Table of Cases - Home - Springer978-3-319-06179-5/1.pdf · Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, ......

Table of Cases

International Arbitral Tribunals

Duche de Bouillion, award of 1 July 1816, in De Lapradelle A, Politis N (1905–1954) Recueil des

arbitrages internationaux. Vol I, Pedone, Paris, p. 257

Arbitral award relating to the boundaries of British and American Northeastern territories,award of 10 January 1831, RIAA 28, pp. 33–44

Boundary between the Colony of British Guiana and the United States of Venezuela, award of

3 October 1899, RIAA 28, pp. 331–340

Pious Funds of California, of 14 October 1902, RIAA 9, pp. 11–14

Belgium/Venezuela Mixed Claim Commission, Postal Claim, 1903, RIAA 9, pp. 328–329

Orinoco Steamship Company Case (USA/Venezuela), Opinion of Commissioner Bainbridge,

1903–1905, RIAA 9, pp. 180–204

The Guiana Boundary Case (Brazil/United Kingdom), 6 June 1904, RIAA 11, pp. 11–23

Boundary Case Between Bolivia and Peru, Award of 9 July 1909, RIAA 11, pp. 133–146

Grisbadarna (Norway, Sweden) award of 23 October 1909, RIAA 11, pp. 147–166

The North Atlantic Coast Fisheries Case (Great Britain, United States), award of 7 September

1910, RIAA 11, pp. 167–226

Carthage (France, Italy), award of 6 May 1913, RIAA 11, pp. 457–461

Manouba (France, Italy), award of 6 May 1913, RIAA 11, pp. 471–479

Religious properties (France, United Kingdom, Spain/Portugal), Spanish Claims, MaximinoLlaneza, judgment of 4 September 1920, RIAA 1, pp. 36–38

Rio Grande Irrigation and Land Company Limited (Great Britain) v. United States, 28 November

1923, RIAA 6, pp. 131–138

Interpretation of the London Agreement of 9 August 1924 (Germany, Reparation Commission),24 March 1926, RIAA 2, pp. 876–883

Island of Palmas (Netherlands, USA), award of 4 April 1928, RIAA 2, pp. 829–871

France/Mexico Claims Commission, Decision No. 34 of 7 June 1929, Estate of Hyacinthe Pellat(France) v. Mexico, RIAA 5, pp. 534–538

Forests of Central Rhodope (Greece/Bulgaria), award of 4 November 1931, RIAA 3, pp. 1392–

1403

Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex, award of 1 December 1933, PCIJ (1933–1934)

Series E 10, pp. 106–126

S. Forlati, The International Court of Justice, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06179-5,© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

213

Trail Smelter (United States of America/Canada), decision of 11 March 1941, RIAA 3, pp. 1938–

1981

Gold of the Bank of Albania, award of 20 February 1953, RIAA 12, pp. 13–52

United Nations Tribunal in Libya, Case Concerning the Institutions, Companies and AssociationsMentioned by Article 5 of the Agreement decision of 3 July 1954, RIAA 12, pp. 375–383

Ottoman Empire Lighthouses Concessions (Greece, France), 24–27 July 1956, RIAA 12,

pp. 154–257

Dispute between Argentina and Chile concerning the Beagle Channel, award of 18 February 1977,RIAA 21, pp. 53–264

Case concerning the delimitation of continental shelf between the United Kingdom ofGreat Britain and Northern Ireland, and the French Republic, decision of 30 June 1977,

RIAA 18, pp. 3–270

Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, No. 25-71-1, Grimm v. Iran, 18 February 1983, (1983)

Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Reports, I, p. 78

Egypt–Israel Arbitration Tribunal, Award in Boundary Dispute Concerning the Taba Area,29 September 1988, RIAA 20, pp. 1–118

Case concerning the difference between New Zealand and France concerning the interpretation orapplication of the two agreements, concluded on 9 July 1986 between the two States and whichrelated to the problems arising from the Rainbow Warrior affair, award of 30 April 1990,

RIAA 20, pp. 217–284

Delimitation of maritime areas between Canada and France, award of 10 June 1992, RIAA 21,

pp. 265–341

Boundary dispute between Argentina and Chile concerning the frontier line between boundarypost 62 and Mount Fitzroy, award of 21 October 1994, RIAA 22, pp. 3–149

Application for revision and subsidiary interpretation of the Award of 21 October 1994 submittedby Chile (Argentina/Chile), Award of 13 October 1995, RIAA 22, pp. 151–207

Arbitration for the Brcko Area (The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. The RepublikaSrpska), Award of 15 February 1997, (1997) ILM 36:428

Arbitration for the Brcko Area (The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. The RepublikaSrpska), supplemental award of 15 March 1998, available at www.ohr.int

Arbitration for the Brcko Area (The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. The RepublikaSrpska), final award of 5 March 1999, (1999) ILM 38:538

Bluefin Tuna (Australia and New Zealand/Japan), award of 4 July 2000, RIAA 23, pp. 1–57

Larsen v. Kingdom of Hawaii, decision of 5 February 2001, (2001) ILR 119:566

Ethiopia-Eritrea Boundary Commission, Order of the Commission, of 17 July 2002, RIAA 25,

pp. 199–203

Mox Plant (Ireland v. United Kingdom), order No. 3 of 24 June 2003, available www.pca-cpa.org

Proceedings pursuant to the OSPAR Convention (Ireland/United Kingdom), award of 2 July 2003,RIAA 23, pp. 59–151

Case concerning the audit of accounts between the Netherlands and France in application ofthe Protocol of 25 September 1991 Additional to the Convention for the Protection of theRhine from Pollution by Chlorides of 3 December 1976, decision of 12 March 2004, RIAA 25,

pp. 267–344

Iran – United States Claims Tribunal, No. ITL 83-B1-FT, The Islamic Republic of Iranv. The United States of America, Case No. B 1 (Counterclaim), interlocutory award of

9 September 2004, available at www.iusct.net

Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Singapore v. Malaysia),decision of 1 September 2005, RIAA 27, pp. 133–145.

214 Table of Cases

http://www.ohr.int/

http://www.pca-cpa.org/

http://www.iusct.net/

Arbitration between Barbados and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, relating to the delimi-tation of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf between them, decision of

11 April 2006, RIAA 27, pp. 147–251

Guyana and Suriname, award of 17 September 2007, (2008) ILM 47:166–254

Mox Plant (Ireland v. United Kingdom), order No. 6 of 6 June 2008, available www.pca-cpa.org

Abyei Arbitration (Government of Sudan/Sudan People Liberation Movement/Army), award of

22 July 2009, (2009) ILM 48:1258

The Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (The Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Republic ofIndia), order on the interim measures application of Pakistan, 6 June 2011, available at www.

cpa-pca.org

Mauritius v. United Kingdom, reasoned decision on challenge of 30 November 2011, (2012)

ILM 51:350

Ara Libertad Arbitration (Argentina v. Ghana), Procedural Order No. 1 of 31 July 2013, availableat www.pca-cpa.org

Arbitration Under the Timor Sea Treaty (Timor Leste v. Australia), instituted on 23 April 2013.

www.pca-cpa.org

Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration between Bangladesh and India, Procedural OrderNo. 1 of 28 August 2013 (as revised on 11 October 2013), available at www.pca-cpa.org

The Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (The Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Republic ofIndia), final award of 20 December 2013, available at www.pca-cpa.org

Permanent Court of International Justice

Wimbledon, judgment of 28 June 1923 (Question of Intervention by Poland), Series A, No. 1

Status of Eastern Carelia, advisory opinion of 23 July 1923, PCIJ, Series B, No. 5

Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, judgment of 30 August 1924, Series A, No. 2

Nationality Decrees in Tunis and Morocco, advisory opinion of 7 February 1923, Series B, No. 4

Polish Postal Service in Danzig, advisory opinion of 16 May 1925, Series B, No. 11

Certain German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia order of 5 February 1926, Series A, No. 7,Annex I

Certain German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia, judgment of 25 May 1926, Series A, No. 7

Lotus, judgment of 7 September 1927, Series A, No. 10

Interpretation of the Greco-Turkish Agreement of 1 December 1926, Final Protocol Article IV,advisory opinion of 28 August 1928, Series B, No. 16

Serbian Loans, judgment of 12 July 1929, Series A, No. 20

Brazilian Loans, judgment of 12 July 1929, Series A, No. 21

Case of the Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex, order of 19 August 1929, Series A,No. 22

Territorial Jurisdiction of the International Commission on the River Oder (United Kingdom,Czechoslovakia, Denmark, France, Germany Sweden v. Poland), judgment of 10 September

1929, Series A, No. 23

Case of the Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex, order of 6 December 1930,

Series A, No. 24

The Greco-Bulgarian Communities, advisory opinion of 31 July 1930, Series B, No. 17

Customs Regime between Germany and Austria, advisory opinion of 5 September 1931,

