Technical Advisory Committee MEETING AGENDA SCTA ......2018/06/28 · 490 Mendocino Ave. #206,...

490 Mendocino Ave. #206, Santa Rosa, CA | 707.565.5373 | scta.ca.gov | rcpa.ca.gov

Technical Advisory Committee

MEETING AGENDA SCTA Headquarters Office

2June 28, 2018 – 1:30 p.m. Sonoma County Transportation Authority

Large Conference Room 490 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 206

Santa Rosa, California 95401 ITEM

1. Introductions

2. Public Comment

3. Approval of Minutes, May 24, 2018*

4. Measure M DISCUSSION / ACTION

4.1. Measure M Invoicing/Obligation Status*

4.2 SB-1 2019 Local Partnership Formulaic Program*

4.3 SB-1 Local Streets and Roads Funding Program 2018 Reporting Guidelines: http://catc.ca.gov/programs/sb1/lsrp/docs/032118-final-LSRP-amended-reporting-guidelines.pdf

5. Regional Information Update INFORMATION

5.1 PMP Certification Status* 5.2. 2017 Regional Pavement Condition Summary Report* 5.3 FFY17/18 Local Federal Aid Obligation Plan* 5.4 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Training – July 25, 2018, Caltrans District 04, Oakland Sign up no later than July 13, 2018 by contacting Jose Reyes at [email protected] or (510) 286-5233 5.5 FY2018-19 Preliminary Obligation Plan for FHWA Funded Projects* 5.6 Federal Inactive Obligations list updated weekly: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/Inactiveprojects.htm Currently Inactive: Sonoma County TPW, Cotati, Sebastopol, Windsor

6. SB743 Update - Example of VMT Estimation/Evaluation Tool – City of San Jose: http://www.sanjoseca.gov/vmt

7. Rail Update DISCUSSION

8. Other Business / Comments / Announcements DISCUSSION

9. Adjourn ACTION

*Materials attached. **Materials handed out at meeting

The next S C T A meeting will be held July 9th, 2018 The next TAC meeting may be held on July 26th 2018

1

tel:707.565.5373

http://scta.ca.gov/

http://rcpa.ca.gov/

http://catc.ca.gov/programs/sb1/lsrp/docs/032118-final-LSRP-amended-reporting-guidelines.pdf

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/Inactiveprojects.htm

http://www.sanjoseca.gov/vmt

Copies of the full Agenda Packet are available at www.scta.ca.gov

DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability that requires the agenda materials to be in an alternate format, or that requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact SCTA at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation.

SB 343 DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Technical Advisory Committee after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Sonoma County Transportation Authority office at 490 Mendocino Ave., Suite 206, during normal business hours.

TAC Voting member attendance – (6 Month rolling 2017/2018)

Jurisdiction November January March April May June

Cloverdale Public Works

Cotati Public Works

County of Sonoma DHS*

County of Sonoma PRMD*

County of Sonoma Regional Parks*

County of Sonoma TPW*

Healdsburg Public Works

Petaluma Public Works & Transit

Rohnert Park Public Works

Santa Rosa Public Works**

Santa Rosa Transit**

Sebastopol Public Works

SMART

Sonoma County Transit*

Sonoma Public Works

Windsor Public Works

*One Vote **One Vote NB: No meeting held in December or February

2

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES

Meeting Notes of May 24, 2018

ITEM

1. Introductions

Meeting called to order at 1:33 p.m. by Katherine Wall.

Committee Members: Katherine Wall, Chair, City of Sonoma; Alejandro Perez, Town of Windsor; Jeff Stutsman, City of Petaluma; Craig Scott, City of Cotati; Elizabeth Tyree, Sonoma County Regional Parks; Eydie Tacata, City of Rohnert Park; Nancy Adams, City of Santa Rosa; Janice Thompson, Sonoma County Transportation and Public Works; Steve Urbanek, Sonoma County Transportation and Public Works; Joanne Parker, SMART; Larry Zimmer, City of Healdsburg; Eric Jansen, City of Cloverdale.

Guests: Steve Birdlebough, Sonoma County Transportation and Land use Coalition.

Staff: Seana Gause; Suzanne Smith; James Cameron; Chris Barney; Dana Turrey; Drew Nichols.

2. Public Comment

N/A

3. Approval of Minutes, April 26th, 2018* - ACTION

Approved as submitted.

4. Measure M – DISCUSSION/ACTION

4.1. Measure M Invoicing/Obligation Status*

Standard item for the committee’s information.

4.2. Call for Projects for a possible renewal/reauthorization for Measure M: Results *

Seana Gause recalled this call for projects is a response to a request by the SCTA Measure M Ad Hoc

committee. $100mil was selected as a goal for the two program’s potential: Local Road and Highways and Bicycle/Pedestrian.

Staff received almost $1.5 billion in requests. The Measure M Ad Hoc expressed underwhelming reaction to the submitted projects.

Staff requested big ticket items that are included in the Countywide Transportation Plan, and that are the highest priority for a given jurisdiction.

Given the high volume of projects contained on the list, and the uncertainty of the outcome of Regional Ballot Measure 3 (RM3) on the June ballot, and the possible repeal of Senate Bill 1 (SB-1) the Measure M Ad Hoc committee decided it would be difficult to craft a message that would resonate with the voters, and thus will recommend to the Board that the reauthorization/renewal not be put on the ballot in November 2018.

Eydie Tacata commented that as jurisdictions reevaluate and update their general plans, this could help inform what would types of projects would reduce VMT and those that can complement emerging technologies.

The committee continued discussing the project list, priority projects, and the next steps moving forward with the reauthorization of Measure M. This issue will be brought back as a future item.

4.3. FY 18/19 Citizens Advisory Committee Project presentation schedule *

Seana Gause presented the FY 18/19 Citizen’s Advisory Committee Project presentations to the committee.

Each year, this schedule is assembled and distributed so each jurisdiction is aware when they

3

are expected to go before the CAC to give an update to their project that has received funding, either programmed or open to appropriations, from Measure M.

This schedule will be taken to the CAC in June for their approval. Staff requests the TAC to provide input on the schedule and approve the submitted schedule.

The committee unanimously approved the schedule.

5. Regional Information Update – Discussion

5.1. Regional ATP Workshops: June 1, 4, 2018 in Napa and San Francisco

This item is included for the committee’s awareness. An email from MTC was sent informing about the statewide and regional guidelines have been approved for the next round of ATP.

5.2. BUILD (Formerly TIGER) grant opportunity*

This is an informational item for grant opportunities.

5.3. Federal Inactive Obligations list updated weekly

The link was included with the agenda packet. Seana Gause encouraged the committee to check regularly to ensure compliance with Caltrans’ needs are met.

6. Sonoma County Travel Behavior Study Cost Sharing Proposal * Discussion/Action

Chris Barney reported to the committee the Sonoma County Travel Model validation has begun. TJKM has been contracted to do the validation work.

Mr. Barney announced that TJKM may be contacting each jurisdiction to request recent traffic counts.

Mr. Barney described the model calibration and validation task, and further described two optional tasks: a travel behavioral study and optional model improvements.

These additional portions of the travel model were discussed at the recent SCTA Planning Advisory Committee and the committee had expressed an interest in moving forward with these two options. The cost sharing proposal for these optional tasks was described.

The travel behavioral study is poised to collect and summarize travel trends in Sonoma County. The idea is to collect mobile source data to have a better understanding of origin and destination data. Similar travel behavior studies have been conducted in Napa and Marin Counties.

Additionally, the optional model improvements are aimed to include tourism travel, weekend travel, incorporating agricultural lands, expanding the boundaries of the model, and to provide tools and resources to support SB 743 implementation.

Mr. Barney requested the committee to review and provide feedback on the cost sharing proposal that was included in the agenda packet.

The TAC discussed the cost sharing proposal and was generally interested in moving forward with this work, but pointed out that 2018-2019 budgets are already set and contributions would need to be pushed out to future years.

7. Rail Update – Discussion

Joanne Parker announced to the committee on SMART’s recent award from the California Transportation Foundation for the Rail Project of the Year.

Furthermore, Ms. Parker described ongoing construction for the Larkspur Ferry station, which is aimed to be open for service in September 2019. The grant from the FTA funds has been executed.

Additionally, staff has also been working on the extension north to Healdsburg and Windsor.

4

Lastly, Ms. Parker described a recent tour of SMART with the Santa Cruz Chamber of Commerce.

8. Other Business / Comments / Announcements – Discussion

N/A

9. Adjourn Action

The committee adjourned at 2:44 p.m.

5

Sonoma County Transportation Authority

Measure M Appropriation/Invoice Status Report

FY 16/17

Project Sponsor Project Name

Measure M

Program

Prior Apprp

Balance

17/18

Programmed

17/18 Amount

Apprp

Appropriation

Date

Last Invoice

Date

Balance

Remaining Notes

Santa Rosa Hearn Avenue (Phase 3) LSP $2,156,029 $0 -$331,215 4/9/2018 $0

Santa Rosa Hearn Avenue (Phase 3) LSP $800,000 $800,000 7/10/17 6/19/18 $702,539 R/W

Santa Rosa Hearn Avenue (Phase 3) LSP $0 $2,131,215 7/10/17 1/29/18 $2,076,704 PSE

Santa Rosa Fulton Road Impvrovements LSP $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 9/11/17 3/26/18 $980,178 PSE

Santa Rosa Fulton Road Impvrovements LSP $0 $200,000 $200,000 9/11/17 4/13/18 $197,822 R/W SUP

Sonoma County Airport Blvd Landscaping PS&E LSP $82,728 3/27/17 2/13/18 $0

Sonoma County Airport Blvd Landscaping CON LSP $740,000 3/27/17 2/13/18 $368,385

Sonoma County Airport Blvd Landscaping CON SUP LSP $53,140 3/27/17 2/13/18 $0

Sonoma County Airport Blvd Landscaping CON 101 $16,492 3/27/17 2/13/18 $0

Santa Rosa Santa Rosa Creek Trail Bike/Ped $0 $52,000 $0 Approp req to Board 6/11/18 for 18/19

Rohnert Park Access Across 101 Bike/Ped $0 $250,000 $0 Approp req to Board 6/11/18 for 18/19

Windsor Access Across 101 Bike/Ped $106,679 $0 $0 6/7/2018 $0

SoCo DHS SRTS (DHS) Bike/Ped $26,000 $10,000 $0 6/12/17 9/1/17 $0

SCBC SRTS (SCBC) Bike/Ped $20,025 $300,000 $300,000 7/10/17 5/16/18 $84,978

SCBC BTW (SCBC) Bike/Ped -$8,697 $12,000 $12,000 7/10/17 7/6/17 $3,303 Deobligated $3K; only $12K prog'd

SoCo Regional Pks Sonoma Schellville Bike/Ped $17,438 $50,000 $0 2/14/18 $0

Petaluma Petaluma River Trail Bike/Ped $0 $331,000 $32,000 2/5/18 1/2/18 $0 appr Advd Fund; awaiting signed coop amnd

SMART NWPRR Bike/Ped $414,896 $0 $0 5/23/18 $227,844 (PSE=$62,203.23); (PAED=$165,640.96)

$3,005,000 $4,144,000 $4,641,754 total remaining

projects that are approaching or past 6 months for invoicing or appropriation Bike Ped Remaining

or projects that are programmed for 17/8 funds that have

not appropriated said funds. LSP Remaining

6

490 Mendocino Ave. #206, Santa Rosa, CA| 707.565.5373 | scta.ca.gov | rcpa.ca.gov

Staff Report To: Sonoma County Transportation Authority – Technical Advisory Committee

From: Seana L. S. Gause, Senior – Programming and Projects

Item: Local Partnership Program (LPP) Formulaic Funds FY19/20

Date: June 28, 2018

Issue:

Shall the TAC approve the proposed project for inclusion in the 2019 Local Partnership Formulaic Program?

