Synthesis and Characterization of New Low-Valent Silicon, … · 2017. 10. 26. · Synthesis and...
Transcript of Synthesis and Characterization of New Low-Valent Silicon, … · 2017. 10. 26. · Synthesis and...
Synthesis and Characterization of New Low-Valent
Silicon Germanium and Tin Compounds
vorgelegt von
Dipl Chem
Wenyuan Wang
aus Nei Mongol (China)
Von der Fakultaumlt II ndash Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften
der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
Institut fuumlr Chemie
zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades
Doktor der Naturwissenschaften
- Dr rer nat -
genehmigte Dissertation
Promotionsausschuss
Vorsitzender Prof Dr Peter Hildebrandt (TU Berlin)
1 Gutachter Prof Dr Matthias Driess (TU Berlin)
2 Gutachter Prof Dr Thomas Braun (HU Berlin)
Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache 31-10-2012
Berlin 2012
D 83
DISSERTATION
by
Dipl Chemiker
Wenyuan Wang
from Nei Mongol (China)
Die vorliegende Arbeit entstand in der Zeit von Feb 2008 bis Jul 2012 unter der
Betreuung von Prof Dr Matthias Driess am Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen
Universitaumlt Berlin
Von Herzen kommend gilt mein Dank meinem verehrten Lehrer
Herrn Professor Dr Matthias Drieszlig
fuumlr die Aufnahme in seinen Arbeitskreis fuumlr seine engagierte Unterstuumltzung
und fuumlr die Forschungsfreiheit
My heartfelt thanks go out to
Prof Dr Thomas Braun for his acceptance of the second commentator ship
Prof Dr Peter Hildebrandt for his acceptance of the chairman
Prof Dr Shigeyoshi Inoue and Prof Dr Christoph van Wuumlllen for DFT calculations
and composition assistance during the course of my PhD work and Dr Stephan
Enthaler for the investigation of the catalytic activity
Dr Shenglai Yao Dr Carsten Praesang Dr Andreas Bruumlck Dr Anne Adams Robert
Adams Ms Marianna Tsaroucha Mr Gengwen Tan Mr Daniel Gallego and Mr
Paul Ensle for useful discussions synthetic suggestions composition and
modification assistance during the course of my PhD work
My laboratory coworkers Mr Stefan Schutte for creating a wonderful lab atmosphere
and Ms Paula Nixdorf Dr Elisabeth Irran for X-ray crystal structure determinations
and solutions Dr Jan-Dirk Epping Dr Heinz-Juumlrgen Kroth and Mr Manfred
Dettlaff for NMR measurements Ms Sigrid Imme for CHN and IR measurements
Mr Robert Rudolph for the measurements of cyclic voltammetry
Ms Andrea Rahmel and all members of my work group for their hail-fellow help
friendship and years of harmonious work together and for their acting as guides in
my living and discovery in all things in Germany
I sincerely thank my parents my wife Xiaoxia Zhao and Prof GuoXingBaTu for
selfless support and encouragement of my study in Germany
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the
Cluster of Excellence ldquoUnifying Concepts in Catalysisrdquo (Unicat)
Table of contents
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds 1
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements 5
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores 8
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands 16
2 MOTIVATION 21
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 23
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates 23
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4 23
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8 28
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5 30
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6 34
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8 35
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8 36
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8 38
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene 40
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands 40
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16 42
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O 45
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23 48
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28 51
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28 52
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel 55
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31 57
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30 59
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31 61
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 65
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34 68
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35 68
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII complex 36 71
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism 74
Table of contents
ii
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 76
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40 76
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40 80
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45 83
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts 85
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 89
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION 98
51 General section 98
52 Analytical methods 99
53 Starting Materials 101
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds 102
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4 102
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5 103
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6 104
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8 105
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 107
526 The new chlorogermylene 14 108
527 The new germylene 16 109
528 Aminogermylene 17 110
529 Germylene hydroxide 18 111
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20 112
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22 113
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23 114
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27 115
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28 116
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29 117
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30 118
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31 119
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 120
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35 120
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36 121
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38 123
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40 124
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41 125
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42 126
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44 127
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45 128
Table of contents
iii
6 REFERENCES 129
7 APPENDIX 138
71 Abbreviations 138
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation 139
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details 142
74 Publications in this dissertation 156
75 Curriculum Vitae 157
Introduction
- 1 -
1 INTRODUCTION
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds
Generally main-group elements higher than of the third period are classified as
ldquoheavy main-group elementsrdquo some of which show abnormal physical and chemical
properties For example Br(VII) is a stronger oxidant than Cl(VII) This different
behavior of high-valent main-group elements can be attributed to the relativistic
effect[1]
of electrons The contraction of all s-orbitals triggered by the relativistic effect
leads to a greater energy difference between s- and p-orbitals in higher period
elements which increases the difficulty of a sp-hybridation Moreover the energy
difference between s- and p-orbitals for elements in the d-district of the fourth period
and f-district of the sixth period vary unconventionally resulting in the so called
ldquosecondary periodicityrdquo of forth and sixth period elements Therefore ns2 electrons in
the valence shell of heavy main-group elements play an essential role for their
chemical properties[2]
During the organometallic research of main group elements a
series of novel compounds have been discovered and new synthetic methods as well
as theoretical insights in their chemistry have been developed and summarized[3]
In whole periodic table the difference of property in the group 14 elements (tetrels)
is maximal[4]
In comparison to carbon compounds of Si Ge Sn and Pb are very
different referring to the physical properties chemical behavior and structural features
The theory for carbon chemistry cannot be fit for the chemistry of heavy group 14
elements A typical example is the synthesis of compounds with a silicon-oxygen
double bond (Si=O silanone) Beginning last century the english chemist Frederic
Stanley Kipping manufactured many silicon-carbon compounds and discovered
thereby resin-like products which he called ldquosilicone of ketonesrdquo Kipping coined the
word ldquosiliconerdquo in 1901 to describe polydiphenylsiloxane by analogy of its formula
(Ph2SiO) with the formula of the ketone benzophenone (Ph2CO) Kipping was well
Introduction
- 2 -
aware that polydiphenylsiloxane is polymeric whereas benzophenone is monomeric
and noted that ldquosiliconerdquo and Ph2CO had very different chemistry[5]
The german chemist Richard Muumlller and the american chemist Eugene G Rochow
found almost at the same time a possibility for the industrial production of
dimethyldichlorosilane (Me2SiCl2) the most important precursor for the production of
the silicone in the 1940s[6]
The procedure today is called Muumlller Rochow synthesis
(Scheme 11) From that many researchers synthesized various silicone products but
crystallographically characterized complexes with a donor-stabilized Si=O double
bond were published at the beginning of this century by our group These are the
silanoic ester I1[7]
the carbene-coordinated silanone I2[8]
and the ketone-coordinated
silanone I3[9]
(Scheme 12) The Si=O double bond distance (1532 pm) in I3 is shorter
than the ones in I1 (1579 pm) and I2 (1541 pm) and represents the shortest Si-O
distance in all molecular Si=O compounds hitherto reported[10]
Scheme 11 Muumlller Rochow silicone synthesis
Scheme 12 Isolable donor-stabilized silanoic ester I1 and silanone I2 and I3
The hundred-year story of silicones to monomeric species bearing Si=O double
bonds shows that the silicon atom prefers σ-bonds over double bond (σ- and π-bonds)
That means the classical π-bond is not of first choice for heavy main-group
elements[11]
In other words not only E=X (E = heavy main-group elements X = C N
O) but also E=Ersquo (Ersquo = heavy main-group elements) systems are difficult to stabilize
Introduction
- 3 -
because they easily form σ-bonded corresponding polymers Consequently it is very
challenging to study compounds of heavy main group elements in their low oxidation
state Especially the study of divalent Si Ge and Sn compounds with lone pair
electrons (metallylenes) is one of the most attractive research fields in contemporary
organometallic chemistry[3 12]
In the past thirty years numerous thermally stable unsaturated Si Ge Sn
compounds were isolated which show extremely impressive chemistry[12d 13]
The
difference between C-C and Si-Si double bond is now well-understood[3a]
Very
different reaction mechanisms for the formation of such doubly-bonded carbon and
silicon compounds were throughly discussed The classical C-C double bond can
readily be explained by the valence bond theory and hybridization[14]
The bonding
state in those heavier alkene analogues can be explained by two sets of ns2rarrp
0 donor-
acceptor interactions between two metallylene monomers (Scheme 1 3)[3 15]
Similarly heavier alkyne analogues of main-group elements present also two dative
bonds of ns2rarrp
0 donor-acceptor interactions plus a normal σ-bond between two pz
orbitals[3 12d]
(Scheme 13) But the sp-hybridization for heavy main-group elements
is not realized in their low-valent compounds because sp-hybridization does not lead
to strengthing of terminal σ-bonds to the ligands R
Scheme 13 Nonclassical multiple bond features (E = heavy main-group elements)
Introduction
- 4 -
Until the end of the last century the synthesis of heavier alkyne analogues was an
unsolved problem because of the lack of suitable large substituent At the first the
isolation of a diplumbylene I4[16]
ArrsquoPb-PbArrsquo (Arrsquo = 26-(Tip)2C6H3 Tip = 246-
iPr3C6H2) was reported by Power in 2000 (Scheme 14) As is evident from the
structural parameters of ArPb-PbAr the triple bond character has vanished completely
The Pb-Pb distance (319 pm) in ArPb-PbAr is longer even than that of a normal Pb-
Pb single bond (308 pm) and the CAr-Pb bond vectors are perpendicular to the Pb-Pb
axes (943deg) These two facts illustrated a complete lack of hybridization of lead
atoms and almost exclusive use of p-orbitals in σ-bonds[17]
In 2002 Power reported
the distannyne ArSnequivSnAr I5[18]
(Ar = 26-Dip2C6H3 Dip = 26-iPr2C6H3) containing
a SnequivSn bond length of 2668 pm shorter compared to Sn-Sn single bonds[19]
and
with multiple bond character A trans bent configuration was also observed in I5 but
the Sn-Sn-C angle with 1252deg is far from a perpendicular situation as in I4 In the
same year Power described the first digermyne I6[20]
ArGeequivGeAr In this case the
Ge-Ge bond length of 2285 pm was found to be considerably shorter than normal Ge-
Ge single[13f]
(244 pm) and Ge-Ge double bonds (221-246 pm) indicated multiple
bonding character[21]
The trans-bending angle of Ge-Ge-C (1288deg) in digermyne I6
is slightly larger than that in distannyne I5
Scheme 14 The first isolated formal alkyne analogues of group 14
Introduction
- 5 -
With the appearance of the first structurally characterized disilyne I7[22]
reported by
Sekiguchi the series of heavier alkyne congeners was completed in 2004 The SiequivSi
bond length with 2062 pm was considerably shorter than that of typical Si-Si single
bonds (235 pm) and somewhat shorter than that of typical Si-Si double bonds[13b]
(216 pm) The molecular structure of compound I7 with a Si-Si-Silyl angle of 1374deg
reveals a heavily trans-bent configuration indicating the presence of a nonclassical
triple bond The theoretical calculation approved the trans bent structure and a bond
order of three
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements
Isolable carbenes and heavier carbene analogues (metallylenes silylenes R2Si
germylenes R2Ge stannylenes R2Sn plumbylenes R2Pb) can be defined as
stabilized divalent monomers of group 14 elements which can impossibly dimerize or
polymerize continuously due to the thermodynamic andor kinetic stabilization As
already mentioned above in contrast to carbon heavier group 14 elements have a low
tendency of sp-hybridization[11]
Accordingly consists of ns2 valence electrons as a
lone pair and use usually three p-valence-orbitals for the formation of their divalent
species[12c]
The ground state of R2E (E = Si Ge Sn Pb) is thereby a singlet while
the ground state of R2C is a triplet (Scheme 15) because two nonbonding electrons
locate in sp-hybrid orbitals[23]
In order to obtain at ambient temperature isolable metallylenes there are today two
particularly effective stabilization methods First of all these unsaturated compounds
can be thermodynamically stabilized by donor electron delocalization to empty p-
orbital as in the case of silylene I8[24]
and silyliumylidene cation I9[25]
(Scheme 16)
In addition the coordination of ns2 electrons to the empty p-orbital of the neighbor
molecule can be kinetically prevented by bulky substituents which was shown by the
Introduction
- 6 -
successful synthesis of the dialkyl silylene I10[26]
that is stabilized only by the steric
hindrance of four large silyl groups and C-SirarrSi hyperconjugation
Scheme 15 Ground states of triplet-carbene and singlet-metallylenes
Scheme 16 Stabilization of silylenes by π-electron delocalization andor steric
hindrance I8 I9 and hyperconjugation I10
The synthesis of heavier carbene analogues depends on suitable starting materials
with oxidation state II Practically in the case of tin and lead the dihalides SnCl2 and
PdCl2 are stable and suitable as starting materials for isolable SnII and Pb
II
organometallic compounds Many germylenes were synthesized employing the known
germanium dichloride complex GeCl2middotdioxane which is easily available[27]
The
carbene-stabilized SiIICl2
[28] (NHCrarrSiCl2 NHC = (HC-NDip)2C
[29]) was reported
recently by Roesky However it is not a trouble-free starting material for silicon(II)
chemistry due to the difficult removing of by-products derivated by the bulky carbene
(NHC) Otherwise divalent compounds of GeII Sn
II and Pb
II are more stable than the
corresponding SiII analogues Therefore the metallylene synthetic chemistry faces the
main difficulty in the synthesis and isolation of functionalized silylene derivates
Accustomed synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes was summarized in
Scheme 17 Their feasibility was also proved by the preparation of new silylenes in
this work
Introduction
- 7 -
Scheme 17 Synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes
Usually N-heteroleptic silylenes are accessible from SiIV
-precursors to form SiII-
species using reductants such as Na K or their alloy KC8 lithium or magnesium
naphthalenide etc A usually silylenes[24 26 30]
like I13 with a five- or six-membered
ring system and some three-coordinated silylenes[31]
like I14 are accessible through
the reductive dehalogenation reactions presented in case A Suitable five-coordinated
SiIV
sources I15 could be treated with a non oxygenated strong base resulting in the
corresponding three-coordinated silylenes[32]
I16 The two-coordinated silylene I13
prepared through an acid-base reaction from its four-coordinated precursor was not
observed so far In case C silylenes I18 could be isolated by salt metathesis reaction
during that the halogen atom was substituted by a desired Rsub[33]
With these new
synthetic methods the generation of many imaginable SiII molecules is possible today
Especially more complicated metallylenes for example interconnected or spacer-
separated bis-metallylenes (see next page) can be obtained in good yield Thus more
reactivity will be found in their subsequent reactions
Introduction
- 8 -
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores
The discussion of diplumbylene I4 indicates the strong tendency to transformate a
bis-metallylene instead of triple bond form in the case of lead Scheme 18 shows the
resonance structures of triply bonded I19 and bis-metallylene I20 together with the
donor ligand coordinated interconnected bis-metallylene structure I21 Hitherto the
chemical research in this area made clear that silicon and germanium prefer the type
of structure I19 while the species of lead is more favorable in the state I20[12d]
Corresponding tin species have vacillant structural feature between I19 and I20
depending on the steric demand of R and the packing force in crystals[34]
The donor
ligand coordination with all heavier alkyne analogues leads to the donor-stabilized
bis-metallylene form I21 which possesses an E-E single σ-bond and two ns2 lone
pairs one at each of the E centers[35]
Scheme 18 Resonance structures of nonclassical triple bond and bis-metallylene
According to the bonding state all known bis-metallylenes can be discriminated in
two different types i) ldquointerconnected bis-metallylenesrdquo in which two E atoms are
directly connected by a chemical bond and ii) ldquospacer-separated bis-metallylenesrdquo in
which two EII atoms are separated by bridged atoms or by a broad spacer without an
E-E bond in the molecules[33a 36]
The isolation of bis-metallylenes of heavier group
14 elements has been a major synthetic challenge owing to their tendency to
polymerize Herein a review of this kind of compounds which appeared almost
suddenly just in the last two decades is given
Introduction
- 9 -
Interconnected bis-metallylenes
Interconnected bis-silylenes are shown in Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylene
examples were firstly reported by Robinson in 2008[35]
which are a carbene-stabilized
bis-silylene I22 with a SiI-Si
I bond (2393 pm) and a carbene-stabilized bis-silylene
I23 with a Si0=Si
0 double bond (2229 pm) One year later the Roesky group prepared
an interconnected bis-silylene I24[37]
stabilized by amidinato ligands with a SiI-Si
I
single bond (2413 pm) Compound I24 exhibits a gauche-bent geometry Another
amidinato donor-stabilized bis-silylene I25[38]
which was synthesized in last year by
Jones et al possesses trans-bent structure not the gauche-bent form The SiI-Si
I
distance (2489 pm) in I25 is longer than those in I22 and I24 because of the more
sterically hindered amidinato ligands In the same year the synthesis of the first
phosphine-stabilized bis-silylene I26[39]
could be achieved and fully characterized In
this molecule the Si-Si bond with the bond length of 2331 pm is visibly shorter than
those in related molecules Baceiredo et al described that the Si-Si fragment in I26
presents a certain multiple-bond character
Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylenes
Interconnected bis-germylenes are shown in Scheme 110 In 2006 Jones and
coworkers reported the first successful isolation of two stable bis-germylenes I27 and
Introduction
- 10 -
I28[40]
which are stabilized by an amidinate and a guanidinate ligand respectively
Their Ge-Ge distances (2672 and 2638 pm) show normal single bond character Two
years later Roesky prepared the bis-germylenes I29[41]
which exhibits a gauche-bent
geometry Since I29 is stabilized by a less bulky amidinate ligands the Ge-Ge bond
with the length of 2569 pm is shorter than those of examples before A different β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized bis-germylene I30[42]
was presented by the work group
of Leung in which the Ge-Ge bond length (2602 pm) is somewhere in between The
reduction of NHCrarrGeCl2 (NHC see Scheme 110) employing magnesium(I)
reagents[43]
furnished the carbene-stabilized bis-germylene I31[44]
with a Ge0=Ge
0
double bond (2349 pm) which is the homologous compound of I23 Theoretical
analyses of I31 suggest a singlet germanium(0) dimer (Ge=Ge) datively coordinated
by two NHC ligands In the last year Jones again reported a bis-germylene I32[38]
which is structurally comparable with I27 and I28 But the Ge-Ge distance in I32 is
similar with that of I30
Scheme 110 Interconnected bis-germylenes
Interconnected bis-stannylenes are shown in Scheme 111 Very interestingly the
introduction of SiMe3 instead of H at the para-position of the aryl ring in distannyne
I5 induced the first bis-stannylene I33[34]
without alteration of the steric crowding
near the tin center The small Sn-Sn-C angle (993deg) and the long Sn-Sn distance
(3066 pm) in I33 indicate two stannylene moieties connected with a single bond and
Introduction
- 11 -
without the sp-hybridization In the similar work of Power et al in 2010 the
introduction of GeMe3 substituents of aryl rings at the para-position resulted also in
single bonded bis-stannylene I34[45]
with Sn-Sn distances of 3077 pm and ldquosharprdquo
Sn-Sn-C bending angles of 978deg With the bis-stannylene I35[46]
Jambor showed that
without the use of bulky substituents such as 26-disubstituted aryl groups a bis-
stannylene can be stabilized by intramolecular NrarrSn interactions The less bulky
aryls (aryl = 26-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3) in I35 led to the shorter Sn-Sn single bond (2971
pm) and a trans-bent angle of 943deg as in the diplumbylene I4 The first amidinato
coordinated bis-stannylene I36[38]
with a Sn-Sn single bond was reported by Jones et
al last year Its structural features are highly similar to the germanium homologue
compound I32
Scheme 111 Interconnected bis-stannylenes
Spacer-separated bis-metallylenes and species containing several EII cores
Lappert and Veith reported on the isolation of divalent germanium and tin
compounds very early[47]
Many of these from the 1970s and 1980s that were
described without X-ray characterization will not be discussed here The spacer-
separated bis-germylene I37[48]
and bis-stannylene I38[48]
(Scheme 112) appeared
first of all of this compound class in 1988 The work group of Veith introduced a facile
Introduction
- 12 -
synthetic method by which tetralithium amide reacted with two equivalents of
GeCl2middotdioxane or SnCl2 to give the corresponding products in over 60 yield In 1990
two interesting germylenes I39[49]
and I41[50]
were reported by Lappert and Power In
comparison to the isolable isonitrile (R-N+equivC
minus) until now it was not possible to
stabilize its homologous derivates of the heavier group 14 elements Compounds I39
and I41 can be considered as the dimer (I39) and trimer (I41) formed after
oligomerization of the unstable germaisonitrile analogue (R-N+equivGe
minus) Nevertheless
compounds with two germylene moieties at the time could be seen as impressive
achievements in the divalent germanium chemistry Another dimer of germaisonitrile
bis-germylene I40[51]
was reported by Roesky in 1997 After this the first stable
dimeric silaisonitrile I42[52]
generated through the reduction of carbene stabilized
dichlorosilaimine (NHCrarrSi(Cl2)=NAr Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) with KC8 was presented
by the work group of Roesky in 2011 The lengthy synthetic protocol bulky protecting
groups and a low yield (21) of I42 indicate a more difficult synthetic chemistry
necessary for the synthesis of the latter silicon compound However a trimer (tris-
silylene) of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) the silicon analogue of I41 is now just a dream of
synthetic chemists
In 1991 two bis-stannylenes (micro-chlorotin(II) amides (micro-Cl-Sn-NR2)2) I43 (NR2 =
N(CMe2)2(CH2)3) and I44 (R = SiMe3) in which two stannylene moieties are bridged
by two chlorine atoms were synthesized by Lappert et al[53]
Surprisingly X-ray
analyses of the two crystals show that I43 is the cis-isomer but I44 has the trans-
configuration In contrast a new bis-stannylene (ClSn-micro-N(Naph)SiMe3)2 I45[54]
was
characterized with two bridged nitrogen atoms by the same work group The Sn-N
bonds of 2438 pm in I45 are much longer than the terminal Sn-N bonds of 2069 pm
in I44 The Sn-N-Sn-N ring in I45 is slightly puckered and bears trans-Cl atoms
Instead of halogen atoms in bis-germylene I46[55]
two terminal N atoms of the azide
groups bridge two germylene parts forming a planar four-membered Ge2N2 ring
Otherwise the germylene centers of I46 are tetracoordinated due to two additional
OrarrGe dative bonds The N-bridged three-core germylenes I47 and stannylenes I48
Introduction
- 13 -
were prepared by Veith in 1991[56]
For four of six molecules X-ray crystal structure
determinations have been carried out which reveal the molecules to be built of a
diamond-lattice-like skeleton The top N atom coordinates to all three germylene
(stannylene) parts and another N atoms bridge with the neighboring two germylene
(stannylene) parts The chair-form six-membered E3N3 ring contains three N-H bonds
and traps one halogen atom (Cl Br I) with the three hydrogen atoms
Scheme 112 Spacer-separated metallylenes I37-I48
The by 14-diamine molecules separated bis-stannylenes I50 and I51 were prepared
from the chlorostannylene dimer I44 and the corresponding dilithium diamide by
Lappert and co-workers in 1994 (Scheme 113)[57]
Bis-germylene I49 was similarly
prepared by the reaction of the GeII homologous derivate ClGeN(SiMe3)2 of I44 with
dilithium diaminobenzene and marked a new development at that time In 1997
Lappert et al reported a new 13-diamine bridged bis-stannylene I52 and a stannylene
I53 with the three SnII cores employing dilithium meta-diamide
[58] The synthesis of
I52 is similar to I50 while I53 was isolated by treatment of the substituted
Introduction
- 14 -
diaminobenzene with Sn(N(SiMe3)2)2 in a ratio of 23 Evidently the formation of I53
involves unexpected C-H activations of the 2-position of 13-diaminobenzene and
eliminations of amine HN(SiMe3)2 The 32 reaction of Sn(NMe2)2 with sterically
bulky aromatic amines (DipNH2 or MesNH2) in toluene can be controlled giving the
heteroleptic stannylenes I54 and I55[59]
in which sterically less bulky NMe2 groups
serve as bridges and one SnII center between two bulky R groups remains its two-
coordination The isolation of the first GeII and Sn
II amide dimers I56 and I57
bridged by the NH2 groups was presented in 2005[60]
They were synthesized by the
reaction of bulky low-valent organo GeII and Sn
II halides (ArE
IICl E = Ge Sn Ar see
Scheme 113) with dry ammonia The Ge2N2 or Sn2N2 cores in I56 and I57 are planar
with rhombohedral shapes and with acute angles near 80deg at Ge or Sn and wider
angles near 100deg at N
Wright 1997
I54 R = Mes I55 R = Dip
I52 Lappert 1997
SnNMe2
Sn
Me2N
NR
NR
NN
SiMe3
E
(Me3Si)2N
E
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
N
N
SiMe3
Sn
(Me3Si)2N
Sn
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
Lappert 1994
I49 E = Ge I50 E = Sn I51 Lappert 1994
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
I53 Lappert 1997
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
Sn
Sn
Power 2005
I56 E = Ge R = Dip
I57 E = Sn R = Tip
R
RE
NH2
E
H2N
R
R
Scheme 113 Spacer-separated metallylenes I49-I57
The discovery of the first spacer-separated bis-silylene I58 (Scheme 114) was
made by Lappert et al in 2005[61]
It was synthesized by reductive dehalogenation of
the bis-dichlorosilane precursor with KC8 With the bis-functionality of I58
eventually a macrocycle metal-complex could be formed but the rigid backbone does
not allow a chelating coordination to a single core In addition Power tried oxidative
Introduction
- 15 -
addition reactions of his Sn and Ge alkyne analogues (I5 and I6 Scheme 114) with
trimethyl silyl azide (Me3SiN3) and adamantanyl azide (Ada-N3) giving the spacer (N-
SiMe3 or N-Ada) separated bis-stannylenes I59[62]
and bis-germylene I60[63]
and with
azobenzene (PhN=NPh) giving the spacer (PhNNPh) separated bis-germylene I61[62]
and bis-stannylene I62[62]
respectively The similar reaction of bis-germylene I29
with azobenzene furnished also the addition product the spacer bridged bis-
germylene I63[64]
with simultaneous cleavage of the Ge-Ge single bond as observed
by Roesky in 2010 At the same time So et al activated the Si-Si single bond of bis-
silylene I24 with phenyl acetylene resulting in the ethylene bridged bis-silylene I64[65]
Many spacer separated bis-germylenes and bis-stannylenes[66]
(I65-I74) were
successfully designed and isolated by Hahn et al for the use as promising chelating
ligands in coordination reactions A few transition-metal complexes of them were
prepared by his research group too (see p 18)
Scheme 114 Spacer-separated metallylenes I58-I74
In 2011 after the synthesis of the first oxygen bridged bis-silylene[32a]
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2
minus) in the course of this PhD work other four analogous were reported
Introduction
- 16 -
which are oxygen bridged bis-germylenes I75[67]
I77[68]
bis-stannylene I78[68]
and
sulfur bridged bis-germylene I76[67]
(Scheme 115) Bis-germylene oxide I75 and
sulfide I76 were synthesized in the work group of So et al by the dehalogenation of
LGeCl (L = amidinate in I75) with KC8 and then the oxidation with trimethylamine
N-oxide (Me3NO) or with elemental sulfur Otherwise Powerrsquos new compounds I77
and I78 were accessible by oxidative addition of alkyne analogues I5 and I6 using the
stoichiometric oxygen transfer reagent pyridine N-oxide (C5H5NO) In the last two
decades several cubanes of attractive tetra-metallylenes with GeII Sn
II Pb
II like I79
were presented[69]
(Scheme 116) Because they are somewhat far from discussed
metallylenes in structural features and synthetic approaches they are not discussed
and shown in detail here The synthesis of the still unknown SiII analogue I80 a
tetramer of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) remains as a fascinating challenge
Scheme 115 New bis-metallylenes bridged by a single atom
Scheme 116 Cubane-like tetra-metallylenes of heavier group 14 elements
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands
The interaction between the central atom and the donor in transition-metal
complexes depends on their electron configuration There are two- and three-
coordinated metallylenes in which the empty np-orbitals are stabilized by
Introduction
- 17 -
intramolecular electron delocalization or by the third donor-ligand donation
respectively Therefore if two types of metallylenes serve as donor-ligands for
transition-metals the interaction of these p-orbitals with the corresponding metal d-
orbitals is essentially different For example two silylenerarrM complexes are shown
in Scheme 117 Complex I81 shows clearly σ-donorπ-acceptor interaction[70]
while
the Fe atom in complex I82[71]
contains only a σ-donor bond from the silylene subunit
In this sense three-coordinate metallylenes as σ-donor ligands are more similar to
isoelectronic triorganophosphine ligands[33a b]
in I83 (Scheme 117) In Table 11 the
difference of three-coordinate silylenes and triorganophosphines are compared and
shown in detail
Scheme 117 The σ-donorπ-acceptor or only σ-donor coordination
Table 11 Comparison of three-coordinate silylenes and phosphines
three-Coordinate silylenes Phosphines (PR3)[72]
Synthesis difficult synthetic approaches well-established synthetic procedures
Embellishment only few scaffolds are known numerous structural transformations
and various substituents of R
Stability air and moisture sensitive normally stable in air
Property easily oxidative addition
much stronger σ-donor ligand
multivariate chemical behavior
seldom oxidative addition
strong σ-donor ligand
predictable chemical behavior
Complex only few transition-metal complexes complexes with numerous metals
State of
Development
underdeveloped chemistry fully established
Introduction
- 18 -
In coordination chemistry the spacer separated bis-metallylenes are at the same
time bidentate chelating ligands despite almost all of them were not or could not be
used as chelating ligands Until 2008 only a few chelated transition-metal complexes
coordinated by isolable spacer separated bis-metallylenes were reported They are the
bis-germylene I65 coordinated Mo(CO)4 complex I65-Mo[66b]
and bis-stannylenes
I73 I74 coordinated Ni0 complexes
[66c] I73-Ni I74-Ni (Scheme 118) reported by
Hahn et al Another bis-germylene complex I29-Fe[64]
with two Fe cores presented
by Roesky in 2010 does not comprise chelating coordination at all The reason for the
lack of representative bis-metallylenes in coordination chemistry is that not only the
formation and isolation of such complexes are very difficult but also the design and
synthesis of bis-metallylenes themself are sometimes infeasible Additionally the air-
and water-sensitivity of these compounds causes many unexpected side-reactions In
general metallylene transition-metal complexes are still limited in using metallylenes
containing single EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn)
Scheme 118 Known complexes of spacer-separated bis-germylenes and stannylenes
The successful usage of bidentate phosphanes in many catalytic transformations
originates from their convenient electronic properties and the variable steric
protection Among those chelating bis-phosphane I84[73]
(BINAP Scheme 119) with
Introduction
- 19 -
backbone chirality can lead to excellent enantioselectivity compared to monodentate
phosphines With ferrocendiyl bridged ligands I85 bimetallic complexes are easily
prepared[74]
Furthermore bis-phosphane ligands like I86 are superior bridges for
heterodinuclear complexes in catalytic hydrogenation[75]
Pincer arenes consisting of
a central aromatic backbone linked to two phosphane parts by different spacers are
particularly attractive because of their feasible structural tuning with many choices of
donor groups[72 76]
Recently the chemistry of pincer-ligated transition-metal
complexes underwent rapid developments and has been used for several intriguing
chemical transformations[72b 77]
The coordination chemistry of the most common
pincer ligands such as NCN- PCP- and SCS-type ligands toward transition-metals in
I87 (Scheme 119) was explored extensively[72b 77]
Pincer arenes with stronger σ-
donor sites E than those provided by group 15 and 16 atoms are very attractive for the
synthesis of more electron-rich transition-metal complexes for activation of small
molecules On the other hand transition-metal complexes with ligands like I84-I87
containing EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn) were scarce before 2009
Scheme 119 Bidentate phosphanes for transition-metal complexes
The challenge of spacer-separated bis-metallylenes as novel bidentate σ-donor
ligands for transition-metal complexes are intriguing because of their unique structure
and their coordination ability Therefore transition-metal complexes with chelating
Introduction
- 20 -
bis-metallylenes which were not throughly uncovered[66b c 78]
have received more
and more attention To date the new development of bis-metallylene synthesis
enables the isolation of their transition-metal complexes containing EII-based
functional groups as chelating ligands These complexes may provide access to their
potential application in which they can play a key role as intermediates in transition-
metal catalyzed transformations[70c 79]
Motivation
- 21 -
2 MOTIVATION
As pointed out in the introduction the metallylene synthetic chemistry is a fast
developing field with a great potential to find novel metallylenes with new
functionalities which would be the basis for the development of new kinds of
transition-metal complexes I am particularly interested in the synthesis of new types
of compounds containing divalent group 14 elements and to study their coordination
properties towards transition-metals New metallylenes could serve as very strong σ-
donor ligands for the generation of transition-metal complexes with unusual high
electron density at the metal site which could possess unique chemical properties
The three reports of transition-metal complexes[66b c]
containing bidentate bis-
germylene (stannylene) ligands were discussed in the ldquoIntroductionrdquo of this work
This potential of bis-metallylenes used as chelating ligands in coordination chemistry
prompted me to investigate new transition-metal complexes along with the
development of a new low-valent Si Ge and Sn chemistry
In this work three main points will be addressed i) the design and synthesis of new
ligand stabilized heavier carbene analogous (metallylenes) and interconnected bis-
metallylenes containing low-valent Si Ge Sn ii) the exploration of synthetic
approaches towards different spacer separated (bridged) bis-metallylenes iii) the
investigation of the properties and coordination abilities of new metallylenes (bis-
metallylenes) to transition-metals
The β-diketiminato and amidinato scaffolds I and II were chosen for the
stabilization of the reactive divalent group 14 units (Scheme 21) The known
metallylene halogenide compounds[31a 32b 80]
III and IV were used as the direct
precursors for the preparation of novel mono- and bis-metallylene derivates
Motivation
- 22 -
Scheme 21 Synthesis of new metallylene derivates from precursors
Scheme 22 Coordination of new spacer-separated bis-metallylene to transition-metals
Using isolated products as precursors complexes with different electronic
configurations and activities can be obtained and further modified through
coordination to transition-metals and varying substituents as ligands (Scheme 22)
This development may provide new divalent group 14 element-based functional
ligands in coordination chemistry towards transition-metals As spacer units for the
bis-metallylenes should serve 13-functionalized arene ferrocene and chalcogen
elements (O S Se) The promising application of new metallylene-metal complexes
will be investigated as the precatalyst in organic reactions
Results and Discussion
- 23 -
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates
In this PhD work the abbreviation of nacnacmacr is used only for the Dip-substituted β-
diketiminato ligand[81]
(CH[CMe(NDip)]2macr Dip = 26-iPrC6H3) The synthesis of β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized germanium complexes (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
and
(nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
were reported through the reaction of GeCl2sdotdioxane or GeCl4
with the corresponding Li(nacnac) reagent These compounds can be obtained in high
yield after recrystallization and were used as starting materials for new low-valent
germanium derivates
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Treatment of β-diketiminato germylene chloride 1 with excess of elemental
potassium at ambient temperature in THF yielded the first cyclogermylidenide
derivative 3[83]
which was isolated by fractional crystallization from diethylether in
the form of its potassium salt in 33 yield as pale yellow crystals Moreover the
reduction of 1 led also to the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-
Dip which was isolated by fractional crystallization from hexane solution as yellow
crystals in 31 yield (Scheme 31) Both 3 and 4 have been characterized by NMR
spectroscopy (1H
13C) EI-mass spectrometry (only for 3) and correct elemental
analyses
Scheme 31 Synthesis of the germylenide potassium salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Results and Discussion
- 24 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3 displays two sets of doublets for the Dip-
methyl groups in the range from 108 to 112 ppm Two additional singlets at 184 and
262 ppm were assigned to methyl groups of the five-membered ring Resonances for
the CH of iso-propyl appears at 298 ppm as septets The resonance of the β-H proton
at the GeNC3 ring appears at δ = 618 ppm One set of resonances for aromatic
protons of Dip-groups appears in the range of 691-698 ppm In addition the
diethylether molecule was observed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy The molar ratio of
ether was determined by integration of the appropriate resonance signals in the 1H-
NMR spectrum of 3 This amounts to 22mol and the determined composition fits
well with the elemental analytical data
Complex 3 is an Et2O coordinated potassium germylene anion salt according to the
1H- and
13C-NMR spectra Its structure has been established by a single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 31 left) It reveals a dimeric half-sandwich complex
interconnected via intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds In the structure each half-
sandwich moiety consists of a K(OEt2)2 cation η5-coordinated to the anionic five-
membered planar GeNC3 ring The K1-Ge1 distance of 3449(1) pm is shorter than
the intermolecular K1-Ge1rsquo distance of 3573(1) pm It is noteworthy such shorter K-
Ge distances have been observed in a related dipotassium (18-crown-6)
tetraphenylgermol dianion (330 335 pm)[84]
as well as in a (18-crown-6)-solvated
potassium silylgermanides (342 pm) with a tetravalent germanium atom[85]
Accordingly the K-C(ring) distances in 3 (3092(2)-3330(2) pm) are also longer than
those observed in the aforementioned dipotassium germol dianion (288-317 pm) The
Ge1-N1 distance of 1944(2) pm are shorter than those Ge-N distances in 1[80]
but
longer than that corresponding values in a N-heterocyclic 6π aromatic
germyliumylidene cation[86]
(189 pm) and the heterofulvene-like germylene[87]
(186 pm) Additionally the Ge1-C2 distance (1887(2) pm) the endocyclic C-C
distances (C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3) pm) and the C4-N1 bond length (1382(3)
pm) suggest significant π-resonance stabilization within the six-membered GeNC3
ring In line with that the remarkable deshielding of the resonance signal (618 ppm)
Results and Discussion
- 25 -
for the β-H atom in the 1H-NMR spectrum is in agreement with a considerable hetero-
Cpmacr-like resonance stabilization in the five-membered GeNC3 ring (Figure 31 right)
The latter is also supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see
section 313) Hereafter the lithium complexes of N-heterocyclic germylidenide and
stannylidenide anions[88]
[(THF)Li-η5-EC(tBu)C(H)C(
tBu)N(Dip) E = Ge Sn] were
presented with a similar reductive reaction
Figure 31 Molecular structure of germylene anion salt 3 (left) and hetero-Cpmacr-like
resonance structure (right) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level
Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg]
Ge1-C2 1887(2) Ge1-N1 1944(2) Ge1-K1 34485(6) Ge1-K1rsquo 35728(7)
K1-C2 3092(2) K1-C3 3122(2) K1-C4 3330(2) K1-N1 3402(2) K1-Ge1rsquo
35728(7) N1-C4 1382(3) C1-C2 1516(3) C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3)
C4-C5 1508(3) C2-Ge1-N1 843(1) C4-N1-Ge1 1130(1) C3-C2-C1 1202(2)
C3-C2-Ge1 1116(2) C1-C2-Ge1 1281(2) C4-C3-C2 1174(2) C3-C4-N1
1135(2) C3-C4-C5 1254(2)
The formulation of the resonance structure clarifies that the nitrogen atom has a
higher affinity to carbon instead to germanium (Scheme 32) The mesomer 3c is
energetically less favorable than 3a and 3b This explains also that the Ge1-C2 bond
(1887(2) pm) is shorter than the Ge1-N1 bond (1944(2) pm) in 3
Results and Discussion
- 26 -
Scheme 32 GeNC3-ring resonance structures of germylenide anion of 3
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 4 shows four sets of doublets and one
multiplet for methyls of Dip-groups in the range from 091 to 130 ppm Resonances
for methyl-groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 162 ppm as one singlet
Multiplets in the range of 329-340 are assigned to CH-groups of iso-propyl groups
The resonance of CH proton at the GeN2C3 ring appears at δ = 503 ppm One singlet
at δ = 564 ppm is assigned to NH-groups One set of resonances for aromatic protons
of Dip-groups appears in the range of 683-718 ppm
Figure 32 Molecular structure of germylene amide 4 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn
at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 2051(2) Ge1-N2 2026(2) Ge1-N3
1905(2) N1-C2 1329(3) N2-C4 1332(3) C1-C2 1518(3) C2-C3 1394(3)
C3-C4 1394(3) C4-C5 1512(3) N3-Ge1-N1 9720(8) N3-Ge1-N2 8876(9)
N2-Ge1-N1 8822(8) C2-N1-Ge1 1229(2) C4-N2-Ge1 1240(2) N1-C2-C3
1227(2) C4-C3-C2 1269(3) N2-C4-C3 1239(3)
Results and Discussion
- 27 -
The structure of compound 4 was established by single crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis (Figure 32) It consists of a slightly puckered six-membered GeN2C3 ring
with geometric parameters similar to the corresponding parameters found in precursor
chlorogermylene 1[80]
The sum of bond angles at Ge atom of 2742deg is comparable to
that of 1 (2815deg) implying the presence of a lone pair of electrons at the Ge center
The Ge-N distances in 4 (2026(2) and 2051(2) ppm) are somewhat longer than those
in chlorogermylene 1 (1988(2) and 1997(3) ppm) In the structure of 4 the terminal
Ge-N distance of 1905(2) pm is significantly shorter than those the endocyclic ones
(2026(2) 2051(2) pm) because it is a common covalent bond and stronger than
dative NrarrGe bonds
A plausible mechanism for the formation of 3 and 4 is proposed as depicted in
Scheme 33 The reduction of (nacnac)GeCl 1 by elemental potassium gives the N-
heterocyclic potassium germylidenide 3d as initial transient species The latter
undergoes a ring contraction to give the transient germylene amide 3e which reacts
with 1 in a salt metathesis reaction affording the Dip-N-bridged bis-germylene 3f
Reductive fission of a Ge-N bond in 3f by elemental potassium leads to the germylene
anion potassium salt 3 and the potassium β-diketiminato-GeII amide (nacnac)Ge-NK-
Dip The formation of 4 from (nacnac)Ge-NK-Dip needs a subsequent protonation
from the solvent in an inert atmosphere
Scheme 33 The mechanism of the formation 3 and 4
Results and Discussion
- 28 -
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
This part of the research is the cowork with Shenglai Yao (TU Berlin)
Another reduction experiment of the related β-diketimiate-substituted
organogermanium trichloride 2[82]
(nacnac)GeCl3 with KC8 was investigated The
reaction of 2 with KC8 in THF led to a brown-red mixture from which colorless
crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex K(nacnac)[89]
have been
isolated as side products along with deep-red crystals of the remarkable novel cluster
species 5[83]
in low yield (3 Scheme 34) In contrast reaction of 1 with elemental
potassium in toluene even at 0 degC led merely to the complete replacement of Ge by K
via reduction of GeII to elemental Ge
0 powder and concomitant formation of the
aforementioned β-diketiminato potassium complex
Scheme 34 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
The X-ray crystal diffraction analysis of 5 revealed a dipotassium salt of the first
ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a Ge4 core (Figure 33)
Remarkably to date only a few metal complexes of ldquoheavyrdquo CBD2-
have been
reported featuring a Si4 and Si2Ge2 core[90]
Compound 5 consists of a planar
Ge4(nacnac)22macr dianion in which the two unusual chelating nacnac-ligands are
attached to the Ge4 core each with terminal Ge-C and Ge-N σ-bonds The dianion is
connected by two η3-coordinated K(OEt2) cations each coordinated to Ge1 Ge2 and
N2 and Ge1rsquo Ge2rsquo and N2rsquo respectively The K-Ge distances of 3355(1) pm (K1-
Ge1) and 3477(1) pm (K1-Ge2) are similar to those K-Ge distances in 3 and in
related potassium germanides[84b 85]
The molecular structure of 5 is also notable for
Results and Discussion
- 29 -
the parallelogram-like configuration of the planar Ge4 moiety The Ge1-Ge2 of
2512(1) pm and Ge1-Ge2rsquo distance of 2553(1) pm are close to the Ge-Ge single
bonds observed in bulky substituted cyclotetragermanes (ca 251 pm)[91]
and longer
than those in Ge4Co complexes[90d]
(235-237 pm) while the transannular Ge2-Ge2rsquo
distance of 2747(1) pm is much longer Interestingly despite of the pyramidal
coordination environment of the Ge atoms the Ge42macr core of 5 shows extremely
strong aromaticity as supported by DFT calculations (see section 313)
Figure 33 Molecular structure of 5 containing a Ge42minus
cluster Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity
Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1rsquo 1932(3) Ge1-Ge2 2512(7)
Ge1-Ge2rsquo 2553(7) Ge2-Ge2rsquo 2747(1) Ge1-K1 3355(12) K1-N2 2814(3)
K1-Ge2 3477(1) N1-C2 1381(4) Ge2-C3rsquo 2019(3) C2-C3 1369(5) C3-C4
1479(5) N2-C4 1296(4) Ge2-Ge1-Ge2rsquo 657(2) Ge1-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 1143(2) Ge1-
Ge2-Ge2rsquo 578(2) Ge1rsquo-Ge2-Ge2rsquo 564(2) N1rsquo-Ge1-Ge2 8716(9) N1rsquo-Ge1-
Ge2rsquo 1026(9) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1 886(1) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 963(1) C2-N1-Ge1rsquo
1239(2) C3-C2-N1 1205(3) C2-C3-C4 1227(3) C2-C3-Ge2rsquo 1184(3) C4-C3-
Ge2rsquo 1184(3) N2-C4-C3 1220(3)
Scheme 35 shows the assumed mechanism of the formation of Ge42minus
cluster 5 The
product after the first reductive step by KC8 is (nacnac)GeCl 1 which was confirmed
by NMR investigation Chlorogermylene 1 could dimerize by sequential reduction to
Results and Discussion
- 30 -
a bis-germylene 5a Due to the instability of 5a bearing two bulky nacnac ligands a
transformation could be in the ascendant from dimer 5a to stable P4-like Ge4-tetramer
5b Intermediate 5c could be formed after double intramolecular deprotonation and
elimination of ldquofreerdquo (nacnac)H The excessive KC8 could offer two electrons to
molecule orbitals of Ge4-cluster 5c to furnish the isolated product 5 with a Ge42minus
cluster
Scheme 35 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 5
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5
The structural feature of 3 leads to a discussion of a possible aromatic character of
the GeNC3-ring in comparison to cyclobutadiene anion Aromaticity is also a key
Results and Discussion
- 31 -
concept in describing homo-elemental four-membered rings such as the square planar
cyclobutadiene-like dianion Therefore nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS)
values for the five-membered GeNC3-rings and the four-membered Ge4-ring in
compound 3 and 5 were calculated by Prof Christoph van Wuumlllen (University of
Kaiserslautern) Since their introduction NICS[92]
values have been used as an
aromaticity criterion in numerous applications both for organic and inorganic
compounds[93]
NICS values were computed using the molecular structures of compound 3 and 5
from X-ray diffraction analysis The positions of the non-hydrogen atoms were taken
from the X-ray data and kept fixed while the hydrogen positions were optimized
using the TURBOMOLE program package[94]
and its density functional capabilities[95]
an exchange-correlation functional with gradient corrections to exchange and
correlation[96]
(BP86 functional) and polarized triple-zeta (TZVP) basis sets[97]
The
geometry optimizations used density fitting techniques (also known as the RI
approximation)[98]
to evaluate the matrix elements of the electrostatic Coulomb
potential
NICS tensors are defined for any position as the negative magnetic shielding at
that position The magnetic shielding tensors were obtained using the integral-direct
IGLO program[99]
which has been extended to allow the use of density functional
theory[100]
The B3LYP[96a 101]
functional and a basis of IGLO-III[102]
quality were
employed For Ge this is a 4s11p7d1f primitive basis sets in which only the steepest
five s-functions three p-functions and two d-functions are contracted In lack of
IGLO-type basis sets for potassium a TZVDP (triple zeta two sets of polarization
functions) basis was used which will affect the accuracy of the magnetic shieldings at
the centers of the potassium atoms but not elsewhere
The ring centre for each ring system was calculated first from the Cartesian
coordinates and determined the plane through the ring center for which the sum of the
Results and Discussion
- 32 -
squares of the distance of that plane to the positions of the atoms forming the ring is
minimal This plane was defined as the ring plane A line through the ring center that
is orthogonal to the plane defines the positions of the NICS centers above and
below the ring centers and the local z direction to which the NICS tensors are
transformed to obtain the zz as well as the in plane (mean value of the xx and yy)
tensor components in addition to the isotropic value which is one third of the sum of
the xx yy and zz components The zz component is of particular interest because a
ring current parallel to the ring plane will most strongly be induced if the external
magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane and the magnetic field induced by such a
current will also be in that direction
In addition to the NICS tensor at the ring center (NICS(0) value) its height profile
contains useful additional information[103]
First the height profile discriminates ring
current effects (which are associated with aromaticity) from diatropic contributions
which stem from the proximity of the ring atoms while the latter approach zero
quickly when moving out of the ring plane the former only slowly do so Furthermore
the height profile helps to distinguish π-aromaticity (which is the type of aromaticity
dominant in organic chemistry) from σ-aromaticity (which is found for many
inorganic compounds) if aromaticity only stems from π-electrons which produce no
ring current in the ring plane then the NICS values when moving out of the ring
center first decrease (ie become more negative) before they gradually approach zero
NICS values 100 pm above or below the ring plane (ldquoNICS(1) valuesrdquo)
Table 31 reports NICS results for compound 3 where the region towards to
coordinating K+ ion was denoted as above the plane of the five-membered GeNC3
rings the other side as below Up to 100 pm the results for NICS centers above and
below are quite similar then the results for the positions 150 and 200 pm above the
ring start to be affected by the K+ ion whose distance to the ring plane is 299 pm The
NICS values are negative and the tensors are highly anisotropic the negative isotropic
value stems from the large and negative zz component Furthermore these values fall
Results and Discussion
- 33 -
off quite slowly when moving out of the ring plane This indicates a diamagnetic ring
current indicative of aromatic behavior Furthermore the most negative values are not
found in the ring center but slightly above which indicates π-aromaticity Of course
this is exactly what has to be expected for a heteroatom analogue of a
cyclopentadienyl anion This is interesting however because the NICS values for
compound 5 see Table 32 show a slightly different behavior again Negative NICS
values fall off slowly but the tensors show a substantial negative in-plane component
up to 200 pm above (or below this is the same in this compound) ring plane This can
be explained by diatropic contributions from the Ge-C and Ge-N bonds which are
nearly perpendicular to the ring plane The second difference between compound 3
and compound 5 is that the NICS values (both the isotropic values and the zz tensor
component) fall off monotonically and have no hump at about 1 pm above the ring
plane The aromaticity of the Ge4 ring in compound 5 must therefore have substantial
σ-character
Table 31 NICS values for compound 3 in ppm (the results are the same for both GeNC3 rings)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash77 ndash87 ndash56
50 pm above ndash82 ndash50 ndash144
100 pm above ndash73 +16 ndash251
150 pm abovea)
ndash59 +64 ndash298
200 pm abovea)
ndash116 +36 ndash422
50 pm below ndash82 ndash46 ndash154
100 pm below ndash74 +04 ndash230
150 pm below ndash54 +19 ndash199
200 pm below ndash37 +11 ndash134
a)
Value affected by a close K+ ion coordinated by the GeNC3 ring
Results and Discussion
- 34 -
Table 32 NICS values for compound 5 in ppm (the results are the same at both sides of the Ge4
ring)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash389 ndash375 ndash417
50 pm above ndash324 ndash286 ndash399
100 pm above ndash215 ndash155 ndash334
150 pm above ndash144 ndash93 ndash248
200 pm above ndash109 ndash82 ndash165
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6
As a nucleophile the germanium(II) anion in 3 seems a promising precursor for the
synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylenes and of related heterodinuclear bis-
metallylenes Accordingly the coupling reaction of the nucleophilic GeII centre in 3
with the electrophilic GeII site in 1
[80] was examined and the reaction in THF at -30 degC
yielded a dark red solution from which the bis-germylene 6[104]
has been isolated as
air- and moisture-sensitive dark red crystals in 66 yield (Scheme 36) The isolated
bis-germylene 6 was fully characterized including X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 36 Synthesis of bis-germylene 6
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 6 exhibits four sets of doublets in the range from 107
to 124 ppm with the ratio of 121266 which can be assigned to CH3-groups of all
Dip-groups The three singlets in the range of 161-262 ppm can be assigned to the
CH3 groups at the ligand backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear
in the range of δ = 301-367 ppm as three sets of septet The remarkable deshielding
Results and Discussion
- 35 -
of the resonance signal for the ring CH proton of the five-membered GeNC3 ring (δ =
682 ppm) is indicative a stronger 6π-aromatic resonance stabilization compared with
that in the precursor 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The proton resonance signal for the γ-ring
proton in the six-membered GeN2C3 ring of δ = 518 ppm suggests however the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization In the UV-vis spectra of 6 an absorption
band is observed at 501 nm showing blue shifted in comparison to the values
observed for related amidinate- and guanidinate- substituted bis-germylenes[40]
(I27
and I28 in Introduction) with GeI-Ge
I bonds
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8
The reactivity of 3 towards chlorostannylene 7[80]
(nacnac)SnCl was examined
also by a coupling reaction If (nacnac)SnCl 7 was used as electrophile for the
reaction with 3 in diethylether at -70 degC this furnished the corresponding product
germylene-stannylene 8[104]
which was isolated in the form of dark red crystals in
34 yield (Scheme 37) The new compound 8 was fully characterized including
NMR spectroscopy (1H
13C
119Sn) and X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 37 Synthesis of germylene-stannylene 8
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 exhibits six sets of doublets in the range from 085 to
129 ppm with the ratio of 666666 for CH3-groups of all Dip-groups The three
singlets in the range of 165-300 ppm can be assigned to the CH3 groups at the ligand
backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear in the range of δ = 305-
378 ppm as three sets of septets
Results and Discussion
- 36 -
A similar situation was observed in the NMR spectra of 8 for the CH moiety at
ligand backbones The deshielding for the ring CH proton of the five-membered
GeNC3 ring in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 (δ = 691 ppm) indicates again a stronger
6π-aromatic resonance stabilization than in 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The chemical shift (δ =
510 ppm) for the γ-ring proton in the six-membered SnN2C3 ring of 8 also shows the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization The 119
Sn chemical shift of 8 at δ -197
ppm in the 119
Sn-NMR spectrum is comparable to the value observed for the precursor
(nacnac)SnCl 7 (δ -224 ppm)[80]
implying a three-coordinated tin atom in solution In
the UV-vis spectrum of 8 an absorption band is observed at 541 nm The latter is
somewhat red shifted in comparison to the values of bis-germylene 6
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8
The new GeI-Ge
I compound 6 represents the first asymmetric substituted bis-
germylene while germylene-stannylene 8 is the first GeI-Sn
I example Their
molecular structures were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis
(Figure 34) Both N2C3 backbones of the chelating six-membered MN2C3 ring (M =
Ge Sn) are essentially planar but the germanium and tin atoms are out of the
respective plane The five-membered GeNC3 rings in both compounds however are
almost planar The most important structural features are the Ge-M distances and
trans-bending angles The Ge-Ge distance of 25498(8) pm in 6 is the shortest GeI-Ge
I
distance among the distances values observed in known bis-germylenes[38 40-42]
(257-
267 pm see Introduction p 10) but significantly longer than those in digermenes[13f
105] (Ge=Ge 221-247 pm) and digermynes
[3b 20 106] (GeequivGe 221-231 pm) This
relatively short Ge1-Ge2 distance was explained with asymmetric structural feature of
6 and some ionic charge distribution between five- and six-membered rings (see
section 317 DFT calculation)
Results and Discussion
- 37 -
Structural features of 6 and 8 are shown in Scheme 38 The torsion angles of the
Ge1-Ge2 bond with Ge1-N1-N2 and Ge2-N3-C31 planes in 6 are 1043deg and 1184deg
respectively (1262deg-1387deg in digermyne[20 106]
) In the structure of 8 the Ge-Sn
distance of 27210(4) pm is longer than that value observed for a Ge=Sn double bond
in a germastannene[107]
and also longer than the Ge-Sn distance in
germylstannanes[105 108]
The torsion angles of the Ge-Sn bond with Sn1-N1-N2 and
Ge1-N3-C31 planes are 939deg and 1006deg respectively (943deg in diplumbylene I4)[16]
Such Ge-M (M = Ge Sn) central bond lengths and trans-bent angles are indicative of
the absence of Ge-M multiple bond character of 6 and 8
Scheme 38 Drawing of torsion angles in 6 and 8
Figure 34 Molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right) Thermal ellipsoids (C1-C5
C30-C34 N1-N3 Ge1 Ge2 and Sn1) are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 6 Ge1-
Ge2 2549(1) Ge1-N1 2015(4) Ge1-N2 2038(4) Ge2-N3 1951(4) Ge2-C31
1903(5) N1-Ge1-N2 8867(15) N1-Ge1-Ge2 10430(11) N2-Ge1-Ge2
Results and Discussion
- 38 -
10149(12) C31-Ge2-N3 8447(19) C31-Ge2-Ge1 11890(15) N3-Ge2-Ge1
9962(12) For 8 Sn1-Ge1 27210(4) Sn1-N1 2233(2) Sn1-N2 2231(2) Ge1-
N3 1964(2) Ge1-C31 1915(3) N2-Sn1-N1 8288(8) N2-Sn1-Ge1 9542(5)
N1-Sn1-Ge1 10368(5) C31-Ge1-N3 8433(12) C31-Ge1-Sn1 11495(9) N3-
Ge1-Sn1 10200(6)
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8
In order to clarify the electronic structure and bonding nature in 6 and 8 DFT
calculations were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The simplified
molecules 6a and 8a [6a M = Ge 8a M = Sn (LanL2DZ for Sn)] (scheme 39) in
which the Dip-groups (26-iPr2C6H3) of 6 and 8 were replaced by phenyl groups were
calculated as model compounds DFT calculations of the model compound of 6a was
performed at the B3LYP6-31(d) level and the model compound 8a was performed at
B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set for Ge N C and H atoms and the LANL2DZ
level for the Sn atom
Scheme 39 Computed model compounds 6a and 8a
The computed geometry is in good agreement with the experimental metric
parameters A NBO analysis of 6a and 8a shows that the HOMOrsquos have a large Ge-M
bond character (Figure 35) and the latter derives largely from overlap of Ge and Sn
p-valence orbitals (6a s 1180 p 8820 8a s 978 p 9022) Apparently the
Ge-M bonds possess s character Likewise the Wiberg bond index exhibits Ge-E bond
orders of 08525 (6a) and 07290 (8a) respectively Similar bonding natures have
Results and Discussion
- 39 -
been identified and reported previously for related GeI-Ge
I dimers
[38 40-42] In addition
the nature of the HOMOrsquos and LUMOrsquos of the model compounds 6a and 8a
corresponds to that of a diplumbylene[16]
which again underlines that the Ge-M bond
in 6 and 8 represents a pure σ-bond
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
Figure 35 Frontier orbitals of model compound 6a and 8a
Interestingly the HOMOrsquos show clearly the presence of p-orbital interaction within
the six-membered MN2C3 ring and a slight interaction with the Ge centre in the
GeN2C3 ring Accordingly the five-membered GeNC3 ring bears a negative net charge
while the six-membered MN2C3 ring has a positive one [NPA charges in the GeN2C3
ring in 6a Ge +065 N (mean) -069 C (mean) 008 vs GeNC3 ring Ge1 +055 N -
066 C (mean) -015 NPA charges in the SnN2C3 ring in 8a Sn +095 N (mean) -
072 C (mean) 007 vs GeNC3 ring Ge +040 N -066 C (mean) -017] Thus the
latter parameters suggest some ionic character of the Ge-M bonds Moreover the
pronounced electron acceptor character of the GeN2C3 ring is also reflected by the
strongly negative values of NICS for 6a and 8a [6a NICS(0) = -88 NICS(1) = -82
8a NICS(0) = -76 NICS(1) = -74] The latter confirms the presence of a 6π-
aromatic stabilization in 6 and 8 as indicated by the 1H-NMR data (see p 34-36)
Results and Discussion
- 40 -
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands
The β-diketiminato ligands can undergo several side-reactions such as 13-
coordination C-N-exchange ring-contraction and deprotonation (Scheme 310) A
more rigid β-diketiminato ligand with a six-membered C6-ring in the backbone was
envisioned to prevent those side-reactions and possibly enhance the stability of the
products[81-83 109]
Scheme 310 Coordination possibilities of the classical β-diketiminato ligand
The syntheses of new β-diketiminato ligands[110]
12 and 20 are shown in Scheme
311 They are easily accessible from the N-cyclohexylidene-26-diisopropyl-
benzenamine 9[111]
in a two-step procedure First the deprotonation of 9 with nBuLi in
diethylether leads to the corresponding lithium amide 10 Salt metathesis reaction of
10 with (Z)-N-(26-diisopropylphenyl)benzimidoyl chloride 11[112]
or (Z)-N-isopropyl
benzimidoyl chloride[112]
19 in diethylether then afforded the novel β-diketiminato
type ligand 12 and 20[110]
in 63 and 60 yield respectively The new compounds
12 and 20 have been analyzed by NMR spectroscopy ESI-mass spectrometry X-ray
diffraction and elemental analyses
Results and Discussion
- 41 -
Et2O - 78degCnBuLi
Et2O - 78degCN
Dip
9
N
Dip
10
Li
N
Ph Dip
Cl
11
12
N
NH
Ph
Dip
Dip
Et2O - 78degC
N
Ph iPr
Cl
19
20
NH
N
Ph
Dip
iPr
Scheme 311 Synthesis of new β-diketiminato ligands 12 and 20
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 12 displays four sets of doublet for methyl of
Dip-groups in the range from 117 to 134 ppm The multiplets by 164 ppm and 217
ppm are assigned to CH2 of the six-membered ring The resonance of NH proton
appears at δ = 187 ppm Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear at δ = 335 ppm
as multiplet The 1H-NMR spectrum of 20 shows three sets of doublet for the
isopropyl of Dip-groups in the range from 109 to 132 ppm The peaks of four CH2
groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 156 208 and 214 ppm as multiplet
The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear by 310 and 323 ppm as septet The
resonance of NH group appears at δ = 1203 ppm as doublet because of the 3J-
coupling with neighbor CH group Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-groups
and phenyl appear in the range of 696-727 ppm for 12 and 713-753 ppm for 20
respectively
NH group connecting with iso-propyl in 20 is also confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 36 and Scheme 312) In compound 12 the N1-C1 bond
length (1360(2) pm) is longer than the N2-C3 bond length (1305(2) pm) due to the
presence of N1-H bond Contrarily the N1-C1 bond length (1309(2) pm) in
compound 20 is shorter than the N2-C3 bond length (1356(2) pm) because of the
presence of N2-H bond
Results and Discussion
- 42 -
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph Dip
Dip
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph iPr
Dip
1356
1386
1445
1309
1377
1360
1305
1452
12 20
HH
Scheme 312 Bonding situation of new ligands 12 and 20 bond length in pm
Figure 36 Molecular structure of compounds 12 (left) and 20 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 12 N1-C1 13600(17) N1-
C13 14349(18) C1-C2 13769(19) C1-C4 15136(18) N2-C3 13046(16) N2-
C25 14297(17) C2-C3 14515(18) C2-C7 15257(18) N1-C1-C2 12221(12)
C1-C2-C3 12230(12) N2-C3-C2 12212(12) For 20 N1-C1 1309(2) N1-C17
1418(2) C1-C2 1445(2) C1-C4 1522(2) N2-C3 1356(2) N2-C14 1461(2)
C2-C3 1386(2) C2-C7 1524(2) C3-C8 1495(2) N1-C1-C2 12080(15) C1-
C2-C3 12151(15) N2-C3-C2 12288(15)
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16
Scheme 313 shows the synthesis of chlorogermylene 14[110]
and germylene 16[110]
Through lithiation of compound 12 with nBuLi the Lithium complex 13 was formed
quantitatively The subsequent reaction of 13 with the dichlorogermylene dioxane
complex[27]
(GeCl2middotC4H8O2) affords the desired chlorogermylene 14 in 82 yield
Results and Discussion
- 43 -
Furthermore germylene 16 was obtained by dehydrochloration of 14 with 13-di-tert-
butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15[113]
as a base in 78 yield The composition and
constitution of 14 and 16 were fully characterized by elemental analysis IR and
multinuclear NMR spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 313 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and germylene 16
In the 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 14 resonances of 8 methyl moieties of Dip-
groups appear in the range from 097 to 155 ppm as multiplets The multiplets in the
range of δ = 128-139 and 203-227 ppm are assigned to CH2 moieties of the six-
membered ring Four sets of septets by 317 327 394 and 417 ppm are assigned to
methine protons of the iso-propyl groups The 1H-NMR spectrum of 16 displays three
sets of doublet for methyl moieties of the Dip-groups in the range from 115 to 135
ppm The peaks of four CH2 groups of the six-membered C6-ring appear at δ = 155
204 and 221 ppm as multiplet Resonances for the methine protons of the iso-propyl
groups appear by 369 and 380 ppm as septets A triplet at δ = 415 ppm is assigned to
the proton connecting with C=C double bond This resonance confirms the
deprotonation of C-CH2 to a C=CH structure on the ligand backbone Resonances for
aromatic protons of Dip-groups and phenyl appear in the range of 680-739 ppm for
145 and 675-725 ppm for 16 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 14 and 16 are shown in Figure 37 and
Figure 38 In compound 14 the six-membered GeN2C3 ring exhibits a boat-like
Results and Discussion
- 44 -
conformation The C2N2 moiety of the chelating ligand (N1 N2 C1 C3) is nearly
planar and the Ge and C2 atoms are out-of-plane (Ge 37 pm C2 13 pm) In
compound 16 the GeN2C3 ring is almost planar The Ge-N bond lengths in 14
(1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) are longer than those in 16 (1843(3) and 1861(3) pm)
and the N1-Ge1-N2 bond angle (9123deg) in 14 is smaller than that of compound 16
(9509deg) This is probably owing to the dative nature of the Ge-N bonds and the three-
coordinate Ge(II) atom in 14 The Ge-Cl bond length of 2296(1) pm in 14 is
consistent with the value observed in the N-heterocyclic β-diketiminato
chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl[80]
The fused cyclohexyl moiety of 14 is distorted
and the phenyl group is oriented in nearly the same direction as the aryl group on the
N2 atom while the C2 C3 C4 and C7 atoms of the fused C6 ring in 14 are coplanar
with the N2C3 ring (C1 C2 C3 N1 N2) while the C5 and C6 atoms deviate above
the plane of the N2C3 ring This conformation of the cyclohexyl moiety is also
observed in compound 16 It is of note that the buta-13-diene moiety (C1 C2 C3 C4
C32) of compound 16 clearly has alternating C-C distances (C32-C1 1498(4) C1-C2
1359(4) C2-C3 1461(4) and C3-C4 1360(4) pm) which is not the case in known
germylene (nacnac)Ge[87]
published in 2006
Figure 37 Molecular structure of compound 14 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 19760(16) Ge1-N2 19804(17) Ge1-Cl1
22956(7) N1-C1 1342(3) N1-C14 1458(3) C1-C2 1397(3) C1-C8 1502(3)
N2-C3 1333(3) N2-C26 1463(2) C2-C3 1415(3) C2-C7 1522(3) C3-C4
Results and Discussion
- 45 -
1509(3) C4-C5 1522(3) N1-Ge1-N2 9123(7) N1-Ge1-Cl1 9560(5) N2-Ge1-
Cl1 9392(5) C1-N1-Ge1 12568(13) N1-C1-C2 12352(17) C1-C2-C3
12503(19) N2-C3-C2 12440(18) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(13)
Figure 38 Molecular structure of compound 16 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 1843(3) Ge1-N2 1861(3) N1-C3 1426(4)
N1-C8 1442(4) N2-C1 1408(4) N2-C20 1454(4) C1-C2 1359(4) C2-C3
1461(4) C1-C32 1498(4) C2-C7 1525(4) C3-C4 1360(4) N1-Ge1-N2
9509(11) C3-N1-Ge1 300(2) N1-C3-C2 1176(3) C1-C2-C3 1267(3) C2-C1-
N2 1241(3) C1-N2-Ge1 1259(2)
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O
The unusual donor-acceptor properties of the zwitterionic silylene and germylene
were described in our group in 2006[30 87]
In these molecules the exocyclic methylene
group remains more negative charges due to the aromaticity of the center six-
membered ring This implies the presence of two reactivity positions in the molecule
a strong nucleophilic methylene group and a nucleophilic (ns-orbital) and
electrophilic (np-orbital) at the metallylene site Mesomeric structures of zwitterionic
germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties are shown in Scheme 314
Results and Discussion
- 46 -
To probe the donor-acceptor properties of zwitterionic germylene 16 its reactivity
toward ammonia and water was investigated Germylene 16 undergoes controllable
ammonolysis and hydrolysis (Scheme 315) Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas
at room temperature in toluene resulted in the formation of the corresponding
aminogermylene 17[110]
in high yield (92) Likewise germylene 16 also readily
reacts with water to produce germylene hydroxide 18[110]
nearly quantitatively (95)
Scheme 314 Mesomeric structures of germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties
Scheme 315 Syntheses of aminogermylene 17 and germylene hydroxide 18
The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectroscopic data of 17 and 18 are very similar to the
corresponding resonances of chlorogermylene 14 appearing at or near the same
chemical shifts In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 17 the protons of the NH2 group appear
at δ = 154 ppm This chemical shift is close to that of the dimeric aminogermylene
(ArrsquoGeNH2)2 (Arrsquo = 26-Tip2C6H3) (δ = 162 ppm)[60a]
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 18
displays a singlet for the hydroxide proton at = 166 ppm which is close to the
respective value observed for the dimeric germylene hydroxide [(nacnac)GeOH]2 (δ =
154 ppm)[114]
The IR spectrum of 18 clearly shows two N-H stretching modes of the
NH2 group at v = 3430 and 3343 cmndash1
respectively These values are similar to those
observed for related aminogermylenes (ArGeNH2)2 (Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) (3380
and 3308 cmndash1
) and (nacnac)GeNH2 (3431 and 3333 cm-1
)[115]
A sharp absorption at v
Results and Discussion
- 47 -
= 3643 cmndash1
that can be attributed to the O-H stretching frequency was observed in
the IR spectrum of 18 This value resembles that of germylene hydroxide
(nacnac)GeOH (3571 cm-1
)[114]
The structure of 17 and 18 are shown in Figure 39 Both compounds 17 and 18 are
monomeric species The structural features of 17 and 18 are very similar and show
close structural parameters compared with that of chlorogermylene 14 As in 14 the
Ge1 and C2 atoms of 17 and 18 slightly deviate from the N2C2 ring (N1 N2 C1 C3)
plane [17 Ge 46 pm and C2 13 pm 18 Ge 49 pm and C2 13 pm] The Ge-N
(ligand) bond lengths (17 2017(2) and 2021(2) pm 18 20054(17) and 20071(16)
pm) of 17 and 18 are longer than the Ge-N(amide) bond length of 17 (1829(3) pm)
Interestingly the Ge-N distance (1905(2) pm) in (nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip 4[83]
due to the
large Dip-substituent is also 8 ppm longer than that of 17 In each case there is clearly
a difference between the dative bond and covalent bond Compound 18 represents the
first monomeric three-coordinate GeII hydroxide in the solid state (Figure 39) owing
the larger steric congestion around the GeII center in contrast to (nacnac)GeOH
[114]
Figure 39 Molecular structures of compound 17 (left) and 18 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 17 Ge1-N1 2021(2) Ge1-
N2 2017(2) Ge1-N3 1829(3) N1-C1 1349(4) C1-C2 1395(4) N2-C3
1336(4) C2-C3 1417(4) C3-C4 1509(4) N3-Ge1-N2 9503(11) N3-Ge1-N1
9709(13) N2-Ge1-N1 8932(10) C1-N1-Ge1 1253(2) C3-N2-Ge1 1247(2)
For 18 Ge1-O1 18249(18) Ge1-N2 20054(17) Ge1-N1 20071(16) N1-C1
Results and Discussion
- 48 -
1340(3) C1-C2 1402(3) N2-C3 1331(3) C2-C3 1419(3) C3-C4 1509(3)
O1-Ge1-N2 9387(8) O1-Ge1-N1 9529(8) N2-Ge1-N1 8943(7) C1-N1-Ge1
12597(14) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(14)
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
In order to understand the coordination behavior of ligand 20 experiments using
germanium precursors GeCl2sdotdioxane and GeCl4 were conducted (Scheme 316) The
reaction of compound 20 with one equivalent of nBuLi resulted directly the lithiated
intermediate 21 The subsequent reaction with GeCl2sdotdioxane in Et2O at -78 degC led to
the unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained
by reaction of 21 with GeCl4 in toluene at -78 degC through dehydrochloration with 13-
di-tert-butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15 as a base in 57 yield The composition and
constitution of 22 and 23 were elucidated by elemental analysis multinuclear NMR
spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 316 Syntheses of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 22 exhibits 6 sets of doublets for 6 methyls of
iso-propyl Five sets of multiplets in the range of δ = 121-206 ppm are assigned to
the CH2 moieties of the six-membered C6-ring Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl
Results and Discussion
- 49 -
appear at δ = 284 367 and 396 ppm as septet In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 23 peaks
at δ = 113 122 and 137 ppm are for methyls of iso-propyl as doublets Resonances
of three CH2 groups of the six-membered ring on backbone appear at δ = 146 189
and 206 ppm as multiplets Two sets of septets by 332 and 361 ppm are assigned to
the CH of iso-propyl A triplet at δ = 421 ppm is for the proton of C=CH group on
backbone and indicates a dianionic ligand 20 in compound 23 owing to two times
deprotonation with nBuLi and carbene 15 Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-
groups and phenyl appear in the range of 688-724 ppm for 22 and 701-726 ppm for
23 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 22 and 23 are shown in Figure 310
Compound 22 represents an imine N-donor stabilized oxo-chloro-germylene and
adopts a pyramidal geometry with the sum of bond angles of 2737deg at the GeII center
The inserted oxygen atom could come in all probability from dioxane molecule in
GeCl2dioxane The cyclohexyl unit on backbone is distorted and the free N2 moiety
is oriented in inverse direction to the cyclohexyl The Ge1-Cl1 bond length of
23073(6) pm in 22 is compatible with the value (2296(1) pm) observed in
chlorogermylene 14 The Ge1-N1 distance of 20908(15) pm is visibly longer than
those of 14 (1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) because of the net NrarrGe coordination bond
without resonance stabilization The Ge1-O1 bond length is normal Ge-O single bond
with a distance of 18265(12) pm Bond lengths of N1-C1 (1284(2) pm) and N2-C7
(1272(2) pm) present clearly C=N double bond while bond lengths of C1-C6
(1525(2) pm) and N6-C7 (1539(2) pm) present normal C-C single bonds
In compound 23 GeIV
atom is tetrahedral coordinated with two nitrogen and two
chlorine atoms All six angles in the range of 1028-1138deg at the GeIV
center are
nearly alike with the angle in methane (1095deg) and indicate a slightly distorted
tetrahedral GeN2Cl2 configuration GeIV
-Cl bond lengths (21339(7) and 21375(9) pm)
in 23 are much shorter than those of germylenes 14 and 22 (229-231 pm) Distances
of the GeIV
-N bonds (1798(2) and 1788(2) pm) in 23 are much shorter than the
Results and Discussion
- 50 -
NrarrGe dative bonds in 14 17 and 18 (198-202 pm) and the net NrarrGe dative bond
(20908(15) pm) in 22 But they are only slightly shorter than GeII-N distances
(1843(3) and 1861(1) pm) in germylene 16 and GeII-NH2 bond length (1829(3) pm)
in germylene 17 Bond lengths of C1-C2 (1339(4) pm) and C3-C4 (1326(4) pm) in
23 illuminate clearly C=C double bond and distances of N1-C1 (1430(3) pm) and
N2-C3 (1441(3) pm) correspond to C-N single bond
Figure 310 Molecular structures of compound 22 (left) and 23 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 22 Ge1-Cl1 23073(6)
Ge1-O1 18265(12) Ge1-N1 20908(15) O1-C6 1418(2) N1-C1 1284(2) N2-
C7 1272(2) C1-C6 1525(2) C6-C7 1539(2) Cl1-Ge1-O1 9789(4) Cl1-Ge1-
N1 9422(4) O1-Ge1-N1 8158(6) Ge1-N1-C1 11291(12) N1-C1-C6
11484(16) C1-C6-O1 10975(14) C6-O1-Ge1 11838(10) N2-C7-C6
11778(17) For 23 Ge1-Cl1 21339(7) Ge1-Cl2 21375(9) Ge1-N1 1798(2)
Ge1-N2 1788(2) N1-C1 1430(3) C1-C2 1339(4) C2-C3 1486(4) C3-C4
1326(4) N2-C3 1441(3) N2-Ge1-N1 10554(10) N2-Ge1-Cl1 11208(7) N1-
Ge1-Cl1 11381(8) N2-Ge1-Cl2 11201(8) N1-Ge1-Cl2 11082(8) Cl1-Ge1-Cl2
10276(3) C1-C2-C3 1266(2) C4-C3-N2 1209(2) C2-C4-C3 1208(3)
The formation of compound 22 indicates that ligand 20 has a different reactivity to
the derivative ligand 12 due to the exchange of Dip-group with iso-propyl But the
situation of complex 23 shows a possibility of a dianionic chelating coordination[30 87]
Results and Discussion
- 51 -
of ligand 20 Coordination chemistry with ligand 20 is currently being investigated for
its suitability to serve as bidentate donor ligand for complexes with low-valent Si Ge
and also transition-metals
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28
Since the successful isolation of halogen bonded silylene and germylene[31a 32b 80]
chemists faced the challenge weather compounds like LEII-X-E
IIL [E = Si Ge Sn X
= O S Se] in which two metallylene moieties are bridged by a single X-atom can be
stabilized at room temperature Key points of this assignment are the identification of
effective ligands for the stabilization of metallylenes and a feasible synthetic route
There is a special interest to synthesize this kind of compounds due to their chemical
nature and coordination properties
Previous attempts to synthesize a stable bis-silylene oxide 28b from silylene 28a[30]
has been unsuccessful The isolated product originating from the reaction of water
with the silylene 28a was the stable siloxysilylene 28c[10a]
(a mixed-valent disiloxane)
(Scheme 317) Recently Roesky et al proposed the formation of bis-silylene oxide 28
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2macr) as a reactive intermediate in the reaction of the bis-
silylene I24[37]
(aLSi-Si
aL) with N2O However 28 could be neither detected nor
chemically trapped[116]
By addition of water to two molar chlorosilylene 26[31a]
in
toluene the expected disiloxane 27 could not be isolated from a complicated reaction
mixture (Scheme 317 )
In the following the isolation of the first oxygen-bridged bis-silylene 28 by a facile
synthetic protocol using 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(HSiCl2)2O as starting
material will be described
Results and Discussion
- 52 -
Scheme 317 Synthesis of siloxysilylene 28c and hydrolysis of chlorosilylene 26
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28
The reaction of 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane (HSiCl2)2O with 2 molar equiv of
lithium amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the desired disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield
(Scheme 318) The target bis-silylene oxide 28 was readily available by
dehydrochloration of 27 employing 2 molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene
Recrystallization in toluene afforded pale yellow crystals of 28[32a]
in 76 yield The
molecular structure of new compounds 27 and 28 was characterized by means of
spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 318 Synthesis of disiloxane 27 and bis-silylene oxide 28
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 27 reveals two singlets one for the
tBu groups at δ =
120 ppm and one corresponding to the Si-H protons at δ = 598 ppm as well as one
set of resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of
Results and Discussion
- 53 -
27 shows a singlet resonance at δ = -1110 ppm The 1H-NMR spectra of 28 displays a
singlet of tBu at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for Ph group in aromatic
resonance region The 29
Si-NMR signal of 28 (δ = -161 ppm) appears shifted ca 95
ppm downfield from the precursor 27 This shift is comparable to that reported for the
triply coordinated silylene alkoxides (aLSiO
tBu) (δ = -52 ppm) and (
aLSiO
iPr) (δ = -
135 ppm)[31b]
respectively
The molecular structure of disiloxane 27 is shown in Figure 311 The center Si1-
O1-Si2 part of molecule 27 was extensively disordered Therefore the X-ray data were
not suitable for accurate discussion Even though the nearly unbent Si1-O1-Si2 angle
(1680deg) in 27 shows a very similar bonded character with sp-hybridized oxygen
bridge in comparison to another disiloxane compounds[118]
The molecule of bis-silylene oxide 28 (Figure 312 left) contains two triply
coordinated Si atoms and two lone pairs one at each of the Si centers Those are two
silylene moieties The sum of bond angles at Si1 and Si2 are 27769deg and 27534deg
respectively which is consistent with the presence of lone pairs In the molecular
structure of 28 Si-O distances of 1641(2) and 1652(2) pm are comparable to those of
siloxysilylene 28c (16442(3) pm and 16501(2) pm) and thus typical for silicon-
oxygen single bonds of other disiloxanes[118]
Moreover as expected for an disiloxane-
like system the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent (15988(15)deg) and larger than
that observed for a C-O-C moiety of ethers
DFT calculations of the compound 28 was performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU
Berlin) at the B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set with the GAUSSIAN-03 program
package[101c 119]
The structure obtained by X-ray analysis was used as the input for
these calculation Optimized structure of 28 is shown in Figure 312 (right) DFT
calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small The
Si-O-Si bond angle of optimized structure is 180deg However the energy difference
between the experimental geometry and linear arrangement is only 071 kJsdotmolminus1
The
Results and Discussion
- 54 -
HOMO (-0163 eV) and HOMO-1 (-0178 eV) represent mainly lone pairs at Si atoms
The LUMO (-0020 eV) is located on the phenyl group of the amidinate ligand
(Figure 313)
Figure 311 Molecular structure of 27 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity The center Si1-O1-Si2
part was extensively disordered Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Cl1-Si1
20349(16) Cl2-Si2 22017(11) Si2-O1 1581(8) Si2-N3 1798(2) Si2-N4
1968(2) Si1-O1 1562(8) Si1-N2 1750(10) Si1-N1 1994(6) Si1-O1-Si2
1680(6)
Figure 312 Molecular structure of 28 (left) and optimized structure (right)
Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted
for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Si1-O1 1641(2) Si2-O1
1652(2) Si1-N1 1896(3) Si1-N2 1902(3) Si2-N3 1888(2) Si2-N4 1908(3)
Si1-O1-Si2 15988(15) O1-Si1-N1 10417(12) O1-Si1-N2 10535(11) O1-Si2-
N3 10196(11) O1-Si2-N4 10481(12) N1-Si1-N2 6815(10) N3-Si2-N4
6855(11)
Results and Discussion
- 55 -
Figure 313 Calculated frontier molecular orbitals of 28
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel
To probe the chelating coordination ability of 28 its reactivity toward Ni(cod)2
(cod = cycloocta-15-diene) was investigated Toluene was added to a mixture of bis-
silylene oxide 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 at room temperature to furnish an
intensely red-colored reaction solution Recrystallization of the crude product from a
saturated n-hexane solution at -30 degC afforded dark red crystals of the Ni complex
29[32a]
in 91 yield (Scheme 319) The isolated compound 29 is the first bidentate
bis-silylene transition-metal complex This work initiates a significant progress on the
chelating silylene ligand transition-metal coordination chemistry The constitution and
composition of 29 could be determined by NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis
and ESI mass spectrometry
Scheme 319 Synthesis of bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
Results and Discussion
- 56 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one singlet for the
tBu groups at δ = 130
ppm and one set of resonances at δ = 281 295 and 504 ppm for the COD-ligand and
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one
singlet (δ = 328 ppm) which shows a downfield shift relative to that of the ldquofreerdquo
ligand 28 The observed downfield shift for the 29
SiII nuclei in 29 clearly suggests the
presence of a bis-silylene chelated complex
The chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to Ni0 is confirmed by X-ray
diffraction analysis The molecular structure of 29 is displayed in Figure 314
Complex 29 containing Ni0 is diamagnetic because of 18 electrons in the valence
shell The two silylene subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are
tetrahedral coordinated to the nickel atom with the Si1-Ni1-Si2 angle at 6890(3)deg
The Si-O bond lengths in 29 [17011 (15) and 17081(17) pm] are longer than that in
28 [1641(2) and 1652(2) pm] while the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 29 (9344(8)deg) is
significantly smaller than that in 28 The Ni-Si bond lengths [21908(7) and 21969(7)
pm] are slightly shorter than those in silylene nickel complex 29a [2207(2) and
2216(2) pm][120]
but longer than those found in silylene nickel complex 29b
(21395(8) pm)[121]
Scheme 320 shows clear bonded prospect of three complexes
Moreover the Ni-Si bond lengths of bis-silylene nickel complex 29 are longer than
those in ylide-like silylene-nickel complexes [20369(6) and 20597(10) pm][70a b 122]
The strong σ-donor character of bis-silylene ligand 28 causes a more electron rich Ni
center It indicates a somewhat stronger π-back-donation from the nickel atom to the
chelating COD-ligand Therefore the Ni-C distances (2070-2090 pm) in 29 are
shorter than those in Ni(cod)2 (211-213 pm)[123]
and silylene nickel complex 29b
(2130-2146 pm)[121]
The coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 with other transition-metals (for example
Ti Cu) is currently investigated together with the reactivity of these complexes on
their use as molecular catalysts
Results and Discussion
- 57 -
29
[Si][Si]
O
Ni
[Si] [Si]
Ni
CO CO
[Si] [Si]
Ni
N N tButBu
Si
N N DipDip
Si
[Si] = [Si] =
29a 29b
2207 2216
2191 2197689deg
934deg
1084deg 1019deg
1708 1701
2139 2139
Scheme 320 Comparison of bonding state in complexes 29 29a and 29b bond lengths in pm
Figure 314 Molecular structure of 29 (left) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Si1-Ni1 21969(7) Si2-Ni1 21908(7) Si1-O1 17011(15)
Si1-N1 18929(19) Si1-N2 1875(2) Si2-O1 17081(17) Si2-N3 18776(19)
Si2-N4 1893(2) Si1-O1-Si2 9344(8) Si1-Ni1-Si2 6890(3) N1-Si1-N2
6941(9) N3-Si2-N4 6954(8)
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
This part of the research is the cowork with Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)
Due to the unique reactivity and electronic properties compounds with a
heteroleptic multiple bond between heavier main-group elements have attracted
considerable attention particularly those between group 14 and 15 elements this is
Results and Discussion
- 58 -
attributed to the pronounced polarity of the E14-E15 multiple bonds[124]
Phosphasilene
containing Si-P double bonds is an analogous of iminosilane The first isolable
phosphasilene with a three coordinate Si and a two coordinate P atom was reported by
Bickelhaupt and coworkers (Scheme 321) in 1984[125]
and several other similar
species containing localized and delocalized Si=P bonds were synthesized and
structurally characterized in the later period[126]
Their rich chemistry provides new
approaches to functional Si-P compounds
Furthermore the more challenging phosphasilyne with a silicon-phosphorus triple
bond (Scheme 321) is heretofore unknown[127]
this is mainly due to the high
tendency of the highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds to dimerize or even
oligomerize[126c]
However the availability of elusive phosphasilyne species would be
a strongly desired progression with respect to the synthesis of polyfunctional silicon-
phosphorus containing materials from it By spatial protection of a Si-P multiple bond
through the steric hindrance by suitable bulky substituents the oligomerization of the
highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds could be prevented additionally to the benefit of
the donor-acceptor stabilization of Si-P multiple bonds
Scheme 321 The first phosphasilene (left) and phosphasilyne (right)
Imaginable methods to synthesize a phosphasilyne employing corresponding
precursors comprise oxidation of bis-silylene 30a with elemental phosphorus and
elimination of phosphino silane 30b (Scheme 322) Whether the phosphasilyne 30c is
available depends only on the spatial andor donor-acceptor protection of bulky ligand
L Now there are not many choices of silicon compounds with very bulky ligand L
that are suitable for preparation of phosphasilynes Our current attempt was on the
Results and Discussion
- 59 -
way towards phosphasilyne employing amidinato ligand stabilized chlorosilylene
aLSiCl
[31a] However the isolated dimerized product was the unique 24-disila-13-
diphosphacyclobuta-13-diene (aLSiP2Si
aL) 31
[128] starting from the new N-
heterocyclic bis(trimethylsilyl) phosphino silylene precursor 30[128]
Scheme 322 Imaginable methods towards a phosphasilyne
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The starting material bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanyl silylene 30[128]
was easily
accessible in 83 yield by salt elimination reaction of N-heterocyclic chlorosilylene
26[31a]
with the corresponding lithium phosphide LiP(SiMe3)2 at room temperature
(Scheme 323) The 1H-NMR spectrum exhibits one singlet at δ = 058 ppm for methyl
of silyl and another singlet at δ = 124 ppm for methyl of NtBu as well as one set of
resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand in the region of 681-741 ppm
The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 30 shows two sets of doublet at δ = 229 ppm for silicon
of silyl and at δ = 1943 ppm for silicon of silylene The latter is much downfield
shifted than that of previously reported aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (562 ppm)
[31b] One
singlet at δ = -221 ppm was found by 31
P-NMR measurement which exhibits a
tremendous upfield shift when compared with that of aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (-165
ppm)[31b]
Results and Discussion
- 60 -
Scheme 323 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The molecular structure of 30 was also substantiated by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 315) The molecule 30 contains triply coordinate Si and P
atoms and two lone pairs at the Si and P center respectively The Si and P center
display a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry The sum of bond angles is 33071deg at
the P center and 27762deg at the Si center The latter is consistent with that (2765deg) of
aLSi-P
iPr2 The angle of N(2)-Si(1)-P(1) (10854(8)deg) is larger than that of N(1)-Si(1)-
P(1) (9998(9)deg) Si-N distances of 1877(3) and 1882(2) pm in 30 are comparable to
those (1875(1) pm and 1881(1) pm) of the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative
[31b] The Si1-P1
distance of 30 (22838(12) pm) is slightly shorter than the Si-P bond length (2307(8)
pm) in the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative and the elongated P1-Si2 and P1-Si3 single bonds in
30 (22264(13) and 22321(12) pm) reflect steric congestion within the P(SiMe3)2
subunit
Figure 315 Molecular structure of 30 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 22838(12) P1-Si2 22264(13) P1-Si3 22321(12)
Si1-N1 1877(3) Si1-N2 1882(2) Si2-P1-Si3 10859(5) Si2-P1-Si1 103905
Results and Discussion
- 61 -
Si3-P1-Si1 11822(5) N1-Si1-N2 6910(11) N1-Si1-P1 9998(9) N2-Si1-P1
10854(8)
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Since the phosphanyl silylene 30 was successfully accessed bearing a SiMe3 as
reactive leaving-groups at phosphorus[129]
its suitability as a precursor for the
formation of a phosphasilyne was probed Because of the labile nature of the P-SiMe3
bonds in 30 the compound was exposed to dichlorotriphenylphosphorane Ph3PCl2 as
a promising smooth oxidant for desilylation with the intention to produce the desired
phosphasilyne along with Me3SiCl and PPh3 Surprisingly the reaction of 30 with one
molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 in toluene at room temperature led to the formation of the
unique compound 31[128]
(Scheme 324) which could be isolated as yellow crystals in
72 yield
Scheme 324 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Compound 31 represents a dimerized form of the desired phosphasilyne and was
fully characterized by means of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-
ray diffraction analysis The 1H-NMR spectra of 31 displays a singlet for the
tBu
groups at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for the Ph groups in the ldquoaromaticrdquo
region The triplet signal in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 31 at δ = 265 ppm (1JSiP = 998
Hz) indicates that two P atoms are bonded to silicon center Meanwhile the more
deshielded (ca 46 ppm) singlet resonance at δ = -1649 ppm in the 31
P-NMR spectrum
compared to that in 30 is in accordance with the four-membered ring structure of 31
Results and Discussion
- 62 -
bearing two polarized Si-P π-bonds
The result of the X-ray diffraction structure analysis is in accordance with that of
NMR spectroscopy which confirms that 31 is a 24-disila-13-diphosphacyclobuta-
13-diene (Figure 316) The Si2P2 core in 31 has a planar diamond-shaped geometry
and possesses two-coordinated P atoms and four-coordinated Si atoms each with a
dative NrarrSi bond The Si-P bonds lengths in 31 are 21701(12) and 21717(11) pm
respectively which are in the range of a Si=P double bond length (2095(3) pm) in the
Phosphasilene[128]
and the Si-P single bond length of 30 (22838(12) pm) this
indicates σ- and π-electron resonance stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has
been confirmed by theoretical calculations (see p 64) Of note the transannular
Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo (25626 pm) is shorter than the Si-Si distance of disilacyclopropene[130]
(tBu3Si)2SiSi(Si
tBu3)C-Ad (Ad = adamantyl) (25797(8) and 25991(9) pm) and hexa-
tert-butyldisilane tBu3Si-Si
tBu3 (2697(9) pm) and the P1middotmiddotmiddotP1rsquo (3505 pm)
separations in 31 is much larger than that for P-P bonds observed in tetrahedral
elementary phosphorus P4 (221 pm)[131]
Evidently the peculiarly short Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo
distance is caused by the geometric constraints of the Si1-P1-Si1rsquo and endocyclic P1-
Si1-P1rsquo angles of 7234(4)deg and 10766(4)deg respectively and not driven by attractive
Si1-Si1rsquo interaction
Figure 316 Molecular structure of 31 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 21701(12) P1-Si1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-N1 1858(3)
Si1-N2 1856(2) Si1-P1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-Si1rsquo 25626(16) Si1-P1-Si1rsquo 7234(4)
N2-Si1-N1 7078(11) P1-Si1-P1rsquo 10766(4)
Results and Discussion
- 63 -
The formation of 31 in a multistep which is depicted in Scheme 325 was proposed
Firstly formation of the corresponding chloro-(silyl)phosphanyl silylene intermediate
31a is conducted by cleavage of one of the Si-P bonds of the P(SiMe3)2 subunit with
Ph3PCl2 Subsequently elimination of Me3SiCl from 31a occurs to give the reactive
intermediate 31b which could be treated as a silylene-phosphinidene (Scheme 325
right) or a phosphasilyne (Scheme 325 left) further dimerization of intermediate 31b
affords the isolated product 31 A similar dimerization process has been proposed by
Wiberg for disilynes (SiequivSi) as reactive intermediates to produce
tetrasilatetrahedranes[132]
To elucidate the reason for the formation of 31 preferred over its hypothetical Si2P2-
tetrahedranceisomer 31d (Scheme 326) we performed DFT calculations of 31 and
disiladiphosphatetrahedranes 31d The result shows that 31d is much less stable than
compound 31 with 462 kcalmiddotmolminus1
higher in energy which is in agreement with the
experimental result Compound 31 with a planar structure is most likely stabilized by
the dative NrarrSi coordination of the bulky amidinato ligands Meanwhile this also
leads to a shorter Si-N bond length that is 1856(2) and 1858(3) pm in 31 are shooter
than those (1877(3) pm and 1882(2) pm) of in 30 and also those of in chlorosilylene
aLSiCl (1870(2) pm and 1917(2) pm)
[31a] Furthermore this NrarrSi donor
stabilization could demonstrate an ylide-like electronic structure of 31 (Scheme 326)
Scheme 325 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 31
Results and Discussion
- 64 -
Scheme 326 Resonance structures of 31
In order to unravel the electronic configuration of 31 DFT calculations at
B3LYP6-31G(d) level using the parameters obtained from X-ray diffraction as the
initial structure were performed[101c 119]
The optimized structure matched the
experimental data of 31 very well According to the NPA charges each Si atom in the
Si2P2-ring has a large positive net charge (+1204) while as expected P atoms in the
ring bear slight smaller negative charges (-0765) Meanwhile HOMO-5 of 31 shows
a set of Si-P σ-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 left) whereas the HOMO-2 contains
mainly the delocalized two π-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 right) Accordingly a
NBO analysis indicates that the Si2P2-core of 31 bears a Lewis structure with four
occupied σ-bond orbitals for the Si-P bonds (1917e for Si1-P1 1916e for Si1-P1rsquo
1916e for Si1rsquo-P1 and 1918e for Si1rsquo-P1rsquo) along with two filled Si-P π-bond
orbitals with 1770e for the Si1- P1 and Si1rsquo-P1rsquo π-bonding interaction respectively
The latter canonical π-bond orbitals are strongly polarized toward the P atoms
(8753 at the P and 1247 at the Si) Likewise the WBI (Wiberg Bond Index)
values of the Si-P bonds (1142 and 1140) are higher than that of the phosphino
silylene 30 (0920)
Figure 317 Molecular orbitals of 31 representing the presence of σ-electron and π-
electron delocalization within the Si2P2 cycle HOMO-5 (left) and HOMO-2 (right)
Results and Discussion
- 65 -
According to the aforementioned betaine (ylide)-like resonance stabilization 31
totally differs from cyclobuta-13-diene derivatives The calculations of the nucleus
independent chemical shift[92]
(NICS) also supports this conclusion The result of
NICS reveals negative values (NICS(1) = -257 and NICS(0) = -601 ppm) indicating
that 31 has a somewhat aromatic character which is opposite to the properties of
cyclobuta-13-dienes that are antiaromatic As a summary the results of theoretical
calculations are in agreement with the idea to describe 31 as the ylide-like resonance
structure 31c with some contribution of the resonance forms As a result the smaller
endocyclic angle at phosphorus than that at silicon is contributed by the repulsion
between the negatively charged P atoms
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
Nucleophilic and electrophilic properties of Si Ge and Sn metallylenes were
discussed in chapter 32 (see p 46) Due to the strong donor property of the carbene
lone pair in coordination to empty p-orbital of low valent Si Ge Sn atom centers
some carbene stabilized divalent Si Ge Sn halides could be synthesized in the last
twenty years[28 44 133]
There is also a great interest to find mixed Si Ge Sn
metallylene-metallylene complexes in which one metallylene is stabilized through the
lone pair coordination of another one In the following the synthesis of the first
example of a silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex will be shown
The dimeric micro-chlorotin(II) amides 32[53]
(I44 in Introduction) was identified as
useful candidate for the generation of such an example The synthesis of
bis(trimethylsilyl)amino-tin chloride ((Me3Si)2N-SnCl)2 32 is shown in Scheme 327
Bis(bis(trimethylsilyl)amino)2tin(II) ((Me3Si)2N)2Sn 32a could be prepared in good
yield by the double lithioamination of SnCl2 with LiN(SiMe3)2 in a 1 2 ratio[47a]
The
Results and Discussion
- 66 -
same reaction but with one molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 gives the monosubstituted
product 32 It was also easily accessible by amino chlorine exchange between
((Me3Si)2N)2Sn and SnCl2 in a 11 ratio[53]
(Scheme 327)
Scheme 327 Synthesis of micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32
The dimeric structure of 32 can be splited by treatment with Lewis base for
example Si Ge Sn metallylenes In order to synthesize a silylene coordinated
stannylene chlorosilylene 26 was mixed with micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32 in toluene A
logical intermediate 33a is proposed here as an inevitable intermediate (Scheme 328)
At first chloro bridges are opened because of the coordination of silylene 26 to create
33a Then via amino chlorine exchange product 33 becomes accessible From a
saturated hexane solution at low temperature the silylene-stannylene dichloride 33
was isolated as colorless crystals in 49 yield The product 33 was determined by X-
ray diffraction analysis and elemental analysis Owing to the unstable nature of
silylene and tin dichloride coordination bond (Si rarrSn) 33 decomposed in a grey
mixture powder of amino silylene also-N(SiMe3)2
[33d] and SnCl2 after isolation from
solvent in vacuum 1H-NMR spectrum shows only resonances of amino silylene in
good agreement with the reported compound[33d]
Scheme 328 Synthesis of aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
According to X-ray diffraction analysis compound 33 represents the first example
of silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex The molecular structure of 33 (Figure 318)
Results and Discussion
- 67 -
exhibits a trigonal pyramidal geometry on Sn and a distorted tetrahedral configuration
of Si The Cl-Sn-Cl angle is 9400(9)deg and the sum of bond angles at the Sn center is
2820deg The SirarrSn distance (2740(2) pm) is longer than the Si-Sn bond lengths
(2622(2) and 2641(2) pm) in the silyl stannane compound[134]
(Scheme 329) The
Sn-Cl distances of 2468(3) and 2473(3) pm in 33 are comparable to those in a
carbene-stannylene complex (2456(2) and 2458(2) pm) (Scheme 329)[133b]
Si-N
distances of 1832(7) and 1827(7) pm in 33 are somewhat shorter than those of
phosphanyl silylene 30 (1877(3) and 1882(2) pm) and amino silylene (18780(10)
and 18776(10) pm) which is the remaining molecule of 33 without SnCl2[33d]
Scheme 329 A silyl stannane[134]
(left) and a carbene-stannylene complex[133b]
(right)
Figure 318 Molecular structure of 33 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Sn1-Si1 2740(2) Sn1-Cl1 2468(3) Sn1-Cl2 2473(3) Si1-
N1 1832(7) Si1-N2 1827(7) Si1-N3 1705(7) Si2-N3 1780(7) Si3-N3
1791(8) Cl1-Sn1-Cl2 9400(9) Cl1-Sn1-Si1 9886(8) Cl2-Sn1-Si1 8914(7)
Sn1-Si1-N3 1252(3) N2-Si1-N1 722(3) Si1-N3-Si2 1172(4) Si1-N3-Si3
1248(4) Si2-N3-Si3 1179(4)
Results and Discussion
- 68 -
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34
Because of the feasible structural tuning with many choices of donor groups a
general overview of pincer arenes was introduced (Introduction p 19) Compounds of
type 35a having a pincer-like skeleton are depicted in Scheme 330 They represent
promising new types of pincer ligands which could coordinate with a metal by facile
C-H activation in the ortho-position Although many bis-metallylenes are accessible
(see Introduction 13) pincer ligands containing divalent heavier group 14 elements
are new in the field of synthetic inorganic chemistry At the same time the desired
pincer arenes 35a could serve as much stronger σ-donor ligand towards transition-
metals than traditional phosphane ligands[70 79b c 122]
Up to now only a few isolable
spacer separated bis-silylenes with two divalent silicon centers are known these
include bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
in this work and bis-silylenes I42[52]
I58[61]
and
I64[65]
(in Introduction p 12-15) Inspired by these results the synthesis of a
silicon(II)-based pincer ligand 35a appeared attractive and its coordination property
towards transition-metals should be investigated
Scheme 330 Low-valent group 14 metallylene-based ECE pincer arenes
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35
Scheme 331 shows the synthetic route for the first attempt towards a bis-silylene-
based SiCSi pincer arene 35d The phenolation of trichlorosilane was readily
accessible to disilane 35b in hexane Reaction of 35b with two molar equiv of lithium
Results and Discussion
- 69 -
amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the amidinate substituted disilane 35c The bis-
silylene pincer arene 35d was not easily separable by the following dehydrochloration
of 35c employing two molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene Products seemed a
complicated silylene-LiCl mixture which was not soluble in toluene or diethylether
The desired bis-silylene pincer arene could not be isolated from mixtures
Scheme 331 The first attempt towards a bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35d
But the synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35 could be achieved through the protocol
in Scheme 332 Dilithiation of 46-di-tert-butylresorcinol with nBuLi furnishes the
corresponding 13-dilithium resorcinolate 34 After a salt metathesis reaction with the
N-donor stabilized chloro silylene 26[32b]
in the molar ratio of 12 the desired
compound 35[33b]
could be isolated as pale yellow crystals in 79 yield The
constitution and composition of SiCSi pincer arene 35 was elucidated by 1H-
13C-
and 29
Si-NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 332 Synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 35 exhibits one singlet for the N
tBu groups at δ = 124
ppm and one singlet for CtBu groups at δ = 174 ppm and one set of resonances for the
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands Almost identical variable-temperature (VT) 1H-
NMR spectra of 35 in C7D8 in the temperature range of 210 to 320 K indicate
Results and Discussion
- 70 -
relatively low rotation barriers of the Si-O bonds on the NMR time scale A sharp
singlet in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum at δ = -240 ppm is comparable to that observed for
alkoxy-substituted silylenes aLSiOR (R =
tBu
iPr)
[31b]
The molecular structure of 35 could be confirmed by a preliminary single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis but a discussion of metric parameters was not possible
because of the moderate crystal quality Still it is clear that the two silylene-like
moieties in 35 face in the almost same direction (Figure 319) To get more
information about the molecular structure of 35 DFT calculations [B3LYP6-
31G(d)][101c 119]
were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The geometry of 35
obtained by X-ray crystallographic analysis was used as the initial structure The
optimized structure of 35e and 35ersquo is displayed in Figure 320 The Si1-O1-C1 angle
(14179deg) is larger than that of Si2-O2-C3 (13217deg) While the dihedral angle of Si1-
O1-C1-C2 is 2437deg the dihedral angle of Si2-O2-C3-C2 is 039deg
Figure 319 Molecular structure of 35 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity X-
ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The Si-O single bond distances of 17056 and 17190 pm are little longer than those
of bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
(1641(2) and 1652(2) pm) and alkoxysilylenes aLSiOR
(R = tBu
iPr)
[31b] (16442(3) and 16501(2) pm) due to steric hindrance The C2-
Results and Discussion
- 71 -
symmetric rotational isomer 35ersquo was identified as a stable form on the hyperpotential
energy surface with a slightly lower energy of 75 kJsdotmolminus1
Interestingly the Si-O
distance of 35ersquo is little longer than those of 35e The bond rotation barrier of the Si-O
bonds in 35e and 35ersquo is similar and estimated to be +334 kJsdotmolminus1
by theoretical
calculation
Figure 320 Optimized structures of bis-silylene SiCSi pincer ligand 35e (left) and
its rotational isomer 35ersquo (right) at the B3LYP6-31G(d) level Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) of 35e and 35ersquo
compound 35e Si1-O1 17056 Si2-O2 17191 Si1-O1-C1 14179 Si2-O2-C3
13217 compound 35ersquo Si1-O1 17294 Si2-O2 17294 Si1-O1-C1 13028 Si2-
O2-C3 13028
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII
complex 36
Although bis-silylene 35 bearing an amidinate ligand may not serve as a π-acceptor
it was a strong σ-donor ligand To investigate the pincer-type coordination ability of
35 its reactivity towards phosphine palladium(0) complexes was evaluated Treatment
of 35 with 05 equiv of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)-palladium Pd(PPh3)4 in hexane
at room temperature afforded the novel silylene-silyl(phenyl)palladium(II) complex
36[33b]
as sole product which could be isolated as orange crystals in 81 yield
(Scheme 333)
Results and Discussion
- 72 -
Scheme 333 Formation of 36 from reaction of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
A different type of silyl-silylene metal complexes has been described by Ogino and
co-workers[66b c 78]
Compound 36 was fully characterized by multinuclear NMR
spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis The structure of 36
indicates that two equivalents of 35 were consumed With a 11 molar ratio of starting
materials the yield of 36 decreased (asymp30) but still no other product or intermediate
could be detected by 1H-NMR spectroscopy
The molecular structure of 36 is shown in Figure 321 Remarkably compound 36
crystallizes as racemic mixture of its R and S enantiomers of which only the S form is
presented here The PdII atom has a typical distorted square-planar configuration
defined by the two silylene SiII atoms Si2 and Si3 the silyl Si
IV atom Si1 and the
carbon atom C1 of the central aryl ring Interestingly there is a 12-hydride shift from
palladium to silicon during the complexation forming a Si-H silyl group which breaks
the former Si1-N2 bond in 35 Due to coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo The bent Si3-Pd1-C1 angle of 16783(12)deg in 36
is contrary to the linear X-Pd-C (X = Cl I Ph 4-fluorophenyl OCOCF3 etc) angles
of reported palladium(II) complexes supported by a PCP type pincer arene ligand[72b
77 135] The Si1-Pd1-Si2 angle of 15503(4)deg deviates from the linear alignment and is
smaller than the respective P-Pd-P angle of the PCP pincer-type palladium
complex[72b 77 135]
The silylene PdII dative bond lengths (Si2-Pd1 23271(12) and
Si3-Pd1 23038(11) pm) of 36 are shorter than that of the Si1-Pd1 distance
Results and Discussion
- 73 -
(23561(12) pm) illustrating the difference between a silyl ligand (Si1) with a SiIV
-Pd
single bond vs a silylene ligand (Si2 and Si3) with a SiII-Pd dative bond However
the Si2-Pd1 and Si3-Pd1 distances in 36 are somewhat longer than those of
silylenerarrpalladium complexes[136]
(224 and 226 pm) from Kira (Scheme 334)
Furthermore Pd1-C1(aryl) bond length of 36 (2125(3) pm) is longer than those of
reported PCP pincer-type palladium(II) complexes (Pd-C distance 197-203 pm)[135a-e
135g] presumably because of steric congestion
Scheme 334 Silylenerarrpalladium complexes from Kira[136]
Figure 321 Molecular structure of 36 Only the S form of racemic mixture is
shown Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity except for the H1 atom Selected bond lengths (pm) and
angles (deg) Pd1-C1 2125(3) Pd1-Si1 23561(12) Pd1-Si2 23271(12) Pd1-Si3
23038(11) Si1-O1 1694(3) Si1-N1 1789(4) Si2-O2 1675(3) Si2-N5 1862(3)
Si2-N6 1840(4) Si3-O3 1662(3) Si3-N7 1888(3) Si3-N8 1860(3) Si4-O4
1704(3) Si4-N3 1893(4) Si4-N4 1892(4) Si1-Pd1-Si2 15503(4) Si1-Pd1-C1
Si2Si1
C1
Pd
Si3
213 pm
233 pm236 pm
230 pm
O1 O2
Results and Discussion
- 74 -
7861(11) Si2-Pd1-C1 7681(11) Si3-Pd1-C1 16783(12)
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 36 shows twelve sets of nonequivalent
tBu groups
which agrees with its crystallographic analysis Moreover the resonance for the Si-H
proton is observed at δ = 659 ppm The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 36 in C6D6 displays
four signals at δ = minus87 (aLSi Si4) 397 (HSi Si1) 623 and 658 ppm (SirarrPd Si2
and Si3) respectively The chemical shift of the Si1 atom (SiIV
-H) has moved upfield
comparable to those of a related HSirarrPd complex reported by Kira Iwamoto and co-
workers because of the electronegative N and O atoms bound to the Si1 atom[136a]
The 29
Si resonances of the two SiII atoms (Si2 Si3) coordinated to the palladium
center are similar to those of other amidinate-based silylene transition-metal
complexes[71 137]
and significantly shifted to higher field in comparison to those
reported for donor-free silylene palladium complexes owing to the additional N-donor
coordination of the amidinate ligand to the SiII atom Additionally the infrared
spectrum of 36 shows a weak Si-H stretching vibration band at 2135 cmminus1
The
observed stretching frequency of 36 is higher than those of other reported palladium
hydridosilyl complexes (2008ndash2121 cmminus1
)[135c 135f 136a]
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism
To investigate the uncommon reactivity of 35 towards Pd(PPh3)4 quantum
chemical calculations using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP level using
6-31G(d) basis set for H C N O P and Si atoms and the LANL2DZ level for the Pd
atom with the Gaussian 03 program for model compounds 36andash36e were performed
by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)[101c 119]
A schematic representation of the potential
energy surface of the proposed pathway for the formation of 36 is given in Scheme
335
Results and Discussion
- 75 -
Scheme 335 DFT-derived relative energies of model compounds 35a-35e
From this it was assumed that stepwise dissociation of phosphine ligands of
Pd(PPh3)4 forms 36a as the initial intermediate by the insertion reaction of Pd0 into
the pincer C-H bond of the central aryl ring of 35 Subsequently the 16-valence
electron PdII complex 36a undergoes a 12-hydride shift from palladium to a silicon(II)
donor atom to form the 14-valence electron silylene silyl(aryl)palladium(II) complex
36c as second intermediate The latter process occurs through transition state 36b-TS
with a barrier of +878 kJsdotmolminus1
and 36c is only 67 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36b-TS
The electron-deficient PdII complex 36c readily undergoes coordination with
phosphine ligand or silylene donor moiety of ldquofreerdquo 35 leading to the formation of
more stable 16-electron complexes According to that the calculated relative energies
of PrarrPd complex 36d stabilized by PPh3 and SirarrPd complex 36e stabilized by
methoxy silylene aLSiOMe as model silylene donor are +380 and minus176 kJsdotmol
minus1
respectively Since SiII of intramolecular N-donor stabilized silylenes is a stronger σ-
donor than PIII
of phosphines complex 36e is 556 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36d
Overall the stepwise transformation of 36a into 36e in the presence of PPh3 and the
model silylene aLSiOMe is exothermic by 176 kJsdotmol
minus1
Results and Discussion
- 76 -
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
After successful isolation of the first bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
and the first bis-
silylene pincer arene 35[33b]
in order to obtain other new bis-silylene(germylene) as
potential bidentate σ-donor ligands the novel type of bis-silylene(germylene) with a
ferrocendiyl spacer which could result in unique properties was investigated The
facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
aLSi-Fc-Si
aL 38 (Fc = ferrocendiyl) and
aLGe-Fc-Ge
aL 40 respectively as well as
their corresponding cobalt and iron complexes could be realized in the course of this
PhD thesis[33a]
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40
Since the reaction of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
with dilithium resorcinolate 34 afforded
the SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 35 was assumed that chlorosilylene 26 and
chlorogermylene 39[41]
(aLGeCl) could be suitable precursors for the desired bis-
metallylene functionalized ferrocenes Ferrocene with nBuLi and TMEDA
(tetramethylethyldiamine) in hexane gave 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37[138]
quantitatively
Subsequently treatment of chlorosilylene 26 with 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 led to the
formation of bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield (Scheme 336) Similarly
bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40[33a]
could be isolated in 77 yield by salt metathesis
reaction of 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorogermylene 39 The structures of 38
and 40 were determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis mass
spectrometry and X-ray crystallographic analysis (only for compound 40)
1H-NMR spectra of compound 38 and 40 are very similar They exhibit a singlet for
four tBu groups (38 δ = 116 ppm 40 δ = 111 ppm) Two sets of hyperfine coupled
triplet (38 δ = 451 and 472 ppm 40 δ = 461 and 471 ppm) are assigned to the
protons of ferrocene The resonance of the Ph protons (38 and 40) appears in aromatic
Results and Discussion
- 77 -
resonance region from 690 to 717 ppm Accordingly the 13
C-NMR spectra of 38 and
40 each show three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (38 δ = 709 727 and
846 ppm 40 δ = 701 723 and 920 ppm) Furthermore bis-silylene 38 gives rise to
a singlet at δ = 433 ppm in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum
Scheme 336 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 40
Single crystals of 40 suitable for an X-ray single crystal analysis were obtained
from hexane solution The crystals of 40 consist of two conformational isomers as
shown in Figure 322 Two molecular structures of 40 confirm that the two N-donor-
stabilized germylene moieties are bonded to C1 and C7 (endo-configuration) or C8
(exo-configuration) of the ferrocendiyl spacer Distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C7 in
40-endo are 1979(9) and 1983(11) pm while distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C8 in 40-
exo are 1991(2) and 19774(19) pm respectively The Ge-N bonds (2006 to 20402
pm) of two isomers are slightly shorter than those of precursor 39[41]
The GeII centers
in 40 adopt a pyramidal geometry with the sums of bond angles of 25593deg and
25669deg for 40-exo 2591deg and 2546deg for 40-endo respectively The structural feature
of the amidinate ligands in 40 is reminiscent of those reported for related bis-
germylenes such as I63[64]
(aLGe-NPh)2 and I75 I76 LGe-X-GeL (X = O S L =
tBuC(N-Dip)2)
[67] The isolation of two conformational isomers of 40-exo and 40-endo
indicates a small rotating energy of the functional ferrocendiyl That means bis-
germylene 40 and bis-silylene 38 don not need more activation energy serving as
bidentate ligand
Results and Discussion
- 78 -
Figure 322 Molecular structures of 40-endo (top) and 40-exo (bottom) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 40-endo (top) Ge(1)-C(1)
1979(9) Ge(2)-C(7) 1983(11) Ge(1)-N(1) 2027(8) Ge(1)-N(2) 2006(8)
Ge(2)-N(3) 2022(7) Ge(2)-N(4) 2037(7) C(1)-Ge(1)-N(2) 983(3) C(1)-Ge(1)-
N(1) 955(3) N(2)-Ge(1)-N(1) 653(3) C(7)-Ge(2)-N(3) 953(4) C(7)-Ge(2)-
N(4) 941(4) N(3)-Ge(2)-N(4) 652(3) for 40-exo (bottom) Ge1-C1 1991(2)
Ge2-C8 19774(19) Ge1-N1 20261(16) Ge1-N2 20247(17) Ge2-N3
20402(15) Ge2-N4 20162(16) C1-Ge1-N1 9662(7) C1-Ge1-N2 9445(7) N1-
Ge1-N2 6486(7) C8-Ge2-N3 9492(7) C8-Ge2-N4 9716(7) N3-Ge2-N4
6459(6)
The molecular structure of bis-silylene 38 has been ambiguously determined by X-
ray single crystal diffraction The structural feature of 38 is very similar to that of 40-
exo isomer However the X-ray data are not sufficient for any further discussion
(Figure 323)
Results and Discussion
- 79 -
Figure 323 Molecular structure of 38 X-ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The mass spectrometry confirmed the composition of 38 (Figure 324) The (ESI)
mass spectrum of 38 is dominated by a peak at mz 703329 which can be attributed to
the protonated molecular ion [38+H]+ Isotopic distribution of molecular peaks
demonstrates a good agreement with calculated mass composition The comparison of
experiment and calculation confirms the presence of bis-silylenyl substituted
ferrocene molecules
6 9 0 6 9 5 7 0 0 7 0 5 7 1 0 7 1 5 7 2 0
m z
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
Re
lative
Abu
nda
nce
7 0 3 3 2 9
7 0 4 3 3 2
7 0 5 3 3 47 0 1 3 3 4
7 0 6 3 2 96 9 0 2 4 9 6 9 5 2 2 5 7 1 7 3 4 57 1 0 4 7 3
7 0 3 3 3 1
7 0 4 3 3 4
7 0 5 3 3 87 0 1 3 3 6
7 0 6 3 3 17 1 0 3 3 5
N L 3 1 3 E 7
W Y-F e S i2 _ S p ri tze 1 -2 9 R T 0 0 0 -0 7 7 A V 2 9 T F T M S + c E S I F u ll m s [1 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 ]
N L 4 9 7 E 5
C 4 0 H 5 4 F e N 4 S i 2 + H C 4 0 H 5 5 F e 1 N 4 S i 2
p a C hrg 1
Figure 324 Experimental (top) and simulated (bottom) ESI-MS spectra of 38
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable silylene- and
germylene-substituted ferrocenes respectively Alternative example of SiII-ferrocene
Results and Discussion
- 80 -
compound is a disilene-functionalized ferrocene reported by Tokitoh and co-workers
recently[139]
However disilene derivates belong essentially to another type of low-
valent silicon compounds in comparison to triply coordinated silylenes Instead of
conjugated electronic effect of disilene-ferrocene system the ferrocene bridged bis-
silylene or bis-germylene system could have better chelating σ-donor character It is to
confirm in a coordination chemistry of bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 with
transition-metals
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40
In order to investigate the coordination ability of 38 and 40 toward transition-
metals and inspired by the reactivity of bis-silylenes 28 and 35 toward Ni0 and Pd
0[32a
33b] as well as by reports on spacer-separated bis-germylene molybdenum chelated
complex I65-Mo[66b]
(see Introduction p 18) firstly the coordination behavior of
potentially bidentate ligands 38 and 40 towards CoICp complex fragments
[140] was
examined A suitable CoICp source is accessible by treatment of CoBr2 with sodium
cyclopentadienide (NaCp) and potassium graphite (KC8) in tolueneTHF 41 mixture
resulting in the generation of (CpCoILn) (L = toluene or THF) in solution Reaction of
thus-formed CoICp species with bis-silylene 38 yielded the desired bis-silylene Co
I
complex 41[33a]
in 30 yield (Scheme 337) Similarly bis-germylene CoI complex
42[33a]
has been successfully synthesized from 40 and isolated in 61 yield
Scheme 337 Synthesis of bis-silylene and bis-germylene CoICp complexes 41 and 42
Results and Discussion
- 81 -
In comparison to bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 1H-NMR spectra of
compound 41 and 42 show an additional singlet for protons of CoICp group (41 δ =
496 ppm 42 δ = 504 ppm) A singlet for four tBu-groups appears at δ = 111 ppm by
bis-silylene Co-complex 41 and at δ = 139 ppm by bis-germylene Co-complex 42
Two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (41 δ = 440 and 461 ppm 42 δ = 438 and
459 ppm) are assigned to protons of ferrocene The resonance of phenyl protons (41
and 42) appears in aromatic resonance region In the 13
C-NMR spectra of 41 and 42
each exhibit one resonance for carbons of CoICp (41 δ = 780 ppm 42 δ = 759 ppm)
and three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (41 δ = 700 745 and 851 ppm
42 δ = 699 737 and 891 ppm) In the 29
Si-NMR spectrum the coordination of the
bis-silylene moieties to the Co atom results in a drastic downfield shift of the
resonance of 41 (δ = 820 ppm) in comparison to situation of 42 (δ = 433 ppm)
Isolated products 41 and 42 are first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-
silylene or bis-germylene in a chelating fashion The molecular structures of 41 and
42 (Figure 325) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses In both
complexes cobalt is coordinated one side by cyclopentadienyl and another side by bis-
silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40 and contains 18 valence electrons Angles of Si1-Co1-
Si2 and Ge1-Co1-Ge2 are 9389(5)deg and 9279(2)deg respectively
The silicon atoms in complex 41 and germanium atoms in complex 42 are four
coordinated and show a distorted tetrahedral geometry The Co-Si bond lengths of 41
(21252(14) and 21200(14) pm) are similar to that in chlorosilylene CoICp(CO)
complex 41a[141]
(21143(4) pm) Furthermore the Co-Si bonds of 41 are shorter than
the Co-Si distances in dichlorosilylene-CoICp(CO) complex 41b
[142] (21348(5) pm)
in dichlorosilylene-Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41c
[143] (2228(2) pm) in
chlorosilylene Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41d
[141] (22060(6) and 22017(6) pm)
respectively The silicon cobalt double bond (Si=CoV) distance (21848(8) pm) in
cobalt(V) complex 41e[144]
is also longer than dative SirarrCoI bond lengths in complex
41 Structures of cited compounds are drawn for clarity in Scheme 338
Results and Discussion
- 82 -
Scheme 338 Structural features of 41 and cited silylene cobalt complexes
Figure 325 Molecular structures of 41 (top) and 42 (bottom) Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 41 (top) Co1-Si1
21252(14) Co1-Si2 21200(14) Si1-C6 1894(5) Si2-C11 1887(5) Si1-N1
1898(4) Si1-N2 1907(4) Si2-N3 1904(4) Si2-N4 1922(4) Si1-Co1-Si2
9389(5) N1-Si1-N2 6847(15) N3-Si2-N4 6866(16) C6-Si1-Co1 13254(14)
for 42 (bottom) Co1-Ge1 21967(6) Co1-Ge2 21979(6) Ge1-C6 1965(4) Ge2-
Results and Discussion
- 83 -
C11 1961(4) Ge1-N1 2020(3) Ge1-N2 2031(3) Ge2-N3 2041(3) Ge2-N4
2029(3) Ge1-Co1-Ge2 9279(2) N1-Ge1-N2 6490(11) N3-Ge2-N4 6485(11)
C6-Ge1-Co1 13280(10) C11-Ge2-Co1 13140(10)
The Co-Ge bonds of 42 (21967(6) and 21979(6) pm) are also shorter than those in
the germylene cobalt(0) complex [((Me3Si)2N)2GerarrCo(CO)3]2[145]
(2262(1) pm) and
the tetragermacyclobutadiene-CoICp complex η
4-((
tBu2MeSi)4Ge4)CoCp (24616(3)
and 25036(3) pm)[90d]
respectively In fact the Co-Ge bonds in 42 are the shortest
Co-Ge bonds known to date The relatively short EII-Co bonds in 41 and 42 suggest
that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands in the series of divalent silicon
and germanium compounds as yet
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45
To test σ-donor ability of bis-(silylene) 38 versus carbonyl a ligand exchange
reaction between 38 and (CO)2CoCp[146]
was explored When 38 was allowed to react
with two molar equivalents of (CO)2CoCp the bis-silylene 41 bridged bimetallic
cobalt complex 44[33a]
could be obtained in 87 yield accompanied by half CO-
elimination of (CO)2CoCp (Scheme 339) The reaction of bis-silylene 38 with one
molar equivalent of (CO)2CoCp furnished the same product but the isolable yield was
low The structure of 44 was determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy
elemental analysis and infrared spectroscopy
Scheme 339 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged CoI(CO)Cp complex 44
Results and Discussion
- 84 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 44 exhibits a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
124 ppm A singlet (δ = 523 ppm) and two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (δ = 461
and 476 ppm) are assigned to protons of CoICp group and ferrocene with the ratio of
1044 The resonance of phenyl protons appears in aromatic resonance region The
29Si-NMR spectrum of 44 shows a singlet resonance at δ = 857 ppm similar to that
of 41 In the 13
C-NMR spectrum of 44 one characteristic signal for the CO ligands
appears at δ = 2078 ppm Furthermore the IR spectrum of 44 exhibits a strong
stretching band at ν = 1888 cmminus1
attributed to the carbonyl groups on the CoI atoms
The observed CO stretching frequency of 44 is much lower than those of 41a
(ν = 1968 cmminus1
)[141]
thus indicating that the bis-silylene substituted ferrocene 38 is a
much stronger σ-donor than chlorosilylene 26[32b]
Another carbonyl-silylene exchange reaction was investigated between bis-
silylene 38 and diiron nonacarbonyl Fe2(CO)9 Toluene was added to a 11 mixture of
38 and Fe2(CO)9 at room temperature to afford a bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4
complex 45 in 73 yield (Scheme 340) The structure of 45 was determined by
multinuclear NMR spectroscopy infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 340 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4 complex 45
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 45 shows a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
109 ppm Two singlets at δ = 483 and 500 ppm are assigned to protons of ferrocene
Multiplets in the range of 699-739 ppm are resonances of phenyl protons The 29
Si-
NMR spectrum of 45 exhibits a singlet resonance at δ = 1050 ppm It is much more
Results and Discussion
- 85 -
downfield shifted than those in complexes 41 (820 ppm) and 44 (857 ppm) One
characteristic strong signal for the CO ligands appears at δ = 2169 ppm in the 13
C-
NMR spectrum of 45 It is compatible to the resonance (δ = 2167 ppm) of the
silylene-Fe(CO)4 complex aL(
tBuO)SirarrFe(CO)4
[71] In the IR spectrum of 45 the
CO stretching frequencies (2026 1948 1900 cmminusl
) are also quite uniform to those of
this complex (2026 1949 1899 cmminusl
)[71]
Due to the rotation energy of ferrocene and
the symmetric bulky coordination of Fe the second CO-substitution could be more
difficult Consequently a chelated complex 38rarrFe(CO)3 was not observed during the
isolation of products
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts
The investigation of the catalytic activity of complexes 28 41 and 42 was carried
out in collaboration with Stephan Enthaler (TU Berlin)[33a]
Nickel or palladium catalyzed cross-coupling reactions between organozinc halides
and aromatic halides constitute an excellent synthetic method for polyfunctional
aromatic compounds[147]
To probe the catalytic activity of bis-silylene oxide Ni0
complex 28 a cross-coupling reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-
iodobenzene was investigated (Scheme 341) The direct iodine substitution of p-
methoxyl-iodobenzene with organometallic compounds was not expected without a
catalyst In the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3) coupling
reaction was observed and product 46 was obtained in 65 yield indicating a
potential application for this kind of complexes
Results and Discussion
- 86 -
Scheme 341 Application of 28 as precatalyst in cross-coupling reactions
Moreover the reactivity of the resulting complexes 41 and 42 as precatalysts for
Co-mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile was
expected[148]
It is known numerous cobalt complexes have been successfully applied
as precatalysts in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions and this becomes a powerful tool in
organic chemistry to form arene and heteroarene moieties[148-149]
Thus the catalytic
abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions were investigated
(Scheme 342)
Scheme 342 Application of 41 and 42 as precatalyst in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions
A first set of experiments was dedicated to the benchmark trimerization of phenyl
acetylene which resulted in the quantitative formation of isomers 47a and 47b in the
presence of complex 41 To our surprise similar attempts to employ 42 as precatalyst
failed with no product formation presumably due to a stronger coordination of GeII
atoms to the Co center which consequently prevents from the formation of an active
Results and Discussion
- 87 -
site for substrate coordination In another set of experiments the formation of
substituted pyridines 48a and 48b by [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenyl acetylene and
an excess of acetonitrile was detected[150]
The catalytic activity of SiII-Co complex 41
was exhibited distinctly again while no product formation could be observed with
GeII-Co complex 42 To some extent the application of CpCo(CO)2 as precatalyst
gave however substituted pyridines in lower yield (48a (3) and 48b (11))[33a]
Scheme 343 Proposed mechanism of 41 as precatalyst for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition
A possible mechanism for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenylacetylene or nitrile
to obtain 47 and 48 is proposed[149a]
as depicted in Scheme 343 At first bis-silylene
complex 41 could participate in a ligand substitution reaction with the
Results and Discussion
- 88 -
phenylacetylene to form an acetylene side-on complex Co-I The latter undergoes a
ring-formation to give the σ-bonded CoIII
complex Co-II which is saturated in
coordination with bis-silylene 38 Then intermediate Co-III is formed after π-donor
substitution by acetylene The succedent ring-enlargement furnishes the transient σ-
complex Co-IV and a subsequent elimination of products 47 and 48 occurs leading to
the active species Co-I by coordination of two phenylacetylene molecules In this
cobalt catalyzed transformation bis-silylene 38 serves as an important accessorial
ligand making the Co-center with high electron density more active and stabilizing the
intermediates Co-II and Co-IV
Unexpectedly complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is inactive The
possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII donor centers to
Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the substrate coordination
Summary
- 89 -
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
In this work various new metallylenes of Si Ge and Sn and bis-metallylenes
(interconnected and spacer separated) were synthesized The properties and
coordination ability of new metallylenes toward transition-metals including Fe Co
Ni and Pd were studied
The reduction of chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
with excess of elemental
potassium furnished the first potassium germylene anionic salt 3[83]
in 33 yield
along with the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip in 31
yield 3 consists of a dimeric half-sandwich complex interconnected via
intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds Each half-sandwich moiety consists of a
K(OEt2)2 cation which is η5-coordinated to the anionic five-membered planar GeNC3
ring with a considerable Cpmacr-like aromatic stabilization This is supported by density
functional theory (DFT) calculations The treatment of (nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
with KC8
gave the same products 3 4 and novel Ge4-cluster compound 5[83]
in very low yield
Compound 5 represents a dipotassium salt of the first ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like
dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a planar Ge42minus
core
Summary
- 90 -
Figure 41 Central molecular structures of 3 (left) and 5 (right)
The reactivity of compound 3 as nucleophile towards chlorogermylene 1[80]
and
chlorostannylene 7[80]
was examined Coupling reactions of 3 with 1 or 7 led to the
corresponding bis-germylene 6[104]
in 66 yield and germylene-stannylene 8[104]
in
34 yield respectively Compounds 6 and 8 were fully characterized including by X-
ray diffraction analysis The new compound 6 represent the first asymmetric
substituted bis-germylene with the shortest GeI-Ge
I bond length The germylene-
stannylene 8 is the first example with a GeI-Sn
I coupling as yet This novel structural
feature was explained with asymmetric structure and some ionic charge distribution
between 5- and six-membered rings by DFT calculation
Figure 42 Central molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right)
Summary
- 91 -
The synthesis of new ligands 12 or 20[110]
was easily accessible from lithium amide
10 with corresponding benzimidoyl chloride 11 or 19[112]
by salt metathesis reactions
Subsequent reactions of 12 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2middotdioxane furnished
chlorogermylene 14[110]
in 82 yield Germylene 16[110]
was obtained by
dehydrochloration of 14 with carbene 15[113]
in 78 yield The molecule of
zwitterionic germylene 16 bears two reactivity positions a strong nucleophilic
methylene group and a nucleophilic(s-orbital)-electrophilic(p-orbital) germylene site
Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas or with water resulted in the formation of
corresponding aminogermylene 17[110]
or germylene hydroxide 18[110]
in high yield
The reaction of compound 20 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2sdotdioxane led to the
unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained by
reaction of 21 with GeCl4 through dehydrochloration with carbene 15 as a base in
57 yield All new compounds have been characterized spectroscopically and
crystallographically 12 and 20 are new types of asymmetric β-diketiminato ligands
with a fused six-membered C6-ring to prevent the transformation of ligand backbone
and side-reactions of ligands They are promising ancillary chelating ligand for the
synthesis of novel silylenes and stannylenes The preparation of new germylenes
added significantly to the growing field of GeII-chemistry capable of small molecule
activation
Summary
- 92 -
Figure 43 Molecular structures of 16 (left) and 18 (right)
Figure 44 Molecular structures of 22 (left) and 23 (right)
A new challenge in metallylene synthetic chemistry is the preparation of chalcogen
(O S Se) bridged bis-metallylene species Here the synthesis and isolation of the
oxygen bridged bis-silylene 28[32a]
was achieved for the first time Reaction of
(HSiCl2)2O with lithium amidinate gave disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield The bis-
silylene oxide 28 was available by dehydrochloration of 27 employing LiN(SiMe3)2 in
76 yield The molecule of 28 contains two triply coordinated Si atoms and two lone
pairs one at each of the Si centers The Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent and
DFT calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small
Compound 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 furnished the Ni0 complex 29
[32a]
in 91 yield which is the first bidentate bis-silylene transition-metal complex with
18 valence electrons at the metal-site In diamagnetic complex 29 the two silylene
Summary
- 93 -
subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are tetrahedrally coordinated to the
Ni0 atom The strong σ-donor character of 28 led to a more electron-rich Ni center
This work will lead to new insights into the chelating silylene ligand transition-metal
coordination chemistry
Figure 45 Molecular structures of 28 (left) and 29 (right)
To possibly get access to a phosphasilyne a desilylation reaction that is phosphino
silylene 30[128]
was allowed to react with Ph3PCl2 30 was synthesized by facile
phosphanylation of chlorosilylene 26 with LiP(SiMe3)2 in 83 yield Surprisingly the
reaction of 30 with one molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 led to the formation of the unique
product 31[128]
as yellow crystals in 72 yield
An X-ray crystal structure analysis confirmed that 31 is a dimer of the desired
phosphasilyne Compound 31 is the first 4π-elektron Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene
derivate with two-coordinated P atoms and a planar Si2P2-ring The Si-P bond lengths
in 31 represent intermediate values between the Si=P bond length and the Si-P bond
length The equal Si-P distances in 31 already indicate σ- and π-electron resonance
stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has been confirmed by theoretical
calculations According to DFT investigation each Si atom in the Si2P2-ring bears a
large positive net charge (+1204) while the P atoms in the ring have somewhat
Summary
- 94 -
smaller negative charges (-0765)
Figure 46 Molecular structure of 31
Pincer arenes having divalent heavier group 14 elements are currently
unprecedented in synthetic chemistry but assumed to form complexes that could
serve as precatalysts for various organic transformations due to their coordination
ability towards metals Here the synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer
arene ligand 35[33b]
through the substitution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
by 13-dilithium
resorcinolate 34 could be achieved in 79 yield Treatment of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
afforded the unexpected silylene-silyl(phenyl)-palladium(II) complex 36[33b]
as orange
crystals in 81 yield
In compound 36 the PdII atom adopts a typical distorted square-planar
configuration defined by the carbon atom C1 two silylene SiII atoms and the silyl
SiIV
atom which is bonded with a hydrogen atom because of hydride shift to Si1 after
C-H activation by Pd Owing to the coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo With the help of theoretical investigation the
Summary
- 95 -
reaction mechanism was explained and the exothermic transformation from 35 to 36
was confirmed This is a new approach in metallylene transition-metal coordination
chemistry with complexes being potentially applicable in catalytic transformation
Figure 47 Molecular structure of 36 tBu and phenyl groups are not shown
Also a type of bis-metallylene with a ferrocendiyl spacer for new bidentate σ-donor
properties was investigated Here the facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and
bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 38 and 40 as well as their corresponding CoI
complexes could be described for the first time By salt metathesis reaction of 11rsquo-
dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorosilylene 26[32b]
or chlorogermylene 39[41]
furnished
bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield or bis-germylene 40[33a]
in 77 yield respectively
Reactions of a suitable CoICp precursor with bis-silylene 38 afforded the bis-silylene
CoI complex 41
[33a] in 30 yield Likewise the bis-germylene Co
I complex 42
[33a]
could be synthesized from 40 with CoICp fragment and isolated in 61 yield
Summary
- 96 -
Figure 48 Molecular structure of 40
Figure 49 Molecular structures of 41 (left) and 42 (right) tBu and phenyl groups
are not shown
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable ferrocene bridged
bis-silylene or bis-germylene respectively The isolated products 41 and 42 are the
first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-silylene or bis-germylene
functioning in a chelating fashion In both complexes cobalt is coordinated on one
side by cyclopentadienyl and on another side by bis-silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40
and contains 18 valence electrons The Co-Si bonds in 41 and the Co-Ge bonds in 42
belong to the shortest Co-E (E = Si Ge) bonds known to date The relatively short EII-
Co bonds in 41 and 42 indicate that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands
in the series of divalent silicon and germanium compounds as yet due to the electron-
rich ferrocene and metallylene segments
In addition in the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3)
cross-coupling[147]
reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-iodo-
benzene was observed evidently The catalytic abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in Co-
Summary
- 97 -
mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile were
probed[148-150]
However complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is
inactive The possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII
donor centers to Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the
substrate coordination
Experimental section
- 98 -
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
51 General section
All experiment and manipulations were carried out under dry oxygen-free nitrogen
using standard Schlenk techniques or in an inert atmosphere of purified nitrogen The
glassware used in all manipulations was dried at 150 degC prior to use cooled to
ambient temperature under high vacuum and flushed with N2 The handling of solid
samples and the preparation of samples for spectroscopic measurements were carried
out inside a glove-box where the O2 and H2O levels were normally kept below 1 ppm
All solvents were purified using conventional procedures and freshly distilled under
N2 atmosphere prior to use They were stored in Schlenk-vessels containing activated
molsieves Benzene toluene n-pentane and n-hexane were purified by distillation
from Nabenzophenone Et2O and THF were initially pre-dried over KOH and then
distilled from Nabenzophenone CH2Cl2 and chloroform were dried by stirring over
CaH2 at ambient temperature
For transfer of solvents or solutions stainless steel cannulas were used which were
stored in the oven at 120 degC The transfer was enabled by the vessel of origin being
left under a positive pressure of protective gas and the receptacle vessel of closed
with a pressure release value By filtration stainless steel cannula containing a filter-
head at one end was utilized Whatman (GFB 25) filters were affixed to the filter end
of the cannula with Teflon tape After use cannulas were cleaned immediately by
thorough rinsing with acetone followed by dilute HCl water acetone and
dichloromethane
In the case of low temperature reactions Dewar vessels were filled with acetone
and dry-ice was added until reaching the desired temperature Ethanol liquid
nitrogen was also employed for reactions in needs of -90 degC
Experimental section
- 99 -
52 Analytical methods
NMR Measurements NMR samples of air andor moisture sensitive compounds were
all prepared under inert atmosphere The deuterated solvents were dried by stirring
over Na (C6D6 THF-d8) or CaH2 (CDCl3) distilled under N2 atmosphere and stored in
Schlenk-vessels containing activated molsieves The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectra were
recorded on ARX 200 (1H 200 MHz
13C 50 MHz) and ARX 400 (
1H 400 MHz
13C
10046 MHz) spectrometers from the Bruker Company The 29
Si-NMR spectra were
recorded only on ARX 400 (29
Si 7949 MHz) spectrometer
The 1H and
13C
1H NMR spectra were calibrated against the residual proton and
natural abundance 13
C resonances of the deuterated solvent relative to
tetramethylsilane (benzene-d6 δH 715 ppm and δC 1280 ppm chloroform-d1 δH 727
ppm and δC 770 ppm THF-d8 δH 173 ppm and δC 253 ppm Heteronuclear spectra
were calibrated as follows 31
P1H external 85 H3PO4
119Sn
1H external SnMe4
Whereby in each case an 1-mm glass capillary tube containing the standard substance
was placed in the appropriate solvent in a 5 mm NMR tube and the spectrum recorded
The abbreviations used to denote the multiplicity of the signals are as follows s =
singlet d = doublet t = triplet q = quartet sept = septet m = multiplet br = broad
Infra-red spectroscopy IR spectra (4000 ndash 400 cm-1
) were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
Spectra 100 FT-IR spectrometer bands were reported in wave-numbers (cm-1
)
Samples of solids were measured as KBr pellets Air or moisture sensitive samples
were prepared in the glove-box and measured immediately The spectra were
processed using the program OMNIC and the abbreviations associated with the
absorptions quoted are vs = very strong s = strong m = medium w = weak br =
broad the intensities of which were assigned on the basis of visual inspection
UV-vis Spectrometry UV-vis spectrophotometric investigations were carried out on a
Specord S 600 spectrophotometer from Analytik Jena AG Pure samples of the
investigated substance were dissolved in dry solvents at suitable concentration The
UV-vis cuvette was filled and closed in a Schlenk tube under N2 atmosphere
Mass Spectrometry Mass spectra were performed at the Chemistry institute of
Experimental section
- 100 -
Technical University Berlin EI spectra were recorded on a 311A Arian MATAMD
spectrometer ESI mass spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap LTQ
XL spectrometer Solid samples were prepared in glove box and the solution of
samples was prepared 15 min before the measurement under N2 atmosphere Mass
spectra are presented in the standard form mz (percent intensity relative to the base
peak)
Elemental analysis The C H N and S analyses of all compounds were carried out on
a Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series instrument Air or moisture sensitive
samples were prepared in ldquotin-boatsrdquo in the glove box Samples with halogen were
filled in the ldquosilver-boatsrdquo for better measuring accuracy
Melting Point determinations A BSGT Apotec II instrument was used for the
determination of melting points Samples were prepared in glass capillary tubes under
N2 atmosphere The melting point was determined while the melded examples had the
same color like the solid before Without melting of samples the color change was
observed was determined as decomposition temperature
Single crystal X-ray structure determinations Crystals suitable to the single crystal
x-ray structure analysis were put on a glass capillary with perfluorinated oil and
measured in a cold nitrogen stream The data of all measurements were collected with
an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur S Saphire diffractometer at 150 K (MoKα radiation λ
= 071073 Aring) The structures were solved by direct methods Refinements were
carried out with the SHELXL-97[151]
software package All thermal displacement
parameters were refined anisotropically for non-H atoms and isotropically for H
atoms All refinements were made by full matrix least-square on F2 In all cases the
graphical representation of the molecular structures was carried out using Ortep32
version 108 The details for the individual structure solutions included in this
dissertation are available in the appendix
Experimental section
- 101 -
53 Starting Materials
Commercially available starting materials were used as received The following
important precursors were prepared according to literature procedures The references
are shown in Table 51
Table 51 Starting materials and references
Compound References Compound References
GeCl2dioxane [27] 15 (HCNtBu)2C [113]
(HSiCl2)2O [117] 19 Ph(Cl)C=N-iPr [112]
1 (nacnac)GeCl [80] 24 tBuN=C=N
tBu [152]
2 (nacnac)GeCl3 [82] 26 aLSiCl [32b]
7 (nacnac)SnCl [80] 32 (Me3Si)2N-SnCl [53]
9 (C5H10)C=N-Dip [111] 39 aLGeCl [41]
11 Ph(Cl)C=N-Dip [112]
Experimental section
- 102 -
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4
To a solution of 1[80]
(133 g 253 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added potassium
(148 g 379 mmol) at room temperature After stirring for 4 h the color of the
solution changed from yellow to brown Volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was first extracted with hexane (60 mL in portions) and then
with diethyl ether (60 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtrated and the filtrate was concentrated
and stored at -20degC for 5 d yielding the first germylene anion 3 as pale yellow crystals
(030 g 083 mmol 33)
C25H44GeKNO2 MW 50236
Properties soluble in THF slightly soluble in Et2O spontaneous
combustion towards air
Melting Point 220 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 108 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 112 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 184 (s 3 H
NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 298 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 618 (s 1 H γ-CH) 691- 698 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 182 (NCMe) 203
(GeCMe) 238 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 1185
(γ-C) 1224-1745 (arom C GeCMe NCMe)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C17H24GeKN(C4H10O)022 C 5797 H 713 N
378 Found C 5764 H 694 N 367
The combined hexane extract was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated and
stored at -20 degC for 2 d yielding the new germylene 4 as yellow crystals (052 g 078
Experimental section
- 103 -
mmol 31)
NHN
GeN
Dip
DipDip
C41H59GeN3 MW 66657
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 192 - 193 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 091 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 109 (d 3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH =
68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 122 (m br 12 H CHMe2) 130 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 162 (s 6 H NCMe) 329-340
(m 6 H CHMe2) 503 (s 1 H γ-CH) 564 (s 1 H NH) 683
ndash 718 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 225 (CHMe) 234 (NCMe)
240 (br CHMe) 245 (CHMe) 247 (CHMe) 256 (CHMe)
288 (CHMe) 292 (CHMe) 964 (γ-C) 1171 ndash 1635 (arom
C NCMe)
EI-MS mz () 6674 (03 [M]+) 4912 (100 [M -
iPr2C6H3NH]
+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C41H59GeN3 C 7388 H 892 N 630 Found
C 7354 H 868 N 613
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5
To a precooled (-78 degC) solution of 2[82]
(097 g 16 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was
added KC8 (094 g 69 mmol) After stirring for 4 h the reaction mixture was allowed
to warm to room temperature and the color of the solution changed from yellow to
brown The reaction mixture was allowed to stir an additional 48 h at room
temperature The signal of compound 1[80]
also disappeared in the 1H-NMR spectrum
of the resulting mixture and compound 3 and 4 were observed as main products
Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was first extracted
with hexane (50 mL in portions) and then with diethyl ether (50 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtered the filtrate was concentrated to 10
Experimental section
- 104 -
mL and stored at -20degC for 48 h yielding 3 as pale yellow crystals (024 g 067 mmol
42) The combined hexane extract was concentrated and stored at -20degC for 24 h
yielding 4 as yellow crystals (042 g 063 mmol 39)
Further concentration of the supernate and cooling at -20degC for 48 h yielded 5 as red
crystals along with colorless crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex
C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 MW 135028
Elemental analysis calcd () for C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 C 7890 H 1003 N 278
Found C 7821 H 999 N 281
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6
C46H65Ge2N3 MW 80531
To a solution of the germylene anion 3 (138 mg 0263 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at -
30 degC was added the solution of the chlorogermylene 1[80]
(93 mg 0263 mmol) in
THF (10 mL) The color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After
stirring for further 2 h at room temperature volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 5 days yielding 6 as dark red crystals (140 mg
017 mmol 66)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt169 degC (decomp)
Experimental section
- 105 -
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 107 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H
CHMe2) 111 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H CHMe2) 120 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 124 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 161 (s
6 H NCMe) 202 (s 3 H NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 301
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 319 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 367 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 518 (s 1 H 6-
ring-γ-CH) 682 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 702- 718 (m 9 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 191 (5-ring-NCMe) 210
(GeCMe) 240 (6-ring-NCMe) 248 (CHMe2) 249 (CHMe2)
250 (CHMe2) 258 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 261 (CHMe2)
279 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 1028 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1238 (5-ring-β-C) 1240 ndash 1694 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
UV-vis λ [nm] = 315 (intense) 358 (intense) 502 (2600)
EI-MS mz () 491 (45 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (15 [M-
(C3N2Ge) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65Ge2N3 C 6861 H 814 N 522 Found
C 6884 H 800 N 516
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8
C46H65GeN3Sn MW 85138
To a suspension of germylene anion 3 (116 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) at -
70 degC was added the solution of 7[80]
(187 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) The
color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After stirring for further 2 h at
room temperature the volatiles of the reaction mixture were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
Experimental section
- 106 -
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 10 days yielding 8 as dark red-black solid (96 mg
011 mmol 34) The solid was solved in Et2O and stored at 0 degC for 24 h building
dark red crystals
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt143 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 085 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 106 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 121 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 127 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 129 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2)
165 (s 6 H SnNCMe) 227 (s 3 H GeNCMe) 300 (s 3 H
GeCMe) 305 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 333 (sept
3JHH
= 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 378 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2)
510 (s 1 H 6-ring-γ-CH) 691 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 705-
721 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 188 (5-ring-NCMe) 207
(GeCMe) 242 (6-ring-NCMe) 246 (CHMe2) 248 (CHMe2)
249 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 260 (CHMe2) 268 (CHMe2)
280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 287 (CHMe2) 1035 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1237 (5-ring-β-C) 1244 ndash 1704 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
119Sn NMR
(C6D6) δ = -197
UV-vis λ [nm] = 314 (15000) 363 (14500) 541 (2800)
EI-MS mz () 537 (8 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (17 [M-
(C3N2Sn) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65GeN3Sn C 6489 H 770 N 494
Found C 6444 H 764 N 477
Experimental section
- 107 -
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12
C37H48N2 MW 52079
To a solution of 9[111]
(200 g 777 mmol) in 200 mL Et2O at -78 degC was added 16
M nBuLi (486 mL 777 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 11[112]
(210 g 700 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h Water free Et3NHCl (108 g 777 mmol) was added to the
reaction mixture and stirred All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 229 g (440 mmol
63 ) of the novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 as colorless crystals
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 148 ~ 150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 117 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 125 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 134 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 164 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 187 (s 1 H NH) 217 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335
(m 4 H CHMe2) 696 (s 3 H arom H) 715- 727 (m 8 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 218 (Cy-CH2) 221
(CHMe2) 236 (CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 256
(CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 285 (Cy-CH2) 286
(Cy-CH2) 977 (Cy-CCN) 1222-1441 (arom C) 1600 (Cy-
CN) 1658 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H49N2+ 5213896 Found 5213878
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48N2 C 8533 H 929 N 538 Found C
8518 H 927 N 547
Experimental section
- 108 -
526 The new chlorogermylene 14
N
N
Ph
Dip
Dip
Cl
Ge
C37H47ClGeN2 MW 62788
nBuLi (881 mL 141 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 12 (720 g 138
mmol) in 80 mL of Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed slowly to warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(330 g 142 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -
30 degC yielding 14 as yellow crystals (710 g 113 mmol 82 )
Properties soluble in hexane toluene sensitive towards air
Melting Point 203 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 097 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 107 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121-127 (m 9 H CHMe2) 128-139 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 144 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 155 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 203-227 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 317
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 327 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 394 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 417 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 680- 739 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 226 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 239 (CHMe2) 245 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
249 (CHMe2) 274 (CHMe2) 277 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
286 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 291 (CHMe2) 293 (CHMe2)
295 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1089 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1476
(arom C) 1651 (Cy-CN) 1688 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47ClGeN2+ 6282640 Found 6282639
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H47ClGeN2 C 7078 H 754 N 446
Found C 7073 H 762 N 457
Experimental section
- 109 -
527 The new germylene 16
C37H46GeN2 MW 59142
Germylene chloride 14 (300 g 479 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-butyl- imidazol-2-
ylidene 15[113]
(091 g 502 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (25 mL) at room
temperature and stirred for 48 h resulting in a white precipitate of the corresponding
NHCmiddotHCl salt The color of the solution changed from yellow to brown-red The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm
hexane two times The combined filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 16 as red crystals (220 g 373 mmol 78 )
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 167 ~ 168 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 115 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 126 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 135 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 12 H CHMe2) 155 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 204 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 221 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 369 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 380 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 415 (t
3JHH =
44 Hz 1 H C=CH) 675- 725 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 226 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 258 (Cy-CH2) 259 (CHMe2) 273 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 987 (Cy-CH)
1117 (Cy-CCN) 1236-1431 (arom C) 1473 1474 (Cy-CN
Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 704 (s) 787 (s) 939 (m) 1104 (s) 1135 (s) 1204 (s) 1248 (s)
1296 (s) 1322 (s) 1365 (s) 1439 (s) 1461 (s) 1535 (m) 1600
(s) 2822 (m) 2865 (s) 2922 (s) 2957 (w) 3022 (w) 3061 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2+ 5932951 Found 5932950
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H46GeN2 C 7514 H 784 N 474 Found
C 7495 H 800 N 484
Experimental section
- 110 -
528 Aminogermylene 17
C37H49GeN3 MW 60845
A red solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (15 mL) was exposed to dry
ammonia gas for 10 min at room temperature The solution turned to a yellow color
and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvent was removed and the
residue was dissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated solution was stored at 0
degC yielding 17 as yellow crystals (560 mg 092 mmol 92 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 173 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 117 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 120-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 142 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
154 (s 2 H NH2) 200-213 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 357 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 363 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 388 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 679- 724 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 214 (CHMe2) 230 (CHMe2)
234 (CHMe2) 237 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
248 (CHMe2) 272 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
285 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
293 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1023 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1462
(arom C) 1643 (Cy-CN) 1669 (Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 704 (s) 752 (s) 796 (s) 839 (m) 922 (s) 1096 (s)
1143 (s) 1174 (s) 1252 (s) 1304 (s) 1360 (s) 1430 (s) 1543
(s) 2865 (m) 2961 (s) 3021 (w) 3048 (m) 3343 (w) 3430
(w)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H49GeN3 C 7304 H 812 N 691 Found
C 7272 H 810 N 683
Experimental section
- 111 -
529 Germylene hydroxide 18
C37H48GeN2O MW 60943
A diluted solution of H2O in THF (179 mL 100 mmol 056 M) was dropped into
a solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) at -30 degC The solution
turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvents
were removed and the residue was redissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated
solution was stored at 0 degC yielding 18 as yellow crystals (580 mg 095 mmol 95 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 188 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 116 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 119-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 139 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
166 (s 1 H OH) 195-221 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 384 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 397 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 675- 726 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 229 (CHMe2)
233 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2) 243 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 281 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
291 (Cy-CH2) 314 (Cy-CH2) 1028 (Cy-CCN) 1233-1464
(arom C) 1647 (Cy-CN) 1666 (Ph-CN)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 713 (s) 743 (s) 770 (s) 791 (s) 839 (s) 926 (m)
1056 (m) 1104 (s) 1148 (s) 1170 (s) 1257 (s) 1313 (s) 1339
(s) 1365 (s) 1430 (s) 1470 (s) 1539 (s) 2861 (s) 2961 (s)
3018 (w) 3057 (m) 3643 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2O+ 6092900 Found 6092901
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48GeN2O C 7292 H 794 N 460
Experimental section
- 112 -
Found C 7300 H 786 N 464
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20
C28H38N2 MW 40230
At -78 degC to a solution of 9[111]
(150 g 583 mmol) in 150 mL Et2O was added 16
M nBuLi (365 mL 584 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 19[112]
(106 g 583 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 141 g (350 mmol
60 ) of 20 as colorless blocks
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 123 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 109 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 132 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 156 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 208 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 214 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 310 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 323 (m 1 H CHMe2) 713- 753 (m 8 H arom H)
1203 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H NH)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 219 (Cy-CH2) 226
(CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (CHMe2) 276
(Cy-CH2) 280 (CHMe2) 300 (Cy-CH2) 459 (CHMe2) 977
(Cy-CCN) 1226 1228 1275 1282 1284 1371 1389
1453 (arom C) 1576 (Cy-CN) 1673 (PhCN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C28H39N2+ 4033113 Found 4033112
Experimental section
- 113 -
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H38N2 C 8353 H 951 N 696 Found C
8270 H 977 N 679
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22
C28H37ClGeN2O MW 52570
nBuLi (16 mL 256 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (100 g 249
mmol) in 15 mL Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed to slowly warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(058 g 250 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 22 as yellow crystals (105 g 200 mmol 80 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 161 ~ 162 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 108 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 134 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 141 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 153 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 189 (m
1 H Cy-CH2) 202 (m 1 H Cy-CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2)
284 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 367 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz
1 H CHMe2) 396 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 688 (m
1 H arom H) 705-724 (m 7 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 222 (CHMe2) 228 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 240 (CHMe2) 241 (CHMe2) 253 (CHMe2)
263 (Cy-CH2) 272 (CHMe2) 283 (CHMe2) 285 (CHMe2)
Experimental section
- 114 -
293 (Cy-CH2) 312 (Cy-CH2) 537 (CHMe2) 1068 (Cy-
CCN) 1239 1250 1267 1271 1288 1294 1388 1410
1446 1469 (arom C) 1620 (Cy-CN) 1654 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H37ClGeN2O C 6397 H 709 N 533
Found C 6426 H 725 N 551
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23
C28H36Cl2GeN2 MW 54415
nBuLi (32 mL 512 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (201 g 500 mmol)
in 30 mL of toluene at -78 degC The solution was allowed to warm to room temperature
and stirred for 4 h To this solution GeCl4 (107 g 500 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-
butylimidazol-2-ylidene 15 (091 g 502 mmol) were added at -78 degC The resulting
suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were removed under
reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm hexane two times The
filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC yielding 23 as yellow crystals (156 g
287 mmol 57 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 126 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 113 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 137 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 146 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 189 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 332 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 361 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 421 (t
3JHH =
42 Hz 1 H C=CH) 701-726 (m 8 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 237 (CHMe2) 243 (Cy-
CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 254 (Cy-CH2) 257 (CHMe2) 286
Experimental section
- 115 -
(CHMe2) 304 (Cy-CH2) 511 (CHMe2) 1036 (Cy-CH)
1125 (Cy-CCN) 1248 1287 1296 1354 1391 1411
1421 1490 (arom C) 1682 (Cy-CN) 1709 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H36Cl2GeN2 C 6180 H 515 N 667
Found C 6203 H 517 N 679
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27
C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 MW 60781
To a solution of tBuN=C=N
tBu
[152] (329 g 213 mmol) in Et2O (80 mL) PhLi (119
mL 214 mmol 18 M) was added at -78 degC The solution was raised to room
temperature and stirred for 2 h To this solution at -90 degC 1133-
tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(230 g 1065 mmol) was added in one minute The
resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with toluene (60 mL)
by 80 degC two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h yielding
27 as colorless crystals (343 g 564 mmol 53)
Properties soluble in toluene sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 175 ~ 177 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 120 (s 36 H CMe3) 598
(s 2 H SiHCl) 733- 746 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 317 (CMe3) 544 (CMe3)
1276 1285 1297 1337 (arom C) 1711 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = -1110
IR(KBr cm-1
) 606 (s) 658 (m) 711 (s) 733 (s) 760 (s) 789 (s) 934 (s)
1068 (s) 1200 (s) 1269 (s) 1378 (s) 1486 (s) 1550 (s) 1566
(s) 1612 (s) 1783 (w) 1826 (w) 1950 (w) 1969 (w) 2000
Experimental section
- 116 -
(w) 2135 (s) 2188 (s) 2909 (s) 2934 (s) 2971 (s) 3232 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C30H49Cl2N4OSi2+ 6072822 Found 6072844
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 C 5928 H 796 N 922
Found C 5971 H 797 N 913
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28
C30H46N4OSi2 MW 53488
Toluene (120 mL) was added to a mixture of 27 (260 g 428 mmol) and
LiN(SiMe3)2 (144 g 856 mmol) at ambient temperature After 2 h the solution turned
to an orange color with the formation of LiCl The resulting mixture was stirred
overnight The solvent was then removed and the residue was extracted with toluene
(100 mL) The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h to yield yellow
crystals of 28 (175 g 327 mmol 76)
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 152 ~ 160 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 692-
731(m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 530 (CMe3)
1277 1291 1299 1349 (arom C) 1623 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -161
IR(KBr cm-1
) 608 (s) 709 (s) 746 (s) 790 (s) 892 (m) 972 (s) 1032 (m)
1070 (m) 1208 (s) 1268 (m) 1359 (s) 1412 (s) 1446 (s)
1476 (s) 1577 (m) 1648 (m) 1778 (w) 1826 (w) 1899 (w)
1970 (w) 2248 (w) 2867 (s) 2902 (s) 2928 (s) 2964 (s)
3065 (m)
Experimental section
- 117 -
ESI-MS mz calcd 5353288 Found 5353227
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H46N4OSi2 C 6736 H 867 N 1047
Found C 6688 H 857 N 1046
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
C38H58N4NiOSi2 MW 70176
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 28 (267 mg 050 mmol) and Ni(cod)2
(1375 mg 050 mmol) at ambient temperature The solution turned to a low-red color
and was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted with
toluene (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield low-red crystals of 29 (319 mg
046 mmol 91) The remaining solid was crystallized from hexane at -30 degC
suitable for single crystal measurement
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 183 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 130 (s 36 H CMe3) 281
(m 4 H CH2) 295 (m 4 H CH2) 504 (s 4 H =CH) 686-
707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 337 (CH2) 535
(CMe3) 760 (=CH) 1277 1293 1296 1335 (arom C)
1690 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 328
IR(KBr cm-1
) 607 (s) 644 (s) 698 (s) 750 (s) 792 (s) 925 (m) 1021 (m)
1075 (s) 1209 (s) 1267 (s) 1320 (m) 1361 (s) 1407 (s)
1444 (s) 1475 (s) 1578 (m) 1647 (m) 1775 (w) 1823 (w)
Experimental section
- 118 -
1902 (w) 1962 (w) 2280 (w) 2791 (s) 2855 (s) 2913 (s)
2975 (s) 3023 (m) 3063 (w)
ESI-MS mz () calcd 7003503 Found 7003577
Elemental analysis calcd () for C38H58N4NiOSi2 C 6504 H 833 N 798
Found C 6387 H 837 N 805
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30
C21H41N2PSi3 MW 43679
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(302 mg 102
mmol) and lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphate (285 mg 103 mmol) at ambient
temperature The solution turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 3 h The solvent
was removed and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30 degC for 24 h yielding 30 as yellow crystals (371 mg
085 mmol 83)
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 149-150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 058 (d
3JP-H = 44 Hz 18 H
SiMe3) 124 (s 18 H CMe3) 681-699 (m 2 H arom H)
734-741 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 44 (d
3JC-P = 100 Hz
SiMe3) 315 (d 4JC-P = 16 Hz CMe3) 540 (CMe3) 1289
1292 1293 1344 (arom C) 1572 (d 3JC-P = 95 Hz
NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 31 (d
1JSi-P = 229 Hz
PSiMe3) 440 (d 1JSi-P = 1943 Hz N2SiP)
31P NMR (81012 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = - 2110
Experimental section
- 119 -
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C21H41N2PSi3 4362315 Found 4362524
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31
C30H46N4P2Si2 MW 58083
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 30 (309 mg 071 mmol) and
triphenylphosphine dichloride (237 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The
solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted
with THF (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield yellow crystals of 31 (148
mg 025 mmol 72)
Properties soluble in THF sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 174 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 705-
733 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 331 (CMe3) 534
(CMe3) 1256 1276 1294 1359 (arom C) 1710 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 267 (t
1JSi-P = 998 Hz)
31P NMR (81012 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = - 1649
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C30H46N4P2Si2 5802736 Found
5802361
Experimental section
- 120 -
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn MW 60944
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(336 mg 114
mmol) and Chloro-amino-stannylene 32[53]
(360 mg 114 mmol) at room temperature
The solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was
extracted with hexane (20 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield colorless
crystals of 33 (343 mg 056 mmol 49)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air decomposed
slowly at room temperature
Melting Point gt 25 degC (slowly decomp)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn C 4139 H 678 N
689 Found C 4195 H 701 N 706
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35
C44H66N4O2Si2 MW 73919
At -78 degC to a solution of 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinol (150 g 675 mmol) in 30 mL
Et2O was added 16 M nBuLi (85 mL 136 mmol) in hexane and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h resulting in white slurry The reaction
mixture was cooled to -78 degC again and added the solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(398 g 135 mmol) in 50 mL toluene After the addition the mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with the warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC 395 g bis-silylene 35 (534
Experimental section
- 121 -
mmol 79 ) as slightly yellow solid
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
174 (s 18 H ArC(CH3)3) 693 - 713 (m 8 H arom H) 754
(s 1 H Ar-H) 787 (s 1 H Ar-H) 802 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (ArC(CH3)3) 318
(NC(CH3)3) 350 (ArC(CH3)3) 530 (NC(CH3)3) 1096
1243 1276 1295 1297 1313 1341 1552 (arom C)
1636 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -240
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C44H66N4O2Si2 C 7049 H 900 N 758
Found C 7075 H 930 N 756
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36
C88H132N8O4PdSi4 MW 158480
Bis-silylene 35 (600 mg 081 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (468 mg 041 mmol) were
mixed in 25 mL hexane at room temperature and stirred for 24 h The hexane solution
was filtrated and the white precipitate was washed with 10 mL hexane one time The
solid product was dried under reduced pressure to yield 520 mg (033 mmol 81 )
white powders The product was dissolved in warm hexane and stored at room
temperature for 10 days giving some orange crystals of 36 The reaction of bis-
Experimental section
- 122 -
silylene 35 with one molar equiv of Pd(PPh3)4 in toluene furnishes the same product
but the isolable yield is only about 30
Properties slightly soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 105 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 108
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 114 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 116 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 131 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 139 (s 9 H C(CH3)3)155
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 168 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 177 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 180 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 185 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 212
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 659 (s 1 H SiH) 686- 789 (m 22 H
arom H) 816 (s 1 H Ar-H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (C(CH3)3) 311
(C(CH3)3) 314 (C(CH3)3) 316 (C(CH3)3) 318 (C(CH3)3)
319 (C(CH3)3) 320 (C(CH3)3) 322 (C(CH3)3) 328
(C(CH3)3) 332 (C(CH3)3) 333 (C(CH3)3) 343 (C(CH3)3)
349 350 351 357 526 527 537 539 540 541 542
561 1112 1225 1236 1243 1256 1258 1271 1285
1287 1289 1291 1293 1294 1302 1303 1318 1323
1324 1326 1340 1342 1378 1380 1381 1409 1430
1533 1559 1585 1613 1622 1654 1731 1742
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -87 (LSi) 397 (Si-H) 623
658 (LSiPd)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 623 (m) 706 (m) 764 (m) 860 (m) 1056 (m) 1108 (m) 1206
(m) 1272 (m) 1365 (m) 1418 (s) 1446 (m) 1476 (m) 1446
(m) 1476 (m) 1495 (m) 1591 (m) 2135 (w) 2875(m) 2906
(s) 2964 (s) 3061 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C88H132N8O4PdSi4 C 6669 H 840 N
707 Found C 6616 H 875 N 676
Experimental section
- 123 -
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38
C40H54FeN4Si2 MW 70290
16 M nBuLi (423 ml 677 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (600 mg 323 mmol) and TMEDA (937 mg 806 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (30 mL) solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(190 g 645 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
pentane Compound 38 was obtained as deep red crystals in 70 yield (159 g 226
mmol) on storage of a saturated pentane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 117 ~ 119 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 116 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
451 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 472 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 692- 707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 318 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 709 (FeCH) 727 (FeCH) 846 (SiC) 1289
1294 1305 1349 (arom C) 1604 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 433
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeN4Si2 C 6835 H 774 N 797
Found C 6803 H 767 N 778
Experimental section
- 124 -
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40
C40H54FeGe2N4 MW 79201
16 M nBuLi (353 ml 564 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (500 mg 269 mmol) and TMEDA (781 mg 672 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (25 mL) solution of chlorogermylene 39[41]
(183 g 538 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
warm hexane Compound 40 was obtained as orange crystals in 77 yield (163 g
206 mmol) on storage of a saturated hexane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 168 ~ 169 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 461
(t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 471 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 691- 697 (m 6 H arom H) 712- 717 (m 4 H arom
H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 320 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 701 (FeCH) 723 (FeCH) 920 (GeC) 1289
1290 1302 1369 (arom C) 1659 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeGe2N4 C 6666 H 687 N 707 Found
C 6655 H 701 N 707
Experimental section
- 125 -
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeN4Si2 MW 82693
In a glove box CoBr2 (202 mg 092 mmol) NaCp (81 mg 092 mmol) and KC8
(131 mg 097 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent
mixture (41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at
room temperature The bis-silylene 38 (650 mg 092 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 41 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 30 yield (230 mg 028 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 166 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 139 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
440 (t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 461 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 496 (s 5 H CoCH) 680- 684 (m 2 H arom H)
692- 696 (m 6 H arom H) 720- 723 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (NC(CH3)3) 534
(NC(CH3)3) 700 (FeCH) 745 (FeCH) 780 (CoCH) 851
(SiC) 1291 1297 1300 1343 (arom C) 1673 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 820
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFeN4Si2 C 6536 H 719 N 678
Found C 6612 H 724 N 686
Experimental section
- 126 -
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhGe
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Ge
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeGe2N4 MW 91604
In a glove box CoBr2 (83 mg 038 mmol) NaCp (33 mg 038 mmol) and KC8 (54
mg 040 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent mixture
(41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at room
temperature The bis-germylene 40 (300 mg 038 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 42 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 61 yield (210 mg 023 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 309 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 131 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
438 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 459 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 504 (s br 5 H CoCH) 684- 688 (m 2 H arom H)
695- 698 (m 6 H arom H) 714- 718 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 322 (NC(CH3)3) 537
(NC(CH3)3) 699 (FeCH) 737 (FeCH) 759 (CoCH) 891
(GeC) 1287 1296 1300 1361(arom C) 1680 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFe Ge2N4 C 5900 H 649 N 612
Found C 5942 H 664 N 590
Experimental section
- 127 -
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44
C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 MW 100697
To a solution of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (250 mg 036 mmol) in 10 ml hexane
was added a solution of CpCo(CO)2 (130 mg 072 mmol) in 8 ml hexane The
reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All solvents were evaporated
in vacuo The corresponding bis-silylene cobalt(I) complex 44 was isolated as brown
air- and moisture-sensitive solids in 87 yield (310 mg 031 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 293 ~ 295 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
461 (m 4 H FeCH) 476 (m 4 H FeCH) 523 (s 10 H
CoCH) 683- 695 (m 6 H arom H) 702- 706 (m 2 H
arom H) 745- 748 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 313 (NC(CH3)3) 542
(NC(CH3)3) 723 (FeCH) 741 (FeCH) 804 (SiC) 809
(CoCH) 1287 1296 1300 1324 (arom C) 1687 (NCN)
2078 (br CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 857
IR(KBr cm-1
) 500 (m) 539 (w) 564 (m) 628 (s) 703 (m) 757 (s) 792 (m)
825 (w) 1028 (m) 1081 (w) 1146 (m) 1199 (s) 1275 (m)
1360 (m) 1388 (m) 1417 (s) 1438 (w) 1474 (m) 1520 (s)
1641 (s) 1888 (s) 2869 (s) 2901 (m) 2926 (m) 2965 (s)
1520 (s) 3097 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 C 6202 H 641 N
Experimental section
- 128 -
556 Found C 6287 H 630 N 571
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45
C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 MW 103867
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (500 mg
071 mmol) and Fe2(CO)9 (259 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The solution
was stirred for 12 h The solvent was evaporated in vacuo The corresponding bis-
silylene iron(0) complex 45 was isolated as yellow-brown air- and moisture-sensitive
solids in 73 yield (540 mg 052 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 155 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 109 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 483
(s 4 H FeCH) 500 (s 4 H FeCH) 699- 712 (m 8 H arom
H) 736- 739 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 311 (NC(CH3)3) 548
(NC(CH3)3) 735 (FeCH) 742 (FeCH) 771 (SiC) 1210
1287 1303 1308 (arom C) 1704 (NCN) 2169 (CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 1050
IR(KBr cm-1
) 630 (s) 765 (w) 1028 (m) 1035 (m) 1200 (m) 1370 (w)
1400 (m) 1474 (w) 1609 (w) 1648 (w) 1900 (s) 1948 (s)
1996(w) 2026 (s) 2865 (w) 2930 (m) 2965 (m)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 C 5550 H 524 N
539 Found C 5623 H 517 N 566
References
- 129 -
6 REFERENCES
1 P Pyykko Chem Rev 1988 88 563
2 N V Sidgwick Clarendon Oxford 1950 1 287 (b) R S Drago J Phys Chem 1958 62
353
3 P P Power Chem Rev 1999 99 3463 (b) R C Fischer P P Power Chem Rev 2010 110
3877
4 R Janoschek Chemie in unserer Zeit 1988 22 128
5 (a) F S Kipping L L Lloyd Dalton Trans 1901 79 449 (b) N N Greenwood A
Earnshaw Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed) 1997 362
6 (a) L Roumlsch P John R Reitmeier Silicon Compounds Organic In Ullmanns Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH amp Co KGaA 2000 (b) A J O Lenick
Basic Silicone Chemistry ndash A Review 1999
7 S Yao Y Xiong M Brym M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 7268
8 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7562
9 Y Xiong S Yao R Muumlller M Kaupp M Driess Nature Chem 2010 2 577
10 (a) S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4159 (b) S
Yao Y Xiong C Milsmann E Bill S Pfirrmann C Limberg M Driess Chem Eur J
2010 16 436
11 (a) K S Pitzer J Am Chem Soc 1948 70 2140 (b) R S Mulliken J Am Chem Soc
1955 77 884
12 (a) M Asay C Jones M Driess Chem Rev 2011 111 354 (b) S Yao Y Xiong M Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 1748 (c) Y Mizuhata T Sasamori N Tokitoh Chem Rev 2009
109 3479 (d) P P Power Organometallics 2007 26 4362 (e) P P Power Chem Rev 2003
103 789 (f) S Nagendran H W Roesky Organometallics 2008 27 457
13 (a) R West M J Fink J Michl Science 1981 214 1343 (b) M J Fink M J Michalczyk
K J Haller R West J Michl Chem Commun 1983 1010 (c) S Masamune Y Hanzawa
D J Williams J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 6136 (d) D E Goldberg D H Harris M F
Lappert K M Thomas Chem Commun 1976 261 (e) K W Klinkhammer T F Faumlssler H
Gruumltzmacher Angew Chem Int Ed 1998 37 124 (f) J T Snow S Murakami S
Masamune D J Williams Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 4191 (g) M Weidenbruch Angew
Chem Int Ed 2003 42 2222
14 L Pauling J Am Chem Soc 1931 53 1367
15 (a) G Trinquier J P Malrieu P Riviere J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 4529 (b) J P
Malrieu G Trinquier J Am Chem Soc 1989 111 5916 (c) H Jacobsen T Ziegler J Am
Chem Soc 1994 116 3667
16 L Pu B Twamley P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2000 122 3524
17 M Kaupp P V R Schleyer J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 1061
18 A D Phillips R J Wright M M Olmstead P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2002 124 5930
19 N Takagi S Nagase Organometallics 2001 20 5498
20 M Stender A D Phillips R J Wright P P Power Angew Chem Int Ed 2002 41 1785
21 T L Allen W H Fink P P Power Dalton Trans 2000 407
References
- 130 -
22 A Sekiguchi R Kinjo M Ichinohe Science 2004 305 1755
23 D Bourissou O Guerret F P Gabbai G Bertrand Chem Rev 2000 100 39
24 M Denk R Lennon R Hayashi R West A V Belyakov H P Verne A Haaland M
Wagner N Metzler J Am Chem Soc 1994 116 2691
25 M Driess S Yao M Brym C V Wuellen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 6730
26 M Kira S Ishida T Iwamoto C Kabuto J Am Chem Soc 1999 121 9722
27 V Lemierre A Chrostowska A Dargelos P Baylegravere W J Leigh C R Harrington Appl
Organom Chem 2004 18 676
28 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky S Merkel J Henn D Stalke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
5683
29 L Jafarpour E D Stevens S P Nolan J Organomet Chem 2000 606 49
30 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen D Lentz J Am Chem Soc 2006 128 9628
31 (a) C-W So H W Roesky J Magull R B Oswald Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 3948
(b) C-W So H W Roesky P M Gurubasavaraj R B Oswald M T Gamer P G Jones S
Blaurock J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12049
32 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890 (b) S S Sen
H W Roesky D Stern J Henn D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2009 132 1123
