Teachers and Students Succeed in the Co-Taught Classroom
Transcript of Teachers and Students Succeed in the Co-Taught Classroom
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Teachers and Students Succeed in the
Co-Taught Classroom
Janet Peeler Student Achievement Specialist
404-202-1284 [email protected]
Draw a Circle Map
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
• In the center circle, write “Co-Teaching”
• Within in the outer circle list all the ways that co-teachers support students
Why are so many people talking about co-teaching?
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
• Teachers want to know how to divide time, resources, & their efforts to effectively address their students’ needs
• Increase in diverse learners in each classroom
• A growing number of teachers agree that two is better than one!
• Students With Disabilities must access the general education curriculum
• A growing body of evidence indicates that collaborating in the classroom increases student achievement
When students are included in a general education setting, they:
• Are members of the same school community as their neighbors and siblings;
• Are placed in chronological age-appropriate grades and classes;
• Are provided support, as needed, in school and community environments; and
• Are actively engaged in learning within the context of the classroom activities.
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
•Have access the Common Core Curriculum •Members of an environment where students with disabilities and other groups of students can achieve academic success •Benefit from the thinking of general education students •Benefit from 2 teachers in the classroom •Are taught by a highly qualified teacher
U. S. Department of Education Standard:
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
90% of Students with Disabilities will be Educated in the General Education Classroom for a Minimum of 80% of the School Day.
Who are the Special Education Students?
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
3 Learning Disabled, average IQ, 2 Speech only, average IQ
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
2 Other Health Impaired average IQ, 1 Emotional Behavior Disorder average IQ, 2 Intellectually Disabled/Autistic
Essential Questions
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
• What are the keys to successful co-teaching?
• What is done before, during and after co-teaching to promote success?
• How do co-teachers differentiate instruction to address the learning needs of all learners?
What are some questions that you have about co-teaching?
How do we define co-teaching?
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
• Co-teaching is a service delivery option • Two or more teachers with equal status
sharing a classroom • Purposeful instruction – both teachers actively
engaged • Takes place in the general education
classroom • Provides opportunities for differentiated
instruction *Individual student needs still must be addressed – co-teaching is not for everyone!
LRE Decision-Making Model
Current Functioning
Discussion of Goals and Objectives
Consideration of supportive services
Placement Options
General Classroom
General Classroom with Supportive Instruction
(paraprofessional, interpreter)
General Classroom with Direct Service
(collaboration, co-teaching)
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Co-Teaching Expertise General Educator
•Content area
•Scope and sequence of curriculum
•Pacing of curriculum
•Georgia Performance Standards
•Knowledge of state testing
•Knowledge of additional resources for the content area
Special Educator
•Specially designed instruction strategies
•Behavior modification techniques
•Identifying specific needs
•Knowledge of the IEP
•Knowledge of special education law
•Monitoring and documenting of student progress
Administrator
•Creating a culture of collaboration
•Scheduling common planning time
•Arranging for professional development
•Limiting the number of special education students in one class
•Observes co-teaching
•Meeting with co-teaching support groups regularly
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Parity of Co-Teachers
• Both teachers’ names are on the board.
• Both teachers’ names are on report cards.
• Both teachers have space for personal belongings.
• Both teachers have similar furniture.
• Both teachers take a lead role in the classroom.
• Both teachers talk during instruction.
• Both teachers give direction or permission without checking with the other teacher.
• Both teachers work with all students.
• Both teachers are considered teachers by all of the students.
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Discuss with a Partner
Which of these descriptors can you and your co-teacher implement in your classroom?
14
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Things to look for in effective co-taught classrooms
• What standards are being taught?
• What models of co-teaching are being implemented?
• What specially designed instruction is taking place?
• What strategies are implemented?
• What is the level of student engagement?
• How is the room arranged?
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Two stages of Classroom Co-Planning
• Getting to know each other
• Weekly co-planning
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Getting to Know Each Other
• Ease into working with one another
• Deal with the “little” things first
• These typically become the deal-breakers down the road, and preventing these road blocks early can make life easier.
