System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004
-
Upload
cameron-thomas -
Category
Documents
-
view
32 -
download
0
description
Transcript of System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator.
System Level Accountability Measures
October 18, 2004
Slide 2
ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATOR:ACCESS TO PROGRAMS & COURSES
• Measure 1D: Student Retention Rates
– Core Measures
• Measure 1D1 – Percent Graduated
• Measure 1D2 – Percent Retained
• Measure 1D3 – Percent Transferred
• Measure 1D4 – Success Rate
– Contextual Measures
• Graduation and Transfer-Out Rates for similar institutions
• Retention rates will be available in the future
Slide 3
MEASURE 1D: DATA SOURCES & REPORTING LEVELS
• Three data sources– ISRS Student Subsystem
– National Student Clearinghouse
– Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
• Reporting Levels– System level
– Institution Type
– Admission status
– Full-Time & Part-Time
– Race-Ethnicity
– Low Income
Slide 4
MEASURE 1D: DEFINITIONS
• Cohort: Entering students in a specified term.
• Graduated: The cumulative percentage of students in the cohort that have graduated by the end of the specified term.
• Retained: The percentage of students in the cohort that have not graduated and are enrolled during the specified term.
Slide 5
MEASURE 1D: DEFINITIONS
• Transferred: The cumulative percentage of students in the cohort that have not graduated and are not enrolled but have enrolled at another U.S. institution.
• Success: The cumulative percentage of students in the cohort that have graduated or transferred plus the percent enrolled during a specific term.
Slide 6
FALL ENTERING STUDENT COHORTS
57,55763,841 64,716 67,549 68,202 69,451
57,413
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Measure 1D Cohort
Slide 7
COHORTS INCLUDE FOUR SUB-COHORTS
College-FT 26,543 38%
College-PT 22,556 32%
University-FT 13,741
20%
University-PT 6,611
10%
Total Entering Students = 69,451 in Fall 2003
Slide 8
SUCCESS RATES DIFFER BY SUBCOHORT
48.4%
57.2%
28.9%
73.6%
33.6%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Su
cc
es
s R
ate
(%
)
System College Full-Time College Part-TimeUniversity Full-Time University Part-Time
Fall 2001 Success Rates in Second Spring
Slide 9
SUCCESS RATE OF FALL 1997 COHORT DURING 6 YEARS FOLLOWING ENTRY:
COLLEGES FULL-TIME
6%
24%
34% 37% 38% 39%
80%
27% 8% 4% 2% 2%
2%
2%1% 1% 1%
2%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1st Spring 2nd Spring 3rd Spring 4th Spring 5th Spring 6th Spring
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredFall 1997 UG Regular
41.9%41.4%41.7%44.2%
53.7%
87.5%
Slide 10
SUCCESS RATE OF FALL 1997 COHORT DURING 6 YEARS FOLLOWING ENTRY:
UNIVERSITIES FULL-TIME
0% 2% 5%13%
37%
47%
93%
67%55%
43%
18%
6%
3%
2%2%
1% 2%
3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1st Spring 2nd Spring 3rd Spring 4th Spring 5th Spring 6th Spring
Su
cc
es
s R
ate
(%
)
Graduated Retained Transferred
Fall 1997 UG Regular
62.1% 57.7% 55.5% 54.6%
71.6%
95.8%
Slide 11
INCREASING RETENTION & SUCCESS RATES AFTER TWO YEARS:
COLLEGES FULL-TIME
24.2% 25.1% 23.1% 23.2% 23.0%
27.2% 27.8% 29.1% 30.4% 31.7%
2.3% 2.5% 2.7% 2.9%2.4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Fall 1997 Fall 1998 Fall 1999 Fall 2000 Fall 2001
