Tegaiyou En

download Tegaiyou En

of 120

Transcript of Tegaiyou En

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    1/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN PATENT SYSTEM

    A BRIEF INTRODUCTION

    Rafael R. Brando (M.Sc Physics, patent examiner)

    INPI (National Institute of Industrial Property) - Brazil

    January 2012

    1 / 5 8

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    2/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    AGENDA

    1 Hystorical Background2 Filing a patent application in Brazil (Basic requirements);

    3 Workflow of a patent application in Brazil;

    4 The Brazilian Patent System and The Japanese Patent System;

    5 INPI of 2012

    2 / 5 8

    http://goforward/http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    3/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    HOW EVERYTHING STARTED:

    1809: D. Joo VI set up the

    license for inventions of new

    machines that could speed up

    the economy;1814: One of the first patents

    was granted in Brazil for

    mining service machines;

    1824: the Empire Constitution

    guaranteed the rights to

    inventors for their inventions;

    1830: Brazilian law of 1830 for

    patents of invention.

    3 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    4/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    WHERE DID IT LEAD TO?

    1883: Signing of the Paris Convention;

    1945: First Code: 7903/45;

    1970: Creation of INPI (Law no5648);

    1971: Law no5772 (outdated now);

    1996: Law no9279 (current);

    2009:INPI began the activities as ISA/IPEA

    4 / 5 8

    H

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    5/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    ART. 5 (CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL)

    Article 5: All persons are equal before the law,

    without any distinction whatsoever, Brazilians and

    foreigners residing in the country being ensured of

    inviolability of the right to life, to liberty, to

    equality, to security and to property, on the

    following terms:XXI - the law shall ensure the

    authors of industrial inventions of a temporary

    privilege for their use,as well as protection of

    industrial creations, property of trademarks, namesof companies and other distinctive signs, viewing

    the social interest and the technological and

    economic development of the country;

    5 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    6/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    MAKING A SUCESSFUL APPLICATION (BASIC

    KNOWLEDGE)

    Patents may be granted in Brazil for the protection ofinventionsand utility models.

    1 Basic requirements:

    Novelty: Brazilian legislation applies the concept of absolute

    novelty in determining the state of the art;Industrial Applicability: An invention is considered of industrial

    applicability when it can be manufactured or utilized industrially;

    Inventive step: For Inventions/Utility Models, the requirement of an

    inventive step is also considered.

    2 Publication/DisclosureAfter 18 months, following the earliest priority or the date of filing.

    3 Protection

    A patent of Invention is protected for 20 years (from the date of filling);

    A patent of Utility Model is protected for 15 years (from the date of

    filling).6 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    7/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    MAKING A SUCESSFUL APPLICATION (BASIC

    KNOWLEDGE)

    Patents may be granted in Brazil for the protection ofinventionsand utility models.

    1 Basic requirements:

    Novelty: Brazilian legislation applies the concept of absolute

    novelty in determining the state of the art;Industrial Applicability: An invention is considered of industrial

    applicability when it can be manufactured or utilized industrially;

    Inventive step: For Inventions/Utility Models, the requirement of an

    inventive step is also considered.

    2 Publication/DisclosureAfter 18 months, following the earliest priority or the date of filing.

    3 Protection

    A patent of Invention is protected for 20 years (from the date of filling);

    A patent of Utility Model is protected for 15 years (from the date of

    filling).6 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    8/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    MAKING A SUCESSFUL APPLICATION (BASIC

    KNOWLEDGE)

    Patents may be granted in Brazil for the protection ofinventionsand utility models.

    1 Basic requirements:

    Novelty: Brazilian legislation applies the concept of absolute

    novelty in determining the state of the art;Industrial Applicability: An invention is considered of industrial

    applicability when it can be manufactured or utilized industrially;

    Inventive step: For Inventions/Utility Models, the requirement of an

    inventive step is also considered.

    2 Publication/DisclosureAfter 18 months, following the earliest priority or the date of filing.

    3 Protection

    A patent of Invention is protected for 20 years (from the date of filling);

    A patent of Utility Model is protected for 15 years (from the date of

    filling).6 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    9/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    MAKING A SUCESSFUL APPLICATION (BASIC

    KNOWLEDGE)

    Patents may be granted in Brazil for the protection ofinventionsand utility models.

    1 Basic requirements:

    Novelty: Brazilian legislation applies the concept of absolute

    novelty in determining the state of the art;Industrial Applicability: An invention is considered of industrial

    applicability when it can be manufactured or utilized industrially;

    Inventive step: For Inventions/Utility Models, the requirement of an

    inventive step is also considered.

    2

    Publication/DisclosureAfter 18 months, following the earliest priority or the date of filing.

    3 Protection

    A patent of Invention is protected for 20 years (from the date of filling);

    A patent of Utility Model is protected for 15 years (from the date of

    filling).6 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    10/120

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    THE STRUCTURE OF A PATENT APPLICATION

    The structure and format of a patent application are determined by rules

    defined byArticle 19 IPLand NA 127/97.

