Tapping into the Internet as an Acoustical / Musical ...cc/pub/pdf/tapInternetMedium.pdf · Tapping...

62
Interactive Networked Music -- Tapping into the Internet as an Acoustical / Musical Medium Chris Chafe Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA) Stanford University

Transcript of Tapping into the Internet as an Acoustical / Musical ...cc/pub/pdf/tapInternetMedium.pdf · Tapping...

  • Interactive Networked Music --Tapping into the Internet as anAcoustical / Musical Medium

    Chris Chafe

    Center for Computer Research inMusic and Acoustics (CCRMA)

    Stanford University

  • Our theme as a magazine cover...

    (ACMDec-01)

  • (Dec-06)

    Stanford Chicago

    RPI, NYSanta Cruz

  • Analogies to other acoustical media: air, water, earth, etc.

  • topologies

  • Acoustical Monitoring for Network Operations(NASA)

    Interactive Sound Art / Theater(SF MOMA, Parc de la Villette)

    Distributed Musical Ensembles

    Distributed Instrument Synthesis (Physical Models)

    Distributed DSP Algorithms (Internet Reverb)

    Applications:

  • Studies:

    Studies of Rhythm Locking under Delay Conditions

    Thoughts on the Qualities of an IP Acoustical Medium

  • Duo PianoConcert

    Stanford / Belfast

    (15-May-07)

  • Duo PianoConcert

    Stanford / Belfast

    (15-May-07)

  • Jam SessionStanford  ?? (2002)

    next studio?Berkeley?

    Sacramento?Denver

    Chicago

    Montreal

    London

    Bass & Saxat Stanford

    Listening quiz: The drums are where?

  • Jam SessionStanford  ?? (2002)

    next studio?Berkeley?

    Sacramento?Denver

    Chicago

    Montreal

    London

    Bass & Saxat Stanford

    Listening quiz: The drums are where?

  • Drums are inMontreal

    Bass & Saxat Stanford

    Jam SessionStanford  McGill Univ. (2002)

  • Jam SessionsStanford  McGill Univ. (2002)

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Quintet (June, 2006)Banff, Alberta (St. Lawrence String Qt.)CCRMA, Stanford (2nd viola)

    (25 msec oneway)

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Listening from Banff side

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Listening from Stanford side

    Quintet (June, 2006)Banff, Alberta (St. Lawrence String Qt.)CCRMA, Stanford (2nd viola)

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    The Perfect Ritard

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    The Perfect Ritard

    Egads! A new use forthe Internet.

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Fighting off the Ritard

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Fighting off the Ritard

    Hmm... wishful thinking.

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Power Structure, the 4 ignore the 1(music minus one) 

    4 players

    1 player follows

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Power Structure, the 4 ignore the 1(music minus one) 

    4 players

    1 player follows

    Best! ...but result is onesided. 

  • Here's what happensjust across a room... (length of room, ca. 20 feet)

    4 players

  • Quartet, recorded in a room.Take 1: all together in one corner

    4 players

  • Take 2, separated by a partition

    3 players

    exiled violist

  • Take 2, separated by a partition

    3 players

    exiled violist

  • Take 2, after recording,compensated by 21 msec 

  • Take 2, after recording,compensated by 21 msec 

  • Summary:

    Separation delay is like molasses (slows tempo down)

    Equality of ensemble makes it worse

    Tactics to compensate (“y ou lead, I'll follow”)

    Post-production compensation

    Room and reverb seem to help

  • Let's make some music, anyway.

  • Trio (May, 2004)Stanford (bass guitar) / Victoria, BC (sitar) / Missoula, MT (elec. Violin) 

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Quartet (June, 2004)Stanford (flute, elec. cello)Stockholm (bass flute, piano)

    ...really slow tempo,not much rhythm...

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Quartet (June, 2004)Stanford (flute, elec. cello)Stockholm (bass flute, piano)

    ...really slow tempo,not much rhythm...

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Octet (March, 2006)Stanford (violin)Seattle (uilleann pipes)Belfast (sextet)

    ...fast, rhythmic...

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

    Octet (March, 2006)Stanford (violin)Seattle (uilleann pipes)Belfast (sextet)

    ...fast, rhythmic...

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  PrincetonNext gig?

  • Experiment Designed toDetermine Effect of Latency onEnsemble Accuracy

  • Subjects = students and staff at Stanford(paired randomly)

    Task = play rhythm accurately, keep an even tempo(no strategies given)

  • Interlocking rhythm

  • Sound(2ms delay each direction, metronome cue = mm94)

  • Delays: 0 – 77ms (each way) in 12 steps

    Experiment 1 with 17 pairs of subjects

    0 25 9

    1420

    2735

    44

    54

    65

    77

    Delay Times (ms) Tested

  • Deceleration from longer delaybut where does it start to cause

    trouble?

    Sound(77ms delay each direction, metronome cue = mm90)

  • Deceleration from longer delaybut where does it start to cause

    trouble?

    Sound(77ms delay each direction, metronome cue = mm90)

  • Results

  • Human clappers at 65ms delay

  • Acceleration vs. delay time(r2 = 0.98)

  • Tempo slope = 0

    Delay = 11.5 ms

    @ Delay  11.5 ms, 85% of trials slowed down

    Sweet Spot?

  • Rhythm Locking

    new field of study, useful for applicationssimilar to turn taking studies

    we like to lock, music, dance, ...physical, fun

    clumsy locking is frustrating

    and tech stuff can really mess it up(i.e., bad network audio) but, also human stuff

  • Analogies to other acoustical media: air, water, earth, etc.

  • speed of sound

    due to network delay jitter and asymmetrythe speed of sound is never uniform

    (but there are also special LAN digital audio networks using dedicated hardware which are constant)

  • never uniform

    easy to interpret by ear...

    sonified pings Stanford www.newscientist.com

  • never uniform

    easy to interpret by ear...

    sonified pings Stanford www.newscientist.com

  • sound quality

    depends on QoS of network pathand hosts' network and audiocapabilities

    ...test with audio feedback loops

  • fast echoes = pitches

    SoundWIRE “ plucking” technique, recirculates audio for fine-grained QoS monitoring

    Stanford UCBerkeley

  • changing delay = variable speed of sound = potential signal discontinuities = sonic booms

  • packet transmission errors = glitches from dropped data or duplicates

  • anisotropic

    in wood, speed of sound isfaster with the grain

    in network, speed of sound is faster in the corebut slows down near the edges where there's often lots of routers

  • Round trip time (ms)Stanford  Princeton

  • asymmetric

    speed never exactly the same bidirectionally

  • Best match: < 25ms = longest delay > 25 ms = mean of delays

    Asymmetry

  • no distance effects on signal = no attenuation, filtering or dispersion

    no mixing =wave channels can be 100% discrete

  • SummaryInternet acoustics, same but differentMore than just a telephone because there's computing involved...musical instruments, spaces, effects are created in software...and prediction algorithms

    Thanks!