SSO Case Study Suchin Rengan Principal Technical Architect Salesforce.com.
Technical Study Case Sharing_ver0
-
Upload
adrian-rampok -
Category
Documents
-
view
115 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Technical Study Case Sharing_ver0
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential
Simple Case Study Sharing
Compiled byAdriansyah Putra TaufikSenior RNPO EngineerHuawei Indonesia NIS
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential
Case Type
Performance Analysis
Alarm Analysis
Drive test Analysis
Configuration Analysis
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 4
Case 1 : Late 2G Cell Reselection
Country I Project A Region W City B Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Drive Test Analysis – Configuration analysis Description : Improper 2G Idle Parameter make bad coverage in several spot Keyword : Rx Lev Access Min Conclusion : Too high Rx Lev Access Min make limited coverage for selected cell
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 5
Case 1 : Late 2G Cell Reselection
We found problem during FAC test , which have late cell reselection so Rx Level can not achieve and make bad spot
Cell KB054GB did not want to cell reselection to Cell BD022GA , even the distance nearest from BD022GA and have good signal. Also we must take analysis for this cell selection reselection. Please see BD022GA have better Rx Level , but have worse C1 and C2 from KB054GB
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 6
Case 1 : Late 2G Cell Reselection
So based on Cell Reselection criteria and formula ,we can check parameter which have improper settingLike : Rx Lev_Access_Min , MS_TXPWR_MAX_CCH,CRO , TO and PT
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 7
Case 1 : Late 2G Cell Reselection After we do parameter checking , we found improper RxLev_Access_min in Cell BD022GA [25] , so we roll back again into default value [8]
Parameter Explanation
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 8
Case 1 : Late 2G Cell Reselection After parameter roll back (Rx lev_access_min) into default value in Cell BD022 , cell reselection process become normal, and coverage bad spot become better
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 9
Case 2 : Wrong TRX Parameter
Country I Project A Region W City C Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Performance Analysis – Configuration Analysis Description : Improper 2G TRX Parameter make performance degradation Keyword : TRX – Receive Mode and Send Mode – BTS 3012 Conclusion : 2G TRX Parameter must be audited (for Huawei BTS 3012 Series) for periodically to avoid
performance degradation because wrong parameter
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 10
Case 2 : Wrong TRX ParameterWe found a cell which have many Handover fail count day per day and make high CDR and low HOSR. After we review Neighbor List relationship is normal , Handover parameter is default. No alarm or hardware issue. Then we check TRU Configuration for that cell and for receive mode is independent receiver (it must be dividing receiver)
TRX / TRU Parameter must be following this rule
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 11
Case 2 : Wrong TRX Parameter
Page 11
After revise TRU / TRX Configuration parameter in Cell KC020GA from independent receiver into dividing receiver , there is KPI OSS improvement in CDR and HOSR
KC020GA TCH Drop Rate Vs Number of TCH Drop
0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
TCH Drop Rate
#Drop TCH
KC020GA HOSR Vs Fail Intra BSC HOSR
75.00%
80.00%
85.00%
90.00%
95.00%
100.00%
105.00%
01020304050607080
HOSR Total
#Fail IntraBSC14 April date to changeparameter
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 12
Case 3 : Late 2G Cell Reselection
Country I Project A Region W City T Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Drive Test Analysis – Configuration Analysis Description : Improper 2G Idle Parameter make bad coverage in several spot Keyword : CRO Conclusion : CRO value parameter can make selected cell more aggressive or less aggresive
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 13
Case 3 : Late 2G Cell Reselection
Page 13
We found a not good coverage (Rx Level in idle) in Cell TS022GB and very late to cell reselection to TS018GA (even already very near distance to TS018G) , so we do some method (check 2G idle parameter related)
Cell TS022GB did not want to cell reselection to other cell which have better Rx Level. After Check idle Parameter , because Cell TS022GB have CR0(2dB) : 1
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 14
Case 4 : Failed Inter BSC Handover
Country I Project A Region W City S Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Performance Analysis – Configuration analysis Description : Failed Inter BSC Handover in border between Vendor Huawei with Vendor Ericsson Keyword : Inter BSC Handover - Invalid Cell Conclusion : Before analyze Inter BSC HOSR, please ensure neighbor in source BSC and Destination / Target
BSC and also every LAC CI in border must be registered in MSC
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 15
Case 4 : Failed Inter BSC Handover We found BG405GC have very bad Inter BSC HOSR value in daily , so we try to analyze (This site is border to Ericsson). So We try check via passive measurement counter (M2000) and 2G LMT tracing
After check via PM counter (M2000) , we can see almost handover request is fail
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 16
Case 4 : Failed Inter BSC Handover From tracing file we can get cause value is invalid cell , so we must create cell / define cell in the Destination BSC and ensure LAC CI already registered in MSC
Check Contain Message from LMT Tracing
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 17
Case 5 : BTS3900 Series Power Test
Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Configuration Analysis Description : BTS3900 Power Test to ensure “Zero Traffic” / “Silent Cell” Keyword : BTS3900 - Zero Traffic – Forward Power / Back Power Conclusion : We can get actual value for Forward and Back Power remotely for BTS 3900 Series
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 18
Case 5 : BTS3900 Series Power TestOne of method to check TRX Quality / Performance / working condition for BTS3900 Series is with Test Site Performance in BSC6000 and test BTS Performance test with MML command in BSC6900.
