TECHNICAL REPORT GARLAND MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CO, Anstruther Township Property ... · 2017. 1....

21
31D16SW8064 63A.298 ANSTRUTHER 010 TECHNICAL REPORT GARLAND MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CO, Anstruther Township Property Peterborough County, Ont* (A.E.C.B. Exploration Permit: MX 93/55) (Ontario Mining Licensei A-29082) -by- " L.Oermain,P,Eng, REPORT No, M - 8g DATEt- November 30th t 1955

Transcript of TECHNICAL REPORT GARLAND MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CO, Anstruther Township Property ... · 2017. 1....

  • 31D16SW8064 63A.298 ANSTRUTHER 010

    TECHNICAL REPORT

    GARLAND MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CO,

    Anstruther Township Property Peterborough County, Ont*

    (A.E.C.B. Exploration Permit: MX 93/55) (Ontario Mining Licensei A-29082)

    -by-

    "

    L.Oermain,P,Eng,

    REPORT No, M - 8g

    DATEt- November 30th t 1955

  • E IX BOULEVARD TE-. RAYMOND 2-3771

    Heonarfc Germain,/XA.. A R C. S

    CONSULTING ENGINEER

    MINING A CHEMICAL

    MEMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS OF QUCBfC

    MEMBER OF THE C l. M. M. AND A A. A. S.

    Montreal, Novenfcer 30th,

    8U MM A R T

    Th* property, consisting of 27 raining claims located In

    Anstruther township, Peterborough County, Ont., was purchased out

    right last winter aa a piece of virgin mining land* It was saleo-

    tod on account of the possibility that It night Ile along the south

    western extension of the radioactive tones found on Blue Book Ct-

    rium Mine, In Monmouth township, at a distance of about U miles.

    To Investigate this possibility, a preliminary explora

    tion program was executed at the property during the period pf A-

    pril to August inclusive. This program consisted Int

    (a) Line cutting at 300-foot Intermit over the entire property}

    (b) Geological mapping of the surface on a seal* of 200 feet to l inch|

    (c) A scintillometer survey with readings at 100-foot Intervalsi

    (d) Some 2,000 linear feet of stripping, trenching In overburden, bulldozing and rook blasting, followed by sampling)

    (e) Survey of the south boundary of the property by a qualified land surveyor.

    As a result of this work it was decided to abandon the

    9 easterly claims which had been found to be underlain by granite

    intruded by pegmatite dykes and ireegular masses which, however, had

    not revealed any radioactivity.

  • (2)

    Mining and Development Con^any Ltd. (Cont'd)

    One single radioactive zone was detected with the scintillo

    meter, running entirely across the property in a northeast-southwest

    direction. The radiometric anomaly is interrupted about the center

    of the property by a swampy area but, there is every reason to belie

    ve that the radioactive zone is continuous across the low area. Its

    total length would then be in excess of one mile with the highest

    readings recorded in the southwesternraost 1,1*00 feet. This is where

    all surface work has been done to date.

    This work has exposed an anastomosis of pegmatite dykes cut

    ting crystalline limestone near its contact with a large granitic

    mass underlying the eastern half of the property. Eighteen chip sam

    ples were cut and assayed radiometrically and chemically for uranium

    oxide indicating that most of the radiation is due to uranium oxide.

    No petrographic work has been done yet and the radioactive mineral

    or minerals have not been positively identified. Most of the values

    obtained so far are below O.OlJf U^Og with the exception of one point

    located on an off-shoot to the main pegmatitic mass where an assay of

    O.U956(C) UoOg has been obtained.

    Three maps are attached to the present reportt

    (a) A surface map of the entire property, on a scale of 200 ft. to l inch, showing geology and scintillometer results as well as some topography}

    (b) A sketch on a scale of 100 ft. to l inch showing detailed bulldozing and rock trenching on claims E.O,lliU88 and 1UU91J

    (c) A plan on a scale of 5*0 ft. to l inch showing locations of samples and assay results.

  • (3)

    ^i 11 i Hi Mining and Development Company .Ltd* ^Cont' d)

    GONG L US I O N S

    The mining work executed to date at the property has been

    t6o lindtod to justify any conclusion as to the prospective value

    ox the property. Some encouragement has been experienced in this

    initial prospecting but, no ore-shoot is yet indicated of a grade

    that could be considered commercial under present economic condi

    tions.

    A limited amount of additional surface work might be exe

    cuted to find out if values will imporve in certain directions but,

    it is suggested that results be constantly reviewed before proceed

    ing to large expenditures.

