Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study Presented by: US Army Corps of Engineers...

27
Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study Presented by: US Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District December 11, 2003 Hydrodynamic Modeling

Transcript of Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study Presented by: US Army Corps of Engineers...

Tampa Harbor ProjectTampa Harbor ProjectGeneral Re-evaluation Study

Presented by: US Army Corps of Engineers

Jacksonville DistrictDecember 11, 2003

Hydrodynamic Modeling

USACE South Atlantic Division

Directed Jacksonville District to seek

support for modeling tools & procedures

from

• Sponsors

Tampa Port Authority, City of St. Pete

• Other stakeholders ABM, TBEP, USGS

Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study

Introduction

• Introduction

• Purpose for Hydrodynamic Modeling

• Model Selection

• Alternatives

• Scope of Modeling

• Other Tasks

Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study

Outline

Introduction

• Navigation ProjectsTampa Harbor GRSSt Petersburg GRS

• Previous Corps Funded Hydro ModelCirculation Changes due to Dredge & Fill (Goodwin, ’87,’91)

Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study

N

TAMPA HARBORPROJECT

CLEARWATER

NASSAU COUNTY

LOCATION MAPNASSAU COUNTY

LOCATION MAP

TAMPA BAY

LOCATION MAP

ST. PETERSBURG

PORTTAMPA

PORTSUTTON

TAM

PA H

AR

BO

RC

HA

NN

EL

Gulfof

Mexico

YBOR

ALAFIARIVER

BIG BEND

PORT MANATEE

Purpose of Hydrodynamic Modeling

• Provide currents to Ship Simulator

• Evaluate changes to circulation/salinitydue to channel modifications

Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study

Existing Conditions• Strong wind, current and tide considerations

• 43-foot deep main Federal channel by 500-foot wide (Cut A-F)

• Increased vessel sizes and port calls

• Vessel accident history from 1980 resulting in loss of life, navigation delays & environmental damage

• Tampa Bay Safety Guidelines Committee established

• Vessel Handling Guidelines for Movement established

• Commerce light-loaded, traffic flow impeded, navigation delays

• Tampa Harbor Safety Zones established

• Tampa Harbor Security Zones established

• Criteria

Represent Channel Mods

Local Mass Conservation

Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study

Model Selection

• Model TypesStructured Grid Orthogonal – ECOM, EFDC

Boundary Fitted – CH3D

Nested – Mike2/3

Unstructured Grid Finite Element – ADCIRC, RMA, MIKE FM

Finite Volume – UnTrim, ELCIRC, FVCOM MIKE FM, Delft

Structured Grids

Structured Grids

Unstructured Grids

UnTrim (Casulli & Walters 2000)

• Unstructured grid

• Mass Conservation

• Stability independent of surface wave speed

• Degenerate to 2D & 1D

• Flooding & Drying

• Proprietary

MIKE FM/FV (DHI)

• MIKE Zero

• (Sediment Transport)

• (Water Quality)

• (Ecolab)

• Stability dep. Surface wave speed

• Proprietary

ELCIRC (Oregon Grad Institute 2001)

• Open Source

Alternatives

• Six preliminary plans

• 2 to 6 alternatives for each

Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study

Preliminary Alternative Plans

Orchid Orchid Daisy Daisy

Zinnia Zinnia Violet Violet Iris Iris

Rose Rose

Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study

Scope of Modeling

• Model SimulationsCalibration & Verification (existing data)Existing Conditions – Base year w/o project (future w/o ?)Three Alternative Project Plans

• Time Scales Project Alternative Optimization – 30 daysImpacts to Circulation & Salinity – Seasonal (3-4 months)

Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study

Revised Scope• OLD

A re-evaluation of the entire harbor projectFeasibility-level study

• NEWMain ship channel congestion relief measures - Anchorage areas - Loop channel - Non-structural alternatives

Other Tasks

• Ship Simulator - optimize channel design

• Channel Shoaling- Diagnostic Modeling System

• PORTSIM- queuing model/ economic analysis

• Ship Wake Analysis - potential impact on seagrass

• Harbor Oscillation – limited to local areas

Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study

Thank You

US Army Corpsof EngineersJacksonville District

Point of contact:Steve [email protected]

Project Schedule

• 1 Mar 04 - Tampa & St PeteCalibration / VerificationExisting Condition

• 1 April 04 - Alternatives (~ 3 model simulations)

• 1 Jun 04 - Recommended Plan, Locally Preferred Plan

Tampa Harbor Project General Re-evaluation Study

Vessel Calls & Cargo TypeTampa Distribution of Calls by Vessel & Cargo Type CY 2001

VESSELL TYPE CARGO TYPE % OF CALLS

Cruise Ships Passengers 6%

General Cargo ShipsBreak Bulk, Neo-bulk,

Containerized 18%

Bulk Carriers & Barges Dry Bulk

Tankers & Barges Petroleum Products

29%

47%

Environmental ResourcesDiverse, high quality fish & wildlife resources within Tampa Bay

• Bethnic Resources

• Estuarine Resources

Seagrass - beds extensive; high value fisheries nursery

Soft bottom – sand/muck (80%)

Hardbottom – invertebrate & fish habitat (850 acres)

West Indian Manatee – extensive protection zones (FWS, DEP, FWC)

Marshes & mangroves – fisheries habitat

Mud flats & salt barrens – microscopic organisms fuel for Bay productivity

Associated uplands – foraging, nesting, loafing habitat (bald eagle, osprey, wood storks)

Low salinity habitats – oysters thrive

“Charting the Course,” CCMP for Tampa Bay, December 1996

Study Guidance• ER 1105-2-100 - “Revised Planning Guidance Notebook”

• ER 1165-2-1 - “Digest of Water Resources Policies & Authorities”

• EM 1110-2-1613 - “Navigation Design Safety Component”

• ER 1165-2-131 – “Over Depth Dredging”

• EC 1165-2-203 – “Internal Technical Reviews”

• USCG 33 CFR 165 – “Security Zones”

• Port of Tampa Authority Input

• Tampa Harbor Pilot Association Input

Vessel Tonnage & MovementCY 2001 Tampa Area Ports’ Tonnage and Vessel Movements *

TAMPA AREA PORTS CY 2001 SHORT TONS CY 2001 INBOUND & OUTBOUND TRIPS

Tampa 45,793,544 6,930

Port Manatee 3,801,621 654

Weedon Island 1,038,674 124

St. Petersburg 52,000 852

Total 50,685,839 8,560

* WBC of the U.S., CY 2001, Part 2 – Waterways and Harbors, Gulf Coast, Mississippi River System and Antilles

Critical Milestones• Begin study

• Feasibility Scoping meeting

• Complete Draft GRR

• Alternative Formulation Briefing

• Project Guidance Memorandum Comments

• Release Draft GRR to the Public

• Complete Public Coordination Period

• Submit Final GRR to MSC *

• Division Commander’s Public Notice (begin design phase)

• Authorization Water Resources Development Act of 2006

• Begin construction

• Complete construction

4/11/02

9/16/03

6/30/04

9/13/04

10/26/04

2/9/05

4/7/05

7/19/05

03/10/06

2007

(tentative) 2010