Technical Evaluation Criteria & Field Reports for CDI-MDM Solutions
Transcript of Technical Evaluation Criteria & Field Reports for CDI-MDM Solutions
Aaron ZornesFounder & Chief Research Officer
The CDI-MDM Institutewww.The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com a.k.a. www.tcdii.com
Technical Evaluation Criteria & Field Reports for CDI-MDM Solutions
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Solidifying Requirements for 3rd Generation CDI-MDM Solutions
Multi-entity hub capabilities SOA/shared services architecture with evolution to “process hubs”Sophisticated hierarchy management High-performance identity managementData governance-ready framework
MASTER DATA
SEARCH
MASTER DATA
MODELING
MASTERDATA
APPLICATIONS
CDI-MDMMASTER
DATA PREPAR-
ATION
MASTERDATA
GOVERNANCE
MASTERDATA
MOVEMENT
Global 5000 enterprises’ “multi-hub” scenarios mandate architectural/infrastructure approach to CDI-MDM
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
“Top 10” CDI Evaluation Criteria
1. Data model2. Business services3. Identity management4. Data governance5. Architecture 6. Data management7. Infrastructure8. Analytics 9. Developer productivity10.Vendor integrity
Infrastructure fracas will escalate as mega app vendors rush to dominate business services/processes & data models as high ground
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Competitive Field Reports**
D&B Integration Mgr
DataFlux
Data Foundations OneData
Hyperion DRM
i2 MDM
IBM WebSphere Customer Center
Initiate Systems
Kalido MDM
Oracle Customer Data Hub
Oracle Universal Customer Master
Purisma Data Hub
SAP NetWeaver MDM
Siperian MDM Hub
Teradata MDM
VisionWare
** Persisted customer data hubs with minimum 5 installs
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: D&B Integration Manager
StrengthsOperational & Analytical MDM Hub-extensible registry stylePure CDI solutions – esp. mktg departments
Best-in-class matching for business ID – e.g. match engine with B2B emphasis
Reference-based matchingB2B hierarchy acceleratorHosting services available~$100M aggregate revenue within $1.7B DSP References – Cisco, EMC, Microsoft Live, Oracle, Sun Microsystems, …
WeaknessesActive hierarchy mgmtLack of strong SI channelLack of vertical strategy2nd tier CDI-MDM vendor alliances evolvingUnder invested in marketingStruggles to perform as S/W vendorPerformance / scaling
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: DataFlux
WeaknessesHigh-end proof pointMinimal CDI-MDM referencesLack of SI channelsLack of BPM/workflow for “policy hubs”
StrengthsIntegrated DQMulti-entity data modelSOAModest data governanceSAS “deep pockets”SAS channelMidmarket references –American Heart Association, Aspect, Intrawest, StorageTek,
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: Data Foundations OneData
StrengthsFull lifecycle with DG frameworkIntegrated customer, product & vendor master data Data model flexibilityFull SOAFocus on MDM & reference dataSophisticated hierarchy mgmt – relationship charts, rules mgmtPrice
WeaknessesPrimarily a tool kitLack of strong SI channelUnder invested in marketingLack of CDI references
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: Hyperion DRM
StrengthsAnalytical MDMMature product (due to Razza acquisition)Hierarchy mgmt for reporting, performance mgmt, DW, …Robust business rules engine Intuitive change mgmt suitable for business usersStrength in financialsIntegration with HYSL corporate performance mgmt apps & othersHYSL sales force as channel
WeaknessesLack of CDI referencesM&A with ORCL & subsequent fallout with SAPLack of direction by ORCL in leveraging full potential of DRM
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: i2 Master Data Management
StrengthsFull lifecycleIntegrated enterprise MDM – customer, product & vendor
Full SOA including reference workflowsRetail, mfg, PIM & vendor mgmt expertiseData model flexibilityFocus on MDM (10+ years & over 1K implementations experience in data models, data semantics & data mgmt)
WeaknessesLack of strong SI channelUnder investment in marketing = name recognition & market awareness issuesLack of CDI referencesTermination of separate S&M division for MDM
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: IBM WebSphere Customer Center
WeaknessesData governance strategy maturingBPM/EAI strategy is maturing for process hubsRegistry strategy still maturing“Forced fit” with WebSphere family (Product Center, Information Server)
StrengthsMDM for analytical & operationalSOA architecture provides for hub swap-outIndustry model expertiseMomentum – AT&T, BankAmerica, Barclays, Canadian Tire, CommerzBank, CWI (Holland Workers Compensation), Irish Life, De Lage Laden/RABO, Mastercard, Norwich Union Life, Post Finance, …
High-end production sites –BCE, Citi, MetLife, …
IBM GBS channel + TCS & Wipro
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: Initiate Systems Identity Hub
WeaknessesData governance strategy missing including high performance rules engine & process hub
Persistence strategy still ramping up
SI channel ramping up –ACN, BE, IBM
Lack of integrated DQ
StrengthsFast time-to-value
Real-time probabilistic match scalability
Public references –Countrywide, Intuit, Microsoft, UPMC, …
Healthcare, hospitality & retail pharmacy expertise
50% growth in customer base
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report:Kalido MDM
StrengthsAnalytical MDM reporting Customer, product, financial, supplier, employee, KPI, etc. References – BP, Nationwide, Labatt, Owens Corning, Shell, …
Process flows for complex data governanceFocus on MDM for analytics & corporate performance mgmtMDM methodology & workflow engineTime variance support for change mgmt
WeaknessesNot focused on operational MDMLack of strong SI channelUnder invested in marketingEnterprise DW positioning vs. early MDM proponentPerformance / scaling (resolved in MDM 8R3?)