Press CTRL+Shift+F12 to enter super admin mode so we can get site
performance test in BTS Performance – Internal Maintenance
– Test Site Performance
Result
Sample
Site Performance Test in BSC6000
systemFrom TRX Site Performance Test we can get
actual value for Forward Power / Back Power and power level. If Forward / Back Power value is zero
mean Module is faulty / problem
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 19
Case 5 : BTS3900 Series Power TestTo test BTS Site Performance in BSC6900 (MML Based), first is to write MML Command TST BTSPERFTEST then press “Generate Input interface” then wait for a moment then add BTS ID and TRX ID based on id type.
From TRX Site Performance Test we can get actual value for Forward Power / Back Power and power level. If Forward / Back Power value is zero mean
Module is faulty / problem
Site Performance Test in BSC6900
using MML Command
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 20
Case 6 : BTS3900 Problem
Country I Project A Region W City K Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Performance Analysis – Drive Test Analysis – Configuration Analysis Description : BTS3900 Problem make “Zero Traffic” / “Silent Cell” Keyword : BTS3900 - Zero Traffic – Forward Power / Back Power Conclusion : To ensure whether there is Zero Traffic / Silent Cell we can analysis with these step :
a. Traffic Data from performance measurement
b. Call Attempt from performance measurement
c. Drive test check
d. Power Test (Internal maintenance)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 21
Case 6 : BTS3900 ProblemWe found 2 cell no serving during drive test , these two cells is BTS3900 , se we check site status , The sites look normal (With “Green” indicator) and no alarm found.
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 22
Case 6 : BTS3900 ProblemAfter we check that 2 cells have no TCH traffic and no call seizures (K3013A). So we check alarm again , there is no major alarm.Also we check parameter and the all parameter is default. So suspect must be TRX. So we do internal maintenance – site performance
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 23
Case 6 : BTS3900 ProblemWe do a site performance test . And the result for cell which can not serving is has back power 0 dBm , it means TRX faulty. So the problem found because DRFU Faulty (Hardware Faulty).
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 24
Case 7 : Power Level make Coverage Degradation
Country I Project A Region W City K Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Drive Test Analysis – Configuration Analysis Description : Power Level Parameter impact to coverage degradation Keyword : Power Level Conclusion : Greater Power Level parameter value can make transmit power reduce by 2 dB for every add 1
level value
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 25
Case 7 : Power Level make Coverage DegradationWe found coverage degradation in K area, even customer declare there is new site on air in K area. So we must verify Actual data configuration whether there is new site and check bad spot / problem to analyze
Problem 1
Problem 2
Problem 3
Coverage Before Coverage After
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 26
Case 7 : Power Level make Coverage DegradationFirst we must ensure from actual data configuration – LMT BSC6000 for new site information based on customer information, after check for sites with red circle still off air
Problem 1
Problem 2
Problem 3
Verify site
information via
LMT BSC
Based on LMT BSC, all sites with red circle is still off air, but the problem , why the coverage is still degraded ? Please see
next slide
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 27
Case 7 : Power Level make Coverage DegradationProblem Area 1 : We found coverage degradation in problem area 1, then we compare 2 data configuration (parameter consistency check) then we found parameter change in power level, for the newer data configuration power value is 1 which mean BTS transmit power decrease by 2 dB
From Old data we found “0” Power level
value
From New data we found “1” Power level
value
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 28
Case 7 : Power Level make Coverage DegradationProblem Area 2 : We found coverage degradation in problem area 1, then we compare 2 data configuration (parameter consistency check) then we found parameter change in power level, for the newer data configuration power value is 1 which mean BTS transmit power decrease by 2 dB
From Old data we found “0” Power level
value
From New data we found “1” Power level
value
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 29
Case 7 : Power Level make Coverage DegradationProblem Area 3 : We found coverage degradation in problem area 1, then we compare 2 data configuration (parameter consistency check) then we found parameter change in power level, for the newer data configuration power value is 1 which mean BTS transmit power decrease by 2 dB
From Old data we found “0” Power level
value
From New data we found “1” Power level
value
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 30
Case 7 : Power Level make Coverage Degradation
Power Level Parameter
Explanation
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 31
Case 8 : Site Audit Founding (1)
Country I Project A Region W City C Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Drive Test Analysis Description : Improper Feeder Type and limitation antenna installation make coverage not optimal Keyword : Azimuth – Feeder Type
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 32
Case 8 : Site Audit Founding (1)Our team found bad coverage even already optimize power level and power type, but bad coverage still occur. So we proposed to site audit. Then from site audit found discrepancy feeder type and antenna limitation because using “Mobile BTS” for tower structure.
