Tax and fiscal enviroment in Puerto Rico today

208
© 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton. All rights reserved. Conference - Tax and fiscal environment in Puerto Rico today December 13, 2016 Caparra Country Club San Juan, Puerto Rico

Transcript of Tax and fiscal enviroment in Puerto Rico today

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

    Conference -Tax and fiscal environment in Puerto Rico today

    December 13, 2016

    Caparra Country ClubSan Juan, Puerto Rico

  • @2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Disclaimer

    DISCLAIMER: These presentations and their content do not represent a consulting. Participants should not act solely on the basis of this material and its content. Its usefulness is for information only and should not be used as a specific consulting. In addition, you must obtain the consultation of an expert before acting or taking a decision on any topic addressed in this presentation.

  • @2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Our Values are CLEARR

    unite through global Collaborationdemonstrate Leadership in all we do

    promote a consistent culture of Excellenceact with Agility

    ensure deep Respect for people and actively communicate

    take Responsibility for our actions and demonstrate integrity

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

    Fiscal and financial oversightin Puerto Rico

    Ojel RodrguezAdvisory partnerCPA/ABV, CVA, CIRA, CISA, CIA, CFE

    Marta RodrguezAdvisory managerCPA/CVA, CGMA

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Governance and management aspects of the Puerto Rico

    Oversight Board

    Requirements of fiscal plan

    Economic growth under PROMESA

    Infrastructure revitalization

    Public debt restructuring and

    issuance

    Agenda

    1 2 43 5

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Overview of PROMESA

    Signed into law by President Obama on June 30, 2016 Creates a structure for exercising federal oversight of the fiscal

    affairs of Puerto Rico Establishes an oversight board with plenary authority over Puerto

    Rico's financial, budgetary, and legislative processes Provides relief from creditor lawsuits through the enactment of a

    temporary stay on litigation Creates two alternative methods to adjust unsustainable debt Expedites approvals of key energy projects and other "critical

    projects" in Puerto Rico

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Overview of PROMESA

    Title I Establishment & Organization of Oversight Board

    Title II Responsibilities of Oversight Board

    Title III Adjustment of Debts

    Title IV Miscellaneous Provisions

    Title V Puerto Rico Infrastructure Revitalization

    Title VI Creditor Collective Actions

    Title VII Sense of Congress Regarding Permanent, Pro-Growth Fiscal Reforms

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Eligibility and requirements of Board members

    PROMESA requires the Board's members to meet the following criteria: has expertise in finance, municipal bond markets, management,

    law, or the organization or operation of business or government is not a candidate for elected office is not an elected or appointed official is not an employee of the territorial government is not a former elected official of the territorial government

    Tenure of members: the term of a member of the Board shall be three (3) years

    beginning the date of appointment the term of the Chair will be two (2) years or until a successor is

    appointedReference: Section 101

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Board's composition

    Speaker of the House of

    Representatives

    Speaker of the House of

    Representatives

    Senate Majority Leader

    Minority Leader of the House

    Minority Leader of the Senate

    Presidents discretion

    Nominee 1Nominee 2Nominee 3

    President of the United States

    Governor or his/her designee

    Nominee 1Nominee 2Nominee 3

    Nominee 1Nominee 2Nominee 3Nominee 4

    Nominee 1Nominee 2Nominee 3

    Nominee 1Nominee 2Nominee 3

    Member 1 Member 2 Member 3 Member 4 Member 5 Member 6 Member 7 Member 8 (non-voting)

    Reference: Section 101

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Board's composition (continued)

    Republican Nominees Democratic Nominees

    Carlos Garcaformer president

    of the Puerto Rico Government Development

    Bank

    President of the United States

    Arthur Gonzlezformer chief judge

    of the US Bankruptcy court in Manhattan, NY

    Jos Carrin IIIinsurance

    executive based in San Juan

    Andrew BiggsAmerican Enterprise

    Institute fellow

    Ana MatosantosCalifornia's

    finance director from 2009 to 2013

    Jos Gonzlezchief executive of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New

    York

    David Skeellaw professor at the University of

    Pennsylvania

    Reference: https://juntasupervision.pr.gov/

    Governor's designee

    Elias Snchez

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Executive Director and Staff

    Appointed by the Chair with the consent of the Board members Will execute the instructions of the Board and be subject to the

    supervision and control of the Board Will have general supervision and direction of the business affairs of the

    Board Subject to the approval of the Board, may enter into and execute on

    behalf of the Board contracts as he/she deems appropriate The Board is responsible for establishing the salary compensation (no

    ceiling or limits are established) The Executive Director may hire and fix the pay of, and remove

    additional personnel employed by the Board, as he/she deems appropriate

    Reference: https://juntasupervision.pr.gov/

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Board's bylaws

    The Board's bylaws were approved on September 30, 2016 during the Board's first meeting in New York the bylaws are based on PROMESA's sections

    All actions of the Board shall be taken by an affirmative vote of no fewer than four (4) members and in accordance to section 206(v) of the Act, an affirmative vote of no fewer than five (5) members is required to issue a restructuring certification

    Board must meet at least quarterly To the greatest extent possible, the Board shall produce all of its written

    materials in English and Spanish The Board shall submit and make public an annual report which will

    include audited financial statements and adopted budget

    Reference: https://juntasupervision.pr.gov/

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Scope of the Board

    63 public entities are covered under PROMESA's dispositions and therefore under the supervision of the Fiscal and Oversight Board, among them: PR Aqueduct and Sewer Authority (PRASA) PR Electric Power Authority (PREPA) Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority (AAFAF) PR Sales Tax Financing Corporation (COFINA) Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company (PRIDCO) University of Puerto Rico Governmental Development Bank for PR (GBD) Public Corporation for the Supervision and Deposit Insurance of

    Puerto Rico Cooperatives (COSSEC)Reference: https://juntasupervision.pr.gov/

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Procedures on Transactions Involving Covered Entities

    On a letter dated November 23, 2016, the Board shared additional procedures regarding transactions involving covered entities

    The Board stipulated that: transactions of covered instrumentalities that are subject to

    Approval under PROMESA, must be submitted to the Board no less than 15 calendar days prior to its required approval

    the clock for such 15 days will start when the Board confirms it has received all the information required for its review

    the Board can delay the transaction and take additional time for its review in the case of complex transactions or in the case the Board believes it requires additional information

    Reference: https://juntasupervision.pr.gov/

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Procedures on Transactions Involving Covered Entities (continued)

    In addition, the approval request must include at least the following information: a detailed memorandum explaining all the details of the transaction

    including purpose, reasons why the transaction is the best public interest, financial resources required and summary of all principal legal documents required to execute

    letter evidencing approval by the Fiscal Agency and Financial Authority of Puerto Rico and its rationale for approval

    letter from the Office of the Governor of Puerto Rico endorsing the transaction and rationale

    legal opinion supporting why the transaction is covered under PROMESA and under what legal basis the transaction can be approved by the Board

    Reference: https://juntasupervision.pr.gov/

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Litigation stay

    PROMESA suspends certain legal actions against Puerto Rico for debt payments and remedies allowing Puerto Rico to: address its immediate fiscal crisis negotiate with creditors instead of defending itself against

    multiple lawsuits improve its governance pursue debt restructuring and liability adjustments resolve long-standing fiscal issues so it can return to

    economic growth The stay would remain in effect until February 15, 2017 or six

    months after the Board is establishedReference: Section 405

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Who will pay for the Board?

    Members shall serve without compensation but may be reimbursed for reasonable and necessary expenses

    Puerto Rico Government shall designate a dedicated funding source within 30 days of the enactment of the bill

    The Board may use its powers to ensure that there are sufficient funds to cover its operation

    $370 million*over a 5 year period (FY2017-FY2022)* CBO estimate

    Reference: Section 107; Congressional Budget Office

  • How powerful is the Oversight Board?