    -o-o-o-o—o-o—

    ^k^X^i ssfe&s'

  • (U)

    Qarland Mining and Development Company Ltd* (Gont'd)

    PROPERTY

    Initially, the property consisted of mining claims E.0.1UU83 to lli^OO inclusively, and, E.0.110^2 to 11060 inclusive, located on lots h to 12, Concession XVIII, Anstruther township, Peterbo rough County, Eastern Ontario Mining Division.

    Recently, mining claims E.0.1105(2 to 11060 incl. have been al io wed to lapse so that the property consists now of only 18 claims of 1)0 acres each for a total area of 900 acres. These claims are unpatented.

    TOPOGRAPHY

    The entire surface -*f the property is surprisingly flat com pared to the rest of t /region. The relief generally does not ex ceed 50 feet with the J iption of some higher hills found towards the northwest corner of the property. But even these hills do not exceed 100 feet in elevation.

    Overburden covers about 2^ of the property area and, consists mostly of sand on the higher ground, with a large swamp occupying the center of the property and extending for a distance of about 3,l|00 feet in an East-West direction and, 1,000 feet North-South. An alternation of hills and valleys imparts a northeast lineation to the topography.

    Considerable second growth hardwood and spruce covers a lar ge part of this area making lumbering an important industry.

    ACCESSIBILITY

    The property is located some 6 miles soufehwest of the vil lage of Tory Hill and, twenty-eight miles west of Bancroft which is located some 16^ miles northeast of the City of Toronto.

    The property can be reached by automobile as far as Blue Rock Cerium Mine. Thence, by Jeep for the remaining distance of a- bout li miles.

    OEOLOQf

    With the exception of a large low area about the center of the property, rock outcrops are very numerous. It may be stated that bedrock outcrops over about 7S# of the property area. Most of the outcrops are small but, some large ones are found on the eastern half of the property.

    No laboratory petrographic work has been done yet although some is planned for the near future. In field geological mapping, Satterly's rock classification has been used as shown on Map No.5*2A

  • garland Miningandi Development Co.Ltd.(Cont'd)

    (5)

    of tho Ontario Department of Kines entitled "Haliburton Area".

    The property is located within the Grenville sub-province of the Precarabrian, and not far from their contact with Paleozoic limestones. The rock formations identified are as follows:

    (a) Oranite pegmatite;(b) Granite, granite gneissj hybrid gneisses of igneous

    origin and also of sedimentary origin;(c) Syenite, hornblende syenite gneissj(d) Metagabbro, amphibolite, hornblende plagioclase

    gneissj(e) Limestone, lime silicate rock}(f) Paragneiss.

    All these rocks have been briefly described by Satterly in "Mineral Occurrences in the Haliburton Area"j Ont. Dept. of Mines, Vol.Lil, Fart II, 1?U3.

    The Haliburton-Bancroft area is largely underlain by pink to grey granite and syenitic rocks which are now largely exposed by e- rosion. These acid intrusive masses and related pegmatites once in vaded thick beds of sediments, now classified as the Hastings- Orenvillo series. Only relatively small areas of the sediments re main as highly altered and infolded bands betwen the many outcrop- pings of the intrusive masses.

    The l? easternmost claims are underlain by granite and gra nite gneiss intruded by many pegmatite dykes and other large irre gular masses. A small circular roof-pendant of paragneiss is found close to the southeast corner as well as a small remnant of lime stone.

    Proceeding towards the northwest from the above-mentioned gra nite mass, wo find that it is flanked by limestone whose average thick ness approximates 1,000 ft.(horizontal) towards the south and some 600 ft. towards the north. A large tongue of raetagabbro intrudes the limestone towards the north boundary of the property and, numerous pegmatite dykes and irregular masses cut through the limestone where ver it is exposed on the property,

    A total thickness of about 3,UOO ft,(horizontal) of paragneis- ses follow the limestone towards the northwest. These paragneisses ex hibit fairly uniform composition and, are intruded on mining claim E.0.1iiU89 by a wedge-shaped mass of syenite 1,200 ft. in legnth by J?00 ft. in width at the north boundary of the property.

    Both paragneisses and limeteone together underlie about the western one-third of the property. They trend N-U!?O-E. and dip on the average 60 degrees to the southeast. No faulting has been obser ved yet although some topographical features would suggest some.

