Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum

8/22/2019 Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum

1/265

Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.9635 Maroon Circle, Suite 120Englewood, Colorado 80112

Phone: 720-963-9200Fax: 720-963-9700

Email: [email protected]

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report

for

Eagle County Re 50 School DistrictAccountability Version

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013


2/265

2013 TCAP Executive Summary ReportEagle County Re 50 School District

Page iReport generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No ScoreNotes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Executive Summary Report

Overview of this Document

This report includes graphic and tabular representations of your 2013 TCAP test results for thedistrict and for schools. It is designed with the following audiences in mind:

School Board Press / Public District and School Accountability Committees District and School Administrative Leadership Team

The Executive Summary Reportis available immediately after the test scores are released todistricts, at a time when the most important questions to answer are:

How does our performance compare to that of the state? How did our performance change this year compared with our performance in prior years? Are the students from various disaggregated groups performing equally well? If not, where arethe gaps?

The Executive Summary Reportaddresses these questions directly. More extensive reports for thedistrict and schools are generated after the state releases additional information in the weeks thatfollow the initial press conference.

Various accountability mandates require data to be reported in several different ways. The data inthis report are presented for all studentsincluding students who eventually will be excluded from theSchool Accountability Reports and/or No Child Left Behind reports. Separate reports are produced

by Alpine based on the specific inclusion and exclusion rules for each of these accountabilitymandates.

The minimum number of students in any given group necessary to generate a graph appears in thelower right corner of each page of this report. This number is set by the district or by the end userdirectly. If you print a report with a minimum of fewer than 10 students, we strongly suggest that younot share it publicly to protect the privacy rights of students.

The accuracy of the information in this report depends upon the accuracy of information in theTCAP/CSAP files and in other documents downloaded from the Colorado Department of Education(CDE) website. Historic achievement data were updated where necessary to reflect the state'srescaling of reading prior to 2001 and writing and math prior to 2002. The records are spot checkedbefore reports are released, but if any school does not appear on this report (e.g., a new school thisyear), or if any result does not make sense, please contact Alpine and we will make any correctionsnecessary.


3/265


Page iiReport generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.


Overall Guiding Questions

This report contains a great deal of information. It is a report you probably will return to regularly asyou share your results with many different audiences in the months ahead.

Look for patterns and trends throughout the report and consider the most important issues facingyour district/school. You should be able to summarize the results for the district or for any school in3-5 descriptive statements. This report is focused on the big picture, not on the details.

Below are some questions to keep in mind as you review your results. Additional questions that arespecific to the interpretation of a particular graph format are shown below sample graphs on the nextseveral pages. The questions below are just a starter list. You will have many more to add.

How well did students in the district/schools perform on the tests overall? Were you pleased

overall with student performance this year? Which grade levels did you think would do well? Did they perform as well as they should have?

In which content areas did you expect the highest performance? What do the data suggest?

In what ways are these data similar to other achievement data you have collected aboutstudents? In what ways are they different?

Which schools showed the most improvement? Which showed the least improvement? Why doyou think this occurred?

What is the good news story from these results?

What was a surprise? What concerns do you have after reviewing these results?

Did you target specific areas for improvement this year? Was there a relationship between yourfocus area and performance? Were there trade offs in other areas?

How might this information guide curriculum and instructional planning decisions in the district?

What factors do you think are related to your performance?

What targets will you set for achievement and/or improvement for next year's tests?

What will you do now?


4/265


Page 1Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.


All Students Totals

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

8 20 66 7 72 0

10 17 66 7 73 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

38 98 322 32 354 1

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Copyright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,

Inc.

Percentage

ofStudents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

8 10

20 17

66 66

7 70 0

U PP P A NS

Eagle County Re 50 Colorado

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

12 20 61 7 68 0

12 17 65 6 71 0

10 22 64 5 69 0

7 19 67 7 74 0

7 20 64 9 74 0

8 20 66 7 72 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

46 78 235 27 262 1

61 83 325 32 357 0

45 102 299 23 322 1

33 91 315 33 348 0

35 104 341 48 389 1

38 98 322 32 354 1

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

68

2009

71

2010

69

2011

74

2012

74

2013

72

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Cop

yright2001-2013AlpineAchievementSystems,

Inc.