Series A/B, No. 31

Table of Cases 215


http://www.cpa-pca.org/

http://www.cpa-pca.org/



www.pca-cpa.org


Case of the Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex, judgment of 7 June 1932,

Series A/B, No. 46

Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex, judgment of 7 June 1932, Series A/B, No. 46

Legal Status of the South-Eastern Territory of Greenland, order of 2 August 1932, Series A/B,No. 48

Appeals from the Hungaro-Czechoslovak Mixed Arbitral Tribunal, order of 26 October 1932,

Series C, No. 68, p. 290

Prince of Pless Administration, order of 4 February 1933, Series A/B, No. 52

Oscar Chinn (United Kingdom v. Belgium), judgment of 12 December 1934, Series A/B, No. 61

Waters on the River Meuse, judgment of 28 June 1937, Series A/B, No. 70

Societe commerciale de Belgique, judgment of 15 June 1939, Series A/B, No. 78

Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria, order of 5 December 1939, Series A/B, No. 79

International Court of Justice

Corfu Channel case. Judgment on Preliminary Objection (United Kingdom of Great Britain andNorthern Ireland v. Albania), judgment of 25 March 1948, ICJ Reports 1948, p. 15

Admission of a State to the United Nations (Charter, Art. 4), advisory opinion of 28 May 1948,

ICJ Reports 1948, p. 57

Corfu Channel case (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Albania), judg-ment of 9 April 1949, in ICJ Reports 1949, p. 4

Corfu Channel (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Albania), judgment of

15 December 1949, ICJ Reports 1949, p. 244

Interpretation of Peace Treaties, advisory opinion of 30 March 1950, ICJ Reports 1950, p. 65

Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru), judgment of 20 November 1950, ICJ Reports 1950, p. 266

Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of November 20th, 1950, in Asylum Case, Judgment of

27 November 1950, ICJ Reports 1950, p. 395

Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. (United Kingdom v. Iran), order of 5 July 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, p. 89

Haya de la Torre (Colombia v. Peru), judgment of 13 June 1951, ICJ Reports 1951, p. 71

Fisheries Case (United Kingdom v. Norway), judgment of 18 December 1951, ICJ Reports1951, p. 116

Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. (United Kingdom v. Iran), judgment of 22 July 1952, ICJ Reports 1952,

p. 93

Case concerning Rights of United States Nationals in Morocco (France v. United States),judgment of 27 August 1952, ICJ Reports 1952, p. 176

Ambatielos (Greece v. United Kingdom), judgment of 19 May 1953, ICJ Reports 1953, p. 10

Minquiers and Ecrehos Case (France/United Kingdom), judgment of 17 November 1953,


Nottebohm (Lichtenstein v. Guatemala), Preliminary Objection, judgment of 18 November 1953,


Monetary Gold (Italy v. France, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland andUnited States of America), judgment of 15 June 1954, ICJ Reports 1954, p. 18

Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala), Second Phase, judgment of 6 April 1955, ICJ Reports1955, p. 4

216 Table of Cases

Judgments of the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO upon Complaints Raised against UNESCO,advisory opinion of 23 October 1956, ICJ Reports 1956, p. 77

Certain Norwegian Loans (France v. Norway), judgment of 6 July 1957, ICJ Reports 1957, p. 9

Right of Passage on Indian Territory (Portugal v. India), Preliminary Objections, judgment of 26

November 1957, ICJ Reports 1957, p. 125

Interhandel (Switzerland v. United States), judgment of 21 March 1959, ICJ Reports 1959, p. 6

Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955 (Israel v. Bulgaria), judgment of 26 May 1959, ICJ Reports1959, p. 127

Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Portugal v. India), judgment of 12 April 1960,


Constitution of the Maritime Safety Committee of the Inter-Governmental Maritime ConsultativeOrganization, advisory opinion of 8 June 1960, ICJ Reports 1960, p. 150

South West Africa Cases (Ethiopia v. Union of South Africa; Liberia v. Union of South Africa),order of 20 May 1961, ICJ Reports 1961, p. 13

Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand) (Preliminary Objections), judgment of 26 May

1961, ICJ Reports 1961, p. 17

Certain Expenses of the United Nations, advisory opinion of 20 July 1962, ICJ Reports1962, p. 151

South West Africa Cases (Ethiopia v. Union of South Africa; Liberia v. Union of South Africa),(Preliminary Objections), judgment of 21 December 1962, ICJ Reports 1962, p. 319

Case Concerning the Northern Cameroons (Cameroon v. United Kingdom), judgment of


Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co. (Belgium v. France) (Preliminary Objections)(Second Phase), judgment of 24 July 1964, ICJ Reports 1964, p. 6

South West Africa Cases (Ethiopia and Liberia v. South Africa),Merits, judgment of 18 July 1966,


North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic ofGermany/Netherlands), order of 26 April 1968, ICJ Reports 1968, p. 9

Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co. (Belgium v. Spain), New Application, judgment of

5 February 1970, in ICJ Reports 1970, p. 3

Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Iceland),Interim Protection, order of 17 August 1972, ICJ Reports 1972, p. 12

Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Interim Protection, order of17 August 1972, ICJ Reports 1972, p. 30

Appeal Relating to the Jurisdiction of the ICAO Council (India v. Pakistan), judgment of

18 August 1972, ICJ Reports 1972, p. 46

Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Jurisdiction of the Court,judgment of 2 February 1973, ICJ Reports 1973, p. 49

Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France), Provisional Measures, order of 23 June 1973, ICJ Reports1973, p. 99

Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France), order of 12 July 1973, ICJ Reports 1973, p. 322

Fisheries Jurisdiction (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, judgment of 25 July

1974, ICJ Reports 1974, p. 175

Nuclear Tests (Jurisdiction) (Australia v. France), judgment of 20 December 1974, ICJ Reports1974, p. 253

Nuclear Tests (Jurisdiction) (New Zealand v. France) judgment of 20 December 1974,


Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France), order of 20 December 1974, ICJ Reports 1974, p. 531

Table of Cases 217

Western Sahara, order of 22 May 1975, ICJ Reports 1975, p. 6

Aegean Sea Continental Shelf (Greece v. Turkey), order of 11 September 1976, ICJ Reports1976, p. 3

Aegean Sea Continental Shelf (Greece v. Turkey), judgment of 19 December 1978, ICJ Reports1978, p. 3

Diplomatic and Consular Staff of the United States in Teheran (United States v. Iran), judgment of

24 May 1980, ICJ Reports 1980, p. 3

Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya), Application to Intervene, judgment of

14 April 1981, ICJ Reports 1981, p. 3

Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada/United States ofAmerica), order of 20 January 1982, ICJ Reports 1982, p. 3

Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya), Merits, judgment of 24 February 1982,


Application for Review of Judgement No. 273 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal,20 July 1982, ICJ Reports 1982, p. 325

Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Application to Intervene, judgment of

21 March 1984, ICJ Reports 1984, p. 3

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. USA), order of

10 May 1984, ICJ Reports 1984, p. 187

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States ofAmerica), Declaration of Intervention, order of 4 October 1984, ICJ Reports 1984, p. 215

Military and Paramilitary Activities of the United States in and against Nicaragua (Nicaraguav. United States of America), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, judgment of 26 November 1984,


Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta),Merits, judgment of 3 June 1985, ICJ Reports1985, p. 13

Application for Revision and Interpretation of the Judgment of 24 February 1982 in theCase concerning the Continental Shelf (Tunisia v. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya), judgment of


Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Mali), Provisional Measures, order of 10 January 1986,


Military and Paramilitary Activities of the United States in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v.

United States of America), Merits, judgment of 27 June 1986, p. 14

Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Mali), judgment of 22 December 1986, ICJ Reports 1986, p. 554

Land, Island and Maritime Frontier (El Salavdor/Honduras), Composition of the Chamber,order of 13 December 1989, ICJ Reports 1989, p. 162

Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of theUnited Nations, advisory opinion of 15 December 1989, ICJ Reports 1989, p. 177

Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras), Application for Permissionto Intervene, order of 28 February 1990, ICJ Reports 1990, p. 3

Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras), Application for Permissionto Intervene, judgment of 13 September 1990, ICJ Reports 1990 p. 92

Case Concerning the Arbitral Award of 31 July 1989 (Guinea Bissau/Senegal), judgment of

12 November 1991, ICJ Reports 1991, p. 53

Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, judgment of 26 June 1992, ICJ Reports 1992, p. 240

Application of the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide(Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Provisional Measures, order of

13 September 1993, ICJ Reports 1993, p. 325

218 Table of Cases

Territorial Dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Chad), judgment of 3 February 1994, ICJ Reports1994, p. 6

Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain, Jurisdiction andAdmissibility, judgment of 1 July 1994, ICJ Reports 1994, p. 112

Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain, Jurisdiction andAdmissibility, judgment of 15 February 1995, ICJ Reports 1995, p. 6

East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), judgment of 30 June 1995, ICJ Reports 1995, p. 90