Background:

On October 18, 2017 the California Transportation Commission adopted the 2018 Local Partnership Program Guidelines in response to the Road Repair and Accountability Act. The objective of the Local Partnership Formulaic Program is to reward counties, cities, districts, and regional transportation agencies in which voters have approved fees or taxes solely dedicated to transportation improvements.

SCTA programmed the first round of LPP funding to projects that were immediately ready to receive funding in order to meet the tight turn around in the 2018 Program. The first round projects needed to be able to receive allocation and incur expenditures in FYs 17/18 and 18/19. Projects selected were focused on Fire Recovery (funding went to bicycle and pedestrian improvements in the area of Coffey Park and Highway 101 to ease congestion to already plagued commute ways that were further burdened by the loss of housing).

Recently, the CTC published the updated guidelines for the LPP formulaic portion that included a revised schedule for delivery of the next round of the program. In order to provide the most visible benefit to the state’s aging roads and highways, the schedule was accelerated somewhat to have projects programmed prior to the November election cycle. Delivery of the 2019 LPP formulaic funds follows the schedule below:

Formulaic Program Cycle 2 (FY2019/20) Date

Publish proposed amended guidelines and formulaic distribution shares June 15, 2018

Commission adopts amended guidelines and formulaic distribution shares

June 27-28, 2018

Call for project applications June 29, 2018

Project applications due August 29, 2018

Release staff recommendations September 26, 2018

Commission adopts program October 17-18, 2018

Again, the turn-around for submittals is very short. The SCTA Board needs to adopt the program prior to any submittals from Sonoma County to the CTC. The SCTA does not meet in August, thus the LPP projects to be

7

tel:707.565.5373

http://scta.ca.gov/

http://rcpa.ca.gov/

submitted need to be approved by the Board no later than the July Board meeting. Staff, in coordination with the County of Sonoma, has selected a project to propose for approval by the TAC and subsequently the Board for submittal to the CTC in order to make this extremely constricted schedule for application submittal. The project has two components:

Pedestrian safety improvements at two locations and pavement of various roadways in and around low income housing areas of unincorporated Sonoma County. The pedestrian improvements are to install High Intensity Activated Crosswalks (HAWK) on Airport Blvd near the SMART station and Old Redwood Highway at Lark Center Drive. The total amount of funding expected to be available to Sonoma County for FY 19/20 is $551,000 and requires a 1:1 match of non-SB-1 funding.

Policy Impacts:

None, it is within Policy for the TAC to make recommendations for funding to the SCTA Board.

Fiscal Impacts:

Funding in the amount of $551,000 would be made available to the County Transportation and Public Works Department for the above referenced project. If SB-1 is repealed in November, the funds would no longer be available.

Staff Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the TAC approve the above referenced project for consideration and approval by the SCTA Board in July.

8

03B_PMP Certification Status Listing.xlsx LSRPDWG Item 3B

Page 3 of 3

PMP Certification ExpiredJune 8, 2018 Expiring within 60 days

Certified

County JurisdictionLast Major Inspectionᵜ Certified

P-TAP Cycle

Certification Expiration Date

ᵜ "Last Major Inspection" is the basis for certification and is indicative of the date the field inspection was completed.

Santa Clara Mountain View 9/30/2016 Yes 19 10/1/2018Santa Clara Palo Alto 12/31/2017 Yes 15 1/1/2020Santa Clara San Jose 11/30/2017 Yes 17 12/1/2019Santa Clara Santa Clara 9/8/2017 Yes 18 10/1/2019Santa Clara Santa Clara County* 2/28/2018 Yes 17 3/1/2020Santa Clara Saratoga 9/30/2016 Yes 17 10/1/2018Santa Clara Sunnyvale 1/31/2017 Yes 17 2/1/2019

Solano Benicia 8/31/2014 No 18 4/30/2018Solano Dixon 12/30/2017 Yes 18 1/1/2020Solano Fairfield 3/31/2017 Yes 19 4/1/2019Solano Rio Vista 10/31/2017 Yes 18 11/1/2019Solano Solano County 3/31/2017 Yes 19 4/1/2019Solano Suisun City 6/30/2016 Yes 19 4/30/2019Solano Vacaville 12/31/2015 Yes 19 1/1/2019Solano Vallejo 10/31/2015 Yes 19 11/1/2018

Sonoma Cloverdale 8/31/2014 Pending 19 4/30/2019Sonoma Cotati 8/31/2017 Yes 18 9/1/2019Sonoma Healdsburg 11/30/2015 Yes 19 12/1/2018Sonoma Petaluma 11/31/2017 Yes 18 12/1/2019Sonoma Rohnert Park 10/31/2017 Yes 18 11/1/2019Sonoma Santa Rosa 4/30/2018 Yes 16 5/1/2020Sonoma Sebastopol* 8/31/2014 Yes 19 4/30/2019Sonoma Sonoma 10/30/2017 Yes 18 11/1/2019Sonoma Sonoma County 11/30/2017 Yes 18 12/1/2019Sonoma Windsor 9/30/2017 Yes 18 10/1/2019

Note: Updated report is posted monthly to:http://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/PMP_Certification_Status_Listing.xlsx

(*) Indicates One-Year Extension. Note: PTAP awardees are ineligible for a one-year extension during the cycle awarded.

(^) Indicates previous P-TAP awardee, but hasn't fulfilled requirement; must submit certification prior to updating to current P-TAP award status.

9

http://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/PMP_Certification_Status_Listing.xlsx

LSRPDWG Item 3G

TO: Local Streets & Roads Working Group DATE: June 12th, 2018

FR: Sui Tan

RE: 2017 Regional Pavement Condition Summary Report – Final

MTC’s Regional Streets & Roads Program staff has completed the 2017 regional pavement condition summary report. The PCI numbers presented in the 2017 regional pavement condition summary report reflect the information contained in each jurisdiction’s StreetSaver® database. The 2017 PCI scores are weighted by pavement section area. Please be aware that the PCI scores are based on pavement conditions as of 12/31/2017. Reports generated for a different date may vary from what is shown in this report. 2017 Regional Pavement Condition Summary In 2017, there were 43,374 lane-miles of local streets and roads reported in the San Francisco Bay Area, an overall network increase of 93 lane-miles as compared to 2016. This increase was driven primarily by new sections being added to the StreetSaver® database. The Bay Area’s average network pavement condition index (PCI) in 2017 was 67, out of a maximum possible of 100, and the three-year moving average PCI is also 67. As shown in the following chart, Bay Area roads in Excellent or Very Good category have increased from 34 percent in 2016 to 37 percent in 2017. This indicates that major effort is being made around the Bay Area to preserve and improve roadways using best pavement management practices. Countywide, the greatest improvement is in the city and county of San Francisco with a gain of five PCI points, followed by the County of Santa Clara with a gain of two PCI points. Conversely, the County of Sonoma has slipped three PCI points. This report does not reflect improvements related to Senate Bill 1 funding which was approved in April 2017. It is anticipated that any gains in condition resulting from SB1 funding will not show up until the 2020 report. MTC’s goal is to provide information that accurately reflects current pavement conditions in the region. Any condition assessment or road repairs and maintenance completed after 12/31/2017 are not included in this report and will be included in the 2018 PCI scores reported next year. You will also find more information in the attachments regarding the break-down of Bay Area roadways by condition category and functional class, as well as a year-over-year comparison of pavement conditions, countywide comparison and jurisdiction ranking summary.

2b

10

LSRPDWG Item 3G June 12, 2018

Page 2

Regional Weighted Network PCI (Year over Year) Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Weighted PCI 66 66 66 66 66 67 67 67 For more information, please contact Sui Tan at [email protected] , 415-778-5844. Attachment 1: 2017 Jurisdiction Ranking Summary

Lists jurisdictions with PCI scores in the Top and Bottom 10, Greatest Increase/Decrease, and Three-year moving averages.

Attachment 2: Bay Area 2017 PCI Scores Provides detailed information on individual jurisdiction PCI scores.

Attachment 3: Bay Area Countywide 2017 PCI Scores Provides regional and county by county comparison

34%

35%

33%

32%

31%

31%

32%

31%

34%

34%

37%

31%

32%

34%

34%

35%

35%

34%

35%

34%

34%

32%

10%

10%

11%

11%

11%

11%

10%

10%

10%

10%

9%

25%

22%

21%

23%

23%

23%

23%

23%

22%

23%

22%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2006

2007

2008/09

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Pavement Conditions for Local Roadways, 2006-2017 (Lane Miles)

Excellent or Very Good Good or Fair At Risk Poor or Failed No Data

11


Attachment 1: Final2017 Jurisdiction Ranking Summary

Year-over-Year RankingTop 10 2017 Bottom 10 2017Dublin 85 Larkspur 44Palo Alto 85 Petaluma 46Clayton 84 Sonoma County 48El Cerrito 83 Calistoga 50Brentwood 82 Napa County 50Daly City 82 Pacifica 51Solano County 81 Vallejo 51Danville 81 Oakland 53Foster City 81 Benicia 54Cupertino 81 Millbrae 54

Sebastopol 54

Greatest Increase 2017 Greatest Decrease 2017Martinez 16 Emeryville -5Rio Vista 9 Saratoga -4Ross 8 Union City -3Richmond 7 Pinole -3Belmont 7 Hercules -3Danville 6 Lafayette -3Milpitas 6 San Ramon -3Mill Valley 5 Colma -3St Helena 5 Sonoma County -3San Francisco 5 Sebastopol -3San Jose 5

3-Year Moving Average RankingTop 10 2017 Bottom 10 2017Dublin 85 Larkspur 42El Cerrito 84 Petaluma 46Clayton 84 Sonoma County 49Palo Alto 83 Napa County 51Brentwood 83 Martinez 51Colma 83 Calistoga 52Foster City 82 Millbrae 52Union City 81 Pacifica 53Daly City 81 Vallejo 53Solano County 81 Cotati 53