    How powerful is the Oversight Board?

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Powers of the Board

    Section 104 of PROMESA describes the Board's broad powers. The Board has the power to:

    hold hearings and seek testimony, and receive evidence obtain information and records from federal agencies, Puerto Rico and its

    creditors issue subpoenas for testimony or records enforce a law that prohibits public sector employees from participating in a

    strike or lockout ensure the electronic payment and administration of taxes seek judicial enforcement of its authority investigate and publicize disclosure and sales practices related to bonds

    purchased by retail investors accept gifts, bequests and devises of services or property, as long all gifts

    and donors are disclosed within 30 days

    Reference: Section 104

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    What does the Board's fiscal plan entails?

    The Board requires the Governor to develop compliant five-year fiscal plans (at least)

    If the government fails to develop a compliant fiscal plan, the Board shall develop and certify a fiscal plan

    Development and

    submissionReview by

    BoardNotice of violation

    Revision by Governor Approval

    Reference: Section 201

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Means to approve the fiscal plan

    Submitted by the Governor and approved by the Board the plan meets the 14 requirements outlined in PROMESA

    Developed and approved by the Board if the Governor fails to take corrective actions on the

    recommendations of the Board Jointly developed by the Board and the Governor

    the bill allows the Board and the Governor to work collaboratively to develop a consensus plan

    Reference: Section 201

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    PROMESA Fiscal Plan Requirements

    1. Provide for estimates of revenues and expenditures in conformance with agreed accounting standards and be based on (i) applicable laws, or (ii) specific bills that require enactment in order to reasonably achieve the projections of the Fiscal Plan

    2. Ensure the funding of essential public services 3. Provide adequate funding for public pension systems4. Provide for the elimination of structural deficits5. For fiscal years covered by a Fiscal Plan in which a stay under titles III or IV

    is not effective, provide for a debt burden that is sustainable6. Improve fiscal governance, accountability and internal controls7. Enable the achievement of fiscal targets8. Create independent forecasts of revenues for the period covered by the

    Fiscal Plan

    Reference: Section 201

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    PROMESA Fiscal Plan Requirements contd

    9. Include a debt sustainability analysis (DSA)10. Provide for capital expenditures and investment necessary to promote

    economic growth11. Adopt appropriate recommendations submitted by the Oversight Board (under

    Section 205(a) of PROMESA)12. Include such additional information as the Oversight Board deems necessary13. Ensure that assets, funds, or resources of a territorial instrumentality are not

    loaned to, transferred to, or otherwise used for the benefit of a covered territory, unless permitted by the constitution of the territory, an approved plan of adjustment under title III, or a Qualifying Modification approved under title VI

    14. Respect the relative lawful priorities or lawful liens, as may be applicable, in the constitution, other laws, or agreements of a covered territory or covered territorial instrumentality in effect prior to the date of enactment of PROMESA

    Reference: Section 201

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Puerto Rico Government Fiscal Plan

    Governor Garcia Padilla formally presented Puerto Rico's Fiscal Plan on October 14, 2016

    On November 9, 2016, the Board open an invitation to comment on the Fiscal Plan (November 23 was the extended its due date for comments submission) A total of 114 comments were received, fifty percent coming from Puerto

    Rico residents. Made public by the Board on December 8. On November 23, 2016, the Board issued an assessment of the fiscal plan in

    which the following was addressed: convey the reasons why the Board rejected the fiscal plan submitted by

    Governor Garca Padilla provide a timeline for the Board to certify a fiscal plan

    The Board understand that "more policy adjustment, particularly with respect to structural reforms, is necessary for the Puerto Rico economy to return to sustainable growth

    Reference: https://juntasupervision.pr.gov/

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Rebuttal of fiscal plan evaluation principles

    The Board established five (5) principles, in addition to the criteria set forth in PROMESA Section 201(b), which the plan must meet in order to be accepted:

    Cover at least the next 10 fiscal years with meaningful progress in the next five (5)

    Meet the standards set forth in the law (14 requirements)

    Achieve the Board's main objective

    Assume no additional federal support beyond that which is already established by law (e.g. no Affordable Care Act support extension and no reliance on Act 154 revenues)

    Include an appropriate mix of structural reform, fiscal adjustment, and debt restructuring supported by the relevant analytical tools (e.g. debt sustainability analysis and a detailed economic projection)

    Achieve the following: stabilize current

    economic situation

    increase the economy's resilience

    shore up public finances

    support long-term growth

    meet basic needs of citizens

    Must include relevant operational plans that show the Government will achieve the changes and reforms it proposes

    Principle Principle Principle Principle Principle

    Reference: https://juntasupervision.pr.gov/

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Fiscal Plan certification timeline

    Publication of Baseline Projections for the Fiscal Plan and principles for achieving balance

    December 9th

    Working Session on Fiscal and Economic Plan

    Fiscal and Economic Plan Draft presented

    Meeting to discuss revised version of Fiscal Plan

    Distribution to the public of revised Fiscal Plan and invitation to open good-faith negotiations with creditors

    Week of December 19th

    December 12thDecember 15th

    Revisedversion of Fiscal Plan to be submitted to the Board

    Week of January 16th

    January 31st

    Target Date for Certification of Fiscal Plan

    Reference: https://juntasupervision.pr.gov/

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Annual and quarterly budgets

    Once a fiscal plan is approved, the governor shall submit annual and quarterly budgets compliant with the fiscal plan the Board will be submitting revenue estimates for the period

    covered by the budget approval process is similar as the one for the fiscal plans

    The Governor would also be required to submit quarterly "budget vs actual" reports in the following areas:

    revenues expenditures cash flowsReference: Section 202

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Inconsistencies in the budget vs actual reports

    Inconsistencies would require explanation and corrective action by the Governor if the Governor fails to take corrective action, the Board would be

    required to notify the US House and Senate the Board has the powers to address directly the inconsistencies

    identified

    Reference: Section 203

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Financial stability and management responsibility

    The Board may submit recommendations, at any time, to address fiscal and management matters, e.g. privatization of public entities alternatives for paying employee pensions performance-based personnel systems modification or transfers of the type of services delivered by

    governmental entities reduce government's non-debt expenditures implement hiring freezes / layoffs in the public sector

    The government would have to adopt the recommendations within 90 days if rejected, the governor must submit a statement to the President and

    Congress explaining why the recommendations were rejected

    Reference: Section 205

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Review of laws, contracts and executive orders

    Under PROMESA, the Governor would be required to prepare and maintain a public registry of all contracts executed

    New contracts must be reviewed and approved by the Board the Board may enter into new contracts without Governor's approval

    Board may revoke any existing contract For any newly enacted law, the Governor shall submit a formal cost

    estimate the Board has the power to certify and amend any proposed or new

    law also has the power to revoke or amend any existing law, regulation

    or executive order

    Reference: Section 204

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Tax abatements and relief agreements

    PROMESA requires the Governor to submit a report documenting all existing tax abatement or similar tax relief agreements

    The Board reserves the power to execute or modify any tax abatement or relief agreement without limits to what constitutes the limit of power

    This report would not be disclosed to the public in order to comply with regulation regarding confidential taxpayer information

    Reference: Section 208

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    For how long would the Board operate?