Pe

rcentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

72

28

76

24

68

31

X X X

56

44

87

13

X X

30

68

53

47

Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

491

241

250

3

7

3

232

237

1

8

40

189

% Prof. or Above

72

76

68

X

X

X

56

87

X

X

30

53

% Below

28

24

31

X

X

X

44

13

X

X

68

47

% NS

0

0

0

X

X

X

0

0

X

X

3

0


5/265




District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

10 23 63 3 67 0

11 21 63 5 68 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

51 122 332 17 349 1

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading


Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

10 11

23 21

63 63

3 5 0 0

U PP P A NS


District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

11 24 62 3 65 0

14 22 59 5 64 0

9 22 66 3 69 1

6 24 65 4 70 0

7 21 65 6 72 0

10 23 63 3 67 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

46 95 248 12 260 1

57 93 248 21 269 2

44 110 338 15 353 4

28 110 297 20 317 1

35 104 322 32 354 0

51 122 332 17 349 1

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

65

2009

64

2010

69

2011

70

2012

72

2013

67

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

67

33

72

28

63

37

X X X

46

54

88

12

X X 16

84

43

57



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

523

234

289

4

10

3

243

257

0

6

62

219

% Prof. or Above

67

72

63

X

X

X

46

88

X

X

16

43

% Below

33

28

37

X

X

X

54

12

X

X

84

57

% NS

0

0

0

X

X

X

0

0

X

X

0

0


6/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

8 18 65 9 74 1

11 18 62 8 70 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

42 89 329 44 373 3

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

8 1118 18

65 62

9 81 0

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

10 20 60 9 70 0

13 19 63 5 68 0

8 17 65 9 74 0

10 16 66 8 74 0

8 18 63 11 73 0

8 18 65 9 74 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

38 77 230 36 266 0

55 81 270 21 291 2

36 74 274 39 313 1

50 81 329 40 369 1

40 86 297 50 347 0

42 89 329 44 373 3



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

70

2009

68

2010

74

2011

74

2012

73

2013

74



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

74

26

77

22

70

29

X X X

58

41

90

10

X X

27

71

56

43



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

507

243

264

5

1

1

245

249

0

6

52

210

% Prof. or Above

74

77

70

X

X

X

58

90

X

X

27

56

% Below

26

22

29

X

X

X

41

10

X

X

71

43

% NS

1

0

1

X

X

X

1

0

X

X

2

1


7/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

6 14 63 15 79 1

8 18 62 11 73 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

30 66 297 72 369 3

4938 11309 38862 7097 45959 845



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

6 814 18

63 62

1511

1 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

12 23 53 12 65 0

6 22 59 13 72 0

9 15 60 15 75 0

7 15 64 13 78 0

7 16 63 14 77 0

6 14 63 15 79 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

50 94 219 51 270 1

24 87 236 52 288 0

40 66 258 65 323 2

30 66 280 58 338 1

37 79 309 69 378 0

30 66 297 72 369 3



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

65

2009

72

2010

75

2011

78

2012

77

2013

79



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

79

21

83

16

75

25

X X X

64

35

93

7

X X

34

66

60

39



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

468

224

244

1

4

0

230

225

0

8

50

189

% Prof. or Above

79

83

75

X

X

X

64

93

X

X

34

60

% Below

21

16

25

X

X

X

35

7

X

X

66

39

% NS

1

1

0

X

X

X

1

0

X

X

0

1


8/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

9 16 65 9 74 1

11 21 59 9 68 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

44 79 324 46 370 6

6815 13070 36650 5501 42151 359



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

9 1116

21

65 59

9 91 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

15 21 56 7 63 0

12 19 57 12 70 0

6 20 64 10 73 0

10 19 60 11 71 0

11 14 64 11 75 0

9 16 65 9 74 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

57 81 212 26 238 1

48 77 235 50 285 0

25 78 248 37 285 0

43 80 257 46 303 0

49 62 282 48 330 0

44 79 324 46 370 6



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

63

2009

70

2010

73

2011

71

2012

75

2013

74



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

74

25

73

26

76

24

X X X

57

41

92

7

X X 11

87

52

46



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

499

245

254

6

8

4

249

227

0

5

46

209

% Prof. or Above

74

73

76

X

X

X

57

92

X

X

11

52

% Below

25

26

24

X

X

X

41

7

X

X

87

46

% NS

1

2

1

X

X

X

2

1

X

X

2

2


9/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

10 19 62 9 71 0

10 23 59 8 67 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

43 84 273 39 312 2

5882 13891 35960 4891 40851 450



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

10 1019 23

62 59

9 80 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

10 20 61 10 70 0