    Art.19 IPLA patent application, inaccordance with the conditionsestablished by INPI, shall contain:

    Request;

    Description;

    Claims;

    Drawings, if any;

    Abstract; and

    Proof of payment of the filing fee

    7 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    11/120

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)

    The patent description shall:

    1 Begin with the title (item a);

    2 Refer to a single invention, or to a group interrelated inventions(item b and IPL Art. 22);

    3 Specify the technical field (item c);

    4 Describe the state of the art... pointing out the existing technicalproblems (item d);

    5 Define the objects and advantages of the invention (item e);

    8 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    12/120

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)

    The patent description shall:

    1 Begin with the title (item a);

    2 Refer to a single invention, or to a group interrelated inventions(item b and IPL Art. 22);

    3 Specify the technical field (item c);

    4 Describe the state of the art... pointing out the existing technicalproblems (item d);

    5 Define the objects and advantages of the invention (item e);

    8 / 5 8

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    13/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    14/120

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)

    The patent description shall:

    1 Begin with the title (item a);

    2 Refer to a single invention, or to a group interrelated inventions(item b and IPL Art. 22);

    3 Specify the technical field (item c);

    4 Describe the state of the art... pointing out the existing technicalproblems (item d);

    5 Define the objects and advantages of the invention (item e);

    8 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    15/120

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)

    The patent description shall:

    1 Begin with the title (item a);

    2 Refer to a single invention, or to a group interrelated inventions(item b and IPL Art. 22);

    3 Specify the technical field (item c);

    4 Describe the state of the art... pointing out the existing technicalproblems (item d);

    5 Define the objects and advantages of the invention (item e);

    8 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    16/120

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)

    The patent description shall:

    1 Begin with the title (item a);

    2 Refer to a single invention, or to a group interrelated inventions(item b and IPL Art. 22);

    3 Specify the technical field (item c);

    4 Describe the state of the art... pointing out the existing technicalproblems (item d);

    5 Define the objects and advantages of the invention (item e);

    8 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    17/120

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)

    6 Point out the novelty (IPL Article 11) and technical effectachieved (item f and IPL Art. 13);

    7 Describe the invention to enable a person skilled in the art torealize the same (item i and IPL Art. 24);

    8 Indicate the industrial use when the same is not obvious (item k

    and IPL Art. 15).

    9 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    18/120

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)

    6 Point out the novelty (IPL Article 11) and technical effectachieved (item f and IPL Art. 13);

    7 Describe the invention to enable a person skilled in the art torealize the same (item i and IPL Art. 24);

    8 Indicate the industrial use when the same is not obvious (item k

    and IPL Art. 15).

    9 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    19/120

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Description (NA 127/97 item 15.1.2)

    6 Point out the novelty (IPL Article 11) and technical effectachieved (item f and IPL Art. 13);

    7 Describe the invention to enable a person skilled in the art torealize the same (item i and IPL Art. 24);

    8 Indicate the industrial use when the same is not obvious (item k

    and IPL Art. 15).

    9 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    20/120

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Claims (NA 127/97 item 15.1.3.1)

    1 The quantity should be sufficient to correctly define the subjectmatter (item a);

    2 The claims should be numbered consecutively, in Arabic

    numerals (item b);

    3 The claims can be of one or several categories...provided theyare linked by a single inventive concept (item c);

    Claims (IPL)

    1 The claims must be based on the description...defining clearlyand precisely the subject matter to be protected (IPL Art. 25);

    2 The extension of the protection ... will be determined by thecontent of the claims, interpreted in the light of the descriptionand drawings (IPL Art. 41).

    1 0 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    P

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    21/120

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Claims (NA 127/97 item 15.1.3.1)

    1 The quantity should be sufficient to correctly define the subjectmatter (item a);

    2 The claims should be numbered consecutively, in Arabic

    numerals (item b);3 The claims can be of one or several categories...provided they

    are linked by a single inventive concept (item c);

    Claims (IPL)

    1 The claims must be based on the description...defining clearlyand precisely the subject matter to be protected (IPL Art. 25);

    2 The extension of the protection ... will be determined by thecontent of the claims, interpreted in the light of the descriptionand drawings (IPL Art. 41).

    1 0 / 5 8

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    22/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    23/120

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Claims (NA 127/97 item 15.1.3.1)

    1 The quantity should be sufficient to correctly define the subjectmatter (item a);

    2 The claims should be numbered consecutively, in Arabic

    numerals (item b);3 The claims can be of one or several categories...provided they

    are linked by a single inventive concept (item c);

    Claims (IPL)

    1 The claims must be based on the description...defining clearlyand precisely the subject matter to be protected (IPL Art. 25);

    2 The extension of the protection ... will be determined by thecontent of the claims, interpreted in the light of the descriptionand drawings (IPL Art. 41).

    1 0 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    24/120

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    Claims (NA 127/97 item 15.1.3.1)

    1 The quantity should be sufficient to correctly define the subjectmatter (item a);

    2 The claims should be numbered consecutively, in Arabic

    numerals (item b);3 The claims can be of one or several categories...provided they

    are linked by a single inventive concept (item c);

    Claims (IPL)

    1 The claims must be based on the description...defining clearlyand precisely the subject matter to be protected (IPL Art. 25);

    2 The extension of the protection ... will be determined by thecontent of the claims, interpreted in the light of the descriptionand drawings (IPL Art. 41).

    1 0 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    25/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSNATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    26/120

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    CLAIMS

    Preamb Characterized by Characterizing part

    Evidentiate the category ofthe claim: products, pro-cesses, methods, etc.

    1 1 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSNATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    27/120

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    NATIONAL LAW ( BRAZIL)

    FORMAL RULES

    CLAIMS

    Preamb Characterized by Characterizing part

    Evidentiate the category ofthe claim: products, pro-cesses, methods, etc.

