Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

64
Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects

Transcript of Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Page 1: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 1

Imaging defects and contours/effects

Page 2: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 2

Dynamical diffraction theoryDynamical diffraction: A beam which is diffracted once will easily be re-diffracted (many times..)

Understanding diffraction contrast in the TEM image

In general, the analysis of the intensity of diffracted beams in the TEM is not simple because a beam which is diffracted once will easily be re-diffracted. We call this repeated diffraction ‘dynamical diffraction.’

Page 3: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 3

Dynamical diffraction:

http://pd.chem.ucl.ac.uk/pdnn/diff2/kinemat1.htm

Assumption: That each individual diffraction/interference event, from whatever locality within the crystal, acts independently of the others

Multiple diffraction throughout the crystal; all of these waves can then interfere with each other

Ewald: Diffraction intensity, I, is proportional to just the magnitude of the structure factor, F, is referred to as the dynamical theory of diffraction

We cannot use the intensities of spots in electron DPs (except under very special conditions such as CBED) for structure determination, in the way that we use intensities in X-ray patterns.

Ex. the intensity of the electron beam varies strongly as the thickness of the specimen changes

Page 4: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 4

THE AMPLITUDE OF A DIFFRACTED BEAM

The amplitude of the electron beam scattered from a unit cell is:

Structure factor

The amplitude in a diffracted beam:

(rn denotes the position of each unit cell)

The intensity at some point P, we then sum over all the unit cells in the specimen.

Page 5: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 5

If the amplitude φg changes by a small increment as the beam passes through a thin slice of material which is dz thick we can write down expressions for the changes in φ g and f0 by using the concept introduced in equation 13.3 but replacing a by the short distance dz

Two beam approximation

Here χO-χD is the change in wave vector as the φg beam scatters into the φ0 beam. Similarly χD-χO is the change in wave vector as the φ0 beam scatters into the φg beam.

Now the difference χO-χD is identical to kOkD although the individual terms are not equal. Then remember that kDkO (=K) is g + s for the perfect crystal.

Page 6: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 6

The two equations can be rearranged to give a pair of coupled differential equations.

We say that φ0 and φg are ‘dynamically coupled.’

The term dynamical diffraction thus means that the amplitudes (and therefore the intensities) of the direct and diffracted beams are constantly changing, i.e., they are dynamic

Howie-Whelan equations

If we can solve the Howie-Whelan equations, then we can predict the intensities in the direct and diffracted beams

Page 7: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 7

Intensity in the Bragg diffracted beam

The effective excitation error

• Ig, in the diffracted beam emerging from the specimen is proportional to sin2(πtΔk) • Thus I0 is proportional to cos2(πtΔk)• Ig and I0 are both periodic in both t and seff

Extinction distance , characteristic length for the diffraction vector g

Solving the Howie – Whelan equations , and then

Page 8: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 8

Intensity related to defects: WHY DO TRANSLATIONS PRODUCE CONTRAST?

A unit cell in a strained crystal will be displaced from its perfect-crystal position so that it is located at position r'0 instead of rn where n is included to remind us that we are considering scattering from an array of unit cells;

We now modify these equations intuitively to include the effect of adding a displacement

Page 9: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 9

Planar defects are seen when ≠ 0

α = 2πg·R

Simplify by setting:

We see contrast from planar defects because the translation, R, causes a phase shift α=2πg·R

Page 10: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 10

Thickness and bendingcontours

Page 11: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 11

Two-beam:

Bend contours: Thickness – constantseff varies locally

Thickness fringes: seff remains constant t varies

(Intensity in the Bragg diffracted beam)

Page 12: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 12

Thickness fringes

Oscillations in I0 or Ig are known as thicknessfringes

You will only see these fringes when the thickness of the specimen varies locally, otherwise the contrast will be a uniform gray

Page 13: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 13

Page 14: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 14

Bending contoursOccur when a particular set of diffracting planes is not parallel everywhere; the planes rock into, and through, the Bragg condition.

Remembering Bragg’s law, the (2h 2k 2l) planes diffract strongly when y has increased to 2θB.

So we’ll see extra contours because of the higher-order diffraction. As θ increases, the planes rotate through the Bragg condition more quickly (within a small distance Δx) so the bend contours become much narrower for higher order reflections.

Page 15: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 15

Page 16: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 16

Page 17: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 17

Moirè fringes

Page 18: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 18

Page 19: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 19

Imaging Dislocations

Page 20: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 20

Edge dislocation

Page 21: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 21

Edge dislocation

Page 22: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 22

Page 23: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 23

(u)

Page 24: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 24

Page 25: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 25

FCC BCC

Slip plane:Slip direction:Burger vector:

Slip plane:Slip direction:Burger vector:

Page 26: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 26

FCC BCC

Slip plane: {111}Slip direction: <110>Burger vector: ao/2[110]

Slip plane: {110}Slip direction: <111>Burger vector: a0/2[111]

Page 27: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 27

Page 28: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 28

Important questions to answer:

• Is the dislocation interacting with other dislocations, or with other lattice defects?

• Is the dislocation jogged, kinked, or straight?• What is the density of dislocations in that region

of the specimen (and what was it before we prepared the specimen)?

