Technical and Tactical Optimization Factors in Judo

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 117 ( 2014 ) 389 – 394

1877-0428 © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.Selection and peer-review under responsibility of ICPESK 2013.doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.233

ScienceDirect

ICSPEK 2013

Technical and Tactical Optimization Factors in Judo

Laurentiu Bocioacaa*

aNational University of Physical Education and Sport, Str. Constantin Noica, No140, Bucharest, Romania

Abstract

Evolution and dynamics of sport science records, requires domain specialists, finding new solutions to optimize athletic training in judo competition in accordance with specific requirements. Domain experts, (coaches, athletes, researchers) demonstrates the need to address training in judo competition activity directly related. The data obtained by us during the research, demonstrates that technical training and preparation tactics, are two “fundamental factors of performance in judo competitions”. Hypothesis that judo athletes optimizer technical training, provide the foundation for tactical preparation is confirmed by the data collected, representing an important direction of orientation training and competitive judo. Research findings, points out that high-level, competitive outcome is determined largely by the technical and tactical actions, the end result, an appropriate motor preparation. © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of ICSPEK 2013 Keywords: performance, training, competition, judo;

1. The aim and research objectives

Research objectively our work, is to determine the relationship between technical and tactical training in judo performance. Trying to make a model of preparation of technically and tactically allows athletes and coaches enrolled in high performance sports activity to interfere with the best ways and means of optimizing training.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: Tel:0745439018 E-mail address: [email protected]

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

© 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.Selection and peer-review under responsibility of ICPESK 2013.

http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.233&domain=pdf

http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.233&domain=pdf

390 Laurentiu Bocioaca / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 117 ( 2014 ) 389 – 394

2. The methodology

Realized the new study is based on analysis of video recordings of 150 matches and technical data, organization of competitions in World and European Championships, Olympics, from 2010-2012. Were used information provided by the coaches of the Olympic teams of Romanian Judo Federation. Data obtained from the analysis of this information was tabulated and statistically analyzed and plotted to determine the possibility of “optimizing the relationship between technical and tactical training” (Sterkowicz and Koziol, 1996) the athletes judoka. Organization and classification of technical and tactical data contained in “ research based on international algorithmic system” (Hantău, 2000), which is determined by the complexity and specific motor actions (attacks, counterattacks).

In the study, it is considered offensive actions in combat, technical procedures executed by the two sports during the competition, “provided that the technical execution, to determine the design of the opponent” (Nicu, 1993). For shares of attack in the fight to her, was “included in the calculation, only actions that led to a score” (Hantău and Bocioacă, 1999) To determine the effectiveness of the technique in appropriate proportions and tactical actions performed by the two athletes, we used the ratio of total shares and shares made after that was a score. Data were processed and plotted to determine the structure of the competitive model.

3. Results and Discussion

Based on data recorded and processed in the 150 meeting, is clearly demonstrated that dominate the fight standing shares technical model. Combat model structure consists of technical and tactical procedures, mainly shoulder and leg structure occupying more than 65% of all action taken. This model is “significantly different from previous models presented in the literature” (Stupineanu, 1970) Technical and “tactical actions in the fight permanently, more than 80% of the entire structure of the competition”(Gagea, 1999), compared to its tactical ground combat, which occupies about 20%. In the fight to the ground, the technical model is characterized by the fact that the actions of restraint and strangulation, are very effective, causing rapidly getting the maximum score or victory. They are used to “measure efficiency and high-risk procedures” (Dragnea, 1996) or sacrifice, in combination with ground fighting, although the proportion of such shares is low.

Table 1. Competitive model to technical and tactical actions conducted in the fight standing.

No The name of the technique, according to the international classification

The total number of attack

Number of actions performe on the left side

Number of actions performe on the right side

Effective percentage of shares (with score)