Request for an Examination of the Situation in Accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court’s

Judgment of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France) Case

(New Zealand v. France), order of 22 September 1995, ICJ Reports 1995, p. 288

Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Provisional Measures), order of15 March 1996, ICJ Reports 1996, p. 13

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, advisory opinion of 8 July 1996, ICJ Reports1996, p. 226

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Bosniaand Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia) (Preliminary Objections), judgment of 11 July 1996,


Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide,(Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Counter-claims, order of 17 December

1997, ICJ Reports 1997, p. 243

Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising fromthe Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United Kingdom), PreliminaryObjections, judgment of 27 February 1998, ICJ Reports 1998, p. 9

Oil Platforms (Iran v. United States) Counter-claim, order of 10 March 1998, ICJ Reports1998, p. 190

Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain, order of 30 March

1998, ICJ Reports 1998, p. 243

Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada), judgment of 4 December 1998, ICJ Reports 1998, p. 432

Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Preliminary Objections), judg-ment of 11 June 1998, ICJ Reports 1998, p. 275

LaGrand (Germany v. United States), Provisional Measures, order of 3 March 1999, ICJ Reports1999, p. 9

Difference Relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission onHuman Rights, of 29 April 1999, ICJ Reports 1999, p. 62

Legality of Use of Force, Provisional Measures (Yugoslavia v. Belgium) order of 2 June

1999, p. 124

Legality of the Use of Force, Provisional Measures (Yugoslavia v. Spain), order of 2 June 1999,


Legality of the Use of Force, Provisional Measures (Yugoslavia v. United States), order of 2 June1999, ICJ Reports 1999, p. 916

Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, order of 30 June 1999, ICJ Reports1999, p. 983

Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, Application by Equatorial Guineafor Permission to Intervene, order of 21 October 1999, ICJ Reports 1999, p. 1029

Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (India v. Pakistan), judgment of 21 June 2000, ICJ Reports2000, p. 12

Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)(Provisional Measures) case, order of 1 July 2000, ICJ Reports 2000, p. 111

Table of Cases 219

Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions (Qatar v. Bahrain), Merits,judgment of 16 March 2001, ICJ Reports 2001, p. 40

LaGrand (Germany v. United States), judgment of 27 June 2001, ICJ Reports 2001, p. 466

Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia), Application for Permission to Intervene,judgment of 23 October 2001, ICJ Reports 2001, p. 575

Armed Activities in the Territory of the Congo (Congo v. Uganda), order of 29 November 2001,


Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium), judgment of

14 February 2002, ICJ Reports 2002, p. 3

Armed Activities in the Territory of the Congo (Congo v. Rwanda), order of 10 July 2002,


Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea Intervening,judgment of 10 October 2002, ICJ Reports 2002, p. 303

Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising from theAerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United Kingdom), order of

10 September 2003, ICJ Reports 2003, p. 149

Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), judgment of 6 November

2003, ICJ Reports 2003, p. 161

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in Palestine, advisory opinion of 9 July 2004,


Legality of Use of Force (Serbia v. Belgium), judgment of 15 December 2004, ICJ Reports2004, p. 279

Legality of Use of Force (Serbia v. Germany), 15 December 2004, ICJ Reports 2004, p. 720

Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany), judgment of 10 February 2005, ICJ Reports 2005,p. 6

Armed Activities in the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of Congo v. Uganda),judgment of 19 December 2005, ICJ Reports 2005, p. 168

Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Provisional Measures, order of 13 July

2006, ICJ Reports 2006, p. 113

Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Provisional Measures, order of

23 January 2007, ICJ Reports 2007, p. 3

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide(Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Merits, judgment of 26 February 2007,


Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea,Judgment of 8 October 2007, ICJ Reports 2007 p. 659

Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore), judgment of 23 May 2008, ICJ Reports 2008, p. 12

Questions of Mutual Assistance (Dijbuti v. France), judgment of 4 June 2008, ICJ. Reports2008, p. 177

Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 31 March 2004 in the Case concerning Avena and

Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America) (Mexico v. United States ofAmerica), Provisional Measures, order of 16 July 2008, ICJ Reports 2008, p. 311

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide(Croatia v. Serbia), Preliminary Objections, judgment of 18 November 2008, ICJ Reports2008, p. 412

Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine), judgment of 3 February 2009,


Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal), ProvisionalMeasures, order of 28 May 2009, ICJ Reports 2009, p. 139

220 Table of Cases

Dispute regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), judgment of

13 July 2009, ICJ Reports 2009, p. 213

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide(Croatia v. Serbia), order of 4 February 2010, ICJ Reports 2010, p. 4

Pulp Mills in the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), judgment of 20 April 2010, ICJ Reports2010, p. 14

Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy), Counter-Claim, order of 6 July 2010,


Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect ofKosovo, advisory opinion of 22 July 2010, ICJ Reports 2010, p. 403

Certain Criminal Proceedings in France (Republic of Congo v. France), order of 16 November

2010, ICJ Reports 2010, p. 635

Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v. Senegal),Merits, judgment of 30 November 2010, ICJ Reports2010, p. 639

Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua),Provisional Measures, order of 8 March 2011, ICJ Reports 2011, p. 6

Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Application by Costa Rica forPermission to Intervene, judgment of 4 May 2011, ICJ Reports 2011, p. 348

Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Application by Honduras for Permis-sion to Intervene, judgment of 4 May 2011, ICJ Reports 2011, p. 420

Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy), Application for Permission to Intervene,order of 4 July 2011, ICJ Reports 2011, p. 494

Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995 (The Former Yugoslav Republic ofMacedonia v. Greece), judgment of 5 December 2011, ICJ Reports 2011, p. 644

Judgment No. 2867 of the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization upona Complaint Filed Against the International Fund for Agricultural Development), of 1 February2012, ICJ Reports 2012, p. 10

Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy), judgment of 3 February 2012,


Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite, judgment of 19 July 2012,


Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), judgment of 19 November 2012,


Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. New Zealand), Declaration of Intervention of New Zealand,order of 6 February 2013

Certain Activities Carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua),Joinder of Proceedings, order of 17 April 2013

Construction of a Road in Costa Rica on the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica), Joinder ofProceedings, order of 17 April 2013

Certain Activities Carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua –

Construction of a Road in Costa Rica on the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica),Counter-Claims, order of 18 April 2013

Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger), judgment of 26 April 2013

Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Niger), Nomination of Experts, order of 12 July 2013

Certain Activities in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) Request for the Modification ofthe Order of 8 March 2011 Indicating Provisional Measures, order of 16 July 2013

Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 15 Judgment 1962 in the Case Concerning the

Temple of Preah Viehar (Cambodia v. Thailand), jugment of 11 November 1913

Table of Cases 221

Certain Activities in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Request Presented by Costa Ricafor New Provisional Measures, order of 22 November 2013

Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v.

Colombia), application of 26 November 2013

Construction of a Road in Costa Rica (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica), Request Presented by Nicaraguafor the Indication of Provisional Measures, order of 13 December 2013

Questions relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor-Lestev. Australia), application of 17 December 2013

Other International Judicial Institutions

CACJ (Cartago-San Jose), Costa Rica v. Nicaragua, judgment of 30 September 1916, (1917) Am J

Int Law 11:181–229

CACJ (Cartago-San Jose), Salvador v. Nicaragua, judgment of 9 March 1917, (1917) Am J Int

Law 11:674

ECJ, case 66/80, International Chemical Corporation SpA v. Amministrazione delle finanze,[1981] ECR 1191

ECJ joined cases 314-315-316/81 and 83/82, Waterkeyn, [1982] ECR 4337

ECtHR, Vermeire v. Belgium, No. 12849/87, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A,No. 214-C,

ECtHR, Modinos v. Cyprus, No. 15070/89, judgment of 22 April 1993, Series A, No. 259

ICTY, The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, decision on the defence motion for interlocutory appeal on

jurisdiction of 2 October 1995, ICTY Judicial Reports 1995–1995, p. 353

CACJ (Managua), Demanda por violacion de normativa del y principios comunitarioscentroamericanos del Sistema de la Integracion Centroamericana (SICA) (Nicaraguav. Honduras), judgment of 27 November 2001, http://portal.ccj.org.ni

CACJ (Managua), Demanda de revocacion de disposiciones legales, actos administrativos yactuaciones de hecho adoptadas por la Republica de Nicaragua que afectan y violan laNormativa Jurıdica y el funcionamiento del Sistema de Integracion Centroamericana (Hon-duras v. Nicaragua), judgment of 28 November 2001, http://portal.ccj.org.ni

ECtHR, Karner v. Austria, No. 40016/98, judgment of 24 July 2003

ITLOS, Land Reclamation (Singapore,Malaysia), order of 8 October 2003, Reports of Judgments,Advisory Opinions and Orders, Vol. 7 (2003)

ECtHR, Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia [GC], No. 25965/04, judgment of 7 January 2010

222 Table of Cases

http://portal.ccj.org.ni/

http://portal.ccj.org.ni/

Bibliography

Abi-Saab G (1987) Cours general de droit international public. Collected Courses 207:9–463

Abi-Saab G (1996) The International Court as a world court. In: Lowe V, Fitzmaurice M (eds)

Fifty years of the International Court of Justice, essays in honour of Sir Robert Jennings.

