Technological regimes and paradigms: a core concept of evolutionary economics ESST Module 4: Unit 2...
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Technological regimes and paradigms: a core concept of evolutionary economics ESST Module 4: Unit 2...
Technological regimes and paradigms: a core concept of evolutionary economics
ESST Module 4: Unit 2Andreas Reinstaller
Remember? The three central question in economics and how Neoclassical economics approaches them
Central questions:“How is economic
activity coordinated?”
“What explains prices?”
“How is wealth created and redistributed?”
Neoclassical approach: Coordination: Markets
coordinate. Is a market in equilibrium all production and consumption plans correspond. There is perfect coordination
Prices: Utility and profit maximization under full information leads that prices embody all information on intrinsic evaluation of goods by consumers and production costs
Growth: Economy as a whole is in a continued but moving equilibrium which is brought about by the coordination mechanisms.
Evolutionary Economics: Competition as an evolutionary process
Coordination: frequency adjustment on the population level. Firms that are not adapted to the social environment/market on which they act will leave the industry, while others may enter.
Prices: reflect intensity of competition on the market, costs, accumulation levels and the growth of demand of the market
Growth: Competition drives the innovation process, which in turn generates growth.
Biology Economics
Fitness Profitability
Genes Routines
Phenotypes Firms
Selection Competition
Cross-over Learning, innovating
Mutation Inventing
Unit of Selection: FirmBounded rationality: firms and other economic agent may act rationally, but within limits.Technologies are complex systems
The representation of technological and organizational learning: rational and bounded rational choices
Location on the fitness landscape
Set o
f tec
hnol
ogic
al a
ltern
ativ
esE
valu
atio
n
Local Distant
Exte
nsiv
e
Lim
ited
On-
line
Off
-lin
e
From G. Gavetti and D.Levinthal (2000),in: ASQ, vol. 45, p. 116
logical Incrementalism(evolutionary)
local experimentation (evolutionary)
cognitiverepresentations(evolutionary)
rational (neo-classical)model
Technology as a complex system: well behaved production sets vs. rugged technological landscapes
A smooth (Neoclassical)technology landscape
Fitness
Fitness
A rugged (evolutionary)technology landscape
2
4
6
82
4
6
8
0.56
0.58
0.6
0.62
2
4
6
8
02
46
810
0
5
10-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Technological interdependence: Local search and lock-in
000(0,1)
011(0.23)
001(0.16)
010(0.16)
110(0.23)
111(0.3)
101(0.23)
100(0.16)
010(0.56)
000(0.53)
001(0.6)
011(0.53)
110(0.43)100
(0.36)
111(0.46)
101(0.4)
N=3 K=0 N=3 K=1
0.30.30.30.3111
0.230.10.30.3011
0.230.30.10.3101
0.230.30.30.1110
0.160.10.10.3001
0.160.10.30.1010
0.160.30.10.1100
0.10.10.10.1000
Ff3f2f1321
0.40.30.20.7111
0.430.80.20.3011
0.40.10.40.7101
0.460.30.20.9110
0.360.40.40.3001
0.560.80.50.4010
0.60.10.80.9100
0.530.40.80.4000
Ff3f2f1321
I1 I2 I3 I1 I2 I3
(no links)
a) b)
From: Reinstaller and Hölzl (2002), The Babbage Principle after Evolutionary Economics: On the complex roots of labour displacing technical change, submitted paper.
Implication: Even ifa firm would know all available routines and dispose over all possible skills, technological interdependence may lead to solutions that from a purely technical and economic standpoint are suboptimal.
Technological Paradigms: the core concept of evolutionary economics What is a paradigm?
“A model and a pattern of solution of selected technological problems, based on selected principles derived from natural sciences and on selected material technologies”, Dosi (1982), p.152
Within a paradigm problem solving behaviour is developed: The selected principles generate routines, heuristics (more later). Together they constitute relevant knowledge.
Technological regimes: Depending on the selection environment and the underlying technology industrial sectors will show specific patterns of development (more later)
Technological trajectories. Once a paradigm is chosen, the technological artefacts developed within this paradigm are improved. This improvement pattern is a technological trajectory.
Generating new Knowledge. How did the economic mainstream try to overcome some of the shortcomings of its Growth theory? A recap of Endogenous Growth theory.
Remember the variable “A” in previous lecture.
Human capital models explain A, through previously accumulated human capital of a nation -> explains growth differentials between developed and less developed countries.
R & D models: same as above, but instead of having fuzzy human capital we have quality ladder due to R & D: countries investing more in R & D have higher growth
Learning by doing models: past levels of investment (accumulation) trigger a learning effect.
Critique Human Capital: The notion of
Human Capital alone does not take into account the complex dynamics of learning and knowledge creation. If we want to understand the process of growth we need to look at learning processes
R & D: linear STI model (see later)
Learning by doing: just a small extension to “Solow” model. But does not remarkably improve the empirical performance of the model.