Updated 2018-05-24

LSRPDWG Item 3G - Attachment 1

12

of 6

Attachment 2: Bay Area 2017 PCI Scores - FINALCurrent Level of Service by County and Jurisdiction

2017 Annual PCI Score 3 YR Moving Average

Total Lane Miles

Total Centerline

Miles

% Poor or Failed

% Excellent or Very Good

Arterial Collector Residential Network2016

Network PCI

Change, 2016 to

20172015 2016 2017

Alameda 8,143 3,619 19% 42% 74 67 64 68 69 -1 68 68 68Alameda 276.5 124.9 20% 42% 73 75 68 71 73 -2 69 71 72Alameda County 993.7 473.0 10% 29% 75 75 66 71 73 -2 71 71 71Albany 58.4 29.3 40% 24% 57 63 54 57 59 -2 57 59 59Berkeley 453.7 216.6 39% 35% 65 67 53 57 58 -1 58 58 57Dublin 276.5 127.1 0% 80% 84 83 87 85 87 -2 85 85 85Emeryville 47.0 19.7 4% 22% 75 73 70 73 78 -5 78 79 77Fremont 1,073.0 498.8 12% 43% 79 73 69 73 72 1 69 71 72Hayward 654.5 281.8 20% 54% 77 68 69 71 71 0 67 68 70Livermore 719.3 340.6 5% 59% 78 78 81 80 76 4 77 76 78Newark 255.5 106.0 8% 54% 77 75 77 76 75 1 76 76 76Oakland 2,021.8 830.9 46% 20% 68 49 46 53 55 -2 57 56 55Piedmont 77.8 38.7 30% 28% 80 72 55 63 59 4 65 62 61Pleasanton 513.4 212.3 5% 60% 75 78 86 80 77 3 79 78 79San Leandro 393.0 181.3 39% 30% 74 66 51 59 58 1 56 56 57Union City 329.2 137.7 6% 52% 73 77 81 79 82 -3 81 82 81Contra Costa 7,159 3,418 15% 45% 76 72 69 71 70 1 69 70 70Antioch 683.4 318.1 17% 38% 79 72 66 69 71 -2 66 67 68Brentwood 420.7 188.7 0% 65% 78 83 83 82 83 -1 85 84 83Clayton 94.2 42.4 1% 72% 89 79 84 84 86 -2 81 83 84Concord 716.7 310.1 27% 13% 68 66 57 61 59 2 61 60 60Contra Costa County 1,330.1 647.9 10% 36% 79 73 68 72 71 1 71 72 72Danville 323.4 157.9 5% 66% 79 68 83 81 75 6 74 75 77El Cerrito 145.3 70.0 1% 72% 82 84 84 83 85 -2 84 84 84Hercules 122.3 58.3 22% 48% 79 65 66 67 70 -3 71 71 69Lafayette 199.4 91.9 2% 39% 77 75 78 77 80 -3 77 79 79Martinez 233.0 121.6 33% 28% 69 61 58 61 45 16 52 48 51Moraga 110.6 56.0 22% 39% 66 70 68 68 67 1 64 67 68Oakley 288.8 136.4 8% 67% 81 73 79 79 75 4 75 76 77Orinda 193.1 92.7 31% 50% 76 77 63 67 63 4 49 54 60Pinole 118.2 51.9 24% 32% 73 59 65 65 68 -3 67 68 68Pittsburg 342.9 169.6 29% 35% 65 65 63 64 66 -2 67 69 67Pleasant Hill 223.8 109.3 19% 26% 79 77 60 67 65 2 65 66 66

YoY Change


13

of 6



Total Lane Miles

Total Centerline

Miles

% Poor or Failed



Network PCI

Change, 2016 to

20172015 2016 2017

YoY Change

Richmond 576.9 289.9 27% 39% 72 63 64 66 59 7 63 61 62San Pablo 103.8 48.3 13% 46% 83 80 67 74 75 -1 77 76 75San Ramon 497.7 239.7 5% 60% 79 79 78 78 81 -3 80 80 80Walnut Creek 435.0 217.5 10% 38% 71 75 74 73 75 -2 71 72 73Marin 2,063 1,037 22% 35% 71 66 66 67 66 1 64 65 66Belvedere 23.4 11.9 4% 33% 82 76 72 74 75 -1 79 77 76Corte Madera 71.9 34.9 15% 27% 78 69 66 68 70 -2 68 69 68Fairfax 54.7 27.5 31% 19% 61 63 62 62 63 -1 65 64 63Larkspur 66.0 33.6 58% 24% 50 58 35 44 42 2 39 41 42Marin County 850.9 424.0 28% 39% 73 64 67 65 65 0 60 62 63Mill Valley 115.9 60.6 28% 42% 64 70 67 67 62 5 60 61 64Novato 318.5 152.2 9% 30% 67 71 70 70 71 -1 70 70 70Ross 22.9 11.5 13% 62% 91 74 79 79 71 8 72 72 74San Anselmo 81.4 39.2 24% 45% 70 62 64 64 63 1 60 62 63San Rafael 331.1 172.7 20% 25% 71 64 65 66 68 -2 68 67 67Sausalito 58.0 32.5 23% 20% 70 59 60 64 64 0 66 65 64Tiburon 68.1 36.2 12% 50% 77 83 74 75 75 0 74 75 76Napa 1,523 745 35% 30% 72 61 52 58 59 -1 59 59 59American Canyon 114.0 56.0 31% 44% 69 62 65 64 66 -2 69 69 67Calistoga 31.1 15.6 48% 9% 64 49 50 50 52 -2 54 52 52Napa 471.4 219.2 23% 42% 69 72 69 70 68 2 66 67 69Napa County 838.0 419.7 59% 15% 74 55 41 50 52 -2 53 52 51St Helena 51.5 26.1 40% 30% 85 60 54 58 53 5 50 55 55Yountville 16.5 8.3 9% 38% 80 79 71 75 74 1 71 74 74San Francisco 2,142 943 12% 49% 74 71 74 74 69 5 67 68 70San Francisco 2,141.6 942.9 12% 49% 74 71 74 74 69 5 67 68 70San Mateo 3,901 1,861 16% 41% 74 74 71 72 72 0 70 71 72Atherton 105.8 53.8 4% 46% 85 82 75 77 77 0 78 77 77Belmont 138.7 69.7 33% 14% 65 66 55 59 52 7 55 54 55Brisbane 67.2 22.5 12% 53% 72 82 82 77 79 -2 76 77 77Burlingame 162.3 83.1 3% 29% 73 75 78 75 75 0 77 76 76Colma 24.2 9.7 2% 61% 87 82 79 80 83 -3 83 84 83Daly City 255.0 115.8 5% 70% 81 84 81 82 84 -2 77 79 81

LSRPDWG Item 3G - Attachment 2Page 2

14

of 6



Total Lane Miles

Total Centerline

Miles

% Poor or Failed



Network PCI

Change, 2016 to

20172015 2016 2017

YoY Change

East Palo Alto 83.1 38.9 18% 38% 75 77 66 70 72 -2 58 63 66Foster City 120.0 54.0 3% 59% 73 79 87 81 82 -1 82 82 82Half Moon Bay 55.4 28.0 36% 24% 64 59 63 62 64 -2 67 66 65Hillsborough 166.4 83.2 2% 58% 87 82 79 80 78 2 71 73 76Menlo Park 196.2 96.3 19% 55% 66 73 74 73 72 1 76 74 73Millbrae 122.9 58.3 45% 26% 71 60 41 54 51 3 54 52 52Pacifica 186.1 89.1 48% 8% 65 48 46 51 53 -2 55 54 53Portola Valley 70.1 36.1 0% 33% 84 78 76 78 79 -1 79 79 79Redwood City 353.6 154.2 3% 29% 76 74 74 75 76 -1 78 78 76San Bruno 180.5 89.0 29% 28% 72 64 59 62 64 -2 65 64 64San Carlos 175.1 86.2 31% 32% 75 60 60 63 65 -2 59 61 62San Mateo 424.2 199.3 12% 49% 77 80 72 75 76 -1 75 76 76San Mateo County 623.2 306.8 8% 35% 74 78 71 74 75 -1 70 72 73South San Francisco 294.8 139.6 9% 51% 70 75 80 76 73 3 73 73 75Woodside 96.4 47.8 11% 57% 70 83 76 76 76 0 72 73 74Santa Clara 10,000 4,478 12% 39% 76 71 67 70 68 2 68 68 68Campbell 229.8 95.1 18% 21% 67 67 66 66 68 -2 72 70 67Cupertino 297.6 137.8 4% 65% 86 77 80 81 78 3 67 72 76Gilroy 269.5 124.1 15% 24% 65 67 68 67 69 -2 69 68 67Los Altos 227.0 111.3 11% 29% 80 72 70 71 71 0 76 73 71Los Altos Hills 122.6 61.4 1% 47% 79 77 81 80 78 2 77 78 79Los Gatos 229.5 108.3 22% 40% 59 70 67 66 66 0 68 67 66Milpitas 298.8 128.6 9% 57% 76 77 77 77 71 6 72 73 74Monte Sereno 26.8 13.3 27% 16% 70 58 61 61 63 -2 63 62 62Morgan Hill 289.8 131.5 16% 40% 71 68 70 70 72 -2 68 69 69Mountain View 332.1 140.0 10% 41% 70 73 75 73 75 -2 70 71 72Palo Alto 414.5 198.4 6% 74% 81 85 86 85 83 2 79 81 83San Jose 4,320.2 1,957.0 21% 34% 78 72 62 67 62 5 62 62 64Santa Clara 592.6 249.2 4% 42% 79 71 76 76 75 1 73 73 74Santa Clara County 1,427.0 619.9 13% 17% 70 66 63 67 68 -1 70 69 68Saratoga 282.9 141.1 19% 43% 80 67 66 69 73 -4 67 68 69Sunnyvale 639.2 260.9 1% 39% 78 73 75 76 76 0 77 76 76Solano 3,535 1,656 27% 36% 73 70 65 67 67 0 65 66 67