    The Board would be operating until it determines and certifies that Puerto Rico has achieved the following: obtained access to short-term and long-term credit markets at

    reasonable rates of interest, and balanced budgets for four (4) consecutive fiscal years

    Reference: Section 209

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Detroit vs Puerto Rico Fiscal Boards

    Reference: Dentons

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Detroit vs Puerto Rico Fiscal Boards

    Reference: Dentons

  • Economic growth under PROMESAEconomic growth under PROMESA

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Overview of Puerto Rico's economy

    2.7%1.9%

    0.5%

    -1.2%

    -2.9%-3.8% -3.6%

    -1.7%

    0.5%

    -0.1%

    -1.7%-0.6%

    -2.2%-2.8%

    -3.3%

    -1.7%

    -5.0%-4.0%-3.0%-2.0%-1.0%0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

    Annual Real GNP Growth

    The local economy has experienced secular deceleration in economic growth since the mid 1970s

    GNP growth has been negative every year since 2007 with the exception of 2012 (0.5%)

    Significant decrease in investment weakened the economy investment in construction fell from nearly $7.0 billion (1999) to around $3.4

    billion (2014)

    Reference: Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Government overspending lies at the root of the current the fiscal crisis from 2001 to 2013, accumulated budget deficits exceeded $20 billion.

    During the same period $42 billion in debt was issued, half of which was used to cover budget deficits

    Overview of Puerto Rico's economy

    463.9

    1,671.6

    201.3

    937.6 1,013.0

    1,855.8

    844.6 965.0

    3,180.1 2,651.9 2,464.7

    3,298.6

    1,322.8

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

    Fiscal deficits

    Reference: Office of Management and Budget

  • 2012 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Outmigration reached historical levels with the loss of approximately 331,000 people or 9% of the total population in the period between 2006 and 2015. This has led to an aging of the remaining population, a decreased net birth rate and declines in Puerto Ricos tax base.

    Recent data also suggest that the rate of outmigration continues to increase

    Overview of Puerto Rico's economy

    Reference: Office of Management and Budget

    - 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000

    3.43.453.5

    3.553.6

    3.653.7

    3.753.8

    3.85

    2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

    (in

    mill

    ions

    )

    Total population and outmigration

    Population Annual outmigrationSource: U.S. Census Bureau

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Overview of Puerto Rico's economy

    Puerto Rico and its various government instrumentalities owe around $68.7 million in debt extraordinarily complex

    18 different issuers, including the Commonwealth itself, financing entities, and operating entities that provide essential public services

    debt is held by countless and diverse creditors, including retail holders (both on- and off- island), hedge funds, mutual funds, local credit unions and mainland institutional investors, each with different interests and motivations in a potential restructuring

    Reference: PROMESA Overview Presentation Government of Puerto Rico

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Congress's point of view

    Section 701 expresses Congress's point of view regarding fiscal reforms for Puerto Rico:

    any durable solution for Puerto Ricos fiscal and economic crisis should include permanent, pro-growth fiscal reforms that feature, among other elements, a free flow of capital between possessions of the United States and the rest of the United States.

    Reference: Section 701

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Congressional Economic Task Force

    Composed of eight (8) members, this task force is responsible of issuing a report by December 31, 2016, that would examine: the relation of federal laws and economic growth in Puerto Rico; economic consequences of a Puerto Rico Department of Health

    Regulation 346, which relates to natural products, natural supplements, and dietary supplements; and would

    recommend changes to federal laws to spur sustainable, long-term economic growth;

    recommend changes to federal law and programs that would reduce child poverty; and

    include additional information as deemed necessary

    Reference: Section 409

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Congressional Economic Task Force(continued)

    On September 15, 2016, the Task Force issued its first status update in which the Task Force highlighted its concerns regarding "the relative lack of reliable data pertaining to certain aspects of the economic, financial, and fiscal situation in Puerto Rico"

    They received over 335 proposal submissions from individuals and organizations regarding economic growth initiatives for Puerto Rico

    The Task Force would be terminated once the report is issued by December 31, 2016

    Congressional Task Force membersCongressional Task Force members are:1. Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT)2. Senator Robert Menndez (D-NJ)3. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL)4. Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL)5. Representative Tom MacArthur

    (R-NJ)6. Resident Commissioner Pedro

    Pierluisi (PR)7. Representative Sean Duffy (R-

    WI)8. Representative Nydia Velzquez

    (D-NY)

    Reference: https://pierluisi.house.gov/

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Economic growth proposals (most discussed)

    Reference: http://pierluisi.house.gov/; Private Sector Coalition; US Department of Health and Human Services

    Health Parity in Medicare and Medicaid Federal funding Elimination of HIT Tax in Puerto Rico End the exclusion of territories from Part D of Low-Income Subsidy Program

    Jones Act and Maritime Transportation Reform Reform or modification of the Jones Act Amend Section 808 of Law 108-176 of December 2003, also known as the Stevens

    Amendment (United States presence in global air cargo industry)

    Energy Extend the authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to review and

    regulate local energy industry Extend the Investment Tax Credit for Renewable Energy in Puerto Rico until 2018Social Security Implement a 50% reduction in the social security tax for workers, employers and the

    self-employed for a period of six (6) years

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Economic growth proposals (most discussed)

    Reference: http://pierluisi.house.gov/; Private Sector Coalition; US Department of Health and Human Services

    Other exemptions 85% exemption on dividends (or repatriation payments) from eligible Puerto Rico

    companies, as defined Reduction in half of the full US statutory tax for active Puerto Rico source income on

    the remaining 15%

    Medicaid Lift the Federal cap on Medicaid funding to Puerto Rico and other US territories Raise the Federal Medicaid share from 55% to 83% over time Expand eligibility of Medicaid program to anyone who is earning less than 100% of the

    Federal poverty levelMedicare Improve hospital payments related to low income patients and uncompensated care Increase payment rates for hospitalsExtend the Earned Income Tax Credit to Puerto RicoExtend the Child Tax Credit to Puerto Rico

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    An opportunity for growth HUBZone

    Designed to encourage economic development and job creation in historically underutilized business zones through a certification and designation process

    Companies and small businesses that become HUBZone-certified by the SBA receive preferential treatment in Federal government contracting over regular businesses

    HUBZone program requires that 3% of all Federal government's contracting dollars be assigned specifically to HUBZone certified businesses

    Reference: Section 412; SBA.gov

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    An opportunity for growth HUBZone

    Section 412 of PROMESA eliminates the 20% restriction from the qualified census tract definition (for Puerto Rico only) until the first of the following events occur: 10 years after the date that the SBA Administrator implements the

    amendment; or the date on which the Board ceases to exist

    With this amendment, more areas could now qualify for the HUBZonedesignation providing local small businesses the chance to benefit from federal contracting opportunities

    Reference: Section 412

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Other provisions

    Reference: Title IV

    PROMESA allows Puerto Rico (with the Board's approval) to establish a $4.25 minimum wage for employees younger than 25

    The rate could last as long as four years or until the board terminates

    Current federal minimum stands at $7.25 an hour for non-exempt employees ($15.00 in some states)

    The bill won't restrict Puerto Rico's right to determine its future political status by plebiscite

    PROMESA excludes PR from the USLD's overtime pay rule which is scheduled to take effect on December 1, 2016

    The rule would raise the salary threshold for white-collar workers (exempt workers) from $23,660 to $47,476

    Employees who earn less than the threshold amount would be eligible for overtime pay

    The exemption would be in effect until GAO determines that the rule wouldn't negatively affect the island's economy

    Minimum wageExemption from Overtime Pay Political status

  • Infrastructure revitalizationInfrastructure revitalization

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    How will infrastructure be revitalized?

