Systems Engineering Update AAC Industry Day 18 Mar 08
description
Transcript of Systems Engineering Update AAC Industry Day 18 Mar 08
Air Armament CenterAir Armament Center
Mr. John MistrettaTechnical Director, AAC/EN850-883-3700
War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Systems Engineering Systems Engineering
UpdateUpdateAAC Industry DayAAC Industry Day
18 Mar 0818 Mar 08
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Outline
• Systems Engineering Assessment (SEA)– AAC SEA Updates/Progress– AF SEA
• Systems Engineering Plans (SEP)– AAC SEP Activities– Zero Baseline Documentation (ZBD)/Center SEP Initiative
• Systems Engineering Improvement Activities– D&SWS Improvement Opportunities – TRA/MRA Updates
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
AAC Systems Engineering Assessment“Spiral I SEA”
Standardized / Summarized Policy & Processes (06)Interfaced with Industry and Government: (06/07)Developed Focused SE Training (06)Conducted Spiral I SEAs
Identified Program Specific Findings & Recommendations (06)Hosted Workshops Sharing Lessons Learned & Best Practices (07)Advised / Consulted on Action Plans (07)
Streamlined Module Based on Feedback & Lessons Learned (07)Expanded Module to Include Manufacturing & Sustainment (07)Fielded as “Spiral II SEA” (07)
FY06-07 Improvement Activities
Program Support
Guides & Tools
Enterprise Support
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Key Process Areas
• Technical Processes– Requirements– Design– Verification/Validation– Transition
• Technical Management Processes– Planning– Risk Management– Configuration Management– Decision Analysis– Technical Assessment
• Technical Processes– Requirements– Design– Verification/Validation– Manufacturing– Fielding & Follow-on
Sustainment
• Technical Management Processes– Planning– Risk Management– Configuration Management– Decision Analysis– Technical Assessment
Spi
ral 1
Spi
ral 2
& 3
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
FY08 AAC SEA Activities“Spiral II SEA”
• Two New Process Areas Successfully Piloted– Manufacturing, Fielding & Follow-on Sustainment– Completed HTS as Beta Program, Jan 08
• Synchronize Spiral II SEA w/IA Tools– Manufacturing element w/MRA tool– Sustainment element w/LHA tool
• Support Assessments as Requested by PMs– Updates to Spiral I – Emerging Programs may have Full Assessments
• e.g., CRIIS, SDB II
• Ensure Effective Transition to Spiral III
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
AF Standard SEA“Spiral III SEA”
• Champions: SAF/AQR & AFMC/EN
• Objective: Develop a common assessment methodology using the Defense Acquisition Guidebook, AFI 63-1201, and current SE best practices as a baseline
• Participants: SAF/AQR, HQ AFMC Staff, all AFMC Product & Logistic Centers, Space and Missile Center
• Targeted as the AAC Spiral III SEA
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
AF Approach FY08-09
• AAC SEA Module Identified as Best Practice– Serving as foundation for AF SEA module
– Valuable additions from all Centers
• Develop Implementation Plan– Develop scoring criteria and assessment methods
– Train Center ENs & affected organizations
– Run pilot test
• Plan for 4 program assessments
• Compare results of all assessments
SEA Complementary to SEPs
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
System Engineering Plans (SEP)
• DoD/AF Policy Requires SEPs
– Applicable to All ACAT Levels
– Required Content Areas/Topics Identified
– AAC Programs Generated 17 SEPs in CY 07
• All Signed by Program Milestone Decision Authority
• Captured Government and Contractor Information
– Leveraged Existing Program Data
• Completion Tracked/Reported at AFMC & SAF
• Used the AAC SEP Guide
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
• AFMC/EN Developed Coordination Guidance (6 Feb 2008)
– Clarification of current SAF SEP policy
– Cross Center coordination/signatures
– Joint program coordination/signatures
– Center ENs keep e-copy of approved SEP & submit to AFMC/EN
System Engineering Plans (SEP)
Zero Baseline Documentation (ZBD) Effort Driving Future SEP Approach
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
ZBD Background
• D&SWS related initiative led by the Deputy PEO for Weapons, Ms Judy Stokley, for Ms Payton
• Driven by redundancy and burden of large number of required program plans/ documentation and excessive staffing lead time
• April 07 SAF/AQ Memo– Identify minimum documentation– Minimum coordination levels
• Nov 07 SAF/AQ Memo– Endorsement of AFPEO/WP implementation plan– Supports development of AAC Center SEP
Create a Center SEP that captures Standard Work
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Center SEP
• Goal: Single document that will be
accepted/acknowledged by AFPEO/WP, SAF/AQ, and
OSD as the standard SE work/processes for armament
and support systems
• Benefit: Get it right now and NO comprehensive SEP
writing will be required for new programs. Minimal
program specific tailoring will be captured.