  • Garland Mining and Development Company Ltd.(Cont'd)

    (6)

    SCINTILLOM.flER SURVEY ft RESULTS

    During, the months of May, June and July 1955* the property was completely grfidded in a north-south pattern with lines at 300- foot intervals. This was followed by a scintillometer survey by Mr. Ernile Leblanc under the fiold supervision of D.E,Cameron, Mining Engineer. The instrument used \jas a C.A.E.Model 963 scintillometer and readings were taken at hip level at every 100 feet along the picket lines with occasional readings taken at ground level when ever possibly significant deviations were obtained. All field obser vations have been recorded on the accompanying map on a scale of 200 feet to one inch.

    The writer has not computed the statistical averages over the different rock formations present at the property but, a glance at the readings would tend to sh'ow that there is no significant dif ference in radioactivity over the different rock formations encoun tered. The average background over the entire property at hip level is approximately 15 counts per second with a range of 8 to 25.

    Some highly scattered and quite isolated readings were ob tained amounting to about 5 times background here and there but, no length was found in connection with these anomalous results with the exception of a band in the limestone which was traced intermittently almost in a straight line right across the property coinciding in direction with the strike of tho contact between intrusive granite and the sedimentary formation. No very nigh readings were recorded along this band, the maximum being about 50 times background but, this band is definitely radioactive and more intensely so between a central low ground area and the south boundary of the property where the highest readings were obtained.

    This radioactive band consists of limestone which follows and has been intruded by a large granitic mass lying to the east. The limestone itself is found intruded in an irregular manner by several dykes and irregular masses of acidic pegmatites within which the ra dioactive mineralization is found. Towards the northeast, past the low central area, the radioactivity could again be traced but, the readings are weaker and not so persistent although they are found a- cross appreciable widths which has reached 300 feet at some points,

    To summarize the foregoing, it may be stated that the scin tillometer survey has Indicated a radioactive zone striking northeast across the entire property for a distance of over 5*000 feefc with a gap at the center where a swamp interrupts the rock formations. This radioactivity is found to be due to radioactive mineralization, not otherwise identified at the present time, but occurring within peg matitic material cutting and intruding limestone in irregular fashion.

    Although the radiometric observations are not, on the whole, too strong, as terrain conditions would have a tendency to reduce the radioactive emission if not masking it completely, in vidw of the fore going results, it was decided by the Company to execute a limited a- mount of surface work to probe that section of the anomaly which had given the strongest radiometric results with the scintillometer.

  • (7)

    A Garland Mining and Developgient Company Ltd. ^Cont'd)

    SURFACE W3RK AND RESULTS

    Consequently, during the month of August 1955* some 2,000 linear feet of trenching, bulldozing and blasting in rock was exe cuted along and on both sides of a sub-base line extending in a northeasterly direction for a distance of 1,000 feet from the south boundary of the property across mining claims E.0.1UU88 and part of E.O.lUU91.(See Sectional Plan No.l attached hereto.)

    This work was followed by some preliminary sampling to as certain radioactive values and also to correlate results with scin tillometer readings. Eighteen chip samples and one grab were taken and assayed both radiometrically and,chemically when results exceed ed 0.03* uranium oxide equivalent, the laboratory work being execu ted by the Toronto Testing Laboratory at Bancroft, Ont.

    All assay restilts are shown on attached Sectional Plan No.2 and could be tabulated as follows:

    RADIOACTIVITY SAMPLE No.

    313233 3U3536373839 UO hi U2 U3 UU 1*5

    U8 U9

    TYPE OF SAMPLE WIDTH

    Chip U.O'Chip 3.0'Chip 3.0'Chip 3.0'Chip U.O'.Chip U.O'Chip U.O'Chip 3.0'Chip 3.P 1Chip U.O'Chip b.O'Ehlp U.O'Chip U.O'Chip U.O'Chip U.O'Chip U.O'Chip U.O'Chip U.O'Grab ~~

    CHEMICAL" ii^ba

    o.o5U* 0.030* O.OU9*

    0.061* 0.063*

    0.032*

    o.oiU* 0.019*

    O.U90* 0,087* 0.621*

    RADIOMETRIC

    0.018* 0.082*o.oUi*0.069* Trace 0.010*0*029* 0.052* 0.07U*o.oiU*w 9 ^r^^+pr0.038*O O91*o.ouo* 0.039* Trace 0.010*0.508* 0.08U* 0.6U9*

    It will be seen from the foregoing results that, if in cer tain cases both radiometric and chemical assays agree very well in other cases there is a very significant difference which is interpre ted as reflecting the presence of thorium in the sample. On the who le, however, it is apparent that the sampling has tended to confirm the indications obtained with the scintillometer.

    In addition, this surface work has revealed that the ra dioactivity was due to pegmatite dykes cutting the limestone in quite irregular fashion.

  • (8)

    Garland Mining and Developmnt Company Ltd, (Cont*d)

    CONCLUSIONS

    One thing became quite obvious during the work which has been previously described: it was the almost complete absence of ra dioactivity over the large granitic intrusive occupying the eastern half of the property. It was therefore decided by the Company to al low the nine eastern claims bearing Nos.E.0.11052 to 11060 incl. to lapse. As these claims became due on September 30th,1955* to all in tents and purposes, these claims should be considered as aVandoned although included on the surface map of the property.

    The scintillometer survey combined with the geological work indicated a fairly promising set of conditions for the presen ce of a radioactive ore-body on the property, if of low-grade. The surface work completed to date is inconclusive i# this respect. In my opinion, some additional work is warranted to a limited extent and, depending on the results obtained, if such course is found Jus tified, an expandod development program involving perhaps some dia mond drilling could then be considered by the Management.

    Respectfully submitted

  • l 31D16SW0064 63A.298 ANSTRUTHER

    B A, ARCS (t.,——r,.,.,,

    CONSULTING ENGINEER jMINING ft CHEMICAL ;

    MONTREAL, QUE.

    020

    TECHNICAL REPORTON

    GARLAND MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CO. .LTD.

    Anstruther Township'Property Peterborough^ Cfonnty ? tjO*vE*

    (A.E.C.B. Exploration Perndtt- MX 93/55) (Ontario Mining License:- A-29082)

    titw"''"J*4Cfo*

    REPORT NO.M...w 8?

    DATE ..January 2lith, 1956

  • TECHNICAL REPORT

    -on-

    OARLAND MININ3 AND DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.

    Anstruther Township Property

    Peterborough County, Ont,

    (A.E.C.B. Exploration permit: MX (Ontario Mining License: A-29082)

    -by-

    L.germain,P,Eng.

    j*

    e* ̂v^StiSrREPORT No. M -

    DATE i -January aUth, 1956

  • JU.EVARP .TEL RAvuoND 2-3771

    Heonarb (Sermam*e.A. A R,c s (FNGIAND)

    CONSULTING ENGINEER

    MINING (k CHEMICAL

    MEMBER O F T HE CORPORATION O F P ROFESSION AU ENGINEERS OF OUEBcC

    MEMBER OP THE C.l.M.M. AND A.A.A.S.

    Montreal, 2J4th ' 1956

    OF QUALIFICATION

    I, LEONARD GEHKAIN, Professional Engineer of the City of Montreal, Province of Quebec, do hereby certify as follows:-

    1.- That I ara a Consulting Engineer, with office at 706? Pie IX Boulevard, Montreal, Province of Quebec, Canada}

    2.- That I have graduated in arts at the University of Montreal, in 1921 and, that I hold the degree of Bachelor of Arts(B.A.)j

    3*- That I have graduated in chemical engineering at the Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, England, in 192U, and that l hold the degree of Associate of the Royal College of Scienoe(A.R,C.S,)j

    U.- That I have been duly admitted a member of the Corporation of Professional Engineers of Quebec on May ?th, 1926, and, that I am a member in good standing of the said Corporation}

    J),- That my experience in mining covers a period of 30 years during which I have been continuously and actively engaged in various phases of the industry}

    6.* That I hold fifty thousand(50,000) pooled shares of OAKLAND MIN'lNO AND DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD,, acquired in payment of sy pro* fesslonal services at the inception of the Company. I have no further interest, either directly or indirectly, in the property mentioned in the present report, or, in the securities of the Cojqpany, nor do I expect to receive any interest, either direc tly or indirectly, in the property concerned or in the securities of the aforementioned cowpany}

    7.- That my present report is based upon personal knowledge of the property, and, upon general information gathered in the courts of supervising the work done thereupon.

  • TEL RAYMOND 2 -3771

    Heonarb GermainB.A. ARCS (ENGLAND)

    CONSULTING ENGINEER

    MINING S. CHEMICAL

    MEMBEfi OF THE CORPORATION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS CF QUEBEC

    MEMBEFi OF THE C l.M.M. AND A A.A.S.

    January 2Uth, 1956

    FOREWORD

    In a previous report (Report No. M-85) dated Noventoer 30th.

    1955* the work done and remits obtained up to the end of August

    had been described and coianented upon.

    On the basis of information gathered in surface geological work

    and during a scintillometer survey of the property, it was then recom

    mended to drop the Eastern part of the property consisting of mining

    ciaim Nos. E.O.11052 to 11050 inci, located on lota 9 to 12 inol, of

    Concession XVIII of Anstruther township, and, to retain the balance

    ooneieting of mining claims Nos. E.0.11^83 to 1U500 inol. covering

    lota 1; to 9 inol. of the same Concession* This has now been done and,

    the Atomic Energy Control Board Exploration Permit MX 93/55 has been

    amended accordingly.

    No work was done at the property during the months of Septem

    ber and October 1955 but, the Company executed some additional surface

    wrk and sampling during the months of November and Deoewber. It ia

    the purpose of the present report to describe this work in detail,

    give the results obtained and make appropriate recommendations re

    garding the future of the property* Maps showing the location* where

    the work was done have been attached hereto.

  • Garland Mining and Development Co.Ltd. (Cont'd)

    WORK DONE

    (2)

    During the months of November and December 19i#, a total of

    210 man-days of actual work was executed which, after correction

    for certain allowances of the Ontario Mining Law depending on the

    nature of the work, yields a total of 1*28 statutory man-days applicable

    as assessment work. This and the previous work completd leaves a ba

    lance of 11 days per claim to complete two years' assessment work,

    The work done during the period has consisted in the following:

    1.- Trenches Ea and G have boen deepened an additional 2 to 3 ft. by rock blasting} Ea being now 6 feet deep and G being h feet}

    2.- Eleven additional rock trenches have been dug for a total li near footage of l8|? feet: three of these trenches being loca ted on cltiras Nos. E.0.1liU93 and 114*92. The average depth of all these trenches is 2 feet;

    3*- Power stripping amounted to 8 days' work in addition to manual labor;

    It,- Approximately 3?,000 square feet of bulldozing was performed to strip parts of the radioactive zones one continuous length of Ii50 feet has been exposed thereby in addition to intermit tent trenching. All trenches were blasted to fresh rock before saraplingj

    5.- Six thousand seven hundred feet (6,700 ft.) of picket lines were cut on each side of the sub-base line,

    6.- All trenches dug wore geologized;

    7.- An additional 2,000 feet of bush road was bulldozed to facilitate the workj

    8.- Twenty-five (25) chip samples were taken distributed over 8 sec tions roughly eighty (80) feet apart. These samples were tested both radlometrically and chemically for uranium at the Toronto Testing Laboratories in Bancroft, Ont,

    All the foregoing work, with the exception of three trenches

    mentioned in (2) above, was done on mining claims Nos.E.0.11*1*88 and E.G.

  • tiarland Mining and Development Co.Ltd. Cont d)

    RESULT S

    (3)

    Plan No, 2 attached hereto shows the locations of all samples taken

    and their percentage uranium oxide content, with samples taken in pre

    vious work being shown above the trenches and those taken during the

    present period appearing below the trenches. Altogether 25 chip sam

    ples were taken during recent work,

    Whereas previous sampling had given an average grade of 0,0385S u-

    t

    raniura oxide across an average width of 6.75 feet for a length of 3UO ft,,

    the present sampling has yielded an average grade of 0,066^ U^OQ, or,

    S9.57 per ton across 9.0 ft, for a length of U50 feet. This is equiva

    lent to approximately 350 tons per vertical foot.

    COMMENTS

    In connection with the foregoing results the following remarks

    would seem warranted.

    1.- Although values have been low for the remaining section, the total

    length of the radioactive zone amounts to approximately 800 feet

    altogether. Should values improve in depth, there would be a fair

    possibility of dcseloping an ore tonnage of 500 to 600 tone per

    vertical footj

    2.- On account of possible leaching of uranium minerals from the sur

    face -and re-precipitation at depth, surface sampling is not consi

    dered a too reliable criterion of the mine-making possibilities

    of the? zone.

    3.- It should also bo rationed that radioactive emission is complete

    ly arrested by l foot of rock, 2 feet of overburden and roughly

    3 feet of water. Consequently, scintillometer readings should not

    be considered too reliable an indication of the grades to be ex

    pected at depths in a radioactive zone.

    It,- VJhen present samplinc results are treated by the statistical method

    of standard deviation it is seen that for the number of sections

    taVen across the radioactive zone, namely 8, and considering the

    fluctuations in values from section to section, the true grade may

    be ae low as 0.029J6 and as high as 0.105# uranium oxide with a

    probability of lOOJfifcXn other words, assuming a break-even point

    (x) that it lies between these two limits.

