T602 l1intro
description
Transcript of T602 l1intro
![Page 1: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
INTRO TO THEOLOGYChallenges to ST
![Page 2: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTRO
Objectives: Understand what is theology. Distinguish between SYSTEMATIC theology and
other forms of theology, especially BIBLICAL theology.
Consider one contemporary challenge to Systematic Theology.
![Page 3: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
WHAT IS THEOLOGY?
Diversity of ways of defining it.
Approach 1: Emphasis on experience:
Schleiermacher: (1768-1834): “Christian doctrines are accounts of the Christian religious affections set forth in speech.”
Problems? Theology is made independent from the Bible. Suspends the question of truth. Places human experience at the center rather than
God.
![Page 4: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
WHAT IS THEOLOGY?
Approach 2: Emphasis on the situation or social context:
Gustavo Guttierrez: “Theology as a critical reflection on historical praxis is a liberating theology”
Rosemary Radford Ruether, “theology as critique of and emancipation from sexism.
Problems? Scripture is made secondary. What fills in the “content” as to what is
“liberating” or “emancipating”?
![Page 5: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
WHAT IS THEOLOGY?
Theology as Science: Charles Hodge (1797-1878): “The duty of the
Christian theologian is to ascertain, collect, and combine all the facts which God has revealed in the Bible.”
Problems? Could avoid the question of what it means today. Danger of simplistic proof-texting.
![Page 6: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
WHAT IS THEOLOGY?
Recommended approach: Human response to God’s communication. Gamble: “knowledge concerning God to the
extent that he has revealed himself.” Since such “communication” is expressed in
Scripture, then Scripture has a normative priority. Sola scriptura Basic idea: Scriptures are the final and ultimate
authority for the Christian Church. Includes: “sufficiency of scripture”: scripture contains
all the words of God we need for salvation, for trusting him perfectly and for obeying him perfectly” (ST, 127).
![Page 7: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
WHAT IS THEOLOGY?
Implications of such an approach? Seeks the truth of biblical revelation. Seeks to understand God’s revelation of himself
in the scriptures in ways appropriate to the “FORM” of communication (i.e. type of literature)
Reflects on the coherence and unity between the various teachings of Scripture.
It seeks to apply these teachings to life and to contemporary problems.
![Page 8: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
WHAT IS SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY?
Presuppositions of ST
Systematic
Historical
Philosophical
Biblical
![Page 9: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SOME DEFINITIONS:
Erickson Grudem Thoennes
“that discipline which strives to give a coherent statement of the doctrines of the Christian faith, based primarily on the Scriptures, placed in the context of culture in general, worded in contemporary idiom, and related to issues of life” (chap 1)
“Systematic theology is any study that answers the question, ‘what does the whole Bible teach us today?’ about any given topic?” (ST, 21)
“Systematic theology seeks to summarize biblical teaching on particular topics in order to draw definitive conclusions that intersect with life.” (ESV Bible)
![Page 10: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
KEY ELEMENTS
System Whole bible Q’s
Unity of Biblical
teachings
Contemporary issues
Worldview formation
![Page 11: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
BIBLICAL THEOLOGY
inductive• texts; authors
Redemptive history•progress
![Page 12: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
EXAMPLE: KINGSHIP
Patriarchs: no king
Prophecy about Judah
JudgesNeed for a
King
MonarchyDavidic King
Corrupt kings
![Page 13: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
EXAMPLE: KINGSHIP
Prophets:Root of JesseServant of the Lord
NT:Jesus –
kingship through suffering
Eschaton:consummatio
n
![Page 14: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
CHALLENGE – INTRO
“The simple fact is, we do not inhabit the ‘world-in-itself’; instead we live in a linguistic world of our own making. As Berger and Luckmann note, human reality is ‘socially constructed reality.’¹
“How can we seek truth in a multicultural world in which various communities offer diverse theological paradigms? In other words, does theology speak about anything objective, or does it content itself with merely articulating the interpretive framework of a specific religious tradition?”
![Page 15: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
CHALLENGE TO ST: POSTMODERNISM
“Donald G. Bloesch: “a strongly rationalist spirit can even be
discerned” within evangelical theology. “a cluster of significant evangelical writers have,
implicitly or explicitly, drawn on assumptions associated with the Enlightenment, rather than the Christian tradition.”
Carl Raschke Evangelical theology is captive to “secular
philosophy.” In particular, a specific view of knowledge: as a
kind of “seeing;” goal : have a “clear and precise picture of what one is viewing” (p. 213).
![Page 16: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
CLARIFICATION
Modernism Postmodernism
Confidence in reason’s ability to obtain truth
• Less confidence in what reason can do
• Multiple-ways of knowing
Universal principles of rationality
Knowledge is perspectival
The interpreter should be neutral; objective
• Interpreter is conditioned by worldviews; history
• Plurality of voices
Method is very important Open to different approaches
![Page 17: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
TOWARDS A RESPONSE:
Strengths of postmodernism: 1. It is critical of some of the values of modernity:
Human reason the final judge of truth. Science as the only method for obtaining knowledge.
2. Rightly emphasizes that our beliefs are shaped by culture, heritage & community.
3. Institutions & traditions can become corrupt.
![Page 18: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
TOWARDS A RESPONSE 1. Moves in the direction of relativism.
Relativism is self-refuting. Example: “The truth is that there is no truth” (Caputo,
Radical Hermeneutics, 156). Relativism destroys genuine communication. It is possible to distinguish between better and worse
interpretations. 2. It emphasizes unnecessary extremes: either
absolute knowledge or full blown relativism. “Since no reading can escape correction, all readings
are misinterpretations” (Culler, On Deconstruction, 178)
A middle way: I can have SOME true knowledge about SOME thing.
![Page 19: T602 l1intro](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082919/553b70044a7959ac798b4692/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
TOWARDS A RESPONSE:
The possibility of systematic theology: Interpretive realism
Acknowledges that we are conditioned. Open to the possibility of discovering truth Our knowledge is Adequate not exhaustive
The basic premise is of a living God who communicates meaningfully to humans. Meaningful communication presupposes certain
standards of rationality. Theology seeks to be “rational” NOT “rationalistic.”
Necessity of ST: Everyone embraces some “theology” Key issue: Is it biblical? Is it consistent?