    Obligatory

    expression

    1 1 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    28/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    C

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    29/120

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING

    Filling of the application

    1 2 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    30/120

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING

    Filling of the application

    Priority document

    12m (Art. 16)

    1 2 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    31/120

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING

    Filling of the application

    Priority document

    12m (Art. 16)

    Prel. formal examinationArt. 20

    1 2 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    32/120

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING

    Filling of the application

    Priority document

    12m (Art. 16)

    Prel. formal examinationArt. 20

    Art. 19 - Ok?

    1 2 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    33/120

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING

    Filling of the application

    Priority document

    12m (Art. 16)

    Prel. formal examinationArt. 20

    Art. 19 - Ok?Formal exigences+ RPI 2.5 No (Art. 21)

    Numeration +RPI 2.1

    Yes

    1 2 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    34/120

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING

    Filling of the application

    Priority document

    12m (Art. 16)

    Prel. formal examinationArt. 20

    Art. 19 - Ok?Formal exigences+ RPI 2.5 No (Art. 21)

    Numeration +RPI 2.1

    Yes

    Problems solved

    30 days

    Yes

    Dismissal ofthe application

    No

    1 2 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    35/120

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW - THE BEGINNING

    Filling of the application

    Priority document

    12m (Art. 16)

    Prel. formal examinationArt. 20

    Art. 19 - Ok?Formal exigences+ RPI 2.5 No (Art. 21)

    Numeration +RPI 2.1

    Yes

    Problems solved

    30 days

    Yes

    Dismissal ofthe application

    No

    National defence?

    Yes

    1 2 / 5 8

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    36/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUNDBASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (B )

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    37/120

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)

    Anticipated on

    request by the

    applicant

    Publication of

    the application

    (RPI 3.1)

    18 months fromthe date of filing

    or of the earliest

    priority

    1 3 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    38/120

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)

    Anticipated on

    request by the

    applicant

    Publication of

    the application

    (RPI 3.1)

    18 months fromthe date of filing

    or of the earliest

    priority

    Art. 30 (1)

    Art. 30

    1 3 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    39/120

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)

    Anticipated on

    request by the

    applicant

    Publication of

    the application

    (RPI 3.1)

    18 months fromthe date of filing

    or of the earliest

    priority

    Art. 30 (1)

    Art. 30

    Request forexamination?

    Art. 33

    Within 36 monthscounted from the

    date of filing

    1 3 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    40/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    41/120

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)

    Anticipated on

    request by the

    applicant

    Publication of

    the application

    (RPI 3.1)

    18 months fromthe date of filing

    or of the earliest

    priority

    Art. 30 (1)

    Art. 30

    Request forexamination?

    Art. 33

    Within 36 monthscounted from the

    date of filing

    Dismissal(RPI 11.1)

    No

    Examination ofthe application

    Yes

    Documents for aidingexamination (Art. 31)

    Art. 31 - At least 60 days from

    the publication

    1 3 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    42/120

    ( )

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)

    Anticipated on

    request by the

    applicant

    Publication of

    the application

    (RPI 3.1)

    18 months fromthe date of filing

    or of the earliest

    priority

    Art. 30 (1)

    Art. 30

    Request forexamination?

    Art. 33

    Within 36 monthscounted from the

    date of filing

    Dismissal(RPI 11.1)

    No

    Examination ofthe application

    Yes

    Documents for aidingexamination (Art. 31)

    Art. 31 - At least 60 days from

    the publication

    Request for rein-

    statement of theapplication (60d)Yes

    1 3 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    43/120

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN WORKFLOW (PUBL/EXAM)

    Anticipated onrequest by the

    applicant

    Publication of

    the application

    (RPI 3.1)

    18 months fromthe date of filing

    or of the earliest

    priority

    Art. 30 (1)

    Art. 30

    Request forexamination?

    Art. 33

    Within 36 monthscounted from the

    date of filing

    Dismissal(RPI 11.1)

    No

    Examination of

    the application

    Yes

    Documents for aiding

    examination (Art. 31)

    Art. 31 - At least 60 days from

    the publication

    Request for rein-

    statement of theapplication (60d)Yes

    Definitive dismissal

    (RPI11.1.1)

    No

    1 3 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    44/120

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)

    Examination of the application

    1 4 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    45/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    46/120

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)

    Examination of the application

    Requirements regarding formal aspects?

    Art. 34

    Solved

    Yes (60d)

    Not solved

    1 4 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    47/120

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)

    Examination of the application

    Requirements regarding formal aspects?

    Art. 34

    Solved

    Yes (60d)

    Not solved Dismissal

    RPI 11.5

    1 4 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    48/120

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)

    Examination of the application

    Requirements regarding formal aspects?

    Art. 34

    Solved

    Yes (60d)

    Not solved

    Dismissal

    RPI 11.5

    Search and Technical reports

    1 4 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    49/120

    U N O ON

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)

    Examination of the application

    Requirements regarding formal aspects?