15

of 6



Total Lane Miles

Total Centerline

Miles

% Poor or Failed



Network PCI

Change, 2016 to

20172015 2016 2017

YoY Change

Benicia 198.0 95.2 49% 22% 66 70 47 54 54 0 57 56 55Dixon 138.9 64.8 23% 32% 72 67 67 67 67 0 72 69 68Fairfield 743.3 341.6 12% 42% 74 70 71 71 71 0 71 72 71Rio Vista 46.0 23.0 34% 49% 75 72 58 65 56 9 57 56 60Solano County 924.2 459.3 3% 64% 82 83 79 81 81 0 79 80 81Suisun City 153.2 76.6 29% 22% 73 65 57 62 64 -2 55 58 60Vacaville 616.3 275.7 19% 31% 73 65 67 68 68 0 69 69 69Vallejo 714.5 320.0 48% 25% 64 57 45 51 53 -2 49 51 53Sonoma 4,908 2,365 34% 29% 73 63 44 53 56 -3 55 55 55Cloverdale 64.6 31.9 32% 10% 61 52 56 57 59 -2 62 61 59Cotati 47.9 23.1 44% 26% 71 45 50 55 52 3 53 52 53Healdsburg 93.2 44.9 31% 16% 63 65 56 60 62 -2 61 61 62Petaluma 396.5 177.5 54% 28% 61 40 42 46 45 1 46 46 46Rohnert Park 211.6 92.0 22% 44% 85 74 59 69 71 -2 69 71 71Santa Rosa 1,121.9 506.0 36% 22% 62 61 57 59 60 -1 61 60 60Sebastopol 47.5 23.8 38% 20% 45 59 53 54 57 -3 60 58 56Sonoma 68.2 33.8 12% 44% 76 79 71 74 73 1 72 73 74Sonoma County 2,686.4 1,346.8 63% 19% 80 66 33 48 51 -3 47 49 49Windsor 170.7 85.2 4% 62% 73 73 80 78 78 0 73 75 78Bay Area 43,374 20,122 22% 37% 74 69 64 67 67 0 66 67 67

Updated 2018-05-23


16

Attachment 3: Bay Area Countywide 2017 PCI Scores - FinalCurrent Level of Service by Countywide

PCI=90-100 PCI=80-89 PCI=70-79 PCI=60-69 PCI=50-59 PCI=25-49 PCI=0-24 2017 Annual PCI YoY Change 3YR Moving Average

CountywideTotal Lane

Miles

Total Centerline

MilesExcellent Very Good Good Fair At Risk Poor Failed Arterial Collector Residential Network

2016 Network

PCI

Change, 2016 to

20172015 2016 2017

Alameda 8,143 3,619 14% 26% 18% 12% 8% 16% 6% 74 67 64 68 69 -1 68 68 68Contra Costa 7,159 3,418 13% 29% 21% 13% 9% 12% 3% 76 72 69 71 70 1 69 70 70Marin 2,063 1,037 14% 20% 17% 12% 13% 18% 5% 71 66 66 67 66 1 64 65 66Napa 1,523 745 13% 13% 10% 11% 9% 29% 15% 72 61 52 58 59 -1 59 59 59San Francisco 2,142 943 24% 25% 17% 12% 9% 10% 2% 74 71 74 74 69 5 67 68 70San Mateo 3,901 1,861 13% 27% 27% 13% 6% 10% 5% 74 74 71 72 72 0 70 71 72Santa Clara 10,000 4,478 15% 21% 20% 17% 13% 12% 2% 76 71 67 70 68 2 68 68 68Solano 3,535 1,656 10% 30% 20% 10% 7% 13% 9% 73 70 65 67 67 0 65 66 67Sonoma 4,908 2,365 10% 13% 12% 7% 8% 24% 26% 73 63 44 53 56 -3 55 55 55Bay Area 43,374 20,122 13% 24% 19% 13% 9% 15% 7% 74 69 64 67 67 0 66 67 67

Updated 2018-05-24


17

MTC FY 2017‐18 Local Federal‐Aid Obligation PlanProject List Total Total Remaining

Obligations Programmed BalanceCounty Local Agency TIP ID FMS ID Unique ID Program Fund Source FPN Phase Project Title Latest Action Latest Action Oblig/Alloc 59% 100% 41%

Status Date Deadline $195,099,732 $328,842,779 $133,743,047County Sponsor TIP ID FMS ID Unique ID Program Fund Source FPN Phase Project Title Latest Action Action Date Deadline Oblig Amount Total Balance

May 30, 2018

San Francisco SFMTA SF‐070004 2292 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐TPI‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ FTACML‐6328(086) FTA TPI ‐ SFMTA: Geary Blvd Bus Rapid Transit Transferred 27‐Feb‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $5,618,681 $5,618,681 $0San Francisco Caltrain SF‐010028 2218 CMAQ‐T4‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG 2 CMAQ FTACML‐6170(036) FTA Caltrain Electrification Transferred 4‐May‐2018 31‐Jan‐2019 $11,188,000 $11,188,000 $0San Mateo Caltrans SM‐150017 6205 EARMARK‐T5‐RE EARMARK EARMARK‐RE FERPL‐6204(125) PE San Mateo US 101 Managed Lanes Obligated 8‐Jan‐2018 30‐Jan‐2019 $48,440 $48,440 $0San Mateo East Palo Alto SM‐070004 2563 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ HPLUL‐5438(011) CON Bay Rd Bicycle/Ped Imps Obligated 2‐Mar‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0San Mateo Redwood City SM‐130022 5787 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5029(035) CON Middlefield Road Bicycle / Ped Obligated 27‐Feb‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $1,752,000 $1,752,000 $0San Mateo SamTrans SM‐170008 6494 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐TPI‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ FTACML‐6014(019) FTA TPI ‐ SAMTrans: El Camino Real Signal Priority Transferred 24‐Jan‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $3,459,000 $3,459,000 $0San Mateo San Bruno SM‐130019 5788 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5226(022) CON San Bruno Ave Street Medians Obligated 15‐Dec‐2017 31‐Jan‐2018 $735,000 $735,000 $0San Mateo San Mateo (City) SM‐150016 6258 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐CIP‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5102(048) CON Downtown San Mateo Parking Technology Impl. Obligated 8‐Nov‐2017 31‐Jan‐2018 $1,385,000 $1,385,000 $0San Mateo San Mateo (City) SM‐150016 6258 CMAQ‐T4‐1‐CII Cycle 1 CMAQ CML‐5102(048) CON Downtown San Mateo Parking Technology Obligated 31‐Jan‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $500,000 $500,000 $0San Mateo San Mateo County SM‐170012 6675 STP‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO‐FAS OBAG 2 STP STPL‐5935(078) PE Canada Road and Edgewood Road Resurfacing Obligated 3‐Apr‐2018 31‐Jan‐2019 $90,000 $90,000 $0San Mateo SMCCAG SM‐110022 4919 CMAQ‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO‐SRTS OBAG 2 CMAQ CMLNI‐6419(027) CON San Mateo SR2S Program ‐ OBAG 2 Obligated 18‐Oct‐2017 31‐Jan‐2018 $2,394,000 $2,394,000 $0San Mateo SMCCAG SM‐110022 4919 CMAQ‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG 2 CMAQ CMLNI‐6419(027) CON San Mateo SR2S Program ‐ OBAG2 Supplemental Obligated 18‐Oct‐2017 31‐Jan‐2018 $223,000 $223,000 $0San Mateo SMCCAG SM‐110022 4919 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐RSRTS‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ CMLNI‐6419(027) CON San Mateo SR2S Program ‐ OBAG1 Supplemental Obligated 11‐Jan‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $225,000 $225,000 $0San Mateo South San Francisco SM‐130003 5677 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5177(035) CON SSF Citywide Sidewalk Gap Closure Obligated 18‐Oct‐2017 31‐Jan‐2018 $356,982 $357,000 $18San Mateo South San Francisco SM‐130030 6009 0648F RTIP RTIP‐FED ACNH‐P082(028) CON SSF Grand Blvd Initiative: Kaiser Way to McLellan Advance Construction 16‐Mar‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $1,991,000 $1,991,000Santa Clara Los Altos SCL170034 6700 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐RSRTS‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5309(018) CON Miramonte Ave Bike Ped Access Imps Phase 1 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000Santa Clara Palo Alto SCL130034 5886 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐RSRTS‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5100(023) CON Arastradero Road Schoolscape/Multiuse Obligated 21‐Dec‐2017 31‐Jan‐2018 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0Santa Clara San Jose VAR110007 6509 H8‐04‐021 HSIP 8 HSIP HSIPL‐5005(149) PE Senter Road Improvement Project H8‐04‐021 Obligated 17‐Nov‐2017 30‐Sep‐2017 $679,230 $679,230 $0Santa Clara San Jose VAR110007 6513 H8‐04‐022 HSIP 8 HSIP HSIPL‐5005(150) PE White Road Improvement Project H8‐04‐022 Obligated 18‐Oct‐2017 30‐Sep‐2017 $218,430 $218,430 $0Santa Clara San Jose SCL130004 5772 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ ‐5005() CON San Jose ‐ Meridian Bike/Ped 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $1,150,000 $1,150,000Santa Clara San Jose SCL130016 5811 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5005(145) CON East San Jose Bikeways ON HOLD 1‐May‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000Santa Clara Santa Clara County SCL130037 5837 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ STPL‐5937(196) CON Capitol Expressway ITS and Bike/Ped Imp 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $24,943 $24,943Santa Clara Santa Clara County SCL130037 5837 STP‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 STP STPL‐5937(196) CON Capitol Expressway ITS and Bike/Ped Imp 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $769,833 $769,833Santa Clara Saratoga SCL130027 5889 STP‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 STP STPL‐5332(023) CON Saratoga Village Sidewalk Rehabilitation Obligated 10‐Jan‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $162,000 $162,000 $0Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL130029 5899 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5213(051) CON Fair Oaks Avenue Bikeway Obligated 28‐Feb‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $571,000 $571,000 $0Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL130029 5899 STP‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 STP CML‐5213(051) CON Fair Oaks Avenue Bikeway Obligated 28‐Feb‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $241,300 $241,300 $0Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL130028 5898 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5213(054) CON Sunnyvale/Saratoga Traffic Signal, Obligated 18‐Oct‐2017 31‐Jan‐2018 $524,000 $524,000 $0Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL130030 5900 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5213(057) CON Maude Avenue Bikeway and Streetscape Obligated 5‐Dec‐2017 31‐Jan‐2018 $918,065 $918,065 $0Santa Clara VTA SCL170012 6501 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐TPI‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ FTACML‐6264(080) FTA TPI ‐ VTA: Santa Clara Pocket Track Light Rail Transferred 30‐Jan‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $500,000 $500,000 $0Santa Clara VTA SCL110125 5662 STP‐T4‐2‐PDA‐CO OBAG 1 STP FTASTPL‐6264(081) FTA VTA: Local PDA Planning ‐ Diridon Master Plan Transferred 24‐Jan‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $492,508 $492,508 $0Santa Clara VTA SCL130040 5902 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ FTACML‐6264(082) FTA Montague Expwy Ped Bridge at Milpitas BART Transferred 21‐Feb‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $3,440,000 $3,440,000 $0Santa Clara VTA TBD TBD CMAQ‐T4‐2‐RSRTS‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ ‐6264() CON Santa Clara SRTS ‐ OBAG 1 Supplemental Not in TIP Yet Not in TIP 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $346,000 $346,000Santa Clara VTA SCL150001 6045 0521C RTIP RTIP‐FED ‐6264() PSE I‐680 Soundwalls ‐ Capitol Expwy to Mueller Ave CTC Ext‐Pending 28‐Jun‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $731,000 $731,000Solano Fairfield SOL110041 5620 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐TCP‐TPI‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ FTACML‐5132(048) FTA TPI ‐ Solano Express Vehicle Replacement ON HOLD 11‐Apr‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $333,719 $333,719Solano Fairfield SOL110041 5620 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐TPI‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ FTACML‐5132(048) FTA TPI ‐ Solano Express Vehicle Replacement ON HOLD 11‐Apr‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000Solano Solano County SOL090015 4582 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG OBAG 1 CMAQ ‐5923() PE Redwood‐Fairgrounds Dr Interchange Imps 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $94,000 $94,000Solano Vallejo SOL150004 6270 2230B ATP‐REG ATP‐FED ATPL‐5030(062) CON STA SR2S Infrastructure & Non‐infrastructure CTC Extension Approved 17‐May‐2018 31‐Mar‐2019 $0 $2,542,000 $2,542,000Solano Vallejo VAR170012 6398 23C0152 HBP‐Seismic Bridge STPLZ‐5030(056) CON Sacramento Street over US Navy RR PAST DUE PAST DUE 28‐Feb‐2018 $0 $5,994,366 $5,994,366Solano Vallejo SOL110037 5582 HSIP5‐04‐031 HSIP 5 HSIP HSIPL‐5030(057) CON Sonoma Blvd Imps: Road diet and add bike lanes PAST DUE PAST DUE 30‐Apr‐2018 $0 $259,640 $259,640Sonoma Caltrans SON070004 3372 STP‐T5‐OBAG2‐REG‐PCA OBAG 2 STP FERPL16‐6204(127) CON US 101 Marin/Sonoma Narrows (Sonoma) Obligated 13‐Dec‐2017 31‐Jan‐2018 $13,000,000 $13,000,000 $0Sonoma Caltrans SON070004 3372 EARMARK‐T5‐RE EARMARK EARMARK‐RE FERPL16‐6204(127) CON US 101 Marin/Sonoma Narrows (Sonoma) Obligated 6‐Feb‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $0Sonoma Cloverdale SON130016 5839 STP‐T4‐2‐OBAG OBAG 1 STP STPL‐5039(023) CON Sidewalks and add Class II bike lanes Delayed Carryover Delayed from FY 17 31‐Jan‐2017 $0 $100,000 $100,000Sonoma Petaluma VAR110007 5576 HSIP5‐04‐014 HSIP 5 HSIP HSIPL‐5022(054) CON Intersection channelization; install raised median Obligated 2‐Apr‐2018 30‐Apr‐2018 $187,800 $187,800 $0Sonoma Santa Rosa SON170012 6614 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5028() PE US 101 Bike/Ped Overcrossing 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $364,000 $364,000Sonoma Santa Rosa CityBus SON030012 3329 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐TPI‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ FTACML‐5028(079) FTA TPI ‐ Santa Rosa CityBus: Enhancements Transferred 24‐Jan‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $411,000 $411,000 $0Sonoma Santa Rosa CityBus SON150019 6308 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐TCP‐TPI‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ FTACML‐5028(080) FTA TPI ‐ Santa Rosa CityBus: Reimagining CityBus Transferred 24‐Jan‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $525,787 $525,787 $0Sonoma SCTA SON170009 6505 STP‐T4‐2‐OBAG OBAG 1 STP CMLNI‐6364(021) CON Sonoma SRTS ‐ OBAG 1 Obligated 16‐Mar‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $50,000 $50,000 $0Sonoma SCTA SON170009 6505 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐RSRTS‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ CMLNI‐6364(021) CON Sonoma SRTS ‐ OBAG 1 Supplemental Obligated 16‐Mar‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $345,000 $345,000 $0Sonoma SCTA SON170009 6505 CMAQ‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO‐SRTS OBAG 2 CMAQ CMLNI‐6364(021) CON Sonoma SRTS ‐ OBAG 2 Obligated 16‐Mar‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $1,655,000 $1,655,000 $0

