Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

download Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

of 21

Transcript of Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    1/21

    Myra Lipsey

    FRIT 7738: Practicum inInstructional Technology

    Technology Center Analysis

    and Evaluation

    Instructional Resources Center

    Georgia Southern University

    Spring 2013

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    2/21

    Executive Summary

    This technology center analysis and evaluation was conducted at the

    Instructional Resources Center which is housed in the College of Education

    building at Georgia Southern University in Statesboro, Georgia. The purpose of

    the Instructional Resources Center is to provide Georgia Southern students

    (mostly whom are education majors) with a place to use computers and to learn

    about technology that is appropriate for use in classrooms. It also provides

    classrooms with lots of technology for Georgia Southern instructors to use when

    teaching which will also allow education majors to understand how and why such

    technologies are important in the classroom when they graduate and get teaching

    jobs.

    Originally, this center was part of the Marvin Pittman School that was

    located on the campus of Georgia Southern University. Approximately ten to

    twelve years ago, the school closed and the Instructional Resource Centers

    purpose changed from being solely focused on student needs (Marvin Pittman

    School students) to focusing on the needs of the Georgia Southern faculty, staff,

    and college students.

    The center presently consists of five computer labs, a small library which

    was left over from the Marvin Pittman School, lots of study rooms and spaces,

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    3/21

    Smart Classrooms for faculty to schedule class meetings in, and a work room that

    contains Ellison Dye machines and accompanying supplies. The centers

    coordinator has refurbished the center through the years taking away

    unnecessary space and turning it into space for students to have to study and

    work together on group projects. She has done away with the photography dark

    room and made it a break room with kitchen supplies for faculty, staff, and

    students to enjoy. Georgia Southern students majoring in education utilize the

    center more than other populations of students. These students come to the IRC

    to work on lesson plans together, practice using Smart Boards and other

    technology to help them out in the field while in their Methods I and II classes as

    well as in student teaching. Many students also come to use computers for

    research and typing. In a survey conducted of some students, most of the

    students said they prefer to come to the IRC over the library because when they

    get out of classes in the building, it is easier to stay here than walk to the library.

    They also stated that sometimes they need to use the equipment that is found

    here and sometimes they need a quieter place to work. The center has one

    classroom that is known as a Digi-Lab. This is a state-of-the-art lab with twenty-

    four chromebooks and a teacher workstation. The lab also contains an Elmo

    digital projecting system and whiteboard tables.

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    4/21

    The IRC provides future educators with lots of technology. Students not

    only can use these resources to help them with their college coursework, but they

    also provide these students with knowledge of new technology that they will be

    utilizing in their future classrooms.

    This paper will outline the existing organization of the center as well as give

    a description of the ways information was collected and used to analyze and

    evaluate this site. It will also describe past performance and the future of the

    center in terms of providing new technology as it becomes available. The

    evaluation comes to the following conclusion: the site is mostly successful in

    providing the technology and resources for the faculty, staff, and students in the

    College of Education.

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    5/21

    Organizational Chart

    Instructional Resources Center

    Coordinator

    Technology Support

    Specialist

    Graduate

    Assistant

    Graduate

    Assistant

    Graduate

    Assistant

    Graduate

    Assistant

    Work Study

    Student

    Casual Labor

    Dean of College of Education

    Vice President for Academic Affairs

    President of

    Georgia Southern University

    Information Systems

    Coordinator

    Director of

    Administration

    CIO

    Casual Labor

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    6/21

    Methods

    In the evaluation phase, information about the Instructional Resource Center at

    Georgia Southern University was gathered in a combination of ways:

    Interviews with the center coordinator, Michelle Rivera Data given access to me by the center coordinator Surveys of students using the center at various times I visited the center Informal observations made while visiting the center Interviews with Georgia Southern Education majors located in my school

    setting in the form of PPB students, Methods II students, and student

    teachers.