    Art. 34

    No

    Search and Technical reports

    1 4 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    50/120

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)

    Search and Technical reports

    1 5 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    51/120

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS WORKFLOW- EXAMINATION (DETAILS)

    Search and Technical reports

    AllowanceRPI 9.1

    Request for amendmentRPI 6.1

    Opinion for non-patenteability RPI 7.1

    Art.36 Art.37

    Art.36

    1 5 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    52/120

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    53/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    54/120

    M OST IMPORTANT LAW S ARTICLES

    REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT

    Request for amendmentRPI 6.1

    1 6 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    55/120

    M OST IMPORTANT LAW S ARTICLES

    REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT

    Request for amendmentRPI 6.1

    (i) division (Art. 35 (III))(ii) technical (Art. 35 (IV))

    1 6 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    56/120

    M OST IMPORTANT LAW S ARTICLES

    REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT

    Request for amendmentRPI 6.1

    (i) division (Art. 35 (III))(ii) technical (Art. 35 (IV))

    Answered -

    Art.36 (2) 90d

    Not answered - Art.36

    (1) 90d

    1 6 / 5 8

    http://goforward/http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    57/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    58/120

    REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT

    Request for amendmentRPI 6.1

    (i) division (Art. 35 (III))(ii) technical (Art. 35 (IV))

    Answered -

    Art.36 (2) 90d

    Not answered - Art.36

    (1) 90d

    Definitive dismissalRPI 11.2

    Not okOk Remarks

    1 6 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    http://goforward/http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    59/120

    REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT

    Request for amendmentRPI 6.1

    (i) division (Art. 35 (III))(ii) technical (Art. 35 (IV))

    Answered -

    Art.36 (2) 90d

    Not answered - Art.36

    (1) 90d

    Definitive dismissalRPI 11.2

    Not okOk Remarks

    Allowance RPI 9.1

    Art. 37

    Examination continues

    1 6 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    60/120

    OPINION FOR NON-PATENTEABILITY

    Opinion for non-patenteabilityRPI 7.1

    1 7 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    61/120

    OPINION FOR NON-PATENTEABILITY

    Opinion for non-patenteabilityRPI 7.1

    (i) Patenteability (Art. 35 (I))(ii) Adaptation to the nature of protection claimed (Art. 35 (II))

    1 7 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    62/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    63/120

    OPINION FOR NON-PATENTEABILITY

    Opinion for non-patenteabilityRPI 7.1

    (i) Patenteability (Art. 35 (I))(ii) Adaptation to the nature of protection claimed (Art. 35 (II))

    Contested -

    Art.36 (2) 90d

    Not contested - Art.36

    (2o) 90d

    Patent rejectedRPI 9.2

    1 7 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    64/120

    OPINION FOR NON-PATENTEABILITY

    Opinion for non-patenteabilityRPI 7.1

    (i) Patenteability (Art. 35 (I))(ii) Adaptation to the nature of protection claimed (Art. 35 (II))

    Contested -

    Art.36 (2) 90d

    Not contested - Art.36

    (2o) 90d

    Patent rejectedRPI 9.2

    Not acceptedAccepted

    1 7 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    65/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    66/120

    OPINION FOR NON-PATENTEABILITY

    Opinion for non-patenteabilityRPI 7.1

    (i) Patenteability (Art. 35 (I))(ii) Adaptation to the nature of protection claimed (Art. 35 (II))

    Contested -

    Art.36 (2) 90d

    Not contested - Art.36

    (2o) 90d

    Patent rejectedRPI 9.2

    Not acceptedAccepted Art. 37

    Allowance RPI 9.1

    Art. 37

    Request for amendmentRPI 6.1

    1 7 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    67/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    Substantive

    examinationYes (even for utility models) Yes

    Term of right

    Patents for Inventions/Utility

    Models are granted for 20/15

    years. Art. 40

    20 years from the filing dateArt. 67

    Subjects of

    protection

    Specially what is "defined" by

    the law articles 8, 9 and 24Art. 8, Art. 9 and Art. 24

    Highly advanced creations of atechnical idea using a natural

    law Art. 1 and Art. 2

    1 8 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    68/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    Substantive

    examination

    Yes (even for utility models) Yes

    Term of right

    Patents for Inventions/Utility

    Models are granted for 20/15

    years. Art. 40

    20 years from the filing dateArt. 67

    Subjects of

    protection

    Specially what is "defined" by

    the law articles 8, 9 and 24Art. 8, Art. 9 and Art. 24

    Highly advanced creations of atechnical idea using a natural

    law Art. 1 and Art. 2

    1 8 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    69/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    Substantive

    examination

    Yes (even for utility models) Yes

    Term of right

    Patents for Inventions/Utility

    Models are granted for 20/15

    years. Art. 40

    20 years from the filing dateArt. 67

    Subjects of

    protection

    Specially what is "defined" by

    the law articles 8, 9 and 24Art. 8, Art. 9 and Art. 24

    Highly advanced creations of atechnical idea using a natural

    law Art. 1 and Art. 2

    1 8 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    B J

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    70/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    Substantive

    examination

    Yes (even for utility models) Yes

    Term of right

    Patents for Inventions/Utility

    Models are granted for 20/15

    years. Art. 40

    20 years from the filing dateArt. 67

    Subjects of

    protection

    Specially what is "defined" by

    the law articles 8, 9 and24 Art. 8, Art. 9 and Art. 24

    Highly advanced creations of atechnical idea using a natural

    law Art. 1 and Art. 2

    1 8 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWSPROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    B J

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    71/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    Divison of a

    patent

    application

    Can be divided before the end

    of examination Art. 26

    Restricted to the same period as

    permitted for amendment

    Art. 44

    Replies to

    Official

    Reports

    90days for any applicant

    Art. 36

    60days for domestic applicants,

    90days for foreign applicants

    (JPOs practical rule)

    Allowed

    period for

    amendment

    Applicants can amendvoluntarily beforerequest for

    examination

    Art. 32

    Applicants can amend voluntarilyeven afterrequest for

    examination

    Art.17 Art.50

    1 9 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    72/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    Divison of a

    patent

    application

    Can be divided before the end

    of examination Art. 26

    Restricted to the same period as

    permitted for amendment

    Art. 44

    Replies to

    Official

    Reports

    90days for any applicant

    Art. 36

    60days for domestic applicants,

    90days for foreign applicants

    (JPOs practical rule)

