. 9 and Art. 24
Highly advanced creations of atechnical idea using a natural
law Art. 1 and Art. 2
1 8 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
69/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
Substantive
examination
Yes (even for utility models) Yes
Term of right
Patents for Inventions/Utility
Models are granted for 20/15
years. Art. 40
20 years from the filing dateArt. 67
Subjects of
protection
Specially what is "defined" by
the law articles 8, 9 and 24Art. 8, Art. 9 and Art. 24
Highly advanced creations of atechnical idea using a natural
law Art. 1 and Art. 2
1 8 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
B J
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
70/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
Substantive
examination
Yes (even for utility models) Yes
Term of right
Patents for Inventions/Utility
Models are granted for 20/15
years. Art. 40
20 years from the filing dateArt. 67
Subjects of
protection
Specially what is "defined" by
the law articles 8, 9 and24 Art. 8, Art. 9 and Art. 24
Highly advanced creations of atechnical idea using a natural
law Art. 1 and Art. 2
1 8 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
B J
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
71/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
Divison of a
patent
application
Can be divided before the end
of examination Art. 26
Restricted to the same period as
permitted for amendment
Art. 44
Replies to
Official
Reports
90days for any applicant
Art. 36
60days for domestic applicants,
90days for foreign applicants
(JPOs practical rule)
Allowed
period for
amendment
Applicants can amendvoluntarily beforerequest for
examination
Art. 32
Applicants can amend voluntarilyeven afterrequest for
examination
Art.17 Art.50
1 9 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
72/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
Divison of a
patent
application
Can be divided before the end
of examination Art. 26
Restricted to the same period as
permitted for amendment
Art. 44
Replies to
Official
Reports
90days for any applicant
Art. 36
60days for domestic applicants,
90days for foreign applicants
(JPOs practical rule)
Allowed
period for
amendment
Applicants can amendvoluntarily beforerequest for
examination
Art. 32
Applicants can amend voluntarilyeven afterrequest for
examination
Art.17 Art.50
1 9 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
73/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
Divison of a
patent
application
Can be divided before the end
of examination Art. 26
Restricted to the same period as
permitted for amendment
Art. 44
Replies to
Official
Reports
90days for any applicant
Art. 36
60days for domestic applicants,
90days for foreign applicants
(JPOs practical rule)
Allowed
period for
amendment
Applicants can amendvoluntarily beforerequest for
examination
Art. 32
Applicants can amend voluntarilyeven afterrequest for
examination
Art.17 Art.50
1 9 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
74/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
Divison of a
patent
application
Can be divided before the end
of examination Art. 26
Restricted to the same period as
permitted for amendment
Art. 44
Replies to
Official
Reports
90days for any applicant
Art. 36
60days for domestic applicants,
90days for foreign applicants
(JPOs practical rule)
Allowed
period for
amendment
Applicants can amendvoluntarily beforerequest for
examination
Art. 32
Applicants can amend voluntarilyeven afterrequest for
examination
Art.17 Art.50
1 9 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
75/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
What cannot
be
protected?
Explicitly described in the IPLArt. 10
Art. 18
Detailed information in theguidelines for examination
Description
of the
invention
Enable somebody skilled in theart to perform the invention
Art. 24
Similar
Art. 36(4)
When an
invention is
considered
new?
If its not part of the state of the
artArt. 11
Pay attention to:Art. 12
Art. 29(1) Art. 29(2)
Attention to:Art. 30
Art. 30 cont
2 0 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
76/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
What cannot
be
protected?
Explicitly described in the IPLArt. 10
Art. 18
Detailed information in theguidelines for examination
Description
of the
invention
Enable somebody skilled in theart to perform the invention
Art. 24
Similar
Art. 36(4)
When an
invention is
considered
new?
If its not part of the state of the
artArt. 11
Pay attention to:Art. 12
Art. 29(1) Art. 29(2)
Attention to:Art. 30
Art. 30 cont
2 0 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
77/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
What cannot
be
protected?
Explicitly described in the IPLArt. 10
Art. 18
Detailed information in theguidelines for examination
Description
of the
invention
Enable somebody skilled in theart to perform the invention
Art. 24
Similar
Art. 36(4)
When an
invention is
considered
new?
If its not part of the state of the
artArt. 11
Pay attention to:Art. 12
Art. 29(1) Art. 29(2)
Attention to:Art. 30Art. 30 cont
2 0 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
78/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
What cannot
be
protected?