    Title V of PROMESA establishes a process to accelerate the development of infrastructure projects that provide essential services or address threats to public health or safety

    Creates the position of "Revitalization Coordinator" and grants it the following powers: a role in reviewing and permitting critical projects establish an expedited review process for such projects add related provisions intended to ease the permitting process and

    increase the federal oversight role Critical project is defined by section 503 as:

    one that is intimately related to addressing an emergency whose approval, consideration, permitting and implementation shall be expedited and streamlined

    Reference: Section 502 and 503

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    How will infrastructure be revitalized? (continued)

    Physical infrastructure could involve projects related to:

    Projects could be proposed by a Puerto Rican agency or private entity The application would have to describe how the project addressed an

    emergency, provide for estimated costs and the availability of funds to support the project

    energy water & sewage

    roads telecommunications other systems

    Reference: Section 503

  • Public debt restructuring and issuance

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Summary of Debt Outstanding

    Issuer Total Bonds and Private Loans (000's)GO $12,896 COFINA 17,294 HTA 4,317 PBA 4,005 GBD 4,015 ERS 3,141 PRIFA 2,158 PFC 1,147 UPR 496 PRCCDA 386 PRIDCO 159 AMA 28 Other Central Gov't Entities 242 Plus/Less: Missed bond interest, GBD and MFA Bonds 1,635Total debt outstanding $68,707

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    How will the debt be restructured?

    PROMESA contains two methods (Title VI and Title III) to adjust Puerto Rico's debts:

    As long as the Board remains in place, the territory including all of its instrumentalities are prohibited of issuing new debt without the Board's approval

    Streamlined process to achieve modifications with the consent of a supermajority of creditors

    Benefits such as potential speed relative to a traditional restructuring through a formal in-court process

    Voluntary adjustments Court-supervised debt-adjustment

    process modeled after Chapter 9 Includes "cram-down" power which

    may provide Puerto Rico with flexibility in debt adjustment

    Gives Board total control over the adjustment process

    Includes certain provisions designed to protect creditor interests

    Court reviews

    Reference: Title III, Title VI

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Title VI and Title III Overview Comparison Chart

    Reference: Title III, Title VI

    Area Title VI Title III

    Application Bonds, loans, or other borrowings predating enactment of the Act Substantially all liabilities predating the

    petition

    Eligible issuers

    The Commonwealth and also any covered territorial instrumentality explicitly authorized by the Board

    The Commonwealth or covered territorial instrumentality for which Board files a petition

    Prerequisites to relief

    There is no prerequisite to entry, but a successful Title VI modification requires that the modification satisfy certain conditions

    Board determines, among other things that the debtor made good-faith efforts at consensual restructuring, adopted procedures to provide timely audited financials, published draft financial statements and other information required to assess restructuring, and adopted a fiscal plan

    Proposals The debtor or the Oversight Board makes the restructuring proposal Only the Board may file a petition or a

    plan of adjustment

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Title VI and Title III Overview Comparison Chart (continued)

    Reference: Title III, Title VI

    Area Title VI Title III

    Process

    Issuer or holders propose a Modification and the Board places affected bonds in pools based on their priority and security features; with limited exceptions, the proposed modification must provide all holders in all pools the same consideration pro rata

    The Board certifies that the modification is consistent with the fiscal plan or, if no fiscal plan exists, that it provides sustainable debt

    In order to become effective and bind non-consenting holders, holders of at least two-thirds in amount of the outstanding principal amount of the bonds that vote consent, provided further that such two-thirds must also constitute a majority in outstanding principal amount (for any secured bonds, non-consenting holders either retain their liens or receive property of a value at least equivalent to the value of the lesser of their bond claims or the collateral securing such bond claims)

    A federal court approves the binding modification

    Board files petition and plan The process and substance otherwise generally

    follows Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, except that confirmation standards include a modified best interests of creditors test and require that the plan of adjustment must be consistent with the fiscal plan (which must respect priorities and liens existing under relevant constitution, law or agreement, but such determination will be made by the Board)

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Questions & feedback

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

    Accounting issues resulting from the actual fiscal environment in Puerto Rico:

    Accounting Estimates

    Angiee Chico, CPA, CIA, CGMAAudit partner

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting Issues Related to Accounting Estimated -Accounts Receivable and Bad Debts Expense

    An accounting estimate impacted by the current economic environment is the collectability of receivables.

    Global and local economic downturn and fiscal crisis have put at risk accounts receivable and constrained cash flows.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting Issues Related to Accounting Estimated -Accounts Receivable and Bad Debts Expense

    Inevitably, no matter how good the credit department and policies are, a company will have a customer that does pay its debts.

    This is simply part of doing business.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting Issues Related to Accounting Estimated -Accounts Receivable and Bad Debts Expense

    General FactsReceivables represent oral promises of the

    purchaser to pay for goods and services sold Short-term extension of creditClassify as either current expect collection within

    one year or non-current and trade or non-trade receivablesNormally collected within 30 to 60 daysLargest uninsured asset on a companys balance

    sheet.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    What Do You Do if You Are Having a Hard Time Collecting the Accounts Receivable?

    Every company needs a formal system to account for, age, follow up and collect receivables.

    Companies should assess more directly and timely the collectability of their receivables.

    Some accounts that dont get paid require more persuasive techniques, such as a call from you, an attorney or a collection agency.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    What Do You Do if You Are Having a Hard Time Collecting the Accounts Receivable?

    Invoicing establish a billing process that ensures accurate invoices are sent on a timely basis. Ask about payment at that time.

    Aging Accounts Receivable - age your accounts starting with the project completion date, sale or service date. Choose a payment date or payment terms. If you dont receive payment in that time, send a reminder or past-due reminder. Keep a record of the age of each account that isnt paid under its terms. Accounts older than the required payment terms need your personal attention.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    What Do You Do if You Are Having a Hard Time Collecting the Accounts Receivable?

    Calling Your Customer effective communication, proactive approach; this gesture might be enough to get payment and avoid a collection agency or attorneys fees.

    Using Collection Agency or Attorney should be considered. Many small-business owners choose not to file suit on receivables under a certain amount and write off the transaction as uncollected. You'll save time and keep the transaction out of the public records.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Collectability and estimates for allowance for doubtful accounts

    Watch for trends in accounts receivable. Companies should assess more directly and timely the collectability of their receivables, as write-offs or additional reserves may be necessary.

    Losses from uncollectible receivables shall be recorded if, based on current information and events, it is probable that the company will be unable to collect all amounts according to the contractual or business terms of the receivable.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Collectability and estimates for allowance for doubtful accounts

    Companies should consider to tighten the credit policy and review regularly.

    Evaluate each individual customer. Consider prior periods' experience and ability to pay.

    Negotiate payment plans to align to corporate collection policies.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Collectability and estimates for allowance for doubtful accounts

    After proper evaluation and discussion, determine adjustments required or estimate for uncollectible accounts receivable.

    Direct Write-Off vs. Allowance MethodThe company needs to determine how it will

    report the money it will not collect.

    Companies use either the direct write-off method or the allowance method to record defaulted sales.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Collectability and estimates for allowance for doubtful accounts

    Estimating Uncollectible BalancesDetermine how to calculate the portion that is

    likely to be uncollected.

    Allowances or adjustments should be recorded in the correct period.Be realistic!

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    How Accounts Receivable Impact the Rest of Accounting

    This estimate and corresponding analysis is critical because of its impact in the rest of accounting.

    Affects working capital or free capital

    Limit investments and growth opportunities

    Limit shareholders payouts

    Inability to invest in new equipment or introduce new products or services

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    How Accounts Receivable Impact the Rest of Accounting

    Accounts Payable and Additional Debtso Cash flow directly impacts the company's ability to

    pay short-term liabilities, including any current portion of long-term debt.

    o May require to obtain additional financing or lines of credit

    Results are reflected in the financial statements and related disclosures, as applicable

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    How Accounts Receivable Impact the Rest of Accounting

    Budgeting Implicationso Accounts receivable can impact the future expected income used

    to make budgeting decisionso If receivables included in income expectations are not paid as

    expected, budgets can quickly become underfunded

    Collection Approacho A higher percentage of overdue receivables can distract limited

    accounting personnel from their daily routines in small businesses, decreasing departmental productivity

    o Aging of receivables can also increase the loss a company takes due to bad debts write-offs or selling them to third-party collections agencies

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    How Accounts Receivable Impact the Rest of Accounting

    Ratio Valuationso Oversight and monitoring of metrics and financial

    covenants by banks, investors and creditors are more tough when making lending or investment decisions.

    o Since receivables are assets, account balances impact any financial ratio based on assets, including the debt-to-assets and assets turnover ratios.

    o Because of its impact on cash flows, receivables also impact liquidity ratios such as the current, quick and cash ratios.

    o The receivables turnover ratio is directly affected by the average maturity of accounts receivable as well.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    What is the next step?