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Ground Rules for Co-Teaching
• Meet prior to the start of co-teaching: “Must-Have Conversations” to establish beliefs, roles and responsibilities
• With a partner, discuss how you and your co-teacher can implement the topics on the handout.
• Share with the group
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Provide Weekly Scheduling Co-Planning Time
• Co-teaching teams should set aside a minimum of one scheduling/planning period (45–60 minutes) per week.
• Experienced teams may need less time
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Weekly Co-Planning
• Effective weekly co-planning is based on regularly scheduled meetings, rather than “fitting it in.”
• Important to stay focused
• Review content in advance of meeting
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
What Does Co-Planning Look Like?
Before:
• Curriculum
• Delivery of Instruction
• Student Specific Accommodations
During:
• Progress Monitoring
• Communication
• Adjust Instruction
After:
• Assessment
• Reteaching
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
What does co-planning look like “Before”?
• Curriculum -discuss standards, content, learning outcomes for the lesson / unit
-identify essential concepts / essential questions, big ideas, and skills to be learned
-identify how learning will be assessed
-identify each co-teacher’s strengths and interests relative to the content
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
What does co-planning look like “Before”?
• Delivery of Instruction
-discuss options for delivery of content
-discuss student needs – use the Individual Learning Plan for SWD
-plan for differentiation
-discuss strategies for grouping students – co-teaching models
-divide up tasks and responsibilities to complete lesson preparation
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
What does co-planning look like “Before”?
• Student Specific Accommodations:
-review accommodations on student’s IEPS
-discuss necessary adjustments for specific students
-note individual goals and objectives per student IEPs that will be addressed in this unit/lesson
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Planning for Instruction: “During” Co-Teaching
• Communicate frequently with each other, share feedback
• Monitor student understanding
• Engage in on-going reflection
• Adapt instructional plans as needed
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Important Concepts for Students With Disabilities:
SWD need both instruction on grade level standards and instruction on skills that are below grade level
The IEP should reflect deficit skills that lead to
achievement of grade level standards (not the standard itself)
Differentiated instruction and flexible grouping
in the general education classroom provide opportunities to meet the needs of diverse learners, including students with disabilities
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
What does co-planning look like “After Teaching”?
• Debrief the lesson
• Review student progress
• Arrange for re-teaching as needed
• Assess – tests, projects, formative, summative assessments
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
What is the Planning Process for Providing for Student Success?
• Unwrap the standard
• Examine the assessment data
• Plan for flexible grouping
• Design differentiated activities
• Determine which co-teaching models to use
• Assess student performance and regroup as necessary
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Classroom Case Study ELACC9-10RH3
Analyze in detail a series of events described in a text; determine whether earlier events caused later ones or simply preceded them.
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Unwrapping the Standard • Unit – Big ideas:
– Organizational Structures: logical order, cause & effect relationships, comparison & contrast, transitions
• Unit Essential Question:
– How does understanding a text’s structure help me better understand its meaning ?
• Lesson EQ:
– How does understanding cause/effect relationships help me in organizing information
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Common Formative Pre-assessment Results Student Special
Needs 10/10 Results
Student Special Needs
10/10 Results
Ana 8/10 Marquise 4/10
Andy 10/10 Esperanza ELL 3/10
Jason SWD 3/10 Angelic 9/10
Thomas SWD 4/10 Gilbert ELL 3/10
Carlota 9/10 Habib 9/10
Diego 8/10 Cornelius RTI 2/10
Crystal 7/10 Seth 8/10
Rosanna RTI 1/10 Fazio 6/10
Susan SWD 2/10 Hector 5/10
Dominick SWD 0/10 Marco ELL 4/10
Jose 8/10 Elizabeth SWD 0/10
Katy 7/10 Javier ELL 4/10
Amanda SWD 7/10
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Individual Learning Plan General Ed. Teacher_________________ Special Ed. Teacher__________________ Date____________ Time/Period____________ Class_________________________
Student Learning issues from
Psych./Eligibility Report, PLOP
Weaknesses identified thru
CRCT/GHSGT
IEP Goal Area / Summary of Objectives
Accommodations Recommended strategies
Dominick
Language processing, rdg. comprehension, disorganized
ELA - 745 Math – 756
Weakest in Data Anal & Probesolving, Meas. &
Geom.