18

MTC FY 2017‐18 Local Federal‐Aid Obligation PlanProject List Total Total Remaining


Status Date Deadline $195,099,732 $328,842,779 $133,743,047County Sponsor TIP ID FMS ID Unique ID Program Fund Source FPN Phase Project Title Latest Action Action Date Deadline Oblig Amount Total Balance

May 30, 2018

Sonoma Sonoma County VAR170012 5253 20C0262 HBP‐Seismic Bridge STPLZ‐5920(059) CON Boyes Blvd over Sonoma Creek PAST DUE 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $4,488,471 $4,488,471Sonoma Sonoma County VAR170012 ‐None‐ 20C0017 HBP‐Seismic Bridge BRLS‐5920(092) ROW/CON Watmaugh Road over Sonoma Creek PAST DUE 30‐Jun‐2018 $0 $4,559,295 $4,559,295Sonoma Sonoma County VAR170012 5251 20C0018 HBP‐Seismic Bridge STPLZ‐5920(135) ROW/CON Bohemian Hwy over Russian River PAST DUE 1‐Nov‐2021 $0 $15,027,082 $15,027,082Sonoma Sonoma County VAR170012 5242 20C0155 HBP‐Seismic Bridge STPLZ‐5920(137) PE Wohler Road over Russian River Obligated 4‐May‐2018 30‐Sep‐2018 $900,000 $900,000 $0Sonoma Sonoma County VAR170012 5242 20C0155 HBP‐Seismic Bridge STPLZ‐5920(137) CON Wohler Road over Russian River PAST DUE 30‐Sep‐2018 $0 $3,718,260 $3,718,260

$195,099,732 $328,842,779 $133,743,047J:\PROJECT\Funding\T5‐FAST\STP‐CMAQ\Obligations and Delivery\Monthly Delivery Status Updates\[MTC FY 2017‐18 Obligation Status.xlsx]FFY 2017‐18 May 31

19

LSRPDWG Item 4B

TO: Joint Partnership Working Group DATE: June 12, 2018

FR: Ross McKeown; John Saelee

RE: FY 2018-19 Preliminary Annual Obligation plan for FHWA-funded projects

The regional project delivery policy (MTC Resolution 3606) establishes certain deadlines and requirements for agencies accepting Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funding and including these funds in the federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The intent of the regional funding delivery policy is to ensure implementing agencies do not lose any funds due to missing a federal or state funding deadline, while providing maximum flexibility in delivering transportation projects. It is also intended to assist the region in managing Obligation Authority (OA) and meeting federal financial constraint requirements. MTC has purposefully established regional deadlines in advance of state and federal funding deadlines to allow implementing agencies, Bay Area County Transportation Agencies BACTAs), transit operators, Caltrans, and MTC to resolve project delivery issues before losing funds due to a missed funding deadline.

One of the most important features of the delivery policy, and a key to the success of on-time delivery, is development and implementation of the annual obligation plan which identifies the projects that will be delivered in the federal fiscal year. Regional discretionary funding, as well as other FHWA funds programmed in the TIP, must meet the Obligation/FTA Transfer/E-76/Authorization deadline established in the Policy and as identified in the Obligation plan. This ensures federal funds are being used in a timely manner, and funds are not lost to the region.

The annual obligation plan is finalized by October 1 of each year and includes the FHWA-funded local projects to be delivered that federal fiscal year. Projects included in the plan must have funds obligated by FHWA or transferred to FTA by the obligation/FTA transfer deadline of January 31, 2019. State and federal funds requiring an allocation by the CTC must be allocated by January 31, 2019.

Attached for action and consideration are the proposed updated annual obligation plan requirements; preliminary FFY 2018-9 Annual Obligation Plan; and listing of OBAG 2 projects agencies may choose from to delivery in FFY 2018-19. Sponsors wishing to deliver their OBAG STP/CMAQ funded projects in FY 2018-19 must have their Single Point of Contact (SPOC) contact the applicable Bay Area County Transportation Agency staff and John Saelee of MTC at [email protected] by the end of August to have their project added to the delivery plan.

Revisions to the attached FFY 2018-19 Annual Obligation Plan Requirements document are marked in bold underscore and include the following:

• Emphasizes that the project sponsor Single Point Of Contact (SPOC) is responsible forsubmitting a request to the appropriate BACTA and MTC staff for including an OBAGSTP/CMAQ funded project in the delivery plan;

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership Joint LSRPDWG\_2018 Joint LSRPDWG\18_LSRPDWG Memos\03_Jun 12 18_Packet\04B.0_MTC FFY 2018-19 Annual Obligation Plan Development Memo.docx

20

http://www.mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/MTC_Res_3606.pdf


LSRPDWG Item 4B

• Updates HSIP project deadlines;• Provides consequences for project sponsors missing ATP and SB1 reporting and

accountability deadlines;• Emphasizes/strengthens the regional CTC allocation deadline of January 31;• Provides consequences for projects sponsors missing a CTC deadline and needing an

extension from the CTC;• Adds Local Bridge Seismic projects to the list to be monitored and included in the plan• Emphasizes/strengthens invoicing/reimbursement deadlines to minimize Inactive

Obligation;• Highlights the upcoming FAST Act rescission at the end of FY 2018-19.

Additional information can be found in the regional project-funding delivery policy MTC Resolution 3606 https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/MTC_Res_3606.pdf

Questions on the plan development and current status of projects can be directed to: John Saelee at (415) 778-6711 or [email protected] or to Ross McKeown at 415-778-5242 or [email protected]

Attachment: Proposed FY 2018-19 Annual Obligation Plan Requirements Attachment: Initial Draft FY 2018-19 Annual Obligation Plan Attachment: Universe of OBAG 2 projects in the 2017 TIP that agencies may choose from to deliver in FFY 2018-19

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership Joint LSRPDWG\_2018 Joint LSRPDWG\18_LSRPDWG Memos\03_Jun 12 18_Packet\04B.0_MTC FFY 2018-19 Annual Obligation Plan Development Memo.docx

21

https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/MTC_Res_3606.pdf

https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/MTC_Res_3606.pdf


mailto:rmckeown@

Annual Obligation Plan Requirements FY 2018-19

Metropolitan Transportation Commission 1 May 31, 2018

Background The regional project delivery policy (MTC Resolution 3606) establishes certain deadlines and requirements for agencies accepting Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funding and including these funds in the federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The intent of the regional funding delivery policy is to ensure implementing agencies do not lose any funds due to missing a federal or state funding deadline, while providing maximum flexibility in delivering transportation projects. It is also intended to assist the region in managing Obligation Authority (OA) and meeting federal financial constraint requirements. MTC has purposefully established regional deadlines in advance of state and federal funding deadlines to provide the opportunity for implementing agencies, Bay Area County Transportation Agencies (BACTAs), Caltrans, and MTC to solve potential project delivery issues and bring projects back in-line in advance of losing funds due to a missed funding deadline. The policy is also intended to assist in project delivery, and ensure funds are used in a timely manner.

