Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

15
TAMING THE PRINT JOURNAL COLLECTION To Boldly Weed Where No One Has Weeded Before Accompanying handout: http :// www.slideshare.net/NASIG/taming-print-journal-collections-handout

description

Over the past few years, Bucknell University’s Bertrand Library has made many changes to evolve our services, physical library space, and collections in response to changing expectations and needs of our researchers. Our Collection Development team was charged with a task to develop a plan that would holistically examine our print journal collection and forecast what would be required for a single-effort de-accessioning project, aiming to weed our print journal collection by 50% or more. I will present our planning process, criteria, and grand reconceptualization for the space. Accompanying handout: http://www.slideshare.net/NASIG/taming-print-journal-collections-handout Presenter: Kathryn Dalius Serials Specialist, Bucknell University

Transcript of Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Page 1: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

TAMING THE PRINT JOURNAL COLLECTION

To Boldly Weed Where No One Has

Weeded Before

Accompanying handout: http://www.slideshare.net/NASIG/taming-print-journal-collections-handout

Page 2: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Architect’s ‘Grand’ Plan…

• In 2013, we worked with the architectural firm, Bohlin, Cywinski, Jackson to develop a plan to renovate our library

• New uses for spaces in the library

Page 3: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

“The Charge”Aug 2013

Prepare a plan that would holistically examine our journal collection and forecast what would be required for a single-effort de-accessioning project aiming to weed our print journal collection by 50% or more

Page 4: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

This is not unique to Bucknell

“By the early 2020s, it is easy to imagine the following:  Print collections will have been reduced by at least half in most academic libraries.  The space will be used for a combination of enhanced reader spaces and other activities.”  

(Lewis, David W.  College and Research Libraries, v.74:2 (2013): 159-176.  From Stacks to the Web:  The Transformation of Academic Library Collecting.)

Page 5: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Questions that emerged…

• What is the right size of our physical collection?• Where does it reside?• Would we ever leverage consortial off-site collection

arrangements?• What is the state of our collection today?• Is our current rate of de-accessioning driven by our

holdings or our available time to undertake collection reviews?

• Are we only de-accessioning bound journals when the titles are replaced in e-format or are there other variables we should consider?

Page 6: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Recommendations & Strategy

In Sept 2013, a subset of the Collection Development Team was formed:

• Director of Collection Development & Access Services• Director for Research Services• Arts & Humanities Librarian• Manager of Reference / Information Services• Social Sciences Librarian• Librarian for Sciences & Engineering

Page 7: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Data

4,146 Print titles

Number of volumes ~ 100,000

Linear feet = 18,780

Page 8: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Methodology• 300 titles were selected at random for review

1. Withdraw the print holdings

2. Keep the holdings in the building

3. Move the holdings to off-site storage

• Each team member received a set of 50 titles for review

• Each title was reviewed by two staff members to determine if a consensus could be achieved regarding the fate of the journal

• Team members also noted the time it took to evaluate each title and the time spent on the second review

Page 9: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before
Page 10: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Criteria for Review

• Title – and title changes• Publisher• Active or Ceased• Local Holdings – how long is our

run compared to the publication history

• Publication History• Extent of online access available

to us• Supports for the curriculum• Primary Source

• Special Features (photographs, pictures, ads, unique information, etc.)

• Condition• Uniqueness• Historic value to the institution• Current subscription• Extent of indexing• Use• Language• Availability from other libraries• Type and extent of online access

that could be acquired

Page 11: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Findings

# Titles % Decision

161 54% Withdraw

67 22% Keep in Library

66 22% Move to Storage

6 2% Require further review (consensus not reached between reviewers)

300 100% Titles Reviewed

Page 12: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Other Considerations

• It took an average of 15 minutes per review (30 minutes per title)

• Collectively, 150 hours were spent on this review

• To complete a review of this nature, in this depth, it would take about 2,073 hours or about 60 weeks

• Additional staff & student time

• Ongoing maintenance and shifting

• Storage Costs

Page 13: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Comments• Several aspects of journal publishing made this a time-consuming

and confusing process

• Title changes

• Publishers change, as do editors and editorial boards

• “…Our main focus was to keep everything that would be used by current & future students that was not available in an online format or that was particularly useful in print.” Some disciplines lend themselves to this strategy rather naturally, while others do not.

Page 14: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Next Steps• Investigate purchase of backfiles

• Present findings to CLIR (Library Faculty Advisory Committee)

• Remote storage?

• Review step – subject librarian and /or academic department

• Review 1,000 titles this summer

Page 15: Taming print journal collections...to boldly weed where no one has weeded before

Questions / More Information

Jennifer L. ClarkeDirector of Collection Development

& Access Services

Library & Information Technology

Bucknell University

Lewisburg, PA

[email protected]

570-570-3252

Kathryn A. DaliusSerials Specialist

Library & Information Technology

Bucknell University

Lewisburg, PA

[email protected]

570-577-1663