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredUG Regular – Five Cohorts Rate at Second Spring
53.7% 55.1% 54.8% 56.3% 57.6%
Slide 12
INCREASING RETENTION & SUCCESS RATES AFTER TWO YEARS:
UNIVERSITIES FULL-TIME
2.4% 1.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4%
66.7% 68.0% 69.6% 69.0% 69.1%
2.9% 2.6% 3.2% 3.7%2.5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Fall 1997 Fall 1998 Fall 1999 Fall 2000 Fall 2001
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredUG Regular – Five Cohorts Rate at Second Spring
71.6% 72.1% 72.4% 72.4% 73.2%
Slide 13
SUBSTANTIAL UNKNOWN RACE-ETHNICITY
White 18,088 88%
Students of Color
2,104 10%
Non-Resident 362 2%
Total FT UG Regular = 28,427 in Fall 2001
Unknown 7,873 28%
Known Race-
Ethnicity 20,554 72%
Slide 14
STUDENTS OF COLOR
American Indian 318
15%
Asian 611 29%
Black or African
American 864 41%
Hispanic 311 15%
Total FT UG Regular Students of Color = 2,104 in Fall 2001
Slide 15
SUCCESS RATES VARY BY RACIAL-ETHNIC GROUP
COLLEGE FULL-TIME
23.0%12.3% 12.0% 7.1%
18.3%27.2%
16.6%
31.7%
27.5%
46.3%
36.4%
31.3%
31.6%
29.1%
3.0%
1.8%
5.1%4.4%
2.6%
3.5%
2.9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Total Am.Indian
Asian Black Hispanic White Unknown
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredFall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring
57.6%
42.8%
60.1%
54.0%
61.3%
48.5% 49.2%
Slide 16
SUCCESS RATES VARY BY RACIAL-ETHNIC GROUP
COLLEGE PART-TIME
5.0%0.6% 3.4% 2.7% 3.0%
6.7%3.0%
23.5%
18.8%
30.6% 30.1% 31.0%27.1%
14.5%
5.6%
2.2% 3.0% 1.5% 2.4%
3.5%
2.8%
0%
20%
40%
Total Am.Indian
Asian Black Hispanic White Unknown
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredFall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring
31.4%
25.0%
36.1% 35.5% 36.2%35.8%
21.1%
Slide 17
SUCCESS RATES VARY BY RACIAL-ETHNIC GROUP UNIVERSITY FULL-TIME
0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.5%
69.1%57.1%
65.2% 60.3%66.1% 70.6% 67.0%
4.1%
3.6%2.7%
1.7%3.5% 4.1%3.7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Total Am.Indian
Asian Black Hispanic White Unknown
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredFall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring
73.2%
61.2%
68.8% 67.8%74.5%
63.0%71.7%
Slide 18
ONE-QUARTER OF FULL-TIME STUDENTS ARE LOW INCOME
LOW INCOME = PELL GRANT
College-Low Income 7,226 19%
College-Not Low Income 17,009 45%
University-Low Income
2,915 8%
University-Not Low Income
10,666 28%
Total FT Entering Students = 37,816 in Fall 2001
Slide 19
SUCCESS RATES BY INCOME CATEGORY
COLLEGE FULL-TIME & PART-TIME
23.0% 21.9% 23.6%
5.0% 5.4% 5.0%
31.7% 32.5% 31.3%
23.5%
36.9%
21.2%
2.7% 3.0%
2.8%
2.8%
2.8%
2.9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Total-FT LowIncome-FT
Not LowIncome-FT
Total-PT LowIncome-PT
Not LowIncome-PT
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained Transferred
Fall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring
57.6% 57.1% 57.8%
45.1%
29.0%31.4%
Slide 20
SYSTEM GRADUATION RATES ARE HIGHER THAN THOSE OF
SIMILAR INSTITUTIONS
32.1%
41.3%
24.4%
38.9%
0%
20%
40%
Public Two-Year Colleges Public Four-Year Universities
Gra
du
atio
n R
ate
(%)
Minnesota U.S.IPEDS 2001 Graduation rates
Slide 21
NEXT STEPS
• Develop contextual data for similar institutions on retention rates
• Measure 1C3: Cumulative Debt Burden of Graduates
• Measure 5B: Course Transfer