Team PATS Sponsor: PATS Aircraft Contact: Matthew Porter Team Members: Mike Brody Phil Holcombe
description
Transcript of Team PATS Sponsor: PATS Aircraft Contact: Matthew Porter Team Members: Mike Brody Phil Holcombe
Team PATSSponsor: PATS Aircraft
Contact: Matthew Porter
Team Members:Mike Brody
Phil HolcombeAdam KonnekerNick LaRocca
Claire NgengweAdvisor: Dr. Hartman
Metric Target Value(s) Importance JustificationMax Payload ≥ 1000 lbs 1 Project purposeTank Rotation ≥ 360-degrees (one axis) 2 Project purposeReliability ≥ 99.9% uptime 3 Increase revenueCost ≤ 10000 USD 4 Increase revenueDimensions ≤ 12 x 5 x 6 ft (l x w x h) 5 Lean manufacturingAdaptability ≥ 1 Tank Model 6 Lean manufacturingWeight ≤ 500 lbs 7 Easily operableDegrees of Freedom ≥ 1 DOF 8 Easily operableRequired Personnel ≤ 2 workers 9 Easily operable
Concept ProblemsHydraulic Weight, size, costScrew Jacks
size
Pneumatic Weight, size
Concept ProblemsPneumatic CostElectric Motor
Cost, extra weight to lift
Concept ProblemsSuction Cups Requires constant
power connectionToggle Clamps
Strength in 1 direction
Lifting System Clamping System
Rotating System
• Steel frame• Bolted HDPE-lined steel clamps• Pulley lifting system
• Welded Steel
• Interchangeable winch
• 4 ft. stroke
•Locking Casters
• Hand wheel to rotate
• Bolts to hold top and bottom clamps together
• 360° Rotation
• Polyethylene contact surfaces
• Not to be included in prototype
• Steel frame
• Locking casters
• Non-slip surfaces
• Sliding center section for bottom access
• Unnecessary to validate concept
Task CostParts Cost $3,811.0
0Labor Estimate $2,000Training Cost $500Total Cost $6,311.0
0
Prototype Total Cost Implementation Costs
Subsystem CostSteel Frame $1,250.0
0Lifting System $111.00Rotating Mechanism
$969.00
Total Cost $2,330.00
Clamping System Polyethylene Contacts
Steel Frame Subsystem• Validate Design• Minimize Deflection (Less that 1/2" on uprights)
Lifting Subsystem• Lift and lower BBJ tank 4 feet• Adequate winch ergonomics
Rotation Subsystem• Rotates tank manually 360°• Verify location of tank center of gravity• Overall Safety
• Prototype lifted and rotated tank successfully• Clamping system very reliable• Test for center of gravity showed prototype design was off significantly• Winch requires too many rotations (may cause fatigue in operator)• Hand wheel requires too much force to turn (result of center of gravity problem)• Average deflection in uprights was .5”
CG
• Order parts• Machine components• Assemble final design• Train workers in use and safety• Train operators on safe usage and protocol changes• Implement design into manufacturing process
• Change center of gravity on rotation system• Higher quality winch• Taller uprights• Thicker frame tubing• More ergonomic hand wheels
• Pats AircraftMatt PorterCalib JanssenJoe ReinhardtLT • AdvisorDr. Hartman
• Machine ShopSteve Beard Al Lance
• FinancesAnn Connor
Testing Protocols