    Allowed

    period for

    amendment

    Applicants can amendvoluntarily beforerequest for

    examination

    Art. 32

    Applicants can amend voluntarilyeven afterrequest for

    examination

    Art.17 Art.50

    1 9 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    73/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    Divison of a

    patent

    application

    Can be divided before the end

    of examination Art. 26

    Restricted to the same period as

    permitted for amendment

    Art. 44

    Replies to

    Official

    Reports

    90days for any applicant

    Art. 36

    60days for domestic applicants,

    90days for foreign applicants

    (JPOs practical rule)

    Allowed

    period for

    amendment

    Applicants can amendvoluntarily beforerequest for

    examination

    Art. 32

    Applicants can amend voluntarilyeven afterrequest for

    examination

    Art.17 Art.50

    1 9 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    74/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    Divison of a

    patent

    application

    Can be divided before the end

    of examination Art. 26

    Restricted to the same period as

    permitted for amendment

    Art. 44

    Replies to

    Official

    Reports

    90days for any applicant

    Art. 36

    60days for domestic applicants,

    90days for foreign applicants

    (JPOs practical rule)

    Allowed

    period for

    amendment

    Applicants can amendvoluntarily beforerequest for

    examination

    Art. 32

    Applicants can amend voluntarilyeven afterrequest for

    examination

    Art.17 Art.50

    1 9 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    75/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    What cannot

    be

    protected?

    Explicitly described in the IPLArt. 10

    Art. 18

    Detailed information in theguidelines for examination

    Description

    of the

    invention

    Enable somebody skilled in theart to perform the invention

    Art. 24

    Similar

    Art. 36(4)

    When an

    invention is

    considered

    new?

    If its not part of the state of the

    artArt. 11

    Pay attention to:Art. 12

    Art. 29(1) Art. 29(2)

    Attention to:Art. 30

    Art. 30 cont

    2 0 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    76/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    What cannot

    be

    protected?

    Explicitly described in the IPLArt. 10

    Art. 18

    Detailed information in theguidelines for examination

    Description

    of the

    invention

    Enable somebody skilled in theart to perform the invention

    Art. 24

    Similar

    Art. 36(4)

    When an

    invention is

    considered

    new?

    If its not part of the state of the

    artArt. 11

    Pay attention to:Art. 12

    Art. 29(1) Art. 29(2)

    Attention to:Art. 30

    Art. 30 cont

    2 0 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    77/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    What cannot

    be

    protected?

    Explicitly described in the IPLArt. 10

    Art. 18

    Detailed information in theguidelines for examination

    Description

    of the

    invention

    Enable somebody skilled in theart to perform the invention

    Art. 24

    Similar

    Art. 36(4)

    When an

    invention is

    considered

    new?

    If its not part of the state of the

    artArt. 11

    Pay attention to:Art. 12

    Art. 29(1) Art. 29(2)

    Attention to:Art. 30Art. 30 cont

    2 0 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    78/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    What cannot

    be

    protected?

    Explicitly described in the IPLArt. 10

    Art. 18

    Detailed information in theguidelines for examination

    Description

    of the

    invention

    Enable somebody skilled in theart to perform the invention

    Art. 24

    Similar

    Art. 36(4)

    When an

    invention is

    considered

    new?

    If its not part of the state of the

    artArt. 11

    Pay attention to:Art. 12

    Art. 29(1) Art. 29(2)

    Attention to:Art. 30Art. 30 cont

    2 0 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    79/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    Inventive

    steps

    An invention shall be taken to

    involve inventive activity when,

    for a person skilled in the art, it

    does not derive in an evident or

    obvious manner from the state

    of the art Art. 13

    Those that cannot be invented"easily"

    Art. 29(2)

    2 1 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    80/120

    BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    Situation Brazil Japan

    Inventive

    steps

    An invention shall be taken to

    involve inventive activity when,

    for a person skilled in the art, it

    does not derive in an evident or

    obvious manner from the state

    of the art Art. 13

    Those that cannot be invented"easily"

    Art. 29(2)

    2 1 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    81/120

    CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)

    ... 2006 2012

    2 2 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    82/120

    CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)

    Decisions 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

    Archives 9232 14611 9460 9363 12401

    Denials 1066 824 2729 2499 3394

    Granted Patents 2785 1855 2824 3153 3620

    Waivers Approved 77 43 52 62 56

    Total 13160 17333 15065 15077 19471

    2 3 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    83/120

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    84/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    85/120

    ( )

    Solutions1 Increasing the number of examiners:

    2006 ... 2010105 ~270

    2 Other possibilities (under study):

    First Action;

    (i) Only for applications filled in Brazil, (ii) written opinion about

    patenteability

    Green Patents;Applications related to some IPC Symbols (defined by WIPO)will/could have a prioritary processing

    PPH

    Avoiding redundance of work

    2 5 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    86/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    87/120

    Solutions1 Increasing the number of examiners:

    2006 ... 2010105 ~270

    2 Other possibilities (under study):

    First Action;

    (i) Only for applications filled in Brazil, (ii) written opinion about

    patenteability

    Green Patents;Applications related to some IPC Symbols (defined by WIPO)will/could have a prioritary processing

    PPH

    Avoiding redundance of work

    2 5 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    CURRENT SITUATION OF INPI (PATENTS)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    88/120

    Major problems:Transition to PAPERLESS

    Steps:

    Tackle the problem

    domestically (applicationselectronically available tothe examiners);

    Make the system availableto the end users (technical

    reports and letter patents);OnLine Filling? (Soon...)