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
SEP Approach
• Approach:
– Integrated 308th and AAC/EN Team
– Use AAC SEP outline as starting point for Center SEP
– Develop material – address sections with standard work potential
– Use source documents to capture common processes
– Translate common processes into “standard” processes applicable to AAC’s portfolio and all ACAT levels
– Identify sections to capture in LCMP
• Source Documents:– AAC SEP Guide
– Existing SEPs (e.g. JASSM, JDAM, SDB2, AMRAAM, HTS)
– 693 ARSS/HTS Operating Instructions
– OSD SEP Guide, AFI 63-1201, AFMCI 63-1201
– AFPEO/WP Independent Review Team – implementation recommendations
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
AAC SEP Content Assessment • 1 Introduction• 1.1 Program Description and Applicable Documents• 1.1.1 Program Description #• 1.1.2 Applicable Documents #• 1.1.3 Program Technical Status as of the SEP Date #• 1.1.4 Approach for SEP Updates• 1.2 System Capabilities, Require and Design
Considerations• 1.2.1 Capabilities to be Achieved #• 1.2.2 Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) #• 1.2.3 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements #• 1.2.4 Certification Requirements #• 1.2.5 Design Considerations• 2 Engineering Organization• 2.1 Integrated Product Teams• 2.1.1 IPT Structure #• 2.1.2 Coordination #• 2.1.3 Integration• 2.2 Technical Authority and Organizational
Responsibilities• 2.2.1 Authority• 2.2.2 Responsibilities and Roles• 2.3 Technical Staffing Plan #• 3 Systems Engineering Processes• 3.0.1 Process Selection #• 3.0.2 Process Improvement• 3.1 Technical Processes• 3.1.1 Requirements Development and Management• 3.1.2 Design• 3.1.3 Verification and Validation (V&V) #• 3.1.4 Transition to Production (Manufacturing) #
STANDARD WORK CANDIDATES (26)
65% of SEP Content
• 3.2 Enabling Processes• 3.2.1 Planning• 3.2.2 Risk Management #• 3.2.3 Decision Analysis (Approach for Trades) #• 3.2.4 Systems Engineering Tools and Resources• 3.3 Technical Baseline Management• 3.3.1 Configuration Management #• 3.3.2 Configuration Change Assessment #• 3.3.3 Configuration Baselines• 3.3.4 Technical Data Management #• 3.4 Technical Reviews and Assessments• 3.4.1 Technical Review Plan (Strategy and Approach)• 3.4.2 Technical Review Authorities• 3.4.3 Participants• 3.4.4 Technical Assessment #• 4 Integrated Acquisition Management• 4.1 Acquisition and Contract Strategies• 4.1.1 Acquisition Strategy #• 4.1.2 Contract Management #• 4.2 Risk Management Integration #• 4.3 Program Planning and Tracking (IMP/IMS/EVMS) #• 5 Life Cycle Logistics and Sustainment• 5.1 OSS&E Baseline Document (OBD)• 5.2 Inspections and Maintenance #• 5.3 Sources of Supply, Maintenance and Repair #
PROGRAM UNIQUE CONTENT (14) # DUPLICATION WITH LCMP (25)
63% of SEP Content NOT INCLUDED IN CALCULATIONS
ZBD INITIATIVE CREATING:- OPPORTUNITIES FOR STREAMLINING
- DOCUMENT COORDINATION INTERDEPENDENCIES
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
Additional SE 08 Initiatives
• Evaluating Emerging TRA/MRA Material
– Closely Engaged with D&SWS
– Update/Improve the AAC IA Processes/Guides
• Establishing TRA/MRA Training
– Multiple Levels
– Appropriate for PM, Acquisition Engineers and Logisticians
• “Off Program” SMEs at Technical Reviews
– Complements the IA Process
War-winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost
What Can Industry Do?
• Share Lessons Learned & Best Practices
• Work with Us to Institutionalize SE Across Our
Integrated Teams
• Flow SE Discipline Down the Supply Chain
• Include Good SE Processes in Best Value Proposals
Help Us Restore Credibility in Our Collective Processes