Tap on, tap off, the tapper - Vigli. · PDF fileTap on, tap off, the tapper – 08/01/13...

Tap on, tap off, the tapper – 08/01/13 1.

Tap on, tap off, the tapper Adam Bull – June 2012 – Jan 2013 (to be continued…)

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?46312-Tap-on-Tap-off-the-tapper.

Background ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

Primer on the importance of Electricity, and it's part in the Chemical and Biological systems ...................... 9

Electrons don't exist ....................................................................................................................................... 16

Governments bodies interested in this work? ................................................................................................ 17

One of my latest experiments ........................................................................................................................ 19

Perpetual motion doesn't exist? ..................................................................................................................... 20

The electron itself doesn't exist ..................................................................................................................... 21

Misconception of Reality, an abstract on the broken science ........................................................................ 23

'Magnetic electricity' discovered ................................................................................................................... 30

To those that believe my explanations are hearsay , unfounded, or non peer reviewed ............................... 33

Faster than light travel, breaking of conservational principles and more. ..................................................... 35

Tesla's Last Known Living Assistant's Recorded Statement ......................................................................... 39

Regarding the scientists that have commented about me "not knowing what I am talking about". .............. 45

ATTENDANTS APPEAL ............................................................................................................................. 47

Simply explain to us why the electron remains in perpetual motion ............................................................. 49

The Copenhagen interpretation was created during this conference. ............................................................ 51

About Tesla’s patent 787412 ......................................................................................................................... 52

These are things which I find appalling and offensive myself ...................................................................... 53

An excerpt from Technology For a New Future p79-84 ............................................................................... 61

Patents & Copyright Buying & Selling Your Nature .................................................................................... 69

The Stars, Their Planets. The Plants & Their Animals.................................................................................. 70

CRIMINALS & THE GOOD LITTLE BOY that never came to prosper .................................................... 72

The Unexplained Power Station Explosions ................................................................................................. 73

Dewey B. Larson, at the 3rd Annual Conference of New Science Advocates "Faster than light exists" ..... 74

Universal Constructor, a short story .............................................................................................................. 75

Edward Leedskalnin’s Cosmic Force ............................................................................................................ 77

Excerpts from Technology For a New Future ............................................................................................... 79

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?46312-Tap-on-Tap-off-the-tapper


Background

So, for a long time I promised that I would bring some of the impressions I had observed to

project Camelot forums.

For the last 10 years or so I have been involved in the researches and historic biography of

several individuals involved in Electricity and free energy, including but not limited to the

life of Nikola Tesla, Wilhelm Reich, Oliver Heaviside, Charles Proteus Steinmetz, Eric

Dollard, Charles Wheatstone, Chris Carson, Kennely and James Clerk Maxwell and

Faraday.

My work is really the sum total of a multitude of geniuses, and I take absolutely no credit

for their work whatsoever. My work has broken me as a man, and challenged me as a soul,

and I have the unfortunate duty of publishing my findings out to someone. I have known of

Kerry and Bill for some time, and after some experiences of my own when I was starting

out I find many of their video's a first-door to my understanding of this strange world. All

of it, rooted in history, and that is where research should stay. I will not speculate in this

post. I will tell you things that will turn you white and cause you to lose sleep, I do so

because I have seen the future, there is no patents, it will be a crime, there is no energy

scarcity either, or overpopulation. It is not illogical or a giant leap, it is a big universe out

there, and I would like to be kind enough and honest enough to explain.

Most people know that Nikola Tesla from 1890 to 1914 was engaged in the development of

A.C technology and for a short period of time worked under Edison Electric, later to

become General Electric, which employed Steinmetz for some period in his life, a

prominent Mathematician of his time that emigrated from Europe to America. What most

people do not know is that the A.C system that Tesla developed was one of a myriad of

important developments and advancements in the electrical system we have today.

Many are familiar with, and have no problem banding about the term "Marconi Wireless

System", yet, their focus always is that Marconi stole Tesla's patents. This is true, Marconi -

sort of stole them - by changing the waves the system employed, however, that is not the

important part of the story.

The important part of the story is that in 1914-1919 the Marconi Wireless Installation was

stolen from Marconi, an italian national, and placed under Military Government general

rule command. This is of course not a joke, and you can check the formation of R.C.A

yourself, and you will see that they "bought" Marconi Wireless Company.

Indeed, however, it was under statute of law. Frankly, the United States was terrified that

the Alexanderson system and Marconi Wireless System would fall into foreign hands, such

as Germany.

In any case, the Marconi System is not famously known for the fact that it exhibited wave

forms that travelled 1.5645161290322580645161290322581 faster than the speed of light.

Yes, that is right, and you likely will have never heard it before. You can check by reading


Eric Dollards books on the subject of Tesla.

What is special about Eric Dollard as a source, as not only has he like Tesla demonstrated

this Technology as working, but he was actually gainfully employed under R.C.A, is a

foremostly recognised expert in Tesla, and gave the MOST ADVANCED lecture on

Electrical Theory since Tesla, at the San Francisco Tesla Society.

In Bolinas, the Marconi Wireless facility was located, and, today, still stands testament to

the most advanced electrical installation ever to exist on the planet earth. Eric Dollard

writes, after having his lab taken away from him, his RCA equipment destroyed ,

confiscated or bulldozed by a SWAT team "that if commonweal and Point Reyes are

allowed to continue allowing the old Marconi Wireless site to degrade it will be a great loss

to humanity".

Nikola Tesla was involved with the Marconi site, I have a picture of him standing next to

Steinmetz, Einstein and many other highly talented prodigies of the era. It is actually a fact

that during these times most engineers thought that free energy was soon to be around the

corner.

It is actually a fact that with the advent of the Marconi Wireless System exhibited two

different waveforms that traveled along its aerial ground structure, it is based on the work

of Marconi and Tesla, and the mathematics of Steinmetz, and makes use of the Multiple

Loaded Flat Top Antennae (MLFTA). The Marconi Wireless System's (MLFTA) it exhibits

2 types of wave simultaneously, the LONGITUDINAL wave of 291,000miles/ per second

& the TRANSVERSE wave of 186,000miles/per second. Of course most of us are familiar

with the light speed TRANSVERSE SINUSOIDAL WAVE of 186,000miles per second,

because it is what Einstein called C, the constant ratio between the exchange of energy and

mass.

The marconi Wireless system was, as Dollard claims rightly, nothing short of absolutely

spectacular, a truly marvelous achievement for humanity. That is, until Radio Corporation

America and David Sarnoff taken over, under the government-military sponsored control

programme.

Funnily enough, the Radio and TV we know today, consists of ONLY transverse (aka

sinusoidal) wave forms, where the wave travels over space and time ONLY. This is what is

known as "radiation resistance" by definition, as the sine wave is altering it's vector or

phase direction along the wave, as set out and invented by Nikola Tesla's sytem of

polyphase AC. In any case, the longitudinal wave of 291,000miles per second that existed

in the Marconi Wireless System, until R.C.A pulled the plug, had a waveform shape that

was infinitely flat, this is akin to a wave whose vector is concentrated, e.g. the longitudinal

wave travels like pulling a rope. And the transverse wave we use today for our TV &

Radio, it has a great deal of resistance, and, is much slower in the speed of propogation.

Let me explain a brain excercise so you can see this more clerely. Imagine if there was a


nice little rope that went accross the universe for you, Joe is on one end, and Matilda is on

the other. Joe pulls one end. What is the speed for the "transmission" of the wave? E.g. the

binary C/W Data (information transmitted by pushing and pulling and sequencing). Well,

the speed is pretty much instant, because the hole rope is connected and straight together, it

is tort, so if one end pulls, the other is pulled instanteously.

This explains why Tesla felt he was able to claim to have "conceived a wave" that travels

completely "regardless of distance". I am quoting Tesla directly. The nice thing about my

post is, that you can see now how he came to this claim.

Interestingly enough Tesla also claimed he had contacted "aliens". This was I believe was

attacked in the die-hard-press relentlessly. Regardless of the fact that if Tesla's rope, or the

technical term, lines of force existed between all points in space, then Tesla may very well

have transmitted basic communications to the entire universe simultaneously. Essentially

triggering all Advanced installations throughout the entire universe to hear the C/W

message. Indeed, if it propogated instanteously as Tesla claimed - then, truly, the galactic

civilisations, if any existed, would have heard that message instanteously.

Perhaps that is why it is instanensouly suppressed and R.C.A founded, Tesla discredited,

and also Tesla air-brushed from the Bolinas photo's that exist in Edison Archive today.

Strange that. However, you can see the funny , and upsetting side of this. Why the defence

department went bonkers, if or when they realised that Tesla may have unknowingly, or

intentionally advertised the civilisation of man to the entire universe simultaneously. That

was bound to irritate some people.

So, Marconi Wireless used Tesla's patents and the system comprised of 2 waveforms in it's

multiple loaded flat top antennae ground-structure. Longitudinal waves which traveled at

approximately 1.56 times the speed of light (push/pull of a rope) that traveled at

291,000mi/sec and transverse waves which traveled at 1.0 the speed of light or C, which

were sinusoidal and spread out over space and time. Wheras the longitudinal wave was not

spread out over space and time.

The transverse wave is like moving the rope that goes accross the universe up one end,

instead of pushing and pulling. There is so much resistance in comparison to just pushing

and pulling it. It of course also travels much slower. Which is why this is such a brilliant

example/demonstration for people who do not understand Tesla's work with oscillating

current & his Tesla Magnifying Transmitter, as well as his longitudinal telluric waveforms

that he claimed "overcome distance". To people who know about Tesla already and find

this surprising, it should not be at all surprising if you know about Tesla. Tesla claimed he

had identified waves traveling 50 times C, or 50 times the speed of light inside his lab, most

likely by an electrical or mechanical means of identification.

Tesla was a true genius who conceived a one wave longitudinal wave system, Marconi

stole it and used 2 waves longitudinal and transverse to circumvent the Tesla patents, and

then the government deemed it a military general controlled endeavour.


They actually sought the removal of public use of the longitudinal wave, substituting it with

the inferior transverse system, the MLFTA was replaced with the Rhombic-D antennae,

that we all are familiar with. Another interesting fact about this obvious suppression was

that FM radio existed in 1930-1940 , see YANKEE RADIO, unfortunately though RCA

and david sarnoff, thought it right to lobby for the FCC to change the FM radio band.

You see, Yankee radio did not need to use AT &T relay lines in their radio transmissions,

unlike with Amplitude modulation, which suffers badly to hills. The problem for RCA, and

sarnoff was that the RCA system was inferior to the AM system, so they had the FCC

change the FM radio band.

Then all of a sudden when the FM radio's didn't transmit as reliably any more (which

Sarnoff and RCA knew , which is why they lobbied), then Yankee Radio was essentially

destroyed, and fair-competition non-existent, leaving a totally dominated government

military control of the propagation media for news, commerce, radio. A terrible terrible

terrible thing that has set back our nation 10's if not 100's of years or more. It leaves the

"free development" of radio, and this so-called Electron technology in complete disarray,

standing as testament to the greatest lie of the 21st century.

The Yankee Network was ruined, they were forced to lease out AT & T Lines, and what

was a once superior FM radio , became a small non-important player in the affiliate war of

commercial radio & TV. Indeed R.C.A & General Electric had it all figured out. The whole

debacle unfortunately ended when the owner of Yankee Radio plummeted to his death. A

testament to the cost of competing with the government military ran R.C.A AM technology.

Indeed both AM and FM are light speed communications. The point here is that R.C.A and

government have been controlling the media since about 1914-1919 by use of the FCC,

lobby groups, or by buying up, and taking over companies, aggressively, or by making it

law, or defence initiative, in the case of R.C.A and the Marconi Wireless System.

The truth is I have not only researched the history of R.C.A and claims of Eric Dollard,

Tesla & Wilhelm Reich and others, as to the legitimacy of this so-called illusive free

energy. Better forget that word "free energy". Tesla and Marconi's work I outlined,

specifically the marconi wireless system and the alexanderson alternator, well, they throw

out the conception of "energy losses" altogether. The systems truly are the most advanced

electrical installations ever to exist, and the removal of the longitudinal magneto dielectric

wave propogations were the greatest defence initiative - to seek control over up-and-

coming wave media, for command and control. This is truly a crime against humanity, and

it was no wonder that Nikola Tesla was so embittered by the moves.

He of course had demonstrated his longitudinal wave to many people, as well as EFFECT

preceding CAUSE. E.g. before the 2nd wire of an electrical circuit is closed, a blue vertical

wave travels up from the ground, BEFORE the wire touches the circuit - that creates a large

blue radial spark we call the spark - gap. Not only does this experiment prove that all


electricity is being affected by the earths magnetic polar mass, but, that the wave traveling

up, PRECEDING the wire being closed, is traveling ahead of time, or rather lagging in

time, to the action of closing the terminal.

This is something I have actually succesfully replicated with the help of Edward

Leedskalnins book on Magnetic Current, an ex NASA spacewatcher I know in Tidbinbilla,

and the support of several extremely gifted individuals. Unfortunately much like Chris

Carson, the man that truly taught me most of the important things about Magnetic Current

and Magneto Electrics, he is just not the same anymore, he lives in Illinois and I worry for

him.

I truly, truly, don't want the same thing to happen to me, so I want to bring this information,

all of it, to all of you, without charge, without motive, without any reason for you to doubt

it.

You see, the whole point of this is, that G.E, Marconi, the government and the military,

they have motives, they have reasons. The history is there and you can prove that

everything I said is true to yourself, by reading the biographies of Tesla, the Books of Eric

Dollard, and by watching his San Francisco Tesla Society Lecture.

The world we live in today thus can exist as nothing short of a lie. At the very least an

assumption of energy scarcity, and the strict control of radio airspace, allows for the

repeated harassment, victimisation, and destruction of the most important technology to

befall man since the discovery of Fire.

I want you to know, Thank you kindly for your reception. It is greatly appreciated.

END TRANSMISSION. Of course, having understood the complete works of Nikola Tesla

and Edward Leedskalnin I am able to grant many who do not know what is going on one

wonderful "truth". That the Pyramid Builders knew everything about the speed of light, the

longitudinal wave that comes from the sun, and how that the longitudinal wave of

291,000mi/sec traveling from the sun, when it hits the mass of planets or moons, reflects

the light speed we call light 186,000mi/sec.

My ex space watcher from Tidbinbilla, and Eric Dollard will be able to vouch for that. The

SUN, it is not visible in space, you cannot see it. You only see reflections of the wave when

it breaks apart, as transverse. This little gem right here, is not only why the Marconi

Wireless System works, but why the universe confirms the waves to both exist, and most of

science to be total utter trash. I believe Tesla used the phrase "works of fiction". He did not

see the continuation of the electron circuits.

It is truly amazing that they consider their circuits closed, when the planets north and south

poles rotating and changing direction is causing the volts in the wire to go up and down.

Do not worry I have written publications about this, I was lucky, as a musician and young

boy of 16, I had actually suspected that what was going on was something like this. - I


explain exactly how the Voltage in the wire goes up and down, and why it must be from

planets. I even explain an experiment for a high resolution recorded video of a spark gap, in

comparative conjunction with an astrological map of where the planet, particularly the

moon is. What is significant is that the planets add up to conserve their north and south pole

lines of force, so over time they go up and down equally.

That is called second order.

The work of Nikola Tesla, Eric Dollard, and my own devices, they all work with 3rd order

or beyond. As a musician I was lucky, and, I want the world to be lucky too.

I don't want a single dime. Just, please.... do something with this because I don't know how

to do something with it myself right now that would seriously benefit humanity in the way I

know it rightly should, and I do believe I have proven that today to you.

* * *

Thank you, thank you ever so much. Remember, I don't want anything, or to advertise my

work at the above site Paul. I know there is a lot of good information there that has taken

me so so long to make the progress towards. People who would like to understand the

technical details in a more simple way than the SFTS Lectures (they are intended with

scientists and engineers), then perhaps the Ham Radio SBARC talk that Eric gives is more

suitable.

It is where I started with Dollard, and as soon as I saw it, I knew I'd discovered someone,

and something very very special indeed.

I also created a video today demonstrated a LEADING CAUSE to EFFECT. This means

that the CAUSE of my switch closing in the circuit, has an effect, that "predicts it" or

"knows that it is coming". This means that the EFFECT LEADS AHEAD OF the cause in

time. Or more simply, the cause is ahead in time of the effect, and lags after the thing

that it seems to be producing. This blows all science out of the water. All of it. That's why

it's classified, eh?

It is also not entirely simple, I had to revise the above paragraph about 5 times, to explain

fully what is going on. It is simplifiable, and it is my hope I am doing that enough for

people of all walks of life understanding the importance of Tesla, Leedskalnins, Reich &

Dollards work, and many many other brilliant human beings that still exist today. Time I

believe does run short though.

If I am right about this particularly, it does a lot more than disprove electrons, or

demonstrate faster than light. It shows that the faster than light waves, operate in the

counterspace that Eric Dollard writes about in his books. The wave (my cause) appears to

propogate backwards in time, so that the leading effect, to lagging cause, can come before,


and meet my closing terminal. The way it does this is by traveling upwards towards my

switch, before it has been closed.

I have caught this nearly 100 times, in about 1000 - 2000 different types of shot. I need

bettery camera's and people need to do the work themselves now. Either the electricity is

alive and is able to anticipate my actions, or electrical wave are propagating forwards and

backwards through time. Or, I am a mad scientist, perhaps, that is quite mistaken.

(accepting).

I hope it finds you well and this meets the unexpected thirst and interest my post seems to

have raised on this forum. I have to say I am so very glad.

ERIC DOLLARD @ SBARC:

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7oAlvaC8ls

MY VIDEO DEMONSTRATION UPLOADED TODAY FOR PROJECT AVALON TO

SHOW EFFECT PRECEDING CAUSE, I have named this effect the "Dollard Tesla

Leedskalnin effect"

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTriBftOPtw

e.g. I don't want credit. I want patents, and the lie of energy scarcity to end. We have

electrical waves which are propogating forwards and backwards in time, at least, if I am

right- and if I am right, then the world is due for a revolution of a socio-political and

scientific kind never seen in this century. Or rather, for the last 100 years it should have

been undergoing it such, if it was not for the unwelcome , immoral and unfair interference

of the military government "lucifer group" since about the inception of RCA.

Thank you, Thank you all, so much. I promise I am not making this up, and I promise if

you look into it you will discover there is much that we will have to do to save this

technology for being destroyed, by groups like Commonweal, R.C.A and the military-

government complex, which took control of the development and licensing of this

technology, as well as a patent monopoly in 1914.

That silly old story "if we had it we'd be using it story" peddled by the ministry of

skepticism et al, becomes tired and wasted; as I have outlined it's assumption : that

there wasn't a documented government-military conspiracy to take precedence of

command and control of the technology.

Thanking you all again, you have lit a bright light today,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7oAlvaC8ls

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTriBftOPtw


Primer on the importance of Electricity, and it's part in the Chemical and

Biological systems

OK. I will try my best. Here is a primer on the importance of Electricity, and it's part in the

Chemical and Biological systems. As well as the importance of approach and observation ,

are essentially the only barrier to our Doctors & Scientists killing us.

If you've ever seen a nuclear bomb you know what I'm on about. It's menacing destruction

to say the least. For me though it's tantamount to torture, because I'm very well aware that

there are much safer ways for both industrial and scientific development could go. I will

provide an example of the danger of industry and commerce. Or "For profit" development

"for humanity".

Hmmmmm..... if that isn't a contradiction, y'know, what is? Our society is based on this

bull****.

Each mind consists of electrical currents coursing through it like branches of a tree fill the

air elevated above the ground. These electrical currents in the mind are rooted, much like

the structure of the tree to the ground.

The electrical currents inside the mind, they are triggered when signal from cell. This

means the physical senses of communication propagate through these tree-like paths. Every

emotion and feeling has a distinct electrical signature.

The brain is able to detect the difference (in engineering called a differential) of the current

that runs from it, and to and from the body. There are two currents, reception and

transmission in the nervous system.

High amplitude impulses are indicate pain, or organ break down, such as the teeth or the

heart, or stomach. This is what we call a shooting pain. It is high amplitude and high

frequency in it's nature, and it causes the vibration of the heart or other organs. These such

electrical conditions indicate the failure of the bodies electrical and physical symbiosis.

The doctors, they are very evil men, the drug makers - more so. You see, the organ , such as

the stomach, or the liver, or the kidney, it does not get sick because "it lacks something" or

because it is "weak". Those organs, they become weak through the chemical, biological and

electrical processes.

A person who eats too much sugar destroys ones' kidney - and stresses it too. A person who

drinks alcohol aswell, they damage it, whilst it is stressed. The kidney is unable to save the

stomach, and the heart, and the blood vessels and lungs from the same afflictions they

might otherwise had been able to via ultra eutrification, and the failure of one organ of

physical was caused by the mind's desires. The single failure of the mind, and the kidneys,


caused failure of the blood and the cells within, and they failed the most important part's of

the body, the lungs and the heart.

Eating just sugar is capable of breaking one organ. Only organs are capable of making

people sick. IF the scientists and money-makers wished to make people well and create a

good medical science, they would have observed that it is NOT the treatment of an organ

that makes a person well, it is the observation that an action , or several combinations of

actions, at once, and over time, caused a degeneration in a single organ, which possesses a

critical and cumulative effect to the other interdependent systems. A slight failure in the

heart, is followed by a slight failure in oxygen supply from the lungs. Which causes

degradation in the heart, which causes degradations in the lungs, which causes degradation

in the mind. Do you see where I'm going? When you fail to look after one thing, the others

all follow in quick succession. This is akin to the human family but inside the organ system.

Sound familiar? IT should to the remainder of the slaughtered tribes. Yes, this is ancient

medicine.

Such a euphemism is equivalent to saying the heart needs the lungs to provide it oxygen

continually, and the brain and nervous system needs this from the lungs too, to continue

communicating with that heart electrically. Water is needed aswell to carry that electrical

signals from the brain to the heart, and the signal from the lungs and diaphragm too. (Ever

wondered why you can consciously and unconsciously control breathing? It's an electrical

nervous system that is rigged into your brain directly.)

I have given direct proof : The heart needed the lungs to provide the oxygen for its

existence, electrically and cellularly. The lungs need the heart to continue beating

electrically and cellularly - if the heart stops, the lungs are unable to keep the heart alive.

And if the lungs are unable to keep the heart alive, the lungs are unable to keep the heart.

The systems are connected, and interdependent.

Had the vatican and other luciferians not gone out of their way to totally oblierate the

natural medicine system of the shaman's in Africa, all human beings would think this way.

