TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

15
1 TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct 33 rd Annual Climate Diagnostics and Prediction Workshop 21 October 2008 Long Term Changes in Tropical Cyclone Activity in the Western North Pacific Tom Murphree and David Meyer Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) [email protected] and [email protected] Typhoon Saomai & Tropical Storm Bopha, Western North Pacific, 08Aug06

description

Typhoon Saomai & Tropical Storm Bopha, Western North Pacific, 08Aug06. Long Term Changes in Tropical Cyclone Activity in the Western North Pacific Tom Murphree and David Meyer Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) [email protected] and [email protected]. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

Page 1: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

11TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

33rd Annual Climate Diagnostics and Prediction Workshop21 October 2008

Long Term Changes in Tropical Cyclone Activity in the Western North PacificTom Murphree and David Meyer

Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)[email protected] and [email protected]

Typhoon Saomai & Tropical Storm Bopha, Western North Pacific, 08Aug06

Page 2: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

22

OverviewAssessment of changes in tropical cyclone (TC) formations andintensities in western North Pacific during 1970-2006:

1. Intraseasonal to multidecadal changes2. Long term net changes3. Relationships between TC changes and known large

scale environmental factors (LSEFs)4. Relationships between TC changes and global warming

(GW)

Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

Hypothesis: Assessments of GW impacts on TCs need to account for all LSEFs that affect TCs, and do so at

time and space scales at which LSEFs affect TCs.

Page 3: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

33

Prior Studies1. LSEFs strongly affect TC formations (e.g., McBride 1995):

a. SSTb. Vertical shear c. Vertical velocity d. Absolute vorticity e. Relative humidity

2. ENLN impacts on TC activity (e.g., Chan 2000, Ford 2000):a. Impacts on formation sites, intensities, tracks

3. GW impacts on TCs so far (e.g., Chan and Liu 2004, Emanuel 2005, Webster and Holland 2005, Klotzbach 2006, Landsea 2007):

a. Little or no increase in TC numbersb. Increase in TC intensities via SST increasesc. Impacts from interannual-multidecadal variations dominated. TC data inadequate to determine GW impactse. Limitations of prior studies:

1. Coarse resolution: basin and seasonal averages2. Focus on one LSEF: SST3. Uncertainties in TC data4. Distinction and attribution: GW impacts vs. other impacts

Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

Page 4: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

44

Data1. TC activity: JTWC best track data (no adjustments)2. LSEFs: NCEP reanalysis 1 and 23. Period: 1970-2006 4. Main TC season: May-December5. Region: western North Pacific (WNP): 0-40° N, 115–185°E6. Main development region (MDR): 0-20° N, 115–165°E7. Temporal resolution: one week8. Spatial resolution: 5°x5° 9. Number of TCs: 989

Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

Page 5: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

5

Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

1950 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006Year

0

10

20

30

40

coun

t

TC Numbers, WNP1950-2006

1970Global Surface T Anomaly1850-2007

1970

From CRU/UEATC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

Selection of analysis period

Page 6: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

66

Methods

1. Identify major temporal and spatial patterns of changes in:a. TCs: formations and accumulated cyclone energy (ACE)b. LSEFs

2. Develop regression models that relate TC formation probability and ACE to local LSEFs at weekly and 5x5 resolutions

3. Validate models using independent TC and LSEF data

4. Use models to assess sensitivity of TC formations and ACE to LSEF variations

5. Relate GW to LSEF changes, and, thus, to TC changes

6. By-product: Models for sub-seasonal forecasting of TC formations and general tropical convection

Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

Page 7: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

77

Number of TC Formations, 1970-2006Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

Main development region (MDR): 0-20°N, 115-165°E

120 E 150 E 180 E

0

15 N

30 N

0 4 81216202428323640

0° N

120 E 150 E 180 E

0

15 N

30 N

0 4 81216202428323640

No. of TCs

Page 8: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

88

Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006Year

20

25

30

35

40

TCs

1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006Year

1000000

2000000

3000000

4000000

5000000

AC

E

Annual TC Numbers Annual ACE

Year

TC N

umbe

r

AC

E (k

ts2 )

Year

Changes in TC Numbers and ACE, 1970-2006

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

1. Large interannual-multidecadal variations (linked to ENLN)2. Long term net increases in TC formations and ACE

Can changes in LSEFs explain these long term changes in TC activity?