As the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the agency serving as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for the nine-counties of the San Francisco Bay Area, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is responsible for various funding and programming requirements, including, but not limited to: development and submittal of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP); managing and administering the federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and project selection for designated federal funds (referred collectively as ‘Regional Discretionary Funding’); As a result of the responsibility to administer these funding programs, the region has established various deadlines for the delivery of regional discretionary funds including the regional Surface Transportation Program (STP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program, regional Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) and Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) to ensure timely project delivery against state and federal funding deadlines. MTC Resolution 3606 establishes standard guidance and policy for enforcing project funding deadlines for these and other FHWA-administered federal funds

One of the most important features of the delivery policy, and a key to the success of on-time delivery, is the obligation deadline. Regional discretionary funding, as well as other FHWA funds in the TIP, must meet the Obligation/E-76/Authorization deadline established in the Policy. This ensures federal funds are being used in a timely manner, and funds are not lost to the region.

FY 2015-16 Delivery Status In 2014, the regional obligation deadline was changed from March 31 to January 31 for projects listed in the FY 2015-16 annual obligation plan. Although FY 2015-16 was a transition year (meaning unobligated funds will not be redirected to other projects until after March 31) it was still expected that project sponsors would meet the new obligation deadline. However, the delivery rate was not as good as hoped. As of January 31 less than 30% of the targeted STP/CMAQ OA had been obligated. In examining the low delivery rate, MTC staff noticed many projects were not ready to proceed when placed in the FY 2015-16 Annual Obligation Plan, and therefore many project sponsors were unable to meet the November 1 Request for Authorization (RFA) deadline, even though the annual obligation plan was made final only a month earlier.

LSRPDWG Item 4B - Attachment 1

22



FY 2016-17 Delivery Status The delivery rate for FY 2016-17 improved over FY 2015-16. As of January 31, 2017 45% of the targeted STP/CMAQ OA had been obligated, compared with 30% in 2016. By March 31, 2017 115% of the STP/CMAQ OA had been delivered. However, the goal is still to have 100% OA delivery by January 31, so that projects may capture favorable bids and proceed to construction over the summer construction season.

FY 2017-18 Delivery Status The delivery rate for FY 2017-18 improved over FY 2015-16 and FY 2016-17. As of January 31, 2018, 75% of the targeted STP/CMAQ OA had been obligated, compared with 30% in 2016 and 45% in 2017. By March 31, 2018 112% of the STP/CMAQ OA had been delivered. However, the goal is still to have 100% OA delivery by January 31 so that projects may capture favorable bids and proceed to construction over the summer construction season.

Increased Importance of Annual Obligation Plan In recent years other regions and the state-managed local programs have improved upon their own annual delivery rate, and the region is once again hitting apportionment limits prior to the end of the fiscal year. These factors are reducing the flexibility the region has in advancing funds and allowing projects to move forward when ready. As a result, the annual obligation plan is becoming increasingly important to prioritize the funding available for projects to be delivered in a given year. It is anticipated that moving forward, the obligation plan will become a more vital tool in managing the delivery of FHWA-funded projects each year

Proposed Annual Obligation Plan Conditions and Requirements To address the issues of projects being included in the annual obligation plan that are not yet ready to proceed, and to better manage the availability of funds (primarily STP/CMAQ) for projects that are ready for delivery, and to facilitate timely project delivery within the region, MTC staff is proposing certain conditions and requirements for projects to be included the Annual Obligation Plan as outlined in Attachment 1. The obligation plan will serve to prioritize delivery of FHWA-funded projects, and assist Caltrans Local Assistance in managing its workload for the federal fiscal year.

FY 2018-19 Annual Obligation Plan Schedule The schedule for development and implementation of the FY 2017-18 Annual Obligation Plan is as follows:

May/June 2018 Projects with known delivery deadlines in FY 2018-19 released for review June/July 2018 Draft Plan reviewed by partnership working groups June/July/Aug 2018 SPOCs submit requests to include STP/CMAQ projects in Obligation Plan September 2018 Proposed Final Plan reviewed by partnership working groups October 1, 2018 FY 2018-19 Obligation Plan finalized and submitted to Caltrans November 1, 2018 Request for Authorization (RFA) submitted to Caltrans January 31, 2019 Obligation deadline for funds in Annual Obligation Plan February 1, 2019 Unused Obligation Authority available first-come first-served

23



Annual Obligation Plan Conditions and Requirements To facilitate timely project delivery within the region, the following proposed conditions and requirements must be met for projects to be included in the Annual Obligation. The obligation plan will serve to prioritize delivery of FHWA-funded projects for the federal fiscal year.

Projects automatically included in PlanTo the extent known, projects with required federal/state funding delivery deadlineswithin the fiscal year will be added to the annual plan. These include but are not limitedto STIP, ATP, HSIP and Local Bridge Seismic projects. It is the responsibility of theSingle Point of Contact (SPOC) to ensure the Plan includes all projects from their agencythat have delivery deadlines within the fiscal year

SPOC InvolvementRequests for OBAG STP/CMAQ projects to be included in the annual obligation plan mustcome from the Single Point of Contact (SPOC) for that agency. This ensures the SPOC isaware of the federal-aid projects to be delivered that year, and to be available to assist theProject Manager(s) through the federal-aid delivery process. In addition, subsequentcommunication to MTC or applicable BACTA regarding potential delays or missed deadlinesof any project in the annual obligation plan must include the SPOC. To add a project to theplan, email the request to the applicable Bay Area County Transportation Agency staffand to John Saelee of MTC at [email protected]

Missed Past Delivery DeadlinesFor project sponsors that have missed delivery deadlines within the past year, the agencymust prepare and submit a delivery status report on major delivery milestones for allfederally active projects with FHWA-administered funds, and all projects with FHWA-administered funds programmed in the current TIP, before their OBAG 2 project(s) areadded to the annual obligation plan. Furthermore, once projects for such agencies areaccepted in the final obligation Plan, the Single Point of Contact (SPOC) for the agencymust report monthly to the applicable BACTA and MTC staff on the status of all agencyproject(s) in the annual obligation plan, until the funds are obligated/authorized. TheFHWA-Funded Projects Status report template is located at:http://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/Template_FHWA_Funded_Projects_Status.xlsx

Field ReviewFor the PE phase of a project to be included in the draft plan, a field review must be scheduledto occur by June 30. To remain in the final plan the field review and related/requireddocumentation, including the Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) if applicable, mustbe completed and accepted/signed off by Caltrans by September 30.

For the Right Of Way or Construction phase of a project to be included in the draft Annual Obligation Plan, the project must have undergone a field review with Caltrans AND all field review related/required documentation, including the Preliminary

24



Environmental Study (PES) ) if applicable, submitted, signed and accepted by Caltrans by June 30. This does not apply to projects for which Caltrans does not conduct a field review, such as FTA transfers, planning activities and most non-infrastructure projects.

HSIP Delivery RequirementsBecause of the importance of timely delivery of safety projects, the following applies toagencies with Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) projects programmed in thefederal TIP.

For project sponsors with HSIP funds in the PE phase of a project: A complete and accurate Request for Authorization (RFA) must be submitted to Caltrans for the PE phase of all of the agency’s HSIP project(s) prior to any OBAG 2 STP/CMAQ project being added to the Annual Obligation Plan for that agency. The Caltrans-managed HSIP program has an obligation deadline for the PE phase of September 30. To meet this deadline, sponsors must have a field review (with all requireddocumentation including the Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) if applicable, accepted by Caltrans) and submit the RFA for PE by June 30.

For project sponsors with HSIP funds in the CON phase of a project: A complete and accurate Request for Authorization (RFA) must be submitted to Caltrans for the CON phase of all of the agency’s HSIP project(s) subject to the delivery deadlines noted below, prior to any OBAG 2 STP/CMAQ project being added to the Annual Obligation Plan for that agency.

HSIP Deadlines for purposes of the Annual Obligation plan are outlined below: Unless a later date is identified in the Caltrans HSIP Project Listing at the following link: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/HSIP/delivery_status.htm)

Cycle 5 HSIP program: PE Authorization: All PE phases have been submitted and authorized CON Authorization: PAST DUE (one remaining project)

Cycle 6 HSIP program: PE Authorization: All PE phases have been submitted and authorized CON Authorization: March 31, 2019 (RFA due Jan 31, 2019) (one remaining

project)

Cycle 7 HSIP program: PE Authorization: All PE phases have been submitted and authorized CON Authorization: December 31, 2018 (RFA due October 31, 2018) CON Authorization: June 30, 2019 (RFA due April 30, 2018) (NOTE: Caltrans has provided a CON authorization date of June 30, 2019 for some Cycle 7 HSIP projects. See Caltrans’ HSIP Project Listing for HSIP

25



obligation deadlines at the following link: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/HSIP/delivery_status.htm)

Cycle 8 HSIP program: PE Authorization: All PE phases have been submitted and authorized CON Authorization: December 31, 2019 (RFA due November 1, 2019)

Cycle 9 HSIP program (Pending): PE Authorization: September 30, 2019 (RFA due May 30, 2019) CON Authorization: December 31, 2021 (RFA due October 31, 2021)

Waiver request for unforeseen project delays: A jurisdiction that has been proceeding with a project in good faith and has encountered unforeseen delays may request special consideration. A sponsor may be allowed to add projects into the annual obligation plan even if it has an outstanding project delay, if Caltrans Local Assistance, MTC and the applicable BACTA reach consensus that the delay was unforeseen, beyond the control of the project sponsor, and not a repeated occurrence for the agency. NOTE: Poor project management is not considered an unforeseen delay.

OBAG 2 RequirementsProjects funded in the One Bay Area Grant 2 Program (OBAG 2) will not be included inthe annual obligation plan until the project sponsor has met applicable OBAG 2requirements, such as submittal of the annual housing element reports to HCD by April 1of each year or fully participating in the statewide local streets and roads needsassessment survey or providing updated information to the Highway PerformanceMonitoring System (HPMS).

Request for Authorization Review PeriodFor purposes of delivery of projects within the annual obligation plan, it is expected thatsponsors schedule at least sixty to ninety days for Caltrans/FHWA review and approval ofthe Request for Authorization (RFA). This is to ensure delivery schedules adequatelyaccount for federal-aid process review.

SPOC ChecklistStarting in 2017, jurisdictions must have the SPOC checklist filled out and on file prior toprojects being included in the annual obligation plan. A new checklist must be filled outwhenever a new SPOC is assigned for that agency.

The following are proposed new Annual Obligation Plan requirements:

ATP and SB1 Reporting and AccountabilityAgencies receiving SB1 and ATP funds are required to report on the status of theprojects on a regular basis. To ensure agencies meet the deadline, MTC expectsreports to be submitted at least 15 days in advance of the CTC deadline. This helps

26



ensure any errors or omissions can be corrected before the reports are due to the CTC/Caltrans. Agencies that miss the reporting/accountability deadline(s) will have OBAG funds subject to re-programming.

CTC AllocationsProjects with funds requiring a CTC allocation, such as STIP, ATP and RMRA (SB1),must receive the CTC allocation by January 31 of the year programmed unlessthere is a special circumstance (such as coordinating the delivery timeline withother fund sources or project schedules) agreed to by the respective Bay AreaCounty Transportation Agency and MTC staff. Sponsors missing the regional CTCallocation deadline are subject to OBAG projects being removed from the AnnualObligation plan and reprogrammed to a later year in the federal TIP, and will havelow-priority for including their OBAG 2 projects in the following annual obligationplan, until the sponsor can demonstrate the ability to meet regional and statedelivery deadlines.

