TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES IN MATERIAL HANDLING
Transcript of TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES IN MATERIAL HANDLING
Sponsored by: Presented by:
Alan M. Marder, The Raymond
Corp., Director-Technology Solutions
Dean Dorcas, Easy Metrics, CEO
Bob Simon, Genco, Director, Process
Solutions
TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES IN MATERIAL HANDLING
2013 MHI™ Copyright claimed as to audiovisual works of seminar sessions and sound
recordings of seminar sessions. All rights reserved.
WAREHOUSE OPTIMIZATION SYSTEMS
Data acquisition that drives warehouse efficiency
WAREHOUSE OPTIMIZATION
Increase
productivity
Make process
improvements
Create a safer
workplace
Instill driver
accountability
Realize labor savings
Programs such as fleet management systems address these opportunities, and
more…
Provide management with business
intelligence
DID YOU KNOW?
72% of all forklift operating expenses are NOT related to truck price
or general maintenance costs
4
Customers demand information to:
Improve productivity
Increase operational efficiency
Reduce costs
Maximize asset utilization
Instill accountability
Reduce impacts/damage
Reduce liability and risk
MOBILE DATA PLATFORMS
Voice-directed Work
Fixed-mount Computers Vehicle Management Systems
Barcode Data Collection
Battery Monitoring
Truck Data Capture
TRUCK DATA CAPTURE SYSTEMS
FLEET OPTIMIZATION – Core Features
• Electronic vs. Paper Checklists
• Paperless/Automated Record Management
• Wireless Maintenance Alerts
• Automatic Vehicle Lockout
OSHA CHECKLISTS
• Multiple Impact Level Settings
• Wireless Impacts Alerts/Recording by Driver
• Damage Expense Avoidance
IMPACT MONITORING
• Increase Operator Efficiency
• Optimize Vehicle Utilization & Mix
PRODUCTIVITY
• Operator Certification & Authorization
• Enforcement & Lockout
• Automated Asset Tracking
ACCESS CONTROL
LMS TODAY
A review of current Labor Management System solutions
» Cost to serve visibility
» Where are my labor $ being spent?
» What is my cost per unit by process, customer or category?
» How am I tracking compared to my volume adjusted budget?
» Employee Accountability
» Recognize top performers and take action with underperformers daily.
» Fair labor standards are critical.
» Pay-for-Performance
» Share part of the savings with employees for hitting stretch goals.
» Should be based on individual or small team performance.
KEY COMPONENTS OF LABOR MANAGEMENT
» Key Challenges
» Productivity should be tracked at the individual level
» Single metric standards (units/hr) vary too much to be effective
» Timely reporting is needed to make effective management decisions
» Spreadsheets are flexible but have significant limitations
» Hard to track performance over a period of time
» Complex models can break easily
» Traditional Labor Management Systems
» Powerful tools but can be expensive to implement and maintain
› Software integration
› Development and maintenance of Engineered Labor Standards
› Mapping warehouse locations to calculate travel distance
CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH LABOR MANAGEMENT
» Fleet management systems collect real-time data from the vehicle
» Travel distances, utilization rates, impact monitoring, checklist automation
» Labor management systems integrate vehicle and employee activities
» Daily data feed from the fleet management system, WMS, spreadsheets and time clock
» Two Options
» Lite version for facilities without scanned data
» Full version combines the data from a fleet management system with WMS data
» Benefits
» Travel metrics without the cost of XYZ modeling
» Accountability and rewards based on fair and accurate metrics
SOLUTION: Fleet Management + Labor Management
VEHICLE LABOR COST BY ACTIVITY
Data collected through fleet management systems, combined with labor data,
provide the ability to determine cost per case by vehicle type. Management can
direct supervisors to place drivers on the most cost effective equipment for the task
being performed.
Date: July 30, 2012
Employee: Curlew, Paula (443)
Performance Summary
Item Last Period 90 Days YTD
ELS 123.99 % 124.66 % 120.25 %
ELS Rank 14 of 37 13 of 50 16 of 61
QLS 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 %
QLS Rank 1 of 37 1 of 50 1 of 61
Direct Hours 67.74 426.75 1,047.28
Indirect Hours 1.83 12.94 12.94
Indirect % 2.64 % 2.95 % 2.64 %
Indirect Rank 17 of 37 28 of 50 24 of 61
Work Days in Period 9 63 147
Bonus Earned $ 191.91 $ 1,102.65 $ 2,405.03
Bonus Rank 5 of 37 8 of 50 8 of 61
Evaluation Score 4.25 4.25 4.25
Eval. Score Rank 1 of 37 1 of 50 1 of 61
Missing Time
Missing Time Rank
EMPLOYEE SCORECARD
» Second largest third-party logistics in North America, with more than 130 facilities
» Has an internal labor management consulting group with extensive experience in this area
» They identified a fleet management system and a labor management system as a powerful combination
» Fully implemented the combined system at the first facility
» Combining lift truck data, WMS data, time clock data and manual tracking sheets
Today…
CASE STUDY – GENCO
A combination of fleet management and labor management systems are now proposed as the solution
for Genco current and new potential 3PL customers.