  • .(h)

    Garland Mining and Development Co.Ltd, (Cont'd)

    of 0.10^ and a price of #7.?!? per pound for uranium oxide, there

    is a possibility that this radioactive zone might yield a profi

    table grade in small tonnages.

    cal study:The following basic data have been used in onr ststisti-

    SAMPL1NG DATA

    LOCATION

    Trench "D"....Trench "F,K".Trench "F"....

    Tiwnrh "H"

    Trench "1",...

    WIDTH (n.).... 6,0.... 1.2.0.... 6,0

    "c? o.... 6,0..., 12.0

    VALUE (^ UiOft

    0,0580.0180,0620.073

    0.065

    ) WIDTH X VALUE

    0.3U80.2160,3720.8760.98U0,780

    As some of the above sections are compounded, It should

    be possible to rai.se the average grade somewhat by taking narrower

    widths.

    CONCLUSIONS AMI i RECO'^iENTJATIOMS

    Although the results obtained to date at this property could

    not be considered commercial, they are too close to commercial gaades

    and the possibility of better results under further exploration IB too

    distinct to allow the property to lapse without further work,

    It is, therefore, recommended that a series of holes be drill

    ed across the zone to out it at a vertical depth of about 100 feet, such

    holes to be spaced not more than ^0 feet apart. It is estimated that some

    13 holes at least will be necessary totalling about 2,000 feet,

    In addition to uranium, the core should be tested also for

    thorium, zirconium and rare earths as the radioactivity of some spe

    cimens tested by the Radioactivity Laboratory of the Dept. of Mines

    and Technical Surveys showed the presence of uraninite, uranothorite,

    allanite and cyrtolite, v^uch additional elements might raise the grade

    sufficiently to make it attractive.

    Respectfully submitted

    L. .Eng,

  • SECTIONAL PUN No.l

    310165*8864 63A.298 ANSTRUTHER 200

  • v l

    ?

    7L-5

    L-8

    f

    f

    f

    ft f

    'f

    3-Q

    ' —

    0-0

    15 7

    o

    3-0*

    — 0

    -024 7

    o

    4-o'

    -oo2

    i 07o

    4-0

    '-0

    -OI4

    7o

    L-9

    l

    V fL-I

    OL

    -HL-1

    2L

    -/3

    L-I

    4L-1

    5L-1

    6L

    -/7

    4-0

    '-0-O

    I47o

    3-0

    '-0

    -06

    37

    o

    3-0

    '-0

    -06

    l7o

    4-0

    '-0-0

    29 7

    o

    4-0

    '-Q

    OI0

    7o

    4-0

    '—

    Tr.

    3-0

    *-0-0

    49 Q

    70

    3-0

    '-0-0

    30 7

    o

    3-0

    '-0

    -05

    47

    o

    4-0

    '-0

    -OI8

    7o

    yd1

    3-0

    '-0-l

    2l7

    o

    3-0'

    -0

    -20

    8

    30'-

    005I

    07o

    '/o

    /

    m

    i * 'r-'^

    '..-;-'.\

    oU

    '-M

    l oC

    Vfife

    -Si.:

    ^'-^

    •^•^

    3

    , .-^

    f-.-

    jSVV

    --.-S

    : ;"-

    ;

    Sub

    Ba

    se

    L

    ine

    N4

    Q*E

    f

    ast.)

    T r. K

    v^is

    \ m v- - - : j

    r-V;l

    ?- '--\

    \^-

    it-;1

    S^'

    l

    l ̂-'-

    ',"l

    ''Z'

    '-'t4'

    3-0

    '-0

    -f5

    607

    o 3-0

    '-0

    037

    07o

    3-0

    '-0

    02

    407

    o

    3-0

    -0-0

    44

    70

    3-0

    -0-0

    31 7

    o

    3-0

    '-0

    -025

    7o

    3-0

    '-0-0

    7870

    3-0

    '-0

    -02

    37

    o

    ^ SI

    '\ 2

    T

    Cla

    im

    N2

    E.G

    . 1

    44

    88

    Lo

    t 5

    Con

    . X

    VIII

    ;f

    7

    Clai

    m N

    e

    E.O

    . I4

    49

    J

    Lot

    6 C

    on.