CTC ExtensionsSponsors with projects requiring a CTC extension are subject to OBAG projectsbeing removed from the Annual Obligation plan and reprogrammed to a later yearin the federal TIP, and will have low-priority for including their OBAG 2 projects inthe following annual obligation plan, until the sponsor can demonstrate the abilityto meet regional and state delivery deadlines.

Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program (LBSRP) Delivery RequirementsThe Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port Security Bond Act of2006 (Prop 1B) includes $125 million of state matching funds to complete LBSRP.These funds provide the required local match for right of way and constructionphases of the remaining seismic retrofit work on local bridges. Several projectswithin the program have not yet proceeded to construction – 12 years after votersapproved funding for the program and 24 years after the Northridge Earthquakeand 29 years after the Loma Prieta Earthquake.

Each project in the LBSRP is monitored by Caltrans at the component level for potential scope, cost, and schedule changes to ensure timely delivery of the full scope as approved and adopted. Projects are “locked” by Caltrans for delivery at the beginning of each federal fiscal year (FFY) and local agencies are not allowed to change the schedules. Projects programmed in the current FFY, for which federal funds are not obligated by the end of the FFY, may be removed from the fundable element of the TIP at the discretion of the Caltrans.

Because of the interest of the California Transportation Commission (CTC) with delivery of the remaining projects in the Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program, project sponsors with remaining seismic bridge projects will need to provide MTC and the respective Bay Area County Transportation Agency with updated status reports at least twice a year.

27



Sponsors with seismic bridge projects in the current FFY that do not deliver by the end of the FFY will have low-priority for including their OBAG 2 projects in the next Annual Obligation plan. OBAG 2 funds will only be included if capacity is available after all other requests have been considered, and the agency has demonstrated the ability to meet regional and state delivery deadlines.

As reported to the CTC in March 2018, the following agencies have local seismic bridge projects programmed for delivery in FY 2017-18: Oakland 23rd Ave over UPRR Oakland Leimert Blvd over Sausal Creek Pittsburg North Parkside Drive over Willow Pass SFCTA On east side of Yerba Buena Island, Reconstruct ramps on and off of I-80

Inactive ObligationsFHWA has expressed significant concern regarding inactive project obligations. Atno time are more than 2% of obligated funds to be inactive. The state, and bayarea, are consistently over this maximum threshold. Under federal regulations,FHWA-administered projects must receive an invoice and reimbursement againstfederal funds at least once every 12 months following obligation. Projects thathave not received a reimbursement of federal funds in the previous 12 months areconsidered inactive with the remaining un-reimbursed funds subject to de-obligation by FHWA with no guarantee the funds are available to the projectsponsor.

Caltrans requires project sponsors to submit invoices at least once every 6 monthsfrom the time of obligation (E-76 authorization) to ensure the invoice may beprocessed and the funds reimbursed in time to meet the federal deadline.

To ensure funds are not lost in the region, regional deadlines have beenestablished in advance of state and federal deadlines. Under the regional project-funding delivery Policy (MTC Resolution 3606) project sponsors must submit avalid invoice to Caltrans Local Assistance at least once every 6 months and receive areimbursement at least once every 9 months.

Agencies with projects that have not been invoiced against at least once in theprevious 6 months or have not received a reimbursement within the previous 9months have missed the invoicing/reimbursement deadlines and are subject torestrictions placed on future regional discretionary funds and the programming ofadditional federal funds in the federal TIP until the agency can demonstrate theability to meet regional, state and federal requirements.

Specifically, project sponsors with continued history of missing the Caltrans andregional 6-month invoice submittal deadline and the region’s 9-monthreimbursement deadline are subject to OBAG projects being removed from the

28



Annual Obligation plan and reprogrammed to a later year in the federal TIP, and will have low-priority for including their OBAG 2 projects in the next Annual Obligation plan. OBAG 2 funds will only be included if capacity is available after all other requests have been considered, and the agency has demonstrated the ability to meet regional and state delivery deadlines.

Caltrans updates the inactive project obligation status reports weekly on the Local Assistance Inactive Project Information web page.

FAST Act RescissionThere is a nationwide rescission of over $8 billion based on unobligatedapportionment balances at the end of the FFY 2018-19. To ensure funds are notrescinded within the region, MTC will seek to advance projects from future years tocapture any unused apportionment after the January 31 obligation deadline.Sponsors with projects scheduled for delivery in FY 2018-19 should note thatunused funds after January 31 may be used up more quickly than prior years. Also,sponsors that commit to delivery in FY 18-19 may possibly see their fundsrescinded if other projects cannot be advanced to obligate all the remainingapportionment.

29

MTC DRAFT FY 2018‐19 Local Federal‐Aid Obligation PlanProject List Total Total Remaining


Status Date Deadline $0 $279,968,014 $279,968,014County Sponsor TIP ID FMS ID Unique ID Program Fund Source FPN Phase Project Title Latest Action Action Date Deadline Oblig Amount Total Balance

May 31, 2018

Santa Clara Palo Alto SCL170021 6759 STP‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG2 STP ‐() PE North Ventura Coorindated Area Plan 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $638,000 $638,000Santa Clara San Jose SCL050083 1949 ATP‐REG‐T4‐1‐FED ATP‐REG ATP‐FED ATPL‐5005(146) CON Coyote Creek Trail: Mabury to Empire 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $4,046,000 $4,046,000Santa Clara San Jose SCL130004 5772 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ ‐5005() CON San Jose ‐ Meridian Bike/Ped Delayed Carryover Delayed from FY 18 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $1,150,000 $1,150,000Santa Clara San Jose SCL130016 5811 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG1‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ ‐5005() CON East San Jose Bikeways ON HOLD 1‐May‐2018 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000Santa Clara San Jose REG070009 6261 HSIP7‐04‐022 HSIP 7 HSIP HSIPL‐5005(144) CON McLaughlin Ave Safety Elements HSIP7‐04‐ 31‐Dec‐2018 $0 $2,513,970 $2,513,970Santa Clara Santa Clara County SCL170019 6749 STP‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO‐FAS OBAG2 STP ‐() PE Uvas Road Pavement Rehabilitation 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $140,000 $140,000Santa Clara Santa Clara County SCL170032 6747 STP‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG2 STP ‐() PE McKean Rd. Pavement Rehabilitation 13‐Jan‐2019 $0 $130,000 $130,000Santa Clara Santa Clara County SCL170033 6748 STP‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG2 STP ‐() PE Capitol Expressway Pavement 13‐Jan‐2019 $0 $200,000 $200,000Santa Clara Sunnyvale REG070009 6252 HSIP7‐04‐026 HSIP 7 HSIP HSIPL‐5213(055) CON Intersection of W. Remington and 30‐Jun‐2019 $0 $176,700 $176,700Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL170022 6566 CMAQ‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG2 CMAQ ‐() PE Java Dr. Road Diet and Bike Lanes 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $214,000 $214,000Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL170023 6613 CMAQ‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG2 CMAQ ‐() PE Peery Park "Sense of Place" Improvements 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $1,151,000 $1,151,000Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL170024 6617 CMAQ‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG2 CMAQ ‐() PE East Sunnyvale Ares "Sense of Place" 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $1,306,000 $1,306,000Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL170025 6619 CMAQ‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG2 CMAQ ‐() PE Fair Oaks Avenue Bikeway ‐ Phase 2 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $335,000 $335,000Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL170026 6627 CMAQ‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG2 CMAQ ‐() PE Lawrence Station Area Sidewalks & Bike Facilities 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $214,000 $214,000Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL170027 6632 STP‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG2 STP ‐() PE Sunnyvale Traffic Signal Upgrades/Replacements 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $200,000 $200,000Santa Clara Sunnyvale REG070009 6246 HSIP7‐04‐025 HSIP 7 HSIP HSIPL‐5213(056) CON Intersection of Mathilda Ave and Indio Way 30‐Jun‐2019 $0 $385,200 $385,200Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL170059 6829 ATP‐ST‐T5‐3‐FED ATP‐ST ATP‐FED ATPL‐5213() ENV Sunnyvale Safe Routes to School Improvements 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $56,000 $56,000Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL170059 6829 ATP‐ST‐T5‐3‐FED ATP‐ST ATP‐FED ATPL‐5213() PSE Sunnyvale Safe Routes to School Improvements 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $318,000 $318,000Santa Clara Sunnyvale SCL170059 6829 ATP‐ST‐T5‐3‐FED ATP‐ST ATP‐FED ATPL‐5213() CON Sunnyvale Safe Routes to School Improvements 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $6,000 $6,000Santa Clara VTA SCL090030 4197 RIP‐T5‐18‐ST‐SCL RTIP RTIP‐FED ‐() ROW US 101 Express Lanes ‐ Phase 4 ‐ Civil 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $600,000 $600,000Santa Clara VTA SCL110002 4198 RIP‐T5‐18‐ST‐SCL RTIP RTIP‐FED ‐() ROW US 101 Express Lanes ‐ Phase 3 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $368,000 $368,000Santa Clara VTA SCL110002 4198 RIP‐T5‐18‐ST‐SCL RTIP RTIP‐FED ‐() PSE US 101 Express Lanes ‐ Phase 5 ‐ Civil (APDE) 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $10,589,000 $10,589,000Santa Clara VTA SCL150001 6045 0521C RTIP RTIP‐FED RPSTPL‐6264() PSE I‐680 Soundwalls ‐ Capitol Expwy to Mueller Ave CTC Ext‐Pending 17‐May‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $731,000 $731,000Solano Benicia REG070009 6268 HSIP7‐04‐002 HSIP 7 HSIP HSIPL‐5003(029) CON Military West/West 7th St Intersection 30‐Jun‐2019 $0 $223,380 $223,380Solano Benicia REG070009 6265 HSIP7‐04‐001 HSIP 7 HSIP HSIPL‐5003(030) CON E. 5th St/Vecino St Pedestrian Improvements 30‐Jun‐2019 $0 $365,940 $365,940Solano Fairfield SOL110041 5620 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐TCP‐TPI‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ ‐5132() FTA TPI ‐ Solano Express Vehicle Replacement ON HOLD ‐ at CT‐HQ 11‐Apr‐2018 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $333,719 $333,719Solano Fairfield SOL110041 5620 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐TPI‐REG OBAG 1 CMAQ ‐5132() FTA TPI ‐ Solano Express Vehicle Replacement ON HOLD ‐ at CT‐HQ 11‐Apr‐2018 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000Solano Solano County SOL090015 4582 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG OBAG 1 CMAQ ‐5923() PE Redwood‐Fairgrounds Dr Interchange Imps Delayed Carryover Delayed from FY 18 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $94,000 $94,000Solano Solano County SOL170016 6706 STP‐T5‐OBAG2‐REG‐PCA OBAG2 STP ‐() PE Solano County Farm to Market Phase 3 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $132,000 $132,000Solano Suisun City REG070009 6263 HSIP7‐04‐023 HSIP 7 HSIP HSIPL‐5032(030) CON Sunset Ave/ Walters Rd Improvements 30‐Jun‐2019 $0 $181,800 $181,800Solano Suisun City REG070009 6231 HSIP7‐04‐024 HSIP 7 HSIP HSIPL‐5032(031) CON HSIP7‐04‐024 SR12 Advance Warning 30‐Jun‐2019 $0 $126,000 $126,000Solano Vallejo SOL150004 6270 2230B ATP‐REG ATP‐FED ATPL‐5030(062) CON Vineyard Road Improvements CTC Alloc‐Pending 17‐May‐2018 31‐Jan‐2018 $0 $2,542,000 $2,542,000Solano Vallejo VAR170012 6398 23C0152 HBP‐Seismic Bridge STPLZ‐5030(056) CON Sacramento Street over US Navy RR FY 19 31‐Oct‐2018 $0 $5,994,366 $5,994,366Solano Vallejo SOL110037 5582 HSIP5‐04‐031 HSIP 5 HSIP HSIPL‐5030(057) CON Sonoma Blvd Road diet and add bike lanes PAST DUE PAST DUE 30‐Apr‐2018 $0 $259,640 $259,640Sonoma Cloverdale SON130016 5839 STP‐T4‐2‐OBAG OBAG 1 STP STPL‐5039(023) CON Sidewalks and add Class II bike lanes Delayed Carryover Delayed from FY 17 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $100,000 $100,000Sonoma Petaluma SON170011 6615 STP‐T5‐OBAG2‐CO OBAG2 STP ‐() PE Petaluma Blvd. South Road Diet at E Street 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $286,000 $286,000Sonoma Santa Rosa SON170012 6614 CMAQ‐T4‐2‐OBAG‐CO OBAG 1 CMAQ CML‐5028() PE US 101 Bike/Ped Overcrossing Delayed Carryover Delayed from FY 18 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $364,000 $364,000Sonoma Sonoma County VAR170012 5253 20C0262 HBP‐Seismic Bridge STPLZ‐5920(059) CON Boyes Blvd over Sonoma Creek FY 19 1‐Nov‐2018 $0 $4,488,471 $4,488,471Sonoma Sonoma County VAR170012 ‐None‐ 20C0017 HBP‐Seismic Bridge BRLS‐5920(092) ROW/CON Watmaugh Road over Sonoma Creek FY 22 30‐Jun‐2022 $0 $4,559,295 $4,559,295Sonoma Sonoma County VAR170012 5251 20C0018 HBP‐Seismic Bridge STPLZ‐5920(135) ROW/CON Monte Rio Bohemian Hwy over Russian River FY 25 30‐Jun‐2025 $0 $15,027,082 $15,027,082Sonoma Sonoma County VAR170012 5242 20C0155 HBP‐Seismic Bridge STPLZ‐5920(137) CON Big Wohler Road over Russian River FY 20 1‐Nov‐2019 $0 $3,718,260 $3,718,260Sonoma Sonoma County TA SON070004 3372 STP‐T5‐OBAG2‐REG‐AOM OBAG2 STP ‐() CON US 101 Marin/Sonoma Narrows (Sonoma) 31‐Jan‐2019 $0 $3,400,000 $3,400,000