» How these systems work together
» Vehicle data is exported from the fleet management system to the labor management system
» Also can be integrated with WMS and time clock data
» Result is a complete picture of operator and vehicle activity
» Rewards can be based on fair and accurate metrics
» Warehouse productivity increases and costs are reduced
COMPLETE VIEW OF WAREHOUSE OPERATIONS
473
259
7691
65
99
166
79
27 3419
30
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
March April May June July August
Moderate and Medium Level Impact Trend, by MonthGenco Xerox March 1 - August 31, 2012
Moderate Medium
RESULT OF IMPACT TRACKING IS AN 80% REDUCTION IN IMPACTS
Managers can monitor facility
impact trending.
80% reduction in moderate
& medium impacts resulting
in lower cost of product,
MHE and rack damage.
VEHICLE FLEET SIZE AND UTILIZATION CAN BE ANALYZED
Monday
Tues
Wed
Thurs
Friday
Order picker 401 reallocated to
another facility. $25K+ cost avoidance (MHE, battery, maintenance, electricity, cost of capital
etc.)
TRAVEL WITH LOAD UTILIZATION
The red arrow tracks
the month-to-month
improvement in
travel with load
(TWL) as a
percentage of
motion time (the
amount of time the
vehicle is traveling
or lifting).
This metric
measures the
amount of time a
vehicle is actually
moving product.
7.9%
increase (from
58.3% to 62.9%) in
TWL since the fleet
management
system was
implemented.
March April May June July August
Login Hours 7191.42 5116.67 5906.02 6475.57 5456.46 5971.72
Motion Hours 2582.32 1917.33 2215.09 2404.82 2041.38 2212.24
TWL Hours 1505.25 1135.02 1340.66 1483.88 1271.94 1391.38
TWL as a % of Motion Time 58.3% 59.2% 60.5% 61.7% 62.3% 62.9%
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Improvement in Travel with Load (TWL) Vehicle UtilizationGenco Xerox March 1 - August 31, 2012 - All vehicles except Order Pickers
Login Hours Motion Hours TWL Hours
COST BREAKDOWN BY PROCESS
DAILY PRODUCTION REPORT
DAILY REPORTS ALLOWS FOR TRACKING TO KPI
Any number of KPI can be tracked using a fleet management system. Supervisors receive a daily
report that ranks drivers by their achievement of TWL as a percentage of login time. Those drivers
who achieve highest scores are recognized; those who need coaching are encouraged to adopt
the best practices of their peers.
4 hours of
opportunity
COMPREHENSIVE REPORTING
Incentive takes ramp-
up period into account
Multiple metrics such
as quality and
performance impact
incentive payout
Reach Truck, 60.98%
Rider PJ Short, 21.30%
Counterbalance, 17.48%
Rider PJ Long, 0.24% Order Picker, 0.00%
Vehicle Utilization for Picking:CaseApril 1 through April 26, 2012
Reach Truck Rider PJ Short Counterbalance Rider PJ Long Order Picker
ANALYSIS OF CASE PICKING VEHICLE USAGE
Case-picking vehicle activity was 33.39% of all vehicle activity for the
period April 1 through April 26, 2012. In-depth view of activity by vehicle
type provides insight into best practices to manage labor and vehicle
assignments to maximize profitability.
ReachTruck
Rider PJShort
Counterbalance
Rider PJLong
OrderPicker
Login Hrs 950.1 331.8 272.3 3.7 0.0
TWL Hours 143.4 70.4 61.1 0.8 0.0
LWL Hours 497.9 230.4 127.3 2.4 0.0
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
600.0
700.0
800.0
900.0
1000.0
Case Picking
Login Hrs TWL Hours LWL Hours
Over 60% of cases picked
using most expensive & less productive MHE
COMBINED PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT
Introduction of
engineered
standards and
incentive
PRODUCTIVITY TREND GRAPHS
The ability to
graph
productivity
trends was
requested by
the Xerox.
Now, this is
part of the
standard
product.
Incentive program
introduced in August
Easy Metrics Go-Live
in June
» Cutting-edge business intelligence functionality
» True metrics based on operator and vehicle activity
» A complete solution to managing equipment usage, plus…
» An employee reward solution for productivity improvement
» Can optimize fleet for warehouse task requirements
BENEFITS TO YOUR WAREHOUSE
Fleet Management + Labor Management
COMBINED RESULTS
» Increased productivity
» Reduced labor costs
» Reduced impacts
» Increased net savings
» Decreased indirect costs
Speaker: [email protected]
Home Page: www.raymondcorp.com
Visit ProMat 2013 Booth 3219
Thank you for attending. For more information, please contact: