Synthesis of nano-carbons from different waste plastics and …cj... · 2019-02-13 · pyrolysis of...
Transcript of Synthesis of nano-carbons from different waste plastics and …cj... · 2019-02-13 · pyrolysis of...
SYNTHESIS OF NANO-CARBONS FROM DIFFERENT WASTE PLASTICS AND
DIVERSE CATALYSTS
A Thesis Presented
By
Zixiang Wei
To
The Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
In partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of
Master of Science
in
Mechanical Engineering
in the field of
Thermofluids
Northeastern University
Boston, Massachusetts
(December 2017)
ii
ABSTRACT
Polymers have important and widespread applications in modern materials due to their
excellent formability, chemical stability, light weight and low cost. Their production has
increased exponentially over the last 60 years after their introduction to the markets from
1.5 million tons/year in 1950 to 322 million tons per year in 2015. Polymeric materials are
often discarded after a single use, and post-consumer waste has become a very serious
environmental problem, as it is no-biodegradable. Therefore, different recycling, reuse and,
even upcycling methods for waste plastics have been investigated. This research aimed at
systematically investigating the influence of the types of stainless steel catalysts and their
pretreatment on the formation of nanotubes. The targeted polymer feedstocks were post-
consumer polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PETE), polypropylene (PP) and
polystyrene (PS) as pellets, clippings or powders. The polymers were pyrolyzed in an inert
nitrogen atmosphere in an electrically heated furnace kept at 800 °C. Their effluent gases
from this furnace, containing the gaseous pyrolyzates of the polymers, were then channeled
to a separate electrically-heated furnace, were the catalyst substrates were heated to 800
°C. Therein synthesis of carbon nanotubes took place by chemical vapor deposition (CVD)
in nitrogen. The catalytic substrates used for the nanoparticle growth were T304, T316,
and T316L stainless steel meshes. The substrates were used as received, or pretreated by
acid wash and/or heat-treated in air or in nitrogen at 800 °C. The produced nanomaterials
were characterized by the use of SEM and TEM.
Keywords: Polymer, Environment, Carbon Nanotubes, Pyrolysis, Waste plastic
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to appreciate my advisor, Professor Yiannis A. Levendis, for his excellent
guidance, caring and patience.
I would like to thank my lab mate Aidin Panahi for his support and technical assistance.
Finally, I would like to thank my family for all of their love and support throughout my
life.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... iii
LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... v
LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... vii
Chapter 1 (Introduction) .................................................................................................. 1
Chapter 2 (Comparison of different pre-treatment methods for different catalysts to
generate CNT from polyethylene) ................................................................................... 8
2.1 Methods ............................................................................................................... 8
2.1.1 Preparation of samples ............................................................................... 8
2.1.2 Experimental Apparatus ............................................................................ 8
2.2 Experimental Results ......................................................................................... 9
2.3 Discussion .......................................................................................................... 11
Chapter 3 (Comparison of different catalysts and waste plastics to generate CNTs)
........................................................................................................................................... 14
3.1 Methods ............................................................................................................. 14
3.1.1 Preparation of samples ............................................................................. 14
3.1.2 Experimental Apparatus .......................................................................... 15
3.2 Experimental Results ....................................................................................... 16
3.2.1 Polyethylene ............................................................................................... 17
3.2.2 Polypropylene ............................................................................................ 20
3.2.3 Polystyrene................................................................................................. 22
3.2.4 Polyethylene terephthalate ....................................................................... 24
3.2.5 Mixed Polymers ......................................................................................... 26
3.3 Discussion .......................................................................................................... 28
CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................. 33
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 34
v
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 World plastics production 1950 – 2015 [25]. ...................................................... 2
Figure 2 World plastics production by area 2006 – 2015 [25] .......................................... 2
Figure 3 World plastics materials demand 2015 by types [25].......................................... 3
Figure 4 Harmful plastic treatment method (a) landfilling, (b) burning ............................ 4
Figure 5 Total plastics waste and recovery 2006 – 2014 [25] ........................................... 5
Figure 6 Sketch of the experiment apparatus ..................................................................... 9
Figure 7. The yield of CNT on different stainless steel catalyst meshes prepared by
different pre-treatment methods a, b, c, d and e, which are described in Table 2. ........... 10
Figure 8 The SEM pictures of the surfaces by different pre-treatment methods ............. 13
Figure 9 SEM images of (a) T304 SS, (b) T316 and (c) T316L SS meshes (woven cloths)
used in this study as catalyst substrates for CNT growth ................................................. 15
Figure 10 SEM and TEM photographs of CNTs grown on different catalysts from PE
feedstock ........................................................................................................................... 18
Figure 11 The (a) yield and (b) physical parameters of CNTs from PE pyrolyzates ...... 19
Figure 12 SEM and TEM photographs of CNT grown on different catalysts from PP
feedstock ........................................................................................................................... 20
Figure 13 The (a) yield and (b) physical parameters of CNTs from PP pyrolyzates ....... 21
Figure 14 SEM and TEM photographs of CNT grown on different catalysts from PS
feedstock ........................................................................................................................... 22
Figure 15 The (a) yield and (b) physical parameters of CNT from PS pyrolyzates ........ 23
Figure 16 SEM and TEM photographs of CNT grown on different catalysts from PETE
feedstock ........................................................................................................................... 24
vi
Figure 17 The (a) yield and (b) physical parameters of CNT by pyrolysis of PETE ...... 25
Figure 18 T SEM and TEM photographs of CNT grown on different catalysts from mixed
feedstock (PE, PP, PS and PETE) ..................................................................................... 26
Figure 19 The (a) yield and (b) physical parameters of CNT by pyrolysis of mixture
plastics............................................................................................................................... 27
Figure 20 Comparison of the CNT yield by pyrolysis different plastics ......................... 29
Figure 21 Comparison of the CNT diameters by pyrolysis of different polmers ............ 30
Figure 22 Comparison of the CNT thickness by pyrolysis of the different polymers ..... 31
Figure 23 TEM images about the quality of the CNT: (a) the inner structure of CNT; (b)
dopant in CNT................................................................................................................... 32
vii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Chemical composition of different stainless steels .............................................. 8
Table 2 Pre-treatment methods and the marks ................................................................. 10
Table 3 Chemical composition of different polymers ...................................................... 14
1
Chapter 1
(Introduction)
Energy consumption:
Energy demand has been increasing rapidly from the industrial revolution. Fossil fuels such
as coal, natural gas, and petroleum have been considered as the main energy resources in
modern times. Coal plays an important role in the power generation, and nearly 40% of
electricity is currently generated by coal in the world [1]. Due to increasing amounts of
greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere [2-6], an emerging challenge in the 21st Century is to
identify alternative fuels that can partially replace fossil fuels. This issue has motivated
researchers to examine the feasibility of utilization of renewable fuels in utility and
industrial furnaces. Biomass is an attractive renewable energy source [7-11]. Also,
alternative fuels can be found in municipal/industrial recycling and waste streams. Post-
consumer plastics is one of those materials that has been studied extensively as an
alternative fuel at Northeastern University’s Combustion & Air Pollution laboratory [12-
19].
Plastics and plastic waste:
Plastics, which are a man-made materials with long chain polymeric molecules [20], have
become one of the most important materials in human’s daily utilization since the1940s
[21] because of their chemical stability, formability and low cost [22-24]. The compound
annual growth rate of plastics production is about 8.6% from 1950 to 2015, see Fig 1. The
2
distribution of plastics production is shown in Fig 2 where it can be seen that China,
Europe, and North America were the top three plastics producers in the world in the year
2015 [25].
Figure 1 World plastics production 1950 – 2015 [25].
Figure 2 World plastics production by area 2006 – 2015 [25]
3
There are many different types of plastics, which are defined by their chemical
composition. Different plastics have different properties, and this makes them have
different application fields. Fig 3 shows that polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE) and
polypropylene (PP) are most commonly used. Plastics find widespread applications and
since, their production is of low cost they are often discarded upon single use, generating
voluminous wasted.