From site audit , we found feeder type is 7/8 “ but in design and planning data
it must be 5/4 “
Also we found antenna
limitation Coverage not optimal
because these two factor : discrepancy feeder type and antenna limitation
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 33
Case 9 : Site Audit Founding (2)
Country I Project A Region W City C Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Drive Test Analysis Description : Improper antenna installation make coverage not optimal Keyword : Antenna azimuth installation
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 34
Case 9 : Site Audit Founding (2)Our team found bad coverage even already optimize power level and power type, but bad coverage still occur. So we proposed to site audit. Then from site audit found improper antenna installation
From site audit , we found antenna limitation so
coverage can not optimum to serve in several / selected
area
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 35
Case 10 : Can Not Access 2G PS
Country I Project A Region W City T Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Drive Test Analysis – Performance Analysis – Configuration Analysis Description : NSVC Parameter not defined in PCU outer make all user in one city can’t access 2G PS. Keyword : PCU – TBF – NSEI Conclusion : To verify 2G PS Access Parameter can be check :
a. PS Drive Test
b. PS Cell Check (PTPBVC)
c. NSEI Check
d. Gb (From BSC to SGSN) Performance measurement check
e. Pb (From BSC to PCU) Performance measurement check (If the PCU is “separated” or “not integrated” with BSC
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 36
Case 10 : Can Not Access 2G PSBefore we analyze, better we must know some parameter in 2G PS
1.Pb Interface : Interface between BSC to PCU
2.Gb Interface : Interface between BSC to SGSN
3.NSVC : Virtual Connection between the BSC and the SGSN
4.PCU : Packet Control Unit
5.PTPBVC: Same like Cell in GSM but use in GPRS
6.TBF: Kind of physical connection used for the transmission of the
data between the MS RR entity and the BSS RR entity. It exist during
data transmission only
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 37
Case 10 : Can Not Access 2G PSWe get complaint by customer, one city can’t access 2G PS for several days. So we do Drive test and performance analysis in this area.
We try 2G PS Test in Cell A Site A, then we found PS Access Failure which have message
“The PPP Link Control Terminated”
Also we try 2G PS Test in Cell B Site B, then we found same event RAS Error with PS Access Failure which have same message “The PPP
Link Control Terminated”
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 38
Case 10 : Can Not Access 2G PSAfter we get 3 sample cell to do PS Test and we check radio condition, we can temporary summarize the problem is not in Radio Part
Finally we try 2G PS Test in Cell C Site C, then we found same event RAS Error with PS
Access Failure which have same message “The PPP Link Control Terminated”
Based on coverage Drive Test (Rx
Level) , there is no radio problem in
Cell C Site C
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 39
Case 10 : Can Not Access 2G PSFrom Pb Interface performance analysis, we get all counter related to resource blocking (Blocked circuit) and resource problem (faulty circuit and maintenance problem) have “zero” counter. So we can temporary summarize there is no problem between PCU to BSC interface
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 40
Case 10 : Can Not Access 2G PSFrom Gb interface performance analysis using TBF establishment analysis, we can see in chart whether there is problem in Gb Link because there is “zero” downlink TBF establishment attempts meanwhile there is number in uplink TBF establishment attempt.
