Take out a piece of paper

44
TAKE OUT A PIECE OF PAPER For each of the next six slides, write down the following for each slide: 1. Age of the person 2. Marital status 3. Job/Career 4. Level of education 5. Two adjectives that describe that person

description

For each of the next six slides, write down the following for each slide: Age of the person Marital status Job/Career Level of education Two adjectives that describe that person. Take out a piece of paper. Subject # 1. Subject #2. Subject #3. Subject #4. Subject #5. Subject #6. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Take out a piece of paper

Page 1: Take out a piece of paper

TAKE OUT A PIECE OF PAPER

For each of the next six slides, write down the following for each slide:

1. Age of the person2. Marital status3. Job/Career4. Level of education5. Two adjectives that describe that

person

Page 2: Take out a piece of paper

SUBJECT # 1

Page 3: Take out a piece of paper

SUBJECT #2

Page 4: Take out a piece of paper

SUBJECT #3

Page 5: Take out a piece of paper

SUBJECT #4

Page 6: Take out a piece of paper

SUBJECT #5

Page 7: Take out a piece of paper

SUBJECT #6

Page 8: Take out a piece of paper

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

Studying the way people relate to others.

Attitude Attraction Aggression Group Behavior

Page 9: Take out a piece of paper

PERSON PERCEPTION- HOW WE FORM IMPRESSIONS OF OTHERS

Physical Appearance Judgments frequently made based on

appearance- more positive qualities to those better looking WHY?

“Beauty is more than just in the eye of the beholder; people do judge & treat others with whom they interact based on attractiveness” (Langlois et al. 2000)

1977 Study- Impact of Beauty & It’s Self-Fulfilling Nature

Page 10: Take out a piece of paper

ATTRACTION

5 Factors of Attraction

Page 11: Take out a piece of paper

1. PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS

• Physically attractiveness predicts dating frequency (they date more).

• Matching Hypothesis

• 1990 Study of Average Faces

Page 12: Take out a piece of paper

WHICH PERSON WOULD YOU WANT TO HAVE A LONG TERM RELATIONSHIP WITH?

Page 13: Take out a piece of paper

WHAT IS BEAUTY?

Page 14: Take out a piece of paper

2. BEAUTY AND CULTURE

Obesity is so revered among Mauritania's white Moor Arab population that the young girls are sometimes force-fed to obtain a weight the government has described as "life-threatening".

Page 15: Take out a piece of paper

3. PROXIMITY

Geographic nearness

Mere exposure effect:

Repeated exposure to something breeds liking.

Page 16: Take out a piece of paper

4. RECIPROCAL LIKING

You are more likely to like someone who likes you.

Why?

Page 17: Take out a piece of paper

5. SIMILARITY

Opposites do NOT attract.

Birds of the same feather do flock together.

Similarity breeds content.

Page 18: Take out a piece of paper

ATTRIBUTION THEORY

• Tries to explain how people determine the cause of the behavior they observe.

It is either a….• Situational

Attribution (external)• Dispositional

Attribution (Internal)

Page 19: Take out a piece of paper

ATTRIBUTION THEORY

• Tries to explain how people determine the cause of the behavior they observe.

It is either a….• Situational Attribution• Dispositional

AttributionAnd • Stable Attribution• Unstable Attribution

Page 20: Take out a piece of paper

ACTOR-OBSERVER BIAS- YOU VIEW YOUR OWN BEHAVIOR DIFFERENT THAN SOMEONE ELSE

Fundamental Attribution Error

Self-Serving Bias

Individualistic V. Collectivistic Cultures

Page 21: Take out a piece of paper

STEREOTYPES, PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION

Stereotype:• Overgeneralized idea

about a group of people; type of social schema

Prejudice:• Biased attitude;

Ethnocentrism is an example of a prejudice.

Discrimination:• Biased action.

Page 22: Take out a piece of paper

HOW DOES PREJUDICE OCCUR?