    Solutions:

    2 6 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    THE END

    http://ecarta.inpi.gov.br/ecartahttp://eparecer.inpi.gov.br/eparecerhttp://evista.inpi.gov.br/http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    89/120

    Obrigado - Thank You

    Rafael Ribeiro Brando ([email protected])

    2 7 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    FINAL REMARKS - FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    90/120

    Strategic planning of INPI:

    Consolidation of the results achieved in recent years and

    advancement of structural reforms;efficiency and operational quality;

    strategic use of intellectual property by Brazilian and residents;

    regional integration;

    enhacement of the global intellectual property and repositioning of

    INPI

    2 8 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    MOST EXAMINED APPLICATIONS - IPC SYMBOLS

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    91/120

    2 9 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    USEFUL LINKS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    92/120

    Main Brazilian IP Laws: enacted by the Legislature:

    http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/profile.jsp?code=BR

    Law No. 9.279 of 14 May 1996 (Industrial Property)http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=515

    Law No. 10.196 of 14 February 2001 (Amends Law on IndustrialProperty) http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=547

    INPI Normative Act No. 127/97 of 5 March 1997 (Implementing Industrial

    Property Law) http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=520

    Provisional Act No. 2.186-16, Dated 23 August 2001 (Genetic Heritage

    & Traditional Knowledge)

    http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=5897

    INPI Resolution No. 191/08 (Priority Right for Patent Application)http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=8390

    3 0 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    USEFUL LINKS

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    93/120

    IP Legal Literature (portuguese only)

    Guidelines for Examination of a Patenthttp://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=8341

    Guidelines for the Examination of Patent Applications in theBiotechnology and Pharmaceutical Filed After 31/12/1994http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=8342

    Patent Forms Folderhttp://www.inpi.gov.br/images/stories/downloads/patentes/zip/Formularios_patentes.zip

    Download of Biological Sequences Softwarehttp://www.inpi.gov.br/images/stories/downloads/patentes/zip/SisBioList-instala.exe

    Brazilian IP Office Feeshttp://www.inpi.gov.br/images/stories/Tabela_Retribuicao_2012_DIRPA.pdf

    Search Brazilian Patent Databasehttp://pesquisa.inpi.gov.br/MarcaPatente/jsp/servimg/servimg.jsp?BasePesquisa=Patentes

    3 1 / 5 8

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    94/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    USEFUL LINKS

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    95/120

    Interesting websites

    INPI - Balance and Perspectives

    http://www.inpi.gov.br/images/stories/downloads/pdf/INPI_Relatorio_Comunicacao_ingles.pdf

    National Health Surveillance Agency website (english version)http://www.anvisa.gov.br/eng/index.htm

    Board of Management of Genetic Resources (CGEN)http://www.mma.gov.br/sitio/en/

    3 3 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PL

    JAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 8, 9 AND 24 (LAW no9279)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    96/120

    Article 8 - To be patentable an invention must meet the requirementsof novelty, inventive activity and industrial application.Article 9 - An object of practical use, or part thereof, is patentable asa utility model, when it is susceptible of industrial application,presents a new shape or arrangement and involves an inventive actthat results in a functional improvement in its use or manufacture.

    Article 24 - The specification must describe the subject matter clearlyand sufficiently so as to enable a person skilled in the art to carry itout and to indicate, when applicable, the best mode of execution.Sole Paragraph - In the case of biological material essential for thepractical execution of the subject matter of the application, which

    cannot be described in the form of this article and which has not beenaccessible to the public, the specification will be supplemented by adeposit of the material in an institution authorized by INPI or indicatedin an international agree

    Back

    3 4 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 10 (LAW no9279)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    97/120

    Article 10 - The following are not considered to be inventions or utilitymodels:I - discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods; II -purely abstract concepts; III - schemes, plans, principles or methodsof a commercial, accounting, financial, educational, publishing, lottery

    or fiscal nature; IV - literary, architectural, artistic and scientific worksor any aesthetic creation; V - computer programs per se; VI - thepresentation of information; VII - rules of games; VIII - operating orsurgical techniques and therapeutic or diagnostic methods, for use onthe human or animal body; and IX - natural living beings, in whole orin part, and biological material, including the genome or germ plasm

    of any natural living being, when found in nature or isolatedtherefrom, and natural biological processes.

    Back

    3 5 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 11 (LAW no9279)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    98/120

    Article 11 - Inventions and utility models are considered to be newwhen not included in the state of the art. 1 - The state of the artcomprises everything made accessible to the public before the dateof filing of a patent application, by written or oral description, by useor any other means, in Brazil or abroad, without prejudice to the

    provisions of articles 12, 16 and 17. 2 - For the purpose ofdetermining novelty, the whole contents of an application filed inBrazil, but not yet published, will be considered as state of the artfrom the date of filing, or from the priority claimed, provided that it ispublished, even though subsequently. 3 - The provisions of theprevious paragraph will be applied to an international patent

    application filed in accordance with a treaty or convention in force inBrazil, provided that there is national processing.