33 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167 (b) W
Wang S Inoue E Irran M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691 (c) R Azhakar R
S Ghadwal H W Roesky H Wolf D Stalke Organometallics 2012 31 4588 (d) S S
Sen J Hey R Herbst-Irmer H W Roesky D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 12311
34 R C Fischer L Pu J C Fettinger M A Brynda P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
11366
35 Y Wang Y Xie P Wei R B King H F Schaefer P Von R Schleyer G H Robinson
Science 2008 321 1069
36 S S Sen S Khan S Nagendran H W Roesky Acc Chem Res 2012 45 578
37 S S Sen A Jana H W Roesky C Schulzke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 8536
38 C Jones S J Bonyhady N Holzmann G Frenking A Stasch Inorg Chem 2011 50
12315
39 D Gau R Rodriguez T Kato N Saffon-Merceron A De Coacutezar F P Cossiacuteo A Baceiredo
Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50 1092
40 S P Green C Jones P C Junk K-A Lippert A Stasch Chem Commun 2006 3978
41 S Nagendran S S Sen H W Roesky D Koley H GrubmuLler A Pal R Herbst-Irmer
Organometallics 2008 27 5459
42 W-P Leung W-K Chiu K-H Chong T C W Mak Chem Commun 2009 6822
43 (a) S P Green C Jones A Stasch Science 2007 318 1754 (b) S J Bonyhady S P Green
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 2973 (c) S J Bonyhady
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch A J Edwards G J Mcintyre Chem Eur J 2010 16 938
44 A Sidiropoulos C Jones A Stasch S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
9701
45 Y Peng R C Fischer W A Merrill J Fischer L Pu B D Ellis J C Fettinger R H
Herber P P Power Chemical Science 2010 1 461
46 R Jambor B Kašnaacute K N Kirschner M Schuumlrmann K Jurkschat Angew Chem Int Ed
References
- 131 -
2008 47 1650
47 (a) C D Schaeffer J J Zuckerman J Am Chem Soc 1974 96 7160 (b) M J S Gynane
D H Harris M F Lappert P P Power P Riviere M Riviere-Baudet Dalton Trans 1977
2004 (c) M F Lappert P P Power M J Slade L Hedberg K Hedberg V Schomaker
Chem Commun 1979 369 (d) T Fjeldberg H Hope M F Lappert P P Power A J
Thorne Chem Commun 1983 639 (e) M Veith M Jarczyk V Huch Chem Ber 1988
121 347
48 M Veith R Lisowsky Angew Chem Int Ed 1988 27 1087
49 P B Hitchcock M F Lappert A J Thorne Chem Commun 1990 1587
50 R A Bartlett P P Power J Am Chem Soc 1990 112 3660
51 J-T Ahlemann H W Roesky R Murugavel E Parisini M Noltemeyer H-G Schmidt O
Muumlller R Herbst-Irmer L N Markovskii Y G Shermilovich Chem Ber 1997 130 1113
52 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky K Proumlpper B Dittrich S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem
Int Ed 2011 50 5374
53 R W Chorley P B Hitchock B S Jolly M F Lappert G A Lawless Chem Commun
1991 1302
54 A G Avent C Drost B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem
2004 630 2090
55 M Veith A Rammo Z Anorg Allg Chem 2001 627 662
56 M Veith J Fischer T R Prout M Noetzel P Hobein V Huch Inorg Chem 1991 30
4130
57 H Braunschweig P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem Int Ed
1994 33 1156
58 H Braunschweig C Drost P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem
Int Ed 1997 36 261
59 R E Allan M A Beswick G R Coggan P R Raithby A E H Wheatley D S Wright
Inorg Chem 1997 36 5202
60 (a) C Stanciu S S Hino M Stender A F Richards M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
Chem 2005 44 2774 (b) Y Peng B D Ellis X Wang P P Power J Am Chem Soc
2008 130 12268
61 B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem 2005 631 1383
62 C Cui M M Olmstead J C Fettinger G H Spikes P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 17530
63 X Wang C Ni Z Zhu J C Fettinger P P Power Inorg Chem 2009 48 2464
64 S S Sen D Kratzert D Stern H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2010 49 5786
65 H-X Yeong H-W Xi K H Lim C-W So Chem Eur J 2010 16 12956
66 (a) F E Hahn A V Zabula T Pape A Hepp Eur J Inorg Chem 2007 2007 2405 (b) A
V Zabula F E Hahn T Pape A Hepp Organometallics 2007 26 1972 (c) A V Zabula T
Pape A Hepp F E Hahn Organometallics 2008 27 2756
67 S-H Zhang C-W So Organometallics 2011 30 2059
68 O T Summerscales M M Olmstead P P Power Organometallics 2011 30 3468
69 (a) M Veith W Frank Angew Chem 1985 97 213 (b) M Veith Angew Chem Int Ed
1987 26 1 (c) H Chen R A Bartlett H V R Dias M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
References
- 132 -
Chem 1991 30 3390 (d) R E Allan M A Beswick A J Edwards M A Paver M-A
Rennie P R Raithby D S Wright Dalton Trans 1995 1991 (e) W J Grigsby T Hascall
J J Ellison M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg Chem 1996 35 3254 (f) R E Allan M A
Beswick M K Davies P R Raithby A Steiner D S Wright J Organomet Chem 1998
550 71 (g) M E G Mosquera J S Palmer A D Hopkins D S Wright Phosphorus
Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 1999 150 107 (h) M Veith M Opsoumllder M Zimmer V Huch
Eur J Inorg Chem 2000 2000 1143 (i) D R Armstrong F Benevelli A D Bond N
Feeder E A Harron A D Hopkins M Mcpartlin D Moncrieff D Saacuteez E A Quadrelli
A D Woods D S Wright Inorg Chem 2002 41 1492 (j) T Chivers Timothy j Clark M
Krahn M Parvez G Schatte Eur J Inorg Chem 2003 2003 1857 (k) J F Eichler O Just
W S Rees Inorg Chem 2006 45 6706 (l) D J Eisler T Chivers Chem Eur J 2006 12
233 (m) H Vaňkaacutetovaacute L Broeckaert F De Proft R Olejniacutek J Turek Z Padělkovaacute A
Růžička Inorg Chem 2011 50 9454
70 (a) A Meltzer C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7232 (b) A Meltzer C
Praumlsang C Milsmann M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 3170 (c) H Ogino The
Chemical Record 2002 2 291 (d) S Inoue M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
5614 (e) M Stoelzel C Praumlsang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed
2012 51 399
71 W Yang H Fu H Wang M Chen Y Ding H W Roesky A Jana Inorg Chem 2009 48
5058
72 (a) J Choi A H R Macarthur M Brookhart A S Goldman Chem Rev 2011 111 1761
(b) N Selander K L N J Szaboacute Chem Rev 2011 111 2048 (c) M E Van Der Boom D
Milstein Chem Rev 2003 103 1759
73 W Tang X Zhang Chem Rev 2003 103 3029
74 (a) A P Shaw J R Norton D Buccella L A Sites S S Kleinbach D A Jarem K M
Bocage C Nataro Organometallics 2009 28 3804 (b) L-C Song J-T Liu Q-M Hu G-
F Wang P Zanello M Fontani Organometallics 2000 19 5342 (c) S Shekhar J F
Hartwig J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 13016
75 N A Marinos Modellsysteme fuumlr die [NiFe]-Hydrogenase und Zinkkatalysatoren fuumlr die
Hydrosilylierung Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin Germany 2011
76 (a) C M Jensen D Morales-Morales The Chemistry of Pincer Compounds Elsevier
Science Amsterdam 2007 (b) M Albrecht G Van Koten Angew Chem Int Ed 2001 40
3750 (c) M Albrecht M M Lindner Dalton Trans 2011 40 8733 (d) D Benito-Garagorri
K Kirchner Acc Chem Res 2008 41 201 (e) C Gunanathan D Milstein Acc Chem Res
2011 44 588
77 (a) N Selander K J Szabo Dalton Trans 2009 6267 (b) H Zhang A Lei Dalton Trans
2011 40 8745 (c) J Dupont C S Consorti J Spencer Chem Rev 2005 105 2527
78 Silyl-silylene transition-metal complexes see (a) K Ueno S Seki H Ogino Chem Lett
1993 22 2159 (b) H Tobita H Wada K Ueno H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 2545
(c) K Ueno A Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 5023 (d) H Wada H Tobita
H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 3870 (e) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino
Organometallics 1998 17 2844 (f) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino Organometallics 1998
17 2850 (g) H Wada H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 1998 27 993 (h) K Ueno A
References
- 133 -
Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1999 18 2694 (i) H Tobita T Sato M Okazaki H
Ogino J Organomet Chem 2000 611 314 (j) H Koshikawa M Okazaki S Matsumoto
K Ueno H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 2005 34 1412 (k) K Ueno S Ito K Endo H
Tobita S Inomata H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 3309
79 For reviews on silylene complexes see (a) M S Eisen Transition-Metal Silyl Complexes
In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2003 pp 2037 (b)
M Okazaki H Tobita H Ogino Dalton Trans 2003 493 (c) R Waterman P G Hayes T
D Tilley Acc Chem Res 2007 40 712
80 Y Ding H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt P P Power Organometallics 2001
20 1190
81 L Bourget-Merle M F Lappert J R Severn Chem Rev 2002 102 3031
82 B Raumlke F Zuumllch Y Ding J Prust H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt Z Anorg
Allg Chem 2001 627 836
83 W Wang S Yao C Van WuLlen M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640
84 (a) R West H Sohn D R Powell T Muumlller Y Apeloig Angew Chem Int Ed 1996 35
1002 (b) W P Freeman T D Tilley L M Liable-Sands A L Rheingold J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 10457
85 J Fischer J Baumgartner C Marschner Organometallics 2005 24 1263
86 M Stender A D Phillips P P Power Inorg Chem 2001 40 5314
87 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 4349
88 W D Woodul A F Richards A Stasch M Driess C Jones Organometallics 2010 29
3655
89 W Clegg E K Cope A J Edwards F S Mair Inorg Chem 1998 37 2317
90 (a) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Matsuno M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 5768 (b) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Angew Chem Int Ed
2006 45 3269 (c) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Eur J Inorg Chem
2007 2007 5471 (d) V Y Lee Y Ito H Yasuda K Takanashi A Sekiguchi J Am Chem
Soc 2011 133 5103
91 S P Mallela S Hill R A Geanangel Inorg Chem 1997 36 6247
92 P V R Schleyer C Maerker A Dransfeld H Jiao N J R V E Hommes J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 6317
93 For a review see Z Chen C S Wannere C Corminboeuf R Puchta P V R Schleyer
Chem Rev 2005 105 3842
94 (a) R Ahlrichs M Baumlr M Haumlser H Horn C Koumllmel Chem Phys Lett 1989 162 165 (b)
M Haumlser R Ahlrichs J Comput Chem 1989 10 104
95 O Treutler R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1995 102 346
96 (a) A D Becke Phys Rev A 1988 38 3098 (b) J P Perdew Phys Rev B 1986 33 8822
97 (a) A Schaumlfer C Huber R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1994 100 5829 (b) K Eichkorn F
Weigend O Treutler R Ahlrichs Theor Chem Acc 1997 97 119
98 K Eichkorn O Treutler H Oumlhm M Haumlser R Ahlrichs Chem Phys Lett 1995 242 652
99 U Meier C Van Wuumlllen M Schindler J Comput Chem 1992 13 551
100 (a) C Van Wuumlllen Chem Phys Lett 1994 219 8 (b) C Van Wuumlllen Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2000 2 2137
References
- 134 -
101 (a) P J Stephens F J Devlin C F Chabalowski M J Frisch J Phys Chem 1994 98
11623 (b) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 1372 (c) C T Lee W T Yang R G Parr
Phys Rev 1988 37 785
102 W Kutzelnigg U Fleischer M Schindler NMR basis principles and progress Springer
Berlin 1990 Vol 23 page 169
103 (a) C Corminboeuf T Heine G Seifert P V R Schleyer J Weber Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2004 6 273 (b) P Von Rague Schleyer M Manoharan Z-X Wang B Kiran H Jiao
R Puchta N J R Van Eikema Hommes Org Lett 2001 3 2465
104 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Chem Commun 2009 2661
105 H Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 1999 18 3159
106 Y Sugiyama T Sasamori Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Takagi S Nagase N Tokitoh J Am
Chem Soc 2006 128 1023
107 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 2003 22 215
108 (a) K H Pannell L Parkanyi H Sharma F Cervantes-Lee Inorg Chem 1992 31 522 (b)
A Kawachi Y Tanaka K Tamao J Organomet Chem 1999 590 15
109 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess Chem Asian J 2009 4 1323
110 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Organometallics 2011 30 6490
111 W Keim S Killat C F Nobile G P Suranna U Englert R Wang S Mecking L D
Schroumlder J Organomet Chem 2002 662 150
112 P H M Budzelaar A B Van Ort A G Orpen Eur J Inorg Chem 1998 1485
113 N M Scott R Dorta E D Stevens A Correa L Cavallo S P Nolan J Am Chem Soc
2005 127 3516
114 L W Pineda V Jancik H W Roesky D Neculai A M Neculai Angew Chem Int Ed
2004 43 1419
115 A Jana I Objartel H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2009 48 798
116 S S Sen G Tavcar H W Roesky D Kratzert J Hey D Stalke Organometallics 2010 29
2343
117 R West J Am Chem Soc 1953 75 1002
118 R Drake I Mackinnon R Taylor Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Siloxane Polymers
and Copolymers In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd
2003 pp 2217
119 (a) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 5648 (b) B Miehlich A Savin H Stoll H
Preuss Chem Phys Lett 1989 157 200 (c) Gussian 03 Revision E01 M J Frisch G W
Trucks H B Schlegel G E Scuseria M A Robb J R Cheeseman J A Montgomery Jr
T Vreven K N Kudin J C Burant J M Millam S S Iyengar J Tomasi V Barone B
Mennucci M Cossi G Scalmani N Rega G A Petersson H Nakatsuji M Hada M
Ehara K Toyota R Fukuda J Hasegawa M Ishida T Nakajima Y Honda O Kitao H
Nakai M Klene X Li J E Knox H P Hratchian J B Cross V Bakken C Adamo J
Jaramillo R Gomperts R E Stratmann O Yazyev A J Austin R Cammi C Pomelli J W
Ochterski P Y Ayala K Morokuma G A Voth P Salvador J J Dannenberg V G
Zakrzewski S Dapprich A D Daniels M C Strain O Farkas D K Malick A D Rabuck
K Raghavachari J B Foresman J V Ortiz Q Cui A G Baboul S Clifford J Cioslowski
B B Stefanov G Liu A Liashenko P Piskorz I Komaromi R L Martin D J Fox T
References
- 135 -
Keith M A Al-Laham C Y Peng A Nanayakkara M Challacombe P M W Gill B
Johnson W Chen M W Wong C Gonzalez and J A Pople Gaussian Inc Wallingford
CT 2004
120 M Denk R K Hayashi R West Chem Commun 1994 33
121 L Kong J Zhang H Song C Cui Dalton Trans 2009 5444
122 A Meltzer S Inoue C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 3038
123 P Macchi D M Proserpio A Sironi J Am Chem Soc 1998 120 1447
124 (a) M Regitz O J Scherer Multiple bonds and Low Coordination in Phosphorus Chemistry
New York 1990 p 5 (b) M Driess Coord Chem Rev 1995 145 1 (c) V Y Lee A
Sekiguchi J Escudieacute H Ranaivonjatovo Chem Lett 2010 39 312
125 C N Smit F M Lock F Bickelhaupt Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 3011
126 (a) C N Smit F Bickelhaupt Organometallics 1987 6 1156 (b) E Niecke E Klein M
Nieger Angew Chem Int Ed 1989 28 751 (c) R Corriu G Lanneau C Priou Angew
Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1130 (d) M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1022 (e) H R
G Bender E Niecke M Nieger J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 3314 (f) M Driess S Rell
H Pritzkow Chem Commun 1995 253 (g) M Driess H Pritzkow S Rell U Winkler
Organometallics 1996 15 1845 (h) M Driess S Block M Brym M T Gamer Angew
Chem Int Ed 2006 45 2293 (i) S Yao S Block M Brym M Driess Chem Commun
2007 3844 (j) V Y Lee M Kawai A Sekiguchi H Ranaivonjatovo J Escudieacute
Organometallics 2009 28 6625 (k) B Li T Matsuo D Hashizume H Fueno K Tanaka
K Tamao J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 13222
127 (a) C H Lai M D Su S Y Chu Inorg Chem 2002 41 1320 (b) R Pietschnig A
Orthaber Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4570 (c) C H Chen M D Su Eur J Inorg Chem
2008 1241 (d) V Lattanzi S Thorwirth D T Halfen L A Mueck L M Ziurys P
Thaddeus J Gauss M C Mccarthy Angew Chem Int Ed 2010 49 5661
128 S Inoue W Wang C Praumlsang M Asay E Irran M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2011 133
2868
129 (a) R Appel W A Paulen Angew Chem Int Ed 1981 20 869 (b) V Cappello J
Baumgartner A Dransfeld K Hassler Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4589
130 M Igarashi M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12660
131 F A Cotton G Wilkinson C Murillo M Bochmann Advanced Inorganic Chemistry 1999
132 (a) N Wiberg C M M Finger K Polborn Angew Chem Int Ed 1993 32 1054 (b) M
Ichinohe M Toyoshima R Kinjo A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2003 125 13328
133 (a) A J Arduengo H V R Dias J C Calabrese F Davidson Inorg Chem 1993 32 1541
(b) N Kuhn T Kratz D Blaumlser R Boese Chem Ber 1995 128 245 (c) P A Rupar M C
Jennings K M Baines Organometallics 2008 27 5043 (d) A J Ruddy P A Rupar K J
Bladek C J Allan J C Avery K M Baines Organometallics 2010 29 1362
134 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch H Marsmann G Henkel Chem Ber 1997 130 1733
135 (a) D Morales-Morales C Grause K Kasaoka R O Redoacuten R E Cramer C M Jensen
Inorg Chim Acta 2000 300ndash302 958 (b) T Kimura Y Uozumi Organometallics 2006 25
4883 (c) R B Bedford M Betham J P H Charmant M F Haddow A G Orpen L T
Pilarski S J Coles M B Hursthouse Organometallics 2007 26 6346 (d) J Aydin K S
Kumar L Eriksson K J Szaboacute Adv Syn Catal 2007 349 2585 (e) J-F Gong Y-H
References
- 136 -
Zhang M-P Song C Xu Organometallics 2007 26 6487 (f) R A Baber R B Bedford
M Betham M E Blake S J Coles M F Haddow M B Hursthouse A G Orpen L T
Pilarski P G Pringle R L Wingad Chem Commun 2006 3880 (g) A V Polukeev S A
Kuklin P V Petrovskii S M Peregudova A F Smolyakov F M Dolgushin A A
Koridze Dalton Trans 2011 40 7201 (h) R B Bedford Y-N Chang M F Haddow C L
Mcmullin Dalton Trans 2011 40 9034
136 (a) C Watanabe T Iwamoto C Kabuto M Kira Angew Chem Int Ed 2008 47 5386 (b)
C Watanabe Y Inagawa T Iwamoto M Kira Dalton Trans 2010 39 9414
137 (a) G Tavcar S S Sen R Azhakar A Thorn H W Roesky Inorg Chem 2010 49 10199
(b) R Azhakar S P Sarish H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Inorg Chem 2011 50 5039
138 W Chen P J Mccormack K Mohammed W Mbafor S M Roberts J Whittall Angew
Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4141
139 (a) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Organometallics 2008 27
3325 (b) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Bull Chem Soc Jpn
2009 82 793
140 (a) F Baumann E Dormann Y Ehleiter W Kaim J Kaumlrcher M Kelemen R Krammer D
Saurenz D Stalke C Wachter G Wolmershaumluser H Sitzmann J Organomet Chem 1999
587 267 (b) F Hung-Low C A Bradley Organometallics 2011 30 2636 (c) F Hung-Low
J P Krogman J W Tye C A Bradley Chem Commun 2012 48 368
141 R Azhakar R S Ghadwal H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Chem Asian J 2012 7 528
142 R S Ghadwal R Azhakar K ProPper J J Holstein B Dittrich H W Roesky Inorg
Chem 2011 50 8502
143 J Li S Merkel J Henn K Meindl A DoRing H W Roesky R S Ghadwal D Stalke
Inorg Chem 2010 49 775
144 M Ingleson H Fan M Pink J Tomaszewski K G Caulton J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
1804
145 A Schnepf Z Anorg Allg Chem 2006 632 935
146 (a) M D Rausch R A Genetti J Org Chem 1970 35 3888 (b) F Ungvary A Sisak L
Markoacute J Organomet Chem 1980 188 373
147 (a) E Erdik Tetrahedron 1992 48 9577 (b) P Knochel R D Singer Chem Rev 1993 93
2117 (c) M Rottlaumlnder P Knochel Tetrahedron Lett 1997 38 1749
148 (a) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1978 17 505 (b) K P C Vollhardt Angew Chem
Int Ed 1984 23 539 (c) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1985 24 248 (d) W Hess
J Treutwein G Hilt Synthesis 2008 2008 3537 (e) C J Scheuermann B D Ward New J
Chem 2008 32 1850 (f) T Shibata K Tsuchikama Org Biomol Chem 2008 6 1317 (g)
K Tanaka Chem Asian J 2009 4 508 (h) J A Varela C Saaacute Synlett 2008 2008 2571
149 (a) G Hilt C Hengst W Hess Eur J Org Chem 2008 2008 2293 (b) A Geny N Agenet
L Iannazzo M Malacria C Aubert V Gandon Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 1810 (c)
C C Eichman J P Bragdon J P Stambuli Synlett 2011 2011 1109
150 (a) Y Wakatsuki H Yamazaki Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1985 58 2715 (b) Y B Taarit Y
Diab B Elleuch M Kerkani M Chihaoui Chem Commun 1986 402 (c) H Nehl Chem
Ber 1994 127 2535 (d) C Wang X Li F Wu B Wan Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
7162
References
- 137 -
151 G M Sheldrick SHELX-97 Program for Crystal Structure Determination Universitaumlt
Goumlttingen (Germany) 1997
152 P Schlack G Keil Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1963 661 72
Appendix
- 138 -
7 APPENDIX
71 Abbreviations
Ada adamantanyl MHz Megahertz
Ar aryl min minute(s)
mmol millimole(ar)
MS mass spectrometry
B3LYP Beckersquos three-parameter hybrid
functional using the Lee Yang
and Parr correlation ldquofunctionalrdquo MW molecular weight
BINAP 22rsquo-(Ph2P)2-11rsquo-binaphthyl mz masscharge
br broad nacnac HC(MeC=N-Dip) 2minus
tBu tert-butyl Naph naphthyl
degC Celsius degree NBO natural bond orbital
ca about NHC N-Heterocyclic Carbene
calc calculated NICS nucleus independent chemical shift
CBD cyclobutadiene NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
cod COD 15-cyclooctadiene NPA natural population analysis
Cp cyclopentadienyl Ph phenyl
d doublet ppm parts per million
DCM dichloromethane iPr iso-propyl
DFT density functional theory q quartet
Dip 26-iPr2C6H3 R organic substituent
EI electron impact ionization RT room temperature
equiv equivalent(s) s singlet strong
ESI electrospray ionization sept septet
Et ethyl t triplet
eV electronvolt THF tetrahydrofuran
Fc ferrocendiyl Tip 246-iPr2C6H2
g gram(s) TMEDA tetramethylethyldiamine
h hour(s) TMS tetramethylsilane
HOMO highest occupied molecular orbital TS transition state
Hz Hertz TZVP triple-zeta valence polarization
IR infrared
K Kelvin
TZVDP TZVP two sets of polarization
functions aL PhC(
tBuN)2
minus UV-vis ultraviolet-visible
VE valence electron LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital vs very strong
M Metal VT variable temperature
m multiplet medium w weak
Me methyl WBI Wiberg Bond Index
Mes mesityl 246-Me3-C6H2 δ chemical shift
Appendix
- 139 -
GeN
N
GeN
Dip
Dip
DipCl
N
SnN
Dip
Dip
GeNN
SnN
Dip
DipDip
N
Dip
6 7
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation
1 2 3 4
5 8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22
Appendix
- 140 -
23 24 25 26
27 28 29
30 31 32 33
34 35 36
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph
Si
Cl
37 38 39 40
Appendix
- 141 -
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
41 42 43
44 45 46
47a 47b 48a 48b
Appendix
- 142 -
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details
Table 731 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 3 4 5
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C50 H88 Ge2 K2 N2 O4
100460
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
106989(7) pm
114137(7) pm
122625(8) pm
74158(6) deg
76395(6) deg
83400(5) deg
139807(16)
1
1193
1263
536
028 x 02 x 018
326 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-13lt=klt=13
-14lt=llt=14
12268
4910 [R(int) = 00358]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 094847
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4910 0 281
0940
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00638
R1 = 00538 wR2 = 00666
0456 and -0223
C41 H5 Ge N3
66650
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
91129(6) pm
113531(7) pm
190282(10) pm
100360(5) deg
101854(5) deg
98627(5) deg
185918(19)
2
1191
0855
716
039 x 012 x 007
297 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-13lt=klt=13
-22lt=llt=22
14570
6543 [R(int) = 00560]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
0943 and 0777
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6543 0 420
0785
R1 = 00399 wR2 = 00513
R1 = 00853 wR2 = 00566
0577 and -0317
C66 H102 Ge4 K2 N4 O2
135208
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
12370(3) pm
148433(14) pm
188725(19) pm
90059(8)deg
96311(14)deg
90082(13)deg
34442(10)
2
1304
1892
1416
030 x 025 x 015
292 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-15lt=klt=17
-14lt=llt=22
17371
6032 [R(int) = 00487]
995
Analytical
0807 and 0584
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6032 2 364
0911
R1 = 00424 wR2 = 00801
R1 = 00874 wR2 = 00885
0497 and -0457
Appendix
- 143 -
Table 732 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 6 8 12
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C46 H65 Ge2 N3
80519
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
44536(2) pm
98204(5) pm
218135(10) pm
90deg
116030(4)deg
90deg
85727(7)
8
1248
1436
3408
038 x 024 x 010
305 to 2500deg
-49lt=hlt=52
-10lt=klt=11
-24lt=llt=25
20162
7493 [R(int) = 00954]
992
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 074676
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7493 0 476
0917
R1 = 00559 wR2 = 00778
R1 = 01461 wR2 = 00966
0590 and -0578
C46 H65 Ge N3 Sn
85129
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
867780(10) pm
120514(4) pm
210797(6) pm
96333(2)deg
97393(2)deg
99141(2)deg
213908(10)
2
1322
1320
888
016 x 014 x 012
295 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-14lt=klt=14
-25lt=llt=25
16936
7496 [R(int) = 00251]
994
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099037
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7496 0 495
1001
R1 = 00309 wR2 = 00706
R1 = 00437 wR2 = 00733
1468 and -0424
C37 H48 N2
52077
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108485(5) pm
127284(7) pm
132348(4) pm
65748(4)deg
86290(3)deg
71699(5)deg
157759(12)
2
1096
0063
568
029 x 022 x 018
298 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13428
5541 [R(int) = 00203]
998
None
09888 and 09820
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5541 0 364
1029
R1 = 00439 wR2 = 00900
R1 = 00633 wR2 = 00963
0188 and -0193
Appendix
- 144 -
Table 733 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 14 16 17
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H46 Cl Ge N2
62680
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117621(2) pm
175495(4) pm
166051(3) pm
90deg
107053(2)deg
90deg
327691(11)
4
1270
1044
1324
040 x 032 x 022
342 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-19lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=18
16923
5742 [R(int) = 00250]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 082078
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5742 0 378
1044
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00709
R1 = 00496 wR2 = 00742
0736 and -0362
C37 H46 Ge N2
59135
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108388(6) pm
127885(7) pm
132778(4) pm
66971(4)deg
85749(3)deg
71833(5)deg
160695(13)
2
1222
0980
628
029 x 015 x 007
307 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13501
5636 [R(int) = 00366]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 092510
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5636 0 369
1031
R1 = 00489 wR2 = 01180
R1 = 00691 wR2 = 01242
0539 and -0501
C37 H49 Ge N3
60838
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117714(4) pm
174309(6) pm
166868(6) pm
90deg
106866(4)deg
90deg
32766(2)
4
1233
0964
1296
030 x 023 x 019
342 to 2500deg
-8lt=hlt=13
-10lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=16
12816
5749 [R(int) = 00325]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 095425
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5749 0 378
1060
R1 = 00464 wR2 = 01084
R1 = 00699 wR2 = 01133
1717 and -0738
Appendix
- 145 -
Table 734 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 18 20 22
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H48 Ge N2 O
60936
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117560(3) pm
174116(5) pm
166421(4) pm
90deg
106992(3)deg
90deg
325778(15)
4
1242
0971
1296
031 x 014 x 005
343 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-20lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=19
23624
5720 [R(int) = 00371]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 083390
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5720 0 379
1018
R1 = 00336 wR2 = 00752
R1 = 00516 wR2 = 00789
0521 and -0366
C28 H38 N2
40260
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
94924(4) pm
256583(9) pm
107465(5) pm
90deg
110403(5)deg
90deg
245320(18)
4
1090
0063
880
017 x 015 x 013
343 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=10
-30lt=klt=27
-12lt=llt=11
8561
4313 [R(int) = 00209]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099057
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4313 0 281
1041
R1 = 00476 wR2 = 01015
R1 = 00771 wR2 = 01083
0253 and -0194
C28 H37 Cl Ge N2 O
52564
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
89021(3) pm
107319(4) pm
151176(6) pm
75734(4)deg
74781(3)deg
75311(3)deg
132282(8)
2
1320
1281
552
020 x 012 x 008
354 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-12lt=klt=12
-15lt=llt=17
9246
4654 [R(int) = 00211]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086160
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4654 0 304
0946
R1 = 00274 wR2 = 00579
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00597
0394 and -0264
Appendix
- 146 -
Table 735 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 23 27 28
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C28 H36 Cl2 Ge N2
54408
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
279616(13) pm
113538(3) pm
177729(7) pm
90deg
109718(5)deg
90deg
53115(4)
8
1361
1374
2272
021 x 017 x 015
332 to 2500deg
-25lt=hlt=33
-7lt=klt=13
-21lt=llt=20
10951
4663 [R(int) = 00459]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091223
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4663 0 304
0856
R1 = 00372 wR2 = 00584
R1 = 00684 wR2 = 00620
0589 and -0533
C30 H48 Cl2 N4 O Si2
60780
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121593(5) pm
162045(6) pm
171248(7) pm
90deg
98177(4)deg
90deg
33399(2)
4
1209
0295
1304
030 x 015 x 005
335 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=13
-16lt=klt=19
-20lt=llt=20
23741
5865 [R(int) = 00491]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086688
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5865 172 490
1035
R1 = 00543 wR2 = 01080
R1 = 00905 wR2 = 01194
0310 and -0412
C30 H46 N4 O Si2
53489
150(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Fdd2
31188(2) pm
39120(3) pm
102620(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
125204(14)
16
1135
0141
4640
031 x 011 x 007
334 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=36
-46lt=klt=45
-12lt=llt=12
11517
4372 [R(int) = 00656]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 097469
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4372 1 346
0897
R1 = 00488 wR2 = 00604
R1 = 00754 wR2 = 00650
0328 and -0229
Appendix
- 147 -
Table 736 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 29 30 31
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C38 H58 N4 Ni O Si2
70177
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
98776(8) pm
129530(11) pm
155488(13) pm
81634(7)deg
83316(7)deg
82826(7)deg
19430(3)
2
1200
0594
756
020 x 009 x 007
330 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=11
-15lt=klt=13
-18lt=llt=18
14961
6828 [R(int) = 00414]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091998
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6828 0 474
0948
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00807
R1 = 00605 wR2 = 00853
0407 and -0240
C21 H41 N2 P Si3
43680
173(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Pbca
193556(7) pm
142399(4) pm
199777(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
55063(3)
8
1054
0239
1904
039 x 036 x 016
351 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=23
-16lt=klt=16
-23lt=llt=22
19912
4836 [R(int) = 00961]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09627 and 09125
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4836 18 287
0906
R1 = 00571 wR2 = 00889
R1 = 01270 wR2 = 01032
0316 and -0214
C44 H60 N4 P2 Si2
76308
173(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
23841(3) pm
101993(12) pm
19369(2) pm
90deg
108346(12)deg
90deg
44703(9)
4
1134
0184
1640
076 x 057 x 055
353 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=28
-12lt=klt=12
-20lt=llt=23
16197
3927 [R(int) = 00447]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09053 and 08725
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
3927 0 251
1034
R1 = 00618 wR2 = 01393
R1 = 00843 wR2 = 01489
0721 and -0649
Appendix
- 148 -
Table 737 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 33 36 40-endo
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C56 H98 Cl4 N6 Si6 Sn2
140312
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
105159(4) pm
127622(6) pm
269391(12) pm
90310(4)deg
90855(3)deg
102927(3)deg
35232(3)
2
1323
1000
1456
013 x 012 x 009
336 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-29lt=llt=32
25757
12396 [R(int) = 00546]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09154 and 08810
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
12396 536 816
2077
R1 = 01231 wR2 = 01906
R1 = 01495 wR2 = 01944
1510 and -4753
C91 H139 N8 O4 Pd Si4
162786
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
145970(8) pm
151441(15) pm
232982(16) pm
71358(8)deg
74666(5)deg
85365(6)deg
47063(6)
2
1149
0298
1750
019 x 013 x 011
327 to 2500deg
-17lt=hlt=17
-17lt=klt=18
-27lt=llt=27
41022
16531 [R(int) = 00735]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09679 and 09455
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
16531 284 1112
0908
R1 = 00558 wR2 = 01021
R1 = 01075 wR2 = 01128
0688 and -0448
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
10532(3) pm
20258(5) pm
18990(5) pm
90deg
10542(3)deg
90deg
39060(19)
4
1347
1927
1648
012 x 008 x 005
322 to 2500deg
-6lt=hlt=12
-22lt=klt=24
-22lt=llt=21
16887
6870 [R(int) = 01353]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 073478
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6870 213 498
1044
R1 = 00912 wR2 = 01786
R1 = 01680 wR2 = 02282
0570 and -1404
Appendix
- 149 -
Table 738 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 40-exo 41 42
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
165582(11) pm
127695(7) pm
198175(12) pm
90deg
107428(7)deg
90deg
39979(4)
4
1316
1883
1648
012 x 011 x 009
337 to 2499deg
-16lt=hlt=19
-15lt=klt=15
-23lt=llt=23
29049
7015 [R(int) = 00329]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 052405
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7015 0 436
1065
R1 = 00263 wR2 = 00574
R1 = 00318 wR2 = 00595
0357 and -0360
C45 H59 Co Fe N4 Si2
82692
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
119176(7) pm
160794(9) pm
220424(13) pm
90deg
94402(5)deg
90deg
42115(4)
4
1304
0831
1752
015 x 013 x 007
323 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=17
-16lt=llt=26
17786
7404 [R(int) = 01111]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 075122
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7404 0 490
1052
R1 = 00717 wR2 = 01045
R1 = 01208 wR2 = 01181
0467 and -0370
C45 H59 Co Fe Ge2 N4
91592
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121662(3) pm
160596(3) pm
220073(5) pm
90deg
93549(2)deg
90deg
429163(16)
4
1418
2134
1896
015 x 011 x 008
336 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=19
-26lt=llt=26
33743
7539 [R(int) = 00521]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 068509
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7539 0 521
1259
R1 = 00400 wR2 = 00965
R1 = 00536 wR2 = 01000
0376 and -0373
Appendix
- 150 -
Atomic coordinates of four unpublished compounds 20 22 23 and 33 are shown in
following tables
Table 739 Atomic coordinates (times10
4) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 20 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
N(1) 1159(1) 1176(1) 6836(1) 20(1)
C(1) 1706(2) 1650(1) 6995(1) 21(1)
N(2) -1293(2) 1547(1) 7057(1) 23(1)
C(2) 789(2) 2089(1) 7078(1) 20(1)
C(3) -626(2) 2021(1) 7158(1) 20(1)
C(4) 3331(2) 1741(1) 7112(2) 29(1)
C(5) 3920(2) 2283(1) 7590(2) 34(1)
C(6) 2795(2) 2681(1) 6772(2) 35(1)
C(7) 1375(2) 2643(1) 7102(2) 27(1)
C(8) -1522(2) 2482(1) 7295(2) 21(1)
C(9) -2759(2) 2643(1) 6227(2) 27(1)
C(10) -3571(2) 3077(1) 6331(2) 33(1)
C(11) -3169(2) 3358(1) 7498(2) 35(1)
C(12) -1948(2) 3199(1) 8573(2) 32(1)
C(13) -1133(2) 2765(1) 8467(2) 27(1)
C(14) -2537(2) 1417(1) 7503(2) 35(1)
C(15) -3250(3) 920(1) 6823(2) 61(1)
C(16) -1974(3) 1344(1) 9002(2) 65(1)
C(17) 2080(2) 741(1) 6834(2) 20(1)
C(18) 2353(2) 597(1) 5670(2) 23(1)
C(19) 3237(2) 160(1) 5724(2) 29(1)
C(20) 3821(2) -131(1) 6867(2) 32(1)
C(21) 3480(2) -1(1) 7977(2) 29(1)
C(22) 2598(2) 427(1) 7984(2) 23(1)
C(23) 2150(2) 562(1) 9174(2) 28(1)
C(24) 2101(2) 91(1) 10028(2) 39(1)
C(25) 3156(2) 987(1) 10029(2) 42(1)
C(26) 1602(2) 885(1) 4374(2) 29(1)
C(27) 2645(3) 974(1) 3586(2) 53(1)
C(28) 195(3) 588(1) 3539(2) 54(1)
Appendix
- 151 -
Table 7310 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 22 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 4751(1) 5279(1) 3913(1) 24(1)
Cl(1) 4863(1) 7474(1) 3443(1) 35(1)
O(1) 2591(1) 5468(1) 4187(1) 20(1)
N(1) 4469(2) 5098(1) 2623(1) 17(1)
C(1) 3006(2) 5278(2) 2582(1) 16(1)
N(2) 1482(2) 7765(2) 2375(1) 20(1)
C(2) 2432(2) 5062(2) 1801(1) 21(1)
C(3) 1144(2) 4228(2) 2174(2) 31(1)
C(4) -158(2) 4793(2) 2933(2) 30(1)
C(5) 534(2) 4844(2) 3741(1) 21(1)
C(6) 1810(2) 5684(2) 3440(1) 17(1)
C(7) 1063(2) 7152(2) 3205(1) 18(1)
C(8) 820(2) 9172(2) 2096(1) 26(1)
C(9) 397(3) 9344(2) 1159(2) 40(1)
C(10) 2058(3) 9950(2) 2035(2) 43(1)
C(11) -95(2) 7719(2) 3998(1) 18(1)
C(12) 434(2) 8108(2) 4652(1) 22(1)
C(13) -648(2) 8637(2) 5376(1) 27(1)
C(14) -2259(2) 8769(2) 5459(2) 30(1)
C(15) -2795(2) 8370(2) 4815(2) 30(1)
C(16) -1724(2) 7845(2) 4085(1) 24(1)
C(17) 5786(2) 4690(2) 1889(1) 19(1)
C(18) 6546(2) 3361(2) 1997(1) 22(1)
C(19) 7868(2) 3005(2) 1310(2) 28(1)
C(20) 8423(2) 3902(2) 552(2) 29(1)
C(21) 7656(2) 5209(2) 464(1) 26(1)
C(22) 6329(2) 5635(2) 1128(1) 21(1)
C(23) 5549(2) 7085(2) 991(2) 26(1)
C(24) 6701(3) 7932(2) 989(2) 41(1)
C(25) 4931(3) 7520(2) 84(2) 40(1)
C(26) 6001(2) 2315(2) 2820(2) 27(1)
C(27) 5775(3) 1139(2) 2495(2) 40(1)
C(28) 7175(3) 1863(2) 3471(2) 38(1)
Appendix
- 152 -
Table 7311 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 23 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 967(1) 7605(1) 1823(1) 18(1)
Cl(1) 1020(1) 9314(1) 2345(1) 29(1)
N(1) 1401(1) 6550(2) 2449(1) 19(1)
C(1) 1534(1) 5601(2) 2029(2) 16(1)
Cl(2) 198(1) 7116(1) 1640(1) 31(1)
N(2) 1101(1) 7630(2) 909(1) 15(1)
C(2) 1548(1) 5691(2) 1285(2) 15(1)
C(3) 1442(1) 6764(2) 777(2) 14(1)
C(4) 1615(1) 6867(2) 172(2) 19(1)
C(5) 1945(1) 5989(2) -42(2) 26(1)
C(6) 2098(1) 4966(2) 547(2) 22(1)
C(7) 1669(1) 4652(2) 844(2) 21(1)
C(8) 1625(1) 4444(2) 2470(2) 17(1)
C(9) 1229(1) 3875(2) 2611(2) 23(1)
C(10) 1291(1) 2785(2) 2983(2) 29(1)
C(11) 1764(2) 2263(3) 3232(2) 32(1)
C(12) 2169(1) 2832(3) 3121(2) 30(1)
C(13) 2101(1) 3920(2) 2737(2) 22(1)
C(14) 1621(1) 6630(2) 3327(2) 20(1)
C(15) 1219(1) 6848(3) 3699(2) 32(1)
C(16) 2052(1) 7524(2) 3583(2) 34(1)
C(17) 833(1) 8395(2) 248(2) 17(1)
C(18) 1019(1) 9542(2) 207(2) 19(1)
C(19) 745(1) 10248(3) -431(2) 29(1)
C(20) 315(1) 9844(3) -1011(2) 36(1)
C(21) 147(1) 8718(3) -973(2) 33(1)
C(22) 399(1) 7960(2) -350(2) 20(1)
C(23) 215(1) 6700(2) -377(2) 23(1)
C(24) 329(1) 6020(3) -1045(2) 34(1)
C(25) -341(1) 6612(3) -475(2) 31(1)
C(26) 1517(1) 10001(2) 789(2) 22(1)
C(27) 1914(1) 10083(3) 375(2) 32(1)
C(28) 1463(1) 11198(2) 1144(2) 36(1)
Appendix
- 153 -
Table 7312 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 33 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Sn(1) 4689(1) 4918(1) 3222(1) 24(1)
Sn(2) 5822(1) 5994(1) 1674(1) 30(1)
Cl(1) 4488(3) 6215(2) 3883(1) 38(1)
Cl(2) 3266(2) 3378(2) 3638(1) 39(1)
Cl(3) 7188(2) 7769(2) 1449(1) 43(1)
Cl(4) 6104(3) 5090(3) 888(1) 57(1)
Si(1) 6825(2) 4259(2) 3587(1) 17(1)
Si(2) 8610(3) 6420(2) 3531(1) 28(1)
Si(3) 9814(2) 4466(2) 3664(1) 26(1)
Si(4) 3648(2) 6680(2) 1375(1) 21(1)
Si(5) 1981(3) 4463(2) 1299(1) 30(1)
Si(6) 649(3) 6348(2) 1247(1) 30(1)
N(1) 6586(7) 2924(5) 3299(3) 20(2)
N(2) 6484(6) 3264(5) 4080(3) 16(2)
N(3) 8389(7) 5001(5) 3582(3) 23(2)
N(4) 3751(7) 7937(6) 1722(3) 22(2)
N(5) 3959(8) 7800(6) 936(3) 27(2)
N(6) 2102(7) 5865(6) 1329(3) 24(2)
C(1) 6258(8) 2470(7) 3742(4) 24(2)
C(2) 5630(8) 1296(7) 3832(3) 20(2)
C(3) 4328(9) 879(7) 3742(4) 30(2)
C(4) 3826(11) -209(8) 3826(4) 44(3)
C(5) 4613(12) -855(8) 3977(4) 47(3)
C(6) 5921(13) -450(9) 4064(4) 54(3)
C(7) 6446(10) 640(8) 3992(4) 36(3)
C(8) 6469(9) 2487(7) 2787(3) 22(2)
C(9) 7183(11) 3385(8) 2465(4) 43(3)
C(10) 5041(10) 2180(9) 2612(4) 44(3)
C(11) 7093(12) 1524(8) 2741(4) 49(3)
C(12) 6251(9) 3286(8) 4625(3) 26(2)
C(13) 4851(10) 2720(9) 4759(4) 48(3)
C(14) 7218(10) 2783(8) 4908(4) 39(3)
C(15) 6455(10) 4474(7) 4759(4) 31(2)
C(16) 7585(10) 6750(8) 3014(4) 43(3)
C(17) 8192(11) 7005(8) 4123(4) 44(3)
C(18) 10317(10) 7108(8) 3367(5) 55(4)
C(19) 10809(9) 4684(9) 3087(4) 39(3)
C(20) 9461(9) 3008(7) 3775(4) 30(2)
Appendix
- 154 -
C(21) 10726(10) 5062(9) 4232(4) 41(3)
C(22) 4144(9) 8514(7) 1315(3) 22(2)
C(23) 4603(10) 9700(7) 1286(3) 30(2)
C(24) 5918(10) 10173(8) 1332(4) 36(3)
C(25) 6315(12) 11289(9) 1292(4) 46(3)
C(26) 5453(14) 11926(9) 1203(4) 50(3)
C(27) 4158(14) 11457(9) 1158(4) 52(3)
C(28) 3726(12) 10336(8) 1194(4) 41(3)
C(29) 3829(9) 8261(7) 2260(3) 24(2)
C(30) 3041(13) 9101(10) 2358(4) 65(4)
C(31) 3223(10) 7251(8) 2537(4) 41(3)
C(32) 5223(10) 8649(10) 2438(4) 59(4)
C(33) 4252(10) 7910(8) 398(3) 30(2)
C(34) 3489(13) 8669(11) 158(4) 67(4)
C(35) 3812(13) 6813(9) 170(4) 60(4)
C(36) 5705(11) 8321(11) 315(4) 63(4)
C(37) 3040(11) 4003(8) 1778(4) 49(3)
C(38) 2431(11) 4059(8) 669(4) 44(3)
C(39) 310(10) 3713(8) 1447(5) 48(3)
C(40) -433(9) 5964(9) 1795(4) 43(3)
C(41) 921(10) 7835(9) 1209(4) 48(3)
C(42) -186(11) 5795(10) 650(4) 57(4)
C(43) -180(17) 209(14) 3445(7) 59(3)
C(44) -1099(17) -417(14) 3132(7) 58(3)
C(45) -949(16) -322(14) 2634(7) 58(2)
C(46) 75(15) 387(13) 2440(7) 58(2)
C(47) 979(17) 1008(14) 2750(6) 60(2)
C(48) 829(17) 908(15) 3251(7) 60(3)
C(49) 210(20) 473(17) 1887(7) 58(3)
C(43A) 798(17) 917(14) 2044(7) 58(3)
C(44A) 1381(17) 1418(14) 2465(7) 59(3)
C(45A) 931(16) 1088(14) 2929(7) 59(3)
C(46A) -134(15) 231(13) 2969(7) 58(2)
C(47A) -748(17) -263(14) 2547(6) 58(2)
C(48A) -289(17) 75(14) 2084(7) 58(2)
C(49A) -640(20) -111(17) 3469(8) 60(3)
C(50) 120(20) -463(18) -179(10) 106(6)
C(51) -640(30) -620(20) 236(10) 106(6)
C(52) -730(20) 250(20) 530(10) 107(6)
C(53) -70(30) 1260(20) 404(11) 109(6)
C(54) 680(20) 1409(19) -10(11) 107(6)
C(55) 780(30) 558(19) -303(11) 106(6)
C(56) 250(30) -1390(20) -499(12) 120(7)
Appendix
- 155 -
C(57) 575(16) 499(14) 4873(6) 52(3)
C(58) 807(18) -512(14) 4941(8) 53(3)
C(59) -138(17) -1326(14) 5128(7) 55(3)
C(60) -1333(18) -1140(15) 5253(8) 57(3)
C(61) -1572(16) -130(15) 5187(7) 56(3)
C(62) -620(17) 686(15) 5000(8) 53(3)
C(63) 1600(20) 1369(17) 4669(9) 59(5)
Appendix
- 156 -
74 Publications in this dissertation
1 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Stephan Enthaler and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167-6171 Angew Chem 2012 124 6271-6275
Bis(silylenyl)- and Bis(germylenyl)-Substituted Ferrocenes Synthesis Structure and Catalytic
Applications of Bidentate Silicon(II)-Cobalt Complex
2 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Elisabeth Irran and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691-3694 Angew Chem 2012 124 3751-3754
Synthesis and unexpected coordination of a silicon(II)-based SiCSi pincerlike arene to
palladium
3 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 6490-6494
Reactivity of N-Heterocyclic germylene toward ammonia and water
4 Shenglai Yao Yun Xiong Wenyuan Wang and Matthias Driess
Chem Eur J 2011 17 4890-4895
Synthesis structure and reactivity of a pyridine-stabilized germanone
5 Shigeyoshi Inoue Wenyuan Wang Carsten Praesang Matthew Asay Elisabeth Irran and
Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 2868ndash2871
An ylide-like phosphasilene and striking formation of a 4π-electron resonance-stabilized 24-
disila-13-diphosphacyclo- butadiene
6 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890ndash15892
An isolable bis-silylene oxide (ldquodisilylenoxanerdquo) and its metal coordination
7 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Chem Commun 2009 2661ndash2663
An unsymmetric substituted digermylene with a Ge(I)ndashGe(I) bond and synthesis of a
germylenendashstannylene with a Ge(I)ndashSn(I) bond
8 Wenyuan Wang Shenglai Yao Christoph van Wuellen and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640ndash9641
A cyclopentadienide analogue containing divalent germanium and a heavy cyclobutadiene-
like dianion with an unusual Ge4 Core
Appendix
- 157 -
75 Curriculum Vitae
Personal Data
Date and Place of Birth 17th
January 1976 in Nei Mongol China
Nationality Chinese
Education
1982-1987 Elementary School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1987-1993 High School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1993-1997 Department of Chemistry Inner Mongolia Normal University (China)
Bachelor Chemistry
071997 Bachelor of Chemistry education
2003-2007 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
Diplom Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
012008 Diplom of Science Degree
2008-2012 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
PhD Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
Herein I affirm that this dissertation was finished independently at the ldquoInstitut fuumlr
Chemierdquo at the ldquoTechnischen Universitaumlt Berlinrdquo under the guidance of
Prof Dr Matthias Driess where all references and additional aid sources have been
appropriately cited
Wenyuan Wang
Berlin Juli 2012
DISSERTATION
by
Dipl Chemiker
Wenyuan Wang
from Nei Mongol (China)
Die vorliegende Arbeit entstand in der Zeit von Feb 2008 bis Jul 2012 unter der
Betreuung von Prof Dr Matthias Driess am Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen
Universitaumlt Berlin
Von Herzen kommend gilt mein Dank meinem verehrten Lehrer
Herrn Professor Dr Matthias Drieszlig
fuumlr die Aufnahme in seinen Arbeitskreis fuumlr seine engagierte Unterstuumltzung
und fuumlr die Forschungsfreiheit
My heartfelt thanks go out to
Prof Dr Thomas Braun for his acceptance of the second commentator ship
Prof Dr Peter Hildebrandt for his acceptance of the chairman
Prof Dr Shigeyoshi Inoue and Prof Dr Christoph van Wuumlllen for DFT calculations
and composition assistance during the course of my PhD work and Dr Stephan
Enthaler for the investigation of the catalytic activity
Dr Shenglai Yao Dr Carsten Praesang Dr Andreas Bruumlck Dr Anne Adams Robert
Adams Ms Marianna Tsaroucha Mr Gengwen Tan Mr Daniel Gallego and Mr
Paul Ensle for useful discussions synthetic suggestions composition and
modification assistance during the course of my PhD work
My laboratory coworkers Mr Stefan Schutte for creating a wonderful lab atmosphere
and Ms Paula Nixdorf Dr Elisabeth Irran for X-ray crystal structure determinations
and solutions Dr Jan-Dirk Epping Dr Heinz-Juumlrgen Kroth and Mr Manfred
Dettlaff for NMR measurements Ms Sigrid Imme for CHN and IR measurements
Mr Robert Rudolph for the measurements of cyclic voltammetry
Ms Andrea Rahmel and all members of my work group for their hail-fellow help
friendship and years of harmonious work together and for their acting as guides in
my living and discovery in all things in Germany
I sincerely thank my parents my wife Xiaoxia Zhao and Prof GuoXingBaTu for
selfless support and encouragement of my study in Germany
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the
Cluster of Excellence ldquoUnifying Concepts in Catalysisrdquo (Unicat)
Table of contents
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds 1
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements 5
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores 8
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands 16
2 MOTIVATION 21
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 23
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates 23
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4 23
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8 28
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5 30
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6 34
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8 35
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8 36
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8 38
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene 40
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands 40
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16 42
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O 45
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23 48
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28 51
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28 52
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel 55
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31 57
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30 59
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31 61
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 65
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34 68
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35 68
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII complex 36 71
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism 74
Table of contents
ii
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 76
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40 76
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40 80
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45 83
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts 85
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 89
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION 98
51 General section 98
52 Analytical methods 99
53 Starting Materials 101
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds 102
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4 102
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5 103
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6 104
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8 105
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 107
526 The new chlorogermylene 14 108
527 The new germylene 16 109
528 Aminogermylene 17 110
529 Germylene hydroxide 18 111
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20 112
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22 113
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23 114
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27 115
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28 116
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29 117
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30 118
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31 119
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 120
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35 120
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36 121
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38 123
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40 124
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41 125
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42 126
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44 127
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45 128
Table of contents
iii
6 REFERENCES 129
7 APPENDIX 138
71 Abbreviations 138
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation 139
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details 142
74 Publications in this dissertation 156
75 Curriculum Vitae 157
Introduction
- 1 -
1 INTRODUCTION
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds
Generally main-group elements higher than of the third period are classified as
ldquoheavy main-group elementsrdquo some of which show abnormal physical and chemical
properties For example Br(VII) is a stronger oxidant than Cl(VII) This different
behavior of high-valent main-group elements can be attributed to the relativistic
effect[1]
of electrons The contraction of all s-orbitals triggered by the relativistic effect
leads to a greater energy difference between s- and p-orbitals in higher period
elements which increases the difficulty of a sp-hybridation Moreover the energy
difference between s- and p-orbitals for elements in the d-district of the fourth period
and f-district of the sixth period vary unconventionally resulting in the so called
ldquosecondary periodicityrdquo of forth and sixth period elements Therefore ns2 electrons in
the valence shell of heavy main-group elements play an essential role for their
chemical properties[2]
During the organometallic research of main group elements a
series of novel compounds have been discovered and new synthetic methods as well
as theoretical insights in their chemistry have been developed and summarized[3]
In whole periodic table the difference of property in the group 14 elements (tetrels)
is maximal[4]
In comparison to carbon compounds of Si Ge Sn and Pb are very
different referring to the physical properties chemical behavior and structural features
The theory for carbon chemistry cannot be fit for the chemistry of heavy group 14
elements A typical example is the synthesis of compounds with a silicon-oxygen
double bond (Si=O silanone) Beginning last century the english chemist Frederic
Stanley Kipping manufactured many silicon-carbon compounds and discovered
thereby resin-like products which he called ldquosilicone of ketonesrdquo Kipping coined the
word ldquosiliconerdquo in 1901 to describe polydiphenylsiloxane by analogy of its formula
(Ph2SiO) with the formula of the ketone benzophenone (Ph2CO) Kipping was well
Introduction
- 2 -
aware that polydiphenylsiloxane is polymeric whereas benzophenone is monomeric
and noted that ldquosiliconerdquo and Ph2CO had very different chemistry[5]
The german chemist Richard Muumlller and the american chemist Eugene G Rochow
found almost at the same time a possibility for the industrial production of
dimethyldichlorosilane (Me2SiCl2) the most important precursor for the production of
the silicone in the 1940s[6]
The procedure today is called Muumlller Rochow synthesis
(Scheme 11) From that many researchers synthesized various silicone products but
crystallographically characterized complexes with a donor-stabilized Si=O double
bond were published at the beginning of this century by our group These are the
silanoic ester I1[7]
the carbene-coordinated silanone I2[8]
and the ketone-coordinated
silanone I3[9]
(Scheme 12) The Si=O double bond distance (1532 pm) in I3 is shorter
than the ones in I1 (1579 pm) and I2 (1541 pm) and represents the shortest Si-O
distance in all molecular Si=O compounds hitherto reported[10]
Scheme 11 Muumlller Rochow silicone synthesis
Scheme 12 Isolable donor-stabilized silanoic ester I1 and silanone I2 and I3
The hundred-year story of silicones to monomeric species bearing Si=O double
bonds shows that the silicon atom prefers σ-bonds over double bond (σ- and π-bonds)
That means the classical π-bond is not of first choice for heavy main-group
elements[11]
In other words not only E=X (E = heavy main-group elements X = C N
O) but also E=Ersquo (Ersquo = heavy main-group elements) systems are difficult to stabilize
Introduction
- 3 -
because they easily form σ-bonded corresponding polymers Consequently it is very
challenging to study compounds of heavy main group elements in their low oxidation
state Especially the study of divalent Si Ge and Sn compounds with lone pair
electrons (metallylenes) is one of the most attractive research fields in contemporary
organometallic chemistry[3 12]
In the past thirty years numerous thermally stable unsaturated Si Ge Sn
compounds were isolated which show extremely impressive chemistry[12d 13]
The
difference between C-C and Si-Si double bond is now well-understood[3a]
Very
different reaction mechanisms for the formation of such doubly-bonded carbon and
silicon compounds were throughly discussed The classical C-C double bond can
readily be explained by the valence bond theory and hybridization[14]
The bonding
state in those heavier alkene analogues can be explained by two sets of ns2rarrp
0 donor-
acceptor interactions between two metallylene monomers (Scheme 1 3)[3 15]
Similarly heavier alkyne analogues of main-group elements present also two dative
bonds of ns2rarrp
0 donor-acceptor interactions plus a normal σ-bond between two pz
orbitals[3 12d]
(Scheme 13) But the sp-hybridization for heavy main-group elements
is not realized in their low-valent compounds because sp-hybridization does not lead
to strengthing of terminal σ-bonds to the ligands R
Scheme 13 Nonclassical multiple bond features (E = heavy main-group elements)
Introduction
- 4 -
Until the end of the last century the synthesis of heavier alkyne analogues was an
unsolved problem because of the lack of suitable large substituent At the first the
isolation of a diplumbylene I4[16]
ArrsquoPb-PbArrsquo (Arrsquo = 26-(Tip)2C6H3 Tip = 246-
iPr3C6H2) was reported by Power in 2000 (Scheme 14) As is evident from the
structural parameters of ArPb-PbAr the triple bond character has vanished completely
The Pb-Pb distance (319 pm) in ArPb-PbAr is longer even than that of a normal Pb-
Pb single bond (308 pm) and the CAr-Pb bond vectors are perpendicular to the Pb-Pb
axes (943deg) These two facts illustrated a complete lack of hybridization of lead
atoms and almost exclusive use of p-orbitals in σ-bonds[17]
In 2002 Power reported
the distannyne ArSnequivSnAr I5[18]
(Ar = 26-Dip2C6H3 Dip = 26-iPr2C6H3) containing
a SnequivSn bond length of 2668 pm shorter compared to Sn-Sn single bonds[19]
and
with multiple bond character A trans bent configuration was also observed in I5 but
the Sn-Sn-C angle with 1252deg is far from a perpendicular situation as in I4 In the
same year Power described the first digermyne I6[20]
ArGeequivGeAr In this case the
Ge-Ge bond length of 2285 pm was found to be considerably shorter than normal Ge-
Ge single[13f]
(244 pm) and Ge-Ge double bonds (221-246 pm) indicated multiple
bonding character[21]
The trans-bending angle of Ge-Ge-C (1288deg) in digermyne I6
is slightly larger than that in distannyne I5
Scheme 14 The first isolated formal alkyne analogues of group 14
Introduction
- 5 -
With the appearance of the first structurally characterized disilyne I7[22]
reported by
Sekiguchi the series of heavier alkyne congeners was completed in 2004 The SiequivSi
bond length with 2062 pm was considerably shorter than that of typical Si-Si single
bonds (235 pm) and somewhat shorter than that of typical Si-Si double bonds[13b]
(216 pm) The molecular structure of compound I7 with a Si-Si-Silyl angle of 1374deg
reveals a heavily trans-bent configuration indicating the presence of a nonclassical
triple bond The theoretical calculation approved the trans bent structure and a bond
order of three
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements
Isolable carbenes and heavier carbene analogues (metallylenes silylenes R2Si
germylenes R2Ge stannylenes R2Sn plumbylenes R2Pb) can be defined as
stabilized divalent monomers of group 14 elements which can impossibly dimerize or
polymerize continuously due to the thermodynamic andor kinetic stabilization As
already mentioned above in contrast to carbon heavier group 14 elements have a low
tendency of sp-hybridization[11]
Accordingly consists of ns2 valence electrons as a
lone pair and use usually three p-valence-orbitals for the formation of their divalent
species[12c]
The ground state of R2E (E = Si Ge Sn Pb) is thereby a singlet while
the ground state of R2C is a triplet (Scheme 15) because two nonbonding electrons
locate in sp-hybrid orbitals[23]
In order to obtain at ambient temperature isolable metallylenes there are today two
particularly effective stabilization methods First of all these unsaturated compounds
can be thermodynamically stabilized by donor electron delocalization to empty p-
orbital as in the case of silylene I8[24]
and silyliumylidene cation I9[25]
(Scheme 16)
In addition the coordination of ns2 electrons to the empty p-orbital of the neighbor
molecule can be kinetically prevented by bulky substituents which was shown by the
Introduction
- 6 -
successful synthesis of the dialkyl silylene I10[26]
that is stabilized only by the steric
hindrance of four large silyl groups and C-SirarrSi hyperconjugation
Scheme 15 Ground states of triplet-carbene and singlet-metallylenes
Scheme 16 Stabilization of silylenes by π-electron delocalization andor steric
hindrance I8 I9 and hyperconjugation I10
The synthesis of heavier carbene analogues depends on suitable starting materials
with oxidation state II Practically in the case of tin and lead the dihalides SnCl2 and
PdCl2 are stable and suitable as starting materials for isolable SnII and Pb
II
organometallic compounds Many germylenes were synthesized employing the known
germanium dichloride complex GeCl2middotdioxane which is easily available[27]
The
carbene-stabilized SiIICl2
[28] (NHCrarrSiCl2 NHC = (HC-NDip)2C
[29]) was reported
recently by Roesky However it is not a trouble-free starting material for silicon(II)
chemistry due to the difficult removing of by-products derivated by the bulky carbene
(NHC) Otherwise divalent compounds of GeII Sn
II and Pb
II are more stable than the
corresponding SiII analogues Therefore the metallylene synthetic chemistry faces the
main difficulty in the synthesis and isolation of functionalized silylene derivates
Accustomed synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes was summarized in
Scheme 17 Their feasibility was also proved by the preparation of new silylenes in
this work
Introduction
- 7 -
Scheme 17 Synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes
Usually N-heteroleptic silylenes are accessible from SiIV
-precursors to form SiII-
species using reductants such as Na K or their alloy KC8 lithium or magnesium
naphthalenide etc A usually silylenes[24 26 30]
like I13 with a five- or six-membered
ring system and some three-coordinated silylenes[31]
like I14 are accessible through
the reductive dehalogenation reactions presented in case A Suitable five-coordinated
SiIV
sources I15 could be treated with a non oxygenated strong base resulting in the
corresponding three-coordinated silylenes[32]
I16 The two-coordinated silylene I13
prepared through an acid-base reaction from its four-coordinated precursor was not
observed so far In case C silylenes I18 could be isolated by salt metathesis reaction
during that the halogen atom was substituted by a desired Rsub[33]
With these new
synthetic methods the generation of many imaginable SiII molecules is possible today
Especially more complicated metallylenes for example interconnected or spacer-
separated bis-metallylenes (see next page) can be obtained in good yield Thus more
reactivity will be found in their subsequent reactions
Introduction
- 8 -
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores
The discussion of diplumbylene I4 indicates the strong tendency to transformate a
bis-metallylene instead of triple bond form in the case of lead Scheme 18 shows the
resonance structures of triply bonded I19 and bis-metallylene I20 together with the
donor ligand coordinated interconnected bis-metallylene structure I21 Hitherto the
chemical research in this area made clear that silicon and germanium prefer the type
of structure I19 while the species of lead is more favorable in the state I20[12d]
Corresponding tin species have vacillant structural feature between I19 and I20
depending on the steric demand of R and the packing force in crystals[34]
The donor
ligand coordination with all heavier alkyne analogues leads to the donor-stabilized
bis-metallylene form I21 which possesses an E-E single σ-bond and two ns2 lone
pairs one at each of the E centers[35]
Scheme 18 Resonance structures of nonclassical triple bond and bis-metallylene
According to the bonding state all known bis-metallylenes can be discriminated in
two different types i) ldquointerconnected bis-metallylenesrdquo in which two E atoms are
directly connected by a chemical bond and ii) ldquospacer-separated bis-metallylenesrdquo in
which two EII atoms are separated by bridged atoms or by a broad spacer without an
E-E bond in the molecules[33a 36]
The isolation of bis-metallylenes of heavier group
14 elements has been a major synthetic challenge owing to their tendency to
polymerize Herein a review of this kind of compounds which appeared almost
suddenly just in the last two decades is given
Introduction
- 9 -
Interconnected bis-metallylenes
Interconnected bis-silylenes are shown in Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylene
examples were firstly reported by Robinson in 2008[35]
which are a carbene-stabilized
bis-silylene I22 with a SiI-Si
I bond (2393 pm) and a carbene-stabilized bis-silylene
I23 with a Si0=Si
0 double bond (2229 pm) One year later the Roesky group prepared
an interconnected bis-silylene I24[37]
stabilized by amidinato ligands with a SiI-Si
I
single bond (2413 pm) Compound I24 exhibits a gauche-bent geometry Another
amidinato donor-stabilized bis-silylene I25[38]
which was synthesized in last year by
Jones et al possesses trans-bent structure not the gauche-bent form The SiI-Si
I
distance (2489 pm) in I25 is longer than those in I22 and I24 because of the more
sterically hindered amidinato ligands In the same year the synthesis of the first
phosphine-stabilized bis-silylene I26[39]
could be achieved and fully characterized In
this molecule the Si-Si bond with the bond length of 2331 pm is visibly shorter than
those in related molecules Baceiredo et al described that the Si-Si fragment in I26
presents a certain multiple-bond character
Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylenes
Interconnected bis-germylenes are shown in Scheme 110 In 2006 Jones and
coworkers reported the first successful isolation of two stable bis-germylenes I27 and
Introduction
- 10 -
I28[40]
which are stabilized by an amidinate and a guanidinate ligand respectively
Their Ge-Ge distances (2672 and 2638 pm) show normal single bond character Two
years later Roesky prepared the bis-germylenes I29[41]
which exhibits a gauche-bent
geometry Since I29 is stabilized by a less bulky amidinate ligands the Ge-Ge bond
with the length of 2569 pm is shorter than those of examples before A different β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized bis-germylene I30[42]
was presented by the work group
of Leung in which the Ge-Ge bond length (2602 pm) is somewhere in between The
reduction of NHCrarrGeCl2 (NHC see Scheme 110) employing magnesium(I)
reagents[43]
furnished the carbene-stabilized bis-germylene I31[44]
with a Ge0=Ge
0
double bond (2349 pm) which is the homologous compound of I23 Theoretical
analyses of I31 suggest a singlet germanium(0) dimer (Ge=Ge) datively coordinated
by two NHC ligands In the last year Jones again reported a bis-germylene I32[38]
which is structurally comparable with I27 and I28 But the Ge-Ge distance in I32 is
similar with that of I30
Scheme 110 Interconnected bis-germylenes
Interconnected bis-stannylenes are shown in Scheme 111 Very interestingly the
introduction of SiMe3 instead of H at the para-position of the aryl ring in distannyne
I5 induced the first bis-stannylene I33[34]
without alteration of the steric crowding
near the tin center The small Sn-Sn-C angle (993deg) and the long Sn-Sn distance
(3066 pm) in I33 indicate two stannylene moieties connected with a single bond and
Introduction
- 11 -
without the sp-hybridization In the similar work of Power et al in 2010 the
introduction of GeMe3 substituents of aryl rings at the para-position resulted also in
single bonded bis-stannylene I34[45]
with Sn-Sn distances of 3077 pm and ldquosharprdquo
Sn-Sn-C bending angles of 978deg With the bis-stannylene I35[46]
Jambor showed that
without the use of bulky substituents such as 26-disubstituted aryl groups a bis-
stannylene can be stabilized by intramolecular NrarrSn interactions The less bulky
aryls (aryl = 26-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3) in I35 led to the shorter Sn-Sn single bond (2971
pm) and a trans-bent angle of 943deg as in the diplumbylene I4 The first amidinato
coordinated bis-stannylene I36[38]
with a Sn-Sn single bond was reported by Jones et
al last year Its structural features are highly similar to the germanium homologue
compound I32
Scheme 111 Interconnected bis-stannylenes
Spacer-separated bis-metallylenes and species containing several EII cores
Lappert and Veith reported on the isolation of divalent germanium and tin
compounds very early[47]
Many of these from the 1970s and 1980s that were
described without X-ray characterization will not be discussed here The spacer-
separated bis-germylene I37[48]
and bis-stannylene I38[48]
(Scheme 112) appeared
first of all of this compound class in 1988 The work group of Veith introduced a facile
Introduction
- 12 -
synthetic method by which tetralithium amide reacted with two equivalents of
GeCl2middotdioxane or SnCl2 to give the corresponding products in over 60 yield In 1990
two interesting germylenes I39[49]
and I41[50]
were reported by Lappert and Power In
comparison to the isolable isonitrile (R-N+equivC
minus) until now it was not possible to
stabilize its homologous derivates of the heavier group 14 elements Compounds I39
and I41 can be considered as the dimer (I39) and trimer (I41) formed after
oligomerization of the unstable germaisonitrile analogue (R-N+equivGe
minus) Nevertheless
compounds with two germylene moieties at the time could be seen as impressive
achievements in the divalent germanium chemistry Another dimer of germaisonitrile
bis-germylene I40[51]
was reported by Roesky in 1997 After this the first stable
dimeric silaisonitrile I42[52]
generated through the reduction of carbene stabilized
dichlorosilaimine (NHCrarrSi(Cl2)=NAr Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) with KC8 was presented
by the work group of Roesky in 2011 The lengthy synthetic protocol bulky protecting
groups and a low yield (21) of I42 indicate a more difficult synthetic chemistry
necessary for the synthesis of the latter silicon compound However a trimer (tris-
silylene) of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) the silicon analogue of I41 is now just a dream of
synthetic chemists
In 1991 two bis-stannylenes (micro-chlorotin(II) amides (micro-Cl-Sn-NR2)2) I43 (NR2 =
N(CMe2)2(CH2)3) and I44 (R = SiMe3) in which two stannylene moieties are bridged
by two chlorine atoms were synthesized by Lappert et al[53]
Surprisingly X-ray
analyses of the two crystals show that I43 is the cis-isomer but I44 has the trans-
configuration In contrast a new bis-stannylene (ClSn-micro-N(Naph)SiMe3)2 I45[54]
was
characterized with two bridged nitrogen atoms by the same work group The Sn-N
bonds of 2438 pm in I45 are much longer than the terminal Sn-N bonds of 2069 pm
in I44 The Sn-N-Sn-N ring in I45 is slightly puckered and bears trans-Cl atoms
Instead of halogen atoms in bis-germylene I46[55]
two terminal N atoms of the azide
groups bridge two germylene parts forming a planar four-membered Ge2N2 ring
Otherwise the germylene centers of I46 are tetracoordinated due to two additional
OrarrGe dative bonds The N-bridged three-core germylenes I47 and stannylenes I48
Introduction
- 13 -
were prepared by Veith in 1991[56]
For four of six molecules X-ray crystal structure
determinations have been carried out which reveal the molecules to be built of a
diamond-lattice-like skeleton The top N atom coordinates to all three germylene
(stannylene) parts and another N atoms bridge with the neighboring two germylene
(stannylene) parts The chair-form six-membered E3N3 ring contains three N-H bonds
and traps one halogen atom (Cl Br I) with the three hydrogen atoms
Scheme 112 Spacer-separated metallylenes I37-I48
The by 14-diamine molecules separated bis-stannylenes I50 and I51 were prepared
from the chlorostannylene dimer I44 and the corresponding dilithium diamide by
Lappert and co-workers in 1994 (Scheme 113)[57]
Bis-germylene I49 was similarly
prepared by the reaction of the GeII homologous derivate ClGeN(SiMe3)2 of I44 with
dilithium diaminobenzene and marked a new development at that time In 1997
Lappert et al reported a new 13-diamine bridged bis-stannylene I52 and a stannylene
I53 with the three SnII cores employing dilithium meta-diamide
[58] The synthesis of
I52 is similar to I50 while I53 was isolated by treatment of the substituted
Introduction
- 14 -
diaminobenzene with Sn(N(SiMe3)2)2 in a ratio of 23 Evidently the formation of I53
involves unexpected C-H activations of the 2-position of 13-diaminobenzene and
eliminations of amine HN(SiMe3)2 The 32 reaction of Sn(NMe2)2 with sterically
bulky aromatic amines (DipNH2 or MesNH2) in toluene can be controlled giving the
heteroleptic stannylenes I54 and I55[59]
in which sterically less bulky NMe2 groups
serve as bridges and one SnII center between two bulky R groups remains its two-
coordination The isolation of the first GeII and Sn
II amide dimers I56 and I57
bridged by the NH2 groups was presented in 2005[60]
They were synthesized by the
reaction of bulky low-valent organo GeII and Sn
II halides (ArE
IICl E = Ge Sn Ar see
Scheme 113) with dry ammonia The Ge2N2 or Sn2N2 cores in I56 and I57 are planar
with rhombohedral shapes and with acute angles near 80deg at Ge or Sn and wider
angles near 100deg at N
Wright 1997
I54 R = Mes I55 R = Dip
I52 Lappert 1997
SnNMe2
Sn
Me2N
NR
NR
NN
SiMe3
E
(Me3Si)2N
E
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
N
N
SiMe3
Sn
(Me3Si)2N
Sn
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
Lappert 1994
I49 E = Ge I50 E = Sn I51 Lappert 1994
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
I53 Lappert 1997
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
Sn
Sn
Power 2005
I56 E = Ge R = Dip
I57 E = Sn R = Tip
R
RE
NH2
E
H2N
R
R
Scheme 113 Spacer-separated metallylenes I49-I57
The discovery of the first spacer-separated bis-silylene I58 (Scheme 114) was
made by Lappert et al in 2005[61]
It was synthesized by reductive dehalogenation of
the bis-dichlorosilane precursor with KC8 With the bis-functionality of I58
eventually a macrocycle metal-complex could be formed but the rigid backbone does
not allow a chelating coordination to a single core In addition Power tried oxidative
Introduction
- 15 -
addition reactions of his Sn and Ge alkyne analogues (I5 and I6 Scheme 114) with
trimethyl silyl azide (Me3SiN3) and adamantanyl azide (Ada-N3) giving the spacer (N-
SiMe3 or N-Ada) separated bis-stannylenes I59[62]
and bis-germylene I60[63]
and with
azobenzene (PhN=NPh) giving the spacer (PhNNPh) separated bis-germylene I61[62]
and bis-stannylene I62[62]
respectively The similar reaction of bis-germylene I29
with azobenzene furnished also the addition product the spacer bridged bis-
germylene I63[64]
with simultaneous cleavage of the Ge-Ge single bond as observed
by Roesky in 2010 At the same time So et al activated the Si-Si single bond of bis-
silylene I24 with phenyl acetylene resulting in the ethylene bridged bis-silylene I64[65]
Many spacer separated bis-germylenes and bis-stannylenes[66]
(I65-I74) were
successfully designed and isolated by Hahn et al for the use as promising chelating
ligands in coordination reactions A few transition-metal complexes of them were
prepared by his research group too (see p 18)
Scheme 114 Spacer-separated metallylenes I58-I74
In 2011 after the synthesis of the first oxygen bridged bis-silylene[32a]
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2
minus) in the course of this PhD work other four analogous were reported
Introduction
- 16 -
which are oxygen bridged bis-germylenes I75[67]
I77[68]
bis-stannylene I78[68]
and
sulfur bridged bis-germylene I76[67]
(Scheme 115) Bis-germylene oxide I75 and
sulfide I76 were synthesized in the work group of So et al by the dehalogenation of
LGeCl (L = amidinate in I75) with KC8 and then the oxidation with trimethylamine
N-oxide (Me3NO) or with elemental sulfur Otherwise Powerrsquos new compounds I77
and I78 were accessible by oxidative addition of alkyne analogues I5 and I6 using the
stoichiometric oxygen transfer reagent pyridine N-oxide (C5H5NO) In the last two
decades several cubanes of attractive tetra-metallylenes with GeII Sn
II Pb
II like I79
were presented[69]
(Scheme 116) Because they are somewhat far from discussed
metallylenes in structural features and synthetic approaches they are not discussed
and shown in detail here The synthesis of the still unknown SiII analogue I80 a
tetramer of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) remains as a fascinating challenge
Scheme 115 New bis-metallylenes bridged by a single atom
Scheme 116 Cubane-like tetra-metallylenes of heavier group 14 elements
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands
The interaction between the central atom and the donor in transition-metal
complexes depends on their electron configuration There are two- and three-
coordinated metallylenes in which the empty np-orbitals are stabilized by
Introduction
- 17 -
intramolecular electron delocalization or by the third donor-ligand donation
respectively Therefore if two types of metallylenes serve as donor-ligands for
transition-metals the interaction of these p-orbitals with the corresponding metal d-
orbitals is essentially different For example two silylenerarrM complexes are shown
in Scheme 117 Complex I81 shows clearly σ-donorπ-acceptor interaction[70]
while
the Fe atom in complex I82[71]
contains only a σ-donor bond from the silylene subunit
In this sense three-coordinate metallylenes as σ-donor ligands are more similar to
isoelectronic triorganophosphine ligands[33a b]
in I83 (Scheme 117) In Table 11 the
difference of three-coordinate silylenes and triorganophosphines are compared and
shown in detail
Scheme 117 The σ-donorπ-acceptor or only σ-donor coordination
Table 11 Comparison of three-coordinate silylenes and phosphines
three-Coordinate silylenes Phosphines (PR3)[72]
Synthesis difficult synthetic approaches well-established synthetic procedures
Embellishment only few scaffolds are known numerous structural transformations
and various substituents of R
Stability air and moisture sensitive normally stable in air
Property easily oxidative addition
much stronger σ-donor ligand
multivariate chemical behavior
seldom oxidative addition
strong σ-donor ligand
predictable chemical behavior
Complex only few transition-metal complexes complexes with numerous metals
State of
Development
underdeveloped chemistry fully established
Introduction
- 18 -
In coordination chemistry the spacer separated bis-metallylenes are at the same
time bidentate chelating ligands despite almost all of them were not or could not be
used as chelating ligands Until 2008 only a few chelated transition-metal complexes
coordinated by isolable spacer separated bis-metallylenes were reported They are the
bis-germylene I65 coordinated Mo(CO)4 complex I65-Mo[66b]
and bis-stannylenes
I73 I74 coordinated Ni0 complexes
[66c] I73-Ni I74-Ni (Scheme 118) reported by
Hahn et al Another bis-germylene complex I29-Fe[64]
with two Fe cores presented
by Roesky in 2010 does not comprise chelating coordination at all The reason for the
lack of representative bis-metallylenes in coordination chemistry is that not only the
formation and isolation of such complexes are very difficult but also the design and
synthesis of bis-metallylenes themself are sometimes infeasible Additionally the air-
and water-sensitivity of these compounds causes many unexpected side-reactions In
general metallylene transition-metal complexes are still limited in using metallylenes
containing single EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn)
Scheme 118 Known complexes of spacer-separated bis-germylenes and stannylenes
The successful usage of bidentate phosphanes in many catalytic transformations
originates from their convenient electronic properties and the variable steric
protection Among those chelating bis-phosphane I84[73]
(BINAP Scheme 119) with
Introduction
- 19 -
backbone chirality can lead to excellent enantioselectivity compared to monodentate
phosphines With ferrocendiyl bridged ligands I85 bimetallic complexes are easily
prepared[74]
Furthermore bis-phosphane ligands like I86 are superior bridges for
heterodinuclear complexes in catalytic hydrogenation[75]
Pincer arenes consisting of
a central aromatic backbone linked to two phosphane parts by different spacers are
particularly attractive because of their feasible structural tuning with many choices of
donor groups[72 76]
Recently the chemistry of pincer-ligated transition-metal
complexes underwent rapid developments and has been used for several intriguing
chemical transformations[72b 77]
The coordination chemistry of the most common
pincer ligands such as NCN- PCP- and SCS-type ligands toward transition-metals in
I87 (Scheme 119) was explored extensively[72b 77]
Pincer arenes with stronger σ-
donor sites E than those provided by group 15 and 16 atoms are very attractive for the
synthesis of more electron-rich transition-metal complexes for activation of small
molecules On the other hand transition-metal complexes with ligands like I84-I87
containing EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn) were scarce before 2009
Scheme 119 Bidentate phosphanes for transition-metal complexes
The challenge of spacer-separated bis-metallylenes as novel bidentate σ-donor
ligands for transition-metal complexes are intriguing because of their unique structure
and their coordination ability Therefore transition-metal complexes with chelating
Introduction
- 20 -
bis-metallylenes which were not throughly uncovered[66b c 78]
have received more
and more attention To date the new development of bis-metallylene synthesis
enables the isolation of their transition-metal complexes containing EII-based
functional groups as chelating ligands These complexes may provide access to their
potential application in which they can play a key role as intermediates in transition-
metal catalyzed transformations[70c 79]
Motivation
- 21 -
2 MOTIVATION
As pointed out in the introduction the metallylene synthetic chemistry is a fast
developing field with a great potential to find novel metallylenes with new
functionalities which would be the basis for the development of new kinds of
transition-metal complexes I am particularly interested in the synthesis of new types
of compounds containing divalent group 14 elements and to study their coordination
properties towards transition-metals New metallylenes could serve as very strong σ-
donor ligands for the generation of transition-metal complexes with unusual high
electron density at the metal site which could possess unique chemical properties
The three reports of transition-metal complexes[66b c]
containing bidentate bis-
germylene (stannylene) ligands were discussed in the ldquoIntroductionrdquo of this work
This potential of bis-metallylenes used as chelating ligands in coordination chemistry
prompted me to investigate new transition-metal complexes along with the
development of a new low-valent Si Ge and Sn chemistry
In this work three main points will be addressed i) the design and synthesis of new
ligand stabilized heavier carbene analogous (metallylenes) and interconnected bis-
metallylenes containing low-valent Si Ge Sn ii) the exploration of synthetic
approaches towards different spacer separated (bridged) bis-metallylenes iii) the
investigation of the properties and coordination abilities of new metallylenes (bis-
metallylenes) to transition-metals
The β-diketiminato and amidinato scaffolds I and II were chosen for the
stabilization of the reactive divalent group 14 units (Scheme 21) The known
metallylene halogenide compounds[31a 32b 80]
III and IV were used as the direct
precursors for the preparation of novel mono- and bis-metallylene derivates
Motivation
- 22 -
Scheme 21 Synthesis of new metallylene derivates from precursors
Scheme 22 Coordination of new spacer-separated bis-metallylene to transition-metals
Using isolated products as precursors complexes with different electronic
configurations and activities can be obtained and further modified through
coordination to transition-metals and varying substituents as ligands (Scheme 22)
This development may provide new divalent group 14 element-based functional
ligands in coordination chemistry towards transition-metals As spacer units for the
bis-metallylenes should serve 13-functionalized arene ferrocene and chalcogen
elements (O S Se) The promising application of new metallylene-metal complexes
will be investigated as the precatalyst in organic reactions
Results and Discussion
- 23 -
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates
In this PhD work the abbreviation of nacnacmacr is used only for the Dip-substituted β-
diketiminato ligand[81]
(CH[CMe(NDip)]2macr Dip = 26-iPrC6H3) The synthesis of β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized germanium complexes (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
and
(nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
were reported through the reaction of GeCl2sdotdioxane or GeCl4
with the corresponding Li(nacnac) reagent These compounds can be obtained in high
yield after recrystallization and were used as starting materials for new low-valent
germanium derivates
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Treatment of β-diketiminato germylene chloride 1 with excess of elemental
potassium at ambient temperature in THF yielded the first cyclogermylidenide
derivative 3[83]
which was isolated by fractional crystallization from diethylether in
the form of its potassium salt in 33 yield as pale yellow crystals Moreover the
reduction of 1 led also to the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-
Dip which was isolated by fractional crystallization from hexane solution as yellow
crystals in 31 yield (Scheme 31) Both 3 and 4 have been characterized by NMR
spectroscopy (1H
13C) EI-mass spectrometry (only for 3) and correct elemental
analyses
Scheme 31 Synthesis of the germylenide potassium salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Results and Discussion
- 24 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3 displays two sets of doublets for the Dip-
methyl groups in the range from 108 to 112 ppm Two additional singlets at 184 and
262 ppm were assigned to methyl groups of the five-membered ring Resonances for
the CH of iso-propyl appears at 298 ppm as septets The resonance of the β-H proton
at the GeNC3 ring appears at δ = 618 ppm One set of resonances for aromatic
protons of Dip-groups appears in the range of 691-698 ppm In addition the
diethylether molecule was observed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy The molar ratio of
ether was determined by integration of the appropriate resonance signals in the 1H-
NMR spectrum of 3 This amounts to 22mol and the determined composition fits
well with the elemental analytical data
Complex 3 is an Et2O coordinated potassium germylene anion salt according to the
1H- and
13C-NMR spectra Its structure has been established by a single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 31 left) It reveals a dimeric half-sandwich complex
interconnected via intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds In the structure each half-
sandwich moiety consists of a K(OEt2)2 cation η5-coordinated to the anionic five-
membered planar GeNC3 ring The K1-Ge1 distance of 3449(1) pm is shorter than
the intermolecular K1-Ge1rsquo distance of 3573(1) pm It is noteworthy such shorter K-
Ge distances have been observed in a related dipotassium (18-crown-6)
tetraphenylgermol dianion (330 335 pm)[84]
as well as in a (18-crown-6)-solvated
potassium silylgermanides (342 pm) with a tetravalent germanium atom[85]
Accordingly the K-C(ring) distances in 3 (3092(2)-3330(2) pm) are also longer than
those observed in the aforementioned dipotassium germol dianion (288-317 pm) The
Ge1-N1 distance of 1944(2) pm are shorter than those Ge-N distances in 1[80]
but
longer than that corresponding values in a N-heterocyclic 6π aromatic
germyliumylidene cation[86]
(189 pm) and the heterofulvene-like germylene[87]
(186 pm) Additionally the Ge1-C2 distance (1887(2) pm) the endocyclic C-C
distances (C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3) pm) and the C4-N1 bond length (1382(3)
pm) suggest significant π-resonance stabilization within the six-membered GeNC3
ring In line with that the remarkable deshielding of the resonance signal (618 ppm)
Results and Discussion
- 25 -
for the β-H atom in the 1H-NMR spectrum is in agreement with a considerable hetero-
Cpmacr-like resonance stabilization in the five-membered GeNC3 ring (Figure 31 right)
The latter is also supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see
section 313) Hereafter the lithium complexes of N-heterocyclic germylidenide and
stannylidenide anions[88]
[(THF)Li-η5-EC(tBu)C(H)C(
tBu)N(Dip) E = Ge Sn] were
presented with a similar reductive reaction
Figure 31 Molecular structure of germylene anion salt 3 (left) and hetero-Cpmacr-like
resonance structure (right) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level
Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg]
Ge1-C2 1887(2) Ge1-N1 1944(2) Ge1-K1 34485(6) Ge1-K1rsquo 35728(7)
K1-C2 3092(2) K1-C3 3122(2) K1-C4 3330(2) K1-N1 3402(2) K1-Ge1rsquo
35728(7) N1-C4 1382(3) C1-C2 1516(3) C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3)
C4-C5 1508(3) C2-Ge1-N1 843(1) C4-N1-Ge1 1130(1) C3-C2-C1 1202(2)
C3-C2-Ge1 1116(2) C1-C2-Ge1 1281(2) C4-C3-C2 1174(2) C3-C4-N1
1135(2) C3-C4-C5 1254(2)
The formulation of the resonance structure clarifies that the nitrogen atom has a
higher affinity to carbon instead to germanium (Scheme 32) The mesomer 3c is
energetically less favorable than 3a and 3b This explains also that the Ge1-C2 bond
(1887(2) pm) is shorter than the Ge1-N1 bond (1944(2) pm) in 3
Results and Discussion
- 26 -
Scheme 32 GeNC3-ring resonance structures of germylenide anion of 3
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 4 shows four sets of doublets and one
multiplet for methyls of Dip-groups in the range from 091 to 130 ppm Resonances
for methyl-groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 162 ppm as one singlet
Multiplets in the range of 329-340 are assigned to CH-groups of iso-propyl groups
The resonance of CH proton at the GeN2C3 ring appears at δ = 503 ppm One singlet
at δ = 564 ppm is assigned to NH-groups One set of resonances for aromatic protons
of Dip-groups appears in the range of 683-718 ppm
Figure 32 Molecular structure of germylene amide 4 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn
at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 2051(2) Ge1-N2 2026(2) Ge1-N3
1905(2) N1-C2 1329(3) N2-C4 1332(3) C1-C2 1518(3) C2-C3 1394(3)
C3-C4 1394(3) C4-C5 1512(3) N3-Ge1-N1 9720(8) N3-Ge1-N2 8876(9)
N2-Ge1-N1 8822(8) C2-N1-Ge1 1229(2) C4-N2-Ge1 1240(2) N1-C2-C3
1227(2) C4-C3-C2 1269(3) N2-C4-C3 1239(3)
Results and Discussion
- 27 -
The structure of compound 4 was established by single crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis (Figure 32) It consists of a slightly puckered six-membered GeN2C3 ring
with geometric parameters similar to the corresponding parameters found in precursor
chlorogermylene 1[80]
The sum of bond angles at Ge atom of 2742deg is comparable to
that of 1 (2815deg) implying the presence of a lone pair of electrons at the Ge center
The Ge-N distances in 4 (2026(2) and 2051(2) ppm) are somewhat longer than those
in chlorogermylene 1 (1988(2) and 1997(3) ppm) In the structure of 4 the terminal
Ge-N distance of 1905(2) pm is significantly shorter than those the endocyclic ones
(2026(2) 2051(2) pm) because it is a common covalent bond and stronger than
dative NrarrGe bonds
A plausible mechanism for the formation of 3 and 4 is proposed as depicted in
Scheme 33 The reduction of (nacnac)GeCl 1 by elemental potassium gives the N-
heterocyclic potassium germylidenide 3d as initial transient species The latter
undergoes a ring contraction to give the transient germylene amide 3e which reacts
with 1 in a salt metathesis reaction affording the Dip-N-bridged bis-germylene 3f
Reductive fission of a Ge-N bond in 3f by elemental potassium leads to the germylene
anion potassium salt 3 and the potassium β-diketiminato-GeII amide (nacnac)Ge-NK-
Dip The formation of 4 from (nacnac)Ge-NK-Dip needs a subsequent protonation
from the solvent in an inert atmosphere
Scheme 33 The mechanism of the formation 3 and 4
Results and Discussion
- 28 -
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
This part of the research is the cowork with Shenglai Yao (TU Berlin)
Another reduction experiment of the related β-diketimiate-substituted
organogermanium trichloride 2[82]
(nacnac)GeCl3 with KC8 was investigated The
reaction of 2 with KC8 in THF led to a brown-red mixture from which colorless
crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex K(nacnac)[89]
have been
isolated as side products along with deep-red crystals of the remarkable novel cluster
species 5[83]
in low yield (3 Scheme 34) In contrast reaction of 1 with elemental
potassium in toluene even at 0 degC led merely to the complete replacement of Ge by K
via reduction of GeII to elemental Ge
0 powder and concomitant formation of the
aforementioned β-diketiminato potassium complex
Scheme 34 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
The X-ray crystal diffraction analysis of 5 revealed a dipotassium salt of the first
ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a Ge4 core (Figure 33)
Remarkably to date only a few metal complexes of ldquoheavyrdquo CBD2-
have been
reported featuring a Si4 and Si2Ge2 core[90]
Compound 5 consists of a planar
Ge4(nacnac)22macr dianion in which the two unusual chelating nacnac-ligands are
attached to the Ge4 core each with terminal Ge-C and Ge-N σ-bonds The dianion is
connected by two η3-coordinated K(OEt2) cations each coordinated to Ge1 Ge2 and
N2 and Ge1rsquo Ge2rsquo and N2rsquo respectively The K-Ge distances of 3355(1) pm (K1-
Ge1) and 3477(1) pm (K1-Ge2) are similar to those K-Ge distances in 3 and in
related potassium germanides[84b 85]
The molecular structure of 5 is also notable for
Results and Discussion
- 29 -
the parallelogram-like configuration of the planar Ge4 moiety The Ge1-Ge2 of
2512(1) pm and Ge1-Ge2rsquo distance of 2553(1) pm are close to the Ge-Ge single
bonds observed in bulky substituted cyclotetragermanes (ca 251 pm)[91]
and longer
than those in Ge4Co complexes[90d]
(235-237 pm) while the transannular Ge2-Ge2rsquo
distance of 2747(1) pm is much longer Interestingly despite of the pyramidal
coordination environment of the Ge atoms the Ge42macr core of 5 shows extremely
strong aromaticity as supported by DFT calculations (see section 313)
Figure 33 Molecular structure of 5 containing a Ge42minus
cluster Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity
Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1rsquo 1932(3) Ge1-Ge2 2512(7)
Ge1-Ge2rsquo 2553(7) Ge2-Ge2rsquo 2747(1) Ge1-K1 3355(12) K1-N2 2814(3)
K1-Ge2 3477(1) N1-C2 1381(4) Ge2-C3rsquo 2019(3) C2-C3 1369(5) C3-C4
1479(5) N2-C4 1296(4) Ge2-Ge1-Ge2rsquo 657(2) Ge1-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 1143(2) Ge1-
Ge2-Ge2rsquo 578(2) Ge1rsquo-Ge2-Ge2rsquo 564(2) N1rsquo-Ge1-Ge2 8716(9) N1rsquo-Ge1-
Ge2rsquo 1026(9) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1 886(1) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 963(1) C2-N1-Ge1rsquo
1239(2) C3-C2-N1 1205(3) C2-C3-C4 1227(3) C2-C3-Ge2rsquo 1184(3) C4-C3-
Ge2rsquo 1184(3) N2-C4-C3 1220(3)
Scheme 35 shows the assumed mechanism of the formation of Ge42minus
cluster 5 The
product after the first reductive step by KC8 is (nacnac)GeCl 1 which was confirmed
by NMR investigation Chlorogermylene 1 could dimerize by sequential reduction to
Results and Discussion
- 30 -
a bis-germylene 5a Due to the instability of 5a bearing two bulky nacnac ligands a
transformation could be in the ascendant from dimer 5a to stable P4-like Ge4-tetramer
5b Intermediate 5c could be formed after double intramolecular deprotonation and
elimination of ldquofreerdquo (nacnac)H The excessive KC8 could offer two electrons to
molecule orbitals of Ge4-cluster 5c to furnish the isolated product 5 with a Ge42minus
cluster
Scheme 35 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 5
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5
The structural feature of 3 leads to a discussion of a possible aromatic character of
the GeNC3-ring in comparison to cyclobutadiene anion Aromaticity is also a key
Results and Discussion
- 31 -
concept in describing homo-elemental four-membered rings such as the square planar
cyclobutadiene-like dianion Therefore nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS)
values for the five-membered GeNC3-rings and the four-membered Ge4-ring in
compound 3 and 5 were calculated by Prof Christoph van Wuumlllen (University of
Kaiserslautern) Since their introduction NICS[92]
values have been used as an
aromaticity criterion in numerous applications both for organic and inorganic
compounds[93]
NICS values were computed using the molecular structures of compound 3 and 5
from X-ray diffraction analysis The positions of the non-hydrogen atoms were taken
from the X-ray data and kept fixed while the hydrogen positions were optimized
using the TURBOMOLE program package[94]
and its density functional capabilities[95]
an exchange-correlation functional with gradient corrections to exchange and
correlation[96]
(BP86 functional) and polarized triple-zeta (TZVP) basis sets[97]
The
geometry optimizations used density fitting techniques (also known as the RI
approximation)[98]
to evaluate the matrix elements of the electrostatic Coulomb
potential
NICS tensors are defined for any position as the negative magnetic shielding at
that position The magnetic shielding tensors were obtained using the integral-direct
IGLO program[99]
which has been extended to allow the use of density functional
theory[100]
The B3LYP[96a 101]
functional and a basis of IGLO-III[102]
quality were
employed For Ge this is a 4s11p7d1f primitive basis sets in which only the steepest
five s-functions three p-functions and two d-functions are contracted In lack of
IGLO-type basis sets for potassium a TZVDP (triple zeta two sets of polarization
functions) basis was used which will affect the accuracy of the magnetic shieldings at
the centers of the potassium atoms but not elsewhere
The ring centre for each ring system was calculated first from the Cartesian
coordinates and determined the plane through the ring center for which the sum of the
Results and Discussion
- 32 -
squares of the distance of that plane to the positions of the atoms forming the ring is
minimal This plane was defined as the ring plane A line through the ring center that
is orthogonal to the plane defines the positions of the NICS centers above and
below the ring centers and the local z direction to which the NICS tensors are
transformed to obtain the zz as well as the in plane (mean value of the xx and yy)
tensor components in addition to the isotropic value which is one third of the sum of
the xx yy and zz components The zz component is of particular interest because a
ring current parallel to the ring plane will most strongly be induced if the external
magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane and the magnetic field induced by such a
current will also be in that direction
In addition to the NICS tensor at the ring center (NICS(0) value) its height profile
contains useful additional information[103]
First the height profile discriminates ring
current effects (which are associated with aromaticity) from diatropic contributions
which stem from the proximity of the ring atoms while the latter approach zero
quickly when moving out of the ring plane the former only slowly do so Furthermore
the height profile helps to distinguish π-aromaticity (which is the type of aromaticity
dominant in organic chemistry) from σ-aromaticity (which is found for many
inorganic compounds) if aromaticity only stems from π-electrons which produce no
ring current in the ring plane then the NICS values when moving out of the ring
center first decrease (ie become more negative) before they gradually approach zero
NICS values 100 pm above or below the ring plane (ldquoNICS(1) valuesrdquo)
Table 31 reports NICS results for compound 3 where the region towards to
coordinating K+ ion was denoted as above the plane of the five-membered GeNC3
rings the other side as below Up to 100 pm the results for NICS centers above and
below are quite similar then the results for the positions 150 and 200 pm above the
ring start to be affected by the K+ ion whose distance to the ring plane is 299 pm The
NICS values are negative and the tensors are highly anisotropic the negative isotropic
value stems from the large and negative zz component Furthermore these values fall
Results and Discussion
- 33 -
off quite slowly when moving out of the ring plane This indicates a diamagnetic ring
current indicative of aromatic behavior Furthermore the most negative values are not
found in the ring center but slightly above which indicates π-aromaticity Of course
this is exactly what has to be expected for a heteroatom analogue of a
cyclopentadienyl anion This is interesting however because the NICS values for
compound 5 see Table 32 show a slightly different behavior again Negative NICS
values fall off slowly but the tensors show a substantial negative in-plane component
up to 200 pm above (or below this is the same in this compound) ring plane This can
be explained by diatropic contributions from the Ge-C and Ge-N bonds which are
nearly perpendicular to the ring plane The second difference between compound 3
and compound 5 is that the NICS values (both the isotropic values and the zz tensor
component) fall off monotonically and have no hump at about 1 pm above the ring
plane The aromaticity of the Ge4 ring in compound 5 must therefore have substantial
σ-character
Table 31 NICS values for compound 3 in ppm (the results are the same for both GeNC3 rings)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash77 ndash87 ndash56
50 pm above ndash82 ndash50 ndash144
100 pm above ndash73 +16 ndash251
150 pm abovea)
ndash59 +64 ndash298
200 pm abovea)
ndash116 +36 ndash422
50 pm below ndash82 ndash46 ndash154
100 pm below ndash74 +04 ndash230
150 pm below ndash54 +19 ndash199
200 pm below ndash37 +11 ndash134
a)
Value affected by a close K+ ion coordinated by the GeNC3 ring
Results and Discussion
- 34 -
Table 32 NICS values for compound 5 in ppm (the results are the same at both sides of the Ge4
ring)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash389 ndash375 ndash417
50 pm above ndash324 ndash286 ndash399
100 pm above ndash215 ndash155 ndash334
150 pm above ndash144 ndash93 ndash248
200 pm above ndash109 ndash82 ndash165
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6
As a nucleophile the germanium(II) anion in 3 seems a promising precursor for the
synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylenes and of related heterodinuclear bis-
metallylenes Accordingly the coupling reaction of the nucleophilic GeII centre in 3
with the electrophilic GeII site in 1
[80] was examined and the reaction in THF at -30 degC
yielded a dark red solution from which the bis-germylene 6[104]
has been isolated as
air- and moisture-sensitive dark red crystals in 66 yield (Scheme 36) The isolated
bis-germylene 6 was fully characterized including X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 36 Synthesis of bis-germylene 6
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 6 exhibits four sets of doublets in the range from 107
to 124 ppm with the ratio of 121266 which can be assigned to CH3-groups of all
Dip-groups The three singlets in the range of 161-262 ppm can be assigned to the
CH3 groups at the ligand backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear
in the range of δ = 301-367 ppm as three sets of septet The remarkable deshielding
Results and Discussion
- 35 -
of the resonance signal for the ring CH proton of the five-membered GeNC3 ring (δ =
682 ppm) is indicative a stronger 6π-aromatic resonance stabilization compared with
that in the precursor 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The proton resonance signal for the γ-ring
proton in the six-membered GeN2C3 ring of δ = 518 ppm suggests however the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization In the UV-vis spectra of 6 an absorption
band is observed at 501 nm showing blue shifted in comparison to the values
observed for related amidinate- and guanidinate- substituted bis-germylenes[40]
(I27
and I28 in Introduction) with GeI-Ge
I bonds
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8
The reactivity of 3 towards chlorostannylene 7[80]
(nacnac)SnCl was examined
also by a coupling reaction If (nacnac)SnCl 7 was used as electrophile for the
reaction with 3 in diethylether at -70 degC this furnished the corresponding product
germylene-stannylene 8[104]
which was isolated in the form of dark red crystals in
34 yield (Scheme 37) The new compound 8 was fully characterized including
NMR spectroscopy (1H
13C
119Sn) and X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 37 Synthesis of germylene-stannylene 8
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 exhibits six sets of doublets in the range from 085 to
129 ppm with the ratio of 666666 for CH3-groups of all Dip-groups The three
singlets in the range of 165-300 ppm can be assigned to the CH3 groups at the ligand
backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear in the range of δ = 305-
378 ppm as three sets of septets
Results and Discussion
- 36 -
A similar situation was observed in the NMR spectra of 8 for the CH moiety at
ligand backbones The deshielding for the ring CH proton of the five-membered
GeNC3 ring in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 (δ = 691 ppm) indicates again a stronger
6π-aromatic resonance stabilization than in 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The chemical shift (δ =
510 ppm) for the γ-ring proton in the six-membered SnN2C3 ring of 8 also shows the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization The 119
Sn chemical shift of 8 at δ -197
ppm in the 119
Sn-NMR spectrum is comparable to the value observed for the precursor
(nacnac)SnCl 7 (δ -224 ppm)[80]
implying a three-coordinated tin atom in solution In
the UV-vis spectrum of 8 an absorption band is observed at 541 nm The latter is
somewhat red shifted in comparison to the values of bis-germylene 6
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8
The new GeI-Ge
I compound 6 represents the first asymmetric substituted bis-
germylene while germylene-stannylene 8 is the first GeI-Sn
I example Their
molecular structures were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis
(Figure 34) Both N2C3 backbones of the chelating six-membered MN2C3 ring (M =
Ge Sn) are essentially planar but the germanium and tin atoms are out of the
respective plane The five-membered GeNC3 rings in both compounds however are
almost planar The most important structural features are the Ge-M distances and
trans-bending angles The Ge-Ge distance of 25498(8) pm in 6 is the shortest GeI-Ge
I
distance among the distances values observed in known bis-germylenes[38 40-42]
(257-
267 pm see Introduction p 10) but significantly longer than those in digermenes[13f
105] (Ge=Ge 221-247 pm) and digermynes
[3b 20 106] (GeequivGe 221-231 pm) This
relatively short Ge1-Ge2 distance was explained with asymmetric structural feature of
6 and some ionic charge distribution between five- and six-membered rings (see
section 317 DFT calculation)
Results and Discussion
- 37 -
Structural features of 6 and 8 are shown in Scheme 38 The torsion angles of the
Ge1-Ge2 bond with Ge1-N1-N2 and Ge2-N3-C31 planes in 6 are 1043deg and 1184deg
respectively (1262deg-1387deg in digermyne[20 106]
) In the structure of 8 the Ge-Sn
distance of 27210(4) pm is longer than that value observed for a Ge=Sn double bond
in a germastannene[107]
and also longer than the Ge-Sn distance in
germylstannanes[105 108]
The torsion angles of the Ge-Sn bond with Sn1-N1-N2 and
Ge1-N3-C31 planes are 939deg and 1006deg respectively (943deg in diplumbylene I4)[16]
Such Ge-M (M = Ge Sn) central bond lengths and trans-bent angles are indicative of
the absence of Ge-M multiple bond character of 6 and 8
Scheme 38 Drawing of torsion angles in 6 and 8
Figure 34 Molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right) Thermal ellipsoids (C1-C5
C30-C34 N1-N3 Ge1 Ge2 and Sn1) are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 6 Ge1-
Ge2 2549(1) Ge1-N1 2015(4) Ge1-N2 2038(4) Ge2-N3 1951(4) Ge2-C31
1903(5) N1-Ge1-N2 8867(15) N1-Ge1-Ge2 10430(11) N2-Ge1-Ge2
Results and Discussion
- 38 -
10149(12) C31-Ge2-N3 8447(19) C31-Ge2-Ge1 11890(15) N3-Ge2-Ge1
9962(12) For 8 Sn1-Ge1 27210(4) Sn1-N1 2233(2) Sn1-N2 2231(2) Ge1-
N3 1964(2) Ge1-C31 1915(3) N2-Sn1-N1 8288(8) N2-Sn1-Ge1 9542(5)
N1-Sn1-Ge1 10368(5) C31-Ge1-N3 8433(12) C31-Ge1-Sn1 11495(9) N3-
Ge1-Sn1 10200(6)
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8
In order to clarify the electronic structure and bonding nature in 6 and 8 DFT
calculations were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The simplified
molecules 6a and 8a [6a M = Ge 8a M = Sn (LanL2DZ for Sn)] (scheme 39) in
which the Dip-groups (26-iPr2C6H3) of 6 and 8 were replaced by phenyl groups were
calculated as model compounds DFT calculations of the model compound of 6a was
performed at the B3LYP6-31(d) level and the model compound 8a was performed at
B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set for Ge N C and H atoms and the LANL2DZ
level for the Sn atom
Scheme 39 Computed model compounds 6a and 8a
The computed geometry is in good agreement with the experimental metric
parameters A NBO analysis of 6a and 8a shows that the HOMOrsquos have a large Ge-M
bond character (Figure 35) and the latter derives largely from overlap of Ge and Sn
p-valence orbitals (6a s 1180 p 8820 8a s 978 p 9022) Apparently the
Ge-M bonds possess s character Likewise the Wiberg bond index exhibits Ge-E bond
orders of 08525 (6a) and 07290 (8a) respectively Similar bonding natures have
Results and Discussion
- 39 -
been identified and reported previously for related GeI-Ge
I dimers
[38 40-42] In addition
the nature of the HOMOrsquos and LUMOrsquos of the model compounds 6a and 8a
corresponds to that of a diplumbylene[16]
which again underlines that the Ge-M bond
in 6 and 8 represents a pure σ-bond
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
Figure 35 Frontier orbitals of model compound 6a and 8a
Interestingly the HOMOrsquos show clearly the presence of p-orbital interaction within
the six-membered MN2C3 ring and a slight interaction with the Ge centre in the
GeN2C3 ring Accordingly the five-membered GeNC3 ring bears a negative net charge
while the six-membered MN2C3 ring has a positive one [NPA charges in the GeN2C3
ring in 6a Ge +065 N (mean) -069 C (mean) 008 vs GeNC3 ring Ge1 +055 N -
066 C (mean) -015 NPA charges in the SnN2C3 ring in 8a Sn +095 N (mean) -
072 C (mean) 007 vs GeNC3 ring Ge +040 N -066 C (mean) -017] Thus the
latter parameters suggest some ionic character of the Ge-M bonds Moreover the
pronounced electron acceptor character of the GeN2C3 ring is also reflected by the
strongly negative values of NICS for 6a and 8a [6a NICS(0) = -88 NICS(1) = -82
8a NICS(0) = -76 NICS(1) = -74] The latter confirms the presence of a 6π-
aromatic stabilization in 6 and 8 as indicated by the 1H-NMR data (see p 34-36)
Results and Discussion
- 40 -
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands
The β-diketiminato ligands can undergo several side-reactions such as 13-
coordination C-N-exchange ring-contraction and deprotonation (Scheme 310) A
more rigid β-diketiminato ligand with a six-membered C6-ring in the backbone was
envisioned to prevent those side-reactions and possibly enhance the stability of the
products[81-83 109]
Scheme 310 Coordination possibilities of the classical β-diketiminato ligand
The syntheses of new β-diketiminato ligands[110]
12 and 20 are shown in Scheme
311 They are easily accessible from the N-cyclohexylidene-26-diisopropyl-
benzenamine 9[111]
in a two-step procedure First the deprotonation of 9 with nBuLi in
diethylether leads to the corresponding lithium amide 10 Salt metathesis reaction of
10 with (Z)-N-(26-diisopropylphenyl)benzimidoyl chloride 11[112]
or (Z)-N-isopropyl
benzimidoyl chloride[112]
19 in diethylether then afforded the novel β-diketiminato
type ligand 12 and 20[110]
in 63 and 60 yield respectively The new compounds
12 and 20 have been analyzed by NMR spectroscopy ESI-mass spectrometry X-ray
diffraction and elemental analyses
Results and Discussion
- 41 -
Et2O - 78degCnBuLi
Et2O - 78degCN
Dip
9
N
Dip
10
Li
N
Ph Dip
Cl
11
12
N
NH
Ph
Dip
Dip
Et2O - 78degC
N
Ph iPr
Cl
19
20
NH
N
Ph
Dip
iPr
Scheme 311 Synthesis of new β-diketiminato ligands 12 and 20
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 12 displays four sets of doublet for methyl of
Dip-groups in the range from 117 to 134 ppm The multiplets by 164 ppm and 217
ppm are assigned to CH2 of the six-membered ring The resonance of NH proton
appears at δ = 187 ppm Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear at δ = 335 ppm
as multiplet The 1H-NMR spectrum of 20 shows three sets of doublet for the
isopropyl of Dip-groups in the range from 109 to 132 ppm The peaks of four CH2
groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 156 208 and 214 ppm as multiplet
The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear by 310 and 323 ppm as septet The
resonance of NH group appears at δ = 1203 ppm as doublet because of the 3J-
coupling with neighbor CH group Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-groups
and phenyl appear in the range of 696-727 ppm for 12 and 713-753 ppm for 20
respectively
NH group connecting with iso-propyl in 20 is also confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 36 and Scheme 312) In compound 12 the N1-C1 bond
length (1360(2) pm) is longer than the N2-C3 bond length (1305(2) pm) due to the
presence of N1-H bond Contrarily the N1-C1 bond length (1309(2) pm) in
compound 20 is shorter than the N2-C3 bond length (1356(2) pm) because of the
presence of N2-H bond
Results and Discussion
- 42 -
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph Dip
Dip
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph iPr
Dip
1356
1386
1445
1309
1377
1360
1305
1452
12 20
HH
Scheme 312 Bonding situation of new ligands 12 and 20 bond length in pm
Figure 36 Molecular structure of compounds 12 (left) and 20 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 12 N1-C1 13600(17) N1-
C13 14349(18) C1-C2 13769(19) C1-C4 15136(18) N2-C3 13046(16) N2-
C25 14297(17) C2-C3 14515(18) C2-C7 15257(18) N1-C1-C2 12221(12)
C1-C2-C3 12230(12) N2-C3-C2 12212(12) For 20 N1-C1 1309(2) N1-C17
1418(2) C1-C2 1445(2) C1-C4 1522(2) N2-C3 1356(2) N2-C14 1461(2)
C2-C3 1386(2) C2-C7 1524(2) C3-C8 1495(2) N1-C1-C2 12080(15) C1-
C2-C3 12151(15) N2-C3-C2 12288(15)
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16
Scheme 313 shows the synthesis of chlorogermylene 14[110]
and germylene 16[110]
Through lithiation of compound 12 with nBuLi the Lithium complex 13 was formed
quantitatively The subsequent reaction of 13 with the dichlorogermylene dioxane
complex[27]
(GeCl2middotC4H8O2) affords the desired chlorogermylene 14 in 82 yield
Results and Discussion
- 43 -
Furthermore germylene 16 was obtained by dehydrochloration of 14 with 13-di-tert-
butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15[113]
as a base in 78 yield The composition and
constitution of 14 and 16 were fully characterized by elemental analysis IR and
multinuclear NMR spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 313 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and germylene 16
In the 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 14 resonances of 8 methyl moieties of Dip-
groups appear in the range from 097 to 155 ppm as multiplets The multiplets in the
range of δ = 128-139 and 203-227 ppm are assigned to CH2 moieties of the six-
membered ring Four sets of septets by 317 327 394 and 417 ppm are assigned to
methine protons of the iso-propyl groups The 1H-NMR spectrum of 16 displays three
sets of doublet for methyl moieties of the Dip-groups in the range from 115 to 135
ppm The peaks of four CH2 groups of the six-membered C6-ring appear at δ = 155
204 and 221 ppm as multiplet Resonances for the methine protons of the iso-propyl
groups appear by 369 and 380 ppm as septets A triplet at δ = 415 ppm is assigned to
the proton connecting with C=C double bond This resonance confirms the
deprotonation of C-CH2 to a C=CH structure on the ligand backbone Resonances for
aromatic protons of Dip-groups and phenyl appear in the range of 680-739 ppm for
145 and 675-725 ppm for 16 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 14 and 16 are shown in Figure 37 and
Figure 38 In compound 14 the six-membered GeN2C3 ring exhibits a boat-like
Results and Discussion
- 44 -
conformation The C2N2 moiety of the chelating ligand (N1 N2 C1 C3) is nearly
planar and the Ge and C2 atoms are out-of-plane (Ge 37 pm C2 13 pm) In
compound 16 the GeN2C3 ring is almost planar The Ge-N bond lengths in 14
(1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) are longer than those in 16 (1843(3) and 1861(3) pm)
and the N1-Ge1-N2 bond angle (9123deg) in 14 is smaller than that of compound 16
(9509deg) This is probably owing to the dative nature of the Ge-N bonds and the three-
coordinate Ge(II) atom in 14 The Ge-Cl bond length of 2296(1) pm in 14 is
consistent with the value observed in the N-heterocyclic β-diketiminato
chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl[80]
The fused cyclohexyl moiety of 14 is distorted
and the phenyl group is oriented in nearly the same direction as the aryl group on the
N2 atom while the C2 C3 C4 and C7 atoms of the fused C6 ring in 14 are coplanar
with the N2C3 ring (C1 C2 C3 N1 N2) while the C5 and C6 atoms deviate above
the plane of the N2C3 ring This conformation of the cyclohexyl moiety is also
observed in compound 16 It is of note that the buta-13-diene moiety (C1 C2 C3 C4
C32) of compound 16 clearly has alternating C-C distances (C32-C1 1498(4) C1-C2
1359(4) C2-C3 1461(4) and C3-C4 1360(4) pm) which is not the case in known
germylene (nacnac)Ge[87]
published in 2006
Figure 37 Molecular structure of compound 14 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 19760(16) Ge1-N2 19804(17) Ge1-Cl1
22956(7) N1-C1 1342(3) N1-C14 1458(3) C1-C2 1397(3) C1-C8 1502(3)
N2-C3 1333(3) N2-C26 1463(2) C2-C3 1415(3) C2-C7 1522(3) C3-C4
Results and Discussion
- 45 -
1509(3) C4-C5 1522(3) N1-Ge1-N2 9123(7) N1-Ge1-Cl1 9560(5) N2-Ge1-
Cl1 9392(5) C1-N1-Ge1 12568(13) N1-C1-C2 12352(17) C1-C2-C3
12503(19) N2-C3-C2 12440(18) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(13)
Figure 38 Molecular structure of compound 16 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 1843(3) Ge1-N2 1861(3) N1-C3 1426(4)
N1-C8 1442(4) N2-C1 1408(4) N2-C20 1454(4) C1-C2 1359(4) C2-C3
1461(4) C1-C32 1498(4) C2-C7 1525(4) C3-C4 1360(4) N1-Ge1-N2
9509(11) C3-N1-Ge1 300(2) N1-C3-C2 1176(3) C1-C2-C3 1267(3) C2-C1-
N2 1241(3) C1-N2-Ge1 1259(2)
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O
The unusual donor-acceptor properties of the zwitterionic silylene and germylene
were described in our group in 2006[30 87]
In these molecules the exocyclic methylene
group remains more negative charges due to the aromaticity of the center six-
membered ring This implies the presence of two reactivity positions in the molecule
a strong nucleophilic methylene group and a nucleophilic (ns-orbital) and
electrophilic (np-orbital) at the metallylene site Mesomeric structures of zwitterionic
germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties are shown in Scheme 314
Results and Discussion
- 46 -
To probe the donor-acceptor properties of zwitterionic germylene 16 its reactivity
toward ammonia and water was investigated Germylene 16 undergoes controllable
ammonolysis and hydrolysis (Scheme 315) Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas
at room temperature in toluene resulted in the formation of the corresponding
aminogermylene 17[110]
in high yield (92) Likewise germylene 16 also readily
reacts with water to produce germylene hydroxide 18[110]
nearly quantitatively (95)
Scheme 314 Mesomeric structures of germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties
Scheme 315 Syntheses of aminogermylene 17 and germylene hydroxide 18
The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectroscopic data of 17 and 18 are very similar to the
corresponding resonances of chlorogermylene 14 appearing at or near the same
chemical shifts In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 17 the protons of the NH2 group appear
at δ = 154 ppm This chemical shift is close to that of the dimeric aminogermylene
(ArrsquoGeNH2)2 (Arrsquo = 26-Tip2C6H3) (δ = 162 ppm)[60a]
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 18
displays a singlet for the hydroxide proton at = 166 ppm which is close to the
respective value observed for the dimeric germylene hydroxide [(nacnac)GeOH]2 (δ =
154 ppm)[114]
The IR spectrum of 18 clearly shows two N-H stretching modes of the
NH2 group at v = 3430 and 3343 cmndash1
respectively These values are similar to those
observed for related aminogermylenes (ArGeNH2)2 (Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) (3380
and 3308 cmndash1
) and (nacnac)GeNH2 (3431 and 3333 cm-1
)[115]
A sharp absorption at v
Results and Discussion
- 47 -
= 3643 cmndash1
that can be attributed to the O-H stretching frequency was observed in
the IR spectrum of 18 This value resembles that of germylene hydroxide
(nacnac)GeOH (3571 cm-1
)[114]
The structure of 17 and 18 are shown in Figure 39 Both compounds 17 and 18 are
monomeric species The structural features of 17 and 18 are very similar and show
close structural parameters compared with that of chlorogermylene 14 As in 14 the
Ge1 and C2 atoms of 17 and 18 slightly deviate from the N2C2 ring (N1 N2 C1 C3)
plane [17 Ge 46 pm and C2 13 pm 18 Ge 49 pm and C2 13 pm] The Ge-N
(ligand) bond lengths (17 2017(2) and 2021(2) pm 18 20054(17) and 20071(16)
pm) of 17 and 18 are longer than the Ge-N(amide) bond length of 17 (1829(3) pm)
Interestingly the Ge-N distance (1905(2) pm) in (nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip 4[83]
due to the
large Dip-substituent is also 8 ppm longer than that of 17 In each case there is clearly
a difference between the dative bond and covalent bond Compound 18 represents the
first monomeric three-coordinate GeII hydroxide in the solid state (Figure 39) owing
the larger steric congestion around the GeII center in contrast to (nacnac)GeOH
[114]
Figure 39 Molecular structures of compound 17 (left) and 18 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 17 Ge1-N1 2021(2) Ge1-
N2 2017(2) Ge1-N3 1829(3) N1-C1 1349(4) C1-C2 1395(4) N2-C3
1336(4) C2-C3 1417(4) C3-C4 1509(4) N3-Ge1-N2 9503(11) N3-Ge1-N1
9709(13) N2-Ge1-N1 8932(10) C1-N1-Ge1 1253(2) C3-N2-Ge1 1247(2)
For 18 Ge1-O1 18249(18) Ge1-N2 20054(17) Ge1-N1 20071(16) N1-C1
Results and Discussion
- 48 -
1340(3) C1-C2 1402(3) N2-C3 1331(3) C2-C3 1419(3) C3-C4 1509(3)
O1-Ge1-N2 9387(8) O1-Ge1-N1 9529(8) N2-Ge1-N1 8943(7) C1-N1-Ge1
12597(14) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(14)
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
In order to understand the coordination behavior of ligand 20 experiments using
germanium precursors GeCl2sdotdioxane and GeCl4 were conducted (Scheme 316) The
reaction of compound 20 with one equivalent of nBuLi resulted directly the lithiated
intermediate 21 The subsequent reaction with GeCl2sdotdioxane in Et2O at -78 degC led to
the unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained
by reaction of 21 with GeCl4 in toluene at -78 degC through dehydrochloration with 13-
di-tert-butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15 as a base in 57 yield The composition and
constitution of 22 and 23 were elucidated by elemental analysis multinuclear NMR
spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 316 Syntheses of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 22 exhibits 6 sets of doublets for 6 methyls of
iso-propyl Five sets of multiplets in the range of δ = 121-206 ppm are assigned to
the CH2 moieties of the six-membered C6-ring Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl
Results and Discussion
- 49 -
appear at δ = 284 367 and 396 ppm as septet In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 23 peaks
at δ = 113 122 and 137 ppm are for methyls of iso-propyl as doublets Resonances
of three CH2 groups of the six-membered ring on backbone appear at δ = 146 189
and 206 ppm as multiplets Two sets of septets by 332 and 361 ppm are assigned to
the CH of iso-propyl A triplet at δ = 421 ppm is for the proton of C=CH group on
backbone and indicates a dianionic ligand 20 in compound 23 owing to two times
deprotonation with nBuLi and carbene 15 Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-
groups and phenyl appear in the range of 688-724 ppm for 22 and 701-726 ppm for
23 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 22 and 23 are shown in Figure 310
Compound 22 represents an imine N-donor stabilized oxo-chloro-germylene and
adopts a pyramidal geometry with the sum of bond angles of 2737deg at the GeII center
The inserted oxygen atom could come in all probability from dioxane molecule in
GeCl2dioxane The cyclohexyl unit on backbone is distorted and the free N2 moiety
is oriented in inverse direction to the cyclohexyl The Ge1-Cl1 bond length of
23073(6) pm in 22 is compatible with the value (2296(1) pm) observed in
chlorogermylene 14 The Ge1-N1 distance of 20908(15) pm is visibly longer than
those of 14 (1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) because of the net NrarrGe coordination bond
without resonance stabilization The Ge1-O1 bond length is normal Ge-O single bond
with a distance of 18265(12) pm Bond lengths of N1-C1 (1284(2) pm) and N2-C7
(1272(2) pm) present clearly C=N double bond while bond lengths of C1-C6
(1525(2) pm) and N6-C7 (1539(2) pm) present normal C-C single bonds
In compound 23 GeIV
atom is tetrahedral coordinated with two nitrogen and two
chlorine atoms All six angles in the range of 1028-1138deg at the GeIV
center are
nearly alike with the angle in methane (1095deg) and indicate a slightly distorted
tetrahedral GeN2Cl2 configuration GeIV
-Cl bond lengths (21339(7) and 21375(9) pm)
in 23 are much shorter than those of germylenes 14 and 22 (229-231 pm) Distances
of the GeIV
-N bonds (1798(2) and 1788(2) pm) in 23 are much shorter than the
Results and Discussion
- 50 -
NrarrGe dative bonds in 14 17 and 18 (198-202 pm) and the net NrarrGe dative bond
(20908(15) pm) in 22 But they are only slightly shorter than GeII-N distances
(1843(3) and 1861(1) pm) in germylene 16 and GeII-NH2 bond length (1829(3) pm)
in germylene 17 Bond lengths of C1-C2 (1339(4) pm) and C3-C4 (1326(4) pm) in
23 illuminate clearly C=C double bond and distances of N1-C1 (1430(3) pm) and
N2-C3 (1441(3) pm) correspond to C-N single bond
Figure 310 Molecular structures of compound 22 (left) and 23 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 22 Ge1-Cl1 23073(6)
Ge1-O1 18265(12) Ge1-N1 20908(15) O1-C6 1418(2) N1-C1 1284(2) N2-
C7 1272(2) C1-C6 1525(2) C6-C7 1539(2) Cl1-Ge1-O1 9789(4) Cl1-Ge1-
N1 9422(4) O1-Ge1-N1 8158(6) Ge1-N1-C1 11291(12) N1-C1-C6
11484(16) C1-C6-O1 10975(14) C6-O1-Ge1 11838(10) N2-C7-C6
11778(17) For 23 Ge1-Cl1 21339(7) Ge1-Cl2 21375(9) Ge1-N1 1798(2)
Ge1-N2 1788(2) N1-C1 1430(3) C1-C2 1339(4) C2-C3 1486(4) C3-C4
1326(4) N2-C3 1441(3) N2-Ge1-N1 10554(10) N2-Ge1-Cl1 11208(7) N1-
Ge1-Cl1 11381(8) N2-Ge1-Cl2 11201(8) N1-Ge1-Cl2 11082(8) Cl1-Ge1-Cl2
10276(3) C1-C2-C3 1266(2) C4-C3-N2 1209(2) C2-C4-C3 1208(3)
The formation of compound 22 indicates that ligand 20 has a different reactivity to
the derivative ligand 12 due to the exchange of Dip-group with iso-propyl But the
situation of complex 23 shows a possibility of a dianionic chelating coordination[30 87]
Results and Discussion
- 51 -
of ligand 20 Coordination chemistry with ligand 20 is currently being investigated for
its suitability to serve as bidentate donor ligand for complexes with low-valent Si Ge
and also transition-metals
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28
Since the successful isolation of halogen bonded silylene and germylene[31a 32b 80]
chemists faced the challenge weather compounds like LEII-X-E
IIL [E = Si Ge Sn X
= O S Se] in which two metallylene moieties are bridged by a single X-atom can be
stabilized at room temperature Key points of this assignment are the identification of
effective ligands for the stabilization of metallylenes and a feasible synthetic route
There is a special interest to synthesize this kind of compounds due to their chemical
nature and coordination properties
Previous attempts to synthesize a stable bis-silylene oxide 28b from silylene 28a[30]
has been unsuccessful The isolated product originating from the reaction of water
with the silylene 28a was the stable siloxysilylene 28c[10a]
(a mixed-valent disiloxane)
(Scheme 317) Recently Roesky et al proposed the formation of bis-silylene oxide 28
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2macr) as a reactive intermediate in the reaction of the bis-
silylene I24[37]
(aLSi-Si
aL) with N2O However 28 could be neither detected nor
chemically trapped[116]
By addition of water to two molar chlorosilylene 26[31a]
in
toluene the expected disiloxane 27 could not be isolated from a complicated reaction
mixture (Scheme 317 )
In the following the isolation of the first oxygen-bridged bis-silylene 28 by a facile
synthetic protocol using 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(HSiCl2)2O as starting
material will be described
Results and Discussion
- 52 -
Scheme 317 Synthesis of siloxysilylene 28c and hydrolysis of chlorosilylene 26
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28
The reaction of 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane (HSiCl2)2O with 2 molar equiv of
lithium amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the desired disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield
(Scheme 318) The target bis-silylene oxide 28 was readily available by
dehydrochloration of 27 employing 2 molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene
Recrystallization in toluene afforded pale yellow crystals of 28[32a]
in 76 yield The
molecular structure of new compounds 27 and 28 was characterized by means of
spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 318 Synthesis of disiloxane 27 and bis-silylene oxide 28
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 27 reveals two singlets one for the
tBu groups at δ =
120 ppm and one corresponding to the Si-H protons at δ = 598 ppm as well as one
set of resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of
Results and Discussion
- 53 -
27 shows a singlet resonance at δ = -1110 ppm The 1H-NMR spectra of 28 displays a
singlet of tBu at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for Ph group in aromatic
resonance region The 29
Si-NMR signal of 28 (δ = -161 ppm) appears shifted ca 95
ppm downfield from the precursor 27 This shift is comparable to that reported for the
triply coordinated silylene alkoxides (aLSiO
tBu) (δ = -52 ppm) and (
aLSiO
iPr) (δ = -
135 ppm)[31b]
respectively
The molecular structure of disiloxane 27 is shown in Figure 311 The center Si1-
O1-Si2 part of molecule 27 was extensively disordered Therefore the X-ray data were
not suitable for accurate discussion Even though the nearly unbent Si1-O1-Si2 angle
(1680deg) in 27 shows a very similar bonded character with sp-hybridized oxygen
bridge in comparison to another disiloxane compounds[118]
The molecule of bis-silylene oxide 28 (Figure 312 left) contains two triply
coordinated Si atoms and two lone pairs one at each of the Si centers Those are two
silylene moieties The sum of bond angles at Si1 and Si2 are 27769deg and 27534deg
respectively which is consistent with the presence of lone pairs In the molecular
structure of 28 Si-O distances of 1641(2) and 1652(2) pm are comparable to those of
siloxysilylene 28c (16442(3) pm and 16501(2) pm) and thus typical for silicon-
oxygen single bonds of other disiloxanes[118]
Moreover as expected for an disiloxane-
like system the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent (15988(15)deg) and larger than
that observed for a C-O-C moiety of ethers
DFT calculations of the compound 28 was performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU
Berlin) at the B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set with the GAUSSIAN-03 program
package[101c 119]
The structure obtained by X-ray analysis was used as the input for
these calculation Optimized structure of 28 is shown in Figure 312 (right) DFT
calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small The
Si-O-Si bond angle of optimized structure is 180deg However the energy difference
between the experimental geometry and linear arrangement is only 071 kJsdotmolminus1
The
Results and Discussion
- 54 -
HOMO (-0163 eV) and HOMO-1 (-0178 eV) represent mainly lone pairs at Si atoms
The LUMO (-0020 eV) is located on the phenyl group of the amidinate ligand
(Figure 313)
Figure 311 Molecular structure of 27 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity The center Si1-O1-Si2
part was extensively disordered Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Cl1-Si1
20349(16) Cl2-Si2 22017(11) Si2-O1 1581(8) Si2-N3 1798(2) Si2-N4
1968(2) Si1-O1 1562(8) Si1-N2 1750(10) Si1-N1 1994(6) Si1-O1-Si2
1680(6)
Figure 312 Molecular structure of 28 (left) and optimized structure (right)
Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted
for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Si1-O1 1641(2) Si2-O1
1652(2) Si1-N1 1896(3) Si1-N2 1902(3) Si2-N3 1888(2) Si2-N4 1908(3)
Si1-O1-Si2 15988(15) O1-Si1-N1 10417(12) O1-Si1-N2 10535(11) O1-Si2-
N3 10196(11) O1-Si2-N4 10481(12) N1-Si1-N2 6815(10) N3-Si2-N4
6855(11)
Results and Discussion
- 55 -
Figure 313 Calculated frontier molecular orbitals of 28
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel
To probe the chelating coordination ability of 28 its reactivity toward Ni(cod)2
(cod = cycloocta-15-diene) was investigated Toluene was added to a mixture of bis-
silylene oxide 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 at room temperature to furnish an
intensely red-colored reaction solution Recrystallization of the crude product from a
saturated n-hexane solution at -30 degC afforded dark red crystals of the Ni complex
29[32a]
in 91 yield (Scheme 319) The isolated compound 29 is the first bidentate
bis-silylene transition-metal complex This work initiates a significant progress on the
chelating silylene ligand transition-metal coordination chemistry The constitution and
composition of 29 could be determined by NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis
and ESI mass spectrometry
Scheme 319 Synthesis of bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
Results and Discussion
- 56 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one singlet for the
tBu groups at δ = 130
ppm and one set of resonances at δ = 281 295 and 504 ppm for the COD-ligand and
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one
singlet (δ = 328 ppm) which shows a downfield shift relative to that of the ldquofreerdquo
ligand 28 The observed downfield shift for the 29
SiII nuclei in 29 clearly suggests the
presence of a bis-silylene chelated complex
The chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to Ni0 is confirmed by X-ray
diffraction analysis The molecular structure of 29 is displayed in Figure 314
Complex 29 containing Ni0 is diamagnetic because of 18 electrons in the valence
shell The two silylene subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are
tetrahedral coordinated to the nickel atom with the Si1-Ni1-Si2 angle at 6890(3)deg
The Si-O bond lengths in 29 [17011 (15) and 17081(17) pm] are longer than that in
28 [1641(2) and 1652(2) pm] while the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 29 (9344(8)deg) is
significantly smaller than that in 28 The Ni-Si bond lengths [21908(7) and 21969(7)
pm] are slightly shorter than those in silylene nickel complex 29a [2207(2) and
2216(2) pm][120]
but longer than those found in silylene nickel complex 29b
(21395(8) pm)[121]
Scheme 320 shows clear bonded prospect of three complexes
Moreover the Ni-Si bond lengths of bis-silylene nickel complex 29 are longer than
those in ylide-like silylene-nickel complexes [20369(6) and 20597(10) pm][70a b 122]
The strong σ-donor character of bis-silylene ligand 28 causes a more electron rich Ni
center It indicates a somewhat stronger π-back-donation from the nickel atom to the
chelating COD-ligand Therefore the Ni-C distances (2070-2090 pm) in 29 are
shorter than those in Ni(cod)2 (211-213 pm)[123]
and silylene nickel complex 29b
(2130-2146 pm)[121]
The coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 with other transition-metals (for example
Ti Cu) is currently investigated together with the reactivity of these complexes on
their use as molecular catalysts
Results and Discussion
- 57 -
29
[Si][Si]
O
Ni
[Si] [Si]
Ni
CO CO
[Si] [Si]
Ni
N N tButBu
Si
N N DipDip
Si
[Si] = [Si] =
29a 29b
2207 2216
2191 2197689deg
934deg
1084deg 1019deg
1708 1701
2139 2139
Scheme 320 Comparison of bonding state in complexes 29 29a and 29b bond lengths in pm
Figure 314 Molecular structure of 29 (left) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Si1-Ni1 21969(7) Si2-Ni1 21908(7) Si1-O1 17011(15)
Si1-N1 18929(19) Si1-N2 1875(2) Si2-O1 17081(17) Si2-N3 18776(19)
Si2-N4 1893(2) Si1-O1-Si2 9344(8) Si1-Ni1-Si2 6890(3) N1-Si1-N2
6941(9) N3-Si2-N4 6954(8)
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
This part of the research is the cowork with Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)
Due to the unique reactivity and electronic properties compounds with a
heteroleptic multiple bond between heavier main-group elements have attracted
considerable attention particularly those between group 14 and 15 elements this is
Results and Discussion
- 58 -
attributed to the pronounced polarity of the E14-E15 multiple bonds[124]
Phosphasilene
containing Si-P double bonds is an analogous of iminosilane The first isolable
phosphasilene with a three coordinate Si and a two coordinate P atom was reported by
Bickelhaupt and coworkers (Scheme 321) in 1984[125]
and several other similar
species containing localized and delocalized Si=P bonds were synthesized and
structurally characterized in the later period[126]
Their rich chemistry provides new
approaches to functional Si-P compounds
Furthermore the more challenging phosphasilyne with a silicon-phosphorus triple
bond (Scheme 321) is heretofore unknown[127]
this is mainly due to the high
tendency of the highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds to dimerize or even
oligomerize[126c]
However the availability of elusive phosphasilyne species would be
a strongly desired progression with respect to the synthesis of polyfunctional silicon-
phosphorus containing materials from it By spatial protection of a Si-P multiple bond
through the steric hindrance by suitable bulky substituents the oligomerization of the
highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds could be prevented additionally to the benefit of
the donor-acceptor stabilization of Si-P multiple bonds
Scheme 321 The first phosphasilene (left) and phosphasilyne (right)
Imaginable methods to synthesize a phosphasilyne employing corresponding
precursors comprise oxidation of bis-silylene 30a with elemental phosphorus and
elimination of phosphino silane 30b (Scheme 322) Whether the phosphasilyne 30c is
available depends only on the spatial andor donor-acceptor protection of bulky ligand
L Now there are not many choices of silicon compounds with very bulky ligand L
that are suitable for preparation of phosphasilynes Our current attempt was on the
Results and Discussion
- 59 -
way towards phosphasilyne employing amidinato ligand stabilized chlorosilylene
aLSiCl
[31a] However the isolated dimerized product was the unique 24-disila-13-
diphosphacyclobuta-13-diene (aLSiP2Si
aL) 31
[128] starting from the new N-
heterocyclic bis(trimethylsilyl) phosphino silylene precursor 30[128]
Scheme 322 Imaginable methods towards a phosphasilyne
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The starting material bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanyl silylene 30[128]
was easily
accessible in 83 yield by salt elimination reaction of N-heterocyclic chlorosilylene
26[31a]
with the corresponding lithium phosphide LiP(SiMe3)2 at room temperature
(Scheme 323) The 1H-NMR spectrum exhibits one singlet at δ = 058 ppm for methyl
of silyl and another singlet at δ = 124 ppm for methyl of NtBu as well as one set of
resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand in the region of 681-741 ppm
The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 30 shows two sets of doublet at δ = 229 ppm for silicon
of silyl and at δ = 1943 ppm for silicon of silylene The latter is much downfield
shifted than that of previously reported aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (562 ppm)
[31b] One
singlet at δ = -221 ppm was found by 31
P-NMR measurement which exhibits a
tremendous upfield shift when compared with that of aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (-165
ppm)[31b]
Results and Discussion
- 60 -
Scheme 323 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The molecular structure of 30 was also substantiated by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 315) The molecule 30 contains triply coordinate Si and P
atoms and two lone pairs at the Si and P center respectively The Si and P center
display a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry The sum of bond angles is 33071deg at
the P center and 27762deg at the Si center The latter is consistent with that (2765deg) of
aLSi-P
iPr2 The angle of N(2)-Si(1)-P(1) (10854(8)deg) is larger than that of N(1)-Si(1)-
P(1) (9998(9)deg) Si-N distances of 1877(3) and 1882(2) pm in 30 are comparable to
those (1875(1) pm and 1881(1) pm) of the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative
[31b] The Si1-P1
distance of 30 (22838(12) pm) is slightly shorter than the Si-P bond length (2307(8)
pm) in the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative and the elongated P1-Si2 and P1-Si3 single bonds in
30 (22264(13) and 22321(12) pm) reflect steric congestion within the P(SiMe3)2
subunit
Figure 315 Molecular structure of 30 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 22838(12) P1-Si2 22264(13) P1-Si3 22321(12)
Si1-N1 1877(3) Si1-N2 1882(2) Si2-P1-Si3 10859(5) Si2-P1-Si1 103905
Results and Discussion
- 61 -
Si3-P1-Si1 11822(5) N1-Si1-N2 6910(11) N1-Si1-P1 9998(9) N2-Si1-P1
10854(8)
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Since the phosphanyl silylene 30 was successfully accessed bearing a SiMe3 as
reactive leaving-groups at phosphorus[129]
its suitability as a precursor for the
formation of a phosphasilyne was probed Because of the labile nature of the P-SiMe3
bonds in 30 the compound was exposed to dichlorotriphenylphosphorane Ph3PCl2 as
a promising smooth oxidant for desilylation with the intention to produce the desired
phosphasilyne along with Me3SiCl and PPh3 Surprisingly the reaction of 30 with one
molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 in toluene at room temperature led to the formation of the
unique compound 31[128]
(Scheme 324) which could be isolated as yellow crystals in
72 yield
Scheme 324 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Compound 31 represents a dimerized form of the desired phosphasilyne and was
fully characterized by means of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-
ray diffraction analysis The 1H-NMR spectra of 31 displays a singlet for the
tBu
groups at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for the Ph groups in the ldquoaromaticrdquo
region The triplet signal in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 31 at δ = 265 ppm (1JSiP = 998
Hz) indicates that two P atoms are bonded to silicon center Meanwhile the more
deshielded (ca 46 ppm) singlet resonance at δ = -1649 ppm in the 31
P-NMR spectrum
compared to that in 30 is in accordance with the four-membered ring structure of 31
Results and Discussion
- 62 -
bearing two polarized Si-P π-bonds
The result of the X-ray diffraction structure analysis is in accordance with that of
NMR spectroscopy which confirms that 31 is a 24-disila-13-diphosphacyclobuta-
13-diene (Figure 316) The Si2P2 core in 31 has a planar diamond-shaped geometry
and possesses two-coordinated P atoms and four-coordinated Si atoms each with a
dative NrarrSi bond The Si-P bonds lengths in 31 are 21701(12) and 21717(11) pm
respectively which are in the range of a Si=P double bond length (2095(3) pm) in the
Phosphasilene[128]
and the Si-P single bond length of 30 (22838(12) pm) this
indicates σ- and π-electron resonance stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has
been confirmed by theoretical calculations (see p 64) Of note the transannular
Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo (25626 pm) is shorter than the Si-Si distance of disilacyclopropene[130]
(tBu3Si)2SiSi(Si
tBu3)C-Ad (Ad = adamantyl) (25797(8) and 25991(9) pm) and hexa-
tert-butyldisilane tBu3Si-Si
tBu3 (2697(9) pm) and the P1middotmiddotmiddotP1rsquo (3505 pm)
separations in 31 is much larger than that for P-P bonds observed in tetrahedral
elementary phosphorus P4 (221 pm)[131]
Evidently the peculiarly short Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo
distance is caused by the geometric constraints of the Si1-P1-Si1rsquo and endocyclic P1-
Si1-P1rsquo angles of 7234(4)deg and 10766(4)deg respectively and not driven by attractive
Si1-Si1rsquo interaction
Figure 316 Molecular structure of 31 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 21701(12) P1-Si1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-N1 1858(3)
Si1-N2 1856(2) Si1-P1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-Si1rsquo 25626(16) Si1-P1-Si1rsquo 7234(4)
N2-Si1-N1 7078(11) P1-Si1-P1rsquo 10766(4)
Results and Discussion
- 63 -
The formation of 31 in a multistep which is depicted in Scheme 325 was proposed
Firstly formation of the corresponding chloro-(silyl)phosphanyl silylene intermediate
31a is conducted by cleavage of one of the Si-P bonds of the P(SiMe3)2 subunit with
Ph3PCl2 Subsequently elimination of Me3SiCl from 31a occurs to give the reactive
intermediate 31b which could be treated as a silylene-phosphinidene (Scheme 325
right) or a phosphasilyne (Scheme 325 left) further dimerization of intermediate 31b
affords the isolated product 31 A similar dimerization process has been proposed by
Wiberg for disilynes (SiequivSi) as reactive intermediates to produce
tetrasilatetrahedranes[132]
To elucidate the reason for the formation of 31 preferred over its hypothetical Si2P2-
tetrahedranceisomer 31d (Scheme 326) we performed DFT calculations of 31 and
disiladiphosphatetrahedranes 31d The result shows that 31d is much less stable than
compound 31 with 462 kcalmiddotmolminus1
higher in energy which is in agreement with the
experimental result Compound 31 with a planar structure is most likely stabilized by
the dative NrarrSi coordination of the bulky amidinato ligands Meanwhile this also
leads to a shorter Si-N bond length that is 1856(2) and 1858(3) pm in 31 are shooter
than those (1877(3) pm and 1882(2) pm) of in 30 and also those of in chlorosilylene
aLSiCl (1870(2) pm and 1917(2) pm)
[31a] Furthermore this NrarrSi donor
stabilization could demonstrate an ylide-like electronic structure of 31 (Scheme 326)
Scheme 325 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 31
Results and Discussion
- 64 -
Scheme 326 Resonance structures of 31
In order to unravel the electronic configuration of 31 DFT calculations at
B3LYP6-31G(d) level using the parameters obtained from X-ray diffraction as the
initial structure were performed[101c 119]
The optimized structure matched the
experimental data of 31 very well According to the NPA charges each Si atom in the
Si2P2-ring has a large positive net charge (+1204) while as expected P atoms in the
ring bear slight smaller negative charges (-0765) Meanwhile HOMO-5 of 31 shows
a set of Si-P σ-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 left) whereas the HOMO-2 contains
mainly the delocalized two π-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 right) Accordingly a
NBO analysis indicates that the Si2P2-core of 31 bears a Lewis structure with four
occupied σ-bond orbitals for the Si-P bonds (1917e for Si1-P1 1916e for Si1-P1rsquo
1916e for Si1rsquo-P1 and 1918e for Si1rsquo-P1rsquo) along with two filled Si-P π-bond
orbitals with 1770e for the Si1- P1 and Si1rsquo-P1rsquo π-bonding interaction respectively
The latter canonical π-bond orbitals are strongly polarized toward the P atoms
(8753 at the P and 1247 at the Si) Likewise the WBI (Wiberg Bond Index)
values of the Si-P bonds (1142 and 1140) are higher than that of the phosphino
silylene 30 (0920)
Figure 317 Molecular orbitals of 31 representing the presence of σ-electron and π-
electron delocalization within the Si2P2 cycle HOMO-5 (left) and HOMO-2 (right)
Results and Discussion
- 65 -
According to the aforementioned betaine (ylide)-like resonance stabilization 31
totally differs from cyclobuta-13-diene derivatives The calculations of the nucleus
independent chemical shift[92]
(NICS) also supports this conclusion The result of
NICS reveals negative values (NICS(1) = -257 and NICS(0) = -601 ppm) indicating
that 31 has a somewhat aromatic character which is opposite to the properties of
cyclobuta-13-dienes that are antiaromatic As a summary the results of theoretical
calculations are in agreement with the idea to describe 31 as the ylide-like resonance
structure 31c with some contribution of the resonance forms As a result the smaller
endocyclic angle at phosphorus than that at silicon is contributed by the repulsion
between the negatively charged P atoms
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
Nucleophilic and electrophilic properties of Si Ge and Sn metallylenes were
discussed in chapter 32 (see p 46) Due to the strong donor property of the carbene
lone pair in coordination to empty p-orbital of low valent Si Ge Sn atom centers
some carbene stabilized divalent Si Ge Sn halides could be synthesized in the last
twenty years[28 44 133]
There is also a great interest to find mixed Si Ge Sn
metallylene-metallylene complexes in which one metallylene is stabilized through the
lone pair coordination of another one In the following the synthesis of the first
example of a silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex will be shown
The dimeric micro-chlorotin(II) amides 32[53]
(I44 in Introduction) was identified as
useful candidate for the generation of such an example The synthesis of
bis(trimethylsilyl)amino-tin chloride ((Me3Si)2N-SnCl)2 32 is shown in Scheme 327
Bis(bis(trimethylsilyl)amino)2tin(II) ((Me3Si)2N)2Sn 32a could be prepared in good
yield by the double lithioamination of SnCl2 with LiN(SiMe3)2 in a 1 2 ratio[47a]
The
Results and Discussion
- 66 -
same reaction but with one molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 gives the monosubstituted
product 32 It was also easily accessible by amino chlorine exchange between
((Me3Si)2N)2Sn and SnCl2 in a 11 ratio[53]
(Scheme 327)
Scheme 327 Synthesis of micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32
The dimeric structure of 32 can be splited by treatment with Lewis base for
example Si Ge Sn metallylenes In order to synthesize a silylene coordinated
stannylene chlorosilylene 26 was mixed with micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32 in toluene A
logical intermediate 33a is proposed here as an inevitable intermediate (Scheme 328)
At first chloro bridges are opened because of the coordination of silylene 26 to create
33a Then via amino chlorine exchange product 33 becomes accessible From a
saturated hexane solution at low temperature the silylene-stannylene dichloride 33
was isolated as colorless crystals in 49 yield The product 33 was determined by X-
ray diffraction analysis and elemental analysis Owing to the unstable nature of
silylene and tin dichloride coordination bond (Si rarrSn) 33 decomposed in a grey
mixture powder of amino silylene also-N(SiMe3)2
[33d] and SnCl2 after isolation from
solvent in vacuum 1H-NMR spectrum shows only resonances of amino silylene in
good agreement with the reported compound[33d]
Scheme 328 Synthesis of aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
According to X-ray diffraction analysis compound 33 represents the first example
of silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex The molecular structure of 33 (Figure 318)
Results and Discussion
- 67 -
exhibits a trigonal pyramidal geometry on Sn and a distorted tetrahedral configuration
of Si The Cl-Sn-Cl angle is 9400(9)deg and the sum of bond angles at the Sn center is
2820deg The SirarrSn distance (2740(2) pm) is longer than the Si-Sn bond lengths
(2622(2) and 2641(2) pm) in the silyl stannane compound[134]
(Scheme 329) The
Sn-Cl distances of 2468(3) and 2473(3) pm in 33 are comparable to those in a
carbene-stannylene complex (2456(2) and 2458(2) pm) (Scheme 329)[133b]
Si-N
distances of 1832(7) and 1827(7) pm in 33 are somewhat shorter than those of
phosphanyl silylene 30 (1877(3) and 1882(2) pm) and amino silylene (18780(10)
and 18776(10) pm) which is the remaining molecule of 33 without SnCl2[33d]
Scheme 329 A silyl stannane[134]
(left) and a carbene-stannylene complex[133b]
(right)
Figure 318 Molecular structure of 33 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Sn1-Si1 2740(2) Sn1-Cl1 2468(3) Sn1-Cl2 2473(3) Si1-
N1 1832(7) Si1-N2 1827(7) Si1-N3 1705(7) Si2-N3 1780(7) Si3-N3
1791(8) Cl1-Sn1-Cl2 9400(9) Cl1-Sn1-Si1 9886(8) Cl2-Sn1-Si1 8914(7)
Sn1-Si1-N3 1252(3) N2-Si1-N1 722(3) Si1-N3-Si2 1172(4) Si1-N3-Si3
1248(4) Si2-N3-Si3 1179(4)
Results and Discussion
- 68 -
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34
Because of the feasible structural tuning with many choices of donor groups a
general overview of pincer arenes was introduced (Introduction p 19) Compounds of
type 35a having a pincer-like skeleton are depicted in Scheme 330 They represent
promising new types of pincer ligands which could coordinate with a metal by facile
C-H activation in the ortho-position Although many bis-metallylenes are accessible
(see Introduction 13) pincer ligands containing divalent heavier group 14 elements
are new in the field of synthetic inorganic chemistry At the same time the desired
pincer arenes 35a could serve as much stronger σ-donor ligand towards transition-
metals than traditional phosphane ligands[70 79b c 122]
Up to now only a few isolable
spacer separated bis-silylenes with two divalent silicon centers are known these
include bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
in this work and bis-silylenes I42[52]
I58[61]
and
I64[65]
(in Introduction p 12-15) Inspired by these results the synthesis of a
silicon(II)-based pincer ligand 35a appeared attractive and its coordination property
towards transition-metals should be investigated
Scheme 330 Low-valent group 14 metallylene-based ECE pincer arenes
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35
Scheme 331 shows the synthetic route for the first attempt towards a bis-silylene-
based SiCSi pincer arene 35d The phenolation of trichlorosilane was readily
accessible to disilane 35b in hexane Reaction of 35b with two molar equiv of lithium
Results and Discussion
- 69 -
amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the amidinate substituted disilane 35c The bis-
silylene pincer arene 35d was not easily separable by the following dehydrochloration
of 35c employing two molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene Products seemed a
complicated silylene-LiCl mixture which was not soluble in toluene or diethylether
The desired bis-silylene pincer arene could not be isolated from mixtures
Scheme 331 The first attempt towards a bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35d
But the synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35 could be achieved through the protocol
in Scheme 332 Dilithiation of 46-di-tert-butylresorcinol with nBuLi furnishes the
corresponding 13-dilithium resorcinolate 34 After a salt metathesis reaction with the
N-donor stabilized chloro silylene 26[32b]
in the molar ratio of 12 the desired
compound 35[33b]
could be isolated as pale yellow crystals in 79 yield The
constitution and composition of SiCSi pincer arene 35 was elucidated by 1H-
13C-
and 29
Si-NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 332 Synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 35 exhibits one singlet for the N
tBu groups at δ = 124
ppm and one singlet for CtBu groups at δ = 174 ppm and one set of resonances for the
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands Almost identical variable-temperature (VT) 1H-
NMR spectra of 35 in C7D8 in the temperature range of 210 to 320 K indicate
Results and Discussion
- 70 -
relatively low rotation barriers of the Si-O bonds on the NMR time scale A sharp
singlet in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum at δ = -240 ppm is comparable to that observed for
alkoxy-substituted silylenes aLSiOR (R =
tBu
iPr)
[31b]
The molecular structure of 35 could be confirmed by a preliminary single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis but a discussion of metric parameters was not possible
because of the moderate crystal quality Still it is clear that the two silylene-like
moieties in 35 face in the almost same direction (Figure 319) To get more
information about the molecular structure of 35 DFT calculations [B3LYP6-
31G(d)][101c 119]
were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The geometry of 35
obtained by X-ray crystallographic analysis was used as the initial structure The
optimized structure of 35e and 35ersquo is displayed in Figure 320 The Si1-O1-C1 angle
(14179deg) is larger than that of Si2-O2-C3 (13217deg) While the dihedral angle of Si1-
O1-C1-C2 is 2437deg the dihedral angle of Si2-O2-C3-C2 is 039deg
Figure 319 Molecular structure of 35 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity X-
ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The Si-O single bond distances of 17056 and 17190 pm are little longer than those
of bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
(1641(2) and 1652(2) pm) and alkoxysilylenes aLSiOR
(R = tBu
iPr)
[31b] (16442(3) and 16501(2) pm) due to steric hindrance The C2-
Results and Discussion
- 71 -
symmetric rotational isomer 35ersquo was identified as a stable form on the hyperpotential
energy surface with a slightly lower energy of 75 kJsdotmolminus1
Interestingly the Si-O
distance of 35ersquo is little longer than those of 35e The bond rotation barrier of the Si-O
bonds in 35e and 35ersquo is similar and estimated to be +334 kJsdotmolminus1
by theoretical
calculation
Figure 320 Optimized structures of bis-silylene SiCSi pincer ligand 35e (left) and
its rotational isomer 35ersquo (right) at the B3LYP6-31G(d) level Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) of 35e and 35ersquo
compound 35e Si1-O1 17056 Si2-O2 17191 Si1-O1-C1 14179 Si2-O2-C3
13217 compound 35ersquo Si1-O1 17294 Si2-O2 17294 Si1-O1-C1 13028 Si2-
O2-C3 13028
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII
complex 36
Although bis-silylene 35 bearing an amidinate ligand may not serve as a π-acceptor
it was a strong σ-donor ligand To investigate the pincer-type coordination ability of
35 its reactivity towards phosphine palladium(0) complexes was evaluated Treatment
of 35 with 05 equiv of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)-palladium Pd(PPh3)4 in hexane
at room temperature afforded the novel silylene-silyl(phenyl)palladium(II) complex
36[33b]
as sole product which could be isolated as orange crystals in 81 yield
(Scheme 333)
Results and Discussion
- 72 -
Scheme 333 Formation of 36 from reaction of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
A different type of silyl-silylene metal complexes has been described by Ogino and
co-workers[66b c 78]
Compound 36 was fully characterized by multinuclear NMR
spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis The structure of 36
indicates that two equivalents of 35 were consumed With a 11 molar ratio of starting
materials the yield of 36 decreased (asymp30) but still no other product or intermediate
could be detected by 1H-NMR spectroscopy
The molecular structure of 36 is shown in Figure 321 Remarkably compound 36
crystallizes as racemic mixture of its R and S enantiomers of which only the S form is
presented here The PdII atom has a typical distorted square-planar configuration
defined by the two silylene SiII atoms Si2 and Si3 the silyl Si
IV atom Si1 and the
carbon atom C1 of the central aryl ring Interestingly there is a 12-hydride shift from
palladium to silicon during the complexation forming a Si-H silyl group which breaks
the former Si1-N2 bond in 35 Due to coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo The bent Si3-Pd1-C1 angle of 16783(12)deg in 36
is contrary to the linear X-Pd-C (X = Cl I Ph 4-fluorophenyl OCOCF3 etc) angles
of reported palladium(II) complexes supported by a PCP type pincer arene ligand[72b
77 135] The Si1-Pd1-Si2 angle of 15503(4)deg deviates from the linear alignment and is
smaller than the respective P-Pd-P angle of the PCP pincer-type palladium
complex[72b 77 135]
The silylene PdII dative bond lengths (Si2-Pd1 23271(12) and
Si3-Pd1 23038(11) pm) of 36 are shorter than that of the Si1-Pd1 distance
Results and Discussion
- 73 -
(23561(12) pm) illustrating the difference between a silyl ligand (Si1) with a SiIV
-Pd
single bond vs a silylene ligand (Si2 and Si3) with a SiII-Pd dative bond However
the Si2-Pd1 and Si3-Pd1 distances in 36 are somewhat longer than those of
silylenerarrpalladium complexes[136]
(224 and 226 pm) from Kira (Scheme 334)
Furthermore Pd1-C1(aryl) bond length of 36 (2125(3) pm) is longer than those of
reported PCP pincer-type palladium(II) complexes (Pd-C distance 197-203 pm)[135a-e
135g] presumably because of steric congestion
Scheme 334 Silylenerarrpalladium complexes from Kira[136]
Figure 321 Molecular structure of 36 Only the S form of racemic mixture is
shown Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity except for the H1 atom Selected bond lengths (pm) and
angles (deg) Pd1-C1 2125(3) Pd1-Si1 23561(12) Pd1-Si2 23271(12) Pd1-Si3
23038(11) Si1-O1 1694(3) Si1-N1 1789(4) Si2-O2 1675(3) Si2-N5 1862(3)
Si2-N6 1840(4) Si3-O3 1662(3) Si3-N7 1888(3) Si3-N8 1860(3) Si4-O4
1704(3) Si4-N3 1893(4) Si4-N4 1892(4) Si1-Pd1-Si2 15503(4) Si1-Pd1-C1
Si2Si1
C1
Pd
Si3
213 pm
233 pm236 pm
230 pm
O1 O2
Results and Discussion
- 74 -
7861(11) Si2-Pd1-C1 7681(11) Si3-Pd1-C1 16783(12)
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 36 shows twelve sets of nonequivalent
tBu groups
which agrees with its crystallographic analysis Moreover the resonance for the Si-H
proton is observed at δ = 659 ppm The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 36 in C6D6 displays
four signals at δ = minus87 (aLSi Si4) 397 (HSi Si1) 623 and 658 ppm (SirarrPd Si2
and Si3) respectively The chemical shift of the Si1 atom (SiIV
-H) has moved upfield
comparable to those of a related HSirarrPd complex reported by Kira Iwamoto and co-
workers because of the electronegative N and O atoms bound to the Si1 atom[136a]
The 29
Si resonances of the two SiII atoms (Si2 Si3) coordinated to the palladium
center are similar to those of other amidinate-based silylene transition-metal
complexes[71 137]
and significantly shifted to higher field in comparison to those
reported for donor-free silylene palladium complexes owing to the additional N-donor
coordination of the amidinate ligand to the SiII atom Additionally the infrared
spectrum of 36 shows a weak Si-H stretching vibration band at 2135 cmminus1
The
observed stretching frequency of 36 is higher than those of other reported palladium
hydridosilyl complexes (2008ndash2121 cmminus1
)[135c 135f 136a]
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism
To investigate the uncommon reactivity of 35 towards Pd(PPh3)4 quantum
chemical calculations using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP level using
6-31G(d) basis set for H C N O P and Si atoms and the LANL2DZ level for the Pd
atom with the Gaussian 03 program for model compounds 36andash36e were performed
by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)[101c 119]
A schematic representation of the potential
energy surface of the proposed pathway for the formation of 36 is given in Scheme
335
Results and Discussion
- 75 -
Scheme 335 DFT-derived relative energies of model compounds 35a-35e
From this it was assumed that stepwise dissociation of phosphine ligands of
Pd(PPh3)4 forms 36a as the initial intermediate by the insertion reaction of Pd0 into
the pincer C-H bond of the central aryl ring of 35 Subsequently the 16-valence
electron PdII complex 36a undergoes a 12-hydride shift from palladium to a silicon(II)
donor atom to form the 14-valence electron silylene silyl(aryl)palladium(II) complex
36c as second intermediate The latter process occurs through transition state 36b-TS
with a barrier of +878 kJsdotmolminus1
and 36c is only 67 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36b-TS
The electron-deficient PdII complex 36c readily undergoes coordination with
phosphine ligand or silylene donor moiety of ldquofreerdquo 35 leading to the formation of
more stable 16-electron complexes According to that the calculated relative energies
of PrarrPd complex 36d stabilized by PPh3 and SirarrPd complex 36e stabilized by
methoxy silylene aLSiOMe as model silylene donor are +380 and minus176 kJsdotmol
minus1
respectively Since SiII of intramolecular N-donor stabilized silylenes is a stronger σ-
donor than PIII
of phosphines complex 36e is 556 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36d
Overall the stepwise transformation of 36a into 36e in the presence of PPh3 and the
model silylene aLSiOMe is exothermic by 176 kJsdotmol
minus1
Results and Discussion
- 76 -
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
After successful isolation of the first bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
and the first bis-
silylene pincer arene 35[33b]
in order to obtain other new bis-silylene(germylene) as
potential bidentate σ-donor ligands the novel type of bis-silylene(germylene) with a
ferrocendiyl spacer which could result in unique properties was investigated The
facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
aLSi-Fc-Si
aL 38 (Fc = ferrocendiyl) and
aLGe-Fc-Ge
aL 40 respectively as well as
their corresponding cobalt and iron complexes could be realized in the course of this
PhD thesis[33a]
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40
Since the reaction of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
with dilithium resorcinolate 34 afforded
the SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 35 was assumed that chlorosilylene 26 and
chlorogermylene 39[41]
(aLGeCl) could be suitable precursors for the desired bis-
metallylene functionalized ferrocenes Ferrocene with nBuLi and TMEDA
(tetramethylethyldiamine) in hexane gave 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37[138]
quantitatively
Subsequently treatment of chlorosilylene 26 with 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 led to the
formation of bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield (Scheme 336) Similarly
bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40[33a]
could be isolated in 77 yield by salt metathesis
reaction of 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorogermylene 39 The structures of 38
and 40 were determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis mass
spectrometry and X-ray crystallographic analysis (only for compound 40)
1H-NMR spectra of compound 38 and 40 are very similar They exhibit a singlet for
four tBu groups (38 δ = 116 ppm 40 δ = 111 ppm) Two sets of hyperfine coupled
triplet (38 δ = 451 and 472 ppm 40 δ = 461 and 471 ppm) are assigned to the
protons of ferrocene The resonance of the Ph protons (38 and 40) appears in aromatic
Results and Discussion
- 77 -
resonance region from 690 to 717 ppm Accordingly the 13
C-NMR spectra of 38 and
40 each show three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (38 δ = 709 727 and
846 ppm 40 δ = 701 723 and 920 ppm) Furthermore bis-silylene 38 gives rise to
a singlet at δ = 433 ppm in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum
Scheme 336 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 40
Single crystals of 40 suitable for an X-ray single crystal analysis were obtained
from hexane solution The crystals of 40 consist of two conformational isomers as
shown in Figure 322 Two molecular structures of 40 confirm that the two N-donor-
stabilized germylene moieties are bonded to C1 and C7 (endo-configuration) or C8
(exo-configuration) of the ferrocendiyl spacer Distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C7 in
40-endo are 1979(9) and 1983(11) pm while distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C8 in 40-
exo are 1991(2) and 19774(19) pm respectively The Ge-N bonds (2006 to 20402
pm) of two isomers are slightly shorter than those of precursor 39[41]
The GeII centers
in 40 adopt a pyramidal geometry with the sums of bond angles of 25593deg and
25669deg for 40-exo 2591deg and 2546deg for 40-endo respectively The structural feature
of the amidinate ligands in 40 is reminiscent of those reported for related bis-
germylenes such as I63[64]
(aLGe-NPh)2 and I75 I76 LGe-X-GeL (X = O S L =
tBuC(N-Dip)2)
[67] The isolation of two conformational isomers of 40-exo and 40-endo
indicates a small rotating energy of the functional ferrocendiyl That means bis-
germylene 40 and bis-silylene 38 don not need more activation energy serving as
bidentate ligand
Results and Discussion
- 78 -
Figure 322 Molecular structures of 40-endo (top) and 40-exo (bottom) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 40-endo (top) Ge(1)-C(1)
1979(9) Ge(2)-C(7) 1983(11) Ge(1)-N(1) 2027(8) Ge(1)-N(2) 2006(8)
Ge(2)-N(3) 2022(7) Ge(2)-N(4) 2037(7) C(1)-Ge(1)-N(2) 983(3) C(1)-Ge(1)-
N(1) 955(3) N(2)-Ge(1)-N(1) 653(3) C(7)-Ge(2)-N(3) 953(4) C(7)-Ge(2)-
N(4) 941(4) N(3)-Ge(2)-N(4) 652(3) for 40-exo (bottom) Ge1-C1 1991(2)
Ge2-C8 19774(19) Ge1-N1 20261(16) Ge1-N2 20247(17) Ge2-N3
20402(15) Ge2-N4 20162(16) C1-Ge1-N1 9662(7) C1-Ge1-N2 9445(7) N1-
Ge1-N2 6486(7) C8-Ge2-N3 9492(7) C8-Ge2-N4 9716(7) N3-Ge2-N4
6459(6)
The molecular structure of bis-silylene 38 has been ambiguously determined by X-
ray single crystal diffraction The structural feature of 38 is very similar to that of 40-
exo isomer However the X-ray data are not sufficient for any further discussion
(Figure 323)
Results and Discussion
- 79 -
Figure 323 Molecular structure of 38 X-ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The mass spectrometry confirmed the composition of 38 (Figure 324) The (ESI)
mass spectrum of 38 is dominated by a peak at mz 703329 which can be attributed to
the protonated molecular ion [38+H]+ Isotopic distribution of molecular peaks
demonstrates a good agreement with calculated mass composition The comparison of
experiment and calculation confirms the presence of bis-silylenyl substituted
ferrocene molecules
6 9 0 6 9 5 7 0 0 7 0 5 7 1 0 7 1 5 7 2 0
m z
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
Re
lative
Abu
nda
nce
7 0 3 3 2 9
7 0 4 3 3 2
7 0 5 3 3 47 0 1 3 3 4
7 0 6 3 2 96 9 0 2 4 9 6 9 5 2 2 5 7 1 7 3 4 57 1 0 4 7 3
7 0 3 3 3 1
7 0 4 3 3 4
7 0 5 3 3 87 0 1 3 3 6
7 0 6 3 3 17 1 0 3 3 5
N L 3 1 3 E 7
W Y-F e S i2 _ S p ri tze 1 -2 9 R T 0 0 0 -0 7 7 A V 2 9 T F T M S + c E S I F u ll m s [1 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 ]
N L 4 9 7 E 5
C 4 0 H 5 4 F e N 4 S i 2 + H C 4 0 H 5 5 F e 1 N 4 S i 2
p a C hrg 1
Figure 324 Experimental (top) and simulated (bottom) ESI-MS spectra of 38
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable silylene- and
germylene-substituted ferrocenes respectively Alternative example of SiII-ferrocene
Results and Discussion
- 80 -
compound is a disilene-functionalized ferrocene reported by Tokitoh and co-workers
recently[139]
However disilene derivates belong essentially to another type of low-
valent silicon compounds in comparison to triply coordinated silylenes Instead of
conjugated electronic effect of disilene-ferrocene system the ferrocene bridged bis-
silylene or bis-germylene system could have better chelating σ-donor character It is to
confirm in a coordination chemistry of bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 with
transition-metals
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40
In order to investigate the coordination ability of 38 and 40 toward transition-
metals and inspired by the reactivity of bis-silylenes 28 and 35 toward Ni0 and Pd
0[32a
33b] as well as by reports on spacer-separated bis-germylene molybdenum chelated
complex I65-Mo[66b]
(see Introduction p 18) firstly the coordination behavior of
potentially bidentate ligands 38 and 40 towards CoICp complex fragments
[140] was
examined A suitable CoICp source is accessible by treatment of CoBr2 with sodium
cyclopentadienide (NaCp) and potassium graphite (KC8) in tolueneTHF 41 mixture
resulting in the generation of (CpCoILn) (L = toluene or THF) in solution Reaction of
thus-formed CoICp species with bis-silylene 38 yielded the desired bis-silylene Co
I
complex 41[33a]
in 30 yield (Scheme 337) Similarly bis-germylene CoI complex
42[33a]
has been successfully synthesized from 40 and isolated in 61 yield
Scheme 337 Synthesis of bis-silylene and bis-germylene CoICp complexes 41 and 42
Results and Discussion
- 81 -
In comparison to bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 1H-NMR spectra of
compound 41 and 42 show an additional singlet for protons of CoICp group (41 δ =
496 ppm 42 δ = 504 ppm) A singlet for four tBu-groups appears at δ = 111 ppm by
bis-silylene Co-complex 41 and at δ = 139 ppm by bis-germylene Co-complex 42
Two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (41 δ = 440 and 461 ppm 42 δ = 438 and
459 ppm) are assigned to protons of ferrocene The resonance of phenyl protons (41
and 42) appears in aromatic resonance region In the 13
C-NMR spectra of 41 and 42
each exhibit one resonance for carbons of CoICp (41 δ = 780 ppm 42 δ = 759 ppm)
and three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (41 δ = 700 745 and 851 ppm
42 δ = 699 737 and 891 ppm) In the 29
Si-NMR spectrum the coordination of the
bis-silylene moieties to the Co atom results in a drastic downfield shift of the
resonance of 41 (δ = 820 ppm) in comparison to situation of 42 (δ = 433 ppm)
Isolated products 41 and 42 are first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-
silylene or bis-germylene in a chelating fashion The molecular structures of 41 and
42 (Figure 325) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses In both
complexes cobalt is coordinated one side by cyclopentadienyl and another side by bis-
silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40 and contains 18 valence electrons Angles of Si1-Co1-
Si2 and Ge1-Co1-Ge2 are 9389(5)deg and 9279(2)deg respectively
The silicon atoms in complex 41 and germanium atoms in complex 42 are four
coordinated and show a distorted tetrahedral geometry The Co-Si bond lengths of 41
(21252(14) and 21200(14) pm) are similar to that in chlorosilylene CoICp(CO)
complex 41a[141]
(21143(4) pm) Furthermore the Co-Si bonds of 41 are shorter than
the Co-Si distances in dichlorosilylene-CoICp(CO) complex 41b
[142] (21348(5) pm)
in dichlorosilylene-Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41c
[143] (2228(2) pm) in
chlorosilylene Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41d
[141] (22060(6) and 22017(6) pm)
respectively The silicon cobalt double bond (Si=CoV) distance (21848(8) pm) in
cobalt(V) complex 41e[144]
is also longer than dative SirarrCoI bond lengths in complex
41 Structures of cited compounds are drawn for clarity in Scheme 338
Results and Discussion
- 82 -
Scheme 338 Structural features of 41 and cited silylene cobalt complexes
Figure 325 Molecular structures of 41 (top) and 42 (bottom) Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 41 (top) Co1-Si1
21252(14) Co1-Si2 21200(14) Si1-C6 1894(5) Si2-C11 1887(5) Si1-N1
1898(4) Si1-N2 1907(4) Si2-N3 1904(4) Si2-N4 1922(4) Si1-Co1-Si2
9389(5) N1-Si1-N2 6847(15) N3-Si2-N4 6866(16) C6-Si1-Co1 13254(14)
for 42 (bottom) Co1-Ge1 21967(6) Co1-Ge2 21979(6) Ge1-C6 1965(4) Ge2-
Results and Discussion
- 83 -
C11 1961(4) Ge1-N1 2020(3) Ge1-N2 2031(3) Ge2-N3 2041(3) Ge2-N4
2029(3) Ge1-Co1-Ge2 9279(2) N1-Ge1-N2 6490(11) N3-Ge2-N4 6485(11)
C6-Ge1-Co1 13280(10) C11-Ge2-Co1 13140(10)
The Co-Ge bonds of 42 (21967(6) and 21979(6) pm) are also shorter than those in
the germylene cobalt(0) complex [((Me3Si)2N)2GerarrCo(CO)3]2[145]
(2262(1) pm) and
the tetragermacyclobutadiene-CoICp complex η
4-((
tBu2MeSi)4Ge4)CoCp (24616(3)
and 25036(3) pm)[90d]
respectively In fact the Co-Ge bonds in 42 are the shortest
Co-Ge bonds known to date The relatively short EII-Co bonds in 41 and 42 suggest
that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands in the series of divalent silicon
and germanium compounds as yet
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45
To test σ-donor ability of bis-(silylene) 38 versus carbonyl a ligand exchange
reaction between 38 and (CO)2CoCp[146]
was explored When 38 was allowed to react
with two molar equivalents of (CO)2CoCp the bis-silylene 41 bridged bimetallic
cobalt complex 44[33a]
could be obtained in 87 yield accompanied by half CO-
elimination of (CO)2CoCp (Scheme 339) The reaction of bis-silylene 38 with one
molar equivalent of (CO)2CoCp furnished the same product but the isolable yield was
low The structure of 44 was determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy
elemental analysis and infrared spectroscopy
Scheme 339 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged CoI(CO)Cp complex 44
Results and Discussion
- 84 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 44 exhibits a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
124 ppm A singlet (δ = 523 ppm) and two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (δ = 461
and 476 ppm) are assigned to protons of CoICp group and ferrocene with the ratio of
1044 The resonance of phenyl protons appears in aromatic resonance region The
29Si-NMR spectrum of 44 shows a singlet resonance at δ = 857 ppm similar to that
of 41 In the 13
C-NMR spectrum of 44 one characteristic signal for the CO ligands
appears at δ = 2078 ppm Furthermore the IR spectrum of 44 exhibits a strong
stretching band at ν = 1888 cmminus1
attributed to the carbonyl groups on the CoI atoms
The observed CO stretching frequency of 44 is much lower than those of 41a
(ν = 1968 cmminus1
)[141]
thus indicating that the bis-silylene substituted ferrocene 38 is a
much stronger σ-donor than chlorosilylene 26[32b]
Another carbonyl-silylene exchange reaction was investigated between bis-
silylene 38 and diiron nonacarbonyl Fe2(CO)9 Toluene was added to a 11 mixture of
38 and Fe2(CO)9 at room temperature to afford a bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4
complex 45 in 73 yield (Scheme 340) The structure of 45 was determined by
multinuclear NMR spectroscopy infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 340 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4 complex 45
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 45 shows a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
109 ppm Two singlets at δ = 483 and 500 ppm are assigned to protons of ferrocene
Multiplets in the range of 699-739 ppm are resonances of phenyl protons The 29
Si-
NMR spectrum of 45 exhibits a singlet resonance at δ = 1050 ppm It is much more
Results and Discussion
- 85 -
downfield shifted than those in complexes 41 (820 ppm) and 44 (857 ppm) One
characteristic strong signal for the CO ligands appears at δ = 2169 ppm in the 13
C-
NMR spectrum of 45 It is compatible to the resonance (δ = 2167 ppm) of the
silylene-Fe(CO)4 complex aL(
tBuO)SirarrFe(CO)4
[71] In the IR spectrum of 45 the
CO stretching frequencies (2026 1948 1900 cmminusl
) are also quite uniform to those of
this complex (2026 1949 1899 cmminusl
)[71]
Due to the rotation energy of ferrocene and
the symmetric bulky coordination of Fe the second CO-substitution could be more
difficult Consequently a chelated complex 38rarrFe(CO)3 was not observed during the
isolation of products
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts
The investigation of the catalytic activity of complexes 28 41 and 42 was carried
out in collaboration with Stephan Enthaler (TU Berlin)[33a]
Nickel or palladium catalyzed cross-coupling reactions between organozinc halides
and aromatic halides constitute an excellent synthetic method for polyfunctional
aromatic compounds[147]
To probe the catalytic activity of bis-silylene oxide Ni0
complex 28 a cross-coupling reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-
iodobenzene was investigated (Scheme 341) The direct iodine substitution of p-
methoxyl-iodobenzene with organometallic compounds was not expected without a
catalyst In the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3) coupling
reaction was observed and product 46 was obtained in 65 yield indicating a
potential application for this kind of complexes
Results and Discussion
- 86 -
Scheme 341 Application of 28 as precatalyst in cross-coupling reactions
Moreover the reactivity of the resulting complexes 41 and 42 as precatalysts for
Co-mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile was
expected[148]
It is known numerous cobalt complexes have been successfully applied
as precatalysts in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions and this becomes a powerful tool in
organic chemistry to form arene and heteroarene moieties[148-149]
Thus the catalytic
abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions were investigated
(Scheme 342)
Scheme 342 Application of 41 and 42 as precatalyst in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions
A first set of experiments was dedicated to the benchmark trimerization of phenyl
acetylene which resulted in the quantitative formation of isomers 47a and 47b in the
presence of complex 41 To our surprise similar attempts to employ 42 as precatalyst
failed with no product formation presumably due to a stronger coordination of GeII
atoms to the Co center which consequently prevents from the formation of an active
Results and Discussion
- 87 -
site for substrate coordination In another set of experiments the formation of
substituted pyridines 48a and 48b by [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenyl acetylene and
an excess of acetonitrile was detected[150]
The catalytic activity of SiII-Co complex 41
was exhibited distinctly again while no product formation could be observed with
GeII-Co complex 42 To some extent the application of CpCo(CO)2 as precatalyst
gave however substituted pyridines in lower yield (48a (3) and 48b (11))[33a]
Scheme 343 Proposed mechanism of 41 as precatalyst for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition
A possible mechanism for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenylacetylene or nitrile
to obtain 47 and 48 is proposed[149a]
as depicted in Scheme 343 At first bis-silylene
complex 41 could participate in a ligand substitution reaction with the
Results and Discussion
- 88 -
phenylacetylene to form an acetylene side-on complex Co-I The latter undergoes a
ring-formation to give the σ-bonded CoIII
complex Co-II which is saturated in
coordination with bis-silylene 38 Then intermediate Co-III is formed after π-donor
substitution by acetylene The succedent ring-enlargement furnishes the transient σ-
complex Co-IV and a subsequent elimination of products 47 and 48 occurs leading to
the active species Co-I by coordination of two phenylacetylene molecules In this
cobalt catalyzed transformation bis-silylene 38 serves as an important accessorial
ligand making the Co-center with high electron density more active and stabilizing the
intermediates Co-II and Co-IV
Unexpectedly complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is inactive The
possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII donor centers to
Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the substrate coordination
Summary
- 89 -
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
In this work various new metallylenes of Si Ge and Sn and bis-metallylenes
(interconnected and spacer separated) were synthesized The properties and
coordination ability of new metallylenes toward transition-metals including Fe Co
Ni and Pd were studied
The reduction of chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
with excess of elemental
potassium furnished the first potassium germylene anionic salt 3[83]
in 33 yield
along with the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip in 31
yield 3 consists of a dimeric half-sandwich complex interconnected via
intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds Each half-sandwich moiety consists of a
K(OEt2)2 cation which is η5-coordinated to the anionic five-membered planar GeNC3
ring with a considerable Cpmacr-like aromatic stabilization This is supported by density
functional theory (DFT) calculations The treatment of (nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
with KC8
gave the same products 3 4 and novel Ge4-cluster compound 5[83]
in very low yield
Compound 5 represents a dipotassium salt of the first ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like
dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a planar Ge42minus
core
Summary
- 90 -
Figure 41 Central molecular structures of 3 (left) and 5 (right)
The reactivity of compound 3 as nucleophile towards chlorogermylene 1[80]
and
chlorostannylene 7[80]
was examined Coupling reactions of 3 with 1 or 7 led to the
corresponding bis-germylene 6[104]
in 66 yield and germylene-stannylene 8[104]
in
34 yield respectively Compounds 6 and 8 were fully characterized including by X-
ray diffraction analysis The new compound 6 represent the first asymmetric
substituted bis-germylene with the shortest GeI-Ge
I bond length The germylene-
stannylene 8 is the first example with a GeI-Sn
I coupling as yet This novel structural
feature was explained with asymmetric structure and some ionic charge distribution
between 5- and six-membered rings by DFT calculation
Figure 42 Central molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right)
Summary
- 91 -
The synthesis of new ligands 12 or 20[110]
was easily accessible from lithium amide
10 with corresponding benzimidoyl chloride 11 or 19[112]
by salt metathesis reactions
Subsequent reactions of 12 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2middotdioxane furnished
chlorogermylene 14[110]
in 82 yield Germylene 16[110]
was obtained by
dehydrochloration of 14 with carbene 15[113]
in 78 yield The molecule of
zwitterionic germylene 16 bears two reactivity positions a strong nucleophilic
methylene group and a nucleophilic(s-orbital)-electrophilic(p-orbital) germylene site
Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas or with water resulted in the formation of
corresponding aminogermylene 17[110]
or germylene hydroxide 18[110]
in high yield
The reaction of compound 20 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2sdotdioxane led to the
unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained by
reaction of 21 with GeCl4 through dehydrochloration with carbene 15 as a base in
57 yield All new compounds have been characterized spectroscopically and
crystallographically 12 and 20 are new types of asymmetric β-diketiminato ligands
with a fused six-membered C6-ring to prevent the transformation of ligand backbone
and side-reactions of ligands They are promising ancillary chelating ligand for the
synthesis of novel silylenes and stannylenes The preparation of new germylenes
added significantly to the growing field of GeII-chemistry capable of small molecule
activation
Summary
- 92 -
Figure 43 Molecular structures of 16 (left) and 18 (right)
Figure 44 Molecular structures of 22 (left) and 23 (right)
A new challenge in metallylene synthetic chemistry is the preparation of chalcogen
(O S Se) bridged bis-metallylene species Here the synthesis and isolation of the
oxygen bridged bis-silylene 28[32a]
was achieved for the first time Reaction of
(HSiCl2)2O with lithium amidinate gave disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield The bis-
silylene oxide 28 was available by dehydrochloration of 27 employing LiN(SiMe3)2 in
76 yield The molecule of 28 contains two triply coordinated Si atoms and two lone
pairs one at each of the Si centers The Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent and
DFT calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small
Compound 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 furnished the Ni0 complex 29
[32a]
in 91 yield which is the first bidentate bis-silylene transition-metal complex with
18 valence electrons at the metal-site In diamagnetic complex 29 the two silylene
Summary
- 93 -
subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are tetrahedrally coordinated to the
Ni0 atom The strong σ-donor character of 28 led to a more electron-rich Ni center
This work will lead to new insights into the chelating silylene ligand transition-metal
coordination chemistry
Figure 45 Molecular structures of 28 (left) and 29 (right)
To possibly get access to a phosphasilyne a desilylation reaction that is phosphino
silylene 30[128]
was allowed to react with Ph3PCl2 30 was synthesized by facile
phosphanylation of chlorosilylene 26 with LiP(SiMe3)2 in 83 yield Surprisingly the
reaction of 30 with one molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 led to the formation of the unique
product 31[128]
as yellow crystals in 72 yield
An X-ray crystal structure analysis confirmed that 31 is a dimer of the desired
phosphasilyne Compound 31 is the first 4π-elektron Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene
derivate with two-coordinated P atoms and a planar Si2P2-ring The Si-P bond lengths
in 31 represent intermediate values between the Si=P bond length and the Si-P bond
length The equal Si-P distances in 31 already indicate σ- and π-electron resonance
stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has been confirmed by theoretical
calculations According to DFT investigation each Si atom in the Si2P2-ring bears a
large positive net charge (+1204) while the P atoms in the ring have somewhat
Summary
- 94 -
smaller negative charges (-0765)
Figure 46 Molecular structure of 31
Pincer arenes having divalent heavier group 14 elements are currently
unprecedented in synthetic chemistry but assumed to form complexes that could
serve as precatalysts for various organic transformations due to their coordination
ability towards metals Here the synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer
arene ligand 35[33b]
through the substitution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
by 13-dilithium
resorcinolate 34 could be achieved in 79 yield Treatment of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
afforded the unexpected silylene-silyl(phenyl)-palladium(II) complex 36[33b]
as orange
crystals in 81 yield
In compound 36 the PdII atom adopts a typical distorted square-planar
configuration defined by the carbon atom C1 two silylene SiII atoms and the silyl
SiIV
atom which is bonded with a hydrogen atom because of hydride shift to Si1 after
C-H activation by Pd Owing to the coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo With the help of theoretical investigation the
Summary
- 95 -
reaction mechanism was explained and the exothermic transformation from 35 to 36
was confirmed This is a new approach in metallylene transition-metal coordination
chemistry with complexes being potentially applicable in catalytic transformation
Figure 47 Molecular structure of 36 tBu and phenyl groups are not shown
Also a type of bis-metallylene with a ferrocendiyl spacer for new bidentate σ-donor
properties was investigated Here the facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and
bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 38 and 40 as well as their corresponding CoI
complexes could be described for the first time By salt metathesis reaction of 11rsquo-
dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorosilylene 26[32b]
or chlorogermylene 39[41]
furnished
bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield or bis-germylene 40[33a]
in 77 yield respectively
Reactions of a suitable CoICp precursor with bis-silylene 38 afforded the bis-silylene
CoI complex 41
[33a] in 30 yield Likewise the bis-germylene Co
I complex 42
[33a]
could be synthesized from 40 with CoICp fragment and isolated in 61 yield
Summary
- 96 -
Figure 48 Molecular structure of 40
Figure 49 Molecular structures of 41 (left) and 42 (right) tBu and phenyl groups
are not shown
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable ferrocene bridged
bis-silylene or bis-germylene respectively The isolated products 41 and 42 are the
first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-silylene or bis-germylene
functioning in a chelating fashion In both complexes cobalt is coordinated on one
side by cyclopentadienyl and on another side by bis-silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40
and contains 18 valence electrons The Co-Si bonds in 41 and the Co-Ge bonds in 42
belong to the shortest Co-E (E = Si Ge) bonds known to date The relatively short EII-
Co bonds in 41 and 42 indicate that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands
in the series of divalent silicon and germanium compounds as yet due to the electron-
rich ferrocene and metallylene segments
In addition in the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3)
cross-coupling[147]
reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-iodo-
benzene was observed evidently The catalytic abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in Co-
Summary
- 97 -
mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile were
probed[148-150]
However complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is
inactive The possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII
donor centers to Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the
substrate coordination
Experimental section
- 98 -
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
51 General section
All experiment and manipulations were carried out under dry oxygen-free nitrogen
using standard Schlenk techniques or in an inert atmosphere of purified nitrogen The
glassware used in all manipulations was dried at 150 degC prior to use cooled to
ambient temperature under high vacuum and flushed with N2 The handling of solid
samples and the preparation of samples for spectroscopic measurements were carried
out inside a glove-box where the O2 and H2O levels were normally kept below 1 ppm
All solvents were purified using conventional procedures and freshly distilled under
N2 atmosphere prior to use They were stored in Schlenk-vessels containing activated
molsieves Benzene toluene n-pentane and n-hexane were purified by distillation
from Nabenzophenone Et2O and THF were initially pre-dried over KOH and then
distilled from Nabenzophenone CH2Cl2 and chloroform were dried by stirring over
CaH2 at ambient temperature
For transfer of solvents or solutions stainless steel cannulas were used which were
stored in the oven at 120 degC The transfer was enabled by the vessel of origin being
left under a positive pressure of protective gas and the receptacle vessel of closed
with a pressure release value By filtration stainless steel cannula containing a filter-
head at one end was utilized Whatman (GFB 25) filters were affixed to the filter end
of the cannula with Teflon tape After use cannulas were cleaned immediately by
thorough rinsing with acetone followed by dilute HCl water acetone and
dichloromethane
In the case of low temperature reactions Dewar vessels were filled with acetone
and dry-ice was added until reaching the desired temperature Ethanol liquid
nitrogen was also employed for reactions in needs of -90 degC
Experimental section
- 99 -
52 Analytical methods
NMR Measurements NMR samples of air andor moisture sensitive compounds were
all prepared under inert atmosphere The deuterated solvents were dried by stirring
over Na (C6D6 THF-d8) or CaH2 (CDCl3) distilled under N2 atmosphere and stored in
Schlenk-vessels containing activated molsieves The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectra were
recorded on ARX 200 (1H 200 MHz
13C 50 MHz) and ARX 400 (
1H 400 MHz
13C
10046 MHz) spectrometers from the Bruker Company The 29
Si-NMR spectra were
recorded only on ARX 400 (29
Si 7949 MHz) spectrometer
The 1H and
13C
1H NMR spectra were calibrated against the residual proton and
natural abundance 13
C resonances of the deuterated solvent relative to
tetramethylsilane (benzene-d6 δH 715 ppm and δC 1280 ppm chloroform-d1 δH 727
ppm and δC 770 ppm THF-d8 δH 173 ppm and δC 253 ppm Heteronuclear spectra
were calibrated as follows 31
P1H external 85 H3PO4
119Sn
1H external SnMe4
Whereby in each case an 1-mm glass capillary tube containing the standard substance
was placed in the appropriate solvent in a 5 mm NMR tube and the spectrum recorded
The abbreviations used to denote the multiplicity of the signals are as follows s =
singlet d = doublet t = triplet q = quartet sept = septet m = multiplet br = broad
Infra-red spectroscopy IR spectra (4000 ndash 400 cm-1
) were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
Spectra 100 FT-IR spectrometer bands were reported in wave-numbers (cm-1
)
Samples of solids were measured as KBr pellets Air or moisture sensitive samples
were prepared in the glove-box and measured immediately The spectra were
processed using the program OMNIC and the abbreviations associated with the
absorptions quoted are vs = very strong s = strong m = medium w = weak br =
broad the intensities of which were assigned on the basis of visual inspection
UV-vis Spectrometry UV-vis spectrophotometric investigations were carried out on a
Specord S 600 spectrophotometer from Analytik Jena AG Pure samples of the
investigated substance were dissolved in dry solvents at suitable concentration The
UV-vis cuvette was filled and closed in a Schlenk tube under N2 atmosphere
Mass Spectrometry Mass spectra were performed at the Chemistry institute of
Experimental section
- 100 -
Technical University Berlin EI spectra were recorded on a 311A Arian MATAMD
spectrometer ESI mass spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap LTQ
XL spectrometer Solid samples were prepared in glove box and the solution of
samples was prepared 15 min before the measurement under N2 atmosphere Mass
spectra are presented in the standard form mz (percent intensity relative to the base
peak)
Elemental analysis The C H N and S analyses of all compounds were carried out on
a Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series instrument Air or moisture sensitive
samples were prepared in ldquotin-boatsrdquo in the glove box Samples with halogen were
filled in the ldquosilver-boatsrdquo for better measuring accuracy
Melting Point determinations A BSGT Apotec II instrument was used for the
determination of melting points Samples were prepared in glass capillary tubes under
N2 atmosphere The melting point was determined while the melded examples had the
same color like the solid before Without melting of samples the color change was
observed was determined as decomposition temperature
Single crystal X-ray structure determinations Crystals suitable to the single crystal
x-ray structure analysis were put on a glass capillary with perfluorinated oil and
measured in a cold nitrogen stream The data of all measurements were collected with
an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur S Saphire diffractometer at 150 K (MoKα radiation λ
= 071073 Aring) The structures were solved by direct methods Refinements were
carried out with the SHELXL-97[151]
software package All thermal displacement
parameters were refined anisotropically for non-H atoms and isotropically for H
atoms All refinements were made by full matrix least-square on F2 In all cases the
graphical representation of the molecular structures was carried out using Ortep32
version 108 The details for the individual structure solutions included in this
dissertation are available in the appendix
Experimental section
- 101 -
53 Starting Materials
Commercially available starting materials were used as received The following
important precursors were prepared according to literature procedures The references
are shown in Table 51
Table 51 Starting materials and references
Compound References Compound References
GeCl2dioxane [27] 15 (HCNtBu)2C [113]
(HSiCl2)2O [117] 19 Ph(Cl)C=N-iPr [112]
1 (nacnac)GeCl [80] 24 tBuN=C=N
tBu [152]
2 (nacnac)GeCl3 [82] 26 aLSiCl [32b]
7 (nacnac)SnCl [80] 32 (Me3Si)2N-SnCl [53]
9 (C5H10)C=N-Dip [111] 39 aLGeCl [41]
11 Ph(Cl)C=N-Dip [112]
Experimental section
- 102 -
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4
To a solution of 1[80]
(133 g 253 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added potassium
(148 g 379 mmol) at room temperature After stirring for 4 h the color of the
solution changed from yellow to brown Volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was first extracted with hexane (60 mL in portions) and then
with diethyl ether (60 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtrated and the filtrate was concentrated
and stored at -20degC for 5 d yielding the first germylene anion 3 as pale yellow crystals
(030 g 083 mmol 33)
C25H44GeKNO2 MW 50236
Properties soluble in THF slightly soluble in Et2O spontaneous
combustion towards air
Melting Point 220 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 108 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 112 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 184 (s 3 H
NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 298 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 618 (s 1 H γ-CH) 691- 698 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 182 (NCMe) 203
(GeCMe) 238 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 1185
(γ-C) 1224-1745 (arom C GeCMe NCMe)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C17H24GeKN(C4H10O)022 C 5797 H 713 N
378 Found C 5764 H 694 N 367
The combined hexane extract was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated and
stored at -20 degC for 2 d yielding the new germylene 4 as yellow crystals (052 g 078
Experimental section
- 103 -
mmol 31)
NHN
GeN
Dip
DipDip
C41H59GeN3 MW 66657
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 192 - 193 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 091 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 109 (d 3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH =
68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 122 (m br 12 H CHMe2) 130 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 162 (s 6 H NCMe) 329-340
(m 6 H CHMe2) 503 (s 1 H γ-CH) 564 (s 1 H NH) 683
ndash 718 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 225 (CHMe) 234 (NCMe)
240 (br CHMe) 245 (CHMe) 247 (CHMe) 256 (CHMe)
288 (CHMe) 292 (CHMe) 964 (γ-C) 1171 ndash 1635 (arom
C NCMe)
EI-MS mz () 6674 (03 [M]+) 4912 (100 [M -
iPr2C6H3NH]
+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C41H59GeN3 C 7388 H 892 N 630 Found
C 7354 H 868 N 613
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5
To a precooled (-78 degC) solution of 2[82]
(097 g 16 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was
added KC8 (094 g 69 mmol) After stirring for 4 h the reaction mixture was allowed
to warm to room temperature and the color of the solution changed from yellow to
brown The reaction mixture was allowed to stir an additional 48 h at room
temperature The signal of compound 1[80]
also disappeared in the 1H-NMR spectrum
of the resulting mixture and compound 3 and 4 were observed as main products
Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was first extracted
with hexane (50 mL in portions) and then with diethyl ether (50 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtered the filtrate was concentrated to 10
Experimental section
- 104 -
mL and stored at -20degC for 48 h yielding 3 as pale yellow crystals (024 g 067 mmol
42) The combined hexane extract was concentrated and stored at -20degC for 24 h
yielding 4 as yellow crystals (042 g 063 mmol 39)
Further concentration of the supernate and cooling at -20degC for 48 h yielded 5 as red
crystals along with colorless crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex
C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 MW 135028
Elemental analysis calcd () for C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 C 7890 H 1003 N 278
Found C 7821 H 999 N 281
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6
C46H65Ge2N3 MW 80531
To a solution of the germylene anion 3 (138 mg 0263 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at -
30 degC was added the solution of the chlorogermylene 1[80]
(93 mg 0263 mmol) in
THF (10 mL) The color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After
stirring for further 2 h at room temperature volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 5 days yielding 6 as dark red crystals (140 mg
017 mmol 66)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt169 degC (decomp)
Experimental section
- 105 -
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 107 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H
CHMe2) 111 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H CHMe2) 120 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 124 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 161 (s
6 H NCMe) 202 (s 3 H NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 301
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 319 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 367 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 518 (s 1 H 6-
ring-γ-CH) 682 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 702- 718 (m 9 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 191 (5-ring-NCMe) 210
(GeCMe) 240 (6-ring-NCMe) 248 (CHMe2) 249 (CHMe2)
250 (CHMe2) 258 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 261 (CHMe2)
279 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 1028 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1238 (5-ring-β-C) 1240 ndash 1694 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
UV-vis λ [nm] = 315 (intense) 358 (intense) 502 (2600)
EI-MS mz () 491 (45 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (15 [M-
(C3N2Ge) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65Ge2N3 C 6861 H 814 N 522 Found
C 6884 H 800 N 516
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8
C46H65GeN3Sn MW 85138
To a suspension of germylene anion 3 (116 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) at -
70 degC was added the solution of 7[80]
(187 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) The
color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After stirring for further 2 h at
room temperature the volatiles of the reaction mixture were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
Experimental section
- 106 -
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 10 days yielding 8 as dark red-black solid (96 mg
011 mmol 34) The solid was solved in Et2O and stored at 0 degC for 24 h building
dark red crystals
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt143 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 085 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 106 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 121 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 127 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 129 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2)
165 (s 6 H SnNCMe) 227 (s 3 H GeNCMe) 300 (s 3 H
GeCMe) 305 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 333 (sept
3JHH
= 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 378 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2)
510 (s 1 H 6-ring-γ-CH) 691 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 705-
721 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 188 (5-ring-NCMe) 207
(GeCMe) 242 (6-ring-NCMe) 246 (CHMe2) 248 (CHMe2)
249 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 260 (CHMe2) 268 (CHMe2)
280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 287 (CHMe2) 1035 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1237 (5-ring-β-C) 1244 ndash 1704 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
119Sn NMR
(C6D6) δ = -197
UV-vis λ [nm] = 314 (15000) 363 (14500) 541 (2800)
EI-MS mz () 537 (8 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (17 [M-
(C3N2Sn) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65GeN3Sn C 6489 H 770 N 494
Found C 6444 H 764 N 477
Experimental section
- 107 -
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12
C37H48N2 MW 52079
To a solution of 9[111]
(200 g 777 mmol) in 200 mL Et2O at -78 degC was added 16
M nBuLi (486 mL 777 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 11[112]
(210 g 700 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h Water free Et3NHCl (108 g 777 mmol) was added to the
reaction mixture and stirred All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 229 g (440 mmol
63 ) of the novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 as colorless crystals
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 148 ~ 150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 117 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 125 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 134 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 164 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 187 (s 1 H NH) 217 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335
(m 4 H CHMe2) 696 (s 3 H arom H) 715- 727 (m 8 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 218 (Cy-CH2) 221
(CHMe2) 236 (CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 256
(CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 285 (Cy-CH2) 286
(Cy-CH2) 977 (Cy-CCN) 1222-1441 (arom C) 1600 (Cy-
CN) 1658 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H49N2+ 5213896 Found 5213878
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48N2 C 8533 H 929 N 538 Found C
8518 H 927 N 547
Experimental section
- 108 -
526 The new chlorogermylene 14
N
N
Ph
Dip
Dip
Cl
Ge
C37H47ClGeN2 MW 62788
nBuLi (881 mL 141 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 12 (720 g 138
mmol) in 80 mL of Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed slowly to warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(330 g 142 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -
30 degC yielding 14 as yellow crystals (710 g 113 mmol 82 )
Properties soluble in hexane toluene sensitive towards air
Melting Point 203 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 097 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 107 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121-127 (m 9 H CHMe2) 128-139 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 144 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 155 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 203-227 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 317
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 327 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 394 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 417 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 680- 739 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 226 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 239 (CHMe2) 245 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
249 (CHMe2) 274 (CHMe2) 277 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
286 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 291 (CHMe2) 293 (CHMe2)
295 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1089 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1476
(arom C) 1651 (Cy-CN) 1688 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47ClGeN2+ 6282640 Found 6282639
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H47ClGeN2 C 7078 H 754 N 446
Found C 7073 H 762 N 457
Experimental section
- 109 -
527 The new germylene 16
C37H46GeN2 MW 59142
Germylene chloride 14 (300 g 479 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-butyl- imidazol-2-
ylidene 15[113]
(091 g 502 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (25 mL) at room
temperature and stirred for 48 h resulting in a white precipitate of the corresponding
NHCmiddotHCl salt The color of the solution changed from yellow to brown-red The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm
hexane two times The combined filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 16 as red crystals (220 g 373 mmol 78 )
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 167 ~ 168 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 115 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 126 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 135 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 12 H CHMe2) 155 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 204 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 221 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 369 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 380 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 415 (t
3JHH =
44 Hz 1 H C=CH) 675- 725 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 226 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 258 (Cy-CH2) 259 (CHMe2) 273 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 987 (Cy-CH)
1117 (Cy-CCN) 1236-1431 (arom C) 1473 1474 (Cy-CN
Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 704 (s) 787 (s) 939 (m) 1104 (s) 1135 (s) 1204 (s) 1248 (s)
1296 (s) 1322 (s) 1365 (s) 1439 (s) 1461 (s) 1535 (m) 1600
(s) 2822 (m) 2865 (s) 2922 (s) 2957 (w) 3022 (w) 3061 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2+ 5932951 Found 5932950
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H46GeN2 C 7514 H 784 N 474 Found
C 7495 H 800 N 484
Experimental section
- 110 -
528 Aminogermylene 17
C37H49GeN3 MW 60845
A red solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (15 mL) was exposed to dry
ammonia gas for 10 min at room temperature The solution turned to a yellow color
and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvent was removed and the
residue was dissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated solution was stored at 0
degC yielding 17 as yellow crystals (560 mg 092 mmol 92 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 173 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 117 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 120-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 142 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
154 (s 2 H NH2) 200-213 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 357 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 363 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 388 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 679- 724 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 214 (CHMe2) 230 (CHMe2)
234 (CHMe2) 237 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
248 (CHMe2) 272 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
285 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
293 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1023 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1462
(arom C) 1643 (Cy-CN) 1669 (Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 704 (s) 752 (s) 796 (s) 839 (m) 922 (s) 1096 (s)
1143 (s) 1174 (s) 1252 (s) 1304 (s) 1360 (s) 1430 (s) 1543
(s) 2865 (m) 2961 (s) 3021 (w) 3048 (m) 3343 (w) 3430
(w)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H49GeN3 C 7304 H 812 N 691 Found
C 7272 H 810 N 683
Experimental section
- 111 -
529 Germylene hydroxide 18
C37H48GeN2O MW 60943
A diluted solution of H2O in THF (179 mL 100 mmol 056 M) was dropped into
a solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) at -30 degC The solution
turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvents
were removed and the residue was redissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated
solution was stored at 0 degC yielding 18 as yellow crystals (580 mg 095 mmol 95 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 188 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 116 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 119-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 139 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
166 (s 1 H OH) 195-221 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 384 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 397 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 675- 726 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 229 (CHMe2)
233 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2) 243 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 281 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
291 (Cy-CH2) 314 (Cy-CH2) 1028 (Cy-CCN) 1233-1464
(arom C) 1647 (Cy-CN) 1666 (Ph-CN)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 713 (s) 743 (s) 770 (s) 791 (s) 839 (s) 926 (m)
1056 (m) 1104 (s) 1148 (s) 1170 (s) 1257 (s) 1313 (s) 1339
(s) 1365 (s) 1430 (s) 1470 (s) 1539 (s) 2861 (s) 2961 (s)
3018 (w) 3057 (m) 3643 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2O+ 6092900 Found 6092901
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48GeN2O C 7292 H 794 N 460
Experimental section
- 112 -
Found C 7300 H 786 N 464
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20
C28H38N2 MW 40230
At -78 degC to a solution of 9[111]
(150 g 583 mmol) in 150 mL Et2O was added 16
M nBuLi (365 mL 584 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 19[112]
(106 g 583 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 141 g (350 mmol
60 ) of 20 as colorless blocks
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 123 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 109 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 132 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 156 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 208 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 214 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 310 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 323 (m 1 H CHMe2) 713- 753 (m 8 H arom H)
1203 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H NH)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 219 (Cy-CH2) 226
(CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (CHMe2) 276
(Cy-CH2) 280 (CHMe2) 300 (Cy-CH2) 459 (CHMe2) 977
(Cy-CCN) 1226 1228 1275 1282 1284 1371 1389
1453 (arom C) 1576 (Cy-CN) 1673 (PhCN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C28H39N2+ 4033113 Found 4033112
Experimental section
- 113 -
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H38N2 C 8353 H 951 N 696 Found C
8270 H 977 N 679
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22
C28H37ClGeN2O MW 52570
nBuLi (16 mL 256 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (100 g 249
mmol) in 15 mL Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed to slowly warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(058 g 250 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 22 as yellow crystals (105 g 200 mmol 80 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 161 ~ 162 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 108 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 134 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 141 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 153 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 189 (m
1 H Cy-CH2) 202 (m 1 H Cy-CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2)
284 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 367 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz
1 H CHMe2) 396 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 688 (m
1 H arom H) 705-724 (m 7 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 222 (CHMe2) 228 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 240 (CHMe2) 241 (CHMe2) 253 (CHMe2)
263 (Cy-CH2) 272 (CHMe2) 283 (CHMe2) 285 (CHMe2)
Experimental section
- 114 -
293 (Cy-CH2) 312 (Cy-CH2) 537 (CHMe2) 1068 (Cy-
CCN) 1239 1250 1267 1271 1288 1294 1388 1410
1446 1469 (arom C) 1620 (Cy-CN) 1654 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H37ClGeN2O C 6397 H 709 N 533
Found C 6426 H 725 N 551
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23
C28H36Cl2GeN2 MW 54415
nBuLi (32 mL 512 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (201 g 500 mmol)
in 30 mL of toluene at -78 degC The solution was allowed to warm to room temperature
and stirred for 4 h To this solution GeCl4 (107 g 500 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-
butylimidazol-2-ylidene 15 (091 g 502 mmol) were added at -78 degC The resulting
suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were removed under
reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm hexane two times The
filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC yielding 23 as yellow crystals (156 g
287 mmol 57 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 126 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 113 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 137 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 146 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 189 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 332 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 361 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 421 (t
3JHH =
42 Hz 1 H C=CH) 701-726 (m 8 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 237 (CHMe2) 243 (Cy-
CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 254 (Cy-CH2) 257 (CHMe2) 286
Experimental section
- 115 -
(CHMe2) 304 (Cy-CH2) 511 (CHMe2) 1036 (Cy-CH)
1125 (Cy-CCN) 1248 1287 1296 1354 1391 1411
1421 1490 (arom C) 1682 (Cy-CN) 1709 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H36Cl2GeN2 C 6180 H 515 N 667
Found C 6203 H 517 N 679
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27
C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 MW 60781
To a solution of tBuN=C=N
tBu
[152] (329 g 213 mmol) in Et2O (80 mL) PhLi (119
mL 214 mmol 18 M) was added at -78 degC The solution was raised to room
temperature and stirred for 2 h To this solution at -90 degC 1133-
tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(230 g 1065 mmol) was added in one minute The
resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with toluene (60 mL)
by 80 degC two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h yielding
27 as colorless crystals (343 g 564 mmol 53)
Properties soluble in toluene sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 175 ~ 177 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 120 (s 36 H CMe3) 598
(s 2 H SiHCl) 733- 746 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 317 (CMe3) 544 (CMe3)
1276 1285 1297 1337 (arom C) 1711 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = -1110
IR(KBr cm-1
) 606 (s) 658 (m) 711 (s) 733 (s) 760 (s) 789 (s) 934 (s)
1068 (s) 1200 (s) 1269 (s) 1378 (s) 1486 (s) 1550 (s) 1566
(s) 1612 (s) 1783 (w) 1826 (w) 1950 (w) 1969 (w) 2000
Experimental section
- 116 -
(w) 2135 (s) 2188 (s) 2909 (s) 2934 (s) 2971 (s) 3232 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C30H49Cl2N4OSi2+ 6072822 Found 6072844
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 C 5928 H 796 N 922
Found C 5971 H 797 N 913
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28
C30H46N4OSi2 MW 53488
Toluene (120 mL) was added to a mixture of 27 (260 g 428 mmol) and
LiN(SiMe3)2 (144 g 856 mmol) at ambient temperature After 2 h the solution turned
to an orange color with the formation of LiCl The resulting mixture was stirred
overnight The solvent was then removed and the residue was extracted with toluene
(100 mL) The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h to yield yellow
crystals of 28 (175 g 327 mmol 76)
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 152 ~ 160 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 692-
731(m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 530 (CMe3)
1277 1291 1299 1349 (arom C) 1623 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -161
IR(KBr cm-1
) 608 (s) 709 (s) 746 (s) 790 (s) 892 (m) 972 (s) 1032 (m)
1070 (m) 1208 (s) 1268 (m) 1359 (s) 1412 (s) 1446 (s)
1476 (s) 1577 (m) 1648 (m) 1778 (w) 1826 (w) 1899 (w)
1970 (w) 2248 (w) 2867 (s) 2902 (s) 2928 (s) 2964 (s)
3065 (m)
Experimental section
- 117 -
ESI-MS mz calcd 5353288 Found 5353227
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H46N4OSi2 C 6736 H 867 N 1047
Found C 6688 H 857 N 1046
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
C38H58N4NiOSi2 MW 70176
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 28 (267 mg 050 mmol) and Ni(cod)2
(1375 mg 050 mmol) at ambient temperature The solution turned to a low-red color
and was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted with
toluene (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield low-red crystals of 29 (319 mg
046 mmol 91) The remaining solid was crystallized from hexane at -30 degC
suitable for single crystal measurement
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 183 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 130 (s 36 H CMe3) 281
(m 4 H CH2) 295 (m 4 H CH2) 504 (s 4 H =CH) 686-
707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 337 (CH2) 535
(CMe3) 760 (=CH) 1277 1293 1296 1335 (arom C)
1690 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 328
IR(KBr cm-1
) 607 (s) 644 (s) 698 (s) 750 (s) 792 (s) 925 (m) 1021 (m)
1075 (s) 1209 (s) 1267 (s) 1320 (m) 1361 (s) 1407 (s)
1444 (s) 1475 (s) 1578 (m) 1647 (m) 1775 (w) 1823 (w)
Experimental section
- 118 -
1902 (w) 1962 (w) 2280 (w) 2791 (s) 2855 (s) 2913 (s)
2975 (s) 3023 (m) 3063 (w)
ESI-MS mz () calcd 7003503 Found 7003577
Elemental analysis calcd () for C38H58N4NiOSi2 C 6504 H 833 N 798
Found C 6387 H 837 N 805
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30
C21H41N2PSi3 MW 43679
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(302 mg 102
mmol) and lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphate (285 mg 103 mmol) at ambient
temperature The solution turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 3 h The solvent
was removed and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30 degC for 24 h yielding 30 as yellow crystals (371 mg
085 mmol 83)
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 149-150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 058 (d
3JP-H = 44 Hz 18 H
SiMe3) 124 (s 18 H CMe3) 681-699 (m 2 H arom H)
734-741 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 44 (d
3JC-P = 100 Hz
SiMe3) 315 (d 4JC-P = 16 Hz CMe3) 540 (CMe3) 1289
1292 1293 1344 (arom C) 1572 (d 3JC-P = 95 Hz
NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 31 (d
1JSi-P = 229 Hz
PSiMe3) 440 (d 1JSi-P = 1943 Hz N2SiP)
31P NMR (81012 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = - 2110
Experimental section
- 119 -
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C21H41N2PSi3 4362315 Found 4362524
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31
C30H46N4P2Si2 MW 58083
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 30 (309 mg 071 mmol) and
triphenylphosphine dichloride (237 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The
solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted
with THF (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield yellow crystals of 31 (148
mg 025 mmol 72)
Properties soluble in THF sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 174 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 705-
733 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 331 (CMe3) 534
(CMe3) 1256 1276 1294 1359 (arom C) 1710 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 267 (t
1JSi-P = 998 Hz)
31P NMR (81012 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = - 1649
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C30H46N4P2Si2 5802736 Found
5802361
Experimental section
- 120 -
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn MW 60944
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(336 mg 114
mmol) and Chloro-amino-stannylene 32[53]
(360 mg 114 mmol) at room temperature
The solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was
extracted with hexane (20 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield colorless
crystals of 33 (343 mg 056 mmol 49)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air decomposed
slowly at room temperature
Melting Point gt 25 degC (slowly decomp)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn C 4139 H 678 N
689 Found C 4195 H 701 N 706
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35
C44H66N4O2Si2 MW 73919
At -78 degC to a solution of 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinol (150 g 675 mmol) in 30 mL
Et2O was added 16 M nBuLi (85 mL 136 mmol) in hexane and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h resulting in white slurry The reaction
mixture was cooled to -78 degC again and added the solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(398 g 135 mmol) in 50 mL toluene After the addition the mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with the warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC 395 g bis-silylene 35 (534
Experimental section
- 121 -
mmol 79 ) as slightly yellow solid
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
174 (s 18 H ArC(CH3)3) 693 - 713 (m 8 H arom H) 754
(s 1 H Ar-H) 787 (s 1 H Ar-H) 802 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (ArC(CH3)3) 318
(NC(CH3)3) 350 (ArC(CH3)3) 530 (NC(CH3)3) 1096
1243 1276 1295 1297 1313 1341 1552 (arom C)
1636 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -240
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C44H66N4O2Si2 C 7049 H 900 N 758
Found C 7075 H 930 N 756
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36
C88H132N8O4PdSi4 MW 158480
Bis-silylene 35 (600 mg 081 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (468 mg 041 mmol) were
mixed in 25 mL hexane at room temperature and stirred for 24 h The hexane solution
was filtrated and the white precipitate was washed with 10 mL hexane one time The
solid product was dried under reduced pressure to yield 520 mg (033 mmol 81 )
white powders The product was dissolved in warm hexane and stored at room
temperature for 10 days giving some orange crystals of 36 The reaction of bis-
Experimental section
- 122 -
silylene 35 with one molar equiv of Pd(PPh3)4 in toluene furnishes the same product
but the isolable yield is only about 30
Properties slightly soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 105 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 108
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 114 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 116 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 131 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 139 (s 9 H C(CH3)3)155
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 168 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 177 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 180 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 185 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 212
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 659 (s 1 H SiH) 686- 789 (m 22 H
arom H) 816 (s 1 H Ar-H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (C(CH3)3) 311
(C(CH3)3) 314 (C(CH3)3) 316 (C(CH3)3) 318 (C(CH3)3)
319 (C(CH3)3) 320 (C(CH3)3) 322 (C(CH3)3) 328
(C(CH3)3) 332 (C(CH3)3) 333 (C(CH3)3) 343 (C(CH3)3)
349 350 351 357 526 527 537 539 540 541 542
561 1112 1225 1236 1243 1256 1258 1271 1285
1287 1289 1291 1293 1294 1302 1303 1318 1323
1324 1326 1340 1342 1378 1380 1381 1409 1430
1533 1559 1585 1613 1622 1654 1731 1742
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -87 (LSi) 397 (Si-H) 623
658 (LSiPd)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 623 (m) 706 (m) 764 (m) 860 (m) 1056 (m) 1108 (m) 1206
(m) 1272 (m) 1365 (m) 1418 (s) 1446 (m) 1476 (m) 1446
(m) 1476 (m) 1495 (m) 1591 (m) 2135 (w) 2875(m) 2906
(s) 2964 (s) 3061 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C88H132N8O4PdSi4 C 6669 H 840 N
707 Found C 6616 H 875 N 676
Experimental section
- 123 -
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38
C40H54FeN4Si2 MW 70290
16 M nBuLi (423 ml 677 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (600 mg 323 mmol) and TMEDA (937 mg 806 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (30 mL) solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(190 g 645 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
pentane Compound 38 was obtained as deep red crystals in 70 yield (159 g 226
mmol) on storage of a saturated pentane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 117 ~ 119 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 116 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
451 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 472 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 692- 707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 318 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 709 (FeCH) 727 (FeCH) 846 (SiC) 1289
1294 1305 1349 (arom C) 1604 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 433
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeN4Si2 C 6835 H 774 N 797
Found C 6803 H 767 N 778
Experimental section
- 124 -
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40
C40H54FeGe2N4 MW 79201
16 M nBuLi (353 ml 564 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (500 mg 269 mmol) and TMEDA (781 mg 672 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (25 mL) solution of chlorogermylene 39[41]
(183 g 538 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
warm hexane Compound 40 was obtained as orange crystals in 77 yield (163 g
206 mmol) on storage of a saturated hexane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 168 ~ 169 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 461
(t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 471 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 691- 697 (m 6 H arom H) 712- 717 (m 4 H arom
H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 320 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 701 (FeCH) 723 (FeCH) 920 (GeC) 1289
1290 1302 1369 (arom C) 1659 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeGe2N4 C 6666 H 687 N 707 Found
C 6655 H 701 N 707
Experimental section
- 125 -
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeN4Si2 MW 82693
In a glove box CoBr2 (202 mg 092 mmol) NaCp (81 mg 092 mmol) and KC8
(131 mg 097 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent
mixture (41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at
room temperature The bis-silylene 38 (650 mg 092 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 41 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 30 yield (230 mg 028 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 166 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 139 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
440 (t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 461 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 496 (s 5 H CoCH) 680- 684 (m 2 H arom H)
692- 696 (m 6 H arom H) 720- 723 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (NC(CH3)3) 534
(NC(CH3)3) 700 (FeCH) 745 (FeCH) 780 (CoCH) 851
(SiC) 1291 1297 1300 1343 (arom C) 1673 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 820
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFeN4Si2 C 6536 H 719 N 678
Found C 6612 H 724 N 686
Experimental section
- 126 -
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhGe
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Ge
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeGe2N4 MW 91604
In a glove box CoBr2 (83 mg 038 mmol) NaCp (33 mg 038 mmol) and KC8 (54
mg 040 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent mixture
(41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at room
temperature The bis-germylene 40 (300 mg 038 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 42 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 61 yield (210 mg 023 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 309 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 131 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
438 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 459 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 504 (s br 5 H CoCH) 684- 688 (m 2 H arom H)
695- 698 (m 6 H arom H) 714- 718 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 322 (NC(CH3)3) 537
(NC(CH3)3) 699 (FeCH) 737 (FeCH) 759 (CoCH) 891
(GeC) 1287 1296 1300 1361(arom C) 1680 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFe Ge2N4 C 5900 H 649 N 612
Found C 5942 H 664 N 590
Experimental section
- 127 -
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44
C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 MW 100697
To a solution of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (250 mg 036 mmol) in 10 ml hexane
was added a solution of CpCo(CO)2 (130 mg 072 mmol) in 8 ml hexane The
reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All solvents were evaporated
in vacuo The corresponding bis-silylene cobalt(I) complex 44 was isolated as brown
air- and moisture-sensitive solids in 87 yield (310 mg 031 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 293 ~ 295 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
461 (m 4 H FeCH) 476 (m 4 H FeCH) 523 (s 10 H
CoCH) 683- 695 (m 6 H arom H) 702- 706 (m 2 H
arom H) 745- 748 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 313 (NC(CH3)3) 542
(NC(CH3)3) 723 (FeCH) 741 (FeCH) 804 (SiC) 809
(CoCH) 1287 1296 1300 1324 (arom C) 1687 (NCN)
2078 (br CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 857
IR(KBr cm-1
) 500 (m) 539 (w) 564 (m) 628 (s) 703 (m) 757 (s) 792 (m)
825 (w) 1028 (m) 1081 (w) 1146 (m) 1199 (s) 1275 (m)
1360 (m) 1388 (m) 1417 (s) 1438 (w) 1474 (m) 1520 (s)
1641 (s) 1888 (s) 2869 (s) 2901 (m) 2926 (m) 2965 (s)
1520 (s) 3097 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 C 6202 H 641 N
Experimental section
- 128 -
556 Found C 6287 H 630 N 571
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45
C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 MW 103867
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (500 mg
071 mmol) and Fe2(CO)9 (259 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The solution
was stirred for 12 h The solvent was evaporated in vacuo The corresponding bis-
silylene iron(0) complex 45 was isolated as yellow-brown air- and moisture-sensitive
solids in 73 yield (540 mg 052 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 155 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 109 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 483
(s 4 H FeCH) 500 (s 4 H FeCH) 699- 712 (m 8 H arom
H) 736- 739 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 311 (NC(CH3)3) 548
(NC(CH3)3) 735 (FeCH) 742 (FeCH) 771 (SiC) 1210
1287 1303 1308 (arom C) 1704 (NCN) 2169 (CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 1050
IR(KBr cm-1
) 630 (s) 765 (w) 1028 (m) 1035 (m) 1200 (m) 1370 (w)
1400 (m) 1474 (w) 1609 (w) 1648 (w) 1900 (s) 1948 (s)
1996(w) 2026 (s) 2865 (w) 2930 (m) 2965 (m)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 C 5550 H 524 N
539 Found C 5623 H 517 N 566
References
- 129 -
6 REFERENCES
1 P Pyykko Chem Rev 1988 88 563
2 N V Sidgwick Clarendon Oxford 1950 1 287 (b) R S Drago J Phys Chem 1958 62
353
3 P P Power Chem Rev 1999 99 3463 (b) R C Fischer P P Power Chem Rev 2010 110
3877
4 R Janoschek Chemie in unserer Zeit 1988 22 128
5 (a) F S Kipping L L Lloyd Dalton Trans 1901 79 449 (b) N N Greenwood A
Earnshaw Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed) 1997 362
6 (a) L Roumlsch P John R Reitmeier Silicon Compounds Organic In Ullmanns Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH amp Co KGaA 2000 (b) A J O Lenick
Basic Silicone Chemistry ndash A Review 1999
7 S Yao Y Xiong M Brym M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 7268
8 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7562
9 Y Xiong S Yao R Muumlller M Kaupp M Driess Nature Chem 2010 2 577
10 (a) S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4159 (b) S
Yao Y Xiong C Milsmann E Bill S Pfirrmann C Limberg M Driess Chem Eur J
2010 16 436
11 (a) K S Pitzer J Am Chem Soc 1948 70 2140 (b) R S Mulliken J Am Chem Soc
1955 77 884
12 (a) M Asay C Jones M Driess Chem Rev 2011 111 354 (b) S Yao Y Xiong M Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 1748 (c) Y Mizuhata T Sasamori N Tokitoh Chem Rev 2009
109 3479 (d) P P Power Organometallics 2007 26 4362 (e) P P Power Chem Rev 2003
103 789 (f) S Nagendran H W Roesky Organometallics 2008 27 457
13 (a) R West M J Fink J Michl Science 1981 214 1343 (b) M J Fink M J Michalczyk
K J Haller R West J Michl Chem Commun 1983 1010 (c) S Masamune Y Hanzawa
D J Williams J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 6136 (d) D E Goldberg D H Harris M F
Lappert K M Thomas Chem Commun 1976 261 (e) K W Klinkhammer T F Faumlssler H
Gruumltzmacher Angew Chem Int Ed 1998 37 124 (f) J T Snow S Murakami S
Masamune D J Williams Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 4191 (g) M Weidenbruch Angew
Chem Int Ed 2003 42 2222
14 L Pauling J Am Chem Soc 1931 53 1367
15 (a) G Trinquier J P Malrieu P Riviere J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 4529 (b) J P
Malrieu G Trinquier J Am Chem Soc 1989 111 5916 (c) H Jacobsen T Ziegler J Am
Chem Soc 1994 116 3667
16 L Pu B Twamley P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2000 122 3524
17 M Kaupp P V R Schleyer J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 1061
18 A D Phillips R J Wright M M Olmstead P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2002 124 5930
19 N Takagi S Nagase Organometallics 2001 20 5498
20 M Stender A D Phillips R J Wright P P Power Angew Chem Int Ed 2002 41 1785
21 T L Allen W H Fink P P Power Dalton Trans 2000 407
References
- 130 -
22 A Sekiguchi R Kinjo M Ichinohe Science 2004 305 1755
23 D Bourissou O Guerret F P Gabbai G Bertrand Chem Rev 2000 100 39
24 M Denk R Lennon R Hayashi R West A V Belyakov H P Verne A Haaland M
Wagner N Metzler J Am Chem Soc 1994 116 2691
25 M Driess S Yao M Brym C V Wuellen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 6730
26 M Kira S Ishida T Iwamoto C Kabuto J Am Chem Soc 1999 121 9722
27 V Lemierre A Chrostowska A Dargelos P Baylegravere W J Leigh C R Harrington Appl
Organom Chem 2004 18 676
28 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky S Merkel J Henn D Stalke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
5683
29 L Jafarpour E D Stevens S P Nolan J Organomet Chem 2000 606 49
30 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen D Lentz J Am Chem Soc 2006 128 9628
31 (a) C-W So H W Roesky J Magull R B Oswald Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 3948
(b) C-W So H W Roesky P M Gurubasavaraj R B Oswald M T Gamer P G Jones S
Blaurock J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12049
32 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890 (b) S S Sen
H W Roesky D Stern J Henn D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2009 132 1123
33 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167 (b) W
Wang S Inoue E Irran M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691 (c) R Azhakar R
S Ghadwal H W Roesky H Wolf D Stalke Organometallics 2012 31 4588 (d) S S
Sen J Hey R Herbst-Irmer H W Roesky D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 12311
34 R C Fischer L Pu J C Fettinger M A Brynda P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
11366
35 Y Wang Y Xie P Wei R B King H F Schaefer P Von R Schleyer G H Robinson
Science 2008 321 1069
36 S S Sen S Khan S Nagendran H W Roesky Acc Chem Res 2012 45 578
37 S S Sen A Jana H W Roesky C Schulzke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 8536
38 C Jones S J Bonyhady N Holzmann G Frenking A Stasch Inorg Chem 2011 50
12315
39 D Gau R Rodriguez T Kato N Saffon-Merceron A De Coacutezar F P Cossiacuteo A Baceiredo
Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50 1092
40 S P Green C Jones P C Junk K-A Lippert A Stasch Chem Commun 2006 3978
41 S Nagendran S S Sen H W Roesky D Koley H GrubmuLler A Pal R Herbst-Irmer
Organometallics 2008 27 5459
42 W-P Leung W-K Chiu K-H Chong T C W Mak Chem Commun 2009 6822
43 (a) S P Green C Jones A Stasch Science 2007 318 1754 (b) S J Bonyhady S P Green
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 2973 (c) S J Bonyhady
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch A J Edwards G J Mcintyre Chem Eur J 2010 16 938
44 A Sidiropoulos C Jones A Stasch S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
9701
45 Y Peng R C Fischer W A Merrill J Fischer L Pu B D Ellis J C Fettinger R H
Herber P P Power Chemical Science 2010 1 461
46 R Jambor B Kašnaacute K N Kirschner M Schuumlrmann K Jurkschat Angew Chem Int Ed
References
- 131 -
2008 47 1650
47 (a) C D Schaeffer J J Zuckerman J Am Chem Soc 1974 96 7160 (b) M J S Gynane
D H Harris M F Lappert P P Power P Riviere M Riviere-Baudet Dalton Trans 1977
2004 (c) M F Lappert P P Power M J Slade L Hedberg K Hedberg V Schomaker
Chem Commun 1979 369 (d) T Fjeldberg H Hope M F Lappert P P Power A J
Thorne Chem Commun 1983 639 (e) M Veith M Jarczyk V Huch Chem Ber 1988
121 347
48 M Veith R Lisowsky Angew Chem Int Ed 1988 27 1087
49 P B Hitchcock M F Lappert A J Thorne Chem Commun 1990 1587
50 R A Bartlett P P Power J Am Chem Soc 1990 112 3660
51 J-T Ahlemann H W Roesky R Murugavel E Parisini M Noltemeyer H-G Schmidt O
Muumlller R Herbst-Irmer L N Markovskii Y G Shermilovich Chem Ber 1997 130 1113
52 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky K Proumlpper B Dittrich S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem
Int Ed 2011 50 5374
53 R W Chorley P B Hitchock B S Jolly M F Lappert G A Lawless Chem Commun
1991 1302
54 A G Avent C Drost B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem
2004 630 2090
55 M Veith A Rammo Z Anorg Allg Chem 2001 627 662
56 M Veith J Fischer T R Prout M Noetzel P Hobein V Huch Inorg Chem 1991 30
4130
57 H Braunschweig P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem Int Ed
1994 33 1156
58 H Braunschweig C Drost P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem
Int Ed 1997 36 261
59 R E Allan M A Beswick G R Coggan P R Raithby A E H Wheatley D S Wright
Inorg Chem 1997 36 5202
60 (a) C Stanciu S S Hino M Stender A F Richards M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
Chem 2005 44 2774 (b) Y Peng B D Ellis X Wang P P Power J Am Chem Soc
2008 130 12268
61 B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem 2005 631 1383
62 C Cui M M Olmstead J C Fettinger G H Spikes P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 17530
63 X Wang C Ni Z Zhu J C Fettinger P P Power Inorg Chem 2009 48 2464
64 S S Sen D Kratzert D Stern H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2010 49 5786
65 H-X Yeong H-W Xi K H Lim C-W So Chem Eur J 2010 16 12956
66 (a) F E Hahn A V Zabula T Pape A Hepp Eur J Inorg Chem 2007 2007 2405 (b) A
V Zabula F E Hahn T Pape A Hepp Organometallics 2007 26 1972 (c) A V Zabula T
Pape A Hepp F E Hahn Organometallics 2008 27 2756
67 S-H Zhang C-W So Organometallics 2011 30 2059
68 O T Summerscales M M Olmstead P P Power Organometallics 2011 30 3468
69 (a) M Veith W Frank Angew Chem 1985 97 213 (b) M Veith Angew Chem Int Ed
1987 26 1 (c) H Chen R A Bartlett H V R Dias M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
References
- 132 -
Chem 1991 30 3390 (d) R E Allan M A Beswick A J Edwards M A Paver M-A
Rennie P R Raithby D S Wright Dalton Trans 1995 1991 (e) W J Grigsby T Hascall
J J Ellison M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg Chem 1996 35 3254 (f) R E Allan M A
Beswick M K Davies P R Raithby A Steiner D S Wright J Organomet Chem 1998
550 71 (g) M E G Mosquera J S Palmer A D Hopkins D S Wright Phosphorus
Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 1999 150 107 (h) M Veith M Opsoumllder M Zimmer V Huch
Eur J Inorg Chem 2000 2000 1143 (i) D R Armstrong F Benevelli A D Bond N
Feeder E A Harron A D Hopkins M Mcpartlin D Moncrieff D Saacuteez E A Quadrelli
A D Woods D S Wright Inorg Chem 2002 41 1492 (j) T Chivers Timothy j Clark M
Krahn M Parvez G Schatte Eur J Inorg Chem 2003 2003 1857 (k) J F Eichler O Just
W S Rees Inorg Chem 2006 45 6706 (l) D J Eisler T Chivers Chem Eur J 2006 12
233 (m) H Vaňkaacutetovaacute L Broeckaert F De Proft R Olejniacutek J Turek Z Padělkovaacute A
Růžička Inorg Chem 2011 50 9454
70 (a) A Meltzer C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7232 (b) A Meltzer C
Praumlsang C Milsmann M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 3170 (c) H Ogino The
Chemical Record 2002 2 291 (d) S Inoue M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
5614 (e) M Stoelzel C Praumlsang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed
2012 51 399
71 W Yang H Fu H Wang M Chen Y Ding H W Roesky A Jana Inorg Chem 2009 48
5058
72 (a) J Choi A H R Macarthur M Brookhart A S Goldman Chem Rev 2011 111 1761
(b) N Selander K L N J Szaboacute Chem Rev 2011 111 2048 (c) M E Van Der Boom D
Milstein Chem Rev 2003 103 1759
73 W Tang X Zhang Chem Rev 2003 103 3029
74 (a) A P Shaw J R Norton D Buccella L A Sites S S Kleinbach D A Jarem K M
Bocage C Nataro Organometallics 2009 28 3804 (b) L-C Song J-T Liu Q-M Hu G-
F Wang P Zanello M Fontani Organometallics 2000 19 5342 (c) S Shekhar J F
Hartwig J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 13016
75 N A Marinos Modellsysteme fuumlr die [NiFe]-Hydrogenase und Zinkkatalysatoren fuumlr die
Hydrosilylierung Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin Germany 2011
76 (a) C M Jensen D Morales-Morales The Chemistry of Pincer Compounds Elsevier
Science Amsterdam 2007 (b) M Albrecht G Van Koten Angew Chem Int Ed 2001 40
3750 (c) M Albrecht M M Lindner Dalton Trans 2011 40 8733 (d) D Benito-Garagorri
K Kirchner Acc Chem Res 2008 41 201 (e) C Gunanathan D Milstein Acc Chem Res
2011 44 588
77 (a) N Selander K J Szabo Dalton Trans 2009 6267 (b) H Zhang A Lei Dalton Trans
2011 40 8745 (c) J Dupont C S Consorti J Spencer Chem Rev 2005 105 2527
78 Silyl-silylene transition-metal complexes see (a) K Ueno S Seki H Ogino Chem Lett
1993 22 2159 (b) H Tobita H Wada K Ueno H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 2545
(c) K Ueno A Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 5023 (d) H Wada H Tobita
H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 3870 (e) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino
Organometallics 1998 17 2844 (f) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino Organometallics 1998
17 2850 (g) H Wada H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 1998 27 993 (h) K Ueno A
References
- 133 -
Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1999 18 2694 (i) H Tobita T Sato M Okazaki H
Ogino J Organomet Chem 2000 611 314 (j) H Koshikawa M Okazaki S Matsumoto
K Ueno H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 2005 34 1412 (k) K Ueno S Ito K Endo H
Tobita S Inomata H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 3309
79 For reviews on silylene complexes see (a) M S Eisen Transition-Metal Silyl Complexes
In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2003 pp 2037 (b)
M Okazaki H Tobita H Ogino Dalton Trans 2003 493 (c) R Waterman P G Hayes T
D Tilley Acc Chem Res 2007 40 712
80 Y Ding H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt P P Power Organometallics 2001
20 1190
81 L Bourget-Merle M F Lappert J R Severn Chem Rev 2002 102 3031
82 B Raumlke F Zuumllch Y Ding J Prust H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt Z Anorg
Allg Chem 2001 627 836
83 W Wang S Yao C Van WuLlen M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640
84 (a) R West H Sohn D R Powell T Muumlller Y Apeloig Angew Chem Int Ed 1996 35
1002 (b) W P Freeman T D Tilley L M Liable-Sands A L Rheingold J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 10457
85 J Fischer J Baumgartner C Marschner Organometallics 2005 24 1263
86 M Stender A D Phillips P P Power Inorg Chem 2001 40 5314
87 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 4349
88 W D Woodul A F Richards A Stasch M Driess C Jones Organometallics 2010 29
3655
89 W Clegg E K Cope A J Edwards F S Mair Inorg Chem 1998 37 2317
90 (a) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Matsuno M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 5768 (b) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Angew Chem Int Ed
2006 45 3269 (c) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Eur J Inorg Chem
2007 2007 5471 (d) V Y Lee Y Ito H Yasuda K Takanashi A Sekiguchi J Am Chem
Soc 2011 133 5103
91 S P Mallela S Hill R A Geanangel Inorg Chem 1997 36 6247
92 P V R Schleyer C Maerker A Dransfeld H Jiao N J R V E Hommes J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 6317
93 For a review see Z Chen C S Wannere C Corminboeuf R Puchta P V R Schleyer
Chem Rev 2005 105 3842
94 (a) R Ahlrichs M Baumlr M Haumlser H Horn C Koumllmel Chem Phys Lett 1989 162 165 (b)
M Haumlser R Ahlrichs J Comput Chem 1989 10 104
95 O Treutler R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1995 102 346
96 (a) A D Becke Phys Rev A 1988 38 3098 (b) J P Perdew Phys Rev B 1986 33 8822
97 (a) A Schaumlfer C Huber R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1994 100 5829 (b) K Eichkorn F
Weigend O Treutler R Ahlrichs Theor Chem Acc 1997 97 119
98 K Eichkorn O Treutler H Oumlhm M Haumlser R Ahlrichs Chem Phys Lett 1995 242 652
99 U Meier C Van Wuumlllen M Schindler J Comput Chem 1992 13 551
100 (a) C Van Wuumlllen Chem Phys Lett 1994 219 8 (b) C Van Wuumlllen Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2000 2 2137
References
- 134 -
101 (a) P J Stephens F J Devlin C F Chabalowski M J Frisch J Phys Chem 1994 98
11623 (b) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 1372 (c) C T Lee W T Yang R G Parr
Phys Rev 1988 37 785
102 W Kutzelnigg U Fleischer M Schindler NMR basis principles and progress Springer
Berlin 1990 Vol 23 page 169
103 (a) C Corminboeuf T Heine G Seifert P V R Schleyer J Weber Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2004 6 273 (b) P Von Rague Schleyer M Manoharan Z-X Wang B Kiran H Jiao
R Puchta N J R Van Eikema Hommes Org Lett 2001 3 2465
104 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Chem Commun 2009 2661
105 H Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 1999 18 3159
106 Y Sugiyama T Sasamori Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Takagi S Nagase N Tokitoh J Am
Chem Soc 2006 128 1023
107 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 2003 22 215
108 (a) K H Pannell L Parkanyi H Sharma F Cervantes-Lee Inorg Chem 1992 31 522 (b)
A Kawachi Y Tanaka K Tamao J Organomet Chem 1999 590 15
109 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess Chem Asian J 2009 4 1323
110 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Organometallics 2011 30 6490
111 W Keim S Killat C F Nobile G P Suranna U Englert R Wang S Mecking L D
Schroumlder J Organomet Chem 2002 662 150
112 P H M Budzelaar A B Van Ort A G Orpen Eur J Inorg Chem 1998 1485
113 N M Scott R Dorta E D Stevens A Correa L Cavallo S P Nolan J Am Chem Soc
2005 127 3516
114 L W Pineda V Jancik H W Roesky D Neculai A M Neculai Angew Chem Int Ed
2004 43 1419
115 A Jana I Objartel H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2009 48 798
116 S S Sen G Tavcar H W Roesky D Kratzert J Hey D Stalke Organometallics 2010 29
2343
117 R West J Am Chem Soc 1953 75 1002
118 R Drake I Mackinnon R Taylor Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Siloxane Polymers
and Copolymers In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd
2003 pp 2217
119 (a) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 5648 (b) B Miehlich A Savin H Stoll H
Preuss Chem Phys Lett 1989 157 200 (c) Gussian 03 Revision E01 M J Frisch G W
Trucks H B Schlegel G E Scuseria M A Robb J R Cheeseman J A Montgomery Jr
T Vreven K N Kudin J C Burant J M Millam S S Iyengar J Tomasi V Barone B
Mennucci M Cossi G Scalmani N Rega G A Petersson H Nakatsuji M Hada M
Ehara K Toyota R Fukuda J Hasegawa M Ishida T Nakajima Y Honda O Kitao H
Nakai M Klene X Li J E Knox H P Hratchian J B Cross V Bakken C Adamo J
Jaramillo R Gomperts R E Stratmann O Yazyev A J Austin R Cammi C Pomelli J W
Ochterski P Y Ayala K Morokuma G A Voth P Salvador J J Dannenberg V G
Zakrzewski S Dapprich A D Daniels M C Strain O Farkas D K Malick A D Rabuck
K Raghavachari J B Foresman J V Ortiz Q Cui A G Baboul S Clifford J Cioslowski
B B Stefanov G Liu A Liashenko P Piskorz I Komaromi R L Martin D J Fox T
References
- 135 -
Keith M A Al-Laham C Y Peng A Nanayakkara M Challacombe P M W Gill B
Johnson W Chen M W Wong C Gonzalez and J A Pople Gaussian Inc Wallingford
CT 2004
120 M Denk R K Hayashi R West Chem Commun 1994 33
121 L Kong J Zhang H Song C Cui Dalton Trans 2009 5444
122 A Meltzer S Inoue C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 3038
123 P Macchi D M Proserpio A Sironi J Am Chem Soc 1998 120 1447
124 (a) M Regitz O J Scherer Multiple bonds and Low Coordination in Phosphorus Chemistry
New York 1990 p 5 (b) M Driess Coord Chem Rev 1995 145 1 (c) V Y Lee A
Sekiguchi J Escudieacute H Ranaivonjatovo Chem Lett 2010 39 312
125 C N Smit F M Lock F Bickelhaupt Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 3011
126 (a) C N Smit F Bickelhaupt Organometallics 1987 6 1156 (b) E Niecke E Klein M
Nieger Angew Chem Int Ed 1989 28 751 (c) R Corriu G Lanneau C Priou Angew
Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1130 (d) M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1022 (e) H R
G Bender E Niecke M Nieger J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 3314 (f) M Driess S Rell
H Pritzkow Chem Commun 1995 253 (g) M Driess H Pritzkow S Rell U Winkler
Organometallics 1996 15 1845 (h) M Driess S Block M Brym M T Gamer Angew
Chem Int Ed 2006 45 2293 (i) S Yao S Block M Brym M Driess Chem Commun
2007 3844 (j) V Y Lee M Kawai A Sekiguchi H Ranaivonjatovo J Escudieacute
Organometallics 2009 28 6625 (k) B Li T Matsuo D Hashizume H Fueno K Tanaka
K Tamao J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 13222
127 (a) C H Lai M D Su S Y Chu Inorg Chem 2002 41 1320 (b) R Pietschnig A
Orthaber Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4570 (c) C H Chen M D Su Eur J Inorg Chem
2008 1241 (d) V Lattanzi S Thorwirth D T Halfen L A Mueck L M Ziurys P
Thaddeus J Gauss M C Mccarthy Angew Chem Int Ed 2010 49 5661
128 S Inoue W Wang C Praumlsang M Asay E Irran M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2011 133
2868
129 (a) R Appel W A Paulen Angew Chem Int Ed 1981 20 869 (b) V Cappello J
Baumgartner A Dransfeld K Hassler Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4589
130 M Igarashi M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12660
131 F A Cotton G Wilkinson C Murillo M Bochmann Advanced Inorganic Chemistry 1999
132 (a) N Wiberg C M M Finger K Polborn Angew Chem Int Ed 1993 32 1054 (b) M
Ichinohe M Toyoshima R Kinjo A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2003 125 13328
133 (a) A J Arduengo H V R Dias J C Calabrese F Davidson Inorg Chem 1993 32 1541
(b) N Kuhn T Kratz D Blaumlser R Boese Chem Ber 1995 128 245 (c) P A Rupar M C
Jennings K M Baines Organometallics 2008 27 5043 (d) A J Ruddy P A Rupar K J
Bladek C J Allan J C Avery K M Baines Organometallics 2010 29 1362
134 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch H Marsmann G Henkel Chem Ber 1997 130 1733
135 (a) D Morales-Morales C Grause K Kasaoka R O Redoacuten R E Cramer C M Jensen
Inorg Chim Acta 2000 300ndash302 958 (b) T Kimura Y Uozumi Organometallics 2006 25
4883 (c) R B Bedford M Betham J P H Charmant M F Haddow A G Orpen L T
Pilarski S J Coles M B Hursthouse Organometallics 2007 26 6346 (d) J Aydin K S
Kumar L Eriksson K J Szaboacute Adv Syn Catal 2007 349 2585 (e) J-F Gong Y-H
References
- 136 -
Zhang M-P Song C Xu Organometallics 2007 26 6487 (f) R A Baber R B Bedford
M Betham M E Blake S J Coles M F Haddow M B Hursthouse A G Orpen L T
Pilarski P G Pringle R L Wingad Chem Commun 2006 3880 (g) A V Polukeev S A
Kuklin P V Petrovskii S M Peregudova A F Smolyakov F M Dolgushin A A
Koridze Dalton Trans 2011 40 7201 (h) R B Bedford Y-N Chang M F Haddow C L
Mcmullin Dalton Trans 2011 40 9034
136 (a) C Watanabe T Iwamoto C Kabuto M Kira Angew Chem Int Ed 2008 47 5386 (b)
C Watanabe Y Inagawa T Iwamoto M Kira Dalton Trans 2010 39 9414
137 (a) G Tavcar S S Sen R Azhakar A Thorn H W Roesky Inorg Chem 2010 49 10199
(b) R Azhakar S P Sarish H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Inorg Chem 2011 50 5039
138 W Chen P J Mccormack K Mohammed W Mbafor S M Roberts J Whittall Angew
Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4141
139 (a) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Organometallics 2008 27
3325 (b) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Bull Chem Soc Jpn
2009 82 793
140 (a) F Baumann E Dormann Y Ehleiter W Kaim J Kaumlrcher M Kelemen R Krammer D
Saurenz D Stalke C Wachter G Wolmershaumluser H Sitzmann J Organomet Chem 1999
587 267 (b) F Hung-Low C A Bradley Organometallics 2011 30 2636 (c) F Hung-Low
J P Krogman J W Tye C A Bradley Chem Commun 2012 48 368
141 R Azhakar R S Ghadwal H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Chem Asian J 2012 7 528
142 R S Ghadwal R Azhakar K ProPper J J Holstein B Dittrich H W Roesky Inorg
Chem 2011 50 8502
143 J Li S Merkel J Henn K Meindl A DoRing H W Roesky R S Ghadwal D Stalke
Inorg Chem 2010 49 775
144 M Ingleson H Fan M Pink J Tomaszewski K G Caulton J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
1804
145 A Schnepf Z Anorg Allg Chem 2006 632 935
146 (a) M D Rausch R A Genetti J Org Chem 1970 35 3888 (b) F Ungvary A Sisak L
Markoacute J Organomet Chem 1980 188 373
147 (a) E Erdik Tetrahedron 1992 48 9577 (b) P Knochel R D Singer Chem Rev 1993 93
2117 (c) M Rottlaumlnder P Knochel Tetrahedron Lett 1997 38 1749
148 (a) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1978 17 505 (b) K P C Vollhardt Angew Chem
Int Ed 1984 23 539 (c) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1985 24 248 (d) W Hess
J Treutwein G Hilt Synthesis 2008 2008 3537 (e) C J Scheuermann B D Ward New J
Chem 2008 32 1850 (f) T Shibata K Tsuchikama Org Biomol Chem 2008 6 1317 (g)
K Tanaka Chem Asian J 2009 4 508 (h) J A Varela C Saaacute Synlett 2008 2008 2571
149 (a) G Hilt C Hengst W Hess Eur J Org Chem 2008 2008 2293 (b) A Geny N Agenet
L Iannazzo M Malacria C Aubert V Gandon Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 1810 (c)
C C Eichman J P Bragdon J P Stambuli Synlett 2011 2011 1109
150 (a) Y Wakatsuki H Yamazaki Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1985 58 2715 (b) Y B Taarit Y
Diab B Elleuch M Kerkani M Chihaoui Chem Commun 1986 402 (c) H Nehl Chem
Ber 1994 127 2535 (d) C Wang X Li F Wu B Wan Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
7162
References
- 137 -
151 G M Sheldrick SHELX-97 Program for Crystal Structure Determination Universitaumlt
Goumlttingen (Germany) 1997
152 P Schlack G Keil Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1963 661 72
Appendix
- 138 -
7 APPENDIX
71 Abbreviations
Ada adamantanyl MHz Megahertz
Ar aryl min minute(s)
mmol millimole(ar)
MS mass spectrometry
B3LYP Beckersquos three-parameter hybrid
functional using the Lee Yang
and Parr correlation ldquofunctionalrdquo MW molecular weight
BINAP 22rsquo-(Ph2P)2-11rsquo-binaphthyl mz masscharge
br broad nacnac HC(MeC=N-Dip) 2minus
tBu tert-butyl Naph naphthyl
degC Celsius degree NBO natural bond orbital
ca about NHC N-Heterocyclic Carbene
calc calculated NICS nucleus independent chemical shift
CBD cyclobutadiene NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
cod COD 15-cyclooctadiene NPA natural population analysis
Cp cyclopentadienyl Ph phenyl
d doublet ppm parts per million
DCM dichloromethane iPr iso-propyl
DFT density functional theory q quartet
Dip 26-iPr2C6H3 R organic substituent
EI electron impact ionization RT room temperature
equiv equivalent(s) s singlet strong
ESI electrospray ionization sept septet
Et ethyl t triplet
eV electronvolt THF tetrahydrofuran
Fc ferrocendiyl Tip 246-iPr2C6H2
g gram(s) TMEDA tetramethylethyldiamine
h hour(s) TMS tetramethylsilane
HOMO highest occupied molecular orbital TS transition state
Hz Hertz TZVP triple-zeta valence polarization
IR infrared
K Kelvin
TZVDP TZVP two sets of polarization
functions aL PhC(
tBuN)2
minus UV-vis ultraviolet-visible
VE valence electron LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital vs very strong
M Metal VT variable temperature
m multiplet medium w weak
Me methyl WBI Wiberg Bond Index
Mes mesityl 246-Me3-C6H2 δ chemical shift
Appendix
- 139 -
GeN
N
GeN
Dip
Dip
DipCl
N
SnN
Dip
Dip
GeNN
SnN
Dip
DipDip
N
Dip
6 7
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation
1 2 3 4
5 8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22
Appendix
- 140 -
23 24 25 26
27 28 29
30 31 32 33
34 35 36
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph
Si
Cl
37 38 39 40
Appendix
- 141 -
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
41 42 43
44 45 46
47a 47b 48a 48b
Appendix
- 142 -
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details
Table 731 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 3 4 5
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C50 H88 Ge2 K2 N2 O4
100460
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
106989(7) pm
114137(7) pm
122625(8) pm
74158(6) deg
76395(6) deg
83400(5) deg
139807(16)
1
1193
1263
536
028 x 02 x 018
326 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-13lt=klt=13
-14lt=llt=14
12268
4910 [R(int) = 00358]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 094847
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4910 0 281
0940
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00638
R1 = 00538 wR2 = 00666
0456 and -0223
C41 H5 Ge N3
66650
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
91129(6) pm
113531(7) pm
190282(10) pm
100360(5) deg
101854(5) deg
98627(5) deg
185918(19)
2
1191
0855
716
039 x 012 x 007
297 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-13lt=klt=13
-22lt=llt=22
14570
6543 [R(int) = 00560]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
0943 and 0777
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6543 0 420
0785
R1 = 00399 wR2 = 00513
R1 = 00853 wR2 = 00566
0577 and -0317
C66 H102 Ge4 K2 N4 O2
135208
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
12370(3) pm
148433(14) pm
188725(19) pm
90059(8)deg
96311(14)deg
90082(13)deg
34442(10)
2
1304
1892
1416
030 x 025 x 015
292 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-15lt=klt=17
-14lt=llt=22
17371
6032 [R(int) = 00487]
995
Analytical
0807 and 0584
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6032 2 364
0911
R1 = 00424 wR2 = 00801
R1 = 00874 wR2 = 00885
0497 and -0457
Appendix
- 143 -
Table 732 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 6 8 12
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C46 H65 Ge2 N3
80519
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
44536(2) pm
98204(5) pm
218135(10) pm
90deg
116030(4)deg
90deg
85727(7)
8
1248
1436
3408
038 x 024 x 010
305 to 2500deg
-49lt=hlt=52
-10lt=klt=11
-24lt=llt=25
20162
7493 [R(int) = 00954]
992
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 074676
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7493 0 476
0917
R1 = 00559 wR2 = 00778
R1 = 01461 wR2 = 00966
0590 and -0578
C46 H65 Ge N3 Sn
85129
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
867780(10) pm
120514(4) pm
210797(6) pm
96333(2)deg
97393(2)deg
99141(2)deg
213908(10)
2
1322
1320
888
016 x 014 x 012
295 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-14lt=klt=14
-25lt=llt=25
16936
7496 [R(int) = 00251]
994
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099037
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7496 0 495
1001
R1 = 00309 wR2 = 00706
R1 = 00437 wR2 = 00733
1468 and -0424
C37 H48 N2
52077
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108485(5) pm
127284(7) pm
132348(4) pm
65748(4)deg
86290(3)deg
71699(5)deg
157759(12)
2
1096
0063
568
029 x 022 x 018
298 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13428
5541 [R(int) = 00203]
998
None
09888 and 09820
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5541 0 364
1029
R1 = 00439 wR2 = 00900
R1 = 00633 wR2 = 00963
0188 and -0193
Appendix
- 144 -
Table 733 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 14 16 17
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H46 Cl Ge N2
62680
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117621(2) pm
175495(4) pm
166051(3) pm
90deg
107053(2)deg
90deg
327691(11)
4
1270
1044
1324
040 x 032 x 022
342 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-19lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=18
16923
5742 [R(int) = 00250]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 082078
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5742 0 378
1044
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00709
R1 = 00496 wR2 = 00742
0736 and -0362
C37 H46 Ge N2
59135
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108388(6) pm
127885(7) pm
132778(4) pm
66971(4)deg
85749(3)deg
71833(5)deg
160695(13)
2
1222
0980
628
029 x 015 x 007
307 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13501
5636 [R(int) = 00366]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 092510
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5636 0 369
1031
R1 = 00489 wR2 = 01180
R1 = 00691 wR2 = 01242
0539 and -0501
C37 H49 Ge N3
60838
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117714(4) pm
174309(6) pm
166868(6) pm
90deg
106866(4)deg
90deg
32766(2)
4
1233
0964
1296
030 x 023 x 019
342 to 2500deg
-8lt=hlt=13
-10lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=16
12816
5749 [R(int) = 00325]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 095425
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5749 0 378
1060
R1 = 00464 wR2 = 01084
R1 = 00699 wR2 = 01133
1717 and -0738
Appendix
- 145 -
Table 734 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 18 20 22
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H48 Ge N2 O
60936
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117560(3) pm
174116(5) pm
166421(4) pm
90deg
106992(3)deg
90deg
325778(15)
4
1242
0971
1296
031 x 014 x 005
343 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-20lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=19
23624
5720 [R(int) = 00371]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 083390
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5720 0 379
1018
R1 = 00336 wR2 = 00752
R1 = 00516 wR2 = 00789
0521 and -0366
C28 H38 N2
40260
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
94924(4) pm
256583(9) pm
107465(5) pm
90deg
110403(5)deg
90deg
245320(18)
4
1090
0063
880
017 x 015 x 013
343 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=10
-30lt=klt=27
-12lt=llt=11
8561
4313 [R(int) = 00209]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099057
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4313 0 281
1041
R1 = 00476 wR2 = 01015
R1 = 00771 wR2 = 01083
0253 and -0194
C28 H37 Cl Ge N2 O
52564
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
89021(3) pm
107319(4) pm
151176(6) pm
75734(4)deg
74781(3)deg
75311(3)deg
132282(8)
2
1320
1281
552
020 x 012 x 008
354 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-12lt=klt=12
-15lt=llt=17
9246
4654 [R(int) = 00211]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086160
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4654 0 304
0946
R1 = 00274 wR2 = 00579
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00597
0394 and -0264
Appendix
- 146 -
Table 735 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 23 27 28
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C28 H36 Cl2 Ge N2
54408
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
279616(13) pm
113538(3) pm
177729(7) pm
90deg
109718(5)deg
90deg
53115(4)
8
1361
1374
2272
021 x 017 x 015
332 to 2500deg
-25lt=hlt=33
-7lt=klt=13
-21lt=llt=20
10951
4663 [R(int) = 00459]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091223
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4663 0 304
0856
R1 = 00372 wR2 = 00584
R1 = 00684 wR2 = 00620
0589 and -0533
C30 H48 Cl2 N4 O Si2
60780
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121593(5) pm
162045(6) pm
171248(7) pm
90deg
98177(4)deg
90deg
33399(2)
4
1209
0295
1304
030 x 015 x 005
335 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=13
-16lt=klt=19
-20lt=llt=20
23741
5865 [R(int) = 00491]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086688
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5865 172 490
1035
R1 = 00543 wR2 = 01080
R1 = 00905 wR2 = 01194
0310 and -0412
C30 H46 N4 O Si2
53489
150(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Fdd2
31188(2) pm
39120(3) pm
102620(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
125204(14)
16
1135
0141
4640
031 x 011 x 007
334 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=36
-46lt=klt=45
-12lt=llt=12
11517
4372 [R(int) = 00656]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 097469
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4372 1 346
0897
R1 = 00488 wR2 = 00604
R1 = 00754 wR2 = 00650
0328 and -0229
Appendix
- 147 -
Table 736 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 29 30 31
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C38 H58 N4 Ni O Si2
70177
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
98776(8) pm
129530(11) pm
155488(13) pm
81634(7)deg
83316(7)deg
82826(7)deg
19430(3)
2
1200
0594
756
020 x 009 x 007
330 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=11
-15lt=klt=13
-18lt=llt=18
14961
6828 [R(int) = 00414]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091998
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6828 0 474
0948
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00807
R1 = 00605 wR2 = 00853
0407 and -0240
C21 H41 N2 P Si3
43680
173(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Pbca
193556(7) pm
142399(4) pm
199777(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
55063(3)
8
1054
0239
1904
039 x 036 x 016
351 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=23
-16lt=klt=16
-23lt=llt=22
19912
4836 [R(int) = 00961]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09627 and 09125
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4836 18 287
0906
R1 = 00571 wR2 = 00889
R1 = 01270 wR2 = 01032
0316 and -0214
C44 H60 N4 P2 Si2
76308
173(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
23841(3) pm
101993(12) pm
19369(2) pm
90deg
108346(12)deg
90deg
44703(9)
4
1134
0184
1640
076 x 057 x 055
353 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=28
-12lt=klt=12
-20lt=llt=23
16197
3927 [R(int) = 00447]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09053 and 08725
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
3927 0 251
1034
R1 = 00618 wR2 = 01393
R1 = 00843 wR2 = 01489
0721 and -0649
Appendix
- 148 -
Table 737 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 33 36 40-endo
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C56 H98 Cl4 N6 Si6 Sn2
140312
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
105159(4) pm
127622(6) pm
269391(12) pm
90310(4)deg
90855(3)deg
102927(3)deg
35232(3)
2
1323
1000
1456
013 x 012 x 009
336 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-29lt=llt=32
25757
12396 [R(int) = 00546]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09154 and 08810
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
12396 536 816
2077
R1 = 01231 wR2 = 01906
R1 = 01495 wR2 = 01944
1510 and -4753
C91 H139 N8 O4 Pd Si4
162786
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
145970(8) pm
151441(15) pm
232982(16) pm
71358(8)deg
74666(5)deg
85365(6)deg
47063(6)
2
1149
0298
1750
019 x 013 x 011
327 to 2500deg
-17lt=hlt=17
-17lt=klt=18
-27lt=llt=27
41022
16531 [R(int) = 00735]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09679 and 09455
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
16531 284 1112
0908
R1 = 00558 wR2 = 01021
R1 = 01075 wR2 = 01128
0688 and -0448
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
10532(3) pm
20258(5) pm
18990(5) pm
90deg
10542(3)deg
90deg
39060(19)
4
1347
1927
1648
012 x 008 x 005
322 to 2500deg
-6lt=hlt=12
-22lt=klt=24
-22lt=llt=21
16887
6870 [R(int) = 01353]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 073478
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6870 213 498
1044
R1 = 00912 wR2 = 01786
R1 = 01680 wR2 = 02282
0570 and -1404
Appendix
- 149 -
Table 738 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 40-exo 41 42
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
165582(11) pm
127695(7) pm
198175(12) pm
90deg
107428(7)deg
90deg
39979(4)
4
1316
1883
1648
012 x 011 x 009
337 to 2499deg
-16lt=hlt=19
-15lt=klt=15
-23lt=llt=23
29049
7015 [R(int) = 00329]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 052405
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7015 0 436
1065
R1 = 00263 wR2 = 00574
R1 = 00318 wR2 = 00595
0357 and -0360
C45 H59 Co Fe N4 Si2
82692
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
119176(7) pm
160794(9) pm
220424(13) pm
90deg
94402(5)deg
90deg
42115(4)
4
1304
0831
1752
015 x 013 x 007
323 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=17
-16lt=llt=26
17786
7404 [R(int) = 01111]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 075122
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7404 0 490
1052
R1 = 00717 wR2 = 01045
R1 = 01208 wR2 = 01181
0467 and -0370
C45 H59 Co Fe Ge2 N4
91592
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121662(3) pm
160596(3) pm
220073(5) pm
90deg
93549(2)deg
90deg
429163(16)
4
1418
2134
1896
015 x 011 x 008
336 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=19
-26lt=llt=26
33743
7539 [R(int) = 00521]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 068509
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7539 0 521
1259
R1 = 00400 wR2 = 00965
R1 = 00536 wR2 = 01000
0376 and -0373
Appendix
- 150 -
Atomic coordinates of four unpublished compounds 20 22 23 and 33 are shown in
following tables
Table 739 Atomic coordinates (times10
4) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 20 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
N(1) 1159(1) 1176(1) 6836(1) 20(1)
C(1) 1706(2) 1650(1) 6995(1) 21(1)
N(2) -1293(2) 1547(1) 7057(1) 23(1)
C(2) 789(2) 2089(1) 7078(1) 20(1)
C(3) -626(2) 2021(1) 7158(1) 20(1)
C(4) 3331(2) 1741(1) 7112(2) 29(1)
C(5) 3920(2) 2283(1) 7590(2) 34(1)
C(6) 2795(2) 2681(1) 6772(2) 35(1)
C(7) 1375(2) 2643(1) 7102(2) 27(1)
C(8) -1522(2) 2482(1) 7295(2) 21(1)
C(9) -2759(2) 2643(1) 6227(2) 27(1)
C(10) -3571(2) 3077(1) 6331(2) 33(1)
C(11) -3169(2) 3358(1) 7498(2) 35(1)
C(12) -1948(2) 3199(1) 8573(2) 32(1)
C(13) -1133(2) 2765(1) 8467(2) 27(1)
C(14) -2537(2) 1417(1) 7503(2) 35(1)
C(15) -3250(3) 920(1) 6823(2) 61(1)
C(16) -1974(3) 1344(1) 9002(2) 65(1)
C(17) 2080(2) 741(1) 6834(2) 20(1)
C(18) 2353(2) 597(1) 5670(2) 23(1)
C(19) 3237(2) 160(1) 5724(2) 29(1)
C(20) 3821(2) -131(1) 6867(2) 32(1)
C(21) 3480(2) -1(1) 7977(2) 29(1)
C(22) 2598(2) 427(1) 7984(2) 23(1)
C(23) 2150(2) 562(1) 9174(2) 28(1)
C(24) 2101(2) 91(1) 10028(2) 39(1)
C(25) 3156(2) 987(1) 10029(2) 42(1)
C(26) 1602(2) 885(1) 4374(2) 29(1)
C(27) 2645(3) 974(1) 3586(2) 53(1)
C(28) 195(3) 588(1) 3539(2) 54(1)
Appendix
- 151 -
Table 7310 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 22 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 4751(1) 5279(1) 3913(1) 24(1)
Cl(1) 4863(1) 7474(1) 3443(1) 35(1)
O(1) 2591(1) 5468(1) 4187(1) 20(1)
N(1) 4469(2) 5098(1) 2623(1) 17(1)
C(1) 3006(2) 5278(2) 2582(1) 16(1)
N(2) 1482(2) 7765(2) 2375(1) 20(1)
C(2) 2432(2) 5062(2) 1801(1) 21(1)
C(3) 1144(2) 4228(2) 2174(2) 31(1)
C(4) -158(2) 4793(2) 2933(2) 30(1)
C(5) 534(2) 4844(2) 3741(1) 21(1)
C(6) 1810(2) 5684(2) 3440(1) 17(1)
C(7) 1063(2) 7152(2) 3205(1) 18(1)
C(8) 820(2) 9172(2) 2096(1) 26(1)
C(9) 397(3) 9344(2) 1159(2) 40(1)
C(10) 2058(3) 9950(2) 2035(2) 43(1)
C(11) -95(2) 7719(2) 3998(1) 18(1)
C(12) 434(2) 8108(2) 4652(1) 22(1)
C(13) -648(2) 8637(2) 5376(1) 27(1)
C(14) -2259(2) 8769(2) 5459(2) 30(1)
C(15) -2795(2) 8370(2) 4815(2) 30(1)
C(16) -1724(2) 7845(2) 4085(1) 24(1)
C(17) 5786(2) 4690(2) 1889(1) 19(1)
C(18) 6546(2) 3361(2) 1997(1) 22(1)
C(19) 7868(2) 3005(2) 1310(2) 28(1)
C(20) 8423(2) 3902(2) 552(2) 29(1)
C(21) 7656(2) 5209(2) 464(1) 26(1)
C(22) 6329(2) 5635(2) 1128(1) 21(1)
C(23) 5549(2) 7085(2) 991(2) 26(1)
C(24) 6701(3) 7932(2) 989(2) 41(1)
C(25) 4931(3) 7520(2) 84(2) 40(1)
C(26) 6001(2) 2315(2) 2820(2) 27(1)
C(27) 5775(3) 1139(2) 2495(2) 40(1)
C(28) 7175(3) 1863(2) 3471(2) 38(1)
Appendix
- 152 -
Table 7311 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 23 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 967(1) 7605(1) 1823(1) 18(1)
Cl(1) 1020(1) 9314(1) 2345(1) 29(1)
N(1) 1401(1) 6550(2) 2449(1) 19(1)
C(1) 1534(1) 5601(2) 2029(2) 16(1)
Cl(2) 198(1) 7116(1) 1640(1) 31(1)
N(2) 1101(1) 7630(2) 909(1) 15(1)
C(2) 1548(1) 5691(2) 1285(2) 15(1)
C(3) 1442(1) 6764(2) 777(2) 14(1)
C(4) 1615(1) 6867(2) 172(2) 19(1)
C(5) 1945(1) 5989(2) -42(2) 26(1)
C(6) 2098(1) 4966(2) 547(2) 22(1)
C(7) 1669(1) 4652(2) 844(2) 21(1)
C(8) 1625(1) 4444(2) 2470(2) 17(1)
C(9) 1229(1) 3875(2) 2611(2) 23(1)
C(10) 1291(1) 2785(2) 2983(2) 29(1)
C(11) 1764(2) 2263(3) 3232(2) 32(1)
C(12) 2169(1) 2832(3) 3121(2) 30(1)
C(13) 2101(1) 3920(2) 2737(2) 22(1)
C(14) 1621(1) 6630(2) 3327(2) 20(1)
C(15) 1219(1) 6848(3) 3699(2) 32(1)
C(16) 2052(1) 7524(2) 3583(2) 34(1)
C(17) 833(1) 8395(2) 248(2) 17(1)
C(18) 1019(1) 9542(2) 207(2) 19(1)
C(19) 745(1) 10248(3) -431(2) 29(1)
C(20) 315(1) 9844(3) -1011(2) 36(1)
C(21) 147(1) 8718(3) -973(2) 33(1)
C(22) 399(1) 7960(2) -350(2) 20(1)
C(23) 215(1) 6700(2) -377(2) 23(1)
C(24) 329(1) 6020(3) -1045(2) 34(1)
C(25) -341(1) 6612(3) -475(2) 31(1)
C(26) 1517(1) 10001(2) 789(2) 22(1)
C(27) 1914(1) 10083(3) 375(2) 32(1)
C(28) 1463(1) 11198(2) 1144(2) 36(1)
Appendix
- 153 -
Table 7312 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 33 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Sn(1) 4689(1) 4918(1) 3222(1) 24(1)
Sn(2) 5822(1) 5994(1) 1674(1) 30(1)
Cl(1) 4488(3) 6215(2) 3883(1) 38(1)
Cl(2) 3266(2) 3378(2) 3638(1) 39(1)
Cl(3) 7188(2) 7769(2) 1449(1) 43(1)
Cl(4) 6104(3) 5090(3) 888(1) 57(1)
Si(1) 6825(2) 4259(2) 3587(1) 17(1)
Si(2) 8610(3) 6420(2) 3531(1) 28(1)
Si(3) 9814(2) 4466(2) 3664(1) 26(1)
Si(4) 3648(2) 6680(2) 1375(1) 21(1)
Si(5) 1981(3) 4463(2) 1299(1) 30(1)
Si(6) 649(3) 6348(2) 1247(1) 30(1)
N(1) 6586(7) 2924(5) 3299(3) 20(2)
N(2) 6484(6) 3264(5) 4080(3) 16(2)
N(3) 8389(7) 5001(5) 3582(3) 23(2)
N(4) 3751(7) 7937(6) 1722(3) 22(2)
N(5) 3959(8) 7800(6) 936(3) 27(2)
N(6) 2102(7) 5865(6) 1329(3) 24(2)
C(1) 6258(8) 2470(7) 3742(4) 24(2)
C(2) 5630(8) 1296(7) 3832(3) 20(2)
C(3) 4328(9) 879(7) 3742(4) 30(2)
C(4) 3826(11) -209(8) 3826(4) 44(3)
C(5) 4613(12) -855(8) 3977(4) 47(3)
C(6) 5921(13) -450(9) 4064(4) 54(3)
C(7) 6446(10) 640(8) 3992(4) 36(3)
C(8) 6469(9) 2487(7) 2787(3) 22(2)
C(9) 7183(11) 3385(8) 2465(4) 43(3)
C(10) 5041(10) 2180(9) 2612(4) 44(3)
C(11) 7093(12) 1524(8) 2741(4) 49(3)
C(12) 6251(9) 3286(8) 4625(3) 26(2)
C(13) 4851(10) 2720(9) 4759(4) 48(3)
C(14) 7218(10) 2783(8) 4908(4) 39(3)
C(15) 6455(10) 4474(7) 4759(4) 31(2)
C(16) 7585(10) 6750(8) 3014(4) 43(3)
C(17) 8192(11) 7005(8) 4123(4) 44(3)
C(18) 10317(10) 7108(8) 3367(5) 55(4)
C(19) 10809(9) 4684(9) 3087(4) 39(3)
C(20) 9461(9) 3008(7) 3775(4) 30(2)
Appendix
- 154 -
C(21) 10726(10) 5062(9) 4232(4) 41(3)
C(22) 4144(9) 8514(7) 1315(3) 22(2)
C(23) 4603(10) 9700(7) 1286(3) 30(2)
C(24) 5918(10) 10173(8) 1332(4) 36(3)
C(25) 6315(12) 11289(9) 1292(4) 46(3)
C(26) 5453(14) 11926(9) 1203(4) 50(3)
C(27) 4158(14) 11457(9) 1158(4) 52(3)
C(28) 3726(12) 10336(8) 1194(4) 41(3)
C(29) 3829(9) 8261(7) 2260(3) 24(2)
C(30) 3041(13) 9101(10) 2358(4) 65(4)
C(31) 3223(10) 7251(8) 2537(4) 41(3)
C(32) 5223(10) 8649(10) 2438(4) 59(4)
C(33) 4252(10) 7910(8) 398(3) 30(2)
C(34) 3489(13) 8669(11) 158(4) 67(4)
C(35) 3812(13) 6813(9) 170(4) 60(4)
C(36) 5705(11) 8321(11) 315(4) 63(4)
C(37) 3040(11) 4003(8) 1778(4) 49(3)
C(38) 2431(11) 4059(8) 669(4) 44(3)
C(39) 310(10) 3713(8) 1447(5) 48(3)
C(40) -433(9) 5964(9) 1795(4) 43(3)
C(41) 921(10) 7835(9) 1209(4) 48(3)
C(42) -186(11) 5795(10) 650(4) 57(4)
C(43) -180(17) 209(14) 3445(7) 59(3)
C(44) -1099(17) -417(14) 3132(7) 58(3)
C(45) -949(16) -322(14) 2634(7) 58(2)
C(46) 75(15) 387(13) 2440(7) 58(2)
C(47) 979(17) 1008(14) 2750(6) 60(2)
C(48) 829(17) 908(15) 3251(7) 60(3)
C(49) 210(20) 473(17) 1887(7) 58(3)
C(43A) 798(17) 917(14) 2044(7) 58(3)
C(44A) 1381(17) 1418(14) 2465(7) 59(3)
C(45A) 931(16) 1088(14) 2929(7) 59(3)
C(46A) -134(15) 231(13) 2969(7) 58(2)
C(47A) -748(17) -263(14) 2547(6) 58(2)
C(48A) -289(17) 75(14) 2084(7) 58(2)
C(49A) -640(20) -111(17) 3469(8) 60(3)
C(50) 120(20) -463(18) -179(10) 106(6)
C(51) -640(30) -620(20) 236(10) 106(6)
C(52) -730(20) 250(20) 530(10) 107(6)
C(53) -70(30) 1260(20) 404(11) 109(6)
C(54) 680(20) 1409(19) -10(11) 107(6)
C(55) 780(30) 558(19) -303(11) 106(6)
C(56) 250(30) -1390(20) -499(12) 120(7)
Appendix
- 155 -
C(57) 575(16) 499(14) 4873(6) 52(3)
C(58) 807(18) -512(14) 4941(8) 53(3)
C(59) -138(17) -1326(14) 5128(7) 55(3)
C(60) -1333(18) -1140(15) 5253(8) 57(3)
C(61) -1572(16) -130(15) 5187(7) 56(3)
C(62) -620(17) 686(15) 5000(8) 53(3)
C(63) 1600(20) 1369(17) 4669(9) 59(5)
Appendix
- 156 -
74 Publications in this dissertation
1 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Stephan Enthaler and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167-6171 Angew Chem 2012 124 6271-6275
Bis(silylenyl)- and Bis(germylenyl)-Substituted Ferrocenes Synthesis Structure and Catalytic
Applications of Bidentate Silicon(II)-Cobalt Complex
2 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Elisabeth Irran and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691-3694 Angew Chem 2012 124 3751-3754
Synthesis and unexpected coordination of a silicon(II)-based SiCSi pincerlike arene to
palladium
3 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 6490-6494
Reactivity of N-Heterocyclic germylene toward ammonia and water
4 Shenglai Yao Yun Xiong Wenyuan Wang and Matthias Driess
Chem Eur J 2011 17 4890-4895
Synthesis structure and reactivity of a pyridine-stabilized germanone
5 Shigeyoshi Inoue Wenyuan Wang Carsten Praesang Matthew Asay Elisabeth Irran and
Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 2868ndash2871
An ylide-like phosphasilene and striking formation of a 4π-electron resonance-stabilized 24-
disila-13-diphosphacyclo- butadiene
6 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890ndash15892
An isolable bis-silylene oxide (ldquodisilylenoxanerdquo) and its metal coordination
7 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Chem Commun 2009 2661ndash2663
An unsymmetric substituted digermylene with a Ge(I)ndashGe(I) bond and synthesis of a
germylenendashstannylene with a Ge(I)ndashSn(I) bond
8 Wenyuan Wang Shenglai Yao Christoph van Wuellen and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640ndash9641
A cyclopentadienide analogue containing divalent germanium and a heavy cyclobutadiene-
like dianion with an unusual Ge4 Core
Appendix
- 157 -
75 Curriculum Vitae
Personal Data
Date and Place of Birth 17th
January 1976 in Nei Mongol China
Nationality Chinese
Education
1982-1987 Elementary School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1987-1993 High School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1993-1997 Department of Chemistry Inner Mongolia Normal University (China)
Bachelor Chemistry
071997 Bachelor of Chemistry education
2003-2007 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
Diplom Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
012008 Diplom of Science Degree
2008-2012 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
PhD Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
Herein I affirm that this dissertation was finished independently at the ldquoInstitut fuumlr
Chemierdquo at the ldquoTechnischen Universitaumlt Berlinrdquo under the guidance of
Prof Dr Matthias Driess where all references and additional aid sources have been
appropriately cited
Wenyuan Wang
Berlin Juli 2012
Die vorliegende Arbeit entstand in der Zeit von Feb 2008 bis Jul 2012 unter der
Betreuung von Prof Dr Matthias Driess am Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen
Universitaumlt Berlin
Von Herzen kommend gilt mein Dank meinem verehrten Lehrer
Herrn Professor Dr Matthias Drieszlig
fuumlr die Aufnahme in seinen Arbeitskreis fuumlr seine engagierte Unterstuumltzung
und fuumlr die Forschungsfreiheit
My heartfelt thanks go out to
Prof Dr Thomas Braun for his acceptance of the second commentator ship
Prof Dr Peter Hildebrandt for his acceptance of the chairman
Prof Dr Shigeyoshi Inoue and Prof Dr Christoph van Wuumlllen for DFT calculations
and composition assistance during the course of my PhD work and Dr Stephan
Enthaler for the investigation of the catalytic activity
Dr Shenglai Yao Dr Carsten Praesang Dr Andreas Bruumlck Dr Anne Adams Robert
Adams Ms Marianna Tsaroucha Mr Gengwen Tan Mr Daniel Gallego and Mr
Paul Ensle for useful discussions synthetic suggestions composition and
modification assistance during the course of my PhD work
My laboratory coworkers Mr Stefan Schutte for creating a wonderful lab atmosphere
and Ms Paula Nixdorf Dr Elisabeth Irran for X-ray crystal structure determinations
and solutions Dr Jan-Dirk Epping Dr Heinz-Juumlrgen Kroth and Mr Manfred
Dettlaff for NMR measurements Ms Sigrid Imme for CHN and IR measurements
Mr Robert Rudolph for the measurements of cyclic voltammetry
Ms Andrea Rahmel and all members of my work group for their hail-fellow help
friendship and years of harmonious work together and for their acting as guides in
my living and discovery in all things in Germany
I sincerely thank my parents my wife Xiaoxia Zhao and Prof GuoXingBaTu for
selfless support and encouragement of my study in Germany
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the
Cluster of Excellence ldquoUnifying Concepts in Catalysisrdquo (Unicat)
Table of contents
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds 1
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements 5
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores 8
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands 16
2 MOTIVATION 21
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 23
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates 23
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4 23
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8 28
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5 30
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6 34
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8 35
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8 36
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8 38
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene 40
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands 40
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16 42
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O 45
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23 48
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28 51
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28 52
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel 55
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31 57
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30 59
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31 61
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 65
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34 68
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35 68
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII complex 36 71
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism 74
Table of contents
ii
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 76
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40 76
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40 80
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45 83
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts 85
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 89
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION 98
51 General section 98
52 Analytical methods 99
53 Starting Materials 101
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds 102
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4 102
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5 103
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6 104
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8 105
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 107
526 The new chlorogermylene 14 108
527 The new germylene 16 109
528 Aminogermylene 17 110
529 Germylene hydroxide 18 111
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20 112
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22 113
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23 114
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27 115
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28 116
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29 117
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30 118
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31 119
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 120
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35 120
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36 121
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38 123
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40 124
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41 125
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42 126
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44 127
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45 128
Table of contents
iii
6 REFERENCES 129
7 APPENDIX 138
71 Abbreviations 138
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation 139
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details 142
74 Publications in this dissertation 156
75 Curriculum Vitae 157
Introduction
- 1 -
1 INTRODUCTION
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds
Generally main-group elements higher than of the third period are classified as
ldquoheavy main-group elementsrdquo some of which show abnormal physical and chemical
properties For example Br(VII) is a stronger oxidant than Cl(VII) This different
behavior of high-valent main-group elements can be attributed to the relativistic
effect[1]
of electrons The contraction of all s-orbitals triggered by the relativistic effect
leads to a greater energy difference between s- and p-orbitals in higher period
elements which increases the difficulty of a sp-hybridation Moreover the energy
difference between s- and p-orbitals for elements in the d-district of the fourth period
and f-district of the sixth period vary unconventionally resulting in the so called
ldquosecondary periodicityrdquo of forth and sixth period elements Therefore ns2 electrons in
the valence shell of heavy main-group elements play an essential role for their
chemical properties[2]
During the organometallic research of main group elements a
series of novel compounds have been discovered and new synthetic methods as well
as theoretical insights in their chemistry have been developed and summarized[3]
In whole periodic table the difference of property in the group 14 elements (tetrels)
is maximal[4]
In comparison to carbon compounds of Si Ge Sn and Pb are very
different referring to the physical properties chemical behavior and structural features
The theory for carbon chemistry cannot be fit for the chemistry of heavy group 14
elements A typical example is the synthesis of compounds with a silicon-oxygen
double bond (Si=O silanone) Beginning last century the english chemist Frederic
Stanley Kipping manufactured many silicon-carbon compounds and discovered
thereby resin-like products which he called ldquosilicone of ketonesrdquo Kipping coined the
word ldquosiliconerdquo in 1901 to describe polydiphenylsiloxane by analogy of its formula
(Ph2SiO) with the formula of the ketone benzophenone (Ph2CO) Kipping was well
Introduction
- 2 -
aware that polydiphenylsiloxane is polymeric whereas benzophenone is monomeric
and noted that ldquosiliconerdquo and Ph2CO had very different chemistry[5]
The german chemist Richard Muumlller and the american chemist Eugene G Rochow
found almost at the same time a possibility for the industrial production of
dimethyldichlorosilane (Me2SiCl2) the most important precursor for the production of
the silicone in the 1940s[6]
The procedure today is called Muumlller Rochow synthesis
(Scheme 11) From that many researchers synthesized various silicone products but
crystallographically characterized complexes with a donor-stabilized Si=O double
bond were published at the beginning of this century by our group These are the
silanoic ester I1[7]
the carbene-coordinated silanone I2[8]
and the ketone-coordinated
silanone I3[9]
(Scheme 12) The Si=O double bond distance (1532 pm) in I3 is shorter
than the ones in I1 (1579 pm) and I2 (1541 pm) and represents the shortest Si-O
distance in all molecular Si=O compounds hitherto reported[10]
Scheme 11 Muumlller Rochow silicone synthesis
Scheme 12 Isolable donor-stabilized silanoic ester I1 and silanone I2 and I3
The hundred-year story of silicones to monomeric species bearing Si=O double
bonds shows that the silicon atom prefers σ-bonds over double bond (σ- and π-bonds)
That means the classical π-bond is not of first choice for heavy main-group
elements[11]
In other words not only E=X (E = heavy main-group elements X = C N
O) but also E=Ersquo (Ersquo = heavy main-group elements) systems are difficult to stabilize
Introduction
- 3 -
because they easily form σ-bonded corresponding polymers Consequently it is very
challenging to study compounds of heavy main group elements in their low oxidation
state Especially the study of divalent Si Ge and Sn compounds with lone pair
electrons (metallylenes) is one of the most attractive research fields in contemporary
organometallic chemistry[3 12]
In the past thirty years numerous thermally stable unsaturated Si Ge Sn
compounds were isolated which show extremely impressive chemistry[12d 13]
The
difference between C-C and Si-Si double bond is now well-understood[3a]
Very
different reaction mechanisms for the formation of such doubly-bonded carbon and
silicon compounds were throughly discussed The classical C-C double bond can
readily be explained by the valence bond theory and hybridization[14]
The bonding
state in those heavier alkene analogues can be explained by two sets of ns2rarrp
0 donor-
acceptor interactions between two metallylene monomers (Scheme 1 3)[3 15]
Similarly heavier alkyne analogues of main-group elements present also two dative
bonds of ns2rarrp
0 donor-acceptor interactions plus a normal σ-bond between two pz
orbitals[3 12d]
(Scheme 13) But the sp-hybridization for heavy main-group elements
is not realized in their low-valent compounds because sp-hybridization does not lead
to strengthing of terminal σ-bonds to the ligands R
Scheme 13 Nonclassical multiple bond features (E = heavy main-group elements)
Introduction
- 4 -
Until the end of the last century the synthesis of heavier alkyne analogues was an
unsolved problem because of the lack of suitable large substituent At the first the
isolation of a diplumbylene I4[16]
ArrsquoPb-PbArrsquo (Arrsquo = 26-(Tip)2C6H3 Tip = 246-
iPr3C6H2) was reported by Power in 2000 (Scheme 14) As is evident from the
structural parameters of ArPb-PbAr the triple bond character has vanished completely
The Pb-Pb distance (319 pm) in ArPb-PbAr is longer even than that of a normal Pb-
Pb single bond (308 pm) and the CAr-Pb bond vectors are perpendicular to the Pb-Pb
axes (943deg) These two facts illustrated a complete lack of hybridization of lead
atoms and almost exclusive use of p-orbitals in σ-bonds[17]
In 2002 Power reported
the distannyne ArSnequivSnAr I5[18]
(Ar = 26-Dip2C6H3 Dip = 26-iPr2C6H3) containing
a SnequivSn bond length of 2668 pm shorter compared to Sn-Sn single bonds[19]
and
with multiple bond character A trans bent configuration was also observed in I5 but
the Sn-Sn-C angle with 1252deg is far from a perpendicular situation as in I4 In the
same year Power described the first digermyne I6[20]
ArGeequivGeAr In this case the
Ge-Ge bond length of 2285 pm was found to be considerably shorter than normal Ge-
Ge single[13f]
(244 pm) and Ge-Ge double bonds (221-246 pm) indicated multiple
bonding character[21]
The trans-bending angle of Ge-Ge-C (1288deg) in digermyne I6
is slightly larger than that in distannyne I5
Scheme 14 The first isolated formal alkyne analogues of group 14
Introduction
- 5 -
With the appearance of the first structurally characterized disilyne I7[22]
reported by
Sekiguchi the series of heavier alkyne congeners was completed in 2004 The SiequivSi
bond length with 2062 pm was considerably shorter than that of typical Si-Si single
bonds (235 pm) and somewhat shorter than that of typical Si-Si double bonds[13b]
(216 pm) The molecular structure of compound I7 with a Si-Si-Silyl angle of 1374deg
reveals a heavily trans-bent configuration indicating the presence of a nonclassical
triple bond The theoretical calculation approved the trans bent structure and a bond
order of three
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements
Isolable carbenes and heavier carbene analogues (metallylenes silylenes R2Si
germylenes R2Ge stannylenes R2Sn plumbylenes R2Pb) can be defined as
stabilized divalent monomers of group 14 elements which can impossibly dimerize or
polymerize continuously due to the thermodynamic andor kinetic stabilization As
already mentioned above in contrast to carbon heavier group 14 elements have a low
tendency of sp-hybridization[11]
Accordingly consists of ns2 valence electrons as a
lone pair and use usually three p-valence-orbitals for the formation of their divalent
species[12c]
The ground state of R2E (E = Si Ge Sn Pb) is thereby a singlet while
the ground state of R2C is a triplet (Scheme 15) because two nonbonding electrons
locate in sp-hybrid orbitals[23]
In order to obtain at ambient temperature isolable metallylenes there are today two
particularly effective stabilization methods First of all these unsaturated compounds
can be thermodynamically stabilized by donor electron delocalization to empty p-
orbital as in the case of silylene I8[24]
and silyliumylidene cation I9[25]
(Scheme 16)
In addition the coordination of ns2 electrons to the empty p-orbital of the neighbor
molecule can be kinetically prevented by bulky substituents which was shown by the
Introduction
- 6 -
successful synthesis of the dialkyl silylene I10[26]
that is stabilized only by the steric
hindrance of four large silyl groups and C-SirarrSi hyperconjugation
Scheme 15 Ground states of triplet-carbene and singlet-metallylenes
Scheme 16 Stabilization of silylenes by π-electron delocalization andor steric
hindrance I8 I9 and hyperconjugation I10
The synthesis of heavier carbene analogues depends on suitable starting materials
with oxidation state II Practically in the case of tin and lead the dihalides SnCl2 and
PdCl2 are stable and suitable as starting materials for isolable SnII and Pb
II
organometallic compounds Many germylenes were synthesized employing the known
germanium dichloride complex GeCl2middotdioxane which is easily available[27]
The
carbene-stabilized SiIICl2
[28] (NHCrarrSiCl2 NHC = (HC-NDip)2C
[29]) was reported
recently by Roesky However it is not a trouble-free starting material for silicon(II)
chemistry due to the difficult removing of by-products derivated by the bulky carbene
(NHC) Otherwise divalent compounds of GeII Sn
II and Pb
II are more stable than the
corresponding SiII analogues Therefore the metallylene synthetic chemistry faces the
main difficulty in the synthesis and isolation of functionalized silylene derivates
Accustomed synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes was summarized in
Scheme 17 Their feasibility was also proved by the preparation of new silylenes in
this work
Introduction
- 7 -
Scheme 17 Synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes
Usually N-heteroleptic silylenes are accessible from SiIV
-precursors to form SiII-
species using reductants such as Na K or their alloy KC8 lithium or magnesium
naphthalenide etc A usually silylenes[24 26 30]
like I13 with a five- or six-membered
ring system and some three-coordinated silylenes[31]
like I14 are accessible through
the reductive dehalogenation reactions presented in case A Suitable five-coordinated
SiIV
sources I15 could be treated with a non oxygenated strong base resulting in the
corresponding three-coordinated silylenes[32]
I16 The two-coordinated silylene I13
prepared through an acid-base reaction from its four-coordinated precursor was not
observed so far In case C silylenes I18 could be isolated by salt metathesis reaction
during that the halogen atom was substituted by a desired Rsub[33]
With these new
synthetic methods the generation of many imaginable SiII molecules is possible today
Especially more complicated metallylenes for example interconnected or spacer-
separated bis-metallylenes (see next page) can be obtained in good yield Thus more
reactivity will be found in their subsequent reactions
Introduction
- 8 -
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores
The discussion of diplumbylene I4 indicates the strong tendency to transformate a
bis-metallylene instead of triple bond form in the case of lead Scheme 18 shows the
resonance structures of triply bonded I19 and bis-metallylene I20 together with the
donor ligand coordinated interconnected bis-metallylene structure I21 Hitherto the
chemical research in this area made clear that silicon and germanium prefer the type
of structure I19 while the species of lead is more favorable in the state I20[12d]
Corresponding tin species have vacillant structural feature between I19 and I20
depending on the steric demand of R and the packing force in crystals[34]
The donor
ligand coordination with all heavier alkyne analogues leads to the donor-stabilized
bis-metallylene form I21 which possesses an E-E single σ-bond and two ns2 lone
pairs one at each of the E centers[35]
Scheme 18 Resonance structures of nonclassical triple bond and bis-metallylene
According to the bonding state all known bis-metallylenes can be discriminated in
two different types i) ldquointerconnected bis-metallylenesrdquo in which two E atoms are
directly connected by a chemical bond and ii) ldquospacer-separated bis-metallylenesrdquo in
which two EII atoms are separated by bridged atoms or by a broad spacer without an
E-E bond in the molecules[33a 36]
The isolation of bis-metallylenes of heavier group
14 elements has been a major synthetic challenge owing to their tendency to
polymerize Herein a review of this kind of compounds which appeared almost
suddenly just in the last two decades is given
Introduction
- 9 -
Interconnected bis-metallylenes
Interconnected bis-silylenes are shown in Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylene
examples were firstly reported by Robinson in 2008[35]
which are a carbene-stabilized
bis-silylene I22 with a SiI-Si
I bond (2393 pm) and a carbene-stabilized bis-silylene
I23 with a Si0=Si
0 double bond (2229 pm) One year later the Roesky group prepared
an interconnected bis-silylene I24[37]
stabilized by amidinato ligands with a SiI-Si
I
single bond (2413 pm) Compound I24 exhibits a gauche-bent geometry Another
amidinato donor-stabilized bis-silylene I25[38]
which was synthesized in last year by
Jones et al possesses trans-bent structure not the gauche-bent form The SiI-Si
I
distance (2489 pm) in I25 is longer than those in I22 and I24 because of the more
sterically hindered amidinato ligands In the same year the synthesis of the first
phosphine-stabilized bis-silylene I26[39]
could be achieved and fully characterized In
this molecule the Si-Si bond with the bond length of 2331 pm is visibly shorter than
those in related molecules Baceiredo et al described that the Si-Si fragment in I26
presents a certain multiple-bond character
Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylenes
Interconnected bis-germylenes are shown in Scheme 110 In 2006 Jones and
coworkers reported the first successful isolation of two stable bis-germylenes I27 and
Introduction
- 10 -
I28[40]
which are stabilized by an amidinate and a guanidinate ligand respectively
Their Ge-Ge distances (2672 and 2638 pm) show normal single bond character Two
years later Roesky prepared the bis-germylenes I29[41]
which exhibits a gauche-bent
geometry Since I29 is stabilized by a less bulky amidinate ligands the Ge-Ge bond
with the length of 2569 pm is shorter than those of examples before A different β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized bis-germylene I30[42]
was presented by the work group
of Leung in which the Ge-Ge bond length (2602 pm) is somewhere in between The
reduction of NHCrarrGeCl2 (NHC see Scheme 110) employing magnesium(I)
reagents[43]
furnished the carbene-stabilized bis-germylene I31[44]
with a Ge0=Ge
0
double bond (2349 pm) which is the homologous compound of I23 Theoretical
analyses of I31 suggest a singlet germanium(0) dimer (Ge=Ge) datively coordinated
by two NHC ligands In the last year Jones again reported a bis-germylene I32[38]
which is structurally comparable with I27 and I28 But the Ge-Ge distance in I32 is
similar with that of I30
Scheme 110 Interconnected bis-germylenes
Interconnected bis-stannylenes are shown in Scheme 111 Very interestingly the
introduction of SiMe3 instead of H at the para-position of the aryl ring in distannyne
I5 induced the first bis-stannylene I33[34]
without alteration of the steric crowding
near the tin center The small Sn-Sn-C angle (993deg) and the long Sn-Sn distance
(3066 pm) in I33 indicate two stannylene moieties connected with a single bond and
Introduction
- 11 -
without the sp-hybridization In the similar work of Power et al in 2010 the
introduction of GeMe3 substituents of aryl rings at the para-position resulted also in
single bonded bis-stannylene I34[45]
with Sn-Sn distances of 3077 pm and ldquosharprdquo
Sn-Sn-C bending angles of 978deg With the bis-stannylene I35[46]
Jambor showed that
without the use of bulky substituents such as 26-disubstituted aryl groups a bis-
stannylene can be stabilized by intramolecular NrarrSn interactions The less bulky
aryls (aryl = 26-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3) in I35 led to the shorter Sn-Sn single bond (2971
pm) and a trans-bent angle of 943deg as in the diplumbylene I4 The first amidinato
coordinated bis-stannylene I36[38]
with a Sn-Sn single bond was reported by Jones et
al last year Its structural features are highly similar to the germanium homologue
compound I32
Scheme 111 Interconnected bis-stannylenes
Spacer-separated bis-metallylenes and species containing several EII cores
Lappert and Veith reported on the isolation of divalent germanium and tin
compounds very early[47]
Many of these from the 1970s and 1980s that were
described without X-ray characterization will not be discussed here The spacer-
separated bis-germylene I37[48]
and bis-stannylene I38[48]
(Scheme 112) appeared
first of all of this compound class in 1988 The work group of Veith introduced a facile
Introduction
- 12 -
synthetic method by which tetralithium amide reacted with two equivalents of
GeCl2middotdioxane or SnCl2 to give the corresponding products in over 60 yield In 1990
two interesting germylenes I39[49]
and I41[50]
were reported by Lappert and Power In
comparison to the isolable isonitrile (R-N+equivC
minus) until now it was not possible to
stabilize its homologous derivates of the heavier group 14 elements Compounds I39
and I41 can be considered as the dimer (I39) and trimer (I41) formed after
oligomerization of the unstable germaisonitrile analogue (R-N+equivGe
minus) Nevertheless
compounds with two germylene moieties at the time could be seen as impressive
achievements in the divalent germanium chemistry Another dimer of germaisonitrile
bis-germylene I40[51]
was reported by Roesky in 1997 After this the first stable
dimeric silaisonitrile I42[52]
generated through the reduction of carbene stabilized
dichlorosilaimine (NHCrarrSi(Cl2)=NAr Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) with KC8 was presented
by the work group of Roesky in 2011 The lengthy synthetic protocol bulky protecting
groups and a low yield (21) of I42 indicate a more difficult synthetic chemistry
necessary for the synthesis of the latter silicon compound However a trimer (tris-
silylene) of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) the silicon analogue of I41 is now just a dream of
synthetic chemists
In 1991 two bis-stannylenes (micro-chlorotin(II) amides (micro-Cl-Sn-NR2)2) I43 (NR2 =
N(CMe2)2(CH2)3) and I44 (R = SiMe3) in which two stannylene moieties are bridged
by two chlorine atoms were synthesized by Lappert et al[53]
Surprisingly X-ray
analyses of the two crystals show that I43 is the cis-isomer but I44 has the trans-
configuration In contrast a new bis-stannylene (ClSn-micro-N(Naph)SiMe3)2 I45[54]
was
characterized with two bridged nitrogen atoms by the same work group The Sn-N
bonds of 2438 pm in I45 are much longer than the terminal Sn-N bonds of 2069 pm
in I44 The Sn-N-Sn-N ring in I45 is slightly puckered and bears trans-Cl atoms
Instead of halogen atoms in bis-germylene I46[55]
two terminal N atoms of the azide
groups bridge two germylene parts forming a planar four-membered Ge2N2 ring
Otherwise the germylene centers of I46 are tetracoordinated due to two additional
OrarrGe dative bonds The N-bridged three-core germylenes I47 and stannylenes I48
Introduction
- 13 -
were prepared by Veith in 1991[56]
For four of six molecules X-ray crystal structure
determinations have been carried out which reveal the molecules to be built of a
diamond-lattice-like skeleton The top N atom coordinates to all three germylene
(stannylene) parts and another N atoms bridge with the neighboring two germylene
(stannylene) parts The chair-form six-membered E3N3 ring contains three N-H bonds
and traps one halogen atom (Cl Br I) with the three hydrogen atoms
Scheme 112 Spacer-separated metallylenes I37-I48
The by 14-diamine molecules separated bis-stannylenes I50 and I51 were prepared
from the chlorostannylene dimer I44 and the corresponding dilithium diamide by
Lappert and co-workers in 1994 (Scheme 113)[57]
Bis-germylene I49 was similarly
prepared by the reaction of the GeII homologous derivate ClGeN(SiMe3)2 of I44 with
dilithium diaminobenzene and marked a new development at that time In 1997
Lappert et al reported a new 13-diamine bridged bis-stannylene I52 and a stannylene
I53 with the three SnII cores employing dilithium meta-diamide
[58] The synthesis of
I52 is similar to I50 while I53 was isolated by treatment of the substituted
Introduction
- 14 -
diaminobenzene with Sn(N(SiMe3)2)2 in a ratio of 23 Evidently the formation of I53
involves unexpected C-H activations of the 2-position of 13-diaminobenzene and
eliminations of amine HN(SiMe3)2 The 32 reaction of Sn(NMe2)2 with sterically
bulky aromatic amines (DipNH2 or MesNH2) in toluene can be controlled giving the
heteroleptic stannylenes I54 and I55[59]
in which sterically less bulky NMe2 groups
serve as bridges and one SnII center between two bulky R groups remains its two-
coordination The isolation of the first GeII and Sn
II amide dimers I56 and I57
bridged by the NH2 groups was presented in 2005[60]
They were synthesized by the
reaction of bulky low-valent organo GeII and Sn
II halides (ArE
IICl E = Ge Sn Ar see
Scheme 113) with dry ammonia The Ge2N2 or Sn2N2 cores in I56 and I57 are planar
with rhombohedral shapes and with acute angles near 80deg at Ge or Sn and wider
angles near 100deg at N
Wright 1997
I54 R = Mes I55 R = Dip
I52 Lappert 1997
SnNMe2
Sn
Me2N
NR
NR
NN
SiMe3
E
(Me3Si)2N
E
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
N
N
SiMe3
Sn
(Me3Si)2N
Sn
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
Lappert 1994
I49 E = Ge I50 E = Sn I51 Lappert 1994
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
I53 Lappert 1997
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
Sn
Sn
Power 2005
I56 E = Ge R = Dip
I57 E = Sn R = Tip
R
RE
NH2
E
H2N
R
R
Scheme 113 Spacer-separated metallylenes I49-I57
The discovery of the first spacer-separated bis-silylene I58 (Scheme 114) was
made by Lappert et al in 2005[61]
It was synthesized by reductive dehalogenation of
the bis-dichlorosilane precursor with KC8 With the bis-functionality of I58
eventually a macrocycle metal-complex could be formed but the rigid backbone does
not allow a chelating coordination to a single core In addition Power tried oxidative
Introduction
- 15 -
addition reactions of his Sn and Ge alkyne analogues (I5 and I6 Scheme 114) with
trimethyl silyl azide (Me3SiN3) and adamantanyl azide (Ada-N3) giving the spacer (N-
SiMe3 or N-Ada) separated bis-stannylenes I59[62]
and bis-germylene I60[63]
and with
azobenzene (PhN=NPh) giving the spacer (PhNNPh) separated bis-germylene I61[62]
and bis-stannylene I62[62]
respectively The similar reaction of bis-germylene I29
with azobenzene furnished also the addition product the spacer bridged bis-
germylene I63[64]
with simultaneous cleavage of the Ge-Ge single bond as observed
by Roesky in 2010 At the same time So et al activated the Si-Si single bond of bis-
silylene I24 with phenyl acetylene resulting in the ethylene bridged bis-silylene I64[65]
Many spacer separated bis-germylenes and bis-stannylenes[66]
(I65-I74) were
successfully designed and isolated by Hahn et al for the use as promising chelating
ligands in coordination reactions A few transition-metal complexes of them were
prepared by his research group too (see p 18)
Scheme 114 Spacer-separated metallylenes I58-I74
In 2011 after the synthesis of the first oxygen bridged bis-silylene[32a]
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2
minus) in the course of this PhD work other four analogous were reported
Introduction
- 16 -
which are oxygen bridged bis-germylenes I75[67]
I77[68]
bis-stannylene I78[68]
and
sulfur bridged bis-germylene I76[67]
(Scheme 115) Bis-germylene oxide I75 and
sulfide I76 were synthesized in the work group of So et al by the dehalogenation of
LGeCl (L = amidinate in I75) with KC8 and then the oxidation with trimethylamine
N-oxide (Me3NO) or with elemental sulfur Otherwise Powerrsquos new compounds I77
and I78 were accessible by oxidative addition of alkyne analogues I5 and I6 using the
stoichiometric oxygen transfer reagent pyridine N-oxide (C5H5NO) In the last two
decades several cubanes of attractive tetra-metallylenes with GeII Sn
II Pb
II like I79
were presented[69]
(Scheme 116) Because they are somewhat far from discussed
metallylenes in structural features and synthetic approaches they are not discussed
and shown in detail here The synthesis of the still unknown SiII analogue I80 a
tetramer of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) remains as a fascinating challenge
Scheme 115 New bis-metallylenes bridged by a single atom
Scheme 116 Cubane-like tetra-metallylenes of heavier group 14 elements
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands
The interaction between the central atom and the donor in transition-metal
complexes depends on their electron configuration There are two- and three-
coordinated metallylenes in which the empty np-orbitals are stabilized by
Introduction
- 17 -
intramolecular electron delocalization or by the third donor-ligand donation
respectively Therefore if two types of metallylenes serve as donor-ligands for
transition-metals the interaction of these p-orbitals with the corresponding metal d-
orbitals is essentially different For example two silylenerarrM complexes are shown
in Scheme 117 Complex I81 shows clearly σ-donorπ-acceptor interaction[70]
while
the Fe atom in complex I82[71]
contains only a σ-donor bond from the silylene subunit
In this sense three-coordinate metallylenes as σ-donor ligands are more similar to
isoelectronic triorganophosphine ligands[33a b]
in I83 (Scheme 117) In Table 11 the
difference of three-coordinate silylenes and triorganophosphines are compared and
shown in detail
Scheme 117 The σ-donorπ-acceptor or only σ-donor coordination
Table 11 Comparison of three-coordinate silylenes and phosphines
three-Coordinate silylenes Phosphines (PR3)[72]
Synthesis difficult synthetic approaches well-established synthetic procedures
Embellishment only few scaffolds are known numerous structural transformations
and various substituents of R
Stability air and moisture sensitive normally stable in air
Property easily oxidative addition
much stronger σ-donor ligand
multivariate chemical behavior
seldom oxidative addition
strong σ-donor ligand
predictable chemical behavior
Complex only few transition-metal complexes complexes with numerous metals
State of
Development
underdeveloped chemistry fully established
Introduction
- 18 -
In coordination chemistry the spacer separated bis-metallylenes are at the same
time bidentate chelating ligands despite almost all of them were not or could not be
used as chelating ligands Until 2008 only a few chelated transition-metal complexes
coordinated by isolable spacer separated bis-metallylenes were reported They are the
bis-germylene I65 coordinated Mo(CO)4 complex I65-Mo[66b]
and bis-stannylenes
I73 I74 coordinated Ni0 complexes
[66c] I73-Ni I74-Ni (Scheme 118) reported by
Hahn et al Another bis-germylene complex I29-Fe[64]
with two Fe cores presented
by Roesky in 2010 does not comprise chelating coordination at all The reason for the
lack of representative bis-metallylenes in coordination chemistry is that not only the
formation and isolation of such complexes are very difficult but also the design and
synthesis of bis-metallylenes themself are sometimes infeasible Additionally the air-
and water-sensitivity of these compounds causes many unexpected side-reactions In
general metallylene transition-metal complexes are still limited in using metallylenes
containing single EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn)
Scheme 118 Known complexes of spacer-separated bis-germylenes and stannylenes
The successful usage of bidentate phosphanes in many catalytic transformations
originates from their convenient electronic properties and the variable steric
protection Among those chelating bis-phosphane I84[73]
(BINAP Scheme 119) with
Introduction
- 19 -
backbone chirality can lead to excellent enantioselectivity compared to monodentate
phosphines With ferrocendiyl bridged ligands I85 bimetallic complexes are easily
prepared[74]
Furthermore bis-phosphane ligands like I86 are superior bridges for
heterodinuclear complexes in catalytic hydrogenation[75]
Pincer arenes consisting of
a central aromatic backbone linked to two phosphane parts by different spacers are
particularly attractive because of their feasible structural tuning with many choices of
donor groups[72 76]
Recently the chemistry of pincer-ligated transition-metal
complexes underwent rapid developments and has been used for several intriguing
chemical transformations[72b 77]
The coordination chemistry of the most common
pincer ligands such as NCN- PCP- and SCS-type ligands toward transition-metals in
I87 (Scheme 119) was explored extensively[72b 77]
Pincer arenes with stronger σ-
donor sites E than those provided by group 15 and 16 atoms are very attractive for the
synthesis of more electron-rich transition-metal complexes for activation of small
molecules On the other hand transition-metal complexes with ligands like I84-I87
containing EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn) were scarce before 2009
Scheme 119 Bidentate phosphanes for transition-metal complexes
The challenge of spacer-separated bis-metallylenes as novel bidentate σ-donor
ligands for transition-metal complexes are intriguing because of their unique structure
and their coordination ability Therefore transition-metal complexes with chelating
Introduction
- 20 -
bis-metallylenes which were not throughly uncovered[66b c 78]
have received more
and more attention To date the new development of bis-metallylene synthesis
enables the isolation of their transition-metal complexes containing EII-based
functional groups as chelating ligands These complexes may provide access to their
potential application in which they can play a key role as intermediates in transition-
metal catalyzed transformations[70c 79]
Motivation
- 21 -
2 MOTIVATION
As pointed out in the introduction the metallylene synthetic chemistry is a fast
developing field with a great potential to find novel metallylenes with new
functionalities which would be the basis for the development of new kinds of
transition-metal complexes I am particularly interested in the synthesis of new types
of compounds containing divalent group 14 elements and to study their coordination
properties towards transition-metals New metallylenes could serve as very strong σ-
donor ligands for the generation of transition-metal complexes with unusual high
electron density at the metal site which could possess unique chemical properties
The three reports of transition-metal complexes[66b c]
containing bidentate bis-
germylene (stannylene) ligands were discussed in the ldquoIntroductionrdquo of this work
This potential of bis-metallylenes used as chelating ligands in coordination chemistry
prompted me to investigate new transition-metal complexes along with the
development of a new low-valent Si Ge and Sn chemistry
In this work three main points will be addressed i) the design and synthesis of new
ligand stabilized heavier carbene analogous (metallylenes) and interconnected bis-
metallylenes containing low-valent Si Ge Sn ii) the exploration of synthetic
approaches towards different spacer separated (bridged) bis-metallylenes iii) the
investigation of the properties and coordination abilities of new metallylenes (bis-
metallylenes) to transition-metals
The β-diketiminato and amidinato scaffolds I and II were chosen for the
stabilization of the reactive divalent group 14 units (Scheme 21) The known
metallylene halogenide compounds[31a 32b 80]
III and IV were used as the direct
precursors for the preparation of novel mono- and bis-metallylene derivates
Motivation
- 22 -
Scheme 21 Synthesis of new metallylene derivates from precursors
Scheme 22 Coordination of new spacer-separated bis-metallylene to transition-metals
Using isolated products as precursors complexes with different electronic
configurations and activities can be obtained and further modified through
coordination to transition-metals and varying substituents as ligands (Scheme 22)
This development may provide new divalent group 14 element-based functional
ligands in coordination chemistry towards transition-metals As spacer units for the
bis-metallylenes should serve 13-functionalized arene ferrocene and chalcogen
elements (O S Se) The promising application of new metallylene-metal complexes
will be investigated as the precatalyst in organic reactions
Results and Discussion
- 23 -
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates
In this PhD work the abbreviation of nacnacmacr is used only for the Dip-substituted β-
diketiminato ligand[81]
(CH[CMe(NDip)]2macr Dip = 26-iPrC6H3) The synthesis of β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized germanium complexes (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
and
(nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
were reported through the reaction of GeCl2sdotdioxane or GeCl4
with the corresponding Li(nacnac) reagent These compounds can be obtained in high
yield after recrystallization and were used as starting materials for new low-valent
germanium derivates
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Treatment of β-diketiminato germylene chloride 1 with excess of elemental
potassium at ambient temperature in THF yielded the first cyclogermylidenide
derivative 3[83]
which was isolated by fractional crystallization from diethylether in
the form of its potassium salt in 33 yield as pale yellow crystals Moreover the
reduction of 1 led also to the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-
Dip which was isolated by fractional crystallization from hexane solution as yellow
crystals in 31 yield (Scheme 31) Both 3 and 4 have been characterized by NMR
spectroscopy (1H
13C) EI-mass spectrometry (only for 3) and correct elemental
analyses
Scheme 31 Synthesis of the germylenide potassium salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Results and Discussion
- 24 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3 displays two sets of doublets for the Dip-
methyl groups in the range from 108 to 112 ppm Two additional singlets at 184 and
262 ppm were assigned to methyl groups of the five-membered ring Resonances for
the CH of iso-propyl appears at 298 ppm as septets The resonance of the β-H proton
at the GeNC3 ring appears at δ = 618 ppm One set of resonances for aromatic
protons of Dip-groups appears in the range of 691-698 ppm In addition the
diethylether molecule was observed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy The molar ratio of
ether was determined by integration of the appropriate resonance signals in the 1H-
NMR spectrum of 3 This amounts to 22mol and the determined composition fits
well with the elemental analytical data
Complex 3 is an Et2O coordinated potassium germylene anion salt according to the
1H- and
13C-NMR spectra Its structure has been established by a single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 31 left) It reveals a dimeric half-sandwich complex
interconnected via intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds In the structure each half-
sandwich moiety consists of a K(OEt2)2 cation η5-coordinated to the anionic five-
membered planar GeNC3 ring The K1-Ge1 distance of 3449(1) pm is shorter than
the intermolecular K1-Ge1rsquo distance of 3573(1) pm It is noteworthy such shorter K-
Ge distances have been observed in a related dipotassium (18-crown-6)
tetraphenylgermol dianion (330 335 pm)[84]
as well as in a (18-crown-6)-solvated
potassium silylgermanides (342 pm) with a tetravalent germanium atom[85]
Accordingly the K-C(ring) distances in 3 (3092(2)-3330(2) pm) are also longer than
those observed in the aforementioned dipotassium germol dianion (288-317 pm) The
Ge1-N1 distance of 1944(2) pm are shorter than those Ge-N distances in 1[80]
but
longer than that corresponding values in a N-heterocyclic 6π aromatic
germyliumylidene cation[86]
(189 pm) and the heterofulvene-like germylene[87]
(186 pm) Additionally the Ge1-C2 distance (1887(2) pm) the endocyclic C-C
distances (C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3) pm) and the C4-N1 bond length (1382(3)
pm) suggest significant π-resonance stabilization within the six-membered GeNC3
ring In line with that the remarkable deshielding of the resonance signal (618 ppm)
Results and Discussion
- 25 -
for the β-H atom in the 1H-NMR spectrum is in agreement with a considerable hetero-
Cpmacr-like resonance stabilization in the five-membered GeNC3 ring (Figure 31 right)
The latter is also supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see
section 313) Hereafter the lithium complexes of N-heterocyclic germylidenide and
stannylidenide anions[88]
[(THF)Li-η5-EC(tBu)C(H)C(
tBu)N(Dip) E = Ge Sn] were
presented with a similar reductive reaction
Figure 31 Molecular structure of germylene anion salt 3 (left) and hetero-Cpmacr-like
resonance structure (right) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level
Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg]
Ge1-C2 1887(2) Ge1-N1 1944(2) Ge1-K1 34485(6) Ge1-K1rsquo 35728(7)
K1-C2 3092(2) K1-C3 3122(2) K1-C4 3330(2) K1-N1 3402(2) K1-Ge1rsquo
35728(7) N1-C4 1382(3) C1-C2 1516(3) C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3)
C4-C5 1508(3) C2-Ge1-N1 843(1) C4-N1-Ge1 1130(1) C3-C2-C1 1202(2)
C3-C2-Ge1 1116(2) C1-C2-Ge1 1281(2) C4-C3-C2 1174(2) C3-C4-N1
1135(2) C3-C4-C5 1254(2)
The formulation of the resonance structure clarifies that the nitrogen atom has a
higher affinity to carbon instead to germanium (Scheme 32) The mesomer 3c is
energetically less favorable than 3a and 3b This explains also that the Ge1-C2 bond
(1887(2) pm) is shorter than the Ge1-N1 bond (1944(2) pm) in 3
Results and Discussion
- 26 -
Scheme 32 GeNC3-ring resonance structures of germylenide anion of 3
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 4 shows four sets of doublets and one
multiplet for methyls of Dip-groups in the range from 091 to 130 ppm Resonances
for methyl-groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 162 ppm as one singlet
Multiplets in the range of 329-340 are assigned to CH-groups of iso-propyl groups
The resonance of CH proton at the GeN2C3 ring appears at δ = 503 ppm One singlet
at δ = 564 ppm is assigned to NH-groups One set of resonances for aromatic protons
of Dip-groups appears in the range of 683-718 ppm
Figure 32 Molecular structure of germylene amide 4 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn
at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 2051(2) Ge1-N2 2026(2) Ge1-N3
1905(2) N1-C2 1329(3) N2-C4 1332(3) C1-C2 1518(3) C2-C3 1394(3)
C3-C4 1394(3) C4-C5 1512(3) N3-Ge1-N1 9720(8) N3-Ge1-N2 8876(9)
N2-Ge1-N1 8822(8) C2-N1-Ge1 1229(2) C4-N2-Ge1 1240(2) N1-C2-C3
1227(2) C4-C3-C2 1269(3) N2-C4-C3 1239(3)
Results and Discussion
- 27 -
The structure of compound 4 was established by single crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis (Figure 32) It consists of a slightly puckered six-membered GeN2C3 ring
with geometric parameters similar to the corresponding parameters found in precursor
chlorogermylene 1[80]
The sum of bond angles at Ge atom of 2742deg is comparable to
that of 1 (2815deg) implying the presence of a lone pair of electrons at the Ge center
The Ge-N distances in 4 (2026(2) and 2051(2) ppm) are somewhat longer than those
in chlorogermylene 1 (1988(2) and 1997(3) ppm) In the structure of 4 the terminal
Ge-N distance of 1905(2) pm is significantly shorter than those the endocyclic ones
(2026(2) 2051(2) pm) because it is a common covalent bond and stronger than
dative NrarrGe bonds
A plausible mechanism for the formation of 3 and 4 is proposed as depicted in
Scheme 33 The reduction of (nacnac)GeCl 1 by elemental potassium gives the N-
heterocyclic potassium germylidenide 3d as initial transient species The latter
undergoes a ring contraction to give the transient germylene amide 3e which reacts
with 1 in a salt metathesis reaction affording the Dip-N-bridged bis-germylene 3f
Reductive fission of a Ge-N bond in 3f by elemental potassium leads to the germylene
anion potassium salt 3 and the potassium β-diketiminato-GeII amide (nacnac)Ge-NK-
Dip The formation of 4 from (nacnac)Ge-NK-Dip needs a subsequent protonation
from the solvent in an inert atmosphere
Scheme 33 The mechanism of the formation 3 and 4
Results and Discussion
- 28 -
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
This part of the research is the cowork with Shenglai Yao (TU Berlin)
Another reduction experiment of the related β-diketimiate-substituted
organogermanium trichloride 2[82]
(nacnac)GeCl3 with KC8 was investigated The
reaction of 2 with KC8 in THF led to a brown-red mixture from which colorless
crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex K(nacnac)[89]
have been
isolated as side products along with deep-red crystals of the remarkable novel cluster
species 5[83]
in low yield (3 Scheme 34) In contrast reaction of 1 with elemental
potassium in toluene even at 0 degC led merely to the complete replacement of Ge by K
via reduction of GeII to elemental Ge
0 powder and concomitant formation of the
aforementioned β-diketiminato potassium complex
Scheme 34 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
The X-ray crystal diffraction analysis of 5 revealed a dipotassium salt of the first
ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a Ge4 core (Figure 33)
Remarkably to date only a few metal complexes of ldquoheavyrdquo CBD2-
have been
reported featuring a Si4 and Si2Ge2 core[90]
Compound 5 consists of a planar
Ge4(nacnac)22macr dianion in which the two unusual chelating nacnac-ligands are
attached to the Ge4 core each with terminal Ge-C and Ge-N σ-bonds The dianion is
connected by two η3-coordinated K(OEt2) cations each coordinated to Ge1 Ge2 and
N2 and Ge1rsquo Ge2rsquo and N2rsquo respectively The K-Ge distances of 3355(1) pm (K1-
Ge1) and 3477(1) pm (K1-Ge2) are similar to those K-Ge distances in 3 and in
related potassium germanides[84b 85]
The molecular structure of 5 is also notable for
Results and Discussion
- 29 -
the parallelogram-like configuration of the planar Ge4 moiety The Ge1-Ge2 of
2512(1) pm and Ge1-Ge2rsquo distance of 2553(1) pm are close to the Ge-Ge single
bonds observed in bulky substituted cyclotetragermanes (ca 251 pm)[91]
and longer
than those in Ge4Co complexes[90d]
(235-237 pm) while the transannular Ge2-Ge2rsquo
distance of 2747(1) pm is much longer Interestingly despite of the pyramidal
coordination environment of the Ge atoms the Ge42macr core of 5 shows extremely
strong aromaticity as supported by DFT calculations (see section 313)
Figure 33 Molecular structure of 5 containing a Ge42minus
cluster Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity
Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1rsquo 1932(3) Ge1-Ge2 2512(7)
Ge1-Ge2rsquo 2553(7) Ge2-Ge2rsquo 2747(1) Ge1-K1 3355(12) K1-N2 2814(3)
K1-Ge2 3477(1) N1-C2 1381(4) Ge2-C3rsquo 2019(3) C2-C3 1369(5) C3-C4
1479(5) N2-C4 1296(4) Ge2-Ge1-Ge2rsquo 657(2) Ge1-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 1143(2) Ge1-
Ge2-Ge2rsquo 578(2) Ge1rsquo-Ge2-Ge2rsquo 564(2) N1rsquo-Ge1-Ge2 8716(9) N1rsquo-Ge1-
Ge2rsquo 1026(9) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1 886(1) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 963(1) C2-N1-Ge1rsquo
1239(2) C3-C2-N1 1205(3) C2-C3-C4 1227(3) C2-C3-Ge2rsquo 1184(3) C4-C3-
Ge2rsquo 1184(3) N2-C4-C3 1220(3)
Scheme 35 shows the assumed mechanism of the formation of Ge42minus
cluster 5 The
product after the first reductive step by KC8 is (nacnac)GeCl 1 which was confirmed
by NMR investigation Chlorogermylene 1 could dimerize by sequential reduction to
Results and Discussion
- 30 -
a bis-germylene 5a Due to the instability of 5a bearing two bulky nacnac ligands a
transformation could be in the ascendant from dimer 5a to stable P4-like Ge4-tetramer
5b Intermediate 5c could be formed after double intramolecular deprotonation and
elimination of ldquofreerdquo (nacnac)H The excessive KC8 could offer two electrons to
molecule orbitals of Ge4-cluster 5c to furnish the isolated product 5 with a Ge42minus
cluster
Scheme 35 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 5
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5
The structural feature of 3 leads to a discussion of a possible aromatic character of
the GeNC3-ring in comparison to cyclobutadiene anion Aromaticity is also a key
Results and Discussion
- 31 -
concept in describing homo-elemental four-membered rings such as the square planar
cyclobutadiene-like dianion Therefore nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS)
values for the five-membered GeNC3-rings and the four-membered Ge4-ring in
compound 3 and 5 were calculated by Prof Christoph van Wuumlllen (University of
Kaiserslautern) Since their introduction NICS[92]
values have been used as an
aromaticity criterion in numerous applications both for organic and inorganic
compounds[93]
NICS values were computed using the molecular structures of compound 3 and 5
from X-ray diffraction analysis The positions of the non-hydrogen atoms were taken
from the X-ray data and kept fixed while the hydrogen positions were optimized
using the TURBOMOLE program package[94]
and its density functional capabilities[95]
an exchange-correlation functional with gradient corrections to exchange and
correlation[96]
(BP86 functional) and polarized triple-zeta (TZVP) basis sets[97]
The
geometry optimizations used density fitting techniques (also known as the RI
approximation)[98]
to evaluate the matrix elements of the electrostatic Coulomb
potential
NICS tensors are defined for any position as the negative magnetic shielding at
that position The magnetic shielding tensors were obtained using the integral-direct
IGLO program[99]
which has been extended to allow the use of density functional
theory[100]
The B3LYP[96a 101]
functional and a basis of IGLO-III[102]
quality were
employed For Ge this is a 4s11p7d1f primitive basis sets in which only the steepest
five s-functions three p-functions and two d-functions are contracted In lack of
IGLO-type basis sets for potassium a TZVDP (triple zeta two sets of polarization
functions) basis was used which will affect the accuracy of the magnetic shieldings at
the centers of the potassium atoms but not elsewhere
The ring centre for each ring system was calculated first from the Cartesian
coordinates and determined the plane through the ring center for which the sum of the
Results and Discussion
- 32 -
squares of the distance of that plane to the positions of the atoms forming the ring is
minimal This plane was defined as the ring plane A line through the ring center that
is orthogonal to the plane defines the positions of the NICS centers above and
below the ring centers and the local z direction to which the NICS tensors are
transformed to obtain the zz as well as the in plane (mean value of the xx and yy)
tensor components in addition to the isotropic value which is one third of the sum of
the xx yy and zz components The zz component is of particular interest because a
ring current parallel to the ring plane will most strongly be induced if the external
magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane and the magnetic field induced by such a
current will also be in that direction
In addition to the NICS tensor at the ring center (NICS(0) value) its height profile
contains useful additional information[103]
First the height profile discriminates ring
current effects (which are associated with aromaticity) from diatropic contributions
which stem from the proximity of the ring atoms while the latter approach zero
quickly when moving out of the ring plane the former only slowly do so Furthermore
the height profile helps to distinguish π-aromaticity (which is the type of aromaticity
dominant in organic chemistry) from σ-aromaticity (which is found for many
inorganic compounds) if aromaticity only stems from π-electrons which produce no
ring current in the ring plane then the NICS values when moving out of the ring
center first decrease (ie become more negative) before they gradually approach zero
NICS values 100 pm above or below the ring plane (ldquoNICS(1) valuesrdquo)
Table 31 reports NICS results for compound 3 where the region towards to
coordinating K+ ion was denoted as above the plane of the five-membered GeNC3
rings the other side as below Up to 100 pm the results for NICS centers above and
below are quite similar then the results for the positions 150 and 200 pm above the
ring start to be affected by the K+ ion whose distance to the ring plane is 299 pm The
NICS values are negative and the tensors are highly anisotropic the negative isotropic
value stems from the large and negative zz component Furthermore these values fall
Results and Discussion
- 33 -
off quite slowly when moving out of the ring plane This indicates a diamagnetic ring
current indicative of aromatic behavior Furthermore the most negative values are not
found in the ring center but slightly above which indicates π-aromaticity Of course
this is exactly what has to be expected for a heteroatom analogue of a
cyclopentadienyl anion This is interesting however because the NICS values for
compound 5 see Table 32 show a slightly different behavior again Negative NICS
values fall off slowly but the tensors show a substantial negative in-plane component
up to 200 pm above (or below this is the same in this compound) ring plane This can
be explained by diatropic contributions from the Ge-C and Ge-N bonds which are
nearly perpendicular to the ring plane The second difference between compound 3
and compound 5 is that the NICS values (both the isotropic values and the zz tensor
component) fall off monotonically and have no hump at about 1 pm above the ring
plane The aromaticity of the Ge4 ring in compound 5 must therefore have substantial
σ-character
Table 31 NICS values for compound 3 in ppm (the results are the same for both GeNC3 rings)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash77 ndash87 ndash56
50 pm above ndash82 ndash50 ndash144
100 pm above ndash73 +16 ndash251
150 pm abovea)
ndash59 +64 ndash298
200 pm abovea)
ndash116 +36 ndash422
50 pm below ndash82 ndash46 ndash154
100 pm below ndash74 +04 ndash230
150 pm below ndash54 +19 ndash199
200 pm below ndash37 +11 ndash134
a)
Value affected by a close K+ ion coordinated by the GeNC3 ring
Results and Discussion
- 34 -
Table 32 NICS values for compound 5 in ppm (the results are the same at both sides of the Ge4
ring)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash389 ndash375 ndash417
50 pm above ndash324 ndash286 ndash399
100 pm above ndash215 ndash155 ndash334
150 pm above ndash144 ndash93 ndash248
200 pm above ndash109 ndash82 ndash165
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6
As a nucleophile the germanium(II) anion in 3 seems a promising precursor for the
synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylenes and of related heterodinuclear bis-
metallylenes Accordingly the coupling reaction of the nucleophilic GeII centre in 3
with the electrophilic GeII site in 1
[80] was examined and the reaction in THF at -30 degC
yielded a dark red solution from which the bis-germylene 6[104]
has been isolated as
air- and moisture-sensitive dark red crystals in 66 yield (Scheme 36) The isolated
bis-germylene 6 was fully characterized including X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 36 Synthesis of bis-germylene 6
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 6 exhibits four sets of doublets in the range from 107
to 124 ppm with the ratio of 121266 which can be assigned to CH3-groups of all
Dip-groups The three singlets in the range of 161-262 ppm can be assigned to the
CH3 groups at the ligand backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear
in the range of δ = 301-367 ppm as three sets of septet The remarkable deshielding
Results and Discussion
- 35 -
of the resonance signal for the ring CH proton of the five-membered GeNC3 ring (δ =
682 ppm) is indicative a stronger 6π-aromatic resonance stabilization compared with
that in the precursor 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The proton resonance signal for the γ-ring
proton in the six-membered GeN2C3 ring of δ = 518 ppm suggests however the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization In the UV-vis spectra of 6 an absorption
band is observed at 501 nm showing blue shifted in comparison to the values
observed for related amidinate- and guanidinate- substituted bis-germylenes[40]
(I27
and I28 in Introduction) with GeI-Ge
I bonds
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8
The reactivity of 3 towards chlorostannylene 7[80]
(nacnac)SnCl was examined
also by a coupling reaction If (nacnac)SnCl 7 was used as electrophile for the
reaction with 3 in diethylether at -70 degC this furnished the corresponding product
germylene-stannylene 8[104]
which was isolated in the form of dark red crystals in
34 yield (Scheme 37) The new compound 8 was fully characterized including
NMR spectroscopy (1H
13C
119Sn) and X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 37 Synthesis of germylene-stannylene 8
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 exhibits six sets of doublets in the range from 085 to
129 ppm with the ratio of 666666 for CH3-groups of all Dip-groups The three
singlets in the range of 165-300 ppm can be assigned to the CH3 groups at the ligand
backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear in the range of δ = 305-
378 ppm as three sets of septets
Results and Discussion
- 36 -
A similar situation was observed in the NMR spectra of 8 for the CH moiety at
ligand backbones The deshielding for the ring CH proton of the five-membered
GeNC3 ring in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 (δ = 691 ppm) indicates again a stronger
6π-aromatic resonance stabilization than in 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The chemical shift (δ =
510 ppm) for the γ-ring proton in the six-membered SnN2C3 ring of 8 also shows the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization The 119
Sn chemical shift of 8 at δ -197
ppm in the 119
Sn-NMR spectrum is comparable to the value observed for the precursor
(nacnac)SnCl 7 (δ -224 ppm)[80]
implying a three-coordinated tin atom in solution In
the UV-vis spectrum of 8 an absorption band is observed at 541 nm The latter is
somewhat red shifted in comparison to the values of bis-germylene 6
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8
The new GeI-Ge
I compound 6 represents the first asymmetric substituted bis-
germylene while germylene-stannylene 8 is the first GeI-Sn
I example Their
molecular structures were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis
(Figure 34) Both N2C3 backbones of the chelating six-membered MN2C3 ring (M =
Ge Sn) are essentially planar but the germanium and tin atoms are out of the
respective plane The five-membered GeNC3 rings in both compounds however are
almost planar The most important structural features are the Ge-M distances and
trans-bending angles The Ge-Ge distance of 25498(8) pm in 6 is the shortest GeI-Ge
I
distance among the distances values observed in known bis-germylenes[38 40-42]
(257-
267 pm see Introduction p 10) but significantly longer than those in digermenes[13f
105] (Ge=Ge 221-247 pm) and digermynes
[3b 20 106] (GeequivGe 221-231 pm) This
relatively short Ge1-Ge2 distance was explained with asymmetric structural feature of
6 and some ionic charge distribution between five- and six-membered rings (see
section 317 DFT calculation)
Results and Discussion
- 37 -
Structural features of 6 and 8 are shown in Scheme 38 The torsion angles of the
Ge1-Ge2 bond with Ge1-N1-N2 and Ge2-N3-C31 planes in 6 are 1043deg and 1184deg
respectively (1262deg-1387deg in digermyne[20 106]
) In the structure of 8 the Ge-Sn
distance of 27210(4) pm is longer than that value observed for a Ge=Sn double bond
in a germastannene[107]
and also longer than the Ge-Sn distance in
germylstannanes[105 108]
The torsion angles of the Ge-Sn bond with Sn1-N1-N2 and
Ge1-N3-C31 planes are 939deg and 1006deg respectively (943deg in diplumbylene I4)[16]
Such Ge-M (M = Ge Sn) central bond lengths and trans-bent angles are indicative of
the absence of Ge-M multiple bond character of 6 and 8
Scheme 38 Drawing of torsion angles in 6 and 8
Figure 34 Molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right) Thermal ellipsoids (C1-C5
C30-C34 N1-N3 Ge1 Ge2 and Sn1) are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 6 Ge1-
Ge2 2549(1) Ge1-N1 2015(4) Ge1-N2 2038(4) Ge2-N3 1951(4) Ge2-C31
1903(5) N1-Ge1-N2 8867(15) N1-Ge1-Ge2 10430(11) N2-Ge1-Ge2
Results and Discussion
- 38 -
10149(12) C31-Ge2-N3 8447(19) C31-Ge2-Ge1 11890(15) N3-Ge2-Ge1
9962(12) For 8 Sn1-Ge1 27210(4) Sn1-N1 2233(2) Sn1-N2 2231(2) Ge1-
N3 1964(2) Ge1-C31 1915(3) N2-Sn1-N1 8288(8) N2-Sn1-Ge1 9542(5)
N1-Sn1-Ge1 10368(5) C31-Ge1-N3 8433(12) C31-Ge1-Sn1 11495(9) N3-
Ge1-Sn1 10200(6)
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8
In order to clarify the electronic structure and bonding nature in 6 and 8 DFT
calculations were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The simplified
molecules 6a and 8a [6a M = Ge 8a M = Sn (LanL2DZ for Sn)] (scheme 39) in
which the Dip-groups (26-iPr2C6H3) of 6 and 8 were replaced by phenyl groups were
calculated as model compounds DFT calculations of the model compound of 6a was
performed at the B3LYP6-31(d) level and the model compound 8a was performed at
B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set for Ge N C and H atoms and the LANL2DZ
level for the Sn atom
Scheme 39 Computed model compounds 6a and 8a
The computed geometry is in good agreement with the experimental metric
parameters A NBO analysis of 6a and 8a shows that the HOMOrsquos have a large Ge-M
bond character (Figure 35) and the latter derives largely from overlap of Ge and Sn
p-valence orbitals (6a s 1180 p 8820 8a s 978 p 9022) Apparently the
Ge-M bonds possess s character Likewise the Wiberg bond index exhibits Ge-E bond
orders of 08525 (6a) and 07290 (8a) respectively Similar bonding natures have
Results and Discussion
- 39 -
been identified and reported previously for related GeI-Ge
I dimers
[38 40-42] In addition
the nature of the HOMOrsquos and LUMOrsquos of the model compounds 6a and 8a
corresponds to that of a diplumbylene[16]
which again underlines that the Ge-M bond
in 6 and 8 represents a pure σ-bond
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
Figure 35 Frontier orbitals of model compound 6a and 8a
Interestingly the HOMOrsquos show clearly the presence of p-orbital interaction within
the six-membered MN2C3 ring and a slight interaction with the Ge centre in the
GeN2C3 ring Accordingly the five-membered GeNC3 ring bears a negative net charge
while the six-membered MN2C3 ring has a positive one [NPA charges in the GeN2C3
ring in 6a Ge +065 N (mean) -069 C (mean) 008 vs GeNC3 ring Ge1 +055 N -
066 C (mean) -015 NPA charges in the SnN2C3 ring in 8a Sn +095 N (mean) -
072 C (mean) 007 vs GeNC3 ring Ge +040 N -066 C (mean) -017] Thus the
latter parameters suggest some ionic character of the Ge-M bonds Moreover the
pronounced electron acceptor character of the GeN2C3 ring is also reflected by the
strongly negative values of NICS for 6a and 8a [6a NICS(0) = -88 NICS(1) = -82
8a NICS(0) = -76 NICS(1) = -74] The latter confirms the presence of a 6π-
aromatic stabilization in 6 and 8 as indicated by the 1H-NMR data (see p 34-36)
Results and Discussion
- 40 -
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands
The β-diketiminato ligands can undergo several side-reactions such as 13-
coordination C-N-exchange ring-contraction and deprotonation (Scheme 310) A
more rigid β-diketiminato ligand with a six-membered C6-ring in the backbone was
envisioned to prevent those side-reactions and possibly enhance the stability of the
products[81-83 109]
Scheme 310 Coordination possibilities of the classical β-diketiminato ligand
The syntheses of new β-diketiminato ligands[110]
12 and 20 are shown in Scheme
311 They are easily accessible from the N-cyclohexylidene-26-diisopropyl-
benzenamine 9[111]
in a two-step procedure First the deprotonation of 9 with nBuLi in
diethylether leads to the corresponding lithium amide 10 Salt metathesis reaction of
10 with (Z)-N-(26-diisopropylphenyl)benzimidoyl chloride 11[112]
or (Z)-N-isopropyl
benzimidoyl chloride[112]
19 in diethylether then afforded the novel β-diketiminato
type ligand 12 and 20[110]
in 63 and 60 yield respectively The new compounds
12 and 20 have been analyzed by NMR spectroscopy ESI-mass spectrometry X-ray
diffraction and elemental analyses
Results and Discussion
- 41 -
Et2O - 78degCnBuLi
Et2O - 78degCN
Dip
9
N
Dip
10
Li
N
Ph Dip
Cl
11
12
N
NH
Ph
Dip
Dip
Et2O - 78degC
N
Ph iPr
Cl
19
20
NH
N
Ph
Dip
iPr
Scheme 311 Synthesis of new β-diketiminato ligands 12 and 20
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 12 displays four sets of doublet for methyl of
Dip-groups in the range from 117 to 134 ppm The multiplets by 164 ppm and 217
ppm are assigned to CH2 of the six-membered ring The resonance of NH proton
appears at δ = 187 ppm Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear at δ = 335 ppm
as multiplet The 1H-NMR spectrum of 20 shows three sets of doublet for the
isopropyl of Dip-groups in the range from 109 to 132 ppm The peaks of four CH2
groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 156 208 and 214 ppm as multiplet
The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear by 310 and 323 ppm as septet The
resonance of NH group appears at δ = 1203 ppm as doublet because of the 3J-
coupling with neighbor CH group Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-groups
and phenyl appear in the range of 696-727 ppm for 12 and 713-753 ppm for 20
respectively
NH group connecting with iso-propyl in 20 is also confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 36 and Scheme 312) In compound 12 the N1-C1 bond
length (1360(2) pm) is longer than the N2-C3 bond length (1305(2) pm) due to the
presence of N1-H bond Contrarily the N1-C1 bond length (1309(2) pm) in
compound 20 is shorter than the N2-C3 bond length (1356(2) pm) because of the
presence of N2-H bond
Results and Discussion
- 42 -
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph Dip
Dip
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph iPr
Dip
1356
1386
1445
1309
1377
1360
1305
1452
12 20
HH
Scheme 312 Bonding situation of new ligands 12 and 20 bond length in pm
Figure 36 Molecular structure of compounds 12 (left) and 20 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 12 N1-C1 13600(17) N1-
C13 14349(18) C1-C2 13769(19) C1-C4 15136(18) N2-C3 13046(16) N2-
C25 14297(17) C2-C3 14515(18) C2-C7 15257(18) N1-C1-C2 12221(12)
C1-C2-C3 12230(12) N2-C3-C2 12212(12) For 20 N1-C1 1309(2) N1-C17
1418(2) C1-C2 1445(2) C1-C4 1522(2) N2-C3 1356(2) N2-C14 1461(2)
C2-C3 1386(2) C2-C7 1524(2) C3-C8 1495(2) N1-C1-C2 12080(15) C1-
C2-C3 12151(15) N2-C3-C2 12288(15)
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16
Scheme 313 shows the synthesis of chlorogermylene 14[110]
and germylene 16[110]
Through lithiation of compound 12 with nBuLi the Lithium complex 13 was formed
quantitatively The subsequent reaction of 13 with the dichlorogermylene dioxane
complex[27]
(GeCl2middotC4H8O2) affords the desired chlorogermylene 14 in 82 yield
Results and Discussion
- 43 -
Furthermore germylene 16 was obtained by dehydrochloration of 14 with 13-di-tert-
butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15[113]
as a base in 78 yield The composition and
constitution of 14 and 16 were fully characterized by elemental analysis IR and
multinuclear NMR spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 313 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and germylene 16
In the 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 14 resonances of 8 methyl moieties of Dip-
groups appear in the range from 097 to 155 ppm as multiplets The multiplets in the
range of δ = 128-139 and 203-227 ppm are assigned to CH2 moieties of the six-
membered ring Four sets of septets by 317 327 394 and 417 ppm are assigned to
methine protons of the iso-propyl groups The 1H-NMR spectrum of 16 displays three
sets of doublet for methyl moieties of the Dip-groups in the range from 115 to 135
ppm The peaks of four CH2 groups of the six-membered C6-ring appear at δ = 155
204 and 221 ppm as multiplet Resonances for the methine protons of the iso-propyl
groups appear by 369 and 380 ppm as septets A triplet at δ = 415 ppm is assigned to
the proton connecting with C=C double bond This resonance confirms the
deprotonation of C-CH2 to a C=CH structure on the ligand backbone Resonances for
aromatic protons of Dip-groups and phenyl appear in the range of 680-739 ppm for
145 and 675-725 ppm for 16 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 14 and 16 are shown in Figure 37 and
Figure 38 In compound 14 the six-membered GeN2C3 ring exhibits a boat-like
Results and Discussion
- 44 -
conformation The C2N2 moiety of the chelating ligand (N1 N2 C1 C3) is nearly
planar and the Ge and C2 atoms are out-of-plane (Ge 37 pm C2 13 pm) In
compound 16 the GeN2C3 ring is almost planar The Ge-N bond lengths in 14
(1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) are longer than those in 16 (1843(3) and 1861(3) pm)
and the N1-Ge1-N2 bond angle (9123deg) in 14 is smaller than that of compound 16
(9509deg) This is probably owing to the dative nature of the Ge-N bonds and the three-
coordinate Ge(II) atom in 14 The Ge-Cl bond length of 2296(1) pm in 14 is
consistent with the value observed in the N-heterocyclic β-diketiminato
chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl[80]
The fused cyclohexyl moiety of 14 is distorted
and the phenyl group is oriented in nearly the same direction as the aryl group on the
N2 atom while the C2 C3 C4 and C7 atoms of the fused C6 ring in 14 are coplanar
with the N2C3 ring (C1 C2 C3 N1 N2) while the C5 and C6 atoms deviate above
the plane of the N2C3 ring This conformation of the cyclohexyl moiety is also
observed in compound 16 It is of note that the buta-13-diene moiety (C1 C2 C3 C4
C32) of compound 16 clearly has alternating C-C distances (C32-C1 1498(4) C1-C2
1359(4) C2-C3 1461(4) and C3-C4 1360(4) pm) which is not the case in known
germylene (nacnac)Ge[87]
published in 2006
Figure 37 Molecular structure of compound 14 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 19760(16) Ge1-N2 19804(17) Ge1-Cl1
22956(7) N1-C1 1342(3) N1-C14 1458(3) C1-C2 1397(3) C1-C8 1502(3)
N2-C3 1333(3) N2-C26 1463(2) C2-C3 1415(3) C2-C7 1522(3) C3-C4
Results and Discussion
- 45 -
1509(3) C4-C5 1522(3) N1-Ge1-N2 9123(7) N1-Ge1-Cl1 9560(5) N2-Ge1-
Cl1 9392(5) C1-N1-Ge1 12568(13) N1-C1-C2 12352(17) C1-C2-C3
12503(19) N2-C3-C2 12440(18) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(13)
Figure 38 Molecular structure of compound 16 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 1843(3) Ge1-N2 1861(3) N1-C3 1426(4)
N1-C8 1442(4) N2-C1 1408(4) N2-C20 1454(4) C1-C2 1359(4) C2-C3
1461(4) C1-C32 1498(4) C2-C7 1525(4) C3-C4 1360(4) N1-Ge1-N2
9509(11) C3-N1-Ge1 300(2) N1-C3-C2 1176(3) C1-C2-C3 1267(3) C2-C1-
N2 1241(3) C1-N2-Ge1 1259(2)
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O
The unusual donor-acceptor properties of the zwitterionic silylene and germylene
were described in our group in 2006[30 87]
In these molecules the exocyclic methylene
group remains more negative charges due to the aromaticity of the center six-
membered ring This implies the presence of two reactivity positions in the molecule
a strong nucleophilic methylene group and a nucleophilic (ns-orbital) and
electrophilic (np-orbital) at the metallylene site Mesomeric structures of zwitterionic
germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties are shown in Scheme 314
Results and Discussion
- 46 -
To probe the donor-acceptor properties of zwitterionic germylene 16 its reactivity
toward ammonia and water was investigated Germylene 16 undergoes controllable
ammonolysis and hydrolysis (Scheme 315) Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas
at room temperature in toluene resulted in the formation of the corresponding
aminogermylene 17[110]
in high yield (92) Likewise germylene 16 also readily
reacts with water to produce germylene hydroxide 18[110]
nearly quantitatively (95)
Scheme 314 Mesomeric structures of germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties
Scheme 315 Syntheses of aminogermylene 17 and germylene hydroxide 18
The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectroscopic data of 17 and 18 are very similar to the
corresponding resonances of chlorogermylene 14 appearing at or near the same
chemical shifts In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 17 the protons of the NH2 group appear
at δ = 154 ppm This chemical shift is close to that of the dimeric aminogermylene
(ArrsquoGeNH2)2 (Arrsquo = 26-Tip2C6H3) (δ = 162 ppm)[60a]
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 18
displays a singlet for the hydroxide proton at = 166 ppm which is close to the
respective value observed for the dimeric germylene hydroxide [(nacnac)GeOH]2 (δ =
154 ppm)[114]
The IR spectrum of 18 clearly shows two N-H stretching modes of the
NH2 group at v = 3430 and 3343 cmndash1
respectively These values are similar to those
observed for related aminogermylenes (ArGeNH2)2 (Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) (3380
and 3308 cmndash1
) and (nacnac)GeNH2 (3431 and 3333 cm-1
)[115]
A sharp absorption at v
Results and Discussion
- 47 -
= 3643 cmndash1
that can be attributed to the O-H stretching frequency was observed in
the IR spectrum of 18 This value resembles that of germylene hydroxide
(nacnac)GeOH (3571 cm-1
)[114]
The structure of 17 and 18 are shown in Figure 39 Both compounds 17 and 18 are
monomeric species The structural features of 17 and 18 are very similar and show
close structural parameters compared with that of chlorogermylene 14 As in 14 the
Ge1 and C2 atoms of 17 and 18 slightly deviate from the N2C2 ring (N1 N2 C1 C3)
plane [17 Ge 46 pm and C2 13 pm 18 Ge 49 pm and C2 13 pm] The Ge-N
(ligand) bond lengths (17 2017(2) and 2021(2) pm 18 20054(17) and 20071(16)
pm) of 17 and 18 are longer than the Ge-N(amide) bond length of 17 (1829(3) pm)
Interestingly the Ge-N distance (1905(2) pm) in (nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip 4[83]
due to the
large Dip-substituent is also 8 ppm longer than that of 17 In each case there is clearly
a difference between the dative bond and covalent bond Compound 18 represents the
first monomeric three-coordinate GeII hydroxide in the solid state (Figure 39) owing
the larger steric congestion around the GeII center in contrast to (nacnac)GeOH
[114]
Figure 39 Molecular structures of compound 17 (left) and 18 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 17 Ge1-N1 2021(2) Ge1-
N2 2017(2) Ge1-N3 1829(3) N1-C1 1349(4) C1-C2 1395(4) N2-C3
1336(4) C2-C3 1417(4) C3-C4 1509(4) N3-Ge1-N2 9503(11) N3-Ge1-N1
9709(13) N2-Ge1-N1 8932(10) C1-N1-Ge1 1253(2) C3-N2-Ge1 1247(2)
For 18 Ge1-O1 18249(18) Ge1-N2 20054(17) Ge1-N1 20071(16) N1-C1
Results and Discussion
- 48 -
1340(3) C1-C2 1402(3) N2-C3 1331(3) C2-C3 1419(3) C3-C4 1509(3)
O1-Ge1-N2 9387(8) O1-Ge1-N1 9529(8) N2-Ge1-N1 8943(7) C1-N1-Ge1
12597(14) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(14)
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
In order to understand the coordination behavior of ligand 20 experiments using
germanium precursors GeCl2sdotdioxane and GeCl4 were conducted (Scheme 316) The
reaction of compound 20 with one equivalent of nBuLi resulted directly the lithiated
intermediate 21 The subsequent reaction with GeCl2sdotdioxane in Et2O at -78 degC led to
the unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained
by reaction of 21 with GeCl4 in toluene at -78 degC through dehydrochloration with 13-
di-tert-butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15 as a base in 57 yield The composition and
constitution of 22 and 23 were elucidated by elemental analysis multinuclear NMR
spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 316 Syntheses of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 22 exhibits 6 sets of doublets for 6 methyls of
iso-propyl Five sets of multiplets in the range of δ = 121-206 ppm are assigned to
the CH2 moieties of the six-membered C6-ring Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl
Results and Discussion
- 49 -
appear at δ = 284 367 and 396 ppm as septet In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 23 peaks
at δ = 113 122 and 137 ppm are for methyls of iso-propyl as doublets Resonances
of three CH2 groups of the six-membered ring on backbone appear at δ = 146 189
and 206 ppm as multiplets Two sets of septets by 332 and 361 ppm are assigned to
the CH of iso-propyl A triplet at δ = 421 ppm is for the proton of C=CH group on
backbone and indicates a dianionic ligand 20 in compound 23 owing to two times
deprotonation with nBuLi and carbene 15 Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-
groups and phenyl appear in the range of 688-724 ppm for 22 and 701-726 ppm for
23 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 22 and 23 are shown in Figure 310
Compound 22 represents an imine N-donor stabilized oxo-chloro-germylene and
adopts a pyramidal geometry with the sum of bond angles of 2737deg at the GeII center
The inserted oxygen atom could come in all probability from dioxane molecule in
GeCl2dioxane The cyclohexyl unit on backbone is distorted and the free N2 moiety
is oriented in inverse direction to the cyclohexyl The Ge1-Cl1 bond length of
23073(6) pm in 22 is compatible with the value (2296(1) pm) observed in
chlorogermylene 14 The Ge1-N1 distance of 20908(15) pm is visibly longer than
those of 14 (1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) because of the net NrarrGe coordination bond
without resonance stabilization The Ge1-O1 bond length is normal Ge-O single bond
with a distance of 18265(12) pm Bond lengths of N1-C1 (1284(2) pm) and N2-C7
(1272(2) pm) present clearly C=N double bond while bond lengths of C1-C6
(1525(2) pm) and N6-C7 (1539(2) pm) present normal C-C single bonds
In compound 23 GeIV
atom is tetrahedral coordinated with two nitrogen and two
chlorine atoms All six angles in the range of 1028-1138deg at the GeIV
center are
nearly alike with the angle in methane (1095deg) and indicate a slightly distorted
tetrahedral GeN2Cl2 configuration GeIV
-Cl bond lengths (21339(7) and 21375(9) pm)
in 23 are much shorter than those of germylenes 14 and 22 (229-231 pm) Distances
of the GeIV
-N bonds (1798(2) and 1788(2) pm) in 23 are much shorter than the
Results and Discussion
- 50 -
NrarrGe dative bonds in 14 17 and 18 (198-202 pm) and the net NrarrGe dative bond
(20908(15) pm) in 22 But they are only slightly shorter than GeII-N distances
(1843(3) and 1861(1) pm) in germylene 16 and GeII-NH2 bond length (1829(3) pm)
in germylene 17 Bond lengths of C1-C2 (1339(4) pm) and C3-C4 (1326(4) pm) in
23 illuminate clearly C=C double bond and distances of N1-C1 (1430(3) pm) and
N2-C3 (1441(3) pm) correspond to C-N single bond
Figure 310 Molecular structures of compound 22 (left) and 23 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 22 Ge1-Cl1 23073(6)
Ge1-O1 18265(12) Ge1-N1 20908(15) O1-C6 1418(2) N1-C1 1284(2) N2-
C7 1272(2) C1-C6 1525(2) C6-C7 1539(2) Cl1-Ge1-O1 9789(4) Cl1-Ge1-
N1 9422(4) O1-Ge1-N1 8158(6) Ge1-N1-C1 11291(12) N1-C1-C6
11484(16) C1-C6-O1 10975(14) C6-O1-Ge1 11838(10) N2-C7-C6
11778(17) For 23 Ge1-Cl1 21339(7) Ge1-Cl2 21375(9) Ge1-N1 1798(2)
Ge1-N2 1788(2) N1-C1 1430(3) C1-C2 1339(4) C2-C3 1486(4) C3-C4
1326(4) N2-C3 1441(3) N2-Ge1-N1 10554(10) N2-Ge1-Cl1 11208(7) N1-
Ge1-Cl1 11381(8) N2-Ge1-Cl2 11201(8) N1-Ge1-Cl2 11082(8) Cl1-Ge1-Cl2
10276(3) C1-C2-C3 1266(2) C4-C3-N2 1209(2) C2-C4-C3 1208(3)
The formation of compound 22 indicates that ligand 20 has a different reactivity to
the derivative ligand 12 due to the exchange of Dip-group with iso-propyl But the
situation of complex 23 shows a possibility of a dianionic chelating coordination[30 87]
Results and Discussion
- 51 -
of ligand 20 Coordination chemistry with ligand 20 is currently being investigated for
its suitability to serve as bidentate donor ligand for complexes with low-valent Si Ge
and also transition-metals
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28
Since the successful isolation of halogen bonded silylene and germylene[31a 32b 80]
chemists faced the challenge weather compounds like LEII-X-E
IIL [E = Si Ge Sn X
= O S Se] in which two metallylene moieties are bridged by a single X-atom can be
stabilized at room temperature Key points of this assignment are the identification of
effective ligands for the stabilization of metallylenes and a feasible synthetic route
There is a special interest to synthesize this kind of compounds due to their chemical
nature and coordination properties
Previous attempts to synthesize a stable bis-silylene oxide 28b from silylene 28a[30]
has been unsuccessful The isolated product originating from the reaction of water
with the silylene 28a was the stable siloxysilylene 28c[10a]
(a mixed-valent disiloxane)
(Scheme 317) Recently Roesky et al proposed the formation of bis-silylene oxide 28
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2macr) as a reactive intermediate in the reaction of the bis-
silylene I24[37]
(aLSi-Si
aL) with N2O However 28 could be neither detected nor
chemically trapped[116]
By addition of water to two molar chlorosilylene 26[31a]
in
toluene the expected disiloxane 27 could not be isolated from a complicated reaction
mixture (Scheme 317 )
In the following the isolation of the first oxygen-bridged bis-silylene 28 by a facile
synthetic protocol using 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(HSiCl2)2O as starting
material will be described
Results and Discussion
- 52 -
Scheme 317 Synthesis of siloxysilylene 28c and hydrolysis of chlorosilylene 26
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28
The reaction of 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane (HSiCl2)2O with 2 molar equiv of
lithium amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the desired disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield
(Scheme 318) The target bis-silylene oxide 28 was readily available by
dehydrochloration of 27 employing 2 molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene
Recrystallization in toluene afforded pale yellow crystals of 28[32a]
in 76 yield The
molecular structure of new compounds 27 and 28 was characterized by means of
spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 318 Synthesis of disiloxane 27 and bis-silylene oxide 28
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 27 reveals two singlets one for the
tBu groups at δ =
120 ppm and one corresponding to the Si-H protons at δ = 598 ppm as well as one
set of resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of
Results and Discussion
- 53 -
27 shows a singlet resonance at δ = -1110 ppm The 1H-NMR spectra of 28 displays a
singlet of tBu at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for Ph group in aromatic
resonance region The 29
Si-NMR signal of 28 (δ = -161 ppm) appears shifted ca 95
ppm downfield from the precursor 27 This shift is comparable to that reported for the
triply coordinated silylene alkoxides (aLSiO
tBu) (δ = -52 ppm) and (
aLSiO
iPr) (δ = -
135 ppm)[31b]
respectively
The molecular structure of disiloxane 27 is shown in Figure 311 The center Si1-
O1-Si2 part of molecule 27 was extensively disordered Therefore the X-ray data were
not suitable for accurate discussion Even though the nearly unbent Si1-O1-Si2 angle
(1680deg) in 27 shows a very similar bonded character with sp-hybridized oxygen
bridge in comparison to another disiloxane compounds[118]
The molecule of bis-silylene oxide 28 (Figure 312 left) contains two triply
coordinated Si atoms and two lone pairs one at each of the Si centers Those are two
silylene moieties The sum of bond angles at Si1 and Si2 are 27769deg and 27534deg
respectively which is consistent with the presence of lone pairs In the molecular
structure of 28 Si-O distances of 1641(2) and 1652(2) pm are comparable to those of
siloxysilylene 28c (16442(3) pm and 16501(2) pm) and thus typical for silicon-
oxygen single bonds of other disiloxanes[118]
Moreover as expected for an disiloxane-
like system the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent (15988(15)deg) and larger than
that observed for a C-O-C moiety of ethers
DFT calculations of the compound 28 was performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU
Berlin) at the B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set with the GAUSSIAN-03 program
package[101c 119]
The structure obtained by X-ray analysis was used as the input for
these calculation Optimized structure of 28 is shown in Figure 312 (right) DFT
calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small The
Si-O-Si bond angle of optimized structure is 180deg However the energy difference
between the experimental geometry and linear arrangement is only 071 kJsdotmolminus1
The
Results and Discussion
- 54 -
HOMO (-0163 eV) and HOMO-1 (-0178 eV) represent mainly lone pairs at Si atoms
The LUMO (-0020 eV) is located on the phenyl group of the amidinate ligand
(Figure 313)
Figure 311 Molecular structure of 27 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity The center Si1-O1-Si2
part was extensively disordered Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Cl1-Si1
20349(16) Cl2-Si2 22017(11) Si2-O1 1581(8) Si2-N3 1798(2) Si2-N4
1968(2) Si1-O1 1562(8) Si1-N2 1750(10) Si1-N1 1994(6) Si1-O1-Si2
1680(6)
Figure 312 Molecular structure of 28 (left) and optimized structure (right)
Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted
for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Si1-O1 1641(2) Si2-O1
1652(2) Si1-N1 1896(3) Si1-N2 1902(3) Si2-N3 1888(2) Si2-N4 1908(3)
Si1-O1-Si2 15988(15) O1-Si1-N1 10417(12) O1-Si1-N2 10535(11) O1-Si2-
N3 10196(11) O1-Si2-N4 10481(12) N1-Si1-N2 6815(10) N3-Si2-N4
6855(11)
Results and Discussion
- 55 -
Figure 313 Calculated frontier molecular orbitals of 28
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel
To probe the chelating coordination ability of 28 its reactivity toward Ni(cod)2
(cod = cycloocta-15-diene) was investigated Toluene was added to a mixture of bis-
silylene oxide 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 at room temperature to furnish an
intensely red-colored reaction solution Recrystallization of the crude product from a
saturated n-hexane solution at -30 degC afforded dark red crystals of the Ni complex
29[32a]
in 91 yield (Scheme 319) The isolated compound 29 is the first bidentate
bis-silylene transition-metal complex This work initiates a significant progress on the
chelating silylene ligand transition-metal coordination chemistry The constitution and
composition of 29 could be determined by NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis
and ESI mass spectrometry
Scheme 319 Synthesis of bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
Results and Discussion
- 56 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one singlet for the
tBu groups at δ = 130
ppm and one set of resonances at δ = 281 295 and 504 ppm for the COD-ligand and
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one
singlet (δ = 328 ppm) which shows a downfield shift relative to that of the ldquofreerdquo
ligand 28 The observed downfield shift for the 29
SiII nuclei in 29 clearly suggests the
presence of a bis-silylene chelated complex
The chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to Ni0 is confirmed by X-ray
diffraction analysis The molecular structure of 29 is displayed in Figure 314
Complex 29 containing Ni0 is diamagnetic because of 18 electrons in the valence
shell The two silylene subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are
tetrahedral coordinated to the nickel atom with the Si1-Ni1-Si2 angle at 6890(3)deg
The Si-O bond lengths in 29 [17011 (15) and 17081(17) pm] are longer than that in
28 [1641(2) and 1652(2) pm] while the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 29 (9344(8)deg) is
significantly smaller than that in 28 The Ni-Si bond lengths [21908(7) and 21969(7)
pm] are slightly shorter than those in silylene nickel complex 29a [2207(2) and
2216(2) pm][120]
but longer than those found in silylene nickel complex 29b
(21395(8) pm)[121]
Scheme 320 shows clear bonded prospect of three complexes
Moreover the Ni-Si bond lengths of bis-silylene nickel complex 29 are longer than
those in ylide-like silylene-nickel complexes [20369(6) and 20597(10) pm][70a b 122]
The strong σ-donor character of bis-silylene ligand 28 causes a more electron rich Ni
center It indicates a somewhat stronger π-back-donation from the nickel atom to the
chelating COD-ligand Therefore the Ni-C distances (2070-2090 pm) in 29 are
shorter than those in Ni(cod)2 (211-213 pm)[123]
and silylene nickel complex 29b
(2130-2146 pm)[121]
The coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 with other transition-metals (for example
Ti Cu) is currently investigated together with the reactivity of these complexes on
their use as molecular catalysts
Results and Discussion
- 57 -
29
[Si][Si]
O
Ni
[Si] [Si]
Ni
CO CO
[Si] [Si]
Ni
N N tButBu
Si
N N DipDip
Si
[Si] = [Si] =
29a 29b
2207 2216
2191 2197689deg
934deg
1084deg 1019deg
1708 1701
2139 2139
Scheme 320 Comparison of bonding state in complexes 29 29a and 29b bond lengths in pm
Figure 314 Molecular structure of 29 (left) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Si1-Ni1 21969(7) Si2-Ni1 21908(7) Si1-O1 17011(15)
Si1-N1 18929(19) Si1-N2 1875(2) Si2-O1 17081(17) Si2-N3 18776(19)
Si2-N4 1893(2) Si1-O1-Si2 9344(8) Si1-Ni1-Si2 6890(3) N1-Si1-N2
6941(9) N3-Si2-N4 6954(8)
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
This part of the research is the cowork with Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)
Due to the unique reactivity and electronic properties compounds with a
heteroleptic multiple bond between heavier main-group elements have attracted
considerable attention particularly those between group 14 and 15 elements this is
Results and Discussion
- 58 -
attributed to the pronounced polarity of the E14-E15 multiple bonds[124]
Phosphasilene
containing Si-P double bonds is an analogous of iminosilane The first isolable
phosphasilene with a three coordinate Si and a two coordinate P atom was reported by
Bickelhaupt and coworkers (Scheme 321) in 1984[125]
and several other similar
species containing localized and delocalized Si=P bonds were synthesized and
structurally characterized in the later period[126]
Their rich chemistry provides new
approaches to functional Si-P compounds
Furthermore the more challenging phosphasilyne with a silicon-phosphorus triple
bond (Scheme 321) is heretofore unknown[127]
this is mainly due to the high
tendency of the highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds to dimerize or even
oligomerize[126c]
However the availability of elusive phosphasilyne species would be
a strongly desired progression with respect to the synthesis of polyfunctional silicon-
phosphorus containing materials from it By spatial protection of a Si-P multiple bond
through the steric hindrance by suitable bulky substituents the oligomerization of the
highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds could be prevented additionally to the benefit of
the donor-acceptor stabilization of Si-P multiple bonds
Scheme 321 The first phosphasilene (left) and phosphasilyne (right)
Imaginable methods to synthesize a phosphasilyne employing corresponding
precursors comprise oxidation of bis-silylene 30a with elemental phosphorus and
elimination of phosphino silane 30b (Scheme 322) Whether the phosphasilyne 30c is
available depends only on the spatial andor donor-acceptor protection of bulky ligand
L Now there are not many choices of silicon compounds with very bulky ligand L
that are suitable for preparation of phosphasilynes Our current attempt was on the
Results and Discussion
- 59 -
way towards phosphasilyne employing amidinato ligand stabilized chlorosilylene
aLSiCl
[31a] However the isolated dimerized product was the unique 24-disila-13-
diphosphacyclobuta-13-diene (aLSiP2Si
aL) 31
[128] starting from the new N-
heterocyclic bis(trimethylsilyl) phosphino silylene precursor 30[128]
Scheme 322 Imaginable methods towards a phosphasilyne
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The starting material bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanyl silylene 30[128]
was easily
accessible in 83 yield by salt elimination reaction of N-heterocyclic chlorosilylene
26[31a]
with the corresponding lithium phosphide LiP(SiMe3)2 at room temperature
(Scheme 323) The 1H-NMR spectrum exhibits one singlet at δ = 058 ppm for methyl
of silyl and another singlet at δ = 124 ppm for methyl of NtBu as well as one set of
resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand in the region of 681-741 ppm
The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 30 shows two sets of doublet at δ = 229 ppm for silicon
of silyl and at δ = 1943 ppm for silicon of silylene The latter is much downfield
shifted than that of previously reported aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (562 ppm)
[31b] One
singlet at δ = -221 ppm was found by 31
P-NMR measurement which exhibits a
tremendous upfield shift when compared with that of aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (-165
ppm)[31b]
Results and Discussion
- 60 -
Scheme 323 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The molecular structure of 30 was also substantiated by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 315) The molecule 30 contains triply coordinate Si and P
atoms and two lone pairs at the Si and P center respectively The Si and P center
display a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry The sum of bond angles is 33071deg at
the P center and 27762deg at the Si center The latter is consistent with that (2765deg) of
aLSi-P
iPr2 The angle of N(2)-Si(1)-P(1) (10854(8)deg) is larger than that of N(1)-Si(1)-
P(1) (9998(9)deg) Si-N distances of 1877(3) and 1882(2) pm in 30 are comparable to
those (1875(1) pm and 1881(1) pm) of the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative
[31b] The Si1-P1
distance of 30 (22838(12) pm) is slightly shorter than the Si-P bond length (2307(8)
pm) in the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative and the elongated P1-Si2 and P1-Si3 single bonds in
30 (22264(13) and 22321(12) pm) reflect steric congestion within the P(SiMe3)2
subunit
Figure 315 Molecular structure of 30 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 22838(12) P1-Si2 22264(13) P1-Si3 22321(12)
Si1-N1 1877(3) Si1-N2 1882(2) Si2-P1-Si3 10859(5) Si2-P1-Si1 103905
Results and Discussion
- 61 -
Si3-P1-Si1 11822(5) N1-Si1-N2 6910(11) N1-Si1-P1 9998(9) N2-Si1-P1
10854(8)
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Since the phosphanyl silylene 30 was successfully accessed bearing a SiMe3 as
reactive leaving-groups at phosphorus[129]
its suitability as a precursor for the
formation of a phosphasilyne was probed Because of the labile nature of the P-SiMe3
bonds in 30 the compound was exposed to dichlorotriphenylphosphorane Ph3PCl2 as
a promising smooth oxidant for desilylation with the intention to produce the desired
phosphasilyne along with Me3SiCl and PPh3 Surprisingly the reaction of 30 with one
molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 in toluene at room temperature led to the formation of the
unique compound 31[128]
(Scheme 324) which could be isolated as yellow crystals in
72 yield
Scheme 324 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Compound 31 represents a dimerized form of the desired phosphasilyne and was
fully characterized by means of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-
ray diffraction analysis The 1H-NMR spectra of 31 displays a singlet for the
tBu
groups at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for the Ph groups in the ldquoaromaticrdquo
region The triplet signal in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 31 at δ = 265 ppm (1JSiP = 998
Hz) indicates that two P atoms are bonded to silicon center Meanwhile the more
deshielded (ca 46 ppm) singlet resonance at δ = -1649 ppm in the 31
P-NMR spectrum
compared to that in 30 is in accordance with the four-membered ring structure of 31
Results and Discussion
- 62 -
bearing two polarized Si-P π-bonds
The result of the X-ray diffraction structure analysis is in accordance with that of
NMR spectroscopy which confirms that 31 is a 24-disila-13-diphosphacyclobuta-
13-diene (Figure 316) The Si2P2 core in 31 has a planar diamond-shaped geometry
and possesses two-coordinated P atoms and four-coordinated Si atoms each with a
dative NrarrSi bond The Si-P bonds lengths in 31 are 21701(12) and 21717(11) pm
respectively which are in the range of a Si=P double bond length (2095(3) pm) in the
Phosphasilene[128]
and the Si-P single bond length of 30 (22838(12) pm) this
indicates σ- and π-electron resonance stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has
been confirmed by theoretical calculations (see p 64) Of note the transannular
Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo (25626 pm) is shorter than the Si-Si distance of disilacyclopropene[130]
(tBu3Si)2SiSi(Si
tBu3)C-Ad (Ad = adamantyl) (25797(8) and 25991(9) pm) and hexa-
tert-butyldisilane tBu3Si-Si
tBu3 (2697(9) pm) and the P1middotmiddotmiddotP1rsquo (3505 pm)
separations in 31 is much larger than that for P-P bonds observed in tetrahedral
elementary phosphorus P4 (221 pm)[131]
Evidently the peculiarly short Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo
distance is caused by the geometric constraints of the Si1-P1-Si1rsquo and endocyclic P1-
Si1-P1rsquo angles of 7234(4)deg and 10766(4)deg respectively and not driven by attractive
Si1-Si1rsquo interaction
Figure 316 Molecular structure of 31 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 21701(12) P1-Si1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-N1 1858(3)
Si1-N2 1856(2) Si1-P1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-Si1rsquo 25626(16) Si1-P1-Si1rsquo 7234(4)
N2-Si1-N1 7078(11) P1-Si1-P1rsquo 10766(4)
Results and Discussion
- 63 -
The formation of 31 in a multistep which is depicted in Scheme 325 was proposed
Firstly formation of the corresponding chloro-(silyl)phosphanyl silylene intermediate
31a is conducted by cleavage of one of the Si-P bonds of the P(SiMe3)2 subunit with
Ph3PCl2 Subsequently elimination of Me3SiCl from 31a occurs to give the reactive
intermediate 31b which could be treated as a silylene-phosphinidene (Scheme 325
right) or a phosphasilyne (Scheme 325 left) further dimerization of intermediate 31b
affords the isolated product 31 A similar dimerization process has been proposed by
Wiberg for disilynes (SiequivSi) as reactive intermediates to produce
tetrasilatetrahedranes[132]
To elucidate the reason for the formation of 31 preferred over its hypothetical Si2P2-
tetrahedranceisomer 31d (Scheme 326) we performed DFT calculations of 31 and
disiladiphosphatetrahedranes 31d The result shows that 31d is much less stable than
compound 31 with 462 kcalmiddotmolminus1
higher in energy which is in agreement with the
experimental result Compound 31 with a planar structure is most likely stabilized by
the dative NrarrSi coordination of the bulky amidinato ligands Meanwhile this also
leads to a shorter Si-N bond length that is 1856(2) and 1858(3) pm in 31 are shooter
than those (1877(3) pm and 1882(2) pm) of in 30 and also those of in chlorosilylene
aLSiCl (1870(2) pm and 1917(2) pm)
[31a] Furthermore this NrarrSi donor
stabilization could demonstrate an ylide-like electronic structure of 31 (Scheme 326)
Scheme 325 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 31
Results and Discussion
- 64 -
Scheme 326 Resonance structures of 31
In order to unravel the electronic configuration of 31 DFT calculations at
B3LYP6-31G(d) level using the parameters obtained from X-ray diffraction as the
initial structure were performed[101c 119]
The optimized structure matched the
experimental data of 31 very well According to the NPA charges each Si atom in the
Si2P2-ring has a large positive net charge (+1204) while as expected P atoms in the
ring bear slight smaller negative charges (-0765) Meanwhile HOMO-5 of 31 shows
a set of Si-P σ-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 left) whereas the HOMO-2 contains
mainly the delocalized two π-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 right) Accordingly a
NBO analysis indicates that the Si2P2-core of 31 bears a Lewis structure with four
occupied σ-bond orbitals for the Si-P bonds (1917e for Si1-P1 1916e for Si1-P1rsquo
1916e for Si1rsquo-P1 and 1918e for Si1rsquo-P1rsquo) along with two filled Si-P π-bond
orbitals with 1770e for the Si1- P1 and Si1rsquo-P1rsquo π-bonding interaction respectively
The latter canonical π-bond orbitals are strongly polarized toward the P atoms
(8753 at the P and 1247 at the Si) Likewise the WBI (Wiberg Bond Index)
values of the Si-P bonds (1142 and 1140) are higher than that of the phosphino
silylene 30 (0920)
Figure 317 Molecular orbitals of 31 representing the presence of σ-electron and π-
electron delocalization within the Si2P2 cycle HOMO-5 (left) and HOMO-2 (right)
Results and Discussion
- 65 -
According to the aforementioned betaine (ylide)-like resonance stabilization 31
totally differs from cyclobuta-13-diene derivatives The calculations of the nucleus
independent chemical shift[92]
(NICS) also supports this conclusion The result of
NICS reveals negative values (NICS(1) = -257 and NICS(0) = -601 ppm) indicating
that 31 has a somewhat aromatic character which is opposite to the properties of
cyclobuta-13-dienes that are antiaromatic As a summary the results of theoretical
calculations are in agreement with the idea to describe 31 as the ylide-like resonance
structure 31c with some contribution of the resonance forms As a result the smaller
endocyclic angle at phosphorus than that at silicon is contributed by the repulsion
between the negatively charged P atoms
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
Nucleophilic and electrophilic properties of Si Ge and Sn metallylenes were
discussed in chapter 32 (see p 46) Due to the strong donor property of the carbene
lone pair in coordination to empty p-orbital of low valent Si Ge Sn atom centers
some carbene stabilized divalent Si Ge Sn halides could be synthesized in the last
twenty years[28 44 133]
There is also a great interest to find mixed Si Ge Sn
metallylene-metallylene complexes in which one metallylene is stabilized through the
lone pair coordination of another one In the following the synthesis of the first
example of a silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex will be shown
The dimeric micro-chlorotin(II) amides 32[53]
(I44 in Introduction) was identified as
useful candidate for the generation of such an example The synthesis of
bis(trimethylsilyl)amino-tin chloride ((Me3Si)2N-SnCl)2 32 is shown in Scheme 327
Bis(bis(trimethylsilyl)amino)2tin(II) ((Me3Si)2N)2Sn 32a could be prepared in good
yield by the double lithioamination of SnCl2 with LiN(SiMe3)2 in a 1 2 ratio[47a]
The
Results and Discussion
- 66 -
same reaction but with one molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 gives the monosubstituted
product 32 It was also easily accessible by amino chlorine exchange between
((Me3Si)2N)2Sn and SnCl2 in a 11 ratio[53]
(Scheme 327)
Scheme 327 Synthesis of micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32
The dimeric structure of 32 can be splited by treatment with Lewis base for
example Si Ge Sn metallylenes In order to synthesize a silylene coordinated
stannylene chlorosilylene 26 was mixed with micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32 in toluene A
logical intermediate 33a is proposed here as an inevitable intermediate (Scheme 328)
At first chloro bridges are opened because of the coordination of silylene 26 to create
33a Then via amino chlorine exchange product 33 becomes accessible From a
saturated hexane solution at low temperature the silylene-stannylene dichloride 33
was isolated as colorless crystals in 49 yield The product 33 was determined by X-
ray diffraction analysis and elemental analysis Owing to the unstable nature of
silylene and tin dichloride coordination bond (Si rarrSn) 33 decomposed in a grey
mixture powder of amino silylene also-N(SiMe3)2
[33d] and SnCl2 after isolation from
solvent in vacuum 1H-NMR spectrum shows only resonances of amino silylene in
good agreement with the reported compound[33d]
Scheme 328 Synthesis of aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
According to X-ray diffraction analysis compound 33 represents the first example
of silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex The molecular structure of 33 (Figure 318)
Results and Discussion
- 67 -
exhibits a trigonal pyramidal geometry on Sn and a distorted tetrahedral configuration
of Si The Cl-Sn-Cl angle is 9400(9)deg and the sum of bond angles at the Sn center is
2820deg The SirarrSn distance (2740(2) pm) is longer than the Si-Sn bond lengths
(2622(2) and 2641(2) pm) in the silyl stannane compound[134]
(Scheme 329) The
Sn-Cl distances of 2468(3) and 2473(3) pm in 33 are comparable to those in a
carbene-stannylene complex (2456(2) and 2458(2) pm) (Scheme 329)[133b]
Si-N
distances of 1832(7) and 1827(7) pm in 33 are somewhat shorter than those of
phosphanyl silylene 30 (1877(3) and 1882(2) pm) and amino silylene (18780(10)
and 18776(10) pm) which is the remaining molecule of 33 without SnCl2[33d]
Scheme 329 A silyl stannane[134]
(left) and a carbene-stannylene complex[133b]
(right)
Figure 318 Molecular structure of 33 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Sn1-Si1 2740(2) Sn1-Cl1 2468(3) Sn1-Cl2 2473(3) Si1-
N1 1832(7) Si1-N2 1827(7) Si1-N3 1705(7) Si2-N3 1780(7) Si3-N3
1791(8) Cl1-Sn1-Cl2 9400(9) Cl1-Sn1-Si1 9886(8) Cl2-Sn1-Si1 8914(7)
Sn1-Si1-N3 1252(3) N2-Si1-N1 722(3) Si1-N3-Si2 1172(4) Si1-N3-Si3
1248(4) Si2-N3-Si3 1179(4)
Results and Discussion
- 68 -
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34
Because of the feasible structural tuning with many choices of donor groups a
general overview of pincer arenes was introduced (Introduction p 19) Compounds of
type 35a having a pincer-like skeleton are depicted in Scheme 330 They represent
promising new types of pincer ligands which could coordinate with a metal by facile
C-H activation in the ortho-position Although many bis-metallylenes are accessible
(see Introduction 13) pincer ligands containing divalent heavier group 14 elements
are new in the field of synthetic inorganic chemistry At the same time the desired
pincer arenes 35a could serve as much stronger σ-donor ligand towards transition-
metals than traditional phosphane ligands[70 79b c 122]
Up to now only a few isolable
spacer separated bis-silylenes with two divalent silicon centers are known these
include bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
in this work and bis-silylenes I42[52]
I58[61]
and
I64[65]
(in Introduction p 12-15) Inspired by these results the synthesis of a
silicon(II)-based pincer ligand 35a appeared attractive and its coordination property
towards transition-metals should be investigated
Scheme 330 Low-valent group 14 metallylene-based ECE pincer arenes
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35
Scheme 331 shows the synthetic route for the first attempt towards a bis-silylene-
based SiCSi pincer arene 35d The phenolation of trichlorosilane was readily
accessible to disilane 35b in hexane Reaction of 35b with two molar equiv of lithium
Results and Discussion
- 69 -
amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the amidinate substituted disilane 35c The bis-
silylene pincer arene 35d was not easily separable by the following dehydrochloration
of 35c employing two molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene Products seemed a
complicated silylene-LiCl mixture which was not soluble in toluene or diethylether
The desired bis-silylene pincer arene could not be isolated from mixtures
Scheme 331 The first attempt towards a bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35d
But the synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35 could be achieved through the protocol
in Scheme 332 Dilithiation of 46-di-tert-butylresorcinol with nBuLi furnishes the
corresponding 13-dilithium resorcinolate 34 After a salt metathesis reaction with the
N-donor stabilized chloro silylene 26[32b]
in the molar ratio of 12 the desired
compound 35[33b]
could be isolated as pale yellow crystals in 79 yield The
constitution and composition of SiCSi pincer arene 35 was elucidated by 1H-
13C-
and 29
Si-NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 332 Synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 35 exhibits one singlet for the N
tBu groups at δ = 124
ppm and one singlet for CtBu groups at δ = 174 ppm and one set of resonances for the
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands Almost identical variable-temperature (VT) 1H-
NMR spectra of 35 in C7D8 in the temperature range of 210 to 320 K indicate
Results and Discussion
- 70 -
relatively low rotation barriers of the Si-O bonds on the NMR time scale A sharp
singlet in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum at δ = -240 ppm is comparable to that observed for
alkoxy-substituted silylenes aLSiOR (R =
tBu
iPr)
[31b]
The molecular structure of 35 could be confirmed by a preliminary single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis but a discussion of metric parameters was not possible
because of the moderate crystal quality Still it is clear that the two silylene-like
moieties in 35 face in the almost same direction (Figure 319) To get more
information about the molecular structure of 35 DFT calculations [B3LYP6-
31G(d)][101c 119]
were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The geometry of 35
obtained by X-ray crystallographic analysis was used as the initial structure The
optimized structure of 35e and 35ersquo is displayed in Figure 320 The Si1-O1-C1 angle
(14179deg) is larger than that of Si2-O2-C3 (13217deg) While the dihedral angle of Si1-
O1-C1-C2 is 2437deg the dihedral angle of Si2-O2-C3-C2 is 039deg
Figure 319 Molecular structure of 35 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity X-
ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The Si-O single bond distances of 17056 and 17190 pm are little longer than those
of bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
(1641(2) and 1652(2) pm) and alkoxysilylenes aLSiOR
(R = tBu
iPr)
[31b] (16442(3) and 16501(2) pm) due to steric hindrance The C2-
Results and Discussion
- 71 -
symmetric rotational isomer 35ersquo was identified as a stable form on the hyperpotential
energy surface with a slightly lower energy of 75 kJsdotmolminus1
Interestingly the Si-O
distance of 35ersquo is little longer than those of 35e The bond rotation barrier of the Si-O
bonds in 35e and 35ersquo is similar and estimated to be +334 kJsdotmolminus1
by theoretical
calculation
Figure 320 Optimized structures of bis-silylene SiCSi pincer ligand 35e (left) and
its rotational isomer 35ersquo (right) at the B3LYP6-31G(d) level Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) of 35e and 35ersquo
compound 35e Si1-O1 17056 Si2-O2 17191 Si1-O1-C1 14179 Si2-O2-C3
13217 compound 35ersquo Si1-O1 17294 Si2-O2 17294 Si1-O1-C1 13028 Si2-
O2-C3 13028
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII
complex 36
Although bis-silylene 35 bearing an amidinate ligand may not serve as a π-acceptor
it was a strong σ-donor ligand To investigate the pincer-type coordination ability of
35 its reactivity towards phosphine palladium(0) complexes was evaluated Treatment
of 35 with 05 equiv of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)-palladium Pd(PPh3)4 in hexane
at room temperature afforded the novel silylene-silyl(phenyl)palladium(II) complex
36[33b]
as sole product which could be isolated as orange crystals in 81 yield
(Scheme 333)
Results and Discussion
- 72 -
Scheme 333 Formation of 36 from reaction of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
A different type of silyl-silylene metal complexes has been described by Ogino and
co-workers[66b c 78]
Compound 36 was fully characterized by multinuclear NMR
spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis The structure of 36
indicates that two equivalents of 35 were consumed With a 11 molar ratio of starting
materials the yield of 36 decreased (asymp30) but still no other product or intermediate
could be detected by 1H-NMR spectroscopy
The molecular structure of 36 is shown in Figure 321 Remarkably compound 36
crystallizes as racemic mixture of its R and S enantiomers of which only the S form is
presented here The PdII atom has a typical distorted square-planar configuration
defined by the two silylene SiII atoms Si2 and Si3 the silyl Si
IV atom Si1 and the
carbon atom C1 of the central aryl ring Interestingly there is a 12-hydride shift from
palladium to silicon during the complexation forming a Si-H silyl group which breaks
the former Si1-N2 bond in 35 Due to coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo The bent Si3-Pd1-C1 angle of 16783(12)deg in 36
is contrary to the linear X-Pd-C (X = Cl I Ph 4-fluorophenyl OCOCF3 etc) angles
of reported palladium(II) complexes supported by a PCP type pincer arene ligand[72b
77 135] The Si1-Pd1-Si2 angle of 15503(4)deg deviates from the linear alignment and is
smaller than the respective P-Pd-P angle of the PCP pincer-type palladium
complex[72b 77 135]
The silylene PdII dative bond lengths (Si2-Pd1 23271(12) and
Si3-Pd1 23038(11) pm) of 36 are shorter than that of the Si1-Pd1 distance
Results and Discussion
- 73 -
(23561(12) pm) illustrating the difference between a silyl ligand (Si1) with a SiIV
-Pd
single bond vs a silylene ligand (Si2 and Si3) with a SiII-Pd dative bond However
the Si2-Pd1 and Si3-Pd1 distances in 36 are somewhat longer than those of
silylenerarrpalladium complexes[136]
(224 and 226 pm) from Kira (Scheme 334)
Furthermore Pd1-C1(aryl) bond length of 36 (2125(3) pm) is longer than those of
reported PCP pincer-type palladium(II) complexes (Pd-C distance 197-203 pm)[135a-e
135g] presumably because of steric congestion
Scheme 334 Silylenerarrpalladium complexes from Kira[136]
Figure 321 Molecular structure of 36 Only the S form of racemic mixture is
shown Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity except for the H1 atom Selected bond lengths (pm) and
angles (deg) Pd1-C1 2125(3) Pd1-Si1 23561(12) Pd1-Si2 23271(12) Pd1-Si3
23038(11) Si1-O1 1694(3) Si1-N1 1789(4) Si2-O2 1675(3) Si2-N5 1862(3)
Si2-N6 1840(4) Si3-O3 1662(3) Si3-N7 1888(3) Si3-N8 1860(3) Si4-O4
1704(3) Si4-N3 1893(4) Si4-N4 1892(4) Si1-Pd1-Si2 15503(4) Si1-Pd1-C1
Si2Si1
C1
Pd
Si3
213 pm
233 pm236 pm
230 pm
O1 O2
Results and Discussion
- 74 -
7861(11) Si2-Pd1-C1 7681(11) Si3-Pd1-C1 16783(12)
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 36 shows twelve sets of nonequivalent
tBu groups
which agrees with its crystallographic analysis Moreover the resonance for the Si-H
proton is observed at δ = 659 ppm The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 36 in C6D6 displays
four signals at δ = minus87 (aLSi Si4) 397 (HSi Si1) 623 and 658 ppm (SirarrPd Si2
and Si3) respectively The chemical shift of the Si1 atom (SiIV
-H) has moved upfield
comparable to those of a related HSirarrPd complex reported by Kira Iwamoto and co-
workers because of the electronegative N and O atoms bound to the Si1 atom[136a]
The 29
Si resonances of the two SiII atoms (Si2 Si3) coordinated to the palladium
center are similar to those of other amidinate-based silylene transition-metal
complexes[71 137]
and significantly shifted to higher field in comparison to those
reported for donor-free silylene palladium complexes owing to the additional N-donor
coordination of the amidinate ligand to the SiII atom Additionally the infrared
spectrum of 36 shows a weak Si-H stretching vibration band at 2135 cmminus1
The
observed stretching frequency of 36 is higher than those of other reported palladium
hydridosilyl complexes (2008ndash2121 cmminus1
)[135c 135f 136a]
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism
To investigate the uncommon reactivity of 35 towards Pd(PPh3)4 quantum
chemical calculations using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP level using
6-31G(d) basis set for H C N O P and Si atoms and the LANL2DZ level for the Pd
atom with the Gaussian 03 program for model compounds 36andash36e were performed
by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)[101c 119]
A schematic representation of the potential
energy surface of the proposed pathway for the formation of 36 is given in Scheme
335
Results and Discussion
- 75 -
Scheme 335 DFT-derived relative energies of model compounds 35a-35e
From this it was assumed that stepwise dissociation of phosphine ligands of
Pd(PPh3)4 forms 36a as the initial intermediate by the insertion reaction of Pd0 into
the pincer C-H bond of the central aryl ring of 35 Subsequently the 16-valence
electron PdII complex 36a undergoes a 12-hydride shift from palladium to a silicon(II)
donor atom to form the 14-valence electron silylene silyl(aryl)palladium(II) complex
36c as second intermediate The latter process occurs through transition state 36b-TS
with a barrier of +878 kJsdotmolminus1
and 36c is only 67 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36b-TS
The electron-deficient PdII complex 36c readily undergoes coordination with
phosphine ligand or silylene donor moiety of ldquofreerdquo 35 leading to the formation of
more stable 16-electron complexes According to that the calculated relative energies
of PrarrPd complex 36d stabilized by PPh3 and SirarrPd complex 36e stabilized by
methoxy silylene aLSiOMe as model silylene donor are +380 and minus176 kJsdotmol
minus1
respectively Since SiII of intramolecular N-donor stabilized silylenes is a stronger σ-
donor than PIII
of phosphines complex 36e is 556 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36d
Overall the stepwise transformation of 36a into 36e in the presence of PPh3 and the
model silylene aLSiOMe is exothermic by 176 kJsdotmol
minus1
Results and Discussion
- 76 -
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
After successful isolation of the first bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
and the first bis-
silylene pincer arene 35[33b]
in order to obtain other new bis-silylene(germylene) as
potential bidentate σ-donor ligands the novel type of bis-silylene(germylene) with a
ferrocendiyl spacer which could result in unique properties was investigated The
facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
aLSi-Fc-Si
aL 38 (Fc = ferrocendiyl) and
aLGe-Fc-Ge
aL 40 respectively as well as
their corresponding cobalt and iron complexes could be realized in the course of this
PhD thesis[33a]
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40
Since the reaction of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
with dilithium resorcinolate 34 afforded
the SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 35 was assumed that chlorosilylene 26 and
chlorogermylene 39[41]
(aLGeCl) could be suitable precursors for the desired bis-
metallylene functionalized ferrocenes Ferrocene with nBuLi and TMEDA
(tetramethylethyldiamine) in hexane gave 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37[138]
quantitatively
Subsequently treatment of chlorosilylene 26 with 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 led to the
formation of bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield (Scheme 336) Similarly
bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40[33a]
could be isolated in 77 yield by salt metathesis
reaction of 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorogermylene 39 The structures of 38
and 40 were determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis mass
spectrometry and X-ray crystallographic analysis (only for compound 40)
1H-NMR spectra of compound 38 and 40 are very similar They exhibit a singlet for
four tBu groups (38 δ = 116 ppm 40 δ = 111 ppm) Two sets of hyperfine coupled
triplet (38 δ = 451 and 472 ppm 40 δ = 461 and 471 ppm) are assigned to the
protons of ferrocene The resonance of the Ph protons (38 and 40) appears in aromatic
Results and Discussion
- 77 -
resonance region from 690 to 717 ppm Accordingly the 13
C-NMR spectra of 38 and
40 each show three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (38 δ = 709 727 and
846 ppm 40 δ = 701 723 and 920 ppm) Furthermore bis-silylene 38 gives rise to
a singlet at δ = 433 ppm in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum
Scheme 336 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 40
Single crystals of 40 suitable for an X-ray single crystal analysis were obtained
from hexane solution The crystals of 40 consist of two conformational isomers as
shown in Figure 322 Two molecular structures of 40 confirm that the two N-donor-
stabilized germylene moieties are bonded to C1 and C7 (endo-configuration) or C8
(exo-configuration) of the ferrocendiyl spacer Distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C7 in
40-endo are 1979(9) and 1983(11) pm while distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C8 in 40-
exo are 1991(2) and 19774(19) pm respectively The Ge-N bonds (2006 to 20402
pm) of two isomers are slightly shorter than those of precursor 39[41]
The GeII centers
in 40 adopt a pyramidal geometry with the sums of bond angles of 25593deg and
25669deg for 40-exo 2591deg and 2546deg for 40-endo respectively The structural feature
of the amidinate ligands in 40 is reminiscent of those reported for related bis-
germylenes such as I63[64]
(aLGe-NPh)2 and I75 I76 LGe-X-GeL (X = O S L =
tBuC(N-Dip)2)
[67] The isolation of two conformational isomers of 40-exo and 40-endo
indicates a small rotating energy of the functional ferrocendiyl That means bis-
germylene 40 and bis-silylene 38 don not need more activation energy serving as
bidentate ligand
Results and Discussion
- 78 -
Figure 322 Molecular structures of 40-endo (top) and 40-exo (bottom) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 40-endo (top) Ge(1)-C(1)
1979(9) Ge(2)-C(7) 1983(11) Ge(1)-N(1) 2027(8) Ge(1)-N(2) 2006(8)
Ge(2)-N(3) 2022(7) Ge(2)-N(4) 2037(7) C(1)-Ge(1)-N(2) 983(3) C(1)-Ge(1)-
N(1) 955(3) N(2)-Ge(1)-N(1) 653(3) C(7)-Ge(2)-N(3) 953(4) C(7)-Ge(2)-
N(4) 941(4) N(3)-Ge(2)-N(4) 652(3) for 40-exo (bottom) Ge1-C1 1991(2)
Ge2-C8 19774(19) Ge1-N1 20261(16) Ge1-N2 20247(17) Ge2-N3
20402(15) Ge2-N4 20162(16) C1-Ge1-N1 9662(7) C1-Ge1-N2 9445(7) N1-
Ge1-N2 6486(7) C8-Ge2-N3 9492(7) C8-Ge2-N4 9716(7) N3-Ge2-N4
6459(6)
The molecular structure of bis-silylene 38 has been ambiguously determined by X-
ray single crystal diffraction The structural feature of 38 is very similar to that of 40-
exo isomer However the X-ray data are not sufficient for any further discussion
(Figure 323)
Results and Discussion
- 79 -
Figure 323 Molecular structure of 38 X-ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The mass spectrometry confirmed the composition of 38 (Figure 324) The (ESI)
mass spectrum of 38 is dominated by a peak at mz 703329 which can be attributed to
the protonated molecular ion [38+H]+ Isotopic distribution of molecular peaks
demonstrates a good agreement with calculated mass composition The comparison of
experiment and calculation confirms the presence of bis-silylenyl substituted
ferrocene molecules
6 9 0 6 9 5 7 0 0 7 0 5 7 1 0 7 1 5 7 2 0
m z
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
Re
lative
Abu
nda
nce
7 0 3 3 2 9
7 0 4 3 3 2
7 0 5 3 3 47 0 1 3 3 4
7 0 6 3 2 96 9 0 2 4 9 6 9 5 2 2 5 7 1 7 3 4 57 1 0 4 7 3
7 0 3 3 3 1
7 0 4 3 3 4
7 0 5 3 3 87 0 1 3 3 6
7 0 6 3 3 17 1 0 3 3 5
N L 3 1 3 E 7
W Y-F e S i2 _ S p ri tze 1 -2 9 R T 0 0 0 -0 7 7 A V 2 9 T F T M S + c E S I F u ll m s [1 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 ]
N L 4 9 7 E 5
C 4 0 H 5 4 F e N 4 S i 2 + H C 4 0 H 5 5 F e 1 N 4 S i 2
p a C hrg 1
Figure 324 Experimental (top) and simulated (bottom) ESI-MS spectra of 38
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable silylene- and
germylene-substituted ferrocenes respectively Alternative example of SiII-ferrocene
Results and Discussion
- 80 -
compound is a disilene-functionalized ferrocene reported by Tokitoh and co-workers
recently[139]
However disilene derivates belong essentially to another type of low-
valent silicon compounds in comparison to triply coordinated silylenes Instead of
conjugated electronic effect of disilene-ferrocene system the ferrocene bridged bis-
silylene or bis-germylene system could have better chelating σ-donor character It is to
confirm in a coordination chemistry of bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 with
transition-metals
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40
In order to investigate the coordination ability of 38 and 40 toward transition-
metals and inspired by the reactivity of bis-silylenes 28 and 35 toward Ni0 and Pd
0[32a
33b] as well as by reports on spacer-separated bis-germylene molybdenum chelated
complex I65-Mo[66b]
(see Introduction p 18) firstly the coordination behavior of
potentially bidentate ligands 38 and 40 towards CoICp complex fragments
[140] was
examined A suitable CoICp source is accessible by treatment of CoBr2 with sodium
cyclopentadienide (NaCp) and potassium graphite (KC8) in tolueneTHF 41 mixture
resulting in the generation of (CpCoILn) (L = toluene or THF) in solution Reaction of
thus-formed CoICp species with bis-silylene 38 yielded the desired bis-silylene Co
I
complex 41[33a]
in 30 yield (Scheme 337) Similarly bis-germylene CoI complex
42[33a]
has been successfully synthesized from 40 and isolated in 61 yield
Scheme 337 Synthesis of bis-silylene and bis-germylene CoICp complexes 41 and 42
Results and Discussion
- 81 -
In comparison to bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 1H-NMR spectra of
compound 41 and 42 show an additional singlet for protons of CoICp group (41 δ =
496 ppm 42 δ = 504 ppm) A singlet for four tBu-groups appears at δ = 111 ppm by
bis-silylene Co-complex 41 and at δ = 139 ppm by bis-germylene Co-complex 42
Two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (41 δ = 440 and 461 ppm 42 δ = 438 and
459 ppm) are assigned to protons of ferrocene The resonance of phenyl protons (41
and 42) appears in aromatic resonance region In the 13
C-NMR spectra of 41 and 42
each exhibit one resonance for carbons of CoICp (41 δ = 780 ppm 42 δ = 759 ppm)
and three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (41 δ = 700 745 and 851 ppm
42 δ = 699 737 and 891 ppm) In the 29
Si-NMR spectrum the coordination of the
bis-silylene moieties to the Co atom results in a drastic downfield shift of the
resonance of 41 (δ = 820 ppm) in comparison to situation of 42 (δ = 433 ppm)
Isolated products 41 and 42 are first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-
silylene or bis-germylene in a chelating fashion The molecular structures of 41 and
42 (Figure 325) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses In both
complexes cobalt is coordinated one side by cyclopentadienyl and another side by bis-
silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40 and contains 18 valence electrons Angles of Si1-Co1-
Si2 and Ge1-Co1-Ge2 are 9389(5)deg and 9279(2)deg respectively
The silicon atoms in complex 41 and germanium atoms in complex 42 are four
coordinated and show a distorted tetrahedral geometry The Co-Si bond lengths of 41
(21252(14) and 21200(14) pm) are similar to that in chlorosilylene CoICp(CO)
complex 41a[141]
(21143(4) pm) Furthermore the Co-Si bonds of 41 are shorter than
the Co-Si distances in dichlorosilylene-CoICp(CO) complex 41b
[142] (21348(5) pm)
in dichlorosilylene-Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41c
[143] (2228(2) pm) in
chlorosilylene Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41d
[141] (22060(6) and 22017(6) pm)
respectively The silicon cobalt double bond (Si=CoV) distance (21848(8) pm) in
cobalt(V) complex 41e[144]
is also longer than dative SirarrCoI bond lengths in complex
41 Structures of cited compounds are drawn for clarity in Scheme 338
Results and Discussion
- 82 -
Scheme 338 Structural features of 41 and cited silylene cobalt complexes
Figure 325 Molecular structures of 41 (top) and 42 (bottom) Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 41 (top) Co1-Si1
21252(14) Co1-Si2 21200(14) Si1-C6 1894(5) Si2-C11 1887(5) Si1-N1
1898(4) Si1-N2 1907(4) Si2-N3 1904(4) Si2-N4 1922(4) Si1-Co1-Si2
9389(5) N1-Si1-N2 6847(15) N3-Si2-N4 6866(16) C6-Si1-Co1 13254(14)
for 42 (bottom) Co1-Ge1 21967(6) Co1-Ge2 21979(6) Ge1-C6 1965(4) Ge2-
Results and Discussion
- 83 -
C11 1961(4) Ge1-N1 2020(3) Ge1-N2 2031(3) Ge2-N3 2041(3) Ge2-N4
2029(3) Ge1-Co1-Ge2 9279(2) N1-Ge1-N2 6490(11) N3-Ge2-N4 6485(11)
C6-Ge1-Co1 13280(10) C11-Ge2-Co1 13140(10)
The Co-Ge bonds of 42 (21967(6) and 21979(6) pm) are also shorter than those in
the germylene cobalt(0) complex [((Me3Si)2N)2GerarrCo(CO)3]2[145]
(2262(1) pm) and
the tetragermacyclobutadiene-CoICp complex η
4-((
tBu2MeSi)4Ge4)CoCp (24616(3)
and 25036(3) pm)[90d]
respectively In fact the Co-Ge bonds in 42 are the shortest
Co-Ge bonds known to date The relatively short EII-Co bonds in 41 and 42 suggest
that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands in the series of divalent silicon
and germanium compounds as yet
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45
To test σ-donor ability of bis-(silylene) 38 versus carbonyl a ligand exchange
reaction between 38 and (CO)2CoCp[146]
was explored When 38 was allowed to react
with two molar equivalents of (CO)2CoCp the bis-silylene 41 bridged bimetallic
cobalt complex 44[33a]
could be obtained in 87 yield accompanied by half CO-
elimination of (CO)2CoCp (Scheme 339) The reaction of bis-silylene 38 with one
molar equivalent of (CO)2CoCp furnished the same product but the isolable yield was
low The structure of 44 was determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy
elemental analysis and infrared spectroscopy
Scheme 339 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged CoI(CO)Cp complex 44
Results and Discussion
- 84 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 44 exhibits a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
124 ppm A singlet (δ = 523 ppm) and two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (δ = 461
and 476 ppm) are assigned to protons of CoICp group and ferrocene with the ratio of
1044 The resonance of phenyl protons appears in aromatic resonance region The
29Si-NMR spectrum of 44 shows a singlet resonance at δ = 857 ppm similar to that
of 41 In the 13
C-NMR spectrum of 44 one characteristic signal for the CO ligands
appears at δ = 2078 ppm Furthermore the IR spectrum of 44 exhibits a strong
stretching band at ν = 1888 cmminus1
attributed to the carbonyl groups on the CoI atoms
The observed CO stretching frequency of 44 is much lower than those of 41a
(ν = 1968 cmminus1
)[141]
thus indicating that the bis-silylene substituted ferrocene 38 is a
much stronger σ-donor than chlorosilylene 26[32b]
Another carbonyl-silylene exchange reaction was investigated between bis-
silylene 38 and diiron nonacarbonyl Fe2(CO)9 Toluene was added to a 11 mixture of
38 and Fe2(CO)9 at room temperature to afford a bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4
complex 45 in 73 yield (Scheme 340) The structure of 45 was determined by
multinuclear NMR spectroscopy infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 340 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4 complex 45
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 45 shows a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
109 ppm Two singlets at δ = 483 and 500 ppm are assigned to protons of ferrocene
Multiplets in the range of 699-739 ppm are resonances of phenyl protons The 29
Si-
NMR spectrum of 45 exhibits a singlet resonance at δ = 1050 ppm It is much more
Results and Discussion
- 85 -
downfield shifted than those in complexes 41 (820 ppm) and 44 (857 ppm) One
characteristic strong signal for the CO ligands appears at δ = 2169 ppm in the 13
C-
NMR spectrum of 45 It is compatible to the resonance (δ = 2167 ppm) of the
silylene-Fe(CO)4 complex aL(
tBuO)SirarrFe(CO)4
[71] In the IR spectrum of 45 the
CO stretching frequencies (2026 1948 1900 cmminusl
) are also quite uniform to those of
this complex (2026 1949 1899 cmminusl
)[71]
Due to the rotation energy of ferrocene and
the symmetric bulky coordination of Fe the second CO-substitution could be more
difficult Consequently a chelated complex 38rarrFe(CO)3 was not observed during the
isolation of products
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts
The investigation of the catalytic activity of complexes 28 41 and 42 was carried
out in collaboration with Stephan Enthaler (TU Berlin)[33a]
Nickel or palladium catalyzed cross-coupling reactions between organozinc halides
and aromatic halides constitute an excellent synthetic method for polyfunctional
aromatic compounds[147]
To probe the catalytic activity of bis-silylene oxide Ni0
complex 28 a cross-coupling reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-
iodobenzene was investigated (Scheme 341) The direct iodine substitution of p-
methoxyl-iodobenzene with organometallic compounds was not expected without a
catalyst In the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3) coupling
reaction was observed and product 46 was obtained in 65 yield indicating a
potential application for this kind of complexes
Results and Discussion
- 86 -
Scheme 341 Application of 28 as precatalyst in cross-coupling reactions
Moreover the reactivity of the resulting complexes 41 and 42 as precatalysts for
Co-mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile was
expected[148]
It is known numerous cobalt complexes have been successfully applied
as precatalysts in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions and this becomes a powerful tool in
organic chemistry to form arene and heteroarene moieties[148-149]
Thus the catalytic
abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions were investigated
(Scheme 342)
Scheme 342 Application of 41 and 42 as precatalyst in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions
A first set of experiments was dedicated to the benchmark trimerization of phenyl
acetylene which resulted in the quantitative formation of isomers 47a and 47b in the
presence of complex 41 To our surprise similar attempts to employ 42 as precatalyst
failed with no product formation presumably due to a stronger coordination of GeII
atoms to the Co center which consequently prevents from the formation of an active
Results and Discussion
- 87 -
site for substrate coordination In another set of experiments the formation of
substituted pyridines 48a and 48b by [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenyl acetylene and
an excess of acetonitrile was detected[150]
The catalytic activity of SiII-Co complex 41
was exhibited distinctly again while no product formation could be observed with
GeII-Co complex 42 To some extent the application of CpCo(CO)2 as precatalyst
gave however substituted pyridines in lower yield (48a (3) and 48b (11))[33a]
Scheme 343 Proposed mechanism of 41 as precatalyst for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition
A possible mechanism for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenylacetylene or nitrile
to obtain 47 and 48 is proposed[149a]
as depicted in Scheme 343 At first bis-silylene
complex 41 could participate in a ligand substitution reaction with the
Results and Discussion
- 88 -
phenylacetylene to form an acetylene side-on complex Co-I The latter undergoes a
ring-formation to give the σ-bonded CoIII
complex Co-II which is saturated in
coordination with bis-silylene 38 Then intermediate Co-III is formed after π-donor
substitution by acetylene The succedent ring-enlargement furnishes the transient σ-
complex Co-IV and a subsequent elimination of products 47 and 48 occurs leading to
the active species Co-I by coordination of two phenylacetylene molecules In this
cobalt catalyzed transformation bis-silylene 38 serves as an important accessorial
ligand making the Co-center with high electron density more active and stabilizing the
intermediates Co-II and Co-IV
Unexpectedly complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is inactive The
possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII donor centers to
Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the substrate coordination
Summary
- 89 -
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
In this work various new metallylenes of Si Ge and Sn and bis-metallylenes
(interconnected and spacer separated) were synthesized The properties and
coordination ability of new metallylenes toward transition-metals including Fe Co
Ni and Pd were studied
The reduction of chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
with excess of elemental
potassium furnished the first potassium germylene anionic salt 3[83]
in 33 yield
along with the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip in 31
yield 3 consists of a dimeric half-sandwich complex interconnected via
intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds Each half-sandwich moiety consists of a
K(OEt2)2 cation which is η5-coordinated to the anionic five-membered planar GeNC3
ring with a considerable Cpmacr-like aromatic stabilization This is supported by density
functional theory (DFT) calculations The treatment of (nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
with KC8
gave the same products 3 4 and novel Ge4-cluster compound 5[83]
in very low yield
Compound 5 represents a dipotassium salt of the first ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like
dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a planar Ge42minus
core
Summary
- 90 -
Figure 41 Central molecular structures of 3 (left) and 5 (right)
The reactivity of compound 3 as nucleophile towards chlorogermylene 1[80]
and
chlorostannylene 7[80]
was examined Coupling reactions of 3 with 1 or 7 led to the
corresponding bis-germylene 6[104]
in 66 yield and germylene-stannylene 8[104]
in
34 yield respectively Compounds 6 and 8 were fully characterized including by X-
ray diffraction analysis The new compound 6 represent the first asymmetric
substituted bis-germylene with the shortest GeI-Ge
I bond length The germylene-
stannylene 8 is the first example with a GeI-Sn
I coupling as yet This novel structural
feature was explained with asymmetric structure and some ionic charge distribution
between 5- and six-membered rings by DFT calculation
Figure 42 Central molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right)
Summary
- 91 -
The synthesis of new ligands 12 or 20[110]
was easily accessible from lithium amide
10 with corresponding benzimidoyl chloride 11 or 19[112]
by salt metathesis reactions
Subsequent reactions of 12 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2middotdioxane furnished
chlorogermylene 14[110]
in 82 yield Germylene 16[110]
was obtained by
dehydrochloration of 14 with carbene 15[113]
in 78 yield The molecule of
zwitterionic germylene 16 bears two reactivity positions a strong nucleophilic
methylene group and a nucleophilic(s-orbital)-electrophilic(p-orbital) germylene site
Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas or with water resulted in the formation of
corresponding aminogermylene 17[110]
or germylene hydroxide 18[110]
in high yield
The reaction of compound 20 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2sdotdioxane led to the
unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained by
reaction of 21 with GeCl4 through dehydrochloration with carbene 15 as a base in
57 yield All new compounds have been characterized spectroscopically and
crystallographically 12 and 20 are new types of asymmetric β-diketiminato ligands
with a fused six-membered C6-ring to prevent the transformation of ligand backbone
and side-reactions of ligands They are promising ancillary chelating ligand for the
synthesis of novel silylenes and stannylenes The preparation of new germylenes
added significantly to the growing field of GeII-chemistry capable of small molecule
activation
Summary
- 92 -
Figure 43 Molecular structures of 16 (left) and 18 (right)
Figure 44 Molecular structures of 22 (left) and 23 (right)
A new challenge in metallylene synthetic chemistry is the preparation of chalcogen
(O S Se) bridged bis-metallylene species Here the synthesis and isolation of the
oxygen bridged bis-silylene 28[32a]
was achieved for the first time Reaction of
(HSiCl2)2O with lithium amidinate gave disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield The bis-
silylene oxide 28 was available by dehydrochloration of 27 employing LiN(SiMe3)2 in
76 yield The molecule of 28 contains two triply coordinated Si atoms and two lone
pairs one at each of the Si centers The Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent and
DFT calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small
Compound 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 furnished the Ni0 complex 29
[32a]
in 91 yield which is the first bidentate bis-silylene transition-metal complex with
18 valence electrons at the metal-site In diamagnetic complex 29 the two silylene
Summary
- 93 -
subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are tetrahedrally coordinated to the
Ni0 atom The strong σ-donor character of 28 led to a more electron-rich Ni center
This work will lead to new insights into the chelating silylene ligand transition-metal
coordination chemistry
Figure 45 Molecular structures of 28 (left) and 29 (right)
To possibly get access to a phosphasilyne a desilylation reaction that is phosphino
silylene 30[128]
was allowed to react with Ph3PCl2 30 was synthesized by facile
phosphanylation of chlorosilylene 26 with LiP(SiMe3)2 in 83 yield Surprisingly the
reaction of 30 with one molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 led to the formation of the unique
product 31[128]
as yellow crystals in 72 yield
An X-ray crystal structure analysis confirmed that 31 is a dimer of the desired
phosphasilyne Compound 31 is the first 4π-elektron Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene
derivate with two-coordinated P atoms and a planar Si2P2-ring The Si-P bond lengths
in 31 represent intermediate values between the Si=P bond length and the Si-P bond
length The equal Si-P distances in 31 already indicate σ- and π-electron resonance
stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has been confirmed by theoretical
calculations According to DFT investigation each Si atom in the Si2P2-ring bears a
large positive net charge (+1204) while the P atoms in the ring have somewhat
Summary
- 94 -
smaller negative charges (-0765)
Figure 46 Molecular structure of 31
Pincer arenes having divalent heavier group 14 elements are currently
unprecedented in synthetic chemistry but assumed to form complexes that could
serve as precatalysts for various organic transformations due to their coordination
ability towards metals Here the synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer
arene ligand 35[33b]
through the substitution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
by 13-dilithium
resorcinolate 34 could be achieved in 79 yield Treatment of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
afforded the unexpected silylene-silyl(phenyl)-palladium(II) complex 36[33b]
as orange
crystals in 81 yield
In compound 36 the PdII atom adopts a typical distorted square-planar
configuration defined by the carbon atom C1 two silylene SiII atoms and the silyl
SiIV
atom which is bonded with a hydrogen atom because of hydride shift to Si1 after
C-H activation by Pd Owing to the coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo With the help of theoretical investigation the
Summary
- 95 -
reaction mechanism was explained and the exothermic transformation from 35 to 36
was confirmed This is a new approach in metallylene transition-metal coordination
chemistry with complexes being potentially applicable in catalytic transformation
Figure 47 Molecular structure of 36 tBu and phenyl groups are not shown
Also a type of bis-metallylene with a ferrocendiyl spacer for new bidentate σ-donor
properties was investigated Here the facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and
bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 38 and 40 as well as their corresponding CoI
complexes could be described for the first time By salt metathesis reaction of 11rsquo-
dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorosilylene 26[32b]
or chlorogermylene 39[41]
furnished
bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield or bis-germylene 40[33a]
in 77 yield respectively
Reactions of a suitable CoICp precursor with bis-silylene 38 afforded the bis-silylene
CoI complex 41
[33a] in 30 yield Likewise the bis-germylene Co
I complex 42
[33a]
could be synthesized from 40 with CoICp fragment and isolated in 61 yield
Summary
- 96 -
Figure 48 Molecular structure of 40
Figure 49 Molecular structures of 41 (left) and 42 (right) tBu and phenyl groups
are not shown
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable ferrocene bridged
bis-silylene or bis-germylene respectively The isolated products 41 and 42 are the
first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-silylene or bis-germylene
functioning in a chelating fashion In both complexes cobalt is coordinated on one
side by cyclopentadienyl and on another side by bis-silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40
and contains 18 valence electrons The Co-Si bonds in 41 and the Co-Ge bonds in 42
belong to the shortest Co-E (E = Si Ge) bonds known to date The relatively short EII-
Co bonds in 41 and 42 indicate that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands
in the series of divalent silicon and germanium compounds as yet due to the electron-
rich ferrocene and metallylene segments
In addition in the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3)
cross-coupling[147]
reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-iodo-
benzene was observed evidently The catalytic abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in Co-
Summary
- 97 -
mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile were
probed[148-150]
However complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is
inactive The possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII
donor centers to Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the
substrate coordination
Experimental section
- 98 -
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
51 General section
All experiment and manipulations were carried out under dry oxygen-free nitrogen
using standard Schlenk techniques or in an inert atmosphere of purified nitrogen The
glassware used in all manipulations was dried at 150 degC prior to use cooled to
ambient temperature under high vacuum and flushed with N2 The handling of solid
samples and the preparation of samples for spectroscopic measurements were carried
out inside a glove-box where the O2 and H2O levels were normally kept below 1 ppm
All solvents were purified using conventional procedures and freshly distilled under
N2 atmosphere prior to use They were stored in Schlenk-vessels containing activated
molsieves Benzene toluene n-pentane and n-hexane were purified by distillation
from Nabenzophenone Et2O and THF were initially pre-dried over KOH and then
distilled from Nabenzophenone CH2Cl2 and chloroform were dried by stirring over
CaH2 at ambient temperature
For transfer of solvents or solutions stainless steel cannulas were used which were
stored in the oven at 120 degC The transfer was enabled by the vessel of origin being
left under a positive pressure of protective gas and the receptacle vessel of closed
with a pressure release value By filtration stainless steel cannula containing a filter-
head at one end was utilized Whatman (GFB 25) filters were affixed to the filter end
of the cannula with Teflon tape After use cannulas were cleaned immediately by
thorough rinsing with acetone followed by dilute HCl water acetone and
dichloromethane
In the case of low temperature reactions Dewar vessels were filled with acetone
and dry-ice was added until reaching the desired temperature Ethanol liquid
nitrogen was also employed for reactions in needs of -90 degC
Experimental section
- 99 -
52 Analytical methods
NMR Measurements NMR samples of air andor moisture sensitive compounds were
all prepared under inert atmosphere The deuterated solvents were dried by stirring
over Na (C6D6 THF-d8) or CaH2 (CDCl3) distilled under N2 atmosphere and stored in
Schlenk-vessels containing activated molsieves The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectra were
recorded on ARX 200 (1H 200 MHz
13C 50 MHz) and ARX 400 (
1H 400 MHz
13C
10046 MHz) spectrometers from the Bruker Company The 29
Si-NMR spectra were
recorded only on ARX 400 (29
Si 7949 MHz) spectrometer
The 1H and
13C
1H NMR spectra were calibrated against the residual proton and
natural abundance 13
C resonances of the deuterated solvent relative to
tetramethylsilane (benzene-d6 δH 715 ppm and δC 1280 ppm chloroform-d1 δH 727
ppm and δC 770 ppm THF-d8 δH 173 ppm and δC 253 ppm Heteronuclear spectra
were calibrated as follows 31
P1H external 85 H3PO4
119Sn
1H external SnMe4
Whereby in each case an 1-mm glass capillary tube containing the standard substance
was placed in the appropriate solvent in a 5 mm NMR tube and the spectrum recorded
The abbreviations used to denote the multiplicity of the signals are as follows s =
singlet d = doublet t = triplet q = quartet sept = septet m = multiplet br = broad
Infra-red spectroscopy IR spectra (4000 ndash 400 cm-1
) were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
Spectra 100 FT-IR spectrometer bands were reported in wave-numbers (cm-1
)
Samples of solids were measured as KBr pellets Air or moisture sensitive samples
were prepared in the glove-box and measured immediately The spectra were
processed using the program OMNIC and the abbreviations associated with the
absorptions quoted are vs = very strong s = strong m = medium w = weak br =
broad the intensities of which were assigned on the basis of visual inspection
UV-vis Spectrometry UV-vis spectrophotometric investigations were carried out on a
Specord S 600 spectrophotometer from Analytik Jena AG Pure samples of the
investigated substance were dissolved in dry solvents at suitable concentration The
UV-vis cuvette was filled and closed in a Schlenk tube under N2 atmosphere
Mass Spectrometry Mass spectra were performed at the Chemistry institute of
Experimental section
- 100 -
Technical University Berlin EI spectra were recorded on a 311A Arian MATAMD
spectrometer ESI mass spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap LTQ
XL spectrometer Solid samples were prepared in glove box and the solution of
samples was prepared 15 min before the measurement under N2 atmosphere Mass
spectra are presented in the standard form mz (percent intensity relative to the base
peak)
Elemental analysis The C H N and S analyses of all compounds were carried out on
a Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series instrument Air or moisture sensitive
samples were prepared in ldquotin-boatsrdquo in the glove box Samples with halogen were
filled in the ldquosilver-boatsrdquo for better measuring accuracy
Melting Point determinations A BSGT Apotec II instrument was used for the
determination of melting points Samples were prepared in glass capillary tubes under
N2 atmosphere The melting point was determined while the melded examples had the
same color like the solid before Without melting of samples the color change was
observed was determined as decomposition temperature
Single crystal X-ray structure determinations Crystals suitable to the single crystal
x-ray structure analysis were put on a glass capillary with perfluorinated oil and
measured in a cold nitrogen stream The data of all measurements were collected with
an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur S Saphire diffractometer at 150 K (MoKα radiation λ
= 071073 Aring) The structures were solved by direct methods Refinements were
carried out with the SHELXL-97[151]
software package All thermal displacement
parameters were refined anisotropically for non-H atoms and isotropically for H
atoms All refinements were made by full matrix least-square on F2 In all cases the
graphical representation of the molecular structures was carried out using Ortep32
version 108 The details for the individual structure solutions included in this
dissertation are available in the appendix
Experimental section
- 101 -
53 Starting Materials
Commercially available starting materials were used as received The following
important precursors were prepared according to literature procedures The references
are shown in Table 51
Table 51 Starting materials and references
Compound References Compound References
GeCl2dioxane [27] 15 (HCNtBu)2C [113]
(HSiCl2)2O [117] 19 Ph(Cl)C=N-iPr [112]
1 (nacnac)GeCl [80] 24 tBuN=C=N
tBu [152]
2 (nacnac)GeCl3 [82] 26 aLSiCl [32b]
7 (nacnac)SnCl [80] 32 (Me3Si)2N-SnCl [53]
9 (C5H10)C=N-Dip [111] 39 aLGeCl [41]
11 Ph(Cl)C=N-Dip [112]
Experimental section
- 102 -
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4
To a solution of 1[80]
(133 g 253 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added potassium
(148 g 379 mmol) at room temperature After stirring for 4 h the color of the
solution changed from yellow to brown Volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was first extracted with hexane (60 mL in portions) and then
with diethyl ether (60 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtrated and the filtrate was concentrated
and stored at -20degC for 5 d yielding the first germylene anion 3 as pale yellow crystals
(030 g 083 mmol 33)
C25H44GeKNO2 MW 50236
Properties soluble in THF slightly soluble in Et2O spontaneous
combustion towards air
Melting Point 220 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 108 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 112 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 184 (s 3 H
NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 298 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 618 (s 1 H γ-CH) 691- 698 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 182 (NCMe) 203
(GeCMe) 238 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 1185
(γ-C) 1224-1745 (arom C GeCMe NCMe)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C17H24GeKN(C4H10O)022 C 5797 H 713 N
378 Found C 5764 H 694 N 367
The combined hexane extract was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated and
stored at -20 degC for 2 d yielding the new germylene 4 as yellow crystals (052 g 078
Experimental section
- 103 -
mmol 31)
NHN
GeN
Dip
DipDip
C41H59GeN3 MW 66657
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 192 - 193 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 091 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 109 (d 3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH =
68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 122 (m br 12 H CHMe2) 130 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 162 (s 6 H NCMe) 329-340
(m 6 H CHMe2) 503 (s 1 H γ-CH) 564 (s 1 H NH) 683
ndash 718 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 225 (CHMe) 234 (NCMe)
240 (br CHMe) 245 (CHMe) 247 (CHMe) 256 (CHMe)
288 (CHMe) 292 (CHMe) 964 (γ-C) 1171 ndash 1635 (arom
C NCMe)
EI-MS mz () 6674 (03 [M]+) 4912 (100 [M -
iPr2C6H3NH]
+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C41H59GeN3 C 7388 H 892 N 630 Found
C 7354 H 868 N 613
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5
To a precooled (-78 degC) solution of 2[82]
(097 g 16 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was
added KC8 (094 g 69 mmol) After stirring for 4 h the reaction mixture was allowed
to warm to room temperature and the color of the solution changed from yellow to
brown The reaction mixture was allowed to stir an additional 48 h at room
temperature The signal of compound 1[80]
also disappeared in the 1H-NMR spectrum
of the resulting mixture and compound 3 and 4 were observed as main products
Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was first extracted
with hexane (50 mL in portions) and then with diethyl ether (50 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtered the filtrate was concentrated to 10
Experimental section
- 104 -
mL and stored at -20degC for 48 h yielding 3 as pale yellow crystals (024 g 067 mmol
42) The combined hexane extract was concentrated and stored at -20degC for 24 h
yielding 4 as yellow crystals (042 g 063 mmol 39)
Further concentration of the supernate and cooling at -20degC for 48 h yielded 5 as red
crystals along with colorless crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex
C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 MW 135028
Elemental analysis calcd () for C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 C 7890 H 1003 N 278
Found C 7821 H 999 N 281
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6
C46H65Ge2N3 MW 80531
To a solution of the germylene anion 3 (138 mg 0263 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at -
30 degC was added the solution of the chlorogermylene 1[80]
(93 mg 0263 mmol) in
THF (10 mL) The color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After
stirring for further 2 h at room temperature volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 5 days yielding 6 as dark red crystals (140 mg
017 mmol 66)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt169 degC (decomp)
Experimental section
- 105 -
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 107 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H
CHMe2) 111 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H CHMe2) 120 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 124 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 161 (s
6 H NCMe) 202 (s 3 H NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 301
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 319 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 367 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 518 (s 1 H 6-
ring-γ-CH) 682 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 702- 718 (m 9 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 191 (5-ring-NCMe) 210
(GeCMe) 240 (6-ring-NCMe) 248 (CHMe2) 249 (CHMe2)
250 (CHMe2) 258 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 261 (CHMe2)
279 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 1028 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1238 (5-ring-β-C) 1240 ndash 1694 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
UV-vis λ [nm] = 315 (intense) 358 (intense) 502 (2600)
EI-MS mz () 491 (45 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (15 [M-
(C3N2Ge) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65Ge2N3 C 6861 H 814 N 522 Found
C 6884 H 800 N 516
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8
C46H65GeN3Sn MW 85138
To a suspension of germylene anion 3 (116 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) at -
70 degC was added the solution of 7[80]
(187 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) The
color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After stirring for further 2 h at
room temperature the volatiles of the reaction mixture were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
Experimental section
- 106 -
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 10 days yielding 8 as dark red-black solid (96 mg
011 mmol 34) The solid was solved in Et2O and stored at 0 degC for 24 h building
dark red crystals
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt143 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 085 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 106 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 121 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 127 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 129 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2)
165 (s 6 H SnNCMe) 227 (s 3 H GeNCMe) 300 (s 3 H
GeCMe) 305 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 333 (sept
3JHH
= 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 378 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2)
510 (s 1 H 6-ring-γ-CH) 691 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 705-
721 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 188 (5-ring-NCMe) 207
(GeCMe) 242 (6-ring-NCMe) 246 (CHMe2) 248 (CHMe2)
249 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 260 (CHMe2) 268 (CHMe2)
280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 287 (CHMe2) 1035 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1237 (5-ring-β-C) 1244 ndash 1704 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
119Sn NMR
(C6D6) δ = -197
UV-vis λ [nm] = 314 (15000) 363 (14500) 541 (2800)
EI-MS mz () 537 (8 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (17 [M-
(C3N2Sn) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65GeN3Sn C 6489 H 770 N 494
Found C 6444 H 764 N 477
Experimental section
- 107 -
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12
C37H48N2 MW 52079
To a solution of 9[111]
(200 g 777 mmol) in 200 mL Et2O at -78 degC was added 16
M nBuLi (486 mL 777 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 11[112]
(210 g 700 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h Water free Et3NHCl (108 g 777 mmol) was added to the
reaction mixture and stirred All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 229 g (440 mmol
63 ) of the novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 as colorless crystals
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 148 ~ 150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 117 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 125 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 134 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 164 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 187 (s 1 H NH) 217 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335
(m 4 H CHMe2) 696 (s 3 H arom H) 715- 727 (m 8 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 218 (Cy-CH2) 221
(CHMe2) 236 (CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 256
(CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 285 (Cy-CH2) 286
(Cy-CH2) 977 (Cy-CCN) 1222-1441 (arom C) 1600 (Cy-
CN) 1658 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H49N2+ 5213896 Found 5213878
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48N2 C 8533 H 929 N 538 Found C
8518 H 927 N 547
Experimental section
- 108 -
526 The new chlorogermylene 14
N
N
Ph
Dip
Dip
Cl
Ge
C37H47ClGeN2 MW 62788
nBuLi (881 mL 141 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 12 (720 g 138
mmol) in 80 mL of Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed slowly to warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(330 g 142 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -
30 degC yielding 14 as yellow crystals (710 g 113 mmol 82 )
Properties soluble in hexane toluene sensitive towards air
Melting Point 203 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 097 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 107 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121-127 (m 9 H CHMe2) 128-139 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 144 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 155 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 203-227 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 317
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 327 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 394 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 417 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 680- 739 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 226 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 239 (CHMe2) 245 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
249 (CHMe2) 274 (CHMe2) 277 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
286 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 291 (CHMe2) 293 (CHMe2)
295 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1089 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1476
(arom C) 1651 (Cy-CN) 1688 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47ClGeN2+ 6282640 Found 6282639
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H47ClGeN2 C 7078 H 754 N 446
Found C 7073 H 762 N 457
Experimental section
- 109 -
527 The new germylene 16
C37H46GeN2 MW 59142
Germylene chloride 14 (300 g 479 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-butyl- imidazol-2-
ylidene 15[113]
(091 g 502 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (25 mL) at room
temperature and stirred for 48 h resulting in a white precipitate of the corresponding
NHCmiddotHCl salt The color of the solution changed from yellow to brown-red The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm
hexane two times The combined filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 16 as red crystals (220 g 373 mmol 78 )
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 167 ~ 168 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 115 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 126 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 135 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 12 H CHMe2) 155 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 204 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 221 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 369 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 380 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 415 (t
3JHH =
44 Hz 1 H C=CH) 675- 725 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 226 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 258 (Cy-CH2) 259 (CHMe2) 273 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 987 (Cy-CH)
1117 (Cy-CCN) 1236-1431 (arom C) 1473 1474 (Cy-CN
Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 704 (s) 787 (s) 939 (m) 1104 (s) 1135 (s) 1204 (s) 1248 (s)
1296 (s) 1322 (s) 1365 (s) 1439 (s) 1461 (s) 1535 (m) 1600
(s) 2822 (m) 2865 (s) 2922 (s) 2957 (w) 3022 (w) 3061 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2+ 5932951 Found 5932950
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H46GeN2 C 7514 H 784 N 474 Found
C 7495 H 800 N 484
Experimental section
- 110 -
528 Aminogermylene 17
C37H49GeN3 MW 60845
A red solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (15 mL) was exposed to dry
ammonia gas for 10 min at room temperature The solution turned to a yellow color
and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvent was removed and the
residue was dissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated solution was stored at 0
degC yielding 17 as yellow crystals (560 mg 092 mmol 92 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 173 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 117 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 120-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 142 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
154 (s 2 H NH2) 200-213 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 357 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 363 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 388 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 679- 724 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 214 (CHMe2) 230 (CHMe2)
234 (CHMe2) 237 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
248 (CHMe2) 272 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
285 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
293 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1023 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1462
(arom C) 1643 (Cy-CN) 1669 (Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 704 (s) 752 (s) 796 (s) 839 (m) 922 (s) 1096 (s)
1143 (s) 1174 (s) 1252 (s) 1304 (s) 1360 (s) 1430 (s) 1543
(s) 2865 (m) 2961 (s) 3021 (w) 3048 (m) 3343 (w) 3430
(w)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H49GeN3 C 7304 H 812 N 691 Found
C 7272 H 810 N 683
Experimental section
- 111 -
529 Germylene hydroxide 18
C37H48GeN2O MW 60943
A diluted solution of H2O in THF (179 mL 100 mmol 056 M) was dropped into
a solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) at -30 degC The solution
turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvents
were removed and the residue was redissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated
solution was stored at 0 degC yielding 18 as yellow crystals (580 mg 095 mmol 95 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 188 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 116 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 119-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 139 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
166 (s 1 H OH) 195-221 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 384 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 397 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 675- 726 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 229 (CHMe2)
233 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2) 243 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 281 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
291 (Cy-CH2) 314 (Cy-CH2) 1028 (Cy-CCN) 1233-1464
(arom C) 1647 (Cy-CN) 1666 (Ph-CN)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 713 (s) 743 (s) 770 (s) 791 (s) 839 (s) 926 (m)
1056 (m) 1104 (s) 1148 (s) 1170 (s) 1257 (s) 1313 (s) 1339
(s) 1365 (s) 1430 (s) 1470 (s) 1539 (s) 2861 (s) 2961 (s)
3018 (w) 3057 (m) 3643 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2O+ 6092900 Found 6092901
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48GeN2O C 7292 H 794 N 460
Experimental section
- 112 -
Found C 7300 H 786 N 464
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20
C28H38N2 MW 40230
At -78 degC to a solution of 9[111]
(150 g 583 mmol) in 150 mL Et2O was added 16
M nBuLi (365 mL 584 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 19[112]
(106 g 583 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 141 g (350 mmol
60 ) of 20 as colorless blocks
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 123 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 109 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 132 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 156 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 208 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 214 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 310 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 323 (m 1 H CHMe2) 713- 753 (m 8 H arom H)
1203 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H NH)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 219 (Cy-CH2) 226
(CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (CHMe2) 276
(Cy-CH2) 280 (CHMe2) 300 (Cy-CH2) 459 (CHMe2) 977
(Cy-CCN) 1226 1228 1275 1282 1284 1371 1389
1453 (arom C) 1576 (Cy-CN) 1673 (PhCN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C28H39N2+ 4033113 Found 4033112
Experimental section
- 113 -
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H38N2 C 8353 H 951 N 696 Found C
8270 H 977 N 679
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22
C28H37ClGeN2O MW 52570
nBuLi (16 mL 256 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (100 g 249
mmol) in 15 mL Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed to slowly warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(058 g 250 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 22 as yellow crystals (105 g 200 mmol 80 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 161 ~ 162 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 108 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 134 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 141 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 153 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 189 (m
1 H Cy-CH2) 202 (m 1 H Cy-CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2)
284 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 367 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz
1 H CHMe2) 396 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 688 (m
1 H arom H) 705-724 (m 7 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 222 (CHMe2) 228 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 240 (CHMe2) 241 (CHMe2) 253 (CHMe2)
263 (Cy-CH2) 272 (CHMe2) 283 (CHMe2) 285 (CHMe2)
Experimental section
- 114 -
293 (Cy-CH2) 312 (Cy-CH2) 537 (CHMe2) 1068 (Cy-
CCN) 1239 1250 1267 1271 1288 1294 1388 1410
1446 1469 (arom C) 1620 (Cy-CN) 1654 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H37ClGeN2O C 6397 H 709 N 533
Found C 6426 H 725 N 551
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23
C28H36Cl2GeN2 MW 54415
nBuLi (32 mL 512 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (201 g 500 mmol)
in 30 mL of toluene at -78 degC The solution was allowed to warm to room temperature
and stirred for 4 h To this solution GeCl4 (107 g 500 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-
butylimidazol-2-ylidene 15 (091 g 502 mmol) were added at -78 degC The resulting
suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were removed under
reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm hexane two times The
filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC yielding 23 as yellow crystals (156 g
287 mmol 57 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 126 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 113 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 137 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 146 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 189 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 332 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 361 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 421 (t
3JHH =
42 Hz 1 H C=CH) 701-726 (m 8 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 237 (CHMe2) 243 (Cy-
CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 254 (Cy-CH2) 257 (CHMe2) 286
Experimental section
- 115 -
(CHMe2) 304 (Cy-CH2) 511 (CHMe2) 1036 (Cy-CH)
1125 (Cy-CCN) 1248 1287 1296 1354 1391 1411
1421 1490 (arom C) 1682 (Cy-CN) 1709 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H36Cl2GeN2 C 6180 H 515 N 667
Found C 6203 H 517 N 679
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27
C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 MW 60781
To a solution of tBuN=C=N
tBu
[152] (329 g 213 mmol) in Et2O (80 mL) PhLi (119
mL 214 mmol 18 M) was added at -78 degC The solution was raised to room
temperature and stirred for 2 h To this solution at -90 degC 1133-
tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(230 g 1065 mmol) was added in one minute The
resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with toluene (60 mL)
by 80 degC two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h yielding
27 as colorless crystals (343 g 564 mmol 53)
Properties soluble in toluene sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 175 ~ 177 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 120 (s 36 H CMe3) 598
(s 2 H SiHCl) 733- 746 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 317 (CMe3) 544 (CMe3)
1276 1285 1297 1337 (arom C) 1711 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = -1110
IR(KBr cm-1
) 606 (s) 658 (m) 711 (s) 733 (s) 760 (s) 789 (s) 934 (s)
1068 (s) 1200 (s) 1269 (s) 1378 (s) 1486 (s) 1550 (s) 1566
(s) 1612 (s) 1783 (w) 1826 (w) 1950 (w) 1969 (w) 2000
Experimental section
- 116 -
(w) 2135 (s) 2188 (s) 2909 (s) 2934 (s) 2971 (s) 3232 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C30H49Cl2N4OSi2+ 6072822 Found 6072844
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 C 5928 H 796 N 922
Found C 5971 H 797 N 913
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28
C30H46N4OSi2 MW 53488
Toluene (120 mL) was added to a mixture of 27 (260 g 428 mmol) and
LiN(SiMe3)2 (144 g 856 mmol) at ambient temperature After 2 h the solution turned
to an orange color with the formation of LiCl The resulting mixture was stirred
overnight The solvent was then removed and the residue was extracted with toluene
(100 mL) The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h to yield yellow
crystals of 28 (175 g 327 mmol 76)
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 152 ~ 160 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 692-
731(m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 530 (CMe3)
1277 1291 1299 1349 (arom C) 1623 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -161
IR(KBr cm-1
) 608 (s) 709 (s) 746 (s) 790 (s) 892 (m) 972 (s) 1032 (m)
1070 (m) 1208 (s) 1268 (m) 1359 (s) 1412 (s) 1446 (s)
1476 (s) 1577 (m) 1648 (m) 1778 (w) 1826 (w) 1899 (w)
1970 (w) 2248 (w) 2867 (s) 2902 (s) 2928 (s) 2964 (s)
3065 (m)
Experimental section
- 117 -
ESI-MS mz calcd 5353288 Found 5353227
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H46N4OSi2 C 6736 H 867 N 1047
Found C 6688 H 857 N 1046
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
C38H58N4NiOSi2 MW 70176
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 28 (267 mg 050 mmol) and Ni(cod)2
(1375 mg 050 mmol) at ambient temperature The solution turned to a low-red color
and was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted with
toluene (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield low-red crystals of 29 (319 mg
046 mmol 91) The remaining solid was crystallized from hexane at -30 degC
suitable for single crystal measurement
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 183 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 130 (s 36 H CMe3) 281
(m 4 H CH2) 295 (m 4 H CH2) 504 (s 4 H =CH) 686-
707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 337 (CH2) 535
(CMe3) 760 (=CH) 1277 1293 1296 1335 (arom C)
1690 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 328
IR(KBr cm-1
) 607 (s) 644 (s) 698 (s) 750 (s) 792 (s) 925 (m) 1021 (m)
1075 (s) 1209 (s) 1267 (s) 1320 (m) 1361 (s) 1407 (s)
1444 (s) 1475 (s) 1578 (m) 1647 (m) 1775 (w) 1823 (w)
Experimental section
- 118 -
1902 (w) 1962 (w) 2280 (w) 2791 (s) 2855 (s) 2913 (s)
2975 (s) 3023 (m) 3063 (w)
ESI-MS mz () calcd 7003503 Found 7003577
Elemental analysis calcd () for C38H58N4NiOSi2 C 6504 H 833 N 798
Found C 6387 H 837 N 805
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30
C21H41N2PSi3 MW 43679
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(302 mg 102
mmol) and lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphate (285 mg 103 mmol) at ambient
temperature The solution turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 3 h The solvent
was removed and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30 degC for 24 h yielding 30 as yellow crystals (371 mg
085 mmol 83)
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 149-150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 058 (d
3JP-H = 44 Hz 18 H
SiMe3) 124 (s 18 H CMe3) 681-699 (m 2 H arom H)
734-741 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 44 (d
3JC-P = 100 Hz
SiMe3) 315 (d 4JC-P = 16 Hz CMe3) 540 (CMe3) 1289
1292 1293 1344 (arom C) 1572 (d 3JC-P = 95 Hz
NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 31 (d
1JSi-P = 229 Hz
PSiMe3) 440 (d 1JSi-P = 1943 Hz N2SiP)
31P NMR (81012 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = - 2110
Experimental section
- 119 -
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C21H41N2PSi3 4362315 Found 4362524
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31
C30H46N4P2Si2 MW 58083
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 30 (309 mg 071 mmol) and
triphenylphosphine dichloride (237 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The
solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted
with THF (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield yellow crystals of 31 (148
mg 025 mmol 72)
Properties soluble in THF sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 174 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 705-
733 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 331 (CMe3) 534
(CMe3) 1256 1276 1294 1359 (arom C) 1710 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 267 (t
1JSi-P = 998 Hz)
31P NMR (81012 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = - 1649
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C30H46N4P2Si2 5802736 Found
5802361
Experimental section
- 120 -
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn MW 60944
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(336 mg 114
mmol) and Chloro-amino-stannylene 32[53]
(360 mg 114 mmol) at room temperature
The solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was
extracted with hexane (20 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield colorless
crystals of 33 (343 mg 056 mmol 49)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air decomposed
slowly at room temperature
Melting Point gt 25 degC (slowly decomp)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn C 4139 H 678 N
689 Found C 4195 H 701 N 706
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35
C44H66N4O2Si2 MW 73919
At -78 degC to a solution of 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinol (150 g 675 mmol) in 30 mL
Et2O was added 16 M nBuLi (85 mL 136 mmol) in hexane and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h resulting in white slurry The reaction
mixture was cooled to -78 degC again and added the solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(398 g 135 mmol) in 50 mL toluene After the addition the mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with the warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC 395 g bis-silylene 35 (534
Experimental section
- 121 -
mmol 79 ) as slightly yellow solid
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
174 (s 18 H ArC(CH3)3) 693 - 713 (m 8 H arom H) 754
(s 1 H Ar-H) 787 (s 1 H Ar-H) 802 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (ArC(CH3)3) 318
(NC(CH3)3) 350 (ArC(CH3)3) 530 (NC(CH3)3) 1096
1243 1276 1295 1297 1313 1341 1552 (arom C)
1636 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -240
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C44H66N4O2Si2 C 7049 H 900 N 758
Found C 7075 H 930 N 756
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36
C88H132N8O4PdSi4 MW 158480
Bis-silylene 35 (600 mg 081 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (468 mg 041 mmol) were
mixed in 25 mL hexane at room temperature and stirred for 24 h The hexane solution
was filtrated and the white precipitate was washed with 10 mL hexane one time The
solid product was dried under reduced pressure to yield 520 mg (033 mmol 81 )
white powders The product was dissolved in warm hexane and stored at room
temperature for 10 days giving some orange crystals of 36 The reaction of bis-
Experimental section
- 122 -
silylene 35 with one molar equiv of Pd(PPh3)4 in toluene furnishes the same product
but the isolable yield is only about 30
Properties slightly soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 105 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 108
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 114 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 116 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 131 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 139 (s 9 H C(CH3)3)155
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 168 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 177 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 180 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 185 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 212
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 659 (s 1 H SiH) 686- 789 (m 22 H
arom H) 816 (s 1 H Ar-H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (C(CH3)3) 311
(C(CH3)3) 314 (C(CH3)3) 316 (C(CH3)3) 318 (C(CH3)3)
319 (C(CH3)3) 320 (C(CH3)3) 322 (C(CH3)3) 328
(C(CH3)3) 332 (C(CH3)3) 333 (C(CH3)3) 343 (C(CH3)3)
349 350 351 357 526 527 537 539 540 541 542
561 1112 1225 1236 1243 1256 1258 1271 1285
1287 1289 1291 1293 1294 1302 1303 1318 1323
1324 1326 1340 1342 1378 1380 1381 1409 1430
1533 1559 1585 1613 1622 1654 1731 1742
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -87 (LSi) 397 (Si-H) 623
658 (LSiPd)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 623 (m) 706 (m) 764 (m) 860 (m) 1056 (m) 1108 (m) 1206
(m) 1272 (m) 1365 (m) 1418 (s) 1446 (m) 1476 (m) 1446
(m) 1476 (m) 1495 (m) 1591 (m) 2135 (w) 2875(m) 2906
(s) 2964 (s) 3061 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C88H132N8O4PdSi4 C 6669 H 840 N
707 Found C 6616 H 875 N 676
Experimental section
- 123 -
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38
C40H54FeN4Si2 MW 70290
16 M nBuLi (423 ml 677 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (600 mg 323 mmol) and TMEDA (937 mg 806 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (30 mL) solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(190 g 645 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
pentane Compound 38 was obtained as deep red crystals in 70 yield (159 g 226
mmol) on storage of a saturated pentane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 117 ~ 119 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 116 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
451 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 472 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 692- 707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 318 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 709 (FeCH) 727 (FeCH) 846 (SiC) 1289
1294 1305 1349 (arom C) 1604 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 433
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeN4Si2 C 6835 H 774 N 797
Found C 6803 H 767 N 778
Experimental section
- 124 -
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40
C40H54FeGe2N4 MW 79201
16 M nBuLi (353 ml 564 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (500 mg 269 mmol) and TMEDA (781 mg 672 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (25 mL) solution of chlorogermylene 39[41]
(183 g 538 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
warm hexane Compound 40 was obtained as orange crystals in 77 yield (163 g
206 mmol) on storage of a saturated hexane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 168 ~ 169 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 461
(t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 471 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 691- 697 (m 6 H arom H) 712- 717 (m 4 H arom
H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 320 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 701 (FeCH) 723 (FeCH) 920 (GeC) 1289
1290 1302 1369 (arom C) 1659 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeGe2N4 C 6666 H 687 N 707 Found
C 6655 H 701 N 707
Experimental section
- 125 -
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeN4Si2 MW 82693
In a glove box CoBr2 (202 mg 092 mmol) NaCp (81 mg 092 mmol) and KC8
(131 mg 097 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent
mixture (41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at
room temperature The bis-silylene 38 (650 mg 092 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 41 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 30 yield (230 mg 028 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 166 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 139 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
440 (t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 461 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 496 (s 5 H CoCH) 680- 684 (m 2 H arom H)
692- 696 (m 6 H arom H) 720- 723 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (NC(CH3)3) 534
(NC(CH3)3) 700 (FeCH) 745 (FeCH) 780 (CoCH) 851
(SiC) 1291 1297 1300 1343 (arom C) 1673 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 820
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFeN4Si2 C 6536 H 719 N 678
Found C 6612 H 724 N 686
Experimental section
- 126 -
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhGe
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Ge
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeGe2N4 MW 91604
In a glove box CoBr2 (83 mg 038 mmol) NaCp (33 mg 038 mmol) and KC8 (54
mg 040 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent mixture
(41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at room
temperature The bis-germylene 40 (300 mg 038 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 42 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 61 yield (210 mg 023 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 309 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 131 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
438 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 459 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 504 (s br 5 H CoCH) 684- 688 (m 2 H arom H)
695- 698 (m 6 H arom H) 714- 718 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 322 (NC(CH3)3) 537
(NC(CH3)3) 699 (FeCH) 737 (FeCH) 759 (CoCH) 891
(GeC) 1287 1296 1300 1361(arom C) 1680 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFe Ge2N4 C 5900 H 649 N 612
Found C 5942 H 664 N 590
Experimental section
- 127 -
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44
C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 MW 100697
To a solution of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (250 mg 036 mmol) in 10 ml hexane
was added a solution of CpCo(CO)2 (130 mg 072 mmol) in 8 ml hexane The
reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All solvents were evaporated
in vacuo The corresponding bis-silylene cobalt(I) complex 44 was isolated as brown
air- and moisture-sensitive solids in 87 yield (310 mg 031 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 293 ~ 295 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
461 (m 4 H FeCH) 476 (m 4 H FeCH) 523 (s 10 H
CoCH) 683- 695 (m 6 H arom H) 702- 706 (m 2 H
arom H) 745- 748 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 313 (NC(CH3)3) 542
(NC(CH3)3) 723 (FeCH) 741 (FeCH) 804 (SiC) 809
(CoCH) 1287 1296 1300 1324 (arom C) 1687 (NCN)
2078 (br CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 857
IR(KBr cm-1
) 500 (m) 539 (w) 564 (m) 628 (s) 703 (m) 757 (s) 792 (m)
825 (w) 1028 (m) 1081 (w) 1146 (m) 1199 (s) 1275 (m)
1360 (m) 1388 (m) 1417 (s) 1438 (w) 1474 (m) 1520 (s)
1641 (s) 1888 (s) 2869 (s) 2901 (m) 2926 (m) 2965 (s)
1520 (s) 3097 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 C 6202 H 641 N
Experimental section
- 128 -
556 Found C 6287 H 630 N 571
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45
C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 MW 103867
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (500 mg
071 mmol) and Fe2(CO)9 (259 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The solution
was stirred for 12 h The solvent was evaporated in vacuo The corresponding bis-
silylene iron(0) complex 45 was isolated as yellow-brown air- and moisture-sensitive
solids in 73 yield (540 mg 052 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 155 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 109 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 483
(s 4 H FeCH) 500 (s 4 H FeCH) 699- 712 (m 8 H arom
H) 736- 739 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 311 (NC(CH3)3) 548
(NC(CH3)3) 735 (FeCH) 742 (FeCH) 771 (SiC) 1210
1287 1303 1308 (arom C) 1704 (NCN) 2169 (CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 1050
IR(KBr cm-1
) 630 (s) 765 (w) 1028 (m) 1035 (m) 1200 (m) 1370 (w)
1400 (m) 1474 (w) 1609 (w) 1648 (w) 1900 (s) 1948 (s)
1996(w) 2026 (s) 2865 (w) 2930 (m) 2965 (m)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 C 5550 H 524 N
539 Found C 5623 H 517 N 566
References
- 129 -
6 REFERENCES
1 P Pyykko Chem Rev 1988 88 563
2 N V Sidgwick Clarendon Oxford 1950 1 287 (b) R S Drago J Phys Chem 1958 62
353
3 P P Power Chem Rev 1999 99 3463 (b) R C Fischer P P Power Chem Rev 2010 110
3877
4 R Janoschek Chemie in unserer Zeit 1988 22 128
5 (a) F S Kipping L L Lloyd Dalton Trans 1901 79 449 (b) N N Greenwood A
Earnshaw Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed) 1997 362
6 (a) L Roumlsch P John R Reitmeier Silicon Compounds Organic In Ullmanns Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH amp Co KGaA 2000 (b) A J O Lenick
Basic Silicone Chemistry ndash A Review 1999
7 S Yao Y Xiong M Brym M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 7268
8 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7562
9 Y Xiong S Yao R Muumlller M Kaupp M Driess Nature Chem 2010 2 577
10 (a) S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4159 (b) S
Yao Y Xiong C Milsmann E Bill S Pfirrmann C Limberg M Driess Chem Eur J
2010 16 436
11 (a) K S Pitzer J Am Chem Soc 1948 70 2140 (b) R S Mulliken J Am Chem Soc
1955 77 884
12 (a) M Asay C Jones M Driess Chem Rev 2011 111 354 (b) S Yao Y Xiong M Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 1748 (c) Y Mizuhata T Sasamori N Tokitoh Chem Rev 2009
109 3479 (d) P P Power Organometallics 2007 26 4362 (e) P P Power Chem Rev 2003
103 789 (f) S Nagendran H W Roesky Organometallics 2008 27 457
13 (a) R West M J Fink J Michl Science 1981 214 1343 (b) M J Fink M J Michalczyk
K J Haller R West J Michl Chem Commun 1983 1010 (c) S Masamune Y Hanzawa
D J Williams J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 6136 (d) D E Goldberg D H Harris M F
Lappert K M Thomas Chem Commun 1976 261 (e) K W Klinkhammer T F Faumlssler H
Gruumltzmacher Angew Chem Int Ed 1998 37 124 (f) J T Snow S Murakami S
Masamune D J Williams Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 4191 (g) M Weidenbruch Angew
Chem Int Ed 2003 42 2222
14 L Pauling J Am Chem Soc 1931 53 1367
15 (a) G Trinquier J P Malrieu P Riviere J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 4529 (b) J P
Malrieu G Trinquier J Am Chem Soc 1989 111 5916 (c) H Jacobsen T Ziegler J Am
Chem Soc 1994 116 3667
16 L Pu B Twamley P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2000 122 3524
17 M Kaupp P V R Schleyer J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 1061
18 A D Phillips R J Wright M M Olmstead P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2002 124 5930
19 N Takagi S Nagase Organometallics 2001 20 5498
20 M Stender A D Phillips R J Wright P P Power Angew Chem Int Ed 2002 41 1785
21 T L Allen W H Fink P P Power Dalton Trans 2000 407
References
- 130 -
22 A Sekiguchi R Kinjo M Ichinohe Science 2004 305 1755
23 D Bourissou O Guerret F P Gabbai G Bertrand Chem Rev 2000 100 39
24 M Denk R Lennon R Hayashi R West A V Belyakov H P Verne A Haaland M
Wagner N Metzler J Am Chem Soc 1994 116 2691
25 M Driess S Yao M Brym C V Wuellen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 6730
26 M Kira S Ishida T Iwamoto C Kabuto J Am Chem Soc 1999 121 9722
27 V Lemierre A Chrostowska A Dargelos P Baylegravere W J Leigh C R Harrington Appl
Organom Chem 2004 18 676
28 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky S Merkel J Henn D Stalke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
5683
29 L Jafarpour E D Stevens S P Nolan J Organomet Chem 2000 606 49
30 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen D Lentz J Am Chem Soc 2006 128 9628
31 (a) C-W So H W Roesky J Magull R B Oswald Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 3948
(b) C-W So H W Roesky P M Gurubasavaraj R B Oswald M T Gamer P G Jones S
Blaurock J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12049
32 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890 (b) S S Sen
H W Roesky D Stern J Henn D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2009 132 1123
33 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167 (b) W
Wang S Inoue E Irran M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691 (c) R Azhakar R
S Ghadwal H W Roesky H Wolf D Stalke Organometallics 2012 31 4588 (d) S S
Sen J Hey R Herbst-Irmer H W Roesky D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 12311
34 R C Fischer L Pu J C Fettinger M A Brynda P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
11366
35 Y Wang Y Xie P Wei R B King H F Schaefer P Von R Schleyer G H Robinson
Science 2008 321 1069
36 S S Sen S Khan S Nagendran H W Roesky Acc Chem Res 2012 45 578
37 S S Sen A Jana H W Roesky C Schulzke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 8536
38 C Jones S J Bonyhady N Holzmann G Frenking A Stasch Inorg Chem 2011 50
12315
39 D Gau R Rodriguez T Kato N Saffon-Merceron A De Coacutezar F P Cossiacuteo A Baceiredo
Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50 1092
40 S P Green C Jones P C Junk K-A Lippert A Stasch Chem Commun 2006 3978
41 S Nagendran S S Sen H W Roesky D Koley H GrubmuLler A Pal R Herbst-Irmer
Organometallics 2008 27 5459
42 W-P Leung W-K Chiu K-H Chong T C W Mak Chem Commun 2009 6822
43 (a) S P Green C Jones A Stasch Science 2007 318 1754 (b) S J Bonyhady S P Green
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 2973 (c) S J Bonyhady
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch A J Edwards G J Mcintyre Chem Eur J 2010 16 938
44 A Sidiropoulos C Jones A Stasch S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
9701
45 Y Peng R C Fischer W A Merrill J Fischer L Pu B D Ellis J C Fettinger R H
Herber P P Power Chemical Science 2010 1 461
46 R Jambor B Kašnaacute K N Kirschner M Schuumlrmann K Jurkschat Angew Chem Int Ed
References
- 131 -
2008 47 1650
47 (a) C D Schaeffer J J Zuckerman J Am Chem Soc 1974 96 7160 (b) M J S Gynane
D H Harris M F Lappert P P Power P Riviere M Riviere-Baudet Dalton Trans 1977
2004 (c) M F Lappert P P Power M J Slade L Hedberg K Hedberg V Schomaker
Chem Commun 1979 369 (d) T Fjeldberg H Hope M F Lappert P P Power A J
Thorne Chem Commun 1983 639 (e) M Veith M Jarczyk V Huch Chem Ber 1988
121 347
48 M Veith R Lisowsky Angew Chem Int Ed 1988 27 1087
49 P B Hitchcock M F Lappert A J Thorne Chem Commun 1990 1587
50 R A Bartlett P P Power J Am Chem Soc 1990 112 3660
51 J-T Ahlemann H W Roesky R Murugavel E Parisini M Noltemeyer H-G Schmidt O
Muumlller R Herbst-Irmer L N Markovskii Y G Shermilovich Chem Ber 1997 130 1113
52 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky K Proumlpper B Dittrich S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem
Int Ed 2011 50 5374
53 R W Chorley P B Hitchock B S Jolly M F Lappert G A Lawless Chem Commun
1991 1302
54 A G Avent C Drost B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem
2004 630 2090
55 M Veith A Rammo Z Anorg Allg Chem 2001 627 662
56 M Veith J Fischer T R Prout M Noetzel P Hobein V Huch Inorg Chem 1991 30
4130
57 H Braunschweig P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem Int Ed
1994 33 1156
58 H Braunschweig C Drost P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem
Int Ed 1997 36 261
59 R E Allan M A Beswick G R Coggan P R Raithby A E H Wheatley D S Wright
Inorg Chem 1997 36 5202
60 (a) C Stanciu S S Hino M Stender A F Richards M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
Chem 2005 44 2774 (b) Y Peng B D Ellis X Wang P P Power J Am Chem Soc
2008 130 12268
61 B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem 2005 631 1383
62 C Cui M M Olmstead J C Fettinger G H Spikes P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 17530
63 X Wang C Ni Z Zhu J C Fettinger P P Power Inorg Chem 2009 48 2464
64 S S Sen D Kratzert D Stern H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2010 49 5786
65 H-X Yeong H-W Xi K H Lim C-W So Chem Eur J 2010 16 12956
66 (a) F E Hahn A V Zabula T Pape A Hepp Eur J Inorg Chem 2007 2007 2405 (b) A
V Zabula F E Hahn T Pape A Hepp Organometallics 2007 26 1972 (c) A V Zabula T
Pape A Hepp F E Hahn Organometallics 2008 27 2756
67 S-H Zhang C-W So Organometallics 2011 30 2059
68 O T Summerscales M M Olmstead P P Power Organometallics 2011 30 3468
69 (a) M Veith W Frank Angew Chem 1985 97 213 (b) M Veith Angew Chem Int Ed
1987 26 1 (c) H Chen R A Bartlett H V R Dias M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
References
- 132 -
Chem 1991 30 3390 (d) R E Allan M A Beswick A J Edwards M A Paver M-A
Rennie P R Raithby D S Wright Dalton Trans 1995 1991 (e) W J Grigsby T Hascall
J J Ellison M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg Chem 1996 35 3254 (f) R E Allan M A
Beswick M K Davies P R Raithby A Steiner D S Wright J Organomet Chem 1998
550 71 (g) M E G Mosquera J S Palmer A D Hopkins D S Wright Phosphorus
Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 1999 150 107 (h) M Veith M Opsoumllder M Zimmer V Huch
Eur J Inorg Chem 2000 2000 1143 (i) D R Armstrong F Benevelli A D Bond N
Feeder E A Harron A D Hopkins M Mcpartlin D Moncrieff D Saacuteez E A Quadrelli
A D Woods D S Wright Inorg Chem 2002 41 1492 (j) T Chivers Timothy j Clark M
Krahn M Parvez G Schatte Eur J Inorg Chem 2003 2003 1857 (k) J F Eichler O Just
W S Rees Inorg Chem 2006 45 6706 (l) D J Eisler T Chivers Chem Eur J 2006 12
233 (m) H Vaňkaacutetovaacute L Broeckaert F De Proft R Olejniacutek J Turek Z Padělkovaacute A
Růžička Inorg Chem 2011 50 9454
70 (a) A Meltzer C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7232 (b) A Meltzer C
Praumlsang C Milsmann M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 3170 (c) H Ogino The
Chemical Record 2002 2 291 (d) S Inoue M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
5614 (e) M Stoelzel C Praumlsang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed
2012 51 399
71 W Yang H Fu H Wang M Chen Y Ding H W Roesky A Jana Inorg Chem 2009 48
5058
72 (a) J Choi A H R Macarthur M Brookhart A S Goldman Chem Rev 2011 111 1761
(b) N Selander K L N J Szaboacute Chem Rev 2011 111 2048 (c) M E Van Der Boom D
Milstein Chem Rev 2003 103 1759
73 W Tang X Zhang Chem Rev 2003 103 3029
74 (a) A P Shaw J R Norton D Buccella L A Sites S S Kleinbach D A Jarem K M
Bocage C Nataro Organometallics 2009 28 3804 (b) L-C Song J-T Liu Q-M Hu G-
F Wang P Zanello M Fontani Organometallics 2000 19 5342 (c) S Shekhar J F
Hartwig J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 13016
75 N A Marinos Modellsysteme fuumlr die [NiFe]-Hydrogenase und Zinkkatalysatoren fuumlr die
Hydrosilylierung Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin Germany 2011
76 (a) C M Jensen D Morales-Morales The Chemistry of Pincer Compounds Elsevier
Science Amsterdam 2007 (b) M Albrecht G Van Koten Angew Chem Int Ed 2001 40
3750 (c) M Albrecht M M Lindner Dalton Trans 2011 40 8733 (d) D Benito-Garagorri
K Kirchner Acc Chem Res 2008 41 201 (e) C Gunanathan D Milstein Acc Chem Res
2011 44 588
77 (a) N Selander K J Szabo Dalton Trans 2009 6267 (b) H Zhang A Lei Dalton Trans
2011 40 8745 (c) J Dupont C S Consorti J Spencer Chem Rev 2005 105 2527
78 Silyl-silylene transition-metal complexes see (a) K Ueno S Seki H Ogino Chem Lett
1993 22 2159 (b) H Tobita H Wada K Ueno H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 2545
(c) K Ueno A Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 5023 (d) H Wada H Tobita
H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 3870 (e) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino
Organometallics 1998 17 2844 (f) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino Organometallics 1998
17 2850 (g) H Wada H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 1998 27 993 (h) K Ueno A
References
- 133 -
Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1999 18 2694 (i) H Tobita T Sato M Okazaki H
Ogino J Organomet Chem 2000 611 314 (j) H Koshikawa M Okazaki S Matsumoto
K Ueno H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 2005 34 1412 (k) K Ueno S Ito K Endo H
Tobita S Inomata H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 3309
79 For reviews on silylene complexes see (a) M S Eisen Transition-Metal Silyl Complexes
In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2003 pp 2037 (b)
M Okazaki H Tobita H Ogino Dalton Trans 2003 493 (c) R Waterman P G Hayes T
D Tilley Acc Chem Res 2007 40 712
80 Y Ding H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt P P Power Organometallics 2001
20 1190
81 L Bourget-Merle M F Lappert J R Severn Chem Rev 2002 102 3031
82 B Raumlke F Zuumllch Y Ding J Prust H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt Z Anorg
Allg Chem 2001 627 836
83 W Wang S Yao C Van WuLlen M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640
84 (a) R West H Sohn D R Powell T Muumlller Y Apeloig Angew Chem Int Ed 1996 35
1002 (b) W P Freeman T D Tilley L M Liable-Sands A L Rheingold J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 10457
85 J Fischer J Baumgartner C Marschner Organometallics 2005 24 1263
86 M Stender A D Phillips P P Power Inorg Chem 2001 40 5314
87 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 4349
88 W D Woodul A F Richards A Stasch M Driess C Jones Organometallics 2010 29
3655
89 W Clegg E K Cope A J Edwards F S Mair Inorg Chem 1998 37 2317
90 (a) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Matsuno M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 5768 (b) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Angew Chem Int Ed
2006 45 3269 (c) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Eur J Inorg Chem
2007 2007 5471 (d) V Y Lee Y Ito H Yasuda K Takanashi A Sekiguchi J Am Chem
Soc 2011 133 5103
91 S P Mallela S Hill R A Geanangel Inorg Chem 1997 36 6247
92 P V R Schleyer C Maerker A Dransfeld H Jiao N J R V E Hommes J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 6317
93 For a review see Z Chen C S Wannere C Corminboeuf R Puchta P V R Schleyer
Chem Rev 2005 105 3842
94 (a) R Ahlrichs M Baumlr M Haumlser H Horn C Koumllmel Chem Phys Lett 1989 162 165 (b)
M Haumlser R Ahlrichs J Comput Chem 1989 10 104
95 O Treutler R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1995 102 346
96 (a) A D Becke Phys Rev A 1988 38 3098 (b) J P Perdew Phys Rev B 1986 33 8822
97 (a) A Schaumlfer C Huber R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1994 100 5829 (b) K Eichkorn F
Weigend O Treutler R Ahlrichs Theor Chem Acc 1997 97 119
98 K Eichkorn O Treutler H Oumlhm M Haumlser R Ahlrichs Chem Phys Lett 1995 242 652
99 U Meier C Van Wuumlllen M Schindler J Comput Chem 1992 13 551
100 (a) C Van Wuumlllen Chem Phys Lett 1994 219 8 (b) C Van Wuumlllen Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2000 2 2137
References
- 134 -
101 (a) P J Stephens F J Devlin C F Chabalowski M J Frisch J Phys Chem 1994 98
11623 (b) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 1372 (c) C T Lee W T Yang R G Parr
Phys Rev 1988 37 785
102 W Kutzelnigg U Fleischer M Schindler NMR basis principles and progress Springer
Berlin 1990 Vol 23 page 169
103 (a) C Corminboeuf T Heine G Seifert P V R Schleyer J Weber Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2004 6 273 (b) P Von Rague Schleyer M Manoharan Z-X Wang B Kiran H Jiao
R Puchta N J R Van Eikema Hommes Org Lett 2001 3 2465
104 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Chem Commun 2009 2661
105 H Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 1999 18 3159
106 Y Sugiyama T Sasamori Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Takagi S Nagase N Tokitoh J Am
Chem Soc 2006 128 1023
107 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 2003 22 215
108 (a) K H Pannell L Parkanyi H Sharma F Cervantes-Lee Inorg Chem 1992 31 522 (b)
A Kawachi Y Tanaka K Tamao J Organomet Chem 1999 590 15
109 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess Chem Asian J 2009 4 1323
110 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Organometallics 2011 30 6490
111 W Keim S Killat C F Nobile G P Suranna U Englert R Wang S Mecking L D
Schroumlder J Organomet Chem 2002 662 150
112 P H M Budzelaar A B Van Ort A G Orpen Eur J Inorg Chem 1998 1485
113 N M Scott R Dorta E D Stevens A Correa L Cavallo S P Nolan J Am Chem Soc
2005 127 3516
114 L W Pineda V Jancik H W Roesky D Neculai A M Neculai Angew Chem Int Ed
2004 43 1419
115 A Jana I Objartel H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2009 48 798
116 S S Sen G Tavcar H W Roesky D Kratzert J Hey D Stalke Organometallics 2010 29
2343
117 R West J Am Chem Soc 1953 75 1002
118 R Drake I Mackinnon R Taylor Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Siloxane Polymers
and Copolymers In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd
2003 pp 2217
119 (a) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 5648 (b) B Miehlich A Savin H Stoll H
Preuss Chem Phys Lett 1989 157 200 (c) Gussian 03 Revision E01 M J Frisch G W
Trucks H B Schlegel G E Scuseria M A Robb J R Cheeseman J A Montgomery Jr
T Vreven K N Kudin J C Burant J M Millam S S Iyengar J Tomasi V Barone B
Mennucci M Cossi G Scalmani N Rega G A Petersson H Nakatsuji M Hada M
Ehara K Toyota R Fukuda J Hasegawa M Ishida T Nakajima Y Honda O Kitao H
Nakai M Klene X Li J E Knox H P Hratchian J B Cross V Bakken C Adamo J
Jaramillo R Gomperts R E Stratmann O Yazyev A J Austin R Cammi C Pomelli J W
Ochterski P Y Ayala K Morokuma G A Voth P Salvador J J Dannenberg V G
Zakrzewski S Dapprich A D Daniels M C Strain O Farkas D K Malick A D Rabuck
K Raghavachari J B Foresman J V Ortiz Q Cui A G Baboul S Clifford J Cioslowski
B B Stefanov G Liu A Liashenko P Piskorz I Komaromi R L Martin D J Fox T
References
- 135 -
Keith M A Al-Laham C Y Peng A Nanayakkara M Challacombe P M W Gill B
Johnson W Chen M W Wong C Gonzalez and J A Pople Gaussian Inc Wallingford
CT 2004
120 M Denk R K Hayashi R West Chem Commun 1994 33
121 L Kong J Zhang H Song C Cui Dalton Trans 2009 5444
122 A Meltzer S Inoue C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 3038
123 P Macchi D M Proserpio A Sironi J Am Chem Soc 1998 120 1447
124 (a) M Regitz O J Scherer Multiple bonds and Low Coordination in Phosphorus Chemistry
New York 1990 p 5 (b) M Driess Coord Chem Rev 1995 145 1 (c) V Y Lee A
Sekiguchi J Escudieacute H Ranaivonjatovo Chem Lett 2010 39 312
125 C N Smit F M Lock F Bickelhaupt Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 3011
126 (a) C N Smit F Bickelhaupt Organometallics 1987 6 1156 (b) E Niecke E Klein M
Nieger Angew Chem Int Ed 1989 28 751 (c) R Corriu G Lanneau C Priou Angew
Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1130 (d) M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1022 (e) H R
G Bender E Niecke M Nieger J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 3314 (f) M Driess S Rell
H Pritzkow Chem Commun 1995 253 (g) M Driess H Pritzkow S Rell U Winkler
Organometallics 1996 15 1845 (h) M Driess S Block M Brym M T Gamer Angew
Chem Int Ed 2006 45 2293 (i) S Yao S Block M Brym M Driess Chem Commun
2007 3844 (j) V Y Lee M Kawai A Sekiguchi H Ranaivonjatovo J Escudieacute
Organometallics 2009 28 6625 (k) B Li T Matsuo D Hashizume H Fueno K Tanaka
K Tamao J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 13222
127 (a) C H Lai M D Su S Y Chu Inorg Chem 2002 41 1320 (b) R Pietschnig A
Orthaber Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4570 (c) C H Chen M D Su Eur J Inorg Chem
2008 1241 (d) V Lattanzi S Thorwirth D T Halfen L A Mueck L M Ziurys P
Thaddeus J Gauss M C Mccarthy Angew Chem Int Ed 2010 49 5661
128 S Inoue W Wang C Praumlsang M Asay E Irran M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2011 133
2868
129 (a) R Appel W A Paulen Angew Chem Int Ed 1981 20 869 (b) V Cappello J
Baumgartner A Dransfeld K Hassler Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4589
130 M Igarashi M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12660
131 F A Cotton G Wilkinson C Murillo M Bochmann Advanced Inorganic Chemistry 1999
132 (a) N Wiberg C M M Finger K Polborn Angew Chem Int Ed 1993 32 1054 (b) M
Ichinohe M Toyoshima R Kinjo A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2003 125 13328
133 (a) A J Arduengo H V R Dias J C Calabrese F Davidson Inorg Chem 1993 32 1541
(b) N Kuhn T Kratz D Blaumlser R Boese Chem Ber 1995 128 245 (c) P A Rupar M C
Jennings K M Baines Organometallics 2008 27 5043 (d) A J Ruddy P A Rupar K J
Bladek C J Allan J C Avery K M Baines Organometallics 2010 29 1362
134 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch H Marsmann G Henkel Chem Ber 1997 130 1733
135 (a) D Morales-Morales C Grause K Kasaoka R O Redoacuten R E Cramer C M Jensen
Inorg Chim Acta 2000 300ndash302 958 (b) T Kimura Y Uozumi Organometallics 2006 25
4883 (c) R B Bedford M Betham J P H Charmant M F Haddow A G Orpen L T
Pilarski S J Coles M B Hursthouse Organometallics 2007 26 6346 (d) J Aydin K S
Kumar L Eriksson K J Szaboacute Adv Syn Catal 2007 349 2585 (e) J-F Gong Y-H
References
- 136 -
Zhang M-P Song C Xu Organometallics 2007 26 6487 (f) R A Baber R B Bedford
M Betham M E Blake S J Coles M F Haddow M B Hursthouse A G Orpen L T
Pilarski P G Pringle R L Wingad Chem Commun 2006 3880 (g) A V Polukeev S A
Kuklin P V Petrovskii S M Peregudova A F Smolyakov F M Dolgushin A A
Koridze Dalton Trans 2011 40 7201 (h) R B Bedford Y-N Chang M F Haddow C L
Mcmullin Dalton Trans 2011 40 9034
136 (a) C Watanabe T Iwamoto C Kabuto M Kira Angew Chem Int Ed 2008 47 5386 (b)
C Watanabe Y Inagawa T Iwamoto M Kira Dalton Trans 2010 39 9414
137 (a) G Tavcar S S Sen R Azhakar A Thorn H W Roesky Inorg Chem 2010 49 10199
(b) R Azhakar S P Sarish H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Inorg Chem 2011 50 5039
138 W Chen P J Mccormack K Mohammed W Mbafor S M Roberts J Whittall Angew
Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4141
139 (a) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Organometallics 2008 27
3325 (b) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Bull Chem Soc Jpn
2009 82 793
140 (a) F Baumann E Dormann Y Ehleiter W Kaim J Kaumlrcher M Kelemen R Krammer D
Saurenz D Stalke C Wachter G Wolmershaumluser H Sitzmann J Organomet Chem 1999
587 267 (b) F Hung-Low C A Bradley Organometallics 2011 30 2636 (c) F Hung-Low
J P Krogman J W Tye C A Bradley Chem Commun 2012 48 368
141 R Azhakar R S Ghadwal H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Chem Asian J 2012 7 528
142 R S Ghadwal R Azhakar K ProPper J J Holstein B Dittrich H W Roesky Inorg
Chem 2011 50 8502
143 J Li S Merkel J Henn K Meindl A DoRing H W Roesky R S Ghadwal D Stalke
Inorg Chem 2010 49 775
144 M Ingleson H Fan M Pink J Tomaszewski K G Caulton J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
1804
145 A Schnepf Z Anorg Allg Chem 2006 632 935
146 (a) M D Rausch R A Genetti J Org Chem 1970 35 3888 (b) F Ungvary A Sisak L
Markoacute J Organomet Chem 1980 188 373
147 (a) E Erdik Tetrahedron 1992 48 9577 (b) P Knochel R D Singer Chem Rev 1993 93
2117 (c) M Rottlaumlnder P Knochel Tetrahedron Lett 1997 38 1749
148 (a) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1978 17 505 (b) K P C Vollhardt Angew Chem
Int Ed 1984 23 539 (c) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1985 24 248 (d) W Hess
J Treutwein G Hilt Synthesis 2008 2008 3537 (e) C J Scheuermann B D Ward New J
Chem 2008 32 1850 (f) T Shibata K Tsuchikama Org Biomol Chem 2008 6 1317 (g)
K Tanaka Chem Asian J 2009 4 508 (h) J A Varela C Saaacute Synlett 2008 2008 2571
149 (a) G Hilt C Hengst W Hess Eur J Org Chem 2008 2008 2293 (b) A Geny N Agenet
L Iannazzo M Malacria C Aubert V Gandon Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 1810 (c)
C C Eichman J P Bragdon J P Stambuli Synlett 2011 2011 1109
150 (a) Y Wakatsuki H Yamazaki Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1985 58 2715 (b) Y B Taarit Y
Diab B Elleuch M Kerkani M Chihaoui Chem Commun 1986 402 (c) H Nehl Chem
Ber 1994 127 2535 (d) C Wang X Li F Wu B Wan Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
7162
References
- 137 -
151 G M Sheldrick SHELX-97 Program for Crystal Structure Determination Universitaumlt
Goumlttingen (Germany) 1997
152 P Schlack G Keil Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1963 661 72
Appendix
- 138 -
7 APPENDIX
71 Abbreviations
Ada adamantanyl MHz Megahertz
Ar aryl min minute(s)
mmol millimole(ar)
MS mass spectrometry
B3LYP Beckersquos three-parameter hybrid
functional using the Lee Yang
and Parr correlation ldquofunctionalrdquo MW molecular weight
BINAP 22rsquo-(Ph2P)2-11rsquo-binaphthyl mz masscharge
br broad nacnac HC(MeC=N-Dip) 2minus
tBu tert-butyl Naph naphthyl
degC Celsius degree NBO natural bond orbital
ca about NHC N-Heterocyclic Carbene
calc calculated NICS nucleus independent chemical shift
CBD cyclobutadiene NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
cod COD 15-cyclooctadiene NPA natural population analysis
Cp cyclopentadienyl Ph phenyl
d doublet ppm parts per million
DCM dichloromethane iPr iso-propyl
DFT density functional theory q quartet
Dip 26-iPr2C6H3 R organic substituent
EI electron impact ionization RT room temperature
equiv equivalent(s) s singlet strong
ESI electrospray ionization sept septet
Et ethyl t triplet
eV electronvolt THF tetrahydrofuran
Fc ferrocendiyl Tip 246-iPr2C6H2
g gram(s) TMEDA tetramethylethyldiamine
h hour(s) TMS tetramethylsilane
HOMO highest occupied molecular orbital TS transition state
Hz Hertz TZVP triple-zeta valence polarization
IR infrared
K Kelvin
TZVDP TZVP two sets of polarization
functions aL PhC(
tBuN)2
minus UV-vis ultraviolet-visible
VE valence electron LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital vs very strong
M Metal VT variable temperature
m multiplet medium w weak
Me methyl WBI Wiberg Bond Index
Mes mesityl 246-Me3-C6H2 δ chemical shift
Appendix
- 139 -
GeN
N
GeN
Dip
Dip
DipCl
N
SnN
Dip
Dip
GeNN
SnN
Dip
DipDip
N
Dip
6 7
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation
1 2 3 4
5 8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22
Appendix
- 140 -
23 24 25 26
27 28 29
30 31 32 33
34 35 36
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph
Si
Cl
37 38 39 40
Appendix
- 141 -
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
41 42 43
44 45 46
47a 47b 48a 48b
Appendix
- 142 -
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details
Table 731 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 3 4 5
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C50 H88 Ge2 K2 N2 O4
100460
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
106989(7) pm
114137(7) pm
122625(8) pm
74158(6) deg
76395(6) deg
83400(5) deg
139807(16)
1
1193
1263
536
028 x 02 x 018
326 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-13lt=klt=13
-14lt=llt=14
12268
4910 [R(int) = 00358]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 094847
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4910 0 281
0940
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00638
R1 = 00538 wR2 = 00666
0456 and -0223
C41 H5 Ge N3
66650
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
91129(6) pm
113531(7) pm
190282(10) pm
100360(5) deg
101854(5) deg
98627(5) deg
185918(19)
2
1191
0855
716
039 x 012 x 007
297 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-13lt=klt=13
-22lt=llt=22
14570
6543 [R(int) = 00560]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
0943 and 0777
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6543 0 420
0785
R1 = 00399 wR2 = 00513
R1 = 00853 wR2 = 00566
0577 and -0317
C66 H102 Ge4 K2 N4 O2
135208
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
12370(3) pm
148433(14) pm
188725(19) pm
90059(8)deg
96311(14)deg
90082(13)deg
34442(10)
2
1304
1892
1416
030 x 025 x 015
292 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-15lt=klt=17
-14lt=llt=22
17371
6032 [R(int) = 00487]
995
Analytical
0807 and 0584
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6032 2 364
0911
R1 = 00424 wR2 = 00801
R1 = 00874 wR2 = 00885
0497 and -0457
Appendix
- 143 -
Table 732 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 6 8 12
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C46 H65 Ge2 N3
80519
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
44536(2) pm
98204(5) pm
218135(10) pm
90deg
116030(4)deg
90deg
85727(7)
8
1248
1436
3408
038 x 024 x 010
305 to 2500deg
-49lt=hlt=52
-10lt=klt=11
-24lt=llt=25
20162
7493 [R(int) = 00954]
992
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 074676
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7493 0 476
0917
R1 = 00559 wR2 = 00778
R1 = 01461 wR2 = 00966
0590 and -0578
C46 H65 Ge N3 Sn
85129
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
867780(10) pm
120514(4) pm
210797(6) pm
96333(2)deg
97393(2)deg
99141(2)deg
213908(10)
2
1322
1320
888
016 x 014 x 012
295 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-14lt=klt=14
-25lt=llt=25
16936
7496 [R(int) = 00251]
994
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099037
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7496 0 495
1001
R1 = 00309 wR2 = 00706
R1 = 00437 wR2 = 00733
1468 and -0424
C37 H48 N2
52077
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108485(5) pm
127284(7) pm
132348(4) pm
65748(4)deg
86290(3)deg
71699(5)deg
157759(12)
2
1096
0063
568
029 x 022 x 018
298 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13428
5541 [R(int) = 00203]
998
None
09888 and 09820
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5541 0 364
1029
R1 = 00439 wR2 = 00900
R1 = 00633 wR2 = 00963
0188 and -0193
Appendix
- 144 -
Table 733 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 14 16 17
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H46 Cl Ge N2
62680
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117621(2) pm
175495(4) pm
166051(3) pm
90deg
107053(2)deg
90deg
327691(11)
4
1270
1044
1324
040 x 032 x 022
342 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-19lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=18
16923
5742 [R(int) = 00250]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 082078
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5742 0 378
1044
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00709
R1 = 00496 wR2 = 00742
0736 and -0362
C37 H46 Ge N2
59135
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108388(6) pm
127885(7) pm
132778(4) pm
66971(4)deg
85749(3)deg
71833(5)deg
160695(13)
2
1222
0980
628
029 x 015 x 007
307 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13501
5636 [R(int) = 00366]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 092510
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5636 0 369
1031
R1 = 00489 wR2 = 01180
R1 = 00691 wR2 = 01242
0539 and -0501
C37 H49 Ge N3
60838
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117714(4) pm
174309(6) pm
166868(6) pm
90deg
106866(4)deg
90deg
32766(2)
4
1233
0964
1296
030 x 023 x 019
342 to 2500deg
-8lt=hlt=13
-10lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=16
12816
5749 [R(int) = 00325]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 095425
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5749 0 378
1060
R1 = 00464 wR2 = 01084
R1 = 00699 wR2 = 01133
1717 and -0738
Appendix
- 145 -
Table 734 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 18 20 22
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H48 Ge N2 O
60936
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117560(3) pm
174116(5) pm
166421(4) pm
90deg
106992(3)deg
90deg
325778(15)
4
1242
0971
1296
031 x 014 x 005
343 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-20lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=19
23624
5720 [R(int) = 00371]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 083390
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5720 0 379
1018
R1 = 00336 wR2 = 00752
R1 = 00516 wR2 = 00789
0521 and -0366
C28 H38 N2
40260
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
94924(4) pm
256583(9) pm
107465(5) pm
90deg
110403(5)deg
90deg
245320(18)
4
1090
0063
880
017 x 015 x 013
343 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=10
-30lt=klt=27
-12lt=llt=11
8561
4313 [R(int) = 00209]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099057
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4313 0 281
1041
R1 = 00476 wR2 = 01015
R1 = 00771 wR2 = 01083
0253 and -0194
C28 H37 Cl Ge N2 O
52564
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
89021(3) pm
107319(4) pm
151176(6) pm
75734(4)deg
74781(3)deg
75311(3)deg
132282(8)
2
1320
1281
552
020 x 012 x 008
354 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-12lt=klt=12
-15lt=llt=17
9246
4654 [R(int) = 00211]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086160
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4654 0 304
0946
R1 = 00274 wR2 = 00579
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00597
0394 and -0264
Appendix
- 146 -
Table 735 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 23 27 28
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C28 H36 Cl2 Ge N2
54408
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
279616(13) pm
113538(3) pm
177729(7) pm
90deg
109718(5)deg
90deg
53115(4)
8
1361
1374
2272
021 x 017 x 015
332 to 2500deg
-25lt=hlt=33
-7lt=klt=13
-21lt=llt=20
10951
4663 [R(int) = 00459]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091223
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4663 0 304
0856
R1 = 00372 wR2 = 00584
R1 = 00684 wR2 = 00620
0589 and -0533
C30 H48 Cl2 N4 O Si2
60780
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121593(5) pm
162045(6) pm
171248(7) pm
90deg
98177(4)deg
90deg
33399(2)
4
1209
0295
1304
030 x 015 x 005
335 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=13
-16lt=klt=19
-20lt=llt=20
23741
5865 [R(int) = 00491]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086688
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5865 172 490
1035
R1 = 00543 wR2 = 01080
R1 = 00905 wR2 = 01194
0310 and -0412
C30 H46 N4 O Si2
53489
150(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Fdd2
31188(2) pm
39120(3) pm
102620(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
125204(14)
16
1135
0141
4640
031 x 011 x 007
334 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=36
-46lt=klt=45
-12lt=llt=12
11517
4372 [R(int) = 00656]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 097469
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4372 1 346
0897
R1 = 00488 wR2 = 00604
R1 = 00754 wR2 = 00650
0328 and -0229
Appendix
- 147 -
Table 736 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 29 30 31
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C38 H58 N4 Ni O Si2
70177
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
98776(8) pm
129530(11) pm
155488(13) pm
81634(7)deg
83316(7)deg
82826(7)deg
19430(3)
2
1200
0594
756
020 x 009 x 007
330 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=11
-15lt=klt=13
-18lt=llt=18
14961
6828 [R(int) = 00414]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091998
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6828 0 474
0948
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00807
R1 = 00605 wR2 = 00853
0407 and -0240
C21 H41 N2 P Si3
43680
173(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Pbca
193556(7) pm
142399(4) pm
199777(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
55063(3)
8
1054
0239
1904
039 x 036 x 016
351 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=23
-16lt=klt=16
-23lt=llt=22
19912
4836 [R(int) = 00961]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09627 and 09125
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4836 18 287
0906
R1 = 00571 wR2 = 00889
R1 = 01270 wR2 = 01032
0316 and -0214
C44 H60 N4 P2 Si2
76308
173(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
23841(3) pm
101993(12) pm
19369(2) pm
90deg
108346(12)deg
90deg
44703(9)
4
1134
0184
1640
076 x 057 x 055
353 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=28
-12lt=klt=12
-20lt=llt=23
16197
3927 [R(int) = 00447]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09053 and 08725
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
3927 0 251
1034
R1 = 00618 wR2 = 01393
R1 = 00843 wR2 = 01489
0721 and -0649
Appendix
- 148 -
Table 737 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 33 36 40-endo
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C56 H98 Cl4 N6 Si6 Sn2
140312
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
105159(4) pm
127622(6) pm
269391(12) pm
90310(4)deg
90855(3)deg
102927(3)deg
35232(3)
2
1323
1000
1456
013 x 012 x 009
336 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-29lt=llt=32
25757
12396 [R(int) = 00546]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09154 and 08810
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
12396 536 816
2077
R1 = 01231 wR2 = 01906
R1 = 01495 wR2 = 01944
1510 and -4753
C91 H139 N8 O4 Pd Si4
162786
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
145970(8) pm
151441(15) pm
232982(16) pm
71358(8)deg
74666(5)deg
85365(6)deg
47063(6)
2
1149
0298
1750
019 x 013 x 011
327 to 2500deg
-17lt=hlt=17
-17lt=klt=18
-27lt=llt=27
41022
16531 [R(int) = 00735]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09679 and 09455
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
16531 284 1112
0908
R1 = 00558 wR2 = 01021
R1 = 01075 wR2 = 01128
0688 and -0448
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
10532(3) pm
20258(5) pm
18990(5) pm
90deg
10542(3)deg
90deg
39060(19)
4
1347
1927
1648
012 x 008 x 005
322 to 2500deg
-6lt=hlt=12
-22lt=klt=24
-22lt=llt=21
16887
6870 [R(int) = 01353]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 073478
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6870 213 498
1044
R1 = 00912 wR2 = 01786
R1 = 01680 wR2 = 02282
0570 and -1404
Appendix
- 149 -
Table 738 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 40-exo 41 42
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
165582(11) pm
127695(7) pm
198175(12) pm
90deg
107428(7)deg
90deg
39979(4)
4
1316
1883
1648
012 x 011 x 009
337 to 2499deg
-16lt=hlt=19
-15lt=klt=15
-23lt=llt=23
29049
7015 [R(int) = 00329]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 052405
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7015 0 436
1065
R1 = 00263 wR2 = 00574
R1 = 00318 wR2 = 00595
0357 and -0360
C45 H59 Co Fe N4 Si2
82692
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
119176(7) pm
160794(9) pm
220424(13) pm
90deg
94402(5)deg
90deg
42115(4)
4
1304
0831
1752
015 x 013 x 007
323 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=17
-16lt=llt=26
17786
7404 [R(int) = 01111]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 075122
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7404 0 490
1052
R1 = 00717 wR2 = 01045
R1 = 01208 wR2 = 01181
0467 and -0370
C45 H59 Co Fe Ge2 N4
91592
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121662(3) pm
160596(3) pm
220073(5) pm
90deg
93549(2)deg
90deg
429163(16)
4
1418
2134
1896
015 x 011 x 008
336 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=19
-26lt=llt=26
33743
7539 [R(int) = 00521]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 068509
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7539 0 521
1259
R1 = 00400 wR2 = 00965
R1 = 00536 wR2 = 01000
0376 and -0373
Appendix
- 150 -
Atomic coordinates of four unpublished compounds 20 22 23 and 33 are shown in
following tables
Table 739 Atomic coordinates (times10
4) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 20 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
N(1) 1159(1) 1176(1) 6836(1) 20(1)
C(1) 1706(2) 1650(1) 6995(1) 21(1)
N(2) -1293(2) 1547(1) 7057(1) 23(1)
C(2) 789(2) 2089(1) 7078(1) 20(1)
C(3) -626(2) 2021(1) 7158(1) 20(1)
C(4) 3331(2) 1741(1) 7112(2) 29(1)
C(5) 3920(2) 2283(1) 7590(2) 34(1)
C(6) 2795(2) 2681(1) 6772(2) 35(1)
C(7) 1375(2) 2643(1) 7102(2) 27(1)
C(8) -1522(2) 2482(1) 7295(2) 21(1)
C(9) -2759(2) 2643(1) 6227(2) 27(1)
C(10) -3571(2) 3077(1) 6331(2) 33(1)
C(11) -3169(2) 3358(1) 7498(2) 35(1)
C(12) -1948(2) 3199(1) 8573(2) 32(1)
C(13) -1133(2) 2765(1) 8467(2) 27(1)
C(14) -2537(2) 1417(1) 7503(2) 35(1)
C(15) -3250(3) 920(1) 6823(2) 61(1)
C(16) -1974(3) 1344(1) 9002(2) 65(1)
C(17) 2080(2) 741(1) 6834(2) 20(1)
C(18) 2353(2) 597(1) 5670(2) 23(1)
C(19) 3237(2) 160(1) 5724(2) 29(1)
C(20) 3821(2) -131(1) 6867(2) 32(1)
C(21) 3480(2) -1(1) 7977(2) 29(1)
C(22) 2598(2) 427(1) 7984(2) 23(1)
C(23) 2150(2) 562(1) 9174(2) 28(1)
C(24) 2101(2) 91(1) 10028(2) 39(1)
C(25) 3156(2) 987(1) 10029(2) 42(1)
C(26) 1602(2) 885(1) 4374(2) 29(1)
C(27) 2645(3) 974(1) 3586(2) 53(1)
C(28) 195(3) 588(1) 3539(2) 54(1)
Appendix
- 151 -
Table 7310 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 22 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 4751(1) 5279(1) 3913(1) 24(1)
Cl(1) 4863(1) 7474(1) 3443(1) 35(1)
O(1) 2591(1) 5468(1) 4187(1) 20(1)
N(1) 4469(2) 5098(1) 2623(1) 17(1)
C(1) 3006(2) 5278(2) 2582(1) 16(1)
N(2) 1482(2) 7765(2) 2375(1) 20(1)
C(2) 2432(2) 5062(2) 1801(1) 21(1)
C(3) 1144(2) 4228(2) 2174(2) 31(1)
C(4) -158(2) 4793(2) 2933(2) 30(1)
C(5) 534(2) 4844(2) 3741(1) 21(1)
C(6) 1810(2) 5684(2) 3440(1) 17(1)
C(7) 1063(2) 7152(2) 3205(1) 18(1)
C(8) 820(2) 9172(2) 2096(1) 26(1)
C(9) 397(3) 9344(2) 1159(2) 40(1)
C(10) 2058(3) 9950(2) 2035(2) 43(1)
C(11) -95(2) 7719(2) 3998(1) 18(1)
C(12) 434(2) 8108(2) 4652(1) 22(1)
C(13) -648(2) 8637(2) 5376(1) 27(1)
C(14) -2259(2) 8769(2) 5459(2) 30(1)
C(15) -2795(2) 8370(2) 4815(2) 30(1)
C(16) -1724(2) 7845(2) 4085(1) 24(1)
C(17) 5786(2) 4690(2) 1889(1) 19(1)
C(18) 6546(2) 3361(2) 1997(1) 22(1)
C(19) 7868(2) 3005(2) 1310(2) 28(1)
C(20) 8423(2) 3902(2) 552(2) 29(1)
C(21) 7656(2) 5209(2) 464(1) 26(1)
C(22) 6329(2) 5635(2) 1128(1) 21(1)
C(23) 5549(2) 7085(2) 991(2) 26(1)
C(24) 6701(3) 7932(2) 989(2) 41(1)
C(25) 4931(3) 7520(2) 84(2) 40(1)
C(26) 6001(2) 2315(2) 2820(2) 27(1)
C(27) 5775(3) 1139(2) 2495(2) 40(1)
C(28) 7175(3) 1863(2) 3471(2) 38(1)
Appendix
- 152 -
Table 7311 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 23 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 967(1) 7605(1) 1823(1) 18(1)
Cl(1) 1020(1) 9314(1) 2345(1) 29(1)
N(1) 1401(1) 6550(2) 2449(1) 19(1)
C(1) 1534(1) 5601(2) 2029(2) 16(1)
Cl(2) 198(1) 7116(1) 1640(1) 31(1)
N(2) 1101(1) 7630(2) 909(1) 15(1)
C(2) 1548(1) 5691(2) 1285(2) 15(1)
C(3) 1442(1) 6764(2) 777(2) 14(1)
C(4) 1615(1) 6867(2) 172(2) 19(1)
C(5) 1945(1) 5989(2) -42(2) 26(1)
C(6) 2098(1) 4966(2) 547(2) 22(1)
C(7) 1669(1) 4652(2) 844(2) 21(1)
C(8) 1625(1) 4444(2) 2470(2) 17(1)
C(9) 1229(1) 3875(2) 2611(2) 23(1)
C(10) 1291(1) 2785(2) 2983(2) 29(1)
C(11) 1764(2) 2263(3) 3232(2) 32(1)
C(12) 2169(1) 2832(3) 3121(2) 30(1)
C(13) 2101(1) 3920(2) 2737(2) 22(1)
C(14) 1621(1) 6630(2) 3327(2) 20(1)
C(15) 1219(1) 6848(3) 3699(2) 32(1)
C(16) 2052(1) 7524(2) 3583(2) 34(1)
C(17) 833(1) 8395(2) 248(2) 17(1)
C(18) 1019(1) 9542(2) 207(2) 19(1)
C(19) 745(1) 10248(3) -431(2) 29(1)
C(20) 315(1) 9844(3) -1011(2) 36(1)
C(21) 147(1) 8718(3) -973(2) 33(1)
C(22) 399(1) 7960(2) -350(2) 20(1)
C(23) 215(1) 6700(2) -377(2) 23(1)
C(24) 329(1) 6020(3) -1045(2) 34(1)
C(25) -341(1) 6612(3) -475(2) 31(1)
C(26) 1517(1) 10001(2) 789(2) 22(1)
C(27) 1914(1) 10083(3) 375(2) 32(1)
C(28) 1463(1) 11198(2) 1144(2) 36(1)
Appendix
- 153 -
Table 7312 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 33 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Sn(1) 4689(1) 4918(1) 3222(1) 24(1)
Sn(2) 5822(1) 5994(1) 1674(1) 30(1)
Cl(1) 4488(3) 6215(2) 3883(1) 38(1)
Cl(2) 3266(2) 3378(2) 3638(1) 39(1)
Cl(3) 7188(2) 7769(2) 1449(1) 43(1)
Cl(4) 6104(3) 5090(3) 888(1) 57(1)
Si(1) 6825(2) 4259(2) 3587(1) 17(1)
Si(2) 8610(3) 6420(2) 3531(1) 28(1)
Si(3) 9814(2) 4466(2) 3664(1) 26(1)
Si(4) 3648(2) 6680(2) 1375(1) 21(1)
Si(5) 1981(3) 4463(2) 1299(1) 30(1)
Si(6) 649(3) 6348(2) 1247(1) 30(1)
N(1) 6586(7) 2924(5) 3299(3) 20(2)
N(2) 6484(6) 3264(5) 4080(3) 16(2)
N(3) 8389(7) 5001(5) 3582(3) 23(2)
N(4) 3751(7) 7937(6) 1722(3) 22(2)
N(5) 3959(8) 7800(6) 936(3) 27(2)
N(6) 2102(7) 5865(6) 1329(3) 24(2)
C(1) 6258(8) 2470(7) 3742(4) 24(2)
C(2) 5630(8) 1296(7) 3832(3) 20(2)
C(3) 4328(9) 879(7) 3742(4) 30(2)
C(4) 3826(11) -209(8) 3826(4) 44(3)
C(5) 4613(12) -855(8) 3977(4) 47(3)
C(6) 5921(13) -450(9) 4064(4) 54(3)
C(7) 6446(10) 640(8) 3992(4) 36(3)
C(8) 6469(9) 2487(7) 2787(3) 22(2)
C(9) 7183(11) 3385(8) 2465(4) 43(3)
C(10) 5041(10) 2180(9) 2612(4) 44(3)
C(11) 7093(12) 1524(8) 2741(4) 49(3)
C(12) 6251(9) 3286(8) 4625(3) 26(2)
C(13) 4851(10) 2720(9) 4759(4) 48(3)
C(14) 7218(10) 2783(8) 4908(4) 39(3)
C(15) 6455(10) 4474(7) 4759(4) 31(2)
C(16) 7585(10) 6750(8) 3014(4) 43(3)
C(17) 8192(11) 7005(8) 4123(4) 44(3)
C(18) 10317(10) 7108(8) 3367(5) 55(4)
C(19) 10809(9) 4684(9) 3087(4) 39(3)
C(20) 9461(9) 3008(7) 3775(4) 30(2)
Appendix
- 154 -
C(21) 10726(10) 5062(9) 4232(4) 41(3)
C(22) 4144(9) 8514(7) 1315(3) 22(2)
C(23) 4603(10) 9700(7) 1286(3) 30(2)
C(24) 5918(10) 10173(8) 1332(4) 36(3)
C(25) 6315(12) 11289(9) 1292(4) 46(3)
C(26) 5453(14) 11926(9) 1203(4) 50(3)
C(27) 4158(14) 11457(9) 1158(4) 52(3)
C(28) 3726(12) 10336(8) 1194(4) 41(3)
C(29) 3829(9) 8261(7) 2260(3) 24(2)
C(30) 3041(13) 9101(10) 2358(4) 65(4)
C(31) 3223(10) 7251(8) 2537(4) 41(3)
C(32) 5223(10) 8649(10) 2438(4) 59(4)
C(33) 4252(10) 7910(8) 398(3) 30(2)
C(34) 3489(13) 8669(11) 158(4) 67(4)
C(35) 3812(13) 6813(9) 170(4) 60(4)
C(36) 5705(11) 8321(11) 315(4) 63(4)
C(37) 3040(11) 4003(8) 1778(4) 49(3)
C(38) 2431(11) 4059(8) 669(4) 44(3)
C(39) 310(10) 3713(8) 1447(5) 48(3)
C(40) -433(9) 5964(9) 1795(4) 43(3)
C(41) 921(10) 7835(9) 1209(4) 48(3)
C(42) -186(11) 5795(10) 650(4) 57(4)
C(43) -180(17) 209(14) 3445(7) 59(3)
C(44) -1099(17) -417(14) 3132(7) 58(3)
C(45) -949(16) -322(14) 2634(7) 58(2)
C(46) 75(15) 387(13) 2440(7) 58(2)
C(47) 979(17) 1008(14) 2750(6) 60(2)
C(48) 829(17) 908(15) 3251(7) 60(3)
C(49) 210(20) 473(17) 1887(7) 58(3)
C(43A) 798(17) 917(14) 2044(7) 58(3)
C(44A) 1381(17) 1418(14) 2465(7) 59(3)
C(45A) 931(16) 1088(14) 2929(7) 59(3)
C(46A) -134(15) 231(13) 2969(7) 58(2)
C(47A) -748(17) -263(14) 2547(6) 58(2)
C(48A) -289(17) 75(14) 2084(7) 58(2)
C(49A) -640(20) -111(17) 3469(8) 60(3)
C(50) 120(20) -463(18) -179(10) 106(6)
C(51) -640(30) -620(20) 236(10) 106(6)
C(52) -730(20) 250(20) 530(10) 107(6)
C(53) -70(30) 1260(20) 404(11) 109(6)
C(54) 680(20) 1409(19) -10(11) 107(6)
C(55) 780(30) 558(19) -303(11) 106(6)
C(56) 250(30) -1390(20) -499(12) 120(7)
Appendix
- 155 -
C(57) 575(16) 499(14) 4873(6) 52(3)
C(58) 807(18) -512(14) 4941(8) 53(3)
C(59) -138(17) -1326(14) 5128(7) 55(3)
C(60) -1333(18) -1140(15) 5253(8) 57(3)
C(61) -1572(16) -130(15) 5187(7) 56(3)
C(62) -620(17) 686(15) 5000(8) 53(3)
C(63) 1600(20) 1369(17) 4669(9) 59(5)
Appendix
- 156 -
74 Publications in this dissertation
1 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Stephan Enthaler and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167-6171 Angew Chem 2012 124 6271-6275
Bis(silylenyl)- and Bis(germylenyl)-Substituted Ferrocenes Synthesis Structure and Catalytic
Applications of Bidentate Silicon(II)-Cobalt Complex
2 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Elisabeth Irran and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691-3694 Angew Chem 2012 124 3751-3754
Synthesis and unexpected coordination of a silicon(II)-based SiCSi pincerlike arene to
palladium
3 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 6490-6494
Reactivity of N-Heterocyclic germylene toward ammonia and water
4 Shenglai Yao Yun Xiong Wenyuan Wang and Matthias Driess
Chem Eur J 2011 17 4890-4895
Synthesis structure and reactivity of a pyridine-stabilized germanone
5 Shigeyoshi Inoue Wenyuan Wang Carsten Praesang Matthew Asay Elisabeth Irran and
Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 2868ndash2871
An ylide-like phosphasilene and striking formation of a 4π-electron resonance-stabilized 24-
disila-13-diphosphacyclo- butadiene
6 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890ndash15892
An isolable bis-silylene oxide (ldquodisilylenoxanerdquo) and its metal coordination
7 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Chem Commun 2009 2661ndash2663
An unsymmetric substituted digermylene with a Ge(I)ndashGe(I) bond and synthesis of a
germylenendashstannylene with a Ge(I)ndashSn(I) bond
8 Wenyuan Wang Shenglai Yao Christoph van Wuellen and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640ndash9641
A cyclopentadienide analogue containing divalent germanium and a heavy cyclobutadiene-
like dianion with an unusual Ge4 Core
Appendix
- 157 -
75 Curriculum Vitae
Personal Data
Date and Place of Birth 17th
January 1976 in Nei Mongol China
Nationality Chinese
Education
1982-1987 Elementary School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1987-1993 High School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1993-1997 Department of Chemistry Inner Mongolia Normal University (China)
Bachelor Chemistry
071997 Bachelor of Chemistry education
2003-2007 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
Diplom Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
012008 Diplom of Science Degree
2008-2012 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
PhD Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
Herein I affirm that this dissertation was finished independently at the ldquoInstitut fuumlr
Chemierdquo at the ldquoTechnischen Universitaumlt Berlinrdquo under the guidance of
Prof Dr Matthias Driess where all references and additional aid sources have been
appropriately cited
Wenyuan Wang
Berlin Juli 2012
My heartfelt thanks go out to
Prof Dr Thomas Braun for his acceptance of the second commentator ship
Prof Dr Peter Hildebrandt for his acceptance of the chairman
Prof Dr Shigeyoshi Inoue and Prof Dr Christoph van Wuumlllen for DFT calculations
and composition assistance during the course of my PhD work and Dr Stephan
Enthaler for the investigation of the catalytic activity
Dr Shenglai Yao Dr Carsten Praesang Dr Andreas Bruumlck Dr Anne Adams Robert
Adams Ms Marianna Tsaroucha Mr Gengwen Tan Mr Daniel Gallego and Mr
Paul Ensle for useful discussions synthetic suggestions composition and
modification assistance during the course of my PhD work
My laboratory coworkers Mr Stefan Schutte for creating a wonderful lab atmosphere
and Ms Paula Nixdorf Dr Elisabeth Irran for X-ray crystal structure determinations
and solutions Dr Jan-Dirk Epping Dr Heinz-Juumlrgen Kroth and Mr Manfred
Dettlaff for NMR measurements Ms Sigrid Imme for CHN and IR measurements
Mr Robert Rudolph for the measurements of cyclic voltammetry
Ms Andrea Rahmel and all members of my work group for their hail-fellow help
friendship and years of harmonious work together and for their acting as guides in
my living and discovery in all things in Germany
I sincerely thank my parents my wife Xiaoxia Zhao and Prof GuoXingBaTu for
selfless support and encouragement of my study in Germany
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the
Cluster of Excellence ldquoUnifying Concepts in Catalysisrdquo (Unicat)
Table of contents
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds 1
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements 5
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores 8
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands 16
2 MOTIVATION 21
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 23
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates 23
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4 23
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8 28
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5 30
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6 34
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8 35
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8 36
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8 38
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene 40
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands 40
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16 42
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O 45
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23 48
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28 51
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28 52
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel 55
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31 57
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30 59
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31 61
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 65
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34 68
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35 68
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII complex 36 71
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism 74
Table of contents
ii
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 76
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40 76
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40 80
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45 83
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts 85
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 89
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION 98
51 General section 98
52 Analytical methods 99
53 Starting Materials 101
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds 102
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4 102
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5 103
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6 104
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8 105
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 107
526 The new chlorogermylene 14 108
527 The new germylene 16 109
528 Aminogermylene 17 110
529 Germylene hydroxide 18 111
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20 112
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22 113
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23 114
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27 115
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28 116
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29 117
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30 118
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31 119
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 120
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35 120
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36 121
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38 123
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40 124
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41 125
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42 126
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44 127
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45 128
Table of contents
iii
6 REFERENCES 129
7 APPENDIX 138
71 Abbreviations 138
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation 139
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details 142
74 Publications in this dissertation 156
75 Curriculum Vitae 157
Introduction
- 1 -
1 INTRODUCTION
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds
Generally main-group elements higher than of the third period are classified as
ldquoheavy main-group elementsrdquo some of which show abnormal physical and chemical
properties For example Br(VII) is a stronger oxidant than Cl(VII) This different
behavior of high-valent main-group elements can be attributed to the relativistic
effect[1]
of electrons The contraction of all s-orbitals triggered by the relativistic effect
leads to a greater energy difference between s- and p-orbitals in higher period
elements which increases the difficulty of a sp-hybridation Moreover the energy
difference between s- and p-orbitals for elements in the d-district of the fourth period
and f-district of the sixth period vary unconventionally resulting in the so called
ldquosecondary periodicityrdquo of forth and sixth period elements Therefore ns2 electrons in
the valence shell of heavy main-group elements play an essential role for their
chemical properties[2]
During the organometallic research of main group elements a
series of novel compounds have been discovered and new synthetic methods as well
as theoretical insights in their chemistry have been developed and summarized[3]
In whole periodic table the difference of property in the group 14 elements (tetrels)
is maximal[4]
In comparison to carbon compounds of Si Ge Sn and Pb are very
different referring to the physical properties chemical behavior and structural features
The theory for carbon chemistry cannot be fit for the chemistry of heavy group 14
elements A typical example is the synthesis of compounds with a silicon-oxygen
double bond (Si=O silanone) Beginning last century the english chemist Frederic
Stanley Kipping manufactured many silicon-carbon compounds and discovered
thereby resin-like products which he called ldquosilicone of ketonesrdquo Kipping coined the
word ldquosiliconerdquo in 1901 to describe polydiphenylsiloxane by analogy of its formula
(Ph2SiO) with the formula of the ketone benzophenone (Ph2CO) Kipping was well
Introduction
- 2 -
aware that polydiphenylsiloxane is polymeric whereas benzophenone is monomeric
and noted that ldquosiliconerdquo and Ph2CO had very different chemistry[5]
The german chemist Richard Muumlller and the american chemist Eugene G Rochow
found almost at the same time a possibility for the industrial production of
dimethyldichlorosilane (Me2SiCl2) the most important precursor for the production of
the silicone in the 1940s[6]
The procedure today is called Muumlller Rochow synthesis
(Scheme 11) From that many researchers synthesized various silicone products but
crystallographically characterized complexes with a donor-stabilized Si=O double
bond were published at the beginning of this century by our group These are the
silanoic ester I1[7]
the carbene-coordinated silanone I2[8]
and the ketone-coordinated
silanone I3[9]
(Scheme 12) The Si=O double bond distance (1532 pm) in I3 is shorter
than the ones in I1 (1579 pm) and I2 (1541 pm) and represents the shortest Si-O
distance in all molecular Si=O compounds hitherto reported[10]
Scheme 11 Muumlller Rochow silicone synthesis
Scheme 12 Isolable donor-stabilized silanoic ester I1 and silanone I2 and I3
The hundred-year story of silicones to monomeric species bearing Si=O double
bonds shows that the silicon atom prefers σ-bonds over double bond (σ- and π-bonds)
That means the classical π-bond is not of first choice for heavy main-group
elements[11]
In other words not only E=X (E = heavy main-group elements X = C N
O) but also E=Ersquo (Ersquo = heavy main-group elements) systems are difficult to stabilize
Introduction
- 3 -
because they easily form σ-bonded corresponding polymers Consequently it is very
challenging to study compounds of heavy main group elements in their low oxidation
state Especially the study of divalent Si Ge and Sn compounds with lone pair
electrons (metallylenes) is one of the most attractive research fields in contemporary
organometallic chemistry[3 12]
In the past thirty years numerous thermally stable unsaturated Si Ge Sn
compounds were isolated which show extremely impressive chemistry[12d 13]
The
difference between C-C and Si-Si double bond is now well-understood[3a]
Very
different reaction mechanisms for the formation of such doubly-bonded carbon and
silicon compounds were throughly discussed The classical C-C double bond can
readily be explained by the valence bond theory and hybridization[14]
The bonding
state in those heavier alkene analogues can be explained by two sets of ns2rarrp
0 donor-
acceptor interactions between two metallylene monomers (Scheme 1 3)[3 15]
Similarly heavier alkyne analogues of main-group elements present also two dative
bonds of ns2rarrp
0 donor-acceptor interactions plus a normal σ-bond between two pz
orbitals[3 12d]
(Scheme 13) But the sp-hybridization for heavy main-group elements
is not realized in their low-valent compounds because sp-hybridization does not lead
to strengthing of terminal σ-bonds to the ligands R
Scheme 13 Nonclassical multiple bond features (E = heavy main-group elements)
Introduction
- 4 -
Until the end of the last century the synthesis of heavier alkyne analogues was an
unsolved problem because of the lack of suitable large substituent At the first the
isolation of a diplumbylene I4[16]
ArrsquoPb-PbArrsquo (Arrsquo = 26-(Tip)2C6H3 Tip = 246-
iPr3C6H2) was reported by Power in 2000 (Scheme 14) As is evident from the
structural parameters of ArPb-PbAr the triple bond character has vanished completely
The Pb-Pb distance (319 pm) in ArPb-PbAr is longer even than that of a normal Pb-
Pb single bond (308 pm) and the CAr-Pb bond vectors are perpendicular to the Pb-Pb
axes (943deg) These two facts illustrated a complete lack of hybridization of lead
atoms and almost exclusive use of p-orbitals in σ-bonds[17]
In 2002 Power reported
the distannyne ArSnequivSnAr I5[18]
(Ar = 26-Dip2C6H3 Dip = 26-iPr2C6H3) containing
a SnequivSn bond length of 2668 pm shorter compared to Sn-Sn single bonds[19]
and
with multiple bond character A trans bent configuration was also observed in I5 but
the Sn-Sn-C angle with 1252deg is far from a perpendicular situation as in I4 In the
same year Power described the first digermyne I6[20]
ArGeequivGeAr In this case the
Ge-Ge bond length of 2285 pm was found to be considerably shorter than normal Ge-
Ge single[13f]
(244 pm) and Ge-Ge double bonds (221-246 pm) indicated multiple
bonding character[21]
The trans-bending angle of Ge-Ge-C (1288deg) in digermyne I6
is slightly larger than that in distannyne I5
Scheme 14 The first isolated formal alkyne analogues of group 14
Introduction
- 5 -
With the appearance of the first structurally characterized disilyne I7[22]
reported by
Sekiguchi the series of heavier alkyne congeners was completed in 2004 The SiequivSi
bond length with 2062 pm was considerably shorter than that of typical Si-Si single
bonds (235 pm) and somewhat shorter than that of typical Si-Si double bonds[13b]
(216 pm) The molecular structure of compound I7 with a Si-Si-Silyl angle of 1374deg
reveals a heavily trans-bent configuration indicating the presence of a nonclassical
triple bond The theoretical calculation approved the trans bent structure and a bond
order of three
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements
Isolable carbenes and heavier carbene analogues (metallylenes silylenes R2Si
germylenes R2Ge stannylenes R2Sn plumbylenes R2Pb) can be defined as
stabilized divalent monomers of group 14 elements which can impossibly dimerize or
polymerize continuously due to the thermodynamic andor kinetic stabilization As
already mentioned above in contrast to carbon heavier group 14 elements have a low
tendency of sp-hybridization[11]
Accordingly consists of ns2 valence electrons as a
lone pair and use usually three p-valence-orbitals for the formation of their divalent
species[12c]
The ground state of R2E (E = Si Ge Sn Pb) is thereby a singlet while
the ground state of R2C is a triplet (Scheme 15) because two nonbonding electrons
locate in sp-hybrid orbitals[23]
In order to obtain at ambient temperature isolable metallylenes there are today two
particularly effective stabilization methods First of all these unsaturated compounds
can be thermodynamically stabilized by donor electron delocalization to empty p-
orbital as in the case of silylene I8[24]
and silyliumylidene cation I9[25]
(Scheme 16)
In addition the coordination of ns2 electrons to the empty p-orbital of the neighbor
molecule can be kinetically prevented by bulky substituents which was shown by the
Introduction
- 6 -
successful synthesis of the dialkyl silylene I10[26]
that is stabilized only by the steric
hindrance of four large silyl groups and C-SirarrSi hyperconjugation
Scheme 15 Ground states of triplet-carbene and singlet-metallylenes
Scheme 16 Stabilization of silylenes by π-electron delocalization andor steric
hindrance I8 I9 and hyperconjugation I10
The synthesis of heavier carbene analogues depends on suitable starting materials
with oxidation state II Practically in the case of tin and lead the dihalides SnCl2 and
PdCl2 are stable and suitable as starting materials for isolable SnII and Pb
II
organometallic compounds Many germylenes were synthesized employing the known
germanium dichloride complex GeCl2middotdioxane which is easily available[27]
The
carbene-stabilized SiIICl2
[28] (NHCrarrSiCl2 NHC = (HC-NDip)2C
[29]) was reported
recently by Roesky However it is not a trouble-free starting material for silicon(II)
chemistry due to the difficult removing of by-products derivated by the bulky carbene
(NHC) Otherwise divalent compounds of GeII Sn
II and Pb
II are more stable than the
corresponding SiII analogues Therefore the metallylene synthetic chemistry faces the
main difficulty in the synthesis and isolation of functionalized silylene derivates
Accustomed synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes was summarized in
Scheme 17 Their feasibility was also proved by the preparation of new silylenes in
this work
Introduction
- 7 -
Scheme 17 Synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes
Usually N-heteroleptic silylenes are accessible from SiIV
-precursors to form SiII-
species using reductants such as Na K or their alloy KC8 lithium or magnesium
naphthalenide etc A usually silylenes[24 26 30]
like I13 with a five- or six-membered
ring system and some three-coordinated silylenes[31]
like I14 are accessible through
the reductive dehalogenation reactions presented in case A Suitable five-coordinated
SiIV
sources I15 could be treated with a non oxygenated strong base resulting in the
corresponding three-coordinated silylenes[32]
I16 The two-coordinated silylene I13
prepared through an acid-base reaction from its four-coordinated precursor was not
observed so far In case C silylenes I18 could be isolated by salt metathesis reaction
during that the halogen atom was substituted by a desired Rsub[33]
With these new
synthetic methods the generation of many imaginable SiII molecules is possible today
Especially more complicated metallylenes for example interconnected or spacer-
separated bis-metallylenes (see next page) can be obtained in good yield Thus more
reactivity will be found in their subsequent reactions
Introduction
- 8 -
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores
The discussion of diplumbylene I4 indicates the strong tendency to transformate a
bis-metallylene instead of triple bond form in the case of lead Scheme 18 shows the
resonance structures of triply bonded I19 and bis-metallylene I20 together with the
donor ligand coordinated interconnected bis-metallylene structure I21 Hitherto the
chemical research in this area made clear that silicon and germanium prefer the type
of structure I19 while the species of lead is more favorable in the state I20[12d]
Corresponding tin species have vacillant structural feature between I19 and I20
depending on the steric demand of R and the packing force in crystals[34]
The donor
ligand coordination with all heavier alkyne analogues leads to the donor-stabilized
bis-metallylene form I21 which possesses an E-E single σ-bond and two ns2 lone
pairs one at each of the E centers[35]
Scheme 18 Resonance structures of nonclassical triple bond and bis-metallylene
According to the bonding state all known bis-metallylenes can be discriminated in
two different types i) ldquointerconnected bis-metallylenesrdquo in which two E atoms are
directly connected by a chemical bond and ii) ldquospacer-separated bis-metallylenesrdquo in
which two EII atoms are separated by bridged atoms or by a broad spacer without an
E-E bond in the molecules[33a 36]
The isolation of bis-metallylenes of heavier group
14 elements has been a major synthetic challenge owing to their tendency to
polymerize Herein a review of this kind of compounds which appeared almost
suddenly just in the last two decades is given
Introduction
- 9 -
Interconnected bis-metallylenes
Interconnected bis-silylenes are shown in Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylene
examples were firstly reported by Robinson in 2008[35]
which are a carbene-stabilized
bis-silylene I22 with a SiI-Si
I bond (2393 pm) and a carbene-stabilized bis-silylene
I23 with a Si0=Si
0 double bond (2229 pm) One year later the Roesky group prepared
an interconnected bis-silylene I24[37]
stabilized by amidinato ligands with a SiI-Si
I
single bond (2413 pm) Compound I24 exhibits a gauche-bent geometry Another
amidinato donor-stabilized bis-silylene I25[38]
which was synthesized in last year by
Jones et al possesses trans-bent structure not the gauche-bent form The SiI-Si
I
distance (2489 pm) in I25 is longer than those in I22 and I24 because of the more
sterically hindered amidinato ligands In the same year the synthesis of the first
phosphine-stabilized bis-silylene I26[39]
could be achieved and fully characterized In
this molecule the Si-Si bond with the bond length of 2331 pm is visibly shorter than
those in related molecules Baceiredo et al described that the Si-Si fragment in I26
presents a certain multiple-bond character
Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylenes
Interconnected bis-germylenes are shown in Scheme 110 In 2006 Jones and
coworkers reported the first successful isolation of two stable bis-germylenes I27 and
Introduction
- 10 -
I28[40]
which are stabilized by an amidinate and a guanidinate ligand respectively
Their Ge-Ge distances (2672 and 2638 pm) show normal single bond character Two
years later Roesky prepared the bis-germylenes I29[41]
which exhibits a gauche-bent
geometry Since I29 is stabilized by a less bulky amidinate ligands the Ge-Ge bond
with the length of 2569 pm is shorter than those of examples before A different β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized bis-germylene I30[42]
was presented by the work group
of Leung in which the Ge-Ge bond length (2602 pm) is somewhere in between The
reduction of NHCrarrGeCl2 (NHC see Scheme 110) employing magnesium(I)
reagents[43]
furnished the carbene-stabilized bis-germylene I31[44]
with a Ge0=Ge
0
double bond (2349 pm) which is the homologous compound of I23 Theoretical
analyses of I31 suggest a singlet germanium(0) dimer (Ge=Ge) datively coordinated
by two NHC ligands In the last year Jones again reported a bis-germylene I32[38]
which is structurally comparable with I27 and I28 But the Ge-Ge distance in I32 is
similar with that of I30
Scheme 110 Interconnected bis-germylenes
Interconnected bis-stannylenes are shown in Scheme 111 Very interestingly the
introduction of SiMe3 instead of H at the para-position of the aryl ring in distannyne
I5 induced the first bis-stannylene I33[34]
without alteration of the steric crowding
near the tin center The small Sn-Sn-C angle (993deg) and the long Sn-Sn distance
(3066 pm) in I33 indicate two stannylene moieties connected with a single bond and
Introduction
- 11 -
without the sp-hybridization In the similar work of Power et al in 2010 the
introduction of GeMe3 substituents of aryl rings at the para-position resulted also in
single bonded bis-stannylene I34[45]
with Sn-Sn distances of 3077 pm and ldquosharprdquo
Sn-Sn-C bending angles of 978deg With the bis-stannylene I35[46]
Jambor showed that
without the use of bulky substituents such as 26-disubstituted aryl groups a bis-
stannylene can be stabilized by intramolecular NrarrSn interactions The less bulky
aryls (aryl = 26-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3) in I35 led to the shorter Sn-Sn single bond (2971
pm) and a trans-bent angle of 943deg as in the diplumbylene I4 The first amidinato
coordinated bis-stannylene I36[38]
with a Sn-Sn single bond was reported by Jones et
al last year Its structural features are highly similar to the germanium homologue
compound I32
Scheme 111 Interconnected bis-stannylenes
Spacer-separated bis-metallylenes and species containing several EII cores
Lappert and Veith reported on the isolation of divalent germanium and tin
compounds very early[47]
Many of these from the 1970s and 1980s that were
described without X-ray characterization will not be discussed here The spacer-
separated bis-germylene I37[48]
and bis-stannylene I38[48]
(Scheme 112) appeared
first of all of this compound class in 1988 The work group of Veith introduced a facile
Introduction
- 12 -
synthetic method by which tetralithium amide reacted with two equivalents of
GeCl2middotdioxane or SnCl2 to give the corresponding products in over 60 yield In 1990
two interesting germylenes I39[49]
and I41[50]
were reported by Lappert and Power In
comparison to the isolable isonitrile (R-N+equivC
minus) until now it was not possible to
stabilize its homologous derivates of the heavier group 14 elements Compounds I39
and I41 can be considered as the dimer (I39) and trimer (I41) formed after
oligomerization of the unstable germaisonitrile analogue (R-N+equivGe
minus) Nevertheless
compounds with two germylene moieties at the time could be seen as impressive
achievements in the divalent germanium chemistry Another dimer of germaisonitrile
bis-germylene I40[51]
was reported by Roesky in 1997 After this the first stable
dimeric silaisonitrile I42[52]
generated through the reduction of carbene stabilized
dichlorosilaimine (NHCrarrSi(Cl2)=NAr Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) with KC8 was presented
by the work group of Roesky in 2011 The lengthy synthetic protocol bulky protecting
groups and a low yield (21) of I42 indicate a more difficult synthetic chemistry
necessary for the synthesis of the latter silicon compound However a trimer (tris-
silylene) of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) the silicon analogue of I41 is now just a dream of
synthetic chemists
In 1991 two bis-stannylenes (micro-chlorotin(II) amides (micro-Cl-Sn-NR2)2) I43 (NR2 =
N(CMe2)2(CH2)3) and I44 (R = SiMe3) in which two stannylene moieties are bridged
by two chlorine atoms were synthesized by Lappert et al[53]
Surprisingly X-ray
analyses of the two crystals show that I43 is the cis-isomer but I44 has the trans-
configuration In contrast a new bis-stannylene (ClSn-micro-N(Naph)SiMe3)2 I45[54]
was
characterized with two bridged nitrogen atoms by the same work group The Sn-N
bonds of 2438 pm in I45 are much longer than the terminal Sn-N bonds of 2069 pm
in I44 The Sn-N-Sn-N ring in I45 is slightly puckered and bears trans-Cl atoms
Instead of halogen atoms in bis-germylene I46[55]
two terminal N atoms of the azide
groups bridge two germylene parts forming a planar four-membered Ge2N2 ring
Otherwise the germylene centers of I46 are tetracoordinated due to two additional
OrarrGe dative bonds The N-bridged three-core germylenes I47 and stannylenes I48
Introduction
- 13 -
were prepared by Veith in 1991[56]
For four of six molecules X-ray crystal structure
determinations have been carried out which reveal the molecules to be built of a
diamond-lattice-like skeleton The top N atom coordinates to all three germylene
(stannylene) parts and another N atoms bridge with the neighboring two germylene
(stannylene) parts The chair-form six-membered E3N3 ring contains three N-H bonds
and traps one halogen atom (Cl Br I) with the three hydrogen atoms
Scheme 112 Spacer-separated metallylenes I37-I48
The by 14-diamine molecules separated bis-stannylenes I50 and I51 were prepared
from the chlorostannylene dimer I44 and the corresponding dilithium diamide by
Lappert and co-workers in 1994 (Scheme 113)[57]
Bis-germylene I49 was similarly
prepared by the reaction of the GeII homologous derivate ClGeN(SiMe3)2 of I44 with
dilithium diaminobenzene and marked a new development at that time In 1997
Lappert et al reported a new 13-diamine bridged bis-stannylene I52 and a stannylene
I53 with the three SnII cores employing dilithium meta-diamide
[58] The synthesis of
I52 is similar to I50 while I53 was isolated by treatment of the substituted
Introduction
- 14 -
diaminobenzene with Sn(N(SiMe3)2)2 in a ratio of 23 Evidently the formation of I53
involves unexpected C-H activations of the 2-position of 13-diaminobenzene and
eliminations of amine HN(SiMe3)2 The 32 reaction of Sn(NMe2)2 with sterically
bulky aromatic amines (DipNH2 or MesNH2) in toluene can be controlled giving the
heteroleptic stannylenes I54 and I55[59]
in which sterically less bulky NMe2 groups
serve as bridges and one SnII center between two bulky R groups remains its two-
coordination The isolation of the first GeII and Sn
II amide dimers I56 and I57
bridged by the NH2 groups was presented in 2005[60]
They were synthesized by the
reaction of bulky low-valent organo GeII and Sn
II halides (ArE
IICl E = Ge Sn Ar see
Scheme 113) with dry ammonia The Ge2N2 or Sn2N2 cores in I56 and I57 are planar
with rhombohedral shapes and with acute angles near 80deg at Ge or Sn and wider
angles near 100deg at N
Wright 1997
I54 R = Mes I55 R = Dip
I52 Lappert 1997
SnNMe2
Sn
Me2N
NR
NR
NN
SiMe3
E
(Me3Si)2N
E
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
N
N
SiMe3
Sn
(Me3Si)2N
Sn
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
Lappert 1994
I49 E = Ge I50 E = Sn I51 Lappert 1994
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
I53 Lappert 1997
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
Sn
Sn
Power 2005
I56 E = Ge R = Dip
I57 E = Sn R = Tip
R
RE
NH2
E
H2N
R
R
Scheme 113 Spacer-separated metallylenes I49-I57
The discovery of the first spacer-separated bis-silylene I58 (Scheme 114) was
made by Lappert et al in 2005[61]
It was synthesized by reductive dehalogenation of
the bis-dichlorosilane precursor with KC8 With the bis-functionality of I58
eventually a macrocycle metal-complex could be formed but the rigid backbone does
not allow a chelating coordination to a single core In addition Power tried oxidative
Introduction
- 15 -
addition reactions of his Sn and Ge alkyne analogues (I5 and I6 Scheme 114) with
trimethyl silyl azide (Me3SiN3) and adamantanyl azide (Ada-N3) giving the spacer (N-
SiMe3 or N-Ada) separated bis-stannylenes I59[62]
and bis-germylene I60[63]
and with
azobenzene (PhN=NPh) giving the spacer (PhNNPh) separated bis-germylene I61[62]
and bis-stannylene I62[62]
respectively The similar reaction of bis-germylene I29
with azobenzene furnished also the addition product the spacer bridged bis-
germylene I63[64]
with simultaneous cleavage of the Ge-Ge single bond as observed
by Roesky in 2010 At the same time So et al activated the Si-Si single bond of bis-
silylene I24 with phenyl acetylene resulting in the ethylene bridged bis-silylene I64[65]
Many spacer separated bis-germylenes and bis-stannylenes[66]
(I65-I74) were
successfully designed and isolated by Hahn et al for the use as promising chelating
ligands in coordination reactions A few transition-metal complexes of them were
prepared by his research group too (see p 18)
Scheme 114 Spacer-separated metallylenes I58-I74
In 2011 after the synthesis of the first oxygen bridged bis-silylene[32a]
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2
minus) in the course of this PhD work other four analogous were reported
Introduction
- 16 -
which are oxygen bridged bis-germylenes I75[67]
I77[68]
bis-stannylene I78[68]
and
sulfur bridged bis-germylene I76[67]
(Scheme 115) Bis-germylene oxide I75 and
sulfide I76 were synthesized in the work group of So et al by the dehalogenation of
LGeCl (L = amidinate in I75) with KC8 and then the oxidation with trimethylamine
N-oxide (Me3NO) or with elemental sulfur Otherwise Powerrsquos new compounds I77
and I78 were accessible by oxidative addition of alkyne analogues I5 and I6 using the
stoichiometric oxygen transfer reagent pyridine N-oxide (C5H5NO) In the last two
decades several cubanes of attractive tetra-metallylenes with GeII Sn
II Pb
II like I79
were presented[69]
(Scheme 116) Because they are somewhat far from discussed
metallylenes in structural features and synthetic approaches they are not discussed
and shown in detail here The synthesis of the still unknown SiII analogue I80 a
tetramer of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) remains as a fascinating challenge
Scheme 115 New bis-metallylenes bridged by a single atom
Scheme 116 Cubane-like tetra-metallylenes of heavier group 14 elements
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands
The interaction between the central atom and the donor in transition-metal
complexes depends on their electron configuration There are two- and three-
coordinated metallylenes in which the empty np-orbitals are stabilized by
Introduction
- 17 -
intramolecular electron delocalization or by the third donor-ligand donation
respectively Therefore if two types of metallylenes serve as donor-ligands for
transition-metals the interaction of these p-orbitals with the corresponding metal d-
orbitals is essentially different For example two silylenerarrM complexes are shown
in Scheme 117 Complex I81 shows clearly σ-donorπ-acceptor interaction[70]
while
the Fe atom in complex I82[71]
contains only a σ-donor bond from the silylene subunit
In this sense three-coordinate metallylenes as σ-donor ligands are more similar to
isoelectronic triorganophosphine ligands[33a b]
in I83 (Scheme 117) In Table 11 the
difference of three-coordinate silylenes and triorganophosphines are compared and
shown in detail
Scheme 117 The σ-donorπ-acceptor or only σ-donor coordination
Table 11 Comparison of three-coordinate silylenes and phosphines
three-Coordinate silylenes Phosphines (PR3)[72]
Synthesis difficult synthetic approaches well-established synthetic procedures
Embellishment only few scaffolds are known numerous structural transformations
and various substituents of R
Stability air and moisture sensitive normally stable in air
Property easily oxidative addition
much stronger σ-donor ligand
multivariate chemical behavior
seldom oxidative addition
strong σ-donor ligand
predictable chemical behavior
Complex only few transition-metal complexes complexes with numerous metals
State of
Development
underdeveloped chemistry fully established
Introduction
- 18 -
In coordination chemistry the spacer separated bis-metallylenes are at the same
time bidentate chelating ligands despite almost all of them were not or could not be
used as chelating ligands Until 2008 only a few chelated transition-metal complexes
coordinated by isolable spacer separated bis-metallylenes were reported They are the
bis-germylene I65 coordinated Mo(CO)4 complex I65-Mo[66b]
and bis-stannylenes
I73 I74 coordinated Ni0 complexes
[66c] I73-Ni I74-Ni (Scheme 118) reported by
Hahn et al Another bis-germylene complex I29-Fe[64]
with two Fe cores presented
by Roesky in 2010 does not comprise chelating coordination at all The reason for the
lack of representative bis-metallylenes in coordination chemistry is that not only the
formation and isolation of such complexes are very difficult but also the design and
synthesis of bis-metallylenes themself are sometimes infeasible Additionally the air-
and water-sensitivity of these compounds causes many unexpected side-reactions In
general metallylene transition-metal complexes are still limited in using metallylenes
containing single EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn)
Scheme 118 Known complexes of spacer-separated bis-germylenes and stannylenes
The successful usage of bidentate phosphanes in many catalytic transformations
originates from their convenient electronic properties and the variable steric
protection Among those chelating bis-phosphane I84[73]
(BINAP Scheme 119) with
Introduction
- 19 -
backbone chirality can lead to excellent enantioselectivity compared to monodentate
phosphines With ferrocendiyl bridged ligands I85 bimetallic complexes are easily
prepared[74]
Furthermore bis-phosphane ligands like I86 are superior bridges for
heterodinuclear complexes in catalytic hydrogenation[75]
Pincer arenes consisting of
a central aromatic backbone linked to two phosphane parts by different spacers are
particularly attractive because of their feasible structural tuning with many choices of
donor groups[72 76]
Recently the chemistry of pincer-ligated transition-metal
complexes underwent rapid developments and has been used for several intriguing
chemical transformations[72b 77]
The coordination chemistry of the most common
pincer ligands such as NCN- PCP- and SCS-type ligands toward transition-metals in
I87 (Scheme 119) was explored extensively[72b 77]
Pincer arenes with stronger σ-
donor sites E than those provided by group 15 and 16 atoms are very attractive for the
synthesis of more electron-rich transition-metal complexes for activation of small
molecules On the other hand transition-metal complexes with ligands like I84-I87
containing EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn) were scarce before 2009
Scheme 119 Bidentate phosphanes for transition-metal complexes
The challenge of spacer-separated bis-metallylenes as novel bidentate σ-donor
ligands for transition-metal complexes are intriguing because of their unique structure
and their coordination ability Therefore transition-metal complexes with chelating
Introduction
- 20 -
bis-metallylenes which were not throughly uncovered[66b c 78]
have received more
and more attention To date the new development of bis-metallylene synthesis
enables the isolation of their transition-metal complexes containing EII-based
functional groups as chelating ligands These complexes may provide access to their
potential application in which they can play a key role as intermediates in transition-
metal catalyzed transformations[70c 79]
Motivation
- 21 -
2 MOTIVATION
As pointed out in the introduction the metallylene synthetic chemistry is a fast
developing field with a great potential to find novel metallylenes with new
functionalities which would be the basis for the development of new kinds of
transition-metal complexes I am particularly interested in the synthesis of new types
of compounds containing divalent group 14 elements and to study their coordination
properties towards transition-metals New metallylenes could serve as very strong σ-
donor ligands for the generation of transition-metal complexes with unusual high
electron density at the metal site which could possess unique chemical properties
The three reports of transition-metal complexes[66b c]
containing bidentate bis-
germylene (stannylene) ligands were discussed in the ldquoIntroductionrdquo of this work
This potential of bis-metallylenes used as chelating ligands in coordination chemistry
prompted me to investigate new transition-metal complexes along with the
development of a new low-valent Si Ge and Sn chemistry
In this work three main points will be addressed i) the design and synthesis of new
ligand stabilized heavier carbene analogous (metallylenes) and interconnected bis-
metallylenes containing low-valent Si Ge Sn ii) the exploration of synthetic
approaches towards different spacer separated (bridged) bis-metallylenes iii) the
investigation of the properties and coordination abilities of new metallylenes (bis-
metallylenes) to transition-metals
The β-diketiminato and amidinato scaffolds I and II were chosen for the
stabilization of the reactive divalent group 14 units (Scheme 21) The known
metallylene halogenide compounds[31a 32b 80]
III and IV were used as the direct
precursors for the preparation of novel mono- and bis-metallylene derivates
Motivation
- 22 -
Scheme 21 Synthesis of new metallylene derivates from precursors
Scheme 22 Coordination of new spacer-separated bis-metallylene to transition-metals
Using isolated products as precursors complexes with different electronic
configurations and activities can be obtained and further modified through
coordination to transition-metals and varying substituents as ligands (Scheme 22)
This development may provide new divalent group 14 element-based functional
ligands in coordination chemistry towards transition-metals As spacer units for the
bis-metallylenes should serve 13-functionalized arene ferrocene and chalcogen
elements (O S Se) The promising application of new metallylene-metal complexes
will be investigated as the precatalyst in organic reactions
Results and Discussion
- 23 -
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates
In this PhD work the abbreviation of nacnacmacr is used only for the Dip-substituted β-
diketiminato ligand[81]
(CH[CMe(NDip)]2macr Dip = 26-iPrC6H3) The synthesis of β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized germanium complexes (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
and
(nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
were reported through the reaction of GeCl2sdotdioxane or GeCl4
with the corresponding Li(nacnac) reagent These compounds can be obtained in high
yield after recrystallization and were used as starting materials for new low-valent
germanium derivates
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Treatment of β-diketiminato germylene chloride 1 with excess of elemental
potassium at ambient temperature in THF yielded the first cyclogermylidenide
derivative 3[83]
which was isolated by fractional crystallization from diethylether in
the form of its potassium salt in 33 yield as pale yellow crystals Moreover the
reduction of 1 led also to the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-
Dip which was isolated by fractional crystallization from hexane solution as yellow
crystals in 31 yield (Scheme 31) Both 3 and 4 have been characterized by NMR
spectroscopy (1H
13C) EI-mass spectrometry (only for 3) and correct elemental
analyses
Scheme 31 Synthesis of the germylenide potassium salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Results and Discussion
- 24 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3 displays two sets of doublets for the Dip-
methyl groups in the range from 108 to 112 ppm Two additional singlets at 184 and
262 ppm were assigned to methyl groups of the five-membered ring Resonances for
the CH of iso-propyl appears at 298 ppm as septets The resonance of the β-H proton
at the GeNC3 ring appears at δ = 618 ppm One set of resonances for aromatic
protons of Dip-groups appears in the range of 691-698 ppm In addition the
diethylether molecule was observed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy The molar ratio of
ether was determined by integration of the appropriate resonance signals in the 1H-
NMR spectrum of 3 This amounts to 22mol and the determined composition fits
well with the elemental analytical data
Complex 3 is an Et2O coordinated potassium germylene anion salt according to the
1H- and
13C-NMR spectra Its structure has been established by a single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 31 left) It reveals a dimeric half-sandwich complex
interconnected via intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds In the structure each half-
sandwich moiety consists of a K(OEt2)2 cation η5-coordinated to the anionic five-
membered planar GeNC3 ring The K1-Ge1 distance of 3449(1) pm is shorter than
the intermolecular K1-Ge1rsquo distance of 3573(1) pm It is noteworthy such shorter K-
Ge distances have been observed in a related dipotassium (18-crown-6)
tetraphenylgermol dianion (330 335 pm)[84]
as well as in a (18-crown-6)-solvated
potassium silylgermanides (342 pm) with a tetravalent germanium atom[85]
Accordingly the K-C(ring) distances in 3 (3092(2)-3330(2) pm) are also longer than
those observed in the aforementioned dipotassium germol dianion (288-317 pm) The
Ge1-N1 distance of 1944(2) pm are shorter than those Ge-N distances in 1[80]
but
longer than that corresponding values in a N-heterocyclic 6π aromatic
germyliumylidene cation[86]
(189 pm) and the heterofulvene-like germylene[87]
(186 pm) Additionally the Ge1-C2 distance (1887(2) pm) the endocyclic C-C
distances (C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3) pm) and the C4-N1 bond length (1382(3)
pm) suggest significant π-resonance stabilization within the six-membered GeNC3
ring In line with that the remarkable deshielding of the resonance signal (618 ppm)
Results and Discussion
- 25 -
for the β-H atom in the 1H-NMR spectrum is in agreement with a considerable hetero-
Cpmacr-like resonance stabilization in the five-membered GeNC3 ring (Figure 31 right)
The latter is also supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see
section 313) Hereafter the lithium complexes of N-heterocyclic germylidenide and
stannylidenide anions[88]
[(THF)Li-η5-EC(tBu)C(H)C(
tBu)N(Dip) E = Ge Sn] were
presented with a similar reductive reaction
Figure 31 Molecular structure of germylene anion salt 3 (left) and hetero-Cpmacr-like
resonance structure (right) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level
Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg]
Ge1-C2 1887(2) Ge1-N1 1944(2) Ge1-K1 34485(6) Ge1-K1rsquo 35728(7)
K1-C2 3092(2) K1-C3 3122(2) K1-C4 3330(2) K1-N1 3402(2) K1-Ge1rsquo
35728(7) N1-C4 1382(3) C1-C2 1516(3) C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3)
C4-C5 1508(3) C2-Ge1-N1 843(1) C4-N1-Ge1 1130(1) C3-C2-C1 1202(2)
C3-C2-Ge1 1116(2) C1-C2-Ge1 1281(2) C4-C3-C2 1174(2) C3-C4-N1
1135(2) C3-C4-C5 1254(2)
The formulation of the resonance structure clarifies that the nitrogen atom has a
higher affinity to carbon instead to germanium (Scheme 32) The mesomer 3c is
energetically less favorable than 3a and 3b This explains also that the Ge1-C2 bond
(1887(2) pm) is shorter than the Ge1-N1 bond (1944(2) pm) in 3
Results and Discussion
- 26 -
Scheme 32 GeNC3-ring resonance structures of germylenide anion of 3
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 4 shows four sets of doublets and one
multiplet for methyls of Dip-groups in the range from 091 to 130 ppm Resonances
for methyl-groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 162 ppm as one singlet
Multiplets in the range of 329-340 are assigned to CH-groups of iso-propyl groups
The resonance of CH proton at the GeN2C3 ring appears at δ = 503 ppm One singlet
at δ = 564 ppm is assigned to NH-groups One set of resonances for aromatic protons
of Dip-groups appears in the range of 683-718 ppm
Figure 32 Molecular structure of germylene amide 4 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn
at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 2051(2) Ge1-N2 2026(2) Ge1-N3
1905(2) N1-C2 1329(3) N2-C4 1332(3) C1-C2 1518(3) C2-C3 1394(3)
C3-C4 1394(3) C4-C5 1512(3) N3-Ge1-N1 9720(8) N3-Ge1-N2 8876(9)
N2-Ge1-N1 8822(8) C2-N1-Ge1 1229(2) C4-N2-Ge1 1240(2) N1-C2-C3
1227(2) C4-C3-C2 1269(3) N2-C4-C3 1239(3)
Results and Discussion
- 27 -
The structure of compound 4 was established by single crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis (Figure 32) It consists of a slightly puckered six-membered GeN2C3 ring
with geometric parameters similar to the corresponding parameters found in precursor
chlorogermylene 1[80]
The sum of bond angles at Ge atom of 2742deg is comparable to
that of 1 (2815deg) implying the presence of a lone pair of electrons at the Ge center
The Ge-N distances in 4 (2026(2) and 2051(2) ppm) are somewhat longer than those
in chlorogermylene 1 (1988(2) and 1997(3) ppm) In the structure of 4 the terminal
Ge-N distance of 1905(2) pm is significantly shorter than those the endocyclic ones
(2026(2) 2051(2) pm) because it is a common covalent bond and stronger than
dative NrarrGe bonds
A plausible mechanism for the formation of 3 and 4 is proposed as depicted in
Scheme 33 The reduction of (nacnac)GeCl 1 by elemental potassium gives the N-
heterocyclic potassium germylidenide 3d as initial transient species The latter
undergoes a ring contraction to give the transient germylene amide 3e which reacts
with 1 in a salt metathesis reaction affording the Dip-N-bridged bis-germylene 3f
Reductive fission of a Ge-N bond in 3f by elemental potassium leads to the germylene
anion potassium salt 3 and the potassium β-diketiminato-GeII amide (nacnac)Ge-NK-
Dip The formation of 4 from (nacnac)Ge-NK-Dip needs a subsequent protonation
from the solvent in an inert atmosphere
Scheme 33 The mechanism of the formation 3 and 4
Results and Discussion
- 28 -
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
This part of the research is the cowork with Shenglai Yao (TU Berlin)
Another reduction experiment of the related β-diketimiate-substituted
organogermanium trichloride 2[82]
(nacnac)GeCl3 with KC8 was investigated The
reaction of 2 with KC8 in THF led to a brown-red mixture from which colorless
crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex K(nacnac)[89]
have been
isolated as side products along with deep-red crystals of the remarkable novel cluster
species 5[83]
in low yield (3 Scheme 34) In contrast reaction of 1 with elemental
potassium in toluene even at 0 degC led merely to the complete replacement of Ge by K
via reduction of GeII to elemental Ge
0 powder and concomitant formation of the
aforementioned β-diketiminato potassium complex
Scheme 34 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
The X-ray crystal diffraction analysis of 5 revealed a dipotassium salt of the first
ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a Ge4 core (Figure 33)
Remarkably to date only a few metal complexes of ldquoheavyrdquo CBD2-
have been
reported featuring a Si4 and Si2Ge2 core[90]
Compound 5 consists of a planar
Ge4(nacnac)22macr dianion in which the two unusual chelating nacnac-ligands are
attached to the Ge4 core each with terminal Ge-C and Ge-N σ-bonds The dianion is
connected by two η3-coordinated K(OEt2) cations each coordinated to Ge1 Ge2 and
N2 and Ge1rsquo Ge2rsquo and N2rsquo respectively The K-Ge distances of 3355(1) pm (K1-
Ge1) and 3477(1) pm (K1-Ge2) are similar to those K-Ge distances in 3 and in
related potassium germanides[84b 85]
The molecular structure of 5 is also notable for
Results and Discussion
- 29 -
the parallelogram-like configuration of the planar Ge4 moiety The Ge1-Ge2 of
2512(1) pm and Ge1-Ge2rsquo distance of 2553(1) pm are close to the Ge-Ge single
bonds observed in bulky substituted cyclotetragermanes (ca 251 pm)[91]
and longer
than those in Ge4Co complexes[90d]
(235-237 pm) while the transannular Ge2-Ge2rsquo
distance of 2747(1) pm is much longer Interestingly despite of the pyramidal
coordination environment of the Ge atoms the Ge42macr core of 5 shows extremely
strong aromaticity as supported by DFT calculations (see section 313)
Figure 33 Molecular structure of 5 containing a Ge42minus
cluster Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity
Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1rsquo 1932(3) Ge1-Ge2 2512(7)
Ge1-Ge2rsquo 2553(7) Ge2-Ge2rsquo 2747(1) Ge1-K1 3355(12) K1-N2 2814(3)
K1-Ge2 3477(1) N1-C2 1381(4) Ge2-C3rsquo 2019(3) C2-C3 1369(5) C3-C4
1479(5) N2-C4 1296(4) Ge2-Ge1-Ge2rsquo 657(2) Ge1-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 1143(2) Ge1-
Ge2-Ge2rsquo 578(2) Ge1rsquo-Ge2-Ge2rsquo 564(2) N1rsquo-Ge1-Ge2 8716(9) N1rsquo-Ge1-
Ge2rsquo 1026(9) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1 886(1) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 963(1) C2-N1-Ge1rsquo
1239(2) C3-C2-N1 1205(3) C2-C3-C4 1227(3) C2-C3-Ge2rsquo 1184(3) C4-C3-
Ge2rsquo 1184(3) N2-C4-C3 1220(3)
Scheme 35 shows the assumed mechanism of the formation of Ge42minus
cluster 5 The
product after the first reductive step by KC8 is (nacnac)GeCl 1 which was confirmed
by NMR investigation Chlorogermylene 1 could dimerize by sequential reduction to
Results and Discussion
- 30 -
a bis-germylene 5a Due to the instability of 5a bearing two bulky nacnac ligands a
transformation could be in the ascendant from dimer 5a to stable P4-like Ge4-tetramer
5b Intermediate 5c could be formed after double intramolecular deprotonation and
elimination of ldquofreerdquo (nacnac)H The excessive KC8 could offer two electrons to
molecule orbitals of Ge4-cluster 5c to furnish the isolated product 5 with a Ge42minus
cluster
Scheme 35 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 5
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5
The structural feature of 3 leads to a discussion of a possible aromatic character of
the GeNC3-ring in comparison to cyclobutadiene anion Aromaticity is also a key
Results and Discussion
- 31 -
concept in describing homo-elemental four-membered rings such as the square planar
cyclobutadiene-like dianion Therefore nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS)
values for the five-membered GeNC3-rings and the four-membered Ge4-ring in
compound 3 and 5 were calculated by Prof Christoph van Wuumlllen (University of
Kaiserslautern) Since their introduction NICS[92]
values have been used as an
aromaticity criterion in numerous applications both for organic and inorganic
compounds[93]
NICS values were computed using the molecular structures of compound 3 and 5
from X-ray diffraction analysis The positions of the non-hydrogen atoms were taken
from the X-ray data and kept fixed while the hydrogen positions were optimized
using the TURBOMOLE program package[94]
and its density functional capabilities[95]
an exchange-correlation functional with gradient corrections to exchange and
correlation[96]
(BP86 functional) and polarized triple-zeta (TZVP) basis sets[97]
The
geometry optimizations used density fitting techniques (also known as the RI
approximation)[98]
to evaluate the matrix elements of the electrostatic Coulomb
potential
NICS tensors are defined for any position as the negative magnetic shielding at
that position The magnetic shielding tensors were obtained using the integral-direct
IGLO program[99]
which has been extended to allow the use of density functional
theory[100]
The B3LYP[96a 101]
functional and a basis of IGLO-III[102]
quality were
employed For Ge this is a 4s11p7d1f primitive basis sets in which only the steepest
five s-functions three p-functions and two d-functions are contracted In lack of
IGLO-type basis sets for potassium a TZVDP (triple zeta two sets of polarization
functions) basis was used which will affect the accuracy of the magnetic shieldings at
the centers of the potassium atoms but not elsewhere
The ring centre for each ring system was calculated first from the Cartesian
coordinates and determined the plane through the ring center for which the sum of the
Results and Discussion
- 32 -
squares of the distance of that plane to the positions of the atoms forming the ring is
minimal This plane was defined as the ring plane A line through the ring center that
is orthogonal to the plane defines the positions of the NICS centers above and
below the ring centers and the local z direction to which the NICS tensors are
transformed to obtain the zz as well as the in plane (mean value of the xx and yy)
tensor components in addition to the isotropic value which is one third of the sum of
the xx yy and zz components The zz component is of particular interest because a
ring current parallel to the ring plane will most strongly be induced if the external
magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane and the magnetic field induced by such a
current will also be in that direction
In addition to the NICS tensor at the ring center (NICS(0) value) its height profile
contains useful additional information[103]
First the height profile discriminates ring
current effects (which are associated with aromaticity) from diatropic contributions
which stem from the proximity of the ring atoms while the latter approach zero
quickly when moving out of the ring plane the former only slowly do so Furthermore
the height profile helps to distinguish π-aromaticity (which is the type of aromaticity
dominant in organic chemistry) from σ-aromaticity (which is found for many
inorganic compounds) if aromaticity only stems from π-electrons which produce no
ring current in the ring plane then the NICS values when moving out of the ring
center first decrease (ie become more negative) before they gradually approach zero
NICS values 100 pm above or below the ring plane (ldquoNICS(1) valuesrdquo)
Table 31 reports NICS results for compound 3 where the region towards to
coordinating K+ ion was denoted as above the plane of the five-membered GeNC3
rings the other side as below Up to 100 pm the results for NICS centers above and
below are quite similar then the results for the positions 150 and 200 pm above the
ring start to be affected by the K+ ion whose distance to the ring plane is 299 pm The
NICS values are negative and the tensors are highly anisotropic the negative isotropic
value stems from the large and negative zz component Furthermore these values fall
Results and Discussion
- 33 -
off quite slowly when moving out of the ring plane This indicates a diamagnetic ring
current indicative of aromatic behavior Furthermore the most negative values are not
found in the ring center but slightly above which indicates π-aromaticity Of course
this is exactly what has to be expected for a heteroatom analogue of a
cyclopentadienyl anion This is interesting however because the NICS values for
compound 5 see Table 32 show a slightly different behavior again Negative NICS
values fall off slowly but the tensors show a substantial negative in-plane component
up to 200 pm above (or below this is the same in this compound) ring plane This can
be explained by diatropic contributions from the Ge-C and Ge-N bonds which are
nearly perpendicular to the ring plane The second difference between compound 3
and compound 5 is that the NICS values (both the isotropic values and the zz tensor
component) fall off monotonically and have no hump at about 1 pm above the ring
plane The aromaticity of the Ge4 ring in compound 5 must therefore have substantial
σ-character
Table 31 NICS values for compound 3 in ppm (the results are the same for both GeNC3 rings)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash77 ndash87 ndash56
50 pm above ndash82 ndash50 ndash144
100 pm above ndash73 +16 ndash251
150 pm abovea)
ndash59 +64 ndash298
200 pm abovea)
ndash116 +36 ndash422
50 pm below ndash82 ndash46 ndash154
100 pm below ndash74 +04 ndash230
150 pm below ndash54 +19 ndash199
200 pm below ndash37 +11 ndash134
a)
Value affected by a close K+ ion coordinated by the GeNC3 ring
Results and Discussion
- 34 -
Table 32 NICS values for compound 5 in ppm (the results are the same at both sides of the Ge4
ring)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash389 ndash375 ndash417
50 pm above ndash324 ndash286 ndash399
100 pm above ndash215 ndash155 ndash334
150 pm above ndash144 ndash93 ndash248
200 pm above ndash109 ndash82 ndash165
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6
As a nucleophile the germanium(II) anion in 3 seems a promising precursor for the
synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylenes and of related heterodinuclear bis-
metallylenes Accordingly the coupling reaction of the nucleophilic GeII centre in 3
with the electrophilic GeII site in 1
[80] was examined and the reaction in THF at -30 degC
yielded a dark red solution from which the bis-germylene 6[104]
has been isolated as
air- and moisture-sensitive dark red crystals in 66 yield (Scheme 36) The isolated
bis-germylene 6 was fully characterized including X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 36 Synthesis of bis-germylene 6
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 6 exhibits four sets of doublets in the range from 107
to 124 ppm with the ratio of 121266 which can be assigned to CH3-groups of all
Dip-groups The three singlets in the range of 161-262 ppm can be assigned to the
CH3 groups at the ligand backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear
in the range of δ = 301-367 ppm as three sets of septet The remarkable deshielding
Results and Discussion
- 35 -
of the resonance signal for the ring CH proton of the five-membered GeNC3 ring (δ =
682 ppm) is indicative a stronger 6π-aromatic resonance stabilization compared with
that in the precursor 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The proton resonance signal for the γ-ring
proton in the six-membered GeN2C3 ring of δ = 518 ppm suggests however the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization In the UV-vis spectra of 6 an absorption
band is observed at 501 nm showing blue shifted in comparison to the values
observed for related amidinate- and guanidinate- substituted bis-germylenes[40]
(I27
and I28 in Introduction) with GeI-Ge
I bonds
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8
The reactivity of 3 towards chlorostannylene 7[80]
(nacnac)SnCl was examined
also by a coupling reaction If (nacnac)SnCl 7 was used as electrophile for the
reaction with 3 in diethylether at -70 degC this furnished the corresponding product
germylene-stannylene 8[104]
which was isolated in the form of dark red crystals in
34 yield (Scheme 37) The new compound 8 was fully characterized including
NMR spectroscopy (1H
13C
119Sn) and X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 37 Synthesis of germylene-stannylene 8
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 exhibits six sets of doublets in the range from 085 to
129 ppm with the ratio of 666666 for CH3-groups of all Dip-groups The three
singlets in the range of 165-300 ppm can be assigned to the CH3 groups at the ligand
backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear in the range of δ = 305-
378 ppm as three sets of septets
Results and Discussion
- 36 -
A similar situation was observed in the NMR spectra of 8 for the CH moiety at
ligand backbones The deshielding for the ring CH proton of the five-membered
GeNC3 ring in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 (δ = 691 ppm) indicates again a stronger
6π-aromatic resonance stabilization than in 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The chemical shift (δ =
510 ppm) for the γ-ring proton in the six-membered SnN2C3 ring of 8 also shows the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization The 119
Sn chemical shift of 8 at δ -197
ppm in the 119
Sn-NMR spectrum is comparable to the value observed for the precursor
(nacnac)SnCl 7 (δ -224 ppm)[80]
implying a three-coordinated tin atom in solution In
the UV-vis spectrum of 8 an absorption band is observed at 541 nm The latter is
somewhat red shifted in comparison to the values of bis-germylene 6
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8
The new GeI-Ge
I compound 6 represents the first asymmetric substituted bis-
germylene while germylene-stannylene 8 is the first GeI-Sn
I example Their
molecular structures were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis
(Figure 34) Both N2C3 backbones of the chelating six-membered MN2C3 ring (M =
Ge Sn) are essentially planar but the germanium and tin atoms are out of the
respective plane The five-membered GeNC3 rings in both compounds however are
almost planar The most important structural features are the Ge-M distances and
trans-bending angles The Ge-Ge distance of 25498(8) pm in 6 is the shortest GeI-Ge
I
distance among the distances values observed in known bis-germylenes[38 40-42]
(257-
267 pm see Introduction p 10) but significantly longer than those in digermenes[13f
105] (Ge=Ge 221-247 pm) and digermynes
[3b 20 106] (GeequivGe 221-231 pm) This
relatively short Ge1-Ge2 distance was explained with asymmetric structural feature of
6 and some ionic charge distribution between five- and six-membered rings (see
section 317 DFT calculation)
Results and Discussion
- 37 -
Structural features of 6 and 8 are shown in Scheme 38 The torsion angles of the
Ge1-Ge2 bond with Ge1-N1-N2 and Ge2-N3-C31 planes in 6 are 1043deg and 1184deg
respectively (1262deg-1387deg in digermyne[20 106]
) In the structure of 8 the Ge-Sn
distance of 27210(4) pm is longer than that value observed for a Ge=Sn double bond
in a germastannene[107]
and also longer than the Ge-Sn distance in
germylstannanes[105 108]
The torsion angles of the Ge-Sn bond with Sn1-N1-N2 and
Ge1-N3-C31 planes are 939deg and 1006deg respectively (943deg in diplumbylene I4)[16]
Such Ge-M (M = Ge Sn) central bond lengths and trans-bent angles are indicative of
the absence of Ge-M multiple bond character of 6 and 8
Scheme 38 Drawing of torsion angles in 6 and 8
Figure 34 Molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right) Thermal ellipsoids (C1-C5
C30-C34 N1-N3 Ge1 Ge2 and Sn1) are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 6 Ge1-
Ge2 2549(1) Ge1-N1 2015(4) Ge1-N2 2038(4) Ge2-N3 1951(4) Ge2-C31
1903(5) N1-Ge1-N2 8867(15) N1-Ge1-Ge2 10430(11) N2-Ge1-Ge2
Results and Discussion
- 38 -
10149(12) C31-Ge2-N3 8447(19) C31-Ge2-Ge1 11890(15) N3-Ge2-Ge1
9962(12) For 8 Sn1-Ge1 27210(4) Sn1-N1 2233(2) Sn1-N2 2231(2) Ge1-
N3 1964(2) Ge1-C31 1915(3) N2-Sn1-N1 8288(8) N2-Sn1-Ge1 9542(5)
N1-Sn1-Ge1 10368(5) C31-Ge1-N3 8433(12) C31-Ge1-Sn1 11495(9) N3-
Ge1-Sn1 10200(6)
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8
In order to clarify the electronic structure and bonding nature in 6 and 8 DFT
calculations were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The simplified
molecules 6a and 8a [6a M = Ge 8a M = Sn (LanL2DZ for Sn)] (scheme 39) in
which the Dip-groups (26-iPr2C6H3) of 6 and 8 were replaced by phenyl groups were
calculated as model compounds DFT calculations of the model compound of 6a was
performed at the B3LYP6-31(d) level and the model compound 8a was performed at
B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set for Ge N C and H atoms and the LANL2DZ
level for the Sn atom
Scheme 39 Computed model compounds 6a and 8a
The computed geometry is in good agreement with the experimental metric
parameters A NBO analysis of 6a and 8a shows that the HOMOrsquos have a large Ge-M
bond character (Figure 35) and the latter derives largely from overlap of Ge and Sn
p-valence orbitals (6a s 1180 p 8820 8a s 978 p 9022) Apparently the
Ge-M bonds possess s character Likewise the Wiberg bond index exhibits Ge-E bond
orders of 08525 (6a) and 07290 (8a) respectively Similar bonding natures have
Results and Discussion
- 39 -
been identified and reported previously for related GeI-Ge
I dimers
[38 40-42] In addition
the nature of the HOMOrsquos and LUMOrsquos of the model compounds 6a and 8a
corresponds to that of a diplumbylene[16]
which again underlines that the Ge-M bond
in 6 and 8 represents a pure σ-bond
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
Figure 35 Frontier orbitals of model compound 6a and 8a
Interestingly the HOMOrsquos show clearly the presence of p-orbital interaction within
the six-membered MN2C3 ring and a slight interaction with the Ge centre in the
GeN2C3 ring Accordingly the five-membered GeNC3 ring bears a negative net charge
while the six-membered MN2C3 ring has a positive one [NPA charges in the GeN2C3
ring in 6a Ge +065 N (mean) -069 C (mean) 008 vs GeNC3 ring Ge1 +055 N -
066 C (mean) -015 NPA charges in the SnN2C3 ring in 8a Sn +095 N (mean) -
072 C (mean) 007 vs GeNC3 ring Ge +040 N -066 C (mean) -017] Thus the
latter parameters suggest some ionic character of the Ge-M bonds Moreover the
pronounced electron acceptor character of the GeN2C3 ring is also reflected by the
strongly negative values of NICS for 6a and 8a [6a NICS(0) = -88 NICS(1) = -82
8a NICS(0) = -76 NICS(1) = -74] The latter confirms the presence of a 6π-
aromatic stabilization in 6 and 8 as indicated by the 1H-NMR data (see p 34-36)
Results and Discussion
- 40 -
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands
The β-diketiminato ligands can undergo several side-reactions such as 13-
coordination C-N-exchange ring-contraction and deprotonation (Scheme 310) A
more rigid β-diketiminato ligand with a six-membered C6-ring in the backbone was
envisioned to prevent those side-reactions and possibly enhance the stability of the
products[81-83 109]
Scheme 310 Coordination possibilities of the classical β-diketiminato ligand
The syntheses of new β-diketiminato ligands[110]
12 and 20 are shown in Scheme
311 They are easily accessible from the N-cyclohexylidene-26-diisopropyl-
benzenamine 9[111]
in a two-step procedure First the deprotonation of 9 with nBuLi in
diethylether leads to the corresponding lithium amide 10 Salt metathesis reaction of
10 with (Z)-N-(26-diisopropylphenyl)benzimidoyl chloride 11[112]
or (Z)-N-isopropyl
benzimidoyl chloride[112]
19 in diethylether then afforded the novel β-diketiminato
type ligand 12 and 20[110]
in 63 and 60 yield respectively The new compounds
12 and 20 have been analyzed by NMR spectroscopy ESI-mass spectrometry X-ray
diffraction and elemental analyses
Results and Discussion
- 41 -
Et2O - 78degCnBuLi
Et2O - 78degCN
Dip
9
N
Dip
10
Li
N
Ph Dip
Cl
11
12
N
NH
Ph
Dip
Dip
Et2O - 78degC
N
Ph iPr
Cl
19
20
NH
N
Ph
Dip
iPr
Scheme 311 Synthesis of new β-diketiminato ligands 12 and 20
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 12 displays four sets of doublet for methyl of
Dip-groups in the range from 117 to 134 ppm The multiplets by 164 ppm and 217
ppm are assigned to CH2 of the six-membered ring The resonance of NH proton
appears at δ = 187 ppm Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear at δ = 335 ppm
as multiplet The 1H-NMR spectrum of 20 shows three sets of doublet for the
isopropyl of Dip-groups in the range from 109 to 132 ppm The peaks of four CH2
groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 156 208 and 214 ppm as multiplet
The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear by 310 and 323 ppm as septet The
resonance of NH group appears at δ = 1203 ppm as doublet because of the 3J-
coupling with neighbor CH group Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-groups
and phenyl appear in the range of 696-727 ppm for 12 and 713-753 ppm for 20
respectively
NH group connecting with iso-propyl in 20 is also confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 36 and Scheme 312) In compound 12 the N1-C1 bond
length (1360(2) pm) is longer than the N2-C3 bond length (1305(2) pm) due to the
presence of N1-H bond Contrarily the N1-C1 bond length (1309(2) pm) in
compound 20 is shorter than the N2-C3 bond length (1356(2) pm) because of the
presence of N2-H bond
Results and Discussion
- 42 -
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph Dip
Dip
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph iPr
Dip
1356
1386
1445
1309
1377
1360
1305
1452
12 20
HH
Scheme 312 Bonding situation of new ligands 12 and 20 bond length in pm
Figure 36 Molecular structure of compounds 12 (left) and 20 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 12 N1-C1 13600(17) N1-
C13 14349(18) C1-C2 13769(19) C1-C4 15136(18) N2-C3 13046(16) N2-
C25 14297(17) C2-C3 14515(18) C2-C7 15257(18) N1-C1-C2 12221(12)
C1-C2-C3 12230(12) N2-C3-C2 12212(12) For 20 N1-C1 1309(2) N1-C17
1418(2) C1-C2 1445(2) C1-C4 1522(2) N2-C3 1356(2) N2-C14 1461(2)
C2-C3 1386(2) C2-C7 1524(2) C3-C8 1495(2) N1-C1-C2 12080(15) C1-
C2-C3 12151(15) N2-C3-C2 12288(15)
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16
Scheme 313 shows the synthesis of chlorogermylene 14[110]
and germylene 16[110]
Through lithiation of compound 12 with nBuLi the Lithium complex 13 was formed
quantitatively The subsequent reaction of 13 with the dichlorogermylene dioxane
complex[27]
(GeCl2middotC4H8O2) affords the desired chlorogermylene 14 in 82 yield
Results and Discussion
- 43 -
Furthermore germylene 16 was obtained by dehydrochloration of 14 with 13-di-tert-
butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15[113]
as a base in 78 yield The composition and
constitution of 14 and 16 were fully characterized by elemental analysis IR and
multinuclear NMR spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 313 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and germylene 16
In the 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 14 resonances of 8 methyl moieties of Dip-
groups appear in the range from 097 to 155 ppm as multiplets The multiplets in the
range of δ = 128-139 and 203-227 ppm are assigned to CH2 moieties of the six-
membered ring Four sets of septets by 317 327 394 and 417 ppm are assigned to
methine protons of the iso-propyl groups The 1H-NMR spectrum of 16 displays three
sets of doublet for methyl moieties of the Dip-groups in the range from 115 to 135
ppm The peaks of four CH2 groups of the six-membered C6-ring appear at δ = 155
204 and 221 ppm as multiplet Resonances for the methine protons of the iso-propyl
groups appear by 369 and 380 ppm as septets A triplet at δ = 415 ppm is assigned to
the proton connecting with C=C double bond This resonance confirms the
deprotonation of C-CH2 to a C=CH structure on the ligand backbone Resonances for
aromatic protons of Dip-groups and phenyl appear in the range of 680-739 ppm for
145 and 675-725 ppm for 16 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 14 and 16 are shown in Figure 37 and
Figure 38 In compound 14 the six-membered GeN2C3 ring exhibits a boat-like
Results and Discussion
- 44 -
conformation The C2N2 moiety of the chelating ligand (N1 N2 C1 C3) is nearly
planar and the Ge and C2 atoms are out-of-plane (Ge 37 pm C2 13 pm) In
compound 16 the GeN2C3 ring is almost planar The Ge-N bond lengths in 14
(1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) are longer than those in 16 (1843(3) and 1861(3) pm)
and the N1-Ge1-N2 bond angle (9123deg) in 14 is smaller than that of compound 16
(9509deg) This is probably owing to the dative nature of the Ge-N bonds and the three-
coordinate Ge(II) atom in 14 The Ge-Cl bond length of 2296(1) pm in 14 is
consistent with the value observed in the N-heterocyclic β-diketiminato
chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl[80]
The fused cyclohexyl moiety of 14 is distorted
and the phenyl group is oriented in nearly the same direction as the aryl group on the
N2 atom while the C2 C3 C4 and C7 atoms of the fused C6 ring in 14 are coplanar
with the N2C3 ring (C1 C2 C3 N1 N2) while the C5 and C6 atoms deviate above
the plane of the N2C3 ring This conformation of the cyclohexyl moiety is also
observed in compound 16 It is of note that the buta-13-diene moiety (C1 C2 C3 C4
C32) of compound 16 clearly has alternating C-C distances (C32-C1 1498(4) C1-C2
1359(4) C2-C3 1461(4) and C3-C4 1360(4) pm) which is not the case in known
germylene (nacnac)Ge[87]
published in 2006
Figure 37 Molecular structure of compound 14 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 19760(16) Ge1-N2 19804(17) Ge1-Cl1
22956(7) N1-C1 1342(3) N1-C14 1458(3) C1-C2 1397(3) C1-C8 1502(3)
N2-C3 1333(3) N2-C26 1463(2) C2-C3 1415(3) C2-C7 1522(3) C3-C4
Results and Discussion
- 45 -
1509(3) C4-C5 1522(3) N1-Ge1-N2 9123(7) N1-Ge1-Cl1 9560(5) N2-Ge1-
Cl1 9392(5) C1-N1-Ge1 12568(13) N1-C1-C2 12352(17) C1-C2-C3
12503(19) N2-C3-C2 12440(18) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(13)
Figure 38 Molecular structure of compound 16 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 1843(3) Ge1-N2 1861(3) N1-C3 1426(4)
N1-C8 1442(4) N2-C1 1408(4) N2-C20 1454(4) C1-C2 1359(4) C2-C3
1461(4) C1-C32 1498(4) C2-C7 1525(4) C3-C4 1360(4) N1-Ge1-N2
9509(11) C3-N1-Ge1 300(2) N1-C3-C2 1176(3) C1-C2-C3 1267(3) C2-C1-
N2 1241(3) C1-N2-Ge1 1259(2)
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O
The unusual donor-acceptor properties of the zwitterionic silylene and germylene
were described in our group in 2006[30 87]
In these molecules the exocyclic methylene
group remains more negative charges due to the aromaticity of the center six-
membered ring This implies the presence of two reactivity positions in the molecule
a strong nucleophilic methylene group and a nucleophilic (ns-orbital) and
electrophilic (np-orbital) at the metallylene site Mesomeric structures of zwitterionic
germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties are shown in Scheme 314
Results and Discussion
- 46 -
To probe the donor-acceptor properties of zwitterionic germylene 16 its reactivity
toward ammonia and water was investigated Germylene 16 undergoes controllable
ammonolysis and hydrolysis (Scheme 315) Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas
at room temperature in toluene resulted in the formation of the corresponding
aminogermylene 17[110]
in high yield (92) Likewise germylene 16 also readily
reacts with water to produce germylene hydroxide 18[110]
nearly quantitatively (95)
Scheme 314 Mesomeric structures of germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties
Scheme 315 Syntheses of aminogermylene 17 and germylene hydroxide 18
The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectroscopic data of 17 and 18 are very similar to the
corresponding resonances of chlorogermylene 14 appearing at or near the same
chemical shifts In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 17 the protons of the NH2 group appear
at δ = 154 ppm This chemical shift is close to that of the dimeric aminogermylene
(ArrsquoGeNH2)2 (Arrsquo = 26-Tip2C6H3) (δ = 162 ppm)[60a]
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 18
displays a singlet for the hydroxide proton at = 166 ppm which is close to the
respective value observed for the dimeric germylene hydroxide [(nacnac)GeOH]2 (δ =
154 ppm)[114]
The IR spectrum of 18 clearly shows two N-H stretching modes of the
NH2 group at v = 3430 and 3343 cmndash1
respectively These values are similar to those
observed for related aminogermylenes (ArGeNH2)2 (Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) (3380
and 3308 cmndash1
) and (nacnac)GeNH2 (3431 and 3333 cm-1
)[115]
A sharp absorption at v
Results and Discussion
- 47 -
= 3643 cmndash1
that can be attributed to the O-H stretching frequency was observed in
the IR spectrum of 18 This value resembles that of germylene hydroxide
(nacnac)GeOH (3571 cm-1
)[114]
The structure of 17 and 18 are shown in Figure 39 Both compounds 17 and 18 are
monomeric species The structural features of 17 and 18 are very similar and show
close structural parameters compared with that of chlorogermylene 14 As in 14 the
Ge1 and C2 atoms of 17 and 18 slightly deviate from the N2C2 ring (N1 N2 C1 C3)
plane [17 Ge 46 pm and C2 13 pm 18 Ge 49 pm and C2 13 pm] The Ge-N
(ligand) bond lengths (17 2017(2) and 2021(2) pm 18 20054(17) and 20071(16)
pm) of 17 and 18 are longer than the Ge-N(amide) bond length of 17 (1829(3) pm)
Interestingly the Ge-N distance (1905(2) pm) in (nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip 4[83]
due to the
large Dip-substituent is also 8 ppm longer than that of 17 In each case there is clearly
a difference between the dative bond and covalent bond Compound 18 represents the
first monomeric three-coordinate GeII hydroxide in the solid state (Figure 39) owing
the larger steric congestion around the GeII center in contrast to (nacnac)GeOH
[114]
Figure 39 Molecular structures of compound 17 (left) and 18 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 17 Ge1-N1 2021(2) Ge1-
N2 2017(2) Ge1-N3 1829(3) N1-C1 1349(4) C1-C2 1395(4) N2-C3
1336(4) C2-C3 1417(4) C3-C4 1509(4) N3-Ge1-N2 9503(11) N3-Ge1-N1
9709(13) N2-Ge1-N1 8932(10) C1-N1-Ge1 1253(2) C3-N2-Ge1 1247(2)
For 18 Ge1-O1 18249(18) Ge1-N2 20054(17) Ge1-N1 20071(16) N1-C1
Results and Discussion
- 48 -
1340(3) C1-C2 1402(3) N2-C3 1331(3) C2-C3 1419(3) C3-C4 1509(3)
O1-Ge1-N2 9387(8) O1-Ge1-N1 9529(8) N2-Ge1-N1 8943(7) C1-N1-Ge1
12597(14) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(14)
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
In order to understand the coordination behavior of ligand 20 experiments using
germanium precursors GeCl2sdotdioxane and GeCl4 were conducted (Scheme 316) The
reaction of compound 20 with one equivalent of nBuLi resulted directly the lithiated
intermediate 21 The subsequent reaction with GeCl2sdotdioxane in Et2O at -78 degC led to
the unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained
by reaction of 21 with GeCl4 in toluene at -78 degC through dehydrochloration with 13-
di-tert-butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15 as a base in 57 yield The composition and
constitution of 22 and 23 were elucidated by elemental analysis multinuclear NMR
spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 316 Syntheses of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 22 exhibits 6 sets of doublets for 6 methyls of
iso-propyl Five sets of multiplets in the range of δ = 121-206 ppm are assigned to
the CH2 moieties of the six-membered C6-ring Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl
Results and Discussion
- 49 -
appear at δ = 284 367 and 396 ppm as septet In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 23 peaks
at δ = 113 122 and 137 ppm are for methyls of iso-propyl as doublets Resonances
of three CH2 groups of the six-membered ring on backbone appear at δ = 146 189
and 206 ppm as multiplets Two sets of septets by 332 and 361 ppm are assigned to
the CH of iso-propyl A triplet at δ = 421 ppm is for the proton of C=CH group on
backbone and indicates a dianionic ligand 20 in compound 23 owing to two times
deprotonation with nBuLi and carbene 15 Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-
groups and phenyl appear in the range of 688-724 ppm for 22 and 701-726 ppm for
23 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 22 and 23 are shown in Figure 310
Compound 22 represents an imine N-donor stabilized oxo-chloro-germylene and
adopts a pyramidal geometry with the sum of bond angles of 2737deg at the GeII center
The inserted oxygen atom could come in all probability from dioxane molecule in
GeCl2dioxane The cyclohexyl unit on backbone is distorted and the free N2 moiety
is oriented in inverse direction to the cyclohexyl The Ge1-Cl1 bond length of
23073(6) pm in 22 is compatible with the value (2296(1) pm) observed in
chlorogermylene 14 The Ge1-N1 distance of 20908(15) pm is visibly longer than
those of 14 (1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) because of the net NrarrGe coordination bond
without resonance stabilization The Ge1-O1 bond length is normal Ge-O single bond
with a distance of 18265(12) pm Bond lengths of N1-C1 (1284(2) pm) and N2-C7
(1272(2) pm) present clearly C=N double bond while bond lengths of C1-C6
(1525(2) pm) and N6-C7 (1539(2) pm) present normal C-C single bonds
In compound 23 GeIV
atom is tetrahedral coordinated with two nitrogen and two
chlorine atoms All six angles in the range of 1028-1138deg at the GeIV
center are
nearly alike with the angle in methane (1095deg) and indicate a slightly distorted
tetrahedral GeN2Cl2 configuration GeIV
-Cl bond lengths (21339(7) and 21375(9) pm)
in 23 are much shorter than those of germylenes 14 and 22 (229-231 pm) Distances
of the GeIV
-N bonds (1798(2) and 1788(2) pm) in 23 are much shorter than the
Results and Discussion
- 50 -
NrarrGe dative bonds in 14 17 and 18 (198-202 pm) and the net NrarrGe dative bond
(20908(15) pm) in 22 But they are only slightly shorter than GeII-N distances
(1843(3) and 1861(1) pm) in germylene 16 and GeII-NH2 bond length (1829(3) pm)
in germylene 17 Bond lengths of C1-C2 (1339(4) pm) and C3-C4 (1326(4) pm) in
23 illuminate clearly C=C double bond and distances of N1-C1 (1430(3) pm) and
N2-C3 (1441(3) pm) correspond to C-N single bond
Figure 310 Molecular structures of compound 22 (left) and 23 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 22 Ge1-Cl1 23073(6)
Ge1-O1 18265(12) Ge1-N1 20908(15) O1-C6 1418(2) N1-C1 1284(2) N2-
C7 1272(2) C1-C6 1525(2) C6-C7 1539(2) Cl1-Ge1-O1 9789(4) Cl1-Ge1-
N1 9422(4) O1-Ge1-N1 8158(6) Ge1-N1-C1 11291(12) N1-C1-C6
11484(16) C1-C6-O1 10975(14) C6-O1-Ge1 11838(10) N2-C7-C6
11778(17) For 23 Ge1-Cl1 21339(7) Ge1-Cl2 21375(9) Ge1-N1 1798(2)
Ge1-N2 1788(2) N1-C1 1430(3) C1-C2 1339(4) C2-C3 1486(4) C3-C4
1326(4) N2-C3 1441(3) N2-Ge1-N1 10554(10) N2-Ge1-Cl1 11208(7) N1-
Ge1-Cl1 11381(8) N2-Ge1-Cl2 11201(8) N1-Ge1-Cl2 11082(8) Cl1-Ge1-Cl2
10276(3) C1-C2-C3 1266(2) C4-C3-N2 1209(2) C2-C4-C3 1208(3)
The formation of compound 22 indicates that ligand 20 has a different reactivity to
the derivative ligand 12 due to the exchange of Dip-group with iso-propyl But the
situation of complex 23 shows a possibility of a dianionic chelating coordination[30 87]
Results and Discussion
- 51 -
of ligand 20 Coordination chemistry with ligand 20 is currently being investigated for
its suitability to serve as bidentate donor ligand for complexes with low-valent Si Ge
and also transition-metals
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28
Since the successful isolation of halogen bonded silylene and germylene[31a 32b 80]
chemists faced the challenge weather compounds like LEII-X-E
IIL [E = Si Ge Sn X
= O S Se] in which two metallylene moieties are bridged by a single X-atom can be
stabilized at room temperature Key points of this assignment are the identification of
effective ligands for the stabilization of metallylenes and a feasible synthetic route
There is a special interest to synthesize this kind of compounds due to their chemical
nature and coordination properties
Previous attempts to synthesize a stable bis-silylene oxide 28b from silylene 28a[30]
has been unsuccessful The isolated product originating from the reaction of water
with the silylene 28a was the stable siloxysilylene 28c[10a]
(a mixed-valent disiloxane)
(Scheme 317) Recently Roesky et al proposed the formation of bis-silylene oxide 28
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2macr) as a reactive intermediate in the reaction of the bis-
silylene I24[37]
(aLSi-Si
aL) with N2O However 28 could be neither detected nor
chemically trapped[116]
By addition of water to two molar chlorosilylene 26[31a]
in
toluene the expected disiloxane 27 could not be isolated from a complicated reaction
mixture (Scheme 317 )
In the following the isolation of the first oxygen-bridged bis-silylene 28 by a facile
synthetic protocol using 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(HSiCl2)2O as starting
material will be described
Results and Discussion
- 52 -
Scheme 317 Synthesis of siloxysilylene 28c and hydrolysis of chlorosilylene 26
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28
The reaction of 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane (HSiCl2)2O with 2 molar equiv of
lithium amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the desired disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield
(Scheme 318) The target bis-silylene oxide 28 was readily available by
dehydrochloration of 27 employing 2 molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene
Recrystallization in toluene afforded pale yellow crystals of 28[32a]
in 76 yield The
molecular structure of new compounds 27 and 28 was characterized by means of
spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 318 Synthesis of disiloxane 27 and bis-silylene oxide 28
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 27 reveals two singlets one for the
tBu groups at δ =
120 ppm and one corresponding to the Si-H protons at δ = 598 ppm as well as one
set of resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of
Results and Discussion
- 53 -
27 shows a singlet resonance at δ = -1110 ppm The 1H-NMR spectra of 28 displays a
singlet of tBu at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for Ph group in aromatic
resonance region The 29
Si-NMR signal of 28 (δ = -161 ppm) appears shifted ca 95
ppm downfield from the precursor 27 This shift is comparable to that reported for the
triply coordinated silylene alkoxides (aLSiO
tBu) (δ = -52 ppm) and (
aLSiO
iPr) (δ = -
135 ppm)[31b]
respectively
The molecular structure of disiloxane 27 is shown in Figure 311 The center Si1-
O1-Si2 part of molecule 27 was extensively disordered Therefore the X-ray data were
not suitable for accurate discussion Even though the nearly unbent Si1-O1-Si2 angle
(1680deg) in 27 shows a very similar bonded character with sp-hybridized oxygen
bridge in comparison to another disiloxane compounds[118]
The molecule of bis-silylene oxide 28 (Figure 312 left) contains two triply
coordinated Si atoms and two lone pairs one at each of the Si centers Those are two
silylene moieties The sum of bond angles at Si1 and Si2 are 27769deg and 27534deg
respectively which is consistent with the presence of lone pairs In the molecular
structure of 28 Si-O distances of 1641(2) and 1652(2) pm are comparable to those of
siloxysilylene 28c (16442(3) pm and 16501(2) pm) and thus typical for silicon-
oxygen single bonds of other disiloxanes[118]
Moreover as expected for an disiloxane-
like system the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent (15988(15)deg) and larger than
that observed for a C-O-C moiety of ethers
DFT calculations of the compound 28 was performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU
Berlin) at the B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set with the GAUSSIAN-03 program
package[101c 119]
The structure obtained by X-ray analysis was used as the input for
these calculation Optimized structure of 28 is shown in Figure 312 (right) DFT
calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small The
Si-O-Si bond angle of optimized structure is 180deg However the energy difference
between the experimental geometry and linear arrangement is only 071 kJsdotmolminus1
The
Results and Discussion
- 54 -
HOMO (-0163 eV) and HOMO-1 (-0178 eV) represent mainly lone pairs at Si atoms
The LUMO (-0020 eV) is located on the phenyl group of the amidinate ligand
(Figure 313)
Figure 311 Molecular structure of 27 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity The center Si1-O1-Si2
part was extensively disordered Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Cl1-Si1
20349(16) Cl2-Si2 22017(11) Si2-O1 1581(8) Si2-N3 1798(2) Si2-N4
1968(2) Si1-O1 1562(8) Si1-N2 1750(10) Si1-N1 1994(6) Si1-O1-Si2
1680(6)
Figure 312 Molecular structure of 28 (left) and optimized structure (right)
Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted
for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Si1-O1 1641(2) Si2-O1
1652(2) Si1-N1 1896(3) Si1-N2 1902(3) Si2-N3 1888(2) Si2-N4 1908(3)
Si1-O1-Si2 15988(15) O1-Si1-N1 10417(12) O1-Si1-N2 10535(11) O1-Si2-
N3 10196(11) O1-Si2-N4 10481(12) N1-Si1-N2 6815(10) N3-Si2-N4
6855(11)
Results and Discussion
- 55 -
Figure 313 Calculated frontier molecular orbitals of 28
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel
To probe the chelating coordination ability of 28 its reactivity toward Ni(cod)2
(cod = cycloocta-15-diene) was investigated Toluene was added to a mixture of bis-
silylene oxide 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 at room temperature to furnish an
intensely red-colored reaction solution Recrystallization of the crude product from a
saturated n-hexane solution at -30 degC afforded dark red crystals of the Ni complex
29[32a]
in 91 yield (Scheme 319) The isolated compound 29 is the first bidentate
bis-silylene transition-metal complex This work initiates a significant progress on the
chelating silylene ligand transition-metal coordination chemistry The constitution and
composition of 29 could be determined by NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis
and ESI mass spectrometry
Scheme 319 Synthesis of bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
Results and Discussion
- 56 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one singlet for the
tBu groups at δ = 130
ppm and one set of resonances at δ = 281 295 and 504 ppm for the COD-ligand and
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one
singlet (δ = 328 ppm) which shows a downfield shift relative to that of the ldquofreerdquo
ligand 28 The observed downfield shift for the 29
SiII nuclei in 29 clearly suggests the
presence of a bis-silylene chelated complex
The chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to Ni0 is confirmed by X-ray
diffraction analysis The molecular structure of 29 is displayed in Figure 314
Complex 29 containing Ni0 is diamagnetic because of 18 electrons in the valence
shell The two silylene subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are
tetrahedral coordinated to the nickel atom with the Si1-Ni1-Si2 angle at 6890(3)deg
The Si-O bond lengths in 29 [17011 (15) and 17081(17) pm] are longer than that in
28 [1641(2) and 1652(2) pm] while the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 29 (9344(8)deg) is
significantly smaller than that in 28 The Ni-Si bond lengths [21908(7) and 21969(7)
pm] are slightly shorter than those in silylene nickel complex 29a [2207(2) and
2216(2) pm][120]
but longer than those found in silylene nickel complex 29b
(21395(8) pm)[121]
Scheme 320 shows clear bonded prospect of three complexes
Moreover the Ni-Si bond lengths of bis-silylene nickel complex 29 are longer than
those in ylide-like silylene-nickel complexes [20369(6) and 20597(10) pm][70a b 122]
The strong σ-donor character of bis-silylene ligand 28 causes a more electron rich Ni
center It indicates a somewhat stronger π-back-donation from the nickel atom to the
chelating COD-ligand Therefore the Ni-C distances (2070-2090 pm) in 29 are
shorter than those in Ni(cod)2 (211-213 pm)[123]
and silylene nickel complex 29b
(2130-2146 pm)[121]
The coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 with other transition-metals (for example
Ti Cu) is currently investigated together with the reactivity of these complexes on
their use as molecular catalysts
Results and Discussion
- 57 -
29
[Si][Si]
O
Ni
[Si] [Si]
Ni
CO CO
[Si] [Si]
Ni
N N tButBu
Si
N N DipDip
Si
[Si] = [Si] =
29a 29b
2207 2216
2191 2197689deg
934deg
1084deg 1019deg
1708 1701
2139 2139
Scheme 320 Comparison of bonding state in complexes 29 29a and 29b bond lengths in pm
Figure 314 Molecular structure of 29 (left) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Si1-Ni1 21969(7) Si2-Ni1 21908(7) Si1-O1 17011(15)
Si1-N1 18929(19) Si1-N2 1875(2) Si2-O1 17081(17) Si2-N3 18776(19)
Si2-N4 1893(2) Si1-O1-Si2 9344(8) Si1-Ni1-Si2 6890(3) N1-Si1-N2
6941(9) N3-Si2-N4 6954(8)
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
This part of the research is the cowork with Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)
Due to the unique reactivity and electronic properties compounds with a
heteroleptic multiple bond between heavier main-group elements have attracted
considerable attention particularly those between group 14 and 15 elements this is
Results and Discussion
- 58 -
attributed to the pronounced polarity of the E14-E15 multiple bonds[124]
Phosphasilene
containing Si-P double bonds is an analogous of iminosilane The first isolable
phosphasilene with a three coordinate Si and a two coordinate P atom was reported by
Bickelhaupt and coworkers (Scheme 321) in 1984[125]
and several other similar
species containing localized and delocalized Si=P bonds were synthesized and
structurally characterized in the later period[126]
Their rich chemistry provides new
approaches to functional Si-P compounds
Furthermore the more challenging phosphasilyne with a silicon-phosphorus triple
bond (Scheme 321) is heretofore unknown[127]
this is mainly due to the high
tendency of the highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds to dimerize or even
oligomerize[126c]
However the availability of elusive phosphasilyne species would be
a strongly desired progression with respect to the synthesis of polyfunctional silicon-
phosphorus containing materials from it By spatial protection of a Si-P multiple bond
through the steric hindrance by suitable bulky substituents the oligomerization of the
highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds could be prevented additionally to the benefit of
the donor-acceptor stabilization of Si-P multiple bonds
Scheme 321 The first phosphasilene (left) and phosphasilyne (right)
Imaginable methods to synthesize a phosphasilyne employing corresponding
precursors comprise oxidation of bis-silylene 30a with elemental phosphorus and
elimination of phosphino silane 30b (Scheme 322) Whether the phosphasilyne 30c is
available depends only on the spatial andor donor-acceptor protection of bulky ligand
L Now there are not many choices of silicon compounds with very bulky ligand L
that are suitable for preparation of phosphasilynes Our current attempt was on the
Results and Discussion
- 59 -
way towards phosphasilyne employing amidinato ligand stabilized chlorosilylene
aLSiCl
[31a] However the isolated dimerized product was the unique 24-disila-13-
diphosphacyclobuta-13-diene (aLSiP2Si
aL) 31
[128] starting from the new N-
heterocyclic bis(trimethylsilyl) phosphino silylene precursor 30[128]
Scheme 322 Imaginable methods towards a phosphasilyne
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The starting material bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanyl silylene 30[128]
was easily
accessible in 83 yield by salt elimination reaction of N-heterocyclic chlorosilylene
26[31a]
with the corresponding lithium phosphide LiP(SiMe3)2 at room temperature
(Scheme 323) The 1H-NMR spectrum exhibits one singlet at δ = 058 ppm for methyl
of silyl and another singlet at δ = 124 ppm for methyl of NtBu as well as one set of
resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand in the region of 681-741 ppm
The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 30 shows two sets of doublet at δ = 229 ppm for silicon
of silyl and at δ = 1943 ppm for silicon of silylene The latter is much downfield
shifted than that of previously reported aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (562 ppm)
[31b] One
singlet at δ = -221 ppm was found by 31
P-NMR measurement which exhibits a
tremendous upfield shift when compared with that of aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (-165
ppm)[31b]
Results and Discussion
- 60 -
Scheme 323 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The molecular structure of 30 was also substantiated by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 315) The molecule 30 contains triply coordinate Si and P
atoms and two lone pairs at the Si and P center respectively The Si and P center
display a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry The sum of bond angles is 33071deg at
the P center and 27762deg at the Si center The latter is consistent with that (2765deg) of
aLSi-P
iPr2 The angle of N(2)-Si(1)-P(1) (10854(8)deg) is larger than that of N(1)-Si(1)-
P(1) (9998(9)deg) Si-N distances of 1877(3) and 1882(2) pm in 30 are comparable to
those (1875(1) pm and 1881(1) pm) of the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative
[31b] The Si1-P1
distance of 30 (22838(12) pm) is slightly shorter than the Si-P bond length (2307(8)
pm) in the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative and the elongated P1-Si2 and P1-Si3 single bonds in
30 (22264(13) and 22321(12) pm) reflect steric congestion within the P(SiMe3)2
subunit
Figure 315 Molecular structure of 30 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 22838(12) P1-Si2 22264(13) P1-Si3 22321(12)
Si1-N1 1877(3) Si1-N2 1882(2) Si2-P1-Si3 10859(5) Si2-P1-Si1 103905
Results and Discussion
- 61 -
Si3-P1-Si1 11822(5) N1-Si1-N2 6910(11) N1-Si1-P1 9998(9) N2-Si1-P1
10854(8)
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Since the phosphanyl silylene 30 was successfully accessed bearing a SiMe3 as
reactive leaving-groups at phosphorus[129]
its suitability as a precursor for the
formation of a phosphasilyne was probed Because of the labile nature of the P-SiMe3
bonds in 30 the compound was exposed to dichlorotriphenylphosphorane Ph3PCl2 as
a promising smooth oxidant for desilylation with the intention to produce the desired
phosphasilyne along with Me3SiCl and PPh3 Surprisingly the reaction of 30 with one
molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 in toluene at room temperature led to the formation of the
unique compound 31[128]
(Scheme 324) which could be isolated as yellow crystals in
72 yield
Scheme 324 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Compound 31 represents a dimerized form of the desired phosphasilyne and was
fully characterized by means of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-
ray diffraction analysis The 1H-NMR spectra of 31 displays a singlet for the
tBu
groups at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for the Ph groups in the ldquoaromaticrdquo
region The triplet signal in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 31 at δ = 265 ppm (1JSiP = 998
Hz) indicates that two P atoms are bonded to silicon center Meanwhile the more
deshielded (ca 46 ppm) singlet resonance at δ = -1649 ppm in the 31
P-NMR spectrum
compared to that in 30 is in accordance with the four-membered ring structure of 31
Results and Discussion
- 62 -
bearing two polarized Si-P π-bonds
The result of the X-ray diffraction structure analysis is in accordance with that of
NMR spectroscopy which confirms that 31 is a 24-disila-13-diphosphacyclobuta-
13-diene (Figure 316) The Si2P2 core in 31 has a planar diamond-shaped geometry
and possesses two-coordinated P atoms and four-coordinated Si atoms each with a
dative NrarrSi bond The Si-P bonds lengths in 31 are 21701(12) and 21717(11) pm
respectively which are in the range of a Si=P double bond length (2095(3) pm) in the
Phosphasilene[128]
and the Si-P single bond length of 30 (22838(12) pm) this
indicates σ- and π-electron resonance stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has
been confirmed by theoretical calculations (see p 64) Of note the transannular
Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo (25626 pm) is shorter than the Si-Si distance of disilacyclopropene[130]
(tBu3Si)2SiSi(Si
tBu3)C-Ad (Ad = adamantyl) (25797(8) and 25991(9) pm) and hexa-
tert-butyldisilane tBu3Si-Si
tBu3 (2697(9) pm) and the P1middotmiddotmiddotP1rsquo (3505 pm)
separations in 31 is much larger than that for P-P bonds observed in tetrahedral
elementary phosphorus P4 (221 pm)[131]
Evidently the peculiarly short Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo
distance is caused by the geometric constraints of the Si1-P1-Si1rsquo and endocyclic P1-
Si1-P1rsquo angles of 7234(4)deg and 10766(4)deg respectively and not driven by attractive
Si1-Si1rsquo interaction
Figure 316 Molecular structure of 31 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 21701(12) P1-Si1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-N1 1858(3)
Si1-N2 1856(2) Si1-P1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-Si1rsquo 25626(16) Si1-P1-Si1rsquo 7234(4)
N2-Si1-N1 7078(11) P1-Si1-P1rsquo 10766(4)
Results and Discussion
- 63 -
The formation of 31 in a multistep which is depicted in Scheme 325 was proposed
Firstly formation of the corresponding chloro-(silyl)phosphanyl silylene intermediate
31a is conducted by cleavage of one of the Si-P bonds of the P(SiMe3)2 subunit with
Ph3PCl2 Subsequently elimination of Me3SiCl from 31a occurs to give the reactive
intermediate 31b which could be treated as a silylene-phosphinidene (Scheme 325
right) or a phosphasilyne (Scheme 325 left) further dimerization of intermediate 31b
affords the isolated product 31 A similar dimerization process has been proposed by
Wiberg for disilynes (SiequivSi) as reactive intermediates to produce
tetrasilatetrahedranes[132]
To elucidate the reason for the formation of 31 preferred over its hypothetical Si2P2-
tetrahedranceisomer 31d (Scheme 326) we performed DFT calculations of 31 and
disiladiphosphatetrahedranes 31d The result shows that 31d is much less stable than
compound 31 with 462 kcalmiddotmolminus1
higher in energy which is in agreement with the
experimental result Compound 31 with a planar structure is most likely stabilized by
the dative NrarrSi coordination of the bulky amidinato ligands Meanwhile this also
leads to a shorter Si-N bond length that is 1856(2) and 1858(3) pm in 31 are shooter
than those (1877(3) pm and 1882(2) pm) of in 30 and also those of in chlorosilylene
aLSiCl (1870(2) pm and 1917(2) pm)
[31a] Furthermore this NrarrSi donor
stabilization could demonstrate an ylide-like electronic structure of 31 (Scheme 326)
Scheme 325 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 31
Results and Discussion
- 64 -
Scheme 326 Resonance structures of 31
In order to unravel the electronic configuration of 31 DFT calculations at
B3LYP6-31G(d) level using the parameters obtained from X-ray diffraction as the
initial structure were performed[101c 119]
The optimized structure matched the
experimental data of 31 very well According to the NPA charges each Si atom in the
Si2P2-ring has a large positive net charge (+1204) while as expected P atoms in the
ring bear slight smaller negative charges (-0765) Meanwhile HOMO-5 of 31 shows
a set of Si-P σ-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 left) whereas the HOMO-2 contains
mainly the delocalized two π-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 right) Accordingly a
NBO analysis indicates that the Si2P2-core of 31 bears a Lewis structure with four
occupied σ-bond orbitals for the Si-P bonds (1917e for Si1-P1 1916e for Si1-P1rsquo
1916e for Si1rsquo-P1 and 1918e for Si1rsquo-P1rsquo) along with two filled Si-P π-bond
orbitals with 1770e for the Si1- P1 and Si1rsquo-P1rsquo π-bonding interaction respectively
The latter canonical π-bond orbitals are strongly polarized toward the P atoms
(8753 at the P and 1247 at the Si) Likewise the WBI (Wiberg Bond Index)
values of the Si-P bonds (1142 and 1140) are higher than that of the phosphino
silylene 30 (0920)
Figure 317 Molecular orbitals of 31 representing the presence of σ-electron and π-
electron delocalization within the Si2P2 cycle HOMO-5 (left) and HOMO-2 (right)
Results and Discussion
- 65 -
According to the aforementioned betaine (ylide)-like resonance stabilization 31
totally differs from cyclobuta-13-diene derivatives The calculations of the nucleus
independent chemical shift[92]
(NICS) also supports this conclusion The result of
NICS reveals negative values (NICS(1) = -257 and NICS(0) = -601 ppm) indicating
that 31 has a somewhat aromatic character which is opposite to the properties of
cyclobuta-13-dienes that are antiaromatic As a summary the results of theoretical
calculations are in agreement with the idea to describe 31 as the ylide-like resonance
structure 31c with some contribution of the resonance forms As a result the smaller
endocyclic angle at phosphorus than that at silicon is contributed by the repulsion
between the negatively charged P atoms
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
Nucleophilic and electrophilic properties of Si Ge and Sn metallylenes were
discussed in chapter 32 (see p 46) Due to the strong donor property of the carbene
lone pair in coordination to empty p-orbital of low valent Si Ge Sn atom centers
some carbene stabilized divalent Si Ge Sn halides could be synthesized in the last
twenty years[28 44 133]
There is also a great interest to find mixed Si Ge Sn
metallylene-metallylene complexes in which one metallylene is stabilized through the
lone pair coordination of another one In the following the synthesis of the first
example of a silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex will be shown
The dimeric micro-chlorotin(II) amides 32[53]
(I44 in Introduction) was identified as
useful candidate for the generation of such an example The synthesis of
bis(trimethylsilyl)amino-tin chloride ((Me3Si)2N-SnCl)2 32 is shown in Scheme 327
Bis(bis(trimethylsilyl)amino)2tin(II) ((Me3Si)2N)2Sn 32a could be prepared in good
yield by the double lithioamination of SnCl2 with LiN(SiMe3)2 in a 1 2 ratio[47a]
The
Results and Discussion
- 66 -
same reaction but with one molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 gives the monosubstituted
product 32 It was also easily accessible by amino chlorine exchange between
((Me3Si)2N)2Sn and SnCl2 in a 11 ratio[53]
(Scheme 327)
Scheme 327 Synthesis of micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32
The dimeric structure of 32 can be splited by treatment with Lewis base for
example Si Ge Sn metallylenes In order to synthesize a silylene coordinated
stannylene chlorosilylene 26 was mixed with micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32 in toluene A
logical intermediate 33a is proposed here as an inevitable intermediate (Scheme 328)
At first chloro bridges are opened because of the coordination of silylene 26 to create
33a Then via amino chlorine exchange product 33 becomes accessible From a
saturated hexane solution at low temperature the silylene-stannylene dichloride 33
was isolated as colorless crystals in 49 yield The product 33 was determined by X-
ray diffraction analysis and elemental analysis Owing to the unstable nature of
silylene and tin dichloride coordination bond (Si rarrSn) 33 decomposed in a grey
mixture powder of amino silylene also-N(SiMe3)2
[33d] and SnCl2 after isolation from
solvent in vacuum 1H-NMR spectrum shows only resonances of amino silylene in
good agreement with the reported compound[33d]
Scheme 328 Synthesis of aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
According to X-ray diffraction analysis compound 33 represents the first example
of silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex The molecular structure of 33 (Figure 318)
Results and Discussion
- 67 -
exhibits a trigonal pyramidal geometry on Sn and a distorted tetrahedral configuration
of Si The Cl-Sn-Cl angle is 9400(9)deg and the sum of bond angles at the Sn center is
2820deg The SirarrSn distance (2740(2) pm) is longer than the Si-Sn bond lengths
(2622(2) and 2641(2) pm) in the silyl stannane compound[134]
(Scheme 329) The
Sn-Cl distances of 2468(3) and 2473(3) pm in 33 are comparable to those in a
carbene-stannylene complex (2456(2) and 2458(2) pm) (Scheme 329)[133b]
Si-N
distances of 1832(7) and 1827(7) pm in 33 are somewhat shorter than those of
phosphanyl silylene 30 (1877(3) and 1882(2) pm) and amino silylene (18780(10)
and 18776(10) pm) which is the remaining molecule of 33 without SnCl2[33d]
Scheme 329 A silyl stannane[134]
(left) and a carbene-stannylene complex[133b]
(right)
Figure 318 Molecular structure of 33 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Sn1-Si1 2740(2) Sn1-Cl1 2468(3) Sn1-Cl2 2473(3) Si1-
N1 1832(7) Si1-N2 1827(7) Si1-N3 1705(7) Si2-N3 1780(7) Si3-N3
1791(8) Cl1-Sn1-Cl2 9400(9) Cl1-Sn1-Si1 9886(8) Cl2-Sn1-Si1 8914(7)
Sn1-Si1-N3 1252(3) N2-Si1-N1 722(3) Si1-N3-Si2 1172(4) Si1-N3-Si3
1248(4) Si2-N3-Si3 1179(4)
Results and Discussion
- 68 -
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34
Because of the feasible structural tuning with many choices of donor groups a
general overview of pincer arenes was introduced (Introduction p 19) Compounds of
type 35a having a pincer-like skeleton are depicted in Scheme 330 They represent
promising new types of pincer ligands which could coordinate with a metal by facile
C-H activation in the ortho-position Although many bis-metallylenes are accessible
(see Introduction 13) pincer ligands containing divalent heavier group 14 elements
are new in the field of synthetic inorganic chemistry At the same time the desired
pincer arenes 35a could serve as much stronger σ-donor ligand towards transition-
metals than traditional phosphane ligands[70 79b c 122]
Up to now only a few isolable
spacer separated bis-silylenes with two divalent silicon centers are known these
include bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
in this work and bis-silylenes I42[52]
I58[61]
and
I64[65]
(in Introduction p 12-15) Inspired by these results the synthesis of a
silicon(II)-based pincer ligand 35a appeared attractive and its coordination property
towards transition-metals should be investigated
Scheme 330 Low-valent group 14 metallylene-based ECE pincer arenes
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35
Scheme 331 shows the synthetic route for the first attempt towards a bis-silylene-
based SiCSi pincer arene 35d The phenolation of trichlorosilane was readily
accessible to disilane 35b in hexane Reaction of 35b with two molar equiv of lithium
Results and Discussion
- 69 -
amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the amidinate substituted disilane 35c The bis-
silylene pincer arene 35d was not easily separable by the following dehydrochloration
of 35c employing two molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene Products seemed a
complicated silylene-LiCl mixture which was not soluble in toluene or diethylether
The desired bis-silylene pincer arene could not be isolated from mixtures
Scheme 331 The first attempt towards a bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35d
But the synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35 could be achieved through the protocol
in Scheme 332 Dilithiation of 46-di-tert-butylresorcinol with nBuLi furnishes the
corresponding 13-dilithium resorcinolate 34 After a salt metathesis reaction with the
N-donor stabilized chloro silylene 26[32b]
in the molar ratio of 12 the desired
compound 35[33b]
could be isolated as pale yellow crystals in 79 yield The
constitution and composition of SiCSi pincer arene 35 was elucidated by 1H-
13C-
and 29
Si-NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 332 Synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 35 exhibits one singlet for the N
tBu groups at δ = 124
ppm and one singlet for CtBu groups at δ = 174 ppm and one set of resonances for the
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands Almost identical variable-temperature (VT) 1H-
NMR spectra of 35 in C7D8 in the temperature range of 210 to 320 K indicate
Results and Discussion
- 70 -
relatively low rotation barriers of the Si-O bonds on the NMR time scale A sharp
singlet in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum at δ = -240 ppm is comparable to that observed for
alkoxy-substituted silylenes aLSiOR (R =
tBu
iPr)
[31b]
The molecular structure of 35 could be confirmed by a preliminary single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis but a discussion of metric parameters was not possible
because of the moderate crystal quality Still it is clear that the two silylene-like
moieties in 35 face in the almost same direction (Figure 319) To get more
information about the molecular structure of 35 DFT calculations [B3LYP6-
31G(d)][101c 119]
were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The geometry of 35
obtained by X-ray crystallographic analysis was used as the initial structure The
optimized structure of 35e and 35ersquo is displayed in Figure 320 The Si1-O1-C1 angle
(14179deg) is larger than that of Si2-O2-C3 (13217deg) While the dihedral angle of Si1-
O1-C1-C2 is 2437deg the dihedral angle of Si2-O2-C3-C2 is 039deg
Figure 319 Molecular structure of 35 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity X-
ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The Si-O single bond distances of 17056 and 17190 pm are little longer than those
of bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
(1641(2) and 1652(2) pm) and alkoxysilylenes aLSiOR
(R = tBu
iPr)
[31b] (16442(3) and 16501(2) pm) due to steric hindrance The C2-
Results and Discussion
- 71 -
symmetric rotational isomer 35ersquo was identified as a stable form on the hyperpotential
energy surface with a slightly lower energy of 75 kJsdotmolminus1
Interestingly the Si-O
distance of 35ersquo is little longer than those of 35e The bond rotation barrier of the Si-O
bonds in 35e and 35ersquo is similar and estimated to be +334 kJsdotmolminus1
by theoretical
calculation
Figure 320 Optimized structures of bis-silylene SiCSi pincer ligand 35e (left) and
its rotational isomer 35ersquo (right) at the B3LYP6-31G(d) level Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) of 35e and 35ersquo
compound 35e Si1-O1 17056 Si2-O2 17191 Si1-O1-C1 14179 Si2-O2-C3
13217 compound 35ersquo Si1-O1 17294 Si2-O2 17294 Si1-O1-C1 13028 Si2-
O2-C3 13028
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII
complex 36
Although bis-silylene 35 bearing an amidinate ligand may not serve as a π-acceptor
it was a strong σ-donor ligand To investigate the pincer-type coordination ability of
35 its reactivity towards phosphine palladium(0) complexes was evaluated Treatment
of 35 with 05 equiv of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)-palladium Pd(PPh3)4 in hexane
at room temperature afforded the novel silylene-silyl(phenyl)palladium(II) complex
36[33b]
as sole product which could be isolated as orange crystals in 81 yield
(Scheme 333)
Results and Discussion
- 72 -
Scheme 333 Formation of 36 from reaction of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
A different type of silyl-silylene metal complexes has been described by Ogino and
co-workers[66b c 78]
Compound 36 was fully characterized by multinuclear NMR
spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis The structure of 36
indicates that two equivalents of 35 were consumed With a 11 molar ratio of starting
materials the yield of 36 decreased (asymp30) but still no other product or intermediate
could be detected by 1H-NMR spectroscopy
The molecular structure of 36 is shown in Figure 321 Remarkably compound 36
crystallizes as racemic mixture of its R and S enantiomers of which only the S form is
presented here The PdII atom has a typical distorted square-planar configuration
defined by the two silylene SiII atoms Si2 and Si3 the silyl Si
IV atom Si1 and the
carbon atom C1 of the central aryl ring Interestingly there is a 12-hydride shift from
palladium to silicon during the complexation forming a Si-H silyl group which breaks
the former Si1-N2 bond in 35 Due to coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo The bent Si3-Pd1-C1 angle of 16783(12)deg in 36
is contrary to the linear X-Pd-C (X = Cl I Ph 4-fluorophenyl OCOCF3 etc) angles
of reported palladium(II) complexes supported by a PCP type pincer arene ligand[72b
77 135] The Si1-Pd1-Si2 angle of 15503(4)deg deviates from the linear alignment and is
smaller than the respective P-Pd-P angle of the PCP pincer-type palladium
complex[72b 77 135]
The silylene PdII dative bond lengths (Si2-Pd1 23271(12) and
Si3-Pd1 23038(11) pm) of 36 are shorter than that of the Si1-Pd1 distance
Results and Discussion
- 73 -
(23561(12) pm) illustrating the difference between a silyl ligand (Si1) with a SiIV
-Pd
single bond vs a silylene ligand (Si2 and Si3) with a SiII-Pd dative bond However
the Si2-Pd1 and Si3-Pd1 distances in 36 are somewhat longer than those of
silylenerarrpalladium complexes[136]
(224 and 226 pm) from Kira (Scheme 334)
Furthermore Pd1-C1(aryl) bond length of 36 (2125(3) pm) is longer than those of
reported PCP pincer-type palladium(II) complexes (Pd-C distance 197-203 pm)[135a-e
135g] presumably because of steric congestion
Scheme 334 Silylenerarrpalladium complexes from Kira[136]
Figure 321 Molecular structure of 36 Only the S form of racemic mixture is
shown Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity except for the H1 atom Selected bond lengths (pm) and
angles (deg) Pd1-C1 2125(3) Pd1-Si1 23561(12) Pd1-Si2 23271(12) Pd1-Si3
23038(11) Si1-O1 1694(3) Si1-N1 1789(4) Si2-O2 1675(3) Si2-N5 1862(3)
Si2-N6 1840(4) Si3-O3 1662(3) Si3-N7 1888(3) Si3-N8 1860(3) Si4-O4
1704(3) Si4-N3 1893(4) Si4-N4 1892(4) Si1-Pd1-Si2 15503(4) Si1-Pd1-C1
Si2Si1
C1
Pd
Si3
213 pm
233 pm236 pm
230 pm
O1 O2
Results and Discussion
- 74 -
7861(11) Si2-Pd1-C1 7681(11) Si3-Pd1-C1 16783(12)
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 36 shows twelve sets of nonequivalent
tBu groups
which agrees with its crystallographic analysis Moreover the resonance for the Si-H
proton is observed at δ = 659 ppm The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 36 in C6D6 displays
four signals at δ = minus87 (aLSi Si4) 397 (HSi Si1) 623 and 658 ppm (SirarrPd Si2
and Si3) respectively The chemical shift of the Si1 atom (SiIV
-H) has moved upfield
comparable to those of a related HSirarrPd complex reported by Kira Iwamoto and co-
workers because of the electronegative N and O atoms bound to the Si1 atom[136a]
The 29
Si resonances of the two SiII atoms (Si2 Si3) coordinated to the palladium
center are similar to those of other amidinate-based silylene transition-metal
complexes[71 137]
and significantly shifted to higher field in comparison to those
reported for donor-free silylene palladium complexes owing to the additional N-donor
coordination of the amidinate ligand to the SiII atom Additionally the infrared
spectrum of 36 shows a weak Si-H stretching vibration band at 2135 cmminus1
The
observed stretching frequency of 36 is higher than those of other reported palladium
hydridosilyl complexes (2008ndash2121 cmminus1
)[135c 135f 136a]
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism
To investigate the uncommon reactivity of 35 towards Pd(PPh3)4 quantum
chemical calculations using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP level using
6-31G(d) basis set for H C N O P and Si atoms and the LANL2DZ level for the Pd
atom with the Gaussian 03 program for model compounds 36andash36e were performed
by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)[101c 119]
A schematic representation of the potential
energy surface of the proposed pathway for the formation of 36 is given in Scheme
335
Results and Discussion
- 75 -
Scheme 335 DFT-derived relative energies of model compounds 35a-35e
From this it was assumed that stepwise dissociation of phosphine ligands of
Pd(PPh3)4 forms 36a as the initial intermediate by the insertion reaction of Pd0 into
the pincer C-H bond of the central aryl ring of 35 Subsequently the 16-valence
electron PdII complex 36a undergoes a 12-hydride shift from palladium to a silicon(II)
donor atom to form the 14-valence electron silylene silyl(aryl)palladium(II) complex
36c as second intermediate The latter process occurs through transition state 36b-TS
with a barrier of +878 kJsdotmolminus1
and 36c is only 67 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36b-TS
The electron-deficient PdII complex 36c readily undergoes coordination with
phosphine ligand or silylene donor moiety of ldquofreerdquo 35 leading to the formation of
more stable 16-electron complexes According to that the calculated relative energies
of PrarrPd complex 36d stabilized by PPh3 and SirarrPd complex 36e stabilized by
methoxy silylene aLSiOMe as model silylene donor are +380 and minus176 kJsdotmol
minus1
respectively Since SiII of intramolecular N-donor stabilized silylenes is a stronger σ-
donor than PIII
of phosphines complex 36e is 556 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36d
Overall the stepwise transformation of 36a into 36e in the presence of PPh3 and the
model silylene aLSiOMe is exothermic by 176 kJsdotmol
minus1
Results and Discussion
- 76 -
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
After successful isolation of the first bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
and the first bis-
silylene pincer arene 35[33b]
in order to obtain other new bis-silylene(germylene) as
potential bidentate σ-donor ligands the novel type of bis-silylene(germylene) with a
ferrocendiyl spacer which could result in unique properties was investigated The
facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
aLSi-Fc-Si
aL 38 (Fc = ferrocendiyl) and
aLGe-Fc-Ge
aL 40 respectively as well as
their corresponding cobalt and iron complexes could be realized in the course of this
PhD thesis[33a]
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40
Since the reaction of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
with dilithium resorcinolate 34 afforded
the SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 35 was assumed that chlorosilylene 26 and
chlorogermylene 39[41]
(aLGeCl) could be suitable precursors for the desired bis-
metallylene functionalized ferrocenes Ferrocene with nBuLi and TMEDA
(tetramethylethyldiamine) in hexane gave 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37[138]
quantitatively
Subsequently treatment of chlorosilylene 26 with 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 led to the
formation of bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield (Scheme 336) Similarly
bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40[33a]
could be isolated in 77 yield by salt metathesis
reaction of 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorogermylene 39 The structures of 38
and 40 were determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis mass
spectrometry and X-ray crystallographic analysis (only for compound 40)
1H-NMR spectra of compound 38 and 40 are very similar They exhibit a singlet for
four tBu groups (38 δ = 116 ppm 40 δ = 111 ppm) Two sets of hyperfine coupled
triplet (38 δ = 451 and 472 ppm 40 δ = 461 and 471 ppm) are assigned to the
protons of ferrocene The resonance of the Ph protons (38 and 40) appears in aromatic
Results and Discussion
- 77 -
resonance region from 690 to 717 ppm Accordingly the 13
C-NMR spectra of 38 and
40 each show three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (38 δ = 709 727 and
846 ppm 40 δ = 701 723 and 920 ppm) Furthermore bis-silylene 38 gives rise to
a singlet at δ = 433 ppm in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum
Scheme 336 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 40
Single crystals of 40 suitable for an X-ray single crystal analysis were obtained
from hexane solution The crystals of 40 consist of two conformational isomers as
shown in Figure 322 Two molecular structures of 40 confirm that the two N-donor-
stabilized germylene moieties are bonded to C1 and C7 (endo-configuration) or C8
(exo-configuration) of the ferrocendiyl spacer Distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C7 in
40-endo are 1979(9) and 1983(11) pm while distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C8 in 40-
exo are 1991(2) and 19774(19) pm respectively The Ge-N bonds (2006 to 20402
pm) of two isomers are slightly shorter than those of precursor 39[41]
The GeII centers
in 40 adopt a pyramidal geometry with the sums of bond angles of 25593deg and
25669deg for 40-exo 2591deg and 2546deg for 40-endo respectively The structural feature
of the amidinate ligands in 40 is reminiscent of those reported for related bis-
germylenes such as I63[64]
(aLGe-NPh)2 and I75 I76 LGe-X-GeL (X = O S L =
tBuC(N-Dip)2)
[67] The isolation of two conformational isomers of 40-exo and 40-endo
indicates a small rotating energy of the functional ferrocendiyl That means bis-
germylene 40 and bis-silylene 38 don not need more activation energy serving as
bidentate ligand
Results and Discussion
- 78 -
Figure 322 Molecular structures of 40-endo (top) and 40-exo (bottom) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 40-endo (top) Ge(1)-C(1)
1979(9) Ge(2)-C(7) 1983(11) Ge(1)-N(1) 2027(8) Ge(1)-N(2) 2006(8)
Ge(2)-N(3) 2022(7) Ge(2)-N(4) 2037(7) C(1)-Ge(1)-N(2) 983(3) C(1)-Ge(1)-
N(1) 955(3) N(2)-Ge(1)-N(1) 653(3) C(7)-Ge(2)-N(3) 953(4) C(7)-Ge(2)-
N(4) 941(4) N(3)-Ge(2)-N(4) 652(3) for 40-exo (bottom) Ge1-C1 1991(2)
Ge2-C8 19774(19) Ge1-N1 20261(16) Ge1-N2 20247(17) Ge2-N3
20402(15) Ge2-N4 20162(16) C1-Ge1-N1 9662(7) C1-Ge1-N2 9445(7) N1-
Ge1-N2 6486(7) C8-Ge2-N3 9492(7) C8-Ge2-N4 9716(7) N3-Ge2-N4
6459(6)
The molecular structure of bis-silylene 38 has been ambiguously determined by X-
ray single crystal diffraction The structural feature of 38 is very similar to that of 40-
exo isomer However the X-ray data are not sufficient for any further discussion
(Figure 323)
Results and Discussion
- 79 -
Figure 323 Molecular structure of 38 X-ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The mass spectrometry confirmed the composition of 38 (Figure 324) The (ESI)
mass spectrum of 38 is dominated by a peak at mz 703329 which can be attributed to
the protonated molecular ion [38+H]+ Isotopic distribution of molecular peaks
demonstrates a good agreement with calculated mass composition The comparison of
experiment and calculation confirms the presence of bis-silylenyl substituted
ferrocene molecules
6 9 0 6 9 5 7 0 0 7 0 5 7 1 0 7 1 5 7 2 0
m z
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
Re
lative
Abu
nda
nce
7 0 3 3 2 9
7 0 4 3 3 2
7 0 5 3 3 47 0 1 3 3 4
7 0 6 3 2 96 9 0 2 4 9 6 9 5 2 2 5 7 1 7 3 4 57 1 0 4 7 3
7 0 3 3 3 1
7 0 4 3 3 4
7 0 5 3 3 87 0 1 3 3 6
7 0 6 3 3 17 1 0 3 3 5
N L 3 1 3 E 7
W Y-F e S i2 _ S p ri tze 1 -2 9 R T 0 0 0 -0 7 7 A V 2 9 T F T M S + c E S I F u ll m s [1 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 ]
N L 4 9 7 E 5
C 4 0 H 5 4 F e N 4 S i 2 + H C 4 0 H 5 5 F e 1 N 4 S i 2
p a C hrg 1
Figure 324 Experimental (top) and simulated (bottom) ESI-MS spectra of 38
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable silylene- and
germylene-substituted ferrocenes respectively Alternative example of SiII-ferrocene
Results and Discussion
- 80 -
compound is a disilene-functionalized ferrocene reported by Tokitoh and co-workers
recently[139]
However disilene derivates belong essentially to another type of low-
valent silicon compounds in comparison to triply coordinated silylenes Instead of
conjugated electronic effect of disilene-ferrocene system the ferrocene bridged bis-
silylene or bis-germylene system could have better chelating σ-donor character It is to
confirm in a coordination chemistry of bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 with
transition-metals
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40
In order to investigate the coordination ability of 38 and 40 toward transition-
metals and inspired by the reactivity of bis-silylenes 28 and 35 toward Ni0 and Pd
0[32a
33b] as well as by reports on spacer-separated bis-germylene molybdenum chelated
complex I65-Mo[66b]
(see Introduction p 18) firstly the coordination behavior of
potentially bidentate ligands 38 and 40 towards CoICp complex fragments
[140] was
examined A suitable CoICp source is accessible by treatment of CoBr2 with sodium
cyclopentadienide (NaCp) and potassium graphite (KC8) in tolueneTHF 41 mixture
resulting in the generation of (CpCoILn) (L = toluene or THF) in solution Reaction of
thus-formed CoICp species with bis-silylene 38 yielded the desired bis-silylene Co
I
complex 41[33a]
in 30 yield (Scheme 337) Similarly bis-germylene CoI complex
42[33a]
has been successfully synthesized from 40 and isolated in 61 yield
Scheme 337 Synthesis of bis-silylene and bis-germylene CoICp complexes 41 and 42
Results and Discussion
- 81 -
In comparison to bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 1H-NMR spectra of
compound 41 and 42 show an additional singlet for protons of CoICp group (41 δ =
496 ppm 42 δ = 504 ppm) A singlet for four tBu-groups appears at δ = 111 ppm by
bis-silylene Co-complex 41 and at δ = 139 ppm by bis-germylene Co-complex 42
Two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (41 δ = 440 and 461 ppm 42 δ = 438 and
459 ppm) are assigned to protons of ferrocene The resonance of phenyl protons (41
and 42) appears in aromatic resonance region In the 13
C-NMR spectra of 41 and 42
each exhibit one resonance for carbons of CoICp (41 δ = 780 ppm 42 δ = 759 ppm)
and three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (41 δ = 700 745 and 851 ppm
42 δ = 699 737 and 891 ppm) In the 29
Si-NMR spectrum the coordination of the
bis-silylene moieties to the Co atom results in a drastic downfield shift of the
resonance of 41 (δ = 820 ppm) in comparison to situation of 42 (δ = 433 ppm)
Isolated products 41 and 42 are first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-
silylene or bis-germylene in a chelating fashion The molecular structures of 41 and
42 (Figure 325) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses In both
complexes cobalt is coordinated one side by cyclopentadienyl and another side by bis-
silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40 and contains 18 valence electrons Angles of Si1-Co1-
Si2 and Ge1-Co1-Ge2 are 9389(5)deg and 9279(2)deg respectively
The silicon atoms in complex 41 and germanium atoms in complex 42 are four
coordinated and show a distorted tetrahedral geometry The Co-Si bond lengths of 41
(21252(14) and 21200(14) pm) are similar to that in chlorosilylene CoICp(CO)
complex 41a[141]
(21143(4) pm) Furthermore the Co-Si bonds of 41 are shorter than
the Co-Si distances in dichlorosilylene-CoICp(CO) complex 41b
[142] (21348(5) pm)
in dichlorosilylene-Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41c
[143] (2228(2) pm) in
chlorosilylene Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41d
[141] (22060(6) and 22017(6) pm)
respectively The silicon cobalt double bond (Si=CoV) distance (21848(8) pm) in
cobalt(V) complex 41e[144]
is also longer than dative SirarrCoI bond lengths in complex
41 Structures of cited compounds are drawn for clarity in Scheme 338
Results and Discussion
- 82 -
Scheme 338 Structural features of 41 and cited silylene cobalt complexes
Figure 325 Molecular structures of 41 (top) and 42 (bottom) Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 41 (top) Co1-Si1
21252(14) Co1-Si2 21200(14) Si1-C6 1894(5) Si2-C11 1887(5) Si1-N1
1898(4) Si1-N2 1907(4) Si2-N3 1904(4) Si2-N4 1922(4) Si1-Co1-Si2
9389(5) N1-Si1-N2 6847(15) N3-Si2-N4 6866(16) C6-Si1-Co1 13254(14)
for 42 (bottom) Co1-Ge1 21967(6) Co1-Ge2 21979(6) Ge1-C6 1965(4) Ge2-
Results and Discussion
- 83 -
C11 1961(4) Ge1-N1 2020(3) Ge1-N2 2031(3) Ge2-N3 2041(3) Ge2-N4
2029(3) Ge1-Co1-Ge2 9279(2) N1-Ge1-N2 6490(11) N3-Ge2-N4 6485(11)
C6-Ge1-Co1 13280(10) C11-Ge2-Co1 13140(10)
The Co-Ge bonds of 42 (21967(6) and 21979(6) pm) are also shorter than those in
the germylene cobalt(0) complex [((Me3Si)2N)2GerarrCo(CO)3]2[145]
(2262(1) pm) and
the tetragermacyclobutadiene-CoICp complex η
4-((
tBu2MeSi)4Ge4)CoCp (24616(3)
and 25036(3) pm)[90d]
respectively In fact the Co-Ge bonds in 42 are the shortest
Co-Ge bonds known to date The relatively short EII-Co bonds in 41 and 42 suggest
that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands in the series of divalent silicon
and germanium compounds as yet
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45
To test σ-donor ability of bis-(silylene) 38 versus carbonyl a ligand exchange
reaction between 38 and (CO)2CoCp[146]
was explored When 38 was allowed to react
with two molar equivalents of (CO)2CoCp the bis-silylene 41 bridged bimetallic
cobalt complex 44[33a]
could be obtained in 87 yield accompanied by half CO-
elimination of (CO)2CoCp (Scheme 339) The reaction of bis-silylene 38 with one
molar equivalent of (CO)2CoCp furnished the same product but the isolable yield was
low The structure of 44 was determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy
elemental analysis and infrared spectroscopy
Scheme 339 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged CoI(CO)Cp complex 44
Results and Discussion
- 84 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 44 exhibits a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
124 ppm A singlet (δ = 523 ppm) and two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (δ = 461
and 476 ppm) are assigned to protons of CoICp group and ferrocene with the ratio of
1044 The resonance of phenyl protons appears in aromatic resonance region The
29Si-NMR spectrum of 44 shows a singlet resonance at δ = 857 ppm similar to that
of 41 In the 13
C-NMR spectrum of 44 one characteristic signal for the CO ligands
appears at δ = 2078 ppm Furthermore the IR spectrum of 44 exhibits a strong
stretching band at ν = 1888 cmminus1
attributed to the carbonyl groups on the CoI atoms
The observed CO stretching frequency of 44 is much lower than those of 41a
(ν = 1968 cmminus1
)[141]
thus indicating that the bis-silylene substituted ferrocene 38 is a
much stronger σ-donor than chlorosilylene 26[32b]
Another carbonyl-silylene exchange reaction was investigated between bis-
silylene 38 and diiron nonacarbonyl Fe2(CO)9 Toluene was added to a 11 mixture of
38 and Fe2(CO)9 at room temperature to afford a bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4
complex 45 in 73 yield (Scheme 340) The structure of 45 was determined by
multinuclear NMR spectroscopy infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 340 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4 complex 45
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 45 shows a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
109 ppm Two singlets at δ = 483 and 500 ppm are assigned to protons of ferrocene
Multiplets in the range of 699-739 ppm are resonances of phenyl protons The 29
Si-
NMR spectrum of 45 exhibits a singlet resonance at δ = 1050 ppm It is much more
Results and Discussion
- 85 -
downfield shifted than those in complexes 41 (820 ppm) and 44 (857 ppm) One
characteristic strong signal for the CO ligands appears at δ = 2169 ppm in the 13
C-
NMR spectrum of 45 It is compatible to the resonance (δ = 2167 ppm) of the
silylene-Fe(CO)4 complex aL(
tBuO)SirarrFe(CO)4
[71] In the IR spectrum of 45 the
CO stretching frequencies (2026 1948 1900 cmminusl
) are also quite uniform to those of
this complex (2026 1949 1899 cmminusl
)[71]
Due to the rotation energy of ferrocene and
the symmetric bulky coordination of Fe the second CO-substitution could be more
difficult Consequently a chelated complex 38rarrFe(CO)3 was not observed during the
isolation of products
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts
The investigation of the catalytic activity of complexes 28 41 and 42 was carried
out in collaboration with Stephan Enthaler (TU Berlin)[33a]
Nickel or palladium catalyzed cross-coupling reactions between organozinc halides
and aromatic halides constitute an excellent synthetic method for polyfunctional
aromatic compounds[147]
To probe the catalytic activity of bis-silylene oxide Ni0
complex 28 a cross-coupling reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-
iodobenzene was investigated (Scheme 341) The direct iodine substitution of p-
methoxyl-iodobenzene with organometallic compounds was not expected without a
catalyst In the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3) coupling
reaction was observed and product 46 was obtained in 65 yield indicating a
potential application for this kind of complexes
Results and Discussion
- 86 -
Scheme 341 Application of 28 as precatalyst in cross-coupling reactions
Moreover the reactivity of the resulting complexes 41 and 42 as precatalysts for
Co-mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile was
expected[148]
It is known numerous cobalt complexes have been successfully applied
as precatalysts in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions and this becomes a powerful tool in
organic chemistry to form arene and heteroarene moieties[148-149]
Thus the catalytic
abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions were investigated
(Scheme 342)
Scheme 342 Application of 41 and 42 as precatalyst in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions
A first set of experiments was dedicated to the benchmark trimerization of phenyl
acetylene which resulted in the quantitative formation of isomers 47a and 47b in the
presence of complex 41 To our surprise similar attempts to employ 42 as precatalyst
failed with no product formation presumably due to a stronger coordination of GeII
atoms to the Co center which consequently prevents from the formation of an active
Results and Discussion
- 87 -
site for substrate coordination In another set of experiments the formation of
substituted pyridines 48a and 48b by [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenyl acetylene and
an excess of acetonitrile was detected[150]
The catalytic activity of SiII-Co complex 41
was exhibited distinctly again while no product formation could be observed with
GeII-Co complex 42 To some extent the application of CpCo(CO)2 as precatalyst
gave however substituted pyridines in lower yield (48a (3) and 48b (11))[33a]
Scheme 343 Proposed mechanism of 41 as precatalyst for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition
A possible mechanism for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenylacetylene or nitrile
to obtain 47 and 48 is proposed[149a]
as depicted in Scheme 343 At first bis-silylene
complex 41 could participate in a ligand substitution reaction with the
Results and Discussion
- 88 -
phenylacetylene to form an acetylene side-on complex Co-I The latter undergoes a
ring-formation to give the σ-bonded CoIII
complex Co-II which is saturated in
coordination with bis-silylene 38 Then intermediate Co-III is formed after π-donor
substitution by acetylene The succedent ring-enlargement furnishes the transient σ-
complex Co-IV and a subsequent elimination of products 47 and 48 occurs leading to
the active species Co-I by coordination of two phenylacetylene molecules In this
cobalt catalyzed transformation bis-silylene 38 serves as an important accessorial
ligand making the Co-center with high electron density more active and stabilizing the
intermediates Co-II and Co-IV
Unexpectedly complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is inactive The
possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII donor centers to
Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the substrate coordination
Summary
- 89 -
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
In this work various new metallylenes of Si Ge and Sn and bis-metallylenes
(interconnected and spacer separated) were synthesized The properties and
coordination ability of new metallylenes toward transition-metals including Fe Co
Ni and Pd were studied
The reduction of chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
with excess of elemental
potassium furnished the first potassium germylene anionic salt 3[83]
in 33 yield
along with the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip in 31
yield 3 consists of a dimeric half-sandwich complex interconnected via
intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds Each half-sandwich moiety consists of a
K(OEt2)2 cation which is η5-coordinated to the anionic five-membered planar GeNC3
ring with a considerable Cpmacr-like aromatic stabilization This is supported by density
functional theory (DFT) calculations The treatment of (nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
with KC8
gave the same products 3 4 and novel Ge4-cluster compound 5[83]
in very low yield
Compound 5 represents a dipotassium salt of the first ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like
dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a planar Ge42minus
core
Summary
- 90 -
Figure 41 Central molecular structures of 3 (left) and 5 (right)
The reactivity of compound 3 as nucleophile towards chlorogermylene 1[80]
and
chlorostannylene 7[80]
was examined Coupling reactions of 3 with 1 or 7 led to the
corresponding bis-germylene 6[104]
in 66 yield and germylene-stannylene 8[104]
in
34 yield respectively Compounds 6 and 8 were fully characterized including by X-
ray diffraction analysis The new compound 6 represent the first asymmetric
substituted bis-germylene with the shortest GeI-Ge
I bond length The germylene-
stannylene 8 is the first example with a GeI-Sn
I coupling as yet This novel structural
feature was explained with asymmetric structure and some ionic charge distribution
between 5- and six-membered rings by DFT calculation
Figure 42 Central molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right)
Summary
- 91 -
The synthesis of new ligands 12 or 20[110]
was easily accessible from lithium amide
10 with corresponding benzimidoyl chloride 11 or 19[112]
by salt metathesis reactions
Subsequent reactions of 12 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2middotdioxane furnished
chlorogermylene 14[110]
in 82 yield Germylene 16[110]
was obtained by
dehydrochloration of 14 with carbene 15[113]
in 78 yield The molecule of
zwitterionic germylene 16 bears two reactivity positions a strong nucleophilic
methylene group and a nucleophilic(s-orbital)-electrophilic(p-orbital) germylene site
Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas or with water resulted in the formation of
corresponding aminogermylene 17[110]
or germylene hydroxide 18[110]
in high yield
The reaction of compound 20 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2sdotdioxane led to the
unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained by
reaction of 21 with GeCl4 through dehydrochloration with carbene 15 as a base in
57 yield All new compounds have been characterized spectroscopically and
crystallographically 12 and 20 are new types of asymmetric β-diketiminato ligands
with a fused six-membered C6-ring to prevent the transformation of ligand backbone
and side-reactions of ligands They are promising ancillary chelating ligand for the
synthesis of novel silylenes and stannylenes The preparation of new germylenes
added significantly to the growing field of GeII-chemistry capable of small molecule
activation
Summary
- 92 -
Figure 43 Molecular structures of 16 (left) and 18 (right)
Figure 44 Molecular structures of 22 (left) and 23 (right)
A new challenge in metallylene synthetic chemistry is the preparation of chalcogen
(O S Se) bridged bis-metallylene species Here the synthesis and isolation of the
oxygen bridged bis-silylene 28[32a]
was achieved for the first time Reaction of
(HSiCl2)2O with lithium amidinate gave disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield The bis-
silylene oxide 28 was available by dehydrochloration of 27 employing LiN(SiMe3)2 in
76 yield The molecule of 28 contains two triply coordinated Si atoms and two lone
pairs one at each of the Si centers The Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent and
DFT calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small
Compound 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 furnished the Ni0 complex 29
[32a]
in 91 yield which is the first bidentate bis-silylene transition-metal complex with
18 valence electrons at the metal-site In diamagnetic complex 29 the two silylene
Summary
- 93 -
subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are tetrahedrally coordinated to the
Ni0 atom The strong σ-donor character of 28 led to a more electron-rich Ni center
This work will lead to new insights into the chelating silylene ligand transition-metal
coordination chemistry
Figure 45 Molecular structures of 28 (left) and 29 (right)
To possibly get access to a phosphasilyne a desilylation reaction that is phosphino
silylene 30[128]
was allowed to react with Ph3PCl2 30 was synthesized by facile
phosphanylation of chlorosilylene 26 with LiP(SiMe3)2 in 83 yield Surprisingly the
reaction of 30 with one molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 led to the formation of the unique
product 31[128]
as yellow crystals in 72 yield
An X-ray crystal structure analysis confirmed that 31 is a dimer of the desired
phosphasilyne Compound 31 is the first 4π-elektron Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene
derivate with two-coordinated P atoms and a planar Si2P2-ring The Si-P bond lengths
in 31 represent intermediate values between the Si=P bond length and the Si-P bond
length The equal Si-P distances in 31 already indicate σ- and π-electron resonance
stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has been confirmed by theoretical
calculations According to DFT investigation each Si atom in the Si2P2-ring bears a
large positive net charge (+1204) while the P atoms in the ring have somewhat
Summary
- 94 -
smaller negative charges (-0765)
Figure 46 Molecular structure of 31
Pincer arenes having divalent heavier group 14 elements are currently
unprecedented in synthetic chemistry but assumed to form complexes that could
serve as precatalysts for various organic transformations due to their coordination
ability towards metals Here the synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer
arene ligand 35[33b]
through the substitution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
by 13-dilithium
resorcinolate 34 could be achieved in 79 yield Treatment of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
afforded the unexpected silylene-silyl(phenyl)-palladium(II) complex 36[33b]
as orange
crystals in 81 yield
In compound 36 the PdII atom adopts a typical distorted square-planar
configuration defined by the carbon atom C1 two silylene SiII atoms and the silyl
SiIV
atom which is bonded with a hydrogen atom because of hydride shift to Si1 after
C-H activation by Pd Owing to the coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo With the help of theoretical investigation the
Summary
- 95 -
reaction mechanism was explained and the exothermic transformation from 35 to 36
was confirmed This is a new approach in metallylene transition-metal coordination
chemistry with complexes being potentially applicable in catalytic transformation
Figure 47 Molecular structure of 36 tBu and phenyl groups are not shown
Also a type of bis-metallylene with a ferrocendiyl spacer for new bidentate σ-donor
properties was investigated Here the facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and
bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 38 and 40 as well as their corresponding CoI
complexes could be described for the first time By salt metathesis reaction of 11rsquo-
dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorosilylene 26[32b]
or chlorogermylene 39[41]
furnished
bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield or bis-germylene 40[33a]
in 77 yield respectively
Reactions of a suitable CoICp precursor with bis-silylene 38 afforded the bis-silylene
CoI complex 41
[33a] in 30 yield Likewise the bis-germylene Co
I complex 42
[33a]
could be synthesized from 40 with CoICp fragment and isolated in 61 yield
Summary
- 96 -
Figure 48 Molecular structure of 40
Figure 49 Molecular structures of 41 (left) and 42 (right) tBu and phenyl groups
are not shown
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable ferrocene bridged
bis-silylene or bis-germylene respectively The isolated products 41 and 42 are the
first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-silylene or bis-germylene
functioning in a chelating fashion In both complexes cobalt is coordinated on one
side by cyclopentadienyl and on another side by bis-silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40
and contains 18 valence electrons The Co-Si bonds in 41 and the Co-Ge bonds in 42
belong to the shortest Co-E (E = Si Ge) bonds known to date The relatively short EII-
Co bonds in 41 and 42 indicate that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands
in the series of divalent silicon and germanium compounds as yet due to the electron-
rich ferrocene and metallylene segments
In addition in the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3)
cross-coupling[147]
reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-iodo-
benzene was observed evidently The catalytic abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in Co-
Summary
- 97 -
mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile were
probed[148-150]
However complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is
inactive The possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII
donor centers to Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the
substrate coordination
Experimental section
- 98 -
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
51 General section
All experiment and manipulations were carried out under dry oxygen-free nitrogen
using standard Schlenk techniques or in an inert atmosphere of purified nitrogen The
glassware used in all manipulations was dried at 150 degC prior to use cooled to
ambient temperature under high vacuum and flushed with N2 The handling of solid
samples and the preparation of samples for spectroscopic measurements were carried
out inside a glove-box where the O2 and H2O levels were normally kept below 1 ppm
All solvents were purified using conventional procedures and freshly distilled under
N2 atmosphere prior to use They were stored in Schlenk-vessels containing activated
molsieves Benzene toluene n-pentane and n-hexane were purified by distillation
from Nabenzophenone Et2O and THF were initially pre-dried over KOH and then
distilled from Nabenzophenone CH2Cl2 and chloroform were dried by stirring over
CaH2 at ambient temperature
For transfer of solvents or solutions stainless steel cannulas were used which were
stored in the oven at 120 degC The transfer was enabled by the vessel of origin being
left under a positive pressure of protective gas and the receptacle vessel of closed
with a pressure release value By filtration stainless steel cannula containing a filter-
head at one end was utilized Whatman (GFB 25) filters were affixed to the filter end
of the cannula with Teflon tape After use cannulas were cleaned immediately by
thorough rinsing with acetone followed by dilute HCl water acetone and
dichloromethane
In the case of low temperature reactions Dewar vessels were filled with acetone
and dry-ice was added until reaching the desired temperature Ethanol liquid
nitrogen was also employed for reactions in needs of -90 degC
Experimental section
- 99 -
52 Analytical methods
NMR Measurements NMR samples of air andor moisture sensitive compounds were
all prepared under inert atmosphere The deuterated solvents were dried by stirring
over Na (C6D6 THF-d8) or CaH2 (CDCl3) distilled under N2 atmosphere and stored in
Schlenk-vessels containing activated molsieves The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectra were
recorded on ARX 200 (1H 200 MHz
13C 50 MHz) and ARX 400 (
1H 400 MHz
13C
10046 MHz) spectrometers from the Bruker Company The 29
Si-NMR spectra were
recorded only on ARX 400 (29
Si 7949 MHz) spectrometer
The 1H and
13C
1H NMR spectra were calibrated against the residual proton and
natural abundance 13
C resonances of the deuterated solvent relative to
tetramethylsilane (benzene-d6 δH 715 ppm and δC 1280 ppm chloroform-d1 δH 727
ppm and δC 770 ppm THF-d8 δH 173 ppm and δC 253 ppm Heteronuclear spectra
were calibrated as follows 31
P1H external 85 H3PO4
119Sn
1H external SnMe4
Whereby in each case an 1-mm glass capillary tube containing the standard substance
was placed in the appropriate solvent in a 5 mm NMR tube and the spectrum recorded
The abbreviations used to denote the multiplicity of the signals are as follows s =
singlet d = doublet t = triplet q = quartet sept = septet m = multiplet br = broad
Infra-red spectroscopy IR spectra (4000 ndash 400 cm-1
) were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
Spectra 100 FT-IR spectrometer bands were reported in wave-numbers (cm-1
)
Samples of solids were measured as KBr pellets Air or moisture sensitive samples
were prepared in the glove-box and measured immediately The spectra were
processed using the program OMNIC and the abbreviations associated with the
absorptions quoted are vs = very strong s = strong m = medium w = weak br =
broad the intensities of which were assigned on the basis of visual inspection
UV-vis Spectrometry UV-vis spectrophotometric investigations were carried out on a
Specord S 600 spectrophotometer from Analytik Jena AG Pure samples of the
investigated substance were dissolved in dry solvents at suitable concentration The
UV-vis cuvette was filled and closed in a Schlenk tube under N2 atmosphere
Mass Spectrometry Mass spectra were performed at the Chemistry institute of
Experimental section
- 100 -
Technical University Berlin EI spectra were recorded on a 311A Arian MATAMD
spectrometer ESI mass spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap LTQ
XL spectrometer Solid samples were prepared in glove box and the solution of
samples was prepared 15 min before the measurement under N2 atmosphere Mass
spectra are presented in the standard form mz (percent intensity relative to the base
peak)
Elemental analysis The C H N and S analyses of all compounds were carried out on
a Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series instrument Air or moisture sensitive
samples were prepared in ldquotin-boatsrdquo in the glove box Samples with halogen were
filled in the ldquosilver-boatsrdquo for better measuring accuracy
Melting Point determinations A BSGT Apotec II instrument was used for the
determination of melting points Samples were prepared in glass capillary tubes under
N2 atmosphere The melting point was determined while the melded examples had the
same color like the solid before Without melting of samples the color change was
observed was determined as decomposition temperature
Single crystal X-ray structure determinations Crystals suitable to the single crystal
x-ray structure analysis were put on a glass capillary with perfluorinated oil and
measured in a cold nitrogen stream The data of all measurements were collected with
an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur S Saphire diffractometer at 150 K (MoKα radiation λ
= 071073 Aring) The structures were solved by direct methods Refinements were
carried out with the SHELXL-97[151]
software package All thermal displacement
parameters were refined anisotropically for non-H atoms and isotropically for H
atoms All refinements were made by full matrix least-square on F2 In all cases the
graphical representation of the molecular structures was carried out using Ortep32
version 108 The details for the individual structure solutions included in this
dissertation are available in the appendix
Experimental section
- 101 -
53 Starting Materials
Commercially available starting materials were used as received The following
important precursors were prepared according to literature procedures The references
are shown in Table 51
Table 51 Starting materials and references
Compound References Compound References
GeCl2dioxane [27] 15 (HCNtBu)2C [113]
(HSiCl2)2O [117] 19 Ph(Cl)C=N-iPr [112]
1 (nacnac)GeCl [80] 24 tBuN=C=N
tBu [152]
2 (nacnac)GeCl3 [82] 26 aLSiCl [32b]
7 (nacnac)SnCl [80] 32 (Me3Si)2N-SnCl [53]
9 (C5H10)C=N-Dip [111] 39 aLGeCl [41]
11 Ph(Cl)C=N-Dip [112]
Experimental section
- 102 -
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4
To a solution of 1[80]
(133 g 253 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added potassium
(148 g 379 mmol) at room temperature After stirring for 4 h the color of the
solution changed from yellow to brown Volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was first extracted with hexane (60 mL in portions) and then
with diethyl ether (60 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtrated and the filtrate was concentrated
and stored at -20degC for 5 d yielding the first germylene anion 3 as pale yellow crystals
(030 g 083 mmol 33)
C25H44GeKNO2 MW 50236
Properties soluble in THF slightly soluble in Et2O spontaneous
combustion towards air
Melting Point 220 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 108 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 112 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 184 (s 3 H
NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 298 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 618 (s 1 H γ-CH) 691- 698 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 182 (NCMe) 203
(GeCMe) 238 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 1185
(γ-C) 1224-1745 (arom C GeCMe NCMe)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C17H24GeKN(C4H10O)022 C 5797 H 713 N
378 Found C 5764 H 694 N 367
The combined hexane extract was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated and
stored at -20 degC for 2 d yielding the new germylene 4 as yellow crystals (052 g 078
Experimental section
- 103 -
mmol 31)
NHN
GeN
Dip
DipDip
C41H59GeN3 MW 66657
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 192 - 193 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 091 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 109 (d 3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH =
68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 122 (m br 12 H CHMe2) 130 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 162 (s 6 H NCMe) 329-340
(m 6 H CHMe2) 503 (s 1 H γ-CH) 564 (s 1 H NH) 683
ndash 718 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 225 (CHMe) 234 (NCMe)
240 (br CHMe) 245 (CHMe) 247 (CHMe) 256 (CHMe)
288 (CHMe) 292 (CHMe) 964 (γ-C) 1171 ndash 1635 (arom
C NCMe)
EI-MS mz () 6674 (03 [M]+) 4912 (100 [M -
iPr2C6H3NH]
+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C41H59GeN3 C 7388 H 892 N 630 Found
C 7354 H 868 N 613
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5
To a precooled (-78 degC) solution of 2[82]
(097 g 16 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was
added KC8 (094 g 69 mmol) After stirring for 4 h the reaction mixture was allowed
to warm to room temperature and the color of the solution changed from yellow to
brown The reaction mixture was allowed to stir an additional 48 h at room
temperature The signal of compound 1[80]
also disappeared in the 1H-NMR spectrum
of the resulting mixture and compound 3 and 4 were observed as main products
Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was first extracted
with hexane (50 mL in portions) and then with diethyl ether (50 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtered the filtrate was concentrated to 10
Experimental section
- 104 -
mL and stored at -20degC for 48 h yielding 3 as pale yellow crystals (024 g 067 mmol
42) The combined hexane extract was concentrated and stored at -20degC for 24 h
yielding 4 as yellow crystals (042 g 063 mmol 39)
Further concentration of the supernate and cooling at -20degC for 48 h yielded 5 as red
crystals along with colorless crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex
C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 MW 135028
Elemental analysis calcd () for C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 C 7890 H 1003 N 278
Found C 7821 H 999 N 281
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6
C46H65Ge2N3 MW 80531
To a solution of the germylene anion 3 (138 mg 0263 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at -
30 degC was added the solution of the chlorogermylene 1[80]
(93 mg 0263 mmol) in
THF (10 mL) The color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After
stirring for further 2 h at room temperature volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 5 days yielding 6 as dark red crystals (140 mg
017 mmol 66)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt169 degC (decomp)
Experimental section
- 105 -
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 107 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H
CHMe2) 111 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H CHMe2) 120 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 124 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 161 (s
6 H NCMe) 202 (s 3 H NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 301
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 319 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 367 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 518 (s 1 H 6-
ring-γ-CH) 682 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 702- 718 (m 9 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 191 (5-ring-NCMe) 210
(GeCMe) 240 (6-ring-NCMe) 248 (CHMe2) 249 (CHMe2)
250 (CHMe2) 258 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 261 (CHMe2)
279 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 1028 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1238 (5-ring-β-C) 1240 ndash 1694 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
UV-vis λ [nm] = 315 (intense) 358 (intense) 502 (2600)
EI-MS mz () 491 (45 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (15 [M-
(C3N2Ge) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65Ge2N3 C 6861 H 814 N 522 Found
C 6884 H 800 N 516
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8
C46H65GeN3Sn MW 85138
To a suspension of germylene anion 3 (116 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) at -
70 degC was added the solution of 7[80]
(187 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) The
color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After stirring for further 2 h at
room temperature the volatiles of the reaction mixture were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
Experimental section
- 106 -
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 10 days yielding 8 as dark red-black solid (96 mg
011 mmol 34) The solid was solved in Et2O and stored at 0 degC for 24 h building
dark red crystals
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt143 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 085 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 106 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 121 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 127 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 129 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2)
165 (s 6 H SnNCMe) 227 (s 3 H GeNCMe) 300 (s 3 H
GeCMe) 305 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 333 (sept
3JHH
= 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 378 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2)
510 (s 1 H 6-ring-γ-CH) 691 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 705-
721 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 188 (5-ring-NCMe) 207
(GeCMe) 242 (6-ring-NCMe) 246 (CHMe2) 248 (CHMe2)
249 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 260 (CHMe2) 268 (CHMe2)
280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 287 (CHMe2) 1035 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1237 (5-ring-β-C) 1244 ndash 1704 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
119Sn NMR
(C6D6) δ = -197
UV-vis λ [nm] = 314 (15000) 363 (14500) 541 (2800)
EI-MS mz () 537 (8 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (17 [M-
(C3N2Sn) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65GeN3Sn C 6489 H 770 N 494
Found C 6444 H 764 N 477
Experimental section
- 107 -
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12
C37H48N2 MW 52079
To a solution of 9[111]
(200 g 777 mmol) in 200 mL Et2O at -78 degC was added 16
M nBuLi (486 mL 777 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 11[112]
(210 g 700 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h Water free Et3NHCl (108 g 777 mmol) was added to the
reaction mixture and stirred All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 229 g (440 mmol
63 ) of the novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 as colorless crystals
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 148 ~ 150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 117 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 125 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 134 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 164 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 187 (s 1 H NH) 217 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335
(m 4 H CHMe2) 696 (s 3 H arom H) 715- 727 (m 8 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 218 (Cy-CH2) 221
(CHMe2) 236 (CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 256
(CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 285 (Cy-CH2) 286
(Cy-CH2) 977 (Cy-CCN) 1222-1441 (arom C) 1600 (Cy-
CN) 1658 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H49N2+ 5213896 Found 5213878
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48N2 C 8533 H 929 N 538 Found C
8518 H 927 N 547
Experimental section
- 108 -
526 The new chlorogermylene 14
N
N
Ph
Dip
Dip
Cl
Ge
C37H47ClGeN2 MW 62788
nBuLi (881 mL 141 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 12 (720 g 138
mmol) in 80 mL of Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed slowly to warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(330 g 142 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -
30 degC yielding 14 as yellow crystals (710 g 113 mmol 82 )
Properties soluble in hexane toluene sensitive towards air
Melting Point 203 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 097 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 107 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121-127 (m 9 H CHMe2) 128-139 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 144 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 155 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 203-227 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 317
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 327 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 394 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 417 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 680- 739 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 226 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 239 (CHMe2) 245 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
249 (CHMe2) 274 (CHMe2) 277 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
286 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 291 (CHMe2) 293 (CHMe2)
295 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1089 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1476
(arom C) 1651 (Cy-CN) 1688 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47ClGeN2+ 6282640 Found 6282639
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H47ClGeN2 C 7078 H 754 N 446
Found C 7073 H 762 N 457
Experimental section
- 109 -
527 The new germylene 16
C37H46GeN2 MW 59142
Germylene chloride 14 (300 g 479 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-butyl- imidazol-2-
ylidene 15[113]
(091 g 502 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (25 mL) at room
temperature and stirred for 48 h resulting in a white precipitate of the corresponding
NHCmiddotHCl salt The color of the solution changed from yellow to brown-red The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm
hexane two times The combined filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 16 as red crystals (220 g 373 mmol 78 )
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 167 ~ 168 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 115 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 126 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 135 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 12 H CHMe2) 155 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 204 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 221 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 369 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 380 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 415 (t
3JHH =
44 Hz 1 H C=CH) 675- 725 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 226 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 258 (Cy-CH2) 259 (CHMe2) 273 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 987 (Cy-CH)
1117 (Cy-CCN) 1236-1431 (arom C) 1473 1474 (Cy-CN
Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 704 (s) 787 (s) 939 (m) 1104 (s) 1135 (s) 1204 (s) 1248 (s)
1296 (s) 1322 (s) 1365 (s) 1439 (s) 1461 (s) 1535 (m) 1600
(s) 2822 (m) 2865 (s) 2922 (s) 2957 (w) 3022 (w) 3061 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2+ 5932951 Found 5932950
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H46GeN2 C 7514 H 784 N 474 Found
C 7495 H 800 N 484
Experimental section
- 110 -
528 Aminogermylene 17
C37H49GeN3 MW 60845
A red solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (15 mL) was exposed to dry
ammonia gas for 10 min at room temperature The solution turned to a yellow color
and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvent was removed and the
residue was dissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated solution was stored at 0
degC yielding 17 as yellow crystals (560 mg 092 mmol 92 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 173 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 117 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 120-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 142 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
154 (s 2 H NH2) 200-213 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 357 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 363 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 388 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 679- 724 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 214 (CHMe2) 230 (CHMe2)
234 (CHMe2) 237 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
248 (CHMe2) 272 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
285 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
293 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1023 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1462
(arom C) 1643 (Cy-CN) 1669 (Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 704 (s) 752 (s) 796 (s) 839 (m) 922 (s) 1096 (s)
1143 (s) 1174 (s) 1252 (s) 1304 (s) 1360 (s) 1430 (s) 1543
(s) 2865 (m) 2961 (s) 3021 (w) 3048 (m) 3343 (w) 3430
(w)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H49GeN3 C 7304 H 812 N 691 Found
C 7272 H 810 N 683
Experimental section
- 111 -
529 Germylene hydroxide 18
C37H48GeN2O MW 60943
A diluted solution of H2O in THF (179 mL 100 mmol 056 M) was dropped into
a solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) at -30 degC The solution
turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvents
were removed and the residue was redissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated
solution was stored at 0 degC yielding 18 as yellow crystals (580 mg 095 mmol 95 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 188 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 116 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 119-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 139 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
166 (s 1 H OH) 195-221 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 384 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 397 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 675- 726 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 229 (CHMe2)
233 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2) 243 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 281 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
291 (Cy-CH2) 314 (Cy-CH2) 1028 (Cy-CCN) 1233-1464
(arom C) 1647 (Cy-CN) 1666 (Ph-CN)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 713 (s) 743 (s) 770 (s) 791 (s) 839 (s) 926 (m)
1056 (m) 1104 (s) 1148 (s) 1170 (s) 1257 (s) 1313 (s) 1339
(s) 1365 (s) 1430 (s) 1470 (s) 1539 (s) 2861 (s) 2961 (s)
3018 (w) 3057 (m) 3643 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2O+ 6092900 Found 6092901
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48GeN2O C 7292 H 794 N 460
Experimental section
- 112 -
Found C 7300 H 786 N 464
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20
C28H38N2 MW 40230
At -78 degC to a solution of 9[111]
(150 g 583 mmol) in 150 mL Et2O was added 16
M nBuLi (365 mL 584 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 19[112]
(106 g 583 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 141 g (350 mmol
60 ) of 20 as colorless blocks
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 123 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 109 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 132 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 156 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 208 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 214 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 310 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 323 (m 1 H CHMe2) 713- 753 (m 8 H arom H)
1203 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H NH)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 219 (Cy-CH2) 226
(CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (CHMe2) 276
(Cy-CH2) 280 (CHMe2) 300 (Cy-CH2) 459 (CHMe2) 977
(Cy-CCN) 1226 1228 1275 1282 1284 1371 1389
1453 (arom C) 1576 (Cy-CN) 1673 (PhCN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C28H39N2+ 4033113 Found 4033112
Experimental section
- 113 -
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H38N2 C 8353 H 951 N 696 Found C
8270 H 977 N 679
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22
C28H37ClGeN2O MW 52570
nBuLi (16 mL 256 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (100 g 249
mmol) in 15 mL Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed to slowly warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(058 g 250 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 22 as yellow crystals (105 g 200 mmol 80 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 161 ~ 162 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 108 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 134 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 141 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 153 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 189 (m
1 H Cy-CH2) 202 (m 1 H Cy-CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2)
284 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 367 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz
1 H CHMe2) 396 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 688 (m
1 H arom H) 705-724 (m 7 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 222 (CHMe2) 228 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 240 (CHMe2) 241 (CHMe2) 253 (CHMe2)
263 (Cy-CH2) 272 (CHMe2) 283 (CHMe2) 285 (CHMe2)
Experimental section
- 114 -
293 (Cy-CH2) 312 (Cy-CH2) 537 (CHMe2) 1068 (Cy-
CCN) 1239 1250 1267 1271 1288 1294 1388 1410
1446 1469 (arom C) 1620 (Cy-CN) 1654 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H37ClGeN2O C 6397 H 709 N 533
Found C 6426 H 725 N 551
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23
C28H36Cl2GeN2 MW 54415
nBuLi (32 mL 512 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (201 g 500 mmol)
in 30 mL of toluene at -78 degC The solution was allowed to warm to room temperature
and stirred for 4 h To this solution GeCl4 (107 g 500 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-
butylimidazol-2-ylidene 15 (091 g 502 mmol) were added at -78 degC The resulting
suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were removed under
reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm hexane two times The
filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC yielding 23 as yellow crystals (156 g
287 mmol 57 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 126 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 113 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 137 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 146 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 189 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 332 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 361 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 421 (t
3JHH =
42 Hz 1 H C=CH) 701-726 (m 8 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 237 (CHMe2) 243 (Cy-
CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 254 (Cy-CH2) 257 (CHMe2) 286
Experimental section
- 115 -
(CHMe2) 304 (Cy-CH2) 511 (CHMe2) 1036 (Cy-CH)
1125 (Cy-CCN) 1248 1287 1296 1354 1391 1411
1421 1490 (arom C) 1682 (Cy-CN) 1709 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H36Cl2GeN2 C 6180 H 515 N 667
Found C 6203 H 517 N 679
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27
C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 MW 60781
To a solution of tBuN=C=N
tBu
[152] (329 g 213 mmol) in Et2O (80 mL) PhLi (119
mL 214 mmol 18 M) was added at -78 degC The solution was raised to room
temperature and stirred for 2 h To this solution at -90 degC 1133-
tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(230 g 1065 mmol) was added in one minute The
resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with toluene (60 mL)
by 80 degC two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h yielding
27 as colorless crystals (343 g 564 mmol 53)
Properties soluble in toluene sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 175 ~ 177 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 120 (s 36 H CMe3) 598
(s 2 H SiHCl) 733- 746 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 317 (CMe3) 544 (CMe3)
1276 1285 1297 1337 (arom C) 1711 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = -1110
IR(KBr cm-1
) 606 (s) 658 (m) 711 (s) 733 (s) 760 (s) 789 (s) 934 (s)
1068 (s) 1200 (s) 1269 (s) 1378 (s) 1486 (s) 1550 (s) 1566
(s) 1612 (s) 1783 (w) 1826 (w) 1950 (w) 1969 (w) 2000
Experimental section
- 116 -
(w) 2135 (s) 2188 (s) 2909 (s) 2934 (s) 2971 (s) 3232 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C30H49Cl2N4OSi2+ 6072822 Found 6072844
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 C 5928 H 796 N 922
Found C 5971 H 797 N 913
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28
C30H46N4OSi2 MW 53488
Toluene (120 mL) was added to a mixture of 27 (260 g 428 mmol) and
LiN(SiMe3)2 (144 g 856 mmol) at ambient temperature After 2 h the solution turned
to an orange color with the formation of LiCl The resulting mixture was stirred
overnight The solvent was then removed and the residue was extracted with toluene
(100 mL) The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h to yield yellow
crystals of 28 (175 g 327 mmol 76)
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 152 ~ 160 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 692-
731(m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 530 (CMe3)
1277 1291 1299 1349 (arom C) 1623 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -161
IR(KBr cm-1
) 608 (s) 709 (s) 746 (s) 790 (s) 892 (m) 972 (s) 1032 (m)
1070 (m) 1208 (s) 1268 (m) 1359 (s) 1412 (s) 1446 (s)
1476 (s) 1577 (m) 1648 (m) 1778 (w) 1826 (w) 1899 (w)
1970 (w) 2248 (w) 2867 (s) 2902 (s) 2928 (s) 2964 (s)
3065 (m)
Experimental section
- 117 -
ESI-MS mz calcd 5353288 Found 5353227
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H46N4OSi2 C 6736 H 867 N 1047
Found C 6688 H 857 N 1046
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
C38H58N4NiOSi2 MW 70176
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 28 (267 mg 050 mmol) and Ni(cod)2
(1375 mg 050 mmol) at ambient temperature The solution turned to a low-red color
and was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted with
toluene (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield low-red crystals of 29 (319 mg
046 mmol 91) The remaining solid was crystallized from hexane at -30 degC
suitable for single crystal measurement
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 183 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 130 (s 36 H CMe3) 281
(m 4 H CH2) 295 (m 4 H CH2) 504 (s 4 H =CH) 686-
707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 337 (CH2) 535
(CMe3) 760 (=CH) 1277 1293 1296 1335 (arom C)
1690 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 328
IR(KBr cm-1
) 607 (s) 644 (s) 698 (s) 750 (s) 792 (s) 925 (m) 1021 (m)
1075 (s) 1209 (s) 1267 (s) 1320 (m) 1361 (s) 1407 (s)
1444 (s) 1475 (s) 1578 (m) 1647 (m) 1775 (w) 1823 (w)
Experimental section
- 118 -
1902 (w) 1962 (w) 2280 (w) 2791 (s) 2855 (s) 2913 (s)
2975 (s) 3023 (m) 3063 (w)
ESI-MS mz () calcd 7003503 Found 7003577
Elemental analysis calcd () for C38H58N4NiOSi2 C 6504 H 833 N 798
Found C 6387 H 837 N 805
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30
C21H41N2PSi3 MW 43679
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(302 mg 102
mmol) and lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphate (285 mg 103 mmol) at ambient
temperature The solution turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 3 h The solvent
was removed and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30 degC for 24 h yielding 30 as yellow crystals (371 mg
085 mmol 83)
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 149-150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 058 (d
3JP-H = 44 Hz 18 H
SiMe3) 124 (s 18 H CMe3) 681-699 (m 2 H arom H)
734-741 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 44 (d
3JC-P = 100 Hz
SiMe3) 315 (d 4JC-P = 16 Hz CMe3) 540 (CMe3) 1289
1292 1293 1344 (arom C) 1572 (d 3JC-P = 95 Hz
NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 31 (d
1JSi-P = 229 Hz
PSiMe3) 440 (d 1JSi-P = 1943 Hz N2SiP)
31P NMR (81012 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = - 2110
Experimental section
- 119 -
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C21H41N2PSi3 4362315 Found 4362524
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31
C30H46N4P2Si2 MW 58083
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 30 (309 mg 071 mmol) and
triphenylphosphine dichloride (237 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The
solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted
with THF (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield yellow crystals of 31 (148
mg 025 mmol 72)
Properties soluble in THF sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 174 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 705-
733 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 331 (CMe3) 534
(CMe3) 1256 1276 1294 1359 (arom C) 1710 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 267 (t
1JSi-P = 998 Hz)
31P NMR (81012 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = - 1649
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C30H46N4P2Si2 5802736 Found
5802361
Experimental section
- 120 -
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn MW 60944
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(336 mg 114
mmol) and Chloro-amino-stannylene 32[53]
(360 mg 114 mmol) at room temperature
The solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was
extracted with hexane (20 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield colorless
crystals of 33 (343 mg 056 mmol 49)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air decomposed
slowly at room temperature
Melting Point gt 25 degC (slowly decomp)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn C 4139 H 678 N
689 Found C 4195 H 701 N 706
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35
C44H66N4O2Si2 MW 73919
At -78 degC to a solution of 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinol (150 g 675 mmol) in 30 mL
Et2O was added 16 M nBuLi (85 mL 136 mmol) in hexane and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h resulting in white slurry The reaction
mixture was cooled to -78 degC again and added the solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(398 g 135 mmol) in 50 mL toluene After the addition the mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with the warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC 395 g bis-silylene 35 (534
Experimental section
- 121 -
mmol 79 ) as slightly yellow solid
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
174 (s 18 H ArC(CH3)3) 693 - 713 (m 8 H arom H) 754
(s 1 H Ar-H) 787 (s 1 H Ar-H) 802 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (ArC(CH3)3) 318
(NC(CH3)3) 350 (ArC(CH3)3) 530 (NC(CH3)3) 1096
1243 1276 1295 1297 1313 1341 1552 (arom C)
1636 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -240
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C44H66N4O2Si2 C 7049 H 900 N 758
Found C 7075 H 930 N 756
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36
C88H132N8O4PdSi4 MW 158480
Bis-silylene 35 (600 mg 081 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (468 mg 041 mmol) were
mixed in 25 mL hexane at room temperature and stirred for 24 h The hexane solution
was filtrated and the white precipitate was washed with 10 mL hexane one time The
solid product was dried under reduced pressure to yield 520 mg (033 mmol 81 )
white powders The product was dissolved in warm hexane and stored at room
temperature for 10 days giving some orange crystals of 36 The reaction of bis-
Experimental section
- 122 -
silylene 35 with one molar equiv of Pd(PPh3)4 in toluene furnishes the same product
but the isolable yield is only about 30
Properties slightly soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 105 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 108
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 114 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 116 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 131 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 139 (s 9 H C(CH3)3)155
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 168 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 177 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 180 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 185 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 212
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 659 (s 1 H SiH) 686- 789 (m 22 H
arom H) 816 (s 1 H Ar-H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (C(CH3)3) 311
(C(CH3)3) 314 (C(CH3)3) 316 (C(CH3)3) 318 (C(CH3)3)
319 (C(CH3)3) 320 (C(CH3)3) 322 (C(CH3)3) 328
(C(CH3)3) 332 (C(CH3)3) 333 (C(CH3)3) 343 (C(CH3)3)
349 350 351 357 526 527 537 539 540 541 542
561 1112 1225 1236 1243 1256 1258 1271 1285
1287 1289 1291 1293 1294 1302 1303 1318 1323
1324 1326 1340 1342 1378 1380 1381 1409 1430
1533 1559 1585 1613 1622 1654 1731 1742
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -87 (LSi) 397 (Si-H) 623
658 (LSiPd)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 623 (m) 706 (m) 764 (m) 860 (m) 1056 (m) 1108 (m) 1206
(m) 1272 (m) 1365 (m) 1418 (s) 1446 (m) 1476 (m) 1446
(m) 1476 (m) 1495 (m) 1591 (m) 2135 (w) 2875(m) 2906
(s) 2964 (s) 3061 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C88H132N8O4PdSi4 C 6669 H 840 N
707 Found C 6616 H 875 N 676
Experimental section
- 123 -
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38
C40H54FeN4Si2 MW 70290
16 M nBuLi (423 ml 677 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (600 mg 323 mmol) and TMEDA (937 mg 806 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (30 mL) solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(190 g 645 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
pentane Compound 38 was obtained as deep red crystals in 70 yield (159 g 226
mmol) on storage of a saturated pentane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 117 ~ 119 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 116 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
451 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 472 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 692- 707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 318 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 709 (FeCH) 727 (FeCH) 846 (SiC) 1289
1294 1305 1349 (arom C) 1604 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 433
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeN4Si2 C 6835 H 774 N 797
Found C 6803 H 767 N 778
Experimental section
- 124 -
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40
C40H54FeGe2N4 MW 79201
16 M nBuLi (353 ml 564 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (500 mg 269 mmol) and TMEDA (781 mg 672 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (25 mL) solution of chlorogermylene 39[41]
(183 g 538 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
warm hexane Compound 40 was obtained as orange crystals in 77 yield (163 g
206 mmol) on storage of a saturated hexane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 168 ~ 169 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 461
(t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 471 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 691- 697 (m 6 H arom H) 712- 717 (m 4 H arom
H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 320 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 701 (FeCH) 723 (FeCH) 920 (GeC) 1289
1290 1302 1369 (arom C) 1659 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeGe2N4 C 6666 H 687 N 707 Found
C 6655 H 701 N 707
Experimental section
- 125 -
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeN4Si2 MW 82693
In a glove box CoBr2 (202 mg 092 mmol) NaCp (81 mg 092 mmol) and KC8
(131 mg 097 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent
mixture (41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at
room temperature The bis-silylene 38 (650 mg 092 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 41 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 30 yield (230 mg 028 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 166 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 139 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
440 (t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 461 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 496 (s 5 H CoCH) 680- 684 (m 2 H arom H)
692- 696 (m 6 H arom H) 720- 723 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (NC(CH3)3) 534
(NC(CH3)3) 700 (FeCH) 745 (FeCH) 780 (CoCH) 851
(SiC) 1291 1297 1300 1343 (arom C) 1673 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 820
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFeN4Si2 C 6536 H 719 N 678
Found C 6612 H 724 N 686
Experimental section
- 126 -
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhGe
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Ge
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeGe2N4 MW 91604
In a glove box CoBr2 (83 mg 038 mmol) NaCp (33 mg 038 mmol) and KC8 (54
mg 040 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent mixture
(41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at room
temperature The bis-germylene 40 (300 mg 038 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 42 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 61 yield (210 mg 023 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 309 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 131 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
438 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 459 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 504 (s br 5 H CoCH) 684- 688 (m 2 H arom H)
695- 698 (m 6 H arom H) 714- 718 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 322 (NC(CH3)3) 537
(NC(CH3)3) 699 (FeCH) 737 (FeCH) 759 (CoCH) 891
(GeC) 1287 1296 1300 1361(arom C) 1680 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFe Ge2N4 C 5900 H 649 N 612
Found C 5942 H 664 N 590
Experimental section
- 127 -
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44
C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 MW 100697
To a solution of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (250 mg 036 mmol) in 10 ml hexane
was added a solution of CpCo(CO)2 (130 mg 072 mmol) in 8 ml hexane The
reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All solvents were evaporated
in vacuo The corresponding bis-silylene cobalt(I) complex 44 was isolated as brown
air- and moisture-sensitive solids in 87 yield (310 mg 031 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 293 ~ 295 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
461 (m 4 H FeCH) 476 (m 4 H FeCH) 523 (s 10 H
CoCH) 683- 695 (m 6 H arom H) 702- 706 (m 2 H
arom H) 745- 748 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 313 (NC(CH3)3) 542
(NC(CH3)3) 723 (FeCH) 741 (FeCH) 804 (SiC) 809
(CoCH) 1287 1296 1300 1324 (arom C) 1687 (NCN)
2078 (br CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 857
IR(KBr cm-1
) 500 (m) 539 (w) 564 (m) 628 (s) 703 (m) 757 (s) 792 (m)
825 (w) 1028 (m) 1081 (w) 1146 (m) 1199 (s) 1275 (m)
1360 (m) 1388 (m) 1417 (s) 1438 (w) 1474 (m) 1520 (s)
1641 (s) 1888 (s) 2869 (s) 2901 (m) 2926 (m) 2965 (s)
1520 (s) 3097 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 C 6202 H 641 N
Experimental section
- 128 -
556 Found C 6287 H 630 N 571
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45
C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 MW 103867
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (500 mg
071 mmol) and Fe2(CO)9 (259 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The solution
was stirred for 12 h The solvent was evaporated in vacuo The corresponding bis-
silylene iron(0) complex 45 was isolated as yellow-brown air- and moisture-sensitive
solids in 73 yield (540 mg 052 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 155 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 109 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 483
(s 4 H FeCH) 500 (s 4 H FeCH) 699- 712 (m 8 H arom
H) 736- 739 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 311 (NC(CH3)3) 548
(NC(CH3)3) 735 (FeCH) 742 (FeCH) 771 (SiC) 1210
1287 1303 1308 (arom C) 1704 (NCN) 2169 (CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 1050
IR(KBr cm-1
) 630 (s) 765 (w) 1028 (m) 1035 (m) 1200 (m) 1370 (w)
1400 (m) 1474 (w) 1609 (w) 1648 (w) 1900 (s) 1948 (s)
1996(w) 2026 (s) 2865 (w) 2930 (m) 2965 (m)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 C 5550 H 524 N
539 Found C 5623 H 517 N 566
References
- 129 -
6 REFERENCES
1 P Pyykko Chem Rev 1988 88 563
2 N V Sidgwick Clarendon Oxford 1950 1 287 (b) R S Drago J Phys Chem 1958 62
353
3 P P Power Chem Rev 1999 99 3463 (b) R C Fischer P P Power Chem Rev 2010 110
3877
4 R Janoschek Chemie in unserer Zeit 1988 22 128
5 (a) F S Kipping L L Lloyd Dalton Trans 1901 79 449 (b) N N Greenwood A
Earnshaw Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed) 1997 362
6 (a) L Roumlsch P John R Reitmeier Silicon Compounds Organic In Ullmanns Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH amp Co KGaA 2000 (b) A J O Lenick
Basic Silicone Chemistry ndash A Review 1999
7 S Yao Y Xiong M Brym M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 7268
8 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7562
9 Y Xiong S Yao R Muumlller M Kaupp M Driess Nature Chem 2010 2 577
10 (a) S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4159 (b) S
Yao Y Xiong C Milsmann E Bill S Pfirrmann C Limberg M Driess Chem Eur J
2010 16 436
11 (a) K S Pitzer J Am Chem Soc 1948 70 2140 (b) R S Mulliken J Am Chem Soc
1955 77 884
12 (a) M Asay C Jones M Driess Chem Rev 2011 111 354 (b) S Yao Y Xiong M Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 1748 (c) Y Mizuhata T Sasamori N Tokitoh Chem Rev 2009
109 3479 (d) P P Power Organometallics 2007 26 4362 (e) P P Power Chem Rev 2003
103 789 (f) S Nagendran H W Roesky Organometallics 2008 27 457
13 (a) R West M J Fink J Michl Science 1981 214 1343 (b) M J Fink M J Michalczyk
K J Haller R West J Michl Chem Commun 1983 1010 (c) S Masamune Y Hanzawa
D J Williams J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 6136 (d) D E Goldberg D H Harris M F
Lappert K M Thomas Chem Commun 1976 261 (e) K W Klinkhammer T F Faumlssler H
Gruumltzmacher Angew Chem Int Ed 1998 37 124 (f) J T Snow S Murakami S
Masamune D J Williams Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 4191 (g) M Weidenbruch Angew
Chem Int Ed 2003 42 2222
14 L Pauling J Am Chem Soc 1931 53 1367
15 (a) G Trinquier J P Malrieu P Riviere J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 4529 (b) J P
Malrieu G Trinquier J Am Chem Soc 1989 111 5916 (c) H Jacobsen T Ziegler J Am
Chem Soc 1994 116 3667
16 L Pu B Twamley P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2000 122 3524
17 M Kaupp P V R Schleyer J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 1061
18 A D Phillips R J Wright M M Olmstead P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2002 124 5930
19 N Takagi S Nagase Organometallics 2001 20 5498
20 M Stender A D Phillips R J Wright P P Power Angew Chem Int Ed 2002 41 1785
21 T L Allen W H Fink P P Power Dalton Trans 2000 407
References
- 130 -
22 A Sekiguchi R Kinjo M Ichinohe Science 2004 305 1755
23 D Bourissou O Guerret F P Gabbai G Bertrand Chem Rev 2000 100 39
24 M Denk R Lennon R Hayashi R West A V Belyakov H P Verne A Haaland M
Wagner N Metzler J Am Chem Soc 1994 116 2691
25 M Driess S Yao M Brym C V Wuellen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 6730
26 M Kira S Ishida T Iwamoto C Kabuto J Am Chem Soc 1999 121 9722
27 V Lemierre A Chrostowska A Dargelos P Baylegravere W J Leigh C R Harrington Appl
Organom Chem 2004 18 676
28 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky S Merkel J Henn D Stalke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
5683
29 L Jafarpour E D Stevens S P Nolan J Organomet Chem 2000 606 49
30 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen D Lentz J Am Chem Soc 2006 128 9628
31 (a) C-W So H W Roesky J Magull R B Oswald Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 3948
(b) C-W So H W Roesky P M Gurubasavaraj R B Oswald M T Gamer P G Jones S
Blaurock J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12049
32 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890 (b) S S Sen
H W Roesky D Stern J Henn D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2009 132 1123
33 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167 (b) W
Wang S Inoue E Irran M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691 (c) R Azhakar R
S Ghadwal H W Roesky H Wolf D Stalke Organometallics 2012 31 4588 (d) S S
Sen J Hey R Herbst-Irmer H W Roesky D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 12311
34 R C Fischer L Pu J C Fettinger M A Brynda P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
11366
35 Y Wang Y Xie P Wei R B King H F Schaefer P Von R Schleyer G H Robinson
Science 2008 321 1069
36 S S Sen S Khan S Nagendran H W Roesky Acc Chem Res 2012 45 578
37 S S Sen A Jana H W Roesky C Schulzke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 8536
38 C Jones S J Bonyhady N Holzmann G Frenking A Stasch Inorg Chem 2011 50
12315
39 D Gau R Rodriguez T Kato N Saffon-Merceron A De Coacutezar F P Cossiacuteo A Baceiredo
Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50 1092
40 S P Green C Jones P C Junk K-A Lippert A Stasch Chem Commun 2006 3978
41 S Nagendran S S Sen H W Roesky D Koley H GrubmuLler A Pal R Herbst-Irmer
Organometallics 2008 27 5459
42 W-P Leung W-K Chiu K-H Chong T C W Mak Chem Commun 2009 6822
43 (a) S P Green C Jones A Stasch Science 2007 318 1754 (b) S J Bonyhady S P Green
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 2973 (c) S J Bonyhady
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch A J Edwards G J Mcintyre Chem Eur J 2010 16 938
44 A Sidiropoulos C Jones A Stasch S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
9701
45 Y Peng R C Fischer W A Merrill J Fischer L Pu B D Ellis J C Fettinger R H
Herber P P Power Chemical Science 2010 1 461
46 R Jambor B Kašnaacute K N Kirschner M Schuumlrmann K Jurkschat Angew Chem Int Ed
References
- 131 -
2008 47 1650
47 (a) C D Schaeffer J J Zuckerman J Am Chem Soc 1974 96 7160 (b) M J S Gynane
D H Harris M F Lappert P P Power P Riviere M Riviere-Baudet Dalton Trans 1977
2004 (c) M F Lappert P P Power M J Slade L Hedberg K Hedberg V Schomaker
Chem Commun 1979 369 (d) T Fjeldberg H Hope M F Lappert P P Power A J
Thorne Chem Commun 1983 639 (e) M Veith M Jarczyk V Huch Chem Ber 1988
121 347
48 M Veith R Lisowsky Angew Chem Int Ed 1988 27 1087
49 P B Hitchcock M F Lappert A J Thorne Chem Commun 1990 1587
50 R A Bartlett P P Power J Am Chem Soc 1990 112 3660
51 J-T Ahlemann H W Roesky R Murugavel E Parisini M Noltemeyer H-G Schmidt O
Muumlller R Herbst-Irmer L N Markovskii Y G Shermilovich Chem Ber 1997 130 1113
52 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky K Proumlpper B Dittrich S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem
Int Ed 2011 50 5374
53 R W Chorley P B Hitchock B S Jolly M F Lappert G A Lawless Chem Commun
1991 1302
54 A G Avent C Drost B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem
2004 630 2090
55 M Veith A Rammo Z Anorg Allg Chem 2001 627 662
56 M Veith J Fischer T R Prout M Noetzel P Hobein V Huch Inorg Chem 1991 30
4130
57 H Braunschweig P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem Int Ed
1994 33 1156
58 H Braunschweig C Drost P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem
Int Ed 1997 36 261
59 R E Allan M A Beswick G R Coggan P R Raithby A E H Wheatley D S Wright
Inorg Chem 1997 36 5202
60 (a) C Stanciu S S Hino M Stender A F Richards M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
Chem 2005 44 2774 (b) Y Peng B D Ellis X Wang P P Power J Am Chem Soc
2008 130 12268
61 B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem 2005 631 1383
62 C Cui M M Olmstead J C Fettinger G H Spikes P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 17530
63 X Wang C Ni Z Zhu J C Fettinger P P Power Inorg Chem 2009 48 2464
64 S S Sen D Kratzert D Stern H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2010 49 5786
65 H-X Yeong H-W Xi K H Lim C-W So Chem Eur J 2010 16 12956
66 (a) F E Hahn A V Zabula T Pape A Hepp Eur J Inorg Chem 2007 2007 2405 (b) A
V Zabula F E Hahn T Pape A Hepp Organometallics 2007 26 1972 (c) A V Zabula T
Pape A Hepp F E Hahn Organometallics 2008 27 2756
67 S-H Zhang C-W So Organometallics 2011 30 2059
68 O T Summerscales M M Olmstead P P Power Organometallics 2011 30 3468
69 (a) M Veith W Frank Angew Chem 1985 97 213 (b) M Veith Angew Chem Int Ed
1987 26 1 (c) H Chen R A Bartlett H V R Dias M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
References
- 132 -
Chem 1991 30 3390 (d) R E Allan M A Beswick A J Edwards M A Paver M-A
Rennie P R Raithby D S Wright Dalton Trans 1995 1991 (e) W J Grigsby T Hascall
J J Ellison M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg Chem 1996 35 3254 (f) R E Allan M A
Beswick M K Davies P R Raithby A Steiner D S Wright J Organomet Chem 1998
550 71 (g) M E G Mosquera J S Palmer A D Hopkins D S Wright Phosphorus
Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 1999 150 107 (h) M Veith M Opsoumllder M Zimmer V Huch
Eur J Inorg Chem 2000 2000 1143 (i) D R Armstrong F Benevelli A D Bond N
Feeder E A Harron A D Hopkins M Mcpartlin D Moncrieff D Saacuteez E A Quadrelli
A D Woods D S Wright Inorg Chem 2002 41 1492 (j) T Chivers Timothy j Clark M
Krahn M Parvez G Schatte Eur J Inorg Chem 2003 2003 1857 (k) J F Eichler O Just
W S Rees Inorg Chem 2006 45 6706 (l) D J Eisler T Chivers Chem Eur J 2006 12
233 (m) H Vaňkaacutetovaacute L Broeckaert F De Proft R Olejniacutek J Turek Z Padělkovaacute A
Růžička Inorg Chem 2011 50 9454
70 (a) A Meltzer C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7232 (b) A Meltzer C
Praumlsang C Milsmann M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 3170 (c) H Ogino The
Chemical Record 2002 2 291 (d) S Inoue M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
5614 (e) M Stoelzel C Praumlsang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed
2012 51 399
71 W Yang H Fu H Wang M Chen Y Ding H W Roesky A Jana Inorg Chem 2009 48
5058
72 (a) J Choi A H R Macarthur M Brookhart A S Goldman Chem Rev 2011 111 1761
(b) N Selander K L N J Szaboacute Chem Rev 2011 111 2048 (c) M E Van Der Boom D
Milstein Chem Rev 2003 103 1759
73 W Tang X Zhang Chem Rev 2003 103 3029
74 (a) A P Shaw J R Norton D Buccella L A Sites S S Kleinbach D A Jarem K M
Bocage C Nataro Organometallics 2009 28 3804 (b) L-C Song J-T Liu Q-M Hu G-
F Wang P Zanello M Fontani Organometallics 2000 19 5342 (c) S Shekhar J F
Hartwig J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 13016
75 N A Marinos Modellsysteme fuumlr die [NiFe]-Hydrogenase und Zinkkatalysatoren fuumlr die
Hydrosilylierung Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin Germany 2011
76 (a) C M Jensen D Morales-Morales The Chemistry of Pincer Compounds Elsevier
Science Amsterdam 2007 (b) M Albrecht G Van Koten Angew Chem Int Ed 2001 40
3750 (c) M Albrecht M M Lindner Dalton Trans 2011 40 8733 (d) D Benito-Garagorri
K Kirchner Acc Chem Res 2008 41 201 (e) C Gunanathan D Milstein Acc Chem Res
2011 44 588
77 (a) N Selander K J Szabo Dalton Trans 2009 6267 (b) H Zhang A Lei Dalton Trans
2011 40 8745 (c) J Dupont C S Consorti J Spencer Chem Rev 2005 105 2527
78 Silyl-silylene transition-metal complexes see (a) K Ueno S Seki H Ogino Chem Lett
1993 22 2159 (b) H Tobita H Wada K Ueno H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 2545
(c) K Ueno A Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 5023 (d) H Wada H Tobita
H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 3870 (e) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino
Organometallics 1998 17 2844 (f) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino Organometallics 1998
17 2850 (g) H Wada H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 1998 27 993 (h) K Ueno A
References
- 133 -
Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1999 18 2694 (i) H Tobita T Sato M Okazaki H
Ogino J Organomet Chem 2000 611 314 (j) H Koshikawa M Okazaki S Matsumoto
K Ueno H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 2005 34 1412 (k) K Ueno S Ito K Endo H
Tobita S Inomata H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 3309
79 For reviews on silylene complexes see (a) M S Eisen Transition-Metal Silyl Complexes
In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2003 pp 2037 (b)
M Okazaki H Tobita H Ogino Dalton Trans 2003 493 (c) R Waterman P G Hayes T
D Tilley Acc Chem Res 2007 40 712
80 Y Ding H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt P P Power Organometallics 2001
20 1190
81 L Bourget-Merle M F Lappert J R Severn Chem Rev 2002 102 3031
82 B Raumlke F Zuumllch Y Ding J Prust H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt Z Anorg
Allg Chem 2001 627 836
83 W Wang S Yao C Van WuLlen M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640
84 (a) R West H Sohn D R Powell T Muumlller Y Apeloig Angew Chem Int Ed 1996 35
1002 (b) W P Freeman T D Tilley L M Liable-Sands A L Rheingold J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 10457
85 J Fischer J Baumgartner C Marschner Organometallics 2005 24 1263
86 M Stender A D Phillips P P Power Inorg Chem 2001 40 5314
87 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 4349
88 W D Woodul A F Richards A Stasch M Driess C Jones Organometallics 2010 29
3655
89 W Clegg E K Cope A J Edwards F S Mair Inorg Chem 1998 37 2317
90 (a) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Matsuno M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 5768 (b) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Angew Chem Int Ed
2006 45 3269 (c) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Eur J Inorg Chem
2007 2007 5471 (d) V Y Lee Y Ito H Yasuda K Takanashi A Sekiguchi J Am Chem
Soc 2011 133 5103
91 S P Mallela S Hill R A Geanangel Inorg Chem 1997 36 6247
92 P V R Schleyer C Maerker A Dransfeld H Jiao N J R V E Hommes J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 6317
93 For a review see Z Chen C S Wannere C Corminboeuf R Puchta P V R Schleyer
Chem Rev 2005 105 3842
94 (a) R Ahlrichs M Baumlr M Haumlser H Horn C Koumllmel Chem Phys Lett 1989 162 165 (b)
M Haumlser R Ahlrichs J Comput Chem 1989 10 104
95 O Treutler R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1995 102 346
96 (a) A D Becke Phys Rev A 1988 38 3098 (b) J P Perdew Phys Rev B 1986 33 8822
97 (a) A Schaumlfer C Huber R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1994 100 5829 (b) K Eichkorn F
Weigend O Treutler R Ahlrichs Theor Chem Acc 1997 97 119
98 K Eichkorn O Treutler H Oumlhm M Haumlser R Ahlrichs Chem Phys Lett 1995 242 652
99 U Meier C Van Wuumlllen M Schindler J Comput Chem 1992 13 551
100 (a) C Van Wuumlllen Chem Phys Lett 1994 219 8 (b) C Van Wuumlllen Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2000 2 2137
References
- 134 -
101 (a) P J Stephens F J Devlin C F Chabalowski M J Frisch J Phys Chem 1994 98
11623 (b) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 1372 (c) C T Lee W T Yang R G Parr
Phys Rev 1988 37 785
102 W Kutzelnigg U Fleischer M Schindler NMR basis principles and progress Springer
Berlin 1990 Vol 23 page 169
103 (a) C Corminboeuf T Heine G Seifert P V R Schleyer J Weber Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2004 6 273 (b) P Von Rague Schleyer M Manoharan Z-X Wang B Kiran H Jiao
R Puchta N J R Van Eikema Hommes Org Lett 2001 3 2465
104 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Chem Commun 2009 2661
105 H Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 1999 18 3159
106 Y Sugiyama T Sasamori Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Takagi S Nagase N Tokitoh J Am
Chem Soc 2006 128 1023
107 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 2003 22 215
108 (a) K H Pannell L Parkanyi H Sharma F Cervantes-Lee Inorg Chem 1992 31 522 (b)
A Kawachi Y Tanaka K Tamao J Organomet Chem 1999 590 15
109 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess Chem Asian J 2009 4 1323
110 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Organometallics 2011 30 6490
111 W Keim S Killat C F Nobile G P Suranna U Englert R Wang S Mecking L D
Schroumlder J Organomet Chem 2002 662 150
112 P H M Budzelaar A B Van Ort A G Orpen Eur J Inorg Chem 1998 1485
113 N M Scott R Dorta E D Stevens A Correa L Cavallo S P Nolan J Am Chem Soc
2005 127 3516
114 L W Pineda V Jancik H W Roesky D Neculai A M Neculai Angew Chem Int Ed
2004 43 1419
115 A Jana I Objartel H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2009 48 798
116 S S Sen G Tavcar H W Roesky D Kratzert J Hey D Stalke Organometallics 2010 29
2343
117 R West J Am Chem Soc 1953 75 1002
118 R Drake I Mackinnon R Taylor Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Siloxane Polymers
and Copolymers In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd
2003 pp 2217
119 (a) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 5648 (b) B Miehlich A Savin H Stoll H
Preuss Chem Phys Lett 1989 157 200 (c) Gussian 03 Revision E01 M J Frisch G W
Trucks H B Schlegel G E Scuseria M A Robb J R Cheeseman J A Montgomery Jr
T Vreven K N Kudin J C Burant J M Millam S S Iyengar J Tomasi V Barone B
Mennucci M Cossi G Scalmani N Rega G A Petersson H Nakatsuji M Hada M
Ehara K Toyota R Fukuda J Hasegawa M Ishida T Nakajima Y Honda O Kitao H
Nakai M Klene X Li J E Knox H P Hratchian J B Cross V Bakken C Adamo J
Jaramillo R Gomperts R E Stratmann O Yazyev A J Austin R Cammi C Pomelli J W
Ochterski P Y Ayala K Morokuma G A Voth P Salvador J J Dannenberg V G
Zakrzewski S Dapprich A D Daniels M C Strain O Farkas D K Malick A D Rabuck
K Raghavachari J B Foresman J V Ortiz Q Cui A G Baboul S Clifford J Cioslowski
B B Stefanov G Liu A Liashenko P Piskorz I Komaromi R L Martin D J Fox T
References
- 135 -
Keith M A Al-Laham C Y Peng A Nanayakkara M Challacombe P M W Gill B
Johnson W Chen M W Wong C Gonzalez and J A Pople Gaussian Inc Wallingford
CT 2004
120 M Denk R K Hayashi R West Chem Commun 1994 33
121 L Kong J Zhang H Song C Cui Dalton Trans 2009 5444
122 A Meltzer S Inoue C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 3038
123 P Macchi D M Proserpio A Sironi J Am Chem Soc 1998 120 1447
124 (a) M Regitz O J Scherer Multiple bonds and Low Coordination in Phosphorus Chemistry
New York 1990 p 5 (b) M Driess Coord Chem Rev 1995 145 1 (c) V Y Lee A
Sekiguchi J Escudieacute H Ranaivonjatovo Chem Lett 2010 39 312
125 C N Smit F M Lock F Bickelhaupt Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 3011
126 (a) C N Smit F Bickelhaupt Organometallics 1987 6 1156 (b) E Niecke E Klein M
Nieger Angew Chem Int Ed 1989 28 751 (c) R Corriu G Lanneau C Priou Angew
Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1130 (d) M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1022 (e) H R
G Bender E Niecke M Nieger J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 3314 (f) M Driess S Rell
H Pritzkow Chem Commun 1995 253 (g) M Driess H Pritzkow S Rell U Winkler
Organometallics 1996 15 1845 (h) M Driess S Block M Brym M T Gamer Angew
Chem Int Ed 2006 45 2293 (i) S Yao S Block M Brym M Driess Chem Commun
2007 3844 (j) V Y Lee M Kawai A Sekiguchi H Ranaivonjatovo J Escudieacute
Organometallics 2009 28 6625 (k) B Li T Matsuo D Hashizume H Fueno K Tanaka
K Tamao J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 13222
127 (a) C H Lai M D Su S Y Chu Inorg Chem 2002 41 1320 (b) R Pietschnig A
Orthaber Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4570 (c) C H Chen M D Su Eur J Inorg Chem
2008 1241 (d) V Lattanzi S Thorwirth D T Halfen L A Mueck L M Ziurys P
Thaddeus J Gauss M C Mccarthy Angew Chem Int Ed 2010 49 5661
128 S Inoue W Wang C Praumlsang M Asay E Irran M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2011 133
2868
129 (a) R Appel W A Paulen Angew Chem Int Ed 1981 20 869 (b) V Cappello J
Baumgartner A Dransfeld K Hassler Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4589
130 M Igarashi M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12660
131 F A Cotton G Wilkinson C Murillo M Bochmann Advanced Inorganic Chemistry 1999
132 (a) N Wiberg C M M Finger K Polborn Angew Chem Int Ed 1993 32 1054 (b) M
Ichinohe M Toyoshima R Kinjo A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2003 125 13328
133 (a) A J Arduengo H V R Dias J C Calabrese F Davidson Inorg Chem 1993 32 1541
(b) N Kuhn T Kratz D Blaumlser R Boese Chem Ber 1995 128 245 (c) P A Rupar M C
Jennings K M Baines Organometallics 2008 27 5043 (d) A J Ruddy P A Rupar K J
Bladek C J Allan J C Avery K M Baines Organometallics 2010 29 1362
134 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch H Marsmann G Henkel Chem Ber 1997 130 1733
135 (a) D Morales-Morales C Grause K Kasaoka R O Redoacuten R E Cramer C M Jensen
Inorg Chim Acta 2000 300ndash302 958 (b) T Kimura Y Uozumi Organometallics 2006 25
4883 (c) R B Bedford M Betham J P H Charmant M F Haddow A G Orpen L T
Pilarski S J Coles M B Hursthouse Organometallics 2007 26 6346 (d) J Aydin K S
Kumar L Eriksson K J Szaboacute Adv Syn Catal 2007 349 2585 (e) J-F Gong Y-H
References
- 136 -
Zhang M-P Song C Xu Organometallics 2007 26 6487 (f) R A Baber R B Bedford
M Betham M E Blake S J Coles M F Haddow M B Hursthouse A G Orpen L T
Pilarski P G Pringle R L Wingad Chem Commun 2006 3880 (g) A V Polukeev S A
Kuklin P V Petrovskii S M Peregudova A F Smolyakov F M Dolgushin A A
Koridze Dalton Trans 2011 40 7201 (h) R B Bedford Y-N Chang M F Haddow C L
Mcmullin Dalton Trans 2011 40 9034
136 (a) C Watanabe T Iwamoto C Kabuto M Kira Angew Chem Int Ed 2008 47 5386 (b)
C Watanabe Y Inagawa T Iwamoto M Kira Dalton Trans 2010 39 9414
137 (a) G Tavcar S S Sen R Azhakar A Thorn H W Roesky Inorg Chem 2010 49 10199
(b) R Azhakar S P Sarish H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Inorg Chem 2011 50 5039
138 W Chen P J Mccormack K Mohammed W Mbafor S M Roberts J Whittall Angew
Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4141
139 (a) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Organometallics 2008 27
3325 (b) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Bull Chem Soc Jpn
2009 82 793
140 (a) F Baumann E Dormann Y Ehleiter W Kaim J Kaumlrcher M Kelemen R Krammer D
Saurenz D Stalke C Wachter G Wolmershaumluser H Sitzmann J Organomet Chem 1999
587 267 (b) F Hung-Low C A Bradley Organometallics 2011 30 2636 (c) F Hung-Low
J P Krogman J W Tye C A Bradley Chem Commun 2012 48 368
141 R Azhakar R S Ghadwal H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Chem Asian J 2012 7 528
142 R S Ghadwal R Azhakar K ProPper J J Holstein B Dittrich H W Roesky Inorg
Chem 2011 50 8502
143 J Li S Merkel J Henn K Meindl A DoRing H W Roesky R S Ghadwal D Stalke
Inorg Chem 2010 49 775
144 M Ingleson H Fan M Pink J Tomaszewski K G Caulton J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
1804
145 A Schnepf Z Anorg Allg Chem 2006 632 935
146 (a) M D Rausch R A Genetti J Org Chem 1970 35 3888 (b) F Ungvary A Sisak L
Markoacute J Organomet Chem 1980 188 373
147 (a) E Erdik Tetrahedron 1992 48 9577 (b) P Knochel R D Singer Chem Rev 1993 93
2117 (c) M Rottlaumlnder P Knochel Tetrahedron Lett 1997 38 1749
148 (a) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1978 17 505 (b) K P C Vollhardt Angew Chem
Int Ed 1984 23 539 (c) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1985 24 248 (d) W Hess
J Treutwein G Hilt Synthesis 2008 2008 3537 (e) C J Scheuermann B D Ward New J
Chem 2008 32 1850 (f) T Shibata K Tsuchikama Org Biomol Chem 2008 6 1317 (g)
K Tanaka Chem Asian J 2009 4 508 (h) J A Varela C Saaacute Synlett 2008 2008 2571
149 (a) G Hilt C Hengst W Hess Eur J Org Chem 2008 2008 2293 (b) A Geny N Agenet
L Iannazzo M Malacria C Aubert V Gandon Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 1810 (c)
C C Eichman J P Bragdon J P Stambuli Synlett 2011 2011 1109
150 (a) Y Wakatsuki H Yamazaki Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1985 58 2715 (b) Y B Taarit Y
Diab B Elleuch M Kerkani M Chihaoui Chem Commun 1986 402 (c) H Nehl Chem
Ber 1994 127 2535 (d) C Wang X Li F Wu B Wan Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
7162
References
- 137 -
151 G M Sheldrick SHELX-97 Program for Crystal Structure Determination Universitaumlt
Goumlttingen (Germany) 1997
152 P Schlack G Keil Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1963 661 72
Appendix
- 138 -
7 APPENDIX
71 Abbreviations
Ada adamantanyl MHz Megahertz
Ar aryl min minute(s)
mmol millimole(ar)
MS mass spectrometry
B3LYP Beckersquos three-parameter hybrid
functional using the Lee Yang
and Parr correlation ldquofunctionalrdquo MW molecular weight
BINAP 22rsquo-(Ph2P)2-11rsquo-binaphthyl mz masscharge
br broad nacnac HC(MeC=N-Dip) 2minus
tBu tert-butyl Naph naphthyl
degC Celsius degree NBO natural bond orbital
ca about NHC N-Heterocyclic Carbene
calc calculated NICS nucleus independent chemical shift
CBD cyclobutadiene NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
cod COD 15-cyclooctadiene NPA natural population analysis
Cp cyclopentadienyl Ph phenyl
d doublet ppm parts per million
DCM dichloromethane iPr iso-propyl
DFT density functional theory q quartet
Dip 26-iPr2C6H3 R organic substituent
EI electron impact ionization RT room temperature
equiv equivalent(s) s singlet strong
ESI electrospray ionization sept septet
Et ethyl t triplet
eV electronvolt THF tetrahydrofuran
Fc ferrocendiyl Tip 246-iPr2C6H2
g gram(s) TMEDA tetramethylethyldiamine
h hour(s) TMS tetramethylsilane
HOMO highest occupied molecular orbital TS transition state
Hz Hertz TZVP triple-zeta valence polarization
IR infrared
K Kelvin
TZVDP TZVP two sets of polarization
functions aL PhC(
tBuN)2
minus UV-vis ultraviolet-visible
VE valence electron LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital vs very strong
M Metal VT variable temperature
m multiplet medium w weak
Me methyl WBI Wiberg Bond Index
Mes mesityl 246-Me3-C6H2 δ chemical shift
Appendix
- 139 -
GeN
N
GeN
Dip
Dip
DipCl
N
SnN
Dip
Dip
GeNN
SnN
Dip
DipDip
N
Dip
6 7
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation
1 2 3 4
5 8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22
Appendix
- 140 -
23 24 25 26
27 28 29
30 31 32 33
34 35 36
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph
Si
Cl
37 38 39 40
Appendix
- 141 -
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
41 42 43
44 45 46
47a 47b 48a 48b
Appendix
- 142 -
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details
Table 731 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 3 4 5
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C50 H88 Ge2 K2 N2 O4
100460
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
106989(7) pm
114137(7) pm
122625(8) pm
74158(6) deg
76395(6) deg
83400(5) deg
139807(16)
1
1193
1263
536
028 x 02 x 018
326 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-13lt=klt=13
-14lt=llt=14
12268
4910 [R(int) = 00358]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 094847
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4910 0 281
0940
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00638
R1 = 00538 wR2 = 00666
0456 and -0223
C41 H5 Ge N3
66650
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
91129(6) pm
113531(7) pm
190282(10) pm
100360(5) deg
101854(5) deg
98627(5) deg
185918(19)
2
1191
0855
716
039 x 012 x 007
297 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-13lt=klt=13
-22lt=llt=22
14570
6543 [R(int) = 00560]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
0943 and 0777
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6543 0 420
0785
R1 = 00399 wR2 = 00513
R1 = 00853 wR2 = 00566
0577 and -0317
C66 H102 Ge4 K2 N4 O2
135208
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
12370(3) pm
148433(14) pm
188725(19) pm
90059(8)deg
96311(14)deg
90082(13)deg
34442(10)
2
1304
1892
1416
030 x 025 x 015
292 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-15lt=klt=17
-14lt=llt=22
17371
6032 [R(int) = 00487]
995
Analytical
0807 and 0584
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6032 2 364
0911
R1 = 00424 wR2 = 00801
R1 = 00874 wR2 = 00885
0497 and -0457
Appendix
- 143 -
Table 732 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 6 8 12
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C46 H65 Ge2 N3
80519
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
44536(2) pm
98204(5) pm
218135(10) pm
90deg
116030(4)deg
90deg
85727(7)
8
1248
1436
3408
038 x 024 x 010
305 to 2500deg
-49lt=hlt=52
-10lt=klt=11
-24lt=llt=25
20162
7493 [R(int) = 00954]
992
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 074676
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7493 0 476
0917
R1 = 00559 wR2 = 00778
R1 = 01461 wR2 = 00966
0590 and -0578
C46 H65 Ge N3 Sn
85129
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
867780(10) pm
120514(4) pm
210797(6) pm
96333(2)deg
97393(2)deg
99141(2)deg
213908(10)
2
1322
1320
888
016 x 014 x 012
295 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-14lt=klt=14
-25lt=llt=25
16936
7496 [R(int) = 00251]
994
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099037
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7496 0 495
1001
R1 = 00309 wR2 = 00706
R1 = 00437 wR2 = 00733
1468 and -0424
C37 H48 N2
52077
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108485(5) pm
127284(7) pm
132348(4) pm
65748(4)deg
86290(3)deg
71699(5)deg
157759(12)
2
1096
0063
568
029 x 022 x 018
298 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13428
5541 [R(int) = 00203]
998
None
09888 and 09820
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5541 0 364
1029
R1 = 00439 wR2 = 00900
R1 = 00633 wR2 = 00963
0188 and -0193
Appendix
- 144 -
Table 733 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 14 16 17
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H46 Cl Ge N2
62680
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117621(2) pm
175495(4) pm
166051(3) pm
90deg
107053(2)deg
90deg
327691(11)
4
1270
1044
1324
040 x 032 x 022
342 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-19lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=18
16923
5742 [R(int) = 00250]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 082078
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5742 0 378
1044
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00709
R1 = 00496 wR2 = 00742
0736 and -0362
C37 H46 Ge N2
59135
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108388(6) pm
127885(7) pm
132778(4) pm
66971(4)deg
85749(3)deg
71833(5)deg
160695(13)
2
1222
0980
628
029 x 015 x 007
307 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13501
5636 [R(int) = 00366]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 092510
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5636 0 369
1031
R1 = 00489 wR2 = 01180
R1 = 00691 wR2 = 01242
0539 and -0501
C37 H49 Ge N3
60838
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117714(4) pm
174309(6) pm
166868(6) pm
90deg
106866(4)deg
90deg
32766(2)
4
1233
0964
1296
030 x 023 x 019
342 to 2500deg
-8lt=hlt=13
-10lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=16
12816
5749 [R(int) = 00325]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 095425
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5749 0 378
1060
R1 = 00464 wR2 = 01084
R1 = 00699 wR2 = 01133
1717 and -0738
Appendix
- 145 -
Table 734 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 18 20 22
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H48 Ge N2 O
60936
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117560(3) pm
174116(5) pm
166421(4) pm
90deg
106992(3)deg
90deg
325778(15)
4
1242
0971
1296
031 x 014 x 005
343 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-20lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=19
23624
5720 [R(int) = 00371]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 083390
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5720 0 379
1018
R1 = 00336 wR2 = 00752
R1 = 00516 wR2 = 00789
0521 and -0366
C28 H38 N2
40260
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
94924(4) pm
256583(9) pm
107465(5) pm
90deg
110403(5)deg
90deg
245320(18)
4
1090
0063
880
017 x 015 x 013
343 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=10
-30lt=klt=27
-12lt=llt=11
8561
4313 [R(int) = 00209]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099057
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4313 0 281
1041
R1 = 00476 wR2 = 01015
R1 = 00771 wR2 = 01083
0253 and -0194
C28 H37 Cl Ge N2 O
52564
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
89021(3) pm
107319(4) pm
151176(6) pm
75734(4)deg
74781(3)deg
75311(3)deg
132282(8)
2
1320
1281
552
020 x 012 x 008
354 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-12lt=klt=12
-15lt=llt=17
9246
4654 [R(int) = 00211]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086160
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4654 0 304
0946
R1 = 00274 wR2 = 00579
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00597
0394 and -0264
Appendix
- 146 -
Table 735 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 23 27 28
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C28 H36 Cl2 Ge N2
54408
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
279616(13) pm
113538(3) pm
177729(7) pm
90deg
109718(5)deg
90deg
53115(4)
8
1361
1374
2272
021 x 017 x 015
332 to 2500deg
-25lt=hlt=33
-7lt=klt=13
-21lt=llt=20
10951
4663 [R(int) = 00459]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091223
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4663 0 304
0856
R1 = 00372 wR2 = 00584
R1 = 00684 wR2 = 00620
0589 and -0533
C30 H48 Cl2 N4 O Si2
60780
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121593(5) pm
162045(6) pm
171248(7) pm
90deg
98177(4)deg
90deg
33399(2)
4
1209
0295
1304
030 x 015 x 005
335 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=13
-16lt=klt=19
-20lt=llt=20
23741
5865 [R(int) = 00491]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086688
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5865 172 490
1035
R1 = 00543 wR2 = 01080
R1 = 00905 wR2 = 01194
0310 and -0412
C30 H46 N4 O Si2
53489
150(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Fdd2
31188(2) pm
39120(3) pm
102620(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
125204(14)
16
1135
0141
4640
031 x 011 x 007
334 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=36
-46lt=klt=45
-12lt=llt=12
11517
4372 [R(int) = 00656]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 097469
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4372 1 346
0897
R1 = 00488 wR2 = 00604
R1 = 00754 wR2 = 00650
0328 and -0229
Appendix
- 147 -
Table 736 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 29 30 31
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C38 H58 N4 Ni O Si2
70177
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
98776(8) pm
129530(11) pm
155488(13) pm
81634(7)deg
83316(7)deg
82826(7)deg
19430(3)
2
1200
0594
756
020 x 009 x 007
330 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=11
-15lt=klt=13
-18lt=llt=18
14961
6828 [R(int) = 00414]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091998
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6828 0 474
0948
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00807
R1 = 00605 wR2 = 00853
0407 and -0240
C21 H41 N2 P Si3
43680
173(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Pbca
193556(7) pm
142399(4) pm
199777(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
55063(3)
8
1054
0239
1904
039 x 036 x 016
351 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=23
-16lt=klt=16
-23lt=llt=22
19912
4836 [R(int) = 00961]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09627 and 09125
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4836 18 287
0906
R1 = 00571 wR2 = 00889
R1 = 01270 wR2 = 01032
0316 and -0214
C44 H60 N4 P2 Si2
76308
173(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
23841(3) pm
101993(12) pm
19369(2) pm
90deg
108346(12)deg
90deg
44703(9)
4
1134
0184
1640
076 x 057 x 055
353 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=28
-12lt=klt=12
-20lt=llt=23
16197
3927 [R(int) = 00447]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09053 and 08725
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
3927 0 251
1034
R1 = 00618 wR2 = 01393
R1 = 00843 wR2 = 01489
0721 and -0649
Appendix
- 148 -
Table 737 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 33 36 40-endo
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C56 H98 Cl4 N6 Si6 Sn2
140312
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
105159(4) pm
127622(6) pm
269391(12) pm
90310(4)deg
90855(3)deg
102927(3)deg
35232(3)
2
1323
1000
1456
013 x 012 x 009
336 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-29lt=llt=32
25757
12396 [R(int) = 00546]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09154 and 08810
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
12396 536 816
2077
R1 = 01231 wR2 = 01906
R1 = 01495 wR2 = 01944
1510 and -4753
C91 H139 N8 O4 Pd Si4
162786
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
145970(8) pm
151441(15) pm
232982(16) pm
71358(8)deg
74666(5)deg
85365(6)deg
47063(6)
2
1149
0298
1750
019 x 013 x 011
327 to 2500deg
-17lt=hlt=17
-17lt=klt=18
-27lt=llt=27
41022
16531 [R(int) = 00735]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09679 and 09455
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
16531 284 1112
0908
R1 = 00558 wR2 = 01021
R1 = 01075 wR2 = 01128
0688 and -0448
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
10532(3) pm
20258(5) pm
18990(5) pm
90deg
10542(3)deg
90deg
39060(19)
4
1347
1927
1648
012 x 008 x 005
322 to 2500deg
-6lt=hlt=12
-22lt=klt=24
-22lt=llt=21
16887
6870 [R(int) = 01353]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 073478
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6870 213 498
1044
R1 = 00912 wR2 = 01786
R1 = 01680 wR2 = 02282
0570 and -1404
Appendix
- 149 -
Table 738 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 40-exo 41 42
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
165582(11) pm
127695(7) pm
198175(12) pm
90deg
107428(7)deg
90deg
39979(4)
4
1316
1883
1648
012 x 011 x 009
337 to 2499deg
-16lt=hlt=19
-15lt=klt=15
-23lt=llt=23
29049
7015 [R(int) = 00329]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 052405
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7015 0 436
1065
R1 = 00263 wR2 = 00574
R1 = 00318 wR2 = 00595
0357 and -0360
C45 H59 Co Fe N4 Si2
82692
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
119176(7) pm
160794(9) pm
220424(13) pm
90deg
94402(5)deg
90deg
42115(4)
4
1304
0831
1752
015 x 013 x 007
323 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=17
-16lt=llt=26
17786
7404 [R(int) = 01111]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 075122
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7404 0 490
1052
R1 = 00717 wR2 = 01045
R1 = 01208 wR2 = 01181
0467 and -0370
C45 H59 Co Fe Ge2 N4
91592
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121662(3) pm
160596(3) pm
220073(5) pm
90deg
93549(2)deg
90deg
429163(16)
4
1418
2134
1896
015 x 011 x 008
336 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=19
-26lt=llt=26
33743
7539 [R(int) = 00521]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 068509
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7539 0 521
1259
R1 = 00400 wR2 = 00965
R1 = 00536 wR2 = 01000
0376 and -0373
Appendix
- 150 -
Atomic coordinates of four unpublished compounds 20 22 23 and 33 are shown in
following tables
Table 739 Atomic coordinates (times10
4) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 20 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
N(1) 1159(1) 1176(1) 6836(1) 20(1)
C(1) 1706(2) 1650(1) 6995(1) 21(1)
N(2) -1293(2) 1547(1) 7057(1) 23(1)
C(2) 789(2) 2089(1) 7078(1) 20(1)
C(3) -626(2) 2021(1) 7158(1) 20(1)
C(4) 3331(2) 1741(1) 7112(2) 29(1)
C(5) 3920(2) 2283(1) 7590(2) 34(1)
C(6) 2795(2) 2681(1) 6772(2) 35(1)
C(7) 1375(2) 2643(1) 7102(2) 27(1)
C(8) -1522(2) 2482(1) 7295(2) 21(1)
C(9) -2759(2) 2643(1) 6227(2) 27(1)
C(10) -3571(2) 3077(1) 6331(2) 33(1)
C(11) -3169(2) 3358(1) 7498(2) 35(1)
C(12) -1948(2) 3199(1) 8573(2) 32(1)
C(13) -1133(2) 2765(1) 8467(2) 27(1)
C(14) -2537(2) 1417(1) 7503(2) 35(1)
C(15) -3250(3) 920(1) 6823(2) 61(1)
C(16) -1974(3) 1344(1) 9002(2) 65(1)
C(17) 2080(2) 741(1) 6834(2) 20(1)
C(18) 2353(2) 597(1) 5670(2) 23(1)
C(19) 3237(2) 160(1) 5724(2) 29(1)
C(20) 3821(2) -131(1) 6867(2) 32(1)
C(21) 3480(2) -1(1) 7977(2) 29(1)
C(22) 2598(2) 427(1) 7984(2) 23(1)
C(23) 2150(2) 562(1) 9174(2) 28(1)
C(24) 2101(2) 91(1) 10028(2) 39(1)
C(25) 3156(2) 987(1) 10029(2) 42(1)
C(26) 1602(2) 885(1) 4374(2) 29(1)
C(27) 2645(3) 974(1) 3586(2) 53(1)
C(28) 195(3) 588(1) 3539(2) 54(1)
Appendix
- 151 -
Table 7310 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 22 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 4751(1) 5279(1) 3913(1) 24(1)
Cl(1) 4863(1) 7474(1) 3443(1) 35(1)
O(1) 2591(1) 5468(1) 4187(1) 20(1)
N(1) 4469(2) 5098(1) 2623(1) 17(1)
C(1) 3006(2) 5278(2) 2582(1) 16(1)
N(2) 1482(2) 7765(2) 2375(1) 20(1)
C(2) 2432(2) 5062(2) 1801(1) 21(1)
C(3) 1144(2) 4228(2) 2174(2) 31(1)
C(4) -158(2) 4793(2) 2933(2) 30(1)
C(5) 534(2) 4844(2) 3741(1) 21(1)
C(6) 1810(2) 5684(2) 3440(1) 17(1)
C(7) 1063(2) 7152(2) 3205(1) 18(1)
C(8) 820(2) 9172(2) 2096(1) 26(1)
C(9) 397(3) 9344(2) 1159(2) 40(1)
C(10) 2058(3) 9950(2) 2035(2) 43(1)
C(11) -95(2) 7719(2) 3998(1) 18(1)
C(12) 434(2) 8108(2) 4652(1) 22(1)
C(13) -648(2) 8637(2) 5376(1) 27(1)
C(14) -2259(2) 8769(2) 5459(2) 30(1)
C(15) -2795(2) 8370(2) 4815(2) 30(1)
C(16) -1724(2) 7845(2) 4085(1) 24(1)
C(17) 5786(2) 4690(2) 1889(1) 19(1)
C(18) 6546(2) 3361(2) 1997(1) 22(1)
C(19) 7868(2) 3005(2) 1310(2) 28(1)
C(20) 8423(2) 3902(2) 552(2) 29(1)
C(21) 7656(2) 5209(2) 464(1) 26(1)
C(22) 6329(2) 5635(2) 1128(1) 21(1)
C(23) 5549(2) 7085(2) 991(2) 26(1)
C(24) 6701(3) 7932(2) 989(2) 41(1)
C(25) 4931(3) 7520(2) 84(2) 40(1)
C(26) 6001(2) 2315(2) 2820(2) 27(1)
C(27) 5775(3) 1139(2) 2495(2) 40(1)
C(28) 7175(3) 1863(2) 3471(2) 38(1)
Appendix
- 152 -
Table 7311 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 23 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 967(1) 7605(1) 1823(1) 18(1)
Cl(1) 1020(1) 9314(1) 2345(1) 29(1)
N(1) 1401(1) 6550(2) 2449(1) 19(1)
C(1) 1534(1) 5601(2) 2029(2) 16(1)
Cl(2) 198(1) 7116(1) 1640(1) 31(1)
N(2) 1101(1) 7630(2) 909(1) 15(1)
C(2) 1548(1) 5691(2) 1285(2) 15(1)
C(3) 1442(1) 6764(2) 777(2) 14(1)
C(4) 1615(1) 6867(2) 172(2) 19(1)
C(5) 1945(1) 5989(2) -42(2) 26(1)
C(6) 2098(1) 4966(2) 547(2) 22(1)
C(7) 1669(1) 4652(2) 844(2) 21(1)
C(8) 1625(1) 4444(2) 2470(2) 17(1)
C(9) 1229(1) 3875(2) 2611(2) 23(1)
C(10) 1291(1) 2785(2) 2983(2) 29(1)
C(11) 1764(2) 2263(3) 3232(2) 32(1)
C(12) 2169(1) 2832(3) 3121(2) 30(1)
C(13) 2101(1) 3920(2) 2737(2) 22(1)
C(14) 1621(1) 6630(2) 3327(2) 20(1)
C(15) 1219(1) 6848(3) 3699(2) 32(1)
C(16) 2052(1) 7524(2) 3583(2) 34(1)
C(17) 833(1) 8395(2) 248(2) 17(1)
C(18) 1019(1) 9542(2) 207(2) 19(1)
C(19) 745(1) 10248(3) -431(2) 29(1)
C(20) 315(1) 9844(3) -1011(2) 36(1)
C(21) 147(1) 8718(3) -973(2) 33(1)
C(22) 399(1) 7960(2) -350(2) 20(1)
C(23) 215(1) 6700(2) -377(2) 23(1)
C(24) 329(1) 6020(3) -1045(2) 34(1)
C(25) -341(1) 6612(3) -475(2) 31(1)
C(26) 1517(1) 10001(2) 789(2) 22(1)
C(27) 1914(1) 10083(3) 375(2) 32(1)
C(28) 1463(1) 11198(2) 1144(2) 36(1)
Appendix
- 153 -
Table 7312 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 33 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Sn(1) 4689(1) 4918(1) 3222(1) 24(1)
Sn(2) 5822(1) 5994(1) 1674(1) 30(1)
Cl(1) 4488(3) 6215(2) 3883(1) 38(1)
Cl(2) 3266(2) 3378(2) 3638(1) 39(1)
Cl(3) 7188(2) 7769(2) 1449(1) 43(1)
Cl(4) 6104(3) 5090(3) 888(1) 57(1)
Si(1) 6825(2) 4259(2) 3587(1) 17(1)
Si(2) 8610(3) 6420(2) 3531(1) 28(1)
Si(3) 9814(2) 4466(2) 3664(1) 26(1)
Si(4) 3648(2) 6680(2) 1375(1) 21(1)
Si(5) 1981(3) 4463(2) 1299(1) 30(1)
Si(6) 649(3) 6348(2) 1247(1) 30(1)
N(1) 6586(7) 2924(5) 3299(3) 20(2)
N(2) 6484(6) 3264(5) 4080(3) 16(2)
N(3) 8389(7) 5001(5) 3582(3) 23(2)
N(4) 3751(7) 7937(6) 1722(3) 22(2)
N(5) 3959(8) 7800(6) 936(3) 27(2)
N(6) 2102(7) 5865(6) 1329(3) 24(2)
C(1) 6258(8) 2470(7) 3742(4) 24(2)
C(2) 5630(8) 1296(7) 3832(3) 20(2)
C(3) 4328(9) 879(7) 3742(4) 30(2)
C(4) 3826(11) -209(8) 3826(4) 44(3)
C(5) 4613(12) -855(8) 3977(4) 47(3)
C(6) 5921(13) -450(9) 4064(4) 54(3)
C(7) 6446(10) 640(8) 3992(4) 36(3)
C(8) 6469(9) 2487(7) 2787(3) 22(2)
C(9) 7183(11) 3385(8) 2465(4) 43(3)
C(10) 5041(10) 2180(9) 2612(4) 44(3)
C(11) 7093(12) 1524(8) 2741(4) 49(3)
C(12) 6251(9) 3286(8) 4625(3) 26(2)
C(13) 4851(10) 2720(9) 4759(4) 48(3)
C(14) 7218(10) 2783(8) 4908(4) 39(3)
C(15) 6455(10) 4474(7) 4759(4) 31(2)
C(16) 7585(10) 6750(8) 3014(4) 43(3)
C(17) 8192(11) 7005(8) 4123(4) 44(3)
C(18) 10317(10) 7108(8) 3367(5) 55(4)
C(19) 10809(9) 4684(9) 3087(4) 39(3)
C(20) 9461(9) 3008(7) 3775(4) 30(2)
Appendix
- 154 -
C(21) 10726(10) 5062(9) 4232(4) 41(3)
C(22) 4144(9) 8514(7) 1315(3) 22(2)
C(23) 4603(10) 9700(7) 1286(3) 30(2)
C(24) 5918(10) 10173(8) 1332(4) 36(3)
C(25) 6315(12) 11289(9) 1292(4) 46(3)
C(26) 5453(14) 11926(9) 1203(4) 50(3)
C(27) 4158(14) 11457(9) 1158(4) 52(3)
C(28) 3726(12) 10336(8) 1194(4) 41(3)
C(29) 3829(9) 8261(7) 2260(3) 24(2)
C(30) 3041(13) 9101(10) 2358(4) 65(4)
C(31) 3223(10) 7251(8) 2537(4) 41(3)
C(32) 5223(10) 8649(10) 2438(4) 59(4)
C(33) 4252(10) 7910(8) 398(3) 30(2)
C(34) 3489(13) 8669(11) 158(4) 67(4)
C(35) 3812(13) 6813(9) 170(4) 60(4)
C(36) 5705(11) 8321(11) 315(4) 63(4)
C(37) 3040(11) 4003(8) 1778(4) 49(3)
C(38) 2431(11) 4059(8) 669(4) 44(3)
C(39) 310(10) 3713(8) 1447(5) 48(3)
C(40) -433(9) 5964(9) 1795(4) 43(3)
C(41) 921(10) 7835(9) 1209(4) 48(3)
C(42) -186(11) 5795(10) 650(4) 57(4)
C(43) -180(17) 209(14) 3445(7) 59(3)
C(44) -1099(17) -417(14) 3132(7) 58(3)
C(45) -949(16) -322(14) 2634(7) 58(2)
C(46) 75(15) 387(13) 2440(7) 58(2)
C(47) 979(17) 1008(14) 2750(6) 60(2)
C(48) 829(17) 908(15) 3251(7) 60(3)
C(49) 210(20) 473(17) 1887(7) 58(3)
C(43A) 798(17) 917(14) 2044(7) 58(3)
C(44A) 1381(17) 1418(14) 2465(7) 59(3)
C(45A) 931(16) 1088(14) 2929(7) 59(3)
C(46A) -134(15) 231(13) 2969(7) 58(2)
C(47A) -748(17) -263(14) 2547(6) 58(2)
C(48A) -289(17) 75(14) 2084(7) 58(2)
C(49A) -640(20) -111(17) 3469(8) 60(3)
C(50) 120(20) -463(18) -179(10) 106(6)
C(51) -640(30) -620(20) 236(10) 106(6)
C(52) -730(20) 250(20) 530(10) 107(6)
C(53) -70(30) 1260(20) 404(11) 109(6)
C(54) 680(20) 1409(19) -10(11) 107(6)
C(55) 780(30) 558(19) -303(11) 106(6)
C(56) 250(30) -1390(20) -499(12) 120(7)
Appendix
- 155 -
C(57) 575(16) 499(14) 4873(6) 52(3)
C(58) 807(18) -512(14) 4941(8) 53(3)
C(59) -138(17) -1326(14) 5128(7) 55(3)
C(60) -1333(18) -1140(15) 5253(8) 57(3)
C(61) -1572(16) -130(15) 5187(7) 56(3)
C(62) -620(17) 686(15) 5000(8) 53(3)
C(63) 1600(20) 1369(17) 4669(9) 59(5)
Appendix
- 156 -
74 Publications in this dissertation
1 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Stephan Enthaler and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167-6171 Angew Chem 2012 124 6271-6275
Bis(silylenyl)- and Bis(germylenyl)-Substituted Ferrocenes Synthesis Structure and Catalytic
Applications of Bidentate Silicon(II)-Cobalt Complex
2 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Elisabeth Irran and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691-3694 Angew Chem 2012 124 3751-3754
Synthesis and unexpected coordination of a silicon(II)-based SiCSi pincerlike arene to
palladium
3 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 6490-6494
Reactivity of N-Heterocyclic germylene toward ammonia and water
4 Shenglai Yao Yun Xiong Wenyuan Wang and Matthias Driess
Chem Eur J 2011 17 4890-4895
Synthesis structure and reactivity of a pyridine-stabilized germanone
5 Shigeyoshi Inoue Wenyuan Wang Carsten Praesang Matthew Asay Elisabeth Irran and
Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 2868ndash2871
An ylide-like phosphasilene and striking formation of a 4π-electron resonance-stabilized 24-
disila-13-diphosphacyclo- butadiene
6 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890ndash15892
An isolable bis-silylene oxide (ldquodisilylenoxanerdquo) and its metal coordination
7 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Chem Commun 2009 2661ndash2663
An unsymmetric substituted digermylene with a Ge(I)ndashGe(I) bond and synthesis of a
germylenendashstannylene with a Ge(I)ndashSn(I) bond
8 Wenyuan Wang Shenglai Yao Christoph van Wuellen and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640ndash9641
A cyclopentadienide analogue containing divalent germanium and a heavy cyclobutadiene-
like dianion with an unusual Ge4 Core
Appendix
- 157 -
75 Curriculum Vitae
Personal Data
Date and Place of Birth 17th
January 1976 in Nei Mongol China
Nationality Chinese
Education
1982-1987 Elementary School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1987-1993 High School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1993-1997 Department of Chemistry Inner Mongolia Normal University (China)
Bachelor Chemistry
071997 Bachelor of Chemistry education
2003-2007 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
Diplom Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
012008 Diplom of Science Degree
2008-2012 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
PhD Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
Herein I affirm that this dissertation was finished independently at the ldquoInstitut fuumlr
Chemierdquo at the ldquoTechnischen Universitaumlt Berlinrdquo under the guidance of
Prof Dr Matthias Driess where all references and additional aid sources have been
appropriately cited
Wenyuan Wang
Berlin Juli 2012
Table of contents
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds 1
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements 5
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores 8
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands 16
2 MOTIVATION 21
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 23
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates 23
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4 23
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8 28
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5 30
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6 34
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8 35
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8 36
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8 38
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene 40
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands 40
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16 42
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O 45
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23 48
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28 51
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28 52
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel 55
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31 57
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30 59
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31 61
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 65
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34 68
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35 68
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII complex 36 71
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism 74
Table of contents
ii
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 76
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40 76
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40 80
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45 83
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts 85
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 89
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION 98
51 General section 98
52 Analytical methods 99
53 Starting Materials 101
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds 102
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4 102
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5 103
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6 104
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8 105
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 107
526 The new chlorogermylene 14 108
527 The new germylene 16 109
528 Aminogermylene 17 110
529 Germylene hydroxide 18 111
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20 112
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22 113
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23 114
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27 115
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28 116
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29 117
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30 118
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31 119
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 120
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35 120
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36 121
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38 123
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40 124
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41 125
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42 126
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44 127
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45 128
Table of contents
iii
6 REFERENCES 129
7 APPENDIX 138
71 Abbreviations 138
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation 139
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details 142
74 Publications in this dissertation 156
75 Curriculum Vitae 157
Introduction
- 1 -
1 INTRODUCTION
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds
Generally main-group elements higher than of the third period are classified as
ldquoheavy main-group elementsrdquo some of which show abnormal physical and chemical
properties For example Br(VII) is a stronger oxidant than Cl(VII) This different
behavior of high-valent main-group elements can be attributed to the relativistic
effect[1]
of electrons The contraction of all s-orbitals triggered by the relativistic effect
leads to a greater energy difference between s- and p-orbitals in higher period
elements which increases the difficulty of a sp-hybridation Moreover the energy
difference between s- and p-orbitals for elements in the d-district of the fourth period
and f-district of the sixth period vary unconventionally resulting in the so called
ldquosecondary periodicityrdquo of forth and sixth period elements Therefore ns2 electrons in
the valence shell of heavy main-group elements play an essential role for their
chemical properties[2]
During the organometallic research of main group elements a
series of novel compounds have been discovered and new synthetic methods as well
as theoretical insights in their chemistry have been developed and summarized[3]
In whole periodic table the difference of property in the group 14 elements (tetrels)
is maximal[4]
In comparison to carbon compounds of Si Ge Sn and Pb are very
different referring to the physical properties chemical behavior and structural features
The theory for carbon chemistry cannot be fit for the chemistry of heavy group 14
elements A typical example is the synthesis of compounds with a silicon-oxygen
double bond (Si=O silanone) Beginning last century the english chemist Frederic
Stanley Kipping manufactured many silicon-carbon compounds and discovered
thereby resin-like products which he called ldquosilicone of ketonesrdquo Kipping coined the
word ldquosiliconerdquo in 1901 to describe polydiphenylsiloxane by analogy of its formula
(Ph2SiO) with the formula of the ketone benzophenone (Ph2CO) Kipping was well
Introduction
- 2 -
aware that polydiphenylsiloxane is polymeric whereas benzophenone is monomeric
and noted that ldquosiliconerdquo and Ph2CO had very different chemistry[5]
The german chemist Richard Muumlller and the american chemist Eugene G Rochow
found almost at the same time a possibility for the industrial production of
dimethyldichlorosilane (Me2SiCl2) the most important precursor for the production of
the silicone in the 1940s[6]
The procedure today is called Muumlller Rochow synthesis
(Scheme 11) From that many researchers synthesized various silicone products but
crystallographically characterized complexes with a donor-stabilized Si=O double
bond were published at the beginning of this century by our group These are the
silanoic ester I1[7]
the carbene-coordinated silanone I2[8]
and the ketone-coordinated
silanone I3[9]
(Scheme 12) The Si=O double bond distance (1532 pm) in I3 is shorter
than the ones in I1 (1579 pm) and I2 (1541 pm) and represents the shortest Si-O
distance in all molecular Si=O compounds hitherto reported[10]
Scheme 11 Muumlller Rochow silicone synthesis
Scheme 12 Isolable donor-stabilized silanoic ester I1 and silanone I2 and I3
The hundred-year story of silicones to monomeric species bearing Si=O double
bonds shows that the silicon atom prefers σ-bonds over double bond (σ- and π-bonds)
That means the classical π-bond is not of first choice for heavy main-group
elements[11]
In other words not only E=X (E = heavy main-group elements X = C N
O) but also E=Ersquo (Ersquo = heavy main-group elements) systems are difficult to stabilize
Introduction
- 3 -
because they easily form σ-bonded corresponding polymers Consequently it is very
challenging to study compounds of heavy main group elements in their low oxidation
state Especially the study of divalent Si Ge and Sn compounds with lone pair
electrons (metallylenes) is one of the most attractive research fields in contemporary
organometallic chemistry[3 12]
In the past thirty years numerous thermally stable unsaturated Si Ge Sn
compounds were isolated which show extremely impressive chemistry[12d 13]
The
difference between C-C and Si-Si double bond is now well-understood[3a]
Very
different reaction mechanisms for the formation of such doubly-bonded carbon and
silicon compounds were throughly discussed The classical C-C double bond can
readily be explained by the valence bond theory and hybridization[14]
The bonding
state in those heavier alkene analogues can be explained by two sets of ns2rarrp
0 donor-
acceptor interactions between two metallylene monomers (Scheme 1 3)[3 15]
Similarly heavier alkyne analogues of main-group elements present also two dative
bonds of ns2rarrp
0 donor-acceptor interactions plus a normal σ-bond between two pz
orbitals[3 12d]
(Scheme 13) But the sp-hybridization for heavy main-group elements
is not realized in their low-valent compounds because sp-hybridization does not lead
to strengthing of terminal σ-bonds to the ligands R
Scheme 13 Nonclassical multiple bond features (E = heavy main-group elements)
Introduction
- 4 -
Until the end of the last century the synthesis of heavier alkyne analogues was an
unsolved problem because of the lack of suitable large substituent At the first the
isolation of a diplumbylene I4[16]
ArrsquoPb-PbArrsquo (Arrsquo = 26-(Tip)2C6H3 Tip = 246-
iPr3C6H2) was reported by Power in 2000 (Scheme 14) As is evident from the
structural parameters of ArPb-PbAr the triple bond character has vanished completely
The Pb-Pb distance (319 pm) in ArPb-PbAr is longer even than that of a normal Pb-
Pb single bond (308 pm) and the CAr-Pb bond vectors are perpendicular to the Pb-Pb
axes (943deg) These two facts illustrated a complete lack of hybridization of lead
atoms and almost exclusive use of p-orbitals in σ-bonds[17]
In 2002 Power reported
the distannyne ArSnequivSnAr I5[18]
(Ar = 26-Dip2C6H3 Dip = 26-iPr2C6H3) containing
a SnequivSn bond length of 2668 pm shorter compared to Sn-Sn single bonds[19]
and
with multiple bond character A trans bent configuration was also observed in I5 but
the Sn-Sn-C angle with 1252deg is far from a perpendicular situation as in I4 In the
same year Power described the first digermyne I6[20]
ArGeequivGeAr In this case the
Ge-Ge bond length of 2285 pm was found to be considerably shorter than normal Ge-
Ge single[13f]
(244 pm) and Ge-Ge double bonds (221-246 pm) indicated multiple
bonding character[21]
The trans-bending angle of Ge-Ge-C (1288deg) in digermyne I6
is slightly larger than that in distannyne I5
Scheme 14 The first isolated formal alkyne analogues of group 14
Introduction
- 5 -
With the appearance of the first structurally characterized disilyne I7[22]
reported by
Sekiguchi the series of heavier alkyne congeners was completed in 2004 The SiequivSi
bond length with 2062 pm was considerably shorter than that of typical Si-Si single
bonds (235 pm) and somewhat shorter than that of typical Si-Si double bonds[13b]
(216 pm) The molecular structure of compound I7 with a Si-Si-Silyl angle of 1374deg
reveals a heavily trans-bent configuration indicating the presence of a nonclassical
triple bond The theoretical calculation approved the trans bent structure and a bond
order of three
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements
Isolable carbenes and heavier carbene analogues (metallylenes silylenes R2Si
germylenes R2Ge stannylenes R2Sn plumbylenes R2Pb) can be defined as
stabilized divalent monomers of group 14 elements which can impossibly dimerize or
polymerize continuously due to the thermodynamic andor kinetic stabilization As
already mentioned above in contrast to carbon heavier group 14 elements have a low
tendency of sp-hybridization[11]
Accordingly consists of ns2 valence electrons as a
lone pair and use usually three p-valence-orbitals for the formation of their divalent
species[12c]
The ground state of R2E (E = Si Ge Sn Pb) is thereby a singlet while
the ground state of R2C is a triplet (Scheme 15) because two nonbonding electrons
locate in sp-hybrid orbitals[23]
In order to obtain at ambient temperature isolable metallylenes there are today two
particularly effective stabilization methods First of all these unsaturated compounds
can be thermodynamically stabilized by donor electron delocalization to empty p-
orbital as in the case of silylene I8[24]
and silyliumylidene cation I9[25]
(Scheme 16)
In addition the coordination of ns2 electrons to the empty p-orbital of the neighbor
molecule can be kinetically prevented by bulky substituents which was shown by the
Introduction
- 6 -
successful synthesis of the dialkyl silylene I10[26]
that is stabilized only by the steric
hindrance of four large silyl groups and C-SirarrSi hyperconjugation
Scheme 15 Ground states of triplet-carbene and singlet-metallylenes
Scheme 16 Stabilization of silylenes by π-electron delocalization andor steric
hindrance I8 I9 and hyperconjugation I10
The synthesis of heavier carbene analogues depends on suitable starting materials
with oxidation state II Practically in the case of tin and lead the dihalides SnCl2 and
PdCl2 are stable and suitable as starting materials for isolable SnII and Pb
II
organometallic compounds Many germylenes were synthesized employing the known
germanium dichloride complex GeCl2middotdioxane which is easily available[27]
The
carbene-stabilized SiIICl2
[28] (NHCrarrSiCl2 NHC = (HC-NDip)2C
[29]) was reported
recently by Roesky However it is not a trouble-free starting material for silicon(II)
chemistry due to the difficult removing of by-products derivated by the bulky carbene
(NHC) Otherwise divalent compounds of GeII Sn
II and Pb
II are more stable than the
corresponding SiII analogues Therefore the metallylene synthetic chemistry faces the
main difficulty in the synthesis and isolation of functionalized silylene derivates
Accustomed synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes was summarized in
Scheme 17 Their feasibility was also proved by the preparation of new silylenes in
this work
Introduction
- 7 -
Scheme 17 Synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes
Usually N-heteroleptic silylenes are accessible from SiIV
-precursors to form SiII-
species using reductants such as Na K or their alloy KC8 lithium or magnesium
naphthalenide etc A usually silylenes[24 26 30]
like I13 with a five- or six-membered
ring system and some three-coordinated silylenes[31]
like I14 are accessible through
the reductive dehalogenation reactions presented in case A Suitable five-coordinated
SiIV
sources I15 could be treated with a non oxygenated strong base resulting in the
corresponding three-coordinated silylenes[32]
I16 The two-coordinated silylene I13
prepared through an acid-base reaction from its four-coordinated precursor was not
observed so far In case C silylenes I18 could be isolated by salt metathesis reaction
during that the halogen atom was substituted by a desired Rsub[33]
With these new
synthetic methods the generation of many imaginable SiII molecules is possible today
Especially more complicated metallylenes for example interconnected or spacer-
separated bis-metallylenes (see next page) can be obtained in good yield Thus more
reactivity will be found in their subsequent reactions
Introduction
- 8 -
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores
The discussion of diplumbylene I4 indicates the strong tendency to transformate a
bis-metallylene instead of triple bond form in the case of lead Scheme 18 shows the
resonance structures of triply bonded I19 and bis-metallylene I20 together with the
donor ligand coordinated interconnected bis-metallylene structure I21 Hitherto the
chemical research in this area made clear that silicon and germanium prefer the type
of structure I19 while the species of lead is more favorable in the state I20[12d]
Corresponding tin species have vacillant structural feature between I19 and I20
depending on the steric demand of R and the packing force in crystals[34]
The donor
ligand coordination with all heavier alkyne analogues leads to the donor-stabilized
bis-metallylene form I21 which possesses an E-E single σ-bond and two ns2 lone
pairs one at each of the E centers[35]
Scheme 18 Resonance structures of nonclassical triple bond and bis-metallylene
According to the bonding state all known bis-metallylenes can be discriminated in
two different types i) ldquointerconnected bis-metallylenesrdquo in which two E atoms are
directly connected by a chemical bond and ii) ldquospacer-separated bis-metallylenesrdquo in
which two EII atoms are separated by bridged atoms or by a broad spacer without an
E-E bond in the molecules[33a 36]
The isolation of bis-metallylenes of heavier group
14 elements has been a major synthetic challenge owing to their tendency to
polymerize Herein a review of this kind of compounds which appeared almost
suddenly just in the last two decades is given
Introduction
- 9 -
Interconnected bis-metallylenes
Interconnected bis-silylenes are shown in Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylene
examples were firstly reported by Robinson in 2008[35]
which are a carbene-stabilized
bis-silylene I22 with a SiI-Si
I bond (2393 pm) and a carbene-stabilized bis-silylene
I23 with a Si0=Si
0 double bond (2229 pm) One year later the Roesky group prepared
an interconnected bis-silylene I24[37]
stabilized by amidinato ligands with a SiI-Si
I
single bond (2413 pm) Compound I24 exhibits a gauche-bent geometry Another
amidinato donor-stabilized bis-silylene I25[38]
which was synthesized in last year by
Jones et al possesses trans-bent structure not the gauche-bent form The SiI-Si
I
distance (2489 pm) in I25 is longer than those in I22 and I24 because of the more
sterically hindered amidinato ligands In the same year the synthesis of the first
phosphine-stabilized bis-silylene I26[39]
could be achieved and fully characterized In
this molecule the Si-Si bond with the bond length of 2331 pm is visibly shorter than
those in related molecules Baceiredo et al described that the Si-Si fragment in I26
presents a certain multiple-bond character
Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylenes
Interconnected bis-germylenes are shown in Scheme 110 In 2006 Jones and
coworkers reported the first successful isolation of two stable bis-germylenes I27 and
Introduction
- 10 -
I28[40]
which are stabilized by an amidinate and a guanidinate ligand respectively
Their Ge-Ge distances (2672 and 2638 pm) show normal single bond character Two
years later Roesky prepared the bis-germylenes I29[41]
which exhibits a gauche-bent
geometry Since I29 is stabilized by a less bulky amidinate ligands the Ge-Ge bond
with the length of 2569 pm is shorter than those of examples before A different β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized bis-germylene I30[42]
was presented by the work group
of Leung in which the Ge-Ge bond length (2602 pm) is somewhere in between The
reduction of NHCrarrGeCl2 (NHC see Scheme 110) employing magnesium(I)
reagents[43]
furnished the carbene-stabilized bis-germylene I31[44]
with a Ge0=Ge
0
double bond (2349 pm) which is the homologous compound of I23 Theoretical
analyses of I31 suggest a singlet germanium(0) dimer (Ge=Ge) datively coordinated
by two NHC ligands In the last year Jones again reported a bis-germylene I32[38]
which is structurally comparable with I27 and I28 But the Ge-Ge distance in I32 is
similar with that of I30
Scheme 110 Interconnected bis-germylenes
Interconnected bis-stannylenes are shown in Scheme 111 Very interestingly the
introduction of SiMe3 instead of H at the para-position of the aryl ring in distannyne
I5 induced the first bis-stannylene I33[34]
without alteration of the steric crowding
near the tin center The small Sn-Sn-C angle (993deg) and the long Sn-Sn distance
(3066 pm) in I33 indicate two stannylene moieties connected with a single bond and
Introduction
- 11 -
without the sp-hybridization In the similar work of Power et al in 2010 the
introduction of GeMe3 substituents of aryl rings at the para-position resulted also in
single bonded bis-stannylene I34[45]
with Sn-Sn distances of 3077 pm and ldquosharprdquo
Sn-Sn-C bending angles of 978deg With the bis-stannylene I35[46]
Jambor showed that
without the use of bulky substituents such as 26-disubstituted aryl groups a bis-
stannylene can be stabilized by intramolecular NrarrSn interactions The less bulky
aryls (aryl = 26-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3) in I35 led to the shorter Sn-Sn single bond (2971
pm) and a trans-bent angle of 943deg as in the diplumbylene I4 The first amidinato
coordinated bis-stannylene I36[38]
with a Sn-Sn single bond was reported by Jones et
al last year Its structural features are highly similar to the germanium homologue
compound I32
Scheme 111 Interconnected bis-stannylenes
Spacer-separated bis-metallylenes and species containing several EII cores
Lappert and Veith reported on the isolation of divalent germanium and tin
compounds very early[47]
Many of these from the 1970s and 1980s that were
described without X-ray characterization will not be discussed here The spacer-
separated bis-germylene I37[48]
and bis-stannylene I38[48]
(Scheme 112) appeared
first of all of this compound class in 1988 The work group of Veith introduced a facile
Introduction
- 12 -
synthetic method by which tetralithium amide reacted with two equivalents of
GeCl2middotdioxane or SnCl2 to give the corresponding products in over 60 yield In 1990
two interesting germylenes I39[49]
and I41[50]
were reported by Lappert and Power In
comparison to the isolable isonitrile (R-N+equivC
minus) until now it was not possible to
stabilize its homologous derivates of the heavier group 14 elements Compounds I39
and I41 can be considered as the dimer (I39) and trimer (I41) formed after
oligomerization of the unstable germaisonitrile analogue (R-N+equivGe
minus) Nevertheless
compounds with two germylene moieties at the time could be seen as impressive
achievements in the divalent germanium chemistry Another dimer of germaisonitrile
bis-germylene I40[51]
was reported by Roesky in 1997 After this the first stable
dimeric silaisonitrile I42[52]
generated through the reduction of carbene stabilized
dichlorosilaimine (NHCrarrSi(Cl2)=NAr Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) with KC8 was presented
by the work group of Roesky in 2011 The lengthy synthetic protocol bulky protecting
groups and a low yield (21) of I42 indicate a more difficult synthetic chemistry
necessary for the synthesis of the latter silicon compound However a trimer (tris-
silylene) of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) the silicon analogue of I41 is now just a dream of
synthetic chemists
In 1991 two bis-stannylenes (micro-chlorotin(II) amides (micro-Cl-Sn-NR2)2) I43 (NR2 =
N(CMe2)2(CH2)3) and I44 (R = SiMe3) in which two stannylene moieties are bridged
by two chlorine atoms were synthesized by Lappert et al[53]
Surprisingly X-ray
analyses of the two crystals show that I43 is the cis-isomer but I44 has the trans-
configuration In contrast a new bis-stannylene (ClSn-micro-N(Naph)SiMe3)2 I45[54]
was
characterized with two bridged nitrogen atoms by the same work group The Sn-N
bonds of 2438 pm in I45 are much longer than the terminal Sn-N bonds of 2069 pm
in I44 The Sn-N-Sn-N ring in I45 is slightly puckered and bears trans-Cl atoms
Instead of halogen atoms in bis-germylene I46[55]
two terminal N atoms of the azide
groups bridge two germylene parts forming a planar four-membered Ge2N2 ring
Otherwise the germylene centers of I46 are tetracoordinated due to two additional
OrarrGe dative bonds The N-bridged three-core germylenes I47 and stannylenes I48
Introduction
- 13 -
were prepared by Veith in 1991[56]
For four of six molecules X-ray crystal structure
determinations have been carried out which reveal the molecules to be built of a
diamond-lattice-like skeleton The top N atom coordinates to all three germylene
(stannylene) parts and another N atoms bridge with the neighboring two germylene
(stannylene) parts The chair-form six-membered E3N3 ring contains three N-H bonds
and traps one halogen atom (Cl Br I) with the three hydrogen atoms
Scheme 112 Spacer-separated metallylenes I37-I48
The by 14-diamine molecules separated bis-stannylenes I50 and I51 were prepared
from the chlorostannylene dimer I44 and the corresponding dilithium diamide by
Lappert and co-workers in 1994 (Scheme 113)[57]
Bis-germylene I49 was similarly
prepared by the reaction of the GeII homologous derivate ClGeN(SiMe3)2 of I44 with
dilithium diaminobenzene and marked a new development at that time In 1997
Lappert et al reported a new 13-diamine bridged bis-stannylene I52 and a stannylene
I53 with the three SnII cores employing dilithium meta-diamide
[58] The synthesis of
I52 is similar to I50 while I53 was isolated by treatment of the substituted
Introduction
- 14 -
diaminobenzene with Sn(N(SiMe3)2)2 in a ratio of 23 Evidently the formation of I53
involves unexpected C-H activations of the 2-position of 13-diaminobenzene and
eliminations of amine HN(SiMe3)2 The 32 reaction of Sn(NMe2)2 with sterically
bulky aromatic amines (DipNH2 or MesNH2) in toluene can be controlled giving the
heteroleptic stannylenes I54 and I55[59]
in which sterically less bulky NMe2 groups
serve as bridges and one SnII center between two bulky R groups remains its two-
coordination The isolation of the first GeII and Sn
II amide dimers I56 and I57
bridged by the NH2 groups was presented in 2005[60]
They were synthesized by the
reaction of bulky low-valent organo GeII and Sn
II halides (ArE
IICl E = Ge Sn Ar see
Scheme 113) with dry ammonia The Ge2N2 or Sn2N2 cores in I56 and I57 are planar
with rhombohedral shapes and with acute angles near 80deg at Ge or Sn and wider
angles near 100deg at N
Wright 1997
I54 R = Mes I55 R = Dip
I52 Lappert 1997
SnNMe2
Sn
Me2N
NR
NR
NN
SiMe3
E
(Me3Si)2N
E
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
N
N
SiMe3
Sn
(Me3Si)2N
Sn
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
Lappert 1994
I49 E = Ge I50 E = Sn I51 Lappert 1994
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
I53 Lappert 1997
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
Sn
Sn
Power 2005
I56 E = Ge R = Dip
I57 E = Sn R = Tip
R
RE
NH2
E
H2N
R
R
Scheme 113 Spacer-separated metallylenes I49-I57
The discovery of the first spacer-separated bis-silylene I58 (Scheme 114) was
made by Lappert et al in 2005[61]
It was synthesized by reductive dehalogenation of
the bis-dichlorosilane precursor with KC8 With the bis-functionality of I58
eventually a macrocycle metal-complex could be formed but the rigid backbone does
not allow a chelating coordination to a single core In addition Power tried oxidative
Introduction
- 15 -
addition reactions of his Sn and Ge alkyne analogues (I5 and I6 Scheme 114) with
trimethyl silyl azide (Me3SiN3) and adamantanyl azide (Ada-N3) giving the spacer (N-
SiMe3 or N-Ada) separated bis-stannylenes I59[62]
and bis-germylene I60[63]
and with
azobenzene (PhN=NPh) giving the spacer (PhNNPh) separated bis-germylene I61[62]
and bis-stannylene I62[62]
respectively The similar reaction of bis-germylene I29
with azobenzene furnished also the addition product the spacer bridged bis-
germylene I63[64]
with simultaneous cleavage of the Ge-Ge single bond as observed
by Roesky in 2010 At the same time So et al activated the Si-Si single bond of bis-
silylene I24 with phenyl acetylene resulting in the ethylene bridged bis-silylene I64[65]
Many spacer separated bis-germylenes and bis-stannylenes[66]
(I65-I74) were
successfully designed and isolated by Hahn et al for the use as promising chelating
ligands in coordination reactions A few transition-metal complexes of them were
prepared by his research group too (see p 18)
Scheme 114 Spacer-separated metallylenes I58-I74
In 2011 after the synthesis of the first oxygen bridged bis-silylene[32a]
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2
minus) in the course of this PhD work other four analogous were reported
Introduction
- 16 -
which are oxygen bridged bis-germylenes I75[67]
I77[68]
bis-stannylene I78[68]
and
sulfur bridged bis-germylene I76[67]
(Scheme 115) Bis-germylene oxide I75 and
sulfide I76 were synthesized in the work group of So et al by the dehalogenation of
LGeCl (L = amidinate in I75) with KC8 and then the oxidation with trimethylamine
N-oxide (Me3NO) or with elemental sulfur Otherwise Powerrsquos new compounds I77
and I78 were accessible by oxidative addition of alkyne analogues I5 and I6 using the
stoichiometric oxygen transfer reagent pyridine N-oxide (C5H5NO) In the last two
decades several cubanes of attractive tetra-metallylenes with GeII Sn
II Pb
II like I79
were presented[69]
(Scheme 116) Because they are somewhat far from discussed
metallylenes in structural features and synthetic approaches they are not discussed
and shown in detail here The synthesis of the still unknown SiII analogue I80 a
tetramer of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) remains as a fascinating challenge
Scheme 115 New bis-metallylenes bridged by a single atom
Scheme 116 Cubane-like tetra-metallylenes of heavier group 14 elements
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands
The interaction between the central atom and the donor in transition-metal
complexes depends on their electron configuration There are two- and three-
coordinated metallylenes in which the empty np-orbitals are stabilized by
Introduction
- 17 -
intramolecular electron delocalization or by the third donor-ligand donation
respectively Therefore if two types of metallylenes serve as donor-ligands for
transition-metals the interaction of these p-orbitals with the corresponding metal d-
orbitals is essentially different For example two silylenerarrM complexes are shown
in Scheme 117 Complex I81 shows clearly σ-donorπ-acceptor interaction[70]
while
the Fe atom in complex I82[71]
contains only a σ-donor bond from the silylene subunit
In this sense three-coordinate metallylenes as σ-donor ligands are more similar to
isoelectronic triorganophosphine ligands[33a b]
in I83 (Scheme 117) In Table 11 the
difference of three-coordinate silylenes and triorganophosphines are compared and
shown in detail
Scheme 117 The σ-donorπ-acceptor or only σ-donor coordination
Table 11 Comparison of three-coordinate silylenes and phosphines
three-Coordinate silylenes Phosphines (PR3)[72]
Synthesis difficult synthetic approaches well-established synthetic procedures
Embellishment only few scaffolds are known numerous structural transformations
and various substituents of R
Stability air and moisture sensitive normally stable in air
Property easily oxidative addition
much stronger σ-donor ligand
multivariate chemical behavior
seldom oxidative addition
strong σ-donor ligand
predictable chemical behavior
Complex only few transition-metal complexes complexes with numerous metals
State of
Development
underdeveloped chemistry fully established
Introduction
- 18 -
In coordination chemistry the spacer separated bis-metallylenes are at the same
time bidentate chelating ligands despite almost all of them were not or could not be
used as chelating ligands Until 2008 only a few chelated transition-metal complexes
coordinated by isolable spacer separated bis-metallylenes were reported They are the
bis-germylene I65 coordinated Mo(CO)4 complex I65-Mo[66b]
and bis-stannylenes
I73 I74 coordinated Ni0 complexes
[66c] I73-Ni I74-Ni (Scheme 118) reported by
Hahn et al Another bis-germylene complex I29-Fe[64]
with two Fe cores presented
by Roesky in 2010 does not comprise chelating coordination at all The reason for the
lack of representative bis-metallylenes in coordination chemistry is that not only the
formation and isolation of such complexes are very difficult but also the design and
synthesis of bis-metallylenes themself are sometimes infeasible Additionally the air-
and water-sensitivity of these compounds causes many unexpected side-reactions In
general metallylene transition-metal complexes are still limited in using metallylenes
containing single EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn)
Scheme 118 Known complexes of spacer-separated bis-germylenes and stannylenes
The successful usage of bidentate phosphanes in many catalytic transformations
originates from their convenient electronic properties and the variable steric
protection Among those chelating bis-phosphane I84[73]
(BINAP Scheme 119) with
Introduction
- 19 -
backbone chirality can lead to excellent enantioselectivity compared to monodentate
phosphines With ferrocendiyl bridged ligands I85 bimetallic complexes are easily
prepared[74]
Furthermore bis-phosphane ligands like I86 are superior bridges for
heterodinuclear complexes in catalytic hydrogenation[75]
Pincer arenes consisting of
a central aromatic backbone linked to two phosphane parts by different spacers are
particularly attractive because of their feasible structural tuning with many choices of
donor groups[72 76]
Recently the chemistry of pincer-ligated transition-metal
complexes underwent rapid developments and has been used for several intriguing
chemical transformations[72b 77]
The coordination chemistry of the most common
pincer ligands such as NCN- PCP- and SCS-type ligands toward transition-metals in
I87 (Scheme 119) was explored extensively[72b 77]
Pincer arenes with stronger σ-
donor sites E than those provided by group 15 and 16 atoms are very attractive for the
synthesis of more electron-rich transition-metal complexes for activation of small
molecules On the other hand transition-metal complexes with ligands like I84-I87
containing EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn) were scarce before 2009
Scheme 119 Bidentate phosphanes for transition-metal complexes
The challenge of spacer-separated bis-metallylenes as novel bidentate σ-donor
ligands for transition-metal complexes are intriguing because of their unique structure
and their coordination ability Therefore transition-metal complexes with chelating
Introduction
- 20 -
bis-metallylenes which were not throughly uncovered[66b c 78]
have received more
and more attention To date the new development of bis-metallylene synthesis
enables the isolation of their transition-metal complexes containing EII-based
functional groups as chelating ligands These complexes may provide access to their
potential application in which they can play a key role as intermediates in transition-
metal catalyzed transformations[70c 79]
Motivation
- 21 -
2 MOTIVATION
As pointed out in the introduction the metallylene synthetic chemistry is a fast
developing field with a great potential to find novel metallylenes with new
functionalities which would be the basis for the development of new kinds of
transition-metal complexes I am particularly interested in the synthesis of new types
of compounds containing divalent group 14 elements and to study their coordination
properties towards transition-metals New metallylenes could serve as very strong σ-
donor ligands for the generation of transition-metal complexes with unusual high
electron density at the metal site which could possess unique chemical properties
The three reports of transition-metal complexes[66b c]
containing bidentate bis-
germylene (stannylene) ligands were discussed in the ldquoIntroductionrdquo of this work
This potential of bis-metallylenes used as chelating ligands in coordination chemistry
prompted me to investigate new transition-metal complexes along with the
development of a new low-valent Si Ge and Sn chemistry
In this work three main points will be addressed i) the design and synthesis of new
ligand stabilized heavier carbene analogous (metallylenes) and interconnected bis-
metallylenes containing low-valent Si Ge Sn ii) the exploration of synthetic
approaches towards different spacer separated (bridged) bis-metallylenes iii) the
investigation of the properties and coordination abilities of new metallylenes (bis-
metallylenes) to transition-metals
The β-diketiminato and amidinato scaffolds I and II were chosen for the
stabilization of the reactive divalent group 14 units (Scheme 21) The known
metallylene halogenide compounds[31a 32b 80]
III and IV were used as the direct
precursors for the preparation of novel mono- and bis-metallylene derivates
Motivation
- 22 -
Scheme 21 Synthesis of new metallylene derivates from precursors
Scheme 22 Coordination of new spacer-separated bis-metallylene to transition-metals
Using isolated products as precursors complexes with different electronic
configurations and activities can be obtained and further modified through
coordination to transition-metals and varying substituents as ligands (Scheme 22)
This development may provide new divalent group 14 element-based functional
ligands in coordination chemistry towards transition-metals As spacer units for the
bis-metallylenes should serve 13-functionalized arene ferrocene and chalcogen
elements (O S Se) The promising application of new metallylene-metal complexes
will be investigated as the precatalyst in organic reactions
Results and Discussion
- 23 -
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates
In this PhD work the abbreviation of nacnacmacr is used only for the Dip-substituted β-
diketiminato ligand[81]
(CH[CMe(NDip)]2macr Dip = 26-iPrC6H3) The synthesis of β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized germanium complexes (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
and
(nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
were reported through the reaction of GeCl2sdotdioxane or GeCl4
with the corresponding Li(nacnac) reagent These compounds can be obtained in high
yield after recrystallization and were used as starting materials for new low-valent
germanium derivates
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Treatment of β-diketiminato germylene chloride 1 with excess of elemental
potassium at ambient temperature in THF yielded the first cyclogermylidenide
derivative 3[83]
which was isolated by fractional crystallization from diethylether in
the form of its potassium salt in 33 yield as pale yellow crystals Moreover the
reduction of 1 led also to the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-
Dip which was isolated by fractional crystallization from hexane solution as yellow
crystals in 31 yield (Scheme 31) Both 3 and 4 have been characterized by NMR
spectroscopy (1H
13C) EI-mass spectrometry (only for 3) and correct elemental
analyses
Scheme 31 Synthesis of the germylenide potassium salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Results and Discussion
- 24 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3 displays two sets of doublets for the Dip-
methyl groups in the range from 108 to 112 ppm Two additional singlets at 184 and
262 ppm were assigned to methyl groups of the five-membered ring Resonances for
the CH of iso-propyl appears at 298 ppm as septets The resonance of the β-H proton
at the GeNC3 ring appears at δ = 618 ppm One set of resonances for aromatic
protons of Dip-groups appears in the range of 691-698 ppm In addition the
diethylether molecule was observed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy The molar ratio of
ether was determined by integration of the appropriate resonance signals in the 1H-
NMR spectrum of 3 This amounts to 22mol and the determined composition fits
well with the elemental analytical data
Complex 3 is an Et2O coordinated potassium germylene anion salt according to the
1H- and
13C-NMR spectra Its structure has been established by a single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 31 left) It reveals a dimeric half-sandwich complex
interconnected via intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds In the structure each half-
sandwich moiety consists of a K(OEt2)2 cation η5-coordinated to the anionic five-
membered planar GeNC3 ring The K1-Ge1 distance of 3449(1) pm is shorter than
the intermolecular K1-Ge1rsquo distance of 3573(1) pm It is noteworthy such shorter K-
Ge distances have been observed in a related dipotassium (18-crown-6)
tetraphenylgermol dianion (330 335 pm)[84]
as well as in a (18-crown-6)-solvated
potassium silylgermanides (342 pm) with a tetravalent germanium atom[85]
Accordingly the K-C(ring) distances in 3 (3092(2)-3330(2) pm) are also longer than
those observed in the aforementioned dipotassium germol dianion (288-317 pm) The
Ge1-N1 distance of 1944(2) pm are shorter than those Ge-N distances in 1[80]
but
longer than that corresponding values in a N-heterocyclic 6π aromatic
germyliumylidene cation[86]
(189 pm) and the heterofulvene-like germylene[87]
(186 pm) Additionally the Ge1-C2 distance (1887(2) pm) the endocyclic C-C
distances (C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3) pm) and the C4-N1 bond length (1382(3)
pm) suggest significant π-resonance stabilization within the six-membered GeNC3
ring In line with that the remarkable deshielding of the resonance signal (618 ppm)
Results and Discussion
- 25 -
for the β-H atom in the 1H-NMR spectrum is in agreement with a considerable hetero-
Cpmacr-like resonance stabilization in the five-membered GeNC3 ring (Figure 31 right)
The latter is also supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see
section 313) Hereafter the lithium complexes of N-heterocyclic germylidenide and
stannylidenide anions[88]
[(THF)Li-η5-EC(tBu)C(H)C(
tBu)N(Dip) E = Ge Sn] were
presented with a similar reductive reaction
Figure 31 Molecular structure of germylene anion salt 3 (left) and hetero-Cpmacr-like
resonance structure (right) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level
Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg]
Ge1-C2 1887(2) Ge1-N1 1944(2) Ge1-K1 34485(6) Ge1-K1rsquo 35728(7)
K1-C2 3092(2) K1-C3 3122(2) K1-C4 3330(2) K1-N1 3402(2) K1-Ge1rsquo
35728(7) N1-C4 1382(3) C1-C2 1516(3) C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3)
C4-C5 1508(3) C2-Ge1-N1 843(1) C4-N1-Ge1 1130(1) C3-C2-C1 1202(2)
C3-C2-Ge1 1116(2) C1-C2-Ge1 1281(2) C4-C3-C2 1174(2) C3-C4-N1
1135(2) C3-C4-C5 1254(2)
The formulation of the resonance structure clarifies that the nitrogen atom has a
higher affinity to carbon instead to germanium (Scheme 32) The mesomer 3c is
energetically less favorable than 3a and 3b This explains also that the Ge1-C2 bond
(1887(2) pm) is shorter than the Ge1-N1 bond (1944(2) pm) in 3
Results and Discussion
- 26 -
Scheme 32 GeNC3-ring resonance structures of germylenide anion of 3
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 4 shows four sets of doublets and one
multiplet for methyls of Dip-groups in the range from 091 to 130 ppm Resonances
for methyl-groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 162 ppm as one singlet
Multiplets in the range of 329-340 are assigned to CH-groups of iso-propyl groups
The resonance of CH proton at the GeN2C3 ring appears at δ = 503 ppm One singlet
at δ = 564 ppm is assigned to NH-groups One set of resonances for aromatic protons
of Dip-groups appears in the range of 683-718 ppm
Figure 32 Molecular structure of germylene amide 4 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn
at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 2051(2) Ge1-N2 2026(2) Ge1-N3
1905(2) N1-C2 1329(3) N2-C4 1332(3) C1-C2 1518(3) C2-C3 1394(3)
C3-C4 1394(3) C4-C5 1512(3) N3-Ge1-N1 9720(8) N3-Ge1-N2 8876(9)
N2-Ge1-N1 8822(8) C2-N1-Ge1 1229(2) C4-N2-Ge1 1240(2) N1-C2-C3
1227(2) C4-C3-C2 1269(3) N2-C4-C3 1239(3)
Results and Discussion
- 27 -
The structure of compound 4 was established by single crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis (Figure 32) It consists of a slightly puckered six-membered GeN2C3 ring
with geometric parameters similar to the corresponding parameters found in precursor
chlorogermylene 1[80]
The sum of bond angles at Ge atom of 2742deg is comparable to
that of 1 (2815deg) implying the presence of a lone pair of electrons at the Ge center
The Ge-N distances in 4 (2026(2) and 2051(2) ppm) are somewhat longer than those
in chlorogermylene 1 (1988(2) and 1997(3) ppm) In the structure of 4 the terminal
Ge-N distance of 1905(2) pm is significantly shorter than those the endocyclic ones
(2026(2) 2051(2) pm) because it is a common covalent bond and stronger than
dative NrarrGe bonds
A plausible mechanism for the formation of 3 and 4 is proposed as depicted in
Scheme 33 The reduction of (nacnac)GeCl 1 by elemental potassium gives the N-
heterocyclic potassium germylidenide 3d as initial transient species The latter
undergoes a ring contraction to give the transient germylene amide 3e which reacts
with 1 in a salt metathesis reaction affording the Dip-N-bridged bis-germylene 3f
Reductive fission of a Ge-N bond in 3f by elemental potassium leads to the germylene
anion potassium salt 3 and the potassium β-diketiminato-GeII amide (nacnac)Ge-NK-
Dip The formation of 4 from (nacnac)Ge-NK-Dip needs a subsequent protonation
from the solvent in an inert atmosphere
Scheme 33 The mechanism of the formation 3 and 4
Results and Discussion
- 28 -
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
This part of the research is the cowork with Shenglai Yao (TU Berlin)
Another reduction experiment of the related β-diketimiate-substituted
organogermanium trichloride 2[82]
(nacnac)GeCl3 with KC8 was investigated The
reaction of 2 with KC8 in THF led to a brown-red mixture from which colorless
crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex K(nacnac)[89]
have been
isolated as side products along with deep-red crystals of the remarkable novel cluster
species 5[83]
in low yield (3 Scheme 34) In contrast reaction of 1 with elemental
potassium in toluene even at 0 degC led merely to the complete replacement of Ge by K
via reduction of GeII to elemental Ge
0 powder and concomitant formation of the
aforementioned β-diketiminato potassium complex
Scheme 34 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
The X-ray crystal diffraction analysis of 5 revealed a dipotassium salt of the first
ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a Ge4 core (Figure 33)
Remarkably to date only a few metal complexes of ldquoheavyrdquo CBD2-
have been
reported featuring a Si4 and Si2Ge2 core[90]
Compound 5 consists of a planar
Ge4(nacnac)22macr dianion in which the two unusual chelating nacnac-ligands are
attached to the Ge4 core each with terminal Ge-C and Ge-N σ-bonds The dianion is
connected by two η3-coordinated K(OEt2) cations each coordinated to Ge1 Ge2 and
N2 and Ge1rsquo Ge2rsquo and N2rsquo respectively The K-Ge distances of 3355(1) pm (K1-
Ge1) and 3477(1) pm (K1-Ge2) are similar to those K-Ge distances in 3 and in
related potassium germanides[84b 85]
The molecular structure of 5 is also notable for
Results and Discussion
- 29 -
the parallelogram-like configuration of the planar Ge4 moiety The Ge1-Ge2 of
2512(1) pm and Ge1-Ge2rsquo distance of 2553(1) pm are close to the Ge-Ge single
bonds observed in bulky substituted cyclotetragermanes (ca 251 pm)[91]
and longer
than those in Ge4Co complexes[90d]
(235-237 pm) while the transannular Ge2-Ge2rsquo
distance of 2747(1) pm is much longer Interestingly despite of the pyramidal
coordination environment of the Ge atoms the Ge42macr core of 5 shows extremely
strong aromaticity as supported by DFT calculations (see section 313)
Figure 33 Molecular structure of 5 containing a Ge42minus
cluster Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity
Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1rsquo 1932(3) Ge1-Ge2 2512(7)
Ge1-Ge2rsquo 2553(7) Ge2-Ge2rsquo 2747(1) Ge1-K1 3355(12) K1-N2 2814(3)
K1-Ge2 3477(1) N1-C2 1381(4) Ge2-C3rsquo 2019(3) C2-C3 1369(5) C3-C4
1479(5) N2-C4 1296(4) Ge2-Ge1-Ge2rsquo 657(2) Ge1-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 1143(2) Ge1-
Ge2-Ge2rsquo 578(2) Ge1rsquo-Ge2-Ge2rsquo 564(2) N1rsquo-Ge1-Ge2 8716(9) N1rsquo-Ge1-
Ge2rsquo 1026(9) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1 886(1) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 963(1) C2-N1-Ge1rsquo
1239(2) C3-C2-N1 1205(3) C2-C3-C4 1227(3) C2-C3-Ge2rsquo 1184(3) C4-C3-
Ge2rsquo 1184(3) N2-C4-C3 1220(3)
Scheme 35 shows the assumed mechanism of the formation of Ge42minus
cluster 5 The
product after the first reductive step by KC8 is (nacnac)GeCl 1 which was confirmed
by NMR investigation Chlorogermylene 1 could dimerize by sequential reduction to
Results and Discussion
- 30 -
a bis-germylene 5a Due to the instability of 5a bearing two bulky nacnac ligands a
transformation could be in the ascendant from dimer 5a to stable P4-like Ge4-tetramer
5b Intermediate 5c could be formed after double intramolecular deprotonation and
elimination of ldquofreerdquo (nacnac)H The excessive KC8 could offer two electrons to
molecule orbitals of Ge4-cluster 5c to furnish the isolated product 5 with a Ge42minus
cluster
Scheme 35 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 5
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5
The structural feature of 3 leads to a discussion of a possible aromatic character of
the GeNC3-ring in comparison to cyclobutadiene anion Aromaticity is also a key
Results and Discussion
- 31 -
concept in describing homo-elemental four-membered rings such as the square planar
cyclobutadiene-like dianion Therefore nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS)
values for the five-membered GeNC3-rings and the four-membered Ge4-ring in
compound 3 and 5 were calculated by Prof Christoph van Wuumlllen (University of
Kaiserslautern) Since their introduction NICS[92]
values have been used as an
aromaticity criterion in numerous applications both for organic and inorganic
compounds[93]
NICS values were computed using the molecular structures of compound 3 and 5
from X-ray diffraction analysis The positions of the non-hydrogen atoms were taken
from the X-ray data and kept fixed while the hydrogen positions were optimized
using the TURBOMOLE program package[94]
and its density functional capabilities[95]
an exchange-correlation functional with gradient corrections to exchange and
correlation[96]
(BP86 functional) and polarized triple-zeta (TZVP) basis sets[97]
The
geometry optimizations used density fitting techniques (also known as the RI
approximation)[98]
to evaluate the matrix elements of the electrostatic Coulomb
potential
NICS tensors are defined for any position as the negative magnetic shielding at
that position The magnetic shielding tensors were obtained using the integral-direct
IGLO program[99]
which has been extended to allow the use of density functional
theory[100]
The B3LYP[96a 101]
functional and a basis of IGLO-III[102]
quality were
employed For Ge this is a 4s11p7d1f primitive basis sets in which only the steepest
five s-functions three p-functions and two d-functions are contracted In lack of
IGLO-type basis sets for potassium a TZVDP (triple zeta two sets of polarization
functions) basis was used which will affect the accuracy of the magnetic shieldings at
the centers of the potassium atoms but not elsewhere
The ring centre for each ring system was calculated first from the Cartesian
coordinates and determined the plane through the ring center for which the sum of the
Results and Discussion
- 32 -
squares of the distance of that plane to the positions of the atoms forming the ring is
minimal This plane was defined as the ring plane A line through the ring center that
is orthogonal to the plane defines the positions of the NICS centers above and
below the ring centers and the local z direction to which the NICS tensors are
transformed to obtain the zz as well as the in plane (mean value of the xx and yy)
tensor components in addition to the isotropic value which is one third of the sum of
the xx yy and zz components The zz component is of particular interest because a
ring current parallel to the ring plane will most strongly be induced if the external
magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane and the magnetic field induced by such a
current will also be in that direction
In addition to the NICS tensor at the ring center (NICS(0) value) its height profile
contains useful additional information[103]
First the height profile discriminates ring
current effects (which are associated with aromaticity) from diatropic contributions
which stem from the proximity of the ring atoms while the latter approach zero
quickly when moving out of the ring plane the former only slowly do so Furthermore
the height profile helps to distinguish π-aromaticity (which is the type of aromaticity
dominant in organic chemistry) from σ-aromaticity (which is found for many
inorganic compounds) if aromaticity only stems from π-electrons which produce no
ring current in the ring plane then the NICS values when moving out of the ring
center first decrease (ie become more negative) before they gradually approach zero
NICS values 100 pm above or below the ring plane (ldquoNICS(1) valuesrdquo)
Table 31 reports NICS results for compound 3 where the region towards to
coordinating K+ ion was denoted as above the plane of the five-membered GeNC3
rings the other side as below Up to 100 pm the results for NICS centers above and
below are quite similar then the results for the positions 150 and 200 pm above the
ring start to be affected by the K+ ion whose distance to the ring plane is 299 pm The
NICS values are negative and the tensors are highly anisotropic the negative isotropic
value stems from the large and negative zz component Furthermore these values fall
Results and Discussion
- 33 -
off quite slowly when moving out of the ring plane This indicates a diamagnetic ring
current indicative of aromatic behavior Furthermore the most negative values are not
found in the ring center but slightly above which indicates π-aromaticity Of course
this is exactly what has to be expected for a heteroatom analogue of a
cyclopentadienyl anion This is interesting however because the NICS values for
compound 5 see Table 32 show a slightly different behavior again Negative NICS
values fall off slowly but the tensors show a substantial negative in-plane component
up to 200 pm above (or below this is the same in this compound) ring plane This can
be explained by diatropic contributions from the Ge-C and Ge-N bonds which are
nearly perpendicular to the ring plane The second difference between compound 3
and compound 5 is that the NICS values (both the isotropic values and the zz tensor
component) fall off monotonically and have no hump at about 1 pm above the ring
plane The aromaticity of the Ge4 ring in compound 5 must therefore have substantial
σ-character
Table 31 NICS values for compound 3 in ppm (the results are the same for both GeNC3 rings)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash77 ndash87 ndash56
50 pm above ndash82 ndash50 ndash144
100 pm above ndash73 +16 ndash251
150 pm abovea)
ndash59 +64 ndash298
200 pm abovea)
ndash116 +36 ndash422
50 pm below ndash82 ndash46 ndash154
100 pm below ndash74 +04 ndash230
150 pm below ndash54 +19 ndash199
200 pm below ndash37 +11 ndash134
a)
Value affected by a close K+ ion coordinated by the GeNC3 ring
Results and Discussion
- 34 -
Table 32 NICS values for compound 5 in ppm (the results are the same at both sides of the Ge4
ring)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash389 ndash375 ndash417
50 pm above ndash324 ndash286 ndash399
100 pm above ndash215 ndash155 ndash334
150 pm above ndash144 ndash93 ndash248
200 pm above ndash109 ndash82 ndash165
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6
As a nucleophile the germanium(II) anion in 3 seems a promising precursor for the
synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylenes and of related heterodinuclear bis-
metallylenes Accordingly the coupling reaction of the nucleophilic GeII centre in 3
with the electrophilic GeII site in 1
[80] was examined and the reaction in THF at -30 degC
yielded a dark red solution from which the bis-germylene 6[104]
has been isolated as
air- and moisture-sensitive dark red crystals in 66 yield (Scheme 36) The isolated
bis-germylene 6 was fully characterized including X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 36 Synthesis of bis-germylene 6
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 6 exhibits four sets of doublets in the range from 107
to 124 ppm with the ratio of 121266 which can be assigned to CH3-groups of all
Dip-groups The three singlets in the range of 161-262 ppm can be assigned to the
CH3 groups at the ligand backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear
in the range of δ = 301-367 ppm as three sets of septet The remarkable deshielding
Results and Discussion
- 35 -
of the resonance signal for the ring CH proton of the five-membered GeNC3 ring (δ =
682 ppm) is indicative a stronger 6π-aromatic resonance stabilization compared with
that in the precursor 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The proton resonance signal for the γ-ring
proton in the six-membered GeN2C3 ring of δ = 518 ppm suggests however the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization In the UV-vis spectra of 6 an absorption
band is observed at 501 nm showing blue shifted in comparison to the values
observed for related amidinate- and guanidinate- substituted bis-germylenes[40]
(I27
and I28 in Introduction) with GeI-Ge
I bonds
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8
The reactivity of 3 towards chlorostannylene 7[80]
(nacnac)SnCl was examined
also by a coupling reaction If (nacnac)SnCl 7 was used as electrophile for the
reaction with 3 in diethylether at -70 degC this furnished the corresponding product
germylene-stannylene 8[104]
which was isolated in the form of dark red crystals in
34 yield (Scheme 37) The new compound 8 was fully characterized including
NMR spectroscopy (1H
13C
119Sn) and X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 37 Synthesis of germylene-stannylene 8
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 exhibits six sets of doublets in the range from 085 to
129 ppm with the ratio of 666666 for CH3-groups of all Dip-groups The three
singlets in the range of 165-300 ppm can be assigned to the CH3 groups at the ligand
backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear in the range of δ = 305-
378 ppm as three sets of septets
Results and Discussion
- 36 -
A similar situation was observed in the NMR spectra of 8 for the CH moiety at
ligand backbones The deshielding for the ring CH proton of the five-membered
GeNC3 ring in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 (δ = 691 ppm) indicates again a stronger
6π-aromatic resonance stabilization than in 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The chemical shift (δ =
510 ppm) for the γ-ring proton in the six-membered SnN2C3 ring of 8 also shows the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization The 119
Sn chemical shift of 8 at δ -197
ppm in the 119
Sn-NMR spectrum is comparable to the value observed for the precursor
(nacnac)SnCl 7 (δ -224 ppm)[80]
implying a three-coordinated tin atom in solution In
the UV-vis spectrum of 8 an absorption band is observed at 541 nm The latter is
somewhat red shifted in comparison to the values of bis-germylene 6
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8
The new GeI-Ge
I compound 6 represents the first asymmetric substituted bis-
germylene while germylene-stannylene 8 is the first GeI-Sn
I example Their
molecular structures were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis
(Figure 34) Both N2C3 backbones of the chelating six-membered MN2C3 ring (M =
Ge Sn) are essentially planar but the germanium and tin atoms are out of the
respective plane The five-membered GeNC3 rings in both compounds however are
almost planar The most important structural features are the Ge-M distances and
trans-bending angles The Ge-Ge distance of 25498(8) pm in 6 is the shortest GeI-Ge
I
distance among the distances values observed in known bis-germylenes[38 40-42]
(257-
267 pm see Introduction p 10) but significantly longer than those in digermenes[13f
105] (Ge=Ge 221-247 pm) and digermynes
[3b 20 106] (GeequivGe 221-231 pm) This
relatively short Ge1-Ge2 distance was explained with asymmetric structural feature of
6 and some ionic charge distribution between five- and six-membered rings (see
section 317 DFT calculation)
Results and Discussion
- 37 -
Structural features of 6 and 8 are shown in Scheme 38 The torsion angles of the
Ge1-Ge2 bond with Ge1-N1-N2 and Ge2-N3-C31 planes in 6 are 1043deg and 1184deg
respectively (1262deg-1387deg in digermyne[20 106]
) In the structure of 8 the Ge-Sn
distance of 27210(4) pm is longer than that value observed for a Ge=Sn double bond
in a germastannene[107]
and also longer than the Ge-Sn distance in
germylstannanes[105 108]
The torsion angles of the Ge-Sn bond with Sn1-N1-N2 and
Ge1-N3-C31 planes are 939deg and 1006deg respectively (943deg in diplumbylene I4)[16]
Such Ge-M (M = Ge Sn) central bond lengths and trans-bent angles are indicative of
the absence of Ge-M multiple bond character of 6 and 8
Scheme 38 Drawing of torsion angles in 6 and 8
Figure 34 Molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right) Thermal ellipsoids (C1-C5
C30-C34 N1-N3 Ge1 Ge2 and Sn1) are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 6 Ge1-
Ge2 2549(1) Ge1-N1 2015(4) Ge1-N2 2038(4) Ge2-N3 1951(4) Ge2-C31
1903(5) N1-Ge1-N2 8867(15) N1-Ge1-Ge2 10430(11) N2-Ge1-Ge2
Results and Discussion
- 38 -
10149(12) C31-Ge2-N3 8447(19) C31-Ge2-Ge1 11890(15) N3-Ge2-Ge1
9962(12) For 8 Sn1-Ge1 27210(4) Sn1-N1 2233(2) Sn1-N2 2231(2) Ge1-
N3 1964(2) Ge1-C31 1915(3) N2-Sn1-N1 8288(8) N2-Sn1-Ge1 9542(5)
N1-Sn1-Ge1 10368(5) C31-Ge1-N3 8433(12) C31-Ge1-Sn1 11495(9) N3-
Ge1-Sn1 10200(6)
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8
In order to clarify the electronic structure and bonding nature in 6 and 8 DFT
calculations were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The simplified
molecules 6a and 8a [6a M = Ge 8a M = Sn (LanL2DZ for Sn)] (scheme 39) in
which the Dip-groups (26-iPr2C6H3) of 6 and 8 were replaced by phenyl groups were
calculated as model compounds DFT calculations of the model compound of 6a was
performed at the B3LYP6-31(d) level and the model compound 8a was performed at
B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set for Ge N C and H atoms and the LANL2DZ
level for the Sn atom
Scheme 39 Computed model compounds 6a and 8a
The computed geometry is in good agreement with the experimental metric
parameters A NBO analysis of 6a and 8a shows that the HOMOrsquos have a large Ge-M
bond character (Figure 35) and the latter derives largely from overlap of Ge and Sn
p-valence orbitals (6a s 1180 p 8820 8a s 978 p 9022) Apparently the
Ge-M bonds possess s character Likewise the Wiberg bond index exhibits Ge-E bond
orders of 08525 (6a) and 07290 (8a) respectively Similar bonding natures have
Results and Discussion
- 39 -
been identified and reported previously for related GeI-Ge
I dimers
[38 40-42] In addition
the nature of the HOMOrsquos and LUMOrsquos of the model compounds 6a and 8a
corresponds to that of a diplumbylene[16]
which again underlines that the Ge-M bond
in 6 and 8 represents a pure σ-bond
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
Figure 35 Frontier orbitals of model compound 6a and 8a
Interestingly the HOMOrsquos show clearly the presence of p-orbital interaction within
the six-membered MN2C3 ring and a slight interaction with the Ge centre in the
GeN2C3 ring Accordingly the five-membered GeNC3 ring bears a negative net charge
while the six-membered MN2C3 ring has a positive one [NPA charges in the GeN2C3
ring in 6a Ge +065 N (mean) -069 C (mean) 008 vs GeNC3 ring Ge1 +055 N -
066 C (mean) -015 NPA charges in the SnN2C3 ring in 8a Sn +095 N (mean) -
072 C (mean) 007 vs GeNC3 ring Ge +040 N -066 C (mean) -017] Thus the
latter parameters suggest some ionic character of the Ge-M bonds Moreover the
pronounced electron acceptor character of the GeN2C3 ring is also reflected by the
strongly negative values of NICS for 6a and 8a [6a NICS(0) = -88 NICS(1) = -82
8a NICS(0) = -76 NICS(1) = -74] The latter confirms the presence of a 6π-
aromatic stabilization in 6 and 8 as indicated by the 1H-NMR data (see p 34-36)
Results and Discussion
- 40 -
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands
The β-diketiminato ligands can undergo several side-reactions such as 13-
coordination C-N-exchange ring-contraction and deprotonation (Scheme 310) A
more rigid β-diketiminato ligand with a six-membered C6-ring in the backbone was
envisioned to prevent those side-reactions and possibly enhance the stability of the
products[81-83 109]
Scheme 310 Coordination possibilities of the classical β-diketiminato ligand
The syntheses of new β-diketiminato ligands[110]
12 and 20 are shown in Scheme
311 They are easily accessible from the N-cyclohexylidene-26-diisopropyl-
benzenamine 9[111]
in a two-step procedure First the deprotonation of 9 with nBuLi in
diethylether leads to the corresponding lithium amide 10 Salt metathesis reaction of
10 with (Z)-N-(26-diisopropylphenyl)benzimidoyl chloride 11[112]
or (Z)-N-isopropyl
benzimidoyl chloride[112]
19 in diethylether then afforded the novel β-diketiminato
type ligand 12 and 20[110]
in 63 and 60 yield respectively The new compounds
12 and 20 have been analyzed by NMR spectroscopy ESI-mass spectrometry X-ray
diffraction and elemental analyses
Results and Discussion
- 41 -
Et2O - 78degCnBuLi
Et2O - 78degCN
Dip
9
N
Dip
10
Li
N
Ph Dip
Cl
11
12
N
NH
Ph
Dip
Dip
Et2O - 78degC
N
Ph iPr
Cl
19
20
NH
N
Ph
Dip
iPr
Scheme 311 Synthesis of new β-diketiminato ligands 12 and 20
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 12 displays four sets of doublet for methyl of
Dip-groups in the range from 117 to 134 ppm The multiplets by 164 ppm and 217
ppm are assigned to CH2 of the six-membered ring The resonance of NH proton
appears at δ = 187 ppm Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear at δ = 335 ppm
as multiplet The 1H-NMR spectrum of 20 shows three sets of doublet for the
isopropyl of Dip-groups in the range from 109 to 132 ppm The peaks of four CH2
groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 156 208 and 214 ppm as multiplet
The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear by 310 and 323 ppm as septet The
resonance of NH group appears at δ = 1203 ppm as doublet because of the 3J-
coupling with neighbor CH group Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-groups
and phenyl appear in the range of 696-727 ppm for 12 and 713-753 ppm for 20
respectively
NH group connecting with iso-propyl in 20 is also confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 36 and Scheme 312) In compound 12 the N1-C1 bond
length (1360(2) pm) is longer than the N2-C3 bond length (1305(2) pm) due to the
presence of N1-H bond Contrarily the N1-C1 bond length (1309(2) pm) in
compound 20 is shorter than the N2-C3 bond length (1356(2) pm) because of the
presence of N2-H bond
Results and Discussion
- 42 -
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph Dip
Dip
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph iPr
Dip
1356
1386
1445
1309
1377
1360
1305
1452
12 20
HH
Scheme 312 Bonding situation of new ligands 12 and 20 bond length in pm
Figure 36 Molecular structure of compounds 12 (left) and 20 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 12 N1-C1 13600(17) N1-
C13 14349(18) C1-C2 13769(19) C1-C4 15136(18) N2-C3 13046(16) N2-
C25 14297(17) C2-C3 14515(18) C2-C7 15257(18) N1-C1-C2 12221(12)
C1-C2-C3 12230(12) N2-C3-C2 12212(12) For 20 N1-C1 1309(2) N1-C17
1418(2) C1-C2 1445(2) C1-C4 1522(2) N2-C3 1356(2) N2-C14 1461(2)
C2-C3 1386(2) C2-C7 1524(2) C3-C8 1495(2) N1-C1-C2 12080(15) C1-
C2-C3 12151(15) N2-C3-C2 12288(15)
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16
Scheme 313 shows the synthesis of chlorogermylene 14[110]
and germylene 16[110]
Through lithiation of compound 12 with nBuLi the Lithium complex 13 was formed
quantitatively The subsequent reaction of 13 with the dichlorogermylene dioxane
complex[27]
(GeCl2middotC4H8O2) affords the desired chlorogermylene 14 in 82 yield
Results and Discussion
- 43 -
Furthermore germylene 16 was obtained by dehydrochloration of 14 with 13-di-tert-
butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15[113]
as a base in 78 yield The composition and
constitution of 14 and 16 were fully characterized by elemental analysis IR and
multinuclear NMR spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 313 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and germylene 16
In the 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 14 resonances of 8 methyl moieties of Dip-
groups appear in the range from 097 to 155 ppm as multiplets The multiplets in the
range of δ = 128-139 and 203-227 ppm are assigned to CH2 moieties of the six-
membered ring Four sets of septets by 317 327 394 and 417 ppm are assigned to
methine protons of the iso-propyl groups The 1H-NMR spectrum of 16 displays three
sets of doublet for methyl moieties of the Dip-groups in the range from 115 to 135
ppm The peaks of four CH2 groups of the six-membered C6-ring appear at δ = 155
204 and 221 ppm as multiplet Resonances for the methine protons of the iso-propyl
groups appear by 369 and 380 ppm as septets A triplet at δ = 415 ppm is assigned to
the proton connecting with C=C double bond This resonance confirms the
deprotonation of C-CH2 to a C=CH structure on the ligand backbone Resonances for
aromatic protons of Dip-groups and phenyl appear in the range of 680-739 ppm for
145 and 675-725 ppm for 16 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 14 and 16 are shown in Figure 37 and
Figure 38 In compound 14 the six-membered GeN2C3 ring exhibits a boat-like
Results and Discussion
- 44 -
conformation The C2N2 moiety of the chelating ligand (N1 N2 C1 C3) is nearly
planar and the Ge and C2 atoms are out-of-plane (Ge 37 pm C2 13 pm) In
compound 16 the GeN2C3 ring is almost planar The Ge-N bond lengths in 14
(1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) are longer than those in 16 (1843(3) and 1861(3) pm)
and the N1-Ge1-N2 bond angle (9123deg) in 14 is smaller than that of compound 16
(9509deg) This is probably owing to the dative nature of the Ge-N bonds and the three-
coordinate Ge(II) atom in 14 The Ge-Cl bond length of 2296(1) pm in 14 is
consistent with the value observed in the N-heterocyclic β-diketiminato
chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl[80]
The fused cyclohexyl moiety of 14 is distorted
and the phenyl group is oriented in nearly the same direction as the aryl group on the
N2 atom while the C2 C3 C4 and C7 atoms of the fused C6 ring in 14 are coplanar
with the N2C3 ring (C1 C2 C3 N1 N2) while the C5 and C6 atoms deviate above
the plane of the N2C3 ring This conformation of the cyclohexyl moiety is also
observed in compound 16 It is of note that the buta-13-diene moiety (C1 C2 C3 C4
C32) of compound 16 clearly has alternating C-C distances (C32-C1 1498(4) C1-C2
1359(4) C2-C3 1461(4) and C3-C4 1360(4) pm) which is not the case in known
germylene (nacnac)Ge[87]
published in 2006
Figure 37 Molecular structure of compound 14 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 19760(16) Ge1-N2 19804(17) Ge1-Cl1
22956(7) N1-C1 1342(3) N1-C14 1458(3) C1-C2 1397(3) C1-C8 1502(3)
N2-C3 1333(3) N2-C26 1463(2) C2-C3 1415(3) C2-C7 1522(3) C3-C4
Results and Discussion
- 45 -
1509(3) C4-C5 1522(3) N1-Ge1-N2 9123(7) N1-Ge1-Cl1 9560(5) N2-Ge1-
Cl1 9392(5) C1-N1-Ge1 12568(13) N1-C1-C2 12352(17) C1-C2-C3
12503(19) N2-C3-C2 12440(18) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(13)
Figure 38 Molecular structure of compound 16 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 1843(3) Ge1-N2 1861(3) N1-C3 1426(4)
N1-C8 1442(4) N2-C1 1408(4) N2-C20 1454(4) C1-C2 1359(4) C2-C3
1461(4) C1-C32 1498(4) C2-C7 1525(4) C3-C4 1360(4) N1-Ge1-N2
9509(11) C3-N1-Ge1 300(2) N1-C3-C2 1176(3) C1-C2-C3 1267(3) C2-C1-
N2 1241(3) C1-N2-Ge1 1259(2)
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O
The unusual donor-acceptor properties of the zwitterionic silylene and germylene
were described in our group in 2006[30 87]
In these molecules the exocyclic methylene
group remains more negative charges due to the aromaticity of the center six-
membered ring This implies the presence of two reactivity positions in the molecule
a strong nucleophilic methylene group and a nucleophilic (ns-orbital) and
electrophilic (np-orbital) at the metallylene site Mesomeric structures of zwitterionic
germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties are shown in Scheme 314
Results and Discussion
- 46 -
To probe the donor-acceptor properties of zwitterionic germylene 16 its reactivity
toward ammonia and water was investigated Germylene 16 undergoes controllable
ammonolysis and hydrolysis (Scheme 315) Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas
at room temperature in toluene resulted in the formation of the corresponding
aminogermylene 17[110]
in high yield (92) Likewise germylene 16 also readily
reacts with water to produce germylene hydroxide 18[110]
nearly quantitatively (95)
Scheme 314 Mesomeric structures of germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties
Scheme 315 Syntheses of aminogermylene 17 and germylene hydroxide 18
The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectroscopic data of 17 and 18 are very similar to the
corresponding resonances of chlorogermylene 14 appearing at or near the same
chemical shifts In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 17 the protons of the NH2 group appear
at δ = 154 ppm This chemical shift is close to that of the dimeric aminogermylene
(ArrsquoGeNH2)2 (Arrsquo = 26-Tip2C6H3) (δ = 162 ppm)[60a]
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 18
displays a singlet for the hydroxide proton at = 166 ppm which is close to the
respective value observed for the dimeric germylene hydroxide [(nacnac)GeOH]2 (δ =
154 ppm)[114]
The IR spectrum of 18 clearly shows two N-H stretching modes of the
NH2 group at v = 3430 and 3343 cmndash1
respectively These values are similar to those
observed for related aminogermylenes (ArGeNH2)2 (Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) (3380
and 3308 cmndash1
) and (nacnac)GeNH2 (3431 and 3333 cm-1
)[115]
A sharp absorption at v
Results and Discussion
- 47 -
= 3643 cmndash1
that can be attributed to the O-H stretching frequency was observed in
the IR spectrum of 18 This value resembles that of germylene hydroxide
(nacnac)GeOH (3571 cm-1
)[114]
The structure of 17 and 18 are shown in Figure 39 Both compounds 17 and 18 are
monomeric species The structural features of 17 and 18 are very similar and show
close structural parameters compared with that of chlorogermylene 14 As in 14 the
Ge1 and C2 atoms of 17 and 18 slightly deviate from the N2C2 ring (N1 N2 C1 C3)
plane [17 Ge 46 pm and C2 13 pm 18 Ge 49 pm and C2 13 pm] The Ge-N
(ligand) bond lengths (17 2017(2) and 2021(2) pm 18 20054(17) and 20071(16)
pm) of 17 and 18 are longer than the Ge-N(amide) bond length of 17 (1829(3) pm)
Interestingly the Ge-N distance (1905(2) pm) in (nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip 4[83]
due to the
large Dip-substituent is also 8 ppm longer than that of 17 In each case there is clearly
a difference between the dative bond and covalent bond Compound 18 represents the
first monomeric three-coordinate GeII hydroxide in the solid state (Figure 39) owing
the larger steric congestion around the GeII center in contrast to (nacnac)GeOH
[114]
Figure 39 Molecular structures of compound 17 (left) and 18 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 17 Ge1-N1 2021(2) Ge1-
N2 2017(2) Ge1-N3 1829(3) N1-C1 1349(4) C1-C2 1395(4) N2-C3
1336(4) C2-C3 1417(4) C3-C4 1509(4) N3-Ge1-N2 9503(11) N3-Ge1-N1
9709(13) N2-Ge1-N1 8932(10) C1-N1-Ge1 1253(2) C3-N2-Ge1 1247(2)
For 18 Ge1-O1 18249(18) Ge1-N2 20054(17) Ge1-N1 20071(16) N1-C1
Results and Discussion
- 48 -
1340(3) C1-C2 1402(3) N2-C3 1331(3) C2-C3 1419(3) C3-C4 1509(3)
O1-Ge1-N2 9387(8) O1-Ge1-N1 9529(8) N2-Ge1-N1 8943(7) C1-N1-Ge1
12597(14) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(14)
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
In order to understand the coordination behavior of ligand 20 experiments using
germanium precursors GeCl2sdotdioxane and GeCl4 were conducted (Scheme 316) The
reaction of compound 20 with one equivalent of nBuLi resulted directly the lithiated
intermediate 21 The subsequent reaction with GeCl2sdotdioxane in Et2O at -78 degC led to
the unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained
by reaction of 21 with GeCl4 in toluene at -78 degC through dehydrochloration with 13-
di-tert-butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15 as a base in 57 yield The composition and
constitution of 22 and 23 were elucidated by elemental analysis multinuclear NMR
spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 316 Syntheses of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 22 exhibits 6 sets of doublets for 6 methyls of
iso-propyl Five sets of multiplets in the range of δ = 121-206 ppm are assigned to
the CH2 moieties of the six-membered C6-ring Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl
Results and Discussion
- 49 -
appear at δ = 284 367 and 396 ppm as septet In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 23 peaks
at δ = 113 122 and 137 ppm are for methyls of iso-propyl as doublets Resonances
of three CH2 groups of the six-membered ring on backbone appear at δ = 146 189
and 206 ppm as multiplets Two sets of septets by 332 and 361 ppm are assigned to
the CH of iso-propyl A triplet at δ = 421 ppm is for the proton of C=CH group on
backbone and indicates a dianionic ligand 20 in compound 23 owing to two times
deprotonation with nBuLi and carbene 15 Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-
groups and phenyl appear in the range of 688-724 ppm for 22 and 701-726 ppm for
23 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 22 and 23 are shown in Figure 310
Compound 22 represents an imine N-donor stabilized oxo-chloro-germylene and
adopts a pyramidal geometry with the sum of bond angles of 2737deg at the GeII center
The inserted oxygen atom could come in all probability from dioxane molecule in
GeCl2dioxane The cyclohexyl unit on backbone is distorted and the free N2 moiety
is oriented in inverse direction to the cyclohexyl The Ge1-Cl1 bond length of
23073(6) pm in 22 is compatible with the value (2296(1) pm) observed in
chlorogermylene 14 The Ge1-N1 distance of 20908(15) pm is visibly longer than
those of 14 (1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) because of the net NrarrGe coordination bond
without resonance stabilization The Ge1-O1 bond length is normal Ge-O single bond
with a distance of 18265(12) pm Bond lengths of N1-C1 (1284(2) pm) and N2-C7
(1272(2) pm) present clearly C=N double bond while bond lengths of C1-C6
(1525(2) pm) and N6-C7 (1539(2) pm) present normal C-C single bonds
In compound 23 GeIV
atom is tetrahedral coordinated with two nitrogen and two
chlorine atoms All six angles in the range of 1028-1138deg at the GeIV
center are
nearly alike with the angle in methane (1095deg) and indicate a slightly distorted
tetrahedral GeN2Cl2 configuration GeIV
-Cl bond lengths (21339(7) and 21375(9) pm)
in 23 are much shorter than those of germylenes 14 and 22 (229-231 pm) Distances
of the GeIV
-N bonds (1798(2) and 1788(2) pm) in 23 are much shorter than the
Results and Discussion
- 50 -
NrarrGe dative bonds in 14 17 and 18 (198-202 pm) and the net NrarrGe dative bond
(20908(15) pm) in 22 But they are only slightly shorter than GeII-N distances
(1843(3) and 1861(1) pm) in germylene 16 and GeII-NH2 bond length (1829(3) pm)
in germylene 17 Bond lengths of C1-C2 (1339(4) pm) and C3-C4 (1326(4) pm) in
23 illuminate clearly C=C double bond and distances of N1-C1 (1430(3) pm) and
N2-C3 (1441(3) pm) correspond to C-N single bond
Figure 310 Molecular structures of compound 22 (left) and 23 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 22 Ge1-Cl1 23073(6)
Ge1-O1 18265(12) Ge1-N1 20908(15) O1-C6 1418(2) N1-C1 1284(2) N2-
C7 1272(2) C1-C6 1525(2) C6-C7 1539(2) Cl1-Ge1-O1 9789(4) Cl1-Ge1-
N1 9422(4) O1-Ge1-N1 8158(6) Ge1-N1-C1 11291(12) N1-C1-C6
11484(16) C1-C6-O1 10975(14) C6-O1-Ge1 11838(10) N2-C7-C6
11778(17) For 23 Ge1-Cl1 21339(7) Ge1-Cl2 21375(9) Ge1-N1 1798(2)
Ge1-N2 1788(2) N1-C1 1430(3) C1-C2 1339(4) C2-C3 1486(4) C3-C4
1326(4) N2-C3 1441(3) N2-Ge1-N1 10554(10) N2-Ge1-Cl1 11208(7) N1-
Ge1-Cl1 11381(8) N2-Ge1-Cl2 11201(8) N1-Ge1-Cl2 11082(8) Cl1-Ge1-Cl2
10276(3) C1-C2-C3 1266(2) C4-C3-N2 1209(2) C2-C4-C3 1208(3)
The formation of compound 22 indicates that ligand 20 has a different reactivity to
the derivative ligand 12 due to the exchange of Dip-group with iso-propyl But the
situation of complex 23 shows a possibility of a dianionic chelating coordination[30 87]
Results and Discussion
- 51 -
of ligand 20 Coordination chemistry with ligand 20 is currently being investigated for
its suitability to serve as bidentate donor ligand for complexes with low-valent Si Ge
and also transition-metals
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28
Since the successful isolation of halogen bonded silylene and germylene[31a 32b 80]
chemists faced the challenge weather compounds like LEII-X-E
IIL [E = Si Ge Sn X
= O S Se] in which two metallylene moieties are bridged by a single X-atom can be
stabilized at room temperature Key points of this assignment are the identification of
effective ligands for the stabilization of metallylenes and a feasible synthetic route
There is a special interest to synthesize this kind of compounds due to their chemical
nature and coordination properties
Previous attempts to synthesize a stable bis-silylene oxide 28b from silylene 28a[30]
has been unsuccessful The isolated product originating from the reaction of water
with the silylene 28a was the stable siloxysilylene 28c[10a]
(a mixed-valent disiloxane)
(Scheme 317) Recently Roesky et al proposed the formation of bis-silylene oxide 28
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2macr) as a reactive intermediate in the reaction of the bis-
silylene I24[37]
(aLSi-Si
aL) with N2O However 28 could be neither detected nor
chemically trapped[116]
By addition of water to two molar chlorosilylene 26[31a]
in
toluene the expected disiloxane 27 could not be isolated from a complicated reaction
mixture (Scheme 317 )
In the following the isolation of the first oxygen-bridged bis-silylene 28 by a facile
synthetic protocol using 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(HSiCl2)2O as starting
material will be described
Results and Discussion
- 52 -
Scheme 317 Synthesis of siloxysilylene 28c and hydrolysis of chlorosilylene 26
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28
The reaction of 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane (HSiCl2)2O with 2 molar equiv of
lithium amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the desired disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield
(Scheme 318) The target bis-silylene oxide 28 was readily available by
dehydrochloration of 27 employing 2 molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene
Recrystallization in toluene afforded pale yellow crystals of 28[32a]
in 76 yield The
molecular structure of new compounds 27 and 28 was characterized by means of
spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 318 Synthesis of disiloxane 27 and bis-silylene oxide 28
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 27 reveals two singlets one for the
tBu groups at δ =
120 ppm and one corresponding to the Si-H protons at δ = 598 ppm as well as one
set of resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of
Results and Discussion
- 53 -
27 shows a singlet resonance at δ = -1110 ppm The 1H-NMR spectra of 28 displays a
singlet of tBu at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for Ph group in aromatic
resonance region The 29
Si-NMR signal of 28 (δ = -161 ppm) appears shifted ca 95
ppm downfield from the precursor 27 This shift is comparable to that reported for the
triply coordinated silylene alkoxides (aLSiO
tBu) (δ = -52 ppm) and (
aLSiO
iPr) (δ = -
135 ppm)[31b]
respectively
The molecular structure of disiloxane 27 is shown in Figure 311 The center Si1-
O1-Si2 part of molecule 27 was extensively disordered Therefore the X-ray data were
not suitable for accurate discussion Even though the nearly unbent Si1-O1-Si2 angle
(1680deg) in 27 shows a very similar bonded character with sp-hybridized oxygen
bridge in comparison to another disiloxane compounds[118]
The molecule of bis-silylene oxide 28 (Figure 312 left) contains two triply
coordinated Si atoms and two lone pairs one at each of the Si centers Those are two
silylene moieties The sum of bond angles at Si1 and Si2 are 27769deg and 27534deg
respectively which is consistent with the presence of lone pairs In the molecular
structure of 28 Si-O distances of 1641(2) and 1652(2) pm are comparable to those of
siloxysilylene 28c (16442(3) pm and 16501(2) pm) and thus typical for silicon-
oxygen single bonds of other disiloxanes[118]
Moreover as expected for an disiloxane-
like system the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent (15988(15)deg) and larger than
that observed for a C-O-C moiety of ethers
DFT calculations of the compound 28 was performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU
Berlin) at the B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set with the GAUSSIAN-03 program
package[101c 119]
The structure obtained by X-ray analysis was used as the input for
these calculation Optimized structure of 28 is shown in Figure 312 (right) DFT
calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small The
Si-O-Si bond angle of optimized structure is 180deg However the energy difference
between the experimental geometry and linear arrangement is only 071 kJsdotmolminus1
The
Results and Discussion
- 54 -
HOMO (-0163 eV) and HOMO-1 (-0178 eV) represent mainly lone pairs at Si atoms
The LUMO (-0020 eV) is located on the phenyl group of the amidinate ligand
(Figure 313)
Figure 311 Molecular structure of 27 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity The center Si1-O1-Si2
part was extensively disordered Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Cl1-Si1
20349(16) Cl2-Si2 22017(11) Si2-O1 1581(8) Si2-N3 1798(2) Si2-N4
1968(2) Si1-O1 1562(8) Si1-N2 1750(10) Si1-N1 1994(6) Si1-O1-Si2
1680(6)
Figure 312 Molecular structure of 28 (left) and optimized structure (right)
Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted
for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Si1-O1 1641(2) Si2-O1
1652(2) Si1-N1 1896(3) Si1-N2 1902(3) Si2-N3 1888(2) Si2-N4 1908(3)
Si1-O1-Si2 15988(15) O1-Si1-N1 10417(12) O1-Si1-N2 10535(11) O1-Si2-
N3 10196(11) O1-Si2-N4 10481(12) N1-Si1-N2 6815(10) N3-Si2-N4
6855(11)
Results and Discussion
- 55 -
Figure 313 Calculated frontier molecular orbitals of 28
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel
To probe the chelating coordination ability of 28 its reactivity toward Ni(cod)2
(cod = cycloocta-15-diene) was investigated Toluene was added to a mixture of bis-
silylene oxide 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 at room temperature to furnish an
intensely red-colored reaction solution Recrystallization of the crude product from a
saturated n-hexane solution at -30 degC afforded dark red crystals of the Ni complex
29[32a]
in 91 yield (Scheme 319) The isolated compound 29 is the first bidentate
bis-silylene transition-metal complex This work initiates a significant progress on the
chelating silylene ligand transition-metal coordination chemistry The constitution and
composition of 29 could be determined by NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis
and ESI mass spectrometry
Scheme 319 Synthesis of bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
Results and Discussion
- 56 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one singlet for the
tBu groups at δ = 130
ppm and one set of resonances at δ = 281 295 and 504 ppm for the COD-ligand and
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one
singlet (δ = 328 ppm) which shows a downfield shift relative to that of the ldquofreerdquo
ligand 28 The observed downfield shift for the 29
SiII nuclei in 29 clearly suggests the
presence of a bis-silylene chelated complex
The chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to Ni0 is confirmed by X-ray
diffraction analysis The molecular structure of 29 is displayed in Figure 314
Complex 29 containing Ni0 is diamagnetic because of 18 electrons in the valence
shell The two silylene subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are
tetrahedral coordinated to the nickel atom with the Si1-Ni1-Si2 angle at 6890(3)deg
The Si-O bond lengths in 29 [17011 (15) and 17081(17) pm] are longer than that in
28 [1641(2) and 1652(2) pm] while the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 29 (9344(8)deg) is
significantly smaller than that in 28 The Ni-Si bond lengths [21908(7) and 21969(7)
pm] are slightly shorter than those in silylene nickel complex 29a [2207(2) and
2216(2) pm][120]
but longer than those found in silylene nickel complex 29b
(21395(8) pm)[121]
Scheme 320 shows clear bonded prospect of three complexes
Moreover the Ni-Si bond lengths of bis-silylene nickel complex 29 are longer than
those in ylide-like silylene-nickel complexes [20369(6) and 20597(10) pm][70a b 122]
The strong σ-donor character of bis-silylene ligand 28 causes a more electron rich Ni
center It indicates a somewhat stronger π-back-donation from the nickel atom to the
chelating COD-ligand Therefore the Ni-C distances (2070-2090 pm) in 29 are
shorter than those in Ni(cod)2 (211-213 pm)[123]
and silylene nickel complex 29b
(2130-2146 pm)[121]
The coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 with other transition-metals (for example
Ti Cu) is currently investigated together with the reactivity of these complexes on
their use as molecular catalysts
Results and Discussion
- 57 -
29
[Si][Si]
O
Ni
[Si] [Si]
Ni
CO CO
[Si] [Si]
Ni
N N tButBu
Si
N N DipDip
Si
[Si] = [Si] =
29a 29b
2207 2216
2191 2197689deg
934deg
1084deg 1019deg
1708 1701
2139 2139
Scheme 320 Comparison of bonding state in complexes 29 29a and 29b bond lengths in pm
Figure 314 Molecular structure of 29 (left) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Si1-Ni1 21969(7) Si2-Ni1 21908(7) Si1-O1 17011(15)
Si1-N1 18929(19) Si1-N2 1875(2) Si2-O1 17081(17) Si2-N3 18776(19)
Si2-N4 1893(2) Si1-O1-Si2 9344(8) Si1-Ni1-Si2 6890(3) N1-Si1-N2
6941(9) N3-Si2-N4 6954(8)
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
This part of the research is the cowork with Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)
Due to the unique reactivity and electronic properties compounds with a
heteroleptic multiple bond between heavier main-group elements have attracted
considerable attention particularly those between group 14 and 15 elements this is
Results and Discussion
- 58 -
attributed to the pronounced polarity of the E14-E15 multiple bonds[124]
Phosphasilene
containing Si-P double bonds is an analogous of iminosilane The first isolable
phosphasilene with a three coordinate Si and a two coordinate P atom was reported by
Bickelhaupt and coworkers (Scheme 321) in 1984[125]
and several other similar
species containing localized and delocalized Si=P bonds were synthesized and
structurally characterized in the later period[126]
Their rich chemistry provides new
approaches to functional Si-P compounds
Furthermore the more challenging phosphasilyne with a silicon-phosphorus triple
bond (Scheme 321) is heretofore unknown[127]
this is mainly due to the high
tendency of the highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds to dimerize or even
oligomerize[126c]
However the availability of elusive phosphasilyne species would be
a strongly desired progression with respect to the synthesis of polyfunctional silicon-
phosphorus containing materials from it By spatial protection of a Si-P multiple bond
through the steric hindrance by suitable bulky substituents the oligomerization of the
highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds could be prevented additionally to the benefit of
the donor-acceptor stabilization of Si-P multiple bonds
Scheme 321 The first phosphasilene (left) and phosphasilyne (right)
Imaginable methods to synthesize a phosphasilyne employing corresponding
precursors comprise oxidation of bis-silylene 30a with elemental phosphorus and
elimination of phosphino silane 30b (Scheme 322) Whether the phosphasilyne 30c is
available depends only on the spatial andor donor-acceptor protection of bulky ligand
L Now there are not many choices of silicon compounds with very bulky ligand L
that are suitable for preparation of phosphasilynes Our current attempt was on the
Results and Discussion
- 59 -
way towards phosphasilyne employing amidinato ligand stabilized chlorosilylene
aLSiCl
[31a] However the isolated dimerized product was the unique 24-disila-13-
diphosphacyclobuta-13-diene (aLSiP2Si
aL) 31
[128] starting from the new N-
heterocyclic bis(trimethylsilyl) phosphino silylene precursor 30[128]
Scheme 322 Imaginable methods towards a phosphasilyne
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The starting material bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanyl silylene 30[128]
was easily
accessible in 83 yield by salt elimination reaction of N-heterocyclic chlorosilylene
26[31a]
with the corresponding lithium phosphide LiP(SiMe3)2 at room temperature
(Scheme 323) The 1H-NMR spectrum exhibits one singlet at δ = 058 ppm for methyl
of silyl and another singlet at δ = 124 ppm for methyl of NtBu as well as one set of
resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand in the region of 681-741 ppm
The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 30 shows two sets of doublet at δ = 229 ppm for silicon
of silyl and at δ = 1943 ppm for silicon of silylene The latter is much downfield
shifted than that of previously reported aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (562 ppm)
[31b] One
singlet at δ = -221 ppm was found by 31
P-NMR measurement which exhibits a
tremendous upfield shift when compared with that of aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (-165
ppm)[31b]
Results and Discussion
- 60 -
Scheme 323 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The molecular structure of 30 was also substantiated by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 315) The molecule 30 contains triply coordinate Si and P
atoms and two lone pairs at the Si and P center respectively The Si and P center
display a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry The sum of bond angles is 33071deg at
the P center and 27762deg at the Si center The latter is consistent with that (2765deg) of
aLSi-P
iPr2 The angle of N(2)-Si(1)-P(1) (10854(8)deg) is larger than that of N(1)-Si(1)-
P(1) (9998(9)deg) Si-N distances of 1877(3) and 1882(2) pm in 30 are comparable to
those (1875(1) pm and 1881(1) pm) of the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative
[31b] The Si1-P1
distance of 30 (22838(12) pm) is slightly shorter than the Si-P bond length (2307(8)
pm) in the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative and the elongated P1-Si2 and P1-Si3 single bonds in
30 (22264(13) and 22321(12) pm) reflect steric congestion within the P(SiMe3)2
subunit
Figure 315 Molecular structure of 30 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 22838(12) P1-Si2 22264(13) P1-Si3 22321(12)
Si1-N1 1877(3) Si1-N2 1882(2) Si2-P1-Si3 10859(5) Si2-P1-Si1 103905
Results and Discussion
- 61 -
Si3-P1-Si1 11822(5) N1-Si1-N2 6910(11) N1-Si1-P1 9998(9) N2-Si1-P1
10854(8)
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Since the phosphanyl silylene 30 was successfully accessed bearing a SiMe3 as
reactive leaving-groups at phosphorus[129]
its suitability as a precursor for the
formation of a phosphasilyne was probed Because of the labile nature of the P-SiMe3
bonds in 30 the compound was exposed to dichlorotriphenylphosphorane Ph3PCl2 as
a promising smooth oxidant for desilylation with the intention to produce the desired
phosphasilyne along with Me3SiCl and PPh3 Surprisingly the reaction of 30 with one
molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 in toluene at room temperature led to the formation of the
unique compound 31[128]
(Scheme 324) which could be isolated as yellow crystals in
72 yield
Scheme 324 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Compound 31 represents a dimerized form of the desired phosphasilyne and was
fully characterized by means of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-
ray diffraction analysis The 1H-NMR spectra of 31 displays a singlet for the
tBu
groups at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for the Ph groups in the ldquoaromaticrdquo
region The triplet signal in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 31 at δ = 265 ppm (1JSiP = 998
Hz) indicates that two P atoms are bonded to silicon center Meanwhile the more
deshielded (ca 46 ppm) singlet resonance at δ = -1649 ppm in the 31
P-NMR spectrum
compared to that in 30 is in accordance with the four-membered ring structure of 31
Results and Discussion
- 62 -
bearing two polarized Si-P π-bonds
The result of the X-ray diffraction structure analysis is in accordance with that of
NMR spectroscopy which confirms that 31 is a 24-disila-13-diphosphacyclobuta-
13-diene (Figure 316) The Si2P2 core in 31 has a planar diamond-shaped geometry
and possesses two-coordinated P atoms and four-coordinated Si atoms each with a
dative NrarrSi bond The Si-P bonds lengths in 31 are 21701(12) and 21717(11) pm
respectively which are in the range of a Si=P double bond length (2095(3) pm) in the
Phosphasilene[128]
and the Si-P single bond length of 30 (22838(12) pm) this
indicates σ- and π-electron resonance stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has
been confirmed by theoretical calculations (see p 64) Of note the transannular
Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo (25626 pm) is shorter than the Si-Si distance of disilacyclopropene[130]
(tBu3Si)2SiSi(Si
tBu3)C-Ad (Ad = adamantyl) (25797(8) and 25991(9) pm) and hexa-
tert-butyldisilane tBu3Si-Si
tBu3 (2697(9) pm) and the P1middotmiddotmiddotP1rsquo (3505 pm)
separations in 31 is much larger than that for P-P bonds observed in tetrahedral
elementary phosphorus P4 (221 pm)[131]
Evidently the peculiarly short Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo
distance is caused by the geometric constraints of the Si1-P1-Si1rsquo and endocyclic P1-
Si1-P1rsquo angles of 7234(4)deg and 10766(4)deg respectively and not driven by attractive
Si1-Si1rsquo interaction
Figure 316 Molecular structure of 31 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 21701(12) P1-Si1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-N1 1858(3)
Si1-N2 1856(2) Si1-P1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-Si1rsquo 25626(16) Si1-P1-Si1rsquo 7234(4)
N2-Si1-N1 7078(11) P1-Si1-P1rsquo 10766(4)
Results and Discussion
- 63 -
The formation of 31 in a multistep which is depicted in Scheme 325 was proposed
Firstly formation of the corresponding chloro-(silyl)phosphanyl silylene intermediate
31a is conducted by cleavage of one of the Si-P bonds of the P(SiMe3)2 subunit with
Ph3PCl2 Subsequently elimination of Me3SiCl from 31a occurs to give the reactive
intermediate 31b which could be treated as a silylene-phosphinidene (Scheme 325
right) or a phosphasilyne (Scheme 325 left) further dimerization of intermediate 31b
affords the isolated product 31 A similar dimerization process has been proposed by
Wiberg for disilynes (SiequivSi) as reactive intermediates to produce
tetrasilatetrahedranes[132]
To elucidate the reason for the formation of 31 preferred over its hypothetical Si2P2-
tetrahedranceisomer 31d (Scheme 326) we performed DFT calculations of 31 and
disiladiphosphatetrahedranes 31d The result shows that 31d is much less stable than
compound 31 with 462 kcalmiddotmolminus1
higher in energy which is in agreement with the
experimental result Compound 31 with a planar structure is most likely stabilized by
the dative NrarrSi coordination of the bulky amidinato ligands Meanwhile this also
leads to a shorter Si-N bond length that is 1856(2) and 1858(3) pm in 31 are shooter
than those (1877(3) pm and 1882(2) pm) of in 30 and also those of in chlorosilylene
aLSiCl (1870(2) pm and 1917(2) pm)
[31a] Furthermore this NrarrSi donor
stabilization could demonstrate an ylide-like electronic structure of 31 (Scheme 326)
Scheme 325 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 31
Results and Discussion
- 64 -
Scheme 326 Resonance structures of 31
In order to unravel the electronic configuration of 31 DFT calculations at
B3LYP6-31G(d) level using the parameters obtained from X-ray diffraction as the
initial structure were performed[101c 119]
The optimized structure matched the
experimental data of 31 very well According to the NPA charges each Si atom in the
Si2P2-ring has a large positive net charge (+1204) while as expected P atoms in the
ring bear slight smaller negative charges (-0765) Meanwhile HOMO-5 of 31 shows
a set of Si-P σ-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 left) whereas the HOMO-2 contains
mainly the delocalized two π-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 right) Accordingly a
NBO analysis indicates that the Si2P2-core of 31 bears a Lewis structure with four
occupied σ-bond orbitals for the Si-P bonds (1917e for Si1-P1 1916e for Si1-P1rsquo
1916e for Si1rsquo-P1 and 1918e for Si1rsquo-P1rsquo) along with two filled Si-P π-bond
orbitals with 1770e for the Si1- P1 and Si1rsquo-P1rsquo π-bonding interaction respectively
The latter canonical π-bond orbitals are strongly polarized toward the P atoms
(8753 at the P and 1247 at the Si) Likewise the WBI (Wiberg Bond Index)
values of the Si-P bonds (1142 and 1140) are higher than that of the phosphino
silylene 30 (0920)
Figure 317 Molecular orbitals of 31 representing the presence of σ-electron and π-
electron delocalization within the Si2P2 cycle HOMO-5 (left) and HOMO-2 (right)
Results and Discussion
- 65 -
According to the aforementioned betaine (ylide)-like resonance stabilization 31
totally differs from cyclobuta-13-diene derivatives The calculations of the nucleus
independent chemical shift[92]
(NICS) also supports this conclusion The result of
NICS reveals negative values (NICS(1) = -257 and NICS(0) = -601 ppm) indicating
that 31 has a somewhat aromatic character which is opposite to the properties of
cyclobuta-13-dienes that are antiaromatic As a summary the results of theoretical
calculations are in agreement with the idea to describe 31 as the ylide-like resonance
structure 31c with some contribution of the resonance forms As a result the smaller
endocyclic angle at phosphorus than that at silicon is contributed by the repulsion
between the negatively charged P atoms
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
Nucleophilic and electrophilic properties of Si Ge and Sn metallylenes were
discussed in chapter 32 (see p 46) Due to the strong donor property of the carbene
lone pair in coordination to empty p-orbital of low valent Si Ge Sn atom centers
some carbene stabilized divalent Si Ge Sn halides could be synthesized in the last
twenty years[28 44 133]
There is also a great interest to find mixed Si Ge Sn
metallylene-metallylene complexes in which one metallylene is stabilized through the
lone pair coordination of another one In the following the synthesis of the first
example of a silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex will be shown
The dimeric micro-chlorotin(II) amides 32[53]
(I44 in Introduction) was identified as
useful candidate for the generation of such an example The synthesis of
bis(trimethylsilyl)amino-tin chloride ((Me3Si)2N-SnCl)2 32 is shown in Scheme 327
Bis(bis(trimethylsilyl)amino)2tin(II) ((Me3Si)2N)2Sn 32a could be prepared in good
yield by the double lithioamination of SnCl2 with LiN(SiMe3)2 in a 1 2 ratio[47a]
The
Results and Discussion
- 66 -
same reaction but with one molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 gives the monosubstituted
product 32 It was also easily accessible by amino chlorine exchange between
((Me3Si)2N)2Sn and SnCl2 in a 11 ratio[53]
(Scheme 327)
Scheme 327 Synthesis of micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32
The dimeric structure of 32 can be splited by treatment with Lewis base for
example Si Ge Sn metallylenes In order to synthesize a silylene coordinated
stannylene chlorosilylene 26 was mixed with micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32 in toluene A
logical intermediate 33a is proposed here as an inevitable intermediate (Scheme 328)
At first chloro bridges are opened because of the coordination of silylene 26 to create
33a Then via amino chlorine exchange product 33 becomes accessible From a
saturated hexane solution at low temperature the silylene-stannylene dichloride 33
was isolated as colorless crystals in 49 yield The product 33 was determined by X-
ray diffraction analysis and elemental analysis Owing to the unstable nature of
silylene and tin dichloride coordination bond (Si rarrSn) 33 decomposed in a grey
mixture powder of amino silylene also-N(SiMe3)2
[33d] and SnCl2 after isolation from
solvent in vacuum 1H-NMR spectrum shows only resonances of amino silylene in
good agreement with the reported compound[33d]
Scheme 328 Synthesis of aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
According to X-ray diffraction analysis compound 33 represents the first example
of silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex The molecular structure of 33 (Figure 318)
Results and Discussion
- 67 -
exhibits a trigonal pyramidal geometry on Sn and a distorted tetrahedral configuration
of Si The Cl-Sn-Cl angle is 9400(9)deg and the sum of bond angles at the Sn center is
2820deg The SirarrSn distance (2740(2) pm) is longer than the Si-Sn bond lengths
(2622(2) and 2641(2) pm) in the silyl stannane compound[134]
(Scheme 329) The
Sn-Cl distances of 2468(3) and 2473(3) pm in 33 are comparable to those in a
carbene-stannylene complex (2456(2) and 2458(2) pm) (Scheme 329)[133b]
Si-N
distances of 1832(7) and 1827(7) pm in 33 are somewhat shorter than those of
phosphanyl silylene 30 (1877(3) and 1882(2) pm) and amino silylene (18780(10)
and 18776(10) pm) which is the remaining molecule of 33 without SnCl2[33d]
Scheme 329 A silyl stannane[134]
(left) and a carbene-stannylene complex[133b]
(right)
Figure 318 Molecular structure of 33 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Sn1-Si1 2740(2) Sn1-Cl1 2468(3) Sn1-Cl2 2473(3) Si1-
N1 1832(7) Si1-N2 1827(7) Si1-N3 1705(7) Si2-N3 1780(7) Si3-N3
1791(8) Cl1-Sn1-Cl2 9400(9) Cl1-Sn1-Si1 9886(8) Cl2-Sn1-Si1 8914(7)
Sn1-Si1-N3 1252(3) N2-Si1-N1 722(3) Si1-N3-Si2 1172(4) Si1-N3-Si3
1248(4) Si2-N3-Si3 1179(4)
Results and Discussion
- 68 -
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34
Because of the feasible structural tuning with many choices of donor groups a
general overview of pincer arenes was introduced (Introduction p 19) Compounds of
type 35a having a pincer-like skeleton are depicted in Scheme 330 They represent
promising new types of pincer ligands which could coordinate with a metal by facile
C-H activation in the ortho-position Although many bis-metallylenes are accessible
(see Introduction 13) pincer ligands containing divalent heavier group 14 elements
are new in the field of synthetic inorganic chemistry At the same time the desired
pincer arenes 35a could serve as much stronger σ-donor ligand towards transition-
metals than traditional phosphane ligands[70 79b c 122]
Up to now only a few isolable
spacer separated bis-silylenes with two divalent silicon centers are known these
include bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
in this work and bis-silylenes I42[52]
I58[61]
and
I64[65]
(in Introduction p 12-15) Inspired by these results the synthesis of a
silicon(II)-based pincer ligand 35a appeared attractive and its coordination property
towards transition-metals should be investigated
Scheme 330 Low-valent group 14 metallylene-based ECE pincer arenes
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35
Scheme 331 shows the synthetic route for the first attempt towards a bis-silylene-
based SiCSi pincer arene 35d The phenolation of trichlorosilane was readily
accessible to disilane 35b in hexane Reaction of 35b with two molar equiv of lithium
Results and Discussion
- 69 -
amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the amidinate substituted disilane 35c The bis-
silylene pincer arene 35d was not easily separable by the following dehydrochloration
of 35c employing two molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene Products seemed a
complicated silylene-LiCl mixture which was not soluble in toluene or diethylether
The desired bis-silylene pincer arene could not be isolated from mixtures
Scheme 331 The first attempt towards a bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35d
But the synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35 could be achieved through the protocol
in Scheme 332 Dilithiation of 46-di-tert-butylresorcinol with nBuLi furnishes the
corresponding 13-dilithium resorcinolate 34 After a salt metathesis reaction with the
N-donor stabilized chloro silylene 26[32b]
in the molar ratio of 12 the desired
compound 35[33b]
could be isolated as pale yellow crystals in 79 yield The
constitution and composition of SiCSi pincer arene 35 was elucidated by 1H-
13C-
and 29
Si-NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 332 Synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 35 exhibits one singlet for the N
tBu groups at δ = 124
ppm and one singlet for CtBu groups at δ = 174 ppm and one set of resonances for the
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands Almost identical variable-temperature (VT) 1H-
NMR spectra of 35 in C7D8 in the temperature range of 210 to 320 K indicate
Results and Discussion
- 70 -
relatively low rotation barriers of the Si-O bonds on the NMR time scale A sharp
singlet in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum at δ = -240 ppm is comparable to that observed for
alkoxy-substituted silylenes aLSiOR (R =
tBu
iPr)
[31b]
The molecular structure of 35 could be confirmed by a preliminary single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis but a discussion of metric parameters was not possible
because of the moderate crystal quality Still it is clear that the two silylene-like
moieties in 35 face in the almost same direction (Figure 319) To get more
information about the molecular structure of 35 DFT calculations [B3LYP6-
31G(d)][101c 119]
were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The geometry of 35
obtained by X-ray crystallographic analysis was used as the initial structure The
optimized structure of 35e and 35ersquo is displayed in Figure 320 The Si1-O1-C1 angle
(14179deg) is larger than that of Si2-O2-C3 (13217deg) While the dihedral angle of Si1-
O1-C1-C2 is 2437deg the dihedral angle of Si2-O2-C3-C2 is 039deg
Figure 319 Molecular structure of 35 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity X-
ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The Si-O single bond distances of 17056 and 17190 pm are little longer than those
of bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
(1641(2) and 1652(2) pm) and alkoxysilylenes aLSiOR
(R = tBu
iPr)
[31b] (16442(3) and 16501(2) pm) due to steric hindrance The C2-
Results and Discussion
- 71 -
symmetric rotational isomer 35ersquo was identified as a stable form on the hyperpotential
energy surface with a slightly lower energy of 75 kJsdotmolminus1
Interestingly the Si-O
distance of 35ersquo is little longer than those of 35e The bond rotation barrier of the Si-O
bonds in 35e and 35ersquo is similar and estimated to be +334 kJsdotmolminus1
by theoretical
calculation
Figure 320 Optimized structures of bis-silylene SiCSi pincer ligand 35e (left) and
its rotational isomer 35ersquo (right) at the B3LYP6-31G(d) level Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) of 35e and 35ersquo
compound 35e Si1-O1 17056 Si2-O2 17191 Si1-O1-C1 14179 Si2-O2-C3
13217 compound 35ersquo Si1-O1 17294 Si2-O2 17294 Si1-O1-C1 13028 Si2-
O2-C3 13028
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII
complex 36
Although bis-silylene 35 bearing an amidinate ligand may not serve as a π-acceptor
it was a strong σ-donor ligand To investigate the pincer-type coordination ability of
35 its reactivity towards phosphine palladium(0) complexes was evaluated Treatment
of 35 with 05 equiv of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)-palladium Pd(PPh3)4 in hexane
at room temperature afforded the novel silylene-silyl(phenyl)palladium(II) complex
36[33b]
as sole product which could be isolated as orange crystals in 81 yield
(Scheme 333)
Results and Discussion
- 72 -
Scheme 333 Formation of 36 from reaction of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
A different type of silyl-silylene metal complexes has been described by Ogino and
co-workers[66b c 78]
Compound 36 was fully characterized by multinuclear NMR
spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis The structure of 36
indicates that two equivalents of 35 were consumed With a 11 molar ratio of starting
materials the yield of 36 decreased (asymp30) but still no other product or intermediate
could be detected by 1H-NMR spectroscopy
The molecular structure of 36 is shown in Figure 321 Remarkably compound 36
crystallizes as racemic mixture of its R and S enantiomers of which only the S form is
presented here The PdII atom has a typical distorted square-planar configuration
defined by the two silylene SiII atoms Si2 and Si3 the silyl Si
IV atom Si1 and the
carbon atom C1 of the central aryl ring Interestingly there is a 12-hydride shift from
palladium to silicon during the complexation forming a Si-H silyl group which breaks
the former Si1-N2 bond in 35 Due to coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo The bent Si3-Pd1-C1 angle of 16783(12)deg in 36
is contrary to the linear X-Pd-C (X = Cl I Ph 4-fluorophenyl OCOCF3 etc) angles
of reported palladium(II) complexes supported by a PCP type pincer arene ligand[72b
77 135] The Si1-Pd1-Si2 angle of 15503(4)deg deviates from the linear alignment and is
smaller than the respective P-Pd-P angle of the PCP pincer-type palladium
complex[72b 77 135]
The silylene PdII dative bond lengths (Si2-Pd1 23271(12) and
Si3-Pd1 23038(11) pm) of 36 are shorter than that of the Si1-Pd1 distance
Results and Discussion
- 73 -
(23561(12) pm) illustrating the difference between a silyl ligand (Si1) with a SiIV
-Pd
single bond vs a silylene ligand (Si2 and Si3) with a SiII-Pd dative bond However
the Si2-Pd1 and Si3-Pd1 distances in 36 are somewhat longer than those of
silylenerarrpalladium complexes[136]
(224 and 226 pm) from Kira (Scheme 334)
Furthermore Pd1-C1(aryl) bond length of 36 (2125(3) pm) is longer than those of
reported PCP pincer-type palladium(II) complexes (Pd-C distance 197-203 pm)[135a-e
135g] presumably because of steric congestion
Scheme 334 Silylenerarrpalladium complexes from Kira[136]
Figure 321 Molecular structure of 36 Only the S form of racemic mixture is
shown Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity except for the H1 atom Selected bond lengths (pm) and
angles (deg) Pd1-C1 2125(3) Pd1-Si1 23561(12) Pd1-Si2 23271(12) Pd1-Si3
23038(11) Si1-O1 1694(3) Si1-N1 1789(4) Si2-O2 1675(3) Si2-N5 1862(3)
Si2-N6 1840(4) Si3-O3 1662(3) Si3-N7 1888(3) Si3-N8 1860(3) Si4-O4
1704(3) Si4-N3 1893(4) Si4-N4 1892(4) Si1-Pd1-Si2 15503(4) Si1-Pd1-C1
Si2Si1
C1
Pd
Si3
213 pm
233 pm236 pm
230 pm
O1 O2
Results and Discussion
- 74 -
7861(11) Si2-Pd1-C1 7681(11) Si3-Pd1-C1 16783(12)
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 36 shows twelve sets of nonequivalent
tBu groups
which agrees with its crystallographic analysis Moreover the resonance for the Si-H
proton is observed at δ = 659 ppm The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 36 in C6D6 displays
four signals at δ = minus87 (aLSi Si4) 397 (HSi Si1) 623 and 658 ppm (SirarrPd Si2
and Si3) respectively The chemical shift of the Si1 atom (SiIV
-H) has moved upfield
comparable to those of a related HSirarrPd complex reported by Kira Iwamoto and co-
workers because of the electronegative N and O atoms bound to the Si1 atom[136a]
The 29
Si resonances of the two SiII atoms (Si2 Si3) coordinated to the palladium
center are similar to those of other amidinate-based silylene transition-metal
complexes[71 137]
and significantly shifted to higher field in comparison to those
reported for donor-free silylene palladium complexes owing to the additional N-donor
coordination of the amidinate ligand to the SiII atom Additionally the infrared
spectrum of 36 shows a weak Si-H stretching vibration band at 2135 cmminus1
The
observed stretching frequency of 36 is higher than those of other reported palladium
hydridosilyl complexes (2008ndash2121 cmminus1
)[135c 135f 136a]
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism
To investigate the uncommon reactivity of 35 towards Pd(PPh3)4 quantum
chemical calculations using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP level using
6-31G(d) basis set for H C N O P and Si atoms and the LANL2DZ level for the Pd
atom with the Gaussian 03 program for model compounds 36andash36e were performed
by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)[101c 119]
A schematic representation of the potential
energy surface of the proposed pathway for the formation of 36 is given in Scheme
335
Results and Discussion
- 75 -
Scheme 335 DFT-derived relative energies of model compounds 35a-35e
From this it was assumed that stepwise dissociation of phosphine ligands of
Pd(PPh3)4 forms 36a as the initial intermediate by the insertion reaction of Pd0 into
the pincer C-H bond of the central aryl ring of 35 Subsequently the 16-valence
electron PdII complex 36a undergoes a 12-hydride shift from palladium to a silicon(II)
donor atom to form the 14-valence electron silylene silyl(aryl)palladium(II) complex
36c as second intermediate The latter process occurs through transition state 36b-TS
with a barrier of +878 kJsdotmolminus1
and 36c is only 67 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36b-TS
The electron-deficient PdII complex 36c readily undergoes coordination with
phosphine ligand or silylene donor moiety of ldquofreerdquo 35 leading to the formation of
more stable 16-electron complexes According to that the calculated relative energies
of PrarrPd complex 36d stabilized by PPh3 and SirarrPd complex 36e stabilized by
methoxy silylene aLSiOMe as model silylene donor are +380 and minus176 kJsdotmol
minus1
respectively Since SiII of intramolecular N-donor stabilized silylenes is a stronger σ-
donor than PIII
of phosphines complex 36e is 556 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36d
Overall the stepwise transformation of 36a into 36e in the presence of PPh3 and the
model silylene aLSiOMe is exothermic by 176 kJsdotmol
minus1
Results and Discussion
- 76 -
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
After successful isolation of the first bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
and the first bis-
silylene pincer arene 35[33b]
in order to obtain other new bis-silylene(germylene) as
potential bidentate σ-donor ligands the novel type of bis-silylene(germylene) with a
ferrocendiyl spacer which could result in unique properties was investigated The
facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
aLSi-Fc-Si
aL 38 (Fc = ferrocendiyl) and
aLGe-Fc-Ge
aL 40 respectively as well as
their corresponding cobalt and iron complexes could be realized in the course of this
PhD thesis[33a]
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40
Since the reaction of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
with dilithium resorcinolate 34 afforded
the SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 35 was assumed that chlorosilylene 26 and
chlorogermylene 39[41]
(aLGeCl) could be suitable precursors for the desired bis-
metallylene functionalized ferrocenes Ferrocene with nBuLi and TMEDA
(tetramethylethyldiamine) in hexane gave 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37[138]
quantitatively
Subsequently treatment of chlorosilylene 26 with 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 led to the
formation of bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield (Scheme 336) Similarly
bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40[33a]
could be isolated in 77 yield by salt metathesis
reaction of 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorogermylene 39 The structures of 38
and 40 were determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis mass
spectrometry and X-ray crystallographic analysis (only for compound 40)
1H-NMR spectra of compound 38 and 40 are very similar They exhibit a singlet for
four tBu groups (38 δ = 116 ppm 40 δ = 111 ppm) Two sets of hyperfine coupled
triplet (38 δ = 451 and 472 ppm 40 δ = 461 and 471 ppm) are assigned to the
protons of ferrocene The resonance of the Ph protons (38 and 40) appears in aromatic
Results and Discussion
- 77 -
resonance region from 690 to 717 ppm Accordingly the 13
C-NMR spectra of 38 and
40 each show three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (38 δ = 709 727 and
846 ppm 40 δ = 701 723 and 920 ppm) Furthermore bis-silylene 38 gives rise to
a singlet at δ = 433 ppm in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum
Scheme 336 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 40
Single crystals of 40 suitable for an X-ray single crystal analysis were obtained
from hexane solution The crystals of 40 consist of two conformational isomers as
shown in Figure 322 Two molecular structures of 40 confirm that the two N-donor-
stabilized germylene moieties are bonded to C1 and C7 (endo-configuration) or C8
(exo-configuration) of the ferrocendiyl spacer Distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C7 in
40-endo are 1979(9) and 1983(11) pm while distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C8 in 40-
exo are 1991(2) and 19774(19) pm respectively The Ge-N bonds (2006 to 20402
pm) of two isomers are slightly shorter than those of precursor 39[41]
The GeII centers
in 40 adopt a pyramidal geometry with the sums of bond angles of 25593deg and
25669deg for 40-exo 2591deg and 2546deg for 40-endo respectively The structural feature
of the amidinate ligands in 40 is reminiscent of those reported for related bis-
germylenes such as I63[64]
(aLGe-NPh)2 and I75 I76 LGe-X-GeL (X = O S L =
tBuC(N-Dip)2)
[67] The isolation of two conformational isomers of 40-exo and 40-endo
indicates a small rotating energy of the functional ferrocendiyl That means bis-
germylene 40 and bis-silylene 38 don not need more activation energy serving as
bidentate ligand
Results and Discussion
- 78 -
Figure 322 Molecular structures of 40-endo (top) and 40-exo (bottom) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 40-endo (top) Ge(1)-C(1)
1979(9) Ge(2)-C(7) 1983(11) Ge(1)-N(1) 2027(8) Ge(1)-N(2) 2006(8)
Ge(2)-N(3) 2022(7) Ge(2)-N(4) 2037(7) C(1)-Ge(1)-N(2) 983(3) C(1)-Ge(1)-
N(1) 955(3) N(2)-Ge(1)-N(1) 653(3) C(7)-Ge(2)-N(3) 953(4) C(7)-Ge(2)-
N(4) 941(4) N(3)-Ge(2)-N(4) 652(3) for 40-exo (bottom) Ge1-C1 1991(2)
Ge2-C8 19774(19) Ge1-N1 20261(16) Ge1-N2 20247(17) Ge2-N3
20402(15) Ge2-N4 20162(16) C1-Ge1-N1 9662(7) C1-Ge1-N2 9445(7) N1-
Ge1-N2 6486(7) C8-Ge2-N3 9492(7) C8-Ge2-N4 9716(7) N3-Ge2-N4
6459(6)
The molecular structure of bis-silylene 38 has been ambiguously determined by X-
ray single crystal diffraction The structural feature of 38 is very similar to that of 40-
exo isomer However the X-ray data are not sufficient for any further discussion
(Figure 323)
Results and Discussion
- 79 -
Figure 323 Molecular structure of 38 X-ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The mass spectrometry confirmed the composition of 38 (Figure 324) The (ESI)
mass spectrum of 38 is dominated by a peak at mz 703329 which can be attributed to
the protonated molecular ion [38+H]+ Isotopic distribution of molecular peaks
demonstrates a good agreement with calculated mass composition The comparison of
experiment and calculation confirms the presence of bis-silylenyl substituted
ferrocene molecules
6 9 0 6 9 5 7 0 0 7 0 5 7 1 0 7 1 5 7 2 0
m z
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
Re
lative
Abu
nda
nce
7 0 3 3 2 9
7 0 4 3 3 2
7 0 5 3 3 47 0 1 3 3 4
7 0 6 3 2 96 9 0 2 4 9 6 9 5 2 2 5 7 1 7 3 4 57 1 0 4 7 3
7 0 3 3 3 1
7 0 4 3 3 4
7 0 5 3 3 87 0 1 3 3 6
7 0 6 3 3 17 1 0 3 3 5
N L 3 1 3 E 7
W Y-F e S i2 _ S p ri tze 1 -2 9 R T 0 0 0 -0 7 7 A V 2 9 T F T M S + c E S I F u ll m s [1 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 ]
N L 4 9 7 E 5
C 4 0 H 5 4 F e N 4 S i 2 + H C 4 0 H 5 5 F e 1 N 4 S i 2
p a C hrg 1
Figure 324 Experimental (top) and simulated (bottom) ESI-MS spectra of 38
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable silylene- and
germylene-substituted ferrocenes respectively Alternative example of SiII-ferrocene
Results and Discussion
- 80 -
compound is a disilene-functionalized ferrocene reported by Tokitoh and co-workers
recently[139]
However disilene derivates belong essentially to another type of low-
valent silicon compounds in comparison to triply coordinated silylenes Instead of
conjugated electronic effect of disilene-ferrocene system the ferrocene bridged bis-
silylene or bis-germylene system could have better chelating σ-donor character It is to
confirm in a coordination chemistry of bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 with
transition-metals
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40
In order to investigate the coordination ability of 38 and 40 toward transition-
metals and inspired by the reactivity of bis-silylenes 28 and 35 toward Ni0 and Pd
0[32a
33b] as well as by reports on spacer-separated bis-germylene molybdenum chelated
complex I65-Mo[66b]
(see Introduction p 18) firstly the coordination behavior of
potentially bidentate ligands 38 and 40 towards CoICp complex fragments
[140] was
examined A suitable CoICp source is accessible by treatment of CoBr2 with sodium
cyclopentadienide (NaCp) and potassium graphite (KC8) in tolueneTHF 41 mixture
resulting in the generation of (CpCoILn) (L = toluene or THF) in solution Reaction of
thus-formed CoICp species with bis-silylene 38 yielded the desired bis-silylene Co
I
complex 41[33a]
in 30 yield (Scheme 337) Similarly bis-germylene CoI complex
42[33a]
has been successfully synthesized from 40 and isolated in 61 yield
Scheme 337 Synthesis of bis-silylene and bis-germylene CoICp complexes 41 and 42
Results and Discussion
- 81 -
In comparison to bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 1H-NMR spectra of
compound 41 and 42 show an additional singlet for protons of CoICp group (41 δ =
496 ppm 42 δ = 504 ppm) A singlet for four tBu-groups appears at δ = 111 ppm by
bis-silylene Co-complex 41 and at δ = 139 ppm by bis-germylene Co-complex 42
Two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (41 δ = 440 and 461 ppm 42 δ = 438 and
459 ppm) are assigned to protons of ferrocene The resonance of phenyl protons (41
and 42) appears in aromatic resonance region In the 13
C-NMR spectra of 41 and 42
each exhibit one resonance for carbons of CoICp (41 δ = 780 ppm 42 δ = 759 ppm)
and three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (41 δ = 700 745 and 851 ppm
42 δ = 699 737 and 891 ppm) In the 29
Si-NMR spectrum the coordination of the
bis-silylene moieties to the Co atom results in a drastic downfield shift of the
resonance of 41 (δ = 820 ppm) in comparison to situation of 42 (δ = 433 ppm)
Isolated products 41 and 42 are first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-
silylene or bis-germylene in a chelating fashion The molecular structures of 41 and
42 (Figure 325) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses In both
complexes cobalt is coordinated one side by cyclopentadienyl and another side by bis-
silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40 and contains 18 valence electrons Angles of Si1-Co1-
Si2 and Ge1-Co1-Ge2 are 9389(5)deg and 9279(2)deg respectively
The silicon atoms in complex 41 and germanium atoms in complex 42 are four
coordinated and show a distorted tetrahedral geometry The Co-Si bond lengths of 41
(21252(14) and 21200(14) pm) are similar to that in chlorosilylene CoICp(CO)
complex 41a[141]
(21143(4) pm) Furthermore the Co-Si bonds of 41 are shorter than
the Co-Si distances in dichlorosilylene-CoICp(CO) complex 41b
[142] (21348(5) pm)
in dichlorosilylene-Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41c
[143] (2228(2) pm) in
chlorosilylene Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41d
[141] (22060(6) and 22017(6) pm)
respectively The silicon cobalt double bond (Si=CoV) distance (21848(8) pm) in
cobalt(V) complex 41e[144]
is also longer than dative SirarrCoI bond lengths in complex
41 Structures of cited compounds are drawn for clarity in Scheme 338
Results and Discussion
- 82 -
Scheme 338 Structural features of 41 and cited silylene cobalt complexes
Figure 325 Molecular structures of 41 (top) and 42 (bottom) Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 41 (top) Co1-Si1
21252(14) Co1-Si2 21200(14) Si1-C6 1894(5) Si2-C11 1887(5) Si1-N1
1898(4) Si1-N2 1907(4) Si2-N3 1904(4) Si2-N4 1922(4) Si1-Co1-Si2
9389(5) N1-Si1-N2 6847(15) N3-Si2-N4 6866(16) C6-Si1-Co1 13254(14)
for 42 (bottom) Co1-Ge1 21967(6) Co1-Ge2 21979(6) Ge1-C6 1965(4) Ge2-
Results and Discussion
- 83 -
C11 1961(4) Ge1-N1 2020(3) Ge1-N2 2031(3) Ge2-N3 2041(3) Ge2-N4
2029(3) Ge1-Co1-Ge2 9279(2) N1-Ge1-N2 6490(11) N3-Ge2-N4 6485(11)
C6-Ge1-Co1 13280(10) C11-Ge2-Co1 13140(10)
The Co-Ge bonds of 42 (21967(6) and 21979(6) pm) are also shorter than those in
the germylene cobalt(0) complex [((Me3Si)2N)2GerarrCo(CO)3]2[145]
(2262(1) pm) and
the tetragermacyclobutadiene-CoICp complex η
4-((
tBu2MeSi)4Ge4)CoCp (24616(3)
and 25036(3) pm)[90d]
respectively In fact the Co-Ge bonds in 42 are the shortest
Co-Ge bonds known to date The relatively short EII-Co bonds in 41 and 42 suggest
that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands in the series of divalent silicon
and germanium compounds as yet
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45
To test σ-donor ability of bis-(silylene) 38 versus carbonyl a ligand exchange
reaction between 38 and (CO)2CoCp[146]
was explored When 38 was allowed to react
with two molar equivalents of (CO)2CoCp the bis-silylene 41 bridged bimetallic
cobalt complex 44[33a]
could be obtained in 87 yield accompanied by half CO-
elimination of (CO)2CoCp (Scheme 339) The reaction of bis-silylene 38 with one
molar equivalent of (CO)2CoCp furnished the same product but the isolable yield was
low The structure of 44 was determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy
elemental analysis and infrared spectroscopy
Scheme 339 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged CoI(CO)Cp complex 44
Results and Discussion
- 84 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 44 exhibits a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
124 ppm A singlet (δ = 523 ppm) and two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (δ = 461
and 476 ppm) are assigned to protons of CoICp group and ferrocene with the ratio of
1044 The resonance of phenyl protons appears in aromatic resonance region The
29Si-NMR spectrum of 44 shows a singlet resonance at δ = 857 ppm similar to that
of 41 In the 13
C-NMR spectrum of 44 one characteristic signal for the CO ligands
appears at δ = 2078 ppm Furthermore the IR spectrum of 44 exhibits a strong
stretching band at ν = 1888 cmminus1
attributed to the carbonyl groups on the CoI atoms
The observed CO stretching frequency of 44 is much lower than those of 41a
(ν = 1968 cmminus1
)[141]
thus indicating that the bis-silylene substituted ferrocene 38 is a
much stronger σ-donor than chlorosilylene 26[32b]
Another carbonyl-silylene exchange reaction was investigated between bis-
silylene 38 and diiron nonacarbonyl Fe2(CO)9 Toluene was added to a 11 mixture of
38 and Fe2(CO)9 at room temperature to afford a bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4
complex 45 in 73 yield (Scheme 340) The structure of 45 was determined by
multinuclear NMR spectroscopy infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 340 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4 complex 45
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 45 shows a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
109 ppm Two singlets at δ = 483 and 500 ppm are assigned to protons of ferrocene
Multiplets in the range of 699-739 ppm are resonances of phenyl protons The 29
Si-
NMR spectrum of 45 exhibits a singlet resonance at δ = 1050 ppm It is much more
Results and Discussion
- 85 -
downfield shifted than those in complexes 41 (820 ppm) and 44 (857 ppm) One
characteristic strong signal for the CO ligands appears at δ = 2169 ppm in the 13
C-
NMR spectrum of 45 It is compatible to the resonance (δ = 2167 ppm) of the
silylene-Fe(CO)4 complex aL(
tBuO)SirarrFe(CO)4
[71] In the IR spectrum of 45 the
CO stretching frequencies (2026 1948 1900 cmminusl
) are also quite uniform to those of
this complex (2026 1949 1899 cmminusl
)[71]
Due to the rotation energy of ferrocene and
the symmetric bulky coordination of Fe the second CO-substitution could be more
difficult Consequently a chelated complex 38rarrFe(CO)3 was not observed during the
isolation of products
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts
The investigation of the catalytic activity of complexes 28 41 and 42 was carried
out in collaboration with Stephan Enthaler (TU Berlin)[33a]
Nickel or palladium catalyzed cross-coupling reactions between organozinc halides
and aromatic halides constitute an excellent synthetic method for polyfunctional
aromatic compounds[147]
To probe the catalytic activity of bis-silylene oxide Ni0
complex 28 a cross-coupling reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-
iodobenzene was investigated (Scheme 341) The direct iodine substitution of p-
methoxyl-iodobenzene with organometallic compounds was not expected without a
catalyst In the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3) coupling
reaction was observed and product 46 was obtained in 65 yield indicating a
potential application for this kind of complexes
Results and Discussion
- 86 -
Scheme 341 Application of 28 as precatalyst in cross-coupling reactions
Moreover the reactivity of the resulting complexes 41 and 42 as precatalysts for
Co-mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile was
expected[148]
It is known numerous cobalt complexes have been successfully applied
as precatalysts in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions and this becomes a powerful tool in
organic chemistry to form arene and heteroarene moieties[148-149]
Thus the catalytic
abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions were investigated
(Scheme 342)
Scheme 342 Application of 41 and 42 as precatalyst in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions
A first set of experiments was dedicated to the benchmark trimerization of phenyl
acetylene which resulted in the quantitative formation of isomers 47a and 47b in the
presence of complex 41 To our surprise similar attempts to employ 42 as precatalyst
failed with no product formation presumably due to a stronger coordination of GeII
atoms to the Co center which consequently prevents from the formation of an active
Results and Discussion
- 87 -
site for substrate coordination In another set of experiments the formation of
substituted pyridines 48a and 48b by [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenyl acetylene and
an excess of acetonitrile was detected[150]
The catalytic activity of SiII-Co complex 41
was exhibited distinctly again while no product formation could be observed with
GeII-Co complex 42 To some extent the application of CpCo(CO)2 as precatalyst
gave however substituted pyridines in lower yield (48a (3) and 48b (11))[33a]
Scheme 343 Proposed mechanism of 41 as precatalyst for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition
A possible mechanism for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenylacetylene or nitrile
to obtain 47 and 48 is proposed[149a]
as depicted in Scheme 343 At first bis-silylene
complex 41 could participate in a ligand substitution reaction with the
Results and Discussion
- 88 -
phenylacetylene to form an acetylene side-on complex Co-I The latter undergoes a
ring-formation to give the σ-bonded CoIII
complex Co-II which is saturated in
coordination with bis-silylene 38 Then intermediate Co-III is formed after π-donor
substitution by acetylene The succedent ring-enlargement furnishes the transient σ-
complex Co-IV and a subsequent elimination of products 47 and 48 occurs leading to
the active species Co-I by coordination of two phenylacetylene molecules In this
cobalt catalyzed transformation bis-silylene 38 serves as an important accessorial
ligand making the Co-center with high electron density more active and stabilizing the
intermediates Co-II and Co-IV
Unexpectedly complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is inactive The
possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII donor centers to
Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the substrate coordination
Summary
- 89 -
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
In this work various new metallylenes of Si Ge and Sn and bis-metallylenes
(interconnected and spacer separated) were synthesized The properties and
coordination ability of new metallylenes toward transition-metals including Fe Co
Ni and Pd were studied
The reduction of chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
with excess of elemental
potassium furnished the first potassium germylene anionic salt 3[83]
in 33 yield
along with the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip in 31
yield 3 consists of a dimeric half-sandwich complex interconnected via
intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds Each half-sandwich moiety consists of a
K(OEt2)2 cation which is η5-coordinated to the anionic five-membered planar GeNC3
ring with a considerable Cpmacr-like aromatic stabilization This is supported by density
functional theory (DFT) calculations The treatment of (nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
with KC8
gave the same products 3 4 and novel Ge4-cluster compound 5[83]
in very low yield
Compound 5 represents a dipotassium salt of the first ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like
dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a planar Ge42minus
core
Summary
- 90 -
Figure 41 Central molecular structures of 3 (left) and 5 (right)
The reactivity of compound 3 as nucleophile towards chlorogermylene 1[80]
and
chlorostannylene 7[80]
was examined Coupling reactions of 3 with 1 or 7 led to the
corresponding bis-germylene 6[104]
in 66 yield and germylene-stannylene 8[104]
in
34 yield respectively Compounds 6 and 8 were fully characterized including by X-
ray diffraction analysis The new compound 6 represent the first asymmetric
substituted bis-germylene with the shortest GeI-Ge
I bond length The germylene-
stannylene 8 is the first example with a GeI-Sn
I coupling as yet This novel structural
feature was explained with asymmetric structure and some ionic charge distribution
between 5- and six-membered rings by DFT calculation
Figure 42 Central molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right)
Summary
- 91 -
The synthesis of new ligands 12 or 20[110]
was easily accessible from lithium amide
10 with corresponding benzimidoyl chloride 11 or 19[112]
by salt metathesis reactions
Subsequent reactions of 12 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2middotdioxane furnished
chlorogermylene 14[110]
in 82 yield Germylene 16[110]
was obtained by
dehydrochloration of 14 with carbene 15[113]
in 78 yield The molecule of
zwitterionic germylene 16 bears two reactivity positions a strong nucleophilic
methylene group and a nucleophilic(s-orbital)-electrophilic(p-orbital) germylene site
Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas or with water resulted in the formation of
corresponding aminogermylene 17[110]
or germylene hydroxide 18[110]
in high yield
The reaction of compound 20 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2sdotdioxane led to the
unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained by
reaction of 21 with GeCl4 through dehydrochloration with carbene 15 as a base in
57 yield All new compounds have been characterized spectroscopically and
crystallographically 12 and 20 are new types of asymmetric β-diketiminato ligands
with a fused six-membered C6-ring to prevent the transformation of ligand backbone
and side-reactions of ligands They are promising ancillary chelating ligand for the
synthesis of novel silylenes and stannylenes The preparation of new germylenes
added significantly to the growing field of GeII-chemistry capable of small molecule
activation
Summary
- 92 -
Figure 43 Molecular structures of 16 (left) and 18 (right)
Figure 44 Molecular structures of 22 (left) and 23 (right)
A new challenge in metallylene synthetic chemistry is the preparation of chalcogen
(O S Se) bridged bis-metallylene species Here the synthesis and isolation of the
oxygen bridged bis-silylene 28[32a]
was achieved for the first time Reaction of
(HSiCl2)2O with lithium amidinate gave disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield The bis-
silylene oxide 28 was available by dehydrochloration of 27 employing LiN(SiMe3)2 in
76 yield The molecule of 28 contains two triply coordinated Si atoms and two lone
pairs one at each of the Si centers The Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent and
DFT calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small
Compound 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 furnished the Ni0 complex 29
[32a]
in 91 yield which is the first bidentate bis-silylene transition-metal complex with
18 valence electrons at the metal-site In diamagnetic complex 29 the two silylene
Summary
- 93 -
subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are tetrahedrally coordinated to the
Ni0 atom The strong σ-donor character of 28 led to a more electron-rich Ni center
This work will lead to new insights into the chelating silylene ligand transition-metal
coordination chemistry
Figure 45 Molecular structures of 28 (left) and 29 (right)
To possibly get access to a phosphasilyne a desilylation reaction that is phosphino
silylene 30[128]
was allowed to react with Ph3PCl2 30 was synthesized by facile
phosphanylation of chlorosilylene 26 with LiP(SiMe3)2 in 83 yield Surprisingly the
reaction of 30 with one molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 led to the formation of the unique
product 31[128]
as yellow crystals in 72 yield
An X-ray crystal structure analysis confirmed that 31 is a dimer of the desired
phosphasilyne Compound 31 is the first 4π-elektron Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene
derivate with two-coordinated P atoms and a planar Si2P2-ring The Si-P bond lengths
in 31 represent intermediate values between the Si=P bond length and the Si-P bond
length The equal Si-P distances in 31 already indicate σ- and π-electron resonance
stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has been confirmed by theoretical
calculations According to DFT investigation each Si atom in the Si2P2-ring bears a
large positive net charge (+1204) while the P atoms in the ring have somewhat
Summary
- 94 -
smaller negative charges (-0765)
Figure 46 Molecular structure of 31
Pincer arenes having divalent heavier group 14 elements are currently
unprecedented in synthetic chemistry but assumed to form complexes that could
serve as precatalysts for various organic transformations due to their coordination
ability towards metals Here the synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer
arene ligand 35[33b]
through the substitution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
by 13-dilithium
resorcinolate 34 could be achieved in 79 yield Treatment of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
afforded the unexpected silylene-silyl(phenyl)-palladium(II) complex 36[33b]
as orange
crystals in 81 yield
In compound 36 the PdII atom adopts a typical distorted square-planar
configuration defined by the carbon atom C1 two silylene SiII atoms and the silyl
SiIV
atom which is bonded with a hydrogen atom because of hydride shift to Si1 after
C-H activation by Pd Owing to the coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo With the help of theoretical investigation the
Summary
- 95 -
reaction mechanism was explained and the exothermic transformation from 35 to 36
was confirmed This is a new approach in metallylene transition-metal coordination
chemistry with complexes being potentially applicable in catalytic transformation
Figure 47 Molecular structure of 36 tBu and phenyl groups are not shown
Also a type of bis-metallylene with a ferrocendiyl spacer for new bidentate σ-donor
properties was investigated Here the facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and
bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 38 and 40 as well as their corresponding CoI
complexes could be described for the first time By salt metathesis reaction of 11rsquo-
dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorosilylene 26[32b]
or chlorogermylene 39[41]
furnished
bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield or bis-germylene 40[33a]
in 77 yield respectively
Reactions of a suitable CoICp precursor with bis-silylene 38 afforded the bis-silylene
CoI complex 41
[33a] in 30 yield Likewise the bis-germylene Co
I complex 42
[33a]
could be synthesized from 40 with CoICp fragment and isolated in 61 yield
Summary
- 96 -
Figure 48 Molecular structure of 40
Figure 49 Molecular structures of 41 (left) and 42 (right) tBu and phenyl groups
are not shown
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable ferrocene bridged
bis-silylene or bis-germylene respectively The isolated products 41 and 42 are the
first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-silylene or bis-germylene
functioning in a chelating fashion In both complexes cobalt is coordinated on one
side by cyclopentadienyl and on another side by bis-silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40
and contains 18 valence electrons The Co-Si bonds in 41 and the Co-Ge bonds in 42
belong to the shortest Co-E (E = Si Ge) bonds known to date The relatively short EII-
Co bonds in 41 and 42 indicate that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands
in the series of divalent silicon and germanium compounds as yet due to the electron-
rich ferrocene and metallylene segments
In addition in the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3)
cross-coupling[147]
reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-iodo-
benzene was observed evidently The catalytic abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in Co-
Summary
- 97 -
mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile were
probed[148-150]
However complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is
inactive The possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII
donor centers to Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the
substrate coordination
Experimental section
- 98 -
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
51 General section
All experiment and manipulations were carried out under dry oxygen-free nitrogen
using standard Schlenk techniques or in an inert atmosphere of purified nitrogen The
glassware used in all manipulations was dried at 150 degC prior to use cooled to
ambient temperature under high vacuum and flushed with N2 The handling of solid
samples and the preparation of samples for spectroscopic measurements were carried
out inside a glove-box where the O2 and H2O levels were normally kept below 1 ppm
All solvents were purified using conventional procedures and freshly distilled under
N2 atmosphere prior to use They were stored in Schlenk-vessels containing activated
molsieves Benzene toluene n-pentane and n-hexane were purified by distillation
from Nabenzophenone Et2O and THF were initially pre-dried over KOH and then
distilled from Nabenzophenone CH2Cl2 and chloroform were dried by stirring over
CaH2 at ambient temperature
For transfer of solvents or solutions stainless steel cannulas were used which were
stored in the oven at 120 degC The transfer was enabled by the vessel of origin being
left under a positive pressure of protective gas and the receptacle vessel of closed
with a pressure release value By filtration stainless steel cannula containing a filter-
head at one end was utilized Whatman (GFB 25) filters were affixed to the filter end
of the cannula with Teflon tape After use cannulas were cleaned immediately by
thorough rinsing with acetone followed by dilute HCl water acetone and
dichloromethane
In the case of low temperature reactions Dewar vessels were filled with acetone
and dry-ice was added until reaching the desired temperature Ethanol liquid
nitrogen was also employed for reactions in needs of -90 degC
Experimental section
- 99 -
52 Analytical methods
NMR Measurements NMR samples of air andor moisture sensitive compounds were
all prepared under inert atmosphere The deuterated solvents were dried by stirring
over Na (C6D6 THF-d8) or CaH2 (CDCl3) distilled under N2 atmosphere and stored in
Schlenk-vessels containing activated molsieves The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectra were
recorded on ARX 200 (1H 200 MHz
13C 50 MHz) and ARX 400 (
1H 400 MHz
13C
10046 MHz) spectrometers from the Bruker Company The 29
Si-NMR spectra were
recorded only on ARX 400 (29
Si 7949 MHz) spectrometer
The 1H and
13C
1H NMR spectra were calibrated against the residual proton and
natural abundance 13
C resonances of the deuterated solvent relative to
tetramethylsilane (benzene-d6 δH 715 ppm and δC 1280 ppm chloroform-d1 δH 727
ppm and δC 770 ppm THF-d8 δH 173 ppm and δC 253 ppm Heteronuclear spectra
were calibrated as follows 31
P1H external 85 H3PO4
119Sn
1H external SnMe4
Whereby in each case an 1-mm glass capillary tube containing the standard substance
was placed in the appropriate solvent in a 5 mm NMR tube and the spectrum recorded
The abbreviations used to denote the multiplicity of the signals are as follows s =
singlet d = doublet t = triplet q = quartet sept = septet m = multiplet br = broad
Infra-red spectroscopy IR spectra (4000 ndash 400 cm-1
) were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
Spectra 100 FT-IR spectrometer bands were reported in wave-numbers (cm-1
)
Samples of solids were measured as KBr pellets Air or moisture sensitive samples
were prepared in the glove-box and measured immediately The spectra were
processed using the program OMNIC and the abbreviations associated with the
absorptions quoted are vs = very strong s = strong m = medium w = weak br =
broad the intensities of which were assigned on the basis of visual inspection
UV-vis Spectrometry UV-vis spectrophotometric investigations were carried out on a
Specord S 600 spectrophotometer from Analytik Jena AG Pure samples of the
investigated substance were dissolved in dry solvents at suitable concentration The
UV-vis cuvette was filled and closed in a Schlenk tube under N2 atmosphere
Mass Spectrometry Mass spectra were performed at the Chemistry institute of
Experimental section
- 100 -
Technical University Berlin EI spectra were recorded on a 311A Arian MATAMD
spectrometer ESI mass spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap LTQ
XL spectrometer Solid samples were prepared in glove box and the solution of
samples was prepared 15 min before the measurement under N2 atmosphere Mass
spectra are presented in the standard form mz (percent intensity relative to the base
peak)
Elemental analysis The C H N and S analyses of all compounds were carried out on
a Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series instrument Air or moisture sensitive
samples were prepared in ldquotin-boatsrdquo in the glove box Samples with halogen were
filled in the ldquosilver-boatsrdquo for better measuring accuracy
Melting Point determinations A BSGT Apotec II instrument was used for the
determination of melting points Samples were prepared in glass capillary tubes under
N2 atmosphere The melting point was determined while the melded examples had the
same color like the solid before Without melting of samples the color change was
observed was determined as decomposition temperature
Single crystal X-ray structure determinations Crystals suitable to the single crystal
x-ray structure analysis were put on a glass capillary with perfluorinated oil and
measured in a cold nitrogen stream The data of all measurements were collected with
an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur S Saphire diffractometer at 150 K (MoKα radiation λ
= 071073 Aring) The structures were solved by direct methods Refinements were
carried out with the SHELXL-97[151]
software package All thermal displacement
parameters were refined anisotropically for non-H atoms and isotropically for H
atoms All refinements were made by full matrix least-square on F2 In all cases the
graphical representation of the molecular structures was carried out using Ortep32
version 108 The details for the individual structure solutions included in this
dissertation are available in the appendix
Experimental section
- 101 -
53 Starting Materials
Commercially available starting materials were used as received The following
important precursors were prepared according to literature procedures The references
are shown in Table 51
Table 51 Starting materials and references
Compound References Compound References
GeCl2dioxane [27] 15 (HCNtBu)2C [113]
(HSiCl2)2O [117] 19 Ph(Cl)C=N-iPr [112]
1 (nacnac)GeCl [80] 24 tBuN=C=N
tBu [152]
2 (nacnac)GeCl3 [82] 26 aLSiCl [32b]
7 (nacnac)SnCl [80] 32 (Me3Si)2N-SnCl [53]
9 (C5H10)C=N-Dip [111] 39 aLGeCl [41]
11 Ph(Cl)C=N-Dip [112]
Experimental section
- 102 -
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4
To a solution of 1[80]
(133 g 253 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added potassium
(148 g 379 mmol) at room temperature After stirring for 4 h the color of the
solution changed from yellow to brown Volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was first extracted with hexane (60 mL in portions) and then
with diethyl ether (60 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtrated and the filtrate was concentrated
and stored at -20degC for 5 d yielding the first germylene anion 3 as pale yellow crystals
(030 g 083 mmol 33)
C25H44GeKNO2 MW 50236
Properties soluble in THF slightly soluble in Et2O spontaneous
combustion towards air
Melting Point 220 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 108 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 112 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 184 (s 3 H
NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 298 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 618 (s 1 H γ-CH) 691- 698 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 182 (NCMe) 203
(GeCMe) 238 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 1185
(γ-C) 1224-1745 (arom C GeCMe NCMe)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C17H24GeKN(C4H10O)022 C 5797 H 713 N
378 Found C 5764 H 694 N 367
The combined hexane extract was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated and
stored at -20 degC for 2 d yielding the new germylene 4 as yellow crystals (052 g 078
Experimental section
- 103 -
mmol 31)
NHN
GeN
Dip
DipDip
C41H59GeN3 MW 66657
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 192 - 193 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 091 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 109 (d 3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH =
68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 122 (m br 12 H CHMe2) 130 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 162 (s 6 H NCMe) 329-340
(m 6 H CHMe2) 503 (s 1 H γ-CH) 564 (s 1 H NH) 683
ndash 718 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 225 (CHMe) 234 (NCMe)
240 (br CHMe) 245 (CHMe) 247 (CHMe) 256 (CHMe)
288 (CHMe) 292 (CHMe) 964 (γ-C) 1171 ndash 1635 (arom
C NCMe)
EI-MS mz () 6674 (03 [M]+) 4912 (100 [M -
iPr2C6H3NH]
+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C41H59GeN3 C 7388 H 892 N 630 Found
C 7354 H 868 N 613
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5
To a precooled (-78 degC) solution of 2[82]
(097 g 16 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was
added KC8 (094 g 69 mmol) After stirring for 4 h the reaction mixture was allowed
to warm to room temperature and the color of the solution changed from yellow to
brown The reaction mixture was allowed to stir an additional 48 h at room
temperature The signal of compound 1[80]
also disappeared in the 1H-NMR spectrum
of the resulting mixture and compound 3 and 4 were observed as main products
Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was first extracted
with hexane (50 mL in portions) and then with diethyl ether (50 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtered the filtrate was concentrated to 10
Experimental section
- 104 -
mL and stored at -20degC for 48 h yielding 3 as pale yellow crystals (024 g 067 mmol
42) The combined hexane extract was concentrated and stored at -20degC for 24 h
yielding 4 as yellow crystals (042 g 063 mmol 39)
Further concentration of the supernate and cooling at -20degC for 48 h yielded 5 as red
crystals along with colorless crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex
C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 MW 135028
Elemental analysis calcd () for C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 C 7890 H 1003 N 278
Found C 7821 H 999 N 281
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6
C46H65Ge2N3 MW 80531
To a solution of the germylene anion 3 (138 mg 0263 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at -
30 degC was added the solution of the chlorogermylene 1[80]
(93 mg 0263 mmol) in
THF (10 mL) The color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After
stirring for further 2 h at room temperature volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 5 days yielding 6 as dark red crystals (140 mg
017 mmol 66)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt169 degC (decomp)
Experimental section
- 105 -
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 107 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H
CHMe2) 111 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H CHMe2) 120 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 124 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 161 (s
6 H NCMe) 202 (s 3 H NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 301
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 319 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 367 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 518 (s 1 H 6-
ring-γ-CH) 682 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 702- 718 (m 9 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 191 (5-ring-NCMe) 210
(GeCMe) 240 (6-ring-NCMe) 248 (CHMe2) 249 (CHMe2)
250 (CHMe2) 258 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 261 (CHMe2)
279 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 1028 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1238 (5-ring-β-C) 1240 ndash 1694 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
UV-vis λ [nm] = 315 (intense) 358 (intense) 502 (2600)
EI-MS mz () 491 (45 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (15 [M-
(C3N2Ge) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65Ge2N3 C 6861 H 814 N 522 Found
C 6884 H 800 N 516
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8
C46H65GeN3Sn MW 85138
To a suspension of germylene anion 3 (116 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) at -
70 degC was added the solution of 7[80]
(187 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) The
color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After stirring for further 2 h at
room temperature the volatiles of the reaction mixture were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
Experimental section
- 106 -
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 10 days yielding 8 as dark red-black solid (96 mg
011 mmol 34) The solid was solved in Et2O and stored at 0 degC for 24 h building
dark red crystals
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt143 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 085 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 106 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 121 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 127 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 129 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2)
165 (s 6 H SnNCMe) 227 (s 3 H GeNCMe) 300 (s 3 H
GeCMe) 305 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 333 (sept
3JHH
= 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 378 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2)
510 (s 1 H 6-ring-γ-CH) 691 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 705-
721 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 188 (5-ring-NCMe) 207
(GeCMe) 242 (6-ring-NCMe) 246 (CHMe2) 248 (CHMe2)
249 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 260 (CHMe2) 268 (CHMe2)
280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 287 (CHMe2) 1035 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1237 (5-ring-β-C) 1244 ndash 1704 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
119Sn NMR
(C6D6) δ = -197
UV-vis λ [nm] = 314 (15000) 363 (14500) 541 (2800)
EI-MS mz () 537 (8 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (17 [M-
(C3N2Sn) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65GeN3Sn C 6489 H 770 N 494
Found C 6444 H 764 N 477
Experimental section
- 107 -
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12
C37H48N2 MW 52079
To a solution of 9[111]
(200 g 777 mmol) in 200 mL Et2O at -78 degC was added 16
M nBuLi (486 mL 777 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 11[112]
(210 g 700 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h Water free Et3NHCl (108 g 777 mmol) was added to the
reaction mixture and stirred All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 229 g (440 mmol
63 ) of the novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 as colorless crystals
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 148 ~ 150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 117 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 125 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 134 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 164 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 187 (s 1 H NH) 217 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335
(m 4 H CHMe2) 696 (s 3 H arom H) 715- 727 (m 8 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 218 (Cy-CH2) 221
(CHMe2) 236 (CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 256
(CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 285 (Cy-CH2) 286
(Cy-CH2) 977 (Cy-CCN) 1222-1441 (arom C) 1600 (Cy-
CN) 1658 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H49N2+ 5213896 Found 5213878
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48N2 C 8533 H 929 N 538 Found C
8518 H 927 N 547
Experimental section
- 108 -
526 The new chlorogermylene 14
N
N
Ph
Dip
Dip
Cl
Ge
C37H47ClGeN2 MW 62788
nBuLi (881 mL 141 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 12 (720 g 138
mmol) in 80 mL of Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed slowly to warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(330 g 142 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -
30 degC yielding 14 as yellow crystals (710 g 113 mmol 82 )
Properties soluble in hexane toluene sensitive towards air
Melting Point 203 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 097 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 107 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121-127 (m 9 H CHMe2) 128-139 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 144 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 155 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 203-227 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 317
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 327 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 394 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 417 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 680- 739 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 226 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 239 (CHMe2) 245 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
249 (CHMe2) 274 (CHMe2) 277 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
286 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 291 (CHMe2) 293 (CHMe2)
295 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1089 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1476
(arom C) 1651 (Cy-CN) 1688 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47ClGeN2+ 6282640 Found 6282639
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H47ClGeN2 C 7078 H 754 N 446
Found C 7073 H 762 N 457
Experimental section
- 109 -
527 The new germylene 16
C37H46GeN2 MW 59142
Germylene chloride 14 (300 g 479 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-butyl- imidazol-2-
ylidene 15[113]
(091 g 502 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (25 mL) at room
temperature and stirred for 48 h resulting in a white precipitate of the corresponding
NHCmiddotHCl salt The color of the solution changed from yellow to brown-red The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm
hexane two times The combined filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 16 as red crystals (220 g 373 mmol 78 )
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 167 ~ 168 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 115 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 126 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 135 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 12 H CHMe2) 155 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 204 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 221 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 369 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 380 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 415 (t
3JHH =
44 Hz 1 H C=CH) 675- 725 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 226 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 258 (Cy-CH2) 259 (CHMe2) 273 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 987 (Cy-CH)
1117 (Cy-CCN) 1236-1431 (arom C) 1473 1474 (Cy-CN
Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 704 (s) 787 (s) 939 (m) 1104 (s) 1135 (s) 1204 (s) 1248 (s)
1296 (s) 1322 (s) 1365 (s) 1439 (s) 1461 (s) 1535 (m) 1600
(s) 2822 (m) 2865 (s) 2922 (s) 2957 (w) 3022 (w) 3061 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2+ 5932951 Found 5932950
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H46GeN2 C 7514 H 784 N 474 Found
C 7495 H 800 N 484
Experimental section
- 110 -
528 Aminogermylene 17
C37H49GeN3 MW 60845
A red solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (15 mL) was exposed to dry
ammonia gas for 10 min at room temperature The solution turned to a yellow color
and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvent was removed and the
residue was dissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated solution was stored at 0
degC yielding 17 as yellow crystals (560 mg 092 mmol 92 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 173 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 117 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 120-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 142 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
154 (s 2 H NH2) 200-213 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 357 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 363 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 388 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 679- 724 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 214 (CHMe2) 230 (CHMe2)
234 (CHMe2) 237 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
248 (CHMe2) 272 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
285 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
293 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1023 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1462
(arom C) 1643 (Cy-CN) 1669 (Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 704 (s) 752 (s) 796 (s) 839 (m) 922 (s) 1096 (s)
1143 (s) 1174 (s) 1252 (s) 1304 (s) 1360 (s) 1430 (s) 1543
(s) 2865 (m) 2961 (s) 3021 (w) 3048 (m) 3343 (w) 3430
(w)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H49GeN3 C 7304 H 812 N 691 Found
C 7272 H 810 N 683
Experimental section
- 111 -
529 Germylene hydroxide 18
C37H48GeN2O MW 60943
A diluted solution of H2O in THF (179 mL 100 mmol 056 M) was dropped into
a solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) at -30 degC The solution
turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvents
were removed and the residue was redissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated
solution was stored at 0 degC yielding 18 as yellow crystals (580 mg 095 mmol 95 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 188 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 116 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 119-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 139 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
166 (s 1 H OH) 195-221 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 384 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 397 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 675- 726 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 229 (CHMe2)
233 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2) 243 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 281 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
291 (Cy-CH2) 314 (Cy-CH2) 1028 (Cy-CCN) 1233-1464
(arom C) 1647 (Cy-CN) 1666 (Ph-CN)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 713 (s) 743 (s) 770 (s) 791 (s) 839 (s) 926 (m)
1056 (m) 1104 (s) 1148 (s) 1170 (s) 1257 (s) 1313 (s) 1339
(s) 1365 (s) 1430 (s) 1470 (s) 1539 (s) 2861 (s) 2961 (s)
3018 (w) 3057 (m) 3643 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2O+ 6092900 Found 6092901
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48GeN2O C 7292 H 794 N 460
Experimental section
- 112 -
Found C 7300 H 786 N 464
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20
C28H38N2 MW 40230
At -78 degC to a solution of 9[111]
(150 g 583 mmol) in 150 mL Et2O was added 16
M nBuLi (365 mL 584 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 19[112]
(106 g 583 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 141 g (350 mmol
60 ) of 20 as colorless blocks
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 123 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 109 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 132 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 156 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 208 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 214 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 310 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 323 (m 1 H CHMe2) 713- 753 (m 8 H arom H)
1203 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H NH)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 219 (Cy-CH2) 226
(CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (CHMe2) 276
(Cy-CH2) 280 (CHMe2) 300 (Cy-CH2) 459 (CHMe2) 977
(Cy-CCN) 1226 1228 1275 1282 1284 1371 1389
1453 (arom C) 1576 (Cy-CN) 1673 (PhCN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C28H39N2+ 4033113 Found 4033112
Experimental section
- 113 -
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H38N2 C 8353 H 951 N 696 Found C
8270 H 977 N 679
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22
C28H37ClGeN2O MW 52570
nBuLi (16 mL 256 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (100 g 249
mmol) in 15 mL Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed to slowly warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(058 g 250 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 22 as yellow crystals (105 g 200 mmol 80 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 161 ~ 162 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 108 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 134 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 141 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 153 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 189 (m
1 H Cy-CH2) 202 (m 1 H Cy-CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2)
284 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 367 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz
1 H CHMe2) 396 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 688 (m
1 H arom H) 705-724 (m 7 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 222 (CHMe2) 228 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 240 (CHMe2) 241 (CHMe2) 253 (CHMe2)
263 (Cy-CH2) 272 (CHMe2) 283 (CHMe2) 285 (CHMe2)
Experimental section
- 114 -
293 (Cy-CH2) 312 (Cy-CH2) 537 (CHMe2) 1068 (Cy-
CCN) 1239 1250 1267 1271 1288 1294 1388 1410
1446 1469 (arom C) 1620 (Cy-CN) 1654 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H37ClGeN2O C 6397 H 709 N 533
Found C 6426 H 725 N 551
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23
C28H36Cl2GeN2 MW 54415
nBuLi (32 mL 512 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (201 g 500 mmol)
in 30 mL of toluene at -78 degC The solution was allowed to warm to room temperature
and stirred for 4 h To this solution GeCl4 (107 g 500 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-
butylimidazol-2-ylidene 15 (091 g 502 mmol) were added at -78 degC The resulting
suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were removed under
reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm hexane two times The
filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC yielding 23 as yellow crystals (156 g
287 mmol 57 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 126 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 113 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 137 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 146 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 189 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 332 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 361 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 421 (t
3JHH =
42 Hz 1 H C=CH) 701-726 (m 8 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 237 (CHMe2) 243 (Cy-
CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 254 (Cy-CH2) 257 (CHMe2) 286
Experimental section
- 115 -
(CHMe2) 304 (Cy-CH2) 511 (CHMe2) 1036 (Cy-CH)
1125 (Cy-CCN) 1248 1287 1296 1354 1391 1411
1421 1490 (arom C) 1682 (Cy-CN) 1709 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H36Cl2GeN2 C 6180 H 515 N 667
Found C 6203 H 517 N 679
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27
C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 MW 60781
To a solution of tBuN=C=N
tBu
[152] (329 g 213 mmol) in Et2O (80 mL) PhLi (119
mL 214 mmol 18 M) was added at -78 degC The solution was raised to room
temperature and stirred for 2 h To this solution at -90 degC 1133-
tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(230 g 1065 mmol) was added in one minute The
resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with toluene (60 mL)
by 80 degC two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h yielding
27 as colorless crystals (343 g 564 mmol 53)
Properties soluble in toluene sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 175 ~ 177 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 120 (s 36 H CMe3) 598
(s 2 H SiHCl) 733- 746 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 317 (CMe3) 544 (CMe3)
1276 1285 1297 1337 (arom C) 1711 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = -1110
IR(KBr cm-1
) 606 (s) 658 (m) 711 (s) 733 (s) 760 (s) 789 (s) 934 (s)
1068 (s) 1200 (s) 1269 (s) 1378 (s) 1486 (s) 1550 (s) 1566
(s) 1612 (s) 1783 (w) 1826 (w) 1950 (w) 1969 (w) 2000
Experimental section
- 116 -
(w) 2135 (s) 2188 (s) 2909 (s) 2934 (s) 2971 (s) 3232 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C30H49Cl2N4OSi2+ 6072822 Found 6072844
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 C 5928 H 796 N 922
Found C 5971 H 797 N 913
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28
C30H46N4OSi2 MW 53488
Toluene (120 mL) was added to a mixture of 27 (260 g 428 mmol) and
LiN(SiMe3)2 (144 g 856 mmol) at ambient temperature After 2 h the solution turned
to an orange color with the formation of LiCl The resulting mixture was stirred
overnight The solvent was then removed and the residue was extracted with toluene
(100 mL) The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h to yield yellow
crystals of 28 (175 g 327 mmol 76)
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 152 ~ 160 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 692-
731(m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 530 (CMe3)
1277 1291 1299 1349 (arom C) 1623 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -161
IR(KBr cm-1
) 608 (s) 709 (s) 746 (s) 790 (s) 892 (m) 972 (s) 1032 (m)
1070 (m) 1208 (s) 1268 (m) 1359 (s) 1412 (s) 1446 (s)
1476 (s) 1577 (m) 1648 (m) 1778 (w) 1826 (w) 1899 (w)
1970 (w) 2248 (w) 2867 (s) 2902 (s) 2928 (s) 2964 (s)
3065 (m)
Experimental section
- 117 -
ESI-MS mz calcd 5353288 Found 5353227
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H46N4OSi2 C 6736 H 867 N 1047
Found C 6688 H 857 N 1046
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
C38H58N4NiOSi2 MW 70176
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 28 (267 mg 050 mmol) and Ni(cod)2
(1375 mg 050 mmol) at ambient temperature The solution turned to a low-red color
and was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted with
toluene (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield low-red crystals of 29 (319 mg
046 mmol 91) The remaining solid was crystallized from hexane at -30 degC
suitable for single crystal measurement
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 183 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 130 (s 36 H CMe3) 281
(m 4 H CH2) 295 (m 4 H CH2) 504 (s 4 H =CH) 686-
707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 337 (CH2) 535
(CMe3) 760 (=CH) 1277 1293 1296 1335 (arom C)
1690 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 328
IR(KBr cm-1
) 607 (s) 644 (s) 698 (s) 750 (s) 792 (s) 925 (m) 1021 (m)
1075 (s) 1209 (s) 1267 (s) 1320 (m) 1361 (s) 1407 (s)
1444 (s) 1475 (s) 1578 (m) 1647 (m) 1775 (w) 1823 (w)
Experimental section
- 118 -
1902 (w) 1962 (w) 2280 (w) 2791 (s) 2855 (s) 2913 (s)
2975 (s) 3023 (m) 3063 (w)
ESI-MS mz () calcd 7003503 Found 7003577
Elemental analysis calcd () for C38H58N4NiOSi2 C 6504 H 833 N 798
Found C 6387 H 837 N 805
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30
C21H41N2PSi3 MW 43679
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(302 mg 102
mmol) and lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphate (285 mg 103 mmol) at ambient
temperature The solution turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 3 h The solvent
was removed and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30 degC for 24 h yielding 30 as yellow crystals (371 mg
085 mmol 83)
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 149-150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 058 (d
3JP-H = 44 Hz 18 H
SiMe3) 124 (s 18 H CMe3) 681-699 (m 2 H arom H)
734-741 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 44 (d
3JC-P = 100 Hz
SiMe3) 315 (d 4JC-P = 16 Hz CMe3) 540 (CMe3) 1289
1292 1293 1344 (arom C) 1572 (d 3JC-P = 95 Hz
NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 31 (d
1JSi-P = 229 Hz
PSiMe3) 440 (d 1JSi-P = 1943 Hz N2SiP)
31P NMR (81012 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = - 2110
Experimental section
- 119 -
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C21H41N2PSi3 4362315 Found 4362524
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31
C30H46N4P2Si2 MW 58083
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 30 (309 mg 071 mmol) and
triphenylphosphine dichloride (237 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The
solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted
with THF (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield yellow crystals of 31 (148
mg 025 mmol 72)
Properties soluble in THF sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 174 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 705-
733 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 331 (CMe3) 534
(CMe3) 1256 1276 1294 1359 (arom C) 1710 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 267 (t
1JSi-P = 998 Hz)
31P NMR (81012 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = - 1649
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C30H46N4P2Si2 5802736 Found
5802361
Experimental section
- 120 -
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn MW 60944
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(336 mg 114
mmol) and Chloro-amino-stannylene 32[53]
(360 mg 114 mmol) at room temperature
The solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was
extracted with hexane (20 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield colorless
crystals of 33 (343 mg 056 mmol 49)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air decomposed
slowly at room temperature
Melting Point gt 25 degC (slowly decomp)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn C 4139 H 678 N
689 Found C 4195 H 701 N 706
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35
C44H66N4O2Si2 MW 73919
At -78 degC to a solution of 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinol (150 g 675 mmol) in 30 mL
Et2O was added 16 M nBuLi (85 mL 136 mmol) in hexane and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h resulting in white slurry The reaction
mixture was cooled to -78 degC again and added the solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(398 g 135 mmol) in 50 mL toluene After the addition the mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with the warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC 395 g bis-silylene 35 (534
Experimental section
- 121 -
mmol 79 ) as slightly yellow solid
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
174 (s 18 H ArC(CH3)3) 693 - 713 (m 8 H arom H) 754
(s 1 H Ar-H) 787 (s 1 H Ar-H) 802 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (ArC(CH3)3) 318
(NC(CH3)3) 350 (ArC(CH3)3) 530 (NC(CH3)3) 1096
1243 1276 1295 1297 1313 1341 1552 (arom C)
1636 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -240
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C44H66N4O2Si2 C 7049 H 900 N 758
Found C 7075 H 930 N 756
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36
C88H132N8O4PdSi4 MW 158480
Bis-silylene 35 (600 mg 081 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (468 mg 041 mmol) were
mixed in 25 mL hexane at room temperature and stirred for 24 h The hexane solution
was filtrated and the white precipitate was washed with 10 mL hexane one time The
solid product was dried under reduced pressure to yield 520 mg (033 mmol 81 )
white powders The product was dissolved in warm hexane and stored at room
temperature for 10 days giving some orange crystals of 36 The reaction of bis-
Experimental section
- 122 -
silylene 35 with one molar equiv of Pd(PPh3)4 in toluene furnishes the same product
but the isolable yield is only about 30
Properties slightly soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 105 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 108
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 114 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 116 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 131 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 139 (s 9 H C(CH3)3)155
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 168 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 177 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 180 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 185 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 212
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 659 (s 1 H SiH) 686- 789 (m 22 H
arom H) 816 (s 1 H Ar-H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (C(CH3)3) 311
(C(CH3)3) 314 (C(CH3)3) 316 (C(CH3)3) 318 (C(CH3)3)
319 (C(CH3)3) 320 (C(CH3)3) 322 (C(CH3)3) 328
(C(CH3)3) 332 (C(CH3)3) 333 (C(CH3)3) 343 (C(CH3)3)
349 350 351 357 526 527 537 539 540 541 542
561 1112 1225 1236 1243 1256 1258 1271 1285
1287 1289 1291 1293 1294 1302 1303 1318 1323
1324 1326 1340 1342 1378 1380 1381 1409 1430
1533 1559 1585 1613 1622 1654 1731 1742
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -87 (LSi) 397 (Si-H) 623
658 (LSiPd)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 623 (m) 706 (m) 764 (m) 860 (m) 1056 (m) 1108 (m) 1206
(m) 1272 (m) 1365 (m) 1418 (s) 1446 (m) 1476 (m) 1446
(m) 1476 (m) 1495 (m) 1591 (m) 2135 (w) 2875(m) 2906
(s) 2964 (s) 3061 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C88H132N8O4PdSi4 C 6669 H 840 N
707 Found C 6616 H 875 N 676
Experimental section
- 123 -
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38
C40H54FeN4Si2 MW 70290
16 M nBuLi (423 ml 677 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (600 mg 323 mmol) and TMEDA (937 mg 806 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (30 mL) solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(190 g 645 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
pentane Compound 38 was obtained as deep red crystals in 70 yield (159 g 226
mmol) on storage of a saturated pentane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 117 ~ 119 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 116 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
451 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 472 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 692- 707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 318 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 709 (FeCH) 727 (FeCH) 846 (SiC) 1289
1294 1305 1349 (arom C) 1604 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 433
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeN4Si2 C 6835 H 774 N 797
Found C 6803 H 767 N 778
Experimental section
- 124 -
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40
C40H54FeGe2N4 MW 79201
16 M nBuLi (353 ml 564 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (500 mg 269 mmol) and TMEDA (781 mg 672 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (25 mL) solution of chlorogermylene 39[41]
(183 g 538 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
warm hexane Compound 40 was obtained as orange crystals in 77 yield (163 g
206 mmol) on storage of a saturated hexane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 168 ~ 169 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 461
(t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 471 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 691- 697 (m 6 H arom H) 712- 717 (m 4 H arom
H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 320 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 701 (FeCH) 723 (FeCH) 920 (GeC) 1289
1290 1302 1369 (arom C) 1659 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeGe2N4 C 6666 H 687 N 707 Found
C 6655 H 701 N 707
Experimental section
- 125 -
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeN4Si2 MW 82693
In a glove box CoBr2 (202 mg 092 mmol) NaCp (81 mg 092 mmol) and KC8
(131 mg 097 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent
mixture (41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at
room temperature The bis-silylene 38 (650 mg 092 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 41 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 30 yield (230 mg 028 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 166 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 139 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
440 (t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 461 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 496 (s 5 H CoCH) 680- 684 (m 2 H arom H)
692- 696 (m 6 H arom H) 720- 723 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (NC(CH3)3) 534
(NC(CH3)3) 700 (FeCH) 745 (FeCH) 780 (CoCH) 851
(SiC) 1291 1297 1300 1343 (arom C) 1673 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 820
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFeN4Si2 C 6536 H 719 N 678
Found C 6612 H 724 N 686
Experimental section
- 126 -
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhGe
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Ge
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeGe2N4 MW 91604
In a glove box CoBr2 (83 mg 038 mmol) NaCp (33 mg 038 mmol) and KC8 (54
mg 040 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent mixture
(41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at room
temperature The bis-germylene 40 (300 mg 038 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 42 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 61 yield (210 mg 023 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 309 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 131 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
438 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 459 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 504 (s br 5 H CoCH) 684- 688 (m 2 H arom H)
695- 698 (m 6 H arom H) 714- 718 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 322 (NC(CH3)3) 537
(NC(CH3)3) 699 (FeCH) 737 (FeCH) 759 (CoCH) 891
(GeC) 1287 1296 1300 1361(arom C) 1680 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFe Ge2N4 C 5900 H 649 N 612
Found C 5942 H 664 N 590
Experimental section
- 127 -
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44
C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 MW 100697
To a solution of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (250 mg 036 mmol) in 10 ml hexane
was added a solution of CpCo(CO)2 (130 mg 072 mmol) in 8 ml hexane The
reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All solvents were evaporated
in vacuo The corresponding bis-silylene cobalt(I) complex 44 was isolated as brown
air- and moisture-sensitive solids in 87 yield (310 mg 031 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 293 ~ 295 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
461 (m 4 H FeCH) 476 (m 4 H FeCH) 523 (s 10 H
CoCH) 683- 695 (m 6 H arom H) 702- 706 (m 2 H
arom H) 745- 748 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 313 (NC(CH3)3) 542
(NC(CH3)3) 723 (FeCH) 741 (FeCH) 804 (SiC) 809
(CoCH) 1287 1296 1300 1324 (arom C) 1687 (NCN)
2078 (br CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 857
IR(KBr cm-1
) 500 (m) 539 (w) 564 (m) 628 (s) 703 (m) 757 (s) 792 (m)
825 (w) 1028 (m) 1081 (w) 1146 (m) 1199 (s) 1275 (m)
1360 (m) 1388 (m) 1417 (s) 1438 (w) 1474 (m) 1520 (s)
1641 (s) 1888 (s) 2869 (s) 2901 (m) 2926 (m) 2965 (s)
1520 (s) 3097 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 C 6202 H 641 N
Experimental section
- 128 -
556 Found C 6287 H 630 N 571
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45
C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 MW 103867
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (500 mg
071 mmol) and Fe2(CO)9 (259 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The solution
was stirred for 12 h The solvent was evaporated in vacuo The corresponding bis-
silylene iron(0) complex 45 was isolated as yellow-brown air- and moisture-sensitive
solids in 73 yield (540 mg 052 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 155 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 109 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 483
(s 4 H FeCH) 500 (s 4 H FeCH) 699- 712 (m 8 H arom
H) 736- 739 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 311 (NC(CH3)3) 548
(NC(CH3)3) 735 (FeCH) 742 (FeCH) 771 (SiC) 1210
1287 1303 1308 (arom C) 1704 (NCN) 2169 (CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 1050
IR(KBr cm-1
) 630 (s) 765 (w) 1028 (m) 1035 (m) 1200 (m) 1370 (w)
1400 (m) 1474 (w) 1609 (w) 1648 (w) 1900 (s) 1948 (s)
1996(w) 2026 (s) 2865 (w) 2930 (m) 2965 (m)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 C 5550 H 524 N
539 Found C 5623 H 517 N 566
References
- 129 -
6 REFERENCES
1 P Pyykko Chem Rev 1988 88 563
2 N V Sidgwick Clarendon Oxford 1950 1 287 (b) R S Drago J Phys Chem 1958 62
353
3 P P Power Chem Rev 1999 99 3463 (b) R C Fischer P P Power Chem Rev 2010 110
3877
4 R Janoschek Chemie in unserer Zeit 1988 22 128
5 (a) F S Kipping L L Lloyd Dalton Trans 1901 79 449 (b) N N Greenwood A
Earnshaw Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed) 1997 362
6 (a) L Roumlsch P John R Reitmeier Silicon Compounds Organic In Ullmanns Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH amp Co KGaA 2000 (b) A J O Lenick
Basic Silicone Chemistry ndash A Review 1999
7 S Yao Y Xiong M Brym M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 7268
8 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7562
9 Y Xiong S Yao R Muumlller M Kaupp M Driess Nature Chem 2010 2 577
10 (a) S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4159 (b) S
Yao Y Xiong C Milsmann E Bill S Pfirrmann C Limberg M Driess Chem Eur J
2010 16 436
11 (a) K S Pitzer J Am Chem Soc 1948 70 2140 (b) R S Mulliken J Am Chem Soc
1955 77 884
12 (a) M Asay C Jones M Driess Chem Rev 2011 111 354 (b) S Yao Y Xiong M Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 1748 (c) Y Mizuhata T Sasamori N Tokitoh Chem Rev 2009
109 3479 (d) P P Power Organometallics 2007 26 4362 (e) P P Power Chem Rev 2003
103 789 (f) S Nagendran H W Roesky Organometallics 2008 27 457
13 (a) R West M J Fink J Michl Science 1981 214 1343 (b) M J Fink M J Michalczyk
K J Haller R West J Michl Chem Commun 1983 1010 (c) S Masamune Y Hanzawa
D J Williams J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 6136 (d) D E Goldberg D H Harris M F
Lappert K M Thomas Chem Commun 1976 261 (e) K W Klinkhammer T F Faumlssler H
Gruumltzmacher Angew Chem Int Ed 1998 37 124 (f) J T Snow S Murakami S
Masamune D J Williams Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 4191 (g) M Weidenbruch Angew
Chem Int Ed 2003 42 2222
14 L Pauling J Am Chem Soc 1931 53 1367
15 (a) G Trinquier J P Malrieu P Riviere J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 4529 (b) J P
Malrieu G Trinquier J Am Chem Soc 1989 111 5916 (c) H Jacobsen T Ziegler J Am
Chem Soc 1994 116 3667
16 L Pu B Twamley P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2000 122 3524
17 M Kaupp P V R Schleyer J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 1061
18 A D Phillips R J Wright M M Olmstead P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2002 124 5930
19 N Takagi S Nagase Organometallics 2001 20 5498
20 M Stender A D Phillips R J Wright P P Power Angew Chem Int Ed 2002 41 1785
21 T L Allen W H Fink P P Power Dalton Trans 2000 407
References
- 130 -
22 A Sekiguchi R Kinjo M Ichinohe Science 2004 305 1755
23 D Bourissou O Guerret F P Gabbai G Bertrand Chem Rev 2000 100 39
24 M Denk R Lennon R Hayashi R West A V Belyakov H P Verne A Haaland M
Wagner N Metzler J Am Chem Soc 1994 116 2691
25 M Driess S Yao M Brym C V Wuellen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 6730
26 M Kira S Ishida T Iwamoto C Kabuto J Am Chem Soc 1999 121 9722
27 V Lemierre A Chrostowska A Dargelos P Baylegravere W J Leigh C R Harrington Appl
Organom Chem 2004 18 676
28 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky S Merkel J Henn D Stalke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
5683
29 L Jafarpour E D Stevens S P Nolan J Organomet Chem 2000 606 49
30 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen D Lentz J Am Chem Soc 2006 128 9628
31 (a) C-W So H W Roesky J Magull R B Oswald Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 3948
(b) C-W So H W Roesky P M Gurubasavaraj R B Oswald M T Gamer P G Jones S
Blaurock J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12049
32 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890 (b) S S Sen
H W Roesky D Stern J Henn D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2009 132 1123
33 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167 (b) W
Wang S Inoue E Irran M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691 (c) R Azhakar R
S Ghadwal H W Roesky H Wolf D Stalke Organometallics 2012 31 4588 (d) S S
Sen J Hey R Herbst-Irmer H W Roesky D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 12311
34 R C Fischer L Pu J C Fettinger M A Brynda P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
11366
35 Y Wang Y Xie P Wei R B King H F Schaefer P Von R Schleyer G H Robinson
Science 2008 321 1069
36 S S Sen S Khan S Nagendran H W Roesky Acc Chem Res 2012 45 578
37 S S Sen A Jana H W Roesky C Schulzke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 8536
38 C Jones S J Bonyhady N Holzmann G Frenking A Stasch Inorg Chem 2011 50
12315
39 D Gau R Rodriguez T Kato N Saffon-Merceron A De Coacutezar F P Cossiacuteo A Baceiredo
Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50 1092
40 S P Green C Jones P C Junk K-A Lippert A Stasch Chem Commun 2006 3978
41 S Nagendran S S Sen H W Roesky D Koley H GrubmuLler A Pal R Herbst-Irmer
Organometallics 2008 27 5459
42 W-P Leung W-K Chiu K-H Chong T C W Mak Chem Commun 2009 6822
43 (a) S P Green C Jones A Stasch Science 2007 318 1754 (b) S J Bonyhady S P Green
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 2973 (c) S J Bonyhady
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch A J Edwards G J Mcintyre Chem Eur J 2010 16 938
44 A Sidiropoulos C Jones A Stasch S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
9701
45 Y Peng R C Fischer W A Merrill J Fischer L Pu B D Ellis J C Fettinger R H
Herber P P Power Chemical Science 2010 1 461
46 R Jambor B Kašnaacute K N Kirschner M Schuumlrmann K Jurkschat Angew Chem Int Ed
References
- 131 -
2008 47 1650
47 (a) C D Schaeffer J J Zuckerman J Am Chem Soc 1974 96 7160 (b) M J S Gynane
D H Harris M F Lappert P P Power P Riviere M Riviere-Baudet Dalton Trans 1977
2004 (c) M F Lappert P P Power M J Slade L Hedberg K Hedberg V Schomaker
Chem Commun 1979 369 (d) T Fjeldberg H Hope M F Lappert P P Power A J
Thorne Chem Commun 1983 639 (e) M Veith M Jarczyk V Huch Chem Ber 1988
121 347
48 M Veith R Lisowsky Angew Chem Int Ed 1988 27 1087
49 P B Hitchcock M F Lappert A J Thorne Chem Commun 1990 1587
50 R A Bartlett P P Power J Am Chem Soc 1990 112 3660
51 J-T Ahlemann H W Roesky R Murugavel E Parisini M Noltemeyer H-G Schmidt O
Muumlller R Herbst-Irmer L N Markovskii Y G Shermilovich Chem Ber 1997 130 1113
52 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky K Proumlpper B Dittrich S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem
Int Ed 2011 50 5374
53 R W Chorley P B Hitchock B S Jolly M F Lappert G A Lawless Chem Commun
1991 1302
54 A G Avent C Drost B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem
2004 630 2090
55 M Veith A Rammo Z Anorg Allg Chem 2001 627 662
56 M Veith J Fischer T R Prout M Noetzel P Hobein V Huch Inorg Chem 1991 30
4130
57 H Braunschweig P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem Int Ed
1994 33 1156
58 H Braunschweig C Drost P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem
Int Ed 1997 36 261
59 R E Allan M A Beswick G R Coggan P R Raithby A E H Wheatley D S Wright
Inorg Chem 1997 36 5202
60 (a) C Stanciu S S Hino M Stender A F Richards M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
Chem 2005 44 2774 (b) Y Peng B D Ellis X Wang P P Power J Am Chem Soc
2008 130 12268
61 B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem 2005 631 1383
62 C Cui M M Olmstead J C Fettinger G H Spikes P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 17530
63 X Wang C Ni Z Zhu J C Fettinger P P Power Inorg Chem 2009 48 2464
64 S S Sen D Kratzert D Stern H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2010 49 5786
65 H-X Yeong H-W Xi K H Lim C-W So Chem Eur J 2010 16 12956
66 (a) F E Hahn A V Zabula T Pape A Hepp Eur J Inorg Chem 2007 2007 2405 (b) A
V Zabula F E Hahn T Pape A Hepp Organometallics 2007 26 1972 (c) A V Zabula T
Pape A Hepp F E Hahn Organometallics 2008 27 2756
67 S-H Zhang C-W So Organometallics 2011 30 2059
68 O T Summerscales M M Olmstead P P Power Organometallics 2011 30 3468
69 (a) M Veith W Frank Angew Chem 1985 97 213 (b) M Veith Angew Chem Int Ed
1987 26 1 (c) H Chen R A Bartlett H V R Dias M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
References
- 132 -
Chem 1991 30 3390 (d) R E Allan M A Beswick A J Edwards M A Paver M-A
Rennie P R Raithby D S Wright Dalton Trans 1995 1991 (e) W J Grigsby T Hascall
J J Ellison M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg Chem 1996 35 3254 (f) R E Allan M A
Beswick M K Davies P R Raithby A Steiner D S Wright J Organomet Chem 1998
550 71 (g) M E G Mosquera J S Palmer A D Hopkins D S Wright Phosphorus
Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 1999 150 107 (h) M Veith M Opsoumllder M Zimmer V Huch
Eur J Inorg Chem 2000 2000 1143 (i) D R Armstrong F Benevelli A D Bond N
Feeder E A Harron A D Hopkins M Mcpartlin D Moncrieff D Saacuteez E A Quadrelli
A D Woods D S Wright Inorg Chem 2002 41 1492 (j) T Chivers Timothy j Clark M
Krahn M Parvez G Schatte Eur J Inorg Chem 2003 2003 1857 (k) J F Eichler O Just
W S Rees Inorg Chem 2006 45 6706 (l) D J Eisler T Chivers Chem Eur J 2006 12
233 (m) H Vaňkaacutetovaacute L Broeckaert F De Proft R Olejniacutek J Turek Z Padělkovaacute A
Růžička Inorg Chem 2011 50 9454
70 (a) A Meltzer C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7232 (b) A Meltzer C
Praumlsang C Milsmann M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 3170 (c) H Ogino The
Chemical Record 2002 2 291 (d) S Inoue M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
5614 (e) M Stoelzel C Praumlsang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed
2012 51 399
71 W Yang H Fu H Wang M Chen Y Ding H W Roesky A Jana Inorg Chem 2009 48
5058
72 (a) J Choi A H R Macarthur M Brookhart A S Goldman Chem Rev 2011 111 1761
(b) N Selander K L N J Szaboacute Chem Rev 2011 111 2048 (c) M E Van Der Boom D
Milstein Chem Rev 2003 103 1759
73 W Tang X Zhang Chem Rev 2003 103 3029
74 (a) A P Shaw J R Norton D Buccella L A Sites S S Kleinbach D A Jarem K M
Bocage C Nataro Organometallics 2009 28 3804 (b) L-C Song J-T Liu Q-M Hu G-
F Wang P Zanello M Fontani Organometallics 2000 19 5342 (c) S Shekhar J F
Hartwig J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 13016
75 N A Marinos Modellsysteme fuumlr die [NiFe]-Hydrogenase und Zinkkatalysatoren fuumlr die
Hydrosilylierung Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin Germany 2011
76 (a) C M Jensen D Morales-Morales The Chemistry of Pincer Compounds Elsevier
Science Amsterdam 2007 (b) M Albrecht G Van Koten Angew Chem Int Ed 2001 40
3750 (c) M Albrecht M M Lindner Dalton Trans 2011 40 8733 (d) D Benito-Garagorri
K Kirchner Acc Chem Res 2008 41 201 (e) C Gunanathan D Milstein Acc Chem Res
2011 44 588
77 (a) N Selander K J Szabo Dalton Trans 2009 6267 (b) H Zhang A Lei Dalton Trans
2011 40 8745 (c) J Dupont C S Consorti J Spencer Chem Rev 2005 105 2527
78 Silyl-silylene transition-metal complexes see (a) K Ueno S Seki H Ogino Chem Lett
1993 22 2159 (b) H Tobita H Wada K Ueno H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 2545
(c) K Ueno A Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 5023 (d) H Wada H Tobita
H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 3870 (e) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino
Organometallics 1998 17 2844 (f) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino Organometallics 1998
17 2850 (g) H Wada H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 1998 27 993 (h) K Ueno A
References
- 133 -
Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1999 18 2694 (i) H Tobita T Sato M Okazaki H
Ogino J Organomet Chem 2000 611 314 (j) H Koshikawa M Okazaki S Matsumoto
K Ueno H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 2005 34 1412 (k) K Ueno S Ito K Endo H
Tobita S Inomata H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 3309
79 For reviews on silylene complexes see (a) M S Eisen Transition-Metal Silyl Complexes
In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2003 pp 2037 (b)
M Okazaki H Tobita H Ogino Dalton Trans 2003 493 (c) R Waterman P G Hayes T
D Tilley Acc Chem Res 2007 40 712
80 Y Ding H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt P P Power Organometallics 2001
20 1190
81 L Bourget-Merle M F Lappert J R Severn Chem Rev 2002 102 3031
82 B Raumlke F Zuumllch Y Ding J Prust H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt Z Anorg
Allg Chem 2001 627 836
83 W Wang S Yao C Van WuLlen M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640
84 (a) R West H Sohn D R Powell T Muumlller Y Apeloig Angew Chem Int Ed 1996 35
1002 (b) W P Freeman T D Tilley L M Liable-Sands A L Rheingold J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 10457
85 J Fischer J Baumgartner C Marschner Organometallics 2005 24 1263
86 M Stender A D Phillips P P Power Inorg Chem 2001 40 5314
87 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 4349
88 W D Woodul A F Richards A Stasch M Driess C Jones Organometallics 2010 29
3655
89 W Clegg E K Cope A J Edwards F S Mair Inorg Chem 1998 37 2317
90 (a) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Matsuno M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 5768 (b) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Angew Chem Int Ed
2006 45 3269 (c) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Eur J Inorg Chem
2007 2007 5471 (d) V Y Lee Y Ito H Yasuda K Takanashi A Sekiguchi J Am Chem
Soc 2011 133 5103
91 S P Mallela S Hill R A Geanangel Inorg Chem 1997 36 6247
92 P V R Schleyer C Maerker A Dransfeld H Jiao N J R V E Hommes J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 6317
93 For a review see Z Chen C S Wannere C Corminboeuf R Puchta P V R Schleyer
Chem Rev 2005 105 3842
94 (a) R Ahlrichs M Baumlr M Haumlser H Horn C Koumllmel Chem Phys Lett 1989 162 165 (b)
M Haumlser R Ahlrichs J Comput Chem 1989 10 104
95 O Treutler R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1995 102 346
96 (a) A D Becke Phys Rev A 1988 38 3098 (b) J P Perdew Phys Rev B 1986 33 8822
97 (a) A Schaumlfer C Huber R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1994 100 5829 (b) K Eichkorn F
Weigend O Treutler R Ahlrichs Theor Chem Acc 1997 97 119
98 K Eichkorn O Treutler H Oumlhm M Haumlser R Ahlrichs Chem Phys Lett 1995 242 652
99 U Meier C Van Wuumlllen M Schindler J Comput Chem 1992 13 551
100 (a) C Van Wuumlllen Chem Phys Lett 1994 219 8 (b) C Van Wuumlllen Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2000 2 2137
References
- 134 -
101 (a) P J Stephens F J Devlin C F Chabalowski M J Frisch J Phys Chem 1994 98
11623 (b) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 1372 (c) C T Lee W T Yang R G Parr
Phys Rev 1988 37 785
102 W Kutzelnigg U Fleischer M Schindler NMR basis principles and progress Springer
Berlin 1990 Vol 23 page 169
103 (a) C Corminboeuf T Heine G Seifert P V R Schleyer J Weber Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2004 6 273 (b) P Von Rague Schleyer M Manoharan Z-X Wang B Kiran H Jiao
R Puchta N J R Van Eikema Hommes Org Lett 2001 3 2465
104 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Chem Commun 2009 2661
105 H Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 1999 18 3159
106 Y Sugiyama T Sasamori Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Takagi S Nagase N Tokitoh J Am
Chem Soc 2006 128 1023
107 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 2003 22 215
108 (a) K H Pannell L Parkanyi H Sharma F Cervantes-Lee Inorg Chem 1992 31 522 (b)
A Kawachi Y Tanaka K Tamao J Organomet Chem 1999 590 15
109 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess Chem Asian J 2009 4 1323
110 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Organometallics 2011 30 6490
111 W Keim S Killat C F Nobile G P Suranna U Englert R Wang S Mecking L D
Schroumlder J Organomet Chem 2002 662 150
112 P H M Budzelaar A B Van Ort A G Orpen Eur J Inorg Chem 1998 1485
113 N M Scott R Dorta E D Stevens A Correa L Cavallo S P Nolan J Am Chem Soc
2005 127 3516
114 L W Pineda V Jancik H W Roesky D Neculai A M Neculai Angew Chem Int Ed
2004 43 1419
115 A Jana I Objartel H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2009 48 798
116 S S Sen G Tavcar H W Roesky D Kratzert J Hey D Stalke Organometallics 2010 29
2343
117 R West J Am Chem Soc 1953 75 1002
118 R Drake I Mackinnon R Taylor Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Siloxane Polymers
and Copolymers In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd
2003 pp 2217
119 (a) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 5648 (b) B Miehlich A Savin H Stoll H
Preuss Chem Phys Lett 1989 157 200 (c) Gussian 03 Revision E01 M J Frisch G W
Trucks H B Schlegel G E Scuseria M A Robb J R Cheeseman J A Montgomery Jr
T Vreven K N Kudin J C Burant J M Millam S S Iyengar J Tomasi V Barone B
Mennucci M Cossi G Scalmani N Rega G A Petersson H Nakatsuji M Hada M
Ehara K Toyota R Fukuda J Hasegawa M Ishida T Nakajima Y Honda O Kitao H
Nakai M Klene X Li J E Knox H P Hratchian J B Cross V Bakken C Adamo J
Jaramillo R Gomperts R E Stratmann O Yazyev A J Austin R Cammi C Pomelli J W
Ochterski P Y Ayala K Morokuma G A Voth P Salvador J J Dannenberg V G
Zakrzewski S Dapprich A D Daniels M C Strain O Farkas D K Malick A D Rabuck
K Raghavachari J B Foresman J V Ortiz Q Cui A G Baboul S Clifford J Cioslowski
B B Stefanov G Liu A Liashenko P Piskorz I Komaromi R L Martin D J Fox T
References
- 135 -
Keith M A Al-Laham C Y Peng A Nanayakkara M Challacombe P M W Gill B
Johnson W Chen M W Wong C Gonzalez and J A Pople Gaussian Inc Wallingford
CT 2004
120 M Denk R K Hayashi R West Chem Commun 1994 33
121 L Kong J Zhang H Song C Cui Dalton Trans 2009 5444
122 A Meltzer S Inoue C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 3038
123 P Macchi D M Proserpio A Sironi J Am Chem Soc 1998 120 1447
124 (a) M Regitz O J Scherer Multiple bonds and Low Coordination in Phosphorus Chemistry
New York 1990 p 5 (b) M Driess Coord Chem Rev 1995 145 1 (c) V Y Lee A
Sekiguchi J Escudieacute H Ranaivonjatovo Chem Lett 2010 39 312
125 C N Smit F M Lock F Bickelhaupt Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 3011
126 (a) C N Smit F Bickelhaupt Organometallics 1987 6 1156 (b) E Niecke E Klein M
Nieger Angew Chem Int Ed 1989 28 751 (c) R Corriu G Lanneau C Priou Angew
Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1130 (d) M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1022 (e) H R
G Bender E Niecke M Nieger J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 3314 (f) M Driess S Rell
H Pritzkow Chem Commun 1995 253 (g) M Driess H Pritzkow S Rell U Winkler
Organometallics 1996 15 1845 (h) M Driess S Block M Brym M T Gamer Angew
Chem Int Ed 2006 45 2293 (i) S Yao S Block M Brym M Driess Chem Commun
2007 3844 (j) V Y Lee M Kawai A Sekiguchi H Ranaivonjatovo J Escudieacute
Organometallics 2009 28 6625 (k) B Li T Matsuo D Hashizume H Fueno K Tanaka
K Tamao J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 13222
127 (a) C H Lai M D Su S Y Chu Inorg Chem 2002 41 1320 (b) R Pietschnig A
Orthaber Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4570 (c) C H Chen M D Su Eur J Inorg Chem
2008 1241 (d) V Lattanzi S Thorwirth D T Halfen L A Mueck L M Ziurys P
Thaddeus J Gauss M C Mccarthy Angew Chem Int Ed 2010 49 5661
128 S Inoue W Wang C Praumlsang M Asay E Irran M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2011 133
2868
129 (a) R Appel W A Paulen Angew Chem Int Ed 1981 20 869 (b) V Cappello J
Baumgartner A Dransfeld K Hassler Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4589
130 M Igarashi M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12660
131 F A Cotton G Wilkinson C Murillo M Bochmann Advanced Inorganic Chemistry 1999
132 (a) N Wiberg C M M Finger K Polborn Angew Chem Int Ed 1993 32 1054 (b) M
Ichinohe M Toyoshima R Kinjo A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2003 125 13328
133 (a) A J Arduengo H V R Dias J C Calabrese F Davidson Inorg Chem 1993 32 1541
(b) N Kuhn T Kratz D Blaumlser R Boese Chem Ber 1995 128 245 (c) P A Rupar M C
Jennings K M Baines Organometallics 2008 27 5043 (d) A J Ruddy P A Rupar K J
Bladek C J Allan J C Avery K M Baines Organometallics 2010 29 1362
134 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch H Marsmann G Henkel Chem Ber 1997 130 1733
135 (a) D Morales-Morales C Grause K Kasaoka R O Redoacuten R E Cramer C M Jensen
Inorg Chim Acta 2000 300ndash302 958 (b) T Kimura Y Uozumi Organometallics 2006 25
4883 (c) R B Bedford M Betham J P H Charmant M F Haddow A G Orpen L T
Pilarski S J Coles M B Hursthouse Organometallics 2007 26 6346 (d) J Aydin K S
Kumar L Eriksson K J Szaboacute Adv Syn Catal 2007 349 2585 (e) J-F Gong Y-H
References
- 136 -
Zhang M-P Song C Xu Organometallics 2007 26 6487 (f) R A Baber R B Bedford
M Betham M E Blake S J Coles M F Haddow M B Hursthouse A G Orpen L T
Pilarski P G Pringle R L Wingad Chem Commun 2006 3880 (g) A V Polukeev S A
Kuklin P V Petrovskii S M Peregudova A F Smolyakov F M Dolgushin A A
Koridze Dalton Trans 2011 40 7201 (h) R B Bedford Y-N Chang M F Haddow C L
Mcmullin Dalton Trans 2011 40 9034
136 (a) C Watanabe T Iwamoto C Kabuto M Kira Angew Chem Int Ed 2008 47 5386 (b)
C Watanabe Y Inagawa T Iwamoto M Kira Dalton Trans 2010 39 9414
137 (a) G Tavcar S S Sen R Azhakar A Thorn H W Roesky Inorg Chem 2010 49 10199
(b) R Azhakar S P Sarish H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Inorg Chem 2011 50 5039
138 W Chen P J Mccormack K Mohammed W Mbafor S M Roberts J Whittall Angew
Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4141
139 (a) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Organometallics 2008 27
3325 (b) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Bull Chem Soc Jpn
2009 82 793
140 (a) F Baumann E Dormann Y Ehleiter W Kaim J Kaumlrcher M Kelemen R Krammer D
Saurenz D Stalke C Wachter G Wolmershaumluser H Sitzmann J Organomet Chem 1999
587 267 (b) F Hung-Low C A Bradley Organometallics 2011 30 2636 (c) F Hung-Low
J P Krogman J W Tye C A Bradley Chem Commun 2012 48 368
141 R Azhakar R S Ghadwal H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Chem Asian J 2012 7 528
142 R S Ghadwal R Azhakar K ProPper J J Holstein B Dittrich H W Roesky Inorg
Chem 2011 50 8502
143 J Li S Merkel J Henn K Meindl A DoRing H W Roesky R S Ghadwal D Stalke
Inorg Chem 2010 49 775
144 M Ingleson H Fan M Pink J Tomaszewski K G Caulton J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
1804
145 A Schnepf Z Anorg Allg Chem 2006 632 935
146 (a) M D Rausch R A Genetti J Org Chem 1970 35 3888 (b) F Ungvary A Sisak L
Markoacute J Organomet Chem 1980 188 373
147 (a) E Erdik Tetrahedron 1992 48 9577 (b) P Knochel R D Singer Chem Rev 1993 93
2117 (c) M Rottlaumlnder P Knochel Tetrahedron Lett 1997 38 1749
148 (a) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1978 17 505 (b) K P C Vollhardt Angew Chem
Int Ed 1984 23 539 (c) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1985 24 248 (d) W Hess
J Treutwein G Hilt Synthesis 2008 2008 3537 (e) C J Scheuermann B D Ward New J
Chem 2008 32 1850 (f) T Shibata K Tsuchikama Org Biomol Chem 2008 6 1317 (g)
K Tanaka Chem Asian J 2009 4 508 (h) J A Varela C Saaacute Synlett 2008 2008 2571
149 (a) G Hilt C Hengst W Hess Eur J Org Chem 2008 2008 2293 (b) A Geny N Agenet
L Iannazzo M Malacria C Aubert V Gandon Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 1810 (c)
C C Eichman J P Bragdon J P Stambuli Synlett 2011 2011 1109
150 (a) Y Wakatsuki H Yamazaki Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1985 58 2715 (b) Y B Taarit Y
Diab B Elleuch M Kerkani M Chihaoui Chem Commun 1986 402 (c) H Nehl Chem
Ber 1994 127 2535 (d) C Wang X Li F Wu B Wan Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
7162
References
- 137 -
151 G M Sheldrick SHELX-97 Program for Crystal Structure Determination Universitaumlt
Goumlttingen (Germany) 1997
152 P Schlack G Keil Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1963 661 72
Appendix
- 138 -
7 APPENDIX
71 Abbreviations
Ada adamantanyl MHz Megahertz
Ar aryl min minute(s)
mmol millimole(ar)
MS mass spectrometry
B3LYP Beckersquos three-parameter hybrid
functional using the Lee Yang
and Parr correlation ldquofunctionalrdquo MW molecular weight
BINAP 22rsquo-(Ph2P)2-11rsquo-binaphthyl mz masscharge
br broad nacnac HC(MeC=N-Dip) 2minus
tBu tert-butyl Naph naphthyl
degC Celsius degree NBO natural bond orbital
ca about NHC N-Heterocyclic Carbene
calc calculated NICS nucleus independent chemical shift
CBD cyclobutadiene NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
cod COD 15-cyclooctadiene NPA natural population analysis
Cp cyclopentadienyl Ph phenyl
d doublet ppm parts per million
DCM dichloromethane iPr iso-propyl
DFT density functional theory q quartet
Dip 26-iPr2C6H3 R organic substituent
EI electron impact ionization RT room temperature
equiv equivalent(s) s singlet strong
ESI electrospray ionization sept septet
Et ethyl t triplet
eV electronvolt THF tetrahydrofuran
Fc ferrocendiyl Tip 246-iPr2C6H2
g gram(s) TMEDA tetramethylethyldiamine
h hour(s) TMS tetramethylsilane
HOMO highest occupied molecular orbital TS transition state
Hz Hertz TZVP triple-zeta valence polarization
IR infrared
K Kelvin
TZVDP TZVP two sets of polarization
functions aL PhC(
tBuN)2
minus UV-vis ultraviolet-visible
VE valence electron LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital vs very strong
M Metal VT variable temperature
m multiplet medium w weak
Me methyl WBI Wiberg Bond Index
Mes mesityl 246-Me3-C6H2 δ chemical shift
Appendix
- 139 -
GeN
N
GeN
Dip
Dip
DipCl
N
SnN
Dip
Dip
GeNN
SnN
Dip
DipDip
N
Dip
6 7
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation
1 2 3 4
5 8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22
Appendix
- 140 -
23 24 25 26
27 28 29
30 31 32 33
34 35 36
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph
Si
Cl
37 38 39 40
Appendix
- 141 -
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
41 42 43
44 45 46
47a 47b 48a 48b
Appendix
- 142 -
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details
Table 731 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 3 4 5
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C50 H88 Ge2 K2 N2 O4
100460
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
106989(7) pm
114137(7) pm
122625(8) pm
74158(6) deg
76395(6) deg
83400(5) deg
139807(16)
1
1193
1263
536
028 x 02 x 018
326 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-13lt=klt=13
-14lt=llt=14
12268
4910 [R(int) = 00358]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 094847
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4910 0 281
0940
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00638
R1 = 00538 wR2 = 00666
0456 and -0223
C41 H5 Ge N3
66650
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
91129(6) pm
113531(7) pm
190282(10) pm
100360(5) deg
101854(5) deg
98627(5) deg
185918(19)
2
1191
0855
716
039 x 012 x 007
297 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-13lt=klt=13
-22lt=llt=22
14570
6543 [R(int) = 00560]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
0943 and 0777
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6543 0 420
0785
R1 = 00399 wR2 = 00513
R1 = 00853 wR2 = 00566
0577 and -0317
C66 H102 Ge4 K2 N4 O2
135208
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
12370(3) pm
148433(14) pm
188725(19) pm
90059(8)deg
96311(14)deg
90082(13)deg
34442(10)
2
1304
1892
1416
030 x 025 x 015
292 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-15lt=klt=17
-14lt=llt=22
17371
6032 [R(int) = 00487]
995
Analytical
0807 and 0584
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6032 2 364
0911
R1 = 00424 wR2 = 00801
R1 = 00874 wR2 = 00885
0497 and -0457
Appendix
- 143 -
Table 732 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 6 8 12
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C46 H65 Ge2 N3
80519
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
44536(2) pm
98204(5) pm
218135(10) pm
90deg
116030(4)deg
90deg
85727(7)
8
1248
1436
3408
038 x 024 x 010
305 to 2500deg
-49lt=hlt=52
-10lt=klt=11
-24lt=llt=25
20162
7493 [R(int) = 00954]
992
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 074676
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7493 0 476
0917
R1 = 00559 wR2 = 00778
R1 = 01461 wR2 = 00966
0590 and -0578
C46 H65 Ge N3 Sn
85129
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
867780(10) pm
120514(4) pm
210797(6) pm
96333(2)deg
97393(2)deg
99141(2)deg
213908(10)
2
1322
1320
888
016 x 014 x 012
295 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-14lt=klt=14
-25lt=llt=25
16936
7496 [R(int) = 00251]
994
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099037
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7496 0 495
1001
R1 = 00309 wR2 = 00706
R1 = 00437 wR2 = 00733
1468 and -0424
C37 H48 N2
52077
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108485(5) pm
127284(7) pm
132348(4) pm
65748(4)deg
86290(3)deg
71699(5)deg
157759(12)
2
1096
0063
568
029 x 022 x 018
298 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13428
5541 [R(int) = 00203]
998
None
09888 and 09820
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5541 0 364
1029
R1 = 00439 wR2 = 00900
R1 = 00633 wR2 = 00963
0188 and -0193
Appendix
- 144 -
Table 733 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 14 16 17
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H46 Cl Ge N2
62680
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117621(2) pm
175495(4) pm
166051(3) pm
90deg
107053(2)deg
90deg
327691(11)
4
1270
1044
1324
040 x 032 x 022
342 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-19lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=18
16923
5742 [R(int) = 00250]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 082078
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5742 0 378
1044
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00709
R1 = 00496 wR2 = 00742
0736 and -0362