    I conducted two interviews with the center coordinator, Michelle Rivera. On the

    first interview (See Appendix A for a list of the interview questions) I asked her to

    answer some questions to provide me with knowledge of the purpose of the

    center, a history of the center, and to give me a tour of the center. On the second

    interview, I asked her if there was some data she could share with me to give me

    an understanding as to how many people actually use the center and for what

    reasons. During this interview, the center coordinator provided a thorough

    description of the centers usability. Notes were taken during this visit. I went to

    the center on two separate evenings and asked some students who were working

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    7/21

    to complete a survey for me. I have spoken with two PPB students who have

    been working in my elementary school, as well as one Methods II student and one

    PPB student. I have also spoken to one graduate level student. All of these

    students answered the questions I asked on the survey (See Appendix B for the

    survey) of the center use. I have also obtained some information from the

    Georgia Southern website link to the IRC, and data provided to me from Michelle

    Rivera. The data Michelle gave me was for a past year. It was the only data she

    could get to at the time of my last visit with her. Upon returning to the center on

    two different evenings, an observation checklist was used. The checklist is

    included in the appendix section of this report. (See Appendix C)

    Center Context and Goals

    The Instructional Resource Center is currently housed in the College of

    Education building on the campus of Georgia Southern University in Statesboro,

    Georgia. The center, as it is now, had its beginning about ten to twelve years ago

    when the Marvin Pittman Laboratory School closed its doors. During the time of

    the operation of the Marvin Pittman Laboratory School, a few parts of this center

    were located within the school. After the school closed, the remaining books

    from the library were moved to the center, and technology needs and

    advancements began to be put into place. Miss Ollie Mae Jernigan a former

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    8/21

    educator with the Marvin Pittman Laboratory School left an endowment fund

    which is used to help supplement this area of the IRC presently. There are also a

    percentage of student technology fees that are awarded to the IRC. Since the

    time of the Instructional Resource Centers beginning, it has established five

    computer labs, a small library which was a part of the Marvin Pittman Laboratory

    School, large and study rooms and area, Smart Classrooms, and several teaching

    stations that include DVD/VCR players and Elmos. Most recently, the center

    prides itself on the establishment of being totally wireless and housing a Digi-Lab

    which contains twenty-four workstations for college students to use. There are

    twenty-four chrome book computers that are dedicated to this lab. Chrome

    books were described by the center coordinator as being similar to laptops except

    they use cloud computing instead of using an operating system. The lab also

    contains whiteboard tables.

    The mission of the center is to provide technology and instructional support

    to meet the needs of the College of Education students, faculty, and staff at

    Georgia Southern University. In the last interview with Mrs. Rivera, she provided

    me with a printed copy of the centers mission statement that had been

    developed by the university. The statement reads, The Instructional Resources

    Center will seek to create a learning environment for the specific use of the

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    9/21

    faculty and students within the College of Education at Georgia Southern

    University. The mission of the Instructional Resources Center is to provide

    services, instructional materials, and equipment to the faculty and students in the

    pursuit of quality education as follows: Instructional Resources Center

    orientation, computer lab orientation, instructional materials in the form of

    textbooks, video tapes, software, etc, equipment such as TV/VCRs, camcorders,

    slide projectors, etc, and production of instructional materials such as overhead

    transparencies, etc. The center aims to provide the latest technology for both

    Georgia Southern instructors to use in teaching future educators, as well as for

    those future educators to use in preparing their coursework for school settings. It

    gives these future teachers a chance to use some of the technologies they will

    find in classrooms they will one day work in. Other goals of the center are to

    provide Georgia Southern faculty with an increased use of the latest technologies

    when instructing their students, as well as increase student learning though the

    use of technology.

    The key stakeholders of the center are Georgia Southern students, faculty,

    and staff. The center falls under the direct supervision of the Dean of the College

    of Education. The center coordinator handles the day-to-day operations of the

    center, such as scheduling the use of classrooms by professors. She also assists

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    10/21

    students in training on smart boards and other equipment as needed. She is

    assisted by four graduate assistants, one student worker and two casual labor

    employees throughout the week. The centers coordinator also serves as an ad

    hoc member of the College of Educations Technology Committee. The center also

    houses one technology support specialist who provides technology support for all

    of the technology housed in the center. Presently, the center is very active with

    undergraduate education students, staff, and faculty from Georgia Southern

    University. In a more recent interview, Mrs. Rivera informed me of a new

    technology the center has to record how many people visit the center each day.

