Table - Comparative Analysis of the Functional Features of PM Software Packages

download Table - Comparative Analysis of the Functional Features of PM Software Packages

of 3

Transcript of Table - Comparative Analysis of the Functional Features of PM Software Packages

  • 7/29/2019 Table - Comparative Analysis of the Functional Features of PM Software Packages

    1/3

    Comparative analysis of the functional features of PM software packages1

    Parameters and Functions

    MS

    Project

    Spider

    Project

    Lite

    Primavera

    Project

    Management

    Open Plan

    Professional

    Spider Project

    Professional

    MSP SPL P6 OPP SPP

    STRUCTURES

    Portfolio Breakdown Structure Yes No Yes Yes Yes1

    Work Breakdown Structure Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes1

    Resource Breakdown Structure Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes1

    Cost Breakdown Structure No Yes Yes Yes Yes

    ACTIVITY TYPES

    Duration Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Effort Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Volume (physical) No Yes No No Yes

    Hammock (LOE) Yes

    2

    Yes Yes Yes YesSwitch No Yes No No Yes

    Milestone Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    RESOURCE TYPES

    Labor Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Material Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Production No No No No Yes

    Skills No Yes4 No Yes3 Yes4

    Multi-Resources (crews) No No No No Yes

    DEPENDENCIES

    Standard 4 types (FS, SS, FF, SF) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Time Lags Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Volume Lags No Yes No No Yes

    Strict Links No No No No Yes

    Conditional Dependencies No Yes No No Yes

    Multiple Links No Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Double Dependencies No Yes No No Yes

    Dependency Filters No Yes No No Yes

    RESOURCE ASSIGNMENTS

    Individual Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Multi-Resources No No No No Yes

    Independent teams (Shifts) No No No No Yes

    Partial Workload Yes Yes5 Yes Yes Yes5

    Predefined Workload Profile Yes No Yes Yes No

    Automatic Workload Profile Adjustment No No No Yes Yes

    Material Consumption Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Material Production No No No No Yes

    Materials consumed by Resources No Yes No No Yes

  • 7/29/2019 Table - Comparative Analysis of the Functional Features of PM Software Packages

    2/3

  • 7/29/2019 Table - Comparative Analysis of the Functional Features of PM Software Packages

    3/3

    Comparative analysis of the functional features of PM software packages3

    PROJECT PORTFOLIO

    Portfolio Scheduling and Leveling No No Yes Yes Yes

    Project Priorities Yes No Yes Yes Yes

    Portfolio Budget Yes No Yes Yes Yes

    Portfolio Budget by Cost Components and Centers No No No No YesPortfolio Cash Flow Including Profits Yes No No Yes Yes

    WORK THROUGH WWW

    Monitoring Performance Yes Yes10 Yes Yes Yes10

    Remote Work With Project Model No Yes10 Yes No Yes10

    Graphical Reports

    Activity Gantt Chart Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    Resource Gantt Chart No Yes No No Yes

    Material Gantt Chart No Yes No No Yes

    Network Diagram Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    WBS and RBS Org Charts No Yes No No Yes

    Time-Location Chart (Linear Diagram) No Yes No No Yes

    Resource Histograms Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    S-Curves Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

    1 - unlimited number of parallel WBS, RBS and other structures in one project

    2 - may be created, does not work properly when resources are assigned.

    3 - for resources with the same productivity4 - resources of the same skill may have different productivities, automatic resource assignments based on skills and availability5 - simulation of quantities and workloads, not just total workload6 - cost accounts but not cost components, impossible to define that resource cost consists of salary, taxes, indirect costs etc.7 - working calendars take into account both activity and resource calendars8 - with the simulation of material supply or production9 - with the simulation of project financing and income10 - using FTP and FTPS, access directly from Spider Project without using third party software.