    Managing the companys accounts receivable should be one of its priorities. Create a plan!

    Work as a team. Business owners, senior managers and key personnel should be highly involved on a day-to-day basis.

    In good times and bad times the company needs to ensure the accounts receivable are as current as possible.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

    Impairment of investments

    Johanna Prez, CPA, CFE, CAMS, CGMAAudit partner

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Agenda

    Impairment definition Impairment indicators Accounting for other-than-temporary impairment

    of investments Example Disclosure requirements New accounting standards

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    What is an Impairment of Investments?

    If, on each reporting date, a security is impaired because its fair value is less than its amortized cost basis, management must decide if the impairment is either temporary or other than temporary.

    An other than temporary impairment does not mean the investment has been permanently impaired, but that the carrying value is not expected to recover through the holding period of the security.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Impairment Indicators

    Significant deterioration in the earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality, or business prospects of the investee;

    Significant adverse change in the regulatory, economic, or technological environment of the investee;

    Significant adverse change in the general market condition or either the geographic area or the industry in which the investee operates;

    A bona fide offer to purchase, an offer by the investee to sell, or a completed auction process for the same or similar security for an amount less than the cost of the investment;

    Factors that raise significant concerns about the investees ability to continue as a going concern;

    Among others.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Impairment Indicators Applicable to Puerto Rico investments

    Overall shrinkage of Puerto Rico's economy

    Default of bond payments by Puerto Rico Government

    Degraded rating of Puerto Rico bonds by principal credit rating agencies: Fitch, Standard & Poor and Moody's

    Among others.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Impairment Indicators Applicable to Puerto Rico investments

    Rating Agency Date Rating Outlook

    Standard & Poor's

    October 1983 A N/A

    April 2016 CC Negative

    Moody's September 1970 A N/A

    April 2016 Caa3 Negative

    Fitch January 2011 BBB+ Stable

    April 2016 CC Rating Watch Negative

    sources: http://www.gdbpr.com/investors_resources/UBS Municipal Brief April 7, 2016

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments

    Guidance on other than temporary impairments is prescribed by ASC 320-10-35 Investments Debt and Equity Securities Overall Subsequent Measurement

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments

    For equity securities, an other-than-temporary impairment loss should be recognized in earnings for the difference between the amortized cost and fair value of the security at the balance sheet date. The fair value becomes the new amortized cost and should not be adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value. (FASB ASC 320-10-35-34)

    https://checkpoint.riag.com/app/main/docLinkNew?DocID=iGAAPCD13:4610.1&SrcDocId=T0PPCGAP:2016fa59d1868f37557-1&feature=tcheckpoint&lastCpReqId=5094843&pinpnt=GAAPCD13:4619.499&d=d#GAAPCD13:4619.499

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments

    For debt securities, the recognition of an other-than temporary impairment loss depends on whether the entity intends to sell the security (or whether it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security) before recovery of the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments

    If the entity intends to sell the security (or more likely than not will be required to sell the security), the other-than-temporary impairment should be recognized in earnings for the entire difference between the amortized cost and fair value at the balance sheet date.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments

    If there is no intention to sell the security or it is not more likely than not the entity will be required to sell, the other-than-temporary impairment should be separated into amounts pertaining to (a) the credit loss and (b) all other factors. The amount relating to the credit loss should be recognized in earnings and the remaining amount should be recognized in other comprehensive income (net of taxes).

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments

    Compare the present value of the expected cash flows versus the amortized cost

    PV of expected cash flow < amortized cost = credit loss

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments

    When developing an estimate of cash flows expected to be collected, management should consider: Past events, current conditions, and reasonable and

    supportable forecasts Remaining payment terms of the security Prepayment speeds Financial condition of the issuer Expected defaults Value of any underlying collateral

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investments

    The prior amortized cost less the impairment loss recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost. This amount should not be adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value, but should be adjusted for accretion and amortization. (FASB ASC 320-10-35-34A through 34E)

    https://checkpoint.riag.com/app/main/docLinkNew?DocID=iGAAPCD13:4610.1&SrcDocId=T0PPCGAP:2016fa59d1868f37557-1&feature=tcheckpoint&lastCpReqId=5094843&pinpnt=GAAPCD13:4619.499&d=d#GAAPCD13:4619.499

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Example

    A company has an investment portfolio on which management identified investments in debt securities (government securities Puerto Rico) with a fair value significantly lesser than its amortized cost.

    IssuerAmortized Cost

    as of 12/31/2015

    Coupon Rate

    Maturity Date

    Credit Rating (Moody's/S&P)

    Market Value as of 12/31/2015

    Market Value as of 12/31/2015

    Diff. between BV and MV

    %

    Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (I)

    5,000,000$ 4.150% 8/1/2017 CA/CC 28.244 1,412,200$ 3,587,800$ 72%

    Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (II)

    5,000,000$ 4.500% 8/1/2019 CA/CC 27.791 1,389,550$ 3,610,450$ 72%

    10,000,000$ 2,801,750$ 7,198,250$

    Sheet1

    IssuerAmortized Cost as of 12/31/2015Coupon RateMaturity DateCredit Rating (Moody's/S&P)Market Value as of 12/31/2015Market Value as of 12/31/2015Diff. between BV and MV%

    Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (I)$ 5,000,0004.150%8/1/17CA/CC28.244$ 1,412,200$ 3,587,80072%

    Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (II)$ 5,000,0004.500%8/1/19CA/CC27.791$ 1,389,550$ 3,610,45072%

    $ 10,000,000$ 2,801,750$ 7,198,250

    GT_Custom

    C1Custom 1

    C2Custom 2

    C3Custom 3

    C4Custom 4

    C5Custom 5

    C6Custom 6

    C7Custom 7

    C8Custom 8

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Example

    0

    50

    100

    150

    2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

    Market Value

    Bond #1 Bond #2Source: Bloomberg

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Example

    Circumstances for an OTTI have occurred and impairment analysis:

    The entity intends to sell the security

    It is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis

    The entity does not expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Example

    Management assumptions:

    Assumption Bond #1 Bond #2

    Principal hair cut -20% -25%

    Coupon interest adjustment -10% -10%

    Maturity term extension (years)

    5 5

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Example

    Revised scenario based on management assumptions:

    New terms Bond #1 Bond #2

    Adjusted principal obligation $4,000,000 $3,750,000

    Adjusted coupon interest 3.735% 4.050%

    Monthly interest payments $12,450 $12,656

    Term to maturity date (months) 79 103

    New maturity date 8/1/2022 8/1/2024

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Example

    Impairment calculation: Credit related impairment loss estimate for the Government Development Bank securities is based on the probability of default and loss severity in the event of default in consideration of the debt securities credit ratings and the latest available information about the Puerto Ricos Governments financial condition, including the Puerto Rico Governments intention to restructure its outstanding bond obligations.