$0 $279,968,014 $279,968,014J:\PROJECT\Funding\T5‐FAST\STP‐CMAQ\Obligations and Delivery\Annual Obligation Plans\FY 2018‐19\[MTC DRAFT FY 2018‐19 Draft Annual Obligation Plan.xlsx]DRAFT FY 2018‐19 Plan May 31

30

�� !��"#$�� %&�%' �� & �(��'��& �(��)�� & ��& �*�+ %' ��&�� ,�� & �� %�*� �� %�*� ��&�� ,�� '�� &-�� )#.""#/ ��&0�/0��0�� 1./!"""1./!""" 1./!"""23�� -�� # 4�" # 4�"�� ) ��%526�� )#.""�7 ��&0�/0��0�� 1""!"""1""!""" 1""!"""6�� #4�� #4�� ) ��%52�� )#."""� ��&0�/0��0�� &8 1"$79�"1: #!#.$!"""#!#.$!""" #!#.$!"""��&��&&��0 #$4# #$4# �� &2 ��%52�� )#."""� ��&0�/0��0��0&8 ��&8 1"$79�"1: ;!$��!""";!$��!""" ";4".4#. ;!$��!""" ;!$��!"""��&��&&��0 #14#. #14#.�� &2 ��%52&�� )#.""## ��&0�/0��0�� !1;"!"""�!1;"!""" �!1;"!"""&��-��'��2 �"4�# �"4�#�� ) ��%52&�� )#.""## ��&0�/0��0�� $1!"""�$1!""" �$1!"""&��-��'��2 #$4# #$4# �� &2 ��%52��-�� &� < ��)#.""#1 ��&0�/0��0�� #!";/!"""#!";/!""" #!";/!"""��-�� &� <�5� �� # 4�" # 4�"�� ) ��%52�� )#.""#� ��,0�/0��0�� #!7#$!"""#!7#$!""" #!7#$!"""6��-=��#"#��&�� "4�# �"4�#�� &2 ��%52�� )#.""�; ��&0�/0��0�� #!1//!"""#!1//!""" #!1//!"""��&��-��*�5� �� #4�� #4�� ) ��%52�� )#.""�# ��&0�/0��0�� #!# /!"""#!# /!""" #!# /!"""��<��8��&�� "4�# �"4�#�� ) ��%52�� )#.""�/ ��&0�/0��0�2�0&�� /� !"""/� !""" /� !""">�� #4�� #4�� ) &��&��2'�� )#.""�/ ��&0�/0��0�2�0&�� 7#!"""�7#!""" �7#!""">�� #.4#$ #.4#$�� &2 &��&��2'�� )"."""7 ��&0�/0��0�2�0�� ;!7""!""";!7""!""" ;!7""!"""?��#"#�� 4��)� �= #$4# �� ) ��%52�� )"."""7 ��&0�/0��0�2�0�� 2�&8#1�"79#�.: #!"""!"""#!"""!""" #�4#;4#. #!"""!""" #!"""!"""?��#"#�� 4��)� �= #.4#$ #.4#$�� ) ��%52�� )"."""7 ��&0�/0��0�2�0�� 2�&8#1�"79#�.: �!$""!"""�!$""!""" #�4#;4#. �!$""!""" �!$""!"""?��#"#�� 4��)� �= #.4#$ #.4#$�� ) ��%52�� )"."""7 ��&0�/0��0�2�0�� 2�&8#1�"79#�.: #!"""!"""#!"""!""" #�4#;4#. #!"""!""" #!"""!"""?��#"#�� 4��)� �= #.4#$ #.4#$�� ) ��%52�� )"."""7 ��&0�/0��0�2�0&�� 2�&8#1�"79#�.: $!�""!"""$!�""!""" #�4#;4#. $!�""!""" $!�""!"""?��#"#�� 4��)� �= #.4#$ #.4#$�� ) ��%52�� )#.""" ��,0�/0��0��0�� 8)% 1;179"�#: #!1//!"""#!1//!""" ";4#14#$ #!1//!""" #!1//!"""��0��0@�� #.4#$ #.4#$�� ) ��%52�� )#.""�� ,0�/0��0�� /"#!"""/"#!""" /"#!""" �� <�&�� "4�# �"4�#�� ) ��%52�� )#.""#" ��&0�/0��0��0�� ;!#17!""";!#17!""" ;!#17!"""��0�� &�� "4�# �"4�#�� ) ��%52�� )#.""#" ��&0�/0��0��0�� #""!"""#""!""" #""!"""��0�� &�� # 4�" # 4�"�� &2 ��%52�� )#.""#; ��&0�/0��0�� !;7"!"""�!;7"!""" �!;7"!"""��-��*�5� �� "4�# �"4�#�� ) ��%52�� )#.""#; ��&0�/0��0�� 1"!"""�1"!""" �1"!"""��-��*�5� �� #$4# #$4# �� &2 ��%52�� )#.""#7 ��,0�/0��0�� #!#7/!"""#!#7/!""" #!#7/!"""� ��<� �� <��&�� #4�� #4�� ) ��%52�� )#.""#7 ��,0�/0��0�� 117!"""117!""" 117!"""� ��<� �� <��&�� # 4�" # 4�"�� &2 ��%52@�� )#."""# ��,0�/0��0�� !//"!"""�!//"!""" �!//"!"""@�� 4@�� "4�# �"4�#�� ) ��%52@�� )#."""# ��&0�/0��0�� 7/"!"""7/"!""" 7/"!"""@�� 4@�� "4�# �"4�#�� ) ��%52 ;1!/1"!""" .! ;;!""" 77!7 ;!""" #1!$��!""" #!1//!""" #$!7..!""" �1!"#1!"""��

�� #7&��#;��*31

�� !��"#$�� %&�%' �� & �(��'��& �(��)�� & ��& �*�+ %' ��&�� ,�� & �� %�*� �� %�*� ��&�� ,�� '�� &-�� .� �� .��#/""�# ��&0�10��0�2�0�� !"""!"""�!"""!""" �!"""!""" ��3��&� *� ��& �� 4�%0$$" #$5# #$5# .� �� ) ��%.2�� .��#/""�# ��&0�10��0�2�0�� &6)%7"$89�:#; #!"""!"""#!"""!""" "85#75#$ #!"""!""" #!"""!""" ��3��&� *� ��& �� 4�%0$$" #/5#$ #/5#$.� �� ) ��%.2�� .��#/""�: ��&0�10��0�2�0�� 8!"""!"""8!"""!""" 8!"""!""" ��3��&� *� ��& �� 4��0$8 #$5# #$5# .� �� ) ��%.2�� .��#/""�: ��&0�10��0�2�0�� &6 7"$89��$; #!"""!"""#!"""!""" "�5��5#$ #!"""!""" #!"""!""" ��3��&� *� ��& �� 4��0$8 #/5#$ #/5#$.� �� &2 ��%.2�� )" """� ��,0�10��0�� 8""!"""8""!""" 8""!"""�� #$5# #$5# .� �� ) ��%.2 $!"""!""" 8""!""" $!8""!""" �!"""!""" " �!"""!""" 7!8""!""".� �� 4 88#! �#!""" :"�!811!1$ /88!:/7!1$ 1:1!81 !1$ �"$! #/!""" :!:$$!"""##1!1� !"""

�� #8&��#8��*32

Technical Advisory Committee MEETING AGENDA SCTA ......2018/06/28 · 490 Mendocino Ave. #206,...

Documents

Transcript of Technical Advisory Committee MEETING AGENDA SCTA ......2018/06/28 · 490 Mendocino Ave. #206,...