C37 H46 Ge N2
59135
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108388(6) pm
127885(7) pm
132778(4) pm
66971(4)deg
85749(3)deg
71833(5)deg
160695(13)
2
1222
0980
628
029 x 015 x 007
307 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13501
5636 [R(int) = 00366]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 092510
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5636 0 369
1031
R1 = 00489 wR2 = 01180
R1 = 00691 wR2 = 01242
0539 and -0501
C37 H49 Ge N3
60838
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117714(4) pm
174309(6) pm
166868(6) pm
90deg
106866(4)deg
90deg
32766(2)
4
1233
0964
1296
030 x 023 x 019
342 to 2500deg
-8lt=hlt=13
-10lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=16
12816
5749 [R(int) = 00325]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 095425
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5749 0 378
1060
R1 = 00464 wR2 = 01084
R1 = 00699 wR2 = 01133
1717 and -0738
Appendix
- 145 -
Table 734 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 18 20 22
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H48 Ge N2 O
60936
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117560(3) pm
174116(5) pm
166421(4) pm
90deg
106992(3)deg
90deg
325778(15)
4
1242
0971
1296
031 x 014 x 005
343 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-20lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=19
23624
5720 [R(int) = 00371]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 083390
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5720 0 379
1018
R1 = 00336 wR2 = 00752
R1 = 00516 wR2 = 00789
0521 and -0366
C28 H38 N2
40260
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
94924(4) pm
256583(9) pm
107465(5) pm
90deg
110403(5)deg
90deg
245320(18)
4
1090
0063
880
017 x 015 x 013
343 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=10
-30lt=klt=27
-12lt=llt=11
8561
4313 [R(int) = 00209]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099057
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4313 0 281
1041
R1 = 00476 wR2 = 01015
R1 = 00771 wR2 = 01083
0253 and -0194
C28 H37 Cl Ge N2 O
52564
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
89021(3) pm
107319(4) pm
151176(6) pm
75734(4)deg
74781(3)deg
75311(3)deg
132282(8)
2
1320
1281
552
020 x 012 x 008
354 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-12lt=klt=12
-15lt=llt=17
9246
4654 [R(int) = 00211]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086160
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4654 0 304
0946
R1 = 00274 wR2 = 00579
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00597
0394 and -0264
Appendix
- 146 -
Table 735 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 23 27 28
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C28 H36 Cl2 Ge N2
54408
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
279616(13) pm
113538(3) pm
177729(7) pm
90deg
109718(5)deg
90deg
53115(4)
8
1361
1374
2272
021 x 017 x 015
332 to 2500deg
-25lt=hlt=33
-7lt=klt=13
-21lt=llt=20
10951
4663 [R(int) = 00459]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091223
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4663 0 304
0856
R1 = 00372 wR2 = 00584
R1 = 00684 wR2 = 00620
0589 and -0533
C30 H48 Cl2 N4 O Si2
60780
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121593(5) pm
162045(6) pm
171248(7) pm
90deg
98177(4)deg
90deg
33399(2)
4
1209
0295
1304
030 x 015 x 005
335 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=13
-16lt=klt=19
-20lt=llt=20
23741
5865 [R(int) = 00491]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086688
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5865 172 490
1035
R1 = 00543 wR2 = 01080
R1 = 00905 wR2 = 01194
0310 and -0412
C30 H46 N4 O Si2
53489
150(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Fdd2
31188(2) pm
39120(3) pm
102620(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
125204(14)
16
1135
0141
4640
031 x 011 x 007
334 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=36
-46lt=klt=45
-12lt=llt=12
11517
4372 [R(int) = 00656]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 097469
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4372 1 346
0897
R1 = 00488 wR2 = 00604
R1 = 00754 wR2 = 00650
0328 and -0229
Appendix
- 147 -
Table 736 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 29 30 31
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C38 H58 N4 Ni O Si2
70177
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
98776(8) pm
129530(11) pm
155488(13) pm
81634(7)deg
83316(7)deg
82826(7)deg
19430(3)
2
1200
0594
756
020 x 009 x 007
330 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=11
-15lt=klt=13
-18lt=llt=18
14961
6828 [R(int) = 00414]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091998
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6828 0 474
0948
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00807
R1 = 00605 wR2 = 00853
0407 and -0240
C21 H41 N2 P Si3
43680
173(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Pbca
193556(7) pm
142399(4) pm
199777(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
55063(3)
8
1054
0239
1904
039 x 036 x 016
351 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=23
-16lt=klt=16
-23lt=llt=22
19912
4836 [R(int) = 00961]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09627 and 09125
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4836 18 287
0906
R1 = 00571 wR2 = 00889
R1 = 01270 wR2 = 01032
0316 and -0214
C44 H60 N4 P2 Si2
76308
173(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
23841(3) pm
101993(12) pm
19369(2) pm
90deg
108346(12)deg
90deg
44703(9)
4
1134
0184
1640
076 x 057 x 055
353 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=28
-12lt=klt=12
-20lt=llt=23
16197
3927 [R(int) = 00447]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09053 and 08725
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
3927 0 251
1034
R1 = 00618 wR2 = 01393
R1 = 00843 wR2 = 01489
0721 and -0649
Appendix
- 148 -
Table 737 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 33 36 40-endo
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C56 H98 Cl4 N6 Si6 Sn2
140312
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
105159(4) pm
127622(6) pm
269391(12) pm
90310(4)deg
90855(3)deg
102927(3)deg
35232(3)
2
1323
1000
1456
013 x 012 x 009
336 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-29lt=llt=32
25757
12396 [R(int) = 00546]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09154 and 08810
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
12396 536 816
2077
R1 = 01231 wR2 = 01906
R1 = 01495 wR2 = 01944
1510 and -4753
C91 H139 N8 O4 Pd Si4
162786
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
145970(8) pm
151441(15) pm
232982(16) pm
71358(8)deg
74666(5)deg
85365(6)deg
47063(6)
2
1149
0298
1750
019 x 013 x 011
327 to 2500deg
-17lt=hlt=17
-17lt=klt=18
-27lt=llt=27
41022
16531 [R(int) = 00735]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09679 and 09455
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
16531 284 1112
0908
R1 = 00558 wR2 = 01021
R1 = 01075 wR2 = 01128
0688 and -0448
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
10532(3) pm
20258(5) pm
18990(5) pm
90deg
10542(3)deg
90deg
39060(19)
4
1347
1927
1648
012 x 008 x 005
322 to 2500deg
-6lt=hlt=12
-22lt=klt=24
-22lt=llt=21
16887
6870 [R(int) = 01353]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 073478
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6870 213 498
1044
R1 = 00912 wR2 = 01786
R1 = 01680 wR2 = 02282
0570 and -1404
Appendix
- 149 -
Table 738 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 40-exo 41 42
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
165582(11) pm
127695(7) pm
198175(12) pm
90deg
107428(7)deg
90deg
39979(4)
4
1316
1883
1648
012 x 011 x 009
337 to 2499deg
-16lt=hlt=19
-15lt=klt=15
-23lt=llt=23
29049
7015 [R(int) = 00329]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 052405
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7015 0 436
1065
R1 = 00263 wR2 = 00574
R1 = 00318 wR2 = 00595
0357 and -0360
C45 H59 Co Fe N4 Si2
82692
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
119176(7) pm
160794(9) pm
220424(13) pm
90deg
94402(5)deg
90deg
42115(4)
4
1304
0831
1752
015 x 013 x 007
323 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=17
-16lt=llt=26
17786
7404 [R(int) = 01111]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 075122
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7404 0 490
1052
R1 = 00717 wR2 = 01045
R1 = 01208 wR2 = 01181
0467 and -0370
C45 H59 Co Fe Ge2 N4
91592
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121662(3) pm
160596(3) pm
220073(5) pm
90deg
93549(2)deg
90deg
429163(16)
4
1418
2134
1896
015 x 011 x 008
336 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=19
-26lt=llt=26
33743
7539 [R(int) = 00521]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 068509
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7539 0 521
1259
R1 = 00400 wR2 = 00965
R1 = 00536 wR2 = 01000
0376 and -0373
Appendix
- 150 -
Atomic coordinates of four unpublished compounds 20 22 23 and 33 are shown in
following tables
Table 739 Atomic coordinates (times10
4) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 20 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
N(1) 1159(1) 1176(1) 6836(1) 20(1)
C(1) 1706(2) 1650(1) 6995(1) 21(1)
N(2) -1293(2) 1547(1) 7057(1) 23(1)
C(2) 789(2) 2089(1) 7078(1) 20(1)
C(3) -626(2) 2021(1) 7158(1) 20(1)
C(4) 3331(2) 1741(1) 7112(2) 29(1)
C(5) 3920(2) 2283(1) 7590(2) 34(1)
C(6) 2795(2) 2681(1) 6772(2) 35(1)
C(7) 1375(2) 2643(1) 7102(2) 27(1)
C(8) -1522(2) 2482(1) 7295(2) 21(1)
C(9) -2759(2) 2643(1) 6227(2) 27(1)
C(10) -3571(2) 3077(1) 6331(2) 33(1)
C(11) -3169(2) 3358(1) 7498(2) 35(1)
C(12) -1948(2) 3199(1) 8573(2) 32(1)
C(13) -1133(2) 2765(1) 8467(2) 27(1)
C(14) -2537(2) 1417(1) 7503(2) 35(1)
C(15) -3250(3) 920(1) 6823(2) 61(1)
C(16) -1974(3) 1344(1) 9002(2) 65(1)
C(17) 2080(2) 741(1) 6834(2) 20(1)
C(18) 2353(2) 597(1) 5670(2) 23(1)
C(19) 3237(2) 160(1) 5724(2) 29(1)
C(20) 3821(2) -131(1) 6867(2) 32(1)
C(21) 3480(2) -1(1) 7977(2) 29(1)
C(22) 2598(2) 427(1) 7984(2) 23(1)
C(23) 2150(2) 562(1) 9174(2) 28(1)
C(24) 2101(2) 91(1) 10028(2) 39(1)
C(25) 3156(2) 987(1) 10029(2) 42(1)
C(26) 1602(2) 885(1) 4374(2) 29(1)
C(27) 2645(3) 974(1) 3586(2) 53(1)
C(28) 195(3) 588(1) 3539(2) 54(1)
Appendix
- 151 -
Table 7310 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 22 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 4751(1) 5279(1) 3913(1) 24(1)
Cl(1) 4863(1) 7474(1) 3443(1) 35(1)
O(1) 2591(1) 5468(1) 4187(1) 20(1)
N(1) 4469(2) 5098(1) 2623(1) 17(1)
C(1) 3006(2) 5278(2) 2582(1) 16(1)
N(2) 1482(2) 7765(2) 2375(1) 20(1)
C(2) 2432(2) 5062(2) 1801(1) 21(1)
C(3) 1144(2) 4228(2) 2174(2) 31(1)
C(4) -158(2) 4793(2) 2933(2) 30(1)
C(5) 534(2) 4844(2) 3741(1) 21(1)
C(6) 1810(2) 5684(2) 3440(1) 17(1)
C(7) 1063(2) 7152(2) 3205(1) 18(1)
C(8) 820(2) 9172(2) 2096(1) 26(1)
C(9) 397(3) 9344(2) 1159(2) 40(1)
C(10) 2058(3) 9950(2) 2035(2) 43(1)
C(11) -95(2) 7719(2) 3998(1) 18(1)
C(12) 434(2) 8108(2) 4652(1) 22(1)
C(13) -648(2) 8637(2) 5376(1) 27(1)
C(14) -2259(2) 8769(2) 5459(2) 30(1)
C(15) -2795(2) 8370(2) 4815(2) 30(1)
C(16) -1724(2) 7845(2) 4085(1) 24(1)
C(17) 5786(2) 4690(2) 1889(1) 19(1)
C(18) 6546(2) 3361(2) 1997(1) 22(1)
C(19) 7868(2) 3005(2) 1310(2) 28(1)
C(20) 8423(2) 3902(2) 552(2) 29(1)
C(21) 7656(2) 5209(2) 464(1) 26(1)
C(22) 6329(2) 5635(2) 1128(1) 21(1)
C(23) 5549(2) 7085(2) 991(2) 26(1)
C(24) 6701(3) 7932(2) 989(2) 41(1)
C(25) 4931(3) 7520(2) 84(2) 40(1)
C(26) 6001(2) 2315(2) 2820(2) 27(1)
C(27) 5775(3) 1139(2) 2495(2) 40(1)
C(28) 7175(3) 1863(2) 3471(2) 38(1)
Appendix
- 152 -
Table 7311 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 23 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 967(1) 7605(1) 1823(1) 18(1)
Cl(1) 1020(1) 9314(1) 2345(1) 29(1)
N(1) 1401(1) 6550(2) 2449(1) 19(1)
C(1) 1534(1) 5601(2) 2029(2) 16(1)
Cl(2) 198(1) 7116(1) 1640(1) 31(1)
N(2) 1101(1) 7630(2) 909(1) 15(1)
C(2) 1548(1) 5691(2) 1285(2) 15(1)
C(3) 1442(1) 6764(2) 777(2) 14(1)
C(4) 1615(1) 6867(2) 172(2) 19(1)
C(5) 1945(1) 5989(2) -42(2) 26(1)
C(6) 2098(1) 4966(2) 547(2) 22(1)
C(7) 1669(1) 4652(2) 844(2) 21(1)
C(8) 1625(1) 4444(2) 2470(2) 17(1)
C(9) 1229(1) 3875(2) 2611(2) 23(1)
C(10) 1291(1) 2785(2) 2983(2) 29(1)
C(11) 1764(2) 2263(3) 3232(2) 32(1)
C(12) 2169(1) 2832(3) 3121(2) 30(1)
C(13) 2101(1) 3920(2) 2737(2) 22(1)
C(14) 1621(1) 6630(2) 3327(2) 20(1)
C(15) 1219(1) 6848(3) 3699(2) 32(1)
C(16) 2052(1) 7524(2) 3583(2) 34(1)
C(17) 833(1) 8395(2) 248(2) 17(1)
C(18) 1019(1) 9542(2) 207(2) 19(1)
C(19) 745(1) 10248(3) -431(2) 29(1)
C(20) 315(1) 9844(3) -1011(2) 36(1)
C(21) 147(1) 8718(3) -973(2) 33(1)
C(22) 399(1) 7960(2) -350(2) 20(1)
C(23) 215(1) 6700(2) -377(2) 23(1)
C(24) 329(1) 6020(3) -1045(2) 34(1)
C(25) -341(1) 6612(3) -475(2) 31(1)
C(26) 1517(1) 10001(2) 789(2) 22(1)
C(27) 1914(1) 10083(3) 375(2) 32(1)
C(28) 1463(1) 11198(2) 1144(2) 36(1)
Appendix
- 153 -
Table 7312 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 33 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Sn(1) 4689(1) 4918(1) 3222(1) 24(1)
Sn(2) 5822(1) 5994(1) 1674(1) 30(1)
Cl(1) 4488(3) 6215(2) 3883(1) 38(1)
Cl(2) 3266(2) 3378(2) 3638(1) 39(1)
Cl(3) 7188(2) 7769(2) 1449(1) 43(1)
Cl(4) 6104(3) 5090(3) 888(1) 57(1)
Si(1) 6825(2) 4259(2) 3587(1) 17(1)
Si(2) 8610(3) 6420(2) 3531(1) 28(1)
Si(3) 9814(2) 4466(2) 3664(1) 26(1)
Si(4) 3648(2) 6680(2) 1375(1) 21(1)
Si(5) 1981(3) 4463(2) 1299(1) 30(1)
Si(6) 649(3) 6348(2) 1247(1) 30(1)
N(1) 6586(7) 2924(5) 3299(3) 20(2)
N(2) 6484(6) 3264(5) 4080(3) 16(2)
N(3) 8389(7) 5001(5) 3582(3) 23(2)
N(4) 3751(7) 7937(6) 1722(3) 22(2)
N(5) 3959(8) 7800(6) 936(3) 27(2)
N(6) 2102(7) 5865(6) 1329(3) 24(2)
C(1) 6258(8) 2470(7) 3742(4) 24(2)
C(2) 5630(8) 1296(7) 3832(3) 20(2)
C(3) 4328(9) 879(7) 3742(4) 30(2)
C(4) 3826(11) -209(8) 3826(4) 44(3)
C(5) 4613(12) -855(8) 3977(4) 47(3)
C(6) 5921(13) -450(9) 4064(4) 54(3)
C(7) 6446(10) 640(8) 3992(4) 36(3)
C(8) 6469(9) 2487(7) 2787(3) 22(2)
C(9) 7183(11) 3385(8) 2465(4) 43(3)
C(10) 5041(10) 2180(9) 2612(4) 44(3)
C(11) 7093(12) 1524(8) 2741(4) 49(3)
C(12) 6251(9) 3286(8) 4625(3) 26(2)
C(13) 4851(10) 2720(9) 4759(4) 48(3)
C(14) 7218(10) 2783(8) 4908(4) 39(3)
C(15) 6455(10) 4474(7) 4759(4) 31(2)
C(16) 7585(10) 6750(8) 3014(4) 43(3)
C(17) 8192(11) 7005(8) 4123(4) 44(3)
C(18) 10317(10) 7108(8) 3367(5) 55(4)
C(19) 10809(9) 4684(9) 3087(4) 39(3)
C(20) 9461(9) 3008(7) 3775(4) 30(2)
Appendix
- 154 -
C(21) 10726(10) 5062(9) 4232(4) 41(3)
C(22) 4144(9) 8514(7) 1315(3) 22(2)
C(23) 4603(10) 9700(7) 1286(3) 30(2)
C(24) 5918(10) 10173(8) 1332(4) 36(3)
C(25) 6315(12) 11289(9) 1292(4) 46(3)
C(26) 5453(14) 11926(9) 1203(4) 50(3)
C(27) 4158(14) 11457(9) 1158(4) 52(3)
C(28) 3726(12) 10336(8) 1194(4) 41(3)
C(29) 3829(9) 8261(7) 2260(3) 24(2)
C(30) 3041(13) 9101(10) 2358(4) 65(4)
C(31) 3223(10) 7251(8) 2537(4) 41(3)
C(32) 5223(10) 8649(10) 2438(4) 59(4)
C(33) 4252(10) 7910(8) 398(3) 30(2)
C(34) 3489(13) 8669(11) 158(4) 67(4)
C(35) 3812(13) 6813(9) 170(4) 60(4)
C(36) 5705(11) 8321(11) 315(4) 63(4)
C(37) 3040(11) 4003(8) 1778(4) 49(3)
C(38) 2431(11) 4059(8) 669(4) 44(3)
C(39) 310(10) 3713(8) 1447(5) 48(3)
C(40) -433(9) 5964(9) 1795(4) 43(3)
C(41) 921(10) 7835(9) 1209(4) 48(3)
C(42) -186(11) 5795(10) 650(4) 57(4)
C(43) -180(17) 209(14) 3445(7) 59(3)
C(44) -1099(17) -417(14) 3132(7) 58(3)
C(45) -949(16) -322(14) 2634(7) 58(2)
C(46) 75(15) 387(13) 2440(7) 58(2)
C(47) 979(17) 1008(14) 2750(6) 60(2)
C(48) 829(17) 908(15) 3251(7) 60(3)
C(49) 210(20) 473(17) 1887(7) 58(3)
C(43A) 798(17) 917(14) 2044(7) 58(3)
C(44A) 1381(17) 1418(14) 2465(7) 59(3)
C(45A) 931(16) 1088(14) 2929(7) 59(3)
C(46A) -134(15) 231(13) 2969(7) 58(2)
C(47A) -748(17) -263(14) 2547(6) 58(2)
C(48A) -289(17) 75(14) 2084(7) 58(2)
C(49A) -640(20) -111(17) 3469(8) 60(3)
C(50) 120(20) -463(18) -179(10) 106(6)
C(51) -640(30) -620(20) 236(10) 106(6)
C(52) -730(20) 250(20) 530(10) 107(6)
C(53) -70(30) 1260(20) 404(11) 109(6)
C(54) 680(20) 1409(19) -10(11) 107(6)
C(55) 780(30) 558(19) -303(11) 106(6)
C(56) 250(30) -1390(20) -499(12) 120(7)
Appendix
- 155 -
C(57) 575(16) 499(14) 4873(6) 52(3)
C(58) 807(18) -512(14) 4941(8) 53(3)
C(59) -138(17) -1326(14) 5128(7) 55(3)
C(60) -1333(18) -1140(15) 5253(8) 57(3)
C(61) -1572(16) -130(15) 5187(7) 56(3)
C(62) -620(17) 686(15) 5000(8) 53(3)
C(63) 1600(20) 1369(17) 4669(9) 59(5)
Appendix
- 156 -
74 Publications in this dissertation
1 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Stephan Enthaler and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167-6171 Angew Chem 2012 124 6271-6275
Bis(silylenyl)- and Bis(germylenyl)-Substituted Ferrocenes Synthesis Structure and Catalytic
Applications of Bidentate Silicon(II)-Cobalt Complex
2 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Elisabeth Irran and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691-3694 Angew Chem 2012 124 3751-3754
Synthesis and unexpected coordination of a silicon(II)-based SiCSi pincerlike arene to
palladium
3 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 6490-6494
Reactivity of N-Heterocyclic germylene toward ammonia and water
4 Shenglai Yao Yun Xiong Wenyuan Wang and Matthias Driess
Chem Eur J 2011 17 4890-4895
Synthesis structure and reactivity of a pyridine-stabilized germanone
5 Shigeyoshi Inoue Wenyuan Wang Carsten Praesang Matthew Asay Elisabeth Irran and
Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 2868ndash2871
An ylide-like phosphasilene and striking formation of a 4π-electron resonance-stabilized 24-
disila-13-diphosphacyclo- butadiene
6 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890ndash15892
An isolable bis-silylene oxide (ldquodisilylenoxanerdquo) and its metal coordination
7 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Chem Commun 2009 2661ndash2663
An unsymmetric substituted digermylene with a Ge(I)ndashGe(I) bond and synthesis of a
germylenendashstannylene with a Ge(I)ndashSn(I) bond
8 Wenyuan Wang Shenglai Yao Christoph van Wuellen and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640ndash9641
A cyclopentadienide analogue containing divalent germanium and a heavy cyclobutadiene-
like dianion with an unusual Ge4 Core
Appendix
- 157 -
75 Curriculum Vitae
Personal Data
Date and Place of Birth 17th
January 1976 in Nei Mongol China
Nationality Chinese
Education
1982-1987 Elementary School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1987-1993 High School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1993-1997 Department of Chemistry Inner Mongolia Normal University (China)
Bachelor Chemistry
071997 Bachelor of Chemistry education
2003-2007 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
Diplom Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
012008 Diplom of Science Degree
2008-2012 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
PhD Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
Herein I affirm that this dissertation was finished independently at the ldquoInstitut fuumlr
Chemierdquo at the ldquoTechnischen Universitaumlt Berlinrdquo under the guidance of
Prof Dr Matthias Driess where all references and additional aid sources have been
appropriately cited
Wenyuan Wang
Berlin Juli 2012
Table of contents
ii
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 76
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40 76
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40 80
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45 83
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts 85
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 89
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION 98
51 General section 98
52 Analytical methods 99
53 Starting Materials 101
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds 102
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4 102
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5 103
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6 104
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8 105
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 107
526 The new chlorogermylene 14 108
527 The new germylene 16 109
528 Aminogermylene 17 110
529 Germylene hydroxide 18 111
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20 112
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22 113
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23 114
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27 115
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28 116
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29 117
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30 118
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31 119
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33 120
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35 120
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36 121
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38 123
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40 124
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41 125
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42 126
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44 127
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45 128
Table of contents
iii
6 REFERENCES 129
7 APPENDIX 138
71 Abbreviations 138
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation 139
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details 142
74 Publications in this dissertation 156
75 Curriculum Vitae 157
Introduction
- 1 -
1 INTRODUCTION
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds
Generally main-group elements higher than of the third period are classified as
ldquoheavy main-group elementsrdquo some of which show abnormal physical and chemical
properties For example Br(VII) is a stronger oxidant than Cl(VII) This different
behavior of high-valent main-group elements can be attributed to the relativistic
effect[1]
of electrons The contraction of all s-orbitals triggered by the relativistic effect
leads to a greater energy difference between s- and p-orbitals in higher period
elements which increases the difficulty of a sp-hybridation Moreover the energy
difference between s- and p-orbitals for elements in the d-district of the fourth period
and f-district of the sixth period vary unconventionally resulting in the so called
ldquosecondary periodicityrdquo of forth and sixth period elements Therefore ns2 electrons in
the valence shell of heavy main-group elements play an essential role for their
chemical properties[2]
During the organometallic research of main group elements a
series of novel compounds have been discovered and new synthetic methods as well
as theoretical insights in their chemistry have been developed and summarized[3]
In whole periodic table the difference of property in the group 14 elements (tetrels)
is maximal[4]
In comparison to carbon compounds of Si Ge Sn and Pb are very
different referring to the physical properties chemical behavior and structural features
The theory for carbon chemistry cannot be fit for the chemistry of heavy group 14
elements A typical example is the synthesis of compounds with a silicon-oxygen
double bond (Si=O silanone) Beginning last century the english chemist Frederic
Stanley Kipping manufactured many silicon-carbon compounds and discovered
thereby resin-like products which he called ldquosilicone of ketonesrdquo Kipping coined the
word ldquosiliconerdquo in 1901 to describe polydiphenylsiloxane by analogy of its formula
(Ph2SiO) with the formula of the ketone benzophenone (Ph2CO) Kipping was well
Introduction
- 2 -
aware that polydiphenylsiloxane is polymeric whereas benzophenone is monomeric
and noted that ldquosiliconerdquo and Ph2CO had very different chemistry[5]
The german chemist Richard Muumlller and the american chemist Eugene G Rochow
found almost at the same time a possibility for the industrial production of
dimethyldichlorosilane (Me2SiCl2) the most important precursor for the production of
the silicone in the 1940s[6]
The procedure today is called Muumlller Rochow synthesis
(Scheme 11) From that many researchers synthesized various silicone products but
crystallographically characterized complexes with a donor-stabilized Si=O double
bond were published at the beginning of this century by our group These are the
silanoic ester I1[7]
the carbene-coordinated silanone I2[8]
and the ketone-coordinated
silanone I3[9]
(Scheme 12) The Si=O double bond distance (1532 pm) in I3 is shorter
than the ones in I1 (1579 pm) and I2 (1541 pm) and represents the shortest Si-O
distance in all molecular Si=O compounds hitherto reported[10]
Scheme 11 Muumlller Rochow silicone synthesis
Scheme 12 Isolable donor-stabilized silanoic ester I1 and silanone I2 and I3
The hundred-year story of silicones to monomeric species bearing Si=O double
bonds shows that the silicon atom prefers σ-bonds over double bond (σ- and π-bonds)
That means the classical π-bond is not of first choice for heavy main-group
elements[11]
In other words not only E=X (E = heavy main-group elements X = C N
O) but also E=Ersquo (Ersquo = heavy main-group elements) systems are difficult to stabilize
Introduction
- 3 -
because they easily form σ-bonded corresponding polymers Consequently it is very
challenging to study compounds of heavy main group elements in their low oxidation
state Especially the study of divalent Si Ge and Sn compounds with lone pair
electrons (metallylenes) is one of the most attractive research fields in contemporary
organometallic chemistry[3 12]
In the past thirty years numerous thermally stable unsaturated Si Ge Sn
compounds were isolated which show extremely impressive chemistry[12d 13]
The
difference between C-C and Si-Si double bond is now well-understood[3a]
Very
different reaction mechanisms for the formation of such doubly-bonded carbon and
silicon compounds were throughly discussed The classical C-C double bond can
readily be explained by the valence bond theory and hybridization[14]
The bonding
state in those heavier alkene analogues can be explained by two sets of ns2rarrp
0 donor-
acceptor interactions between two metallylene monomers (Scheme 1 3)[3 15]
Similarly heavier alkyne analogues of main-group elements present also two dative
bonds of ns2rarrp
0 donor-acceptor interactions plus a normal σ-bond between two pz
orbitals[3 12d]
(Scheme 13) But the sp-hybridization for heavy main-group elements
is not realized in their low-valent compounds because sp-hybridization does not lead
to strengthing of terminal σ-bonds to the ligands R
Scheme 13 Nonclassical multiple bond features (E = heavy main-group elements)
Introduction
- 4 -
Until the end of the last century the synthesis of heavier alkyne analogues was an
unsolved problem because of the lack of suitable large substituent At the first the
isolation of a diplumbylene I4[16]
ArrsquoPb-PbArrsquo (Arrsquo = 26-(Tip)2C6H3 Tip = 246-
iPr3C6H2) was reported by Power in 2000 (Scheme 14) As is evident from the
structural parameters of ArPb-PbAr the triple bond character has vanished completely
The Pb-Pb distance (319 pm) in ArPb-PbAr is longer even than that of a normal Pb-
Pb single bond (308 pm) and the CAr-Pb bond vectors are perpendicular to the Pb-Pb
axes (943deg) These two facts illustrated a complete lack of hybridization of lead
atoms and almost exclusive use of p-orbitals in σ-bonds[17]
In 2002 Power reported
the distannyne ArSnequivSnAr I5[18]
(Ar = 26-Dip2C6H3 Dip = 26-iPr2C6H3) containing
a SnequivSn bond length of 2668 pm shorter compared to Sn-Sn single bonds[19]
and
with multiple bond character A trans bent configuration was also observed in I5 but
the Sn-Sn-C angle with 1252deg is far from a perpendicular situation as in I4 In the
same year Power described the first digermyne I6[20]
ArGeequivGeAr In this case the
Ge-Ge bond length of 2285 pm was found to be considerably shorter than normal Ge-
Ge single[13f]
(244 pm) and Ge-Ge double bonds (221-246 pm) indicated multiple
bonding character[21]
The trans-bending angle of Ge-Ge-C (1288deg) in digermyne I6
is slightly larger than that in distannyne I5
Scheme 14 The first isolated formal alkyne analogues of group 14
Introduction
- 5 -
With the appearance of the first structurally characterized disilyne I7[22]
reported by
Sekiguchi the series of heavier alkyne congeners was completed in 2004 The SiequivSi
bond length with 2062 pm was considerably shorter than that of typical Si-Si single
bonds (235 pm) and somewhat shorter than that of typical Si-Si double bonds[13b]
(216 pm) The molecular structure of compound I7 with a Si-Si-Silyl angle of 1374deg
reveals a heavily trans-bent configuration indicating the presence of a nonclassical
triple bond The theoretical calculation approved the trans bent structure and a bond
order of three
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements
Isolable carbenes and heavier carbene analogues (metallylenes silylenes R2Si
germylenes R2Ge stannylenes R2Sn plumbylenes R2Pb) can be defined as
stabilized divalent monomers of group 14 elements which can impossibly dimerize or
polymerize continuously due to the thermodynamic andor kinetic stabilization As
already mentioned above in contrast to carbon heavier group 14 elements have a low
tendency of sp-hybridization[11]
Accordingly consists of ns2 valence electrons as a
lone pair and use usually three p-valence-orbitals for the formation of their divalent
species[12c]
The ground state of R2E (E = Si Ge Sn Pb) is thereby a singlet while
the ground state of R2C is a triplet (Scheme 15) because two nonbonding electrons
locate in sp-hybrid orbitals[23]
In order to obtain at ambient temperature isolable metallylenes there are today two
particularly effective stabilization methods First of all these unsaturated compounds
can be thermodynamically stabilized by donor electron delocalization to empty p-
orbital as in the case of silylene I8[24]
and silyliumylidene cation I9[25]
(Scheme 16)
In addition the coordination of ns2 electrons to the empty p-orbital of the neighbor
molecule can be kinetically prevented by bulky substituents which was shown by the
Introduction
- 6 -
successful synthesis of the dialkyl silylene I10[26]
that is stabilized only by the steric
hindrance of four large silyl groups and C-SirarrSi hyperconjugation
Scheme 15 Ground states of triplet-carbene and singlet-metallylenes
Scheme 16 Stabilization of silylenes by π-electron delocalization andor steric
hindrance I8 I9 and hyperconjugation I10
The synthesis of heavier carbene analogues depends on suitable starting materials
with oxidation state II Practically in the case of tin and lead the dihalides SnCl2 and
PdCl2 are stable and suitable as starting materials for isolable SnII and Pb
II
organometallic compounds Many germylenes were synthesized employing the known
germanium dichloride complex GeCl2middotdioxane which is easily available[27]
The
carbene-stabilized SiIICl2
[28] (NHCrarrSiCl2 NHC = (HC-NDip)2C
[29]) was reported
recently by Roesky However it is not a trouble-free starting material for silicon(II)
chemistry due to the difficult removing of by-products derivated by the bulky carbene
(NHC) Otherwise divalent compounds of GeII Sn
II and Pb
II are more stable than the
corresponding SiII analogues Therefore the metallylene synthetic chemistry faces the
main difficulty in the synthesis and isolation of functionalized silylene derivates
Accustomed synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes was summarized in
Scheme 17 Their feasibility was also proved by the preparation of new silylenes in
this work
Introduction
- 7 -
Scheme 17 Synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes
Usually N-heteroleptic silylenes are accessible from SiIV
-precursors to form SiII-
species using reductants such as Na K or their alloy KC8 lithium or magnesium
naphthalenide etc A usually silylenes[24 26 30]
like I13 with a five- or six-membered
ring system and some three-coordinated silylenes[31]
like I14 are accessible through
the reductive dehalogenation reactions presented in case A Suitable five-coordinated
SiIV
sources I15 could be treated with a non oxygenated strong base resulting in the
corresponding three-coordinated silylenes[32]
I16 The two-coordinated silylene I13
prepared through an acid-base reaction from its four-coordinated precursor was not
observed so far In case C silylenes I18 could be isolated by salt metathesis reaction
during that the halogen atom was substituted by a desired Rsub[33]
With these new
synthetic methods the generation of many imaginable SiII molecules is possible today
Especially more complicated metallylenes for example interconnected or spacer-
separated bis-metallylenes (see next page) can be obtained in good yield Thus more
reactivity will be found in their subsequent reactions
Introduction
- 8 -
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores
The discussion of diplumbylene I4 indicates the strong tendency to transformate a
bis-metallylene instead of triple bond form in the case of lead Scheme 18 shows the
resonance structures of triply bonded I19 and bis-metallylene I20 together with the
donor ligand coordinated interconnected bis-metallylene structure I21 Hitherto the
chemical research in this area made clear that silicon and germanium prefer the type
of structure I19 while the species of lead is more favorable in the state I20[12d]
Corresponding tin species have vacillant structural feature between I19 and I20
depending on the steric demand of R and the packing force in crystals[34]
The donor
ligand coordination with all heavier alkyne analogues leads to the donor-stabilized
bis-metallylene form I21 which possesses an E-E single σ-bond and two ns2 lone
pairs one at each of the E centers[35]
Scheme 18 Resonance structures of nonclassical triple bond and bis-metallylene
According to the bonding state all known bis-metallylenes can be discriminated in
two different types i) ldquointerconnected bis-metallylenesrdquo in which two E atoms are
directly connected by a chemical bond and ii) ldquospacer-separated bis-metallylenesrdquo in
which two EII atoms are separated by bridged atoms or by a broad spacer without an
E-E bond in the molecules[33a 36]
The isolation of bis-metallylenes of heavier group
14 elements has been a major synthetic challenge owing to their tendency to
polymerize Herein a review of this kind of compounds which appeared almost
suddenly just in the last two decades is given
Introduction
- 9 -
Interconnected bis-metallylenes
Interconnected bis-silylenes are shown in Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylene
examples were firstly reported by Robinson in 2008[35]
which are a carbene-stabilized
bis-silylene I22 with a SiI-Si
I bond (2393 pm) and a carbene-stabilized bis-silylene
I23 with a Si0=Si
0 double bond (2229 pm) One year later the Roesky group prepared
an interconnected bis-silylene I24[37]
stabilized by amidinato ligands with a SiI-Si
I
single bond (2413 pm) Compound I24 exhibits a gauche-bent geometry Another
amidinato donor-stabilized bis-silylene I25[38]
which was synthesized in last year by
Jones et al possesses trans-bent structure not the gauche-bent form The SiI-Si
I
distance (2489 pm) in I25 is longer than those in I22 and I24 because of the more
sterically hindered amidinato ligands In the same year the synthesis of the first
phosphine-stabilized bis-silylene I26[39]
could be achieved and fully characterized In
this molecule the Si-Si bond with the bond length of 2331 pm is visibly shorter than
those in related molecules Baceiredo et al described that the Si-Si fragment in I26
presents a certain multiple-bond character
Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylenes
Interconnected bis-germylenes are shown in Scheme 110 In 2006 Jones and
coworkers reported the first successful isolation of two stable bis-germylenes I27 and
Introduction
- 10 -
I28[40]
which are stabilized by an amidinate and a guanidinate ligand respectively
Their Ge-Ge distances (2672 and 2638 pm) show normal single bond character Two
years later Roesky prepared the bis-germylenes I29[41]
which exhibits a gauche-bent
geometry Since I29 is stabilized by a less bulky amidinate ligands the Ge-Ge bond
with the length of 2569 pm is shorter than those of examples before A different β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized bis-germylene I30[42]
was presented by the work group
of Leung in which the Ge-Ge bond length (2602 pm) is somewhere in between The
reduction of NHCrarrGeCl2 (NHC see Scheme 110) employing magnesium(I)
reagents[43]
furnished the carbene-stabilized bis-germylene I31[44]
with a Ge0=Ge
0
double bond (2349 pm) which is the homologous compound of I23 Theoretical
analyses of I31 suggest a singlet germanium(0) dimer (Ge=Ge) datively coordinated
by two NHC ligands In the last year Jones again reported a bis-germylene I32[38]
which is structurally comparable with I27 and I28 But the Ge-Ge distance in I32 is
similar with that of I30
Scheme 110 Interconnected bis-germylenes
Interconnected bis-stannylenes are shown in Scheme 111 Very interestingly the
introduction of SiMe3 instead of H at the para-position of the aryl ring in distannyne
I5 induced the first bis-stannylene I33[34]
without alteration of the steric crowding
near the tin center The small Sn-Sn-C angle (993deg) and the long Sn-Sn distance
(3066 pm) in I33 indicate two stannylene moieties connected with a single bond and
Introduction
- 11 -
without the sp-hybridization In the similar work of Power et al in 2010 the
introduction of GeMe3 substituents of aryl rings at the para-position resulted also in
single bonded bis-stannylene I34[45]
with Sn-Sn distances of 3077 pm and ldquosharprdquo
Sn-Sn-C bending angles of 978deg With the bis-stannylene I35[46]
Jambor showed that
without the use of bulky substituents such as 26-disubstituted aryl groups a bis-
stannylene can be stabilized by intramolecular NrarrSn interactions The less bulky
aryls (aryl = 26-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3) in I35 led to the shorter Sn-Sn single bond (2971
pm) and a trans-bent angle of 943deg as in the diplumbylene I4 The first amidinato
coordinated bis-stannylene I36[38]
with a Sn-Sn single bond was reported by Jones et
al last year Its structural features are highly similar to the germanium homologue
compound I32
Scheme 111 Interconnected bis-stannylenes
Spacer-separated bis-metallylenes and species containing several EII cores
Lappert and Veith reported on the isolation of divalent germanium and tin
compounds very early[47]
Many of these from the 1970s and 1980s that were
described without X-ray characterization will not be discussed here The spacer-
separated bis-germylene I37[48]
and bis-stannylene I38[48]
(Scheme 112) appeared
first of all of this compound class in 1988 The work group of Veith introduced a facile
Introduction
- 12 -
synthetic method by which tetralithium amide reacted with two equivalents of
GeCl2middotdioxane or SnCl2 to give the corresponding products in over 60 yield In 1990
two interesting germylenes I39[49]
and I41[50]
were reported by Lappert and Power In
comparison to the isolable isonitrile (R-N+equivC
minus) until now it was not possible to
stabilize its homologous derivates of the heavier group 14 elements Compounds I39
and I41 can be considered as the dimer (I39) and trimer (I41) formed after
oligomerization of the unstable germaisonitrile analogue (R-N+equivGe
minus) Nevertheless
compounds with two germylene moieties at the time could be seen as impressive
achievements in the divalent germanium chemistry Another dimer of germaisonitrile
bis-germylene I40[51]
was reported by Roesky in 1997 After this the first stable
dimeric silaisonitrile I42[52]
generated through the reduction of carbene stabilized
dichlorosilaimine (NHCrarrSi(Cl2)=NAr Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) with KC8 was presented
by the work group of Roesky in 2011 The lengthy synthetic protocol bulky protecting
groups and a low yield (21) of I42 indicate a more difficult synthetic chemistry
necessary for the synthesis of the latter silicon compound However a trimer (tris-
silylene) of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) the silicon analogue of I41 is now just a dream of
synthetic chemists
In 1991 two bis-stannylenes (micro-chlorotin(II) amides (micro-Cl-Sn-NR2)2) I43 (NR2 =
N(CMe2)2(CH2)3) and I44 (R = SiMe3) in which two stannylene moieties are bridged
by two chlorine atoms were synthesized by Lappert et al[53]
Surprisingly X-ray
analyses of the two crystals show that I43 is the cis-isomer but I44 has the trans-
configuration In contrast a new bis-stannylene (ClSn-micro-N(Naph)SiMe3)2 I45[54]
was
characterized with two bridged nitrogen atoms by the same work group The Sn-N
bonds of 2438 pm in I45 are much longer than the terminal Sn-N bonds of 2069 pm
in I44 The Sn-N-Sn-N ring in I45 is slightly puckered and bears trans-Cl atoms
Instead of halogen atoms in bis-germylene I46[55]
two terminal N atoms of the azide
groups bridge two germylene parts forming a planar four-membered Ge2N2 ring
Otherwise the germylene centers of I46 are tetracoordinated due to two additional
OrarrGe dative bonds The N-bridged three-core germylenes I47 and stannylenes I48
Introduction
- 13 -
were prepared by Veith in 1991[56]
For four of six molecules X-ray crystal structure
determinations have been carried out which reveal the molecules to be built of a
diamond-lattice-like skeleton The top N atom coordinates to all three germylene
(stannylene) parts and another N atoms bridge with the neighboring two germylene
(stannylene) parts The chair-form six-membered E3N3 ring contains three N-H bonds
and traps one halogen atom (Cl Br I) with the three hydrogen atoms
Scheme 112 Spacer-separated metallylenes I37-I48
The by 14-diamine molecules separated bis-stannylenes I50 and I51 were prepared
from the chlorostannylene dimer I44 and the corresponding dilithium diamide by
Lappert and co-workers in 1994 (Scheme 113)[57]
Bis-germylene I49 was similarly
prepared by the reaction of the GeII homologous derivate ClGeN(SiMe3)2 of I44 with
dilithium diaminobenzene and marked a new development at that time In 1997
Lappert et al reported a new 13-diamine bridged bis-stannylene I52 and a stannylene
I53 with the three SnII cores employing dilithium meta-diamide
[58] The synthesis of
I52 is similar to I50 while I53 was isolated by treatment of the substituted
Introduction
- 14 -
diaminobenzene with Sn(N(SiMe3)2)2 in a ratio of 23 Evidently the formation of I53
involves unexpected C-H activations of the 2-position of 13-diaminobenzene and
eliminations of amine HN(SiMe3)2 The 32 reaction of Sn(NMe2)2 with sterically
bulky aromatic amines (DipNH2 or MesNH2) in toluene can be controlled giving the
heteroleptic stannylenes I54 and I55[59]
in which sterically less bulky NMe2 groups
serve as bridges and one SnII center between two bulky R groups remains its two-
coordination The isolation of the first GeII and Sn
II amide dimers I56 and I57
bridged by the NH2 groups was presented in 2005[60]
They were synthesized by the
reaction of bulky low-valent organo GeII and Sn
II halides (ArE
IICl E = Ge Sn Ar see
Scheme 113) with dry ammonia The Ge2N2 or Sn2N2 cores in I56 and I57 are planar
with rhombohedral shapes and with acute angles near 80deg at Ge or Sn and wider
angles near 100deg at N
Wright 1997
I54 R = Mes I55 R = Dip
I52 Lappert 1997
SnNMe2
Sn
Me2N
NR
NR
NN
SiMe3
E
(Me3Si)2N
E
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
N
N
SiMe3
Sn
(Me3Si)2N
Sn
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
Lappert 1994
I49 E = Ge I50 E = Sn I51 Lappert 1994
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
I53 Lappert 1997
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
Sn
Sn
Power 2005
I56 E = Ge R = Dip
I57 E = Sn R = Tip
R
RE
NH2
E
H2N
R
R
Scheme 113 Spacer-separated metallylenes I49-I57
The discovery of the first spacer-separated bis-silylene I58 (Scheme 114) was
made by Lappert et al in 2005[61]
It was synthesized by reductive dehalogenation of
the bis-dichlorosilane precursor with KC8 With the bis-functionality of I58
eventually a macrocycle metal-complex could be formed but the rigid backbone does
not allow a chelating coordination to a single core In addition Power tried oxidative
Introduction
- 15 -
addition reactions of his Sn and Ge alkyne analogues (I5 and I6 Scheme 114) with
trimethyl silyl azide (Me3SiN3) and adamantanyl azide (Ada-N3) giving the spacer (N-
SiMe3 or N-Ada) separated bis-stannylenes I59[62]
and bis-germylene I60[63]
and with
azobenzene (PhN=NPh) giving the spacer (PhNNPh) separated bis-germylene I61[62]
and bis-stannylene I62[62]
respectively The similar reaction of bis-germylene I29
with azobenzene furnished also the addition product the spacer bridged bis-
germylene I63[64]
with simultaneous cleavage of the Ge-Ge single bond as observed
by Roesky in 2010 At the same time So et al activated the Si-Si single bond of bis-
silylene I24 with phenyl acetylene resulting in the ethylene bridged bis-silylene I64[65]
Many spacer separated bis-germylenes and bis-stannylenes[66]
(I65-I74) were
successfully designed and isolated by Hahn et al for the use as promising chelating
ligands in coordination reactions A few transition-metal complexes of them were
prepared by his research group too (see p 18)
Scheme 114 Spacer-separated metallylenes I58-I74
In 2011 after the synthesis of the first oxygen bridged bis-silylene[32a]
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2
minus) in the course of this PhD work other four analogous were reported
Introduction
- 16 -
which are oxygen bridged bis-germylenes I75[67]
I77[68]
bis-stannylene I78[68]
and
sulfur bridged bis-germylene I76[67]
(Scheme 115) Bis-germylene oxide I75 and
sulfide I76 were synthesized in the work group of So et al by the dehalogenation of
LGeCl (L = amidinate in I75) with KC8 and then the oxidation with trimethylamine
N-oxide (Me3NO) or with elemental sulfur Otherwise Powerrsquos new compounds I77
and I78 were accessible by oxidative addition of alkyne analogues I5 and I6 using the
stoichiometric oxygen transfer reagent pyridine N-oxide (C5H5NO) In the last two
decades several cubanes of attractive tetra-metallylenes with GeII Sn
II Pb
II like I79
were presented[69]
(Scheme 116) Because they are somewhat far from discussed
metallylenes in structural features and synthetic approaches they are not discussed
and shown in detail here The synthesis of the still unknown SiII analogue I80 a
tetramer of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) remains as a fascinating challenge
Scheme 115 New bis-metallylenes bridged by a single atom
Scheme 116 Cubane-like tetra-metallylenes of heavier group 14 elements
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands
The interaction between the central atom and the donor in transition-metal
complexes depends on their electron configuration There are two- and three-
coordinated metallylenes in which the empty np-orbitals are stabilized by
Introduction
- 17 -
intramolecular electron delocalization or by the third donor-ligand donation
respectively Therefore if two types of metallylenes serve as donor-ligands for
transition-metals the interaction of these p-orbitals with the corresponding metal d-
orbitals is essentially different For example two silylenerarrM complexes are shown
in Scheme 117 Complex I81 shows clearly σ-donorπ-acceptor interaction[70]
while
the Fe atom in complex I82[71]
contains only a σ-donor bond from the silylene subunit
In this sense three-coordinate metallylenes as σ-donor ligands are more similar to
isoelectronic triorganophosphine ligands[33a b]
in I83 (Scheme 117) In Table 11 the
difference of three-coordinate silylenes and triorganophosphines are compared and
shown in detail
Scheme 117 The σ-donorπ-acceptor or only σ-donor coordination
Table 11 Comparison of three-coordinate silylenes and phosphines
three-Coordinate silylenes Phosphines (PR3)[72]
Synthesis difficult synthetic approaches well-established synthetic procedures
Embellishment only few scaffolds are known numerous structural transformations
and various substituents of R
Stability air and moisture sensitive normally stable in air
Property easily oxidative addition
much stronger σ-donor ligand
multivariate chemical behavior
seldom oxidative addition
strong σ-donor ligand
predictable chemical behavior
Complex only few transition-metal complexes complexes with numerous metals
State of
Development
underdeveloped chemistry fully established
Introduction
- 18 -
In coordination chemistry the spacer separated bis-metallylenes are at the same
time bidentate chelating ligands despite almost all of them were not or could not be
used as chelating ligands Until 2008 only a few chelated transition-metal complexes
coordinated by isolable spacer separated bis-metallylenes were reported They are the
bis-germylene I65 coordinated Mo(CO)4 complex I65-Mo[66b]
and bis-stannylenes
I73 I74 coordinated Ni0 complexes
[66c] I73-Ni I74-Ni (Scheme 118) reported by
Hahn et al Another bis-germylene complex I29-Fe[64]
with two Fe cores presented
by Roesky in 2010 does not comprise chelating coordination at all The reason for the
lack of representative bis-metallylenes in coordination chemistry is that not only the
formation and isolation of such complexes are very difficult but also the design and
synthesis of bis-metallylenes themself are sometimes infeasible Additionally the air-
and water-sensitivity of these compounds causes many unexpected side-reactions In
general metallylene transition-metal complexes are still limited in using metallylenes
containing single EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn)
Scheme 118 Known complexes of spacer-separated bis-germylenes and stannylenes
The successful usage of bidentate phosphanes in many catalytic transformations
originates from their convenient electronic properties and the variable steric
protection Among those chelating bis-phosphane I84[73]
(BINAP Scheme 119) with
Introduction
- 19 -
backbone chirality can lead to excellent enantioselectivity compared to monodentate
phosphines With ferrocendiyl bridged ligands I85 bimetallic complexes are easily
prepared[74]
Furthermore bis-phosphane ligands like I86 are superior bridges for
heterodinuclear complexes in catalytic hydrogenation[75]
Pincer arenes consisting of
a central aromatic backbone linked to two phosphane parts by different spacers are
particularly attractive because of their feasible structural tuning with many choices of
donor groups[72 76]
Recently the chemistry of pincer-ligated transition-metal
complexes underwent rapid developments and has been used for several intriguing
chemical transformations[72b 77]
The coordination chemistry of the most common
pincer ligands such as NCN- PCP- and SCS-type ligands toward transition-metals in
I87 (Scheme 119) was explored extensively[72b 77]
Pincer arenes with stronger σ-
donor sites E than those provided by group 15 and 16 atoms are very attractive for the
synthesis of more electron-rich transition-metal complexes for activation of small
molecules On the other hand transition-metal complexes with ligands like I84-I87
containing EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn) were scarce before 2009
Scheme 119 Bidentate phosphanes for transition-metal complexes
The challenge of spacer-separated bis-metallylenes as novel bidentate σ-donor
ligands for transition-metal complexes are intriguing because of their unique structure
and their coordination ability Therefore transition-metal complexes with chelating
Introduction
- 20 -
bis-metallylenes which were not throughly uncovered[66b c 78]
have received more
and more attention To date the new development of bis-metallylene synthesis
enables the isolation of their transition-metal complexes containing EII-based
functional groups as chelating ligands These complexes may provide access to their
potential application in which they can play a key role as intermediates in transition-
metal catalyzed transformations[70c 79]
Motivation
- 21 -
2 MOTIVATION
As pointed out in the introduction the metallylene synthetic chemistry is a fast
developing field with a great potential to find novel metallylenes with new
functionalities which would be the basis for the development of new kinds of
transition-metal complexes I am particularly interested in the synthesis of new types
of compounds containing divalent group 14 elements and to study their coordination
properties towards transition-metals New metallylenes could serve as very strong σ-
donor ligands for the generation of transition-metal complexes with unusual high
electron density at the metal site which could possess unique chemical properties
The three reports of transition-metal complexes[66b c]
containing bidentate bis-
germylene (stannylene) ligands were discussed in the ldquoIntroductionrdquo of this work
This potential of bis-metallylenes used as chelating ligands in coordination chemistry
prompted me to investigate new transition-metal complexes along with the
development of a new low-valent Si Ge and Sn chemistry
In this work three main points will be addressed i) the design and synthesis of new
ligand stabilized heavier carbene analogous (metallylenes) and interconnected bis-
metallylenes containing low-valent Si Ge Sn ii) the exploration of synthetic
approaches towards different spacer separated (bridged) bis-metallylenes iii) the
investigation of the properties and coordination abilities of new metallylenes (bis-
metallylenes) to transition-metals
The β-diketiminato and amidinato scaffolds I and II were chosen for the
stabilization of the reactive divalent group 14 units (Scheme 21) The known
metallylene halogenide compounds[31a 32b 80]
III and IV were used as the direct
precursors for the preparation of novel mono- and bis-metallylene derivates
Motivation
- 22 -
Scheme 21 Synthesis of new metallylene derivates from precursors
Scheme 22 Coordination of new spacer-separated bis-metallylene to transition-metals
Using isolated products as precursors complexes with different electronic
configurations and activities can be obtained and further modified through
coordination to transition-metals and varying substituents as ligands (Scheme 22)
This development may provide new divalent group 14 element-based functional
ligands in coordination chemistry towards transition-metals As spacer units for the
bis-metallylenes should serve 13-functionalized arene ferrocene and chalcogen
elements (O S Se) The promising application of new metallylene-metal complexes
will be investigated as the precatalyst in organic reactions
Results and Discussion
- 23 -
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates
In this PhD work the abbreviation of nacnacmacr is used only for the Dip-substituted β-
diketiminato ligand[81]
(CH[CMe(NDip)]2macr Dip = 26-iPrC6H3) The synthesis of β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized germanium complexes (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
and
(nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
were reported through the reaction of GeCl2sdotdioxane or GeCl4
with the corresponding Li(nacnac) reagent These compounds can be obtained in high
yield after recrystallization and were used as starting materials for new low-valent
germanium derivates
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Treatment of β-diketiminato germylene chloride 1 with excess of elemental
potassium at ambient temperature in THF yielded the first cyclogermylidenide
derivative 3[83]
which was isolated by fractional crystallization from diethylether in
the form of its potassium salt in 33 yield as pale yellow crystals Moreover the
reduction of 1 led also to the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-
Dip which was isolated by fractional crystallization from hexane solution as yellow
crystals in 31 yield (Scheme 31) Both 3 and 4 have been characterized by NMR
spectroscopy (1H
13C) EI-mass spectrometry (only for 3) and correct elemental
analyses
Scheme 31 Synthesis of the germylenide potassium salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Results and Discussion
- 24 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3 displays two sets of doublets for the Dip-
methyl groups in the range from 108 to 112 ppm Two additional singlets at 184 and
262 ppm were assigned to methyl groups of the five-membered ring Resonances for
the CH of iso-propyl appears at 298 ppm as septets The resonance of the β-H proton
at the GeNC3 ring appears at δ = 618 ppm One set of resonances for aromatic
protons of Dip-groups appears in the range of 691-698 ppm In addition the
diethylether molecule was observed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy The molar ratio of
ether was determined by integration of the appropriate resonance signals in the 1H-
NMR spectrum of 3 This amounts to 22mol and the determined composition fits
well with the elemental analytical data
Complex 3 is an Et2O coordinated potassium germylene anion salt according to the
1H- and
13C-NMR spectra Its structure has been established by a single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 31 left) It reveals a dimeric half-sandwich complex
interconnected via intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds In the structure each half-
sandwich moiety consists of a K(OEt2)2 cation η5-coordinated to the anionic five-
membered planar GeNC3 ring The K1-Ge1 distance of 3449(1) pm is shorter than
the intermolecular K1-Ge1rsquo distance of 3573(1) pm It is noteworthy such shorter K-
Ge distances have been observed in a related dipotassium (18-crown-6)
tetraphenylgermol dianion (330 335 pm)[84]
as well as in a (18-crown-6)-solvated
potassium silylgermanides (342 pm) with a tetravalent germanium atom[85]
Accordingly the K-C(ring) distances in 3 (3092(2)-3330(2) pm) are also longer than
those observed in the aforementioned dipotassium germol dianion (288-317 pm) The
Ge1-N1 distance of 1944(2) pm are shorter than those Ge-N distances in 1[80]
but
longer than that corresponding values in a N-heterocyclic 6π aromatic
germyliumylidene cation[86]
(189 pm) and the heterofulvene-like germylene[87]
(186 pm) Additionally the Ge1-C2 distance (1887(2) pm) the endocyclic C-C
distances (C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3) pm) and the C4-N1 bond length (1382(3)
pm) suggest significant π-resonance stabilization within the six-membered GeNC3
ring In line with that the remarkable deshielding of the resonance signal (618 ppm)
Results and Discussion
- 25 -
for the β-H atom in the 1H-NMR spectrum is in agreement with a considerable hetero-
Cpmacr-like resonance stabilization in the five-membered GeNC3 ring (Figure 31 right)
The latter is also supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see
section 313) Hereafter the lithium complexes of N-heterocyclic germylidenide and
stannylidenide anions[88]
[(THF)Li-η5-EC(tBu)C(H)C(
tBu)N(Dip) E = Ge Sn] were
presented with a similar reductive reaction
Figure 31 Molecular structure of germylene anion salt 3 (left) and hetero-Cpmacr-like
resonance structure (right) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level
Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg]
Ge1-C2 1887(2) Ge1-N1 1944(2) Ge1-K1 34485(6) Ge1-K1rsquo 35728(7)
K1-C2 3092(2) K1-C3 3122(2) K1-C4 3330(2) K1-N1 3402(2) K1-Ge1rsquo
35728(7) N1-C4 1382(3) C1-C2 1516(3) C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3)
C4-C5 1508(3) C2-Ge1-N1 843(1) C4-N1-Ge1 1130(1) C3-C2-C1 1202(2)
C3-C2-Ge1 1116(2) C1-C2-Ge1 1281(2) C4-C3-C2 1174(2) C3-C4-N1
1135(2) C3-C4-C5 1254(2)
The formulation of the resonance structure clarifies that the nitrogen atom has a
higher affinity to carbon instead to germanium (Scheme 32) The mesomer 3c is
energetically less favorable than 3a and 3b This explains also that the Ge1-C2 bond
(1887(2) pm) is shorter than the Ge1-N1 bond (1944(2) pm) in 3
Results and Discussion
- 26 -
Scheme 32 GeNC3-ring resonance structures of germylenide anion of 3
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 4 shows four sets of doublets and one
multiplet for methyls of Dip-groups in the range from 091 to 130 ppm Resonances
for methyl-groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 162 ppm as one singlet
Multiplets in the range of 329-340 are assigned to CH-groups of iso-propyl groups
The resonance of CH proton at the GeN2C3 ring appears at δ = 503 ppm One singlet
at δ = 564 ppm is assigned to NH-groups One set of resonances for aromatic protons
of Dip-groups appears in the range of 683-718 ppm
Figure 32 Molecular structure of germylene amide 4 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn
at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 2051(2) Ge1-N2 2026(2) Ge1-N3
1905(2) N1-C2 1329(3) N2-C4 1332(3) C1-C2 1518(3) C2-C3 1394(3)
C3-C4 1394(3) C4-C5 1512(3) N3-Ge1-N1 9720(8) N3-Ge1-N2 8876(9)
N2-Ge1-N1 8822(8) C2-N1-Ge1 1229(2) C4-N2-Ge1 1240(2) N1-C2-C3
1227(2) C4-C3-C2 1269(3) N2-C4-C3 1239(3)
Results and Discussion
- 27 -
The structure of compound 4 was established by single crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis (Figure 32) It consists of a slightly puckered six-membered GeN2C3 ring
with geometric parameters similar to the corresponding parameters found in precursor
chlorogermylene 1[80]
The sum of bond angles at Ge atom of 2742deg is comparable to
that of 1 (2815deg) implying the presence of a lone pair of electrons at the Ge center
The Ge-N distances in 4 (2026(2) and 2051(2) ppm) are somewhat longer than those
in chlorogermylene 1 (1988(2) and 1997(3) ppm) In the structure of 4 the terminal
Ge-N distance of 1905(2) pm is significantly shorter than those the endocyclic ones
(2026(2) 2051(2) pm) because it is a common covalent bond and stronger than
dative NrarrGe bonds
A plausible mechanism for the formation of 3 and 4 is proposed as depicted in
Scheme 33 The reduction of (nacnac)GeCl 1 by elemental potassium gives the N-
heterocyclic potassium germylidenide 3d as initial transient species The latter
undergoes a ring contraction to give the transient germylene amide 3e which reacts
with 1 in a salt metathesis reaction affording the Dip-N-bridged bis-germylene 3f
Reductive fission of a Ge-N bond in 3f by elemental potassium leads to the germylene
anion potassium salt 3 and the potassium β-diketiminato-GeII amide (nacnac)Ge-NK-
Dip The formation of 4 from (nacnac)Ge-NK-Dip needs a subsequent protonation
from the solvent in an inert atmosphere
Scheme 33 The mechanism of the formation 3 and 4
Results and Discussion
- 28 -
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
This part of the research is the cowork with Shenglai Yao (TU Berlin)
Another reduction experiment of the related β-diketimiate-substituted
organogermanium trichloride 2[82]
(nacnac)GeCl3 with KC8 was investigated The
reaction of 2 with KC8 in THF led to a brown-red mixture from which colorless
crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex K(nacnac)[89]
have been
isolated as side products along with deep-red crystals of the remarkable novel cluster
species 5[83]
in low yield (3 Scheme 34) In contrast reaction of 1 with elemental
potassium in toluene even at 0 degC led merely to the complete replacement of Ge by K
via reduction of GeII to elemental Ge
0 powder and concomitant formation of the
aforementioned β-diketiminato potassium complex
Scheme 34 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
The X-ray crystal diffraction analysis of 5 revealed a dipotassium salt of the first
ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a Ge4 core (Figure 33)
Remarkably to date only a few metal complexes of ldquoheavyrdquo CBD2-
have been
reported featuring a Si4 and Si2Ge2 core[90]
Compound 5 consists of a planar
Ge4(nacnac)22macr dianion in which the two unusual chelating nacnac-ligands are
attached to the Ge4 core each with terminal Ge-C and Ge-N σ-bonds The dianion is
connected by two η3-coordinated K(OEt2) cations each coordinated to Ge1 Ge2 and
N2 and Ge1rsquo Ge2rsquo and N2rsquo respectively The K-Ge distances of 3355(1) pm (K1-
Ge1) and 3477(1) pm (K1-Ge2) are similar to those K-Ge distances in 3 and in
related potassium germanides[84b 85]
The molecular structure of 5 is also notable for
Results and Discussion
- 29 -
the parallelogram-like configuration of the planar Ge4 moiety The Ge1-Ge2 of
2512(1) pm and Ge1-Ge2rsquo distance of 2553(1) pm are close to the Ge-Ge single
bonds observed in bulky substituted cyclotetragermanes (ca 251 pm)[91]
and longer
than those in Ge4Co complexes[90d]
(235-237 pm) while the transannular Ge2-Ge2rsquo
distance of 2747(1) pm is much longer Interestingly despite of the pyramidal
coordination environment of the Ge atoms the Ge42macr core of 5 shows extremely
strong aromaticity as supported by DFT calculations (see section 313)
Figure 33 Molecular structure of 5 containing a Ge42minus
cluster Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity
Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1rsquo 1932(3) Ge1-Ge2 2512(7)
Ge1-Ge2rsquo 2553(7) Ge2-Ge2rsquo 2747(1) Ge1-K1 3355(12) K1-N2 2814(3)
K1-Ge2 3477(1) N1-C2 1381(4) Ge2-C3rsquo 2019(3) C2-C3 1369(5) C3-C4
1479(5) N2-C4 1296(4) Ge2-Ge1-Ge2rsquo 657(2) Ge1-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 1143(2) Ge1-
Ge2-Ge2rsquo 578(2) Ge1rsquo-Ge2-Ge2rsquo 564(2) N1rsquo-Ge1-Ge2 8716(9) N1rsquo-Ge1-
Ge2rsquo 1026(9) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1 886(1) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 963(1) C2-N1-Ge1rsquo
1239(2) C3-C2-N1 1205(3) C2-C3-C4 1227(3) C2-C3-Ge2rsquo 1184(3) C4-C3-
Ge2rsquo 1184(3) N2-C4-C3 1220(3)
Scheme 35 shows the assumed mechanism of the formation of Ge42minus
cluster 5 The
product after the first reductive step by KC8 is (nacnac)GeCl 1 which was confirmed
by NMR investigation Chlorogermylene 1 could dimerize by sequential reduction to
Results and Discussion
- 30 -
a bis-germylene 5a Due to the instability of 5a bearing two bulky nacnac ligands a
transformation could be in the ascendant from dimer 5a to stable P4-like Ge4-tetramer
5b Intermediate 5c could be formed after double intramolecular deprotonation and
elimination of ldquofreerdquo (nacnac)H The excessive KC8 could offer two electrons to
molecule orbitals of Ge4-cluster 5c to furnish the isolated product 5 with a Ge42minus
cluster
Scheme 35 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 5
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5
The structural feature of 3 leads to a discussion of a possible aromatic character of
the GeNC3-ring in comparison to cyclobutadiene anion Aromaticity is also a key
Results and Discussion
- 31 -
concept in describing homo-elemental four-membered rings such as the square planar
cyclobutadiene-like dianion Therefore nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS)
values for the five-membered GeNC3-rings and the four-membered Ge4-ring in
compound 3 and 5 were calculated by Prof Christoph van Wuumlllen (University of
Kaiserslautern) Since their introduction NICS[92]
values have been used as an
aromaticity criterion in numerous applications both for organic and inorganic
compounds[93]
NICS values were computed using the molecular structures of compound 3 and 5
from X-ray diffraction analysis The positions of the non-hydrogen atoms were taken
from the X-ray data and kept fixed while the hydrogen positions were optimized
using the TURBOMOLE program package[94]
and its density functional capabilities[95]
an exchange-correlation functional with gradient corrections to exchange and
correlation[96]
(BP86 functional) and polarized triple-zeta (TZVP) basis sets[97]
The
geometry optimizations used density fitting techniques (also known as the RI
approximation)[98]
to evaluate the matrix elements of the electrostatic Coulomb
potential
NICS tensors are defined for any position as the negative magnetic shielding at
that position The magnetic shielding tensors were obtained using the integral-direct
IGLO program[99]
which has been extended to allow the use of density functional
theory[100]
The B3LYP[96a 101]
functional and a basis of IGLO-III[102]
quality were
employed For Ge this is a 4s11p7d1f primitive basis sets in which only the steepest
five s-functions three p-functions and two d-functions are contracted In lack of
IGLO-type basis sets for potassium a TZVDP (triple zeta two sets of polarization
functions) basis was used which will affect the accuracy of the magnetic shieldings at
the centers of the potassium atoms but not elsewhere
The ring centre for each ring system was calculated first from the Cartesian
coordinates and determined the plane through the ring center for which the sum of the
Results and Discussion
- 32 -
squares of the distance of that plane to the positions of the atoms forming the ring is
minimal This plane was defined as the ring plane A line through the ring center that
is orthogonal to the plane defines the positions of the NICS centers above and
below the ring centers and the local z direction to which the NICS tensors are
transformed to obtain the zz as well as the in plane (mean value of the xx and yy)
tensor components in addition to the isotropic value which is one third of the sum of
the xx yy and zz components The zz component is of particular interest because a
ring current parallel to the ring plane will most strongly be induced if the external
magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane and the magnetic field induced by such a
current will also be in that direction
In addition to the NICS tensor at the ring center (NICS(0) value) its height profile
contains useful additional information[103]
First the height profile discriminates ring
current effects (which are associated with aromaticity) from diatropic contributions
which stem from the proximity of the ring atoms while the latter approach zero
quickly when moving out of the ring plane the former only slowly do so Furthermore
the height profile helps to distinguish π-aromaticity (which is the type of aromaticity
dominant in organic chemistry) from σ-aromaticity (which is found for many
inorganic compounds) if aromaticity only stems from π-electrons which produce no
ring current in the ring plane then the NICS values when moving out of the ring
center first decrease (ie become more negative) before they gradually approach zero
NICS values 100 pm above or below the ring plane (ldquoNICS(1) valuesrdquo)
Table 31 reports NICS results for compound 3 where the region towards to
coordinating K+ ion was denoted as above the plane of the five-membered GeNC3
rings the other side as below Up to 100 pm the results for NICS centers above and
below are quite similar then the results for the positions 150 and 200 pm above the
ring start to be affected by the K+ ion whose distance to the ring plane is 299 pm The
NICS values are negative and the tensors are highly anisotropic the negative isotropic
value stems from the large and negative zz component Furthermore these values fall
Results and Discussion
- 33 -
off quite slowly when moving out of the ring plane This indicates a diamagnetic ring
current indicative of aromatic behavior Furthermore the most negative values are not
found in the ring center but slightly above which indicates π-aromaticity Of course
this is exactly what has to be expected for a heteroatom analogue of a
cyclopentadienyl anion This is interesting however because the NICS values for
compound 5 see Table 32 show a slightly different behavior again Negative NICS
values fall off slowly but the tensors show a substantial negative in-plane component
up to 200 pm above (or below this is the same in this compound) ring plane This can
be explained by diatropic contributions from the Ge-C and Ge-N bonds which are
nearly perpendicular to the ring plane The second difference between compound 3
and compound 5 is that the NICS values (both the isotropic values and the zz tensor
component) fall off monotonically and have no hump at about 1 pm above the ring
plane The aromaticity of the Ge4 ring in compound 5 must therefore have substantial
σ-character
Table 31 NICS values for compound 3 in ppm (the results are the same for both GeNC3 rings)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash77 ndash87 ndash56
50 pm above ndash82 ndash50 ndash144
100 pm above ndash73 +16 ndash251
150 pm abovea)
ndash59 +64 ndash298
200 pm abovea)
ndash116 +36 ndash422
50 pm below ndash82 ndash46 ndash154
100 pm below ndash74 +04 ndash230
150 pm below ndash54 +19 ndash199
200 pm below ndash37 +11 ndash134
a)
Value affected by a close K+ ion coordinated by the GeNC3 ring
Results and Discussion
- 34 -
Table 32 NICS values for compound 5 in ppm (the results are the same at both sides of the Ge4
ring)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash389 ndash375 ndash417
50 pm above ndash324 ndash286 ndash399
100 pm above ndash215 ndash155 ndash334
150 pm above ndash144 ndash93 ndash248
200 pm above ndash109 ndash82 ndash165
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6
As a nucleophile the germanium(II) anion in 3 seems a promising precursor for the
synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylenes and of related heterodinuclear bis-
metallylenes Accordingly the coupling reaction of the nucleophilic GeII centre in 3
with the electrophilic GeII site in 1
[80] was examined and the reaction in THF at -30 degC
yielded a dark red solution from which the bis-germylene 6[104]
has been isolated as
air- and moisture-sensitive dark red crystals in 66 yield (Scheme 36) The isolated
bis-germylene 6 was fully characterized including X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 36 Synthesis of bis-germylene 6
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 6 exhibits four sets of doublets in the range from 107
to 124 ppm with the ratio of 121266 which can be assigned to CH3-groups of all
Dip-groups The three singlets in the range of 161-262 ppm can be assigned to the
CH3 groups at the ligand backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear
in the range of δ = 301-367 ppm as three sets of septet The remarkable deshielding
Results and Discussion
- 35 -
of the resonance signal for the ring CH proton of the five-membered GeNC3 ring (δ =
682 ppm) is indicative a stronger 6π-aromatic resonance stabilization compared with
that in the precursor 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The proton resonance signal for the γ-ring
proton in the six-membered GeN2C3 ring of δ = 518 ppm suggests however the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization In the UV-vis spectra of 6 an absorption
band is observed at 501 nm showing blue shifted in comparison to the values
observed for related amidinate- and guanidinate- substituted bis-germylenes[40]
(I27
and I28 in Introduction) with GeI-Ge
I bonds
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8
The reactivity of 3 towards chlorostannylene 7[80]
(nacnac)SnCl was examined
also by a coupling reaction If (nacnac)SnCl 7 was used as electrophile for the
reaction with 3 in diethylether at -70 degC this furnished the corresponding product
germylene-stannylene 8[104]
which was isolated in the form of dark red crystals in
34 yield (Scheme 37) The new compound 8 was fully characterized including
NMR spectroscopy (1H
13C
119Sn) and X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 37 Synthesis of germylene-stannylene 8
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 exhibits six sets of doublets in the range from 085 to
129 ppm with the ratio of 666666 for CH3-groups of all Dip-groups The three
singlets in the range of 165-300 ppm can be assigned to the CH3 groups at the ligand
backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear in the range of δ = 305-
378 ppm as three sets of septets
Results and Discussion
- 36 -
A similar situation was observed in the NMR spectra of 8 for the CH moiety at
ligand backbones The deshielding for the ring CH proton of the five-membered
GeNC3 ring in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 (δ = 691 ppm) indicates again a stronger
6π-aromatic resonance stabilization than in 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The chemical shift (δ =
510 ppm) for the γ-ring proton in the six-membered SnN2C3 ring of 8 also shows the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization The 119
Sn chemical shift of 8 at δ -197
ppm in the 119
Sn-NMR spectrum is comparable to the value observed for the precursor
(nacnac)SnCl 7 (δ -224 ppm)[80]
implying a three-coordinated tin atom in solution In
the UV-vis spectrum of 8 an absorption band is observed at 541 nm The latter is
somewhat red shifted in comparison to the values of bis-germylene 6
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8
The new GeI-Ge
I compound 6 represents the first asymmetric substituted bis-
germylene while germylene-stannylene 8 is the first GeI-Sn
I example Their
molecular structures were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis
(Figure 34) Both N2C3 backbones of the chelating six-membered MN2C3 ring (M =
Ge Sn) are essentially planar but the germanium and tin atoms are out of the
respective plane The five-membered GeNC3 rings in both compounds however are
almost planar The most important structural features are the Ge-M distances and
trans-bending angles The Ge-Ge distance of 25498(8) pm in 6 is the shortest GeI-Ge
I
distance among the distances values observed in known bis-germylenes[38 40-42]
(257-
267 pm see Introduction p 10) but significantly longer than those in digermenes[13f
105] (Ge=Ge 221-247 pm) and digermynes
[3b 20 106] (GeequivGe 221-231 pm) This
relatively short Ge1-Ge2 distance was explained with asymmetric structural feature of
6 and some ionic charge distribution between five- and six-membered rings (see
section 317 DFT calculation)
Results and Discussion
- 37 -
Structural features of 6 and 8 are shown in Scheme 38 The torsion angles of the
Ge1-Ge2 bond with Ge1-N1-N2 and Ge2-N3-C31 planes in 6 are 1043deg and 1184deg
respectively (1262deg-1387deg in digermyne[20 106]
) In the structure of 8 the Ge-Sn
distance of 27210(4) pm is longer than that value observed for a Ge=Sn double bond
in a germastannene[107]
and also longer than the Ge-Sn distance in
germylstannanes[105 108]
The torsion angles of the Ge-Sn bond with Sn1-N1-N2 and
Ge1-N3-C31 planes are 939deg and 1006deg respectively (943deg in diplumbylene I4)[16]
Such Ge-M (M = Ge Sn) central bond lengths and trans-bent angles are indicative of
the absence of Ge-M multiple bond character of 6 and 8
Scheme 38 Drawing of torsion angles in 6 and 8
Figure 34 Molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right) Thermal ellipsoids (C1-C5
C30-C34 N1-N3 Ge1 Ge2 and Sn1) are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 6 Ge1-
Ge2 2549(1) Ge1-N1 2015(4) Ge1-N2 2038(4) Ge2-N3 1951(4) Ge2-C31
1903(5) N1-Ge1-N2 8867(15) N1-Ge1-Ge2 10430(11) N2-Ge1-Ge2
Results and Discussion
- 38 -
10149(12) C31-Ge2-N3 8447(19) C31-Ge2-Ge1 11890(15) N3-Ge2-Ge1
9962(12) For 8 Sn1-Ge1 27210(4) Sn1-N1 2233(2) Sn1-N2 2231(2) Ge1-
N3 1964(2) Ge1-C31 1915(3) N2-Sn1-N1 8288(8) N2-Sn1-Ge1 9542(5)
N1-Sn1-Ge1 10368(5) C31-Ge1-N3 8433(12) C31-Ge1-Sn1 11495(9) N3-
Ge1-Sn1 10200(6)
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8
In order to clarify the electronic structure and bonding nature in 6 and 8 DFT
calculations were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The simplified
molecules 6a and 8a [6a M = Ge 8a M = Sn (LanL2DZ for Sn)] (scheme 39) in
which the Dip-groups (26-iPr2C6H3) of 6 and 8 were replaced by phenyl groups were
calculated as model compounds DFT calculations of the model compound of 6a was
performed at the B3LYP6-31(d) level and the model compound 8a was performed at
B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set for Ge N C and H atoms and the LANL2DZ
level for the Sn atom
Scheme 39 Computed model compounds 6a and 8a
The computed geometry is in good agreement with the experimental metric
parameters A NBO analysis of 6a and 8a shows that the HOMOrsquos have a large Ge-M
bond character (Figure 35) and the latter derives largely from overlap of Ge and Sn
p-valence orbitals (6a s 1180 p 8820 8a s 978 p 9022) Apparently the
Ge-M bonds possess s character Likewise the Wiberg bond index exhibits Ge-E bond
orders of 08525 (6a) and 07290 (8a) respectively Similar bonding natures have
Results and Discussion
- 39 -
been identified and reported previously for related GeI-Ge
I dimers
[38 40-42] In addition
the nature of the HOMOrsquos and LUMOrsquos of the model compounds 6a and 8a
corresponds to that of a diplumbylene[16]
which again underlines that the Ge-M bond
in 6 and 8 represents a pure σ-bond
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
Figure 35 Frontier orbitals of model compound 6a and 8a
Interestingly the HOMOrsquos show clearly the presence of p-orbital interaction within
the six-membered MN2C3 ring and a slight interaction with the Ge centre in the
GeN2C3 ring Accordingly the five-membered GeNC3 ring bears a negative net charge
while the six-membered MN2C3 ring has a positive one [NPA charges in the GeN2C3
ring in 6a Ge +065 N (mean) -069 C (mean) 008 vs GeNC3 ring Ge1 +055 N -
066 C (mean) -015 NPA charges in the SnN2C3 ring in 8a Sn +095 N (mean) -
072 C (mean) 007 vs GeNC3 ring Ge +040 N -066 C (mean) -017] Thus the
latter parameters suggest some ionic character of the Ge-M bonds Moreover the
pronounced electron acceptor character of the GeN2C3 ring is also reflected by the
strongly negative values of NICS for 6a and 8a [6a NICS(0) = -88 NICS(1) = -82
8a NICS(0) = -76 NICS(1) = -74] The latter confirms the presence of a 6π-
aromatic stabilization in 6 and 8 as indicated by the 1H-NMR data (see p 34-36)
Results and Discussion
- 40 -
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands
The β-diketiminato ligands can undergo several side-reactions such as 13-
coordination C-N-exchange ring-contraction and deprotonation (Scheme 310) A
more rigid β-diketiminato ligand with a six-membered C6-ring in the backbone was
envisioned to prevent those side-reactions and possibly enhance the stability of the
products[81-83 109]
Scheme 310 Coordination possibilities of the classical β-diketiminato ligand
The syntheses of new β-diketiminato ligands[110]
12 and 20 are shown in Scheme
311 They are easily accessible from the N-cyclohexylidene-26-diisopropyl-
benzenamine 9[111]
in a two-step procedure First the deprotonation of 9 with nBuLi in
diethylether leads to the corresponding lithium amide 10 Salt metathesis reaction of
10 with (Z)-N-(26-diisopropylphenyl)benzimidoyl chloride 11[112]
or (Z)-N-isopropyl
benzimidoyl chloride[112]
19 in diethylether then afforded the novel β-diketiminato
type ligand 12 and 20[110]
in 63 and 60 yield respectively The new compounds
12 and 20 have been analyzed by NMR spectroscopy ESI-mass spectrometry X-ray
diffraction and elemental analyses
Results and Discussion
- 41 -
Et2O - 78degCnBuLi
Et2O - 78degCN
Dip
9
N
Dip
10
Li
N
Ph Dip
Cl
11
12
N
NH
Ph
Dip
Dip
Et2O - 78degC
N
Ph iPr
Cl
19
20
NH
N
Ph
Dip
iPr
Scheme 311 Synthesis of new β-diketiminato ligands 12 and 20
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 12 displays four sets of doublet for methyl of
Dip-groups in the range from 117 to 134 ppm The multiplets by 164 ppm and 217
ppm are assigned to CH2 of the six-membered ring The resonance of NH proton
appears at δ = 187 ppm Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear at δ = 335 ppm
as multiplet The 1H-NMR spectrum of 20 shows three sets of doublet for the
isopropyl of Dip-groups in the range from 109 to 132 ppm The peaks of four CH2
groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 156 208 and 214 ppm as multiplet
The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear by 310 and 323 ppm as septet The
resonance of NH group appears at δ = 1203 ppm as doublet because of the 3J-
coupling with neighbor CH group Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-groups
and phenyl appear in the range of 696-727 ppm for 12 and 713-753 ppm for 20
respectively
NH group connecting with iso-propyl in 20 is also confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 36 and Scheme 312) In compound 12 the N1-C1 bond
length (1360(2) pm) is longer than the N2-C3 bond length (1305(2) pm) due to the
presence of N1-H bond Contrarily the N1-C1 bond length (1309(2) pm) in
compound 20 is shorter than the N2-C3 bond length (1356(2) pm) because of the
presence of N2-H bond
Results and Discussion
- 42 -
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph Dip
Dip
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph iPr
Dip
1356
1386
1445
1309
1377
1360
1305
1452
12 20
HH
Scheme 312 Bonding situation of new ligands 12 and 20 bond length in pm
Figure 36 Molecular structure of compounds 12 (left) and 20 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 12 N1-C1 13600(17) N1-
C13 14349(18) C1-C2 13769(19) C1-C4 15136(18) N2-C3 13046(16) N2-
C25 14297(17) C2-C3 14515(18) C2-C7 15257(18) N1-C1-C2 12221(12)
C1-C2-C3 12230(12) N2-C3-C2 12212(12) For 20 N1-C1 1309(2) N1-C17
1418(2) C1-C2 1445(2) C1-C4 1522(2) N2-C3 1356(2) N2-C14 1461(2)
C2-C3 1386(2) C2-C7 1524(2) C3-C8 1495(2) N1-C1-C2 12080(15) C1-
C2-C3 12151(15) N2-C3-C2 12288(15)
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16
Scheme 313 shows the synthesis of chlorogermylene 14[110]
and germylene 16[110]
Through lithiation of compound 12 with nBuLi the Lithium complex 13 was formed
quantitatively The subsequent reaction of 13 with the dichlorogermylene dioxane
complex[27]
(GeCl2middotC4H8O2) affords the desired chlorogermylene 14 in 82 yield
Results and Discussion
- 43 -
Furthermore germylene 16 was obtained by dehydrochloration of 14 with 13-di-tert-
butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15[113]
as a base in 78 yield The composition and
constitution of 14 and 16 were fully characterized by elemental analysis IR and
multinuclear NMR spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 313 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and germylene 16
In the 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 14 resonances of 8 methyl moieties of Dip-
groups appear in the range from 097 to 155 ppm as multiplets The multiplets in the
range of δ = 128-139 and 203-227 ppm are assigned to CH2 moieties of the six-
membered ring Four sets of septets by 317 327 394 and 417 ppm are assigned to
methine protons of the iso-propyl groups The 1H-NMR spectrum of 16 displays three
sets of doublet for methyl moieties of the Dip-groups in the range from 115 to 135
ppm The peaks of four CH2 groups of the six-membered C6-ring appear at δ = 155
204 and 221 ppm as multiplet Resonances for the methine protons of the iso-propyl
groups appear by 369 and 380 ppm as septets A triplet at δ = 415 ppm is assigned to
the proton connecting with C=C double bond This resonance confirms the
deprotonation of C-CH2 to a C=CH structure on the ligand backbone Resonances for
aromatic protons of Dip-groups and phenyl appear in the range of 680-739 ppm for
145 and 675-725 ppm for 16 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 14 and 16 are shown in Figure 37 and
Figure 38 In compound 14 the six-membered GeN2C3 ring exhibits a boat-like
Results and Discussion
- 44 -
conformation The C2N2 moiety of the chelating ligand (N1 N2 C1 C3) is nearly
planar and the Ge and C2 atoms are out-of-plane (Ge 37 pm C2 13 pm) In
compound 16 the GeN2C3 ring is almost planar The Ge-N bond lengths in 14
(1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) are longer than those in 16 (1843(3) and 1861(3) pm)
and the N1-Ge1-N2 bond angle (9123deg) in 14 is smaller than that of compound 16
(9509deg) This is probably owing to the dative nature of the Ge-N bonds and the three-
coordinate Ge(II) atom in 14 The Ge-Cl bond length of 2296(1) pm in 14 is
consistent with the value observed in the N-heterocyclic β-diketiminato
chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl[80]
The fused cyclohexyl moiety of 14 is distorted
and the phenyl group is oriented in nearly the same direction as the aryl group on the
N2 atom while the C2 C3 C4 and C7 atoms of the fused C6 ring in 14 are coplanar
with the N2C3 ring (C1 C2 C3 N1 N2) while the C5 and C6 atoms deviate above
the plane of the N2C3 ring This conformation of the cyclohexyl moiety is also
observed in compound 16 It is of note that the buta-13-diene moiety (C1 C2 C3 C4
C32) of compound 16 clearly has alternating C-C distances (C32-C1 1498(4) C1-C2
1359(4) C2-C3 1461(4) and C3-C4 1360(4) pm) which is not the case in known
germylene (nacnac)Ge[87]
published in 2006
Figure 37 Molecular structure of compound 14 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 19760(16) Ge1-N2 19804(17) Ge1-Cl1
22956(7) N1-C1 1342(3) N1-C14 1458(3) C1-C2 1397(3) C1-C8 1502(3)
N2-C3 1333(3) N2-C26 1463(2) C2-C3 1415(3) C2-C7 1522(3) C3-C4
Results and Discussion
- 45 -
1509(3) C4-C5 1522(3) N1-Ge1-N2 9123(7) N1-Ge1-Cl1 9560(5) N2-Ge1-
Cl1 9392(5) C1-N1-Ge1 12568(13) N1-C1-C2 12352(17) C1-C2-C3
12503(19) N2-C3-C2 12440(18) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(13)
Figure 38 Molecular structure of compound 16 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 1843(3) Ge1-N2 1861(3) N1-C3 1426(4)
N1-C8 1442(4) N2-C1 1408(4) N2-C20 1454(4) C1-C2 1359(4) C2-C3
1461(4) C1-C32 1498(4) C2-C7 1525(4) C3-C4 1360(4) N1-Ge1-N2
9509(11) C3-N1-Ge1 300(2) N1-C3-C2 1176(3) C1-C2-C3 1267(3) C2-C1-
N2 1241(3) C1-N2-Ge1 1259(2)
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O
The unusual donor-acceptor properties of the zwitterionic silylene and germylene
were described in our group in 2006[30 87]
In these molecules the exocyclic methylene
group remains more negative charges due to the aromaticity of the center six-
membered ring This implies the presence of two reactivity positions in the molecule
a strong nucleophilic methylene group and a nucleophilic (ns-orbital) and
electrophilic (np-orbital) at the metallylene site Mesomeric structures of zwitterionic
germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties are shown in Scheme 314
Results and Discussion
- 46 -
To probe the donor-acceptor properties of zwitterionic germylene 16 its reactivity
toward ammonia and water was investigated Germylene 16 undergoes controllable
ammonolysis and hydrolysis (Scheme 315) Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas
at room temperature in toluene resulted in the formation of the corresponding
aminogermylene 17[110]
in high yield (92) Likewise germylene 16 also readily
reacts with water to produce germylene hydroxide 18[110]
nearly quantitatively (95)
Scheme 314 Mesomeric structures of germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties
Scheme 315 Syntheses of aminogermylene 17 and germylene hydroxide 18
The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectroscopic data of 17 and 18 are very similar to the
corresponding resonances of chlorogermylene 14 appearing at or near the same
chemical shifts In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 17 the protons of the NH2 group appear
at δ = 154 ppm This chemical shift is close to that of the dimeric aminogermylene
(ArrsquoGeNH2)2 (Arrsquo = 26-Tip2C6H3) (δ = 162 ppm)[60a]
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 18
displays a singlet for the hydroxide proton at = 166 ppm which is close to the
respective value observed for the dimeric germylene hydroxide [(nacnac)GeOH]2 (δ =
154 ppm)[114]
The IR spectrum of 18 clearly shows two N-H stretching modes of the
NH2 group at v = 3430 and 3343 cmndash1
respectively These values are similar to those
observed for related aminogermylenes (ArGeNH2)2 (Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) (3380
and 3308 cmndash1
) and (nacnac)GeNH2 (3431 and 3333 cm-1
)[115]
A sharp absorption at v
Results and Discussion
- 47 -
= 3643 cmndash1
that can be attributed to the O-H stretching frequency was observed in
the IR spectrum of 18 This value resembles that of germylene hydroxide
(nacnac)GeOH (3571 cm-1
)[114]
The structure of 17 and 18 are shown in Figure 39 Both compounds 17 and 18 are
monomeric species The structural features of 17 and 18 are very similar and show
close structural parameters compared with that of chlorogermylene 14 As in 14 the
Ge1 and C2 atoms of 17 and 18 slightly deviate from the N2C2 ring (N1 N2 C1 C3)
plane [17 Ge 46 pm and C2 13 pm 18 Ge 49 pm and C2 13 pm] The Ge-N
(ligand) bond lengths (17 2017(2) and 2021(2) pm 18 20054(17) and 20071(16)
pm) of 17 and 18 are longer than the Ge-N(amide) bond length of 17 (1829(3) pm)
Interestingly the Ge-N distance (1905(2) pm) in (nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip 4[83]
due to the
large Dip-substituent is also 8 ppm longer than that of 17 In each case there is clearly
a difference between the dative bond and covalent bond Compound 18 represents the
first monomeric three-coordinate GeII hydroxide in the solid state (Figure 39) owing
the larger steric congestion around the GeII center in contrast to (nacnac)GeOH
[114]
Figure 39 Molecular structures of compound 17 (left) and 18 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 17 Ge1-N1 2021(2) Ge1-
N2 2017(2) Ge1-N3 1829(3) N1-C1 1349(4) C1-C2 1395(4) N2-C3
1336(4) C2-C3 1417(4) C3-C4 1509(4) N3-Ge1-N2 9503(11) N3-Ge1-N1
9709(13) N2-Ge1-N1 8932(10) C1-N1-Ge1 1253(2) C3-N2-Ge1 1247(2)
For 18 Ge1-O1 18249(18) Ge1-N2 20054(17) Ge1-N1 20071(16) N1-C1
Results and Discussion
- 48 -
1340(3) C1-C2 1402(3) N2-C3 1331(3) C2-C3 1419(3) C3-C4 1509(3)
O1-Ge1-N2 9387(8) O1-Ge1-N1 9529(8) N2-Ge1-N1 8943(7) C1-N1-Ge1
12597(14) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(14)
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
In order to understand the coordination behavior of ligand 20 experiments using
germanium precursors GeCl2sdotdioxane and GeCl4 were conducted (Scheme 316) The
reaction of compound 20 with one equivalent of nBuLi resulted directly the lithiated
intermediate 21 The subsequent reaction with GeCl2sdotdioxane in Et2O at -78 degC led to
the unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained
by reaction of 21 with GeCl4 in toluene at -78 degC through dehydrochloration with 13-
di-tert-butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15 as a base in 57 yield The composition and
constitution of 22 and 23 were elucidated by elemental analysis multinuclear NMR
spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 316 Syntheses of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 22 exhibits 6 sets of doublets for 6 methyls of
iso-propyl Five sets of multiplets in the range of δ = 121-206 ppm are assigned to
the CH2 moieties of the six-membered C6-ring Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl
Results and Discussion
- 49 -
appear at δ = 284 367 and 396 ppm as septet In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 23 peaks
at δ = 113 122 and 137 ppm are for methyls of iso-propyl as doublets Resonances
of three CH2 groups of the six-membered ring on backbone appear at δ = 146 189
and 206 ppm as multiplets Two sets of septets by 332 and 361 ppm are assigned to
the CH of iso-propyl A triplet at δ = 421 ppm is for the proton of C=CH group on
backbone and indicates a dianionic ligand 20 in compound 23 owing to two times
deprotonation with nBuLi and carbene 15 Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-
groups and phenyl appear in the range of 688-724 ppm for 22 and 701-726 ppm for
23 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 22 and 23 are shown in Figure 310
Compound 22 represents an imine N-donor stabilized oxo-chloro-germylene and
adopts a pyramidal geometry with the sum of bond angles of 2737deg at the GeII center
The inserted oxygen atom could come in all probability from dioxane molecule in
GeCl2dioxane The cyclohexyl unit on backbone is distorted and the free N2 moiety
is oriented in inverse direction to the cyclohexyl The Ge1-Cl1 bond length of
23073(6) pm in 22 is compatible with the value (2296(1) pm) observed in
chlorogermylene 14 The Ge1-N1 distance of 20908(15) pm is visibly longer than
those of 14 (1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) because of the net NrarrGe coordination bond
without resonance stabilization The Ge1-O1 bond length is normal Ge-O single bond
with a distance of 18265(12) pm Bond lengths of N1-C1 (1284(2) pm) and N2-C7
(1272(2) pm) present clearly C=N double bond while bond lengths of C1-C6
(1525(2) pm) and N6-C7 (1539(2) pm) present normal C-C single bonds
In compound 23 GeIV
atom is tetrahedral coordinated with two nitrogen and two
chlorine atoms All six angles in the range of 1028-1138deg at the GeIV
center are
nearly alike with the angle in methane (1095deg) and indicate a slightly distorted
tetrahedral GeN2Cl2 configuration GeIV
-Cl bond lengths (21339(7) and 21375(9) pm)
in 23 are much shorter than those of germylenes 14 and 22 (229-231 pm) Distances
of the GeIV
-N bonds (1798(2) and 1788(2) pm) in 23 are much shorter than the
Results and Discussion
- 50 -
NrarrGe dative bonds in 14 17 and 18 (198-202 pm) and the net NrarrGe dative bond
(20908(15) pm) in 22 But they are only slightly shorter than GeII-N distances
(1843(3) and 1861(1) pm) in germylene 16 and GeII-NH2 bond length (1829(3) pm)
in germylene 17 Bond lengths of C1-C2 (1339(4) pm) and C3-C4 (1326(4) pm) in
23 illuminate clearly C=C double bond and distances of N1-C1 (1430(3) pm) and
N2-C3 (1441(3) pm) correspond to C-N single bond
Figure 310 Molecular structures of compound 22 (left) and 23 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 22 Ge1-Cl1 23073(6)
Ge1-O1 18265(12) Ge1-N1 20908(15) O1-C6 1418(2) N1-C1 1284(2) N2-
C7 1272(2) C1-C6 1525(2) C6-C7 1539(2) Cl1-Ge1-O1 9789(4) Cl1-Ge1-
N1 9422(4) O1-Ge1-N1 8158(6) Ge1-N1-C1 11291(12) N1-C1-C6
11484(16) C1-C6-O1 10975(14) C6-O1-Ge1 11838(10) N2-C7-C6
11778(17) For 23 Ge1-Cl1 21339(7) Ge1-Cl2 21375(9) Ge1-N1 1798(2)
Ge1-N2 1788(2) N1-C1 1430(3) C1-C2 1339(4) C2-C3 1486(4) C3-C4
1326(4) N2-C3 1441(3) N2-Ge1-N1 10554(10) N2-Ge1-Cl1 11208(7) N1-
Ge1-Cl1 11381(8) N2-Ge1-Cl2 11201(8) N1-Ge1-Cl2 11082(8) Cl1-Ge1-Cl2
10276(3) C1-C2-C3 1266(2) C4-C3-N2 1209(2) C2-C4-C3 1208(3)
The formation of compound 22 indicates that ligand 20 has a different reactivity to
the derivative ligand 12 due to the exchange of Dip-group with iso-propyl But the
situation of complex 23 shows a possibility of a dianionic chelating coordination[30 87]
Results and Discussion
- 51 -
of ligand 20 Coordination chemistry with ligand 20 is currently being investigated for
its suitability to serve as bidentate donor ligand for complexes with low-valent Si Ge
and also transition-metals
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28
Since the successful isolation of halogen bonded silylene and germylene[31a 32b 80]
chemists faced the challenge weather compounds like LEII-X-E
IIL [E = Si Ge Sn X
= O S Se] in which two metallylene moieties are bridged by a single X-atom can be
stabilized at room temperature Key points of this assignment are the identification of
effective ligands for the stabilization of metallylenes and a feasible synthetic route
There is a special interest to synthesize this kind of compounds due to their chemical
nature and coordination properties
Previous attempts to synthesize a stable bis-silylene oxide 28b from silylene 28a[30]
has been unsuccessful The isolated product originating from the reaction of water
with the silylene 28a was the stable siloxysilylene 28c[10a]
(a mixed-valent disiloxane)
(Scheme 317) Recently Roesky et al proposed the formation of bis-silylene oxide 28
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2macr) as a reactive intermediate in the reaction of the bis-
silylene I24[37]
(aLSi-Si
aL) with N2O However 28 could be neither detected nor
chemically trapped[116]
By addition of water to two molar chlorosilylene 26[31a]
in
toluene the expected disiloxane 27 could not be isolated from a complicated reaction
mixture (Scheme 317 )
In the following the isolation of the first oxygen-bridged bis-silylene 28 by a facile
synthetic protocol using 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(HSiCl2)2O as starting
material will be described
Results and Discussion
- 52 -
Scheme 317 Synthesis of siloxysilylene 28c and hydrolysis of chlorosilylene 26
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28
The reaction of 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane (HSiCl2)2O with 2 molar equiv of
lithium amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the desired disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield
(Scheme 318) The target bis-silylene oxide 28 was readily available by
dehydrochloration of 27 employing 2 molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene
Recrystallization in toluene afforded pale yellow crystals of 28[32a]
in 76 yield The
molecular structure of new compounds 27 and 28 was characterized by means of
spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 318 Synthesis of disiloxane 27 and bis-silylene oxide 28
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 27 reveals two singlets one for the
tBu groups at δ =
120 ppm and one corresponding to the Si-H protons at δ = 598 ppm as well as one
set of resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of
Results and Discussion
- 53 -
27 shows a singlet resonance at δ = -1110 ppm The 1H-NMR spectra of 28 displays a
singlet of tBu at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for Ph group in aromatic
resonance region The 29
Si-NMR signal of 28 (δ = -161 ppm) appears shifted ca 95
ppm downfield from the precursor 27 This shift is comparable to that reported for the
triply coordinated silylene alkoxides (aLSiO
tBu) (δ = -52 ppm) and (
aLSiO
iPr) (δ = -
135 ppm)[31b]
respectively
The molecular structure of disiloxane 27 is shown in Figure 311 The center Si1-
O1-Si2 part of molecule 27 was extensively disordered Therefore the X-ray data were
not suitable for accurate discussion Even though the nearly unbent Si1-O1-Si2 angle
(1680deg) in 27 shows a very similar bonded character with sp-hybridized oxygen
bridge in comparison to another disiloxane compounds[118]
The molecule of bis-silylene oxide 28 (Figure 312 left) contains two triply
coordinated Si atoms and two lone pairs one at each of the Si centers Those are two
silylene moieties The sum of bond angles at Si1 and Si2 are 27769deg and 27534deg
respectively which is consistent with the presence of lone pairs In the molecular
structure of 28 Si-O distances of 1641(2) and 1652(2) pm are comparable to those of
siloxysilylene 28c (16442(3) pm and 16501(2) pm) and thus typical for silicon-
oxygen single bonds of other disiloxanes[118]
Moreover as expected for an disiloxane-
like system the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent (15988(15)deg) and larger than
that observed for a C-O-C moiety of ethers
DFT calculations of the compound 28 was performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU
Berlin) at the B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set with the GAUSSIAN-03 program
package[101c 119]
The structure obtained by X-ray analysis was used as the input for
these calculation Optimized structure of 28 is shown in Figure 312 (right) DFT
calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small The
Si-O-Si bond angle of optimized structure is 180deg However the energy difference
between the experimental geometry and linear arrangement is only 071 kJsdotmolminus1
The
Results and Discussion
- 54 -
HOMO (-0163 eV) and HOMO-1 (-0178 eV) represent mainly lone pairs at Si atoms
The LUMO (-0020 eV) is located on the phenyl group of the amidinate ligand
(Figure 313)
Figure 311 Molecular structure of 27 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity The center Si1-O1-Si2
part was extensively disordered Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Cl1-Si1
20349(16) Cl2-Si2 22017(11) Si2-O1 1581(8) Si2-N3 1798(2) Si2-N4
1968(2) Si1-O1 1562(8) Si1-N2 1750(10) Si1-N1 1994(6) Si1-O1-Si2
1680(6)
Figure 312 Molecular structure of 28 (left) and optimized structure (right)
Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted
for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Si1-O1 1641(2) Si2-O1
1652(2) Si1-N1 1896(3) Si1-N2 1902(3) Si2-N3 1888(2) Si2-N4 1908(3)
Si1-O1-Si2 15988(15) O1-Si1-N1 10417(12) O1-Si1-N2 10535(11) O1-Si2-
N3 10196(11) O1-Si2-N4 10481(12) N1-Si1-N2 6815(10) N3-Si2-N4
6855(11)
Results and Discussion
- 55 -
Figure 313 Calculated frontier molecular orbitals of 28
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel
To probe the chelating coordination ability of 28 its reactivity toward Ni(cod)2
(cod = cycloocta-15-diene) was investigated Toluene was added to a mixture of bis-
silylene oxide 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 at room temperature to furnish an
intensely red-colored reaction solution Recrystallization of the crude product from a
saturated n-hexane solution at -30 degC afforded dark red crystals of the Ni complex
29[32a]
in 91 yield (Scheme 319) The isolated compound 29 is the first bidentate
bis-silylene transition-metal complex This work initiates a significant progress on the
chelating silylene ligand transition-metal coordination chemistry The constitution and
composition of 29 could be determined by NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis
and ESI mass spectrometry
Scheme 319 Synthesis of bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
Results and Discussion
- 56 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one singlet for the
tBu groups at δ = 130
ppm and one set of resonances at δ = 281 295 and 504 ppm for the COD-ligand and
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one
singlet (δ = 328 ppm) which shows a downfield shift relative to that of the ldquofreerdquo
ligand 28 The observed downfield shift for the 29
SiII nuclei in 29 clearly suggests the
presence of a bis-silylene chelated complex
The chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to Ni0 is confirmed by X-ray
diffraction analysis The molecular structure of 29 is displayed in Figure 314
Complex 29 containing Ni0 is diamagnetic because of 18 electrons in the valence
shell The two silylene subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are
tetrahedral coordinated to the nickel atom with the Si1-Ni1-Si2 angle at 6890(3)deg
The Si-O bond lengths in 29 [17011 (15) and 17081(17) pm] are longer than that in
28 [1641(2) and 1652(2) pm] while the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 29 (9344(8)deg) is
significantly smaller than that in 28 The Ni-Si bond lengths [21908(7) and 21969(7)
pm] are slightly shorter than those in silylene nickel complex 29a [2207(2) and
2216(2) pm][120]
but longer than those found in silylene nickel complex 29b
(21395(8) pm)[121]
Scheme 320 shows clear bonded prospect of three complexes
Moreover the Ni-Si bond lengths of bis-silylene nickel complex 29 are longer than
those in ylide-like silylene-nickel complexes [20369(6) and 20597(10) pm][70a b 122]
The strong σ-donor character of bis-silylene ligand 28 causes a more electron rich Ni
center It indicates a somewhat stronger π-back-donation from the nickel atom to the
chelating COD-ligand Therefore the Ni-C distances (2070-2090 pm) in 29 are
shorter than those in Ni(cod)2 (211-213 pm)[123]
and silylene nickel complex 29b
(2130-2146 pm)[121]
The coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 with other transition-metals (for example
Ti Cu) is currently investigated together with the reactivity of these complexes on
their use as molecular catalysts
Results and Discussion
- 57 -
29
[Si][Si]
O
Ni
[Si] [Si]
Ni
CO CO
[Si] [Si]
Ni
N N tButBu
Si
N N DipDip
Si
[Si] = [Si] =
29a 29b
2207 2216
2191 2197689deg
934deg
1084deg 1019deg
1708 1701
2139 2139
Scheme 320 Comparison of bonding state in complexes 29 29a and 29b bond lengths in pm
Figure 314 Molecular structure of 29 (left) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Si1-Ni1 21969(7) Si2-Ni1 21908(7) Si1-O1 17011(15)
Si1-N1 18929(19) Si1-N2 1875(2) Si2-O1 17081(17) Si2-N3 18776(19)
Si2-N4 1893(2) Si1-O1-Si2 9344(8) Si1-Ni1-Si2 6890(3) N1-Si1-N2
6941(9) N3-Si2-N4 6954(8)
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
This part of the research is the cowork with Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)
Due to the unique reactivity and electronic properties compounds with a
heteroleptic multiple bond between heavier main-group elements have attracted
considerable attention particularly those between group 14 and 15 elements this is
Results and Discussion
- 58 -
attributed to the pronounced polarity of the E14-E15 multiple bonds[124]
Phosphasilene
containing Si-P double bonds is an analogous of iminosilane The first isolable
phosphasilene with a three coordinate Si and a two coordinate P atom was reported by
Bickelhaupt and coworkers (Scheme 321) in 1984[125]
and several other similar
species containing localized and delocalized Si=P bonds were synthesized and
structurally characterized in the later period[126]
Their rich chemistry provides new
approaches to functional Si-P compounds
Furthermore the more challenging phosphasilyne with a silicon-phosphorus triple
bond (Scheme 321) is heretofore unknown[127]
this is mainly due to the high
tendency of the highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds to dimerize or even
oligomerize[126c]
However the availability of elusive phosphasilyne species would be
a strongly desired progression with respect to the synthesis of polyfunctional silicon-
phosphorus containing materials from it By spatial protection of a Si-P multiple bond
through the steric hindrance by suitable bulky substituents the oligomerization of the
highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds could be prevented additionally to the benefit of
the donor-acceptor stabilization of Si-P multiple bonds
Scheme 321 The first phosphasilene (left) and phosphasilyne (right)
Imaginable methods to synthesize a phosphasilyne employing corresponding
precursors comprise oxidation of bis-silylene 30a with elemental phosphorus and
elimination of phosphino silane 30b (Scheme 322) Whether the phosphasilyne 30c is
available depends only on the spatial andor donor-acceptor protection of bulky ligand
L Now there are not many choices of silicon compounds with very bulky ligand L
that are suitable for preparation of phosphasilynes Our current attempt was on the
Results and Discussion
- 59 -
way towards phosphasilyne employing amidinato ligand stabilized chlorosilylene
aLSiCl
[31a] However the isolated dimerized product was the unique 24-disila-13-
diphosphacyclobuta-13-diene (aLSiP2Si
aL) 31
[128] starting from the new N-
heterocyclic bis(trimethylsilyl) phosphino silylene precursor 30[128]
Scheme 322 Imaginable methods towards a phosphasilyne
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The starting material bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanyl silylene 30[128]
was easily
accessible in 83 yield by salt elimination reaction of N-heterocyclic chlorosilylene
26[31a]
with the corresponding lithium phosphide LiP(SiMe3)2 at room temperature
(Scheme 323) The 1H-NMR spectrum exhibits one singlet at δ = 058 ppm for methyl
of silyl and another singlet at δ = 124 ppm for methyl of NtBu as well as one set of
resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand in the region of 681-741 ppm
The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 30 shows two sets of doublet at δ = 229 ppm for silicon
of silyl and at δ = 1943 ppm for silicon of silylene The latter is much downfield
shifted than that of previously reported aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (562 ppm)
[31b] One
singlet at δ = -221 ppm was found by 31
P-NMR measurement which exhibits a
tremendous upfield shift when compared with that of aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (-165
ppm)[31b]
Results and Discussion
- 60 -
Scheme 323 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The molecular structure of 30 was also substantiated by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 315) The molecule 30 contains triply coordinate Si and P
atoms and two lone pairs at the Si and P center respectively The Si and P center
display a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry The sum of bond angles is 33071deg at
the P center and 27762deg at the Si center The latter is consistent with that (2765deg) of
aLSi-P
iPr2 The angle of N(2)-Si(1)-P(1) (10854(8)deg) is larger than that of N(1)-Si(1)-
P(1) (9998(9)deg) Si-N distances of 1877(3) and 1882(2) pm in 30 are comparable to
those (1875(1) pm and 1881(1) pm) of the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative
[31b] The Si1-P1
distance of 30 (22838(12) pm) is slightly shorter than the Si-P bond length (2307(8)
pm) in the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative and the elongated P1-Si2 and P1-Si3 single bonds in
30 (22264(13) and 22321(12) pm) reflect steric congestion within the P(SiMe3)2
subunit
Figure 315 Molecular structure of 30 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 22838(12) P1-Si2 22264(13) P1-Si3 22321(12)
Si1-N1 1877(3) Si1-N2 1882(2) Si2-P1-Si3 10859(5) Si2-P1-Si1 103905
Results and Discussion
- 61 -
Si3-P1-Si1 11822(5) N1-Si1-N2 6910(11) N1-Si1-P1 9998(9) N2-Si1-P1
10854(8)
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Since the phosphanyl silylene 30 was successfully accessed bearing a SiMe3 as
reactive leaving-groups at phosphorus[129]
its suitability as a precursor for the
formation of a phosphasilyne was probed Because of the labile nature of the P-SiMe3
bonds in 30 the compound was exposed to dichlorotriphenylphosphorane Ph3PCl2 as
a promising smooth oxidant for desilylation with the intention to produce the desired
phosphasilyne along with Me3SiCl and PPh3 Surprisingly the reaction of 30 with one
molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 in toluene at room temperature led to the formation of the
unique compound 31[128]
(Scheme 324) which could be isolated as yellow crystals in
72 yield
Scheme 324 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Compound 31 represents a dimerized form of the desired phosphasilyne and was
fully characterized by means of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-
ray diffraction analysis The 1H-NMR spectra of 31 displays a singlet for the
tBu
groups at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for the Ph groups in the ldquoaromaticrdquo
region The triplet signal in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 31 at δ = 265 ppm (1JSiP = 998
Hz) indicates that two P atoms are bonded to silicon center Meanwhile the more
deshielded (ca 46 ppm) singlet resonance at δ = -1649 ppm in the 31
P-NMR spectrum
compared to that in 30 is in accordance with the four-membered ring structure of 31
Results and Discussion
- 62 -
bearing two polarized Si-P π-bonds
The result of the X-ray diffraction structure analysis is in accordance with that of
NMR spectroscopy which confirms that 31 is a 24-disila-13-diphosphacyclobuta-
13-diene (Figure 316) The Si2P2 core in 31 has a planar diamond-shaped geometry
and possesses two-coordinated P atoms and four-coordinated Si atoms each with a
dative NrarrSi bond The Si-P bonds lengths in 31 are 21701(12) and 21717(11) pm
respectively which are in the range of a Si=P double bond length (2095(3) pm) in the
Phosphasilene[128]
and the Si-P single bond length of 30 (22838(12) pm) this
indicates σ- and π-electron resonance stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has
been confirmed by theoretical calculations (see p 64) Of note the transannular
Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo (25626 pm) is shorter than the Si-Si distance of disilacyclopropene[130]
(tBu3Si)2SiSi(Si
tBu3)C-Ad (Ad = adamantyl) (25797(8) and 25991(9) pm) and hexa-
tert-butyldisilane tBu3Si-Si
tBu3 (2697(9) pm) and the P1middotmiddotmiddotP1rsquo (3505 pm)
separations in 31 is much larger than that for P-P bonds observed in tetrahedral
elementary phosphorus P4 (221 pm)[131]
Evidently the peculiarly short Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo
distance is caused by the geometric constraints of the Si1-P1-Si1rsquo and endocyclic P1-
Si1-P1rsquo angles of 7234(4)deg and 10766(4)deg respectively and not driven by attractive
Si1-Si1rsquo interaction
Figure 316 Molecular structure of 31 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 21701(12) P1-Si1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-N1 1858(3)
Si1-N2 1856(2) Si1-P1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-Si1rsquo 25626(16) Si1-P1-Si1rsquo 7234(4)
N2-Si1-N1 7078(11) P1-Si1-P1rsquo 10766(4)
Results and Discussion
- 63 -
The formation of 31 in a multistep which is depicted in Scheme 325 was proposed
Firstly formation of the corresponding chloro-(silyl)phosphanyl silylene intermediate
31a is conducted by cleavage of one of the Si-P bonds of the P(SiMe3)2 subunit with
Ph3PCl2 Subsequently elimination of Me3SiCl from 31a occurs to give the reactive
intermediate 31b which could be treated as a silylene-phosphinidene (Scheme 325
right) or a phosphasilyne (Scheme 325 left) further dimerization of intermediate 31b
affords the isolated product 31 A similar dimerization process has been proposed by
Wiberg for disilynes (SiequivSi) as reactive intermediates to produce
tetrasilatetrahedranes[132]
To elucidate the reason for the formation of 31 preferred over its hypothetical Si2P2-
tetrahedranceisomer 31d (Scheme 326) we performed DFT calculations of 31 and
disiladiphosphatetrahedranes 31d The result shows that 31d is much less stable than
compound 31 with 462 kcalmiddotmolminus1
higher in energy which is in agreement with the
experimental result Compound 31 with a planar structure is most likely stabilized by
the dative NrarrSi coordination of the bulky amidinato ligands Meanwhile this also
leads to a shorter Si-N bond length that is 1856(2) and 1858(3) pm in 31 are shooter
than those (1877(3) pm and 1882(2) pm) of in 30 and also those of in chlorosilylene
aLSiCl (1870(2) pm and 1917(2) pm)
[31a] Furthermore this NrarrSi donor
stabilization could demonstrate an ylide-like electronic structure of 31 (Scheme 326)
Scheme 325 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 31
Results and Discussion
- 64 -
Scheme 326 Resonance structures of 31
In order to unravel the electronic configuration of 31 DFT calculations at
B3LYP6-31G(d) level using the parameters obtained from X-ray diffraction as the
initial structure were performed[101c 119]
The optimized structure matched the
experimental data of 31 very well According to the NPA charges each Si atom in the
Si2P2-ring has a large positive net charge (+1204) while as expected P atoms in the
ring bear slight smaller negative charges (-0765) Meanwhile HOMO-5 of 31 shows
a set of Si-P σ-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 left) whereas the HOMO-2 contains
mainly the delocalized two π-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 right) Accordingly a
NBO analysis indicates that the Si2P2-core of 31 bears a Lewis structure with four
occupied σ-bond orbitals for the Si-P bonds (1917e for Si1-P1 1916e for Si1-P1rsquo
1916e for Si1rsquo-P1 and 1918e for Si1rsquo-P1rsquo) along with two filled Si-P π-bond
orbitals with 1770e for the Si1- P1 and Si1rsquo-P1rsquo π-bonding interaction respectively
The latter canonical π-bond orbitals are strongly polarized toward the P atoms
(8753 at the P and 1247 at the Si) Likewise the WBI (Wiberg Bond Index)
values of the Si-P bonds (1142 and 1140) are higher than that of the phosphino
silylene 30 (0920)
Figure 317 Molecular orbitals of 31 representing the presence of σ-electron and π-
electron delocalization within the Si2P2 cycle HOMO-5 (left) and HOMO-2 (right)
Results and Discussion
- 65 -
According to the aforementioned betaine (ylide)-like resonance stabilization 31
totally differs from cyclobuta-13-diene derivatives The calculations of the nucleus
independent chemical shift[92]
(NICS) also supports this conclusion The result of
NICS reveals negative values (NICS(1) = -257 and NICS(0) = -601 ppm) indicating
that 31 has a somewhat aromatic character which is opposite to the properties of
cyclobuta-13-dienes that are antiaromatic As a summary the results of theoretical
calculations are in agreement with the idea to describe 31 as the ylide-like resonance
structure 31c with some contribution of the resonance forms As a result the smaller
endocyclic angle at phosphorus than that at silicon is contributed by the repulsion
between the negatively charged P atoms
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
Nucleophilic and electrophilic properties of Si Ge and Sn metallylenes were
discussed in chapter 32 (see p 46) Due to the strong donor property of the carbene
lone pair in coordination to empty p-orbital of low valent Si Ge Sn atom centers
some carbene stabilized divalent Si Ge Sn halides could be synthesized in the last
twenty years[28 44 133]
There is also a great interest to find mixed Si Ge Sn
metallylene-metallylene complexes in which one metallylene is stabilized through the
lone pair coordination of another one In the following the synthesis of the first
example of a silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex will be shown
The dimeric micro-chlorotin(II) amides 32[53]
(I44 in Introduction) was identified as
useful candidate for the generation of such an example The synthesis of
bis(trimethylsilyl)amino-tin chloride ((Me3Si)2N-SnCl)2 32 is shown in Scheme 327
Bis(bis(trimethylsilyl)amino)2tin(II) ((Me3Si)2N)2Sn 32a could be prepared in good
yield by the double lithioamination of SnCl2 with LiN(SiMe3)2 in a 1 2 ratio[47a]
The
Results and Discussion
- 66 -
same reaction but with one molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 gives the monosubstituted
product 32 It was also easily accessible by amino chlorine exchange between
((Me3Si)2N)2Sn and SnCl2 in a 11 ratio[53]
(Scheme 327)
Scheme 327 Synthesis of micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32
The dimeric structure of 32 can be splited by treatment with Lewis base for
example Si Ge Sn metallylenes In order to synthesize a silylene coordinated
stannylene chlorosilylene 26 was mixed with micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32 in toluene A
logical intermediate 33a is proposed here as an inevitable intermediate (Scheme 328)
At first chloro bridges are opened because of the coordination of silylene 26 to create
33a Then via amino chlorine exchange product 33 becomes accessible From a
saturated hexane solution at low temperature the silylene-stannylene dichloride 33
was isolated as colorless crystals in 49 yield The product 33 was determined by X-
ray diffraction analysis and elemental analysis Owing to the unstable nature of
silylene and tin dichloride coordination bond (Si rarrSn) 33 decomposed in a grey
mixture powder of amino silylene also-N(SiMe3)2
[33d] and SnCl2 after isolation from
solvent in vacuum 1H-NMR spectrum shows only resonances of amino silylene in
good agreement with the reported compound[33d]
Scheme 328 Synthesis of aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
According to X-ray diffraction analysis compound 33 represents the first example
of silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex The molecular structure of 33 (Figure 318)
Results and Discussion
- 67 -
exhibits a trigonal pyramidal geometry on Sn and a distorted tetrahedral configuration
of Si The Cl-Sn-Cl angle is 9400(9)deg and the sum of bond angles at the Sn center is
2820deg The SirarrSn distance (2740(2) pm) is longer than the Si-Sn bond lengths
(2622(2) and 2641(2) pm) in the silyl stannane compound[134]
(Scheme 329) The
Sn-Cl distances of 2468(3) and 2473(3) pm in 33 are comparable to those in a
carbene-stannylene complex (2456(2) and 2458(2) pm) (Scheme 329)[133b]
Si-N
distances of 1832(7) and 1827(7) pm in 33 are somewhat shorter than those of
phosphanyl silylene 30 (1877(3) and 1882(2) pm) and amino silylene (18780(10)
and 18776(10) pm) which is the remaining molecule of 33 without SnCl2[33d]
Scheme 329 A silyl stannane[134]
(left) and a carbene-stannylene complex[133b]
(right)
Figure 318 Molecular structure of 33 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Sn1-Si1 2740(2) Sn1-Cl1 2468(3) Sn1-Cl2 2473(3) Si1-
N1 1832(7) Si1-N2 1827(7) Si1-N3 1705(7) Si2-N3 1780(7) Si3-N3
1791(8) Cl1-Sn1-Cl2 9400(9) Cl1-Sn1-Si1 9886(8) Cl2-Sn1-Si1 8914(7)
Sn1-Si1-N3 1252(3) N2-Si1-N1 722(3) Si1-N3-Si2 1172(4) Si1-N3-Si3
1248(4) Si2-N3-Si3 1179(4)
Results and Discussion
- 68 -
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34
Because of the feasible structural tuning with many choices of donor groups a
general overview of pincer arenes was introduced (Introduction p 19) Compounds of
type 35a having a pincer-like skeleton are depicted in Scheme 330 They represent
promising new types of pincer ligands which could coordinate with a metal by facile
C-H activation in the ortho-position Although many bis-metallylenes are accessible
(see Introduction 13) pincer ligands containing divalent heavier group 14 elements
are new in the field of synthetic inorganic chemistry At the same time the desired
pincer arenes 35a could serve as much stronger σ-donor ligand towards transition-
metals than traditional phosphane ligands[70 79b c 122]
Up to now only a few isolable
spacer separated bis-silylenes with two divalent silicon centers are known these
include bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
in this work and bis-silylenes I42[52]
I58[61]
and
I64[65]
(in Introduction p 12-15) Inspired by these results the synthesis of a
silicon(II)-based pincer ligand 35a appeared attractive and its coordination property
towards transition-metals should be investigated
Scheme 330 Low-valent group 14 metallylene-based ECE pincer arenes
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35
Scheme 331 shows the synthetic route for the first attempt towards a bis-silylene-
based SiCSi pincer arene 35d The phenolation of trichlorosilane was readily
accessible to disilane 35b in hexane Reaction of 35b with two molar equiv of lithium
Results and Discussion
- 69 -
amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the amidinate substituted disilane 35c The bis-
silylene pincer arene 35d was not easily separable by the following dehydrochloration
of 35c employing two molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene Products seemed a
complicated silylene-LiCl mixture which was not soluble in toluene or diethylether
The desired bis-silylene pincer arene could not be isolated from mixtures
Scheme 331 The first attempt towards a bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35d
But the synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35 could be achieved through the protocol
in Scheme 332 Dilithiation of 46-di-tert-butylresorcinol with nBuLi furnishes the
corresponding 13-dilithium resorcinolate 34 After a salt metathesis reaction with the
N-donor stabilized chloro silylene 26[32b]
in the molar ratio of 12 the desired
compound 35[33b]
could be isolated as pale yellow crystals in 79 yield The
constitution and composition of SiCSi pincer arene 35 was elucidated by 1H-
13C-
and 29
Si-NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 332 Synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 35 exhibits one singlet for the N
tBu groups at δ = 124
ppm and one singlet for CtBu groups at δ = 174 ppm and one set of resonances for the
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands Almost identical variable-temperature (VT) 1H-
NMR spectra of 35 in C7D8 in the temperature range of 210 to 320 K indicate
Results and Discussion
- 70 -
relatively low rotation barriers of the Si-O bonds on the NMR time scale A sharp
singlet in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum at δ = -240 ppm is comparable to that observed for
alkoxy-substituted silylenes aLSiOR (R =
tBu
iPr)
[31b]
The molecular structure of 35 could be confirmed by a preliminary single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis but a discussion of metric parameters was not possible
because of the moderate crystal quality Still it is clear that the two silylene-like
moieties in 35 face in the almost same direction (Figure 319) To get more
information about the molecular structure of 35 DFT calculations [B3LYP6-
31G(d)][101c 119]
were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The geometry of 35
obtained by X-ray crystallographic analysis was used as the initial structure The
optimized structure of 35e and 35ersquo is displayed in Figure 320 The Si1-O1-C1 angle
(14179deg) is larger than that of Si2-O2-C3 (13217deg) While the dihedral angle of Si1-
O1-C1-C2 is 2437deg the dihedral angle of Si2-O2-C3-C2 is 039deg
Figure 319 Molecular structure of 35 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity X-
ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The Si-O single bond distances of 17056 and 17190 pm are little longer than those
of bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
(1641(2) and 1652(2) pm) and alkoxysilylenes aLSiOR
(R = tBu
iPr)
[31b] (16442(3) and 16501(2) pm) due to steric hindrance The C2-
Results and Discussion
- 71 -
symmetric rotational isomer 35ersquo was identified as a stable form on the hyperpotential
energy surface with a slightly lower energy of 75 kJsdotmolminus1
Interestingly the Si-O
distance of 35ersquo is little longer than those of 35e The bond rotation barrier of the Si-O
bonds in 35e and 35ersquo is similar and estimated to be +334 kJsdotmolminus1
by theoretical
calculation
Figure 320 Optimized structures of bis-silylene SiCSi pincer ligand 35e (left) and
its rotational isomer 35ersquo (right) at the B3LYP6-31G(d) level Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) of 35e and 35ersquo
compound 35e Si1-O1 17056 Si2-O2 17191 Si1-O1-C1 14179 Si2-O2-C3
13217 compound 35ersquo Si1-O1 17294 Si2-O2 17294 Si1-O1-C1 13028 Si2-
O2-C3 13028
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII
complex 36
Although bis-silylene 35 bearing an amidinate ligand may not serve as a π-acceptor
it was a strong σ-donor ligand To investigate the pincer-type coordination ability of
35 its reactivity towards phosphine palladium(0) complexes was evaluated Treatment
of 35 with 05 equiv of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)-palladium Pd(PPh3)4 in hexane
at room temperature afforded the novel silylene-silyl(phenyl)palladium(II) complex
36[33b]
as sole product which could be isolated as orange crystals in 81 yield
(Scheme 333)
Results and Discussion
- 72 -
Scheme 333 Formation of 36 from reaction of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
A different type of silyl-silylene metal complexes has been described by Ogino and
co-workers[66b c 78]
Compound 36 was fully characterized by multinuclear NMR
spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis The structure of 36
indicates that two equivalents of 35 were consumed With a 11 molar ratio of starting
materials the yield of 36 decreased (asymp30) but still no other product or intermediate
could be detected by 1H-NMR spectroscopy
The molecular structure of 36 is shown in Figure 321 Remarkably compound 36
crystallizes as racemic mixture of its R and S enantiomers of which only the S form is
presented here The PdII atom has a typical distorted square-planar configuration
defined by the two silylene SiII atoms Si2 and Si3 the silyl Si
IV atom Si1 and the
carbon atom C1 of the central aryl ring Interestingly there is a 12-hydride shift from
palladium to silicon during the complexation forming a Si-H silyl group which breaks
the former Si1-N2 bond in 35 Due to coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo The bent Si3-Pd1-C1 angle of 16783(12)deg in 36
is contrary to the linear X-Pd-C (X = Cl I Ph 4-fluorophenyl OCOCF3 etc) angles
of reported palladium(II) complexes supported by a PCP type pincer arene ligand[72b
77 135] The Si1-Pd1-Si2 angle of 15503(4)deg deviates from the linear alignment and is
smaller than the respective P-Pd-P angle of the PCP pincer-type palladium
complex[72b 77 135]
The silylene PdII dative bond lengths (Si2-Pd1 23271(12) and
Si3-Pd1 23038(11) pm) of 36 are shorter than that of the Si1-Pd1 distance
Results and Discussion
- 73 -
(23561(12) pm) illustrating the difference between a silyl ligand (Si1) with a SiIV
-Pd
single bond vs a silylene ligand (Si2 and Si3) with a SiII-Pd dative bond However
the Si2-Pd1 and Si3-Pd1 distances in 36 are somewhat longer than those of
silylenerarrpalladium complexes[136]
(224 and 226 pm) from Kira (Scheme 334)
Furthermore Pd1-C1(aryl) bond length of 36 (2125(3) pm) is longer than those of
reported PCP pincer-type palladium(II) complexes (Pd-C distance 197-203 pm)[135a-e
135g] presumably because of steric congestion
Scheme 334 Silylenerarrpalladium complexes from Kira[136]
Figure 321 Molecular structure of 36 Only the S form of racemic mixture is
shown Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity except for the H1 atom Selected bond lengths (pm) and
angles (deg) Pd1-C1 2125(3) Pd1-Si1 23561(12) Pd1-Si2 23271(12) Pd1-Si3
23038(11) Si1-O1 1694(3) Si1-N1 1789(4) Si2-O2 1675(3) Si2-N5 1862(3)
Si2-N6 1840(4) Si3-O3 1662(3) Si3-N7 1888(3) Si3-N8 1860(3) Si4-O4
1704(3) Si4-N3 1893(4) Si4-N4 1892(4) Si1-Pd1-Si2 15503(4) Si1-Pd1-C1
Si2Si1
C1
Pd
Si3
213 pm
233 pm236 pm
230 pm
O1 O2
Results and Discussion
- 74 -
7861(11) Si2-Pd1-C1 7681(11) Si3-Pd1-C1 16783(12)
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 36 shows twelve sets of nonequivalent
tBu groups
which agrees with its crystallographic analysis Moreover the resonance for the Si-H
proton is observed at δ = 659 ppm The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 36 in C6D6 displays
four signals at δ = minus87 (aLSi Si4) 397 (HSi Si1) 623 and 658 ppm (SirarrPd Si2
and Si3) respectively The chemical shift of the Si1 atom (SiIV
-H) has moved upfield
comparable to those of a related HSirarrPd complex reported by Kira Iwamoto and co-
workers because of the electronegative N and O atoms bound to the Si1 atom[136a]
The 29
Si resonances of the two SiII atoms (Si2 Si3) coordinated to the palladium
center are similar to those of other amidinate-based silylene transition-metal
complexes[71 137]
and significantly shifted to higher field in comparison to those
reported for donor-free silylene palladium complexes owing to the additional N-donor
coordination of the amidinate ligand to the SiII atom Additionally the infrared
spectrum of 36 shows a weak Si-H stretching vibration band at 2135 cmminus1
The
observed stretching frequency of 36 is higher than those of other reported palladium
hydridosilyl complexes (2008ndash2121 cmminus1
)[135c 135f 136a]
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism
To investigate the uncommon reactivity of 35 towards Pd(PPh3)4 quantum
chemical calculations using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP level using
6-31G(d) basis set for H C N O P and Si atoms and the LANL2DZ level for the Pd
atom with the Gaussian 03 program for model compounds 36andash36e were performed
by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)[101c 119]
A schematic representation of the potential
energy surface of the proposed pathway for the formation of 36 is given in Scheme
335
Results and Discussion
- 75 -
Scheme 335 DFT-derived relative energies of model compounds 35a-35e
From this it was assumed that stepwise dissociation of phosphine ligands of
Pd(PPh3)4 forms 36a as the initial intermediate by the insertion reaction of Pd0 into
the pincer C-H bond of the central aryl ring of 35 Subsequently the 16-valence
electron PdII complex 36a undergoes a 12-hydride shift from palladium to a silicon(II)
donor atom to form the 14-valence electron silylene silyl(aryl)palladium(II) complex
36c as second intermediate The latter process occurs through transition state 36b-TS
with a barrier of +878 kJsdotmolminus1
and 36c is only 67 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36b-TS
The electron-deficient PdII complex 36c readily undergoes coordination with
phosphine ligand or silylene donor moiety of ldquofreerdquo 35 leading to the formation of
more stable 16-electron complexes According to that the calculated relative energies
of PrarrPd complex 36d stabilized by PPh3 and SirarrPd complex 36e stabilized by
methoxy silylene aLSiOMe as model silylene donor are +380 and minus176 kJsdotmol
minus1
respectively Since SiII of intramolecular N-donor stabilized silylenes is a stronger σ-
donor than PIII
of phosphines complex 36e is 556 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36d
Overall the stepwise transformation of 36a into 36e in the presence of PPh3 and the
model silylene aLSiOMe is exothermic by 176 kJsdotmol
minus1
Results and Discussion
- 76 -
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
After successful isolation of the first bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
and the first bis-
silylene pincer arene 35[33b]
in order to obtain other new bis-silylene(germylene) as
potential bidentate σ-donor ligands the novel type of bis-silylene(germylene) with a
ferrocendiyl spacer which could result in unique properties was investigated The
facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
aLSi-Fc-Si
aL 38 (Fc = ferrocendiyl) and
aLGe-Fc-Ge
aL 40 respectively as well as
their corresponding cobalt and iron complexes could be realized in the course of this
PhD thesis[33a]
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40
Since the reaction of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
with dilithium resorcinolate 34 afforded
the SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 35 was assumed that chlorosilylene 26 and
chlorogermylene 39[41]
(aLGeCl) could be suitable precursors for the desired bis-
metallylene functionalized ferrocenes Ferrocene with nBuLi and TMEDA
(tetramethylethyldiamine) in hexane gave 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37[138]
quantitatively
Subsequently treatment of chlorosilylene 26 with 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 led to the
formation of bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield (Scheme 336) Similarly
bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40[33a]
could be isolated in 77 yield by salt metathesis
reaction of 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorogermylene 39 The structures of 38
and 40 were determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis mass
spectrometry and X-ray crystallographic analysis (only for compound 40)
1H-NMR spectra of compound 38 and 40 are very similar They exhibit a singlet for
four tBu groups (38 δ = 116 ppm 40 δ = 111 ppm) Two sets of hyperfine coupled
triplet (38 δ = 451 and 472 ppm 40 δ = 461 and 471 ppm) are assigned to the
protons of ferrocene The resonance of the Ph protons (38 and 40) appears in aromatic
Results and Discussion
- 77 -
resonance region from 690 to 717 ppm Accordingly the 13
C-NMR spectra of 38 and
40 each show three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (38 δ = 709 727 and
846 ppm 40 δ = 701 723 and 920 ppm) Furthermore bis-silylene 38 gives rise to
a singlet at δ = 433 ppm in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum
Scheme 336 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 40
Single crystals of 40 suitable for an X-ray single crystal analysis were obtained
from hexane solution The crystals of 40 consist of two conformational isomers as
shown in Figure 322 Two molecular structures of 40 confirm that the two N-donor-
stabilized germylene moieties are bonded to C1 and C7 (endo-configuration) or C8
(exo-configuration) of the ferrocendiyl spacer Distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C7 in
40-endo are 1979(9) and 1983(11) pm while distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C8 in 40-
exo are 1991(2) and 19774(19) pm respectively The Ge-N bonds (2006 to 20402
pm) of two isomers are slightly shorter than those of precursor 39[41]
The GeII centers
in 40 adopt a pyramidal geometry with the sums of bond angles of 25593deg and
25669deg for 40-exo 2591deg and 2546deg for 40-endo respectively The structural feature
of the amidinate ligands in 40 is reminiscent of those reported for related bis-
germylenes such as I63[64]
(aLGe-NPh)2 and I75 I76 LGe-X-GeL (X = O S L =
tBuC(N-Dip)2)
[67] The isolation of two conformational isomers of 40-exo and 40-endo
indicates a small rotating energy of the functional ferrocendiyl That means bis-
germylene 40 and bis-silylene 38 don not need more activation energy serving as
bidentate ligand
Results and Discussion
- 78 -
Figure 322 Molecular structures of 40-endo (top) and 40-exo (bottom) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 40-endo (top) Ge(1)-C(1)
1979(9) Ge(2)-C(7) 1983(11) Ge(1)-N(1) 2027(8) Ge(1)-N(2) 2006(8)
Ge(2)-N(3) 2022(7) Ge(2)-N(4) 2037(7) C(1)-Ge(1)-N(2) 983(3) C(1)-Ge(1)-
N(1) 955(3) N(2)-Ge(1)-N(1) 653(3) C(7)-Ge(2)-N(3) 953(4) C(7)-Ge(2)-
N(4) 941(4) N(3)-Ge(2)-N(4) 652(3) for 40-exo (bottom) Ge1-C1 1991(2)
Ge2-C8 19774(19) Ge1-N1 20261(16) Ge1-N2 20247(17) Ge2-N3
20402(15) Ge2-N4 20162(16) C1-Ge1-N1 9662(7) C1-Ge1-N2 9445(7) N1-
Ge1-N2 6486(7) C8-Ge2-N3 9492(7) C8-Ge2-N4 9716(7) N3-Ge2-N4
6459(6)
The molecular structure of bis-silylene 38 has been ambiguously determined by X-
ray single crystal diffraction The structural feature of 38 is very similar to that of 40-
exo isomer However the X-ray data are not sufficient for any further discussion
(Figure 323)
Results and Discussion
- 79 -
Figure 323 Molecular structure of 38 X-ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The mass spectrometry confirmed the composition of 38 (Figure 324) The (ESI)
mass spectrum of 38 is dominated by a peak at mz 703329 which can be attributed to
the protonated molecular ion [38+H]+ Isotopic distribution of molecular peaks
demonstrates a good agreement with calculated mass composition The comparison of
experiment and calculation confirms the presence of bis-silylenyl substituted
ferrocene molecules
6 9 0 6 9 5 7 0 0 7 0 5 7 1 0 7 1 5 7 2 0
m z
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
Re
lative
Abu
nda
nce
7 0 3 3 2 9
7 0 4 3 3 2
7 0 5 3 3 47 0 1 3 3 4
7 0 6 3 2 96 9 0 2 4 9 6 9 5 2 2 5 7 1 7 3 4 57 1 0 4 7 3
7 0 3 3 3 1
7 0 4 3 3 4
7 0 5 3 3 87 0 1 3 3 6
7 0 6 3 3 17 1 0 3 3 5
N L 3 1 3 E 7
W Y-F e S i2 _ S p ri tze 1 -2 9 R T 0 0 0 -0 7 7 A V 2 9 T F T M S + c E S I F u ll m s [1 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 ]
N L 4 9 7 E 5
C 4 0 H 5 4 F e N 4 S i 2 + H C 4 0 H 5 5 F e 1 N 4 S i 2
p a C hrg 1
Figure 324 Experimental (top) and simulated (bottom) ESI-MS spectra of 38
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable silylene- and
germylene-substituted ferrocenes respectively Alternative example of SiII-ferrocene
Results and Discussion
- 80 -
compound is a disilene-functionalized ferrocene reported by Tokitoh and co-workers
recently[139]
However disilene derivates belong essentially to another type of low-
valent silicon compounds in comparison to triply coordinated silylenes Instead of
conjugated electronic effect of disilene-ferrocene system the ferrocene bridged bis-
silylene or bis-germylene system could have better chelating σ-donor character It is to
confirm in a coordination chemistry of bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 with
transition-metals
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40
In order to investigate the coordination ability of 38 and 40 toward transition-
metals and inspired by the reactivity of bis-silylenes 28 and 35 toward Ni0 and Pd
0[32a
33b] as well as by reports on spacer-separated bis-germylene molybdenum chelated
complex I65-Mo[66b]
(see Introduction p 18) firstly the coordination behavior of
potentially bidentate ligands 38 and 40 towards CoICp complex fragments
[140] was
examined A suitable CoICp source is accessible by treatment of CoBr2 with sodium
cyclopentadienide (NaCp) and potassium graphite (KC8) in tolueneTHF 41 mixture
resulting in the generation of (CpCoILn) (L = toluene or THF) in solution Reaction of
thus-formed CoICp species with bis-silylene 38 yielded the desired bis-silylene Co
I
complex 41[33a]
in 30 yield (Scheme 337) Similarly bis-germylene CoI complex
42[33a]
has been successfully synthesized from 40 and isolated in 61 yield
Scheme 337 Synthesis of bis-silylene and bis-germylene CoICp complexes 41 and 42
Results and Discussion
- 81 -
In comparison to bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 1H-NMR spectra of
compound 41 and 42 show an additional singlet for protons of CoICp group (41 δ =
496 ppm 42 δ = 504 ppm) A singlet for four tBu-groups appears at δ = 111 ppm by
bis-silylene Co-complex 41 and at δ = 139 ppm by bis-germylene Co-complex 42
Two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (41 δ = 440 and 461 ppm 42 δ = 438 and
459 ppm) are assigned to protons of ferrocene The resonance of phenyl protons (41
and 42) appears in aromatic resonance region In the 13
C-NMR spectra of 41 and 42
each exhibit one resonance for carbons of CoICp (41 δ = 780 ppm 42 δ = 759 ppm)
and three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (41 δ = 700 745 and 851 ppm
42 δ = 699 737 and 891 ppm) In the 29
Si-NMR spectrum the coordination of the
bis-silylene moieties to the Co atom results in a drastic downfield shift of the
resonance of 41 (δ = 820 ppm) in comparison to situation of 42 (δ = 433 ppm)
Isolated products 41 and 42 are first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-
silylene or bis-germylene in a chelating fashion The molecular structures of 41 and
42 (Figure 325) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses In both
complexes cobalt is coordinated one side by cyclopentadienyl and another side by bis-
silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40 and contains 18 valence electrons Angles of Si1-Co1-
Si2 and Ge1-Co1-Ge2 are 9389(5)deg and 9279(2)deg respectively
The silicon atoms in complex 41 and germanium atoms in complex 42 are four
coordinated and show a distorted tetrahedral geometry The Co-Si bond lengths of 41
(21252(14) and 21200(14) pm) are similar to that in chlorosilylene CoICp(CO)
complex 41a[141]
(21143(4) pm) Furthermore the Co-Si bonds of 41 are shorter than
the Co-Si distances in dichlorosilylene-CoICp(CO) complex 41b
[142] (21348(5) pm)
in dichlorosilylene-Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41c
[143] (2228(2) pm) in
chlorosilylene Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41d
[141] (22060(6) and 22017(6) pm)
respectively The silicon cobalt double bond (Si=CoV) distance (21848(8) pm) in
cobalt(V) complex 41e[144]
is also longer than dative SirarrCoI bond lengths in complex
41 Structures of cited compounds are drawn for clarity in Scheme 338
Results and Discussion
- 82 -
Scheme 338 Structural features of 41 and cited silylene cobalt complexes
Figure 325 Molecular structures of 41 (top) and 42 (bottom) Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 41 (top) Co1-Si1
21252(14) Co1-Si2 21200(14) Si1-C6 1894(5) Si2-C11 1887(5) Si1-N1
1898(4) Si1-N2 1907(4) Si2-N3 1904(4) Si2-N4 1922(4) Si1-Co1-Si2
9389(5) N1-Si1-N2 6847(15) N3-Si2-N4 6866(16) C6-Si1-Co1 13254(14)
for 42 (bottom) Co1-Ge1 21967(6) Co1-Ge2 21979(6) Ge1-C6 1965(4) Ge2-
Results and Discussion
- 83 -
C11 1961(4) Ge1-N1 2020(3) Ge1-N2 2031(3) Ge2-N3 2041(3) Ge2-N4
2029(3) Ge1-Co1-Ge2 9279(2) N1-Ge1-N2 6490(11) N3-Ge2-N4 6485(11)
C6-Ge1-Co1 13280(10) C11-Ge2-Co1 13140(10)
The Co-Ge bonds of 42 (21967(6) and 21979(6) pm) are also shorter than those in
the germylene cobalt(0) complex [((Me3Si)2N)2GerarrCo(CO)3]2[145]
(2262(1) pm) and
the tetragermacyclobutadiene-CoICp complex η
4-((
tBu2MeSi)4Ge4)CoCp (24616(3)
and 25036(3) pm)[90d]
respectively In fact the Co-Ge bonds in 42 are the shortest
Co-Ge bonds known to date The relatively short EII-Co bonds in 41 and 42 suggest
that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands in the series of divalent silicon
and germanium compounds as yet
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45
To test σ-donor ability of bis-(silylene) 38 versus carbonyl a ligand exchange
reaction between 38 and (CO)2CoCp[146]
was explored When 38 was allowed to react
with two molar equivalents of (CO)2CoCp the bis-silylene 41 bridged bimetallic
cobalt complex 44[33a]
could be obtained in 87 yield accompanied by half CO-
elimination of (CO)2CoCp (Scheme 339) The reaction of bis-silylene 38 with one
molar equivalent of (CO)2CoCp furnished the same product but the isolable yield was
low The structure of 44 was determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy
elemental analysis and infrared spectroscopy
Scheme 339 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged CoI(CO)Cp complex 44
Results and Discussion
- 84 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 44 exhibits a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
124 ppm A singlet (δ = 523 ppm) and two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (δ = 461
and 476 ppm) are assigned to protons of CoICp group and ferrocene with the ratio of
1044 The resonance of phenyl protons appears in aromatic resonance region The
29Si-NMR spectrum of 44 shows a singlet resonance at δ = 857 ppm similar to that
of 41 In the 13
C-NMR spectrum of 44 one characteristic signal for the CO ligands
appears at δ = 2078 ppm Furthermore the IR spectrum of 44 exhibits a strong
stretching band at ν = 1888 cmminus1
attributed to the carbonyl groups on the CoI atoms
The observed CO stretching frequency of 44 is much lower than those of 41a
(ν = 1968 cmminus1
)[141]
thus indicating that the bis-silylene substituted ferrocene 38 is a
much stronger σ-donor than chlorosilylene 26[32b]
Another carbonyl-silylene exchange reaction was investigated between bis-
silylene 38 and diiron nonacarbonyl Fe2(CO)9 Toluene was added to a 11 mixture of
38 and Fe2(CO)9 at room temperature to afford a bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4
complex 45 in 73 yield (Scheme 340) The structure of 45 was determined by
multinuclear NMR spectroscopy infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 340 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4 complex 45
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 45 shows a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
109 ppm Two singlets at δ = 483 and 500 ppm are assigned to protons of ferrocene
Multiplets in the range of 699-739 ppm are resonances of phenyl protons The 29
Si-
NMR spectrum of 45 exhibits a singlet resonance at δ = 1050 ppm It is much more
Results and Discussion
- 85 -
downfield shifted than those in complexes 41 (820 ppm) and 44 (857 ppm) One
characteristic strong signal for the CO ligands appears at δ = 2169 ppm in the 13
C-
NMR spectrum of 45 It is compatible to the resonance (δ = 2167 ppm) of the
silylene-Fe(CO)4 complex aL(
tBuO)SirarrFe(CO)4
[71] In the IR spectrum of 45 the
CO stretching frequencies (2026 1948 1900 cmminusl
) are also quite uniform to those of
this complex (2026 1949 1899 cmminusl
)[71]
Due to the rotation energy of ferrocene and
the symmetric bulky coordination of Fe the second CO-substitution could be more
difficult Consequently a chelated complex 38rarrFe(CO)3 was not observed during the
isolation of products
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts
The investigation of the catalytic activity of complexes 28 41 and 42 was carried
out in collaboration with Stephan Enthaler (TU Berlin)[33a]
Nickel or palladium catalyzed cross-coupling reactions between organozinc halides
and aromatic halides constitute an excellent synthetic method for polyfunctional
aromatic compounds[147]
To probe the catalytic activity of bis-silylene oxide Ni0
complex 28 a cross-coupling reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-
iodobenzene was investigated (Scheme 341) The direct iodine substitution of p-
methoxyl-iodobenzene with organometallic compounds was not expected without a
catalyst In the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3) coupling
reaction was observed and product 46 was obtained in 65 yield indicating a
potential application for this kind of complexes
Results and Discussion
- 86 -
Scheme 341 Application of 28 as precatalyst in cross-coupling reactions
Moreover the reactivity of the resulting complexes 41 and 42 as precatalysts for
Co-mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile was
expected[148]
It is known numerous cobalt complexes have been successfully applied
as precatalysts in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions and this becomes a powerful tool in
organic chemistry to form arene and heteroarene moieties[148-149]
Thus the catalytic
abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions were investigated
(Scheme 342)
Scheme 342 Application of 41 and 42 as precatalyst in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions
A first set of experiments was dedicated to the benchmark trimerization of phenyl
acetylene which resulted in the quantitative formation of isomers 47a and 47b in the
presence of complex 41 To our surprise similar attempts to employ 42 as precatalyst
failed with no product formation presumably due to a stronger coordination of GeII
atoms to the Co center which consequently prevents from the formation of an active
Results and Discussion
- 87 -
site for substrate coordination In another set of experiments the formation of
substituted pyridines 48a and 48b by [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenyl acetylene and
an excess of acetonitrile was detected[150]
The catalytic activity of SiII-Co complex 41
was exhibited distinctly again while no product formation could be observed with
GeII-Co complex 42 To some extent the application of CpCo(CO)2 as precatalyst
gave however substituted pyridines in lower yield (48a (3) and 48b (11))[33a]
Scheme 343 Proposed mechanism of 41 as precatalyst for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition
A possible mechanism for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenylacetylene or nitrile
to obtain 47 and 48 is proposed[149a]
as depicted in Scheme 343 At first bis-silylene
complex 41 could participate in a ligand substitution reaction with the
Results and Discussion
- 88 -
phenylacetylene to form an acetylene side-on complex Co-I The latter undergoes a
ring-formation to give the σ-bonded CoIII
complex Co-II which is saturated in
coordination with bis-silylene 38 Then intermediate Co-III is formed after π-donor
substitution by acetylene The succedent ring-enlargement furnishes the transient σ-
complex Co-IV and a subsequent elimination of products 47 and 48 occurs leading to
the active species Co-I by coordination of two phenylacetylene molecules In this
cobalt catalyzed transformation bis-silylene 38 serves as an important accessorial
ligand making the Co-center with high electron density more active and stabilizing the
intermediates Co-II and Co-IV
Unexpectedly complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is inactive The
possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII donor centers to
Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the substrate coordination
Summary
- 89 -
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
In this work various new metallylenes of Si Ge and Sn and bis-metallylenes
(interconnected and spacer separated) were synthesized The properties and
coordination ability of new metallylenes toward transition-metals including Fe Co
Ni and Pd were studied
The reduction of chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
with excess of elemental
potassium furnished the first potassium germylene anionic salt 3[83]
in 33 yield
along with the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip in 31
yield 3 consists of a dimeric half-sandwich complex interconnected via
intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds Each half-sandwich moiety consists of a
K(OEt2)2 cation which is η5-coordinated to the anionic five-membered planar GeNC3
ring with a considerable Cpmacr-like aromatic stabilization This is supported by density
functional theory (DFT) calculations The treatment of (nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
with KC8
gave the same products 3 4 and novel Ge4-cluster compound 5[83]
in very low yield
Compound 5 represents a dipotassium salt of the first ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like
dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a planar Ge42minus
core
Summary
- 90 -
Figure 41 Central molecular structures of 3 (left) and 5 (right)
The reactivity of compound 3 as nucleophile towards chlorogermylene 1[80]
and
chlorostannylene 7[80]
was examined Coupling reactions of 3 with 1 or 7 led to the
corresponding bis-germylene 6[104]
in 66 yield and germylene-stannylene 8[104]
in
34 yield respectively Compounds 6 and 8 were fully characterized including by X-
ray diffraction analysis The new compound 6 represent the first asymmetric
substituted bis-germylene with the shortest GeI-Ge
I bond length The germylene-
stannylene 8 is the first example with a GeI-Sn
I coupling as yet This novel structural
feature was explained with asymmetric structure and some ionic charge distribution
between 5- and six-membered rings by DFT calculation
Figure 42 Central molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right)
Summary
- 91 -
The synthesis of new ligands 12 or 20[110]
was easily accessible from lithium amide
10 with corresponding benzimidoyl chloride 11 or 19[112]
by salt metathesis reactions
Subsequent reactions of 12 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2middotdioxane furnished
chlorogermylene 14[110]
in 82 yield Germylene 16[110]
was obtained by
dehydrochloration of 14 with carbene 15[113]
in 78 yield The molecule of
zwitterionic germylene 16 bears two reactivity positions a strong nucleophilic
methylene group and a nucleophilic(s-orbital)-electrophilic(p-orbital) germylene site
Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas or with water resulted in the formation of
corresponding aminogermylene 17[110]
or germylene hydroxide 18[110]
in high yield
The reaction of compound 20 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2sdotdioxane led to the
unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained by
reaction of 21 with GeCl4 through dehydrochloration with carbene 15 as a base in
57 yield All new compounds have been characterized spectroscopically and
crystallographically 12 and 20 are new types of asymmetric β-diketiminato ligands
with a fused six-membered C6-ring to prevent the transformation of ligand backbone
and side-reactions of ligands They are promising ancillary chelating ligand for the
synthesis of novel silylenes and stannylenes The preparation of new germylenes
added significantly to the growing field of GeII-chemistry capable of small molecule
activation
Summary
- 92 -
Figure 43 Molecular structures of 16 (left) and 18 (right)
Figure 44 Molecular structures of 22 (left) and 23 (right)
A new challenge in metallylene synthetic chemistry is the preparation of chalcogen
(O S Se) bridged bis-metallylene species Here the synthesis and isolation of the
oxygen bridged bis-silylene 28[32a]
was achieved for the first time Reaction of
(HSiCl2)2O with lithium amidinate gave disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield The bis-
silylene oxide 28 was available by dehydrochloration of 27 employing LiN(SiMe3)2 in
76 yield The molecule of 28 contains two triply coordinated Si atoms and two lone
pairs one at each of the Si centers The Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent and
DFT calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small
Compound 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 furnished the Ni0 complex 29
[32a]
in 91 yield which is the first bidentate bis-silylene transition-metal complex with
18 valence electrons at the metal-site In diamagnetic complex 29 the two silylene
Summary
- 93 -
subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are tetrahedrally coordinated to the
Ni0 atom The strong σ-donor character of 28 led to a more electron-rich Ni center
This work will lead to new insights into the chelating silylene ligand transition-metal
coordination chemistry
Figure 45 Molecular structures of 28 (left) and 29 (right)
To possibly get access to a phosphasilyne a desilylation reaction that is phosphino
silylene 30[128]
was allowed to react with Ph3PCl2 30 was synthesized by facile
phosphanylation of chlorosilylene 26 with LiP(SiMe3)2 in 83 yield Surprisingly the
reaction of 30 with one molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 led to the formation of the unique
product 31[128]
as yellow crystals in 72 yield
An X-ray crystal structure analysis confirmed that 31 is a dimer of the desired
phosphasilyne Compound 31 is the first 4π-elektron Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene
derivate with two-coordinated P atoms and a planar Si2P2-ring The Si-P bond lengths
in 31 represent intermediate values between the Si=P bond length and the Si-P bond
length The equal Si-P distances in 31 already indicate σ- and π-electron resonance
stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has been confirmed by theoretical
calculations According to DFT investigation each Si atom in the Si2P2-ring bears a
large positive net charge (+1204) while the P atoms in the ring have somewhat
Summary
- 94 -
smaller negative charges (-0765)
Figure 46 Molecular structure of 31
Pincer arenes having divalent heavier group 14 elements are currently
unprecedented in synthetic chemistry but assumed to form complexes that could
serve as precatalysts for various organic transformations due to their coordination
ability towards metals Here the synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer
arene ligand 35[33b]
through the substitution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
by 13-dilithium
resorcinolate 34 could be achieved in 79 yield Treatment of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
afforded the unexpected silylene-silyl(phenyl)-palladium(II) complex 36[33b]
as orange
crystals in 81 yield
In compound 36 the PdII atom adopts a typical distorted square-planar
configuration defined by the carbon atom C1 two silylene SiII atoms and the silyl
SiIV
atom which is bonded with a hydrogen atom because of hydride shift to Si1 after
C-H activation by Pd Owing to the coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo With the help of theoretical investigation the
Summary
- 95 -
reaction mechanism was explained and the exothermic transformation from 35 to 36
was confirmed This is a new approach in metallylene transition-metal coordination
chemistry with complexes being potentially applicable in catalytic transformation
Figure 47 Molecular structure of 36 tBu and phenyl groups are not shown
Also a type of bis-metallylene with a ferrocendiyl spacer for new bidentate σ-donor
properties was investigated Here the facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and
bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 38 and 40 as well as their corresponding CoI
complexes could be described for the first time By salt metathesis reaction of 11rsquo-
dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorosilylene 26[32b]
or chlorogermylene 39[41]
furnished
bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield or bis-germylene 40[33a]
in 77 yield respectively
Reactions of a suitable CoICp precursor with bis-silylene 38 afforded the bis-silylene
CoI complex 41
[33a] in 30 yield Likewise the bis-germylene Co
I complex 42
[33a]
could be synthesized from 40 with CoICp fragment and isolated in 61 yield
Summary
- 96 -
Figure 48 Molecular structure of 40
Figure 49 Molecular structures of 41 (left) and 42 (right) tBu and phenyl groups
are not shown
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable ferrocene bridged
bis-silylene or bis-germylene respectively The isolated products 41 and 42 are the
first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-silylene or bis-germylene
functioning in a chelating fashion In both complexes cobalt is coordinated on one
side by cyclopentadienyl and on another side by bis-silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40
and contains 18 valence electrons The Co-Si bonds in 41 and the Co-Ge bonds in 42
belong to the shortest Co-E (E = Si Ge) bonds known to date The relatively short EII-
Co bonds in 41 and 42 indicate that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands
in the series of divalent silicon and germanium compounds as yet due to the electron-
rich ferrocene and metallylene segments
In addition in the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3)
cross-coupling[147]
reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-iodo-
benzene was observed evidently The catalytic abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in Co-
Summary
- 97 -
mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile were
probed[148-150]
However complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is
inactive The possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII
donor centers to Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the
substrate coordination
Experimental section
- 98 -
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
51 General section
All experiment and manipulations were carried out under dry oxygen-free nitrogen
using standard Schlenk techniques or in an inert atmosphere of purified nitrogen The
glassware used in all manipulations was dried at 150 degC prior to use cooled to
ambient temperature under high vacuum and flushed with N2 The handling of solid
samples and the preparation of samples for spectroscopic measurements were carried
out inside a glove-box where the O2 and H2O levels were normally kept below 1 ppm
All solvents were purified using conventional procedures and freshly distilled under
N2 atmosphere prior to use They were stored in Schlenk-vessels containing activated
molsieves Benzene toluene n-pentane and n-hexane were purified by distillation
from Nabenzophenone Et2O and THF were initially pre-dried over KOH and then
distilled from Nabenzophenone CH2Cl2 and chloroform were dried by stirring over
CaH2 at ambient temperature
For transfer of solvents or solutions stainless steel cannulas were used which were
stored in the oven at 120 degC The transfer was enabled by the vessel of origin being
left under a positive pressure of protective gas and the receptacle vessel of closed
with a pressure release value By filtration stainless steel cannula containing a filter-
head at one end was utilized Whatman (GFB 25) filters were affixed to the filter end
of the cannula with Teflon tape After use cannulas were cleaned immediately by
thorough rinsing with acetone followed by dilute HCl water acetone and
dichloromethane
In the case of low temperature reactions Dewar vessels were filled with acetone
and dry-ice was added until reaching the desired temperature Ethanol liquid
nitrogen was also employed for reactions in needs of -90 degC
Experimental section
- 99 -
52 Analytical methods
NMR Measurements NMR samples of air andor moisture sensitive compounds were
all prepared under inert atmosphere The deuterated solvents were dried by stirring
over Na (C6D6 THF-d8) or CaH2 (CDCl3) distilled under N2 atmosphere and stored in
Schlenk-vessels containing activated molsieves The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectra were
recorded on ARX 200 (1H 200 MHz
13C 50 MHz) and ARX 400 (
1H 400 MHz
13C
10046 MHz) spectrometers from the Bruker Company The 29
Si-NMR spectra were
recorded only on ARX 400 (29
Si 7949 MHz) spectrometer
The 1H and
13C
1H NMR spectra were calibrated against the residual proton and
natural abundance 13
C resonances of the deuterated solvent relative to
tetramethylsilane (benzene-d6 δH 715 ppm and δC 1280 ppm chloroform-d1 δH 727
ppm and δC 770 ppm THF-d8 δH 173 ppm and δC 253 ppm Heteronuclear spectra
were calibrated as follows 31
P1H external 85 H3PO4
119Sn
1H external SnMe4
Whereby in each case an 1-mm glass capillary tube containing the standard substance
was placed in the appropriate solvent in a 5 mm NMR tube and the spectrum recorded
The abbreviations used to denote the multiplicity of the signals are as follows s =
singlet d = doublet t = triplet q = quartet sept = septet m = multiplet br = broad
Infra-red spectroscopy IR spectra (4000 ndash 400 cm-1
) were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
Spectra 100 FT-IR spectrometer bands were reported in wave-numbers (cm-1
)
Samples of solids were measured as KBr pellets Air or moisture sensitive samples
were prepared in the glove-box and measured immediately The spectra were
processed using the program OMNIC and the abbreviations associated with the
absorptions quoted are vs = very strong s = strong m = medium w = weak br =
broad the intensities of which were assigned on the basis of visual inspection
UV-vis Spectrometry UV-vis spectrophotometric investigations were carried out on a
Specord S 600 spectrophotometer from Analytik Jena AG Pure samples of the
investigated substance were dissolved in dry solvents at suitable concentration The
UV-vis cuvette was filled and closed in a Schlenk tube under N2 atmosphere
Mass Spectrometry Mass spectra were performed at the Chemistry institute of
Experimental section
- 100 -
Technical University Berlin EI spectra were recorded on a 311A Arian MATAMD
spectrometer ESI mass spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap LTQ
XL spectrometer Solid samples were prepared in glove box and the solution of
samples was prepared 15 min before the measurement under N2 atmosphere Mass
spectra are presented in the standard form mz (percent intensity relative to the base
peak)
Elemental analysis The C H N and S analyses of all compounds were carried out on
a Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series instrument Air or moisture sensitive
samples were prepared in ldquotin-boatsrdquo in the glove box Samples with halogen were
filled in the ldquosilver-boatsrdquo for better measuring accuracy
Melting Point determinations A BSGT Apotec II instrument was used for the
determination of melting points Samples were prepared in glass capillary tubes under
N2 atmosphere The melting point was determined while the melded examples had the
same color like the solid before Without melting of samples the color change was
observed was determined as decomposition temperature
Single crystal X-ray structure determinations Crystals suitable to the single crystal
x-ray structure analysis were put on a glass capillary with perfluorinated oil and
measured in a cold nitrogen stream The data of all measurements were collected with
an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur S Saphire diffractometer at 150 K (MoKα radiation λ
= 071073 Aring) The structures were solved by direct methods Refinements were
carried out with the SHELXL-97[151]
software package All thermal displacement
parameters were refined anisotropically for non-H atoms and isotropically for H
atoms All refinements were made by full matrix least-square on F2 In all cases the
graphical representation of the molecular structures was carried out using Ortep32
version 108 The details for the individual structure solutions included in this
dissertation are available in the appendix
Experimental section
- 101 -
53 Starting Materials
Commercially available starting materials were used as received The following
important precursors were prepared according to literature procedures The references
are shown in Table 51
Table 51 Starting materials and references
Compound References Compound References
GeCl2dioxane [27] 15 (HCNtBu)2C [113]
(HSiCl2)2O [117] 19 Ph(Cl)C=N-iPr [112]
1 (nacnac)GeCl [80] 24 tBuN=C=N
tBu [152]
2 (nacnac)GeCl3 [82] 26 aLSiCl [32b]
7 (nacnac)SnCl [80] 32 (Me3Si)2N-SnCl [53]
9 (C5H10)C=N-Dip [111] 39 aLGeCl [41]
11 Ph(Cl)C=N-Dip [112]
Experimental section
- 102 -
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4
To a solution of 1[80]
(133 g 253 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added potassium
(148 g 379 mmol) at room temperature After stirring for 4 h the color of the
solution changed from yellow to brown Volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was first extracted with hexane (60 mL in portions) and then
with diethyl ether (60 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtrated and the filtrate was concentrated
and stored at -20degC for 5 d yielding the first germylene anion 3 as pale yellow crystals
(030 g 083 mmol 33)
C25H44GeKNO2 MW 50236
Properties soluble in THF slightly soluble in Et2O spontaneous
combustion towards air
Melting Point 220 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 108 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 112 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 184 (s 3 H
NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 298 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 618 (s 1 H γ-CH) 691- 698 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 182 (NCMe) 203
(GeCMe) 238 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 1185
(γ-C) 1224-1745 (arom C GeCMe NCMe)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C17H24GeKN(C4H10O)022 C 5797 H 713 N
378 Found C 5764 H 694 N 367
The combined hexane extract was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated and
stored at -20 degC for 2 d yielding the new germylene 4 as yellow crystals (052 g 078
Experimental section
- 103 -
mmol 31)
NHN
GeN
Dip
DipDip
C41H59GeN3 MW 66657
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 192 - 193 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 091 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 109 (d 3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH =
68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 122 (m br 12 H CHMe2) 130 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 162 (s 6 H NCMe) 329-340
(m 6 H CHMe2) 503 (s 1 H γ-CH) 564 (s 1 H NH) 683
ndash 718 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 225 (CHMe) 234 (NCMe)
240 (br CHMe) 245 (CHMe) 247 (CHMe) 256 (CHMe)
288 (CHMe) 292 (CHMe) 964 (γ-C) 1171 ndash 1635 (arom
C NCMe)
EI-MS mz () 6674 (03 [M]+) 4912 (100 [M -
iPr2C6H3NH]
+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C41H59GeN3 C 7388 H 892 N 630 Found
C 7354 H 868 N 613
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5
To a precooled (-78 degC) solution of 2[82]
(097 g 16 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was
added KC8 (094 g 69 mmol) After stirring for 4 h the reaction mixture was allowed
to warm to room temperature and the color of the solution changed from yellow to
brown The reaction mixture was allowed to stir an additional 48 h at room
temperature The signal of compound 1[80]
also disappeared in the 1H-NMR spectrum
of the resulting mixture and compound 3 and 4 were observed as main products
Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was first extracted
with hexane (50 mL in portions) and then with diethyl ether (50 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtered the filtrate was concentrated to 10
Experimental section
- 104 -
mL and stored at -20degC for 48 h yielding 3 as pale yellow crystals (024 g 067 mmol
42) The combined hexane extract was concentrated and stored at -20degC for 24 h
yielding 4 as yellow crystals (042 g 063 mmol 39)
Further concentration of the supernate and cooling at -20degC for 48 h yielded 5 as red
crystals along with colorless crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex
C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 MW 135028
Elemental analysis calcd () for C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 C 7890 H 1003 N 278
Found C 7821 H 999 N 281
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6
C46H65Ge2N3 MW 80531
To a solution of the germylene anion 3 (138 mg 0263 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at -
30 degC was added the solution of the chlorogermylene 1[80]
(93 mg 0263 mmol) in
THF (10 mL) The color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After
stirring for further 2 h at room temperature volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 5 days yielding 6 as dark red crystals (140 mg
017 mmol 66)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt169 degC (decomp)
Experimental section
- 105 -
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 107 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H
CHMe2) 111 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H CHMe2) 120 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 124 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 161 (s
6 H NCMe) 202 (s 3 H NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 301
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 319 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 367 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 518 (s 1 H 6-
ring-γ-CH) 682 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 702- 718 (m 9 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 191 (5-ring-NCMe) 210
(GeCMe) 240 (6-ring-NCMe) 248 (CHMe2) 249 (CHMe2)
250 (CHMe2) 258 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 261 (CHMe2)
279 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 1028 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1238 (5-ring-β-C) 1240 ndash 1694 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
UV-vis λ [nm] = 315 (intense) 358 (intense) 502 (2600)
EI-MS mz () 491 (45 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (15 [M-
(C3N2Ge) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65Ge2N3 C 6861 H 814 N 522 Found
C 6884 H 800 N 516
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8
C46H65GeN3Sn MW 85138
To a suspension of germylene anion 3 (116 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) at -
70 degC was added the solution of 7[80]
(187 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) The
color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After stirring for further 2 h at
room temperature the volatiles of the reaction mixture were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
Experimental section
- 106 -
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 10 days yielding 8 as dark red-black solid (96 mg
011 mmol 34) The solid was solved in Et2O and stored at 0 degC for 24 h building
dark red crystals
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt143 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 085 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 106 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 121 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 127 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 129 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2)
165 (s 6 H SnNCMe) 227 (s 3 H GeNCMe) 300 (s 3 H
GeCMe) 305 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 333 (sept
3JHH
= 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 378 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2)
510 (s 1 H 6-ring-γ-CH) 691 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 705-
721 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 188 (5-ring-NCMe) 207
(GeCMe) 242 (6-ring-NCMe) 246 (CHMe2) 248 (CHMe2)
249 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 260 (CHMe2) 268 (CHMe2)
280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 287 (CHMe2) 1035 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1237 (5-ring-β-C) 1244 ndash 1704 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
119Sn NMR
(C6D6) δ = -197
UV-vis λ [nm] = 314 (15000) 363 (14500) 541 (2800)
EI-MS mz () 537 (8 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (17 [M-
(C3N2Sn) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65GeN3Sn C 6489 H 770 N 494
Found C 6444 H 764 N 477
Experimental section
- 107 -
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12
C37H48N2 MW 52079
To a solution of 9[111]
(200 g 777 mmol) in 200 mL Et2O at -78 degC was added 16
M nBuLi (486 mL 777 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 11[112]
(210 g 700 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h Water free Et3NHCl (108 g 777 mmol) was added to the
reaction mixture and stirred All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 229 g (440 mmol
63 ) of the novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 as colorless crystals
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 148 ~ 150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 117 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 125 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 134 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 164 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 187 (s 1 H NH) 217 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335
(m 4 H CHMe2) 696 (s 3 H arom H) 715- 727 (m 8 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 218 (Cy-CH2) 221
(CHMe2) 236 (CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 256
(CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 285 (Cy-CH2) 286
(Cy-CH2) 977 (Cy-CCN) 1222-1441 (arom C) 1600 (Cy-
CN) 1658 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H49N2+ 5213896 Found 5213878
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48N2 C 8533 H 929 N 538 Found C
8518 H 927 N 547
Experimental section
- 108 -
526 The new chlorogermylene 14
N
N
Ph
Dip
Dip
Cl
Ge
C37H47ClGeN2 MW 62788
nBuLi (881 mL 141 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 12 (720 g 138
mmol) in 80 mL of Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed slowly to warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(330 g 142 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -
30 degC yielding 14 as yellow crystals (710 g 113 mmol 82 )
Properties soluble in hexane toluene sensitive towards air
Melting Point 203 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 097 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 107 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121-127 (m 9 H CHMe2) 128-139 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 144 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 155 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 203-227 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 317
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 327 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 394 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 417 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 680- 739 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 226 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 239 (CHMe2) 245 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
249 (CHMe2) 274 (CHMe2) 277 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
286 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 291 (CHMe2) 293 (CHMe2)
295 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1089 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1476
(arom C) 1651 (Cy-CN) 1688 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47ClGeN2+ 6282640 Found 6282639
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H47ClGeN2 C 7078 H 754 N 446
Found C 7073 H 762 N 457
Experimental section
- 109 -
527 The new germylene 16
C37H46GeN2 MW 59142
Germylene chloride 14 (300 g 479 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-butyl- imidazol-2-
ylidene 15[113]
(091 g 502 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (25 mL) at room
temperature and stirred for 48 h resulting in a white precipitate of the corresponding
NHCmiddotHCl salt The color of the solution changed from yellow to brown-red The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm
hexane two times The combined filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 16 as red crystals (220 g 373 mmol 78 )
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 167 ~ 168 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 115 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 126 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 135 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 12 H CHMe2) 155 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 204 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 221 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 369 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 380 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 415 (t
3JHH =
44 Hz 1 H C=CH) 675- 725 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 226 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 258 (Cy-CH2) 259 (CHMe2) 273 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 987 (Cy-CH)
1117 (Cy-CCN) 1236-1431 (arom C) 1473 1474 (Cy-CN
Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 704 (s) 787 (s) 939 (m) 1104 (s) 1135 (s) 1204 (s) 1248 (s)
1296 (s) 1322 (s) 1365 (s) 1439 (s) 1461 (s) 1535 (m) 1600
(s) 2822 (m) 2865 (s) 2922 (s) 2957 (w) 3022 (w) 3061 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2+ 5932951 Found 5932950
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H46GeN2 C 7514 H 784 N 474 Found
C 7495 H 800 N 484
Experimental section
- 110 -
528 Aminogermylene 17
C37H49GeN3 MW 60845
A red solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (15 mL) was exposed to dry
ammonia gas for 10 min at room temperature The solution turned to a yellow color
and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvent was removed and the
residue was dissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated solution was stored at 0
degC yielding 17 as yellow crystals (560 mg 092 mmol 92 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 173 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 117 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 120-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 142 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
154 (s 2 H NH2) 200-213 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 357 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 363 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 388 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 679- 724 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 214 (CHMe2) 230 (CHMe2)
234 (CHMe2) 237 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
248 (CHMe2) 272 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
285 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
293 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1023 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1462
(arom C) 1643 (Cy-CN) 1669 (Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 704 (s) 752 (s) 796 (s) 839 (m) 922 (s) 1096 (s)
1143 (s) 1174 (s) 1252 (s) 1304 (s) 1360 (s) 1430 (s) 1543
(s) 2865 (m) 2961 (s) 3021 (w) 3048 (m) 3343 (w) 3430
(w)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H49GeN3 C 7304 H 812 N 691 Found
C 7272 H 810 N 683
Experimental section
- 111 -
529 Germylene hydroxide 18
C37H48GeN2O MW 60943
A diluted solution of H2O in THF (179 mL 100 mmol 056 M) was dropped into
a solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) at -30 degC The solution
turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvents
were removed and the residue was redissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated
solution was stored at 0 degC yielding 18 as yellow crystals (580 mg 095 mmol 95 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 188 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 116 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 119-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 139 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
166 (s 1 H OH) 195-221 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 384 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 397 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 675- 726 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 229 (CHMe2)
233 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2) 243 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 281 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
291 (Cy-CH2) 314 (Cy-CH2) 1028 (Cy-CCN) 1233-1464
(arom C) 1647 (Cy-CN) 1666 (Ph-CN)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 713 (s) 743 (s) 770 (s) 791 (s) 839 (s) 926 (m)
1056 (m) 1104 (s) 1148 (s) 1170 (s) 1257 (s) 1313 (s) 1339
(s) 1365 (s) 1430 (s) 1470 (s) 1539 (s) 2861 (s) 2961 (s)
3018 (w) 3057 (m) 3643 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2O+ 6092900 Found 6092901
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48GeN2O C 7292 H 794 N 460
Experimental section
- 112 -
Found C 7300 H 786 N 464
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20
C28H38N2 MW 40230
At -78 degC to a solution of 9[111]
(150 g 583 mmol) in 150 mL Et2O was added 16
M nBuLi (365 mL 584 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 19[112]
(106 g 583 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 141 g (350 mmol
60 ) of 20 as colorless blocks
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 123 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 109 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 132 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 156 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 208 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 214 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 310 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 323 (m 1 H CHMe2) 713- 753 (m 8 H arom H)
1203 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H NH)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 219 (Cy-CH2) 226
(CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (CHMe2) 276
(Cy-CH2) 280 (CHMe2) 300 (Cy-CH2) 459 (CHMe2) 977
(Cy-CCN) 1226 1228 1275 1282 1284 1371 1389
1453 (arom C) 1576 (Cy-CN) 1673 (PhCN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C28H39N2+ 4033113 Found 4033112
Experimental section
- 113 -
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H38N2 C 8353 H 951 N 696 Found C
8270 H 977 N 679
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22
C28H37ClGeN2O MW 52570
nBuLi (16 mL 256 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (100 g 249
mmol) in 15 mL Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed to slowly warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(058 g 250 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 22 as yellow crystals (105 g 200 mmol 80 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 161 ~ 162 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 108 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 134 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 141 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 153 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 189 (m
1 H Cy-CH2) 202 (m 1 H Cy-CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2)
284 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 367 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz
1 H CHMe2) 396 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 688 (m
1 H arom H) 705-724 (m 7 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 222 (CHMe2) 228 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 240 (CHMe2) 241 (CHMe2) 253 (CHMe2)
263 (Cy-CH2) 272 (CHMe2) 283 (CHMe2) 285 (CHMe2)
Experimental section
- 114 -
293 (Cy-CH2) 312 (Cy-CH2) 537 (CHMe2) 1068 (Cy-
CCN) 1239 1250 1267 1271 1288 1294 1388 1410
1446 1469 (arom C) 1620 (Cy-CN) 1654 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H37ClGeN2O C 6397 H 709 N 533
Found C 6426 H 725 N 551
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23
C28H36Cl2GeN2 MW 54415
nBuLi (32 mL 512 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (201 g 500 mmol)
in 30 mL of toluene at -78 degC The solution was allowed to warm to room temperature
and stirred for 4 h To this solution GeCl4 (107 g 500 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-
butylimidazol-2-ylidene 15 (091 g 502 mmol) were added at -78 degC The resulting
suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were removed under
reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm hexane two times The
filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC yielding 23 as yellow crystals (156 g
287 mmol 57 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 126 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 113 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 137 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 146 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 189 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 332 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 361 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 421 (t
3JHH =
42 Hz 1 H C=CH) 701-726 (m 8 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 237 (CHMe2) 243 (Cy-
CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 254 (Cy-CH2) 257 (CHMe2) 286
Experimental section
- 115 -
(CHMe2) 304 (Cy-CH2) 511 (CHMe2) 1036 (Cy-CH)
1125 (Cy-CCN) 1248 1287 1296 1354 1391 1411
1421 1490 (arom C) 1682 (Cy-CN) 1709 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H36Cl2GeN2 C 6180 H 515 N 667
Found C 6203 H 517 N 679
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27
C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 MW 60781
To a solution of tBuN=C=N
tBu
[152] (329 g 213 mmol) in Et2O (80 mL) PhLi (119
mL 214 mmol 18 M) was added at -78 degC The solution was raised to room
temperature and stirred for 2 h To this solution at -90 degC 1133-
tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(230 g 1065 mmol) was added in one minute The
resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with toluene (60 mL)
by 80 degC two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h yielding
27 as colorless crystals (343 g 564 mmol 53)
Properties soluble in toluene sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 175 ~ 177 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 120 (s 36 H CMe3) 598
(s 2 H SiHCl) 733- 746 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 317 (CMe3) 544 (CMe3)
1276 1285 1297 1337 (arom C) 1711 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = -1110
IR(KBr cm-1
) 606 (s) 658 (m) 711 (s) 733 (s) 760 (s) 789 (s) 934 (s)
1068 (s) 1200 (s) 1269 (s) 1378 (s) 1486 (s) 1550 (s) 1566
(s) 1612 (s) 1783 (w) 1826 (w) 1950 (w) 1969 (w) 2000
Experimental section
- 116 -
(w) 2135 (s) 2188 (s) 2909 (s) 2934 (s) 2971 (s) 3232 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C30H49Cl2N4OSi2+ 6072822 Found 6072844
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 C 5928 H 796 N 922
Found C 5971 H 797 N 913
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28
C30H46N4OSi2 MW 53488
Toluene (120 mL) was added to a mixture of 27 (260 g 428 mmol) and
LiN(SiMe3)2 (144 g 856 mmol) at ambient temperature After 2 h the solution turned
to an orange color with the formation of LiCl The resulting mixture was stirred
overnight The solvent was then removed and the residue was extracted with toluene
(100 mL) The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h to yield yellow
crystals of 28 (175 g 327 mmol 76)
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 152 ~ 160 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 692-
731(m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 530 (CMe3)
1277 1291 1299 1349 (arom C) 1623 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -161
IR(KBr cm-1
) 608 (s) 709 (s) 746 (s) 790 (s) 892 (m) 972 (s) 1032 (m)
1070 (m) 1208 (s) 1268 (m) 1359 (s) 1412 (s) 1446 (s)
1476 (s) 1577 (m) 1648 (m) 1778 (w) 1826 (w) 1899 (w)
1970 (w) 2248 (w) 2867 (s) 2902 (s) 2928 (s) 2964 (s)
3065 (m)
Experimental section
- 117 -
ESI-MS mz calcd 5353288 Found 5353227
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H46N4OSi2 C 6736 H 867 N 1047
Found C 6688 H 857 N 1046
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
C38H58N4NiOSi2 MW 70176
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 28 (267 mg 050 mmol) and Ni(cod)2
(1375 mg 050 mmol) at ambient temperature The solution turned to a low-red color
and was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted with
toluene (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield low-red crystals of 29 (319 mg
046 mmol 91) The remaining solid was crystallized from hexane at -30 degC
suitable for single crystal measurement
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 183 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 130 (s 36 H CMe3) 281
(m 4 H CH2) 295 (m 4 H CH2) 504 (s 4 H =CH) 686-
707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 337 (CH2) 535
(CMe3) 760 (=CH) 1277 1293 1296 1335 (arom C)
1690 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 328
IR(KBr cm-1
) 607 (s) 644 (s) 698 (s) 750 (s) 792 (s) 925 (m) 1021 (m)
1075 (s) 1209 (s) 1267 (s) 1320 (m) 1361 (s) 1407 (s)
1444 (s) 1475 (s) 1578 (m) 1647 (m) 1775 (w) 1823 (w)
Experimental section
- 118 -
1902 (w) 1962 (w) 2280 (w) 2791 (s) 2855 (s) 2913 (s)
2975 (s) 3023 (m) 3063 (w)
ESI-MS mz () calcd 7003503 Found 7003577
Elemental analysis calcd () for C38H58N4NiOSi2 C 6504 H 833 N 798
Found C 6387 H 837 N 805
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30
C21H41N2PSi3 MW 43679
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(302 mg 102
mmol) and lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphate (285 mg 103 mmol) at ambient
temperature The solution turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 3 h The solvent
was removed and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30 degC for 24 h yielding 30 as yellow crystals (371 mg
085 mmol 83)
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 149-150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 058 (d
3JP-H = 44 Hz 18 H
SiMe3) 124 (s 18 H CMe3) 681-699 (m 2 H arom H)
734-741 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 44 (d
3JC-P = 100 Hz
SiMe3) 315 (d 4JC-P = 16 Hz CMe3) 540 (CMe3) 1289
1292 1293 1344 (arom C) 1572 (d 3JC-P = 95 Hz
NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 31 (d
1JSi-P = 229 Hz
PSiMe3) 440 (d 1JSi-P = 1943 Hz N2SiP)
31P NMR (81012 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = - 2110
Experimental section
- 119 -
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C21H41N2PSi3 4362315 Found 4362524
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31
C30H46N4P2Si2 MW 58083
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 30 (309 mg 071 mmol) and
triphenylphosphine dichloride (237 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The
solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted
with THF (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield yellow crystals of 31 (148
mg 025 mmol 72)
Properties soluble in THF sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 174 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 705-
733 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 331 (CMe3) 534
(CMe3) 1256 1276 1294 1359 (arom C) 1710 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 267 (t
1JSi-P = 998 Hz)
31P NMR (81012 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = - 1649
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C30H46N4P2Si2 5802736 Found
5802361
Experimental section
- 120 -
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn MW 60944
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(336 mg 114
mmol) and Chloro-amino-stannylene 32[53]
(360 mg 114 mmol) at room temperature
The solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was
extracted with hexane (20 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield colorless
crystals of 33 (343 mg 056 mmol 49)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air decomposed
slowly at room temperature
Melting Point gt 25 degC (slowly decomp)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn C 4139 H 678 N
689 Found C 4195 H 701 N 706
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35
C44H66N4O2Si2 MW 73919