Vocab, multiple meanings, reading comp –main idea, sup details,
whQs, interpret graphs, id geometric shapes
Pref. seating, paraphrase directions, repeat directions,
frequent breaks, extended time.
-graphic organizers -Pictionary/dictionary - provide structure for instruction/class setup -Use visuals, demonstrations -Provide more frequent review/reteaching
Amanda
ADHD, focusing & attention, weakest area is math, but also borderline
in reading
ELA – 802 Math – 785
Weakest in Num & Op, also weak in Measurement, Data
Analysis and Probability
Organization Study skills
Math - using strategies to solve problems, word probs, vocab.
Small group, preferential seating, repetition of directions, frequent
breaks, extended time
-provide structure for instruction/class set up -connect learning to real life -use cues to focus attention -use graphic organizers -ask student which strategies work best to focus attention
Jason
Difficulties with visual processing, weak in both
math and reading, difficulty copying from the board, visually loses place
in text
ELA – 780, weakest areas are in comprehension of
written material Math – 756
weakest in computation – but has problems with all strands of Mathematics
standards
Identify main idea & supporting details, follow directions in writing
w/auditory cues, answer comp. Qs, math computation, word
problems, use strategies to solve problems, draw conclusions from
tables and graphs
Preferential seating, small group, paraphrase directions, repeat
directions, use of highlighter by student
-use a template to isolate sections on a page -use highlighters -color code when possible -use pictures, artifacts, and manipulatives -use multisensory approaches to learning -separate items on a worksheet, text, or test
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Discuss with a Partner
• What types of accommodations do your students require?
• How do you and your co-teacher implement the requirements from the IEP in the general education classroom?
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Assignment Organizational Chart Tiered Groups On Grade Level
Meeting standards: Can work on assignment for continued growth
Foundational Below Grade Level: Scaffolding, breaking information into smaller parts, may need previewing
Extension Advanced for a specific skill or standard; going to higher levels of complexity or enrichment
Students Grouped based upon preassessment
Score 4 – 7 on preassessment Thomas (SWD) Diego (ELL) Crystal Katy Amanda (SWD) Marquise Fazio Hector Marco (ELL) Javier (ELL)
Score 0 – 3 on preassessment Jason (SWD) Rosanna (RTI) Susan (SWD) Dominick (SWD) Esperanza (ELL) Gilbert (ELL) Cornelius (RTI) Elizabeth (SWD)
Score 8 – 10 on preassessment Ana Andy Carlota Jose Cassie Habib Seth (SWD)
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Assignment Organizational Chart
On Grade Level Foundational Extension
Critical Questions
Based on a biography of Jackie Robinson
How would you explain the impact of the Emancipation Proclamation on Jackie Robinson’s life?
Can you identify 5 major events that influenced Jackie Robinson’s career?
How would you compare the impact of the Emancipation Proclamation on Jackie Robinson’s life to that of Bill Cosby’s life?