Explicitly described in the IPLArt. 10
Art. 18
Detailed information in theguidelines for examination
Description
of the
invention
Enable somebody skilled in theart to perform the invention
Art. 24
Similar
Art. 36(4)
When an
invention is
considered
new?
If its not part of the state of the
artArt. 11
Pay attention to:Art. 12
Art. 29(1) Art. 29(2)
Attention to:Art. 30Art. 30 cont
2 0 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
79/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
Inventive
steps
An invention shall be taken to
involve inventive activity when,
for a person skilled in the art, it
does not derive in an evident or
obvious manner from the state
of the art Art. 13
Those that cannot be invented"easily"
Art. 29(2)
2 1 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
80/120
BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
Situation Brazil Japan
Inventive
steps
An invention shall be taken to
involve inventive activity when,
for a person skilled in the art, it
does not derive in an evident or
obvious manner from the state
of the art Art. 13
Those that cannot be invented"easily"
Art. 29(2)
2 1 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
81/120
CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)
... 2006 2012
2 2 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
82/120
CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)
Decisions 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*
Archives 9232 14611 9460 9363 12401
Denials 1066 824 2729 2499 3394
Granted Patents 2785 1855 2824 3153 3620
Waivers Approved 77 43 52 62 56
Total 13160 17333 15065 15077 19471
2 3 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
83/120
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
84/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
85/120
( )
Solutions1 Increasing the number of examiners:
2006 ... 2010105 ~270
2 Other possibilities (under study):
First Action;
(i) Only for applications filled in Brazil, (ii) written opinion about
patenteability
Green Patents;Applications related to some IPC Symbols (defined by WIPO)will/could have a prioritary processing
PPH
Avoiding redundance of work
2 5 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
86/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
87/120
Solutions1 Increasing the number of examiners:
2006 ... 2010105 ~270
2 Other possibilities (under study):
First Action;
(i) Only for applications filled in Brazil, (ii) written opinion about
patenteability
Green Patents;Applications related to some IPC Symbols (defined by WIPO)will/could have a prioritary processing
PPH
Avoiding redundance of work
2 5 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
88/120
Major problems:Transition to PAPERLESS
Steps:
Tackle the problem
domestically (applicationselectronically available tothe examiners);
Make the system availableto the end users (technical
reports and letter patents);OnLine Filling? (Soon...)
Solutions:
2 6 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
THE END
http://ecarta.inpi.gov.br/ecartahttp://eparecer.inpi.gov.br/eparecerhttp://evista.inpi.gov.br/http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
89/120
Obrigado - Thank You
Rafael Ribeiro Brando ([email protected])
2 7 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
FINAL REMARKS - FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
90/120
Strategic planning of INPI:
Consolidation of the results achieved in recent years and
advancement of structural reforms;efficiency and operational quality;
strategic use of intellectual property by Brazilian and residents;
regional integration;
enhacement of the global intellectual property and repositioning of
INPI
2 8 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
MOST EXAMINED APPLICATIONS - IPC SYMBOLS
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
91/120
2 9 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
USEFUL LINKS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
92/120
Main Brazilian IP Laws: enacted by the Legislature:
http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/profile.jsp?code=BR
Law No. 9.279 of 14 May 1996 (Industrial Property)http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=515
Law No. 10.196 of 14 February 2001 (Amends Law on IndustrialProperty) http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=547
INPI Normative Act No. 127/97 of 5 March 1997 (Implementing Industrial
Property Law) http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=520
Provisional Act No. 2.186-16, Dated 23 August 2001 (Genetic Heritage
& Traditional Knowledge)
http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=5897
INPI Resolution No. 191/08 (Priority Right for Patent Application)http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=8390
3 0 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
USEFUL LINKS
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
93/120
IP Legal Literature (portuguese only)
Guidelines for Examination of a Patenthttp://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=8341
Guidelines for the Examination of Patent Applications in theBiotechnology and Pharmaceutical Filed After 31/12/1994http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=8342
Patent Forms Folderhttp://www.inpi.gov.br/images/stories/downloads/patentes/zip/Formularios_patentes.zip
Download of Biological Sequences Softwarehttp://www.inpi.gov.br/images/stories/downloads/patentes/zip/SisBioList-instala.exe
Brazilian IP Office Feeshttp://www.inpi.gov.br/images/stories/Tabela_Retribuicao_2012_DIRPA.pdf
Search Brazilian Patent Databasehttp://pesquisa.inpi.gov.br/MarcaPatente/jsp/servimg/servimg.jsp?BasePesquisa=Patentes
3 1 / 5 8
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
94/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
USEFUL LINKS
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
95/120
Interesting websites
INPI - Balance and Perspectives
http://www.inpi.gov.br/images/stories/downloads/pdf/INPI_Relatorio_Comunicacao_ingles.pdf
National Health Surveillance Agency website (english version)http://www.anvisa.gov.br/eng/index.htm
Board of Management of Genetic Resources (CGEN)http://www.mma.gov.br/sitio/en/
3 3 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PL
JAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 8, 9 AND 24 (LAW no9279)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
96/120
Article 8 - To be patentable an invention must meet the requirementsof novelty, inventive activity and industrial application.Article 9 - An object of practical use, or part thereof, is patentable asa utility model, when it is susceptible of industrial application,presents a new shape or arrangement and involves an inventive actthat results in a functional improvement in its use or manufacture.