    XV

    III

    sf

    '~-~"

    .

    l "-

    X

    iT

    rL

    /

    /

    ^

    Gra

    nite

    p

    eg

    ma

    tite

    Lim

    est

    on

    e

    Gra

    nite

    g

    ne

    iss

    Bulld

    oze

    d

    are

    a

    Rock

    tr

    ench

    Cla

    im (

    Lo

    t) l

    ine

    Pic

    ke

    t lin

    e

    Ro

    ck

    ou

    tcro

    p

    Str

    ike

    and

    dip

    o

    f co

    nta

    ct

    Str

    ike

    and

    dip

    o

    f

    **to

    wi

    '*X

    NO

    TE

    : A

    ll

    assa

    ys

    indic

    ate

    p

    erc

    ent

    Ura

    niu

    m

    oxid

    e

    per

    sh

    ort

    to

    n.

    ****

    .

    **.

    An

    assays

    above

    O

    -O30 %

    are

    fr

    om

    chem

    ical

    analy

    sis

    the

    oth

    ers

    a

    re

    fro

    m

    rad

    iom

    etr

    ic

    an

    aly

    sis

    exc

    ep

    t

    31

    D

    ANST

    RU

    THER

    S10

    (U

    in

    tre

    nch

    'A

    ' -Q

    -022%

    is

    chem

    ical

    (2J

    in

    tren

    ch

    'D

    ' 0

    -O2

    8

    'fa

    is

    chem

    ical

    (3.)

    in

    tr

    ench

    'E

    ' Q

    -O/5

    %

    is

    chem

    ical

    a

    (4.)

    in

    tren

    ch

    'G

    ' -

    0-O

    24

    %

    is

    chem

    ical

    All

    the

    sa

    mp

    les

    were

    C

    hip

    s'

    GA

    RLA

    ND

    M

    ININ

    G

    ft

    DE

    VE

    L.

    CO.

    LTD

    AN

    STR

    UTH

    ER

    T

    WP

    .-

    EA

    STE

    RN

    O

    NT.

    Sur

    face

    pl

    an

    of

    radi

    oact

    ive

    zone

    show

    ing

    loca

    tions

    of

    sa

    mpl

    es

    in

    rock

    tr

    ench

    es

    with

    as

    say

    resu

    lts

    Sca

    le:

    l in

    ch

    * 4

    0 fe

    et.

    Dra

    wn

    by;

    Dat

    e:

    Jahu

    ary

    ^45,

    1956

    _______

    PL

    AN

    N

    S 2

    A.

  • LEGEND

    Granite pegmatite

    Granite gneiss

    Bulldozed area

    Rock trench

    Claim ( Lot) line

    Strike and dip of contact

    Strike and dip of sediments

    GARLAND MINING 8 DEVEL. CO. LTD.,ANSTRUTHER TWP.- EASTERN ONT.

    NOTE:

    -Area cleared io bedrock by bulldozer

    is approximately 17,000 square feet.

    -The rock trenches are generally 4' to 6' deep

    -The picket lines are blazed and chained

    SURFACE PLAN showing nature and extent of assessment work

    carried out on claims E.O. 14488 ft E.0.14491

    Claim N2

    E.G. 14488

    Claim N2

    E.G. 14491Lot6

    Con. XVIII

    Lot 5

    Con. XVIII during November and December, 1955.-*— ̂ \Scale; l inch - 40 feet.South B oundary Surveyed

    Drawn by31DI6SW0064 63A.a9S ANSTRUTHER

    o o o

  • vtfr.

    J

    T

    T

    l

    sto

    3 S

    (

    (O10 l

    \

    Claim N*

    E.0.14492Lot 7

    Con.XVIII

    NOTE

    T

    l

    \

    II

    LEGEND

    l. G ranite pegmatite

    Limestone

    Granite gneiss

    i O pen swamp

    Rock outcrop

    Bulldozed area

    Rock trench

    . -— - Claim line

    Picket line

    Claim N2

    E.G. I4493Lot 7

    Con.XVIII

    roMain base line

    4-

    I

    O rOi

    Note: Area cleared tobedrock by bulldozer is approx. I5,000sq.ft.

    The picket lines were cut prior to below period

    w

    The. scintillometer readings obtained over

    the rocks exposed in the trenches did 4l

    not justify sampling.

    31D16SW0064 63A.298 ANSTRUTHER230

    GARLAND MINING S DEVEL.CO. LTD.,

    ANSTRUTHER TWP.- EASTERN ONT.

    SURFACE PLAN

    showing nature and extent of assessment wor

    carried out on claims E.O. 14492 ft E.0.14s,

    Drawn by:

    during November and December, 1955.