    Back

    3 6 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 12 (LAW no9279)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    99/120

    Article 12 - The disclosure of an invention or utility model whichoccurs during the twelve months preceding the date of filing or priorityof the patent application will not be considered as part of the state ofthe art, provided such disclosure is made: I - by the inventor; II - bythe National Institute of Industrial Property - INPI, by means of the

    official publication of a patent application filed without the consent ofthe inventor and based on information obtained from him or as aresult of his acts; or III - by third parties, on the basis of informationreceived directly or indirectly from the inventor or as the result of hisacts. Sole Paragraph - INPI may require the inventor to provide a

    declaration relating to the disclosure, accompanied or not by proof,under the conditions established in the rules.

    Back

    3 7 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 13 (LAW no9279)

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    100/120

    Article 13 - An invention shall be taken to involve inventive activity

    when, for a person skilled in the art, it does not derive in an evident orobvious manner from the state of the art.

    Back

    3 8 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 18 (LAW no9279)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    101/120

    Article 18 - The following are not patentable: I - that which is contrary tomorals, good customs and public security, order and health; II - substances,

    matter, mixtures, elements or products of any kind, as well as the

    modification of their physical-chemical properties and the respective

    processes of obtaining or modifying them, when they result from the

    transformation of the atomic nucleus; and III - living beings, in whole or in

    part, except transgenic micro-organisms meeting the three patentability

    requirements - novelty, inventive activity and industrial application - provided

    for in article 8 and which are not mere discoveries; Sole Paragraph - For the

    purposes of this law, transgenic micro-organisms are organisms, except the

    whole or part of plants or animals, that exhibit, due to direct human

    intervention in their genetic composition, a characteristic that can notnormally be attained by the species under natural conditions.

    Back

    3 9 / 5 8 HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 24 (LAW no9279)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    102/120

    Article 24 - The specification must describe the subject matter clearlyand sufficiently so as to enable a person skilled in the art to carry itout and to indicate, when applicable, the best mode of execution.

    Sole Paragraph - In the case of biological material essential for thepractical execution of the subject matter of the application, whichcannot be described in the form of this article and which has not beenaccessible to the public, the specification will be supplemented by adeposit of the material in an institution authorized by INPI or indicatedin an international agreement.

    Back

    4 0 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    103/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 32 (LAW no9279)

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    104/120

    Article 32 - In order better to clarify or define a patent application,applicant may effect amendments up to the date a request for

    examination is made, provided such amendments be limited to thesubject matter initially disclosed in the application.

    Back

    4 2 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWSCOMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 33 (LAW no9279)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    105/120

    Article 33 - Examination of a patent application must be requested bythe applicant or by any interested party, within 36 (thirty-six) months

    counted from the date of filing, under pain of dismissal of theapplication.

    Back

    4 3 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    106/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 36 (LAW no9279)

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    107/120

    Article 36 - When the Official report is for non-patentiability or for theinadequacy of the application for the nature of protection claimed or

    requires technical amendments, the applicant will be notified to replywithin 90 (ninety) days.

    Back

    4 5 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 40 (LAW no9279)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    108/120

    Article 40 - A Patent of invention will have a term of 20 (twenty) yearsand a utility model patent a term of 15 (fifteen) years, counted fromthe filing date.Sole Paragraph - The term will not be less than 10 (ten) years forpatents of invention and 7 (seven) years for utility model patents,counted from grant, except when INPI is prevented from proceedingwith the examination as to the merit of the application, due to aproven pendente lite or for reasons of force majeure.

    Back

    4 6 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 1 AND ART. 2 (JAPANESEPATENT ACT)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    109/120

    (Purpose)Article 1 - The purpose of this Act is, through promoting the protectionand the utilization of inventions, to encourage inventions, and therebyto contribute to the development of industry.(Definitions)Article 2 (1) - "Invention" in this Act means the highly advancedcreation of technical ideas utilizing the laws of nature...

    Back

    4 7 / 5 8

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    110/120

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 29(1) (JAPANESE PATENT ACT)

  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    111/120

    Article 29 (1) - An inventor of an invention that is industriallyapplicable may be entitled to obtain a patent for the said invention,except for the following: (i) inventions that were publicly known inJapan or a foreign country, prior to the filing of the patent application;

    (ii) inventions that were publicly worked in Japan or a foreign country,prior to the filing of the patent application; or (iii) inventions that weredescribed in a distributed publication, or inventions that were madepublicly available through an electric telecommunication line in Japanor a foreign country, prior to the filing of the patent application...

    Back

    4 9 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 29(1) (JAPANESE PATENT ACT)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    112/120

    Article 29 (1) - An inventor of an invention that is industriallyapplicable may be entitled to obtain a patent for the said invention,except for the following: (i) inventions that were publicly known inJapan or a foreign country, prior to the filing of the patent application;

    (ii) inventions that were publicly worked in Japan or a foreign country,prior to the filing of the patent application; or (iii) inventions that weredescribed in a distributed publication, or inventions that were madepublicly available through an electric telecommunication line in Japanor a foreign country, prior to the filing of the patent application...

    Back

    5 0 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 29(2) (JAPANESE PATENT ACT)

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    113/120

    Article 29 (2) - Where, prior to the filing of the patent application, aperson ordinarily skilled in the art of the invention would have beenable to easily make the invention based on an invention prescribed in

    any of the items of the preceding paragraph, a patent shall not begranted for such an invention notwithstanding the precedingparagraph...

    Back

    5 1 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 29(2) (JAPANESE PATENT ACT)

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    114/120

    Article 29 (2) - Where, prior to the filing of the patent application, aperson ordinarily skilled in the art of the invention would have beenable to easily make the invention based on an invention prescribed in

    any of the items of the preceding paragraph, a patent shall not begranted for such an invention notwithstanding the precedingparagraph...