Article 24 - The specification must describe the subject matter clearlyand sufficiently so as to enable a person skilled in the art to carry itout and to indicate, when applicable, the best mode of execution.Sole Paragraph - In the case of biological material essential for thepractical execution of the subject matter of the application, which
cannot be described in the form of this article and which has not beenaccessible to the public, the specification will be supplemented by adeposit of the material in an institution authorized by INPI or indicatedin an international agree
Back
3 4 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 10 (LAW no9279)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
97/120
Article 10 - The following are not considered to be inventions or utilitymodels:I - discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods; II -purely abstract concepts; III - schemes, plans, principles or methodsof a commercial, accounting, financial, educational, publishing, lottery
or fiscal nature; IV - literary, architectural, artistic and scientific worksor any aesthetic creation; V - computer programs per se; VI - thepresentation of information; VII - rules of games; VIII - operating orsurgical techniques and therapeutic or diagnostic methods, for use onthe human or animal body; and IX - natural living beings, in whole orin part, and biological material, including the genome or germ plasm
of any natural living being, when found in nature or isolatedtherefrom, and natural biological processes.
Back
3 5 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 11 (LAW no9279)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
98/120
Article 11 - Inventions and utility models are considered to be newwhen not included in the state of the art. 1 - The state of the artcomprises everything made accessible to the public before the dateof filing of a patent application, by written or oral description, by useor any other means, in Brazil or abroad, without prejudice to the
provisions of articles 12, 16 and 17. 2 - For the purpose ofdetermining novelty, the whole contents of an application filed inBrazil, but not yet published, will be considered as state of the artfrom the date of filing, or from the priority claimed, provided that it ispublished, even though subsequently. 3 - The provisions of theprevious paragraph will be applied to an international patent
application filed in accordance with a treaty or convention in force inBrazil, provided that there is national processing.
Back
3 6 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 12 (LAW no9279)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
99/120
Article 12 - The disclosure of an invention or utility model whichoccurs during the twelve months preceding the date of filing or priorityof the patent application will not be considered as part of the state ofthe art, provided such disclosure is made: I - by the inventor; II - bythe National Institute of Industrial Property - INPI, by means of the
official publication of a patent application filed without the consent ofthe inventor and based on information obtained from him or as aresult of his acts; or III - by third parties, on the basis of informationreceived directly or indirectly from the inventor or as the result of hisacts. Sole Paragraph - INPI may require the inventor to provide a
declaration relating to the disclosure, accompanied or not by proof,under the conditions established in the rules.
Back
3 7 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 13 (LAW no9279)
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
100/120
Article 13 - An invention shall be taken to involve inventive activity
when, for a person skilled in the art, it does not derive in an evident orobvious manner from the state of the art.
Back
3 8 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 18 (LAW no9279)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
101/120
Article 18 - The following are not patentable: I - that which is contrary tomorals, good customs and public security, order and health; II - substances,
matter, mixtures, elements or products of any kind, as well as the
modification of their physical-chemical properties and the respective
processes of obtaining or modifying them, when they result from the
transformation of the atomic nucleus; and III - living beings, in whole or in
part, except transgenic micro-organisms meeting the three patentability
requirements - novelty, inventive activity and industrial application - provided
for in article 8 and which are not mere discoveries; Sole Paragraph - For the
purposes of this law, transgenic micro-organisms are organisms, except the
whole or part of plants or animals, that exhibit, due to direct human
intervention in their genetic composition, a characteristic that can notnormally be attained by the species under natural conditions.
Back
3 9 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 24 (LAW no9279)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
102/120
Article 24 - The specification must describe the subject matter clearlyand sufficiently so as to enable a person skilled in the art to carry itout and to indicate, when applicable, the best mode of execution.