Page 29: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 29

Howie-Whelan equationsModify the Howie-Whelan equations to include a lattice distortion R. So for the imperfect crystal

Adding lattice displacement

α = 2πg·R Defects are visible when α ≠ 0

𝐼=¿𝜑𝑔¿2

Intensity of the scattered beam

Page 30: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 30

Isotropic elasticity theory, the lattice displacement R due to a straight dislocation in the u-direction is:

Contrast from a dislocation:

b is the Burgers vector, be is the edge component of the Burgers vector, u is a unit vector along the dislocation line (the line direction), and ν is Poisson’s ratio.

g·R causes the contrast and for a dislocation

𝑅=12𝜋

(𝑏𝜑+1

4 (1−𝑣 ){𝑏𝑒+𝑏×𝑢 (2 (1−2𝑣 ) 𝑙𝑛𝑟 +𝑐𝑜𝑠2𝜑) })

Page 31: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 31

g · R / g · b analysis

Screw:

Edge:

be = 0b || u b x u = 0 𝑅=𝑏 𝜑

2𝜋= 𝑏2𝜋

𝑡𝑎𝑛−1(𝑧−𝑧𝑑

𝑥)

b = be b ˔ u 𝑅=

12𝜋

(𝑏𝜑+1

4 (1−𝑣 ){𝑏+𝑏×𝑢 (2 (1−2𝑣 ) 𝑙𝑛𝑟 +𝑐𝑜𝑠2𝜑)})

𝑅=12𝜋

(𝑏𝜑+1

4 (1−𝑣 ){𝑏𝑒+𝑏×𝑢 (2 (1−2𝑣 ) 𝑙𝑛𝑟 +𝑐𝑜𝑠2𝜑) })

𝑔 ∙𝑅∝𝑔 ∙𝑏 Invisibility criterion: 𝑔 ∙𝑏=0

𝑔 ∙𝑏×𝑢=0Invisibility criterion:

Page 32: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 32

Cindy Smith

Page 33: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 33

Page 34: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 34

Page 35: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 35

g·b = 1

g·b = 2

Screw dislocation

Important to know the value of S

Page 36: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 36

Edge dislocation

• Always remember: g·R causes the contrast and for a dislocation, R changes with z.

• We say that g·b = n. If we know g and we determine n, then we know b.

g · b = 0 Gives invisibilityg · b = +1 Gives one intensity dipg · b = +2 Gives two intensity dips close to s=0

Usually set s > 0 for g when imaging a dislocation in two-beam conditions. Then the dislocation can appear dark against a bright background in a BF image

Page 37: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 37

Page 38: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 38

Page 39: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 39

Example:

U = [2-1-1]B=1/2[101]

Page 40: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 40

Imaging dislocations with Two-beam technique

Page 41: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 41

Page 42: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 42

Page 43: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 43

Imaging dislocations with Weak-beam technique

Page 44: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 44

The contrast of a dislocations are quite wide (~ ξgeff/3)

Weak beam Small effective extinction distance for large S

Two-beam:

Increase s to 0.2 nm-1 in WF to increase Seff

Narrow image of most defects

ξ 𝑔❑𝑒𝑓𝑓 =

ξ𝑔√1+𝑠2ξ𝑔2

Characteristic length of the diffraction vector

Page 45: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 45

Page 46: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 46

Page 47: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 47

Page 48: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 48

Imaging Stacking faults in FCC

Page 49: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 49

Page 50: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 50

Page 51: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 51

Page 52: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 52

Example: Stacking faults in FCC

Page 53: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 53

Page 54: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 54

Intensity of the fringes depends on α

BF: sin α > 0 : FF (First Fringe) – Bright

LF (Last Fringe) -- Bright sin α < 0 : FF – Dark

LF – Dark

DF: sin α > 0 : FF – Bright

LF -- Dark sin α < 0 : FF – Dark

LF – Bright

α ≠ ± π

α = 2πg·R

Page 55: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 55

(A–D) Four strong-beam images of an SF recorded using ±g BF and ±g DF. The beam was nearly normal to the surfaces; the SF fringe intensity is similar at the top surface but complementary at the bottom surface.

The rules are summarized in (E) and (F) where G and W indicate that the first fringe is gray or white; (T, B) indicates top/bottom.

Page 56: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 56

Then there are some rules for interpreting the contrast:

1. In the image, the fringe corresponding to the top surface (T) is white in BF if g·R is > 0 and black if g·R < 0.

2. Using the same strong hkl reflection for BF and DF imaging, the fringe from the bottom (B) of the fault will be complementary whereas the fringe from the top (T) will be the same in both the BF and DF images.

3. The central fringes fade away as the thickness increases. 4. The reason it is important to know the sign of g is that you will use this

information to determine the sign of R.5. For the geometry shown in Figure 25.3, if the origin of the g vector is placed at

the center of the SF in the DF image, the vector g points away from the bright outer fringe if the fault is extrinsic and toward it if it is intrinsic (200, 222, and 440 reflections); if the reflection is a 400, 111, or 220 the reverse is the case.

Page 57: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 57

Images

Page 58: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 58

Page 59: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 59

Page 60: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 60

Page 61: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 61

Page 62: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 62

Page 63: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 63

Page 64: Technology for a better society 1 Imaging defects and contours/effects.

Technology for a better society 64