    Back

    5 2 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 30 (JAPANESEPATENT ACT)

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    115/120

    Article 30 (Exception to lack of novelty of invention) (1) In the case of an invention which has fallenunder any of the items of Article 29 (1) by reason of the fact that the person having the right toobtain a patent has conducted a test, has made a presentation in a printed publication, has made apresentation through electric telecommunication lines, or has made a presentation in writing at astudy meeting held by an academic group designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office,such invention shall be deemed not have fallen under any of the items of Article 29(1) for the

    purposes of Article 29(1) and (2) for the invention claimed in a patent application which has beenfiled by the said person within six months from the date on which the invention first fell under any ofthose items. (2) In the case of an invention which has fallen under any of the items of Article 29 (1)against the will of the person having the right to obtain a patent, the preceding paragraph shall alsoapply for the purposes of Article 29(1) and (2) to the invention claimed in the patent applicationwhich has been filed by the said person within six months from the date on which the invention firstfell under any of those paragraphs.

    Back

    5 3 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 30 (CONT)(JAPANESEPATENT ACT)

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    116/120

    (3) In the case of an invention which has fallen under any of the items of Article 29 (1) by reason ofthe fact that the person having the right to obtain a patent has exhibited the invention at anexhibition held by the Government or a local public entity (hereinafter referred to as the"Government, etc."), an exhibition held by those who are not the Government, etc. where suchexhibition has been designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office, an internationalexhibition held in the territory of a country of the Union of the Paris Convention or a member of theWorld Trade Organization by its Government, etc. or those who are authorized thereby to hold suchan exhibition, or an international exhibition held in the territory of a state which is neither of a

    country of the Union of the Paris Convention nor a member of the World Trade Organization by itsGovernment, etc. or those who are authorized thereby where such exhibition has been designatedby the Commissioner of the Patent Office, paragraph (1) shall also apply for the purposes of Article29(1) and (2) to the invention claimed in the patent application which has been filed by the saidperson within six months from the date on which the invention first fell under any of those items. (4)Any person seeking the application of paragraph (1) or (3) shall submit to the Commissioner of thePatent Office, at the time of filing of the patent application, a document stating thereof and, withinthirty days from the date of filing of the patent application, a document proving the fact that the

    invention which has otherwise fallen under any of the items of Article 29(1) is an invention to whichparagraph (1) or (3) of this Article may be applicable.

    Back

    5 4 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 36(4) (JAPANESE PATENT ACT)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    117/120

    Article 36 (1) A person requesting the grant of a patent shall submit an application to the

    Commissioner of the Patent Office stating the following: (i) the name and domicile or residence of

    the applicant(s) for the patent; and (ii) the name and domicile or residence of the inventor(s). (2)

    The description, scope of claims, drawings (where required), and abstract shall be attached to the

    application. (3) The description as provided in the preceding paragraph shall state the following: (i)

    the title of the invention; (ii) a brief explanation of the drawing(s); and (iii) a detailed explanation of

    the invention. (4) The statement of the detailed explanation of the invention as provided in item (iii)

    of the preceding Paragraph shall comply with each of the following items: (i) in accordance with

    Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, the statement shall beclear and sufficient as to enable any person ordinarilyskilled in the art to which the invention pertains to work

    the invention...

    Back

    5 5 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMS

    INPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 44 (JAPANESEPATENT ACT)

    http://find/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    118/120

    Article 44 (1) An applicant for a patent may extract one or more new patentapplications out of a patent application containing two or more inventions only

    within the following time limits:(i) within the allowable time limit foramendments of the description, scope of claims or drawings attachedto the application; (ii) within 30 days from the date on which a certifiedcopy of the examiners decision to the effect that a patent is to be

    granted (excluding the examiners decision to the effect that a patent is to be grantedunder Article 51 as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 163(3) and the examiners

    decision to the effect that a patent is to be granted with regard to a patent application

    that has been subject to examination as provided in Article 160(1)) has beenserved; and (iii) within 30 days from the date on which a certified copy

    of the examiners initial decision to the effect that the application is tobe refused has been served.

    Back

    5 6 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMSINPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 50 (JAPANESEPATENT ACT)

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    119/120

    Article 50 Where the examiner intends to render an examinersdecision to the effect that an application is to be refused, theexaminer shall notify the applicant for the patent of the reasonstherefor and give the said applicant an opportunity to submit a writtenopinion, designating an adequate time limit for such purpose...

    Back

    5 7 / 5 8

    HYSTORICAL BACKGROUND

    BASIC LAWS

    PROCEDURE FLOWS

    COMPARISON BETWEE N BRAZILIAN AND JAPANESE PATENT SYSTEMSINPI (BRAZIL) NOWADAYS

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    "M OST IMPORTANT" LAWS ARTICLES

    BRAZILIANS I PLJAPANESE PATENTACT

    ART. 67 (JAPANESEPATENT ACT)

    http://find/http://goback/
  • 8/12/2019 Tegaiyou En

    120/120

    Article 67(1) The duration of a patent right shall expire after a period of 20years from the filing date of the patent application.(2) Where there is a period during which the patented invention isunable to be worked because approvals prescribed by relevant Acts

    that are intended to ensure the safely, etc. or any other dispositiondesignated by Cabinet Order as requiring considerable time for theproper execution of the disposition in light of the purpose,procedures, etc., of such a disposition is necessary to obtain for theworking of the patented invention, the duration of the patent right maybe extended, upon the filing of a request for the registration ofextension of the duration, by a period not exceeding 5 years.

    Back

    5 8 / 5 8

    http://find/