    Bond #1 Bond #2 Total

    Amortized cost $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $10,000,000

    Present value of expected cash flows

    $3,904,517 $3,630,034 $7,534,551

    Impairment amount (credit loss portion)

    ($1,095,483) ($1,369,966) ($2,465,449)

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Journal Entry

    Account Description Debit Credit

    Impairment losses - current earnings 2,465,449$ -$ Unrealized losses - other comprehensive income 4,732,801 - Impairment loss on investments - 7,198,250

    7,198,250$ 7,198,250$

    Sheet1

    Account DescriptionDebitCredit

    Impairment losses - current earnings$ 2,465,449$ - 0

    Unrealized losses - other comprehensive income4,732,801- 0

    Impairment loss on investments- 07,198,250

    $ 7,198,250$ 7,198,250

    GT_Custom

    C1Custom 1

    C2Custom 2

    C3Custom 3

    C4Custom 4

    C5Custom 5

    C6Custom 6

    C7Custom 7

    C8Custom 8

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment (Balance Sheet)

    Balance Sheet

    Investment in marketable securities 2,801,750$

    Sheet1

    Balance Sheet

    Investment in marketable securities$ 2,801,750

    GT_Custom

    C1Custom 1

    C2Custom 2

    C3Custom 3

    C4Custom 4

    C5Custom 5

    C6Custom 6

    C7Custom 7

    C8Custom 8

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment (Income Statement)

    Income Statement

    Total other-than-temporary impairment losses (7,198,250)$

    Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income before taxes 4,732,801

    Net impairment losses recognized in earnings (2,465,449)$

    Sheet1

    Income Statement

    Total other-than-temporary impairment losses$ (7,198,250)

    Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income before taxes4,732,801

    Net impairment losses recognized in earnings$ (2,465,449)

    GT_Custom

    C1Custom 1

    C2Custom 2

    C3Custom 3

    C4Custom 4

    C5Custom 5

    C6Custom 6

    C7Custom 7

    C8Custom 8

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Disclosure Requirements

    ASC 320-10-50 Methodology and significant inputs used to measure the

    amount related to credit loss (recognized in earnings) Performance indicators such as default rates, delinquency rates,

    percentage of nonperforming assets Loan-to-collateral-value ratios Third party guarantees Geographic concentration Credit ratings

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Disclosure Requirements

    ASC 320-10-50 Roll forward of the amount related to credit losses

    recognized in earnings Beg. balance of credit losses for which a portion of an other-than-temporary

    impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income Additions to the credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was

    not previously recognized Reductions for securities sold during the period (realized) Reductions for securities for which the amount previously recognized in other

    comprehensive income was recognized in earnings because the entity intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Disclosure Requirements (cont.)

    ASC 320-10-50 Roll forward of the amount related to credit losses

    recognized in earnings (cont.) If the entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not

    that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, additional increases to the amount related to the credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized

    Reductions for increases in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security

    The ending balance of the amount related to credit losses on debt securities held by the entity at the end of the period for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting Standards Update

    ASU No. 2016-01 Financial Instruments Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities which amends the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the classification and measurement of financial instruments.Changes to the current GAAP model primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, the guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities was clarified.

    The ASU is effective for public companies for years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for all other entities an additional year after that.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting Standards Update

    ASU No. 2016-13 Financial Instruments Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments which amend the guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. The new guidance introduces an approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments. It also modifies the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination.

    ASU is effective for public companies for years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for non-public entities for years beginning after December 2021.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

    Troubled debt restructuring

    Kayra Rivera, CPA, CGMAAudit director

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Troubled debt restructuring

    ASC 470-60 Debt, Troubled Debt Restructurings by Debtors establishes standards of financial accounting and reporting by the debtor for a troubled debt restructuring.

    ASC 405-20 Liabilities, Extinguishments of Liabilities establishes standards of financial accounting and reporting for extinguishments of all liabilities.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for debt modifications

    Basic types of transactions:

    Trouble debt restructuringsModification of terms of an existing debtExtinguishment of debt

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Definition of troubled debt restructuring

    A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if:

    (1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, and

    (2) the lender grants a concession that it would not have otherwise considered

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Factors to determine a troubled debt restructuring

    If a borrower's creditworthiness has deteriorated since its debt was originally issued, it should then assess all aspects of its current financial position to determine whether it is experiencing financial difficulty.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    TDR Identification Two-Step Process

    Step 1:

    Determine whether the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. Indicators include the following:

    the debtor is currently in default on any of its debt

    the debtor has declared or is in the process of declaring bankruptcy

    doubt about ability to continue as a going concern

    currently, the debtor has securities that have been delisted, are in the process of being delisted, or are under threat of being delisted from an exchange.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    TDR Identification Two-Step Process

    Step 1:

    continuation -

    the debtor forecasts that its entity-specific cash flows will be insufficient to service debt (both interest and principal) in accordance with the contractual terms of the existing agreement through maturity.

    absent the current modification, the debtor cannot obtain funds from sources other than the existing creditors at an effective interest rate equal to the market interest rate for a similar debt for a nontroubleddebtor.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    TDR Identification Two-Step Process (cont.)

    Step 2:

    Determine whether modification is a concession.

    the effective borrowing rate on the restructured debt is less than the effective borrowing rate of the original debt.

    o the effective borrowing rate of the restructured debt is calculated by projecting all the cash flows under the new terms and solving for the discount rate that equates the present value of the cash flows under the new terms to the debtor's current carrying amount of the old debt.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    TDR Identification Two-Step Process (cont.)

    Step 2:

    Examples include the following:

    Forgiving principal or interest

    Modifying interest rate to a below-market rate

    Deferring principal payments(e.g. interest only)

    Extending the maturity date

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Troubled debt restructuring Settlement of debt

    Involves most commonly the following:

    Full settlement with assets or equity if the debtor transfers receivables from third parties or other assets or equity to the creditor to fully settle a debt, it should recognize a gain on the transaction in the amount by which the carrying amount of the payable exceeds the fair value of the assets transferred.

    Partial settlement with assets or equity if the debtor transfers receivables from third parties or other assets or equity to partially settle a debt, it should only measure the transaction with the fair value of the assets transferred (not the fair value of the payable).

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for a Settlement of debt Example Exchange of assets

    ABC, Inc. owes $300,000 plus $20,000 of accrued interest to PR Bank. The debt is a 10-year, 10% note. During 2015, ABC, Inc.s business deteriorated due to a faltering regional economy. On December 31, 2015, PR Bank agrees to accept an old machine and cancel the entire debt. The machine has a cost of $490,000, accumulated depreciation of $321,000, and a fair market value of $290,000.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for a Settlement of debt Example (cont.)

    Journal entries to be recorded:ABC, Inc:

    Notes Payable 300,000Interest Payable 20,000Accumulated Depreciation 321,000

    Machine 490,000Gain on Disposition of Machine 121,000 (a)Gain on Debt Restructuring 30,000 (b)

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for a TDR involving modification of terms

    When a borrower has a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) in which the terms of its debt are modified, it should analyse the future undiscounted cash flows to determine appropriate accounting treatment.

    If the future undiscounted cash flows under the new terms is lesser than the adjusted net carrying value of the original debt -- a gain is recorded on the transaction.

    If otherwise, no gain would be recorded.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for a TDR involving modification of terms

    In calculating the future undiscounted cash flows specified by the new terms:

    All payments under the new terms should be included

    Any contingent payments should be included without regard to the probability of those payments being made

    If the number of future payment periods may vary because the debt is payable on demand, the estimate of future cash payments should be based on the maximum number of periods that could be required under the terms of the revised debt agreement

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for a TDR involving modification of terms(cont.)

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for a TDR involving modification of terms(cont.)

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Example of Modification of terms Gain recorded

    On December 31, 2012, ABC Bank enters into a debt restructuring agreement with DEF Company, which is now experiencing financial trouble. The bank agrees to restructure a 12%, issued at par, $2,000,000 note receivable by the following modifications.