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–16

Abi-Saab G (1999) On discretion – reflections on the nature of the consultative function of

the International Court of Justice. In: Sands P, Boisson de Chazournes L (eds) International law,

the International Court of Justice and nuclear weapons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

pp 36–50

Ago R (1991) “Binding” advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice. Am J Int Law

85:439–451

Aldrich GH (1996) The jurisprudence of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal. Clarendon,

Oxford

Amerasinghe C (2005) Evidence in international litigation. Nijhoff, Leiden

Amr MSM (2003) The role of the International Court of Justice as the principal judicial organ of

the United Nations. Kluwer, The Hague

Andenas M, Weatherhall T (2013) International Court of Justice: Questions Relating to

the Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute (Belgium v. Senegal) judgment of 20 July 2012.

Int Comp Law Q 62:753–769

Antonopoulos C (2011) Counterclaims before the International Court of Justice. Asser, The Hague

Anzilotti D (1915) Corso di diritto internazionale – Volume Terzo: I modi di risoluzione delle

controversie internazionali. Athenaeum, Roma

Anzilotti D (1929) La riconvenzione nel processo internazionale. Riv dir int 21:309–327 (French

translation: Anzilotti D (1930) La demande reconventionnelle en procedure internationale.

Journal du droit international 57:857–877)

Arangio-Ruiz G (1958) Arbitrato. In: Enciclopedia del diritto, vol II. Giuffre, Milano, pp 974–994

Arangio-Ruiz G (1962) Corte internazionale di giustizia. In: Enciclopedia del diritto, vol X.Giuffre,

Milano, pp 1037–1048

Arangio-Ruiz G (1996) The establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former

territory of Yugoslavia and the doctrine of implied powers of the United Nations. In:

Lattanzi F, Sciso E (eds) Dai tribunali internazionali penali ad hoc ad una Corte permanente.

Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli, pp 31–45

Arndt K (1970) Die Wirkung der Amtsniederlegung eines nationalen ad hoc-Richters fur seine

Partei sowie auf die Stellung des von der Gegenseite benannten ad hoc-Richters. Zeitschrift

30:542–545

Ascensio H (2001) L’amicus curiae devant les juridictions internationales. Rev gen dr int pub

105:897–930

S. Forlati, The International Court of Justice, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06179-5,© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

223

Ascensio H (2003) La notion de juridiction internationale en question. In: SFDI, La juridiction-

nalisation du droit international, Colloque de Lille. Pedone, Paris, pp 163–202

Bacot G (1980) Reflexions sur les clauses qui rendent obligatoires les avis consultatifs de la CPJI

et de la CIJ. Rev gen dr int pub 84:1027–1067

Bannelier K, Kristakis T, Heathcote S (eds) (2012) The ICJ and the evolution of international law.

Routledge, London

Barile G (1952) Osservazioni sull’indicazione di misure cautelari nei procedimenti davanti la

Corte internazionale di giustizia. Comunicazioni e studi 4:143–156

Bastid S (1951) La jurisprudence de la Cour internationale de Justice. Collected Courses 78:

575–686

Bastin L (2012) The amicus curiae in investor-state arbitration. Camb J Comp Law 1:208–234

Bedjaoui M (1997) Preface. In: Muller AS, Raic D, Thuranszky JM (eds) The International Court

of Justice – its future role after fifty years. Nijhoff, The Hague, pp xxi–xxiii

Bedjaoui M (2009) L’egalite des Etats dans le proces international, un mythe? In: Liber amicorumJean-Pierre Cot – Le proces international. Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp 1–27

Bekker PHF (1996) East Timor. Am J Int Law 90:94–98

Bekker P (2013) The World Court awards sovereignty over several islands in the Caribbean sea to

Colombia and fixes a single maritime boundary between Colombia and Nicaragua. Am Soc Int

Law Insights 17(3)

Benvenuti P (1985) L’accertamento del diritto mediante i pareri consultivi della Corte internazionale

di giustizia. Giuffre, Milano

Benzing M (2012) Evidentiary issues. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K,

Tams C (eds) The Statute of the International Court of Justice – a commentary, 2nd edn.

Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1234–1275

Bhattacharya S (2013) ‘Proceeding at Your Own Risk’: evaluating a new principle of international

law for provisional measures. Yale Law J 38:511–524

Bingham T (2012) Alabama arbitration. In: Wolfrum R (ed) Max Planck encyclopedia of public

international law, vol I. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 272–275

Boisson de Chazournes L, Angelini A (2013) Between saying and doing: the diplomatic means of

implementation of the Court’s “juris dictum”. In: Boisson de Chazournes L, Kohen MG,

Vinuales JE (eds) Diplomatic and judicial means of dispute settlement. Nijhoff, Leiden,

pp 155–185

Bollecker-Stern B (1974) L’affaire des essais nucleaires francais devant la Court internationale de

justice. Ann fr dr int 20:299–333

Bonafe BI (2011) Il potere della Corte internazionale di giustizia di riformulare la domanda di

parere consultivo. In: Gradoni L, Milano L (eds) Il parere della Corte internazionale di giustizia

sulla dichiarazione di indipendenza del Kosovo – Un’analisi critica. Cedam, Padova, pp 31–57

Bonafe BI (2012) Interests of a legal nature justifying intervention before the International Court

of Justice. Leiden J Int Law 25:739–757

Bonafe BI (2013) L’adeguamento dei diritti processuali derivanti dall’intervento del terzo ai sensi

dell’art. 63 dello Statuto della Corte internazionale di giustizia nel caso della Caccia allabalena nell’Antartico. Riv dir int 96:537–543

Bordin FL (2013) Procedural developments at the International Court of Justice. Law Pract Int

Courts Tribunals 12:81–111

Borsi V (1913) Le clausole eccettuative di controversie nei trattati di arbitrato obbligatorio. Riv dir

int 1(Second series):155–177

Bowett DW (1983) Contemporary developments in legal techniques in the settlement of disputes.

Collected Courses 180:169–235

Bowett D, Crawford J, Sinclair I, Watts A (1996) The International Court of Justice. Efficiency of

procedures and working methods. Int Comp Law Q 45

Brower CH (2012) Arbitration. In: Wolfrum R (ed) Max Planck encyclopedia of public international

law, vol I. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 531–549

224 Bibliography

Brower CN, Bekker PHF (2002) Understanding ‘binding’ advisory opinions. In: Ando N,

McWhinney E, Wolfrum R (eds) Liber amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda. Kluwer, The Hague,

pp 351–368

Brown C (2007) A common law of international adjudication. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Brownlie I (2002) Why do States take disputes to the International Court? In: Ando N,

McWhinney E, Wolfrum R (eds) Liber amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda. Kluwer, The Hague,

pp 829–834

Carlston KS (1946) The process of international arbitration. Columbia University Press, New York

Caron D (1986) Interim measures of protection: theory and practice in light of the Iran–United

States Claims Tribunal. Zeitschrift 46:465–518

Caron D (1990) The nature of the Iran–United States claims tribunal and the evolving structure of

international dispute resolution. Am J Int Law 84:104–156

Cassese A (2012) The International Court of Justice: it is high time to restyle the respected old

lady. In: Cassese A (ed) Realizing Utopia – the future of international law. Oxford University

Press, Oxford, pp 239–249

Cavare L (1956) La notion de juridiction internationale. Ann fr dr int 2:496–509

Cazala J (2009) Adaptation des regles et principes probatoires au nom d’une bonne administration

de la justice internationale. L’observateur des Nations Unies 27(2):55–73

Cellamare G (1991) Le forme di intervento nel processo dinanzi alla Corte internazionale di

giustizia. Cacucci, Bari

Chinkin C (1986) Third party intervention before the International Court of Justice. Am J Int Law

80:495–531

Chinkin C (1993) Third parties in international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Chinkin C (1997) Increasing the use and appeal of the Court. In: Peck C, Lee RS (eds) Increasing

the effectiveness of the International Court of Justice. Nijhoff/UNITAR, The Hague, pp 43–56

Chinkin C (2012a) Article 62. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds)

The Statute of the International Court of Justice – a commentary, 2nd edn. Oxford University


Chinkin C (2012b) Article 63. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds)



Collier JG (1996) The International Court of Justice and the peaceful settlement of disputes. In:

Lowe V, Fitzmaurice M (eds) Fifty years of the International Court of Justice, essays in honour

of Sir Robert Jennings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 364–372

Condorelli L (1987) L’autorite de la decision des juridictions internationales. In: Societe francaise

de droit international, La juridiction internationale permanente. Pedone, Paris, pp 277–313

Conforti B (1986) L’arret de la Cour internationale de Justice dans l’affaire de la delimitation du

plateau continental entre la Libye et Malte. Rev gen dr int pub 90:313–343

Costantino B (1975) Il giudice ad hoc nell’attivita consultiva della Corte internazionale di

giustizia. Comunicazioni e Studi 14:235–266

Cot J-P (1973) Affaire des Essais nucleaires (Australie c. France et Nouvelle-Zelande c. France).