    She said there is only one drawback to this new tracking system. It records a

    person each time they enter, so they may leave and go to the restroom or to a

    class and return and it counts them each time.

    Center Activities

    The Instructional Resources Center is a very busy place. All of the times I

    visited the center, there were a lot of activities taking place. I did visit recently on

    a Saturday and found no one had been in the center all day. I observed several

    groups of students Methods II students and others utilizing the computers to

    work on lesson plans, practicing using the Smart Board and Elmo, and cutting out

    letters on the Ellison Die machine. During the first visit, while on a tour of the

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    11/21

    facility, a Georgia Southern College of Education professor was using one of the

    classroom labs for instruction. Professors utilize these labs to allow their students

    use of computers and other equipment such as scanners, printers, Elmo, and

    smart boards. Instructors and others who wish to use a lab must reserve it with

    the centers coordinator ahead of time. There are certain criteria that have to be

    followed as to when various instructors are allowed to schedule classes in these

    labs. College of Education faculty has priority over other departments in

    scheduling classes to use the labs. Instructional Technology faculty also has

    priority over other College of Education departments.

    All of the classroom labs are Smart classrooms because they have built-in

    technology and teaching stations that include DVD/VCR combos as well as an

    Elmo visual presenter.

    The center is utilized by students as a place to study, a place to work on

    lesson plans and other coursework required by classes in education, a place to

    check out teaching materials, a place to practice with technology that is located in

    most classrooms today, as well as a place to use new kinds of technology.

    Students seemed to have learned of the center in their first education coursework

    taken. From then on, they continue to find the center very useful for their needs.

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    12/21

    Working on group projects and planning activities makes this a great place for

    students to be able to spread out while working.

    Evaluation

    My evaluation of this center consisted of the following items:

    Does this center adequately address the needs of its participants? What are some of the reasons students use this facility instead of others? Is the center being used enough to warrant it being kept open?

    The first item was answered for me after conducting interviews of the

    center coordinator and surveys of student participants (Appendix B). Also after

    several observations, it appeared that the Instructional Resources Center is doing

    a good job of meeting the needs of those who use it. One of the goals of the

    center is to provide technology and instructional support to meet the needs of

    the College of Education students, faculty, and staff at Georgia Southern

    University. The center is meeting this goal by providing lots of technology in the

    form of computers, printers, scanners, Elmo presenters, Smart Boards, Chrome

    Books, and others. Georgia Southern professors teach their students in these labs

    in a two-fold manner. Students are not only learning the material their instructor

    is presenting, they are also learning how to utilize this equipment by how their

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    13/21

    instructor is using it to present information to them. Faculty and staff are also

    able to utilize the center to gain training in various areas of technology.

    The second item became evident from the completed surveys given to

    some of the students both in the center and those who are in various roles at my

    school. Also, after informally observing in the center for several afternoons, it

    became evident that students majoring in education prefer this center over

    others mainly due to convenience and because of the smallness of the center.

    Student comments were that it was just easier to come to this center when they

    got out of class because the center was in the same building as their classes.

    Others said they like the feel of the center because it is small and provides them

    with a sense of being able to work in a quieter environment than some of the

    other places on campus.

    The third item was determined by data given to me by the center

    coordinator. Also, the link to the Instructional Resources Center from the Georgia

    Southern website shows a good picture of how much the center is used.

    In conclusion, the following points can be made:

    The center is definitely being used to a very large extent.

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    14/21

    The center is used for lots of different purposes, but primarily bystudents who find the location prime for them and because of the

    equipment available to them.

    The center does a good job of addressing the needs of itsparticipants.

    Recommendations

    There is really not a whole lot to suggest in the way of improvement, but a

    couple of recommendations for improvement that could be made are:

    1) Send emails to graduate students to inform them of the InstructionalResource Center and what it offers them. Some graduate students may not

    know about it if they did not complete there undergraduate coursework

    there, and as a student who graduated many years ago, I had no idea that

    this center existed until I started working on my Masters a couple of years

    ago. Emails would be a good way to get the word out about the center to

    make sure all Georgia Southern students are aware of the center and what

    it has to offer those students who are working on degrees in the area of

    education and instructional technology.