Figure 3 World plastics materials demand 2015 by types [25]
Since plastics resist natural degradation, the plastic wastes increase is a serious
environmental problem, contributing to air pollution [26], soil pollution and marine
pollution [27-29]. Landfilling, incineration, and recycling are three common methods to
deal with plastic waste. Plastic landfilling will lead a very serious soil pollution and reduce
the available land space for humans, as illustrated in Fig 4 a [30]. Uncontrolled open-air
4
burning of wastes plastics, shown in Fig 4 b, generates air pollution because of incomplete
combustion [26] and may produce some toxic matters like dioxins.
(a) (b)
Figure 4 Harmful plastic treatment method (a) landfilling, (b) burning
Recycling is considered as an environment-friendly method to dispose of the plastic waste.
Recycling also can help to improve the efficiency of using petroleum. Biological recycling
of biodegradable plastics is degrading of the waste plastic by microorganisms [30-35].
Mechanical methods are used to collect, re-manufacture waste plastic without any chemical
changes [21, 36-38]. Some chemical processes, such as pyrolysis, are used to decompose
plastic into hydrocarbon, hydrogen and some other monomers or compounds. The rate of
recycling waste plastic has increased in recent years, as shown in Fig 5. However,
landfilling still possesses a definite proportion. Finding different applications to recycle the
waste plastic is also very important. There are some researches that use the pyrolyzates as
fuel [39, 40]. This applications can be considered as an alternative energy resource to
reduce the pressure of using fossil fuel. The pyrolyzates from the chemical recycling of
waste plastic has also important applications, such as generating gaseous and liquid fuels
[39, 40] [41-46] and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [12-16].
5
Figure 5 Total plastics waste and recovery 2006 – 2014 [25]
What are Carbon Nanotubes?
Iijima [47] first discovered CNTs in 1991. CNT is a micrometer-scale graphene sheet rolled
into a cylinder of nanoscale diameter and capped with spherical fullerene molecules [48].
CNTs have excellent thermal and electrical conductivity, high tensile strength, thermal and
chemical stability and some other physical and chemical properties [49-60] which make
CNTs is one of the most applicable nanomaterials in the last two decades. CNTs have a
wide range of potential application in composite materials, microelectronics,
electrochemistry (batteries and solar cell) and biological field [61-80]. Laser ablation of
carbon [81-83], carbon-arc discharge [47, 76, 84-86] and chemical vapor deposition (CVD)
[87-89] are three usual methods to generate CNTs. Purification and non-limitation of the
sample size make CVD more popular than the other two methods to generate CNTs [90].
The carbonaceous feedstock to generate CNT by CVD comprise a wide range of
hydrocarbons, such as C2H2, CH4, benzene, etc. [91-95].
6
Previous work on post-consumer plastics:
The carbonaceous gas is used by the CVD process as a carbon donor for the generation of
the CNTs. The concept of synthesis of CNT from plastic waste has been ongoing since
1996 [96] because the most of the plastic pyrolyzation is a mixture of hydrocarbons (gas
phase and liquid phase) [97-101]. In recent years there have been many attempts at
pyrolysis of different plastics such as polyethylene [102-105], polypropylene [102, 105,
106], polystyrene [107, 108], polyethylene terephthalate [109, 110] and different mixtures
of plastics [111, 112]. The pyrolysis products of plastics then can be used a carbon growth
agents for CNTs [19].
Previous work on Catalysts:
Selecting an appropriate catalyst is the most challenging part of generating CNT in CVD.
Metals such as nickel, iron and cobalt, as well as metallic compounds such as nickel oxides,
cobalt acetate, etc., have been used as a catalyst in the literature [93, 113-122]. Moreover,
stainless steels (types 304,316,316L) have been reported as feasible catalysts in CNT
synthesis from hydrocarbon carbon donors, such as C2H2, C6H6 and C2H6 [123-128] . A
review of the literature shows that there have been many attempts at improving the CNT
generation by using different pre-treatment methods [123, 125, 129-135] .
In the previous work in this laboratory, Zhuo et al. [136] have focused on the heat treatment
of stainless steel T316L to improve the CNT yield. Their heat treatment method improved
the CNT yield by 1.45%. Martínez-Hansen et al. [126] have used three steps of pre-
treatment including acid wash, oxidation by air and heat treating in H2 to pre-treat the
T316L stainless steel. This method improved the yield by 2%. Baddour et al. [127] have
7
applied a combination of washing the T304 stainless steel in acetone or acids and heat
treating in N2. Using this method, they reported 97% coverage of the catalyst with CNTs.
The goal of this research:
Previous research in this laboratory has been performed on the synthesis of CNTs from a
number of post-consumer plastics [12-16, 19, 137]. However, additional work was deemed
necessary on the selection of the right catalyst substrate and its appropriate pre-treatement
method in view of the work of Baddour et al. [127] and Zhuo et al. [136] to maximize the
CNT yield per unit area of catalyst. This was accomplished by applying different pre-
treatment methods on stainless steel meshes of three different types 304, 316 and 316L to
investigate their capability to generate CNT and thus obtain the maximum yield from
different post-consumer plastics. The targeted polymers were polyethylene (PE),
polyethylene terephthalate (PETE), polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS) in the size
range of a few millimeter pellets, powders, and debris. Considering difficulties of the waste
plastic separation into different categories in the recycling process, in this study, a mixture
of the aforesaid waste plastics, in equal proportions by mass, was also tested as a feedstock
for CNT generation on the stainless steel types 304,316 and 316L.
8
Chapter 2
Comparison of different pre-treatment methods for different
catalysts to generate CNT from polyethylene
2.1 Methods
2.1.1 Preparation of samples
Three different stainless steel (T304, T316 and T316L) meshes, procured from TWP Inc. (
T304 and T316) and Huaxin Hardware Inc. (T316L), were used as catalysts and the
chemical compositions are shown in Table 1. There it can be seen that T316 and T316L
have more Ni and less Cr than T304; moreover T304 doesn't have any Mo. T316L have
less Carbon than T316. All of the stainless steel mesh has the same size (400 per inch). The
meshes were cut into circular coupons with diameters of 38mm. The stainless steel meshes
were washed with isopropyl alcohol in an ultrasonic bath and, then, they were subjected to
different pretreatment methods. A fixed amount of 4 g of polyethylene was used in the
experiment as the feedstock. N2 which was procured from Medical-Technical Gases Inc.
was used as carrier gas and protection gas at the flow rate of 2 l/min.
Table 1 Chemical composition of different stainless steels
Grade (wt. %) C Si Mn P S Ni Cr Mo
304 0.08 1 2 0.045 0.03 8-10.5 18-20 /
316 0.08 1 2 0.045 0.03 10.0-14.0 16-18 2.00-3.00
316L 0.03 1 2 0.045 0.03 12.0-15.0 16-18 2.00-3.00
2.1.2 Experimental Apparatus
A specially designed quartz tube which is shown in Fig 6 was fitted inside two electrically-
heated furnace, from HEVI-DUTY ELECTRIC Co. The ceramic honeycomb filter which is
9
manufactured by Ibiden was used to prevent 97% soot that generated by pyrolysis process
[19]. The experiment procedure included two steps. The first step was pyrolysis and the
second step was CNT synthesis. For the pyrolysis process, Furnace 1 was preheated up to
800 °C and then a ceramic boat containing a certain mass of polymer was inserted into the
quartz tube in an inert N2 flow. The polymer was pyrolyzed into a gaseous hydrocarbon
mixture. The gaseous effluent then traversed the ceramic filter and transitioned into to the
second step, the synthesis process. Furnace 2 was also heated up to 800°C. When the
gaseous mixture traversed the treated catalyst meshes, which were placed at the center of
Furnace 2, the CNTs was generated at the surface of the catalyst by Chemical Vapor
Deposition (CVD).
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the surface of the stainless steel.
SEM (Hitachi S-4800) was used in these experiments to observe the coverage of the CNT.
The instrument was operated with a 3 kV of accelerating voltage, 10 µA of beam current
and 8.2 mm working distance.
Figure 6 Sketch of the experiment apparatus
2.2 Experimental Results
10
Four pre-treatment methods which, are described in Table 2, were used to generate CNTs.
Three different types of stainless steel meshes (T304, T316 and T316L) were used in these
experiments.
Table 2 Pre-treatment methods and the marks
Pre-treatment method label
No pre-treatment a
Acid (40% HCl) wash for 10 minutes b
Heat treatment in air at 800°C for 1 minute then quench c
Acid (HCl) wash for 10 minutes then heat treatment in air at 800°C for 1
minute and quench
d
Acid (HCl) wash for 10 minutes then heat treatment in N2 at 800°C for 30 min e
Fig 7 shows the yield of CNTs from pyrolysis of 4 g polyethylene feedstock. The yield is:
Yield = 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑁𝑇
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑠 × 100% (1)
Figure 7. The yield of CNT on different stainless steel catalyst meshes prepared by different pre-treatment methods a, b, c, d and e, which are described in Table 2.
11
2.3 Discussion
Fig 7 shows the yield of CNTs on the stainless steel catalyst substrates prepared by different
pre-treatment methods. The purpose of pre-treatment was to break the chromium oxide
layer at the surface of the stainless steel, to increase the surface roughness and to activate
the surface to act as a catalyst for CNT growth [136]. Figs. 8 a, b and c show SEM photos
of the original untreated surfaces of the three steels used in this investigation. Figs. 8 d, e
and f show the three steel surfaces after acid wash. It can be detected from Figs. 8 d, e and
f that the surface of T304 was affected the most by the Cl-ion environment generated by
the HCl acid, whereas T316 and T316 L were not visibly affected. This difference is
attributed to the fact that both T316 and T316L contain Mo element, which is known to
resist corrosion [138]. Acid wash can help to remove lipids and oxides from the surface of
the stainless steel, which can expose the metal alloy and promote the growth of CNT and
increase their yields, as shown in Fig. 7. Heat treatment in air was effective to alter the
surfaces of all types of stainless steel, as shown in Figs. 8 g, h and i. The effect of heat
treatment in air generated some nanoscale morphologies on the surfaces of the stainless
steel substrates, with grain size in the order of 50 nm. Figs. 8 j, k and l show the effects
the acid wash superimposed on heat treatment in air. Clearly the combined treatments
promoted the generation of bigger and more regular nanoscale morphologies, with grain
size in the order of 160 nm. The resulting substrates facilitated the synthesis of larger
quantities of CNTs than the case of heat treated in air alone, as attested by the yields
displayed in Fig. 7.
12
The effects of exposing the acid-treated samples to additional heat treatment in air or in
nitrogen are shown in Figs. 8 g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n and o. On one hand, the effects of
superimposing acid treatment to the heat treatment in air altered the surfaces of the T304
and T316 the most, but had little effect on the surface of the heat treated T316L. On the
other hand, the effects of superimposing acid treatment to the heat treatment in nitrogen
altered the surfaces of all steels. It becomes apparent by comparing Figs. 8 j, k and l and
Figs. 8 m, n and o that the surfaces of the steels exposed to air and nitrogen contained
grains of distinctly different types and shapes, the former containing spheroidal grains, the
latter more elongated rice-shaped grains. Given that the product CNT yields on the air
treated substrates was consistently higher than those in nitrogen, see Fig. 7, it can be
concluded that air was more successful to break the protective chromium oxide layer of the
stainless steel substrates, as also reported in Ref. [136].
13
Figure 8 The SEM pictures of the surfaces by different pre-treatment methods
14
Chapter 3
Comparison of different catalysts and waste plastics to
generate CNTs
3.1 Methods
3.1.1 Preparation of samples
Four common polymers (PE, PETE, PP and PS plastics) and their mixtures are used as
feedstock. The chemical composition of these polymers is shown in Table 3. In all
experiments, the mass of polymers was fixed (4 g of each plastic and 12 g of the plastic
mixture). Three different stainless steel (T304, T316 and 316L) meshes, which are shown
in Fig 9, were used as catalysts. All of the stainless steel meshes had the same size (400
per inch). The mesh wires had a diameter of 25 µm. The meshes were cut into circular
coupons with diameters of 38 mm. The coupons were first ultra-sonically washed with
isopropyl alcohol for 10 min and then they were treated with hydrochloric acid (40 vol%
HCl) for 10 min, and were heat treated in air at 800 C for 1 min and then air quenched. The
polymers were pyrolyzed in N2, which was procured from Medical-Technical Gases Inc.
at a flow rate of 2 l/min.
Table 3 Chemical composition of different polymers
Type of polymer Molecular formula
C
wt% H wt O
PE Polyethylene (C2H4)n 85.7% 14.3% 0
PETE Polyethylene terephthalate (C10H8O4)n 62.5% 4.17% 33.33%
PS Polystyrene (C8H8)n 92.3% 7.7% 0
PP Polypropylene (C3H6)n 85.7% 14.3% 0
15
Figure 9 SEM images of (a) T304 SS, (b) T316 and (c) T316L SS meshes (woven cloths) used in this study as catalyst substrates for CNT growth
3.1.2 Experimental Apparatus
A specially designed quartz tube which is showen in Fig 6 was fitted inside two electrically-
heated furnace, from HEVI-DUTY ELECTRIC Co. A ceramic honeycomb filter, which was
manufactured by Ibiden, was used to prevent 97% of any soot generated during the
pyrolysis process from entering the CNT synthesis chamber [19]. The experimental
procedures included two steps. The first step was pyrolysis and the second step was CNT
synthesis. Both steps were conducted in an inert nitrogen enviroment. For the pyrolysis
process, the first furnace was heated up to 800 °C, and then a ceramic boat containing a
certain mass of polymer was inserted into the quartz tube. The polymer was pyrolyzed into
a gaseous hydrocarbon mixture. The gaseous pyrolyzated then crossed the ceramic filter
and transited into the second step, the CNT synthesis process inside the second furnace,
which was also heated to 800°C. When the gaseous mixture crossed the treated catalyst
16
substrates, placed in the mid-length of the second furnace, the CNTs were generated at the
surface of the catalyst mesh wires by Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD).
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) were
used to observe the generated CNTs. A Hitachi S-4800 SEM instrument, operated at 3 kV
of accelerating voltage, 10 µA of beam current and 8.0 mm working distance, was used to
observe the coverage of the mesh with CNTs. Upon completion of experiments, the CNTs
were removed from the stainless steel mesh by sonication in 100% ethanol. A TEM (JEOL
1010 instrument) was used to detect the qualities and properties of CNTs, with 60- 65 kV
accelerating voltage and 60 µA beam current. ImageJ, an image analysis software by NIH,
was used to measure all the CNT parameters.
3.2 Experimental Results
In these experiments the following amounts of polymers were pyrolyzed: 4 g of PE, PP,
PS and PETE, as well as 12 g of mixtures of the four polymers in equal amounts.
For PE, PP and PS, the pyrolysis yields:
(CxHy)n → CaHb + H2 (1)
For PETE, the pyrolysis yields:
(C10H8O4)m → CaHb + CO + CO2 + H2 + H2O (2)
For the plastic mixture, the pyrolysis yields:
(CxHy)n + (C10H8O4)m → CaHb + CcHdOe + CO + CO2 + H2 +H2O (3)
For all plastics, the Chemical Vapor Deposition procedure yields:
17
CaHb → C + H2 (4)
3.2.1 Polyethylene
Fig 10 shows SEM and TEM pictures of CNTs grown on the catalytic substrates of T304,
T316 and T316L by pyrolysis of polyethylene (PE) feedstock. The SEM pictures show that
forests of CNTs were grown on all substrates, around the surfaces of the woven cloth wires.
CNT forests on T316 and T316L appear to be denser and the tubes appear to be longer than
the CNTs grown on T304. CNT forest density and length are two important factors that
impact the yield of the CNTs, which is shown in Fig 11 a. The SEM pictures also show
that the CNTs on T304 and T316 are ordered, vertically grown from the curved wire
surfaces, whereas the CNT at T316L appear to be relatively unordered. Fig 11 b also shows
the measured diameter and thickness (outer diameter – inner diameter) of the CNT at
different catalysts. From the table, the CNT yield on T316 is the highest, followed by that
on T316L, and then by that on T304. The tube thickness and diameter are the similarities
between different catalysts.
18
Figure 10 SEM and TEM photographs of CNTs grown on different catalysts from PE feedstock
19
(a)
(b)
Figure 11 The (a) yield and (b) physical parameters of CNTs from PE pyrolyzates
20
3.2.2 Polypropylene
Fig 12 shows SEM and TEM pictures of CNTs grown on T304, T316 and T316L
catalytic substrates by pyrolyzing polypropylene (PP) feedstock. The CNTs that were
generated from PP are very similar to the CNTs generated from PE. Again the CNTs
generated on T316 and T316L are longer and more densely-populated than the CNTs
generated on T304; the CNT generated on T304 and T316 are ordered appear to be
vertically grown from the wire surfaces, forming forests, whereas those grown on the
T316L are relatively unordered. Fig 13 shows the yield and qualities of the CNT.
Figure 12 SEM and TEM photographs of CNT grown on different catalysts from PP feedstock
21
(a)
(b)
Figure 13 The (a) yield and (b) physical parameters of CNTs from PP pyrolyzates
22
3.2.3 Polystyrene
Figure 14 shows SEM and TEM pictures of CNTs grown on T304, T316 and T316L
catalytic substrates by pyrolyzing polystyrene (PS) feedstock. Only the CNTs grown
on T316 are relatively densely populated and have the appearance of a forest. The
CNTs grown on T316L and T304 are sparse and unordered. Fig 15 a shows that the
yields of CNTs from PS pyrolyzates are lower than the yields of CNTs from both PP
and PE pyrolyzates. The pyrolyzates of polypropylene are composed of nearly 30% of
liquid oil, which contain styrene [139]. The oil fraction of the pyrolyzates is not utilized
in the generation of CNTs, hence the lower yields. Fig 15 b shows physical parameters
of the CNTs that are generated form PS feedstock.
Figure 14 SEM and TEM photographs of CNT grown on different catalysts from PS feedstock
23
(a)
(b)
Figure 15 The (a) yield and (b) physical parameters of CNT from PS pyrolyzates
24
3.2.4 Polyethylene terephthalate
Fig 16 shows SEM and TEM photographs of CNTs grown on the surfaces of T304,
T316 and T316L catalyst substrates by pyrolyzing polyethylene terephthalate (PETE)
feedstock. No CNTs were grown on T304, hence this catalyst is not included in this
figure. The CNTs on T316 and T316L are sparse and unordered. The yields of CNT
from PETE pyrolyzates, shown in Fig 17 a, were much lower than those obtained from
the other polymers. This was partly attributed to the fact that the pyrolyzates of PETE
contain large amounts of CO and CO2 and large amounts of solids and liquids that
cannot be utilized for CNT synthesis; also the pyrolyzates of PETE contain benzoic
acid that has been reported to be poisonous to the catalyst, and thus, to prevent CNT
growth [92, 110]. Fig 17 b also shows physical parameters of the CNTs that were
obtained for pyrolysis of PETE.
Figure 16 SEM and TEM photographs of CNT grown on different catalysts from PETE feedstock
25
(a)
(b)
Figure 17 The (a) yield and (b) physical parameters of CNT by pyrolysis of PETE
26
3.2.5 Mixed Polymers
In practice a lot of postconsumer plastics are collected in mixed form, therefore
generation of CNTs from mixed plastics was also examined. Fig 18 shows SEM and
TEM photographs of CNTs grown on T304, T316 and T316L substrates from pyrolysis
of 12 g mixed plastics feedstock, containing equal amounts of PE, PP, PS and PETE (4
g each). Fig 19 shows the yield and physical properties of these CNTs.
Figure 18 T SEM and TEM photographs of CNT grown on different catalysts from mixed feedstock (PE, PP, PS and PETE)
The yield and physical properties of the CNTs that were generated from the mixed
feedstock followed the same pattern as the CNTs produced from PP, PE and PS.
27
(a)
(b)
Figure 19 The (a) yield and (b) physical parameters of CNT by pyrolysis of mixture plastics
28
3.3 Discussion
A comparison of the aforesaid CNT yields reveals that for all polymer feedstock T316
seemed to be the most productive catalyst substrate, see Fig 20, and T304 was the least
productive. T136L was in between, albeit closer to T316. This variable performance
can be partly attributed to the fact that T316 and T316L contain molybdenum (Mo)
whereas T304 does not. Molybdenum element will generate molybdenum oxide at the
surface upon heat treatment in the air. Molybdenum oxides have been proven to be
effective catalysts to generate CNTs by CVD [140, 141]. This was identified as the
main reason that T316 and T316L yielded more CNT than T304 at the same experiment
conditions. The fact that T316 yield little more CNT than T316L may be due to the fact
that T316L has more nickel (Ni) element than T316, as listed in Table 1, Ni element in
alloy does not seem to be effective as a catalyst in the synthesis of CNTs from the
plastic pyrolyzates. This concept has been proved by experiments in the laboratory
where synthesis of CNTs was attempted on a nickel-rich alloy (67% Nickle) mesh and
failed. The mass of Ni reduces the mass fractions of other effective elements that can
be used as catalysts to synthesis CNT from plastic pyrolyzates. This is offered herein
as an apparent reason to explain why less CNT amounts were grown on the T316L than
on the T316 substrates.
A comparison of the CNT yields reveals that for the same catalyst substrates,
polypropylene was the most productive polymer feedstock, see Fig 20, followed by PE,
PS and then PETE. These differences in these yields are caused by the amounts and
compositions of the pyrolyzates. PP and PE feedstock contain high amounts of carbon
(85.7% each) and (hydrogen 14.3% each). Both pyrolyze effectively (95%) to gas at
29
800 °C to a variety of light hydrocarbons, including ethylene and propylene, which are
effective CNT growth agents [123]. Polystyrene contains more carbon, however, its
pyrolyzates contain oils and tars and, thus, less gas than the aforesaid polyolefins, hence
its CNT yields are also lower. The yields from PETE feedstock are much lower since
it contains even less carbon (62.5%) and its pyrolyzates contain only a limited fraction
of gas (less than half of the initial polymer mass [109, 110] and even that gas contains
mostly CO and CO2 [109, 110] and low amounts of light hydrocarbons, which are
effective CNT growth agents. The oil fraction contains oxygenated hydrocarbons such
as benzoic acid which has been shown to be harmful to the generation of CNTs
generating [92, 110].
Figure 20 Comparison of the CNT yield by pyrolysis different plastics
30
Fig 21 shows the diameters of the generated CNTs. For each polymer feedstock, the
diameters are remarkably similar for different similarly-treated catalysts. If feedstock
are compared, then the results show that the CNTs from pyrolysis of PP have the
minimum diameters (~40 µm), whereas the CNTs from pyrolysis of PETE have the
maximum diameters (~80 µm). This shows that the hydrocarbon pyrolyzates have an
important influence on the diameters of the generated CNTs. CNT with different
diameters have different potential applications. The results of these experiments may
be used as a reference for CNT application. For the mixture plastics, the CNTs appear
to be mixtures of CNTs with different diameters as the STDEV of these diameters is
the highest.
Figure 21 Comparison of the CNT diameters by pyrolysis of different polmers
31
For the mixed polymer runs 4 g PP, 4 g PP, 4 g PS and 4 g PETE were used. However,
the yield of CNTs from pyrolysis of the combined 12 g of the mixture is less than the
yield of CNTs from pyrolysis of 4 g PP or 4 g PE. The reason for this discrepancy is
that the polymer pyrolyzates are impacted by those of other plastics. Apparently, the
net result was a decrease in CNT yields. One possible reason may be the generation of
the problematic benzoic acid from the pyrolysis of PETE, as mentioned earlier. The
average diameter of the CNTs that were generated by the mixed polymers is near the
average of the CNTs generated form the four polymers. The thickness of the CNTs
follows the same trend with the diameter of the CNTs, as it shown in Fig 22.
Figure 22 Comparison of the CNT thickness by pyrolysis of the different polymers
Fig 23 a shows that the inner structure of the CNT is often segmented. Such a structure
is caused by the difference of the carbon diffusion rate between inner and outer layers
32
of the formed CNTs. Some caps were generated at the inner surfaces because the carbon
diffusion rate is slower at the inner space of the CNTs than at their outer space [123,
142-144]. Fig 23 b shows that there are some dark particles inside the CNTs. These
dark particles are metal morphologies that are formed by stretching forces. The surface
layers of the catalysts melt into a liquid phase at the CNT synthesis working
temperature (800 ºC) and then they are elongated by the stretching force and finally
break into nano-sized particles. The nano particles stay inside of the CNTs and move
with the growth of the CNTs [125, 145]. The segmented structure of the CNTs and the
metal morphologies cannot be avoided because of the CNT growth mechanism.
Figure 23 TEM images about the quality of the CNT: (a) the inner structure of CNT; (b) dopant in
CNT
33
CONCLUSIONS
• The most effective method for pretreating stainless steels as catalyst substrates for
CNT growth is washing by acid (40% HCl) for 10 minutes, heat treating in air for
1 minute and then air-quenching.
• For any given polymer, T316 achieved the highest yield of CNTs. The yield of
CNTs on T316L was less than T316, whereas T304 achieved the lowest yield of
CNTs.
• T316 and T304 were shown to achieve the growth of ordered forest-like CNTs,
whereas the CNTs grown on T316L were typically not ordered.
• The four polymer feedstock generated CNT yields in the following order:
PP>PE>PS>PETE.
• The four polymer feedstock generated CNTs with diameters and thicknesses in
the following order: PP<PE<PS<PETE.
• The CNT yields from mixed-polymer feedstock were higher than those from
PETE and PS, but lower than those of PE and PP.
• The average diameter of the CNTs generated from mixed-polymer feedstock
correspond to than average of the diameters of the CNTs generated from the
different polymer feedstock.
34
REFERENCES
[1] EIA U. State Energy Consumption Estimates 1960 Through 2014. DOE/EIA-0214;
2014.
[2] Rokni E, Panahi A, Ren X, Levendis YA. Curtailing the generation of sulfur
dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions by blending and oxy-combustion of coals.
Fuel 2016;181:772-84.
[3] Rokni E, Panahi A, Ren X, Levendis YA. Reduction of sulfur dioxide emissions by
burning coal blends. Journal of Energy Resources Technology
2016;138(3):032204.
[4] Levendis YA, Panahi A, Rokni E, Ren X. Emissions from Cofiring Coals. In:
Sakkestad BA, ed. 40th International Technical Conference on Clean Coal & Fuel
Systems. Clearwater, Florida, USA; 2015:533-44.
[5] Rokni E, Chi HH, Levendis YA. In-Furnace Sulfur Capture by Cofiring Coal With
Alkali-Based Sorbents. Journal of Energy Resources Technology
2017;139(4):042204.
[6] Rokni E, Levendis YA. Utilization of a High-Alkali Lignite Coal Ash for SO 2
Capture in Power Generation. Journal of Energy Engineering
2016;143(4):04016067.
[7] Panahi A, Levendis YA, Vorobiev N, Schiemann M. Direct observations on the
combustion characteristics of Miscanthus and Beechwood biomass including
fusion and spherodization. Fuel Processing Technology 2017;166:41-9.
35
[8] Rokni E, Ren X, Panahi A, Levendis YA. Emissions of SO 2, NO x, CO 2, and HCl
from Co-firing of coals with raw and torrefied biomass fuels. Fuel 2018;211:363-
74.
[9] Vorobiev N, Becker A, Kruggel-Emden H, Panahi A, Levendis YA, Schiemann M.
Particle shape and Stefan flow effects on the burning rate of torrefied biomass. Fuel
2017;210:107-20.
[10] Ren X, Meng X, Panahi A, Rokni E, Sun R, Levendis YA. HCl Release from
Combustion of Corn Straw in a Fixed Bed. Journal of Energy Resources
Technology 2017;140(5):051801.
[11] Panahi A, Levendis YA, Vorobiev N, Schiemann M, Scherer V. Combustion
Behaviors of a Herbaceous and a Woody Biomass. In: Sakkestad BA, ed. 41st
International Technical Conference on Clean Coal & Fuel Systems. Clearwater,
Florida, USA; 2016:62-72.
[12] Alves J, Zhuo C, Levendis Y, Tenorio J. Analysis of light hydrocarbon gases in the
pyrolysis and combustion processes of waste tires. Minerals, Metals and Materials
Society/AIME, 420 Commonwealth Dr., P. O. Box 430 Warrendale PA 15086
USA; 2010.
[13] Alves JO, Zhuo C, Levendis YA, Tenorio JAS. Analysis of light hydrocarbon gases
in the pyrolysis process of sugarcane bagasse. Tecnologia em Metalurgia, Materiais
e Mineracao 2010;20100726:766-73.
[14] Alves JO, Zhuo C, Levendis YA, Tenorio JA. Analysis and Control of Light
Hydrocarbon Gases in the Pyrolysis/Combustion Process of Several Solid Wastes.
EPD Congress 2011. Wiley Online Library; 2011:1005-12.
36
[15] Anaraki ST, Davies A, Zhuo C, Levendis YA. Waste-to-Energy Conversion by
Stepwise Liquefaction, Pyrolysis and “Clean Combustion” of Waste Plastics. 20th
Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference. American Society of
Mechanical Engineers; 2012:29-35.
[16] Soheilian R, Davies A, Talebi Anaraki S, Zhuo C, Levendis YA. Pyrolytic
Gasification of Post-consumer Polyolefins To Allow for “Clean” Premixed
Combustion. Energy & Fuels 2013;27(8):4859-68.
[17] Wang Z, Wang J, Richter H, Howard JB, Carlson J, Levendis YA. Comparative
study on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, light hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide,
and particulate emissions from the combustion of polyethylene, polystyrene, and
poly (vinyl chloride). Energy & Fuels 2003;17(4):999-1013.
[18] Wang Z, Richter H, Howard JB, Jordan J, Carlson J, Levendis YA. Laboratory
investigation of the products of the incomplete combustion of waste plastics and
techniques for their minimization. Industrial & engineering chemistry research
2004;43(12):2873-86.
[19] Zhuo C, Hall B, Richter H, Levendis Y. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes by
sequential pyrolysis and combustion of polyethylene. Carbon 2010;48(14):4024-
34.
[20] Scott G. Polymers and the Environment. Royal Society of Chemistry; 1999.
[21] Al-Salem S, Lettieri P, Baeyens J. Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid
waste (PSW): A review. Waste management 2009;29(10):2625-43.
37
[22] Meenakshi P, Noorjahan S, Rajini R, Venkateswarlu U, Rose C, Sastry T.
Mechanical and microstructure studies on the modification of CA film by blending
with PS. Bulletin of Materials Science 2002;25(1):25-9.
[23] Fang J, Fowler P. The use of starch and its derivatives as biopolymer sources of
packaging materials. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 2003;1:82-4.
[24] Carraher Jr CE. Introduction to polymer chemistry. CRC press; 2012.
[25] PlasticsEurope. World Plastics Production 1950 - 2015. 2015.
[26] Wheatley L, Levendis YA, Vouros P. Exploratory study on the combustion and
PAH emissions of selected municipal waste plastics. Environmental science &
technology 1993;27(13):2885-95.
[27] Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, et al. Plastic
waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 2015;347(6223):768-71.
[28] Andrady AL. Microplastics in the marine environment. Marine pollution bulletin
2011;62(8):1596-605.
[29] Derraik JG. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review.
Marine pollution bulletin 2002;44(9):842-52.
[30] Ishigaki T, Sugano W, Nakanishi A, Tateda M, Ike M, Fujita M. The degradability
of biodegradable plastics in aerobic and anaerobic waste landfill model reactors.
Chemosphere 2004;54(3):225-33.
[31] Shimao M. Biodegradation of plastics. Current opinion in Biotechnology
2001;12(3):242-7.
[32] Shah AA, Hasan F, Hameed A, Ahmed S. Biological degradation of plastics: a
comprehensive review. Biotechnology advances 2008;26(3):246-65.
38
[33] Zheng Y, Yanful EK, Bassi AS. A review of plastic waste biodegradation. Critical
Reviews in Biotechnology 2005;25(4):243-50.
[34] Amass W, Amass A, Tighe B. A review of biodegradable polymers: uses, current
developments in the synthesis and characterization of biodegradable polyesters,
blends of biodegradable polymers and recent advances in biodegradation studies.
Polymer international 1998;47(2):89-144.
[35] Bonhomme S, Cuer A, Delort A, Lemaire J, Sancelme M, Scott G. Environmental
biodegradation of polyethylene. Polymer Degradation and Stability
2003;81(3):441-52.
[36] Dodbiba G, Takahashi K, Sadaki J, Fujita T. The recycling of plastic wastes from
discarded TV sets: comparing energy recovery with mechanical recycling in the
context of life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 2008;16(4):458-70.
[37] Perugini F, Mastellone ML, Arena U. A life cycle assessment of mechanical and
feedstock recycling options for management of plastic packaging wastes.
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 2005;24(2):137-54.
[38] Briassoulis D, Hiskakis M, Babou E. Technical specifications for mechanical
recycling of agricultural plastic waste. Waste management 2013;33(6):1516-30.
[39] Soheilian R. Pyrolytic gasification of post-consumer polyolefins to generate clean-
burning fuels. Northeastern University; 2013.
[40] Anaraki ST. Waste to Energy Conversion by Stepwise Liquefaction, Gasification
and “Clean” Combustion of Pelletized Waste Polyethylene for Electric Power
Generation—in a Miniature Steam Engine. Northeastern University; 2012.
39
[41] Aguado J, Serrano D, San Miguel G. European trends in the feedstock recycling of
plastic wastes. Global Nest J 2007;9(1):12-9.
[42] Achilias D, Roupakias C, Megalokonomos P, Lappas A, Antonakou Ε. Chemical
recycling of plastic wastes made from polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE) and
polypropylene (PP). Journal of Hazardous Materials 2007;149(3):536-42.
[43] Karayannidis GP, Achilias DS. Chemical recycling of poly (ethylene
terephthalate). Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2007;292(2):128-46.
[44] Kaminsky W. Chemical recycling of mixed plastics of pyrolysis. Advances in
Polymer Technology 1995;14(4):337-44.
[45] Paszun D, Spychaj T. Chemical recycling of poly (ethylene terephthalate).
Industrial & engineering chemistry research 1997;36(4):1373-83.
[46] Goto M. Chemical recycling of plastics using sub-and supercritical fluids. The
Journal of Supercritical Fluids 2009;47(3):500-7.
[47] Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. nature 1991;354(6348):56.
[48] Mauter MS, Elimelech M. Environmental applications of carbon-based
nanomaterials. Environmental Science & Technology 2008;42(16):5843-59.
[49] Kasumov AY, Khodos I, Ajayan P, Colliex C. Electrical resistance of a single
carbon nanotube. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 1996;34(6):429.
[50] Ebbesen T, Lezec H, Hiura H, Bennett J, Ghaemi H, Thio T. Electrical conductivity
of individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 1996;382(6586):54-6.
[51] Ruoff RS, Lorents DC. Mechanical and thermal properties of carbon nanotubes.
carbon 1995;33(7):925-30.
40
[52] Pan Z, Xie S, Lu L, Chang B, Sun L, Zhou W, et al. Tensile tests of ropes of very
long aligned multiwall carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters
1999;74(21):3152-4.
[53] Li F, Cheng H, Bai S, Su G, Dresselhaus M. Tensile strength of single-walled
carbon nanotubes directly measured from their macroscopic ropes. Applied physics
letters 2000;77(20):3161-3.
[54] Salvetat-Delmotte J-P, Rubio A. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes: a fiber
digest for beginners. Carbon 2002;40(10):1729-34.
[55] Yu M-F, Files BS, Arepalli S, Ruoff RS. Tensile loading of ropes of single wall
carbon nanotubes and their mechanical properties. Physical review letters
2000;84(24):5552.
[56] Ugarte D, Chatelain A, De Heer W. Nanocapillarity and chemistry in carbon
nanotubes. Science 1996;274(5294):1897.
[57] Niu C, Sichel EK, Hoch R, Moy D, Tennent H. High power electrochemical
capacitors based on carbon nanotube electrodes. Applied Physics Letters
1997;70(11):1480-2.
[58] Gooding JJ. Nanostructuring electrodes with carbon nanotubes: A review on
electrochemistry and applications for sensing. Electrochimica Acta
2005;50(15):3049-60.
[59] Chen J, Hamon MA, Hu H, Chen Y, Rao AM, Eklund PC, et al. Solution properties
of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science 1998;282(5386):95-8.
[60] Ajayan P, Redlich P. Structure of carbon nanotube‐based nanocomposites. Journal
of Microscopy 1997;185(2):275-82.
41
[61] De Volder MF, Tawfick SH, Baughman RH, Hart AJ. Carbon nanotubes: present
and future commercial applications. science 2013;339(6119):535-9.
[62] Wang Q, Arash B. A review on applications of carbon nanotubes and graphenes as
nano-resonator sensors. Computational Materials Science 2014;82:350-60.
[63] Mittal G, Dhand V, Rhee KY, Park S-J, Lee WR. A review on carbon nanotubes
and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Journal of Industrial
and Engineering Chemistry 2015;21:11-25.
[64] Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, De Heer WA. Carbon nanotubes--the route toward
applications. science 2002;297(5582):787-92.
[65] Bauhofer W, Kovacs JZ. A review and analysis of electrical percolation in carbon
nanotube polymer composites. Composites Science and Technology
2009;69(10):1486-98.
[66] Chou T-W, Gao L, Thostenson ET, Zhang Z, Byun J-H. An assessment of the
science and technology of carbon nanotube-based fibers and composites.
Composites Science and Technology 2010;70(1):1-19.
[67] Song K, Zhang Y, Meng J, Green EC, Tajaddod N, Li H, et al. Structural polymer-
based carbon nanotube composite fibers: understanding the processing–structure–
performance relationship. Materials 2013;6(6):2543-77.
[68] Gojny F, Wichmann M, Köpke U, Fiedler B, Schulte K. Carbon nanotube-
reinforced epoxy-composites: enhanced stiffness and fracture toughness at low
nanotube content. Composites science and technology 2004;64(15):2363-71.
[69] Ionescu AM, Riel H. Tunnel field-effect transistors as energy-efficient electronic
switches. nature 2011;479(7373):329.
42
[70] Jensen K, Weldon J, Garcia H, Zettl A. Nanotube radio. Nano letters
2007;7(11):3508-11.
[71] Sun D-m, Timmermans MY, Tian Y, Nasibulin AG, Kauppinen EI, Kishimoto S,
et al. Flexible high-performance carbon nanotube integrated circuits. Nature
nanotechnology 2011;6(3):156-61.
[72] Evanoff K, Khan J, Balandin AA, Magasinski A, Ready WJ, Fuller TF, et al.
Towards ultrathick battery electrodes: Aligned carbon nanotube–enabled
architecture. Advanced Materials 2012;24(4):533-7.
[73] Sotowa C, Origi G, Takeuchi M, Nishimura Y, Takeuchi K, Jang IY, et al. The
Reinforcing Effect of Combined Carbon Nanotubes and Acetylene Blacks on the
Positive Electrode of Lithium‐Ion Batteries. ChemSusChem 2008;1(11):911-5.
[74] Suzuki K, Yamaguchi M, Kumagai M, Yanagida S. Application of carbon
nanotubes to counter electrodes of dye-sensitized solar cells. Chemistry Letters
2002;32(1):28-9.
[75] Bianco A, Kostarelos K, Prato M. Making carbon nanotubes biocompatible and
biodegradable. Chemical communications 2011;47(37):10182-8.
[76] Nayagam DA, Williams RA, Chen J, Magee KA, Irwin J, Tan J, et al.
Biocompatibility of immobilized aligned carbon nanotubes. Small 2011;7(8):1035-
42.
[77] Mazov I, Rudina N, Ishchenko A, Kuznetsov V, Romanenko A, Anikeeva O, et al.
Structural and physical properties of MWNT/polyolefine composites. Fullerenes,
Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures 2012;20(4-7):510-8.
43
[78] Zaman HU, Hun PD, Khan RA, Yoon K-B. Effect of multi-walled carbon
nanotubes on morphology, mechanical and thermal properties of poly (ethylene
terephthalate) nanocomposites. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures
2013;21(8):701-11.
[79] Lam S-M, Sin J-C, Abdullah AZ, Mohamed AR. Photocatalytic TiO2/carbon
nanotube nanocomposites for environmental applications: an overview and recent
developments. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures 2014;22(5):471-
509.
[80] Singh I, Rehni AK, Kumar P, Kumar M, Aboul‐Enein HY. Carbon nanotubes:
synthesis, properties and pharmaceutical applications. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and
Carbon Nanostructures 2009;17(4):361-77.
[81] Rinzler A, Liu J, Dai H, Nikolaev P, Huffman C, Rodriguez-Macias F, et al. Large-
scale purification of single-wall carbon nanotubes: process, product, and
characterization. Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing
1998;67(1):29-37.
[82] Scott CD, Arepalli S, Nikolaev P, Smalley RE. Growth mechanisms for single-wall
carbon nanotubes in a laser-ablation process. Applied Physics A: Materials Science
& Processing 2001;72(5):573-80.
[83] Yudasaka M, Komatsu T, Ichihashi T, Iijima S. Single-wall carbon nanotube
formation by laser ablation using double-targets of carbon and metal. Chemical
physics letters 1997;278(1-3):102-6.
[84] Journet C, Maser W, Bernier P, Loiseau A. Large-scale production of single-walled
carbon nanotubes by the electric-arc technique. Nature 1997;388(6644):756.
44
[85] Shi Z, Lian Y, Liao FH, Zhou X, Gu Z, Zhang Y, et al. Large scale synthesis of
single-wall carbon nanotubes by arc-discharge method. Journal of physics and
chemistry of solids 2000;61(7):1031-6.
[86] Dosodia A, Lal* C, Singh B, Mathur R, Sharma* D. Development of catalyst free
carbon nanotubes from coal and waste plastics. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon
Nanostructures 2009;17(5):567-82.
[87] Huang Z, Xu J, Ren Z, Wang J, Siegal M, Provencio P. Growth of highly oriented
carbon nanotubes by plasma-enhanced hot filament chemical vapor deposition.
Applied physics letters 1998;73(26):3845-7.
[88] Colomer J-F, Stephan C, Lefrant S, Van Tendeloo G, Willems I, Konya Z, et al.
Large-scale synthesis of single-wall carbon nanotubes by catalytic chemical vapor
deposition (CCVD) method. Chemical Physics Letters 2000;317(1):83-9.
[89] Kar KK, Rahaman A, Agnihotri P, Sathiyamoorthy D. Synthesis of carbon
nanotubes on the surface of carbon fiber/fabric by catalytic chemical vapor
deposition and their characterization. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon
Nanostructures 2009;17(3):209-29.
[90] Thostenson ET, Ren Z, Chou T-W. Advances in the science and technology of
carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Composites science and
technology 2001;61(13):1899-912.
[91] Eslami PA, Ghoranneviss M, Moradi S, Azar PA, Khorrami SA, Laheghi SN.
Growth of carbon nanowalls by thermal CVD on magnetron sputtered Fe thin film.
Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon Nanostructures 2011;19(3):237-49.
45
[92] Yu L, Lv Y, Wu K, Li C. Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes by Using a Series of
Phenyl Derivatives as Precursors. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon
Nanostructures 2015;23(12):1073-6.
[93] Öncel Ç, Yürüm Y. Carbon nanotube synthesis via the catalytic CVD method: a
review on the effect of reaction parameters. Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon
Nonstructures 2006;14(1):17-37.
[94] Khavarian M, Chai S-P, Tan SH, Mohamed AR. Effects of growth parameters on
the morphology of aligned carbon nanotubes synthesized by floating catalyst and
the growth model. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures
2013;21(9):765-77.
[95] Benito A, Maniette Y, Munoz E, Martinez M. Carbon nanotubes production by
catalytic pyrolysis of benzene. Carbon 1998;36(5):681-3.
[96] Cho WS, Hamada E, Kondo Y, Takayanagi K. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes from
bulk polymer. Applied physics letters 1996;69(2):278-9.
[97] Miandad R, Barakat M, Aburiazaiza AS, Rehan M, Nizami A. Catalytic pyrolysis
of plastic waste: a review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection
2016;102:822-38.
[98] Yang X, Sun L, Xiang J, Hu S, Su S. Pyrolysis and dehalogenation of plastics from
waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE): A review. Waste management
2013;33(2):462-73.
[99] Sharuddin SDA, Abnisa F, Daud WMAW, Aroua MK. A review on pyrolysis of
plastic wastes. Energy conversion and management 2016;115:308-26.
46
[100] Kiran N, Ekinci E, Snape C. Recyling of plastic wastes via pyrolysis. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling 2000;29(4):273-83.
[101] Pinto F, Costa P, Gulyurtlu I, Cabrita I. Pyrolysis of plastic wastes. 1. Effect of
plastic waste composition on product yield. Journal of Analytical and Applied
Pyrolysis 1999;51(1):39-55.
[102] Jung S-H, Cho M-H, Kang B-S, Kim J-S. Pyrolysis of a fraction of waste
polypropylene and polyethylene for the recovery of BTX aromatics using a
fluidized bed reactor. Fuel Processing Technology 2010;91(3):277-84.
[103] Conesa JA, Font R, Marcilla A, Garcia AN. Pyrolysis of polyethylene in a fluidized
bed reactor. Energy & Fuels 1994;8(6):1238-46.
[104] Park JJ, Park K, Park J-W, Kim DC. Characteristics of LDPE pyrolysis. Korean
Journal of Chemical Engineering 2002;19(4):658-62.
[105] Çit İ, Sınağ A, Yumak T, Uçar S, Mısırlıoğlu Z, Canel M. Comparative pyrolysis
of polyolefins (PP and LDPE) and PET. Polymer bulletin 2010;64(8):817-34.
[106] Lin Y-H, Yen H-Y. Fluidised bed pyrolysis of polypropylene over cracking
catalysts for producing hydrocarbons. Polymer degradation and Stability
2005;89(1):101-8.
[107] Aguado R, Olazar Mn, Gaisán B, Prieto R, Bilbao J. Kinetics of polystyrene
pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal
2003;92(1-3):91-9.