Democrats and so-called capitalist freedom lovers would prefer it too, but currently they

call it "holistic", and they are misguided by the calming,(but chilling) words of science, that

a "universal approach is unnecessary and foolhardy".

They go on and on for hours, years decades and centuries about how important it is to

divide reality so that it can be understood. They do this and chemists have no idea how

biology is supposed to work, and biologists have no idea how physics works. Yet in the

human body it is clear, they are all at work, and it is also clear because of how we decided

to approach it as a modern civilisation we are unable to fathom this, intellectually or

spiritually. What does it matter you say?

It matters that whilst the entire body of so-called sane thinking scientists, continue to split

the world up , so that it isn't an "unordered mess they do not understand", that "unordered

mess" they are talking about - it is the human body. This directly means by logical


construct and natural philosophy, that the reluctance to consider the chemical, biological

and physical systems to be interactive, and inductive theory to be based on it, has resulted

in the misgiven and delusive notion that these faculties would somehow exist as separate

systems; they are not, the human body shows it.

So you can see it's clear why we are all so sick, the very thing we are - chemical's, matter,

and electricity and biology in symbiosis, is the very opposite direction to that which science

has marched. The age of "It shouldn't be doing that" is the height of the Scientific fiction.

Had they realised that the human body worked much like the rest of the universe, they

would have realised that "treatment" being prescribed was like a perfect metaphor for

pulling out one stop of an Organ, which is attached by string to each of the rest by a ratio of

electro-biological chemical mineral enzymatic and electro-bio-feedback kind". You cannot

change one current in the body without altering another.

They are treating people right now, considering a limited number of currents. They are

changing one current in the body, without realising that many others are altered, and they

are not experts - nobody is an expert.

It all could have been avoided if they didn't consider that treatment was that of a condition;

and the condition is something that is mostly created by treatments of different conditional

changes of the electrical, mineral, and conductive balance of the bio-electrical system. Yes

this is suppressed science.

Yes they really are using the inventive method to treat cancer, and illness, and aids. When

the inductive method can display a system of complexity that is beyond the interest, or self-

considered-grasp of scientists.

That is why they are so mad about splitting it up, and isolating it, and making it double

blind you see- because they have ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE how things are connected

together. Had they some consideration of the inter-dependability of significant variables,

then they would realise their double-blind experiments are equally useless unless they are

"GODS" capable of isolating every single variation of the test subject, genetically,

chemically, electrically, equatorially, and their angle to the sun.

Most people that have side effects of sniffing the floor and trying to walk their dog upside

down, don't expect that the angle of rotations of planets, and electrical fields insulating and

penetrating their body currents of blood in golden ratio tubes called veins and arteries,

effects the enzymatic and climatic balance of nearly every single one of their systems - they

consider it a "side effect". OR rather, something that the scientists that prescribed it, don't

entirely understand.

Had they understood it, then it would be entirely unpresent. As things that are unpleasant

generally should. Of course unless money had something to do with it.

Just because the suppressed the Shamans in Africa. They lost holistic healing and medicine


wheel' the cells within cells. Not just a bull**** way of thinking that is the opposite of

science. Proof that science marches in the opposite direction of the FULLY UNIFIED ONE

of mind body spirit, biology, chemistry and physical matter - all in one. So for those who

wonder why science is dehumanising; it can and should hardly be a surprise to you. I just

explained that WHAT WE ARE as systems of inderdependant electrical biological and

chemical and physical arrangements they are in contradiction with science's "LAW" of

separation and isolation.

And any method of science that works this way, always ignores the universal.

They are of course totally oblivious to the fact that the reason things were split up in the

first place, was because we were not gods that could understand how universal action

interacted, how the universal system of biology chemistry and physical electricity we knew

to exist (all life) WAS.

That is why we split it (the universe) up, to understand the universal, because we were not

gods that could see the beautiful interaction that we KNOW EXISTS, or we would not have

separated it into faculty to start with !! This is obvious!!!

They have forgotten we split up the universe and sciences into faculty, because "WE

WERE NOT GODS THAT COULD NOT KNOW EVERY VARIABLE AND SEE ITS

WONDER AND BEAUTY IN INTERACTION".

They march on in experiments, supposedly isolating things, when they are not, and they

call it "the best approach". They play god, whilst simultaneously denying the "God", or

"connected universe" Within.

They would much prefer a battle of "Noahs Ark versus Quantum Electro Dynamics".

Instead we have a science that is ultimately brilliant, versus an ultimately decrepid and old

system of shamanism. Shamanism with the tools of science, would be able to create

electrical, chemical, and physical-matter in reactance with their environment to achieve

wonders that surely have not been achieved for almost 36,000 years now. Indeed, what I am

talking about is no short than the Technology for a New Babylon, and it's suppression. And

the death of literally countless millions and billions, because of the reluctance, and in some

cases, darn right insistence of a method that was DESIGNED TO UNDERSTAND THE

UNIVERSAL PROGRESSIVELY BY "fictional abstractions" of isolation.

They march on with their isolation, regardless they are not gods to split the universal

forces, and thus in many cases they "FAIL TO SEPARATE THEIR EXPERIMENTS

FROM THUS FAR UNKNOWN FORCES" - i.e.make the same fictional conclusions, not

based on inductive hypothesis, but based on the inventive abstractive context of describing

a system that is ISOLATED and thus MIS-REPRESENTATIVE fiction of real scenario's.

This is exactly according to Tesla's best work- and Tesla himself felt strongly about the

importance of observation. Indeed Tesla himself said that "For more than eighteen years I


have been reading treatises, reports of scientific transactions, and articles on Hertz-wave

telegraphy, to keep myself informed, but they have always imprest me like works of

fiction.".

Well they are still marching on with hertz waves, and those "silly phones". 3G, for 3

Gigahertz. They emit Transverse waves of 186,000 miles per second. So far einstein agree's

with that, just nothing going any faster.

The interesting thing is that the 186,000miles per second waves from the microwave signals

of the phone. They dislodge Deoxyribone nuclear acid from your cellular matter. The

transverse waves from your mobile phone, they are at a very low amplitude that would

serve to diminish a totally destructive effect of this transverse wave - though you can expect

the radiation resistance of the transverse light speed wave to damage your DNA and RNA

sequences. Don't worry though , the FDA and their BEST SCIENTISTS have determined it

to be entirely safe.

Funnily enough Tesla determined his technology, that traveled faster than light,

(291,000miles per second and faster) - was entirely harmless to the body. Mainly because

the radiation resistance was 0. e.g. instead of an L shaped transverse radio/electrical energy

wave, he worked with an infinitely flat magneto dielectric longitudinal wave. Much like the

skin effect, it's propogation - it does not go through your brain , at least if you had a mobile

phone that Used the Tesla Wireless.

Oh well. Money came first folks.

I think this is sort of what you wanted - I hate mysticism, just as much as my teachers

dislike "Asteroid" "Meteor" and "New Age" comments, that does not mean we are not

proponents of it. IT simply means that Bearden and Searl disinformation seek to mislead

the observational mind. In my mind, I consider this intentional.

Some have recently suggestions I wanted to make money out of this, this could not be

further from the truth. I am very well aware that everything I have told you, If I am correct,

neccissitates the insttaneous death and destruction of money, tax and other land value

inflation. Indeed there is a very large plot available. Just not within the minds of men. My

tears are shed because I am not convinced that the minds of men consider things as I.

Afterall that is why I would come here in the first place.

Not only does the moon put that billions of trillions of watts of energy from it's

MOVEMENT ALONE, into the long-fluid-conductor we call the OCEAN, but Tesla found

a way to intercept all of the energy, before it even reached the sea on the earth.

In short Tesla found a way to power the world for free. Then , enough to power it 1000

times over, every year, forever. There would be so much free energy people would be able

to create gold in their own personal 500 KVA (500 Kilovolt Ampere) Flywheels. The Fed,

and other criminal enterprises would quickly vanish, and a military that considered itself


superior in production, distillation or other high-tech means, would find that any man or

woman could compete.

Indeed they'd have a power source that could power lasers.

IT scares the hell out of them. Rightly so. I want this to be public and people to benefit

from it. So here you are. Take it how you like! I will say though, do you think that I

would have been doing this non-stop for 5 years regardless to the amount of money I had?

If you check I have no money. I create experiments out of old equipment that others

consider worthless. So did Edward Leedskalnin and he managed to re-create what he

described as the Secrets of the Pyramid Builders, with no less than a flywheel, chain, 5

stacked layers of V magnets around a wheel in NN SS configuration, a J hook hanging

above, several peices of wood in the north and in the west. And several elevetated

capacitance aerial spools above the flywheel. All wrapped around at 15 degree

intersections, and with the V magnets inhabiting EACHOTHERS field by being PUSHED

NEAR EACHOTHER as to repel but being ENCASED in PURE CONCRETE, whereby

the magnetic field is altered. Physicists invent names for it now, but you will note that must

of what Leedskalnin worked with - including symbols , shapes and depictions, they not

only match his electrical work, but fit with the descriptions he makes in his great book

magnetic current.

Edward Leedskalnin was a brilliant man, a truly brilliant man, much like Tesla. He applied

for his patents, he never got them. I'll never apply for any patent, because I know with

assuredness that they will be an illegal claim in the future. Nobody can own anything that is

a force that exists in the universe - and so they cannot own the device and it's rights, as it is

akin to owning the force and the universe itself.

You see these evil men, they all have something in common.

They think they are god. We are here to take that privilege away from them. They are not

gods. They are dangerous, petit minded, short sighted people. They would frolic in the

chance to laugh at things that are genuinely beyond their spiritual and intellectual capacity.

Indeed, such evil men, they have no desire to punish themselves.

Or translated, they have no desire for the truth. Absolute. For anyone who asked for advice.

My advice is to make sure we don't end up like that. The scientists they think they know

what educated is. For me educated means that we are prepared and ABLE to believe in

things that we are able to prove. It means though that people who are not who they appear

to be, or honest and as wise as they appear to be, they will not fool me. This is what the

scientific method establishes itself to be, but it isn't. It's a great work of fiction. I'm telling

you now, electrons, they don't even exist. So you ask - "wtf is going around in all of our

electrical circuits."

Good question.


They (Scientist and engineers) haven't the foggiest. Physicists concentrate on how the

positive terminal works... and engineers are obsessed with the negative. Sound familiar?

Sounds a bit like chemistry and biology, electricity and chemistry, a human body that

describes and facilitates them all, universally, and a continuing ignorance as to their

energies being representational abstractions of eachother. Much like the way that Tesla and

Dollard proven without doubt that DIELECTRIC and MAGNETIC field are ENTIRELY

SEPARATE.

IT is not a complicated mistake. What they did wrong is simple. You can test it too. All you

have to do is go back to Maxwell Version I, and Oliver Heaviside and Quaternions and you

will see that the work is not finished. All the best work isn't.

Sorry, did I hear someone say profit? All the BEST work isn't. It's funny really. I gave all

the historic details of the R.C.A suppression in one post. I would have expected more

focused and concerned replies on this subject. Perhaps people do not realise HOW

GRAVELY IMPORTANT IT IS? People who want to know the "secrets" of my work. You

don't have to look far.

I've discovered that the electron doesn't exist. It is not a new discovery. Tesla, Leedskalnin,

Pyramid Builders. This is not a joke guys. The scientists say that the electron goes round

the electrical cable in one direction. This is bull****. I have proven it to be by

experimentation. All you need to do is get an array of magnets and hang them above

running wire. You'll see that its a magnetic field of north and south going through each

wire. Just as Leedskalnin said, to run one current you will have to run the other.

I've come to the conclusion, this stuff isn't hard. Neither is the basis of the claims I make.

Understanding the reasoning as to why this "must be". That is either very difficult, or

banned as far as I can make out.

Some of the responses I've seen at the very least suggest this may be the case,

* * *


Electrons don't exist

I think that is enough for now. Electrons don't exist. The circuit has more than 1 direction

of electron flow. There is 2 directions of flow. North and south Pole, they run against

eachother, just like in Newtons Theory.

This open and closed circuit bull****. Throw it away. It's just a name for externally

induced and internally induced currents. Since the latter DOES NOT EXIST because all

particles are entangled with other current-systems as mentioned above - then the OPEN

SYSTEM is the only system that actually exists and operates. Yup the "Closed circuit"

fiction we've assumed for the last century.

It's total fiction.

E.g. power lines that would be considered CLOSED CIRCUITS. Yeah well - they are

OPEN. OPEN AS CAN BE. If you don't think this so, wait for a strong Aurora Borealis.

Then you'll see how open that "closed circuit" always was.

Open circuits have become "popular", because enough engineers and scientists have

succesfully documented that photons and electrons from outer space can effect the voltage

in a wire (or at least the phase velocity). THE TRUTH is that the Open circuit is ALL there

is. nothing can be entirely insulated or isolated, just like nothing can be an absolute vacuum

or absolute 0 Kelvin. Not yet anyway.

(since that is practically Q.E.D anyway) - it isn't a great leap, even from the dysfunctional

physics that we have today. Mainly because most abstractive concepts cannot entirely

remove the presence of the "reality" but rather repackage it into convenient, if not entirely

misrepresented fictions. But even fiction is based on some small truth. The electron, is

"there", if you like it to be. It's because the north and south (equal and opposite as Newton

said so) magnetic currents that flow in TWO DIRECTIONS in a wire collide, and create

RADIATION RESISTANCE.

Electrons are "real". But the observation of Electrons is entirely fictional. "electrons" They

are created by running north pole and south pole magnets against eachother. So the "1 orbit

electron" consists of 2 orbits, or 2 sides. Tesla gave the propogation of his waves as pi / 2 *

C. I wonder why. So electrons, the so-called base of our period table differences.

They aren't ELECTRONS. They are magnetic orbits. Yes. This applies to the PERIODIC

TABLE. They are orbiting north and south poles FOR EACH electron that is supposedly

orbiting in our PERIOD TABLE. The PERIODIC TABLE representing electrons is

"WRONG", if each they consist of both North And South Pole.

8 is the "maximum" number of electrons (or spinning particles) in conventional science.

My science, Leedskalnins and Tesla' said there are 16 ORBITS not 8. Each electron orbit

needs representing by a North and South Pole. The problem was the equipment, and the

waveform and velocity of the equipment we used to measure the PERIODIC ELEMENTS.

That is why we only saw 8 electrons. We saw the interaction of the NORTH AND SOUTH


POLE.

SIMPLE.

Tesla gave:

(phase) Velocity = pi / 2 * C (or speed of light....)

hmmm..... Now you know what the /2 is for. There is a half wave. North pole. and the other

half of the wave is the South pole. The earth, like most planets has a north and south pole.

The moon has a north and south pole. The moons north pole pushes against the earths north

pole, and the earths south pole it keeps the moons south pole far away. If the moon was

rotated, 1/2, then it would fall surely to the earth...(and just think about the energy involved

to rotate it versus the energy from it exploding).

Turning the moon, or altering the angles of it's poles, created the energy , or attraction, for

it to "fall" to the earth. I don't know about you but it looks like gravity and electricity isn't

what we think it is.

* * *

Governments bodies interested in this work?

Question for you all.

Would you bother continuing putting this information out if nobody was really interested

when this tends to happen when I publish my work?

Oh, not to worry It's just the NRO, and A myriad of government and military organisations

spying on my website. Nothing to worry about! Carry on here! Not spooky to you? tough, it

is to me, because I have a large website, and guess what, the only articles they visit are the

ones I have written. Hmm I wonder why.

Could it be because they are decent information?

109.180.22.209.in-addr.arpa name = w31cidzwsa44a.nro.mil.

153.36.154.128.in-addr.arpa name = gsod200618722d.wff.nasa.gov.

168.23.225.131.in-addr.arpa name = tsa5-wan.fnal.gov.

25.155.225.159.in-addr.arpa name = dhsproxy.dhs.lacounty.gov.

33.18.5.192.in-addr.arpa name = ws18-33.darpa.mil.

6.10.49.128.in-addr.arpa name = swanson-0t5fwh.sd.spawar.navy.mil

30.140.194.140.in-addr.arpa name = swl-w.usace.army.mil.

39.40.194.140.in-addr.arpa name = mvk-c.usace.army.mil.

2.125.190.128.in-addr.arpa name = wks125-2.belvoir.army.mil.

68.32.22.130.in-addr.arpa name = scucer02-08fwl01.hq.southcom.mil.


41.0.162.138.in-addr.arpa name = gate1-norfolk.nmci.navy.mil.






57.8.162.138.in-addr.arpa name = gate1-jacksonville.nmci.navy.mil.

58.8.162.138.in-addr.arpa name = gate2-jacksonville.nmci.navy.mil.

71.106.163.138.in-addr.arpa name = gate1-bremerton.nmci.navy.mil.

72.106.163.138.in-addr.arpa name = gate2-bremerton.nmci.navy.mil.

41.128.163.138.in-addr.arpa name = gate1-hawaii.nmci.navy.mil.

41.240.163.138.in-addr.arpa name = gate11-pearlharbor.nmci.usmc.mil.

42.240.163.138.in-addr.arpa name = gate12-pearlharbor.nmci.usmc.mil.

18.1.27.138.in-addr.arpa name = huaweb-proxy.hua.army.mil.

6.13.79.143.in-addr.arpa name = CAMP011PXAGA005.campbell.army.mil.

242.199.85.143.in-addr.arpa name = fp04.col.apc.army.mil.

2.31.183.144.in-addr.arpa name = slvrext.dcma.mil.

183.159.58.147.in-addr.arpa name = generichost.redriver.army.mil.

10.155.71.147.in-addr.arpa name = gtp000012gts.bliss.army.mil.

254.17.121.152.in-addr.arpa name = gateway-17-254.uscg.mil.




71.251.49.164.in-addr.arpa name = proxy1.proxyad.smdc.army.mil.

36.57.138.192.in-addr.arpa name = bamc-cache.amedd.army.mil.

34.14.156.192.in-addr.arpa name = gate1.matcombic.usmc.mil.

248.239.49.198.in-addr.arpa name = nhoki-wsa-dp.med.navy.mil.

196.181.56.205.in-addr.arpa name = pnocb1f3.pr.navy.mil.

154.38.38.206.in-addr.arpa name = proxy1.troopsupport.dla.mil.

81.81.81.216.in-addr.arpa name = cbcp1.dhs.gov.





10.27.115.128.in-addr.arpa name = sgzero.llnl.gov.

87.253.114.148.in-addr.arpa name = sscswg5.ssc.nasa.gov.

134.80.81.216.in-addr.arpa name = gw-dc2-va.tsa.dhs.gov.

Clearly at least some of us wouldn't know what free energy and the truth was if it jumped

up and kicked us in the face.

For all of you who have not expressed an interest in this work or expressed a myriad of

unrelated work of their own, do you get friendly visits from Fermilab, NASA, Los Alamos


labs, Vandenberg, the pentagon and the secretary of the department of defence, because I

actually do get these visits, all the time. They are only interested in the important work that

I am transmitting about this subject. I am so sick and tired of humanity, why bother doing

this for you? Why bother making my work public, if the only bloody people that show an

interest are the luciferian types from the military and defence arenas? They will come for

me, and then you will be sad that you didn't listen. It's your choice admittedly.

Here is your kicking. Why would you bother transmitting information at great risk if you

could see it wasn't helping you or anyone else, don't like it? Neither do I. I consider this my

last chance. I have not asked for anything but your attention, but people can't even do that

nowadays.

Too many distractions like smart phones. Good luck with them, your not so smart for using

them. I'm terrified of 3G now I know what it is. You people you need to get smart fast, or

you are going to wonder why your brains have been damaged by the 3gigahertz radiation

resistance of a low amplitude mobile phone, not low enough is the answer! Nauseus,

headaches, you think you get headaches because your head hurts?

Get real people. It's wireless. Transverse wireless is deadly by the way. If you go near to a

radio transmitter you are likely to get fried. That is not a a low amplitude. Now you know

what the mobile phone is, it is a tiny frier that knocks our your DNA, in the same way as

the large frier. Sound funny to you? I'm not laughing.

Abandon hope all ye who enter here - Wardenclyffe.

* * *

One of my latest experiments

Here is one of my latest experiments for those that are still following..

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3YRbOsjpHQ - June 2012, 900 views

My contemporary also has a working Tesla Magnifying Transmitter operating at 137%.

There is absolutely nothing fictional about the Tesla Marconi System. Nor is their anything

unbelievable, impractical or unobtainable in refining the impedance characteristics of two

propagating electrical velocities of electrical wave, that exist inside all transformers.

All we need do is create the right coil surface area ratio arrangements, and then we will

have the R.C.A MLFTA that the military went to effort to remove from historic , scientific

and engineering existence.

Heaviside ruined the Maxwell Theory. It's taken this long for us to prove to the millions of

scientists that everything Tesla said was not 100 years of his time, it was held back 100

years by the people that let R.C.A win.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3YRbOsjpHQ


Don't let these people win. 137%. The output, per second, is 137% of the input. 2 Distinct

waves have been detected, and I have created a formative mathematics that is now readily

available to describe the magnification effects as an equation fuction co-efficient of surface

area ratio in space. E.g. the surface area minus pi renders 1.54C (or 291,000 miles per

second longitudinal wave divided by the transverse light speed wave of 186,000 miles/per

second). We have test data now. It show's that the electrons aren't just moving at

186,000mi/sec, something else is driving at well over 105 thousand miles a second faster!

Don't miss out Eric Dollard, and others, they can really do this, and so can we.

* * *

Perpetual motion doesn't exist?

Hi, Just a quick one , because this is important Kindred.

Perpetual motion doesn't exist, except for around the fictional orbits of the electron? (Each

electron is being caused by two poles chasing each other in a double HELIX arrangement).

Perpetual motion doesn't exist, except for the very planet that they stand on acts

marvellously like a perpetually rotating, stable orbiting electron. I've had these discussions

with physicists, they shot me down for a long time, but now they have some serious

problems debating me. (in fact, it is impossible to debate, because what I plainly am about

to state is entirely scientifically supported).

These atoms, and chemicals, metal conductors, and oceans, they are in constant motion.

This is a perpetual motion. Particularly though all chemicals, all metals, all periodic table

elements, they are all PERPETUALLY MOVING. Not my words, Richard Feynman's.

The only assumption that can truly be supported by science is that the perpetual magnetic

orbit of those so-called electrons cannot be extended to a much larger orbit. OR rather a

device that is pretending to be the structure of an atom, and creating moving conducting

magnetic fields that mimic the orbit path held by the atom.