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    15/21

    2) A list of materials and resources available in the center would be somethingvaluable to include on the website for the center. (There is a list now, but it

    is vague.)

    3) Classes need to be implemented to make faculty, staff and students moreaware of new Web 2.0 tools that are available for them to use.

    4) The blog page of the center needs to be updated and made more visually-appealing.

    Monthly Report/Brags

    The partial month of February that data was provided for me, showed that

    February was a busy month for the Instructional Resources Center. Data for the

    month of February shows the following number of people used the center: (some

    of the data sheets were missing from the center notebook)

    February 4 394 visitors

    February 5 696 visitors

    February 11 488 visitors

    February 12 865 visitors

    February 13 1,330 visitors

    February 18 621 visitors

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    16/21

    The data in this chart shows that the center is used frequently on a daily

    basis. The numbers fluctuate based on whether students are coming to the

    center on their own, or as part of a class. The time of the semester would also

    cause a difference in numbers from one time of the month to the other.

    Students were involved in the following various activities during observations:

    Lesson planning Research on computers Studying for tests both individual and small groups Practicing using Elmo and Smart Board Finding resources for teaching

    Suggestions to showcase the IRC:

    An electronic monthly newsletter showing how many visitors came to thecenter the previous month

    Updated website link showing videos of students working in the center andprofessors teaching classes

    Monthly class offerings to faculty, staff and students on a different Web 2.0tool each month

    Cleaning and straightening up the rooms

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    17/21

    Appendix A

    Interview Questions used with the center coordinator:

    1) What is your position at this location?2) What technology and resources are available at the center?3) What are your job duties and responsibilities?4) What other employees work with you and what do they do?5) What can you tell me about the history of this center?6) What are the goals of the center? The mission? The vision?7) Who are the stakeholders?8) Where can one find out more information about the center?

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    18/21

    Appendix B - Student SurveyGSU -Instructional Resource Center

    I am a graduate student at GSU working towards my Master in Instructional

    Technology. I am presently working on a project that requires me to analyze the

    effectiveness of a technology center. I chose the IRC (Instructional ResourcesCenter). If you have time, would you please answer the following questions. I will

    be in the center and you can turn your completed survey upside down on the

    round table at the door and I will collect them on my way out. Thank you very

    much for your help.

    Myra Lipsey

    __________________________________________________________________

    Please put a check mark beside as many answers as you need to in order to

    answer the questions.

    1. How did you learn about the IRC?____from an instructor

    ____from the GSU website

    ____from another student or friend

    ____other ___________________________________________________

    ____________________________________________________________

    2. How many times do you say you have visited the IRC during last semester?____1 5 times____5 10 times

    ____10 20 times

    ____more than 20 times

    3. What are some of your reasons for visiting the IRC? (What things do youcome here for?) Please write in a response.

    4. Do you find the IRC beneficial in meeting your needs?____yes____no (Explain)

    5. Is there any service not presently provided by the IRC that you wish wereoffered? (If yes, please tell what services or other things that you wish

    were offered.)

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    19/21

    Appendix C

    Checklist for Observations

    1) What kinds of things are being done at this location?2) Is technology the major focus for the participants here?3) Do the participants seem pleased with the resources available to them?4) Is there any evidence of future educators practicing how to use various

    technology available in the center?

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    20/21

    Appendix D

    Interview Questions asked of Student Teachers, PPB Students, and Methods

    Students at my school and some that have graduated recently

    1) Have you used the IRC?2) What kinds of things have you done at the IRC?3) Do you think the IRC provides you with modern technology?4) What is the one most important thing that you have used the IRC for?5) Does the IRC meet your technology needs? How?

  • 7/28/2019 Technology Center Analysis and Evaluation IRC

    21/21

    References

    Adkins, E. (February/March 2013). PPB Student, Personal Communication.

    Johnson, J. (March/April 2013). PPB Student, Personal Communication.

    Mikell, B. (February/March/April 2013). Student Teacher, Personal Communication.

    Rivera, M. (February, March, April 2013). Coordinator of IRC, Personal Communication.

    Sinclair, B. (February, March, April 2013). Graduate Student, Personal Communication.

    Other:

    Anonymous Surveys of Students from IRC

    www.georgiasouthern.edu

    http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/