14 18 61 7 68 0

9 19 63 9 72 0

6 21 62 11 73 0

11 22 59 7 66 1

10 19 62 9 71 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

39 78 241 38 279 0

52 66 222 24 246 0

38 77 261 38 299 2

24 83 249 43 292 1

49 98 263 32 295 3

43 84 273 39 312 2



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

70

2009

68

2010

72

2011

73

2012

66

2013

71



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

71

29

77

23

66

34

X X X

54

45

88

13

X X

8

92

50

49



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

441

199

242

1

6

1

217

208

0

8

38

171

% Prof. or Above

71

77

66

X

X

X

54

88

X

X

8

50

% Below

29

23

34

X

X

X

45

13

X

X

92

49

% NS

0

1

0

X

X

X

1

0

X

X

0

1


10/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

7 23 65 5 69 1

7 24 64 4 68 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

32 101 286 21 307 3

4258 14768 39370 2272 41642 879



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

7 7

23 24

65 64

5 4 1 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

9 31 54 5 58 1

5 25 64 3 67 3

11 22 60 3 63 5

8 21 64 5 69 3

4 22 70 2 72 2

7 23 65 5 69 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

34 116 200 17 217 5

19 99 255 10 265 13

44 91 250 11 261 21

33 90 278 23 301 11

20 98 313 11 324 7

32 101 286 21 307 3



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

58

2009

67

2010

63

2011

69

2012

72

2013

69



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

69

30

74

26

64

35

X X X

53

46

88

11

X X18

80

52

47



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

443

239

204

2

6

4

231

195

0

5

50

208

% Prof. or Above

69

74

64

X

X

X

53

88

X

X

18

52

% Below

30

26

35

X

X

X

46

11

X

X

80

47

% NS

1

0

1

X

X

X

1

1

X

X

2

1


11/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

5 20 64 11 74 1

7 21 59 10 70 2

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

20 85 274 46 320 6

4132 12301 34821 6048 40869 1384



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

5 7

20 21

64 59

11 101 2

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

9 21 60 8 69 1

8 29 56 5 61 2

10 22 57 9 66 3

12 24 56 5 61 3

6 20 62 11 73 1

5 20 64 11 74 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

38 87 248 35 283 5

31 109 213 20 233 6

38 86 225 34 259 10

46 93 213 19 232 12

26 83 259 46 305 3

20 85 274 46 320 6



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

69

2009

61

2010

66

2011

61

2012

73

2013

74



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

74

24

80

20

69

29

X X X

62

36

85

14

X X

33

64

57

40



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

431

203

228

6

4

0

193

221

1

6

39

168

% Prof. or Above

74

80

69

X

X

X

62

85

X

X

33

57

% Below

24

20

29

X

X

X

36

14

X

X

64

40

% NS

1

0

2

X

X

X

2

1

X

X

3

2


12/265




District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

22 17 61 0 61 0

15 20 51 13 64 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

4 3 11 0 11 0

181 234 601 151 752 8

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

2215 17

20

6151

0

13

0 1

U PP P A NS


District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

12 12 70 7 77 0

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

6 19 63 13 75 0

15 20 65 0 65 0

22 17 61 0 61 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

5 5 30 3 33 0

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

1 3 10 2 12 0

3 4 13 0 13 0

4 3 11 0 11 0

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

77

2009

X

2010

X

2011

75

2012

65

2013

61

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

61

39

X X X X X

61

39

X X X X

61

39


Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

18

6

12

0

0

0

18

0

0

0

3

18

% Prof. or Above

61

X

X

X

X

X

61

X

X

X

X

61

% Below

39

X

X

X

X

X

39

X

X

X

X

39

% NS

0

X

X

X

X

X

0

X

X

X

X

0


13/265




District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

District and State

Eagle County Re 50Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

X X X X X X31 33 31 4 35 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

X X X X X X34 36 34 4 38 0

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

X

31

X

33

X

31

X 4 X 0

U PP P A NS


District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

X

2009

X

2010

X

2011

X

2012

X

2013

X

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

X X X X X X X X X X X X


Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

6

0

6

0

0

0

6

0

0

0

0

6

% Prof. or Above

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

% Below

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

% NS

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X


14/265




District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

6 43 45 6 50 0

6 43 43 8 51 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

28 211 218 27 245 2

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing


Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