Page 9: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006Year

28.5

28.9

29.3

29.7

SST

99

LSEF Changes – SST in MDRLong Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

Year

SST

(C)

Page 10: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

10

Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone ActivityLSEF Changes – SST

1. Overall SST increase in MDR (+0.4 °C) is favorable for increases in TC formations and intensities, and consistent with GW.

2. Some SST decreases in TC active areas of WNP.

SST increases consistent with long term increases in TC numbers and intensities.

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

90 E 120 E 150 E 180 E 150 W 120 W

15 S

0

15 N

30 N

45 N

60 N

SST Change, JASO, 1970-2006 (°C)

90 E 120 E 150 E 180 E 150 W 120 W

15 S

0

15 N

30 N

45 N

60 N -2-1.6-1.2-0.8-0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2

TC Unfavorable

TC Favorable

Page 11: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

11

LSEF Changes – Vertical Velocity in MDRLong Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006Year

3.1

3.6

4.1

4.6

5.1

5.6

Vert

Vel

Vert

ical

Vel

ocity

(-P

a/s)

Year

Page 12: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

90 E 120 E 150 E 180 E 150 W 120 W 90 W

15 S

0

15 N

30 N

45 N

60 N

1212

LSEF Changes – Vertical VelocityLong Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

Vertical Velocity Change, JASO, 1980-2006 (-Pa/s)

90 E 120 E 150 E 180 E 150 W 120 W 90 W

15 S

0

15 N

30 N

45 N

60 N -12-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10

TC unfavorable

TC favorable

Have vertical velocity decreases countered impacts of SST increases on TC formations?

1. Overall decrease in MDR is unfavorable for TC formation and ACE increases.2. Other LSEFs (shear, vorticity, RH) show no pronounced long term changes.

Page 13: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

1313

Regression Modeling of TC – LSEF Relationships

1. TC formation probability = log(p/(1-p))= a + b·SST + c·VertVel - d·Shear – e·Shear2 + f·AbsVort + g·Equat

2. ACE = A + B·SST + C·VertVel + D·Shear - E·Shear2 + F·AbsVort + G·RH

Sensitivity to LSEF Changes: Increase in each LSEF by one standard deviationleads to following changes in formation probability and ACE:

Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

LSEF % Increase in Formation Probability

Vertical velocity +73.68

Shear -40.51

SST +25.67

Absolute vorticity +1.68

LSEF % Increase inACE

Absolute vorticity +21.20SST +14.83Relative humidity +10.31Shear -8.63Vertical velocity +3.38

1. TC formation relatively sensitive (insensitive) to vertical velocity (SST).2. ACE moderately sensitive to SST and relatively insensitive to vertical

velocity.

Page 14: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

1515

Validation of TC Formation Probability Model

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08

1. Modeled TC formation probabilities for individual week at 5x5 degree resolution (calculated using independent LSEF data)

2. Developing sub-seasonal TC formation forecasts based on model

TC Formation Probability for 2006 Week 40 Thresholds not considered

120 E 150 E 180 E 150 W

15 S

0

15 N

30 N

45 N Modeled TC formation

probabilities,01-07 Oct 2006

10%

25%

40%

55%

70%

Verifying observations of TC

formations from best track data

Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

Page 15: TC Activity in WNP, murphree@nps.edu, Oct08

1616

Summary1. Shortcomings of TC and LSEF data sets are problematic.2. TC formations and intensities have undergone long term increases since

1970.3. SST and vertical velocity are the only LSEFs that experienced net long term

changes in WNP during 1970-2006.4. SST (vertical velocity) changes were favorable (unfavorable) for increases

in TC formation and intensity.5. Impacts of SSTs on TC formations may have been minimized by vertical

velocity decreases.6. GW may have contributed to increases in TC formations and ACE, by way

of SST increases but mitigated by vertical velocity decreases.7. But attribution is problematic, given:

a. Shortcomings of data setsb. Large interannual to multidecadal variationsc. Uncertainties about LSEF-TC relationships and GW signatures

8. LSEFs affect both TC formations and intensities, and need to be considered at realistic time and space scales in assessing GW impacts.

Long Term Changes in WNP Tropical Cyclone Activity

TC Activity in WNP, [email protected], Oct08