From TBF establishment analysis, we can conclude whether there is problem in Gb link because there is no
TBF establishment in DL which mean there is no
data transmission between PS domain to Mobile Station Side direction
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 41
Case 10 : Can Not Access 2G PSSo next step we check PCU (PCU Outer Model) Data Configuration for every cell (PTPBVC) status like activation and normal state. And as we can see the result is normal and active, so the PTPBVC / cell run normal
From PTP BVC (Cell in PS domain) in PCU data
Configuration check all Cell active and normal.
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 42
Case 10 : Can Not Access 2G PSSo next step is to check NSVC Status to check NSEI (Like LAC in 2G CS). From all PCU Outer only PCUTS01 doesn’t have NSVC and NSEI definition which is have complaint in one city and zero downlink TBF establishment attempt.
For every PCU Outer status in W Region, only PCUTS01 doesn’t have NSEI Table definition which inline with problem in one city can not
access 2G PS.
Actual Data Capture in PCU show NSVC Status in PCUTS01
has empty table which mean NSEI
didn’t define
Actual Data Capture in PCU show NSVC Status in other PCU
has NSEI Table define
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 43
Case 10 : Can Not Access 2G PSConclusion : Based on Drive Test Result, we found event RAS Error with PS Access Failure which message “The PPP Link Control Terminated” and also founding based on performance measurement data there is “zero” data for downlink TBF establishment attempt . Then based on data configuration as we can see there is no NSEI (like LAC in 2G CS) definition so this make can not access 2G PS
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 44
Case 11 : Power Control Parameter Set Too Aggressive Make Degradation Coverage during Dedicated Mode
Country I Project A Region W City C Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Drive Test Analysis – Configuration Analysis Description : During drive test in dedicated mode, we get degradation if we compare to idle mode, after we check
data configuration – we found power control parameter too aggressive so for temporary solution we disable power control to ensure there is no coverage reduction during dedicated
Keyword : Huawei Power Control II Conclusion : If we set power control parameter threshold too aggressive can make coverage reduction due to
decrease step level from power control adjustment in action zone.
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 45
Case 11 : Power Control Parameter Set Too Aggressive Make Degradation Coverage during Dedicated Mode (HW PC II Intro)
Before we enter to analysis, better we must know Huawei Power Control II Method. As Per chart below, power control can be applied / start / works whether entering area / criteria of UL/DL Qual Upper – Lower Threshold and area / criteria of UL/DL RX_Lev Lower - Upper threshold. Then action it’s depend by it criteria it self
Action Zone
Receive Level
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 46
Case 11 : Power Control Parameter Set Too Aggressive Make Degradation Coverage during Dedicated Mode (HW PC II Intro)
Below picture are RX level threshold parameter explanation for power control parameter “windowing” / prerequisite for action zone
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 47
Case 11 : Power Control Parameter Set Too Aggressive Make Degradation Coverage during Dedicated Mode (HW PC II Intro)
Below picture are RX qual threshold parameter explanation for power control parameter “windowing” / prerequisite for action zone
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 48
Case 11 : Power Control Parameter Set Too Aggressive Make Degradation Coverage during Dedicated Mode
We get Rx Level much reduce during drive test in dedicated mode compare to idle mode in several cells.
Idle mode Dedicated mode
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 49
Case 11 : Power Control Parameter Set Too Aggressive Make Degradation Coverage during Dedicated Mode
Also snapshot below show there is much reduce for Rx level during dedicated mode compare to idle mode.
Idle mode Dedicated mode
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 50
Case 11 : Power Control Parameter Set Too Aggressive Make Degradation Coverage during Dedicated Mode
Also snapshot below show there is much reduce for Rx level during dedicated mode compare to idle mode.