6 6

43 43 45 43

6 80 0

U PP P A NS


District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

9 43 42 7 49 0

8 41 42 9 51 0

3 47 41 8 49 0

6 37 46 11 57 0

5 45 46 4 50 0

6 43 45 6 50 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

33 165 161 27 188 0

39 206 211 44 255 0

15 223 194 38 232 0

27 176 218 52 270 0

29 236 244 20 264 1

28 211 218 27 245 2

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

49

2009

51

2010

49

2011

57

2012

50

2013

50

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

50

49

59

41

42

57

X X X

35

65

64

35

X X 16

84

35

65


Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

486

239

247

3

7

3

232

235

1

5

38

188

% Prof. or Above

50

59

42

X

X

X

35

64

X

X

16

35

% Below

49

41

57

X

X

X

65

35

X

X

84

65

% NS

0

0

0

X

X

X

0

1

X

X

0

0


15/265




District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

6 42 44 7 51 0

7 39 45 8 53 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

33 221 228 39 267 2

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing


Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

6 7

42 3944 45

7 80 0

U PP P A NS


District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

8 45 40 7 48 0

10 44 40 5 45 0

7 37 45 9 55 1

4 37 48 11 59 0

4 43 47 6 53 0

6 42 44 7 51 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

31 179 161 30 191 1

43 186 169 23 192 1

38 190 232 48 280 3

20 168 219 48 267 1

19 214 230 30 260 0

33 221 228 39 267 2

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

48

2009

45

2010

55

2011

59

2012

53

2013

51

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

51

49

61

39

43

56

X X X

29

70

71

28

X X 10

90

28

72



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

523

234

289

4

10

3

243

257

0

6

62

219

% Prof. or Above

51

61

43

X

X

X

29

71

X

X

10

28

% Below

49

39

56

X

X

X

70

28

X

X

90

72

% NS

0

0

1

X

X

X

0

0

X

X

0

0


16/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

5 36 50 9 58 1

5 37 48 9 57 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

23 183 252 44 296 5

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

5 5

36 37

50 48

9 91 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

4 34 51 11 61 0

6 35 53 6 59 0

3 37 52 7 60 0

3 32 55 10 65 0

4 36 49 11 60 0

5 36 50 9 58 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

16 131 193 41 234 0

25 150 227 25 252 2

14 156 222 31 253 2

17 159 277 48 325 0

18 172 231 51 282 1

23 183 252 44 296 5



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

61

2009

59

2010

60

2011

65

2012

60

2013

58



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

58

41

66

33

51

48

X X X

38

61

79

20

X X 15

83

35

64



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

507

243

264

5

1

1

245

249

0

6

52

210

% Prof. or Above

58

66

51

X

X

X

38

79

X

X

15

35

% Below

41

33

48

X

X

X

61

20

X

X

83

64

% NS

1

1

1

X

X

X

1

1

X

X

2

1


17/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

3 33 55 9 64 1

4 38 49 9 58 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

14 153 258 40 298 3

2629 23740 30751 5578 36329 355



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

3 4

3338

5549

9 91 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

4 36 47 12 59 0

3 31 55 12 66 0

5 31 52 12 63 0

4 28 56 13 68 0

4 35 52 9 61 0

3 33 55 9 64 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

18 151 195 50 245 1

13 122 218 46 264 0

23 134 223 50 273 1

16 121 242 55 297 1

19 172 258 45 303 0

14 153 258 40 298 3



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

59

2009

66

2010

63

2011

68

2012

61

2013

64



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

64

36

75

25

54

46

X X X

45

54

81

18

X X

26

74

42

57



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

468

224

244

1

4

0

230

225

0

8

50

189

% Prof. or Above

64

75

54

X

X

X

45

81

X

X

26

42

% Below

36

25

46

X

X

X

54

18

X

X

74

57

% NS

1

1

0

X

X

X

1

0

X

X

0

1


18/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

2 29 55 13 68 1

3 35 47 15 61 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

11 144 274 64 338 6

1739 21930 29033 9265 38298 431



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

2 3

2935

5547

13 15

1 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

5 39 47 9 56 0

4 30 48 18 66 0

3 30 51 17 68 0

4 29 53 14 67 0

3 29 55 13 68 0

2 29 55 13 68 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

20 147 177 33 210 0

16 123 197 74 271 0

11 115 196 66 262 0

15 125 225 61 286 0

15 128 242 56 298 0

11 144 274 64 338 6



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

56

2009

66

2010

68

2011

67

2012

68

2013

68



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

68

31

70

29

66

33

X X X

48

51

89

11

X X 13

85

43

56



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

499

245

254

6

8

4

249

227

0

5

46

209