    Reduce principal obligation from $2,000,000 to $1,300,000. Extend the maturity date from December 31, 2012, to December 31,

    2015. Reduce the interest rate from 12% to 10%.

    DEF Company pays interest at the end of each year. On January 1, 2016, DEF Company will pay $1,300,000 in cash to ABC Bank.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Example of Modification of terms Gain recorded (cont.)

    Journal December 31, 2012:Note Payable 310,000

    Gain on Debt Restructuring 310,000

    Total future cash flows after restructuring: Principal 1,300,000$ Interest ($1,300,000 x 10% x 3) 390,000

    1,690,000

    Total pre-restructuring carrying amountof note (principal): 2,000,000

    Gain ($2,000,000 - $1,690,000) 310,000$

    Sheet1

    Total future cash flows after restructuring:

    Principal$ 1,300,000

    Interest ($1,300,000 x 10% x 3)390,000

    1,690,000

    Total pre-restructuring carrying amount

    of note (principal): 2,000,000

    Gain ($2,000,000 - $1,690,000)$ 310,000

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Example of Modification of terms No gain recorded

    On December 31, 2012, ABC Bank enters into a debt restructuring agreement with DEF Company, which is now experiencing financial trouble. The bank agrees to restructure a 12%, issued at par, $2,000,000 note receivable by the following modifications.

    Reduce principal obligation from $2,000,000 to $1,600,000. Extend the maturity date from December 31, 2012, to December 31,

    2015. Reduce the interest rate from 12% to 10%.

    DEF Company pays interest at the end of each year. On January 1, 2016, DEF Company pays $1,600,000 in cash to ABC Bank.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Example of Modification of terms No gain recorded (cont.)

    Under this example, no gain is recorded by DEF Company since total future cash flows after restructuring exceed total pre-restructuring carrying amount of the note (principal):

    Total future cash flows after restructuring: Principal 1,600,000$ Interest ($1,600,000 x 10% x 3) 480,000

    2,080,000$

    Total pre-restructuring carrying amountof note (principal): 2,000,000$

    Sheet1

    Total future cash flows after restructuring:

    Principal$ 1,600,000

    Interest ($1,600,000 x 10% x 3)480,000

    $ 2,080,000

    Total pre-restructuring carrying amount

    of note (principal): $ 2,000,000

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Extinguishment of liabilities- ASC 405-20General

    ASC 405-20-40-1 provides guidance on when a reporting entity should extinguish a debt.

    A liability has been extinguished if the debtor either: the debtor pays the creditor and is relieved of its

    obligation for the liability the debtor is legally released from primary obligation

    under the liability, either judicially or by the creditor

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Extinguishment of liabilities- ASC 405-20What is considered?

    an exchange of debt with substantially different terms a substantial modification of terms

    If the difference between the present value of the cash flows of the new debt and the present value of the remaining cash flows of the original debt is

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Extinguishment of liabilities-Measurement of debt extinguishments

    For all debt extinguishments, the difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the debt extinguished (which includes any deferred debt issuance costs) should be recognized as a gain or loss when the debt is extinguished. Extraordinary item new guidance effective

    Transaction with related parties - recognition of gain or loss may not be appropriate (such a restructuring may be in essence a capital transaction).

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Accounting for a Debt extinguishment

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Troubled debt restructuringChapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings

    since debtor would be restating its liabilities generally, this subtopic would not apply to the debtor's accounting for such reduction of liabilities.

    this subtopic would apply to an isolated TDR by a debtor involved in bankruptcy proceedings if such restructuring did not result in a general restatement of the debtor's liabilities.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Administrative Determination 16-14Taxation of income due to debt forgiveness

    Section 1031.01 (a) (6) of the 2011 Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the "Code"), provides that, as a general rule, the income or benefit derived from the forgiveness of a debt is considered as part of the gross income subject to income tax.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Administrative Determination 16-14Taxation of income due to debt forgiveness

    Certain amounts are excluded: The cancellation is the result of filing an application for

    bankruptcy in an action under the provisions of Title 11 of the United States Code.

    Student loans, in whole or in part Reorganization of a mortgage loan guaranteed by the

    qualifying residence of the taxpayer, provided that the original mortgage loan amount does not exceed $1,000,000.

    Insolvency of the taxpayer

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Administrative Determination 16-14 Taxation of income due to debt forgiveness

    This Administrative Determination establishes the rules to determine the amount exempt from debt forgiveness under the following exclusions and also establishes the way to report the income for debt forgiveness under such circumstances:

    reorganization of a mortgage loan guaranteed by the qualifying residence of the taxpayer;

    when the taxpayer is insolvent Agreed upon procedures required

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

    Francisco Luis, JD, CPATax partner

    Recent tax legislation affecting multinational organizations

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Topics

    01 Act 40-201302 Circular Letters03 Act 72-201504 Wal-Mart Case05 Where are we now?

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Background Act 40-2013

    Act 40-2013 was enacted to impose, among others, important limitations to Puerto Rico taxpayers that had transactions with related parties not engaged in a trade or business and not subject to tax in Puerto Rico, as follows:

    established certain disallowance of expenses incurred or paid to a related person ; and

    added new components to the Alternative Minimum Tax ("AMT") computation.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Non-Deductible Expenses

    for ordinary tax purposes, Act 40-2013 established a disallowance of 51% of the expenses incurred with a related party that is not engaged in a trade or business or subject to taxes in Puerto Rico (section 1033.17)

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Alternative Minimum Tax

    the AMT of a corporation is the excess of, if any, the tentative minimum tax over the regular tax.

    important changes:

    2011 PR InternalRevenue Code

    Act 40-2013

    AMT Tax Rate 20% 30%

    Book Income Adjustment

    50% 60%

    NOL Limitation 90% 80%

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Alternative Minimum Tax

    the tentative minimum tax is composed of the greater of: 30% of the alternative minimum net income,

    or the sum of the following two items:

    1. 20% of the expenses incurred or paid to related parties and/or the expenses allocated from a home office to a branch located in Puerto Rico, if such payments were not subject to tax in Puerto Rico during the tax year

    2. up to 2% on the purchases of tangible personal property from a related person

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Authority to the Secretary of Treasury

    Act 40-2013 provided authority to the Secretary of Treasury to approve waivers to exclude expenses subject to the disallowance of 51% and the 20% charge in the AMT. It was also authorized to waive also the AMT on the transfer of personal property the Secretary was requested to issue guidelines on the

    procedures to request such waivers

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Waiver for expenses

    Circular Letter 13-06 was issued providing the procedures to request the exclusion of certain expenses incurred or paid to a related person with regards to: deduction of said expenses with regards to the 49%

    limitation imposed for income tax purposes 20% tax under the AMT calculation

    under these sections, the Secretary may grant an exclusion upon assessment of the nature of the expenses or costs paid to related person or office

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Waiver for expenses

    Circular Letter 13-06 required that among others a Memorandum in support of the waiver should be filed together with certain Agreed Upon Procedures covering the 4 taxable years prior to the year for which the waiver was being requested. the waiver, if granted would have been valid for 2

    taxable years

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Waiver for transfers of personal property

    Circular Letter 13-07 was issued to provide the procedure for requesting a partial or total waiver from inclusion in the AMT calculation of the purchase value of property acquired from a related person or transferred from home office Secretary may grant a partial or total waiver to reduce the

    tax rate limited to .2% when it is determined that the value of the purchased property or transferred property to the taxpayer was the same or substantially similar to the value under which said related person sells the property to an unrelated party.