1. Thought-saving device2. Operant Conditioning3. Observational Learning4. Just World

Phenomenon- world is just and people deserve what they get

5. In-Group versus Out-Groups; In-Group Bias

A class divided

Page 23: Take out a piece of paper

PREJUDICES CAN OFTEN LEAD TO A….

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

A prediction that causes itself to be true.

Rosenthal and Jacobson’s “Pygmalion in the Classroom” experiment.

Page 24: Take out a piece of paper

COMBATING PREJUDICE

Contact Theory• Contact between hostile groups will reduce

animosity if they are made to work towards a superordinate goal.

Page 25: Take out a piece of paper

ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOR

• relatively stable organization of beliefs, feelings, & behavior tendencies

Cognitive Dissonance Theory• People want to have

consistent attitudes and behaviors….when they are not they experience dissonance (unpleasant tension).

• Usually they will change their attitude.

You have a belief that cheating on tests is bad.

But you cheat on a test!!!

The teacher was really bad so in that class it is OK.

Page 26: Take out a piece of paper
Page 27: Take out a piece of paper

ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOR

Effort Justification (type of CD)- you give a lot but receive little in return so to justify why you gave so much you rate it more favorably

Relate to cults

Page 28: Take out a piece of paper

ATTITUDES & PERSUASION

Advertising is ALL based on attitude formation.

Mere Exposure Effect

Elaboration Likelihood Model- 2 basic “routes” to persuasion Central Route v.

Peripheral Route

Page 29: Take out a piece of paper

COMPLIANCE STRATEGIES

Foot-in-the-door phenomenon

Door-in-the-face phenomenon

Norms of reciprocity

Low Ball Technique

Page 30: Take out a piece of paper

HOW GROUPS AFFECT OUR BEHAVIOR?

Page 31: Take out a piece of paper

PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR

• Kitty Genovese case in Kew Gardens NY.

Bystander Effect:• Conditions in which people

are more or less likely to help one another. In general…the more people around…the less chance of help….because of…

• Diffusion of ResponsibilityPluralistic Ignorance• People decide what to do by

looking to others.video

Page 32: Take out a piece of paper

SOCIAL FACILITATION THEORY

• If you are really good at something….or it is an easy task…you will perform BETTER in front of a group.

Page 33: Take out a piece of paper

CONFORMITY STUDIES

Adjusting one’s behavior or thinking to coincide with a group standard.

Candid camera

Page 34: Take out a piece of paper

ASCH’S STUDY OF CONFORMITY

Asch

Page 35: Take out a piece of paper

ASCH’S RESULTS

• About 1/3 of the participants conformed.

• 70% conformed at least once.

To strengthen conformity:• The group is unanimous• The group is at least three

people.• One admires the group’s status• One had made no prior

commitment

Page 37: Take out a piece of paper

RESULTS OF THE MILGRAM STUDY

Page 38: Take out a piece of paper

WHAT DID WE LEARN FROM MILGRAM? Ordinary people

can do shocking things.

Ethical issues…. Would not have

received approval from today’s IRB (Internal Review Board).

Page 39: Take out a piece of paper

SOCIAL LOAFING

The tendency for people in a group to exert less effort when pooling efforts toward a common goal than if they were individually accountable.

Page 40: Take out a piece of paper

GROUP POLARIZATION

Groups tend to make more extreme decisions than the individual.

Page 41: Take out a piece of paper
Page 42: Take out a piece of paper

GROUPTHINK

• Group members suppress their reservations about the ideas supported by the group.

• They are more concerned with group harmony.

• Worse in highly cohesive groups.

The Challenger

Page 43: Take out a piece of paper

DEINDIVIDUATION

People get swept up in a group and lose sense of self.

Feel anonymous and aroused.

Explains rioting behaviors.

Page 44: Take out a piece of paper

ZIMBARDO’S STANFORD PRISON STUDY

Illustrated the power of the situation

College subjects were assigned the role of a prisoner or guard for a make-shift prison

Subjects experienced a loss of identity and transformed into their roles