% Prof. or Above

68

70

66

X

X

X

48

89

X

X

13

43

% Below

31

29

33

X

X

X

51

11

X

X

85

56

% NS

1

2

1

X

X

X

2

1

X

X

2

2


19/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

4 34 54 7 61 0

3 40 47 9 56 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

19 151 240 30 270 1

1836 24683 28434 5641 34075 485



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

4 3

3440

5447

7 90 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

4 37 45 13 59 1

4 39 50 7 57 0

3 35 49 13 62 0

3 37 47 13 60 0

2 35 53 10 63 1

4 34 54 7 61 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

15 147 180 52 232 2

13 143 182 25 207 1

13 144 205 53 258 1

11 149 188 51 239 1

7 154 236 45 281 3

19 151 240 30 270 1



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

59

2009

57

2010

62

2011

60

2012

63

2013

61



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

61

39

69

31

55

45

X X X

45

54

77

23

X X 3

97

43

57



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

441

199

242

1

6

1

217

208

0

8

38

171

% Prof. or Above

61

69

55

X

X

X

45

77

X

X

3

43

% Below

39

31

45

X

X

X

54

23

X

X

97

57

% NS

0

0

0

X

X

X

0

0

X

X

0

1


20/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

3 37 51 8 59 1

3 40 47 8 55 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

15 164 227 34 261 3

1969 24862 28738 5144 33882 840



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

3 3

37 40

5147

8 81 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

8 52 36 3 40 1

2 43 46 6 52 4

6 44 39 5 45 5

5 36 47 9 56 3

3 42 48 5 53 2

3 37 51 8 59 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

29 192 134 13 147 4

7 169 183 23 206 14

26 183 164 22 186 21

20 158 206 38 244 13

12 189 217 23 240 8

15 164 227 34 261 3



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

40

2009

52

2010

45

2011

56

2012

53

2013

59



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

59

40

65

35

52

47

X X X

39

60

82

17

X X 10

88

40

59



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

443

239

204

2

6

4

231

195

0

5

50

208

% Prof. or Above

59

65

52

X

X

X

39

82

X

X

10

40

% Below

40

35

47

X

X

X

60

17

X

X

88

59

% NS

1

0

1

X

X

X

1

1

X

X

2

1


21/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

4 45 41 8 49 2

6 43 41 7 49 2

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

17 196 178 33 211 7

3790 24972 24307 4316 28623 1311



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

4 6

45 43 41 41

8 72 2

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

8 45 40 5 45 1

7 49 40 3 42 2

9 41 38 9 47 3

6 47 39 4 43 3

3 42 48 6 54 1

4 45 41 8 49 2

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

35 186 166 21 187 5

26 186 150 11 161 6

35 163 150 34 184 11

24 181 149 17 166 12

14 175 200 25 225 3

17 196 178 33 211 7



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

45

2009

42

2010

47

2011

43

2012

54

2013

49



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

49

49

60

39

39

58

X X X

28

69

67

32

X X 10

85

24

73



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

431

203

228

6

4

0

193

221

1

6

39

168

% Prof. or Above

49

60

39

X

X

X

28

67

X

X

10

24

% Below

49

39

58

X

X

X

69

32

X

X

85

73

% NS

2

0

3

X

X

X

2

1

X

X

5

2


22/265




District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

33 50 17 0 17 0

20 24 37 18 56 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

6 9 3 0 3 0

236 282 442 218 660 1

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

33

20

50

2417

37

0

18

0 0

U PP P A NS


District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

14 33 40 14 53 0

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

19 13 50 19 69 0

32 11 47 11 58 0

33 50 17 0 17 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

6 14 17 6 23 0

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

3 2 8 3 11 0

6 2 9 2 11 0

6 9 3 0 3 0

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

53

2009

X

2010

X

2011

69

2012

58

2013

17

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

17

83

X X X X X 17

83

X X X X 17

83


Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

18

6

12

0

0

0

18

0

0

0

3

18

% Prof. or Above

17

X

X

X

X

X

17

X

X

X

X

17

% Below

83

X

X

X

X

X

83

X

X

X

X

83

% NS

0

X

X

X

X

X

0

X

X

X

X

0


23/265




District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

District and State

Eagle County Re 50Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

X X X X X X44 32 18 1 19 6

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

X X X X X X47 35 19 1 20 6

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

X

44

X

32

X

18

X 1 X6

U PP P A NS


District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

X

2009

X

2010

X

2011

X

2012

X

2013

X

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

X X X X X X X X X X X X


Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)

Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

6

0

6

0

0

0

6

0

0

0

0

6

% Prof. or Above

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

% Below

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

% NS

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X


24/265




District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

7 25 40 28 69 0

7 20 41 31 72 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

34 124 204 142 346 1

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math


Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

7 7

2520

40 41

28 31

0 0

U PP P A NS


District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

11 23 38 28 66 0

7 23 40 29 69 0

5 23 36 36 72 0

6 17 41 36 77 0

8 22 42 27 70 1

7 25 40 28 69 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

47 100 163 120 283 0

38 119 206 146 352 0

23 108 173 172 345 0

29 84 202 174 376 0

43 121 232 150 382 3

34 124 204 142 346 1

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

66

2009

69

2010

72

2011

77

2012

70

2013

69

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

69

31

68

32

69

31

X X X

54

45

83

17

X X

32

68

51

48


Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

505

246

259

3

7

3

251

234

1

6

41

207

% Prof. or Above

69

68

69

X

X

X

54

83

X

X

32

51

% Below

31

32

31

X

X

X

45

17

X

X

68

48

% NS

0

0

0

X

X

X

0

0

X

X

0

0


25/265




District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

8 23 47 22 69 0

8 20 43 28 72 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

44 120 249 115 364 1

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math


Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

8 8

23 20

47 43

2228

0 0

U PP P A NS


District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

10 25 45 20 66 0

10 20 43 27 69 0

7 19 40 34 74 0

5 18 45 33 77 0

7 19 43 30 73 0

8 23 47 22 69 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

40 101 186 83 269 0

43 87 182 114 296 1

34 99 207 172 379 1

23 82 205 150 355 0

36 96 215 148 363 1

44 120 249 115 364 1

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

66

2009

69

2010

74

2011

77

2012

73

2013

69

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math


Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

69

31

72

28

66

34

X X X

50

49

87

13

X X

31

69

48

52



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

529

234

295

4

9

3

250

257

0

6

62

225

% Prof. or Above

69

72

66

X

X

X

50

87

X

X

31

48

% Below

31

28

34

X

X

X

49

13

X

X

69

52

% NS

0

0

0

X

X

X

0

0

X

X

0

0


26/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

9 27 39 25 64 0

9 25 36 29 65 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

44 137 196 129 325 2

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

9 9

27 25

39 36

25 29

0 0

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

7 26 40 27 67 0

11 27 36 26 62 1

7 28 35 30 64 0

8 21 36 35 71 0

8 28 39 25 64 0

9 27 39 25 64 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

27 98 154 102 256 0

45 116 154 109 263 3

30 121 148 126 274 0

40 106 180 176 356 0

37 133 184 119 303 0

44 137 196 129 325 2



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

67

2009

62

2010

64

2011

71

2012

64

2013

64



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

64

36

64

36

64

35

X X X

44

55

84

16

X X23

77

41

59



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

508

244

264

5

1

1

246

249

0

6

52

211

% Prof. or Above

64

64

64

X

X

X

44

84

X

X

23

41

% Below

36

36

35

X

X

X

55

16

X

X

77

59

% NS

0

0

1

X

X

X

1

0

X

X

0

0


27/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