Differentiation Strategies/
Assignments/
Assessments
Tiered Menus and Learning Contracts
Preview vocabulary and important concepts, Scaffolding,
Tiered Menus and Learning Contracts
Tiered Menus and Learning Contracts
Differentiated Instruction: Providing Choice and Varying the Level of Difficulty
• Tic-Tac-Toe Boards: Allow for differentiation by readiness, interest, and learning style, can have a free choice square
• Cubing Template Dice: Provides topics for discussion groups. Groups can have same questions or several different cubes to choose from
• Anchor Activities: Ongoing assignments that students can work on independently throughout the unit
• Menu: Variation of choice boards with more steps
• Tiered Assignments: Assignments designed to develop essential skills by varying complexity, abstractness, number of steps, concreteness
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Flexible Grouping Strategies Co-Teaching Models
Over the course of a unit, the following models are used: ALTERNATIVE TEACHING
◦ Foundational group is pulled to the side to provide a preview of vocabulary and concepts
TEAM TEACHING ◦ to introduce the new unit, ◦ provide some of the new content, ◦ to explain the directions for the Tiered Menu and Learning Contracts
STATION TEACHING ◦ to provide students with more assistance on their assignments ◦ grouped according to their choices from the menu as well as by their Tiered Groups
ALTERNATIVE TEACHING (may be used again)
◦ when assessment indicates that a group needs reteaching, extra practice or direct instruction for extension
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Case Study Questions:
1. Why is it important to look at pre-assessment data and
the Individual Learning Plan when designing instruction?
2. In addition to pre-assessment results, what other factors could be considered for grouping the students? (i.e. group size, other individual characteristics, etc.
3. What is important to consider when designing instruction
for each of the groups: On Grade Level, Foundational, and Extension?
4. What is the difference between specialized instruction and
differentiated instruction?
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
50 Ways to Keep Your Co-Teacher!
• Read over the phrases and select two or three that are most meaningful to you.
• Be prepared to share your thoughts with the group.
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
References
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Austin, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 245–255.
Cook, L. H., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(2), 1–12.
Cook, L. H., & Friend, M. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Dieker, L. (2001). What are the characteristics of “effective” middle and high school co-taught teams? Preventing School Failure, 46, 14–25.
Dieker, L. (2002). Co-planner (semester). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design. Fennick, E. (2001). Co-teaching: An inclusive curriculum for transition. Teaching
Exceptional Children, 33(6), 60–66. Friend, M., & Cook, L. H. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school
professionals (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Gately, S. E. (2005). Two are better than one. Principal Leadership, 5(9), 36–41. Gately, S. E., & Gately, F. J. (2001). Understanding co-teaching components. Teaching
Exceptional Children, 33(4), 40–47. Geen, A. G. (1985). Team teaching in the secondary schools of England and Wales.
Educational Review, 37, 29–38. Hourcade, J. J., & Bauwens, J. (2001). Cooperative teaching: The renewal of teachers.
Clearinghouse, 74, 242–247. Kronberg, R. (2007). Teaming for Student’s Success: Making Differentiation Work in
the Co-Taught Classroom. ASCD Summer Conference 2007.
References, Continued
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Graetz, J. E., Nordland, J., Gardizi, W., & McDuffie, K. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 260–270.
Marzano, R. J. (2007). The Art and Science of Teaching. Alexandria, VA: The Association for Supervison and Curriculum Development.
Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction That Works. Alexandria, VA: The Association for Supervison and Curriculum Development.
Murawski, W. W., & Dieker, L. A. (2008). 50 ways to keep your co-teacher. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(4), 40-–48.
Murawski, W. W. (2005). Addressing diverse needs through co-teaching: Take baby steps! Kappa Delta Pi Record, 41(2), 77–82.
Murawski, W. W., & Dieker, L. A. (2004). Tips and strategies for co-teaching at the secondary level. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(5), 52–58.
Salend, S., Gordon, I., & Lopez-Vona, K. (2002). Evaluating cooperative teams. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37(4), 195–200.
Steele, N., Bell, D., & George, N. (2005, April). Risky business: The art and science of true collaboration. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children’s Annual Conference, Baltimore, MD.
Trump, J. L. (1966). Secondary education tomorrow: Four imperatives for improvement. NASSP Bulletin, 50(309), 87–95.
Walsh, J. M., & Jones, B. (2004). New models of cooperative teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(5), 14–20.
Walther-Thomas, C., Bryant, M., & Land, S. (1996). Planning for effective co-teaching: The key to successful inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 255–265.
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Contact
Janet Peeler
404-202-1284
Student Achievement Consultant
Copyright PFI Global Partners, Inc. www.pfiglobal.com
Need more information?