Idle mode Dedicated mode
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 51
Case 11 : Power Control Parameter Set Too Aggressive Make Degradation Coverage during Dedicated Mode
Then we try to temporary disable downlink power control to ensure there is problem in power control algorithm. So we conclude there is “improper” power control threshold like DL/UL Lower – Upper Level / qual threshold which make power control start in good Rx Level / Rx Qual and also maybe power control action like reduction step level is too much (like 8 dB to decrease)
Dedicated Mode with power control enable
Dedicated mode with power control disable
Downlink power control disabled
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 52
Case 12 : 2G Ping-Pong Handover (Too frequent Handover)
Country I Project A Region W City T Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Drive Test Analysis Description : During drive test we get bad Rx Qual, after do RF analysis we get one cell overshoot and serving
site azimuth is not to wide only 30 degree Keyword : Rx Qual - Ping Pong HO Conclusion : To ensure good RX Qual beside we must consider good ARFCN Plan – other cell/site overshoot, is
to check actual site / cell azimuth/ bearing whether difference between one sector to other sector is too tight or not to wide
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 53
Case 12 : 2G Ping-Pong Handover (Too frequent Handover)
Problem Spot 1
Problem Spot 2
Problem Spot with many Ping Pong HO
Happened
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 54
Case 12 : 2G Ping-Pong Handover (Too frequent Handover)
Problem Spot 1
Ping-pong HO happened becauseCM035 Sector A overshoot
This problem spot area must be serve by CM035 Sector B not
Sector A, so next step is to do site audit to check azimuth and tilting
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 55
Case 12 : 2G Ping-Pong Handover (Too frequent Handover)
Site ID Problem Date Of OptimizationAzimuth Mechanical Electrical
before after before after before after
CM043GA All DT Item (Change Route) 30-Apr-09 35 20 0 4 0 0
CM043GB All DT Item (Change Route) 30-Apr-09 170 170 0 4 0 2
CM043GC All DT Item (Change Route) 30-Apr-09 335 335 0 0 0 0
Ping Pong HO happened because Sector separator too close for CM043GC and CM043GA (Only 35 degree)
Suggestion make CM043GCAzimuth around 300-315 or CM043GA azimuth around 35-45
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 56
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
Country I Project T Region E Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Configuration Analysis – Performance Analysis Description : We found call drop degradation in BSC and in one area, after we check there is increase number
interference band in several cell in same area which mean indicate there is external interference Keyword : Interference Band Conclusion : One of way to analyze to check call drop rate degradation is to check interference band (SDCCH-
TCHH-TCHF)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 57
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
2G Interference Band Explanation
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 58
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
There is TDR,HOSR and There is TDR,HOSR and SDSR degradation from 22 SDSR degradation from 22
December in December in BSC_jemberbukit4BSC_jemberbukit4
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 59
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
There is CM330 (Call Drop There is CM330 (Call Drop on radio interface in stable on radio interface in stable
state) and CM331 (Call state) and CM331 (Call Drop on radio interface in Drop on radio interface in handover state) increase handover state) increase number in 22 December number in 22 December
2010 and lead to KPI 2010 and lead to KPI DegradationDegradation
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 60
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
There is H3028Ca (Failed internal intra-cell handovers) number increase and lead to CM331 Increase, also there is M3201A (Call drop There is H3028Ca (Failed internal intra-cell handovers) number increase and lead to CM331 Increase, also there is M3201A (Call drop due to Connection fail) number increase and lead to CM330 Increasedue to Connection fail) number increase and lead to CM330 Increase
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 61
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
There is no related alarm to KPI degradation in 22 december 2010, in 23 December 2010 there is alarm related to transmission.There is no related alarm to KPI degradation in 22 december 2010, in 23 December 2010 there is alarm related to transmission.So we can conclude there is no related alarm to this case (Call Drop Degradation)So we can conclude there is no related alarm to this case (Call Drop Degradation)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 62
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
- Interference Band give related analysis about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- Interference Band give related analysis about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- There is no degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2+3, but there is degradation for Band 1+2 inThere is no degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2+3, but there is degradation for Band 1+2 in 22 December 201022 December 2010
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 63
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
-- We make problem cell list based on TDR Performance , so we calculate number of call drop count after 22 december 2010 (when the - We make problem cell list based on TDR Performance , so we calculate number of call drop count after 22 december 2010 (when the performance degraded) and before 22 december 2010performance degraded) and before 22 december 2010
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 64
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
64
Highlight : (Find from cell which have high different call drop count from 23 Dec until 21 Dec)Highlight : (Find from cell which have high different call drop count from 23 Dec until 21 Dec)-There is main or diversity average RSSI around -92 dBm in Pakusari-1 And Unmuh Jember-0There is main or diversity average RSSI around -92 dBm in Pakusari-1 And Unmuh Jember-0- Both Pakusari-1 and Unmuh Jember-0 have high different call drop between 23 december and 21 decemberBoth Pakusari-1 and Unmuh Jember-0 have high different call drop between 23 december and 21 december