Then you will have a perpetual motion from the atom's derived in the chemical battery, that

is several million times bigger in size, I your physical device, and thus also in force. Now

you have an idea how it may be possible to derive perpetual power from these perpetual

orbits, and perhaps how Edward Leedskalnin was able to achieve very high powered laser

cutter from this arrangement, that could also be used for lifting purposes. If you have seen

lightning, you will be aware of the awesome power that high voltage power supply

possesses. If you think that each tiny little electron orbit in each periodic element has a

small amount of energy you would be right. If those electrons want to spin around in orbit,

or rather if those electrons were magnetic currents, then all we would have to do is perfectly

recreate the structure of an atom in a large rotating metal conducting device, and then we

could have a larger version of the weak "magnetic force" that holds all those particles

together. Indeed, the same force that holds the atom together, and keeps it in perpetual


movement. Richard Feynmans words, celebrated quantum physicist and author of Q.E.D.

This certainly is not to be toyed with. This certainly is not a joke. Patient can run thin when

amazing knowledge is on the new-age collar of doubt.

There is nothing to be put at doubt with perpetual motion. The problem is that people are

not willing to prove the things they believe. Had people insisted upon this fact, they would

not be fooled where the sun and polaris really are, or convinced that perpetual motion did

not exist. A better term is that perpetual motion has not been seen to exist in a large device

beyond that of the functional atomic device (electron orbits). I had to unfool myself just

like Leedskalnin and Tesla. I invite those willing to do the same.

I give this knowledge freely.

It is scary stuff, it should be , and I strongly believe telling you put's my life in jeopardy.

Especially if humanity is still not ready yet. This is suppressed technology. Please don't

ignore this information, it is just too important. The whole energy scarcity thing is a load of

total BS. All energy is based on those perpetually orbiting electrons being accelerated off a

periodic element.

ALL OF IT. Coal power, nuclear power, wind power, all of it.

Think about that. Also find me a generator that doesn't have to use a magnetic north and

south pole to generate those fictional electrons in a wire. You won't find one.

* * *

The electron itself doesn't exist

Bang on , the truth is it can be taken further, the electron itself doesn't exist. The electron is

visible because of a reaction with the observer. The North and south pole currents exist in-

between all atoms. When we see an electron it's caused by the "photons" of observation

from the viewing device or observers eye. Scientists have invented all sorts of names for

this effect, including, action at a distance, phase variance, delta t, red shift, blue shift, it's

some hilarious stuff - except for realising that the electron is a REACTION, not the

EXISTENT thing it claims to be. In fact light itself requires more than the electron, but the

fundamental basis of electricity - the north and south pole.

So, bang on correct, and I mean you really really get it. For what it is worth I was

discouraged too, strongly. To the point that I did not want to have any contact with people

any more. My only other point is that the rabbit hole goes down deeper than this. After all

we just proven inductively that all energy is magnetic at it's base. North and south poles,

when we look the wave reacts with the poles producing an electron. Quantum physicists

invent names. We don't just have perpetual atomic movement. We have a working proof

that electrons don't exist until they are observed. Anyone who ever done some Q physics

will realise that everything about it is everything I am talking about - except explained in a


much more insane way. Considering what I've said these last few posts, that's saying

something.

Shame that most people on this planet are too mindless and self-important to interpret the

most fundamental assumptions in their observations, scientists are supposed to do this, yet

we see the same obsession with mathematics as a reflection of beauty, and experimentation

as a fundamental dehumanising replacement for common-sense and educated observation.

Are new agers any better? Probably not.

You made a difference, you looked, you did the work. You asked the hard questions - and

you aw their faces of total bemusement. If this isn't proof that scientists are egotistical idiots

that make it up as they go along via "inventive thinking" what the hell is? "I don't know" is

a common remark by scientists; the remark that disgusts me the most is "It should be doing

that".

I think it is revealing to say the very least. They think they are God! This is not a joke.

When these self-appointed hypocritical self-stroking scientists are caught totally off-guard,

it becomes clear that they are simply just another human being, and the whimsical

inventory of reasons why other human beings do not have the right to think without their

dictionary of words becomes clearly apparent. Without those words, not only would they

not be able to understand eachother, but individuals would be able to make progress

without implied assumptions behind the meanings of symbols.

The pyramid builders, and the Egyptians clearly got this. You have clearly got this. Nikola

Tesla clearly got this. Hence his claims.

You have my sincere thanks and respect. You also kept it simple, and provided proof for

your theories. Very very important. Look how out of control the electron has got with

proof! Are new-agers any different? Probably not.

Observation and conclusions are as important as the method and the aim.

I have made my point now. Thank you so much, this will be my last transmission. People

are not educated if they are prepared to believe in something they cannot prove. Less they

be subjected to the fools of science whom they call the work the best work. Yet they were

neither educated, nor the best, if their work is no longer best in 25 years.

It can never be as good as the universe can do it if you do not think large enough.

Scientists, new-agers, skeptics, their world is far too small for sane thinking. And the insane

are far too busy for sanity.

It is somewhat a message of irony and peril that this could have all been avoided by

humanity by simply observing the ground we stand on and the very atoms we have

discovered - and most importantly of all understanding what education really is.


Certainly not what I was given should be called.

If my so-called education was called a syllabus we would be getting closer to the truth. A

syllabus is not education, it is other peoples education. The proof of my perpetual energy

device is that my education was verified by my own invention and inductive reasoning. I

did not try and copy someone else's education. I got my own. So in short, education is not

something any body can give you. Unless the entire world has got it correct in the school

books. Since they haven't got it all, or even it all right, any book now will no longer be

good in 25 years. Scientists, religious zealots and new agers are probably rolling around in

their grave at 666rpm right about now.. Einstein is dialling 911. Oh well. Someone's gotta

do it.

To be good now, it will have to be good in 25 years. I have enjoyed this thread, it has

taught me a lot about myself and humanity to say the very least. This will be my last

transmission.

My last thoughts: The rising sun, the setting moon, the phase of the moon, the million

billion trillion watts of energy conducted wirelessly into the ocean. No contradiction, no

lies, no profit, no agenda. Just a proof that is already readily observable, confirmable, and

fully conformist with current scientific thinking. Just an obvious fact that rises way above

the heads of the scientists. If it wasn't for their incapability and so-called education basic

observation would not have escaped them. Else they would not be making sea-power and

wind-power, they'd be after the thing that caused it.

I was. I was like that once. I even worked for the government, British Forces actually.

* * *

Misconception of Reality, an abstract on the broken science

For a long time now the separation of the sciences into chemistry and biology, physics and

quantum physics, sub quantum kinetics, thermal dynamics, and mathematics have

prevented the physicists from knowing how the chemical periodic elements work, and the

chemists from understanding that there is a work of physics occurring in their chemical

reactions (reacting periodic elements and their orbits spinning around and into eachother).

OR rather those chemistry endothermic and exothermic reactions between periodic

elements creating substrates, is an chemical energetic and physics kinetic, so-both chemical

, and physical at the atomic level. The creation of all new chemicals, the philosophers

stones by the alchemist will all follow this periodic chemical reaction between these so-

called electrons orbiting and exchanging their orbits with other periodic chemicals,

releasing energy in the form of heat, or cold - exothermic or endothermic.

The chemists do not understand physics, and the physicians do not understand chemistry,

the biologists do not know physics and the chemists care not for biology. Yet - the human


body is the one place that the physical kinetic processes are produced, the chemical and

biological processes are present. Here lies proof in the fundamental truths of observation in

the universe. Do not be mistaken. You are not educated if you are willing to believe things

you are unable to prove. Here I will prove it to you.

A battery produces electricity, these so-called electrons we find present in the wire - which

can drive machinery, create elements like silver and gold and platinum, and manufacture

new kinds of elements in complicated accelerator technology, which involves throwing

atoms together at very high speed. Or rather forcing the chemical reaction , and those

orbiting so-called electrons into eachother. In the industry this is refered to as the "Island of

stability". The battery that produced electricity, did so because of basic chemistry. The

Egyptians were great chemists, and the pyramid builders that came before them too were

great mathematicians and physicists, of the atomic and chemical kind. A battery consists of

3 things. 2 Metals, for an anode and a cathode terminal, and an acid such as sulfuric acid,

nitric acid, citric acid, or phosphoric acid are common. The orbits of those non-existing

electrons are pealed of one of the metals and transporting to the other metal. This is how a

battery works during discharging.

During the battery charging, the reverse occurs, and the metal and it's orbits that were

transported by the acid are returned to the terminal they originally came from. So we can

see that a battery is working chemically, and has nothing to do with 3rd Degree A grade

physics. There is no scientist in sight, except there is a Jewish Priest, King Solomon and the

Knights of the Templar laying in wake. Lets continue. I have told you how a battery works

chemically, now I am going to tell you what powers the electrons that are forced by the

chemical reaction in the design of a battery which electricity came.

The atomic force is the force that causes the perpetual movement and energy of all

electrons in periodic elements. The battery is a crude device, that breaks the orbits of one

metal in the battery and transports them to the other terminal, the atom itself is a

perpetually moving and rotating mass, they are very small things and they are not of much

use unless in great number. The batteries electrons are released from the atoms of the

metals in the battery and recirculated in an orbit around the metals free-electron valency.

This means that the electrons that were perpetually moving around their periodic mass are

no longer rotating perpetually around an atom, but have been funneled into the electron

orbit valancy of a conductive metal such as a wire. In more simplistic terms, the metals

electrons in the battery, which were once in perpetual movement, when exposed to the acid

in the battery are no longer perpetual, and form only a single flow channel from one anode

to the cathode and in reverse depending on whether it is charging or discharging.

As you can see this is proof that the electrons which had a perpetual current, and perpetual

movement, are transformed by the battery into something much less useful. The scientists

they consider it more useful this way today, because they do not know how to create a large

device, that has these electrons from a battery, and to have them perpetually orbiting in

great number around the device as an atom would. They do not know. That is why they

made the battery, because the atomic force and it's electrons have vast and unlimited


amounts of energy, which is considered by many as yet untapped. The history of radio is

stranger than fiction. The battery is an old device, it is not efficient like the atoms, and

when the orbits of the metal leave it, then they do not run in the wire perpetually, like they

did at the atom.

As I have told you how a battery works, let me tell you more about how a conductor works.

A conductor is something that can transport these so-called electrons. I have proven the JJ

Thompsons electrons to be non-existing delusive works of fiction, however, for the

purposes of understanding why the battery is not efficient it is important. The reason the

battery cannot circulate the electrons perpetually through it's wire's like the atoms of the

metal and glass, is because the battery is not an atomic arrangement, and the battery is not

an atom. If the battery or power source, or the device that is channeling the atomic orbits is

not designed like an atom then you will not find the same perpetually orbiting electron

currents around each atom that exists in the universe.

All electrons , according to our best scientists are "perpetually moving". There is only very

minute amounts of energy from one electron. Even though I have proven the electron to not

exist. In the battery, the electron orbits are transformed from the anode and cathode

periodic perpetual orbits to a conductive metal that exists outside of the battery that is not

shaped like an atom. The electricity as we call it, the electrons, they still orbit in a

corkscrew like spinning fashion at approximately 15 to 18.5 degrees. So the orbits are still

there, but they are orbiting around the outside of the wire, and they are reluctant to leave the

wire. Like they were reluctant to leave the atom.

The difference between the electrons the battery puts out and the infinite perpetual motion

in each electron of the annode and cathode metal of a battery, is that the electricity atomic

orbits can jump out of the wire and be lost, but in the atom the perpetual movement of their

electrons is unceasing, and so is the energy which provides it, it is perfectly balanced the

atom, and perfectly stable, yet it produces enough energy and a current to keep it moving.

Each atom has this perpetually moving electrons. Some metals have more of the electrons

than others. As I have said electrons do not exist, only magnets exist, I have proven it.

Electrons are not the finest, or smallest particle, the atomic orbits are, and they appear to be

magnetic. I have discovered that the electron consists of a north and south pole magnet.

That is why you will need one bar magnet, and a conductive wire coil, to get your non

existent electrons, because the base that creates them is from the small magnetic poles, or

lines of force, present in all electricity lines. IT is these that drive the electrons.

Here be it known that the electron is an atomic orbit that is unstable, that jumps out of the

wire, and the atoms, in the wire the electron, it is no longer perpetually orbiting it's energy,

or it's magnetic field. It has been disrupted. It has been looked at and interfered with. It has

been dissolved into the batteries acid, and released in a wire, but it does not perpetually

orbit like it did inside the atom. This is not a failure of the battery alone, but a failure of

how the metal geometry allowed the spinning atomic orbits to get out. Tesla's best work

with the Tesla Magnifying Transmitter was a design that specifically allowed for a greater

output per second than input per second. This was achieved by a 3 coil arrangement, that


allowed for a recirculation current per second of 40%, or a total leakage of 60% per cycle.

Thereby causing the capacitor to gain 40% of the previous cycles voltage per cycle. This is

why it was known as the Tesla Magnifying Transmitter. A capacitor would essentially fill

at 100% the first time, saving 40% to a recirculating current and a differential between the

secondary coil and a mutual inductance that inducts reverse resistance in the primary allows

for the capacitor to fill with the 40% of the first cycle, thereby causing the capacitor and

spark gap to fire at a greater rate, per cycle, per 40% extra of the previous. This causes what

is referred to by Eric Dollard and Charles Steinmetz who worked at General Electricity, and

RCA over 20 years as a cumulative oscillation. Whereby the voltage of each cycle is

~140% of the previous strength of the cycle. Note, the power supply provides the same

amount of energy per second, what is going on is that energy is STORED within the

capacitance and self inductance of the 3 COILS, and there is a TIME DIFFERENTIAL

between the propagation reflections, or rather, what is referred to as a recirculating current.

Or, a total leakage of only 60%. This means that 40% energy is gained per cycle. This is

referred to as an Asymptotic voltage increase. A Similar effect can be observed in AC

Transmission Lines which will be discussed later.

The permanent magnet works differently to the electrons produced by the battery. I have a

small device that can turn the atomic orbits of a battery into permanent orbits. It is the good

device that Edward Leedskalnin designed and discussed in his book Magnetic Current. He

called it to the perpetual motion holder. I have explained to you why , because it turns those

electrical power from the battery that usually would not orbit perpetually, into a magnetic

electromagnet, which does orbit perpetually.

My Leedskalnin Perpetual Motion Holder certainly does turn those non-existing electrons,

that I prefer to call atomic-orbits into a perpetually orbiting current. My Electromagnet is a

permanent magnet, all of the non-existing electrons that went into it from my battery, set

them going this way. As you can see I have found a way to turn the batteries orbits that

would have usually stopped orbiting to continue orbiting. In this way you can see that my

perpetual motion holder is more like the atomic orbit and the perpetually moving electrons

that you would find inside the battery.

This means that the perpetual motion holder is capable of turning the wasted electrons into

an orbit that is permanent, like the atom. This is the first and most important requirement in

the refinement of energy. The understanding that all of the energy, wherever it may come

from, it is coming from the atoms, not the object that the atoms consist of, but the very

atoms themselves, and how those atoms are connected together determines the properties.

So, the arrangement of my perpetually orbiting magnets in my perpetual motion holder,

kept the chemical orbits of the perpetual atoms chemically balanced, when this happens, the

north and south pole formed at each end of the electromagnet prongs. I think that is proof

enough that a stable atomic orbit will create two poles with the electromagnet. This is proof

absolute that the electron must consist of the north and south pole. Not only is the electron

created in all transmission lines with the north and south pole magnetic induction, but when

those non existing electron orbits from the battery are put into my U metal and wrapped


coils, it creates an electromagnet with a north and south pole. This shows that the north and

south pole is involved in the charging and the discharging of electrons, and thus the

electrons can only be considered a secondary-force.

The primary force of the battery is the atomic orbits, which are perpetual. The battery

crudely seperates them, and then they are not perpetual anymore. The edward leedskalnin

perpetual motion holder, the device that I have working here, makes sure that the orbits

from the fictional electrons exist as a north and south pole only, and that they recirculate

indefinitely and perpetually, as in the atom. Here we can see that the magnetic force we call

the permanent magnet metal, is in fact a permanent magnetic substance, that is shared in the

orbit of the metal, if the metal is right, like in my device, you will find that the energy from

your battery will stay in orbit indefinitely.

And so we have a prototype for the first large atomic orbit powered device. A way to keep

all energy in orbit. Energy storage, just like can be found in the Tesla Magnifying

Transmitter and the Alexanderson Generator, and the Marconi Wireless System's

MULTIPLE LOADED FLAT TOP ANTENNAE.

Electricity is provided once, and the magnetic substance that is drawn into the metal is the

thing that keeps the metal a permanent magnet. Repeat the metal is not magnetic, the

substance that recirculates inside the permanent magnet metal is.

Now about A.C transmission lines. Many of you are wondering how the A.C Transmission

line is able to keeps it's volts so well, whereas the D.C Transmission line is not. There is

only one different between alternating current and direct current. Direct current is a push

that is constant, and so the pressure in the transmission line is constant. The Alternating

Current works differently, and taps impulses onto the transmission line, this causes the

pressure of the line to rapidly increase, and decrease over time, per second.

What happens will amaze you. It is so simple. The Alternating Current transmission mode,

changes the pressure of the wire, up and down. So that between cycles, there will be exactly

0 pressure in the line for a period of very short time. This causes the individual magnets

that are in the air to flood into the alternating current transmission line, at the exact centre

of it's rest cycle. This means that the way that alternating current transmission line keeps it's

volts from the generator, is by using a transmission mode that allows the transmission line

itself to pull in magnets. This means A.C turns the thin air into a generator, to pull magnets

in to furnish the transmission of magnets in the wire itself. For instance, when the pressure

goes up in between cycles and the wire is filled with magnets, then the transmission wire's

valency will be different, and so the same impression will conduct electronic substance in

the metal better. As you can see the thing inside all of the electricity wires has a pressure,

and that is something only a substance usually would have.

As you can see now, probably with some amazement, that the A.C Transmission Mode at

the generator end of a line, can cause the line itself to generate millions of free-volts, there


exists for the last 100 years or more, readily a framework to employ and research this

complex transmission line problem to put it to use for generating vast amounts of free

electricity. Furthermore and importantly, where the AC Transmission line caused magnets

to pulled in it crosswise to aid it's voltage transmission between cycle stops and starts, my

Perpetual Motion Holder Electromagnet transformer is a generator itself that causes the

magnets to be pulled in it crosswise from the electrons running in it's coils lengthways.

Given this is the truth about how an A.C Transmission line really gets it's extra power from,

to stop it's voltage dropping like D.C constant pressure current - I can say for sure that my

electromagnet , my perpetual motion holder is permanently orbiting something, or it's

pulling power would diminish over time, after electrons are provided to it once . So there

are only 2 possibilities, my device is permanently magnetic because the orbits from the

battery continued going around it or because the orbits from the battery caused a pressure

change like the A.C Transmission line that is permanently causing more magnets to flow

into it from the surrounding air, than can get out through the crosswise prong cores which

are inducted once around the lengthwise wires by the batteries orbits.

Note that the battery orbiting lengthways in the coil wires around the metal core , caused an

magnetic orbit crosswise in the core, that is perpetual and continuous just like the electrons

in the atom that came from the battery.

Thanks for wanting to know more about what electricity is. Remember, electricity is atomic

orbits. Coal, being burnt, is creating carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and other carbon

like products, this is proof that the fuel, and energy released is from the reaction of those

elements. Furthermore if we inspect what is left of the mass of the combusted fuel,

whatever it may be, we will note that it is hollowed out. This is because the magnetic links

that held it together and made it strong for energy based work like leverage and lifting, are

no longer present in them. Their orbiting magnets exchanged with other periodic elements.

This is what conservation of energy is, the truth that energy cannot be lost is because the

only thing that actually happens is that orbits fly off atoms and go elsewhere. None are lost.

We are just ignorant that this radiation can be recaptured by devices such as the T.M.T. The

coal electricity power, burns up the periodic coal fuel, with oxygen and other surrounding

periodically active exothermic elements involved in the reaction, it heats up water, another

periodic element to cause it's atomic orbits to be very excited, so that it turns to gas, and

rises up into a turbine. The turbine itself is a heavy wheel that has north and south pole

magnets, that spin as the excited heat gas from the water runs through it, causing the wheel

to spin next to a coil which absorbs the heavy magnetic north and south pole lines of force.

That is how we get electrons.

With nuclear power it is the same. We get the atoms that are radioactive, and are throwing

off their atomic orbits in a myriad of shapes, and impulses, except that we get a specifically

large mass of the matter, so that it has a given number of atomic orbits, that would cause

the inner pressure of the chemical periodic stability to become less stable, this causes many

magnetic orbits to be thrown off in the same was as the battery. Hillarious as it seems, they

do not magnetically derive this force yet. Like the coal plant, they will use those atomic


orbits flying off the radioactive mass to heat up the water..aha.. you know where this is

going? Yup, the steams atomic orbits are excited, causing them to float, and turn into a

gas... like your ufo's maybe?? Then the gas, turns a turbine, which has north and south

pole magnets in it, that drives a coil that produces those non existant electrons. The

smoking gun proof of course is that the electrons can only be derived from the atomic force.

So proof is that the electrons are at the very least a secondary force, that is not primary to

energy, but rather an electron system of valency induction that can be produced by the

chemical and periodic element orbits of metals, and radioactive materials, and coal, thereby

being converted by north and south pole turbine generators.

And this is why I'm angry for the world. I give all this sort of stuff freely, and it is free. I

don't ask for anything, and people are not really interested.

I have a theory, that people are not ready... and would rather to go on continuing what they

have been told is the way it works, regardless that this is madness - we should only believe

in things we are able to prove. In the case of atomic orbits being perpetual. This is proven.

In the case of all electrons being made from north and south poles, I haven proven that to

you as well. I have also shown you that a battery turns the atomic orbits that were perpetual

into an energy that is not perpetual any-more. Still puzzled? What do you think was the

energy that kept the atom moving on it's own perpetually and forever until the battery

dissolved it in the battery to release it's "electrons"? The same thing then perhaps that is

recirculating around my perpetual motion holder, perpetually. Atomic orbits.

Here we have a way of generating free perpetual power like an atom does, but we will have

to create a very large device, with many, many orbits for that small amount of energy to

become readily observable. That is why I created the PMH that Leedskalnin worked with,

because it has the ability of storing orbits. Leedskalnin says it "wastes no magnets". Either

that is because it can store them in the magnetic field in a perpetual orbit, (a field magnet),

or because the device design of the electromagnet is readily creating a pressure in the

outside coils that causes more magnets to be pulled in from the air.

If magnets are being pulled into my generator from the air, it sure would explain why some

of us are reading 6 amps of current when there is no power supply or battery connected to

it.

Because the magnetic orbits are perpetually orbiting, just like in the electron.

"Magnets can't do work", "Perpetual Motion cannot exist". "If this worked we'd all be using

it". "If it sounds too good to be true it usually is." "We have already proven that nothing can

travel faster than the speed of light time and time over again in scientific theory" "The

magnetic field is static it doesn't orbit anywhere!!!" "The magnetic field can't orbit it's

relationship to the dielectric field is irrelevant".

If you say so. 6 amps. No battery. All atoms have energy, that causes them to perpetually

orbit. My electromagnet perpetually orbits, atomically, chemically, periodically, the


magnetic field is not static, it moves at very very very high speed, it is a substance inside

the metal, the atomic orbits that came initially from the battery, and then the alternating

current of the electromagnet, and north and south pole, and the crosswise flooding of

magnets from the surrounding air.

So if we make this bigger, we'll be pulling lots of magnets from the surrounding air. I

wonder what would happen if we pulled the magnets we got from the surrounding air, and

then put them with wires back into the alternating current generator. Then we'd have the air

powering the device that creates the magnetic pressure change in the wire, that causes more

magnets to fly in, which causes a greater current to run in the wire to pull the magnets,

which causes more magnets to flow in, which are directed to the alternating current that is

pulling the magnets, and so on.

Maybe that is what Leedskalnin meant that magnetic force are "equal" on a ground level. I

guess that means there are unequal at different heights. Ooh multiple loaded flat top

antennae.... 3 coil Tesla Magnifying Transmitter, yada yada yada. There are two modes of

resonance that are achievable tandem resonance and concatenated resonance. Thank Eric

Dollard for that one. My friend has a 137% magnifier that works. Now people are working

on ones that have more than 137% output. The Tandemn two coil mode I am talking about

is very basic.

I did notice though that the surface area relationships of 5.7:1 and 2.4:1 had a relationship

with the subtraction of PI that gave the speed of a longitudinal wave by ratio 1.55, given

that 291,000/186,000 is 1.54 . (relative ratio of light speed to the theoretical longitudinal

wave). I think the engineering side ought to be considered by the more technical. I think

this is enough for one posting. This will be a test if people are ready I think

* * *

'Magnetic electricity' discovered

Researchers have discovered a magnetic equivalent to electricity: single magnetic charges

that can behave and interact like electrical ones.

The work is the first to make use of the magnetic monopoles that exist in special crystals

known as spin ice.

Writing in Nature journal, a team showed that monopoles gather to form a "magnetic

current" like electricity.

The phenomenon, dubbed "magnetricity", could be used in magnetic storage or in

computing.

Magnetic monopoles were first predicted to exist over a century ago, as a perfect analogue

to electric charges.

Although there are protons and electrons with net positive and negative electric charges,

there were no particles in existence which carry magnetic charges. Rather, every magnet

has a "north" and "south" pole.


I think this scientific research documented by an internationally acclaimed news outlet casts

doubt on your quick and potentially arrogant assumptions. You are after all talking about a

decade of work, which has provided models.

For instance if gravity is a cause of motion then our hopes are in vain, but if gravity was an

effect caused by cosmic rays from our sun, then, you have a lot to learn about how the north

and south pole of atoms and planets are made, and, I hope you do not take offence.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8307804.stm

No person should take offence at asking a hard question, and no man who knows better

would take offence of the ignorance of another, but ask himself ways in which he might

explain it as a real functioning thing, how it works, what causes it. Currently scientists don't

have an explanation for gravity or the perpetual rotation of your electrons around an atom.

If you can tell me why the electron perpetually turns around the atom, then I might as well

pack my bags, but, as of yet you've not done that, so perhaps you could read more about

what I am saying before accusing me of jumping to a conclusion and ignoring an entire

body of science which contradicts my work, or worse even perhaps jumping to conclusions

yourself,

All that was great in the past was ridiculed, condemned, combated, suppressed — only to

emerge all the more powerfully, all

the more triumphantly from the struggle. - Nikola Tesla

―The scientific man does not aim at an immediate result. He does not expect that his

advanced ideas will be readily taken up. His work is like that of the planter — for the

future. His duty is to lay the foundation for those who are to come, and point the way. He

lives and labors and hopes‖. – Nikola Tesla

Do not mistake what I am trying to do for nonsense, because I do not mistake the nonsense

of the electron for a working description - and so I have worked to determine the cause of

gravity and the cause of perpetual atomic motion. Which as I have repeated time and time

again, no electricity would flow anywhere if it were not for the pre-existing perpetual

motion of every single valent metal capable of close to light speed transmission from a

heavy electron mass going in one end, quite simply a different electron comes out the other

end - as Einstein's theory predicts, what it does not explain however is why and how it runs.

What is failed to be understood that if every periodic element didnt have it's atom's so-

called electrons perpetually spinning no chemical reactions would exist, batteries would not

work, and electrical transmission lines would not carry current.

It has been known for thousands of years that cosmic rays effect conductors, but it has been

established in the scientific theory for at least 100 years, since the early days of G.E and the

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8307804.stm


continuing problems that aurora cause to electrical transmission line. In fact the aurora is

quite magnetic, north and south pole, and this has a polarisation effect on transmission lines

causing the north and south pole to run in it, and blow up entire electrical stations. The

reason why this does not happen as frequently as it did circa 1910 is simply because

billions of $ have been invested in managing the "problem" of inductive cosmic rays i.e.

aurora.

Do your research before criticizing another, it may turn out to be important part of your

science. After all, all incomplete scientific theories of invention bare one similarity, some

peice of important information is still missing, and it seems in a relatively short time once

again you jump to conclusions whilst accusing another of such a thing. There exists a whole

body of evidence from Eric Dollard , Nikola Tesla and Walter Russell on how gravity and

magnetism might be connected, and how light might be made by INVISIBLE rays from our

star traveling at pi / 2 times faster than light. What's not to get? Nothing apparently, because

that is what you are taking away from this work, absolutely nothing.

Yes my 60 quid book is full of nonsense, but it cost me about £40 to print just one of them,

I also gave up my career - This is not wishful thinking, this is a model , a hypothesis and a

description of inventive theory how electricity and gravity function, there are many sources

i have used such as the journal of nature and they are quite reliable sources, peer reviewed,

etc, my friend, it is you who speaks nonsense.

I am sorry.

Without the solar rays or north and south poles, as I have stipulated, there would be no light

created on this earth, there would be no life, and the life would not create petrol and

charcoal, or built up combustible energy and matter in the earths rocks.

I respect you and scientists, but when something this simple appears so awkward by you to

grasp it is hard to see it as anything else but men trying to drink water from a boat that they

sit in, whilst repeating again and again and again the electron must exist.

The problem with scientists, and people like you is, you have never seen an electron. That

is why i set out to do these experiments and write this book in the first place. I have curved

light. Do you understand the significance of this accomplishment? Nonsense. Really? Have

you ever read nobel prize winner feynmans work , like his book Q.E.D and studied physics

as I have? I am not uneducated, like yourself, i once believed in the electron , and that is

what it was, a belief. Now I have curved light and built non ohmic non Kirchhoffian

transformers, it's really hard to take seriously people that can emit and radiate as much

complete ignorance and mallice such as you.

Find somewhere else to troll, this is important work.. not that your reaction is much

different than the rest of humanity. Always looking for problems but never for answers.


To those that believe my explanations are hearsay , unfounded, or non peer

reviewed

To those that believe my explanations are hearsay , unfounded, or non peer reviewed

scientific assumptions consider that light is highly magnetic of inconceivable power than

the laws of motion previously predicted for the last 100 years (2011, University of

Michigan). It's proven what I am saying.

Academics know nothing but textbooks and equations. Which describe things admirably,

but if they are perceptually incorrect, they are always wrong. Like The greeks theory of

gravity, and the embarassing accumulations of contradictory evidence. Like the greeks

theory of solar motion, and the embarassing accumulation of inventive epicycles to "prop

up the broken invention of the greeks". This is a method not unfamiliar to that of Einstein.

When an inventive effort breaks down, simply invent a new one to prop it up. Newton

would have been appalled. So what is going on here anyway?

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA079jWyAm4 - Dec 2012 – 250 views

Not just says me, Dollard, Leedskalnin, Tesla, University of Michigan, Egor Babaev and

the list actually goes on. Faster than light waves did exist in the Marconi facility post 1914-

1917 until R.C.A took it over. Tesla gave the speed of his electrical propogations as pi / 2 *

C, a full 1.57 times faster than Einstein's fallacy law of relativity predicts. Let's see what

Tesla had to say about it:

"He described relativity as a 'beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a

king.' In support of his statement he cited a number of experiments he had conducted as far

back as 1896 on the cosmic ray. He has measured cosmic-ray velocities from Antarus, he

said, which he found to be fifty times greater than the speed of light, thus demolishing, he

contended, one of the basic pillars of relativity, according to which there can be no speed

greater than that of light.”

-- New York Times, 7/11/35.

Professor Wheatstone, inventor of the wheatstone bridge and the principles of electrical

measurement for analog multimeters gave the electrostatic discharge as 291,000 miles per

second aswell, a full 105,000 miles per second faster than einstein's speed of light, or rather

pi / 2 * C . Professor Wheatstone, Tesla, Dollard all give the same propagation velocity for

their electrical waves. Deluded sciences of fallacy? No. Pioneers that designed working

equipment that were motivated by these 1.57 speed of light waves.

Nothing is left for "guessing". You are all just wrong. I'm sorry, but I am not the con man.

You are the con men. Or the conned.

Whilst you were busy believing what you were taught and educated. I was busy doing the

experiments and research.

Did you not notice all the current science laws of today were built on the heresy of people

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA079jWyAm4


like Volta, and Tesla yesterday? Most of Tesla's best ideas were considered ridiculous for

his time. Yet, they lay in use today.

This is not a fallacy, this is new science. It is to be expected that those that regard the

heresy of yesterday as the immovable laws of today, would consider Einstein an exception

to the general rule of fallacy. That is, the fallacy of gravity invented by the greeks was quite

improper. It would be 2000 years until someone with enough bravery like Galileo and

Newton were to inductively prove the inventions of the greeks wrong.

There was nothing wrong with the greeks maths, or the greeks reasoning. They were simple

lacking some important piece of information that prevented a proper explanation being true

and holding to the rigorous laws of the ultimate method of science. In the case of Newton ,

now instead of thinking inventively as the greeks did was thinking inductively and he

eventually could see several important peices of information, in the same way that galileo

did. And in the case of those that glory in the achievement of einstein, they are making the

assumption that an inductive process, or rather an accumulation of contradictory inventive

terms, will not occur again. Such as the clear and concise examples i have given of these

contradictory accumulations, such as the unexplainable perpetual motion of electrons

orbiting their atoms, or rays from stars consisting of an immense magnetic field that creates

light and all things. Now it is being proven, just in the last 2 years. Against all fundamental

laws of motion and it is 100 million times more powerful than predicted.

My work stands testament to all that Tesla believed. And I would thank you for giving it

the fair chance, and proper research and inspection that such a monumental thing would

require.

The only assumption being made by all the correct science and maths today is that

einstein's relativity has and will not collect an EMBARRASSING accumulation of

contradictions, in the same way that Newton, The Greek's and others did. Indeed, the only

assumption is by you scientists who would discredit me and my careful and exhaustive

research and models - your only assumption is that Einstein is an exception to the universal

rule of science and conceptualisation, rather than an example of it. And that means I am

deluded? It seems clear to me scientists in here are the ones who are deluded. Insanity even.

History will record the victors, and truth will be recorded by real gods. Not the self

appointed Gods of men, that were taught every single thing they've assumed unmovable,

without even seeing an electron. An electron curve , or the light that is coming from the so-

called electrons which you einsteinians hold so fear, being curved aswell.

"Let the future tell the truth and evaluate each one according to his work and

accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine."

Bill Ryan, I appreciate you taking the time to reply to this thread but ultimately I would not

ask people to buy technology for a new future, I would ask them to study. Study hard. Find


the truth. It is so much stranger than fiction. And anyway if einstein is wrong - and the

physicists are wrong about electrons which I have now proved - conclusively - then it

would be highly inadvisable to reject such a proposal without a proper considered research

and reflection. It took me a decade to reach many of the conclusions I have come to. Names

like Dollard, Leedskalnin, Tesla, are all you need. Such a thing being true would require the

slow and painful deconstruction of most of the tenets of science established in the last 100

years, and that is exactly what is now happening. (whether we like it or not)

Please, forget about me, and remove all links to solomon-books and my book if you really

do think that I would be so self centered to attempt profit from a scam. I say what I say

because I have done experiments and have come to the frightful conclusions that have been

time and time again established.

If just one person can tell me why atoms rotate perpetually around their atoms. I could go

home happy. But today, the substitution of technical competence for misplaced greed and

commerce is the most disgusting thing - and it can only be a result of the clearly delusive

idea that energy is not free. An inconceivable amount of free energy from our star and the

stars in all this cosmos is beaming down into this planet. All of it wireless and

electrostatically conveyed at a speed faster than that of light. (really). Indeed this is

something Tesla, Dollard Leedskalnin and myself repeatedly and repeatedly assert. Have

you studied our lives? I think you'll find if it's money we're after, we did a poor job of it.

All on deaf ears i'm afraid. It is not hard to tell if a trained mathematician or physicists is

deluded, just ask him why electrons are motivated by locomotion around an atom and

where that force might come from. They will never answer. This is the tell tale signs of a

conceptually wrong idea, something of which the clear thinkers and engineers of yesterday,

i.e. the inductive thinkers would never have permitted.

The problem with inventors is they accuse people like me of invention whilst holding onto

a physics of electrons which does plainly not exist. Nobody has ever seen an electron ever.

But it doesn't stop people quacking endlessly parroting the same old laws. This is

something that the greeks did for 2000 years, scientists are small minded men if they truly

believe that Einstein is an exception to this rule rather than an example of it. Truly.

This is not a con, this is new science. Remove all links to my book. I care not about the

book. I care about the truth. It is why I wrote the book, and I disrespect those that would

claim otherwise. You are small men.

Faster than light travel, breaking of conservational principles and more.

As it turns out "science" shows me to NOT be incorrect. Your silence can speak volumes.

My truth needs no man to speak for it. For it is being shown to be true by real scientists at

MIT like Walter Lewin. Time and time again. But no space-time. hmmm...


http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/MI...etism_999.html

Science remarkably shows this to be a reality. Other than getting the credit and modern

dating incorrect. This is in fact an old invention of Tesla's. Indeed, the first radio patent was

1.57C, that is over 1 and a half times in excess to the speed of light given by Einstein as a

speed limit.

To put it bluntly "oh dear"

MIT researchers discover a new kind of magnetism

Boston MA (SPX) Dec 21, 2012

" It may take a long time to translate this "very fundamental research" into practical

applications, Lee says. The work could possibly lead to advances in data storage or

communications, he says - perhaps using an exotic quantum phenomenon called long-

range entanglement, in which two widely separated particles can instantaneously

influence each other's states. The findings could also bear on research into high-

temperature superconductors, and could ultimately lead to new developments in that

field, he says.

"We have to get a more comprehensive understanding of the big picture," Lee says. "There

is no theory that describes everything that we're seeing." "

Read the full article at

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/MI...etism_999.html

Story of the Missing

Don't miss our future, when it's hidden in the past. Kind and going out of fashion. Will

einstein be an exception, or an example of the rule of deprecated and superceded theory.

The author is beginning to wonder if Einstein's space-time even exists.

"Einstein always did have a problem with it". - two widely separated particles can

instantaneously influence each other's states. He never did like it. Not one bit at all. Einstein

frowned and the world cried "WE shall not frown like the little boy that cried the speed of

light". THE END.

The only differnce between these scientists and me, is that I will give Tesla the credit he

deserves, for his apparatus that can transmit at 1.57C as well as his instantaneous

transmitter, of a speed of infinite C; the T.M.T wardenclyffe invention that tesla historically

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/MIT_researchers_discover_a_new_kind_of_magnetism_999.html

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/MIT_researchers_discover_a_new_kind_of_magnetism_999.html


claimed could transmit "regardless of distance". Here is the scientific principle of research

showing, clearly, without obfuscation or any confusion that what Tesla stated was a

working reality, not only was possible, but was a working reality then, as well as this

science research of today showing that all the claims he made, might be 100% scientifically

true.

Indeed, this is not old or current MODERN science. It is incredibly old ancient science,

and relatively old modern science, the future that was stolen from Tesla over 100 years ago

now. That will be retaken. Whether the imbasile or the fool chooses to chime in his own

efforts or not, the past modern science literature is becoming the reality it always was. The

1.57C transmitter was in operation for 4 years until the military and government took over

the marconi bolinas facility.

The reason they had to take it over was that it was using tesla's faster than light patents, and

threatened the "good american way of material life and economy". It didn't only have those

Einstein speed Hertzian velocity waves. It had the tesla faster than light velocities.

This would have to be dealt with, and removed as soon as possible.

And that is what happened. They removed the tesla faster than light waves, and resulted in

the imprisonment of humanity to einstein limitation 1.0C Electromagnetic waves. It would

now be "against the law" to believe or do work, to experiment with any other type of wave.

In fact the faster than light waves are now classified from 1918-present.

Here they were saving their material age of greed and war, and the 60's and 70's cold war

along with it. Killing and slaying then, were they the free energy system, the faster than

light system that couldn't possibly ever exist, yet it did, because if such a system ever

existed then the conservation of energy principle would break down and we could all have

abundant amounts of energy without leveraging our trillions of $ investment in fossil fuels

and other hazardous petrochemicals. Gone would be industry, and teh rampant and runaway

control of the american and "democratic" state. Gone would be the null-enterprise of

deception, and born could be the real free-enterprise, for all meaning of the intensive word,

FREE. This is what had to be slain by Radio Corporation America. Slain must the multiple

loaded flat top antenna of 1.57C longitudinal dielectric propogations, and kept the billions

of times more inefficient hertzian transverse einstein 1.0C rhombic D transmitter. Slain and

killed, destroyed and vanquished is the faster than light waves, and heralded is the

inefficient and deceitful, the destructive and the life destroyer rhombic D hertzian einstein

1.0C waves, which ruin the chromosomal life of all plants and animals. 100% mutation

with some seeds. Shocking. There will be no faster than light on this earth R.C.A and

Sarnoff hum. Russia and other states had different plans.

Me and the other forward thinking heretics, we make the current laws of tomorrow, that

their future scientists will hold so dear. But true innovators, and inductive thinkers know,

their thoughts will one day be that of an old science, that the new heretics will replace, and


their future kin will hold onto the past idea like wolves and hyaenas yet again. This holding

onto the old past heretic scientists' ideas, it is the highest insanity. For what of todays that

build tomorrow? You are ignorant of them, and the future, and even the ancient past.

Shame on you.

A charge which most people on this forum are guilty, whom have chosen to slander the

thread without truly understanding it. Shame on you.

My theory shows how gravity is NOT caused by mass. That gravity is CAUSED by the

cosmic rays traveling through into the earth 1000's of miles, which causes the EFFECT of

gravity in the mass. Without the external cosmic equal and opposite force, there would be

no equal and opposite gravity. This process of gravity creation in dense atomic structures at

the centre of the earth is caused in the same way that light rays are caused by the solar rays

hitting radium, or other radioactive material.

Once sufficiently shielded, the radioactivity of the material (radium light ray), and/or it's

gravity structure is completely negligent to masses creation of radioactivity, light, and

gravity.

Behold the true meaning of science. To account properly for these forces. Not to wildly

discredit the inductive approach I have used - and worse, using poorly thought models of

inventive science that fail to account for the processes that have been given time and time

again.

Science is at the beginning of a revolution. And it doesn't matter what you think. Because

the super conductive high temperature liquid's I have been working with , and it's new kind

of magnetism. Appears to already have been discovered.

"A quantum liquid state" these scientists harp, well, if they want to call it that, it's fine with

me, but i've been experimenting with it for quite some time now. As well as curving

electrons and light in iron structure. It matters little what the attempts to subvert my work

cause now, as the body of science itself, since the end of 2012 have officially discovered

what Leedskalnin discovered circa 1945, what Tesla discovered circa 1896 and what the

pyramid builders discovered circa 11500- 16,000 BC.

instantaneous action, bye bye equal and opposite forces, byebye conservation, byebye

relativity, byebye einstein. This will be a permanent adjustment to society when people

realize that space-time DOES NOT EXIST as a primary function, only as a secondary

invention to explain atomic events. What I have been working with is not just atomic, but

sub atomic.

Now you know why Einstein always had a problem with it, he was at least smart enough to

understand that it went against everything he believed. Exactly that, everything he believed.

He died without showing he known a way it could exist without violating his most coveted

law. though it seems scientists at MIT are well on their way to doing this, and I commend


them, for when they do it without adam bull, or jon de pew, or jeremy stride, or eric

dollard, or edward leedskalnin or nikola tesla, it will not change the truth. It will only seek

to confirm our statements. If not today, then one day.

Energy is free. All of it. It's all wireless, and like gravity, light, radiation, consists of north

and south poles, everything does. These are not my claims, but ancient ones and the more

modern ones of Nikola Tesla and Edward Leedskalnin. People should do their research

before discrediting me, as they are discrediting the proven works of the genius Tesla,

Leedskalnin and Dollard, and there are now many publications carrying stories of faster

than light and instantaneous transmission or strange instantaneous transfer. When the

inventor of radio himself suggested it and said that he had created an apparatus where his

waves were 1.57 times faster than light in 1896, and claiming later on he had found a way

to transmit data at an infinite velocity (quote "completely regardless of distance"). What of

this?

Or perhaps the Bolinas facility of Marconi using these darn 1.57C non-existent waves?

Yes, at 1.57 times the speed of light, and they used them for 4 years between 1914 and

1917, until the military and government took-over Marconi and radio and monopolized it

for themselves. What of it? Only ignorance to be found here in planet know it all avalon?

Unbelievable? It's just the truth. I'm trying to give you people it back but many of you have

been brainwashed by inventive thinking.

Do not let your own humanity fall on your own deaf ears.

Tesla's Last Known Living Assistant's Recorded Statement

Transcript of Arthur Mathews (Tesla's Last Assistant) interview (book on page 300-305)

1-3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5gBXDvhXBs

In 1933 to 1943 by Arthur Mathews Province of Quebec, Canada.

To understand properly the first part of the story you will need a map of the province of

Quebec, Canada. It was early in Spring that Major Henry Sanford of New York City came

to Quebec with a number of friends. One of these friends was Nikola Tesla. Major Sanford

owned a large camp in the Quebec woods not far from a place called Lake Edwards. Major

Sanford invited me to go with them to his camp. We met in Quebec City at the old Lake

Saint John railway station. The Lake Saint John railway at that time operated the railway

between Quebec City and Chicoutimi at Lake Saint John. Major Sanford had a private train

consisting of two coaches and a baggage car. The baggage car was loaded with electrical

equipment. One item of that equipment was a 75 KW generator set. This generator was

driven with a gasoline motor due to the fact that Major Sanford's camp was located at about

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5gBXDvhXBs


almost 10 miles from the railway station and the only way to get there was by means of a

foot path through the bush and a fortarge on which canoes could carry materials. And of

course this meant that everything that we had had to be carried by hand. And then to make

this more convenient, most of the heavy materials such as the 75 KW generators had been

taken apart and packed in small containers.

We left that morning from Quebec at around 8:00 and I don't remember exactly what time it

was when we arrived at Sanford station but it was around noon I believe. Arriving at

Sanford station, the train was placed on a siding and we unloaded the baggage car. And

from there I will try to remember all the members in the party as we arrived at Sanford

station. Major Sanford and Mrs. Sanford, there was a trained nurse Miss Kidd, and Tesla

and myself and twelve Indian guides. The head guide or chief was a man named Gro Louis.

The material was divided up amongst us and we all had as much as we could carry. Some

of the parcels were very heavy and required two guides to carry them. There was no

particular rush for we could go as slow or as fast as we pleased, admiring the beautiful

woods as we walked along. So finally we arrived at the camp sometime late that evening.

My first job on arriving at the camp was to put the 75 KW generator together. When I

completed the power plant we then built an exact model of a Tesla transformer which he

had built at Colorado in 1898. I don't remember the exact date but I believe this was in

1898. This transformer was to transmit power through the earth without using any wires.

After the transmitting transformer had been built, we then built three other transformers to

receive the power, which would be sent from this big transformer. The first one was located

about ten miles away in the bush, the second transformer was located at Lake Saint John

near Desbiens and the third transformer was built later on at Tadoussac which was on the

river Saint Lawrence.

For the purpose of making any required adjustments Tesla first used the nearby transformer

which was about ten miles from the transmitter. Power was then sent to this ten mile away

transformer and the power sent was considerable and convinced Major Sanford that the idea

was practical. After proving to Major Sanford that his wireless power idea was workable,

Tesla then turned his attention to some new things.

The first thing was radar and the war preventing idea. The radar was in fact part of this war

preventer. It was the guide. TV was demonstrated and a voice operated typewriter and other

things, which I will mention later on. Tesla had offered his idea of radar to the American

government but whoever it was who investigated the idea did not think it was practical and

so it was turned down.

One of the showpieces of Sanford was a gold wire aerial. This was used to receive short

wave programs. This gold wire aerial was actually constructed by the Indian. I showed him

how to do it and it was placed on top of two tall trees, which were about sixty-five feet

apart. It was a gold plated aerial as I said. A cage type aerial which was used on the

battleships at that time with twelve wires separated in the middle by a ring twelve inches in

diameter tapering down to each end to two inches. At Sanford I constructed a number of


short wave receivers which the major presented to some friends and the local hospital at

Lake Edwards. Dr. Creed was one and he also presented one of the receivers to Gro Louis,

the Indian guide. I should say the chief of the Indian guides. Tesla also built a microwave

receiver, which were very small indeed.

One of the ideas of Tesla was a metal analyzer. This was very useful in finding out what

certain pieces of metal were. I first used this at Ottawa in 1969. There was a large lump,

chunk of metal had been discovered on the beach near Neuville and this piece of metal

weighing something like three thousand pounds was taken to Valcartier Camp where they

tried to find out what it was. It was a kind of a mystery and they were not able to find out

what it was at Bacarte and then it was shipped to Ottawa to the national research council

where they also did everything possible to find out what it was but they were not able to do

that. Needless to say they could not be certain of what it was. The story went around that it

fell from the sky and it was a part of a spaceship or something or other of that kind but no

one could say exactly what it was. And so, in 1969 I was invited to go to Ottawa and test

this with the tester, with the Tesla analyzer. I had, I still have in fact this invention of Tesla.

Well, to shorten the story, I certainly found out what the piece of metal was using the Tesla

analyzer.

Another wonder, it was a small portable TV machine. This TV machine could see through

stone walls. In other words, like a camera, a special kind of camera, you pointed it at a wall

and

it could see anything on the other side of the wall. It recorded this on a tape of some kind

and then you wind it up and you could transmit this picture which had been picked up

through a stone wall and send it to a small screen. This screen of Sanford's was mounted on

the wall and it looked like a colored picture of some kind. I said, in other tapes, ah, oil

painting TV because when it was operating that's exactly what it looked like to me because

it was like a picture in a nice frame on the wall and there were no visible wires to it but

Tesla had a small box that he was operating from the table and as he operated this it could

change these pictures that were seemingly coming from nowhere on this frame of some

kind and it looked like, as I say, it looked like an oil painting and I had called it an oil

painting TV. He had a camera with him during our trip through the bush and he had

pictures recorded of us and the guide carrying parcels walking through the forest and he

sent this picture to this oil painting picture and as I say it very much resembled an oil

painting because it was in color. That's the first I had heard of the TV, and remember, this

was in 1932.

Another marvel was a small recording machine, something like our modern tape recorders

but it had no moving parts. It had no tape or anything else. It simply recorded and would

play back your recording at a push of a button just exactly like our tape recorders but it

would record for an hour or so and play back, as I said, what was recorded without the use

of tape or any moving parts whatever. There was no motor in it.

Many of these ideas had been conceived by Tesla many years before but he did not have the


opportunity to develop them and here at Sanford's it was a beautiful place, a magnificent

place, a beautiful workshop which had been constructed by Major Sanford, well equipped

with almost everything you could think of.

Another fearful fantastic idea which Tesla developed with Sanford was his dark idea. This

would also prevent wars. But would it? I believe that this could also be used to make war

because the equipment could be carried in an airplane and it would float over a city and put

it to dark. Not a bit of light anywhere would show. This is, to me, a most fearful idea. You

turn on a switch and everything goes dark. There would be no electric lights, no lights in

your car, your headlights would not show, if you strike a match it would burn but it would

not show any light. No form of light whatever, instantly, the moment the switch is closed.

So then Tesla said that if war started and the switch was turned on, the war would not be

able to continue because nobody would be able to see. I wonder how it would be? I wonder

if it would ever be used? Can you imagine what would happen in a big city, say at

noontime, suddenly, not a pick of light anywhere; the sun would suddenly die out.

Headlights of cars would not turn on and so it would be a terrible mess. And this apparatus,

according to Tesla, could be put to work and control whole nations, either a city, or a

village, a town, or the whole nation. All of America, all of Canada, of a press of a button. Is

it a good idea? I really don't know.

Apart from the very big things used all over the world, inventions of Tesla, there are a

number of little things. Very important little things. For instance, the ignition system which,

I believe, is used in almost every car in the world. It was invented by Tesla many years ago.

But certainly all of the cars that I can think of use the same identical ignition system which

was invented by Tesla at the beginning of the century and no one has been able to find a

better system. The speedometer, which is also used in almost every car in the world, also

invented by Tesla. So was the ship's log. Most ships in the world use the Tesla Log.

The hydro system, that is to say, the method for driving generators to produce electricity

from waterfalls, was one of the great inventions of Tesla. The first power plant in the entire

world was Niagara Falls, which was built by the Westinghouse Company in 1895. It's one

of the few things, which had Tesla's name on it up to recent years.

Tesla also developed a number of ideas for helping overcome pain in the human being such

as sciatica, rheumatism and all kinds of things like that and he uses a small electrical

vibrator.

Another one of his great inventions was the electric car. He built the first one in 1897 and

he drove from New York City to Buffalo, New York and it had an average speed of 94

miles an hour. This car, if it was built today, would cost one-cent a mile to operate and it

would cost practically nothing for repairs because apart from the mechanical parts, that is to

say the wheels and the steering apparatus where they would compose the only moving

parts, the engine in this electric car is a small alternating current motor which runs at the

tremendous speed of thirty thousand rpm and this is reduced to eighteen hundred by means

of a fluid transmission, also the invention of Tesla. The whole electric car is a magnificent


piece of work and it could be put in use today and save the public hundreds of billions of

dollars now wasted in gasoline and oil and spare parts. I could give a few details about this

electric car. You see, it does not use a storage battery. It uses the special primary battery

and if you know anything about primary batteries you'll know that the only part of a

primary battery which fails is the negative plate. Any little dry cells you use for your

flashlight, for instance, is the zinc which gives way, and when that gives way the battery

goes dead. Well now, Tesla invented a completely new kind of primary battery and in this

primary battery, if the negative plate wears out, it can be replaced even by a child in a few

seconds. And the battery, when installed in this electric car, will run that car five hundred

miles before the battery needs to be attended to. And when the battery does need to be

attended to it would take you ten minutes to remedy whatever is going on and the spare

parts are all in the trunk. You have enough spare parts to keep that battery running twelve

months of the year. You do not have to stop at the service station. You could run five

hundred miles for instance at seventy five miles per hour, if you were allowed to do it of

course, but you could run this car say fifty or sixty miles an hour right across the country

and probably not have to stop more than fifteen minutes to attend to the batteries.

Well, some time in the future somebody will no doubt build this Tesla electric car but it

will be when we have no more fuel oil or gasoline? I don't know how long the present oil

supply will last. It certainly will not last forever so we will have to have other means of

transportation. Would it be by the Tesla electric car?

If you have read my book, The Wall of Light, you will know the first part is the life story of

Tesla. This story was written by Tesla himself and you will note in this story that Tesla

gives full credit to God for his ability to discover some amazing new ideas in the Bible. As

I have mentioned before the microwave comes from the fourth chapter of Revelations. In

many places in his work Tesla mentions the fact that he was inspired by Bible study to

conceive his amazing ideas. His idea of the alternating current comes from the book of

Matthew. In other words from the Trinity. Tesla explains that his microwave, for instance,

is not what many others think it is. It is not a wave, it is a dimension. The actual dimension

of the beam. Tesla

clearly states that his microwave is a beam which grows smaller. But he states that it's

diameter is smaller than the hair of your head.

Another idea of Tesla is a locator. This will help you to find anything underground. It will

help you to find metal deposits or liquid deposits such as island water. I wrote a story about

this locator many years ago which was published in one of the radio magazines of that time

and a man out west read my story and he wrote to me and he said that his father had died

suddenly and left his money buried someplace on their three hundred acre farm and did I

think that Tesla's locator would help him to find it? Well I wrote back and told him that

sure, if you can build the Tesla locator you certainly would be able to find it if your father

put it in a metal box or a metal lined box. Because if it was in a wooden box and the money

was in paper then it would be very difficult to find it but if the money was in cache, coins

or if it was in a money box then I was fairly sure he would be able to find it. Well, to make

the story shorter I sent him a diagram of this locator. This man built the locator and he


found the money.

Another marvelous idea of Tesla was what he called the translator. This was not a very

large affair either. It was something about the size of a small tape recorder and it had many

buttons on it and you pushed one of these buttons to translate a language. In other words the

button would be of Japanese for instance, you'd push the Japanese button and it would

translate the Japanese into whatever language you wanted such as English, French,

Chinese, what not and so on.

Tesla also had a small gadget, which was a speed warner. This was about as big as a pocket

wallet and once you were driving the car for instance he would set it and if you went too

fast over the speed limit it would yell loudly and tell you if you were going too fast or not.

There is no connection to the car whatever. You simply could carry this like a purse in your

pocket. You set it for instance at fifty miles per hour and if you went over fifty miles an

hour it would yell out.

Also at Sanford's, Tesla built what he called a gravity motor. This was a tripod of three tall

trees, the logs of three tall trees, latched together at the top and in the center of the top part

there is a pulley and over this pulley was a rope and you handed this rope that goes down a

shaft at the base and a weight on the other end and when the weight was coming down it

was turning the shaft and you had free power. Free power, which would last as long as the

rock was falling down, turning the shaft. Leonardo de Vinci was said to have built such a

power plant. It was absolutely free and very useful but one difficult point was the fact that

you had to wind it up.

Many people write to me asking the question where can they find the best books

concerning the life of Tesla? I have been answering letters like that for many years, since

the early twenties in fact, and I give the same answer to everybody that writes to me. Where

can they find information, which is true about Tesla? Well, you can find it in copies of his

patents. You can get those patents or copies of the patents in the Washington patent office,

Washington D.C., United States of America. Now there are also lectures and articles, which

Tesla had published before 1943, in other words before he died. Anything published in

recent years might be a little bit altered, I don't know. I don't say that the present day

publications are altered but if you want all the truth without any guess work get copies of

the original papers, lectures, articles, and patents, and his life story which is published in

the first part of my book The Wall of Light.

Tesla was a man who minded his own business and wanted other people to mind theirs. He

did not like gossip. His private life was his life and it belonged to no one else. He did not

interfere with other people's business and he did not want anyone to interfere with his.

Tesla was a down to earth kind of man. He was a mechanical engineer.


Regarding the scientists that have commented about me "not knowing

what I am talking about".

Might I refer you to the fundamental question of Einsteins relativity. What causes the

negative charged electron to orbit perpetually around it's positively charged protons and

neutrally charged neutron particles?

Simple question. And - if the "so-called" scientist's cant answer this simple and

fundamental question, then perhaps they don't know what they are talking about. Other than

repeating Einsteins assertions true parrot fashion. If they cannot account for the model with

logical reasoning and must resort to a mathematical theory that LACKS fully the

explanation of the thing it is modeling, then, perhaps scientists are less wise than they make

themselves out to be.

Quite simply - the maths is right. Of course it is. The math's is always right. Newtons

maths, correct. The greeks math's. Quite correct. Galileo's math, quite correct. Bohr's and

Rutherford, Thompson's, All their maths, correct.

It was not the maths that was the problem. It was the conceptually wrong ideas the maths

was based on, that failed to account for the full model. In this case the perpetual motion of

the negatively charged orbiting electron.

It's a simple question science men. I double dare you to try and answer it without making a

fool out of yourselves, that is what some here would see me do. But what of this

fundamental question I ask? What of it? If you cannot say how, with the math's, then there

is something missing from it.

Relativity

The only thing that is missing from this conceptually incomplete theory is what is missing

from all conceptually incorrect theories - that is, some important piece of information. This

is as it has always been in developing sciences - the case of an incomplete science; the

missing piece of information is always fundamentally obstructing and preventing the

correct conceptualization of the process and model being described, and results in an

incomplete mathematical description.

Mathematical description of a theory and function model

The mathematics is admirable and eloquent, and quite correct. But then again A=A is

correct, but it is conceptually flawed in that it tells us almost nothing. That is, an

incomplete and incorrect conceptualization, always results in an inaccurate mathematical

equation, which is always bearing the same mark of incompletion, such as in this case

missing some fundamental thing, and the resultant inability to explain something such as

perpetual electron orbits around positive and neutral charges and their source of energy,

being one of those fundamental things.


"Einstein quackers" and the contradicting truth in Experimentation show non

Kirchoffian , Non einsteinian Non conservatory particle streams

E=MC^2 is quite correct, but if you can transmit an ampere into the ground without

drawing power from the electricity supply, because it is TOTALLY RESONANT - More

than just Einstein and newton go out the window. But the fundamental laws of conservation

itself.

The Quantum Wave Function and how the electron and the atom are inherently unobservable

This is a deep problem of quantum wave functions that is truly yet to be fathomed, it stems

from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the work of Dr. Schrodinger. Indeed a

fundamental physics that shows that measuring the velocity cannot be acheived at the same

moment of measuring the position, therefore fundamentally it is impossible to know the full

properties of universal atomic theory, according to Heisenberg wave function principles.

According to the wave function principles the atom is "INHERENTLY

UNOBSERVABLE" quote unquote.

Scientific Facts about the Electron

So the model of the electron, by this fundamental precept, repeat, the model of the electron

- is completely obligatory and assumed. Nobody has ever seen an electron. And that's a fact

supported by the Uncertainty principle and quantum wave function. Admirably. It's a

scientific fact.

A challenge to know it all scientists

Added, still waiting on the so-called science men's explanation of the perpetual electron

orbits. I expect it will be a long time. (NON SCIENTISTS: note silence speaks volumes

from "scientists".)

* * *


ATTENDANTS APPEAL

I , Adam Bull am writing to you to appeal to your dignity, your self respect, your common

decency, your courtesy, your charity, and your heart, mind, body spirit and soul.

I am writing to you, at a time of grave misappropriations of planet earth's resources, and

about a material deceit of humanity in the history of Radio. Please listen to this email

carefully and heed the message it carries.

1) The maximum speed of a wave given by Nikola Tesla is faster than Einstein's speed of

Light. It has been this way since Tesla invented radio in 1896.

2) Tesla gave the speed of his radio waves as pi / 2 * C which is equal to 1.57 times the

speed of light.

3) Scientists today claim that 186,000 miles per hour, or 1.00 times the speed of light is the

limit.

4) Tesla disagreed with this rigorously citing numerous experiments he had conducted

showing cosmic rays to be moving at 50 times the speed of light from Antarus..

5) The speed that Tesla gives , if true completely disproves all of the modern science that

exists today assuming the speed of light as a limit.

6) Free energy cannot ever exist according to the modern scientific age, simply because

energy cannot travel faster than the speed of light.

7) Quantum Physics shows "instantaneous action at a distance" also known as "spooky

action at a distance".

8) Einstein always had a problem with spooky action at a distance and instanteous action at

a distance because it completely contradicts his theory of relativity, and the fundamental

laws of conservation.

9) Tesla claimed he designed a communications and power transfer system that could

transfer data or power accross the universe completely REGARDLESS OF DISTANCE,

that is, the device had no approximate speed limit.

10) The advancements of Tesla claimed that he had overcome the theory and law of

conservation, and had discovered a way to create a perpetual motion device.

11) The advancements of Edward Leedskalnin in his numerous books shows the same. And

even calls the accomplishment "perpetual power" from the "perpetual motion holder".


12) A basic electromagnet I have here curves light and turns electrons around 180 degree's

completely contrary to the Hertz Wave 1.0C speed of light theory and the theory of

conservation.

13) Radio Corporation America tookover MArconi in 1917, and replaced the faster than

light system with the inferior Hertzian speed of light Einstein system we see today.

14) Scientists, reluctant to accept the truth of history and the obviously cemented patents

and descriptions, and nyt publications of nikola tesla on "the True wireless" continue to

refuse the possibility of faster than light waves regardless.

15) Scientists will continue to refuse to accept this basic truth, irregardless that a working

faster than light wave system, being the most advanced and the first radio system ever to

exist, was present and accounted for in Bolinas California, at Marconi wireless and

transmitted at 1.57C for 4 years between 1914-1917, and this cannot be taken away from

humanity or from history, but it can and has been deleted.

16) DO not forget this. Or the future and the truth will die with me and people like Eric

Dollard.

Time is short. This is part 1 of a 2 part email explaining how to generate perpetual motion

and overunity effects including the synthesis of electricity, the isolation of cosmic rays to

HALT radioactivity of radium INSTANTLY, and the isolation of dense matter from the

cosmic rays preventing the equal and opposite gravity force from radiating from the earth.

These 2 emails will form a basis for a new theory of gravity as an EFFECT caused by

external things, and NOT caused by the MASS of the earth.

Quite contrarily, the mass produces the equal and opposite effect of gravity, when the earth

centre mass is hit by an equal and opposite cosmic force, which causes it's equal and

opposite north and south pole magnets to be released in all directions, which attract about

equally the electrons and protons of all atomic things.

Repeat, gravity is not a cause, it is an effect.

Repeat, radioactivity is not caused by unstable elements like radum. The radium will cease

to be radioactive altogether when sufficiently shielded from the cosmic rays.

This proves that the scientists are only working with one sided instruments, equipment,

models, conceptions and equations, and are negating 1/2 of the forces responsible for all

things.

Memorandum : They are still looking for where this extra energy comes from.

And they also are looking for the scientific reason why the negatively charged electron


seems to perpetually orbit around the positively charged proton and neutrally charged

neutron. They are still trying to explain it, regardless that perpetual motion is outlawed as a

crime in the scientific theory, and regardless to the fact that they fail to account it , the

scientists of today can be seen as nothing less than true inexplicable fallacies that the world

will one day see.

And that is the end of the first part.

* * *

Simply explain to us why the electron remains in perpetual motion

Simply explain to us why the electron remains in perpetual motion. This is hardly

"explaining the dynamics of the atom". What is the maximum speed of an electron?

Another simple question.

In any case as I have asserted, the electron is a non existent invention. Nobody has ever

seen one before. Yet most of our technology is using them. Do you not see the problem?

The science backs up what I am saying about the electron being un-observable -

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle predicts it to be inherently un-observable. Indeed, an

electron has never been observed, Scientific fact. What causes the negative charge to orbit

perpetually? We use it to power all our technology - it's kind of important.

It's a simple question. Given than perpetual motion doesn't exist according to your mantra,

there has to be a reason behind the electron perpetually spinning. Do you know what it is?

For anything to be in perpetual motion it requires energy to do it,

I think you need to be able to explain why the electron has perpetual motion before using a

theory that is intrinsically unable to explain the perpetual motion of electrons as a way to

"disprove" 100 years of radio history.

As I have said for 4 years the marconi plant had 1.57C waves in use. They were non

hertzian. I.e. most likely something you have never even heard of nor worked with. Am I

correct in assuming?

The waves employed, were also non transverse hertzian type waves. This is a historical and

scientific fact. The patents prove it. Perhaps If I give you the exact patent numbers you will

cease your unfounded remarks? I shouldn't have to though. As I set out below, the science

history speaks for itself.

Faster than light waves exist. Scientific Fact. Suppressed scientific fact. Whilst I would like

to claim the "rationality" and "logic" of people like yourself helped the situation, I have to

report that it hasn't. The world is still "in the dark" about it.

1) The maximum speed of a wave given by Nikola Tesla is faster than Einstein's speed of

Light. It has been this way since Tesla invented radio.


2) Tesla gave the speed of his radio waves as pi / 2 * C which is equal to 1.57 times the

speed of light. That's about 292,000 miles per second.

3) Wheatstone, pretty important guy, designer of the wheatstone bridge gave the velocity of

the electrostatic discharge as 292,000 miles per second.

Problem? No these are scientific facts - Preserved in history. Most of the Aerial Ground

Structure of the Marconi plant is intact. It's not like you can't go there and see it if you don't

believe that 1.57 C waves were in use for 4 years until the military and government R.C.A

project took over Marconi. This is more than a basic criminal conspiracy, it is a scientific

history that is hard to ignore. That is what you are continuing to do if you fail to remedy

these facts. Indeed, the onus is not on me at all. I have explained it several times in different

ways in varying levels of depth and clarity. All on deaf ears I am afraid.

May people be the judge.

“When others asked the truth of me, I was convinced it was not the truth they wanted, but

an illusion they could bear to live with.” ― Anaïs Nin

Best Wishes,

Adam

Footnote Memorandum :

"all of my investigations seem to point to the conclusions that they are small particles, each

carrying so small a charge that we are jutsified in calling them n eutrons. They move with

great velocity, exceeding that of light" - Nikola Tesla July 10, 1932

With Einstein’s universal speed limit in a jumble after CERN did what it does best, it

appears Nikola Telsa could have saved the international science organisation some trouble.

It’s a well-known fact the Serbian engineer was way ahead of his time. But close to 80

years? That’s quite a prediction.

No High-Speed Limit, Says Tesla *

(Following is a summary of the referenced article.)

Dr. Nikola Tesla asserted in an interview with Hugo Gernsback that speeds greater than that

of light, which are considered impossible by the Einstein theory of relativity, have been

produced.

Stating that the Einstein theory is erroneous in many respects, Dr. Tesla stated as early as

1900, in his patent 787,412, that the current of his radiopower transmitter passed over the


surface of the earth with a speed of 292,830 miles a second. According to the Einstein

theory, the highest possible speed is 186,300 miles a second.

Tesla indicated knowledge of speeds several times greater than light, and had apparatus

designed to project so-called electrons with a speed equal to twice that of light.

Tesla disagreed with the part of the Einstein theory which states that the mass of an object

increases with its speed. The mass of a body is unalterable, contended Dr. Tesla, According

to the article, "otherwise energy could be produced from nothing, since the kinetic energy

acquired in the fall of a body would be greater than that necessary to lift it at a small

velocity."

The Copenhagen interpretation was created during this conference.

Until this time on earth never had so many leading physicists been together.

Einstein is looking glum because he has lost the argument. Victory goes to Neils Bohr,.

Heisenberg won a victory that day too. His Quantum Wave function and uncertainty

principle resulted in the scientific model of spooky action at a distance.

Einstein mainly had a problem with it because it meant that things could travel not just

faster than his relativity's speed of light, but regardless to it, in fact at infinite speeds.

Instant speeds. As asserted, scientifically in the Copenhagen principle. Einstein looks rather

gloomy here, because after attempting all day to discredit the work of Heisenberg and Bohr,

he failed. This was when quantum physics was born.

Einstein would die "fighting relentlessly" the faster than light force.

It's still taking a long time to filter through. The speed of light is not a limit. As established

by Tesla, Wheatstone and Dollard, and as expressed in the Copenhagen Principle. The

whole conception of the atom changed during this conference. Relativity was trumped.

Copenhagen predicts action at a distance. That is - instant interaction between entangled

particles. Or rather, particles that effect each other REGARDLESS of distance, just as Tesla

said his system was capable.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/attachment.php?attachmentid=19943&d=1357445465


That is - faster than light, in fact, infinitely faster than light.

Again, all established science i'm afraid, and you are wrong. Very wrong. Faster than light

is a reality, long since passed as a theoretical force.

What I'm suggesting is not new to science. Ignorance though, runs rife.

* * *

About Tesla’s patent 787412

This I provide for the kind people who responded with contributory correspondence to the

established scientific facts that have been provided entirely vindicating the faster than light

wave I have continuously stipulated throughout this thread. That is - this is for those that

chose to challenge their own ignorance and preconceptions before judging or accusing

another of it.

"Third. The most essential requirement is however, that irrespective of frequency the wave

or wave-train should continue for a certain interval of time, which I have estimated to be

not less than one-twelfth or probably 0.08484 of a second and which is taken in passing to

and returning from the region diametrically opposite the pole over the earth's surface

with a mean velocity of about four hundred and seventy-one thousand two hundred and

forty kilometers per second.(292,815 miles per second or 1.57 the speed of light)" Nikola

Tesla, US GOV Patent number 787412

Patent number: 787412

Filing date: May 16, 1900

Issue date: Apr 18, 1905

It is as I have said all along regardless of what the hecklers have had to say in their

erroneous and largely offensive and disrespectful postings.

Contrary to popular relief, I am making no profit out of this, I gave up a promising career in

defense to do it. I feel no obligation to continue to punish myself and clearly the minds of

the ignorant many as some mere curiosity. I generally wanted to change the world.

For those interested the man whose name I forget, who transcribed all of the trial court

proceedings of Tesla's faster than light waves records that exactly the same thing that has

occurred on this thread, occurred once before there in court. Upon repeated and repeated

citing of experiments that shown non hertzian non transverse electromagnetic waves

traveling faster than the speed of light, they were ignored.

This is of course some many years before the Copenhagen conference and the realisation of

Quantum Physics, faster than light particle entanglement and a foundation of Physics that


requires instaneous action at a distance, or infinite velocity particles to exist. Tesla indeed

was ahead of his time. And unfortunately still appears to be.

I am sorry but I am reluctant to offer more. Truth stares you in the face, and I have,

contrary to the claim provided quite a considerable amount of historic and scientific

evidence that fully vindicates the basic assertions that have been presented,

"the most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not

formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most

intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt,

what is laid before him" - Leo Tolstoy

This is proof I'm not lying, or making this up. What more is there to say?

* * *

These are things which I find appalling and offensive myself

I wont ignore it either but it does seem a shame that people will suffer not having the

benefit of hearing my free expression, thoughts and perhaps wisdom , without unfounded

accusations against me of idiocy or profiteering. A great deal of effort went into doing this

work. I have given up literally years of career time, and am now destitute.

Did I ask for money? No. Did I want to advertise my book? Yes, to help get this

information out there, not to make profit. Yes I self published my book. What of it. I made

no effort to approach any publisher, I simply gave up work, and believe me it has upset

many friends, colleagues and family doing something that basically nobody was doing, or

wanted me to do. I wanted to do it, for you, for you all. What I know is big stuff and the

world will be a terrible place if it does not become aware of it. Truly. It is not remarkable, I

see that I have already partially failed to save off the old stories of suppression, deception,

hearsay, speculation and true human ignorance for want of a better word. Humanity.

Not naming names but these people know who they are. They are the people that have

made up their mind already and choose to slander me. Nothing wrong with a question right.

Clearly it's the way people ask the question. I feel like my effort to communicate this

information has been taken over by irrelevant argumentative and generally low minds. I

share what I have at great cost, and likely at peril to my livelyhood - it is worth noting if the

massive criminal conspiracy exists as I have witnessed, explained and testified is true, I

may pay the ultimate price.

Some greeting for me huh?

So whilst people continue to argue here about who said what or did or didn't offend who, I

can go out fully knowing that I tried to convey my thoughts and researches, and can go


away in the full knowledge that the scientific facts, historical and technical facts I have

shared are true. I tried to do a good thing, and I can walk away from this feeling alright.

The people who can't, Truly they have my deepest sympathies and apologies that I could

not help further. Truly.

You will not hear a more genuine word or story than mine.

It is a fact that the electromagnetic wave everyone is talking about here has absolutely

nothing to do with my work. The comments made by some one about have been most

preposterous, as we are not talking about light we are talking about those so-called

electrons, or rather electricity, traveling faster than the constant square of light to energy

and mass exchange. Somebody mentioned that nothing can travel faster than the speed of

light in any media. I wish that were true or I would not be here in the first place. In the

vacuum of space cosmic rays travel between 292,000 and 9,300,000 miles per hour. The

electromagnetic theory is by definition criminally and socially useless. This is what I have

repeated throughout this thread in numerous different ways. All on deaf ears? Not all.

Thank you to those people, you know who you are. You have my respect and appreciation

and it is with sincere greetings I am glad to have yours. This is how it should be, should it

not?

Some waves travel well in excess of 50 times the speed of light, they will go through

absolutely anything, and are tiny. Indeed, whilst light has a limited amount of mass, and

comprises of a great deal of wave particle energy, the electron consists greatly of mass in

it's conveyance of charge, and it is a fundamental principle of relativity and the famous

einstein equation that nothing with mass can travel faster than the speed of light. This

includes the so-called electron, the thing that is conveying our so-called electricity, as

modern scientists and anyone academically trained will declare.

Of course the electron, as professed by the so-called experts cannot travel faster than the

speed of light, because of it's mass, but what if the thing that caused the electron to rotate

around it's atom was not consisting of mass, nor was it constrained by the speed of light.

Then all the completely appalling attitudes that did rear their ugly heads can take a bite of

biscuit for why I repeatedly asked them to explain why an electron, with it's mass, and

therefore requiring energy, according to einsteins equation to rotate around the atom, yet

this is not accounted for. There is no place we know that the energy comes from, and we do

not know what makes the electrons spin like they do.

In fact if the thing scientists call electrons were not in perpetual motion around atoms, no

conductors would conduct electricity. So, the thing limiting the mass of the electron with

it's negative charge traveling from point A to B is not the mass of the electron is it, nor is it

it's energy , power or charge, it is the perpetual motion.

The energy to account for the perpetual motion of the electron is missing, and conveniently

ignored by relativitsts, but quantum physicists are not so deluded. Feynman, nobel prize

winner was not fooled, he realised this early on, hence why he invented the modern phase


diagram for quantum wave theory, because he knew that thinking inside the ordinary box of

singular energies was wrong, the straight line and energy of any photon and electron

actually consists of an almost infinite amount of energy, which in quantum superposition

almost completely cancel out. If there was a way to deflect and bend, like a prism can split

light, but for some of the quantum paths of the photons and electrons, we could all have

free energy, right now. It is likely if this was possible that the energy gained, would come

from somewhere, perhaps the thing that gives the electrons their perpetual motion.

It is interesting to note that it is the motion of the MEDIA and it's PERPETUAL negative

electron orbits is the true thing that allows the electromagnetic waves of electron particle

mass to travel at the speed of light through the medium at approximately the speed of light.

The electron conveyed at point B at the end of a transmission line electron-conveyer is in

fact a different electron than the one that went in the transmission line at point A. This must

be the case because Einsteins theory says the electron has mass, and anything with mass

cannot travel so close to the speed of light. This proves that it is the media that is the thing

that is doing the work, and allowing an electron going in point A to create the appearance

of a new electron at point B at light speed. So A electron is traveling at about walking pace

or less, but B came out instantly. The pressure and motion of the valent media is the thing

that caused the velocity of the output at B, and indeed the electron was an electron out of

the atomic wire, pushed out because of the pressure of the mass charge A entering in

between the sub divided atomic media. Or rather, for every ampere there is an equal

and opposite ampere.

It is well worth noting the Copenhagen interpretation of spooky action at a distance (which

is proven) shows instant transmission from point A to point B. Therefore accounting that

the motion and energy that carried it there must be of an infinite velocity and infinite

energy.

Poor einstein. You can see why he hated the idea and looked so grumpy in the Copenhagen

picture I presented to you all. He'd LOST, and that's a fact. All day he spent trying to

disprove it, and inventing reasons for why it "couldn't be". Scientsits do that all the time.

But the great Einstein died, still without a solution. Poor Einstein, indeed.

This is all proof that it was the pre-existing electron motion of the sub divided atoms we

call the transmission media that were truly responsible for the media's ability to conduct

and transmit. It also means that einstein's theory of relativity and the theory of maximal

limit of light in a vacuum ignores space as a media, and a dimension, and fails to

understand the true non electromagnetic nature of the electrostatic discharge as professed

by Tesla and Wheatstone. It is also proof that all light speed propogations in Q.E.D result

from faster than light propogations of a multitude of other waves of different velocities and

positions. (AKA Heisenberg uncertainty and Feynman).

The evidence is staring many of you in the face. But many of you would rather rattle on in

self exorbitance. I am glad many steersmen and hijackers of this thread feel good and

confident about themselves. I however have never been confident in any of the ideas I


propose, as, I have often learnt that being too quick to judge is an embarassing endeavor. It

has taught me to be thorough, to not act quickly, to think before judging, and most

importantly of all, to respect all human beings of all kinds. Maybe this explains why I tried

to bring this information to you all in the first place.

I would add that human ignorance is the greatest and most destructive force on this planet.

And having re-read this thread thoroughly, and the facts that I have stated, I can say firmly

and confidently myself that it was not I who has been ignorant here.

Some people ought to know better, but others want to make sure of it , that is, that "other

people ought to know better" - and they are not afraid to speak and assert their theories no

matter how droll, conservative or outright ridiculous they are. Many of the theories I have

proposed seem difficult for the scientist, and I think that has been demonstrated here.

I will not partake in a massive "hoo haw" appealing to authority - I do my own research and

experiments, and people here would do well to do the same. I cannot recount the number of

times that people have told me "what are you doing, playing with sparks, idiot, this teaches

me nothing" . Invariably they are always men that have accepted the description of the

electron, and the neutrino, and the neutron, and so and and so on, and stringently believe

things like radioactivity "take care of themselves". The truth is that radioactivity

COMPLETELY CEASES when shielded from cosmic rays, that is, starlight to the folks

that find it difficult to keep up with my "badly presented" posts.

Perhaps it is not what I present, but the competence, and the self centered and self

assuredness of some of the people here leaping to conclusions. That is the opinion my

technical experience lends me to consider strongly after witnessing this debacle. Before

attempting to understand the advanced ideas that I have laid to rest here, they are quick to

quote what they believe and only know to be right. Do not think that I am not familiar with

your explanations. I have shown that I am.

The reason why I continuously asked for relativists to account for perpetual motion of the

electron has been asserted.

Because it can't be explained. Yet electrical theory, the whole of relativity and spooky

action at a distance may very well be deeply, or entirely dependent on perpetual motion.

Ironically it is outlawed, that is perpetual motion, and every academic is told to hunt down

and slay anyone who suggests otherwise, more often than that, making continuous demands

for "extraordinary evidence for extraordinary claims".

My friends I have backed up my extraordinary claims with the patent of Nikola Tesla

himself, giving the speed of his waves as 292,000 miles per second, a full 105,000 miles

per second faster than light. It remains a FACT that I have actually provided quite a lot

more than that. and my God I wish I could convey to you how difficult it has been. This is

not a new reaction you know. Look what they did to Wilhelm Reich, they wanted to "help


him" and save peoples lives from fake cancer cures. Ya think? This stuff has been around

for decades, more people would be using it if people were more competent or even less

ignorant.

Nothing will be good enough, these people have already decided. It now remains to be seen

whether I will be allowed to explain it to the people that haven't without these infernal and

unsupported accusations largely claiming the same of me. I beg to differ, and I will leave it

at that.

People have judged incorrectly in many cases, and for that, I am truly sorry that my best

was not good enough for them. I am also truly regretful that my plight to help people, at

great risk and deep and personal sacrafice to my body , mind and spirit could be confused

with the appalling suggestions and frankly very rude and upsetting behavior of some people

here.

I was warned not to try, and was warned that this would happen, but I am a scientist and I

do believe in free commune, but when so many might jump to these conclusions, it is really

no wonder that the things I have been speaking about here, the forgotten electricity systems

of Nikola Tesla have been lost and deleted. - you let it - you let idiots lead you. You were

greedy instead of competent, self absorbed rather than world-centric. You thought small,

instead of big, and so your world reflected it. The small man, that is all that is left.

Regardless that we had free energy in 1914.

Make no mistake I attempted to expose this , (and I did quite admirably) that Radio

Corporation America is a criminal enterprise expressly designed and enacted by the U.S

military government to takeover tesla's last remaining works and funnel them into

government and military projects. Now most are classified - removing quietly the multiple

loaded flat top antenna and replacing it with the rhombic-D. There will be no more special

scalar waves, and faster than light waves mr marconi and mr tesla, there will be no more

longitudinal magneto dielectric tesla coils or wardenclyffe towers mr tesla and marconi,

there will be only the electromagnetic, the billions of times more wasteful electrical system,

and boy will we make a killing!

Literally - a killing! More have died because of this than in the last world war. International

poverty is a terrible thing.

Make no mistake, these technical details outlay the greatest criminal conspiracy to ever

happen. And to all those completely bemused how something could be so true, we only

need to look at some of the reactions from people here to see how quickly a fool will lap up

a commendation or some false sense of "helping" and "protecting people against the ideas

of liars and con artists"; we stand to now observe this reaction is in fact venom from the

liars and con artists themselves. These people are the ones that are to blame for things like

this going unnoticed.

Perhaps if you have to "save people" maybe they weren't saving. Or maybe you can't accept


an alternative point of view, and answer a few basic questions yourself.

A truly shocking memorandum I have.

Remarks:

It is however, that the Telluric Transmission Networks of N. Tesla are completely

engineer-able. This is also true for the U.S.N. Alexanderson systems of transmission. The

Rogers U.S.N. system also should be noted. The Tesla “thru the Earth” radio has been

rendered mere technical details by the writings of L.V. Bewely, Blume, Steinmetz, and

Dollard. In particular note Bewely, “Traveling Waves on Transmission Systems,” chapter

on single winding waves, and Dollard, “Condensed Introduction to the Tesla

Transformer”, and “Theory of Wireless Power” section on coil Coil Calculations.

The Tesla Magnifying Transmitter is now an engineer-able reality, this for any competent

radio engineer. The 160 meter Ham Band, (1.8 – 2.0 Megacycle per sec.) is the perfect spot

for our “International Contest.” My longitudinal videos show the construction of a “160

meter” flat spiral transformer.

These medium wave frequencies along with large paths of transmission on a quadrant of

the Earth make velocity determination possible.

Note that Tesla’s drawing indicates that velocity depends on the cosecant of the latitudinal

angle, it is infinity at the poles and luminal at the equator, if anyone ever bothered to look

at the fine print. The pi over two is the effective velocity between the limits of c and infinity.

There is no longer any excuse for not implementing Tesla Transmission on the Ham Bands,

none!

Eric Dollard 12-05-2011

A bad Situation

Lieutenant Junior Grade, U.S.N. Albert Einstein is seated before five senior officers at a

Judge Advocate General Board of Inquiry. It has been convened at Pearl Harbor Naval

Shipyard. Lt. J.G. Einstein is the defendant and the Board is about to issue it’s verdict. The

charges are very serious.

It seems that Mr. Einstein utilized a college physics textbook, in lieu of Bureau of Ships

directives, in performing operations on a shore power connection. Mr. Einstein employed

“his understanding”, as derived from Physics, “Maxwell’s Equations”, in determining the

connections for a shore power transformer bank (480V at 1500 KVA). Seaman Lopez was

directed by Lt. J.G. Einstein to make the “backward” connections, but Lopez knew the

outcome would spell disaster. He learned in his Naval Electricians Mate training that the

connection would cross phase, however Mr. Einstein berated Lopez, as Einstein’s

Princeton University education overshadowed “Electricity Schools”. Lopez was reminded


that to refuse orders would result in a Captains Mast and possible Court Martial under the

U.C.M.J. A terrified Lopez closed the switch and was killed in the blast. Four more were

injured and the Shipyard was without power for several hours.

Lieutenant Junior Grade Albert Einstein was pronounced –guilty- by the Board. He

received a life sentence at Leavenworth Federal Prison. The next day the Chief of Naval

Operations issues the following directive to all Fleet Commanders. It reads in part; At

0000 hours U.T.C. Dec 21, 2012 the following order is in effect: The use of Physics Texts in

any and all Naval Operations is henceforth PROHIBITED. The next day a Presidential

Order is signed abolishing the practice of teaching Electrical Principles by Physicists. (But

the Mayan Calendar says we will not make it that far)

We have reached the Final Proclamation. It can no longer be avoided. It is that the “Laws

of Physics” find no application in the understanding of Electricity for the Electrical

Scientist. The Physicist is best regarded as a subversive from an enemy country, and his

efforts best suited for the development of “Weapons of Mass Destruction.”

The entire system of “Units and Dimensions” for electrical work as they exist today are an

incongruous quagmire force fit to Einstein’s E equals mc square. Electricity is a “mass

free” phenomena. This is given by Dr. Wilhelm Reich in his “Cosmic Superimposition”.

Mass has no place in Electrical Units and a directive is issued to remove it from said units

and dimensions. The question of mass is touched upon by Oliver Heaviside in his “Electro-

Magnetic Theory” Vol I, pages 337 to 339.

Art. 189, Internal Obstruction and Superficial Conduction

On page 339, “In the limit, with no resistance (perfect conduction) it never gets in at all.

Where then is the current?” There is none.

It is further found that the existing system of units are infected with useless constants such

as 4*pi and one over c square, as well as a multitude of arbitrary powers of ten. The

systems of units as they exist today are pure N.F.G. This is given by Heaviside, same

Volume I, pages 116 to 123.

Art. 90, “The eruption of the 4*pi”

Art. 91, “The origin and the spread of the Eruption.”

Art. 92, “The cure of the Disease by Proper Measure of the Strength of the Sources.”

Art. 93, “The Obnoxious Effect of the Eruption.”

Art. 94, “A Plea For the Removal of The Eruption by the Radical Cure.”

Here now the Primary Directive is issued: Rationalize the system of units and dimensions.

Remove all “pathogenic” dimensional relations, MASS IN PARTICULAR. This will follow


shortly. (Also, on this matter see “Impulses, Waves, Discharges”, Steinmetz, pages 14 &

15.)

Lamare has pushed forward these writings in order to accommodate the “Moon-bounce

Initiative”. Hence certain introductory material for the “Youngsters” must be passed over

for now. This “act of genius” on the part of Lamare must in itself be pushed forward; An

International Ham Contest to disprove Einstein, (but do not ask the A.R.R.L.). Wow Mr.

Wizard, that sounds like loads of fun. Lets get started today.

It should be noted however that Lamare is taking a most difficult path. His route lacks any

definite engineering formulation but let me draw his attention to C.P. Steinmetz and the

treatment of a related situation. It is found in “Theory and Calculation of Transient

Electric Phenomena”, “Transients in Space” and section on “Velocity of Propagation of

the Electric Field, Capacity of a Sphere”. When the one over c square and the 4*pi*10^-9

are eliminated, the velocity of propagation of the dielectric field is an independent variable.

These relations were given by myself at the International Tesla Society in my lecture

“Hysteresis of the Aether”. The P.E.E.E., QRM and Dis-infos were conspicuously absent

from this presentation! I wonder why?