[108] Liu Y, Qian J, Wang J. Pyrolysis of polystyrene waste in a fluidized-bed reactor to
obtain styrene monomer and gasoline fraction. Fuel Processing Technology
2000;63(1):45-55.
47
[109] Artetxe M, Lopez G, Amutio M, Elordi G, Olazar M, Bilbao J. Operating conditions
for the pyrolysis of poly-(ethylene terephthalate) in a conical spouted-bed reactor.
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2010;49(5):2064-9.
[110] Yoshioka T, Grause G, Eger C, Kaminsky W, Okuwaki A. Pyrolysis of poly
(ethylene terephthalate) in a fluidised bed plant. Polymer Degradation and Stability
2004;86(3):499-504.
[111] Ballice L. Classification of volatile products evolved during temperature-
programmed co-pyrolysis of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) with polypropylene
(PP). Fuel 2002;81(9):1233-40.
[112] Williams EA, Williams PT. The pyrolysis of individual plastics and a plastic
mixture in a fixed bed reactor. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology
1997;70(1):9-20.
[113] See CH, Harris AT. A review of carbon nanotube synthesis via fluidized-bed
chemical vapor deposition. Industrial & engineering chemistry research
2007;46(4):997-1012.
[114] Huang Z, Wang D, Wen J, Sennett M, Gibson H, Ren Z. Effect of nickel, iron and
cobalt on growth of aligned carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics A: Materials
Science & Processing 2002;74(3):387-91.
[115] Sarangi D, Godon C, Granier A, Moalic R, Goullet A, Turban G, et al. Carbon
nanotubes and nanostructures grown from diamond-like carbon and polyethylene.
Applied Physics A 2001;73(6):765-8.
48
[116] Chen X, He J, Yan C, Tang H. Novel in situ fabrication of chestnut-like carbon
nanotube spheres from polypropylene and nickel formate. The Journal of Physical
Chemistry B 2006;110(43):21684-9.
[117] Chung Y-H, Jou S. Carbon nanotubes from catalytic pyrolysis of polypropylene.
Materials chemistry and physics 2005;92(1):256-9.
[118] Gong J, Liu J, Jiang Z, Wen X, Chen X, Mijowska E, et al. Effect of the added
amount of organically-modified montmorillonite on the catalytic carbonization of
polypropylene into cup-stacked carbon nanotubes. Chemical engineering journal
2013;225:798-808.
[119] Song R, Ji Q. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes from polypropylene in the presence of
Ni/Mo/MgO catalysts via combustion. Chemistry Letters 2011;40(10):1110-2.
[120] Pol VG, Thiyagarajan P. Remediating plastic waste into carbon nanotubes. Journal
of environmental monitoring 2010;12(2):455-9.
[121] Lehrle RS, Peakman RE, Robb JC. Pyrolysis-gas-liquid-chromatography utilised
for a kinetic study of the mechanisms of initiation and termination in the thermal
degradation of polystyrene. European Polymer Journal 1982;18(6):517-29.
[122] Aboul-Enein AA, Adel-Rahman H, Haggar AM, Awadallah AE. Simple method
for synthesis of carbon nanotubes over Ni-Mo/Al2O3 catalyst via pyrolysis of
polyethylene waste using a two-stage process. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon
Nanostructures 2017;25(4):211-22.
[123] Vander Wal RL, Hall LJ. Carbon nanotube synthesis upon stainless steel meshes.
Carbon 2003;41(4):659-72.
49
[124] Zhou D, Seraphin S. Complex branching phenomena in the growth of carbon
nanotubes. Chemical physics letters 1995;238(4-6):286-9.
[125] Camilli L, Scarselli M, Del Gobbo S, Castrucci P, Nanni F, Gautron E, et al. The
synthesis and characterization of carbon nanotubes grown by chemical vapor
deposition using a stainless steel catalyst. Carbon 2011;49(10):3307-15.
[126] Martínez-Hansen V, Latorre N, Royo C, Romeo E, García-Bordejé E, Monzón A.
Development of aligned carbon nanotubes layers over stainless steel mesh
monoliths. Catalysis Today 2009;147:S71-S5.
[127] Baddour CE, Fadlallah F, Nasuhoglu D, Mitra R, Vandsburger L, Meunier J-L. A
simple thermal CVD method for carbon nanotube synthesis on stainless steel 304
without the addition of an external catalyst. Carbon 2009;47(1):313-8.
[128] Hall B, Zhuo C, Levendis YA, Richter H. Influence of the fuel structure on the
flame synthesis of carbon nanomaterials. Carbon 2011;49(11):3412-23.
[129] Tripathi PK, Durbach S, Coville NJ. Synthesis of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
from Plastic Waste Using a Stainless-Steel CVD Reactor as Catalyst.
Nanomaterials 2017;7(10):284.
[130] Karwa M, Iqbal Z, Mitra S. Scaled-up self-assembly of carbon nanotubes inside
long stainless steel tubing. Carbon 2006;44(7):1235-42.
[131] Sano N, Hori Y, Yamamoto S, Tamon H. A simple oxidation–reduction process for
the activation of a stainless steel surface to synthesize multi-walled carbon
nanotubes and its application to phenol degradation in water. Carbon
2012;50(1):115-22.
50
[132] Park D, Kim YH, Lee JK. Pretreatment of stainless steel substrate surface for the
growth of carbon nanotubes by PECVD. Journal of materials science
2003;38(24):4933-9.
[133] Hashempour M, Vicenzo A, Zhao F, Bestetti M. Direct growth of MWCNTs on
316 stainless steel by chemical vapor deposition: Effect of surface nano-features on
CNT growth and structure. Carbon 2013;63:330-47.
[134] Masarapu C, Wei B. Direct growth of aligned multiwalled carbon nanotubes on
treated stainless steel substrates. Langmuir 2007;23(17):9046-9.
[135] Zhou Q, Li C, Gu F, Du H. Flame synthesis of carbon nanotubes with high density
on stainless steel mesh. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2008;463(1):317-22.
[136] Zhuo C, Wang X, Nowak W, Levendis YA. Oxidative heat treatment of 316L
stainless steel for effective catalytic growth of carbon nanotubes. Applied Surface
Science 2014;313:227-36.
[137] Zhuo C, Levendis YA. Upcycling waste plastics into carbon nanomaterials: A
review. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2014;131(4):39931.
[138] Pardo A, Merino M, Coy A, Viejo F, Arrabal R, Matykina E. Pitting corrosion
behaviour of austenitic stainless steels–combining effects of Mn and Mo additions.
Corrosion Science 2008;50(6):1796-806.
[139] Karaduman A, Şimşek E, Cicek B, Bilgesü A. Flash pyrolysis of polystyrene wastes
in a free-fall reactor under vacuum. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
2001;60(2):179-86.
51
[140] KuanáChen Y, ChiáTsang S. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes filled with long
continuous crystals of molybdenum oxides. Chemical Communications
1996(21):2489-90.
[141] Flahaut E, Peigney A, Bacsa WS, Bacsa RR, Laurent C. CCVD synthesis of carbon
nanotubes from (Mg, Co, Mo) O catalysts: influence of the proportions of cobalt
and molybdenum. Journal of Materials Chemistry 2004;14(4):646-53.
[142] Lee CJ, Park J. Growth and structure of carbon nanotubes produced by thermal
chemical vapor deposition. Carbon 2001;39(12):1891-6.
[143] Zhang X, Li Z, Wen G, Fung K, Chen J, Li Y. Microstructure and growth of
bamboo-shaped carbon nanotubes. Chemical Physics Letters 2001;333(6):509-14.
[144] De Jong KP, Geus JW. Carbon nanofibers: catalytic synthesis and applications.
Catalysis Reviews 2000;42(4):481-510.
[145] Chen X, Wang R, Xu J, Yu D. TEM investigation on the growth mechanism of
carbon nanotubes synthesized by hot-filament chemical vapor deposition. Micron
2004;35(6):455-60.