Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08...

14
Teaching Assistant Teaching Assistant Evaluations Evaluations

Transcript of Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08...

Page 1: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

Teaching Assistant Teaching Assistant EvaluationsEvaluations

Teaching Assistant Teaching Assistant EvaluationsEvaluations

Page 2: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

Pilot Year II• We ‘tried out’ the design during

the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year, 2008-09.

• It will include ALL untenured TA’s (approximately 100) and a sample of tenured TA’s (50) in all 3 instructional divisions.

Page 3: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

What does the contract say?

• ARTICLE IV M. Evaluations – Teaching Assistants 1 – 5, including an Evaluation Form

• (handout)

Page 4: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

THREE ‘TYPES’ OF EVALUATION

• Supervisor Evaluation• Growth Plan• Project Plan

Page 5: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

The ‘RUBRIC’• Handout of the Capital Region

BOCES Teaching Assistant Evaluation Form (5 pages)

Page 6: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

4 Domains of the Rubric

• Planning and Preparation• Classroom Environment• Instructional Environment• Professional Responsibility

– 4 levels of performance (Unsatisfactory, Basic, Proficient, Distinguished) and Not Applicable

Page 7: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

The “Supervisor Evaluation” Form

• The purpose• The frequency• To fill it in entirely, or concentrate

on only a few of the elements?• Where is it filed?

Page 8: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

Using the Supervisor Evaluation Form

• All of the 14 elements are of equal importance

• The document should be as complete as possible

• Use the narrative space to provide context

• This is ONE of the tools and sources of information used to evaluate an individual

Page 9: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

When a TA is Encountering Difficulty

• May wish to use the “TA’s Encountering Difficulty” guidelines (Handout)

• It is NOT required to be written or submitted, however it is advised that if serious or long-standing, a written document be produced and signed by both parties and forwarded to HR

Page 10: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

Resolving Differences of Opinion About Performance

• The TA has the option of writing a rebuttal.

• If the TA refuses to sign, the supervisor so notes, and includes the date.

• Chain of command should be followed.

Page 11: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

Growth Plan

• TA reflects on their practice, and marks each element

• Instead of “Comments”, they write their “Evidence”

• Conversation with supervisor follows• Each writes a section on the last

page

Page 12: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

Growth Plan (continued)

• Starts with TA review of the rubrics and where they think they are performing. The conversation with the supervisor is a ‘jumping off point’ for at least one goal related to the rubric. The goal should relate to an element in the rubric.

• The last page records the area selected for growth and includes the Plan, the Timeline, the Materials, if any, and the Evidence of completion. All growth goals must relate to one of the four areas and at least one of the elements in the rubric.

Page 13: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

Project Plan• An individual or group PROJECT

(handout)• A project is typically an activity,

event, detailed plan or course of action related to the students served.

• Must be agreed to (in writing) early in the year selected

• Whose priority can it be?

Page 14: Teaching Assistant Evaluations. Pilot Year II We ‘tried out’ the design during the 2007-08 school year. Revisions are being made for the second year,

Additional Clarification• No separate Summative Narrative

Evaluation at the end of the year – submit the actual form instead

• Scope of pilot • How will we monitor and evaluate the

pilot this year?• TA’s to be included on the APPR

Committee during the pilot year