Scan Frequency Result In Pakusari-1 and Unmuh Jember-0 (Problem Cell)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 65
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
65
Highlight : (Find from cell which have high different call drop count from 23 Dec until 21 Dec)Highlight : (Find from cell which have high different call drop count from 23 Dec until 21 Dec)-There is main or diversity average RSSI around -92 dBm in Arjasa Jember-2 and Jelbuk-2There is main or diversity average RSSI around -92 dBm in Arjasa Jember-2 and Jelbuk-2- Both Arjasa Jember-2 and Jelbuk-2 have high different call drop between 23 december and 21 decemberBoth Arjasa Jember-2 and Jelbuk-2 have high different call drop between 23 december and 21 december
Scan Frequency Result In Arjasa Jember-2 and Jelbuk-2 (Problem Cell)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 66
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
66
Highlight : (Find from cell which have no or low different call drop count from 23 Dec until 21 Dec)Highlight : (Find from cell which have no or low different call drop count from 23 Dec until 21 Dec)-There is main or diversity average RSSI around -102 dBm in perum alfa-0 and sukorambe relok jember-0There is main or diversity average RSSI around -102 dBm in perum alfa-0 and sukorambe relok jember-0- Both perum alfa-0 and sukorambe relok jember-0 have low or no different call drop between 23 december and 21 decemberBoth perum alfa-0 and sukorambe relok jember-0 have low or no different call drop between 23 december and 21 december
Scan Frequency Result In Perum Alfa-0 and Sukorambe Relok Jember-0 (Normal Cell)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 67
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
67
Highlight : (Find from cell which have no or low different call drop count from 23 Dec until 21 Dec)Highlight : (Find from cell which have no or low different call drop count from 23 Dec until 21 Dec)-There is main or diversity average RSSI around -102 dBm in Jelbuk-0There is main or diversity average RSSI around -102 dBm in Jelbuk-0- Jelbuk-0 has low or no different call drop between 23 december and 21 decemberJelbuk-0 has low or no different call drop between 23 december and 21 december
Scan Frequency Result in Jelbuk-0 (Normal Cell)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 68
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
68
Highlight :Highlight :- Interference Band give information about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- Interference Band give information about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- There is degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2 fromThere is degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2 from 22 December 201022 December 2010
Interference Band Percentage In Pakusari-1 (Problem Cell)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 69
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
69
Highlight :Highlight :- Interference Band give information about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- Interference Band give information about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- There is degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2 fromThere is degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2 from 22 December 201022 December 2010
Interference Band Percentage In Unmuh Jember-0 (Problem Cell)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 70
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
70
Highlight :Highlight :- Interference Band give information about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- Interference Band give information about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- There is degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2 fromThere is degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2 from 22 December 201022 December 2010
Interference Band Percentage In Arjasa Jember-2 (Problem Cell)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 71
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
71
Highlight :Highlight :- Interference Band give information about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- Interference Band give information about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- There is no degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2 fromThere is no degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2 from 22 December 201022 December 2010
Interference Band Percentage In Jelbuk-0 (Normal Cell)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 72
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
72
Highlight :Highlight :- Interference Band give information about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- Interference Band give information about interference which is related to SDCCH Success Rate- There is no degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2 fromThere is no degradation in In SDCCH/TCHF/TCHH Interference Band Percentage for Band 1+2 from 22 December 201022 December 2010
Interference Band Percentage In Jelbuk-0 (Normal Cell)
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 73
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
73
From analysis chart we can conclude there is TDR and HOSR Degradation meanwhile we found increase number of interference band in several cell
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 74
Case 13 : External Interference (Uplink Interference) Problem make Call Drop degradation
74
From analysis chart we can conclude there is SDSR and EMD (Erlang Minute Drop) Degradation meanwhile we found increase number of interference band in several cell which mean “indicate” external interference in some cell
HISILICON SEMICONDUCTORHUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Page 75
Case 14 : Call Drop Due To Equipment Failure because Alarm in A Interface Board
Country I Project T Region E Technology : 2G Vendor : Huawei Case Type : Configuration Analysis – Performance Analysis Description : We found call drop degradation in BSC and in one area, after we check there is increase number
interference band in several cell in same area which mean indicate there is external interference Keyword : Call Drop due to Equipment Failure Conclusion : One of way to analyze to check call drop rate degradation is to check interference band (SDCCH-
TCHH-TCHF)
Thank youwww.huawei.com
Copyright©2010 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved.