Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

32
Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project South Swell Development Group

Transcript of Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Page 1: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

South Swell Development Group

Page 2: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

∗ Most major urban areas clustered around bays make use of the water for moving people

∗ Better known examples ∗ Sydney ∗ New York ∗ San Francisco ∗ Vancouver ∗ Seattle ∗ Hong Kong ∗ Widespread in Europe

Natural Market for Passenger Ferry Service

Page 3: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

∗ 1991 Commuter Rail Authority. ∗ Ferry included TBARTA master plan. ∗ Hillsborough County Feasibility Study and

Demonstration Project - $475,000 secured through efforts of Cong. Castor and Billirakis in 2008 and 2009 ∗ Funds Still Available.

∗ Two MPO studies, last concluded 2012.

Ferry Service Long Desired, Never Delivered

Page 4: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

South County Commuter

Downtown to Downtown Special Event and Weekender

Tampa Bay Ferry 1.0

Page 5: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

∗ Current commute trips are between 22-40 miles one way over top of Bay ∗ MAFB 6 miles across the bay

∗ Ferry cuts travel time 11-15 minutes each way ∗ Over 7800 crowd onto local and regional roadways

during the peak rush hour ---/1 ½ lanes of roadway ∗ 10 minute wait at gates, lines can reach 1.5 miles in length ∗ Avg MAFB South County employee spends $245/mo ∗ Strong MAFB employee interest – over 90% in some zip

codes.

Commuter Service Opportunity Poor Commuter Options

Page 6: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Green - Route to MacDill (23 minutes)

Black - Ridership Catchment Area

Residence Location of MacDill AFB military and Civilian Employees by Zip Code Area - 7831 in

Ridership Catchment Area based upon July 2013 MAFB employee survey

Page 7: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

∗ Public Private Partnership between Hillsborough County, HMS Ferries, Inc. and South Swell Development Group.

∗ Purpose is to establish passenger ferry service in Tampa Bay with private sector partners to cover operating costs, lower capital costs and speed project implementation.

Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Project

Page 8: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project
Page 9: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Operating Strategy Larger Ferries

Page 10: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

∗ Catamaran style vessels - very good stability. ∗ 149 PAX and up. ∗ Speeds over 25 knots. ∗ Shallow draft – approximately 4’ – 5’. ∗ American-made.

Ferry Vessel Features

Page 11: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Key Element is South County Terminal Location

18 months of private due diligence

6 Months of County Due Diligence

NEPA Process Commencing --- Preferred Site Selection by Fall

2015

Page 12: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project
Page 13: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Green - Route to MacDill

Ferry Routes

Page 14: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

∗ Fast Loading/Unloading ∗ Wind and weather screens ∗ Employees dropped off closer to office than they

most park

MAFB Trams

Page 15: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Morning Route

Page 16: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

MAFB Employee Ridership Data Based On Employee Survey

Results ( July 2013 )

Survey Responses

Based One Way Fare Costs

$2.50

“Definitely Use”

Response

Zip Code Area MAFB residing in Zip

Code % Avg. Miles Saved

33511 West-South Bloomingdale 1327 29% 24.46

33534 Gibsonton 265 56% 30.8

33547 FishHawk 1142 30% 32.88

33569 Boyette 963 40% 39.14

33570 Ruskin 214 59% 59.5

33572 Apollo Beach 272 60% 49.2

33573 Sun City 144 62% 46.14

33578 Riverview 1089 38% 24.1

33579 Balm 1206 29% 46.14

33596 East- South Bloomingdale 1168 30% 26.42

33598 Wimauma 41 80% 42.08 Total 7831

Page 17: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Evening and Weekend Service

Commences Immediately subject to Market Demand and Facilities

Page 18: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Green - Route to MacDill Orange - Route to Downtown St. Petersburg Blue - Route to Downtown Tampa

Ferry Routes

Page 19: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Tampa

Page 20: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

St. Petersburg

Page 21: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Community Benefits

Page 22: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

MacDill-South County Commuter Ferry Community Benefits

Total Employees 7831

Individual Daily Miles Saved Range 24- 60

Daily Total Miles Saved 62,081

Annual Miles Saved 13,968,188

Daily Riders 1561

Annual Fare Revenue $3,972,638.60

Annual Net Individual Out of Pocket Savings Range $928 - $2,109

Annual Net Out of Pocket Savings $2,193,278

Annual Net Individual Average AAA Car Operating Savings Ranges $1848 - $6,223

Annual Net AAA Average Operating Savings $5,903,143

Gross CO2 Reduction (tons) 5,990.2

Gross NOX Reduction (tons) 15.5

Page 23: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Public Investment Advantage Ferry v. Other Options In Connection with MAFB Commuter

3 x 200 PAX ferries – 1800/peak; 2400 commute period. 1 Lane Interstate can carry 2,200 vehicles/hour. Adding one lane mile to major roadways = $20 million/mile. One lane mile addition for urban interstate = $50 to $100 million/mile. SunRail costs $1.2 billion plus millions in on-going state and local operating subsidies for initial 30 mile system. Proposed system capital cost 32X less than SunRail. Bus option would require 61 buses, >$3 million in operating subsidies plus buses would be stuck in traffic.

Page 24: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Project Description Distance (miles) Cost (millions $) Cost/Mile (Million $)

2 to 4 lanes on MLK between Kingway and McIntosh 2 39.9 $ 19.95

Resurfacing SR 60 between Faulkenberg and Lake Cathy (7 lanes) 1 3.8 $ 3.80

Resurfacing SR 674 from E Commercail Ctr to E. of US 301 (4 lanes) 2.65 4.5 $ 1.70

Add lanes and Reconstruct US 301 (2-6) SR 674-CR 672 3.98 $43.70 $ 10.98

PDE US 41 from 674-Mantee County Line 7.3 4 $ 0.55

US 41 Resurfacing from E 15th through Conover St (6 lanes) 1.8 5.5 $ 3.06

US 41 Resurfacing from Bullfrong Creek to Denver St. (4 lanes) 5.2 8.1 $ 1.56

Automated People Mover (all elements not specified, see MPO for additional information) 1.3 350 $ 269.23

Tampa Bay Ferry Project (*miles reflect average trip length for MAFB commuter) 33* 25 $ 0.76

Ferries Are Great Investment

Page 25: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

∗ First phase $23.8 million includes vessels, trams and Redwing location – assumes three 149-200 PAX vessels.

∗ HMS takes first five years of operating risk – shared risk benefit thereafter. Includes Profit Sharing. 5 Year Min. with Extensions.

∗ Funding from private sector (operating), and combination of federal, state and local dollars for capital size.

∗ Schedule. ∗ NEPA completed 4Q 2015. ∗ Design, Engineering, Permitting Commence 4Q 2015. ∗ Construction Commence 2Q 2017. ∗ Revenue Operation Could Commence Dec. 2018. Happy New

Year Kick Off?

Project Budget and Time Frames

Page 26: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

• Regular Weekend and Potentially Thursday-Friday evening service between Tampa, St. Pete and Schultz Ferry Park.

• Initially peak season --- expanded beyond. • Charter basis but co-op model may be workable. • Never need a car. • Requires addition of 4th vessel.

TAMPA BAY URBAN ECO-TOURISM

Tampa Bay Ferry 2.0

Page 27: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

Regional Prospects

Page 28: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project
Page 29: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

∗ St. Pete to Westshore/TIA. 3-4 vessels. 40 minute travel time. Service every 30 minutes peak; 60 minutes off peak. Est. Capital Cost. $20 - $35 million.

∗ St. Pete to SouthShore. 3 vessels. Approx. 30 minute travel time. < $20 million.

∗ Intracoastal. Dunedin – St. Petersburg Beach. ∗ Min 4 vessels. Capital Cost dependent on terminals. ∗ 30 minute headways. ∗ Approximately 60 minute travel time. Congestion proof. ∗ Six Stops with connecting bus/trolley routes.

∗ Dunedin, Downtown CLW, CLW Harbor, Indian Rocks, John’s Pass and St. Pete Beach (on Pasedena Causeway).

Pinellas Prospects

Travel times and capital costs are for concept planning purposes only. Operational costs and subsidies subject to many variables including vessel types, operating hours, frequencies and bridge issues.

Page 30: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project
Page 31: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

No other transportation option can do so much, for

so little, so fast, with so much private investment

and that is so cool.

Page 32: Tampa Bay Passenger Ferry Public Private Partnership Project

WOW !