Taxpayer is eligible for lower rate of tax under Section 115A of the Act on payment of royalty since...
-
Upload
kpmg-india -
Category
Education
-
view
189 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Taxpayer is eligible for lower rate of tax under Section 115A of the Act on payment of royalty since...
© 2014 KPMG, an Indian Registered Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG FLASH NEWS
KPMG IN INDIA
Taxpayer is eligible for lower rate of tax under Section 115A of the Act on payment of royalty since the new agreements entered into by the taxpayer were not an extension of old agreements 23 September 2014
Background
Recently, the Pune Bench of the Income-tax Appellate
Tribunal (the Tribunal) in the case of GKN Holdings
Plc1 (the taxpayer) held that benefit of the lower rate
of tax under Section 115A2 of the Income-tax Act,
1961 (the Act) on royalty income cannot be denied to
the taxpayer since these provisions do not debar the
taxpayer to enter into new agreements. Further, the
new agreements entered into by the taxpayer were
not an extension of old agreements.
The Tribunal also observed that the taxpayer can
manage its affairs within the framework of the statute.
The tax department cannot sit into the business
decisions of the taxpayer. Even if the taxpayer has
managed its affairs as far as renewal of agreement is
concerned, the tax department should not interfere
with the same, unless it is proved beyond doubt that it
is nothing but a colourable device.
_____________
1 GKN Holdings Plc v. DDIT (ITA No.149/PN/2013) – Taxsutra.com
2 Section 115A(1)(b)(AA) - The amount of income-tax calculated on the
income by way of royalty, if any, included in the total income, at the rate of
ten per cent if such royalty is received in pursuance of an agreement made
on or after 1 June 2005
Facts of the case
The taxpayer is a U.K. based company. It has two associate companies in India, namely GKN Sinter Metals Ltd. and GKN Driveline (India) Ltd.
The taxpayer is a proprietor of certain trademarks and entered into agreements in the year 2004 with GKN Sinter Metals Limited and GKN Driveline (India) Limited permitting them to use its trademarks in respect of various products and services.
In the year 2007, new licence agreements were entered into by the taxpayer with its associates as per which royalty was charged based on sales at the rates dependent on the reported operating profit by each foreign entity.
During the Assessment Year 2008-09, the taxpayer received payment of royalty from GKN Driveline (India) Ltd. and from GKN Sinter Metals Ltd., and it was offered to tax at 10.56 per cent as per Section 115A of the Act.
© 2014 KPMG, an Indian Registered Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The Assessing Officer (AO) held that since the new agreement entered in the year 2007 was nothing but extension of the existing agreement, the taxpayer will not get the benefit of lower rate of tax under Section 115A(1)(b)(AA) of the Act. Accordingly, the AO rejected the contention of the taxpayer and assessed the royalty income at 15 per cent under Article 13 of the India-U.K. tax treaty (tax treaty).
The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld the order of the AO.
Tribunal’s ruling
As per the provisions of Section 115A(1)(b)(AA) of the Act, the tax will be levied on royalty income at 10 per cent on the strength of the agreement. It was an undisputable fact that the taxpayer had an earlier agreement in 2004 with GKN Sinter Metals Ltd. and the same was renewed in 2007.
The provisions of Section 115A(1)(b)(AA) of the Act does not debar the taxpayer from entering into new agreements after change of situation in the provisions of the said Section as far as the reduced rate of royalty is concerned.
New agreements entered into in 2007 between the taxpayer and GKN Sinter Metals Ltd., and in the same year with GKN Driveline (India) Ltd. are independent agreements.
The taxpayer can manage its affairs within the framework of the statute. The tax department cannot sit into the business decisions of the taxpayer. By no stretch of imagination, the new agreement entered into in 2007 can be said to be the extension of old agreements entered into between the parties.
Even if the taxpayer has managed its affairs as far as the renewal of agreement is concerned, the tax department should not interfere with the same, unless it is proved beyond doubt that it is nothing but a colourable device.
Even if the taxpayer had entered into new licence agreements with GKN Sinter Metals Ltd. and GKN Driveline (India) Ltd. to take advantage of the lower rate of tax of 10 per cent, the same cannot be denied to the taxpayer on the grounds that the same is nothing but an extension of the old agreement.
The new licence fee agreement entered into by the taxpayer with GKN Sinter Metals Ltd. and in the same year with GKN Driveline (India) Ltd. is nothing but a new and separate agreement. Accordingly, the licence fee income should be taxed at 10 per cent.
Our comments
This is a welcome ruling by the Pune Tribunal where it has held that the taxpayer is eligible for the lower rate of tax under Section 115A of the Act. The Pune Tribunal while giving this benefit to the taxpayer observed that the taxpayer can manage its affairs within the framework of the statute. The tax department cannot interfere with the business decisions of the taxpayer. Even if the taxpayer has managed its affairs as far as the renewal of agreement is concerned, the tax department should not interfere with the same, unless it is proved beyond doubt that it is nothing but a colourable device.
The Calcutta High Court in the case of Great Lakes Carbon Corporation
3, while dealing with Section 115A
of the Act, observed that the old agreement was not a separate or new agreement but a continuation of original agreement and therefore, the royalty payment was taxable at the higher rate.
_______________ 3 Great Lakes Carbon Corporation v. CIT [1993] 202 ITR 133 (Cal)
© 2014 KPMG, an Indian Registered Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we
endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue
to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.
© 2014 KPMG, an Indian Registered Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International
Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity“ are registered trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
www.kpmg.com/in
Ahmedabad
Commerce House V, 9th Floor,
902 & 903, Near Vodafone House,
Corporate Road,
Prahlad Nagar,
Ahmedabad – 380 051
Tel: +91 79 4040 2200
Fax: +91 79 4040 2244
Bengaluru
Maruthi Info-Tech Centre
11-12/1, Inner Ring Road
Koramangala, Bangalore 560 071
Tel: +91 80 3980 6000
Fax: +91 80 3980 6999
Chandigarh
SCO 22-23 (Ist Floor)
Sector 8C, Madhya Marg
Chandigarh 160 009
Tel: +91 172 393 5777/781
Fax: +91 172 393 5780
Chennai
No.10, Mahatma Gandhi Road
Nungambakkam
Chennai 600 034
Tel: +91 44 3914 5000
Fax: +91 44 3914 5999
Delhi
Building No.10, 8th Floor
DLF Cyber City, Phase II
Gurgaon, Haryana 122 002
Tel: +91 124 307 4000
Fax: +91 124 254 9101
Hyderabad
8-2-618/2
Reliance Humsafar, 4th Floor
Road No.11, Banjara Hills
Hyderabad 500 034
Tel: +91 40 3046 5000
Fax: +91 40 3046 5299
Kochi
Syama Business Center
3rd Floor, NH By Pass Road,
Vytilla, Kochi – 682019
Tel: +91 484 302 7000
Fax: +91 484 302 7001
Kolkata
Unit No. 603 – 604,
6th Floor, Tower – 1,
Godrej Waterside,
Sector – V, Salt Lake,
Kolkata 700 091
Tel: +91 33 44034000
Fax: +91 33 44034199
Mumbai
Lodha Excelus, Apollo Mills
N. M. Joshi Marg
Mahalaxmi, Mumbai 400 011
Tel: +91 22 3989 6000
Fax: +91 22 3983 6000
Pune
703, Godrej Castlemaine
Bund Garden
Pune 411 001
Tel: +91 20 3050 4000
Fax: +91 20 3050 4010