Demandes en indication des mesures conservatoires. — Ordonnances du 22 juin 1973. Ann fr

dr int 19:252–271

Cot J-P (2002) Appearing “for” or “on behalf of” a State: the role of private counsel before

international tribunals. In: Ando N, McWhinney E, Wolfrum R (eds) Liber amicorum Judge

Shigeru Oda. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 835–847

Cot J-P (2012) Article 68. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds) The

Statute of the International Court of Justice – a commentary, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press,

Oxford, pp 1669–1684

Cowell F (2013) Death of the Southern African Development Community Tribunal’s human rights

jurisdiction. Hum Rights Law Rev 13:153–165

Bibliography 225

Crawford J (2013) The international bar: essence before existence? ESIL 2013 5th Research

Forum: International Law as a Profession Conference Paper No. 11/2013. Available at

SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract¼2364104 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364104

D’Aspremont J (2007) Recommendations made by the International Court of Justice. Int Comp

Law Q 56:185–198

Damrosch L (2012) Article 56. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds)



Daniele L (1993) Le misure cautelari nel processo dinanzi alla Corte internazionale di giustizia.

Giuffre, Milano

Daniele L (1996) L’ordonnance sur la demande d’examen de la situation dans l’affaire des essais

nucleaires et le pouvoir de la Cour internationale de Justice de regler sa propre procedure. Rev

gen dr int pub 100:653–671

Davı A (1984) L’intervento davanti alla Corte internazionale di giustizia. Jovene, Napoli

Decaux E (1992) Le differend terrestre, insulaire et maritime (El Salvador/Honduras), arret de la

CIJ du 11 septembre 1992 – La delimitation terrestre. Ann fr dr int 38:393–426

De Guttry A, Post HHG, Venturini G (eds) (2009) The 1998–2000 war between Eritrea and

Ethiopia: an international legal perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

De Lapradelle A, Politis N (1905–1954) Recueil des arbitrages internationaux. Pedone, Paris

De Visscher C (1965) La chose jugee devant la Cour internationale La Haye. Revue belge de droit

international 1:5–14

De Visscher C (1966) Aspects recents du droit procedural de la Cour internationale de Justice.

Pedone, Paris

De Wet E (2004) The Chapter VII powers of the United Nations Security Council. Hart, Oxford

Del Vecchio A (1975) Le parti nel processo internazionale. Giuffre, Milano

Delcourt B (1996) Un seul Etat vous manque. . . L’application de la jurisprudence de l’Ormonetaire a l’affaire du Timor oriental. Revue belge de droit international 28:191–215

Dumberry P (2002) The Hawaiian Kingdom Arbitration Case and the unsettled question of the

Hawaiian Kingdom’s claim to continuity as an independent State under international law. Chin

J Int Law 1:655–684

Dupuy PM (2002) L’unite de l’ordre juridique international. Collected Courses 297:9–490

Dupuy P-M (2013) Recourse to the International Court of Justice for the purpose of settling a

dispute. In: Kohen MG, Vinuales JE, Boisson de Chazournes L (eds) Diplomatic and judicial

means of dispute settlement. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 61–69

Eisemann PM (2013) Quelques observations sur les mesures conservatoires indiquees par la Cour

de la Haye. In: Boschiero N, Scovazzi T, Pitea C, Ragni C (eds) International courts and the

development of international law. Asser, The Hague, pp 121–135

Elias TO (1983) Limits of the right of intervention before the International Court of Justice. In:

Bernhardt R, Geck WK, Jaenicke G, Steinberger H (eds) Volkerrecht als Rechtsordnung –

Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit – Menschenrechte: Festschrift fur Hermann Mosler. Springer,

Berlin, pp 159–172

Elkind J (1981) Interim protection – a functional approach. Nijhoff, The Hague

Evans M (1995) Case concerning maritime delimitation and territorial questions between Qatar

and Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahrain), jurisdiction and admissibility. Int Comp Law Q 44:691–698

Fachiri AP (1932) The Permanent Court of International Justice – its constitution, procedure and

work, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

FaragWM (1927) L’intervention devant la Cour permanente de justice internationale. LGDJ, Paris

Ferrari Bravo L (1958) La prova nel processo internazionale. Jovene, Napoli

Fisler Damrosch L (1987) Multilateral disputes. In: Fisler Damrosh L (ed) The International Court

of Justice at a crossroads. Transnational Publishers, Dobbs Ferry, pp 376–400

FitzmauriceG (1986)The law and procedure of the InternationalCourt of Justice. Grotius,Cambridge

Forlati S (2001) Azioni dinanzi alla Corte internazionale di giustizia rispetto a violazioni di

obblighi erga omnes. Riv dir int 84:69–109

226 Bibliography

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2364104


http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364104

Forlati S (2002) ‘Interesse di natura giuridica’ ed effetti per gli Stati terzi delle sentenze della Corte

internazionale di giustizia. Riv dir int 85:99–138

Forlati S (2007a) Protection diplomatique, droits de l’homme et reclamations ‘directes’ devant la

Cour internationale de Justice. Rev gen dr int pub 111:89–116

Forlati S (2007b) Violazione dell’obbligo di prevenire il genocidio e riparazione nell’affare

Bosnia-Erzegovina c. Serbia. Riv dir int 40:425–430

Forlati S (2011) Intervento nel processo ai sensi dell’art. 62 dello Statuto: quale coerenza nella

giurisprudenza della Corte internazionale di giustizia? Riv dir int 94:1197–1203

Forlati S (2013) Delimitazione dei confini marittimi e Stati terzi: il caso Nicaragua c. Colombia.Riv dir int 96:135–140

Forlati S (in press) Il ruolo del giudice ad hoc nel processo dinanzi alla Corte internazionale di

giustizia. In: Cortese B (ed) Studi in onore di Maria Laura Picchio Forlati. CEDAM, Padova

Forteau M (2010) La Cour internationale de Justice et les systemes regionaux. Plaidoyer pour le

pluralisme desordonne. In: Dubout E, Touze S (eds) Les droits fondamentaux: charnieres entre

ordres et systemes juridiques. Pedone, Paris, pp 39–64

Franck TM (1975) Word made law: the decision of the ICJ in the nuclear test cases. Am J Int Law

69:612–620

Franzina P (2008) Norme sull’efficacia delle decisioni straniere e immunita degli Stati dalla

giurisdizione civile in caso di violazioni gravi dei diritti dell’uomo. Diritti umani e diritto

internazionale 2:638–643

Fumagalli L (2013) Evidence before the International Court of Justice: issues of fact and questions

of law in the determination of international custom. In: Boschiero N, Scovazzi T, Pitea C,

Ragni C (eds) International courts and the development of international law. Asser, The Hague,

pp 137–148

Gaeta P (2000) La giustizia cautelare nel diritto internazionale. CEDAM, Padova

Gaeta P (2003) Inherent powers of international courts and tribunals. In: Vorhah LC et al (eds)

Man’s inhumanity to man. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 353–372

Gaja G (1975) Considerazioni sugli effetti delle sentenze di merito della Corte internazionale di

giustizia. Comunicazioni e Studi 14:313–335

Gaja G (1995) Sul ruolo della Corte internazionale di giustizia nell’accertamento del diritto

internazionale generale. In: Salerno F (ed) Il ruolo del giudice internazionale nell’evoluzione

del diritto internazionale e comunitario. CEDAM, Padova, pp 233–238

Gaja G (2010) States having an interest in compliance with the obligation breached. In:

Crawford J, Pellet A, Olleson J (eds) The law of international responsibility. Oxford University


Gaja G (2011) Submitting observations on the construction of multilateral treaties to the Inter-

national Court of Justice. In: Fastenrath U et al (eds) From bilateralism to community interest:

essays in honour of Judge Bruno Simma. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 665–673

Gattini A (2007) Breach of the obligation to prevent and reparation thereof in the ICJ’s genocide

judgment. Eur J Int Law 18:695–713

Giardina A (1975) Arrangements amiables ed estinzione del processo di fronte alla Corte

internazionale di giustizia. Comunicazioni e Studi 14:337–364

Gibson CH (2013) Representing the United States abroad: proper conduct of U.S. Government

attorneys in international tribunals. Georgetown J Int Law 44:1167–1216

Giegerich T (2012) Article 36 UN Charter. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K,



Goodrich LM (1938) The nature of the advisory opinions of the Permanent Court of International

Justice. Am J Int Law 32:738–758

Gowlland-Debbas V (2012) Article 7 UN Charter. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-

Frahm K, Tams C (eds) The Statute of the International Court of Justice – a commentary,

2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 90–118

Bibliography 227

Gray C (2006) The Eritrea/Ethiopia Claims Commission oversteps its boundaries: a partial award?