10 25 38 27 65 1

12 26 35 27 62 0

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

45 117 177 126 303 3

7457 16200 22056 17049 39105 288



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

10 12

25 26

38 3527 27

1 0

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

13 26 38 22 60 0

9 24 40 27 67 0

11 24 44 22 65 0

9 27 34 29 63 0

13 28 37 22 59 0

10 25 38 27 65 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

55 109 159 92 251 0

37 96 159 107 266 0

46 102 188 94 282 1

41 118 150 126 276 0

63 138 182 111 293 0

45 117 177 126 303 3



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

60

2009

67

2010

65

2011

63

2012

59

2013

65



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

65

35

67

32

62

37

X X X

45

54

84

16

X X

34

64

45

54



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

468

224

244

1

4

0

230

225

0

8

50

189

% Prof. or Above

65

67

62

X

X

X

45

84

X

X

34

45

% Below

35

32

37

X

X

X

54

16

X

X

64

54

% NS

1

0

1

X

X

X

1

0

X

X

2

1


28/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

13 26 30 29 60 1

14 30 28 27 55 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

66 128 151 147 298 7

8842 18935 17406 16893 34299 327



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

13 14

2630 30 28 29 27

1 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

21 41 27 11 38 0

12 32 29 27 56 0

10 30 41 19 60 0

11 30 35 23 58 0

15 34 26 25 51 0

13 26 30 29 60 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

78 154 103 42 145 0

49 130 118 111 229 2

40 117 159 72 231 0

48 129 149 100 249 0

64 152 116 109 225 0

66 128 151 147 298 7



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

38

2009

56

2010

60

2011

58

2012

51

2013

60



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

60

39

58

41

62

37

X X X

43

55

77

22

X X7

91

38

60



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

499

245

254

6

8

4

249

227

0

5

46

209

% Prof. or Above

60

58

62

X

X

X

43

77

X

X

7

38

% Below

39

41

37

X

X

X

55

22

X

X

91

60

% NS

1

2

1

X

X

X

2

1

X

X

2

1


29/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

17 28 30 24 54 1

19 29 29 23 51 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

75 124 131 108 239 3

1 1577 17668 17463 13977 31440 385



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

17 1928 29 30 29 24 23

1 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

20 33 31 15 46 0

15 28 38 19 57 0

13 25 36 25 61 0

12 24 40 24 64 0

19 30 30 21 51 0

17 28 30 24 54 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

80 132 123 59 182 1

56 101 138 68 206 0

55 106 149 106 255 2

48 96 161 95 256 1

85 133 133 94 227 0

75 124 131 108 239 3



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Year

2008

46

2009

57

2010

61

2011

64

2012

51

2013

54



Inc.

Percentage

ofStudentsP+

A

0

20

40

60

80

100

Group

54

45

50

49

57

42

X X X

34

65

74

26

X X

8

92

35

64



Groups

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Asian

BlkAfAm

Hisp

Wht

HwPacIs

Mult

IEP

ELL

Ns

441

199

242

1

6

1

217

208

0

8

38

171

% Prof. or Above

54

50

57

X

X

X

34

74

X

X

8

35

% Below

45

49

42

X

X

X

65

26

X

X

92

64

% NS

1

1

1

X

X

X

1

0

X

X

0

2


30/265





District and State

Eagle County Re 50

Colorado

Percentages

U PP P A PA NS

28 38 23 10 33 1

30 30 24 15 39 1

Ns

U PP P A PA NS

122 170 102 46 148 3

18263 18670 14741 9176 23917 692



Inc.

Percentage

ofStu

dents

0

20

40

60

80

100

Proficiency Levels

28 3038

3023 24

1015

1 1

U PP P A NS



Years

2008

2009

2010

2011

Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum

Documents

Transcript of Tcap Csap 2013 Exec Sum