Generating new knowledge. What is knowledge? A definition.
Knowledge is structured information on a system or a subset of its elements that allows to predict the behaviour of that system. This entails a process of structuring information during which elementary pieces of information on the system are put into causal relation with each other, and a hierarchy of causal relations is set up.
From: A.Reinstaller (2002), “The use of Genetic Programming in Evolutionary Economics by Bernd Ebersberger and Andreas Pyka. A note.”, manuscript (referee report)
Generating new knowledge. What is knowledge? Different types.
Aristotle’s knowledge taxonomy: Knowledge has been at the centre of analytical interest from the very beginning of civilisation. Epistèmè: knowledge that is
universal and theoretical: "know-why."
Technè: knowledge that is instrumental, context-specific and practice-related: "know-how."
Phronesis: Knowledge that is normative, experience-based, context-specific and related to common sense: "practical wisdom."
Knowledge has been divided into four categories (Lundvall and Johnson, 1994): Know-what: knowledge about
“facts”. Know-why: knowledge about
principles and laws of motion in nature, in the human mind and in society.
Know-how: skills – i.e. the ability to do something.
Know-who: involves information about who knows what and who knows what to do (network knowledge).
On the location of knowledge Embedded in individuals Embedded in organisations
and institutions (shared codes of communication, shared routines, shared methods for problem solving and searching) .
Knowledge is tacit or codified Tacit knowledge cannot be
easily transfered. -> No Blueprint character.
Even codified knowledge cannot always be easily transfered -> absorptive capacities
Person: Substantive and
procedural Skills Formal knowledge
Organizational routines and heuristics Combination of They are the “genes” of
the evolutionary process
The characteristics of technological knowledge
Technological knowledge has characteristics of a public good, i.e. non-rivalry and non-excludability make it easily accessible to others
Uncertainty: it is difficult to assess further developments and market opportunities
Cumulativeness: it builds on previous knowledge
This has also an advantage: it generates externalities and spillovers (i.e. the social rate of return is higher than the private one)
The disadvantage is that it may lead to underinvestment, hence some protection is needed (attained by patent protection, industrial secrecy...)
Operationalising the concept of technological paradigms: technological regimes and trajectories, or what’s the effect on an industry?
A Technological Regime is a particular combination of: opportunity conditions (scarce or pervasive) appropriability conditions (high or low appropriability) cumulativeness (dependence on previous technological
achievements) knowledge base (degree of taciteness and complexity, i.e. relieance
one or several different sciences and knowledge bases) These factors determine development path, the technological
trajectory, of each single technology in the regime. This gives rise to specific development patterns of industries, as it
has an influence on Competition in that industry The Market structure in that industry Technical change in that industry
A technological regime is the manifestation of technological paradigms.
Technological regimes: The extreme cases: Schumpeter Mk. I, Schumpeter Mk II
There are roughly two distinct regimes that are distinguished:
Schumpeter Mark I: high opportunity low appropriability low cumulativeness example: machine tool or mechanical industries
Schumpeter Mark II: high opportunity high appropriability high cumulativeness example: chemicals, electronics
Assessing EE and Scot: Characteristics of evolutionary processes
Processes which generate variation in the pool of characteristics in a population
Processes which restrict and guide possible patterns of variation in behaviour
Processes which change the relative frequency of different entities within the population
Processes which determine the rate at which the above three processes change
Processes which determine the overall direction of evolutionary change
Source: Metcalfe, J.S. (1998), Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction, London, p. 23
Relating Evolutionary Economic Theory to SCOT, ISCOT Unit of analysis: social actors
(individual, company, institution, government…) grouped into relevant social groups for the development of a technology
Inducement to engage into research: problems in society
Generation of variety: different technological communities produce solutions, or “facts” that are channeled into the pool of possible solutions
Selection mechanisms: value set of a society (e.g. religion) in filtering relevant problems, relevant social groups select the final design.
Main conclusion: technologies are socially constructed
EE Unit of analysis: business firm
grouped into industries Inducement to engage into
research: technological opportunity; “need is the mother of invention” view is partially rejected.
Selection mechanism: market. Firms that are better adapted to social circumstances (embodied in characteristics of demand) survive. (genotype: routines, phenotype: firm)
Main conclusion: economic development is a evolutionary process in which better adapted firms survive. What makes it better adapted is left open -> SCOT is here complementary
Relating Evolutionary Economic Theory to SCOT, II
By Marc Dijk (2001), A generic process-model ofscience and technology development, ESST 2001, term paper, Maastricht.
General conclusion comparison SCOT - EE
The two approaches are complementary, as both are evolutionary! SCOT explains parts of the problem which are not explained by EE, i.e. it provides an accurate description of the “selection” environment in which business firms and industries act. EE explores how the evolutionary selection mechanism actually acts upon business firms. The focus of EE is narrower as it lies on the exploration of the dynamics of the creation of wealth, and is not interested in problems of wider concern.