Taxsifu © Liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation....
-
Upload
earl-ellis -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Taxsifu © Liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation....
Taxsifu © Liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
Michael Evans CA FCPA FTI
Place of provision of services:An international perspective
Distance to GST. Has the Union budget 2012 shortened it?
Saturday, June 2nd, 2012
1
Scope of topic
The two approaches to collection of VAT/GST
NZ, Singapore, Australia, Canada, South Africa
The EU
Sharing the tax base and enforcement in Federal jurisdictions and common markets
2
The “NZ model”
GST is payable to the central government by the supplier on goods and services supplied by him
Exported goods and services are zero-rated
Registered recipients claim input tax credits
“Place of supply” is used to identify transactions for which the obligations of registration and collection of GST can be imposed
Imports of goods are subject to GST at the border
Reverse charge applies to acquisition by registered traders of services from offshore No reverse charge in SingaporeLimited application in Australia and NZ
3
EU model
VAT is payable by the supplier to the State in which he is established for:Goods and services supplied by him in that State
to recipients in that StateGoods and services supplied if the place of supply
is in that StateGoods and services supplied by him to
unregistered recipients in another StateSometimes a different rule for goods
Services supplied to non-EU recipients do not have a place of supply in any State of the EU effectively a zero-rate
4
EU model (cont)
VAT is payable by a recipient that is registered in a State if:The supplier is not established in that StateThe place of supply is in that State
The reverse charge
“Place of supply” is used to identify the State of taxationWhich state collects the revenue
Imports of goods are subject to GST at the border
Reverse charge applies to acquisition by registered traders of services from offshore
5
Difference
The difference between the two models is:NOT ABOUT how much VAT / GST is collectedBUT IT IS ABOUT how the revenue is shared
between the States
The problem arises becauseState taxing authorityHow to claim ITCs for tax collected by other State
Enforcement is easier on local sale by local authoritySupplier is the main point of focus
6
Sharing revenue between States
Singapore and NZ – no sub-national states
Australia and Canada – central collectionAustralia - Redistributed on “HFE” system
Interim report of GST distribution review panel
Canada – proportionate to provincial consumption
EU model – collected by member States on supplies made “in the member State”Place of provision for inter-state supplies - general
B2B services – where registered recipient is established» Reverse charge in place of receipt
B2C services – where supplier is established
7
EU specific rules
Connected with immovable property
Transport Passenger – place of transport proportionate
to distanceGoods – place of departure
Cultural, artistic, sporting, scientific, educational, entertainment or similar – where carried out
Loading and handling / valuations and work on movable property – where the work is carried outShort term hire of transport – place of delivery
8
EU Specific rules
Restaurant and cateringOn board ships, boats or trains – point of
departureOtherwise - where the services are carries out
Electronically supplied services by person outside the EU – place where unregistered recipient is resident
Effective use and enjoyment override
Generally if recipient is not registered, in the place in which the
9
Other ideas for Federal jurisdictions
Common external tariff (CET) modelLodge in home State
GST and ITC separated per State State pays across to other States
P-VATSupplier pays GST collected to other State
CVATSeparate return to central clearing house for
interstate salesEach registrant pays interstate GST and claims
interstate ITC
10
Comments
Generally, traders are not required to register and collect VAT/GST in the State in which they are not established – lack of enforcement
Audit and integrity issuesTrader in one State does not remit VAT/GST on sale
made from its establishment (to a resident in another State)
Risk of fraud, error, inconsistent interpretationRecapitulative statements in EU – expert study
» http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/common/publications/studies/index_en.htm
Only relevant in practice for registered recipient with exempt supplies.
11
Comments
Different rates / scope?
Complexity, uncertainty and inconsistency
Rules reflect negotiations between the States as to revenue share
US States have enforcement limitations for goods purchased from interstateGST on imported goods and services
How to match integrity, State revenue needs, certainty, simplicity and neutrality
12
Exported services from EU
licences, trade marks and similar rights -
advertising services;
consultants, engineers, consultancy firms, lawyers, accountants , data processing and the provision of information;
obligations to refrain from pursuing or exercising a business activity or a right referred
banking, financial and insurance transactions including reinsurance, with the exception of the hire of safes;
the supply of staff;
the hiring out of movable tangible property, with the exception of all means of transport;
access to natural gas and electricity distribution systems and the provision of other services directly linked thereto;
Telecommunications, radio and television broadcasting services;
electronically supplied services
13
NZ zero-rated exported services
Services directly connected with goods or real property outside the countryNot connected with tangible property in NZ
To a non-resent that is not in the countryNot connected with tangible property in NZ
To any person who is not in the country where use and enjoyment is outside
Rights or information for use outside the countryRestrictive covenants for same
International transport of goods and passengers
Services connected with temporary imports14
Michael Evans CA, FCPA, FTI Regd. Tax Agent (55349002)
PO Box 1678, Rozelle, NSW, 2039
Phone: +61 2 98183315Mobile: +61 412252228
email: [email protected]
Liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
15