1 SEOI-NAGE 216 129 87 20

2 UCHI- MATA 170 102 68 16

3 TAI-OTOSHI 40 22 18 3.7

4 O-UCHI-GARI 74 44 30 7

5 KO-UCHI-GARI 48 37 11 4.4

6 HARAI-GOSHI 47 25 22 4

7 O-SOTO-GARI 32 18 14 3

8 KO-SOTO-GARI 30 17 13 2.77

9 YOKO-OTOSHI 21 12 9 2

10 SEOI-OTOSHI 26 14 12 2.4

11 TANI-OTOSHI 23 13 10 2.1


12 KATA-GURUMA 31 17 14 2.87

13 DE-ASHI-HARAI 32 17 15 3

14 SASAE-TSURI 8 3 5 0.74

15 MOROTE-GARI 30 16 14 2.77

16 TOMOE-NAGE 43 25 18 4

17 SUMI-GAESHI 35 15 20 3.24

18 O-GOSHI 41 24 17 2.87

19 URA-NAGE 14 10 4 2

20 SUMI-OTOSHI 20 5 15 2

21 KIBISU-GAESHI 18 9 9 1.66

22 USHIRO-GOSHI 30 17 13 2.77

23 SODE-TSURI-KOMI-GOSHI 25 15 10 2.31

24 OTHER 26 16 10 2.4

25 TOTAL 1080 622 458 100

Table 2. The technical competitive actions in the fight to the ground.

No. The name of the technique, according to the

international classification

The total number of attack

Effective percentage of shares (with score)

1 KESA - GATAME 49 18

2 KATA - GATAME 38 14

3 KAMI - SHIHO - GATAME 21 7.7

4 YOKO - SHIHO -GATAME 12 4.4

5 TATE – SHIHO - GATAME 8 3

6 NAMI - JUJI - JIME 15 5.5

7 GYAKU - JUJI - JIME 9 3.3

8 KATA - JUJI - JIME 12 4.4

9 OKURI - ERI - JIME 36 13.7

10 TSUKIKOMI - JIME 25 9

11 UDE - HISHIGI - JUJI - GATAME 32 11.5

12 UDE - HISHIGI - WAKI - GATAME 5 2.5

13 UDE - HISHIGI - SANKAKU - GATAME 3 1

25 OTHER 5 2

26 TOTAL 270 100


Fig. 1. The total number of attack in the fight standing

Fig. 2. Effective percentage of shares (with score), in the fight standing (%)


Fig. 3. The total number of attack in the fight to the ground

Fig. 4. Effective percentage of shares in the fight to thr ground.

4. Closing remarks and conclusions

Following the data presented in this study, we found that the research is sufficiently comprehensive to describe trends shaping the technical and tactical training in judo. In our opinion, research conducted, describe the main lines of routing high “performance judo athletes training for the purposes of optimizing the means and methods of preparation” (Dahnovshi and Lescenko,1990). Through our study, we aimed in particular to draw


general characteristics of competitive activity in relation to actions conducted by the two combatants and less specific characterization. Based on the data presented, we can draw the following conclusions:

technical actions in the fight glued legs, the dominant structure of the model is to fight from competition ground combat actions and executing the sacrifice, are considered secondary in the fighting strategy of

athletes high performance, but includes a significant number of shares quickly get points a significant number of athletes choose to perform technical actions left - most processes that make up the

technical model, specific driving actions performed with legs. Based on the data presented, or we can consider that actions in competition activity modelling and optimization training, must include:

the ability to developing enforcement procedures on both side, with increased learning the action that execute on the right side port;

- learning counterattacks the dominant processes the model of ground fighting and fight legs; develop motor skills required to carry out the technical and tactical largest share in the structure of the two

competitive models; Linking programming and planning training means evolution and structure of the model of behaviour from the

competition.

References

Bocioaca, L., & Hantau I., T(1998). raining in judo. Physical training and technique. Publisher University of Pitesti, ( pp. 100). Dahnovshi C.V., & Lescenko S., (1990). Preparation of high performance fighter. Publisher C.C.P.S., 307- 307 . Bucharest. Dragnea A., (1996). Sports Training. Publisher Didactic and pedagogical, R.A, (pp. 140). Bucharest. Gagea A., (1999). The methodology of scientific research in sports training. Publisher Romania Tomorrow, (pp. 180). Bucharest. Hantau I., (2000). The structure of training in judo. Publisher Printech, (pp.110). Bucharest. Hantu I., & Bocioaca L., (1999). The analysis of functional and interrelations of training in judo. International conferences, scientific, N.S.A., Sofia. Nicu A., (1993). Modern sports training. Publisher Editis, (pp.220). Bucharest. Sterkowicz, S., &Koziol J., (1996). Method of analysis tactical in judo. Publisher Naukowy, (pp. 113). Krakow. Stupineanu I., (1970). Simulation and simulator in professional sport. Publisher Sport Disk, 317, Bucharest.

Technical and Tactical Optimization Factors in Judo

Documents

Transcript of Technical and Tactical Optimization Factors in Judo