It is however, that the Telluric Transmission Networks of N. Tesla are completely engineer-

able. This is also true for the U.S.N. Alexanderson systems of transmission. The Rogers

U.S.N. system also should be noted. The Tesla “thru the Earth” radio has been rendered

mere technical details by the writings of L.V. Bewely, Blume, Steinmetz, and Dollard. In

particular note Bewely, “Traveling Waves on Transmission Systems,” chapter on single

winding waves, and Dollard, “Condensed Introduction to the Tesla Transformer”, and

“Theory of Wireless Power” section on coil Coil Calculations. The Tesla Magnifying

Transmitter is now an engineer-able reality, this for any competent radio engineer. The 160

meter Ham Band, (1.8 – 2.0 Megacycle per sec.) is the perfect spot for our “International

Contest.” My longitudinal videos show the construction of a “160 meter” flat spiral

transformer. These medium wave frequencies along with large paths of transmission on a

quadrant of the Earth make velocity determination possible. Note that Tesla’s drawing

indicates that velocity depends on the cosecant of the latitudinal angle, it is infinity at the

poles and luminal at the equator, if anyone ever bothered to look at the fine print. The pi

over two is the effective velocity between the limits of c and infinity. There is no longer any

excuse for not implementing Tesla Transmission on the Ham Bands, none!

Now the Coyote has to puke. Up comes the goo & mucus of undigestable matter, what a

mess. Forget the Bearden fecal matter, Forget the Corum carrion. IT IS ABSOLUTELY

USELESS. This material is Pathogenic, also from another standpoint. There are

Journalistic Interest, such as the B.B.C. & etc. that sometimes turn a favorable ear to Tesla

concepts. For these interested to get mired in a concatenated sequence of falsehoods &

misconceptions is the “Kiss of Death” to any public awareness. It also illegitimizes “The

Work” in the eyes of Scientists & Engineers. Puke it up once and for all!

The Bearden zealot stands at the bottom of the utility pole, exclaiming to the lineman on


top, replacing a missing cross-arm brace, “You lose half your power in that 33KV line

(50% efficient) because you don’t pump the Scalar Waves.” The irritated Lineman drops

the brace and now must climb down to retrieve it. Angered, the Lineman slams his fist into

the mouth of the yac-yac, knocking him to the ground and shouts, “This Line is 98%

efficient you moron.” What more can I say, Heaviside E.M. Theory, Vol III, page 1, art.

450.

Adagio. Andante, Allegro Moderato.

“There is a time for all things: for shouting, for gentle speaking, for silence; for washing of

pots and the writing of books. Let the pots go black, and set to work. It is hard to make a

beginning, but it must be done.” Oliver Heaviside

73 DE N6KPH

Eric Dollard, 12-05-2011

* * *

An excerpt from Technology For a New Future p79-84 General Principia of a new periodic table and energy physics defined not by atomic

number but by atom particle motion

and a commentary on the explanation of the evolving scientific method in the scientific

principle

The truth about the "great Einstein" and the "great relativity theory" on which all

electromagnetic assumptions of the only existent features of waves are evidently based

Dewey B Larson (Transcription)

The best lost lecture on Scientific Theory Ever

THE FUNDAMENTALS OF SCIENCE IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, by

Dewey B. Larson, Principal Address to the Third Annual NSA Conference, University of

Utah, Salt Lake City, August 18, 1978

5000 years ago when the invention of writing on clay tablets by the Sumerians first gave

the human race an opportunity to make a permanent record of its thoughts and actions.

Already in existence was a sophisticated science of astronomy. The priests who were the

scientists of those days were not only familiar with elementary astronomical facts such as

the apparent movements of the sun, moon and planets, but they had also advanced to the

point where they were able to predict eclipses and were able to predict the year within a

half hour of its accepted value. The premises, on which these calculations and others of the

same kind were made, were the fundamentals of the science of that day. In the sense in

which I am using the term tonight. That is they are the most basic of the relations, the

http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/lec/larlect1978.htm




principles - that were used by the science of that day. These principles were originally

derived by a simple application of what we now call inductive reasoning - that is they were

generalisations from experience. And that is the most reliable method at arriving at

scientific principles, fundamental or otherwise. But unfortunately it is limited by the

amount of empirical information that’s available and by the extent to which that

information has been analyzed. So the result is of that an inductive science, such as that of

the ancient peoples, has a tendency to fall behind the progress of empirical discovery, and

ultimately it acquires a rather embarrassing accumulation of unsolved problems. Now that

was the situation in Egypt, Babylonia and the far East about 3000 years ago. The time was

clearly right for some new approach, and that was provided by a remarkable group of

thinkers that flourished in Greece, during the golden age in that country’s history. The

source of order in the universe these men said was mind, and the proper way of arriving at

general principles was to apply insight and reasoning. A result of that change in policy was

to concentrate attention on the CAUSES of physical phenomenon, rather than on the

phenomena themselves; where the Egyptians only saw that a rock would fall from a height,

the Greek's looked for the cause of the fall. The Greeks reasoned that everything must have

their natural place. So the rock falling was seeking its natural place. In this way the Greeks

by providing an explanation they remedied the chief defect of the previous inductive

theories. Similarly they reasoned that whilst the earth is obviously imperfect the heavens

are perfect - and all heavenly motions must then take the perfect form, that of a circle. So

the orbits of the planets are undoubtedly circular. Now observation and experiment were

definitely relegated to secondary position by the Greeks, but they were not disregarded

altogether. So when the observation shown that the planetary orbits were not circles, it was

recognised, that this was an awkward discrepancy that we have to do something about. But

one of the strong points of an inventive science, such as that of the Greeks, is that it can

easily accommodate new discoveries simply by more invention. So they assumed that the

planets move in small circles called epicycles, and these epicycles then move around the

main planetary orbit. Then when further observational refinement disclosed still more

discrepancy, those could be taken off in exactly the same way, by adding more epicycles.

This ptolemaic theory of planetary orbits, is typical of inventive theories in general, and

since we see it in a historical perspective, by taking a look at this ptolemaic theory, we can

get an idea of the general characteristics of inventive theories.

1. That theory was mathematically correct, within the existing observational limits. The

Then existing limits. That is a general characteristic of all inventive theories because they

are invented for that specific purpose. They are specifically designed to fit mathematics that

are already known

2. The second significant point is that that theory, the Ptolemaic theory was conceptually

wrong. The interpretation of the mathematics was wrong. And that again is a general

characteristic that applies to all inventive theories because of the circumstances under

which they are invented. As many observers have pointed out, long standing problems in

science do not continue to exist on a lack of competence of those who are trying to solve

them. Nor do they continue to exist as a result of a lack of methods to go about solving

them. They exist because some piece, or pieces of information that are essential, are

missing. In the cases of the Ptolemaic theory there were two such pieces of information.


The Greeks did not realise that the planets revolved around the sun, rather than around the

earth. And they did not know that there was a force of gravitation controlling those

movements. Without those two pieces of information neither the Ptolemaic theory, or any

other theory that was invented to explain the mathematics could have been correct.

Now that is a general characteristic of inventive theories. If all of the information is

available, if all of the information is there, then there is no need to invent a theory, then we

can achieve it by inductive means. If the essential information is not there, then any theory

we invent cannot be conceptually be right. In view of the practically unlimited opportunity

for making ad-hoc assumptions, that is adding epicycles. An inventive theory never comes

to the fate of the inductive systems of theories. The inventive system may fail to account

for a few things at any given time, but there is never the big accumulation that characterises

an inductive system of theory that has fallen behind the progress of discovery. But the

inventive theory, ultimately an inventive system of theories, an inventive science I might

call it, ultimately encounters a fate of its own. Sooner or later we just have too many

epicycles, and in the meantime the progress of observation and construction of inductive

theories of lower rank has continued. So that ultimately we get to the point when the scope

of those theories is broad enough to challenge the prevailing inventive (specific) theory.

And then the inventive theory goes to the boards. That is what happened to the Greek

inventive system, about 500 years ago, and at that time the perfection of the heavens and

the natural places of objects and the other governing principles that the Greeks had invented

were discarded and replaced by other principles that were derived by such men as Kepler

and Newton, from factual foundations by inductive reasoning. Now the benefit of the 2500

years of accumulated scientific knowledge, since the demise of the first inductive theories,

this new science of Newton and his contemporaries was a vastly improved product, and it

scored some very impressive successes. At one time the practitioners of that science were

pretty thoroughly convinced that the knowledge of the entire physical universe was within

their grasp, but here again the inherent weakness of an inductive theory then asserted itself.

And Newtonian science found itself faced with a series of problems for which it had no

answers. So then the present day inventive science took over.

When an idea, or a set of ideas gains general acceptance and becomes a familiar feature of

thought, its origins recede from view, now I wouldn't be surprised that you may be reluctant

to accept the idea that the basic theories of modern day physics, such as the relativity theory

for example, belong in the same category as the Ptolemaic theory of planetary orbits. But

they were all inventive theories. The originators of the present day theories don't deny that,

in fact they emphasise it. We might even say they glory in it. Einstein told us that pure

invention is the "only way by which these basic principles can be obtained". He was highly

critical of Newton’s attempt to ascertain them inductively. Here is what he said "Newton

believed that the basic laws and concepts of his system could be derived from experience.

The tremendous practical successes of his doctrines may well have prevented him and the

physicists of the 18th and 19th centuries from recognising the fictitious character of his

system". Einstein's own view was that the basic concepts and laws of physics, what I am

calling the fundamentals are quote "in a logical sense free inventions of the human mind".

He elaborates this view in these statements that I have taken from his book the "World as I


see it".

"Since However space perception only gives information of this external world of physical

reality indirectly we can only grasp the latter by speculative means. The theoretical scientist

is compelled in an increasing degree to be guided by purely mathematical, formal

considerations, in his search for a theory, because the physical experience of the

experimenter cannot lift him into the regions of highest abstraction. The axiomatic basis of

theoretical physics cannot be an inference from experience but must be free invention".

There is a rather general tendency to believe that Einstein and the other architects of

modern physics could not have been as casual about the foundations of their system as

these words indicate. That they must have been tied into something solid somewhere, but

that’s not true as Rudolf Carnap puts it "they were constructed flowing the air so to speak".

Einstein gives us enough information about the origin of his own theories to make it clear

when he talks about free inventions he means free inventions, nothing else.

For instance the propagation of electromagnetic radiation plays a very significant part in his

theories, and the comments that he made about the theory that he invented to account for

that propagation have a considerable bearing on what we are talking about now. In one of

his books he goes on at considerable length about what a difficult problem this is and he

concludes with this statement "I only way out seems to be to take for granted the fact that

space has the physical property of transmitting electromagnetic waves and not to bother too

much with the meaning of this statement".

The point of all this is, that all invented theories share the same defect they are all

mathematically correct but they are all conceptually wrong, not because of any errors in the

construction, but because of their inherent characteristics. Now this statement may seem to

be in direct conflict with many of the confident assertions we find in present day scientific

literature that tells us that the validity of present day theories have been established beyond

any reasonable doubt. But if you look at the evidence in support of those assertions, you

will find that it is all mathematical. What has been done is to establish that those theories

are mathematically correct, just as I have said all along that they are - because of the way

they were constructed. But those theories that are mathematically correct are not unique,

none of them are. In every case there are other theories that are also mathematically correct

and as Richard Feynman tells us "we can’t distinguish between any two of them on any

scientific basis and say which is correct because they both agree with experiment to the

same extent. So two theories, although they may have deeply different ideas behind them

maybe mathematically identical, then there is no scientific way to distinguish them.

Now Feynman goes on to say this "Every theoretical physicist who is any good knows 6 or

7 theoretical representations for exactly the same kind of physics". What Feynman does not

say that those statements only apply to the present day and other day inventive theories.

They do not apply to inductive theories - that is theories that have been derived by

induction from factual premises. For example the kinetic theory of gases is a theory that

relates to gas laws to the motions of the particles that compose the gas. No one tells us that

he has half a dozen equally valid representations for what the kinetic theory tells us, in fact


there is not another one alternative - because the kinetic theory is an inductive theory that is

tied into the facts both mathematically and physically, so that it is both conceptually and

mathematically correct. Whereas the inventive theories are correct mathematically only.

Now that raises an interesting philosophical question as to whether there is actually any net

gain by using these inventive theories during a period when we would have otherwise have

no theories at all to account for some important physical phenomenon. Actually we don't

need them, we could equally well use the mathematical explanations we have, without any

theoretical explanation. So the whole thing boils down to a question as to whether it is

better to have a wrong theory than no theory at all. Now there is a very widespread belief

that that’s true, that it is better to have a wrong theory and it dates back to at least Sir

Francis Bacon. The idea behind it is that a plausible theory, even if it is wrong, may suggest

some lines of inquiry that in the end will be productive, on the other hand we know that

continued adherence to the Greek inventive theories particularly during the last few years of

the Greek era was a very serious roadblock in the way of scientific process, and we have

pretty good reason for believing that much the same is going on now. In any event the fact

that needs to be recognised at the moment is that we have again arrived at a kind of

situation that existed in the middle ages, the present day inventive theories have

accumulated too many epicycles, and at the same time inductive theory has caught up with

observation and experiment so that as we enter the 21st century shortly we are in a position

to GO BACK FROM THE INVENTIVE THEORY to a SOLIDLY BASED INDUCTIVE

THEORY AGAIN. Now the eminence of such a change could be deduced simply from an

examination of the times involved in the cycle of reversals that I have been talking about.

The first inductive theories lasted for thousands of years before they were overthrown by

the Greek inventive science. Now that the first of the inventive sciences indulged for 2500

years before it met its fate at the hands of Newtonian inductive science. The accelerating

pace of science is shown by the fact that in spite of its greatly superior character, the

science that’s normally associated with the name of Newton only lasted for 400 years

before it in turn succumbed to the "2nd inventive science" now if we consider the same rate

of acceleration we can see that since another 100 years have passed we are about due for

another reversal that will take us back into an inductive theory, but we don't have to depend

entirely on inferences of that kind because there is plenty of direct evidence to show that we

are again in exactly the same kind of situation in which Greek science found itself during

the middle ages. At which point the accumulation of epicycles had reached the point of

absurdity in a great many cases, and the quantum theories have a long history of one ad-hoc

modification or interpretation after another, until it's very questionable now if the theory is

even intelligible. In fact Richard Feynman says "it isn’t". Feynman says this "I think I can

safely say that nobody understands Quantum Mechanics".

The situation in the field of atomic structure is much the same the favourite past time there

is inventive properties for the illusive particles called quarks. Now nobody has seen or

otherwise observed a quark or anything that could be a quark. In fact the most urgent

problem for the theorists right now is to invent some theory in which it can be said that the

quarks are inherently unobservable, but nevertheless we are told just what kind of quarks

could exist and what their properties are. Such interesting properties as colour, charm and

so on. In order to fit this situation into the proper perspective lets bear in mind that not only


are the quarks themselves unobservable but the particles that are supposed to be constructed

out of quarks have never been observed either. now those particles are given familiar names

such as electrons for instance but the hypothetical electron constituent of the atom has a

doubly different set of properties from the OBSERVED electron, and there is actually no

adequate justification for calling them by the same name. The same is true for the other

hypothetical constituents, the hypothetical neutron constituent of the atom for instance has

to be "stable" or else the observed neutron is very much unstable. The truth is that there is

no definite evidence that the atom is constructed of particles at all, now that may seem to be

rank heresy but a great many of our foremost scientists have said the same thing in different

words. For instance Erwin Schrodinger "once we have become aware of this state of affairs,

the epistemological question do the electrons really exist in these orbits within the atom is

to be answered with a decisive NO unless we prefer to say that the putting of the question

itself has absolutely no meaning. Here we have a good example of the difference between

induction and invention, in the construction of a theory. Since I am making this my

principle point I want to elaborate on it a little.

Such men as Newton and Einstein were very much aware of that difference. Newton

insisted time and time again that he did not resort to invention. Einstein on the contrary

criticised Newton for trying to get his theories inductively. I am afraid that a great many

people do not recognise the difference because they both start in the same way. The both

start with a hypothesis. That is the only way we are going to end up with something more

general than we already have. But the Newton’s looked upon that hypothesis of something

to be tested, and they test that hypothesis and if it doesn’t fit the facts they throw it out and

try a new hypothesis or at least a greatly modified hypothesis, they test that and if that

doesn’t work they try another one. The Einstein’s take that hypothesis and test it and if it

doesn't work they invent something to make it work, and if that doesn't work quite right

they invent something to help the first invention make it work. You may think I'm being

funny on this, but if you read Einstein yourself he tells you exactly that same thing in

different words he says it "has to be pure invention". But that's the difference between

induction and invention. In the one case it is HYPOTHESIS TEST DISCARD

HYPOTHESIS TEST DISCARD until we finally don’t have to discard, and in the other

case it is HYPOTHESIS TEST INVENT TEST INVENT until we get something we don’t

have to invent anymore.

When it was first discovered that atoms disintegrate under certain appropriate conditions

and emit particles in so doing, it was a very natural hypothesis that the atoms were

constructed of such particles, but now we have found out that those particles do not have

the properties that are necessary to be constituents of atoms we have a totally different

situation. We no longer have any justification for inventing something that we can find no

base of.

But the general opinion still stands that this , these atoms, must be constructed of particles.

The present day theories are obsessed with the idea that they have to keep on dividing and

sub dividing until they get to something they can call an elementary particle. In fact the

whole situation with the physical particles is beginning to resemble the status of the flees


and that popular little verse. Big flees have little flees upon their backs to bight them, the

little flees have still smaller flees. The impetus for this frantic search for an elementary

particle of matter, comes from the present day concept of the nature of the universe - which

sees it as one in which the basic entities are elementary particles of matter existing in a

framework provided by space and time. But the modern discovery that matter can be

converted into non matter and vice versa has completely destroyed that concept. It is now

obvious that matter cannot be the basic constituent. That there must be some common

denominator underlying matter and non matter. And since that is the situation there must be

some level below which matter does not exist, and that which exists , is this common

denominator, whatever it is, for the moment let’s call it x. This again is nothing particularly

heretical, some of our foremost scientists have emphasised it quite strongly. Heisenberg for

instance was very clear on the subject and tried to figure out what this entity x could be, he

suggests energy but he has no idea he admits or did admit, how energy could fit the bill.

Let’s consider further this question of inventive vs. inductive theories and how they sound

now. At the beginning of this century when the modern inventive theory took over from

Newtonian inductive science, the necessary information for constructing a inductive theory,

that would account for the new discoveries that had been made around that time was

entirely inadequate. The information that could be collected was not enough to extend the

existing inductive theories into what we may call the far out regions. The regions of the

very fast, the very small, and the very large. There were a few of the essential building

blocks in place. The discrete nature of the units of energy had already been established.

Radioactivity had already been discovered, and the status of electrical current as a

movement of "electrons" had been determined, but there was still an immense amount of

information that had to be collected before an inductive theory was capable of being

extended into these far out regions, could be constructed. That information has now been

accumulated and the final inductive step that was necessary in order to construct the theory

that would extend into all these regions has been taken by the development that is the

subject of discussion at this conference.

That development like a great many other results of scientific research was a totally

unexpected result at a project aimed at an entirely different objection. The original

objective was to construct a theory or some means whereby physical properties could be

calculated from the chemical composition. IN some respects, it is not a very good subject

for examination, because it’s been very thoroughly combed over by previous investigators,

but on the other hand it is also something that has a definite answer, because obviously

those physical properties are determined by the chemical composition. I want to say at this

point that while I may be regarded as a heretic that’s not be intonation, I started from a

purely conventional base and my first work was directed entirely along conventional lines,

the base from which I started was the idea that is embodied in the periodic table, the idea

that the principle properties of the chemical elements are determined by two variables

represented horizontally and vertically in the tables. The first really important advance that

I made at least that is important in view of what turned up later on, was the finding that one

of these variables takes both POSITIVE and NEGATIVE values, whereas the other one


takes POSITIVE values only.

When after a good deal of traditional trial and error I found that there were actually 3

variables rather than two. Now whilst all these efforts to determine the form of the

mathematical relations were going on, I was also struggling to determine the meaning of

the terms of those relations, that is the other essential for an inductive theory, one that will

be conceptually valid. Here again I didn't stray off the reservation for quite a while. I started

from the purely conventional idea that the atom is made up of a group of particles and that

the properties and the differences in properties between the elements are due to differences

in the number an arrangement of those particles, but after some years of work I got

nowhere. Exactly nowhere. So I had to try some different approach or quit the job. I tried a

number of things and discarded them, the old trial and error process. And finally I got the

idea that perhaps some of the differences in the properties might be due to different

properties due to motions of the particles, rather than the differences in the actual number

and arrangement of the particles themselves, and well that didn't work either, but in the

process there were some indications that I might be on the right track, so I didn't throw that

away immediately, and I worked on it. And as I worked on it, the more emphasis I put on

the motions and the less emphasis I put on the number of particles the more of these

indications there were I was getting somewhere. So eventually I simply discarded the idea

that the motions might account for some of the properties in the atoms, but they might

account for all of the properties in the atoms. Now that was the first really radical

conceptual jump that I had made in the whole project, and it led to some important

consequences. Since I had determined that there were only three main variables, then if we

attributed them to motions, it follows that they must be motions of the atom, rather than

large motions of constituents. Then one comes to the conclusion that the motions of the

atom, and then of objects of that kind almost certainly be rotations, and the number 3 then

suggested that these were rotations around 3 perpendicular axis.

In that event the differences in the magnitudes of the properties can be very easily

explained in the differences in the speed of rotation. SO I have come then to the point then

of an atom constructed entirely of motions with 3 rotational motions around the 3

perpendicular axis and different speeds in the different dimensions. SO I had identified this

quantity x, quantity x is motion. When we subdivide matter we subdivide down to a certain

point which we find is the atom, and we subdivide further and we have motion, not matter.

With this understanding of the general nature of the atom, of matter, the stage was set for

the final conceptual jump in this inductive phase of the original project.

In the work I had done in some 20 years or so up to this time I would arrive at some rather

interesting mathematical expressions connecting some of the physical properties of matter,

with the atomic numbers, now all I had to do was connect the atomic numbers to motions,

this was another long and difficult task, and was very often a frustrating task but it finally

dawned on me one day that one of the most interesting of these expressions, one that

connected the inter atomic distances in the solid state, or the atomic number, could be very

easily and simply explained if I assumed a general reciprocal relation between space and

time. Now those of you are encountering this idea for the first time my find it rather weird.

So did I , I can quite understand how you might feel that way. In fact when I first thought of


it, the idea of a reciprocal of space struck me as about as reasonable as the idea of a

reciprocal of a soft boiled egg. But when I took a second look at it, it wasn't so

unreasonable after all, the only relation between space and time of which we have any

knowledge is motion, and in motion space and time are reciprocally related. So of course

having come that far I had to go on farther and see what else I could put this relation to use

with. And very much to my surprise it was almost immediately evident that this relation

gives us the answers, simple and logical answers to no less than a half a dozen of the

longstanding problems of science. Now any of you who have ever done research work will

realise this is the kind of a breakthrough that we see in our most rosy dreams, and obviously

it called for an immediate start on a full scale investigation to see how far this clarification

could go, or physical picture would extend. By the time of my first publication in 1959, I

had arrived at a set of two postulates from which it is possible, I showed then that it was

possible to derive the principle features of the major branches of physical science by pure

deduction without any supplementary assumptions and without drawing on anything from

experience. In the meantime, the members of this organisation that are meeting here today

and other scientists around the world joined in this effort, and we have extended the scope

of the theory to the point where we now feel fairly confident that we will ultimately reach

the goal that the Newtonian scientists were aiming at and couldn’t quite make, that is a

general explanation of the physical universe.

For those who shudder at the thought of having to reconstruct all of the scientific ideas I

want to say that probably 90% of what passes for scientific knowledge today will be

incorporated into our new system without any significant change other than perhaps the

language in which the ideas are expressed. Another 5% will take only a change in the

interpretation of the mathematics, because the mathematics is OK, and another 5% or so we

will have to reconstruct. And all of those items are in what I call the "far out regions" ,

regions where the scientific theory are having difficulty with now.

* * *

Patents & Copyright Buying & Selling Your Nature an excerpt from page 96 of Technology For a New Future

The science men, political men and business men, the founders and caretakers of this planet

and our people, they all can agree in telling us that everything is right about patenting and

copyrighting one‘s idea. I have noticed that all of my ideas, and not just my best ideas do

not come from me, they come from a keen observation of nature and their systems and so it

has always seemed backwards to me that an observed effect present in the universe, that is

then recreated by me in ingenuity can be monopolized to my name and my personal effects

as if I possessed the very currents of the rain and the thunder. One might scoff at such a

basic description, but if every invention, and thus copyrighted trademark and patent, is

based on a natural system that already exists, then ownership was taken of the nature and

then it was sold back to the people. In my mind this can never be right; this is like taking

the land from underneath the elephants and asking them to pay for their industrial


revolution that is land ownership. This sort of copying and segregation of nature is like

stealing the electricity from the sky, and charging the rain for it. There can be no glory or

logic in copying nature and claiming it as our own, there can be only our own greed and our

own money, because of this my care for patents and copyrights is limited to the means by

which they can be useful as ideas, and not by this apparent and fictional connection with

the ownership of natural effects and the fictional material power that is contained within

their so-called patent exploitation, and, so-called intellectual protection offered by them,

condemning surely any man without a penny to a life of pain and regret, and those men of

wealth and material ideology, that of the greatest ignorance and greed. Had they thought

ahead, they would realise that there can be no profit in others doom.

Indeed, the only thing that man truly owns is his tendency to claim as his what he observed,

and to build a machine based on it that nobody else can have without paying a fee. Other

men to enforce it to ensure that the barbarity and the suppression of this great planet nations

venturing into the far reaches of space, and accomplishing worthwhile endeavors. The thing

that is enforced is akin to a prison. Where men whom could make a difference are unable to

afford to make anything of it, and the ones who cannot make any difference but preserve

the hypocrisy that exists is able to afford to make anything that he so chooses. And so the

blind are leading the capable, and the capable are unable to lead the blind – and this is what

we call free enterprise. The condemnation of other men because of one man‘s good thought

and observation, and the exploitation of them for money represents a high discourtesy that

will one day be a criminal action not unlike slave labour. These same men condemn the

very idea of a student copying another‘s work, a high intellectual sin, yet, this is what we

see in the highest of scientific and engineering thinking today – copying natures work, and

claiming it as his own.

About the man that deserves the Nobel Prize: He is the man that deserves the Nobel Prize.

That man is Tesla. That man is Eric Dollard. The Nobel Prize is not for them. Irrespective

of their contributions of an electrical system with 0 losses - that can transmit to any point in

the universe. Telluric waves they call it. There will be no Nobel Prize for them. It‘s just too

damn useful and practical, it‘d be hard to sell anything afterwards.

* * *

The Stars, Their Planets. The Plants & Their Animals An excerpt of Technology For a New Future, page 112

The sun creates light rays from above and they are dropped below to the earth. The earth

has the plants and they take up the light rays and they convert some of the light into their

mass. So the sun converted its mass into light energy and the sun is in deconstruction, the

plant converted the light energy into its mass in construction. Then the animal comes along,

and eats the plant and drops it below into his stomach, acid there deconstructs the mass of

the plant, and releases the energy. So the plant uses the energy of the light to magnetically

bond its mass together, and the animals stomach uses the acid to take the light energy back


out of the plant. Animals that do not believe their survival depends on the light going in the

plant should go to Africa and ask the farmers to grow food for energy and surviving

without the light. The truth is there is no energy without the light. And if there was not

light, there would not even be petrol. So the same thing that is driving your car and your

batteries, is also driving you and all the life of all kinds on this planet and in the universe. It

is the light.

The sun giving off the light rays in energy lost some of its mass in its deconstruction and

the earth gains some of its energy for its perpetual construction and transformation. Einstein

tells us that energy and the mass are exchangeable, and, they are exchangeable by the

constant square ratio of light. So the suns energy is converted into supposed-light. The

plants turn the light into energy by constructing its matter. The animal eats the plant, and so

it takes apart the energy in the bonds that were put together by the sun, and the acid in the

animals stomach is working like a battery. The light rays from the sun are working like a

radio. And the plants themselves, they are acting like transformers. The plants will

perpetually create new mass from the sunlight , at the square ratio of light to the energy

gradient of light provided. The animals will perpetually live and grow their mass from the

sunlight too. It was the sunlight remember that built up the mass of the plant. So without

the light to build the mass of the plant, the animals cannot eat the mass of the plant or other

animals. So the real thing that gave the plant its mass was the light. We know this is true

because the plant cannot built it‘s mass without the light. So the animal cannot unbuild the

mass and take the energy the light put in it without the plant. And that is why the light

creates the animals and the plants, and not the plants and then the animals. I am not saying

that there was a plan, I am saying that the light is how the energy is taken by the plant and

the animal. So plant is taking the energy from the light to build itself up, and the animals

take the energy from the plants built up mass, to get the energy to build themselves.

Many are wondering how it was possible for the plants to start at all. The minerals and

vitamins. These vitamins build their mass up from the light. You will find the vitamins and

minerals in the plants now. The vitamins and minerals are created by the plant. So if the

light going in the plant can build up the minerals and the vitamins mass in the plant, then it

bares common sense that vitamins and minerals that were created from light alone made up

the first plant. Darwin and his evolution theory, it is not wrong. It is basic. My theory is

much more basic than his but look how far mine went. This is the difference between

discovery and patience. Darwin speaks about species. MY theory talks about the universe

and how it designed minerals, then plants, and then how the larger animals could derive

their energy from them, and where the energy to take Darwin‘s evolutionary process came

from. Whilst Darwin‘s Evolution theory tells how the environment cause & effects the

species and they are naturally selected by that environment. My evolution theory shows

how the cause and effects of the environment are varied by cosmological constants. So my

theory bears a resemblance to Einstein‘s, Tesla‘s and Darwins without a large degree of

bias or condemnation. All observation is correct, but all definitions are never what was

observed. For to explain what was observed would require a comprehension as great as the

universe. Or God.


CRIMINALS & THE GOOD LITTLE BOY that never came to prosper

An article written by Adam Bull

I feel that patents are criminal, they are not free enterprise at all, they represent the

struggling vestige that is man. When one is ignored continuously such as Tesla was, and his

basic models, the remarkable question to the inventor or natural philosopher is, that it is

suffered by the truth of his own ignorance or that of his surrounding men. I see how Tesla

must have felt. I explained a theory , a working theory for manipulating gravity by

sufficiently shielding it from cosmic rays. I see this was missed. I should say ignored, as

was all of the remarkable work of Tesla. I hear people talking about electrons like a matter

of fact. The truth is nobody has ever seen an electron, not now, or ever. In fact electrons are

only produced by the dielectric 2 pole condition found in all conductors.

The proof is very simple, the electron with mass going in point A start of transmission line

cannot travel at the speed of light. So the electron conveyor belt of motion traveling at the

speed of light out of point B, the end of the transmission line can be held to account on the

perpetual electron motion of non electrified atoms.

All atoms have spinning negative bound charges on them. It is so simple. No battery could

generate any charge if the iron atoms were not moving already, and the zinc atoms were

moving already. As well as the Acid.

Here we have proof that perpetual motion of atoms is responsible for the speed of light

charges.

Just as Dollard and Tesla claimed.

Why on earth is it so easily missed I seriously fail to fathom, my patience for society runs

short. What hope can there be for people who dismiss ideas suggested by pioneers, even

amateur ones such as myself, using non existent particles as a basis of description.

Electrons are produced by 2 poles, or rather resistance, in the same way a light bulb

produces light from 2 currents. Yes, 2 currents. It's not electrons doing the work as I have

previously explained time and time again. Does this disagree with the pi /2 *C constant?

No, it rather remarkably confirms it.

My apologies for my rant. My heart is with you all, but if people's minds are governed by

non existent inventions, there is little hope for inductive scientists such as myself. Very

little hope.

Eric will send my letter and package to you shortly.

Jesus spends his life in hell. But I am not Jesus or governed by invented ideas of religion or

science. I like, Eric, am just an ordinary man that has given up everything and encouraged a

life of almost penniless servitude, trying to do the right thing. The story of the good boy


that never came to prosper by Mark Twain does come to mind. And I feel as if we are all

surrounded by people who are the embodiment of the bad little boy that never came to

grief.

That is the problem with electrons. They never come to grief. They only return back to

where they came from. Bohr and Einstein.

Here is some real criminal activity sometimes mistaken for forward thinking science, or

even something as ridiculous as to be called "free enterprise".

IT never fooled me for a minute. We have betrayed ourselves and called it logical scientific

debate. And rejected truth and called it fallacy and hearsay, using nothing but the

inventions of einsteinian fallacy itself. Many electrical men here should be ashamed of

themselves, and others should work harder to help Eric as I and others such as Techzombie

do. Fools quoting non existent electrons accusing fallacy reaches no bounds and represents

the most intolerable handicap of such great men as Eric, Tesla, Reich, Carson &

Leedskalnin.

By Adam Bull

* * *

The Unexplained Power Station Explosions

―This really led to a lot of confusion in the early attempts of G.E laboratories to

ascertain why these complex wave forms they were experiencing in their substation

transformers were causing them to explode for unexplainable reasons. The standing waves

would build up and appear at the centre of the windings and puncture the insulation but yet

from terminal to terminal there was no voltage difference. The process was basically started

off by Steinmetz. And then Buley which was the one that really developed all the

differential equations for describing this stuff kind of forgot about mutual inductance and

its proper dimensions, and even though quantified all of these things very admirably in his

book called traveling waves on transmission systems, probably one of the best books on

electric waves ever written, he still failed to understand the true nature of the longitudinal

wave and the dimensionality of mutual inductance. Now of course at the double energy

flows when these things combine we have the longitudinal wave, the wave of Tesla and the

transverse electromagnetic wave, the wave of hertz. The hertz wave is the wave we use

today for transmission, the longitudinal wave has been completely forgotten, unless it

incidentally appears in case you have too big of a loading coil".

- Eric Dollard, SBARC Ham Radio Conference


The Holistic system of Electrical Systems and the Extinct "Shamanic" Representation of

Nature

Thanks to the crimes of the church and the west globalist agendas to "bring science to all"

All they brought was death and the destruction of sacred art and knowledge, even

civilisations. Anybody who disagree's with this and has trust in his government looking

after him should seek advice from a Native American Indian.

* * *

Dewey B. Larson, at the 3rd Annual Conference of New Science Advocates

"Faster than light exists"

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XgUCkID_n4 – 1:06 - June 2012 – 260 views

"It's Einstein's denial of existences of speeds greater than light which has led to the

trouble that science is now experiencing, in what I call the 'far out region'. It's that error

that has caused science theory to far exceed science fiction, with all its black holes, its

neutron stars, it's electrons. Hurtless destroyers of pleasant illusions. There is one happy

thought I want to leave my associates with, and that even though our predecessors in the

middle ages were challenging thoroughly inferenced and established inventive thought, we

are not going to meet the same end as those people, we are not likely to get thrown in jail or

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XgUCkID_n4



burnt at the stake, thank you." - Dewey B. Larson

Oh Mr. Larson, if only you were right about it not being like the middle ages. If only.

Unfortunately people are still getting thrown in jail or "burnt at the stake" for claiming

faster than light wave propagation's. Not just Tesla's lab and Eric Dollards RCA equipment

being destroyed and bulldozed by police. No, nothing to see here. Everything is fine at

Einstein Royale. Once you go in, you never come out. Move on or you will be arrested for

questioning the bull**** of modern science.

* * *

Universal Constructor, a short story

by Adam Bull

The universal constructor is an unusual kind of device. Most of all and especially to all the

academics. It is in fact not in any of the academic books. It bears such the unusual title of

the undiscovered virtue. What is this undiscovered virtue the academics hiss. It is the

undiscovered sciences the laboratory man replies.

It is not like any other device, except for the universe. It can create many things, like many

of the planets of the universe can. Minerals, plants, and animals are one of the things, but

mostly what it can do is turn the light of the stars into something assuredly material and

solid. The professor remarked "It turns the light particles into the neutral matter particles".

Nature responded earnestly "The constructor is really a simple thing, and is quite ordinary,

but some of the things this universal constructor has made have invented quite unusual

things and called them current sciences". Nature never could understand how it's creations

could be so wise. For nature had built the wise and he wondered what it was that was not

universal about them and their inventions.

"Oh yes the constructor it is universal and quite ordinary". Ordinary, and most in particular

- peculiar in nature. The laboratory professor was quite unimpressed by the remark. The

chemists and the biologists trumpeted to the harsh sounds of eggs being crushed, it was not

the lack of birth from them, but it was the singular viciousness of the inventors footsteps

that crushed it so readily. And then nature wept with all it's heart.

Nature angry in it's association channeled a deep blue bolt of lightning into the professors

head, and it accompanied 7 red shades of colour. It spoke.

"My friend, in your mind, and heart and soul of kernasera mendoi hajuoi kloj. You should

know."

The professor looked so baffled. Until nature got angry. "The chemical reactions in the

atoms, the hormones and receptors and neurons in your brain, the central nervous system,


the chemical battery, and the electrical transmission line, your inventions and your being,

your consciousness and your soul is controlled by me." The professor said but why do I

anger you? . Nature furiously responded "I ANGER YOU , for you are cruel to me." Nature

continued "everything is universal, and I give it motion, so that your chemicals can create

electricity, your inventions can carry current, and your machines can build crafts, so that

your mind and nervous system can carry messages of pain and joy, and feelings of

resentment and cruelty. What of it?". The chemists could not half believe themselves, and

the biologists looked upset aswell, the physicists most of all could not understand how

motion could do anything. They already knew about motion. It seemed preposterous that

motion could fuel every chemical reaction, every implosion, every explosion, every thought

of consciousness, and even dictate the very light speed reactions. Totally alien they

considered it.

The universal constructor is a miracle of device, it can create parts from the light of stars in

the most universal way, and transmit them at great distance, or I should say without regard

to it whatsoever. Natures creations hissed "entanglement". Nature laughed and said, "you

should not laugh unless you wish to be laughed at , you are half - that is what you are, but I

am all". The greatest professor entered and said "light instead of being turned into the

neutral particles of life, and instead of being turned into the volcanoes and mountains and

crystals , diamonds , golds and various rocks from various currents, can instead be

wirelessly channeled into this electrical device that I have here". He continued "This

electrical device is like a small planet, assembling your inventions of minerals and life, and

electricity, from the motion of the stars, and that is what the universal constructor can do. It

can make all things from light. All things are magnets, so there is no problem".

The greatest thing about this miracle of universal construction is that it could turn so much

energy from the wireless stars , that it could create things for free. Factory parts, bricks for

housing, silicon and glass windows. All entirely automatically and all electrically derived in

the same way that wind and dam power does, but it was direct. Totally direct. The great

professor from this virtu-ed planet finaliZed his remark "all from motion of current, all of it

and this device knows that like my very friend nature". He helped me destroy famine,

poverty, greed & war, in that order. Thanks be to him. Thanks be to the universal

constructor.

"Nature replied, the invention of my great self and my great universe was for you to

observe. I can victor that you would copy me. As I copied nothing to make you, but the sky

and below, the land and the above. I am you and you are me. I am all things. I am the

universal consciousness, current, motion and electricity, i am all things. I am ATOM."


Universal Constructors

* * *

Edward Leedskalnin’s Cosmic Force

by Edward Leedskalnin, from Miami Daily circa 1946, also on page 140 of Technology For

a New Future

“COSMIC FORCE: Here is additional information for those who read my advertisement in

The Miami Daily News, February 3rd, 1946. The North and South pole individual magnets

are the cosmic force. They are the building blocks of nature's perpetual transformation of

matter, and they are so small that they can pass through everything. They pass through the

earth from pole to pole, and around the earth.

If the North and South Pole individual magnets could not pass through a vacuum tube the

same as the Thompson’s electrons cannot, then they could not be the building blocks. The

Thomson electrons are very small parts of matter which come out of the cathode while the

cathode is burned up or consumed in the vacuum tube.

Without the general circulation of the building blocks there would be no change.

Everything would remain in the same way as it is now. The building blocks from a matter

that go to pieces could not get in the general circulation for the new construction.

I think the Radium and Uranium were built up inside the earth with high pressure, and heat,

while the North and South pole individual magnets were circulating through the earth.

During the time the Radium and Uranium were inside the earth they absorbed more of the

individual North and South pole magnets than they normally could hold, and so now while



they are on top of the earth they let the magnets go so they can become normal again.

Gravitation must be caused by the matter in the middle of the earth, and more concentrated

than Uranium. When Uranium atoms burst they release the North and South pole individual

magnets that held the atom together, then the magnets scatter all around, but when the

atoms burst in the middle of the earth, and many burst at the same time, they can only run

from the middle to the outside.

When the North and South pole magnets are running alongside each other and in the same

direction, they have no attraction for the other kind. They only attract if they are running

one kind against the other kind. When the magnets are running out of the middle of the

earth, as soon as they meet an object they attract it, on account of the fact that in any object

there is both kinds of magnets in it.

It can be seen by rubbing hard rubber or glass until they get hot, then they will attract sand,

iron filings, salt, and other things. To see how it functions, move a salt crystal a little, if it

happens to get on a different magnet pole, then it will jump away. Another way is to rub

hard rubber until it gets hot, then it will be a temporary magnet.

The difference between the rubber magnet and the steel magnet is that the magnet in the

rubber comes from the magnets that hold together the rubber, and both North and South

poles are in the same side of the rubber and the magnet poles are small and there are many

of them close together, but in the steel bar the attracting magnet is not the magnet that holds

together the steel, but the surplus magnets the circulating magnet that was put in it.”

“Attract the iron filings with the rubber magnet, then approach with the steel magnet.

Change the poles, then you will see some of the filings jump away. This means the steel

magnet changed the magnet poles in the iron filings, and so they jumped away.” – October

1945, Edward Leedskalnin

* * *


Excerpts from Technology For a New Future

by Adam Bull

The 4 Types of Transmission Paths

1. Dielectric (forgotten) (NON ELECTROMAGNETIC)

2. Longitudinal Dielectric (completely misunderstood, lost) (NON

ELECTROMAGNETIC)

3. Magnetic (misunderstood)

4. Electromagnetic (Loved) (incorrectly asserted as the only type thanks to R.C.A and the

delusive Hertzian theory)

4. Magneto Dielectric (destroyed by R.C.A and the military government complex)

Remarks: Electromagnetic is a small part of the spectrum of rays.

The 4 Types of Current

1. Alternating Current (Tesla) (Alive and well by necessity)

2. Direct Current (Edison) (alive and well)

3. Impulse Current (TESLA) (DEAD)

4. Oscillating Current (TESLA) (very DEAD)

The 4 Types of Wave Envelopes for the 4 Types of Current and their dimensions



Remarks: Note electromagnetic is only ONE TYPE of wave. NOT all TYPES. as scientists

trained with electromagnetic and hertzian systems would profess to claim most incorrectly

otherwise. The reason why they claim this is because they assume if it was important it

would be of course taught to them. I am sorry to say they are wrong. This has been

classified since circa 1917

Interesting note, alternating current isnt more efficient because of the way it's

packeted in the transmission line. Alternating Current only appears to carry the

current better because in between the alternating cycles electricity is pulled around

from the surrounding air. This is fundamentally why aurora borealis and other

cosmic ray effects on the atmosphere tend to cause inexplicable explosions at power

stations and military and broadcasting electrical installations and other undesirable

effects for which an entire litany of documentation can be found on this. Research will

reveal that electrical companies have spent billions, and most likely trillions since the early

20th century removing this free energy from stars and suns.

Extra Remarks: These power station overloads, from cosmic rays, they can happen at night,

(when the sun is on the other side of the earth). The power station overloads are caused by

rays accounted by the solar flare ejections of our sun. But also sometimes they cannot be

accounted for. This is unique cosmological events where a great deal of wireless energy,

not unlike Tesla's wireless energy interferes and inducts into the transmission line from

great cosmological distance. This energy is always available and could likely be used to

generate power from about 500KVA up practically. See Eric Dollard Wireless Power and

Introduction to Primary Coils, and the tentative research in telluric rays by Eric Dollard.

These fields are equivalent to what some new agers called Ley Lines, it represents an

ancient knowledge, and upon inspecting the Bolinas Marconi site, still intact, but tagged for

immenent destruction to which the loss to man would be incontrovertible, shows the tell

tale signs of being aligned to these telluric currents.

And most likely the earth itself was used as an amplifier for these currents in the same way



as expressly described above, as the nature of alternating currents in short duration impulse

trains (the suppressed lost current type) results in clear and observable overunity effects that

could channel power from the moon and the wind, without using any kinetic deriving

device such as hydroelectric or windpower plants, this energy can all be obtained,

wirelessly, electrically and directly before it moves the trillions of watts of energy in the

ocean, or creates the wind and temperature differentials on earth. It can all be obtained

directly - indeed, in the same way the exemplar inexplicable power station centre

transformer coils tend to explode for no apparent reason - indeed they channeled the cosmic

rays from the inside out in a "non hertzian fashion", or a differential would be detected

from terminal to terminal.

In fact it is most likely that "spooky action at a distance" the strane quantum effect where

an object can effect another literally trillions of light years away instantly will be the power

source of the future, and, it could have been much sooner, as I have repeatedly asserted.

I believe such uses remain only in critical defense instrumentation, and that is about it.

They are all classified. Like the use of some vacuum tubes,

Tap on, tap off, the tapper - Vigli. · PDF fileTap on, tap off, the tapper – 08/01/13...

Documents

Transcript of Tap on, tap off, the tapper - Vigli. · PDF fileTap on, tap off, the tapper – 08/01/13...