Eur J Int Law 17:699–721

Greig D (1992) Third party rights and intervention before the International Court. Va J Int Law 32:

285–376

Gross L (1964) Limitations upon the judicial function. Am J Int Law 58:415–431

Gross L (1967) The International Court of Justice and the United Nations. Collected Courses 120:

313–440

Guggenheim P (1932) Les mesures conservatoires dans la procedure arbitrale et judiciaire.


Guillaume G (1999) La ‘cause commune’ devant la Cour internationale de Justice. In: Yakpo E,

Boumedra T (eds) Liber amicorum Mohammed Bedjaoui. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 325–341

Guyomar G (1983) Commentaire du Reglement de la Cour internationale de Justice – Adopte le

14 Avril 1978. Pedone, Paris

Hambro E (1950) The jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. Collected Courses 76:

121–215

Hambro E (1954) The reasons behind the decisions of the International Court of Justice. Curr Leg

Probl 7:212–227

Hambro E (1956) The binding character of the provisional measures of protection indicated by the

International Court of Justice. In: Schatzel W (ed) Rechtsfragen der internationalen Organisa-

tion – Festschrift fur Hans Wehberg zu seinem 70. Geburtstag, Klostermann, Frankfurt a.M.,

pp 152–171

Hambro E (1975) Intervention under Article 63 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

Comunicazioni e studi 14:387–400

Hammarskjold D (1935) Quelques aspects de la question des mesures conservatoires en droit

international positif. Zeitschrift 5:5–33

Happold M (2013) East Timor takes Australia to the ICJ over documents seized by Australian

intelligence. www.ejiltalk.org. Accessed 20 Dec 2013

Higgins R (1991) International law and the avoidance, containment and resolution of disputes.

General course on public international law. Collected Courses 230:9–342

Higgins R (2001) Respecting sovereign States and running a tight courtroom. Int Comp Law Q

50:121–132

Higgins R (2012) Concluding remarks. Am Soc Int Law Proc 106:241–242

Highet K (1987) Evidence, the Court and the Nicaragua case. Am J Int Law 81:1–56

HudsonMO (1943) The Permanent Court of International Justice 1920–1942.Macmillan, NewYork

Iwasawa Y (2002) Third parties before international tribunals. In: Ando N, McWhinney E,

Wolfrum R (eds) Liber amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 871–891

Jacob P (2011) L’intervention devant la Cour internationale de Justice a la lumiere des decisions

rendues en 2011: lente asphyxie ou resurrection? Ann fr dr int 57:213–234

Jenks CW (1964) The prospects of international adjudication. Stevens, London

Jennings R (1997) The proper work and purposes of the International Court of Justice. In:

Muller AS, Raic D, Thuranszky JM (eds) The International Court of Justice – its future role

after fifty years. Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 33–45

Jennings R (2002) The differences between conducting a case in the ICJ and in an ad hoc

arbitration tribunal – an inside view. In: Ando N, McWhinney E, Wolfrum R (eds)

Liber amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 893–909

Jennings R, Higgins R (2012) General introduction. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-

Frahm K, Tams C (eds) The Statute of the International Court of Justice – a commentary, 2nd

edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–46

Jessup P (1981) Intervention in the International Court. Am J Int Law 75:903–909

Jimenez de Arechaga E (1971) Judges ad hoc in advisory proceedings. Zeitschrift 31:697–711

Jimenez de Arechaga E (1973) The amendments to the rules of procedure of the International

Court of Justice. Am J Int Law 67:1–22

228 Bibliography

http://www.ejiltalk.org/

Jimenez de Arechaga E (1983) Intervention under Article 62 of the Statute. In: Bernhardt R,

Geck WK, Jaenicke G, Steinberger H (eds) Volkerrecht als Rechtsordnung – Internationale

Gerichtsbarkeit – Menschenrechte: Festschrift fur Hermann Mosler. Springer, Berlin,

pp 453–465

Johns L, Pelcz KJ (2013) Fear of crowds in WTO disputes: why don’t more countries participate?


Johnson DHN (1955) The case of monetary gold removed from Rome in 1943. Int Comp Law Q

4:93–110

Jouannet E (1996) Le principe de l’Or monetaire a propos de l’arret de la Cour du 30 juin 1995

dans l’affaire du Timor oriental (Portugal c. Australie). Rev gen dr int pub 105:673–714

Kauffmann H (1939) Die Gutachten des Standigen Internationalen Gerichtshofs als Mittel

Zwischenstaatlicher Streitschlichtung. Helbing und Lichtenhahn, Basel

Kawano M (2009a) The administration of justice by the International Court of Justice and the

parties. In: Yee S, Morin J-Y (eds) Multiculturalism and international law. Brill, The Hague,

pp 285–300

Kawano M (2009b) The role of judicial procedures in the process of the Pacific settlement of

international disputes. Collected Courses 346:9–474

Kazazi M (1996) Burden of proof and related issues. A study on evidence before international

tribunals. Kluwer, The Hague

Kerbrat Y (2002) De quelques aspects des procedures incidentes devant la Cour internationale de

Justice: les ordonnances de 29 novembre 2001 et de 10 juillet 2002 dans les affaires des

activites armees sur le territoire du Congo. Ann fr dr int 48:343–361

Kolb R (2009) La maxime de la ‘bonne administration de la justice’ dans la jurisprudence

internationale. L’observateur des Nations Unies 27(2):5–21

Kolb R (2012) General principles of procedural law. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-



Kolb R (2013) The International Court of Justice. Hart, Oxford

Kooijmans P (2007) The ICJ in the 21st century: judicial restraint, judicial activism, or proactive

judicial policy. Int Comp Law Q 56:741–754

Kooijmans P (2012) Article 31. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds)



Krisch N (2012) Article 41. In: Simma B, Khan DE, Nolte G, Paulus A (eds) The Charter of the

United Nations, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1304–1329

Ku J (2013) Is Colombia going to just ignore the ICJ’s ruling on Nicaragua? www.opiniojuris.org.

Accessed 26 Aug 2013

Lammasch H (1913) Die Rechtskraft internationaler Schiedsspruche. Aschehoug, Kristiania

Lammasch H (1914) Die Lehre von der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit in ihrem ganzen Umfange.

Kohlhammer, Berlin

Lattanzi F (1992) Inesistenza e nullita delle sentenze arbitrali in una pronuncia della Corte

internazionale di giustizia. Riv dir int 75:41–64

Lauterpacht H (1958) The development of international law by the International Court.

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Lauterpacht E (1996) ‘Partial’ judgments and the inherent jurisdiction of the International Court of

Justice. In: Lowe V, Fitzmaurice M (eds) Fifty years of the International Court of Justice,

essays in honour of Sir Robert Jennings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 465–486

Lauterpacht E (1997) The role of ad hoc judges. In: Peck C, Lee RS (eds) Increasing the

effectiveness of the International Court of Justice. Nijhoff/UNITAR, The Hague, pp 371–378

Lauterpacht E (2009) Principles of procedure in International Litigation. Collected Courses 345:

391–530

Le Floch G (2008) L’urgence devant les juridictions internationales. Pedone, Paris

Bibliography 229


http://www.opiniojuris.org/

Lelarge A (2009) L’emergence d’un principe de bonne administration de la justice internationale

dans la jurisprudence internationale anterieure au 1945. L’observateur des Nations Unies

27(2):23–51

Lopes Pegna O (1998) Counter-claims and obligations erga omnes before the International Courtof Justice. Eur J Int Law 9:724–736

Magid P (1997) The post-adjudicative phase. In: Peck C, Lee RS (eds) Increasing the effectiveness

of the International Court of Justice. Nijoff/UNITAR, The Hague, pp 325–347

Mahoney P (2008) The international judiciary – independence and accountability. Law Pract Int

Courts Tribunals 7:313–349

Makowski J (1931) L’organisation actuelle de l’arbitrage international. Collected Courses 36:

263–384

Marston G (2000) Falsification of documentary evidence before international tribunals: an aspect

of the Behring Sea arbitration, 1892–3. Br Year B Int Law 71:357–373

Mbaye K (1988) L’interet pour agir devant la Cour internationale de Justice. Recueil des Cours

209:223–345

McHugo J (1997) The judgments of the International Court of Justice in the jurisdiction and

admissibility phase ofQatar v. Bahrain: an example of the continuing need for ‘fact-scepticism’.

Neth Yearb Int Law 28:171–196

Mendelson M (2002) The curious case of Qatar v. Bahrain in the International Court of Justice.

