Technique: Mental Energy Analysis 1.Mental Energy: At the cognitive level, the interaction between...
-
Upload
frederick-alexander -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Technique: Mental Energy Analysis 1.Mental Energy: At the cognitive level, the interaction between...
Technique: Mental Energy Analysis
1. Mental Energy: At the cognitive level, the interaction between people and artifacts (or people and people) can be modeled as a conversion of mental energy.
2
Copyright © 2009 Mark K. Clare
Mental Energy Why is this a good foundation for optimizing design for how minds work?
We put mental energy into artifacts to learn, use and maintain them and we get mental energy out in terms of how they make us think and feel. The concept of energy in cognitive psychology and neuroscience is getting traction– Provides potential scientific foundation
We can unify (post hoc) a large number of cognitive factors under one conceptual roof
3
Copyright © 2009 Mark K. Clare
Energy or resource constrained
view of mind
Cognitive Load
The New Science of Mental Energy
International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI)
Ego Depletion and Self StudiesVisceral Factors
Statistical Models of Neural ProcessingPsychophysics
1. Ability to do mental work
2. Feeling of energy/fatigue
3. Motivation to accomplish mental/
physical tasks
The Science of Mental Energy is on the Rise
Minimize “free energy” to optimally tune mental models to sensory input
At the psychological level we seek to maximize our mental energy.
4
Copyright © 2009 Mark K. Clare
Interaction as the Conversion of Mental Energy
Mental energy that goes into an interaction is converted into an altered form of mental energy that comes out of the interactionMental energy can be generated or released during the interactionCan have the experience of getting more out then we put it (net mental energy that “picks us up”) or using more then we get (loss of mental energy that “brings us down”)The experience of mental energy strongly determines the relationship we have with artifacts
5
Copyright © 2009 Mark K. Clare
Load Factors:Estimating Mental Workload or Energy-In
Mental Effort– Intensity of perception and interpretation– Number of decisions to be made– Length of (number of steps) in procedures to follow– Amount of learning
Conscious Memory– Number of items in working memory– Level of abstraction– Number of things I must remember to remember (prospective memory)
Vigilance– Need to self regulate, monitor or control– Role of situational awareness and variability– Use of executive functions or metacognition
Time Pressure– Penalty for acting to slowly or fast– Consciously monitor time during use
The more things I need to figure out, remember, monitor and control the more energy I must put into the interaction.
6
Copyright © 2009 Mark K. Clare
Production Factors:Estimating Mental Benefit or Energy-Out
Meaning– Personal association– Remembrance– Link to identity
Visceral Response– Emotions– Drive states (hunger, pain, fear, thirst, sexual desire)– Cravings or addictions
Incidental Processing– Associations, metaphors, archetypes– Heuristics, cognitive bias, automatic naturalistic reasoning– Activation of a mental model, script or other cognitive structure
Duration– Extending with positive valence can lead to savoring or other optimal state– Strong negative valence (e.g. revenge) can linger indefinitely
Triggering positive, deep and naturalistically aligned associations can release tremendous mental energy.
7
Copyright © 2009 Mark K. Clare
Cognitive Ergonomics
Energy-In > Energy-Out = AgitatesEnergy-In = Energy-Out = ToleratesEnergy-Out > Energy-In = ResonatesEnergy-Out >> Energy-In = Accelerates
8
Copyright © 2009 Mark K. Clare
Design Observations
Agitate is not always bad designTolerate seems mundane but can be a great achievement in complex situationsResonance often requires a tight fit to a psychographic profileIntegrate can be established with ordinary objects
Load Factors (L)
or cool cognitive
subsystem
Mental Effort
Conscious Memory
Vigilance
Time Pressure
Mental Workload or Energy-In
Production Factors (P)
or hot cognitive
subsystem
Meaning
Visceral Response
Triggered Structures
Duration
Mental Benefit or
Energy-Out
Emotions
Drive States
Cravings
+
-
+
-
+
-
Level of Cognitive Fit or Frame of
Mind
L << P (accelerate)L < P (resonate)L = P (tolerate)L > P (agitate)
+
-
Decrease negative valences (-) and increase positive (+) valence effects.
Self Regulation
Triggered Processes
+
-
A Mental Energy Framework for Designers
10
Copyright © 2009 Mark K. Clare
Using the Mental Energy Framework
Can assess current artifacts and suggest potential improvementTool for reverse engineering highly successful designFactors indicate which areas of cognitive science are especially relevant to designersProvides direction for what should be modeled or studied
11
Copyright © 2009 Mark K. Clare
Discussion or Group Activity
Generate a list of artifacts – products, services, work processes, programs, etc. that have dramatically poor cognitive ergonomics
– Very high load compared to production– Tend to agitate us or otherwise produce a negative mental state
Generate a list of artifacts with outstanding cognitive ergonomics– Very high production compared to load – Tend to resonance with us or even accelerate our thoughts and feelings to
produce a positive mental state
Identify at least one feature and corresponding cognitive factor that is driving the ergonomics
See handout for summary of factors and framework