Sole Paragraph - In the case of biological material essential for thepractical execution of the subject matter of the application, whichcannot be described in the form of this article and which has not beenaccessible to the public, the specification will be supplemented by adeposit of the material in an institution authorized by INPI or indicatedin an international agreement.
Back
4 0 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
103/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 32 (LAW no9279)
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
104/120
Article 32 - In order better to clarify or define a patent application,applicant may effect amendments up to the date a request for
examination is made, provided such amendments be limited to thesubject matter initially disclosed in the application.
Back
4 2 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 33 (LAW no9279)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
105/120
Article 33 - Examination of a patent application must be requested bythe applicant or by any interested party, within 36 (thirty-six) months
counted from the date of filing, under pain of dismissal of theapplication.
Back
4 3 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
106/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 36 (LAW no9279)
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
107/120
Article 36 - When the Official report is for non-patentiability or for theinadequacy of the application for the nature of protection claimed or
requires technical amendments, the applicant will be notified to replywithin 90 (ninety) days.
Back
4 5 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 40 (LAW no9279)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
108/120
Article 40 - A Patent of invention will have a term of 20 (twenty) yearsand a utility model patent a term of 15 (fifteen) years, counted fromthe filing date.Sole Paragraph - The term will not be less than 10 (ten) years forpatents of invention and 7 (seven) years for utility model patents,counted from grant, except when INPI is prevented from proceedingwith the examination as to the merit of the application, due to aproven pendente lite or for reasons of force majeure.
Back
4 6 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 1 AND ART. 2 (JAPANESEPATENT ACT)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
109/120
(Purpose)Article 1 - The purpose of this Act is, through promoting the protectionand the utilization of inventions, to encourage inventions, and therebyto contribute to the development of industry.(Definitions)Article 2 (1) - "Invention" in this Act means the highly advancedcreation of technical ideas utilizing the laws of nature...
Back
4 7 / 5 8
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
110/120
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 29(1) (JAPANESE PATENT ACT)
-
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
111/120
Article 29 (1) - An inventor of an invention that is industriallyapplicable may be entitled to obtain a patent for the said invention,except for the following: (i) inventions that were publicly known inJapan or a foreign country, prior to the filing of the patent application;
(ii) inventions that were publicly worked in Japan or a foreign country,prior to the filing of the patent application; or (iii) inventions that weredescribed in a distributed publication, or inventions that were madepublicly available through an electric telecommunication line in Japanor a foreign country, prior to the filing of the patent application...
Back
4 9 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 29(1) (JAPANESE PATENT ACT)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
112/120
Article 29 (1) - An inventor of an invention that is industriallyapplicable may be entitled to obtain a patent for the said invention,except for the following: (i) inventions that were publicly known inJapan or a foreign country, prior to the filing of the patent application;
(ii) inventions that were publicly worked in Japan or a foreign country,prior to the filing of the patent application; or (iii) inventions that weredescribed in a distributed publication, or inventions that were madepublicly available through an electric telecommunication line in Japanor a foreign country, prior to the filing of the patent application...
Back
5 0 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 29(2) (JAPANESE PATENT ACT)
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
113/120
Article 29 (2) - Where, prior to the filing of the patent application, aperson ordinarily skilled in the art of the invention would have beenable to easily make the invention based on an invention prescribed in
any of the items of the preceding paragraph, a patent shall not begranted for such an invention notwithstanding the precedingparagraph...
Back
5 1 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 29(2) (JAPANESE PATENT ACT)
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
114/120
Article 29 (2) - Where, prior to the filing of the patent application, aperson ordinarily skilled in the art of the invention would have beenable to easily make the invention based on an invention prescribed in
any of the items of the preceding paragraph, a patent shall not begranted for such an invention notwithstanding the precedingparagraph...
Back
5 2 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 30 (JAPANESEPATENT ACT)
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
115/120
Article 30 (Exception to lack of novelty of invention) (1) In the case of an invention which has fallenunder any of the items of Article 29 (1) by reason of the fact that the person having the right toobtain a patent has conducted a test, has made a presentation in a printed publication, has made apresentation through electric telecommunication lines, or has made a presentation in writing at astudy meeting held by an academic group designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office,such invention shall be deemed not have fallen under any of the items of Article 29(1) for the
purposes of Article 29(1) and (2) for the invention claimed in a patent application which has beenfiled by the said person within six months from the date on which the invention first fell under any ofthose items. (2) In the case of an invention which has fallen under any of the items of Article 29 (1)against the will of the person having the right to obtain a patent, the preceding paragraph shall alsoapply for the purposes of Article 29(1) and (2) to the invention claimed in the patent applicationwhich has been filed by the said person within six months from the date on which the invention firstfell under any of those paragraphs.