Br Year B Int Law 73 183–210

Merrills JG (1980) The International Court of Justice and the General Act of 1928. Camb Law J

39: 137–171

Merrills JG (2011) International dispute settlement, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Michel N (2013) Two cases in perspective: boundary delimitation in the Bakassi Peninsula and

criminal accountability in Kenya (interview with H.E. Kofi Annan). In: Boisson de

Chazournes L, Kohen MG, Vinuales JE (eds) Diplomatic and judicial means of dispute

settlement. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 281–290

Migliorino L (1992) Sur la declaration d’illiceite comme forme de satisfaction: a propos de la

sentence arbitrale du 30 avril 1990 dans l’affaire du Rainbow Warrior. Rev gen dr int pub

96:61–74

Milano E, Papanicolopulu I (2011) State responsibility in disputed areas on land and at sea.

Zeitschrift 71:587–640

Morelli G (1931) La sentenza internazionale. CEDAM, Padova

Morelli G (1937) La theorie generale du proces international. Collected Courses 61:253–374

Morelli G (1950) Estinzione e soluzione di controversie internazionali. Comunicazioni e studi

3:43–53

Morelli G (1982) Note sull’intervento nel processo internazionale. Riv dir int 65:805–815

Morelli G (1984) Fonction et objet de l’intervention dans le proces international. In: Makarczyk J

(ed) Essays in international law in honour of Judge Manfred Lachs. Nijhoff, The Hague,

pp 403–408

Mosler H (1984) The area of justiciability: some cases of agreed delimitation in the submission of

disputes to the International Court of Justice. In: Makarczick J (ed) Essays in international law

in honour of Judge Manfred Lachs. Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 409–421

Murphy SD (2012) Counter-claims – Article 80 of the rules. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C,

Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds) The Statute of the International Court of Justice – a commen-

tary, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1000–1025

Niemeyer G (1932) Einstweilige Verfugungen desWeltgerichtshofes, ihrWesen und ihre Grenzen.

Noske, Leipzig

Niyungeko G (2005) La prevue devant les juridictions internationales. Bruylant, Bruxelles

Niyungeko G (2009) Les faits notoires dans le contentieux international et la bonne administration

de la justice. L’observateur des Nations Unies 27(2):75–83

Oda S (1983) Intervention in the International Court of Justice – Articles 62 and 63 of the Statute.

In: Bernhardt R, Geck WK, Jaenicke G, Steinberger H (eds) Volkerrecht als Rechtsordnung –

230 Bibliography

Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit – Menschenrechte: Festschrift fur Hermann Mosler. Springer,

Berlin, pp 629–648

Oda S (1993) The International Court of Justice viewed from the bench (1976–1993).


Oellers-Frahm K (1975) Die einstweilige Anordnung in der internationalen Gerichtsbarkeit.

Springer, Berlin

Oellers-Frahm K (1990) Uberlegungen anlaßlich der Zulassung der Intervention Nicaraguas im

Streit zwischen El Salvador und Honduras – Urteil der Kammer vom 13.9.1990. Zeitschrift

50:795–811

Oellers-Frahm K (2012a) Article 41. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C

(eds) The Statute of the International Court of Justice – a commentary, 2nd edn. Oxford

University Press, Oxford, pp 1026–1077

Oellers-FrahmK (2012b) Expanding the competence to issue provisional measures – strengthening

the international judicial function. In: von Bogdandy A, Venzke I (eds) International judicial

lawmaking. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 389–409

Orakhelashvili A (2007) The International Court and ‘Its freedom to select the ground upon which

it will base its judgment’. Int Comp Law Q 56:171–184

Palchetti P (1999) L’indicazione di misure cautelari da parte della Corte internazionale di giustizia

in situazioni di estrema urgenza. Riv dir int 82:719–728

Palchetti P (2002) Opening the International Court of Justice to third States: intervention and

beyond. Max Planck Yearbk Unit Nations Law 6:139–181

Palchetti P (2003) La protection des interets des Etats tiers par la Cour internationale de Justice:

L’affaire de la Frontiere terrestre et maritime entre le Cameroun et le Nigeria. Rev gen dr int

pub 107: 865–883

Palchetti P (2008) The power of the International Court of Justice to indicate provisional measures

to prevent the aggravation of a dispute. Leiden J Int Law 21:623–642

Palchetti P (2012) Article 26. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds)



Papa MI (2006) I rapporti tra la Corte internazionale di giustizia e il Consiglio di sicurezza.

CEDAM, Padova

Papa MI (2013) Interesse ad agire davanti alla Corte internazionale di giustizia e tutela di valori

collettivi nella sentenza sul casoBelgio c. Senegal. Diritti umani e diritto internazionale 7: 79–104

Peck C, Lee RS (eds) (1997) Increasing the effectiveness of the International Court of Justice.

Clarendon, Oxford

Pellet A (2000) The role of the international lawyer in international litigation. In: Wickremasinghe

C (ed) The international lawyer as practitioner. BIICL, London, pp 147–162

Pellet A (2012) Article 38. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds) The



Pellonpaa M, Caron D (1994) The UNCITRAL arbitration rules as interpreted and applied.

Selected problems in the light of the practice of the Iran–United States claims tribunal. Finnish

Lawyers’ Publishing, Helsinki

Queneudec J-P (2005) The Eritrea–Yemen arbitration – its contribution to international law. In:

Shifman B (ed) The Eritrea–Yemen arbitration awards 1998 and 1999. Asser Press, The Hague,

pp 1–16

Quigley J (2009) The United States’ withdrawal from International Court of Justice jurisdiction in

consular cases: reasons and consequences. Duke J Int Comp Law 19:263–305

Reichler PS (2012) The Nicaragua case: a response to Judge Schwebel. Am J Int Law 106:

316–321

Rigaux F (2003) Les demandes reconventionneles devant la Cour internationale de Justice.

In: Ando N, McWhinney E, Wolfrum R (eds) Liber amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda. Kluwer,

The Hague, pp 935–945

Bibliography 231

Riquelme Cortado RM (1993) La intervencion de terceros estados en el proceso internacional – Un

caso test: La intervencion de Nicaragua en la controversia marıtima Honduras/El Salvador.

Tecnos, Madrid

Rosenne S (1965) The law and practice of the International Court. Sijthoff, Leiden

Rosenne S (1993) Intervention in the International Court of Justice. Nijhoff, Dordrecht

Rosenne S (1999) Article 31 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice revisited. In:

Dupuy R-J (ed) Melanges en l’honneur de Nicolas Valticos – Droit et justice. Pedone, Paris,

pp 301–317

Rosenne S (2002) International Court of Justice: practice directions on Judges ad hoc; agents,counsel and advocates; and submission of documents. Law Pract Int Courts Tribunals 1:

223–245

Rosenne S (2005) Provisional measures in international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Rosenne S (2006) The law and practice of the International Court of Justice 1920–2005. Nijhoff,

Leiden

Rousseau C (1964) Reglement arbitral et judiciaire et les Etats tiers. Melanges offerts a Henri

Rolin – Problemes de droit des gens. Pedone, Paris, pp 300–310

Ruiz-Fabri H, Sorel JM (2007) La prevue devant les juridictions internationales. Pedone, Paris

Salerno F (1999) La demande reconventionnelle dans la procedure de la Cour internationale de

Justice. Rev gen dr int pub 103:329–378

Salerno F (2013) Diritto internazionale – Principi e norme, 3rd edn. CEDAM, Padova

Salmon J, Sinclair I (2004) Special features of the Qatar v. Bahrain case before the ICJ – Affaire

de la delimitation maritime et des questions territoriales entre Qatar et Bahreın. L’arret de la

CIJ du 16 mars 2001. In: Studi di diritto internazionale in onore di Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz.


Salvioli G (1923a) La Corte permanente di giustizia internazionale. Riv dir int 2(Third series):11–39

Salvioli G (1923b) La Corte permanente di giustizia internazionale. Riv dir int 2(Third

series):450–509

Salvioli G (1928) La Corte permanente di giustizia internazionale. Anonima Editoriale Romana,

Roma

Salvioli G (1941) Tutela dei diritti e degli interessi internazionali. CEDAM, Padova

Sandifer D (1975) Evidence before international tribunals, 2nd edn. University Press of Virginia,

Charlottesville

Sands P (2013) Interaction between counsel and international courts and arbitral tribunals: ethical

standards for counsel. In: Wolfrum R, Gatzschmann I (eds) International dispute settlement:

room for innovations? Springer, Heidelberg, pp 127–136

Santulli C (2000) Qu’est-ce qu’une juridiction internationale? Des organes repressifs

internationaux a l’O.R.D. Ann fr dr int 46:58–81

Santulli C (2005) Droit du contentieux international. Montchrestien, Paris

Sarvarian A (2012) Common ethical standards for Counsel before the European Court of Justice

and the European Court of Human Rights. Eur J Int Law 23:991–1014

Sarvarian A (2013) Professional ethics at the international bar. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Scerni M (1938) La procedure de la Cour permanente de justice internationale. Collected Courses

65:561–682

Schachter O (1977) The invisible college of international lawyers. Northwest Univ Law Rev 72:

217–226

Schachter O (1983) Creativity and objectivity of international tribunals. In: Bernhardt R, GeckWK,

JaenickeG, Steinberger H (eds) Volkerrecht als Rechtsordnung – Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit

– Menschenrechte: Festschrift fur Hermann Mosler. Springer, Berlin, pp 813–821

Schwarzenberger G (1986) International law as applied by international courts and tribunals.