    Scale: l inch * 1 00 feetD a t e i 'PLAN

    z?P

  • !WP

    MIN

    ING

    a D

    EVEL

    OPM

    ENT

    CO.

    LTD

    AN

    STR

    UTH

    ER

    TW

    P.

    EA

    STE

    RN

    O

    NTAR

    IO

    SU

    RFA

    CE

    M

    AP

    Sci

    ntill

    omet

    er,

    Geo

    logy

    , Tr

    ench

    ing.

    Mo n

    mo

    u t h

    Twp.

    A

    nst

    ruth

    er

    Twp.

    •V 7

    POPL

    AR

    RIDG

    E-L

    20

    ED

    -144

    83

    EO

    -144

    86

    EO-1

    4498

    .2 H

    IGH

    H

    AR

    DW

    OO

    D/'

    a

    f fZ

    O

    •l

    ' \

    \\(

    EO

    -II05

    5E

    O-H

    058

    PO

    P L

    AR

    '

    RID

    8E

    La

    ke

    BO

    ULD

    ER

    C

    LA

    Y

    EO

    -I44

    S7

    .2

    /O

    X

    pO-1

    4493

    1449

    6E

    OI4

    499

    EO

    -II0

    5E

    O-I

    I05

    6

    EO

    -II0

    59

    LOW

    HA

    RD

    WO

    OD

    RID

    GE

    •*\"

    \\

    Ls

    */

    tOW

    ,

    FLA

    T

    PO

    PLA

    R

    RID

    GE

    EO-1

    4485

    -145

    00E

    O-1

    449/

    •144

    94LO

    W

    FLA

    T

    4zg

    RID

    GE

    Mf.

    1449

    7

    EO 1

    1057

    6f O

    -110

    .60

    HA

    RD

    WO

    OD

    LEG

    EN

    D

    Gra

    nite

    p

    eg

    ma

    tite

    Gra

    nite

    , gr

    anite

    gne

    iss;

    h

    ybrid g

    neis

    ses

    of

    igne

    ous

    and

    sedi

    men

    tary

    or

    igin

    Sye

    nite

    , ho

    rnbl

    ende

    sy

    enite

    g

    ne

    iss

    Met

    agab

    bro,

    a

    mph

    ibo

    lite

    Hor

    nble

    nde

    plag

    iocl

    ase

    gnei

    ss* *

    Lim

    est

    on

    e,

    lime

    si

    lica

    te

    rock

    *-P

    arag

    neis

    s

    SY

    MB

    OLS

    Str

    ife

    and

    tfip

    of

    sedi

    men

    ts

    Str

    ike

    and

    dip

    of

    schi

    stos

    ityan

    d gn

    eiss

    osity

    S

    wam

    p,

    low

    gr

    ound

    Geo

    logi

    cal

    con

    tact

    (

    defined)

    Geo

    logi

    cal

    con

    tact

    (a

    ssu

    me

    d)

    Bus

    h ro

    ad

    Rig

    ht s

    ide

    ' hi

    p le

    vel

    Sci

    ntil

    lom

    ete

    r re

    ad

    ing

    s:

    . ^

    ^ ,

    Left

    side

    : g

    roun

    d le

    vel

    Bou

    ndar

    y lin

    e

    (Pro

    pe

    rty)

    Lot

    line

    s

    Cla

    im

    line

    s

    Tre

    nch

    Cre

    ek

    Roc

    k tr

    en

    ch

    Dra

    wn

    by:

    App

    rove

    d by

    :

    Dat

    e: S

    ept.

    24,

    1955

    f

    i '

    Z..

    Germ

    ain

    P.

    E

    fig.

    IND

    EX

    M

    AP

    l in

    ch -

    20

    mile

    s

    : l

    inch

    *

    2OO

    fe

    et

    20

    0

    100

    200

    400

    60

    080

    010

    00

    FEE

    T

    CO

    N^

    XV

    IH

    CON.

    XV

    ~I l

    RA

    RE

    E

    AR

    TH

    M

    INE

    S

    BLU

    E

    RO

    CK

    M

    INE

    S

    •BA

    NC

    RO

    FT

    Min

    ing

    a

    Dev

    elop

    men

    t Co

    . Lt

    d

    nstru

    ther

    Tw

    p.

    LIND-

    SAY

    PE

    TE

    RB

    OR

    OU

    GH

    o M

    AD

    OC

    BE

    LL

    EV

    ILL

    E

    31D

    I6S

    Waa

    64

    63A

    .298

    AN

    STR

    UTH

    ER

    24

    0