Back
5 3 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 30 (CONT)(JAPANESEPATENT ACT)
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
116/120
(3) In the case of an invention which has fallen under any of the items of Article 29 (1) by reason ofthe fact that the person having the right to obtain a patent has exhibited the invention at anexhibition held by the Government or a local public entity (hereinafter referred to as the"Government, etc."), an exhibition held by those who are not the Government, etc. where suchexhibition has been designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office, an internationalexhibition held in the territory of a country of the Union of the Paris Convention or a member of theWorld Trade Organization by its Government, etc. or those who are authorized thereby to hold suchan exhibition, or an international exhibition held in the territory of a state which is neither of a
country of the Union of the Paris Convention nor a member of the World Trade Organization by itsGovernment, etc. or those who are authorized thereby where such exhibition has been designatedby the Commissioner of the Patent Office, paragraph (1) shall also apply for the purposes of Article29(1) and (2) to the invention claimed in the patent application which has been filed by the saidperson within six months from the date on which the invention first fell under any of those items. (4)Any person seeking the application of paragraph (1) or (3) shall submit to the Commissioner of thePatent Office, at the time of filing of the patent application, a document stating thereof and, withinthirty days from the date of filing of the patent application, a document proving the fact that the
invention which has otherwise fallen under any of the items of Article 29(1) is an invention to whichparagraph (1) or (3) of this Article may be applicable.
Back
5 4 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 36(4) (JAPANESE PATENT ACT)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
117/120
Article 36 (1) A person requesting the grant of a patent shall submit an application to the
Commissioner of the Patent Office stating the following: (i) the name and domicile or residence of
the applicant(s) for the patent; and (ii) the name and domicile or residence of the inventor(s). (2)
The description, scope of claims, drawings (where required), and abstract shall be attached to the
application. (3) The description as provided in the preceding paragraph shall state the following: (i)
the title of the invention; (ii) a brief explanation of the drawing(s); and (iii) a detailed explanation of
the invention. (4) The statement of the detailed explanation of the invention as provided in item (iii)
of the preceding Paragraph shall comply with each of the following items: (i) in accordance with
Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, the statement shall beclear and sufficient as to enable any person ordinarilyskilled in the art to which the invention pertains to work
the invention...
Back
5 5 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS
INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 44 (JAPANESEPATENT ACT)
http://find/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
118/120
Article 44 (1) An applicant for a patent may extract one or more new patentapplications out of a patent application containing two or more inventions only
within the following time limits:(i) within the allowable time limit foramendments of the description, scope of claims or drawings attachedto the application; (ii) within 30 days from the date on which a certifiedcopy of the examiners decision to the effect that a patent is to be
granted (excluding the examiners decision to the effect that a patent is to be grantedunder Article 51 as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 163(3) and the examiners
decision to the effect that a patent is to be granted with regard to a patent application
that has been subject to examination as provided in Article 160(1)) has beenserved; and (iii) within 30 days from the date on which a certified copy
of the examiners initial decision to the effect that the application is tobe refused has been served.
Back
5 6 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMSINPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 50 (JAPANESEPATENT ACT)
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
119/120
Article 50 Where the examiner intends to render an examinersdecision to the effect that an application is to be refused, theexaminer shall notify the applicant for the patent of the reasonstherefor and give the said applicant an opportunity to submit a writtenopinion, designating an adequate time limit for such purpose...
Back
5 7 / 5 8
HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND
BASIC LAWS
PROCEDURE FLOWS
COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMSINPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS
FURTHER INFORMATION
"M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES
BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT
ART. 67 (JAPANESEPATENT ACT)
http://find/http://goback/ -
8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En
120/120
Article 67(1) The duration of a patent right shall expire after a period of 20years from the filing date of the patent application.(2) Where there is a period during which the patented invention isunable to be worked because approvals prescribed by relevant Acts
that are intended to ensure the safely, etc. or any other dispositiondesignated by Cabinet Order as requiring considerable time for theproper execution of the disposition in light of the purpose,procedures, etc., of such a disposition is necessary to obtain for theworking of the patented invention, the duration of the patent right maybe extended, upon the filing of a request for the registration ofextension of the duration, by a period not exceeding 5 years.
Back
5 8 / 5 8
http://find/