Stevens, London

Schwebel S (1992) Three cases of fact finding by the International Court of Justice. In: Lillich RB

(ed) Fact-finding before international tribunals. Transnational Publishers, Ardsley-on-Hudson,

pp 1–17

232 Bibliography

Schwebel S (1999) National judges and judges ad hoc. In: Dupuy R-J (ed) Melanges en l’honneur

de Nicolas Valticos – Droit et justice. Pedone, Paris, pp 319–329

Schwebel S (2012) Celebrating a fraud on the Court. Am J Int Law 106:102–105

Scobbie I (2005) ‘Une heresie en matiere judiciaire’? The role of the judge ad hoc in the

International Court. Law Pract Int Courts Tribunals 4:421–464

Sereni AP (1955) Principi generali di diritto e processo internazionale. Giuffre, Milano

Shahabuddeen M (1996) Precedent in the World Court. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Shany Y (2003) The competing jurisdictions of international courts and tribunals. Oxford Univer-

sity Press, Oxford

ShawMN (2009) Settling Territorial Disputes. In : Le proces international – Liber amicorum Jean-

Pierre Cot. Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp 255–348

ShifmanB (ed) (2005)TheEritrea–Yemen arbitration awards 1998 and 1999. Asser Press, TheHague

Simma B (1994) Bilateralism and community interest in international law. Collected Courses 254:

217–384

Simma B (2012) The International Court of Justice and scientific expertise. Am Soc Int Law Proc

106:230–233

Stein TL (1984) Jurisprudence and jurists’ prudence: the Iranian-forum clause decisions of the

Iran–U.S. Claims Tribunal. Am J Int Law 78:1–52

Stern B (2003) L’intervention des tiers dans le contentieux de l’OMC. Rev gen dr int pub 107:257–

303

Sztucki J (1983) Interim measures in the Hague Court. Kluwer, Deventer

Tams CJ, Sloan J (eds) (2013) The development of international law by the International Court of

Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Tanaka K (1975) Independence of international judges. Comunicazioni e Studi 14:855–871

Tesauro G (1975) Le misure cautelari della Corte internazionale di giustizia. Comunicazioni e

studi 14:873–901

Thierry H (1964) Affaire du Cameroun Septentrional (Cameroun c. Royaume-Uni), Exceptions

preliminaries, arret du 2 decembre 1963. Ann fr dr int 10:315–327

Thierry H (2000) Au sujet du juge ad hoc. In: Armas Barea CA et al (eds) Liber amicorum in

memory of Judge Jose Maria Ruda. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 285–289

Thirlway H (1996) Procedural law and the International Court of Justice. In: Lowe V, Fitzmaurice

M (eds) Fifty years of the International Court of Justice, essays in honour of Sir Robert

Jennings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 389–405

Thirlway H (1998) The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–89, part nine.

Br Year B Int Law 69:1–83

Thirlway H (2000) The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989,

part eleven. Br Year B Int Law 71:71–180


part twelve. Br Year B Int Law 72:37–181


part thirteen. Br Year B Int Law 74:7–114

Thirlway H (2009) Recommendations made by the International Court of Justice: a sceptical view.

Int Comp Law Q 58:151–162

Thirlway H (2012) Article 30. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds)



Thirlway H (2013) The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice. Oxford University

Press, Oxford

Tomuschat C (2002) The 1928 General Act for the Pacific settlement of international disputes

revisited. In: Ando N, McWhinney E, Wolfrum R (eds) Liber amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda.

Kluwer, The Hague, pp 977–994

Tomuschat C (2007) Reparations in cases of genocide. J Int Crim Justice 5:905–912

Bibliography 233

Torres Bernardez S (1995) L’intervention dans la procedure de la Cour internationale de Justice.


Torres Bernardez S (2002) Bilateral, plural and multipartite elements in international judicial

settlement. In: Ando N, McWhinney E, Wolfrum R (eds) Liber amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda.


Torres Bernardez S (2003) La modification des articles du Reglement de la Cour internationale de

Justice relatifs aux exceptions preliminaires et aux demandes reconventionnelles. Ann fr dr int

49: 207–247

Torres Bernardez S (2012) Article 48. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K,



Treves T (1997) Le Reglement du Tribunal international du droit de la mer entre tradition et

innovation. Ann fr dr int 43:341–367

Treves T (2003) The political use of unilateral applications and provisional measures proceedings.

In: Frowein J, Scharioth K, Winkelmann I, Wolfrum R (eds) Verhandeln fur den Frieden,

negotiating for peace – Liber Amicorum Tono Eitel. Springer, Berlin, pp 463–481

Treves T (2004) Provisional measures granted by an international tribunal pending the constitution

of an arbitral tribunal. In: Studi di diritto internazionale in onore di Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz.


Treves T (2009) Les mesures conservatoires au Tribunal du droit de la mer et a la Cour

Internationale de Justice: contribuition au dialogue entre cours et tribunaux internationaux.

In: Liber amicorum Jean-Pierre Cot. Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp 341–348

Triggs G, Bialek D (2002) Australia withdraws maritime disputes from the compulsory jurisdiction

of the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Int J

Mar Coast Law 17:423–430

Vagts D (1996) The international legal profession: a need for more governance? Am J Int Law

90:250–261

Valencia-Ospina E (1996) The use of chambers of the International Court of Justice. In: Lowe V,

Fiztmaurice M (eds) Fifty years of the International Court of Justice, essays in honour of Sir

Robert Jennings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 503–527

Valticos N (2003) Pratique et ethique d’un juge ad hoc a la Cour internationale de Justice.

In: Ando N, McWhinney E, Wolfrum R (eds) Liber amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda. Kluwer,

The Hague, pp 107–116

Verhoeven J (1983) A propos de la fonction de juger en droit international public. In: Gerard P,

Van de Kerkhove M, Ost F (eds) Fonction de juger et pouvoir judiciaire. Transformations et

deplacements Publications des Facultes Universitaires Saint Louis, Bruxelles, pp 447–468

von Mangoldt H, Zimmermann A (2012) Article 53. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-



Walter C (2012) Article 44. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds)



Watts A (2002) New practice directions of the International Court of Justice. Law Pract Int Courts

Tribunals 1:247–256

Wegen G (2012) Discontinuance and withdrawal. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-



Wittich S (2008) The judicial functions of the International Court of Justice. In: Buffard I,

Crawford J, Pellet A, Wittich S (eds) International law between universalism and fragmenta-

tion: Festschrift in honour of Gerhard Hafner. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 981–1000

Wolfrum R (2001) Intervention in the proceedings before the International Court of Justice and the

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. In: Rao PC, Khan R (eds) The International

Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: law and practice. Kluwer, The Hague, pp 161–172

234 Bibliography

Wolfrum R (2001) Provisional measures at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. In:

Rao PC, Khan R (eds) The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: law and practice.


Yee S (2009) Notes on the International Court of Justice (Part 3): rule-making at the Court –

integration, uniformization, keeping existing article numbers and giving public notice. Chin J

Int Law 8:681–694

Yee S (2012) Article 40. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K, Tams C (eds) The



Zafrulla Khan M (1975) The appointment of arbitrators by the President of the International Court

of Justice. Comunicazioni e studi 14:1021–1042

Zimmermann A (1990) Ad hoc-Kammern des Internationalen Gerichtshofes und Intervention –

Die Entscheidung im Streitfall vor dem IGH zwischen El Salvador und Honduras (Land, island

and maritime frontier dispute). Zeitschrift 50:646–660

Zimmermann A (1995) Die Zustandigkeit des Internationalen Gerichtshofes zur Entscheidung

uber Anspruche gegen am Verfahren nicht beteiligten Staaten. Zeitschrift 55:1051–1075

Zimmermann A, Geiss R (2012) Article 61. In: Zimmermann A, Tomuschat C, Oellers-Frahm K,



Zyberi G (2010) Provisional measures of the International Court of Justice in armed conflict

situations. Leiden J Int Law 23:571–584

Zyberi G (2013) Navigating the tension between effective and efficient legal counselling and

respecting the formal rules of the tribunals: what compass to use? ESIL2013 5th Research

Forum: International Law as a Profession Conference Paper No. 3/2013. Available at SSRN:

http://ssrn.com/abstract¼2363601

Bibliography 235



Table of Cases - Home - Springer978-3-319-06179-5/1.pdf · Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, ......

Documents

Transcript of Table of Cases - Home - Springer978-3-319-06179-5/1.pdf · Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, ......