    Pursuant to Act 40-2013, a transfer price study is required.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Circular Letter No. 13-23

    it was issued to clarify the term "eligible charges" to be excluded from the 51% disallowance for ordinary tax purposes and the AMT 20% charge. eligible charges are those that are expenses or directs

    costs that are essential and meet the following criteria:1) should be directly related to the operation of the

    industry or trade or business in Puerto Rico2) should be indispensable to make the operation viable

    in Puerto Rico It also indicated that the eligible charges should be those that although paid to a related party, they are truly reimbursements of expenses paid to non related third parties

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Act 72-2015 changes

    Act 72-2015 brought the following significant changes to the rules for related party transactions: it limited the amount of the expenses that the

    Secretary could waive to 60% from the 51% disallowance for ordinary tax purposes and from the 20% tax for AMT; and

    it also eliminated the waiver process for the purchases of personal property and provided an increase on the tax over those purchases from 2% to 6.5%, depending on the taxpayer's gross revenues

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Act 159-2015 Technical amendment to Act 72-2015 Waiver on Expenses with Related Parties it provides that the waiver request to exclude 60% of

    the expenses incurred with a related party that is not engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico from the 51% disallowance for ordinary tax purposes and from the 20% tax for AMT, should be made within the first taxable year for which such waiver is being requested. If granted, the waiver will be valid for a maximum of 3 taxable years.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Wal-Mart Action First Instance

    on December 4, 2015, Wal-Mart initiated legal action against the Secretary to challenge the changes brought by Act 72-2015.

    the main focus of Wal-Mart's claim was particularly with the AMT imposition on the purchases of personal property as it is the area in which it received the most impact.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Wal-Mart Action First Instance

    Wal-Mart requested an injunction against the continued enforcement of the AMT provisions sustaining that they were unlawful under the following: Dormant Commerce Clause Equal Protection Clause Bill of Attainder Clause Federal Relation Acts

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Wal-Mart Action First Instance

    on March 28, 2016, the district court issued an order stating its findings of fact and conclusions of law. It held that:1) it had jurisdiction under the Butler Act because of the

    lack of a "plain, speedy and efficient remedy" in Puerto Rico courts;

    2) the AMT violates the Dormant Commerce and the Equal Protection Clause;

    3) the AMT violates the Federal Relations Act;4) the AMT does not violate the Bill of Attainder Clause

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Wal-Mart Action The Court of Appeals determination the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's

    decision, therefore the injunction against the enforcement of the AMT against Wal-Mart continues.

    it indicates that the District Court had jurisdiction over Wal-Mart claims.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Wal-Mart Action The Court of Appeals determination Remarkable points the decision states that the AMT dispositions of Act 72-

    2015 are discriminatory as it taxes only cross border transactions between a Puerto Rico corporate taxpayer and a related entity outside of Puerto Rico.

    furthermore, the Appeal's Panel concluded also that if Act 72-2015 would have been valid, it would prevent multistate corporations from enjoying the functional integration, centralization of management, and economies of scale associated with their interstate business model.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Wal-Mart Action The Court of Appeals determination Remarkable points the decision mentions that Act 72-2015 is based on the

    incorrect presumption that all intercorporate transfers to a Puerto Rico branch from a related party are fraudulently priced to evade taxes.

    it says that there are alternatives to validate if there is an undue profit shifting as it is the case with "the already existing set of regulations that authorize the PR Treasury to conduct a traditional transfer pricing audit of interstate transactions between related parties and to adjust specific transfer prices to recapture improperly shifted profits."

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Wal-Mart Action The Court of Appeals determination Remarkable points certainly, the Appeals Court decision reaffirms, not

    only the unconstitutionality of these arbitrary impositions on related party transactions, but emphasizes the fact that Puerto Rico has regulations to review transactions among related parties, similar to those in the Federal Tax System.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Administrative Determination 16-11

    the Secretary of Treasury issued the AD 16-11 to clarify the applicability of the AMT after the resolution of the case with Wal-Mart for taxable years beginning after January 1, 2016,

    the AMT computation will not include the charge on the transfer of personal property and the 20% charge on expenses with related parties not engaged in a trade or business in Puerto Rico

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Administrative Determination 16-11

    provides rules stating that if the amount of tax for taxable year 2016, without considering the AMT charges on transfer of personal property and expenses, is already covered with the estimated tax payments made, no additional estimated tax payments are necessary.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Administrative Determination 16-11

    what about taxable year 2015? the AD 16-11 indicates that the taxpayer may

    amend its 2015 tax return to eliminate the tax portion that was attributable to the AMT computations on personal property and expense, if any. the excess tax paid should be claimed then as a

    credit of income taxes or as an AMT credit for future years.

    it specifically states that any excess tax paid can not be requested as a refund.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Administrative Determination 16-11

    what about the 51% disallowance? the Secretary indicates that even though the AMT

    charges on transfers of personal property and expenses with related parties not engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico were declared unconstitutional, the 51% disallowance continues to be valid.

  • 2016 Kevane Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

    Transfer Pricing

    Isabel Hernndez, CPATax partner

  • @2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Agenda

    Overview Arm's Length History US Regulation OECD Guidelines PR Regulation Transfer Pricing Study BEPS

  • @2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    What is Transfer Pricing?

    The pricing of transactions between related parties, such as a parent and a subsidiary.

    Companies undertaking transactions with unrelated companies in the marketplace must set competitive prices for goods they sell, services they provide, or the use of intangibles, but companies transferring goods or services between entities do not have to set competitive prices.

  • @2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Deals with the evaluation of prices charged in transactions between RELATED PARTIES

    Parties: Owned or controlled directly or indirectly by the same interests

    Transactions: Sale, lease, use of tangible property Sale, license, use of intangible property Services Loans

    Scope of Transfer Pricing

  • @2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Multinational companies operate in different countries with different tax laws/tax rates

    Large companies can have difficulty determining where income is earned

    Companies have incentives to transfer income to lowest tax jurisdictions

    Companies can use transfer pricing as a planning opportunity to reduce taxes

    In many countries, enforcing transfer pricing regulations is perceived to be a significant revenue raising strategy used by the local tax authorities

    In many countries, the local tax authority imposes significant penalties for noncompliance with the transfer pricing regulations

    Importance of Transfer Pricing

  • @2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    Any multinational company that has intercompany transfers of tangible property, services or intangibles

    Multi-state companies with intercompany pricing issues Companies with management objectives of determining

    intercompany prices Companies whose transfer pricing policies are being audited Companies who have related party transactions involving

    entities not part of a consolidated tax return Companies which require an analysis of the value of certain

    functions and risks (ex: value of intangible property)

    Types of Companies that Benefit from a Transfer Pricing Analysis

  • @2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    There are two options for meeting regulatory requirements: annual report and Advance Pricing Agreements (APA)

    Meeting Regulatory Requirements

    This is typically considered to be the standard way to meet regulatory compliance

    Companies must annually document their activities (documentation requirements vary by country) and be ready to support a tax return filed

    This approach to regulatory compliance is most common among the clients as it is still the dominantly chosen means for compliance

    An APA is an agreement between the taxpayer and the Tax Authorities concerning the methods the taxpayer will use to set its transfer prices over some specified period of time

    The main advantage of an APA is that it reduces uncertainties both for taxpayers and tax authorities, reducing the threat of penalties

    The main obstacle to an APA is the cost of time and resources involved in negotiating one successfully

    Under an APA, a company must still carry-out the agreed methodology in order to determine the appropriate allocation of profits

    APAANNUAL REPORTING

  • @2016 Kevane Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved.

    The arms-length standard is the fundamental basis of worldwide transfer pricing regulations.

    A transaction is at arms-length if the transaction is consistent with results of uncontrolled taxpayers engaged in comparable transactions.

    Specific methods for analyzing intercompany transfers of tangible goods, services and intangible goods are outlined in regulations under Section 482 of the US IRC and Section 1040.09 of the PRIRC.

    When two or more transfers occur withi