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: Oracle Customer Data Hub
WeaknessesHigh-end referencesFair-to-meek customer recognition capabilityBest fit is mid-market & B2B Lack of industry-specific data models
StrengthsStrong enterprise MDM visionMid-market references –BBC-TV, CIT Group, Co-Op, Etat De Geneve, GGB, Hanjin Shipping, Network Appliance , …
High-tech mfg expertiseTrading community architectureGlobal ID generation, mgmt & x-refIntegrated DQ & analyticsFuture integration with Oracle DB
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: Oracle-Siebel Universal Customer Master
WeaknessesData governance strategy just evolving – at tactical data stewardship levelFusion MDM roadmap “under construction”for future integration of hubs, & also with appsIntelligent batch load scaling issues**
StrengthsStrong enterprise MDM visionFirst to mkt with process hub (Privacy Management Policy Hub)Momentum & expertise in telco & retail bankingHigh-end production sites –Endesa, Home Depot, UMB Bank, TFS, …
Integrated DQ & analyticsStrong SI channelFuture Oracle DB integration **Resolved by Oracle Data Integrator (a.k.a. Sunopsys)
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: Purisma Data Hub
WeaknessesLack of strong SI channelScarce public references
StrengthsB2B, B2C, & B2B2C hierarchy management
Global ID capability
Appliance model
Data governance accelerator
Expected R&D & marketinginvestments by D&B
Potential to redefine market as every MDM implementation needs external trusted reference data source
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: SAP NetWeaver Master Data Management
WeaknessesOperational MDM lacking
M/W only for transport Batch-like SAP XI required for data movement
“Customer” data type still maturing
No party-based data model ... “business partner” ≠customerMDM 5.5 sp4 data model does not support party conceptOnly simple 2 layer hierarchiesMatching works but no AUTOMERGE
StrengthsAnalytical MDM reporting
Quantity of MDM references – Adidas, Intel, Nortel, Whirlpool, …
Supply chain expertise
PIM focus – product
information management
Image management (catalog publishing)
SAP underpinnings for change mgmt
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: Siperian MDM Hub
StrengthsField-tested multi-entity support– Products/Customers– B2B/B2C/B2B2C– Employee/Contractor/Clinical Protocol/Product
Multiple implementation architecturesFederated architecture + high-speed match & linkStrong partnership with Identity Systems Pharma & financial services expertise/momentum
WeaknessesEntity lifecycle mgmt –esp. data governanceSI & data service provider partnerships still maturingUnder invested in marketingPerceived as “pharma-centric”
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: Teradata Master Data Management
StrengthsAnalytical + Operational MDM Full lifecycle & process flows for multi-entity support Proven data models with industry expertise – Banking, Insurance, Retail, Telco, Travel & Transportation
Consolidated platform for EDW & MDM as unified/single repository of enterprise master data = lower TCO Integrated risk management
WeaknessesOne year hiatus – post-i2 software acquisition & pre-IPO periodFormal CDI solution just coming onlineOperational data governance strategy evolvingMinimal references given it is a new solution
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Field Report: VisionWare MultiVue Identification Server
StrengthsAnalytical + Operational MDMPeople, property & assets Public sector expertiseSophisticated, yet well-packaged core MDM functionality – e.g., DB partitioning, web services, BPM
Mid-market pricingMSFT software stack affinity MSFT as channel100+ installations
WeaknessesStrategy beyond public sector just beginningCurrently mid-market scalability – e.g., millions vs. 10s of millions of master records
Matching algorithms require onerous manual interventionOperational data governance strategy evolvingRegistry-orientation more than persisted data hub
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
Bottom Line
Acknowledge that no single vendor “does it all well”
Analytical vs. Operational vs. Collaborative MDMB2B vs. B2C vs. B2B2CBatch vs. real-time
Recognize that industry expertise matters
Test drive matching & consulting expertise
Apply data stewardship tools for business users for long-term data sustainability
© 2007 The CDI-MDM Institute The-CDI-MDM-Institute.com
How to Leverage the CDI-MDM Institute
Kick start the “MDM evaluation process”Attend public workshopBring workshop on-site
Fine tune in-process MDM strategiesDue diligence on reference checking & contract details
Stay ahead of curve via CMDM Business CouncilRe-qualify every 6 months via surveyReceive MDM Alerts & access to Web-hosted research
Increase your knowledge & negotiatingstrengths via MDM Advisory Council Membership
Participate in monthly email surveys & receive updated industry scorecard Receive unlimited CDI, MDM, & data governance consultation via telephone
“Independent, Authoritative, & Relevant”
Q&A