At -78 degC to a solution of 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinol (150 g 675 mmol) in 30 mL
Et2O was added 16 M nBuLi (85 mL 136 mmol) in hexane and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h resulting in white slurry The reaction
mixture was cooled to -78 degC again and added the solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(398 g 135 mmol) in 50 mL toluene After the addition the mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with the warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC 395 g bis-silylene 35 (534
Experimental section
- 121 -
mmol 79 ) as slightly yellow solid
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
174 (s 18 H ArC(CH3)3) 693 - 713 (m 8 H arom H) 754
(s 1 H Ar-H) 787 (s 1 H Ar-H) 802 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (ArC(CH3)3) 318
(NC(CH3)3) 350 (ArC(CH3)3) 530 (NC(CH3)3) 1096
1243 1276 1295 1297 1313 1341 1552 (arom C)
1636 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -240
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C44H66N4O2Si2 C 7049 H 900 N 758
Found C 7075 H 930 N 756
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36
C88H132N8O4PdSi4 MW 158480
Bis-silylene 35 (600 mg 081 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (468 mg 041 mmol) were
mixed in 25 mL hexane at room temperature and stirred for 24 h The hexane solution
was filtrated and the white precipitate was washed with 10 mL hexane one time The
solid product was dried under reduced pressure to yield 520 mg (033 mmol 81 )
white powders The product was dissolved in warm hexane and stored at room
temperature for 10 days giving some orange crystals of 36 The reaction of bis-
Experimental section
- 122 -
silylene 35 with one molar equiv of Pd(PPh3)4 in toluene furnishes the same product
but the isolable yield is only about 30
Properties slightly soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 105 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 108
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 114 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 116 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 131 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 139 (s 9 H C(CH3)3)155
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 168 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 177 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 180 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 185 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 212
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 659 (s 1 H SiH) 686- 789 (m 22 H
arom H) 816 (s 1 H Ar-H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (C(CH3)3) 311
(C(CH3)3) 314 (C(CH3)3) 316 (C(CH3)3) 318 (C(CH3)3)
319 (C(CH3)3) 320 (C(CH3)3) 322 (C(CH3)3) 328
(C(CH3)3) 332 (C(CH3)3) 333 (C(CH3)3) 343 (C(CH3)3)
349 350 351 357 526 527 537 539 540 541 542
561 1112 1225 1236 1243 1256 1258 1271 1285
1287 1289 1291 1293 1294 1302 1303 1318 1323
1324 1326 1340 1342 1378 1380 1381 1409 1430
1533 1559 1585 1613 1622 1654 1731 1742
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -87 (LSi) 397 (Si-H) 623
658 (LSiPd)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 623 (m) 706 (m) 764 (m) 860 (m) 1056 (m) 1108 (m) 1206
(m) 1272 (m) 1365 (m) 1418 (s) 1446 (m) 1476 (m) 1446
(m) 1476 (m) 1495 (m) 1591 (m) 2135 (w) 2875(m) 2906
(s) 2964 (s) 3061 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C88H132N8O4PdSi4 C 6669 H 840 N
707 Found C 6616 H 875 N 676
Experimental section
- 123 -
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38
C40H54FeN4Si2 MW 70290
16 M nBuLi (423 ml 677 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (600 mg 323 mmol) and TMEDA (937 mg 806 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (30 mL) solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(190 g 645 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
pentane Compound 38 was obtained as deep red crystals in 70 yield (159 g 226
mmol) on storage of a saturated pentane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 117 ~ 119 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 116 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
451 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 472 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 692- 707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 318 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 709 (FeCH) 727 (FeCH) 846 (SiC) 1289
1294 1305 1349 (arom C) 1604 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 433
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeN4Si2 C 6835 H 774 N 797
Found C 6803 H 767 N 778
Experimental section
- 124 -
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40
C40H54FeGe2N4 MW 79201
16 M nBuLi (353 ml 564 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (500 mg 269 mmol) and TMEDA (781 mg 672 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (25 mL) solution of chlorogermylene 39[41]
(183 g 538 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
warm hexane Compound 40 was obtained as orange crystals in 77 yield (163 g
206 mmol) on storage of a saturated hexane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 168 ~ 169 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 461
(t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 471 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 691- 697 (m 6 H arom H) 712- 717 (m 4 H arom
H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 320 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 701 (FeCH) 723 (FeCH) 920 (GeC) 1289
1290 1302 1369 (arom C) 1659 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeGe2N4 C 6666 H 687 N 707 Found
C 6655 H 701 N 707
Experimental section
- 125 -
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeN4Si2 MW 82693
In a glove box CoBr2 (202 mg 092 mmol) NaCp (81 mg 092 mmol) and KC8
(131 mg 097 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent
mixture (41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at
room temperature The bis-silylene 38 (650 mg 092 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 41 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 30 yield (230 mg 028 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 166 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 139 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
440 (t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 461 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 496 (s 5 H CoCH) 680- 684 (m 2 H arom H)
692- 696 (m 6 H arom H) 720- 723 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (NC(CH3)3) 534
(NC(CH3)3) 700 (FeCH) 745 (FeCH) 780 (CoCH) 851
(SiC) 1291 1297 1300 1343 (arom C) 1673 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 820
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFeN4Si2 C 6536 H 719 N 678
Found C 6612 H 724 N 686
Experimental section
- 126 -
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhGe
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Ge
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeGe2N4 MW 91604
In a glove box CoBr2 (83 mg 038 mmol) NaCp (33 mg 038 mmol) and KC8 (54
mg 040 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent mixture
(41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at room
temperature The bis-germylene 40 (300 mg 038 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 42 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 61 yield (210 mg 023 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 309 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 131 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
438 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 459 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 504 (s br 5 H CoCH) 684- 688 (m 2 H arom H)
695- 698 (m 6 H arom H) 714- 718 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 322 (NC(CH3)3) 537
(NC(CH3)3) 699 (FeCH) 737 (FeCH) 759 (CoCH) 891
(GeC) 1287 1296 1300 1361(arom C) 1680 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFe Ge2N4 C 5900 H 649 N 612
Found C 5942 H 664 N 590
Experimental section
- 127 -
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44
C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 MW 100697
To a solution of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (250 mg 036 mmol) in 10 ml hexane
was added a solution of CpCo(CO)2 (130 mg 072 mmol) in 8 ml hexane The
reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All solvents were evaporated
in vacuo The corresponding bis-silylene cobalt(I) complex 44 was isolated as brown
air- and moisture-sensitive solids in 87 yield (310 mg 031 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 293 ~ 295 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
461 (m 4 H FeCH) 476 (m 4 H FeCH) 523 (s 10 H
CoCH) 683- 695 (m 6 H arom H) 702- 706 (m 2 H
arom H) 745- 748 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 313 (NC(CH3)3) 542
(NC(CH3)3) 723 (FeCH) 741 (FeCH) 804 (SiC) 809
(CoCH) 1287 1296 1300 1324 (arom C) 1687 (NCN)
2078 (br CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 857
IR(KBr cm-1
) 500 (m) 539 (w) 564 (m) 628 (s) 703 (m) 757 (s) 792 (m)
825 (w) 1028 (m) 1081 (w) 1146 (m) 1199 (s) 1275 (m)
1360 (m) 1388 (m) 1417 (s) 1438 (w) 1474 (m) 1520 (s)
1641 (s) 1888 (s) 2869 (s) 2901 (m) 2926 (m) 2965 (s)
1520 (s) 3097 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 C 6202 H 641 N
Experimental section
- 128 -
556 Found C 6287 H 630 N 571
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45
C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 MW 103867
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (500 mg
071 mmol) and Fe2(CO)9 (259 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The solution
was stirred for 12 h The solvent was evaporated in vacuo The corresponding bis-
silylene iron(0) complex 45 was isolated as yellow-brown air- and moisture-sensitive
solids in 73 yield (540 mg 052 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 155 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 109 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 483
(s 4 H FeCH) 500 (s 4 H FeCH) 699- 712 (m 8 H arom
H) 736- 739 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 311 (NC(CH3)3) 548
(NC(CH3)3) 735 (FeCH) 742 (FeCH) 771 (SiC) 1210
1287 1303 1308 (arom C) 1704 (NCN) 2169 (CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 1050
IR(KBr cm-1
) 630 (s) 765 (w) 1028 (m) 1035 (m) 1200 (m) 1370 (w)
1400 (m) 1474 (w) 1609 (w) 1648 (w) 1900 (s) 1948 (s)
1996(w) 2026 (s) 2865 (w) 2930 (m) 2965 (m)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 C 5550 H 524 N
539 Found C 5623 H 517 N 566
References
- 129 -
6 REFERENCES
1 P Pyykko Chem Rev 1988 88 563
2 N V Sidgwick Clarendon Oxford 1950 1 287 (b) R S Drago J Phys Chem 1958 62
353
3 P P Power Chem Rev 1999 99 3463 (b) R C Fischer P P Power Chem Rev 2010 110
3877
4 R Janoschek Chemie in unserer Zeit 1988 22 128
5 (a) F S Kipping L L Lloyd Dalton Trans 1901 79 449 (b) N N Greenwood A
Earnshaw Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed) 1997 362
6 (a) L Roumlsch P John R Reitmeier Silicon Compounds Organic In Ullmanns Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH amp Co KGaA 2000 (b) A J O Lenick
Basic Silicone Chemistry ndash A Review 1999
7 S Yao Y Xiong M Brym M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 7268
8 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7562
9 Y Xiong S Yao R Muumlller M Kaupp M Driess Nature Chem 2010 2 577
10 (a) S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4159 (b) S
Yao Y Xiong C Milsmann E Bill S Pfirrmann C Limberg M Driess Chem Eur J
2010 16 436
11 (a) K S Pitzer J Am Chem Soc 1948 70 2140 (b) R S Mulliken J Am Chem Soc
1955 77 884
12 (a) M Asay C Jones M Driess Chem Rev 2011 111 354 (b) S Yao Y Xiong M Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 1748 (c) Y Mizuhata T Sasamori N Tokitoh Chem Rev 2009
109 3479 (d) P P Power Organometallics 2007 26 4362 (e) P P Power Chem Rev 2003
103 789 (f) S Nagendran H W Roesky Organometallics 2008 27 457
13 (a) R West M J Fink J Michl Science 1981 214 1343 (b) M J Fink M J Michalczyk
K J Haller R West J Michl Chem Commun 1983 1010 (c) S Masamune Y Hanzawa
D J Williams J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 6136 (d) D E Goldberg D H Harris M F
Lappert K M Thomas Chem Commun 1976 261 (e) K W Klinkhammer T F Faumlssler H
Gruumltzmacher Angew Chem Int Ed 1998 37 124 (f) J T Snow S Murakami S
Masamune D J Williams Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 4191 (g) M Weidenbruch Angew
Chem Int Ed 2003 42 2222
14 L Pauling J Am Chem Soc 1931 53 1367
15 (a) G Trinquier J P Malrieu P Riviere J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 4529 (b) J P
Malrieu G Trinquier J Am Chem Soc 1989 111 5916 (c) H Jacobsen T Ziegler J Am
Chem Soc 1994 116 3667
16 L Pu B Twamley P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2000 122 3524
17 M Kaupp P V R Schleyer J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 1061
18 A D Phillips R J Wright M M Olmstead P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2002 124 5930
19 N Takagi S Nagase Organometallics 2001 20 5498
20 M Stender A D Phillips R J Wright P P Power Angew Chem Int Ed 2002 41 1785
21 T L Allen W H Fink P P Power Dalton Trans 2000 407
References
- 130 -
22 A Sekiguchi R Kinjo M Ichinohe Science 2004 305 1755
23 D Bourissou O Guerret F P Gabbai G Bertrand Chem Rev 2000 100 39
24 M Denk R Lennon R Hayashi R West A V Belyakov H P Verne A Haaland M
Wagner N Metzler J Am Chem Soc 1994 116 2691
25 M Driess S Yao M Brym C V Wuellen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 6730
26 M Kira S Ishida T Iwamoto C Kabuto J Am Chem Soc 1999 121 9722
27 V Lemierre A Chrostowska A Dargelos P Baylegravere W J Leigh C R Harrington Appl
Organom Chem 2004 18 676
28 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky S Merkel J Henn D Stalke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
5683
29 L Jafarpour E D Stevens S P Nolan J Organomet Chem 2000 606 49
30 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen D Lentz J Am Chem Soc 2006 128 9628
31 (a) C-W So H W Roesky J Magull R B Oswald Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 3948
(b) C-W So H W Roesky P M Gurubasavaraj R B Oswald M T Gamer P G Jones S
Blaurock J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12049
32 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890 (b) S S Sen
H W Roesky D Stern J Henn D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2009 132 1123
33 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167 (b) W
Wang S Inoue E Irran M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691 (c) R Azhakar R
S Ghadwal H W Roesky H Wolf D Stalke Organometallics 2012 31 4588 (d) S S
Sen J Hey R Herbst-Irmer H W Roesky D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 12311
34 R C Fischer L Pu J C Fettinger M A Brynda P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
11366
35 Y Wang Y Xie P Wei R B King H F Schaefer P Von R Schleyer G H Robinson
Science 2008 321 1069
36 S S Sen S Khan S Nagendran H W Roesky Acc Chem Res 2012 45 578
37 S S Sen A Jana H W Roesky C Schulzke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 8536
38 C Jones S J Bonyhady N Holzmann G Frenking A Stasch Inorg Chem 2011 50
12315
39 D Gau R Rodriguez T Kato N Saffon-Merceron A De Coacutezar F P Cossiacuteo A Baceiredo
Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50 1092
40 S P Green C Jones P C Junk K-A Lippert A Stasch Chem Commun 2006 3978
41 S Nagendran S S Sen H W Roesky D Koley H GrubmuLler A Pal R Herbst-Irmer
Organometallics 2008 27 5459
42 W-P Leung W-K Chiu K-H Chong T C W Mak Chem Commun 2009 6822
43 (a) S P Green C Jones A Stasch Science 2007 318 1754 (b) S J Bonyhady S P Green
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 2973 (c) S J Bonyhady
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch A J Edwards G J Mcintyre Chem Eur J 2010 16 938
44 A Sidiropoulos C Jones A Stasch S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
9701
45 Y Peng R C Fischer W A Merrill J Fischer L Pu B D Ellis J C Fettinger R H
Herber P P Power Chemical Science 2010 1 461
46 R Jambor B Kašnaacute K N Kirschner M Schuumlrmann K Jurkschat Angew Chem Int Ed
References
- 131 -
2008 47 1650
47 (a) C D Schaeffer J J Zuckerman J Am Chem Soc 1974 96 7160 (b) M J S Gynane
D H Harris M F Lappert P P Power P Riviere M Riviere-Baudet Dalton Trans 1977
2004 (c) M F Lappert P P Power M J Slade L Hedberg K Hedberg V Schomaker
Chem Commun 1979 369 (d) T Fjeldberg H Hope M F Lappert P P Power A J
Thorne Chem Commun 1983 639 (e) M Veith M Jarczyk V Huch Chem Ber 1988
121 347
48 M Veith R Lisowsky Angew Chem Int Ed 1988 27 1087
49 P B Hitchcock M F Lappert A J Thorne Chem Commun 1990 1587
50 R A Bartlett P P Power J Am Chem Soc 1990 112 3660
51 J-T Ahlemann H W Roesky R Murugavel E Parisini M Noltemeyer H-G Schmidt O
Muumlller R Herbst-Irmer L N Markovskii Y G Shermilovich Chem Ber 1997 130 1113
52 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky K Proumlpper B Dittrich S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem
Int Ed 2011 50 5374
53 R W Chorley P B Hitchock B S Jolly M F Lappert G A Lawless Chem Commun
1991 1302
54 A G Avent C Drost B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem
2004 630 2090
55 M Veith A Rammo Z Anorg Allg Chem 2001 627 662
56 M Veith J Fischer T R Prout M Noetzel P Hobein V Huch Inorg Chem 1991 30
4130
57 H Braunschweig P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem Int Ed
1994 33 1156
58 H Braunschweig C Drost P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem
Int Ed 1997 36 261
59 R E Allan M A Beswick G R Coggan P R Raithby A E H Wheatley D S Wright
Inorg Chem 1997 36 5202
60 (a) C Stanciu S S Hino M Stender A F Richards M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
Chem 2005 44 2774 (b) Y Peng B D Ellis X Wang P P Power J Am Chem Soc
2008 130 12268
61 B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem 2005 631 1383
62 C Cui M M Olmstead J C Fettinger G H Spikes P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 17530
63 X Wang C Ni Z Zhu J C Fettinger P P Power Inorg Chem 2009 48 2464
64 S S Sen D Kratzert D Stern H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2010 49 5786
65 H-X Yeong H-W Xi K H Lim C-W So Chem Eur J 2010 16 12956
66 (a) F E Hahn A V Zabula T Pape A Hepp Eur J Inorg Chem 2007 2007 2405 (b) A
V Zabula F E Hahn T Pape A Hepp Organometallics 2007 26 1972 (c) A V Zabula T
Pape A Hepp F E Hahn Organometallics 2008 27 2756
67 S-H Zhang C-W So Organometallics 2011 30 2059
68 O T Summerscales M M Olmstead P P Power Organometallics 2011 30 3468
69 (a) M Veith W Frank Angew Chem 1985 97 213 (b) M Veith Angew Chem Int Ed
1987 26 1 (c) H Chen R A Bartlett H V R Dias M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
References
- 132 -
Chem 1991 30 3390 (d) R E Allan M A Beswick A J Edwards M A Paver M-A
Rennie P R Raithby D S Wright Dalton Trans 1995 1991 (e) W J Grigsby T Hascall
J J Ellison M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg Chem 1996 35 3254 (f) R E Allan M A
Beswick M K Davies P R Raithby A Steiner D S Wright J Organomet Chem 1998
550 71 (g) M E G Mosquera J S Palmer A D Hopkins D S Wright Phosphorus
Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 1999 150 107 (h) M Veith M Opsoumllder M Zimmer V Huch
Eur J Inorg Chem 2000 2000 1143 (i) D R Armstrong F Benevelli A D Bond N
Feeder E A Harron A D Hopkins M Mcpartlin D Moncrieff D Saacuteez E A Quadrelli
A D Woods D S Wright Inorg Chem 2002 41 1492 (j) T Chivers Timothy j Clark M
Krahn M Parvez G Schatte Eur J Inorg Chem 2003 2003 1857 (k) J F Eichler O Just
W S Rees Inorg Chem 2006 45 6706 (l) D J Eisler T Chivers Chem Eur J 2006 12
233 (m) H Vaňkaacutetovaacute L Broeckaert F De Proft R Olejniacutek J Turek Z Padělkovaacute A
Růžička Inorg Chem 2011 50 9454
70 (a) A Meltzer C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7232 (b) A Meltzer C
Praumlsang C Milsmann M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 3170 (c) H Ogino The
Chemical Record 2002 2 291 (d) S Inoue M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
5614 (e) M Stoelzel C Praumlsang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed
2012 51 399
71 W Yang H Fu H Wang M Chen Y Ding H W Roesky A Jana Inorg Chem 2009 48
5058
72 (a) J Choi A H R Macarthur M Brookhart A S Goldman Chem Rev 2011 111 1761
(b) N Selander K L N J Szaboacute Chem Rev 2011 111 2048 (c) M E Van Der Boom D
Milstein Chem Rev 2003 103 1759
73 W Tang X Zhang Chem Rev 2003 103 3029
74 (a) A P Shaw J R Norton D Buccella L A Sites S S Kleinbach D A Jarem K M
Bocage C Nataro Organometallics 2009 28 3804 (b) L-C Song J-T Liu Q-M Hu G-
F Wang P Zanello M Fontani Organometallics 2000 19 5342 (c) S Shekhar J F
Hartwig J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 13016
75 N A Marinos Modellsysteme fuumlr die [NiFe]-Hydrogenase und Zinkkatalysatoren fuumlr die
Hydrosilylierung Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin Germany 2011
76 (a) C M Jensen D Morales-Morales The Chemistry of Pincer Compounds Elsevier
Science Amsterdam 2007 (b) M Albrecht G Van Koten Angew Chem Int Ed 2001 40
3750 (c) M Albrecht M M Lindner Dalton Trans 2011 40 8733 (d) D Benito-Garagorri
K Kirchner Acc Chem Res 2008 41 201 (e) C Gunanathan D Milstein Acc Chem Res
2011 44 588
77 (a) N Selander K J Szabo Dalton Trans 2009 6267 (b) H Zhang A Lei Dalton Trans
2011 40 8745 (c) J Dupont C S Consorti J Spencer Chem Rev 2005 105 2527
78 Silyl-silylene transition-metal complexes see (a) K Ueno S Seki H Ogino Chem Lett
1993 22 2159 (b) H Tobita H Wada K Ueno H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 2545
(c) K Ueno A Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 5023 (d) H Wada H Tobita
H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 3870 (e) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino
Organometallics 1998 17 2844 (f) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino Organometallics 1998
17 2850 (g) H Wada H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 1998 27 993 (h) K Ueno A
References
- 133 -
Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1999 18 2694 (i) H Tobita T Sato M Okazaki H
Ogino J Organomet Chem 2000 611 314 (j) H Koshikawa M Okazaki S Matsumoto
K Ueno H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 2005 34 1412 (k) K Ueno S Ito K Endo H
Tobita S Inomata H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 3309
79 For reviews on silylene complexes see (a) M S Eisen Transition-Metal Silyl Complexes
In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2003 pp 2037 (b)
M Okazaki H Tobita H Ogino Dalton Trans 2003 493 (c) R Waterman P G Hayes T
D Tilley Acc Chem Res 2007 40 712
80 Y Ding H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt P P Power Organometallics 2001
20 1190
81 L Bourget-Merle M F Lappert J R Severn Chem Rev 2002 102 3031
82 B Raumlke F Zuumllch Y Ding J Prust H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt Z Anorg
Allg Chem 2001 627 836
83 W Wang S Yao C Van WuLlen M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640
84 (a) R West H Sohn D R Powell T Muumlller Y Apeloig Angew Chem Int Ed 1996 35
1002 (b) W P Freeman T D Tilley L M Liable-Sands A L Rheingold J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 10457
85 J Fischer J Baumgartner C Marschner Organometallics 2005 24 1263
86 M Stender A D Phillips P P Power Inorg Chem 2001 40 5314
87 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 4349
88 W D Woodul A F Richards A Stasch M Driess C Jones Organometallics 2010 29
3655
89 W Clegg E K Cope A J Edwards F S Mair Inorg Chem 1998 37 2317
90 (a) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Matsuno M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 5768 (b) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Angew Chem Int Ed
2006 45 3269 (c) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Eur J Inorg Chem
2007 2007 5471 (d) V Y Lee Y Ito H Yasuda K Takanashi A Sekiguchi J Am Chem
Soc 2011 133 5103
91 S P Mallela S Hill R A Geanangel Inorg Chem 1997 36 6247
92 P V R Schleyer C Maerker A Dransfeld H Jiao N J R V E Hommes J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 6317
93 For a review see Z Chen C S Wannere C Corminboeuf R Puchta P V R Schleyer
Chem Rev 2005 105 3842
94 (a) R Ahlrichs M Baumlr M Haumlser H Horn C Koumllmel Chem Phys Lett 1989 162 165 (b)
M Haumlser R Ahlrichs J Comput Chem 1989 10 104
95 O Treutler R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1995 102 346
96 (a) A D Becke Phys Rev A 1988 38 3098 (b) J P Perdew Phys Rev B 1986 33 8822
97 (a) A Schaumlfer C Huber R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1994 100 5829 (b) K Eichkorn F
Weigend O Treutler R Ahlrichs Theor Chem Acc 1997 97 119
98 K Eichkorn O Treutler H Oumlhm M Haumlser R Ahlrichs Chem Phys Lett 1995 242 652
99 U Meier C Van Wuumlllen M Schindler J Comput Chem 1992 13 551
100 (a) C Van Wuumlllen Chem Phys Lett 1994 219 8 (b) C Van Wuumlllen Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2000 2 2137
References
- 134 -
101 (a) P J Stephens F J Devlin C F Chabalowski M J Frisch J Phys Chem 1994 98
11623 (b) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 1372 (c) C T Lee W T Yang R G Parr
Phys Rev 1988 37 785
102 W Kutzelnigg U Fleischer M Schindler NMR basis principles and progress Springer
Berlin 1990 Vol 23 page 169
103 (a) C Corminboeuf T Heine G Seifert P V R Schleyer J Weber Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2004 6 273 (b) P Von Rague Schleyer M Manoharan Z-X Wang B Kiran H Jiao
R Puchta N J R Van Eikema Hommes Org Lett 2001 3 2465
104 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Chem Commun 2009 2661
105 H Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 1999 18 3159
106 Y Sugiyama T Sasamori Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Takagi S Nagase N Tokitoh J Am
Chem Soc 2006 128 1023
107 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 2003 22 215
108 (a) K H Pannell L Parkanyi H Sharma F Cervantes-Lee Inorg Chem 1992 31 522 (b)
A Kawachi Y Tanaka K Tamao J Organomet Chem 1999 590 15
109 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess Chem Asian J 2009 4 1323
110 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Organometallics 2011 30 6490
111 W Keim S Killat C F Nobile G P Suranna U Englert R Wang S Mecking L D
Schroumlder J Organomet Chem 2002 662 150
112 P H M Budzelaar A B Van Ort A G Orpen Eur J Inorg Chem 1998 1485
113 N M Scott R Dorta E D Stevens A Correa L Cavallo S P Nolan J Am Chem Soc
2005 127 3516
114 L W Pineda V Jancik H W Roesky D Neculai A M Neculai Angew Chem Int Ed
2004 43 1419
115 A Jana I Objartel H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2009 48 798
116 S S Sen G Tavcar H W Roesky D Kratzert J Hey D Stalke Organometallics 2010 29
2343
117 R West J Am Chem Soc 1953 75 1002
118 R Drake I Mackinnon R Taylor Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Siloxane Polymers
and Copolymers In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd
2003 pp 2217
119 (a) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 5648 (b) B Miehlich A Savin H Stoll H
Preuss Chem Phys Lett 1989 157 200 (c) Gussian 03 Revision E01 M J Frisch G W
Trucks H B Schlegel G E Scuseria M A Robb J R Cheeseman J A Montgomery Jr
T Vreven K N Kudin J C Burant J M Millam S S Iyengar J Tomasi V Barone B
Mennucci M Cossi G Scalmani N Rega G A Petersson H Nakatsuji M Hada M
Ehara K Toyota R Fukuda J Hasegawa M Ishida T Nakajima Y Honda O Kitao H
Nakai M Klene X Li J E Knox H P Hratchian J B Cross V Bakken C Adamo J
Jaramillo R Gomperts R E Stratmann O Yazyev A J Austin R Cammi C Pomelli J W
Ochterski P Y Ayala K Morokuma G A Voth P Salvador J J Dannenberg V G
Zakrzewski S Dapprich A D Daniels M C Strain O Farkas D K Malick A D Rabuck
K Raghavachari J B Foresman J V Ortiz Q Cui A G Baboul S Clifford J Cioslowski
B B Stefanov G Liu A Liashenko P Piskorz I Komaromi R L Martin D J Fox T
References
- 135 -
Keith M A Al-Laham C Y Peng A Nanayakkara M Challacombe P M W Gill B
Johnson W Chen M W Wong C Gonzalez and J A Pople Gaussian Inc Wallingford
CT 2004
120 M Denk R K Hayashi R West Chem Commun 1994 33
121 L Kong J Zhang H Song C Cui Dalton Trans 2009 5444
122 A Meltzer S Inoue C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 3038
123 P Macchi D M Proserpio A Sironi J Am Chem Soc 1998 120 1447
124 (a) M Regitz O J Scherer Multiple bonds and Low Coordination in Phosphorus Chemistry
New York 1990 p 5 (b) M Driess Coord Chem Rev 1995 145 1 (c) V Y Lee A
Sekiguchi J Escudieacute H Ranaivonjatovo Chem Lett 2010 39 312
125 C N Smit F M Lock F Bickelhaupt Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 3011
126 (a) C N Smit F Bickelhaupt Organometallics 1987 6 1156 (b) E Niecke E Klein M
Nieger Angew Chem Int Ed 1989 28 751 (c) R Corriu G Lanneau C Priou Angew
Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1130 (d) M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1022 (e) H R
G Bender E Niecke M Nieger J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 3314 (f) M Driess S Rell
H Pritzkow Chem Commun 1995 253 (g) M Driess H Pritzkow S Rell U Winkler
Organometallics 1996 15 1845 (h) M Driess S Block M Brym M T Gamer Angew
Chem Int Ed 2006 45 2293 (i) S Yao S Block M Brym M Driess Chem Commun
2007 3844 (j) V Y Lee M Kawai A Sekiguchi H Ranaivonjatovo J Escudieacute
Organometallics 2009 28 6625 (k) B Li T Matsuo D Hashizume H Fueno K Tanaka
K Tamao J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 13222
127 (a) C H Lai M D Su S Y Chu Inorg Chem 2002 41 1320 (b) R Pietschnig A
Orthaber Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4570 (c) C H Chen M D Su Eur J Inorg Chem
2008 1241 (d) V Lattanzi S Thorwirth D T Halfen L A Mueck L M Ziurys P
Thaddeus J Gauss M C Mccarthy Angew Chem Int Ed 2010 49 5661
128 S Inoue W Wang C Praumlsang M Asay E Irran M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2011 133
2868
129 (a) R Appel W A Paulen Angew Chem Int Ed 1981 20 869 (b) V Cappello J
Baumgartner A Dransfeld K Hassler Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4589
130 M Igarashi M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12660
131 F A Cotton G Wilkinson C Murillo M Bochmann Advanced Inorganic Chemistry 1999
132 (a) N Wiberg C M M Finger K Polborn Angew Chem Int Ed 1993 32 1054 (b) M
Ichinohe M Toyoshima R Kinjo A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2003 125 13328
133 (a) A J Arduengo H V R Dias J C Calabrese F Davidson Inorg Chem 1993 32 1541
(b) N Kuhn T Kratz D Blaumlser R Boese Chem Ber 1995 128 245 (c) P A Rupar M C
Jennings K M Baines Organometallics 2008 27 5043 (d) A J Ruddy P A Rupar K J
Bladek C J Allan J C Avery K M Baines Organometallics 2010 29 1362
134 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch H Marsmann G Henkel Chem Ber 1997 130 1733
135 (a) D Morales-Morales C Grause K Kasaoka R O Redoacuten R E Cramer C M Jensen
Inorg Chim Acta 2000 300ndash302 958 (b) T Kimura Y Uozumi Organometallics 2006 25
4883 (c) R B Bedford M Betham J P H Charmant M F Haddow A G Orpen L T
Pilarski S J Coles M B Hursthouse Organometallics 2007 26 6346 (d) J Aydin K S
Kumar L Eriksson K J Szaboacute Adv Syn Catal 2007 349 2585 (e) J-F Gong Y-H
References
- 136 -
Zhang M-P Song C Xu Organometallics 2007 26 6487 (f) R A Baber R B Bedford
M Betham M E Blake S J Coles M F Haddow M B Hursthouse A G Orpen L T
Pilarski P G Pringle R L Wingad Chem Commun 2006 3880 (g) A V Polukeev S A
Kuklin P V Petrovskii S M Peregudova A F Smolyakov F M Dolgushin A A
Koridze Dalton Trans 2011 40 7201 (h) R B Bedford Y-N Chang M F Haddow C L
Mcmullin Dalton Trans 2011 40 9034
136 (a) C Watanabe T Iwamoto C Kabuto M Kira Angew Chem Int Ed 2008 47 5386 (b)
C Watanabe Y Inagawa T Iwamoto M Kira Dalton Trans 2010 39 9414
137 (a) G Tavcar S S Sen R Azhakar A Thorn H W Roesky Inorg Chem 2010 49 10199
(b) R Azhakar S P Sarish H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Inorg Chem 2011 50 5039
138 W Chen P J Mccormack K Mohammed W Mbafor S M Roberts J Whittall Angew
Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4141
139 (a) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Organometallics 2008 27
3325 (b) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Bull Chem Soc Jpn
2009 82 793
140 (a) F Baumann E Dormann Y Ehleiter W Kaim J Kaumlrcher M Kelemen R Krammer D
Saurenz D Stalke C Wachter G Wolmershaumluser H Sitzmann J Organomet Chem 1999
587 267 (b) F Hung-Low C A Bradley Organometallics 2011 30 2636 (c) F Hung-Low
J P Krogman J W Tye C A Bradley Chem Commun 2012 48 368
141 R Azhakar R S Ghadwal H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Chem Asian J 2012 7 528
142 R S Ghadwal R Azhakar K ProPper J J Holstein B Dittrich H W Roesky Inorg
Chem 2011 50 8502
143 J Li S Merkel J Henn K Meindl A DoRing H W Roesky R S Ghadwal D Stalke
Inorg Chem 2010 49 775
144 M Ingleson H Fan M Pink J Tomaszewski K G Caulton J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
1804
145 A Schnepf Z Anorg Allg Chem 2006 632 935
146 (a) M D Rausch R A Genetti J Org Chem 1970 35 3888 (b) F Ungvary A Sisak L
Markoacute J Organomet Chem 1980 188 373
147 (a) E Erdik Tetrahedron 1992 48 9577 (b) P Knochel R D Singer Chem Rev 1993 93
2117 (c) M Rottlaumlnder P Knochel Tetrahedron Lett 1997 38 1749
148 (a) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1978 17 505 (b) K P C Vollhardt Angew Chem
Int Ed 1984 23 539 (c) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1985 24 248 (d) W Hess
J Treutwein G Hilt Synthesis 2008 2008 3537 (e) C J Scheuermann B D Ward New J
Chem 2008 32 1850 (f) T Shibata K Tsuchikama Org Biomol Chem 2008 6 1317 (g)
K Tanaka Chem Asian J 2009 4 508 (h) J A Varela C Saaacute Synlett 2008 2008 2571
149 (a) G Hilt C Hengst W Hess Eur J Org Chem 2008 2008 2293 (b) A Geny N Agenet
L Iannazzo M Malacria C Aubert V Gandon Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 1810 (c)
C C Eichman J P Bragdon J P Stambuli Synlett 2011 2011 1109
150 (a) Y Wakatsuki H Yamazaki Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1985 58 2715 (b) Y B Taarit Y
Diab B Elleuch M Kerkani M Chihaoui Chem Commun 1986 402 (c) H Nehl Chem
Ber 1994 127 2535 (d) C Wang X Li F Wu B Wan Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
7162
References
- 137 -
151 G M Sheldrick SHELX-97 Program for Crystal Structure Determination Universitaumlt
Goumlttingen (Germany) 1997
152 P Schlack G Keil Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1963 661 72
Appendix
- 138 -
7 APPENDIX
71 Abbreviations
Ada adamantanyl MHz Megahertz
Ar aryl min minute(s)
mmol millimole(ar)
MS mass spectrometry
B3LYP Beckersquos three-parameter hybrid
functional using the Lee Yang
and Parr correlation ldquofunctionalrdquo MW molecular weight
BINAP 22rsquo-(Ph2P)2-11rsquo-binaphthyl mz masscharge
br broad nacnac HC(MeC=N-Dip) 2minus
tBu tert-butyl Naph naphthyl
degC Celsius degree NBO natural bond orbital
ca about NHC N-Heterocyclic Carbene
calc calculated NICS nucleus independent chemical shift
CBD cyclobutadiene NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
cod COD 15-cyclooctadiene NPA natural population analysis
Cp cyclopentadienyl Ph phenyl
d doublet ppm parts per million
DCM dichloromethane iPr iso-propyl
DFT density functional theory q quartet
Dip 26-iPr2C6H3 R organic substituent
EI electron impact ionization RT room temperature
equiv equivalent(s) s singlet strong
ESI electrospray ionization sept septet
Et ethyl t triplet
eV electronvolt THF tetrahydrofuran
Fc ferrocendiyl Tip 246-iPr2C6H2
g gram(s) TMEDA tetramethylethyldiamine
h hour(s) TMS tetramethylsilane
HOMO highest occupied molecular orbital TS transition state
Hz Hertz TZVP triple-zeta valence polarization
IR infrared
K Kelvin
TZVDP TZVP two sets of polarization
functions aL PhC(
tBuN)2
minus UV-vis ultraviolet-visible
VE valence electron LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital vs very strong
M Metal VT variable temperature
m multiplet medium w weak
Me methyl WBI Wiberg Bond Index
Mes mesityl 246-Me3-C6H2 δ chemical shift
Appendix
- 139 -
GeN
N
GeN
Dip
Dip
DipCl
N
SnN
Dip
Dip
GeNN
SnN
Dip
DipDip
N
Dip
6 7
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation
1 2 3 4
5 8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22
Appendix
- 140 -
23 24 25 26
27 28 29
30 31 32 33
34 35 36
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph
Si
Cl
37 38 39 40
Appendix
- 141 -
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
41 42 43
44 45 46
47a 47b 48a 48b
Appendix
- 142 -
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details
Table 731 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 3 4 5
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C50 H88 Ge2 K2 N2 O4
100460
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
106989(7) pm
114137(7) pm
122625(8) pm
74158(6) deg
76395(6) deg
83400(5) deg
139807(16)
1
1193
1263
536
028 x 02 x 018
326 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-13lt=klt=13
-14lt=llt=14
12268
4910 [R(int) = 00358]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 094847
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4910 0 281
0940
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00638
R1 = 00538 wR2 = 00666
0456 and -0223
C41 H5 Ge N3
66650
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
91129(6) pm
113531(7) pm
190282(10) pm
100360(5) deg
101854(5) deg
98627(5) deg
185918(19)
2
1191
0855
716
039 x 012 x 007
297 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-13lt=klt=13
-22lt=llt=22
14570
6543 [R(int) = 00560]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
0943 and 0777
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6543 0 420
0785
R1 = 00399 wR2 = 00513
R1 = 00853 wR2 = 00566
0577 and -0317
C66 H102 Ge4 K2 N4 O2
135208
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
12370(3) pm
148433(14) pm
188725(19) pm
90059(8)deg
96311(14)deg
90082(13)deg
34442(10)
2
1304
1892
1416
030 x 025 x 015
292 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-15lt=klt=17
-14lt=llt=22
17371
6032 [R(int) = 00487]
995
Analytical
0807 and 0584
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6032 2 364
0911
R1 = 00424 wR2 = 00801
R1 = 00874 wR2 = 00885
0497 and -0457
Appendix
- 143 -
Table 732 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 6 8 12
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C46 H65 Ge2 N3
80519
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
44536(2) pm
98204(5) pm
218135(10) pm
90deg
116030(4)deg
90deg
85727(7)
8
1248
1436
3408
038 x 024 x 010
305 to 2500deg
-49lt=hlt=52
-10lt=klt=11
-24lt=llt=25
20162
7493 [R(int) = 00954]
992
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 074676
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7493 0 476
0917
R1 = 00559 wR2 = 00778
R1 = 01461 wR2 = 00966
0590 and -0578
C46 H65 Ge N3 Sn
85129
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
867780(10) pm
120514(4) pm
210797(6) pm
96333(2)deg
97393(2)deg
99141(2)deg
213908(10)
2
1322
1320
888
016 x 014 x 012
295 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-14lt=klt=14
-25lt=llt=25
16936
7496 [R(int) = 00251]
994
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099037
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7496 0 495
1001
R1 = 00309 wR2 = 00706
R1 = 00437 wR2 = 00733
1468 and -0424
C37 H48 N2
52077
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108485(5) pm
127284(7) pm
132348(4) pm
65748(4)deg
86290(3)deg
71699(5)deg
157759(12)
2
1096
0063
568
029 x 022 x 018
298 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13428
5541 [R(int) = 00203]
998
None
09888 and 09820
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5541 0 364
1029
R1 = 00439 wR2 = 00900
R1 = 00633 wR2 = 00963
0188 and -0193
Appendix
- 144 -
Table 733 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 14 16 17
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H46 Cl Ge N2
62680
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117621(2) pm
175495(4) pm
166051(3) pm
90deg
107053(2)deg
90deg
327691(11)
4
1270
1044
1324
040 x 032 x 022
342 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-19lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=18
16923
5742 [R(int) = 00250]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 082078
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5742 0 378
1044
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00709
R1 = 00496 wR2 = 00742
0736 and -0362
C37 H46 Ge N2
59135
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108388(6) pm
127885(7) pm
132778(4) pm
66971(4)deg
85749(3)deg
71833(5)deg
160695(13)
2
1222
0980
628
029 x 015 x 007
307 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13501
5636 [R(int) = 00366]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 092510
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5636 0 369
1031
R1 = 00489 wR2 = 01180
R1 = 00691 wR2 = 01242
0539 and -0501
C37 H49 Ge N3
60838
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117714(4) pm
174309(6) pm
166868(6) pm
90deg
106866(4)deg
90deg
32766(2)
4
1233
0964
1296
030 x 023 x 019
342 to 2500deg
-8lt=hlt=13
-10lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=16
12816
5749 [R(int) = 00325]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 095425
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5749 0 378
1060
R1 = 00464 wR2 = 01084
R1 = 00699 wR2 = 01133
1717 and -0738
Appendix
- 145 -
Table 734 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 18 20 22
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H48 Ge N2 O
60936
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117560(3) pm
174116(5) pm
166421(4) pm
90deg
106992(3)deg
90deg
325778(15)
4
1242
0971
1296
031 x 014 x 005
343 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-20lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=19
23624
5720 [R(int) = 00371]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 083390
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5720 0 379
1018
R1 = 00336 wR2 = 00752
R1 = 00516 wR2 = 00789
0521 and -0366
C28 H38 N2
40260
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
94924(4) pm
256583(9) pm
107465(5) pm
90deg
110403(5)deg
90deg
245320(18)
4
1090
0063
880
017 x 015 x 013
343 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=10
-30lt=klt=27
-12lt=llt=11
8561
4313 [R(int) = 00209]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099057
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4313 0 281
1041
R1 = 00476 wR2 = 01015
R1 = 00771 wR2 = 01083
0253 and -0194
C28 H37 Cl Ge N2 O
52564
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
89021(3) pm
107319(4) pm
151176(6) pm
75734(4)deg
74781(3)deg
75311(3)deg
132282(8)
2
1320
1281
552
020 x 012 x 008
354 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-12lt=klt=12
-15lt=llt=17
9246
4654 [R(int) = 00211]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086160
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4654 0 304
0946
R1 = 00274 wR2 = 00579
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00597
0394 and -0264
Appendix
- 146 -
Table 735 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 23 27 28
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C28 H36 Cl2 Ge N2
54408
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
279616(13) pm
113538(3) pm
177729(7) pm
90deg
109718(5)deg
90deg
53115(4)
8
1361
1374
2272
021 x 017 x 015
332 to 2500deg
-25lt=hlt=33
-7lt=klt=13
-21lt=llt=20
10951
4663 [R(int) = 00459]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091223
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4663 0 304
0856
R1 = 00372 wR2 = 00584
R1 = 00684 wR2 = 00620
0589 and -0533
C30 H48 Cl2 N4 O Si2
60780
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121593(5) pm
162045(6) pm
171248(7) pm
90deg
98177(4)deg
90deg
33399(2)
4
1209
0295
1304
030 x 015 x 005
335 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=13
-16lt=klt=19
-20lt=llt=20
23741
5865 [R(int) = 00491]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086688
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5865 172 490
1035
R1 = 00543 wR2 = 01080
R1 = 00905 wR2 = 01194
0310 and -0412
C30 H46 N4 O Si2
53489
150(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Fdd2
31188(2) pm
39120(3) pm
102620(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
125204(14)
16
1135
0141
4640
031 x 011 x 007
334 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=36
-46lt=klt=45
-12lt=llt=12
11517
4372 [R(int) = 00656]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 097469
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4372 1 346
0897
R1 = 00488 wR2 = 00604
R1 = 00754 wR2 = 00650
0328 and -0229
Appendix
- 147 -
Table 736 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 29 30 31
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C38 H58 N4 Ni O Si2
70177
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
98776(8) pm
129530(11) pm
155488(13) pm
81634(7)deg
83316(7)deg
82826(7)deg
19430(3)
2
1200
0594
756
020 x 009 x 007
330 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=11
-15lt=klt=13
-18lt=llt=18
14961
6828 [R(int) = 00414]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091998
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6828 0 474
0948
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00807
R1 = 00605 wR2 = 00853
0407 and -0240
C21 H41 N2 P Si3
43680
173(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Pbca
193556(7) pm
142399(4) pm
199777(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
55063(3)
8
1054
0239
1904
039 x 036 x 016
351 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=23
-16lt=klt=16
-23lt=llt=22
19912
4836 [R(int) = 00961]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09627 and 09125
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4836 18 287
0906
R1 = 00571 wR2 = 00889
R1 = 01270 wR2 = 01032
0316 and -0214
C44 H60 N4 P2 Si2
76308
173(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
23841(3) pm
101993(12) pm
19369(2) pm
90deg
108346(12)deg
90deg
44703(9)
4
1134
0184
1640
076 x 057 x 055
353 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=28
-12lt=klt=12
-20lt=llt=23
16197
3927 [R(int) = 00447]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09053 and 08725
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
3927 0 251
1034
R1 = 00618 wR2 = 01393
R1 = 00843 wR2 = 01489
0721 and -0649
Appendix
- 148 -
Table 737 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 33 36 40-endo
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C56 H98 Cl4 N6 Si6 Sn2
140312
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
105159(4) pm
127622(6) pm
269391(12) pm
90310(4)deg
90855(3)deg
102927(3)deg
35232(3)
2
1323
1000
1456
013 x 012 x 009
336 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-29lt=llt=32
25757
12396 [R(int) = 00546]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09154 and 08810
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
12396 536 816
2077
R1 = 01231 wR2 = 01906
R1 = 01495 wR2 = 01944
1510 and -4753
C91 H139 N8 O4 Pd Si4
162786
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
145970(8) pm
151441(15) pm
232982(16) pm
71358(8)deg
74666(5)deg
85365(6)deg
47063(6)
2
1149
0298
1750
019 x 013 x 011
327 to 2500deg
-17lt=hlt=17
-17lt=klt=18
-27lt=llt=27
41022
16531 [R(int) = 00735]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09679 and 09455
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
16531 284 1112
0908
R1 = 00558 wR2 = 01021
R1 = 01075 wR2 = 01128
0688 and -0448
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
10532(3) pm
20258(5) pm
18990(5) pm
90deg
10542(3)deg
90deg
39060(19)
4
1347
1927
1648
012 x 008 x 005
322 to 2500deg
-6lt=hlt=12
-22lt=klt=24
-22lt=llt=21
16887
6870 [R(int) = 01353]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 073478
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6870 213 498
1044
R1 = 00912 wR2 = 01786
R1 = 01680 wR2 = 02282
0570 and -1404
Appendix
- 149 -
Table 738 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 40-exo 41 42
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
165582(11) pm
127695(7) pm
198175(12) pm
90deg
107428(7)deg
90deg
39979(4)
4
1316
1883
1648
012 x 011 x 009
337 to 2499deg
-16lt=hlt=19
-15lt=klt=15
-23lt=llt=23
29049
7015 [R(int) = 00329]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 052405
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7015 0 436
1065
R1 = 00263 wR2 = 00574
R1 = 00318 wR2 = 00595
0357 and -0360
C45 H59 Co Fe N4 Si2
82692
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
119176(7) pm
160794(9) pm
220424(13) pm
90deg
94402(5)deg
90deg
42115(4)
4
1304
0831
1752
015 x 013 x 007
323 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=17
-16lt=llt=26
17786
7404 [R(int) = 01111]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 075122
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7404 0 490
1052
R1 = 00717 wR2 = 01045
R1 = 01208 wR2 = 01181
0467 and -0370
C45 H59 Co Fe Ge2 N4
91592
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121662(3) pm
160596(3) pm
220073(5) pm
90deg
93549(2)deg
90deg
429163(16)
4
1418
2134
1896
015 x 011 x 008
336 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=19
-26lt=llt=26
33743
7539 [R(int) = 00521]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 068509
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7539 0 521
1259
R1 = 00400 wR2 = 00965
R1 = 00536 wR2 = 01000
0376 and -0373
Appendix
- 150 -
Atomic coordinates of four unpublished compounds 20 22 23 and 33 are shown in
following tables
Table 739 Atomic coordinates (times10
4) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 20 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
N(1) 1159(1) 1176(1) 6836(1) 20(1)
C(1) 1706(2) 1650(1) 6995(1) 21(1)
N(2) -1293(2) 1547(1) 7057(1) 23(1)
C(2) 789(2) 2089(1) 7078(1) 20(1)
C(3) -626(2) 2021(1) 7158(1) 20(1)
C(4) 3331(2) 1741(1) 7112(2) 29(1)
C(5) 3920(2) 2283(1) 7590(2) 34(1)
C(6) 2795(2) 2681(1) 6772(2) 35(1)
C(7) 1375(2) 2643(1) 7102(2) 27(1)
C(8) -1522(2) 2482(1) 7295(2) 21(1)
C(9) -2759(2) 2643(1) 6227(2) 27(1)
C(10) -3571(2) 3077(1) 6331(2) 33(1)
C(11) -3169(2) 3358(1) 7498(2) 35(1)
C(12) -1948(2) 3199(1) 8573(2) 32(1)
C(13) -1133(2) 2765(1) 8467(2) 27(1)
C(14) -2537(2) 1417(1) 7503(2) 35(1)
C(15) -3250(3) 920(1) 6823(2) 61(1)
C(16) -1974(3) 1344(1) 9002(2) 65(1)
C(17) 2080(2) 741(1) 6834(2) 20(1)
C(18) 2353(2) 597(1) 5670(2) 23(1)
C(19) 3237(2) 160(1) 5724(2) 29(1)
C(20) 3821(2) -131(1) 6867(2) 32(1)
C(21) 3480(2) -1(1) 7977(2) 29(1)
C(22) 2598(2) 427(1) 7984(2) 23(1)
C(23) 2150(2) 562(1) 9174(2) 28(1)
C(24) 2101(2) 91(1) 10028(2) 39(1)
C(25) 3156(2) 987(1) 10029(2) 42(1)
C(26) 1602(2) 885(1) 4374(2) 29(1)
C(27) 2645(3) 974(1) 3586(2) 53(1)
C(28) 195(3) 588(1) 3539(2) 54(1)
Appendix
- 151 -
Table 7310 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 22 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 4751(1) 5279(1) 3913(1) 24(1)
Cl(1) 4863(1) 7474(1) 3443(1) 35(1)
O(1) 2591(1) 5468(1) 4187(1) 20(1)
N(1) 4469(2) 5098(1) 2623(1) 17(1)
C(1) 3006(2) 5278(2) 2582(1) 16(1)
N(2) 1482(2) 7765(2) 2375(1) 20(1)
C(2) 2432(2) 5062(2) 1801(1) 21(1)
C(3) 1144(2) 4228(2) 2174(2) 31(1)
C(4) -158(2) 4793(2) 2933(2) 30(1)
C(5) 534(2) 4844(2) 3741(1) 21(1)
C(6) 1810(2) 5684(2) 3440(1) 17(1)
C(7) 1063(2) 7152(2) 3205(1) 18(1)
C(8) 820(2) 9172(2) 2096(1) 26(1)
C(9) 397(3) 9344(2) 1159(2) 40(1)
C(10) 2058(3) 9950(2) 2035(2) 43(1)
C(11) -95(2) 7719(2) 3998(1) 18(1)
C(12) 434(2) 8108(2) 4652(1) 22(1)
C(13) -648(2) 8637(2) 5376(1) 27(1)
C(14) -2259(2) 8769(2) 5459(2) 30(1)
C(15) -2795(2) 8370(2) 4815(2) 30(1)
C(16) -1724(2) 7845(2) 4085(1) 24(1)
C(17) 5786(2) 4690(2) 1889(1) 19(1)
C(18) 6546(2) 3361(2) 1997(1) 22(1)
C(19) 7868(2) 3005(2) 1310(2) 28(1)
C(20) 8423(2) 3902(2) 552(2) 29(1)
C(21) 7656(2) 5209(2) 464(1) 26(1)
C(22) 6329(2) 5635(2) 1128(1) 21(1)
C(23) 5549(2) 7085(2) 991(2) 26(1)
C(24) 6701(3) 7932(2) 989(2) 41(1)
C(25) 4931(3) 7520(2) 84(2) 40(1)
C(26) 6001(2) 2315(2) 2820(2) 27(1)
C(27) 5775(3) 1139(2) 2495(2) 40(1)
C(28) 7175(3) 1863(2) 3471(2) 38(1)
Appendix
- 152 -
Table 7311 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 23 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 967(1) 7605(1) 1823(1) 18(1)
Cl(1) 1020(1) 9314(1) 2345(1) 29(1)
N(1) 1401(1) 6550(2) 2449(1) 19(1)
C(1) 1534(1) 5601(2) 2029(2) 16(1)
Cl(2) 198(1) 7116(1) 1640(1) 31(1)
N(2) 1101(1) 7630(2) 909(1) 15(1)
C(2) 1548(1) 5691(2) 1285(2) 15(1)
C(3) 1442(1) 6764(2) 777(2) 14(1)
C(4) 1615(1) 6867(2) 172(2) 19(1)
C(5) 1945(1) 5989(2) -42(2) 26(1)
C(6) 2098(1) 4966(2) 547(2) 22(1)
C(7) 1669(1) 4652(2) 844(2) 21(1)
C(8) 1625(1) 4444(2) 2470(2) 17(1)
C(9) 1229(1) 3875(2) 2611(2) 23(1)
C(10) 1291(1) 2785(2) 2983(2) 29(1)
C(11) 1764(2) 2263(3) 3232(2) 32(1)
C(12) 2169(1) 2832(3) 3121(2) 30(1)
C(13) 2101(1) 3920(2) 2737(2) 22(1)
C(14) 1621(1) 6630(2) 3327(2) 20(1)
C(15) 1219(1) 6848(3) 3699(2) 32(1)
C(16) 2052(1) 7524(2) 3583(2) 34(1)
C(17) 833(1) 8395(2) 248(2) 17(1)
C(18) 1019(1) 9542(2) 207(2) 19(1)
C(19) 745(1) 10248(3) -431(2) 29(1)
C(20) 315(1) 9844(3) -1011(2) 36(1)
C(21) 147(1) 8718(3) -973(2) 33(1)
C(22) 399(1) 7960(2) -350(2) 20(1)
C(23) 215(1) 6700(2) -377(2) 23(1)
C(24) 329(1) 6020(3) -1045(2) 34(1)
C(25) -341(1) 6612(3) -475(2) 31(1)
C(26) 1517(1) 10001(2) 789(2) 22(1)
C(27) 1914(1) 10083(3) 375(2) 32(1)
C(28) 1463(1) 11198(2) 1144(2) 36(1)
Appendix
- 153 -
Table 7312 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 33 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Sn(1) 4689(1) 4918(1) 3222(1) 24(1)
Sn(2) 5822(1) 5994(1) 1674(1) 30(1)
Cl(1) 4488(3) 6215(2) 3883(1) 38(1)
Cl(2) 3266(2) 3378(2) 3638(1) 39(1)
Cl(3) 7188(2) 7769(2) 1449(1) 43(1)
Cl(4) 6104(3) 5090(3) 888(1) 57(1)
Si(1) 6825(2) 4259(2) 3587(1) 17(1)
Si(2) 8610(3) 6420(2) 3531(1) 28(1)
Si(3) 9814(2) 4466(2) 3664(1) 26(1)
Si(4) 3648(2) 6680(2) 1375(1) 21(1)
Si(5) 1981(3) 4463(2) 1299(1) 30(1)
Si(6) 649(3) 6348(2) 1247(1) 30(1)
N(1) 6586(7) 2924(5) 3299(3) 20(2)
N(2) 6484(6) 3264(5) 4080(3) 16(2)
N(3) 8389(7) 5001(5) 3582(3) 23(2)
N(4) 3751(7) 7937(6) 1722(3) 22(2)
N(5) 3959(8) 7800(6) 936(3) 27(2)
N(6) 2102(7) 5865(6) 1329(3) 24(2)
C(1) 6258(8) 2470(7) 3742(4) 24(2)
C(2) 5630(8) 1296(7) 3832(3) 20(2)
C(3) 4328(9) 879(7) 3742(4) 30(2)
C(4) 3826(11) -209(8) 3826(4) 44(3)
C(5) 4613(12) -855(8) 3977(4) 47(3)
C(6) 5921(13) -450(9) 4064(4) 54(3)
C(7) 6446(10) 640(8) 3992(4) 36(3)
C(8) 6469(9) 2487(7) 2787(3) 22(2)
C(9) 7183(11) 3385(8) 2465(4) 43(3)
C(10) 5041(10) 2180(9) 2612(4) 44(3)
C(11) 7093(12) 1524(8) 2741(4) 49(3)
C(12) 6251(9) 3286(8) 4625(3) 26(2)
C(13) 4851(10) 2720(9) 4759(4) 48(3)
C(14) 7218(10) 2783(8) 4908(4) 39(3)
C(15) 6455(10) 4474(7) 4759(4) 31(2)
C(16) 7585(10) 6750(8) 3014(4) 43(3)
C(17) 8192(11) 7005(8) 4123(4) 44(3)
C(18) 10317(10) 7108(8) 3367(5) 55(4)
C(19) 10809(9) 4684(9) 3087(4) 39(3)
C(20) 9461(9) 3008(7) 3775(4) 30(2)
Appendix
- 154 -
C(21) 10726(10) 5062(9) 4232(4) 41(3)
C(22) 4144(9) 8514(7) 1315(3) 22(2)
C(23) 4603(10) 9700(7) 1286(3) 30(2)
C(24) 5918(10) 10173(8) 1332(4) 36(3)
C(25) 6315(12) 11289(9) 1292(4) 46(3)
C(26) 5453(14) 11926(9) 1203(4) 50(3)
C(27) 4158(14) 11457(9) 1158(4) 52(3)
C(28) 3726(12) 10336(8) 1194(4) 41(3)
C(29) 3829(9) 8261(7) 2260(3) 24(2)
C(30) 3041(13) 9101(10) 2358(4) 65(4)
C(31) 3223(10) 7251(8) 2537(4) 41(3)
C(32) 5223(10) 8649(10) 2438(4) 59(4)
C(33) 4252(10) 7910(8) 398(3) 30(2)
C(34) 3489(13) 8669(11) 158(4) 67(4)
C(35) 3812(13) 6813(9) 170(4) 60(4)
C(36) 5705(11) 8321(11) 315(4) 63(4)
C(37) 3040(11) 4003(8) 1778(4) 49(3)
C(38) 2431(11) 4059(8) 669(4) 44(3)
C(39) 310(10) 3713(8) 1447(5) 48(3)
C(40) -433(9) 5964(9) 1795(4) 43(3)
C(41) 921(10) 7835(9) 1209(4) 48(3)
C(42) -186(11) 5795(10) 650(4) 57(4)
C(43) -180(17) 209(14) 3445(7) 59(3)
C(44) -1099(17) -417(14) 3132(7) 58(3)
C(45) -949(16) -322(14) 2634(7) 58(2)
C(46) 75(15) 387(13) 2440(7) 58(2)
C(47) 979(17) 1008(14) 2750(6) 60(2)
C(48) 829(17) 908(15) 3251(7) 60(3)
C(49) 210(20) 473(17) 1887(7) 58(3)
C(43A) 798(17) 917(14) 2044(7) 58(3)
C(44A) 1381(17) 1418(14) 2465(7) 59(3)
C(45A) 931(16) 1088(14) 2929(7) 59(3)
C(46A) -134(15) 231(13) 2969(7) 58(2)
C(47A) -748(17) -263(14) 2547(6) 58(2)
C(48A) -289(17) 75(14) 2084(7) 58(2)
C(49A) -640(20) -111(17) 3469(8) 60(3)
C(50) 120(20) -463(18) -179(10) 106(6)
C(51) -640(30) -620(20) 236(10) 106(6)
C(52) -730(20) 250(20) 530(10) 107(6)
C(53) -70(30) 1260(20) 404(11) 109(6)
C(54) 680(20) 1409(19) -10(11) 107(6)
C(55) 780(30) 558(19) -303(11) 106(6)
C(56) 250(30) -1390(20) -499(12) 120(7)
Appendix
- 155 -
C(57) 575(16) 499(14) 4873(6) 52(3)
C(58) 807(18) -512(14) 4941(8) 53(3)
C(59) -138(17) -1326(14) 5128(7) 55(3)
C(60) -1333(18) -1140(15) 5253(8) 57(3)
C(61) -1572(16) -130(15) 5187(7) 56(3)
C(62) -620(17) 686(15) 5000(8) 53(3)
C(63) 1600(20) 1369(17) 4669(9) 59(5)
Appendix
- 156 -
74 Publications in this dissertation
1 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Stephan Enthaler and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167-6171 Angew Chem 2012 124 6271-6275
Bis(silylenyl)- and Bis(germylenyl)-Substituted Ferrocenes Synthesis Structure and Catalytic
Applications of Bidentate Silicon(II)-Cobalt Complex
2 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Elisabeth Irran and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691-3694 Angew Chem 2012 124 3751-3754
Synthesis and unexpected coordination of a silicon(II)-based SiCSi pincerlike arene to
palladium
3 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 6490-6494
Reactivity of N-Heterocyclic germylene toward ammonia and water
4 Shenglai Yao Yun Xiong Wenyuan Wang and Matthias Driess
Chem Eur J 2011 17 4890-4895
Synthesis structure and reactivity of a pyridine-stabilized germanone
5 Shigeyoshi Inoue Wenyuan Wang Carsten Praesang Matthew Asay Elisabeth Irran and
Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 2868ndash2871
An ylide-like phosphasilene and striking formation of a 4π-electron resonance-stabilized 24-
disila-13-diphosphacyclo- butadiene
6 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890ndash15892
An isolable bis-silylene oxide (ldquodisilylenoxanerdquo) and its metal coordination
7 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Chem Commun 2009 2661ndash2663
An unsymmetric substituted digermylene with a Ge(I)ndashGe(I) bond and synthesis of a
germylenendashstannylene with a Ge(I)ndashSn(I) bond
8 Wenyuan Wang Shenglai Yao Christoph van Wuellen and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640ndash9641
A cyclopentadienide analogue containing divalent germanium and a heavy cyclobutadiene-
like dianion with an unusual Ge4 Core
Appendix
- 157 -
75 Curriculum Vitae
Personal Data
Date and Place of Birth 17th
January 1976 in Nei Mongol China
Nationality Chinese
Education
1982-1987 Elementary School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1987-1993 High School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1993-1997 Department of Chemistry Inner Mongolia Normal University (China)
Bachelor Chemistry
071997 Bachelor of Chemistry education
2003-2007 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
Diplom Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
012008 Diplom of Science Degree
2008-2012 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
PhD Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
Herein I affirm that this dissertation was finished independently at the ldquoInstitut fuumlr
Chemierdquo at the ldquoTechnischen Universitaumlt Berlinrdquo under the guidance of
Prof Dr Matthias Driess where all references and additional aid sources have been
appropriately cited
Wenyuan Wang
Berlin Juli 2012
Table of contents
iii
6 REFERENCES 129
7 APPENDIX 138
71 Abbreviations 138
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation 139
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details 142
74 Publications in this dissertation 156
75 Curriculum Vitae 157
Introduction
- 1 -
1 INTRODUCTION
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds
Generally main-group elements higher than of the third period are classified as
ldquoheavy main-group elementsrdquo some of which show abnormal physical and chemical
properties For example Br(VII) is a stronger oxidant than Cl(VII) This different
behavior of high-valent main-group elements can be attributed to the relativistic
effect[1]
of electrons The contraction of all s-orbitals triggered by the relativistic effect
leads to a greater energy difference between s- and p-orbitals in higher period
elements which increases the difficulty of a sp-hybridation Moreover the energy
difference between s- and p-orbitals for elements in the d-district of the fourth period
and f-district of the sixth period vary unconventionally resulting in the so called
ldquosecondary periodicityrdquo of forth and sixth period elements Therefore ns2 electrons in
the valence shell of heavy main-group elements play an essential role for their
chemical properties[2]
During the organometallic research of main group elements a
series of novel compounds have been discovered and new synthetic methods as well
as theoretical insights in their chemistry have been developed and summarized[3]
In whole periodic table the difference of property in the group 14 elements (tetrels)
is maximal[4]
In comparison to carbon compounds of Si Ge Sn and Pb are very
different referring to the physical properties chemical behavior and structural features
The theory for carbon chemistry cannot be fit for the chemistry of heavy group 14
elements A typical example is the synthesis of compounds with a silicon-oxygen
double bond (Si=O silanone) Beginning last century the english chemist Frederic
Stanley Kipping manufactured many silicon-carbon compounds and discovered
thereby resin-like products which he called ldquosilicone of ketonesrdquo Kipping coined the
word ldquosiliconerdquo in 1901 to describe polydiphenylsiloxane by analogy of its formula
(Ph2SiO) with the formula of the ketone benzophenone (Ph2CO) Kipping was well
Introduction
- 2 -
aware that polydiphenylsiloxane is polymeric whereas benzophenone is monomeric
and noted that ldquosiliconerdquo and Ph2CO had very different chemistry[5]
The german chemist Richard Muumlller and the american chemist Eugene G Rochow
found almost at the same time a possibility for the industrial production of
dimethyldichlorosilane (Me2SiCl2) the most important precursor for the production of
the silicone in the 1940s[6]
The procedure today is called Muumlller Rochow synthesis
(Scheme 11) From that many researchers synthesized various silicone products but
crystallographically characterized complexes with a donor-stabilized Si=O double
bond were published at the beginning of this century by our group These are the
silanoic ester I1[7]
the carbene-coordinated silanone I2[8]
and the ketone-coordinated
silanone I3[9]
(Scheme 12) The Si=O double bond distance (1532 pm) in I3 is shorter
than the ones in I1 (1579 pm) and I2 (1541 pm) and represents the shortest Si-O
distance in all molecular Si=O compounds hitherto reported[10]
Scheme 11 Muumlller Rochow silicone synthesis
Scheme 12 Isolable donor-stabilized silanoic ester I1 and silanone I2 and I3
The hundred-year story of silicones to monomeric species bearing Si=O double
bonds shows that the silicon atom prefers σ-bonds over double bond (σ- and π-bonds)
That means the classical π-bond is not of first choice for heavy main-group
elements[11]
In other words not only E=X (E = heavy main-group elements X = C N
O) but also E=Ersquo (Ersquo = heavy main-group elements) systems are difficult to stabilize
Introduction
- 3 -
because they easily form σ-bonded corresponding polymers Consequently it is very
challenging to study compounds of heavy main group elements in their low oxidation
state Especially the study of divalent Si Ge and Sn compounds with lone pair
electrons (metallylenes) is one of the most attractive research fields in contemporary
organometallic chemistry[3 12]
In the past thirty years numerous thermally stable unsaturated Si Ge Sn
compounds were isolated which show extremely impressive chemistry[12d 13]
The
difference between C-C and Si-Si double bond is now well-understood[3a]
Very
different reaction mechanisms for the formation of such doubly-bonded carbon and
silicon compounds were throughly discussed The classical C-C double bond can
readily be explained by the valence bond theory and hybridization[14]
The bonding
state in those heavier alkene analogues can be explained by two sets of ns2rarrp
0 donor-
acceptor interactions between two metallylene monomers (Scheme 1 3)[3 15]
Similarly heavier alkyne analogues of main-group elements present also two dative
bonds of ns2rarrp
0 donor-acceptor interactions plus a normal σ-bond between two pz
orbitals[3 12d]
(Scheme 13) But the sp-hybridization for heavy main-group elements
is not realized in their low-valent compounds because sp-hybridization does not lead
to strengthing of terminal σ-bonds to the ligands R
Scheme 13 Nonclassical multiple bond features (E = heavy main-group elements)
Introduction
- 4 -
Until the end of the last century the synthesis of heavier alkyne analogues was an
unsolved problem because of the lack of suitable large substituent At the first the
isolation of a diplumbylene I4[16]
ArrsquoPb-PbArrsquo (Arrsquo = 26-(Tip)2C6H3 Tip = 246-
iPr3C6H2) was reported by Power in 2000 (Scheme 14) As is evident from the
structural parameters of ArPb-PbAr the triple bond character has vanished completely
The Pb-Pb distance (319 pm) in ArPb-PbAr is longer even than that of a normal Pb-
Pb single bond (308 pm) and the CAr-Pb bond vectors are perpendicular to the Pb-Pb
axes (943deg) These two facts illustrated a complete lack of hybridization of lead
atoms and almost exclusive use of p-orbitals in σ-bonds[17]
In 2002 Power reported
the distannyne ArSnequivSnAr I5[18]
(Ar = 26-Dip2C6H3 Dip = 26-iPr2C6H3) containing
a SnequivSn bond length of 2668 pm shorter compared to Sn-Sn single bonds[19]
and
with multiple bond character A trans bent configuration was also observed in I5 but
the Sn-Sn-C angle with 1252deg is far from a perpendicular situation as in I4 In the
same year Power described the first digermyne I6[20]
ArGeequivGeAr In this case the
Ge-Ge bond length of 2285 pm was found to be considerably shorter than normal Ge-
Ge single[13f]
(244 pm) and Ge-Ge double bonds (221-246 pm) indicated multiple
bonding character[21]
The trans-bending angle of Ge-Ge-C (1288deg) in digermyne I6
is slightly larger than that in distannyne I5
Scheme 14 The first isolated formal alkyne analogues of group 14
Introduction
- 5 -
With the appearance of the first structurally characterized disilyne I7[22]
reported by
Sekiguchi the series of heavier alkyne congeners was completed in 2004 The SiequivSi
bond length with 2062 pm was considerably shorter than that of typical Si-Si single
bonds (235 pm) and somewhat shorter than that of typical Si-Si double bonds[13b]
(216 pm) The molecular structure of compound I7 with a Si-Si-Silyl angle of 1374deg
reveals a heavily trans-bent configuration indicating the presence of a nonclassical
triple bond The theoretical calculation approved the trans bent structure and a bond
order of three
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements
Isolable carbenes and heavier carbene analogues (metallylenes silylenes R2Si
germylenes R2Ge stannylenes R2Sn plumbylenes R2Pb) can be defined as
stabilized divalent monomers of group 14 elements which can impossibly dimerize or
polymerize continuously due to the thermodynamic andor kinetic stabilization As
already mentioned above in contrast to carbon heavier group 14 elements have a low
tendency of sp-hybridization[11]
Accordingly consists of ns2 valence electrons as a
lone pair and use usually three p-valence-orbitals for the formation of their divalent
species[12c]
The ground state of R2E (E = Si Ge Sn Pb) is thereby a singlet while
the ground state of R2C is a triplet (Scheme 15) because two nonbonding electrons
locate in sp-hybrid orbitals[23]
In order to obtain at ambient temperature isolable metallylenes there are today two
particularly effective stabilization methods First of all these unsaturated compounds
can be thermodynamically stabilized by donor electron delocalization to empty p-
orbital as in the case of silylene I8[24]
and silyliumylidene cation I9[25]
(Scheme 16)
In addition the coordination of ns2 electrons to the empty p-orbital of the neighbor
molecule can be kinetically prevented by bulky substituents which was shown by the
Introduction
- 6 -
successful synthesis of the dialkyl silylene I10[26]
that is stabilized only by the steric
hindrance of four large silyl groups and C-SirarrSi hyperconjugation
Scheme 15 Ground states of triplet-carbene and singlet-metallylenes
Scheme 16 Stabilization of silylenes by π-electron delocalization andor steric
hindrance I8 I9 and hyperconjugation I10
The synthesis of heavier carbene analogues depends on suitable starting materials
with oxidation state II Practically in the case of tin and lead the dihalides SnCl2 and
PdCl2 are stable and suitable as starting materials for isolable SnII and Pb
II
organometallic compounds Many germylenes were synthesized employing the known
germanium dichloride complex GeCl2middotdioxane which is easily available[27]
The
carbene-stabilized SiIICl2
[28] (NHCrarrSiCl2 NHC = (HC-NDip)2C
[29]) was reported
recently by Roesky However it is not a trouble-free starting material for silicon(II)
chemistry due to the difficult removing of by-products derivated by the bulky carbene
(NHC) Otherwise divalent compounds of GeII Sn
II and Pb
II are more stable than the
corresponding SiII analogues Therefore the metallylene synthetic chemistry faces the
main difficulty in the synthesis and isolation of functionalized silylene derivates
Accustomed synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes was summarized in
Scheme 17 Their feasibility was also proved by the preparation of new silylenes in
this work
Introduction
- 7 -
Scheme 17 Synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes
Usually N-heteroleptic silylenes are accessible from SiIV
-precursors to form SiII-
species using reductants such as Na K or their alloy KC8 lithium or magnesium
naphthalenide etc A usually silylenes[24 26 30]
like I13 with a five- or six-membered
ring system and some three-coordinated silylenes[31]
like I14 are accessible through
the reductive dehalogenation reactions presented in case A Suitable five-coordinated
SiIV
sources I15 could be treated with a non oxygenated strong base resulting in the
corresponding three-coordinated silylenes[32]
I16 The two-coordinated silylene I13
prepared through an acid-base reaction from its four-coordinated precursor was not
observed so far In case C silylenes I18 could be isolated by salt metathesis reaction
during that the halogen atom was substituted by a desired Rsub[33]
With these new
synthetic methods the generation of many imaginable SiII molecules is possible today
Especially more complicated metallylenes for example interconnected or spacer-
separated bis-metallylenes (see next page) can be obtained in good yield Thus more
reactivity will be found in their subsequent reactions
Introduction
- 8 -
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores
The discussion of diplumbylene I4 indicates the strong tendency to transformate a
bis-metallylene instead of triple bond form in the case of lead Scheme 18 shows the
resonance structures of triply bonded I19 and bis-metallylene I20 together with the
donor ligand coordinated interconnected bis-metallylene structure I21 Hitherto the
chemical research in this area made clear that silicon and germanium prefer the type
of structure I19 while the species of lead is more favorable in the state I20[12d]
Corresponding tin species have vacillant structural feature between I19 and I20
depending on the steric demand of R and the packing force in crystals[34]
The donor
ligand coordination with all heavier alkyne analogues leads to the donor-stabilized
bis-metallylene form I21 which possesses an E-E single σ-bond and two ns2 lone
pairs one at each of the E centers[35]
Scheme 18 Resonance structures of nonclassical triple bond and bis-metallylene
According to the bonding state all known bis-metallylenes can be discriminated in
two different types i) ldquointerconnected bis-metallylenesrdquo in which two E atoms are
directly connected by a chemical bond and ii) ldquospacer-separated bis-metallylenesrdquo in
which two EII atoms are separated by bridged atoms or by a broad spacer without an
E-E bond in the molecules[33a 36]
The isolation of bis-metallylenes of heavier group
14 elements has been a major synthetic challenge owing to their tendency to
polymerize Herein a review of this kind of compounds which appeared almost
suddenly just in the last two decades is given
Introduction
- 9 -
Interconnected bis-metallylenes
Interconnected bis-silylenes are shown in Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylene
examples were firstly reported by Robinson in 2008[35]
which are a carbene-stabilized
bis-silylene I22 with a SiI-Si
I bond (2393 pm) and a carbene-stabilized bis-silylene
I23 with a Si0=Si
0 double bond (2229 pm) One year later the Roesky group prepared
an interconnected bis-silylene I24[37]
stabilized by amidinato ligands with a SiI-Si
I
single bond (2413 pm) Compound I24 exhibits a gauche-bent geometry Another
amidinato donor-stabilized bis-silylene I25[38]
which was synthesized in last year by
Jones et al possesses trans-bent structure not the gauche-bent form The SiI-Si
I
distance (2489 pm) in I25 is longer than those in I22 and I24 because of the more
sterically hindered amidinato ligands In the same year the synthesis of the first
phosphine-stabilized bis-silylene I26[39]
could be achieved and fully characterized In
this molecule the Si-Si bond with the bond length of 2331 pm is visibly shorter than
those in related molecules Baceiredo et al described that the Si-Si fragment in I26
presents a certain multiple-bond character
Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylenes
Interconnected bis-germylenes are shown in Scheme 110 In 2006 Jones and
coworkers reported the first successful isolation of two stable bis-germylenes I27 and
Introduction
- 10 -
I28[40]
which are stabilized by an amidinate and a guanidinate ligand respectively
Their Ge-Ge distances (2672 and 2638 pm) show normal single bond character Two
years later Roesky prepared the bis-germylenes I29[41]
which exhibits a gauche-bent
geometry Since I29 is stabilized by a less bulky amidinate ligands the Ge-Ge bond
with the length of 2569 pm is shorter than those of examples before A different β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized bis-germylene I30[42]
was presented by the work group
of Leung in which the Ge-Ge bond length (2602 pm) is somewhere in between The
reduction of NHCrarrGeCl2 (NHC see Scheme 110) employing magnesium(I)
reagents[43]
furnished the carbene-stabilized bis-germylene I31[44]
with a Ge0=Ge
0
double bond (2349 pm) which is the homologous compound of I23 Theoretical
analyses of I31 suggest a singlet germanium(0) dimer (Ge=Ge) datively coordinated
by two NHC ligands In the last year Jones again reported a bis-germylene I32[38]
which is structurally comparable with I27 and I28 But the Ge-Ge distance in I32 is
similar with that of I30
Scheme 110 Interconnected bis-germylenes
Interconnected bis-stannylenes are shown in Scheme 111 Very interestingly the
introduction of SiMe3 instead of H at the para-position of the aryl ring in distannyne
I5 induced the first bis-stannylene I33[34]
without alteration of the steric crowding
near the tin center The small Sn-Sn-C angle (993deg) and the long Sn-Sn distance
(3066 pm) in I33 indicate two stannylene moieties connected with a single bond and
Introduction
- 11 -
without the sp-hybridization In the similar work of Power et al in 2010 the
introduction of GeMe3 substituents of aryl rings at the para-position resulted also in
single bonded bis-stannylene I34[45]
with Sn-Sn distances of 3077 pm and ldquosharprdquo
Sn-Sn-C bending angles of 978deg With the bis-stannylene I35[46]
Jambor showed that
without the use of bulky substituents such as 26-disubstituted aryl groups a bis-
stannylene can be stabilized by intramolecular NrarrSn interactions The less bulky
aryls (aryl = 26-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3) in I35 led to the shorter Sn-Sn single bond (2971
pm) and a trans-bent angle of 943deg as in the diplumbylene I4 The first amidinato
coordinated bis-stannylene I36[38]
with a Sn-Sn single bond was reported by Jones et
al last year Its structural features are highly similar to the germanium homologue
compound I32
Scheme 111 Interconnected bis-stannylenes
Spacer-separated bis-metallylenes and species containing several EII cores
Lappert and Veith reported on the isolation of divalent germanium and tin
compounds very early[47]
Many of these from the 1970s and 1980s that were
described without X-ray characterization will not be discussed here The spacer-
separated bis-germylene I37[48]
and bis-stannylene I38[48]
(Scheme 112) appeared
first of all of this compound class in 1988 The work group of Veith introduced a facile
Introduction
- 12 -
synthetic method by which tetralithium amide reacted with two equivalents of
GeCl2middotdioxane or SnCl2 to give the corresponding products in over 60 yield In 1990
two interesting germylenes I39[49]
and I41[50]
were reported by Lappert and Power In
comparison to the isolable isonitrile (R-N+equivC
minus) until now it was not possible to
stabilize its homologous derivates of the heavier group 14 elements Compounds I39
and I41 can be considered as the dimer (I39) and trimer (I41) formed after
oligomerization of the unstable germaisonitrile analogue (R-N+equivGe
minus) Nevertheless
compounds with two germylene moieties at the time could be seen as impressive
achievements in the divalent germanium chemistry Another dimer of germaisonitrile
bis-germylene I40[51]
was reported by Roesky in 1997 After this the first stable
dimeric silaisonitrile I42[52]
generated through the reduction of carbene stabilized
dichlorosilaimine (NHCrarrSi(Cl2)=NAr Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) with KC8 was presented
by the work group of Roesky in 2011 The lengthy synthetic protocol bulky protecting
groups and a low yield (21) of I42 indicate a more difficult synthetic chemistry
necessary for the synthesis of the latter silicon compound However a trimer (tris-
silylene) of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) the silicon analogue of I41 is now just a dream of
synthetic chemists
In 1991 two bis-stannylenes (micro-chlorotin(II) amides (micro-Cl-Sn-NR2)2) I43 (NR2 =
N(CMe2)2(CH2)3) and I44 (R = SiMe3) in which two stannylene moieties are bridged
by two chlorine atoms were synthesized by Lappert et al[53]
Surprisingly X-ray
analyses of the two crystals show that I43 is the cis-isomer but I44 has the trans-
configuration In contrast a new bis-stannylene (ClSn-micro-N(Naph)SiMe3)2 I45[54]
was
characterized with two bridged nitrogen atoms by the same work group The Sn-N
bonds of 2438 pm in I45 are much longer than the terminal Sn-N bonds of 2069 pm
in I44 The Sn-N-Sn-N ring in I45 is slightly puckered and bears trans-Cl atoms
Instead of halogen atoms in bis-germylene I46[55]
two terminal N atoms of the azide
groups bridge two germylene parts forming a planar four-membered Ge2N2 ring
Otherwise the germylene centers of I46 are tetracoordinated due to two additional
OrarrGe dative bonds The N-bridged three-core germylenes I47 and stannylenes I48
Introduction
- 13 -
were prepared by Veith in 1991[56]
For four of six molecules X-ray crystal structure
determinations have been carried out which reveal the molecules to be built of a
diamond-lattice-like skeleton The top N atom coordinates to all three germylene
(stannylene) parts and another N atoms bridge with the neighboring two germylene
(stannylene) parts The chair-form six-membered E3N3 ring contains three N-H bonds
and traps one halogen atom (Cl Br I) with the three hydrogen atoms
Scheme 112 Spacer-separated metallylenes I37-I48
The by 14-diamine molecules separated bis-stannylenes I50 and I51 were prepared
from the chlorostannylene dimer I44 and the corresponding dilithium diamide by
Lappert and co-workers in 1994 (Scheme 113)[57]
Bis-germylene I49 was similarly
prepared by the reaction of the GeII homologous derivate ClGeN(SiMe3)2 of I44 with
dilithium diaminobenzene and marked a new development at that time In 1997
Lappert et al reported a new 13-diamine bridged bis-stannylene I52 and a stannylene
I53 with the three SnII cores employing dilithium meta-diamide
[58] The synthesis of
I52 is similar to I50 while I53 was isolated by treatment of the substituted
Introduction
- 14 -
diaminobenzene with Sn(N(SiMe3)2)2 in a ratio of 23 Evidently the formation of I53
involves unexpected C-H activations of the 2-position of 13-diaminobenzene and
eliminations of amine HN(SiMe3)2 The 32 reaction of Sn(NMe2)2 with sterically
bulky aromatic amines (DipNH2 or MesNH2) in toluene can be controlled giving the
heteroleptic stannylenes I54 and I55[59]
in which sterically less bulky NMe2 groups
serve as bridges and one SnII center between two bulky R groups remains its two-
coordination The isolation of the first GeII and Sn
II amide dimers I56 and I57
bridged by the NH2 groups was presented in 2005[60]
They were synthesized by the
reaction of bulky low-valent organo GeII and Sn
II halides (ArE
IICl E = Ge Sn Ar see
Scheme 113) with dry ammonia The Ge2N2 or Sn2N2 cores in I56 and I57 are planar
with rhombohedral shapes and with acute angles near 80deg at Ge or Sn and wider
angles near 100deg at N
Wright 1997
I54 R = Mes I55 R = Dip
I52 Lappert 1997
SnNMe2
Sn
Me2N
NR
NR
NN
SiMe3
E
(Me3Si)2N
E
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
N
N
SiMe3
Sn
(Me3Si)2N
Sn
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
Lappert 1994
I49 E = Ge I50 E = Sn I51 Lappert 1994
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
I53 Lappert 1997
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
Sn
Sn
Power 2005
I56 E = Ge R = Dip
I57 E = Sn R = Tip
R
RE
NH2
E
H2N
R
R
Scheme 113 Spacer-separated metallylenes I49-I57
The discovery of the first spacer-separated bis-silylene I58 (Scheme 114) was
made by Lappert et al in 2005[61]
It was synthesized by reductive dehalogenation of
the bis-dichlorosilane precursor with KC8 With the bis-functionality of I58
eventually a macrocycle metal-complex could be formed but the rigid backbone does
not allow a chelating coordination to a single core In addition Power tried oxidative
Introduction
- 15 -
addition reactions of his Sn and Ge alkyne analogues (I5 and I6 Scheme 114) with
trimethyl silyl azide (Me3SiN3) and adamantanyl azide (Ada-N3) giving the spacer (N-
SiMe3 or N-Ada) separated bis-stannylenes I59[62]
and bis-germylene I60[63]
and with
azobenzene (PhN=NPh) giving the spacer (PhNNPh) separated bis-germylene I61[62]
and bis-stannylene I62[62]
respectively The similar reaction of bis-germylene I29
with azobenzene furnished also the addition product the spacer bridged bis-
germylene I63[64]
with simultaneous cleavage of the Ge-Ge single bond as observed
by Roesky in 2010 At the same time So et al activated the Si-Si single bond of bis-
silylene I24 with phenyl acetylene resulting in the ethylene bridged bis-silylene I64[65]
Many spacer separated bis-germylenes and bis-stannylenes[66]
(I65-I74) were
successfully designed and isolated by Hahn et al for the use as promising chelating
ligands in coordination reactions A few transition-metal complexes of them were
prepared by his research group too (see p 18)
Scheme 114 Spacer-separated metallylenes I58-I74
In 2011 after the synthesis of the first oxygen bridged bis-silylene[32a]
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2
minus) in the course of this PhD work other four analogous were reported
Introduction
- 16 -
which are oxygen bridged bis-germylenes I75[67]
I77[68]
bis-stannylene I78[68]
and
sulfur bridged bis-germylene I76[67]
(Scheme 115) Bis-germylene oxide I75 and
sulfide I76 were synthesized in the work group of So et al by the dehalogenation of
LGeCl (L = amidinate in I75) with KC8 and then the oxidation with trimethylamine
N-oxide (Me3NO) or with elemental sulfur Otherwise Powerrsquos new compounds I77
and I78 were accessible by oxidative addition of alkyne analogues I5 and I6 using the
stoichiometric oxygen transfer reagent pyridine N-oxide (C5H5NO) In the last two
decades several cubanes of attractive tetra-metallylenes with GeII Sn
II Pb
II like I79
were presented[69]
(Scheme 116) Because they are somewhat far from discussed
metallylenes in structural features and synthetic approaches they are not discussed
and shown in detail here The synthesis of the still unknown SiII analogue I80 a
tetramer of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) remains as a fascinating challenge
Scheme 115 New bis-metallylenes bridged by a single atom
Scheme 116 Cubane-like tetra-metallylenes of heavier group 14 elements
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands
The interaction between the central atom and the donor in transition-metal
complexes depends on their electron configuration There are two- and three-
coordinated metallylenes in which the empty np-orbitals are stabilized by
Introduction
- 17 -
intramolecular electron delocalization or by the third donor-ligand donation
respectively Therefore if two types of metallylenes serve as donor-ligands for
transition-metals the interaction of these p-orbitals with the corresponding metal d-
orbitals is essentially different For example two silylenerarrM complexes are shown
in Scheme 117 Complex I81 shows clearly σ-donorπ-acceptor interaction[70]
while
the Fe atom in complex I82[71]
contains only a σ-donor bond from the silylene subunit
In this sense three-coordinate metallylenes as σ-donor ligands are more similar to
isoelectronic triorganophosphine ligands[33a b]
in I83 (Scheme 117) In Table 11 the
difference of three-coordinate silylenes and triorganophosphines are compared and
shown in detail
Scheme 117 The σ-donorπ-acceptor or only σ-donor coordination
Table 11 Comparison of three-coordinate silylenes and phosphines
three-Coordinate silylenes Phosphines (PR3)[72]
Synthesis difficult synthetic approaches well-established synthetic procedures
Embellishment only few scaffolds are known numerous structural transformations
and various substituents of R
Stability air and moisture sensitive normally stable in air
Property easily oxidative addition
much stronger σ-donor ligand
multivariate chemical behavior
seldom oxidative addition
strong σ-donor ligand
predictable chemical behavior
Complex only few transition-metal complexes complexes with numerous metals
State of
Development
underdeveloped chemistry fully established
Introduction
- 18 -
In coordination chemistry the spacer separated bis-metallylenes are at the same
time bidentate chelating ligands despite almost all of them were not or could not be
used as chelating ligands Until 2008 only a few chelated transition-metal complexes
coordinated by isolable spacer separated bis-metallylenes were reported They are the
bis-germylene I65 coordinated Mo(CO)4 complex I65-Mo[66b]
and bis-stannylenes
I73 I74 coordinated Ni0 complexes
[66c] I73-Ni I74-Ni (Scheme 118) reported by
Hahn et al Another bis-germylene complex I29-Fe[64]
with two Fe cores presented
by Roesky in 2010 does not comprise chelating coordination at all The reason for the
lack of representative bis-metallylenes in coordination chemistry is that not only the
formation and isolation of such complexes are very difficult but also the design and
synthesis of bis-metallylenes themself are sometimes infeasible Additionally the air-
and water-sensitivity of these compounds causes many unexpected side-reactions In
general metallylene transition-metal complexes are still limited in using metallylenes
containing single EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn)
Scheme 118 Known complexes of spacer-separated bis-germylenes and stannylenes
The successful usage of bidentate phosphanes in many catalytic transformations
originates from their convenient electronic properties and the variable steric
protection Among those chelating bis-phosphane I84[73]
(BINAP Scheme 119) with
Introduction
- 19 -
backbone chirality can lead to excellent enantioselectivity compared to monodentate
phosphines With ferrocendiyl bridged ligands I85 bimetallic complexes are easily
prepared[74]
Furthermore bis-phosphane ligands like I86 are superior bridges for
heterodinuclear complexes in catalytic hydrogenation[75]
Pincer arenes consisting of
a central aromatic backbone linked to two phosphane parts by different spacers are
particularly attractive because of their feasible structural tuning with many choices of
donor groups[72 76]
Recently the chemistry of pincer-ligated transition-metal
complexes underwent rapid developments and has been used for several intriguing
chemical transformations[72b 77]
The coordination chemistry of the most common
pincer ligands such as NCN- PCP- and SCS-type ligands toward transition-metals in
I87 (Scheme 119) was explored extensively[72b 77]
Pincer arenes with stronger σ-
donor sites E than those provided by group 15 and 16 atoms are very attractive for the
synthesis of more electron-rich transition-metal complexes for activation of small
molecules On the other hand transition-metal complexes with ligands like I84-I87
containing EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn) were scarce before 2009
Scheme 119 Bidentate phosphanes for transition-metal complexes
The challenge of spacer-separated bis-metallylenes as novel bidentate σ-donor
ligands for transition-metal complexes are intriguing because of their unique structure
and their coordination ability Therefore transition-metal complexes with chelating
Introduction
- 20 -
bis-metallylenes which were not throughly uncovered[66b c 78]
have received more
and more attention To date the new development of bis-metallylene synthesis
enables the isolation of their transition-metal complexes containing EII-based
functional groups as chelating ligands These complexes may provide access to their
potential application in which they can play a key role as intermediates in transition-
metal catalyzed transformations[70c 79]
Motivation
- 21 -
2 MOTIVATION
As pointed out in the introduction the metallylene synthetic chemistry is a fast
developing field with a great potential to find novel metallylenes with new
functionalities which would be the basis for the development of new kinds of
transition-metal complexes I am particularly interested in the synthesis of new types
of compounds containing divalent group 14 elements and to study their coordination
properties towards transition-metals New metallylenes could serve as very strong σ-
donor ligands for the generation of transition-metal complexes with unusual high
electron density at the metal site which could possess unique chemical properties
The three reports of transition-metal complexes[66b c]
containing bidentate bis-
germylene (stannylene) ligands were discussed in the ldquoIntroductionrdquo of this work
This potential of bis-metallylenes used as chelating ligands in coordination chemistry
prompted me to investigate new transition-metal complexes along with the
development of a new low-valent Si Ge and Sn chemistry
In this work three main points will be addressed i) the design and synthesis of new
ligand stabilized heavier carbene analogous (metallylenes) and interconnected bis-
metallylenes containing low-valent Si Ge Sn ii) the exploration of synthetic
approaches towards different spacer separated (bridged) bis-metallylenes iii) the
investigation of the properties and coordination abilities of new metallylenes (bis-
metallylenes) to transition-metals
The β-diketiminato and amidinato scaffolds I and II were chosen for the
stabilization of the reactive divalent group 14 units (Scheme 21) The known
metallylene halogenide compounds[31a 32b 80]
III and IV were used as the direct
precursors for the preparation of novel mono- and bis-metallylene derivates
Motivation
- 22 -
Scheme 21 Synthesis of new metallylene derivates from precursors
Scheme 22 Coordination of new spacer-separated bis-metallylene to transition-metals
Using isolated products as precursors complexes with different electronic
configurations and activities can be obtained and further modified through
coordination to transition-metals and varying substituents as ligands (Scheme 22)
This development may provide new divalent group 14 element-based functional
ligands in coordination chemistry towards transition-metals As spacer units for the
bis-metallylenes should serve 13-functionalized arene ferrocene and chalcogen
elements (O S Se) The promising application of new metallylene-metal complexes
will be investigated as the precatalyst in organic reactions
Results and Discussion
- 23 -
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates
In this PhD work the abbreviation of nacnacmacr is used only for the Dip-substituted β-
diketiminato ligand[81]
(CH[CMe(NDip)]2macr Dip = 26-iPrC6H3) The synthesis of β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized germanium complexes (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
and
(nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
were reported through the reaction of GeCl2sdotdioxane or GeCl4
with the corresponding Li(nacnac) reagent These compounds can be obtained in high
yield after recrystallization and were used as starting materials for new low-valent
germanium derivates
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Treatment of β-diketiminato germylene chloride 1 with excess of elemental
potassium at ambient temperature in THF yielded the first cyclogermylidenide
derivative 3[83]
which was isolated by fractional crystallization from diethylether in
the form of its potassium salt in 33 yield as pale yellow crystals Moreover the
reduction of 1 led also to the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-
Dip which was isolated by fractional crystallization from hexane solution as yellow
crystals in 31 yield (Scheme 31) Both 3 and 4 have been characterized by NMR
spectroscopy (1H
13C) EI-mass spectrometry (only for 3) and correct elemental
analyses
Scheme 31 Synthesis of the germylenide potassium salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Results and Discussion
- 24 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3 displays two sets of doublets for the Dip-
methyl groups in the range from 108 to 112 ppm Two additional singlets at 184 and
262 ppm were assigned to methyl groups of the five-membered ring Resonances for
the CH of iso-propyl appears at 298 ppm as septets The resonance of the β-H proton
at the GeNC3 ring appears at δ = 618 ppm One set of resonances for aromatic
protons of Dip-groups appears in the range of 691-698 ppm In addition the
diethylether molecule was observed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy The molar ratio of
ether was determined by integration of the appropriate resonance signals in the 1H-
NMR spectrum of 3 This amounts to 22mol and the determined composition fits
well with the elemental analytical data
Complex 3 is an Et2O coordinated potassium germylene anion salt according to the
1H- and
13C-NMR spectra Its structure has been established by a single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 31 left) It reveals a dimeric half-sandwich complex
interconnected via intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds In the structure each half-
sandwich moiety consists of a K(OEt2)2 cation η5-coordinated to the anionic five-
membered planar GeNC3 ring The K1-Ge1 distance of 3449(1) pm is shorter than
the intermolecular K1-Ge1rsquo distance of 3573(1) pm It is noteworthy such shorter K-
Ge distances have been observed in a related dipotassium (18-crown-6)
tetraphenylgermol dianion (330 335 pm)[84]
as well as in a (18-crown-6)-solvated
potassium silylgermanides (342 pm) with a tetravalent germanium atom[85]
Accordingly the K-C(ring) distances in 3 (3092(2)-3330(2) pm) are also longer than
those observed in the aforementioned dipotassium germol dianion (288-317 pm) The
Ge1-N1 distance of 1944(2) pm are shorter than those Ge-N distances in 1[80]
but
longer than that corresponding values in a N-heterocyclic 6π aromatic
germyliumylidene cation[86]
(189 pm) and the heterofulvene-like germylene[87]
(186 pm) Additionally the Ge1-C2 distance (1887(2) pm) the endocyclic C-C
distances (C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3) pm) and the C4-N1 bond length (1382(3)
pm) suggest significant π-resonance stabilization within the six-membered GeNC3
ring In line with that the remarkable deshielding of the resonance signal (618 ppm)
Results and Discussion
- 25 -
for the β-H atom in the 1H-NMR spectrum is in agreement with a considerable hetero-
Cpmacr-like resonance stabilization in the five-membered GeNC3 ring (Figure 31 right)
The latter is also supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see
section 313) Hereafter the lithium complexes of N-heterocyclic germylidenide and
stannylidenide anions[88]
[(THF)Li-η5-EC(tBu)C(H)C(
tBu)N(Dip) E = Ge Sn] were
presented with a similar reductive reaction
Figure 31 Molecular structure of germylene anion salt 3 (left) and hetero-Cpmacr-like
resonance structure (right) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level
Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg]
Ge1-C2 1887(2) Ge1-N1 1944(2) Ge1-K1 34485(6) Ge1-K1rsquo 35728(7)
K1-C2 3092(2) K1-C3 3122(2) K1-C4 3330(2) K1-N1 3402(2) K1-Ge1rsquo
35728(7) N1-C4 1382(3) C1-C2 1516(3) C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3)
C4-C5 1508(3) C2-Ge1-N1 843(1) C4-N1-Ge1 1130(1) C3-C2-C1 1202(2)
C3-C2-Ge1 1116(2) C1-C2-Ge1 1281(2) C4-C3-C2 1174(2) C3-C4-N1
1135(2) C3-C4-C5 1254(2)
The formulation of the resonance structure clarifies that the nitrogen atom has a
higher affinity to carbon instead to germanium (Scheme 32) The mesomer 3c is
energetically less favorable than 3a and 3b This explains also that the Ge1-C2 bond
(1887(2) pm) is shorter than the Ge1-N1 bond (1944(2) pm) in 3
Results and Discussion
- 26 -
Scheme 32 GeNC3-ring resonance structures of germylenide anion of 3
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 4 shows four sets of doublets and one
multiplet for methyls of Dip-groups in the range from 091 to 130 ppm Resonances
for methyl-groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 162 ppm as one singlet
Multiplets in the range of 329-340 are assigned to CH-groups of iso-propyl groups
The resonance of CH proton at the GeN2C3 ring appears at δ = 503 ppm One singlet
at δ = 564 ppm is assigned to NH-groups One set of resonances for aromatic protons
of Dip-groups appears in the range of 683-718 ppm
Figure 32 Molecular structure of germylene amide 4 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn
at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 2051(2) Ge1-N2 2026(2) Ge1-N3
1905(2) N1-C2 1329(3) N2-C4 1332(3) C1-C2 1518(3) C2-C3 1394(3)
C3-C4 1394(3) C4-C5 1512(3) N3-Ge1-N1 9720(8) N3-Ge1-N2 8876(9)
N2-Ge1-N1 8822(8) C2-N1-Ge1 1229(2) C4-N2-Ge1 1240(2) N1-C2-C3
1227(2) C4-C3-C2 1269(3) N2-C4-C3 1239(3)
Results and Discussion
- 27 -
The structure of compound 4 was established by single crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis (Figure 32) It consists of a slightly puckered six-membered GeN2C3 ring
with geometric parameters similar to the corresponding parameters found in precursor
chlorogermylene 1[80]
The sum of bond angles at Ge atom of 2742deg is comparable to
that of 1 (2815deg) implying the presence of a lone pair of electrons at the Ge center
The Ge-N distances in 4 (2026(2) and 2051(2) ppm) are somewhat longer than those
in chlorogermylene 1 (1988(2) and 1997(3) ppm) In the structure of 4 the terminal
Ge-N distance of 1905(2) pm is significantly shorter than those the endocyclic ones
(2026(2) 2051(2) pm) because it is a common covalent bond and stronger than
dative NrarrGe bonds
A plausible mechanism for the formation of 3 and 4 is proposed as depicted in
Scheme 33 The reduction of (nacnac)GeCl 1 by elemental potassium gives the N-
heterocyclic potassium germylidenide 3d as initial transient species The latter
undergoes a ring contraction to give the transient germylene amide 3e which reacts
with 1 in a salt metathesis reaction affording the Dip-N-bridged bis-germylene 3f
Reductive fission of a Ge-N bond in 3f by elemental potassium leads to the germylene
anion potassium salt 3 and the potassium β-diketiminato-GeII amide (nacnac)Ge-NK-
Dip The formation of 4 from (nacnac)Ge-NK-Dip needs a subsequent protonation
from the solvent in an inert atmosphere
Scheme 33 The mechanism of the formation 3 and 4
Results and Discussion
- 28 -
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
This part of the research is the cowork with Shenglai Yao (TU Berlin)
Another reduction experiment of the related β-diketimiate-substituted
organogermanium trichloride 2[82]
(nacnac)GeCl3 with KC8 was investigated The
reaction of 2 with KC8 in THF led to a brown-red mixture from which colorless
crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex K(nacnac)[89]
have been
isolated as side products along with deep-red crystals of the remarkable novel cluster
species 5[83]
in low yield (3 Scheme 34) In contrast reaction of 1 with elemental
potassium in toluene even at 0 degC led merely to the complete replacement of Ge by K
via reduction of GeII to elemental Ge
0 powder and concomitant formation of the
aforementioned β-diketiminato potassium complex
Scheme 34 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
The X-ray crystal diffraction analysis of 5 revealed a dipotassium salt of the first
ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a Ge4 core (Figure 33)
Remarkably to date only a few metal complexes of ldquoheavyrdquo CBD2-
have been
reported featuring a Si4 and Si2Ge2 core[90]
Compound 5 consists of a planar
Ge4(nacnac)22macr dianion in which the two unusual chelating nacnac-ligands are
attached to the Ge4 core each with terminal Ge-C and Ge-N σ-bonds The dianion is
connected by two η3-coordinated K(OEt2) cations each coordinated to Ge1 Ge2 and
N2 and Ge1rsquo Ge2rsquo and N2rsquo respectively The K-Ge distances of 3355(1) pm (K1-
Ge1) and 3477(1) pm (K1-Ge2) are similar to those K-Ge distances in 3 and in
related potassium germanides[84b 85]
The molecular structure of 5 is also notable for
Results and Discussion
- 29 -
the parallelogram-like configuration of the planar Ge4 moiety The Ge1-Ge2 of
2512(1) pm and Ge1-Ge2rsquo distance of 2553(1) pm are close to the Ge-Ge single
bonds observed in bulky substituted cyclotetragermanes (ca 251 pm)[91]
and longer
than those in Ge4Co complexes[90d]
(235-237 pm) while the transannular Ge2-Ge2rsquo
distance of 2747(1) pm is much longer Interestingly despite of the pyramidal
coordination environment of the Ge atoms the Ge42macr core of 5 shows extremely
strong aromaticity as supported by DFT calculations (see section 313)
Figure 33 Molecular structure of 5 containing a Ge42minus
cluster Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity
Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1rsquo 1932(3) Ge1-Ge2 2512(7)
Ge1-Ge2rsquo 2553(7) Ge2-Ge2rsquo 2747(1) Ge1-K1 3355(12) K1-N2 2814(3)
K1-Ge2 3477(1) N1-C2 1381(4) Ge2-C3rsquo 2019(3) C2-C3 1369(5) C3-C4
1479(5) N2-C4 1296(4) Ge2-Ge1-Ge2rsquo 657(2) Ge1-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 1143(2) Ge1-
Ge2-Ge2rsquo 578(2) Ge1rsquo-Ge2-Ge2rsquo 564(2) N1rsquo-Ge1-Ge2 8716(9) N1rsquo-Ge1-
Ge2rsquo 1026(9) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1 886(1) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 963(1) C2-N1-Ge1rsquo
1239(2) C3-C2-N1 1205(3) C2-C3-C4 1227(3) C2-C3-Ge2rsquo 1184(3) C4-C3-
Ge2rsquo 1184(3) N2-C4-C3 1220(3)
Scheme 35 shows the assumed mechanism of the formation of Ge42minus
cluster 5 The
product after the first reductive step by KC8 is (nacnac)GeCl 1 which was confirmed
by NMR investigation Chlorogermylene 1 could dimerize by sequential reduction to
Results and Discussion
- 30 -
a bis-germylene 5a Due to the instability of 5a bearing two bulky nacnac ligands a
transformation could be in the ascendant from dimer 5a to stable P4-like Ge4-tetramer
5b Intermediate 5c could be formed after double intramolecular deprotonation and
elimination of ldquofreerdquo (nacnac)H The excessive KC8 could offer two electrons to
molecule orbitals of Ge4-cluster 5c to furnish the isolated product 5 with a Ge42minus
cluster
Scheme 35 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 5
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5
The structural feature of 3 leads to a discussion of a possible aromatic character of
the GeNC3-ring in comparison to cyclobutadiene anion Aromaticity is also a key
Results and Discussion
- 31 -
concept in describing homo-elemental four-membered rings such as the square planar
cyclobutadiene-like dianion Therefore nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS)
values for the five-membered GeNC3-rings and the four-membered Ge4-ring in
compound 3 and 5 were calculated by Prof Christoph van Wuumlllen (University of
Kaiserslautern) Since their introduction NICS[92]
values have been used as an
aromaticity criterion in numerous applications both for organic and inorganic
compounds[93]
NICS values were computed using the molecular structures of compound 3 and 5
from X-ray diffraction analysis The positions of the non-hydrogen atoms were taken
from the X-ray data and kept fixed while the hydrogen positions were optimized
using the TURBOMOLE program package[94]
and its density functional capabilities[95]
an exchange-correlation functional with gradient corrections to exchange and
correlation[96]
(BP86 functional) and polarized triple-zeta (TZVP) basis sets[97]
The
geometry optimizations used density fitting techniques (also known as the RI
approximation)[98]
to evaluate the matrix elements of the electrostatic Coulomb
potential
NICS tensors are defined for any position as the negative magnetic shielding at
that position The magnetic shielding tensors were obtained using the integral-direct
IGLO program[99]
which has been extended to allow the use of density functional
theory[100]
The B3LYP[96a 101]
functional and a basis of IGLO-III[102]
quality were
employed For Ge this is a 4s11p7d1f primitive basis sets in which only the steepest
five s-functions three p-functions and two d-functions are contracted In lack of
IGLO-type basis sets for potassium a TZVDP (triple zeta two sets of polarization
functions) basis was used which will affect the accuracy of the magnetic shieldings at
the centers of the potassium atoms but not elsewhere
The ring centre for each ring system was calculated first from the Cartesian
coordinates and determined the plane through the ring center for which the sum of the
Results and Discussion
- 32 -
squares of the distance of that plane to the positions of the atoms forming the ring is
minimal This plane was defined as the ring plane A line through the ring center that
is orthogonal to the plane defines the positions of the NICS centers above and
below the ring centers and the local z direction to which the NICS tensors are
transformed to obtain the zz as well as the in plane (mean value of the xx and yy)
tensor components in addition to the isotropic value which is one third of the sum of
the xx yy and zz components The zz component is of particular interest because a
ring current parallel to the ring plane will most strongly be induced if the external
magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane and the magnetic field induced by such a
current will also be in that direction
In addition to the NICS tensor at the ring center (NICS(0) value) its height profile
contains useful additional information[103]
First the height profile discriminates ring
current effects (which are associated with aromaticity) from diatropic contributions
which stem from the proximity of the ring atoms while the latter approach zero
quickly when moving out of the ring plane the former only slowly do so Furthermore
the height profile helps to distinguish π-aromaticity (which is the type of aromaticity
dominant in organic chemistry) from σ-aromaticity (which is found for many
inorganic compounds) if aromaticity only stems from π-electrons which produce no
ring current in the ring plane then the NICS values when moving out of the ring
center first decrease (ie become more negative) before they gradually approach zero
NICS values 100 pm above or below the ring plane (ldquoNICS(1) valuesrdquo)
Table 31 reports NICS results for compound 3 where the region towards to
coordinating K+ ion was denoted as above the plane of the five-membered GeNC3
rings the other side as below Up to 100 pm the results for NICS centers above and
below are quite similar then the results for the positions 150 and 200 pm above the
ring start to be affected by the K+ ion whose distance to the ring plane is 299 pm The
NICS values are negative and the tensors are highly anisotropic the negative isotropic
value stems from the large and negative zz component Furthermore these values fall
Results and Discussion
- 33 -
off quite slowly when moving out of the ring plane This indicates a diamagnetic ring
current indicative of aromatic behavior Furthermore the most negative values are not
found in the ring center but slightly above which indicates π-aromaticity Of course
this is exactly what has to be expected for a heteroatom analogue of a
cyclopentadienyl anion This is interesting however because the NICS values for
compound 5 see Table 32 show a slightly different behavior again Negative NICS
values fall off slowly but the tensors show a substantial negative in-plane component
up to 200 pm above (or below this is the same in this compound) ring plane This can
be explained by diatropic contributions from the Ge-C and Ge-N bonds which are
nearly perpendicular to the ring plane The second difference between compound 3
and compound 5 is that the NICS values (both the isotropic values and the zz tensor
component) fall off monotonically and have no hump at about 1 pm above the ring
plane The aromaticity of the Ge4 ring in compound 5 must therefore have substantial
σ-character
Table 31 NICS values for compound 3 in ppm (the results are the same for both GeNC3 rings)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash77 ndash87 ndash56
50 pm above ndash82 ndash50 ndash144
100 pm above ndash73 +16 ndash251
150 pm abovea)
ndash59 +64 ndash298
200 pm abovea)
ndash116 +36 ndash422
50 pm below ndash82 ndash46 ndash154
100 pm below ndash74 +04 ndash230
150 pm below ndash54 +19 ndash199
200 pm below ndash37 +11 ndash134
a)
Value affected by a close K+ ion coordinated by the GeNC3 ring
Results and Discussion
- 34 -
Table 32 NICS values for compound 5 in ppm (the results are the same at both sides of the Ge4
ring)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash389 ndash375 ndash417
50 pm above ndash324 ndash286 ndash399
100 pm above ndash215 ndash155 ndash334
150 pm above ndash144 ndash93 ndash248
200 pm above ndash109 ndash82 ndash165
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6
As a nucleophile the germanium(II) anion in 3 seems a promising precursor for the
synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylenes and of related heterodinuclear bis-
metallylenes Accordingly the coupling reaction of the nucleophilic GeII centre in 3
with the electrophilic GeII site in 1
[80] was examined and the reaction in THF at -30 degC
yielded a dark red solution from which the bis-germylene 6[104]
has been isolated as
air- and moisture-sensitive dark red crystals in 66 yield (Scheme 36) The isolated
bis-germylene 6 was fully characterized including X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 36 Synthesis of bis-germylene 6
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 6 exhibits four sets of doublets in the range from 107
to 124 ppm with the ratio of 121266 which can be assigned to CH3-groups of all
Dip-groups The three singlets in the range of 161-262 ppm can be assigned to the
CH3 groups at the ligand backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear
in the range of δ = 301-367 ppm as three sets of septet The remarkable deshielding
Results and Discussion
- 35 -
of the resonance signal for the ring CH proton of the five-membered GeNC3 ring (δ =
682 ppm) is indicative a stronger 6π-aromatic resonance stabilization compared with
that in the precursor 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The proton resonance signal for the γ-ring
proton in the six-membered GeN2C3 ring of δ = 518 ppm suggests however the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization In the UV-vis spectra of 6 an absorption
band is observed at 501 nm showing blue shifted in comparison to the values
observed for related amidinate- and guanidinate- substituted bis-germylenes[40]
(I27
and I28 in Introduction) with GeI-Ge
I bonds
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8
The reactivity of 3 towards chlorostannylene 7[80]
(nacnac)SnCl was examined
also by a coupling reaction If (nacnac)SnCl 7 was used as electrophile for the
reaction with 3 in diethylether at -70 degC this furnished the corresponding product
germylene-stannylene 8[104]
which was isolated in the form of dark red crystals in
34 yield (Scheme 37) The new compound 8 was fully characterized including
NMR spectroscopy (1H
13C
119Sn) and X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 37 Synthesis of germylene-stannylene 8
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 exhibits six sets of doublets in the range from 085 to
129 ppm with the ratio of 666666 for CH3-groups of all Dip-groups The three
singlets in the range of 165-300 ppm can be assigned to the CH3 groups at the ligand
backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear in the range of δ = 305-
378 ppm as three sets of septets
Results and Discussion
- 36 -
A similar situation was observed in the NMR spectra of 8 for the CH moiety at
ligand backbones The deshielding for the ring CH proton of the five-membered
GeNC3 ring in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 (δ = 691 ppm) indicates again a stronger
6π-aromatic resonance stabilization than in 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The chemical shift (δ =
510 ppm) for the γ-ring proton in the six-membered SnN2C3 ring of 8 also shows the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization The 119
Sn chemical shift of 8 at δ -197
ppm in the 119
Sn-NMR spectrum is comparable to the value observed for the precursor
(nacnac)SnCl 7 (δ -224 ppm)[80]
implying a three-coordinated tin atom in solution In
the UV-vis spectrum of 8 an absorption band is observed at 541 nm The latter is
somewhat red shifted in comparison to the values of bis-germylene 6
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8
The new GeI-Ge
I compound 6 represents the first asymmetric substituted bis-
germylene while germylene-stannylene 8 is the first GeI-Sn
I example Their
molecular structures were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis
(Figure 34) Both N2C3 backbones of the chelating six-membered MN2C3 ring (M =
Ge Sn) are essentially planar but the germanium and tin atoms are out of the
respective plane The five-membered GeNC3 rings in both compounds however are
almost planar The most important structural features are the Ge-M distances and
trans-bending angles The Ge-Ge distance of 25498(8) pm in 6 is the shortest GeI-Ge
I
distance among the distances values observed in known bis-germylenes[38 40-42]
(257-
267 pm see Introduction p 10) but significantly longer than those in digermenes[13f
105] (Ge=Ge 221-247 pm) and digermynes
[3b 20 106] (GeequivGe 221-231 pm) This
relatively short Ge1-Ge2 distance was explained with asymmetric structural feature of
6 and some ionic charge distribution between five- and six-membered rings (see
section 317 DFT calculation)
Results and Discussion
- 37 -
Structural features of 6 and 8 are shown in Scheme 38 The torsion angles of the
Ge1-Ge2 bond with Ge1-N1-N2 and Ge2-N3-C31 planes in 6 are 1043deg and 1184deg
respectively (1262deg-1387deg in digermyne[20 106]
) In the structure of 8 the Ge-Sn
distance of 27210(4) pm is longer than that value observed for a Ge=Sn double bond
in a germastannene[107]
and also longer than the Ge-Sn distance in
germylstannanes[105 108]
The torsion angles of the Ge-Sn bond with Sn1-N1-N2 and
Ge1-N3-C31 planes are 939deg and 1006deg respectively (943deg in diplumbylene I4)[16]
Such Ge-M (M = Ge Sn) central bond lengths and trans-bent angles are indicative of
the absence of Ge-M multiple bond character of 6 and 8
Scheme 38 Drawing of torsion angles in 6 and 8
Figure 34 Molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right) Thermal ellipsoids (C1-C5
C30-C34 N1-N3 Ge1 Ge2 and Sn1) are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 6 Ge1-
Ge2 2549(1) Ge1-N1 2015(4) Ge1-N2 2038(4) Ge2-N3 1951(4) Ge2-C31
1903(5) N1-Ge1-N2 8867(15) N1-Ge1-Ge2 10430(11) N2-Ge1-Ge2
Results and Discussion
- 38 -
10149(12) C31-Ge2-N3 8447(19) C31-Ge2-Ge1 11890(15) N3-Ge2-Ge1
9962(12) For 8 Sn1-Ge1 27210(4) Sn1-N1 2233(2) Sn1-N2 2231(2) Ge1-
N3 1964(2) Ge1-C31 1915(3) N2-Sn1-N1 8288(8) N2-Sn1-Ge1 9542(5)
N1-Sn1-Ge1 10368(5) C31-Ge1-N3 8433(12) C31-Ge1-Sn1 11495(9) N3-
Ge1-Sn1 10200(6)
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8
In order to clarify the electronic structure and bonding nature in 6 and 8 DFT
calculations were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The simplified
molecules 6a and 8a [6a M = Ge 8a M = Sn (LanL2DZ for Sn)] (scheme 39) in
which the Dip-groups (26-iPr2C6H3) of 6 and 8 were replaced by phenyl groups were
calculated as model compounds DFT calculations of the model compound of 6a was
performed at the B3LYP6-31(d) level and the model compound 8a was performed at
B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set for Ge N C and H atoms and the LANL2DZ
level for the Sn atom
Scheme 39 Computed model compounds 6a and 8a
The computed geometry is in good agreement with the experimental metric
parameters A NBO analysis of 6a and 8a shows that the HOMOrsquos have a large Ge-M
bond character (Figure 35) and the latter derives largely from overlap of Ge and Sn
p-valence orbitals (6a s 1180 p 8820 8a s 978 p 9022) Apparently the
Ge-M bonds possess s character Likewise the Wiberg bond index exhibits Ge-E bond
orders of 08525 (6a) and 07290 (8a) respectively Similar bonding natures have
Results and Discussion
- 39 -
been identified and reported previously for related GeI-Ge
I dimers
[38 40-42] In addition
the nature of the HOMOrsquos and LUMOrsquos of the model compounds 6a and 8a
corresponds to that of a diplumbylene[16]
which again underlines that the Ge-M bond
in 6 and 8 represents a pure σ-bond
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
Figure 35 Frontier orbitals of model compound 6a and 8a
Interestingly the HOMOrsquos show clearly the presence of p-orbital interaction within
the six-membered MN2C3 ring and a slight interaction with the Ge centre in the
GeN2C3 ring Accordingly the five-membered GeNC3 ring bears a negative net charge
while the six-membered MN2C3 ring has a positive one [NPA charges in the GeN2C3
ring in 6a Ge +065 N (mean) -069 C (mean) 008 vs GeNC3 ring Ge1 +055 N -
066 C (mean) -015 NPA charges in the SnN2C3 ring in 8a Sn +095 N (mean) -
072 C (mean) 007 vs GeNC3 ring Ge +040 N -066 C (mean) -017] Thus the
latter parameters suggest some ionic character of the Ge-M bonds Moreover the
pronounced electron acceptor character of the GeN2C3 ring is also reflected by the
strongly negative values of NICS for 6a and 8a [6a NICS(0) = -88 NICS(1) = -82
8a NICS(0) = -76 NICS(1) = -74] The latter confirms the presence of a 6π-
aromatic stabilization in 6 and 8 as indicated by the 1H-NMR data (see p 34-36)
Results and Discussion
- 40 -
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands
The β-diketiminato ligands can undergo several side-reactions such as 13-
coordination C-N-exchange ring-contraction and deprotonation (Scheme 310) A
more rigid β-diketiminato ligand with a six-membered C6-ring in the backbone was
envisioned to prevent those side-reactions and possibly enhance the stability of the
products[81-83 109]
Scheme 310 Coordination possibilities of the classical β-diketiminato ligand
The syntheses of new β-diketiminato ligands[110]
12 and 20 are shown in Scheme
311 They are easily accessible from the N-cyclohexylidene-26-diisopropyl-
benzenamine 9[111]
in a two-step procedure First the deprotonation of 9 with nBuLi in
diethylether leads to the corresponding lithium amide 10 Salt metathesis reaction of
10 with (Z)-N-(26-diisopropylphenyl)benzimidoyl chloride 11[112]
or (Z)-N-isopropyl
benzimidoyl chloride[112]
19 in diethylether then afforded the novel β-diketiminato
type ligand 12 and 20[110]
in 63 and 60 yield respectively The new compounds
12 and 20 have been analyzed by NMR spectroscopy ESI-mass spectrometry X-ray
diffraction and elemental analyses
Results and Discussion
- 41 -
Et2O - 78degCnBuLi
Et2O - 78degCN
Dip
9
N
Dip
10
Li
N
Ph Dip
Cl
11
12
N
NH
Ph
Dip
Dip
Et2O - 78degC
N
Ph iPr
Cl
19
20
NH
N
Ph
Dip
iPr
Scheme 311 Synthesis of new β-diketiminato ligands 12 and 20
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 12 displays four sets of doublet for methyl of
Dip-groups in the range from 117 to 134 ppm The multiplets by 164 ppm and 217
ppm are assigned to CH2 of the six-membered ring The resonance of NH proton
appears at δ = 187 ppm Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear at δ = 335 ppm
as multiplet The 1H-NMR spectrum of 20 shows three sets of doublet for the
isopropyl of Dip-groups in the range from 109 to 132 ppm The peaks of four CH2
groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 156 208 and 214 ppm as multiplet
The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear by 310 and 323 ppm as septet The
resonance of NH group appears at δ = 1203 ppm as doublet because of the 3J-
coupling with neighbor CH group Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-groups
and phenyl appear in the range of 696-727 ppm for 12 and 713-753 ppm for 20
respectively
NH group connecting with iso-propyl in 20 is also confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 36 and Scheme 312) In compound 12 the N1-C1 bond
length (1360(2) pm) is longer than the N2-C3 bond length (1305(2) pm) due to the
presence of N1-H bond Contrarily the N1-C1 bond length (1309(2) pm) in
compound 20 is shorter than the N2-C3 bond length (1356(2) pm) because of the
presence of N2-H bond
Results and Discussion
- 42 -
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph Dip
Dip
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph iPr
Dip
1356
1386
1445
1309
1377
1360
1305
1452
12 20
HH
Scheme 312 Bonding situation of new ligands 12 and 20 bond length in pm
Figure 36 Molecular structure of compounds 12 (left) and 20 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 12 N1-C1 13600(17) N1-
C13 14349(18) C1-C2 13769(19) C1-C4 15136(18) N2-C3 13046(16) N2-
C25 14297(17) C2-C3 14515(18) C2-C7 15257(18) N1-C1-C2 12221(12)
C1-C2-C3 12230(12) N2-C3-C2 12212(12) For 20 N1-C1 1309(2) N1-C17
1418(2) C1-C2 1445(2) C1-C4 1522(2) N2-C3 1356(2) N2-C14 1461(2)
C2-C3 1386(2) C2-C7 1524(2) C3-C8 1495(2) N1-C1-C2 12080(15) C1-
C2-C3 12151(15) N2-C3-C2 12288(15)
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16
Scheme 313 shows the synthesis of chlorogermylene 14[110]
and germylene 16[110]
Through lithiation of compound 12 with nBuLi the Lithium complex 13 was formed
quantitatively The subsequent reaction of 13 with the dichlorogermylene dioxane
complex[27]
(GeCl2middotC4H8O2) affords the desired chlorogermylene 14 in 82 yield
Results and Discussion
- 43 -
Furthermore germylene 16 was obtained by dehydrochloration of 14 with 13-di-tert-
butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15[113]
as a base in 78 yield The composition and
constitution of 14 and 16 were fully characterized by elemental analysis IR and
multinuclear NMR spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 313 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and germylene 16
In the 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 14 resonances of 8 methyl moieties of Dip-
groups appear in the range from 097 to 155 ppm as multiplets The multiplets in the
range of δ = 128-139 and 203-227 ppm are assigned to CH2 moieties of the six-
membered ring Four sets of septets by 317 327 394 and 417 ppm are assigned to
methine protons of the iso-propyl groups The 1H-NMR spectrum of 16 displays three
sets of doublet for methyl moieties of the Dip-groups in the range from 115 to 135
ppm The peaks of four CH2 groups of the six-membered C6-ring appear at δ = 155
204 and 221 ppm as multiplet Resonances for the methine protons of the iso-propyl
groups appear by 369 and 380 ppm as septets A triplet at δ = 415 ppm is assigned to
the proton connecting with C=C double bond This resonance confirms the
deprotonation of C-CH2 to a C=CH structure on the ligand backbone Resonances for
aromatic protons of Dip-groups and phenyl appear in the range of 680-739 ppm for
145 and 675-725 ppm for 16 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 14 and 16 are shown in Figure 37 and
Figure 38 In compound 14 the six-membered GeN2C3 ring exhibits a boat-like
Results and Discussion
- 44 -
conformation The C2N2 moiety of the chelating ligand (N1 N2 C1 C3) is nearly
planar and the Ge and C2 atoms are out-of-plane (Ge 37 pm C2 13 pm) In
compound 16 the GeN2C3 ring is almost planar The Ge-N bond lengths in 14
(1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) are longer than those in 16 (1843(3) and 1861(3) pm)
and the N1-Ge1-N2 bond angle (9123deg) in 14 is smaller than that of compound 16
(9509deg) This is probably owing to the dative nature of the Ge-N bonds and the three-
coordinate Ge(II) atom in 14 The Ge-Cl bond length of 2296(1) pm in 14 is
consistent with the value observed in the N-heterocyclic β-diketiminato
chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl[80]
The fused cyclohexyl moiety of 14 is distorted
and the phenyl group is oriented in nearly the same direction as the aryl group on the
N2 atom while the C2 C3 C4 and C7 atoms of the fused C6 ring in 14 are coplanar
with the N2C3 ring (C1 C2 C3 N1 N2) while the C5 and C6 atoms deviate above
the plane of the N2C3 ring This conformation of the cyclohexyl moiety is also
observed in compound 16 It is of note that the buta-13-diene moiety (C1 C2 C3 C4
C32) of compound 16 clearly has alternating C-C distances (C32-C1 1498(4) C1-C2
1359(4) C2-C3 1461(4) and C3-C4 1360(4) pm) which is not the case in known
germylene (nacnac)Ge[87]
published in 2006
Figure 37 Molecular structure of compound 14 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 19760(16) Ge1-N2 19804(17) Ge1-Cl1
22956(7) N1-C1 1342(3) N1-C14 1458(3) C1-C2 1397(3) C1-C8 1502(3)
N2-C3 1333(3) N2-C26 1463(2) C2-C3 1415(3) C2-C7 1522(3) C3-C4
Results and Discussion
- 45 -
1509(3) C4-C5 1522(3) N1-Ge1-N2 9123(7) N1-Ge1-Cl1 9560(5) N2-Ge1-
Cl1 9392(5) C1-N1-Ge1 12568(13) N1-C1-C2 12352(17) C1-C2-C3
12503(19) N2-C3-C2 12440(18) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(13)
Figure 38 Molecular structure of compound 16 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 1843(3) Ge1-N2 1861(3) N1-C3 1426(4)
N1-C8 1442(4) N2-C1 1408(4) N2-C20 1454(4) C1-C2 1359(4) C2-C3
1461(4) C1-C32 1498(4) C2-C7 1525(4) C3-C4 1360(4) N1-Ge1-N2
9509(11) C3-N1-Ge1 300(2) N1-C3-C2 1176(3) C1-C2-C3 1267(3) C2-C1-
N2 1241(3) C1-N2-Ge1 1259(2)
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O
The unusual donor-acceptor properties of the zwitterionic silylene and germylene
were described in our group in 2006[30 87]
In these molecules the exocyclic methylene
group remains more negative charges due to the aromaticity of the center six-
membered ring This implies the presence of two reactivity positions in the molecule
a strong nucleophilic methylene group and a nucleophilic (ns-orbital) and
electrophilic (np-orbital) at the metallylene site Mesomeric structures of zwitterionic
germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties are shown in Scheme 314
Results and Discussion
- 46 -
To probe the donor-acceptor properties of zwitterionic germylene 16 its reactivity
toward ammonia and water was investigated Germylene 16 undergoes controllable
ammonolysis and hydrolysis (Scheme 315) Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas
at room temperature in toluene resulted in the formation of the corresponding
aminogermylene 17[110]
in high yield (92) Likewise germylene 16 also readily
reacts with water to produce germylene hydroxide 18[110]
nearly quantitatively (95)
Scheme 314 Mesomeric structures of germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties
Scheme 315 Syntheses of aminogermylene 17 and germylene hydroxide 18
The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectroscopic data of 17 and 18 are very similar to the
corresponding resonances of chlorogermylene 14 appearing at or near the same
chemical shifts In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 17 the protons of the NH2 group appear
at δ = 154 ppm This chemical shift is close to that of the dimeric aminogermylene
(ArrsquoGeNH2)2 (Arrsquo = 26-Tip2C6H3) (δ = 162 ppm)[60a]
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 18
displays a singlet for the hydroxide proton at = 166 ppm which is close to the
respective value observed for the dimeric germylene hydroxide [(nacnac)GeOH]2 (δ =
154 ppm)[114]
The IR spectrum of 18 clearly shows two N-H stretching modes of the
NH2 group at v = 3430 and 3343 cmndash1
respectively These values are similar to those
observed for related aminogermylenes (ArGeNH2)2 (Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) (3380
and 3308 cmndash1
) and (nacnac)GeNH2 (3431 and 3333 cm-1
)[115]
A sharp absorption at v
Results and Discussion
- 47 -
= 3643 cmndash1
that can be attributed to the O-H stretching frequency was observed in
the IR spectrum of 18 This value resembles that of germylene hydroxide
(nacnac)GeOH (3571 cm-1
)[114]
The structure of 17 and 18 are shown in Figure 39 Both compounds 17 and 18 are
monomeric species The structural features of 17 and 18 are very similar and show
close structural parameters compared with that of chlorogermylene 14 As in 14 the
Ge1 and C2 atoms of 17 and 18 slightly deviate from the N2C2 ring (N1 N2 C1 C3)
plane [17 Ge 46 pm and C2 13 pm 18 Ge 49 pm and C2 13 pm] The Ge-N
(ligand) bond lengths (17 2017(2) and 2021(2) pm 18 20054(17) and 20071(16)
pm) of 17 and 18 are longer than the Ge-N(amide) bond length of 17 (1829(3) pm)
Interestingly the Ge-N distance (1905(2) pm) in (nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip 4[83]
due to the
large Dip-substituent is also 8 ppm longer than that of 17 In each case there is clearly
a difference between the dative bond and covalent bond Compound 18 represents the
first monomeric three-coordinate GeII hydroxide in the solid state (Figure 39) owing
the larger steric congestion around the GeII center in contrast to (nacnac)GeOH
[114]
Figure 39 Molecular structures of compound 17 (left) and 18 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 17 Ge1-N1 2021(2) Ge1-
N2 2017(2) Ge1-N3 1829(3) N1-C1 1349(4) C1-C2 1395(4) N2-C3
1336(4) C2-C3 1417(4) C3-C4 1509(4) N3-Ge1-N2 9503(11) N3-Ge1-N1
9709(13) N2-Ge1-N1 8932(10) C1-N1-Ge1 1253(2) C3-N2-Ge1 1247(2)
For 18 Ge1-O1 18249(18) Ge1-N2 20054(17) Ge1-N1 20071(16) N1-C1
Results and Discussion
- 48 -
1340(3) C1-C2 1402(3) N2-C3 1331(3) C2-C3 1419(3) C3-C4 1509(3)
O1-Ge1-N2 9387(8) O1-Ge1-N1 9529(8) N2-Ge1-N1 8943(7) C1-N1-Ge1
12597(14) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(14)
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
In order to understand the coordination behavior of ligand 20 experiments using
germanium precursors GeCl2sdotdioxane and GeCl4 were conducted (Scheme 316) The
reaction of compound 20 with one equivalent of nBuLi resulted directly the lithiated
intermediate 21 The subsequent reaction with GeCl2sdotdioxane in Et2O at -78 degC led to
the unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained
by reaction of 21 with GeCl4 in toluene at -78 degC through dehydrochloration with 13-
di-tert-butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15 as a base in 57 yield The composition and
constitution of 22 and 23 were elucidated by elemental analysis multinuclear NMR
spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 316 Syntheses of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 22 exhibits 6 sets of doublets for 6 methyls of
iso-propyl Five sets of multiplets in the range of δ = 121-206 ppm are assigned to
the CH2 moieties of the six-membered C6-ring Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl
Results and Discussion
- 49 -
appear at δ = 284 367 and 396 ppm as septet In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 23 peaks
at δ = 113 122 and 137 ppm are for methyls of iso-propyl as doublets Resonances
of three CH2 groups of the six-membered ring on backbone appear at δ = 146 189
and 206 ppm as multiplets Two sets of septets by 332 and 361 ppm are assigned to
the CH of iso-propyl A triplet at δ = 421 ppm is for the proton of C=CH group on
backbone and indicates a dianionic ligand 20 in compound 23 owing to two times
deprotonation with nBuLi and carbene 15 Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-
groups and phenyl appear in the range of 688-724 ppm for 22 and 701-726 ppm for
23 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 22 and 23 are shown in Figure 310
Compound 22 represents an imine N-donor stabilized oxo-chloro-germylene and
adopts a pyramidal geometry with the sum of bond angles of 2737deg at the GeII center
The inserted oxygen atom could come in all probability from dioxane molecule in
GeCl2dioxane The cyclohexyl unit on backbone is distorted and the free N2 moiety
is oriented in inverse direction to the cyclohexyl The Ge1-Cl1 bond length of
23073(6) pm in 22 is compatible with the value (2296(1) pm) observed in
chlorogermylene 14 The Ge1-N1 distance of 20908(15) pm is visibly longer than
those of 14 (1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) because of the net NrarrGe coordination bond
without resonance stabilization The Ge1-O1 bond length is normal Ge-O single bond
with a distance of 18265(12) pm Bond lengths of N1-C1 (1284(2) pm) and N2-C7
(1272(2) pm) present clearly C=N double bond while bond lengths of C1-C6
(1525(2) pm) and N6-C7 (1539(2) pm) present normal C-C single bonds
In compound 23 GeIV
atom is tetrahedral coordinated with two nitrogen and two
chlorine atoms All six angles in the range of 1028-1138deg at the GeIV
center are
nearly alike with the angle in methane (1095deg) and indicate a slightly distorted
tetrahedral GeN2Cl2 configuration GeIV
-Cl bond lengths (21339(7) and 21375(9) pm)
in 23 are much shorter than those of germylenes 14 and 22 (229-231 pm) Distances
of the GeIV
-N bonds (1798(2) and 1788(2) pm) in 23 are much shorter than the
Results and Discussion
- 50 -
NrarrGe dative bonds in 14 17 and 18 (198-202 pm) and the net NrarrGe dative bond
(20908(15) pm) in 22 But they are only slightly shorter than GeII-N distances
(1843(3) and 1861(1) pm) in germylene 16 and GeII-NH2 bond length (1829(3) pm)
in germylene 17 Bond lengths of C1-C2 (1339(4) pm) and C3-C4 (1326(4) pm) in
23 illuminate clearly C=C double bond and distances of N1-C1 (1430(3) pm) and
N2-C3 (1441(3) pm) correspond to C-N single bond
Figure 310 Molecular structures of compound 22 (left) and 23 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 22 Ge1-Cl1 23073(6)
Ge1-O1 18265(12) Ge1-N1 20908(15) O1-C6 1418(2) N1-C1 1284(2) N2-
C7 1272(2) C1-C6 1525(2) C6-C7 1539(2) Cl1-Ge1-O1 9789(4) Cl1-Ge1-
N1 9422(4) O1-Ge1-N1 8158(6) Ge1-N1-C1 11291(12) N1-C1-C6
11484(16) C1-C6-O1 10975(14) C6-O1-Ge1 11838(10) N2-C7-C6
11778(17) For 23 Ge1-Cl1 21339(7) Ge1-Cl2 21375(9) Ge1-N1 1798(2)
Ge1-N2 1788(2) N1-C1 1430(3) C1-C2 1339(4) C2-C3 1486(4) C3-C4
1326(4) N2-C3 1441(3) N2-Ge1-N1 10554(10) N2-Ge1-Cl1 11208(7) N1-
Ge1-Cl1 11381(8) N2-Ge1-Cl2 11201(8) N1-Ge1-Cl2 11082(8) Cl1-Ge1-Cl2
10276(3) C1-C2-C3 1266(2) C4-C3-N2 1209(2) C2-C4-C3 1208(3)
The formation of compound 22 indicates that ligand 20 has a different reactivity to
the derivative ligand 12 due to the exchange of Dip-group with iso-propyl But the
situation of complex 23 shows a possibility of a dianionic chelating coordination[30 87]
Results and Discussion
- 51 -
of ligand 20 Coordination chemistry with ligand 20 is currently being investigated for
its suitability to serve as bidentate donor ligand for complexes with low-valent Si Ge
and also transition-metals
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28
Since the successful isolation of halogen bonded silylene and germylene[31a 32b 80]
chemists faced the challenge weather compounds like LEII-X-E
IIL [E = Si Ge Sn X
= O S Se] in which two metallylene moieties are bridged by a single X-atom can be
stabilized at room temperature Key points of this assignment are the identification of
effective ligands for the stabilization of metallylenes and a feasible synthetic route
There is a special interest to synthesize this kind of compounds due to their chemical
nature and coordination properties
Previous attempts to synthesize a stable bis-silylene oxide 28b from silylene 28a[30]
has been unsuccessful The isolated product originating from the reaction of water
with the silylene 28a was the stable siloxysilylene 28c[10a]
(a mixed-valent disiloxane)
(Scheme 317) Recently Roesky et al proposed the formation of bis-silylene oxide 28
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2macr) as a reactive intermediate in the reaction of the bis-
silylene I24[37]
(aLSi-Si
aL) with N2O However 28 could be neither detected nor
chemically trapped[116]
By addition of water to two molar chlorosilylene 26[31a]
in
toluene the expected disiloxane 27 could not be isolated from a complicated reaction
mixture (Scheme 317 )
In the following the isolation of the first oxygen-bridged bis-silylene 28 by a facile
synthetic protocol using 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(HSiCl2)2O as starting
material will be described
Results and Discussion
- 52 -
Scheme 317 Synthesis of siloxysilylene 28c and hydrolysis of chlorosilylene 26
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28
The reaction of 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane (HSiCl2)2O with 2 molar equiv of
lithium amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the desired disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield
(Scheme 318) The target bis-silylene oxide 28 was readily available by
dehydrochloration of 27 employing 2 molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene
Recrystallization in toluene afforded pale yellow crystals of 28[32a]
in 76 yield The
molecular structure of new compounds 27 and 28 was characterized by means of
spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 318 Synthesis of disiloxane 27 and bis-silylene oxide 28
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 27 reveals two singlets one for the
tBu groups at δ =
120 ppm and one corresponding to the Si-H protons at δ = 598 ppm as well as one
set of resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of
Results and Discussion
- 53 -
27 shows a singlet resonance at δ = -1110 ppm The 1H-NMR spectra of 28 displays a
singlet of tBu at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for Ph group in aromatic
resonance region The 29
Si-NMR signal of 28 (δ = -161 ppm) appears shifted ca 95
ppm downfield from the precursor 27 This shift is comparable to that reported for the
triply coordinated silylene alkoxides (aLSiO
tBu) (δ = -52 ppm) and (
aLSiO
iPr) (δ = -
135 ppm)[31b]
respectively
The molecular structure of disiloxane 27 is shown in Figure 311 The center Si1-
O1-Si2 part of molecule 27 was extensively disordered Therefore the X-ray data were
not suitable for accurate discussion Even though the nearly unbent Si1-O1-Si2 angle
(1680deg) in 27 shows a very similar bonded character with sp-hybridized oxygen
bridge in comparison to another disiloxane compounds[118]
The molecule of bis-silylene oxide 28 (Figure 312 left) contains two triply
coordinated Si atoms and two lone pairs one at each of the Si centers Those are two
silylene moieties The sum of bond angles at Si1 and Si2 are 27769deg and 27534deg
respectively which is consistent with the presence of lone pairs In the molecular
structure of 28 Si-O distances of 1641(2) and 1652(2) pm are comparable to those of
siloxysilylene 28c (16442(3) pm and 16501(2) pm) and thus typical for silicon-
oxygen single bonds of other disiloxanes[118]
Moreover as expected for an disiloxane-
like system the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent (15988(15)deg) and larger than
that observed for a C-O-C moiety of ethers
DFT calculations of the compound 28 was performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU
Berlin) at the B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set with the GAUSSIAN-03 program
package[101c 119]
The structure obtained by X-ray analysis was used as the input for
these calculation Optimized structure of 28 is shown in Figure 312 (right) DFT
calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small The
Si-O-Si bond angle of optimized structure is 180deg However the energy difference
between the experimental geometry and linear arrangement is only 071 kJsdotmolminus1
The
Results and Discussion
- 54 -
HOMO (-0163 eV) and HOMO-1 (-0178 eV) represent mainly lone pairs at Si atoms
The LUMO (-0020 eV) is located on the phenyl group of the amidinate ligand
(Figure 313)
Figure 311 Molecular structure of 27 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity The center Si1-O1-Si2
part was extensively disordered Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Cl1-Si1
20349(16) Cl2-Si2 22017(11) Si2-O1 1581(8) Si2-N3 1798(2) Si2-N4
1968(2) Si1-O1 1562(8) Si1-N2 1750(10) Si1-N1 1994(6) Si1-O1-Si2
1680(6)
Figure 312 Molecular structure of 28 (left) and optimized structure (right)
Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted
for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Si1-O1 1641(2) Si2-O1
1652(2) Si1-N1 1896(3) Si1-N2 1902(3) Si2-N3 1888(2) Si2-N4 1908(3)
Si1-O1-Si2 15988(15) O1-Si1-N1 10417(12) O1-Si1-N2 10535(11) O1-Si2-
N3 10196(11) O1-Si2-N4 10481(12) N1-Si1-N2 6815(10) N3-Si2-N4
6855(11)
Results and Discussion
- 55 -
Figure 313 Calculated frontier molecular orbitals of 28
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel
To probe the chelating coordination ability of 28 its reactivity toward Ni(cod)2
(cod = cycloocta-15-diene) was investigated Toluene was added to a mixture of bis-
silylene oxide 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 at room temperature to furnish an
intensely red-colored reaction solution Recrystallization of the crude product from a
saturated n-hexane solution at -30 degC afforded dark red crystals of the Ni complex
29[32a]
in 91 yield (Scheme 319) The isolated compound 29 is the first bidentate
bis-silylene transition-metal complex This work initiates a significant progress on the
chelating silylene ligand transition-metal coordination chemistry The constitution and
composition of 29 could be determined by NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis
and ESI mass spectrometry
Scheme 319 Synthesis of bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
Results and Discussion
- 56 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one singlet for the
tBu groups at δ = 130
ppm and one set of resonances at δ = 281 295 and 504 ppm for the COD-ligand and
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one
singlet (δ = 328 ppm) which shows a downfield shift relative to that of the ldquofreerdquo
ligand 28 The observed downfield shift for the 29
SiII nuclei in 29 clearly suggests the
presence of a bis-silylene chelated complex
The chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to Ni0 is confirmed by X-ray
diffraction analysis The molecular structure of 29 is displayed in Figure 314
Complex 29 containing Ni0 is diamagnetic because of 18 electrons in the valence
shell The two silylene subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are
tetrahedral coordinated to the nickel atom with the Si1-Ni1-Si2 angle at 6890(3)deg
The Si-O bond lengths in 29 [17011 (15) and 17081(17) pm] are longer than that in
28 [1641(2) and 1652(2) pm] while the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 29 (9344(8)deg) is
significantly smaller than that in 28 The Ni-Si bond lengths [21908(7) and 21969(7)
pm] are slightly shorter than those in silylene nickel complex 29a [2207(2) and
2216(2) pm][120]
but longer than those found in silylene nickel complex 29b
(21395(8) pm)[121]
Scheme 320 shows clear bonded prospect of three complexes
Moreover the Ni-Si bond lengths of bis-silylene nickel complex 29 are longer than
those in ylide-like silylene-nickel complexes [20369(6) and 20597(10) pm][70a b 122]
The strong σ-donor character of bis-silylene ligand 28 causes a more electron rich Ni
center It indicates a somewhat stronger π-back-donation from the nickel atom to the
chelating COD-ligand Therefore the Ni-C distances (2070-2090 pm) in 29 are
shorter than those in Ni(cod)2 (211-213 pm)[123]
and silylene nickel complex 29b
(2130-2146 pm)[121]
The coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 with other transition-metals (for example
Ti Cu) is currently investigated together with the reactivity of these complexes on
their use as molecular catalysts
Results and Discussion
- 57 -
29
[Si][Si]
O
Ni
[Si] [Si]
Ni
CO CO
[Si] [Si]
Ni
N N tButBu
Si
N N DipDip
Si
[Si] = [Si] =
29a 29b
2207 2216
2191 2197689deg
934deg
1084deg 1019deg
1708 1701
2139 2139
Scheme 320 Comparison of bonding state in complexes 29 29a and 29b bond lengths in pm
Figure 314 Molecular structure of 29 (left) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Si1-Ni1 21969(7) Si2-Ni1 21908(7) Si1-O1 17011(15)
Si1-N1 18929(19) Si1-N2 1875(2) Si2-O1 17081(17) Si2-N3 18776(19)
Si2-N4 1893(2) Si1-O1-Si2 9344(8) Si1-Ni1-Si2 6890(3) N1-Si1-N2
6941(9) N3-Si2-N4 6954(8)
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
This part of the research is the cowork with Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)
Due to the unique reactivity and electronic properties compounds with a
heteroleptic multiple bond between heavier main-group elements have attracted
considerable attention particularly those between group 14 and 15 elements this is
Results and Discussion
- 58 -
attributed to the pronounced polarity of the E14-E15 multiple bonds[124]
Phosphasilene
containing Si-P double bonds is an analogous of iminosilane The first isolable
phosphasilene with a three coordinate Si and a two coordinate P atom was reported by
Bickelhaupt and coworkers (Scheme 321) in 1984[125]
and several other similar
species containing localized and delocalized Si=P bonds were synthesized and
structurally characterized in the later period[126]
Their rich chemistry provides new
approaches to functional Si-P compounds
Furthermore the more challenging phosphasilyne with a silicon-phosphorus triple
bond (Scheme 321) is heretofore unknown[127]
this is mainly due to the high
tendency of the highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds to dimerize or even
oligomerize[126c]
However the availability of elusive phosphasilyne species would be
a strongly desired progression with respect to the synthesis of polyfunctional silicon-
phosphorus containing materials from it By spatial protection of a Si-P multiple bond
through the steric hindrance by suitable bulky substituents the oligomerization of the
highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds could be prevented additionally to the benefit of
the donor-acceptor stabilization of Si-P multiple bonds
Scheme 321 The first phosphasilene (left) and phosphasilyne (right)
Imaginable methods to synthesize a phosphasilyne employing corresponding
precursors comprise oxidation of bis-silylene 30a with elemental phosphorus and
elimination of phosphino silane 30b (Scheme 322) Whether the phosphasilyne 30c is
available depends only on the spatial andor donor-acceptor protection of bulky ligand
L Now there are not many choices of silicon compounds with very bulky ligand L
that are suitable for preparation of phosphasilynes Our current attempt was on the
Results and Discussion
- 59 -
way towards phosphasilyne employing amidinato ligand stabilized chlorosilylene
aLSiCl
[31a] However the isolated dimerized product was the unique 24-disila-13-
diphosphacyclobuta-13-diene (aLSiP2Si
aL) 31
[128] starting from the new N-
heterocyclic bis(trimethylsilyl) phosphino silylene precursor 30[128]
Scheme 322 Imaginable methods towards a phosphasilyne
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The starting material bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanyl silylene 30[128]
was easily
accessible in 83 yield by salt elimination reaction of N-heterocyclic chlorosilylene
26[31a]
with the corresponding lithium phosphide LiP(SiMe3)2 at room temperature
(Scheme 323) The 1H-NMR spectrum exhibits one singlet at δ = 058 ppm for methyl
of silyl and another singlet at δ = 124 ppm for methyl of NtBu as well as one set of
resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand in the region of 681-741 ppm
The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 30 shows two sets of doublet at δ = 229 ppm for silicon
of silyl and at δ = 1943 ppm for silicon of silylene The latter is much downfield
shifted than that of previously reported aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (562 ppm)
[31b] One
singlet at δ = -221 ppm was found by 31
P-NMR measurement which exhibits a
tremendous upfield shift when compared with that of aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (-165
ppm)[31b]
Results and Discussion
- 60 -
Scheme 323 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The molecular structure of 30 was also substantiated by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 315) The molecule 30 contains triply coordinate Si and P
atoms and two lone pairs at the Si and P center respectively The Si and P center
display a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry The sum of bond angles is 33071deg at
the P center and 27762deg at the Si center The latter is consistent with that (2765deg) of
aLSi-P
iPr2 The angle of N(2)-Si(1)-P(1) (10854(8)deg) is larger than that of N(1)-Si(1)-
P(1) (9998(9)deg) Si-N distances of 1877(3) and 1882(2) pm in 30 are comparable to
those (1875(1) pm and 1881(1) pm) of the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative
[31b] The Si1-P1
distance of 30 (22838(12) pm) is slightly shorter than the Si-P bond length (2307(8)
pm) in the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative and the elongated P1-Si2 and P1-Si3 single bonds in
30 (22264(13) and 22321(12) pm) reflect steric congestion within the P(SiMe3)2
subunit
Figure 315 Molecular structure of 30 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 22838(12) P1-Si2 22264(13) P1-Si3 22321(12)
Si1-N1 1877(3) Si1-N2 1882(2) Si2-P1-Si3 10859(5) Si2-P1-Si1 103905
Results and Discussion
- 61 -
Si3-P1-Si1 11822(5) N1-Si1-N2 6910(11) N1-Si1-P1 9998(9) N2-Si1-P1
10854(8)
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Since the phosphanyl silylene 30 was successfully accessed bearing a SiMe3 as
reactive leaving-groups at phosphorus[129]
its suitability as a precursor for the
formation of a phosphasilyne was probed Because of the labile nature of the P-SiMe3
bonds in 30 the compound was exposed to dichlorotriphenylphosphorane Ph3PCl2 as
a promising smooth oxidant for desilylation with the intention to produce the desired
phosphasilyne along with Me3SiCl and PPh3 Surprisingly the reaction of 30 with one
molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 in toluene at room temperature led to the formation of the
unique compound 31[128]
(Scheme 324) which could be isolated as yellow crystals in
72 yield
Scheme 324 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Compound 31 represents a dimerized form of the desired phosphasilyne and was
fully characterized by means of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-
ray diffraction analysis The 1H-NMR spectra of 31 displays a singlet for the
tBu
groups at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for the Ph groups in the ldquoaromaticrdquo
region The triplet signal in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 31 at δ = 265 ppm (1JSiP = 998
Hz) indicates that two P atoms are bonded to silicon center Meanwhile the more
deshielded (ca 46 ppm) singlet resonance at δ = -1649 ppm in the 31
P-NMR spectrum
compared to that in 30 is in accordance with the four-membered ring structure of 31
Results and Discussion
- 62 -
bearing two polarized Si-P π-bonds
The result of the X-ray diffraction structure analysis is in accordance with that of
NMR spectroscopy which confirms that 31 is a 24-disila-13-diphosphacyclobuta-
13-diene (Figure 316) The Si2P2 core in 31 has a planar diamond-shaped geometry
and possesses two-coordinated P atoms and four-coordinated Si atoms each with a
dative NrarrSi bond The Si-P bonds lengths in 31 are 21701(12) and 21717(11) pm
respectively which are in the range of a Si=P double bond length (2095(3) pm) in the
Phosphasilene[128]
and the Si-P single bond length of 30 (22838(12) pm) this
indicates σ- and π-electron resonance stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has
been confirmed by theoretical calculations (see p 64) Of note the transannular
Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo (25626 pm) is shorter than the Si-Si distance of disilacyclopropene[130]
(tBu3Si)2SiSi(Si
tBu3)C-Ad (Ad = adamantyl) (25797(8) and 25991(9) pm) and hexa-
tert-butyldisilane tBu3Si-Si
tBu3 (2697(9) pm) and the P1middotmiddotmiddotP1rsquo (3505 pm)
separations in 31 is much larger than that for P-P bonds observed in tetrahedral
elementary phosphorus P4 (221 pm)[131]
Evidently the peculiarly short Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo
distance is caused by the geometric constraints of the Si1-P1-Si1rsquo and endocyclic P1-
Si1-P1rsquo angles of 7234(4)deg and 10766(4)deg respectively and not driven by attractive
Si1-Si1rsquo interaction
Figure 316 Molecular structure of 31 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 21701(12) P1-Si1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-N1 1858(3)
Si1-N2 1856(2) Si1-P1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-Si1rsquo 25626(16) Si1-P1-Si1rsquo 7234(4)
N2-Si1-N1 7078(11) P1-Si1-P1rsquo 10766(4)
Results and Discussion
- 63 -
The formation of 31 in a multistep which is depicted in Scheme 325 was proposed
Firstly formation of the corresponding chloro-(silyl)phosphanyl silylene intermediate
31a is conducted by cleavage of one of the Si-P bonds of the P(SiMe3)2 subunit with
Ph3PCl2 Subsequently elimination of Me3SiCl from 31a occurs to give the reactive
intermediate 31b which could be treated as a silylene-phosphinidene (Scheme 325
right) or a phosphasilyne (Scheme 325 left) further dimerization of intermediate 31b
affords the isolated product 31 A similar dimerization process has been proposed by
Wiberg for disilynes (SiequivSi) as reactive intermediates to produce
tetrasilatetrahedranes[132]
To elucidate the reason for the formation of 31 preferred over its hypothetical Si2P2-
tetrahedranceisomer 31d (Scheme 326) we performed DFT calculations of 31 and
disiladiphosphatetrahedranes 31d The result shows that 31d is much less stable than
compound 31 with 462 kcalmiddotmolminus1
higher in energy which is in agreement with the
experimental result Compound 31 with a planar structure is most likely stabilized by
the dative NrarrSi coordination of the bulky amidinato ligands Meanwhile this also
leads to a shorter Si-N bond length that is 1856(2) and 1858(3) pm in 31 are shooter
than those (1877(3) pm and 1882(2) pm) of in 30 and also those of in chlorosilylene
aLSiCl (1870(2) pm and 1917(2) pm)
[31a] Furthermore this NrarrSi donor
stabilization could demonstrate an ylide-like electronic structure of 31 (Scheme 326)
Scheme 325 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 31
Results and Discussion
- 64 -
Scheme 326 Resonance structures of 31
In order to unravel the electronic configuration of 31 DFT calculations at
B3LYP6-31G(d) level using the parameters obtained from X-ray diffraction as the
initial structure were performed[101c 119]
The optimized structure matched the
experimental data of 31 very well According to the NPA charges each Si atom in the
Si2P2-ring has a large positive net charge (+1204) while as expected P atoms in the
ring bear slight smaller negative charges (-0765) Meanwhile HOMO-5 of 31 shows
a set of Si-P σ-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 left) whereas the HOMO-2 contains
mainly the delocalized two π-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 right) Accordingly a
NBO analysis indicates that the Si2P2-core of 31 bears a Lewis structure with four
occupied σ-bond orbitals for the Si-P bonds (1917e for Si1-P1 1916e for Si1-P1rsquo
1916e for Si1rsquo-P1 and 1918e for Si1rsquo-P1rsquo) along with two filled Si-P π-bond
orbitals with 1770e for the Si1- P1 and Si1rsquo-P1rsquo π-bonding interaction respectively
The latter canonical π-bond orbitals are strongly polarized toward the P atoms
(8753 at the P and 1247 at the Si) Likewise the WBI (Wiberg Bond Index)
values of the Si-P bonds (1142 and 1140) are higher than that of the phosphino
silylene 30 (0920)
Figure 317 Molecular orbitals of 31 representing the presence of σ-electron and π-
electron delocalization within the Si2P2 cycle HOMO-5 (left) and HOMO-2 (right)
Results and Discussion
- 65 -
According to the aforementioned betaine (ylide)-like resonance stabilization 31
totally differs from cyclobuta-13-diene derivatives The calculations of the nucleus
independent chemical shift[92]
(NICS) also supports this conclusion The result of
NICS reveals negative values (NICS(1) = -257 and NICS(0) = -601 ppm) indicating
that 31 has a somewhat aromatic character which is opposite to the properties of
cyclobuta-13-dienes that are antiaromatic As a summary the results of theoretical
calculations are in agreement with the idea to describe 31 as the ylide-like resonance
structure 31c with some contribution of the resonance forms As a result the smaller
endocyclic angle at phosphorus than that at silicon is contributed by the repulsion
between the negatively charged P atoms
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
Nucleophilic and electrophilic properties of Si Ge and Sn metallylenes were
discussed in chapter 32 (see p 46) Due to the strong donor property of the carbene
lone pair in coordination to empty p-orbital of low valent Si Ge Sn atom centers
some carbene stabilized divalent Si Ge Sn halides could be synthesized in the last
twenty years[28 44 133]
There is also a great interest to find mixed Si Ge Sn
metallylene-metallylene complexes in which one metallylene is stabilized through the
lone pair coordination of another one In the following the synthesis of the first
example of a silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex will be shown
The dimeric micro-chlorotin(II) amides 32[53]
(I44 in Introduction) was identified as
useful candidate for the generation of such an example The synthesis of
bis(trimethylsilyl)amino-tin chloride ((Me3Si)2N-SnCl)2 32 is shown in Scheme 327
Bis(bis(trimethylsilyl)amino)2tin(II) ((Me3Si)2N)2Sn 32a could be prepared in good
yield by the double lithioamination of SnCl2 with LiN(SiMe3)2 in a 1 2 ratio[47a]
The
Results and Discussion
- 66 -
same reaction but with one molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 gives the monosubstituted
product 32 It was also easily accessible by amino chlorine exchange between
((Me3Si)2N)2Sn and SnCl2 in a 11 ratio[53]
(Scheme 327)
Scheme 327 Synthesis of micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32
The dimeric structure of 32 can be splited by treatment with Lewis base for
example Si Ge Sn metallylenes In order to synthesize a silylene coordinated
stannylene chlorosilylene 26 was mixed with micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32 in toluene A
logical intermediate 33a is proposed here as an inevitable intermediate (Scheme 328)
At first chloro bridges are opened because of the coordination of silylene 26 to create
33a Then via amino chlorine exchange product 33 becomes accessible From a
saturated hexane solution at low temperature the silylene-stannylene dichloride 33
was isolated as colorless crystals in 49 yield The product 33 was determined by X-
ray diffraction analysis and elemental analysis Owing to the unstable nature of
silylene and tin dichloride coordination bond (Si rarrSn) 33 decomposed in a grey
mixture powder of amino silylene also-N(SiMe3)2
[33d] and SnCl2 after isolation from
solvent in vacuum 1H-NMR spectrum shows only resonances of amino silylene in
good agreement with the reported compound[33d]
Scheme 328 Synthesis of aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
According to X-ray diffraction analysis compound 33 represents the first example
of silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex The molecular structure of 33 (Figure 318)
Results and Discussion
- 67 -
exhibits a trigonal pyramidal geometry on Sn and a distorted tetrahedral configuration
of Si The Cl-Sn-Cl angle is 9400(9)deg and the sum of bond angles at the Sn center is
2820deg The SirarrSn distance (2740(2) pm) is longer than the Si-Sn bond lengths
(2622(2) and 2641(2) pm) in the silyl stannane compound[134]
(Scheme 329) The
Sn-Cl distances of 2468(3) and 2473(3) pm in 33 are comparable to those in a
carbene-stannylene complex (2456(2) and 2458(2) pm) (Scheme 329)[133b]
Si-N
distances of 1832(7) and 1827(7) pm in 33 are somewhat shorter than those of
phosphanyl silylene 30 (1877(3) and 1882(2) pm) and amino silylene (18780(10)
and 18776(10) pm) which is the remaining molecule of 33 without SnCl2[33d]
Scheme 329 A silyl stannane[134]
(left) and a carbene-stannylene complex[133b]
(right)
Figure 318 Molecular structure of 33 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Sn1-Si1 2740(2) Sn1-Cl1 2468(3) Sn1-Cl2 2473(3) Si1-
N1 1832(7) Si1-N2 1827(7) Si1-N3 1705(7) Si2-N3 1780(7) Si3-N3
1791(8) Cl1-Sn1-Cl2 9400(9) Cl1-Sn1-Si1 9886(8) Cl2-Sn1-Si1 8914(7)
Sn1-Si1-N3 1252(3) N2-Si1-N1 722(3) Si1-N3-Si2 1172(4) Si1-N3-Si3
1248(4) Si2-N3-Si3 1179(4)
Results and Discussion
- 68 -
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34
Because of the feasible structural tuning with many choices of donor groups a
general overview of pincer arenes was introduced (Introduction p 19) Compounds of
type 35a having a pincer-like skeleton are depicted in Scheme 330 They represent
promising new types of pincer ligands which could coordinate with a metal by facile
C-H activation in the ortho-position Although many bis-metallylenes are accessible
(see Introduction 13) pincer ligands containing divalent heavier group 14 elements
are new in the field of synthetic inorganic chemistry At the same time the desired
pincer arenes 35a could serve as much stronger σ-donor ligand towards transition-
metals than traditional phosphane ligands[70 79b c 122]
Up to now only a few isolable
spacer separated bis-silylenes with two divalent silicon centers are known these
include bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
in this work and bis-silylenes I42[52]
I58[61]
and
I64[65]
(in Introduction p 12-15) Inspired by these results the synthesis of a
silicon(II)-based pincer ligand 35a appeared attractive and its coordination property
towards transition-metals should be investigated
Scheme 330 Low-valent group 14 metallylene-based ECE pincer arenes
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35
Scheme 331 shows the synthetic route for the first attempt towards a bis-silylene-
based SiCSi pincer arene 35d The phenolation of trichlorosilane was readily
accessible to disilane 35b in hexane Reaction of 35b with two molar equiv of lithium
Results and Discussion
- 69 -
amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the amidinate substituted disilane 35c The bis-
silylene pincer arene 35d was not easily separable by the following dehydrochloration
of 35c employing two molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene Products seemed a
complicated silylene-LiCl mixture which was not soluble in toluene or diethylether
The desired bis-silylene pincer arene could not be isolated from mixtures
Scheme 331 The first attempt towards a bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35d
But the synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35 could be achieved through the protocol
in Scheme 332 Dilithiation of 46-di-tert-butylresorcinol with nBuLi furnishes the
corresponding 13-dilithium resorcinolate 34 After a salt metathesis reaction with the
N-donor stabilized chloro silylene 26[32b]
in the molar ratio of 12 the desired
compound 35[33b]
could be isolated as pale yellow crystals in 79 yield The
constitution and composition of SiCSi pincer arene 35 was elucidated by 1H-
13C-
and 29
Si-NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 332 Synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 35 exhibits one singlet for the N
tBu groups at δ = 124
ppm and one singlet for CtBu groups at δ = 174 ppm and one set of resonances for the
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands Almost identical variable-temperature (VT) 1H-
NMR spectra of 35 in C7D8 in the temperature range of 210 to 320 K indicate
Results and Discussion
- 70 -
relatively low rotation barriers of the Si-O bonds on the NMR time scale A sharp
singlet in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum at δ = -240 ppm is comparable to that observed for
alkoxy-substituted silylenes aLSiOR (R =
tBu
iPr)
[31b]
The molecular structure of 35 could be confirmed by a preliminary single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis but a discussion of metric parameters was not possible
because of the moderate crystal quality Still it is clear that the two silylene-like
moieties in 35 face in the almost same direction (Figure 319) To get more
information about the molecular structure of 35 DFT calculations [B3LYP6-
31G(d)][101c 119]
were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The geometry of 35
obtained by X-ray crystallographic analysis was used as the initial structure The
optimized structure of 35e and 35ersquo is displayed in Figure 320 The Si1-O1-C1 angle
(14179deg) is larger than that of Si2-O2-C3 (13217deg) While the dihedral angle of Si1-
O1-C1-C2 is 2437deg the dihedral angle of Si2-O2-C3-C2 is 039deg
Figure 319 Molecular structure of 35 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity X-
ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The Si-O single bond distances of 17056 and 17190 pm are little longer than those
of bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
(1641(2) and 1652(2) pm) and alkoxysilylenes aLSiOR
(R = tBu
iPr)
[31b] (16442(3) and 16501(2) pm) due to steric hindrance The C2-
Results and Discussion
- 71 -
symmetric rotational isomer 35ersquo was identified as a stable form on the hyperpotential
energy surface with a slightly lower energy of 75 kJsdotmolminus1
Interestingly the Si-O
distance of 35ersquo is little longer than those of 35e The bond rotation barrier of the Si-O
bonds in 35e and 35ersquo is similar and estimated to be +334 kJsdotmolminus1
by theoretical
calculation
Figure 320 Optimized structures of bis-silylene SiCSi pincer ligand 35e (left) and
its rotational isomer 35ersquo (right) at the B3LYP6-31G(d) level Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) of 35e and 35ersquo
compound 35e Si1-O1 17056 Si2-O2 17191 Si1-O1-C1 14179 Si2-O2-C3
13217 compound 35ersquo Si1-O1 17294 Si2-O2 17294 Si1-O1-C1 13028 Si2-
O2-C3 13028
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII
complex 36
Although bis-silylene 35 bearing an amidinate ligand may not serve as a π-acceptor
it was a strong σ-donor ligand To investigate the pincer-type coordination ability of
35 its reactivity towards phosphine palladium(0) complexes was evaluated Treatment
of 35 with 05 equiv of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)-palladium Pd(PPh3)4 in hexane
at room temperature afforded the novel silylene-silyl(phenyl)palladium(II) complex
36[33b]
as sole product which could be isolated as orange crystals in 81 yield
(Scheme 333)
Results and Discussion
- 72 -
Scheme 333 Formation of 36 from reaction of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
A different type of silyl-silylene metal complexes has been described by Ogino and
co-workers[66b c 78]
Compound 36 was fully characterized by multinuclear NMR
spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis The structure of 36
indicates that two equivalents of 35 were consumed With a 11 molar ratio of starting
materials the yield of 36 decreased (asymp30) but still no other product or intermediate
could be detected by 1H-NMR spectroscopy
The molecular structure of 36 is shown in Figure 321 Remarkably compound 36
crystallizes as racemic mixture of its R and S enantiomers of which only the S form is
presented here The PdII atom has a typical distorted square-planar configuration
defined by the two silylene SiII atoms Si2 and Si3 the silyl Si
IV atom Si1 and the
carbon atom C1 of the central aryl ring Interestingly there is a 12-hydride shift from
palladium to silicon during the complexation forming a Si-H silyl group which breaks
the former Si1-N2 bond in 35 Due to coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo The bent Si3-Pd1-C1 angle of 16783(12)deg in 36
is contrary to the linear X-Pd-C (X = Cl I Ph 4-fluorophenyl OCOCF3 etc) angles
of reported palladium(II) complexes supported by a PCP type pincer arene ligand[72b
77 135] The Si1-Pd1-Si2 angle of 15503(4)deg deviates from the linear alignment and is
smaller than the respective P-Pd-P angle of the PCP pincer-type palladium
complex[72b 77 135]
The silylene PdII dative bond lengths (Si2-Pd1 23271(12) and
Si3-Pd1 23038(11) pm) of 36 are shorter than that of the Si1-Pd1 distance
Results and Discussion
- 73 -
(23561(12) pm) illustrating the difference between a silyl ligand (Si1) with a SiIV
-Pd
single bond vs a silylene ligand (Si2 and Si3) with a SiII-Pd dative bond However
the Si2-Pd1 and Si3-Pd1 distances in 36 are somewhat longer than those of
silylenerarrpalladium complexes[136]
(224 and 226 pm) from Kira (Scheme 334)
Furthermore Pd1-C1(aryl) bond length of 36 (2125(3) pm) is longer than those of
reported PCP pincer-type palladium(II) complexes (Pd-C distance 197-203 pm)[135a-e
135g] presumably because of steric congestion
Scheme 334 Silylenerarrpalladium complexes from Kira[136]
Figure 321 Molecular structure of 36 Only the S form of racemic mixture is
shown Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity except for the H1 atom Selected bond lengths (pm) and
angles (deg) Pd1-C1 2125(3) Pd1-Si1 23561(12) Pd1-Si2 23271(12) Pd1-Si3
23038(11) Si1-O1 1694(3) Si1-N1 1789(4) Si2-O2 1675(3) Si2-N5 1862(3)
Si2-N6 1840(4) Si3-O3 1662(3) Si3-N7 1888(3) Si3-N8 1860(3) Si4-O4
1704(3) Si4-N3 1893(4) Si4-N4 1892(4) Si1-Pd1-Si2 15503(4) Si1-Pd1-C1
Si2Si1
C1
Pd
Si3
213 pm
233 pm236 pm
230 pm
O1 O2
Results and Discussion
- 74 -
7861(11) Si2-Pd1-C1 7681(11) Si3-Pd1-C1 16783(12)
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 36 shows twelve sets of nonequivalent
tBu groups
which agrees with its crystallographic analysis Moreover the resonance for the Si-H
proton is observed at δ = 659 ppm The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 36 in C6D6 displays
four signals at δ = minus87 (aLSi Si4) 397 (HSi Si1) 623 and 658 ppm (SirarrPd Si2
and Si3) respectively The chemical shift of the Si1 atom (SiIV
-H) has moved upfield
comparable to those of a related HSirarrPd complex reported by Kira Iwamoto and co-
workers because of the electronegative N and O atoms bound to the Si1 atom[136a]
The 29
Si resonances of the two SiII atoms (Si2 Si3) coordinated to the palladium
center are similar to those of other amidinate-based silylene transition-metal
complexes[71 137]
and significantly shifted to higher field in comparison to those
reported for donor-free silylene palladium complexes owing to the additional N-donor
coordination of the amidinate ligand to the SiII atom Additionally the infrared
spectrum of 36 shows a weak Si-H stretching vibration band at 2135 cmminus1
The
observed stretching frequency of 36 is higher than those of other reported palladium
hydridosilyl complexes (2008ndash2121 cmminus1
)[135c 135f 136a]
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism
To investigate the uncommon reactivity of 35 towards Pd(PPh3)4 quantum
chemical calculations using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP level using
6-31G(d) basis set for H C N O P and Si atoms and the LANL2DZ level for the Pd
atom with the Gaussian 03 program for model compounds 36andash36e were performed
by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)[101c 119]
A schematic representation of the potential
energy surface of the proposed pathway for the formation of 36 is given in Scheme
335
Results and Discussion
- 75 -
Scheme 335 DFT-derived relative energies of model compounds 35a-35e
From this it was assumed that stepwise dissociation of phosphine ligands of
Pd(PPh3)4 forms 36a as the initial intermediate by the insertion reaction of Pd0 into
the pincer C-H bond of the central aryl ring of 35 Subsequently the 16-valence
electron PdII complex 36a undergoes a 12-hydride shift from palladium to a silicon(II)
donor atom to form the 14-valence electron silylene silyl(aryl)palladium(II) complex
36c as second intermediate The latter process occurs through transition state 36b-TS
with a barrier of +878 kJsdotmolminus1
and 36c is only 67 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36b-TS
The electron-deficient PdII complex 36c readily undergoes coordination with
phosphine ligand or silylene donor moiety of ldquofreerdquo 35 leading to the formation of
more stable 16-electron complexes According to that the calculated relative energies
of PrarrPd complex 36d stabilized by PPh3 and SirarrPd complex 36e stabilized by
methoxy silylene aLSiOMe as model silylene donor are +380 and minus176 kJsdotmol
minus1
respectively Since SiII of intramolecular N-donor stabilized silylenes is a stronger σ-
donor than PIII
of phosphines complex 36e is 556 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36d
Overall the stepwise transformation of 36a into 36e in the presence of PPh3 and the
model silylene aLSiOMe is exothermic by 176 kJsdotmol
minus1
Results and Discussion
- 76 -
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
After successful isolation of the first bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
and the first bis-
silylene pincer arene 35[33b]
in order to obtain other new bis-silylene(germylene) as
potential bidentate σ-donor ligands the novel type of bis-silylene(germylene) with a
ferrocendiyl spacer which could result in unique properties was investigated The
facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
aLSi-Fc-Si
aL 38 (Fc = ferrocendiyl) and
aLGe-Fc-Ge
aL 40 respectively as well as
their corresponding cobalt and iron complexes could be realized in the course of this
PhD thesis[33a]
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40
Since the reaction of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
with dilithium resorcinolate 34 afforded
the SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 35 was assumed that chlorosilylene 26 and
chlorogermylene 39[41]
(aLGeCl) could be suitable precursors for the desired bis-
metallylene functionalized ferrocenes Ferrocene with nBuLi and TMEDA
(tetramethylethyldiamine) in hexane gave 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37[138]
quantitatively
Subsequently treatment of chlorosilylene 26 with 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 led to the
formation of bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield (Scheme 336) Similarly
bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40[33a]
could be isolated in 77 yield by salt metathesis
reaction of 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorogermylene 39 The structures of 38
and 40 were determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis mass
spectrometry and X-ray crystallographic analysis (only for compound 40)
1H-NMR spectra of compound 38 and 40 are very similar They exhibit a singlet for
four tBu groups (38 δ = 116 ppm 40 δ = 111 ppm) Two sets of hyperfine coupled
triplet (38 δ = 451 and 472 ppm 40 δ = 461 and 471 ppm) are assigned to the
protons of ferrocene The resonance of the Ph protons (38 and 40) appears in aromatic
Results and Discussion
- 77 -
resonance region from 690 to 717 ppm Accordingly the 13
C-NMR spectra of 38 and
40 each show three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (38 δ = 709 727 and
846 ppm 40 δ = 701 723 and 920 ppm) Furthermore bis-silylene 38 gives rise to
a singlet at δ = 433 ppm in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum
Scheme 336 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 40
Single crystals of 40 suitable for an X-ray single crystal analysis were obtained
from hexane solution The crystals of 40 consist of two conformational isomers as
shown in Figure 322 Two molecular structures of 40 confirm that the two N-donor-
stabilized germylene moieties are bonded to C1 and C7 (endo-configuration) or C8
(exo-configuration) of the ferrocendiyl spacer Distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C7 in
40-endo are 1979(9) and 1983(11) pm while distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C8 in 40-
exo are 1991(2) and 19774(19) pm respectively The Ge-N bonds (2006 to 20402
pm) of two isomers are slightly shorter than those of precursor 39[41]
The GeII centers
in 40 adopt a pyramidal geometry with the sums of bond angles of 25593deg and
25669deg for 40-exo 2591deg and 2546deg for 40-endo respectively The structural feature
of the amidinate ligands in 40 is reminiscent of those reported for related bis-
germylenes such as I63[64]
(aLGe-NPh)2 and I75 I76 LGe-X-GeL (X = O S L =
tBuC(N-Dip)2)
[67] The isolation of two conformational isomers of 40-exo and 40-endo
indicates a small rotating energy of the functional ferrocendiyl That means bis-
germylene 40 and bis-silylene 38 don not need more activation energy serving as
bidentate ligand
Results and Discussion
- 78 -
Figure 322 Molecular structures of 40-endo (top) and 40-exo (bottom) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 40-endo (top) Ge(1)-C(1)
1979(9) Ge(2)-C(7) 1983(11) Ge(1)-N(1) 2027(8) Ge(1)-N(2) 2006(8)
Ge(2)-N(3) 2022(7) Ge(2)-N(4) 2037(7) C(1)-Ge(1)-N(2) 983(3) C(1)-Ge(1)-
N(1) 955(3) N(2)-Ge(1)-N(1) 653(3) C(7)-Ge(2)-N(3) 953(4) C(7)-Ge(2)-
N(4) 941(4) N(3)-Ge(2)-N(4) 652(3) for 40-exo (bottom) Ge1-C1 1991(2)
Ge2-C8 19774(19) Ge1-N1 20261(16) Ge1-N2 20247(17) Ge2-N3
20402(15) Ge2-N4 20162(16) C1-Ge1-N1 9662(7) C1-Ge1-N2 9445(7) N1-
Ge1-N2 6486(7) C8-Ge2-N3 9492(7) C8-Ge2-N4 9716(7) N3-Ge2-N4
6459(6)
The molecular structure of bis-silylene 38 has been ambiguously determined by X-
ray single crystal diffraction The structural feature of 38 is very similar to that of 40-
exo isomer However the X-ray data are not sufficient for any further discussion
(Figure 323)
Results and Discussion
- 79 -
Figure 323 Molecular structure of 38 X-ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The mass spectrometry confirmed the composition of 38 (Figure 324) The (ESI)
mass spectrum of 38 is dominated by a peak at mz 703329 which can be attributed to
the protonated molecular ion [38+H]+ Isotopic distribution of molecular peaks
demonstrates a good agreement with calculated mass composition The comparison of
experiment and calculation confirms the presence of bis-silylenyl substituted
ferrocene molecules
6 9 0 6 9 5 7 0 0 7 0 5 7 1 0 7 1 5 7 2 0
m z
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
Re
lative
Abu
nda
nce
7 0 3 3 2 9
7 0 4 3 3 2
7 0 5 3 3 47 0 1 3 3 4
7 0 6 3 2 96 9 0 2 4 9 6 9 5 2 2 5 7 1 7 3 4 57 1 0 4 7 3
7 0 3 3 3 1
7 0 4 3 3 4
7 0 5 3 3 87 0 1 3 3 6
7 0 6 3 3 17 1 0 3 3 5
N L 3 1 3 E 7
W Y-F e S i2 _ S p ri tze 1 -2 9 R T 0 0 0 -0 7 7 A V 2 9 T F T M S + c E S I F u ll m s [1 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 ]
N L 4 9 7 E 5
C 4 0 H 5 4 F e N 4 S i 2 + H C 4 0 H 5 5 F e 1 N 4 S i 2
p a C hrg 1
Figure 324 Experimental (top) and simulated (bottom) ESI-MS spectra of 38
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable silylene- and
germylene-substituted ferrocenes respectively Alternative example of SiII-ferrocene
Results and Discussion
- 80 -
compound is a disilene-functionalized ferrocene reported by Tokitoh and co-workers
recently[139]
However disilene derivates belong essentially to another type of low-
valent silicon compounds in comparison to triply coordinated silylenes Instead of
conjugated electronic effect of disilene-ferrocene system the ferrocene bridged bis-
silylene or bis-germylene system could have better chelating σ-donor character It is to
confirm in a coordination chemistry of bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 with
transition-metals
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40
In order to investigate the coordination ability of 38 and 40 toward transition-
metals and inspired by the reactivity of bis-silylenes 28 and 35 toward Ni0 and Pd
0[32a
33b] as well as by reports on spacer-separated bis-germylene molybdenum chelated
complex I65-Mo[66b]
(see Introduction p 18) firstly the coordination behavior of
potentially bidentate ligands 38 and 40 towards CoICp complex fragments
[140] was
examined A suitable CoICp source is accessible by treatment of CoBr2 with sodium
cyclopentadienide (NaCp) and potassium graphite (KC8) in tolueneTHF 41 mixture
resulting in the generation of (CpCoILn) (L = toluene or THF) in solution Reaction of
thus-formed CoICp species with bis-silylene 38 yielded the desired bis-silylene Co
I
complex 41[33a]
in 30 yield (Scheme 337) Similarly bis-germylene CoI complex
42[33a]
has been successfully synthesized from 40 and isolated in 61 yield
Scheme 337 Synthesis of bis-silylene and bis-germylene CoICp complexes 41 and 42
Results and Discussion
- 81 -
In comparison to bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 1H-NMR spectra of
compound 41 and 42 show an additional singlet for protons of CoICp group (41 δ =
496 ppm 42 δ = 504 ppm) A singlet for four tBu-groups appears at δ = 111 ppm by
bis-silylene Co-complex 41 and at δ = 139 ppm by bis-germylene Co-complex 42
Two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (41 δ = 440 and 461 ppm 42 δ = 438 and
459 ppm) are assigned to protons of ferrocene The resonance of phenyl protons (41
and 42) appears in aromatic resonance region In the 13
C-NMR spectra of 41 and 42
each exhibit one resonance for carbons of CoICp (41 δ = 780 ppm 42 δ = 759 ppm)
and three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (41 δ = 700 745 and 851 ppm
42 δ = 699 737 and 891 ppm) In the 29
Si-NMR spectrum the coordination of the
bis-silylene moieties to the Co atom results in a drastic downfield shift of the
resonance of 41 (δ = 820 ppm) in comparison to situation of 42 (δ = 433 ppm)
Isolated products 41 and 42 are first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-
silylene or bis-germylene in a chelating fashion The molecular structures of 41 and
42 (Figure 325) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses In both
complexes cobalt is coordinated one side by cyclopentadienyl and another side by bis-
silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40 and contains 18 valence electrons Angles of Si1-Co1-
Si2 and Ge1-Co1-Ge2 are 9389(5)deg and 9279(2)deg respectively
The silicon atoms in complex 41 and germanium atoms in complex 42 are four
coordinated and show a distorted tetrahedral geometry The Co-Si bond lengths of 41
(21252(14) and 21200(14) pm) are similar to that in chlorosilylene CoICp(CO)
complex 41a[141]
(21143(4) pm) Furthermore the Co-Si bonds of 41 are shorter than
the Co-Si distances in dichlorosilylene-CoICp(CO) complex 41b
[142] (21348(5) pm)
in dichlorosilylene-Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41c
[143] (2228(2) pm) in
chlorosilylene Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41d
[141] (22060(6) and 22017(6) pm)
respectively The silicon cobalt double bond (Si=CoV) distance (21848(8) pm) in
cobalt(V) complex 41e[144]
is also longer than dative SirarrCoI bond lengths in complex
41 Structures of cited compounds are drawn for clarity in Scheme 338
Results and Discussion
- 82 -
Scheme 338 Structural features of 41 and cited silylene cobalt complexes
Figure 325 Molecular structures of 41 (top) and 42 (bottom) Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 41 (top) Co1-Si1
21252(14) Co1-Si2 21200(14) Si1-C6 1894(5) Si2-C11 1887(5) Si1-N1
1898(4) Si1-N2 1907(4) Si2-N3 1904(4) Si2-N4 1922(4) Si1-Co1-Si2
9389(5) N1-Si1-N2 6847(15) N3-Si2-N4 6866(16) C6-Si1-Co1 13254(14)
for 42 (bottom) Co1-Ge1 21967(6) Co1-Ge2 21979(6) Ge1-C6 1965(4) Ge2-
Results and Discussion
- 83 -
C11 1961(4) Ge1-N1 2020(3) Ge1-N2 2031(3) Ge2-N3 2041(3) Ge2-N4
2029(3) Ge1-Co1-Ge2 9279(2) N1-Ge1-N2 6490(11) N3-Ge2-N4 6485(11)
C6-Ge1-Co1 13280(10) C11-Ge2-Co1 13140(10)
The Co-Ge bonds of 42 (21967(6) and 21979(6) pm) are also shorter than those in
the germylene cobalt(0) complex [((Me3Si)2N)2GerarrCo(CO)3]2[145]
(2262(1) pm) and
the tetragermacyclobutadiene-CoICp complex η
4-((
tBu2MeSi)4Ge4)CoCp (24616(3)
and 25036(3) pm)[90d]
respectively In fact the Co-Ge bonds in 42 are the shortest
Co-Ge bonds known to date The relatively short EII-Co bonds in 41 and 42 suggest
that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands in the series of divalent silicon
and germanium compounds as yet
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45
To test σ-donor ability of bis-(silylene) 38 versus carbonyl a ligand exchange
reaction between 38 and (CO)2CoCp[146]
was explored When 38 was allowed to react
with two molar equivalents of (CO)2CoCp the bis-silylene 41 bridged bimetallic
cobalt complex 44[33a]
could be obtained in 87 yield accompanied by half CO-
elimination of (CO)2CoCp (Scheme 339) The reaction of bis-silylene 38 with one
molar equivalent of (CO)2CoCp furnished the same product but the isolable yield was
low The structure of 44 was determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy
elemental analysis and infrared spectroscopy
Scheme 339 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged CoI(CO)Cp complex 44
Results and Discussion
- 84 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 44 exhibits a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
124 ppm A singlet (δ = 523 ppm) and two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (δ = 461
and 476 ppm) are assigned to protons of CoICp group and ferrocene with the ratio of
1044 The resonance of phenyl protons appears in aromatic resonance region The
29Si-NMR spectrum of 44 shows a singlet resonance at δ = 857 ppm similar to that
of 41 In the 13
C-NMR spectrum of 44 one characteristic signal for the CO ligands
appears at δ = 2078 ppm Furthermore the IR spectrum of 44 exhibits a strong
stretching band at ν = 1888 cmminus1
attributed to the carbonyl groups on the CoI atoms
The observed CO stretching frequency of 44 is much lower than those of 41a
(ν = 1968 cmminus1
)[141]
thus indicating that the bis-silylene substituted ferrocene 38 is a
much stronger σ-donor than chlorosilylene 26[32b]
Another carbonyl-silylene exchange reaction was investigated between bis-
silylene 38 and diiron nonacarbonyl Fe2(CO)9 Toluene was added to a 11 mixture of
38 and Fe2(CO)9 at room temperature to afford a bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4
complex 45 in 73 yield (Scheme 340) The structure of 45 was determined by
multinuclear NMR spectroscopy infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 340 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4 complex 45
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 45 shows a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
109 ppm Two singlets at δ = 483 and 500 ppm are assigned to protons of ferrocene
Multiplets in the range of 699-739 ppm are resonances of phenyl protons The 29
Si-
NMR spectrum of 45 exhibits a singlet resonance at δ = 1050 ppm It is much more
Results and Discussion
- 85 -
downfield shifted than those in complexes 41 (820 ppm) and 44 (857 ppm) One
characteristic strong signal for the CO ligands appears at δ = 2169 ppm in the 13
C-
NMR spectrum of 45 It is compatible to the resonance (δ = 2167 ppm) of the
silylene-Fe(CO)4 complex aL(
tBuO)SirarrFe(CO)4
[71] In the IR spectrum of 45 the
CO stretching frequencies (2026 1948 1900 cmminusl
) are also quite uniform to those of
this complex (2026 1949 1899 cmminusl
)[71]
Due to the rotation energy of ferrocene and
the symmetric bulky coordination of Fe the second CO-substitution could be more
difficult Consequently a chelated complex 38rarrFe(CO)3 was not observed during the
isolation of products
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts
The investigation of the catalytic activity of complexes 28 41 and 42 was carried
out in collaboration with Stephan Enthaler (TU Berlin)[33a]
Nickel or palladium catalyzed cross-coupling reactions between organozinc halides
and aromatic halides constitute an excellent synthetic method for polyfunctional
aromatic compounds[147]
To probe the catalytic activity of bis-silylene oxide Ni0
complex 28 a cross-coupling reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-
iodobenzene was investigated (Scheme 341) The direct iodine substitution of p-
methoxyl-iodobenzene with organometallic compounds was not expected without a
catalyst In the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3) coupling
reaction was observed and product 46 was obtained in 65 yield indicating a
potential application for this kind of complexes
Results and Discussion
- 86 -
Scheme 341 Application of 28 as precatalyst in cross-coupling reactions
Moreover the reactivity of the resulting complexes 41 and 42 as precatalysts for
Co-mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile was
expected[148]
It is known numerous cobalt complexes have been successfully applied
as precatalysts in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions and this becomes a powerful tool in
organic chemistry to form arene and heteroarene moieties[148-149]
Thus the catalytic
abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions were investigated
(Scheme 342)
Scheme 342 Application of 41 and 42 as precatalyst in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions
A first set of experiments was dedicated to the benchmark trimerization of phenyl
acetylene which resulted in the quantitative formation of isomers 47a and 47b in the
presence of complex 41 To our surprise similar attempts to employ 42 as precatalyst
failed with no product formation presumably due to a stronger coordination of GeII
atoms to the Co center which consequently prevents from the formation of an active
Results and Discussion
- 87 -
site for substrate coordination In another set of experiments the formation of
substituted pyridines 48a and 48b by [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenyl acetylene and
an excess of acetonitrile was detected[150]
The catalytic activity of SiII-Co complex 41
was exhibited distinctly again while no product formation could be observed with
GeII-Co complex 42 To some extent the application of CpCo(CO)2 as precatalyst
gave however substituted pyridines in lower yield (48a (3) and 48b (11))[33a]
Scheme 343 Proposed mechanism of 41 as precatalyst for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition
A possible mechanism for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenylacetylene or nitrile
to obtain 47 and 48 is proposed[149a]
as depicted in Scheme 343 At first bis-silylene
complex 41 could participate in a ligand substitution reaction with the
Results and Discussion
- 88 -
phenylacetylene to form an acetylene side-on complex Co-I The latter undergoes a
ring-formation to give the σ-bonded CoIII
complex Co-II which is saturated in
coordination with bis-silylene 38 Then intermediate Co-III is formed after π-donor
substitution by acetylene The succedent ring-enlargement furnishes the transient σ-
complex Co-IV and a subsequent elimination of products 47 and 48 occurs leading to
the active species Co-I by coordination of two phenylacetylene molecules In this
cobalt catalyzed transformation bis-silylene 38 serves as an important accessorial
ligand making the Co-center with high electron density more active and stabilizing the
intermediates Co-II and Co-IV
Unexpectedly complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is inactive The
possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII donor centers to
Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the substrate coordination
Summary
- 89 -
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
In this work various new metallylenes of Si Ge and Sn and bis-metallylenes
(interconnected and spacer separated) were synthesized The properties and
coordination ability of new metallylenes toward transition-metals including Fe Co
Ni and Pd were studied
The reduction of chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
with excess of elemental
potassium furnished the first potassium germylene anionic salt 3[83]
in 33 yield
along with the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip in 31
yield 3 consists of a dimeric half-sandwich complex interconnected via
intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds Each half-sandwich moiety consists of a
K(OEt2)2 cation which is η5-coordinated to the anionic five-membered planar GeNC3
ring with a considerable Cpmacr-like aromatic stabilization This is supported by density
functional theory (DFT) calculations The treatment of (nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
with KC8
gave the same products 3 4 and novel Ge4-cluster compound 5[83]
in very low yield
Compound 5 represents a dipotassium salt of the first ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like
dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a planar Ge42minus
core
Summary
- 90 -
Figure 41 Central molecular structures of 3 (left) and 5 (right)
The reactivity of compound 3 as nucleophile towards chlorogermylene 1[80]
and
chlorostannylene 7[80]
was examined Coupling reactions of 3 with 1 or 7 led to the
corresponding bis-germylene 6[104]
in 66 yield and germylene-stannylene 8[104]
in
34 yield respectively Compounds 6 and 8 were fully characterized including by X-
ray diffraction analysis The new compound 6 represent the first asymmetric
substituted bis-germylene with the shortest GeI-Ge
I bond length The germylene-
stannylene 8 is the first example with a GeI-Sn
I coupling as yet This novel structural
feature was explained with asymmetric structure and some ionic charge distribution
between 5- and six-membered rings by DFT calculation
Figure 42 Central molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right)
Summary
- 91 -
The synthesis of new ligands 12 or 20[110]
was easily accessible from lithium amide
10 with corresponding benzimidoyl chloride 11 or 19[112]
by salt metathesis reactions
Subsequent reactions of 12 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2middotdioxane furnished
chlorogermylene 14[110]
in 82 yield Germylene 16[110]
was obtained by
dehydrochloration of 14 with carbene 15[113]
in 78 yield The molecule of
zwitterionic germylene 16 bears two reactivity positions a strong nucleophilic
methylene group and a nucleophilic(s-orbital)-electrophilic(p-orbital) germylene site
Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas or with water resulted in the formation of
corresponding aminogermylene 17[110]
or germylene hydroxide 18[110]
in high yield
The reaction of compound 20 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2sdotdioxane led to the
unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained by
reaction of 21 with GeCl4 through dehydrochloration with carbene 15 as a base in
57 yield All new compounds have been characterized spectroscopically and
crystallographically 12 and 20 are new types of asymmetric β-diketiminato ligands
with a fused six-membered C6-ring to prevent the transformation of ligand backbone
and side-reactions of ligands They are promising ancillary chelating ligand for the
synthesis of novel silylenes and stannylenes The preparation of new germylenes
added significantly to the growing field of GeII-chemistry capable of small molecule
activation
Summary
- 92 -
Figure 43 Molecular structures of 16 (left) and 18 (right)
Figure 44 Molecular structures of 22 (left) and 23 (right)
A new challenge in metallylene synthetic chemistry is the preparation of chalcogen
(O S Se) bridged bis-metallylene species Here the synthesis and isolation of the
oxygen bridged bis-silylene 28[32a]
was achieved for the first time Reaction of
(HSiCl2)2O with lithium amidinate gave disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield The bis-
silylene oxide 28 was available by dehydrochloration of 27 employing LiN(SiMe3)2 in
76 yield The molecule of 28 contains two triply coordinated Si atoms and two lone
pairs one at each of the Si centers The Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent and
DFT calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small
Compound 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 furnished the Ni0 complex 29
[32a]
in 91 yield which is the first bidentate bis-silylene transition-metal complex with
18 valence electrons at the metal-site In diamagnetic complex 29 the two silylene
Summary
- 93 -
subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are tetrahedrally coordinated to the
Ni0 atom The strong σ-donor character of 28 led to a more electron-rich Ni center
This work will lead to new insights into the chelating silylene ligand transition-metal
coordination chemistry
Figure 45 Molecular structures of 28 (left) and 29 (right)
To possibly get access to a phosphasilyne a desilylation reaction that is phosphino
silylene 30[128]
was allowed to react with Ph3PCl2 30 was synthesized by facile
phosphanylation of chlorosilylene 26 with LiP(SiMe3)2 in 83 yield Surprisingly the
reaction of 30 with one molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 led to the formation of the unique
product 31[128]
as yellow crystals in 72 yield
An X-ray crystal structure analysis confirmed that 31 is a dimer of the desired
phosphasilyne Compound 31 is the first 4π-elektron Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene
derivate with two-coordinated P atoms and a planar Si2P2-ring The Si-P bond lengths
in 31 represent intermediate values between the Si=P bond length and the Si-P bond
length The equal Si-P distances in 31 already indicate σ- and π-electron resonance
stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has been confirmed by theoretical
calculations According to DFT investigation each Si atom in the Si2P2-ring bears a
large positive net charge (+1204) while the P atoms in the ring have somewhat
Summary
- 94 -
smaller negative charges (-0765)
Figure 46 Molecular structure of 31
Pincer arenes having divalent heavier group 14 elements are currently
unprecedented in synthetic chemistry but assumed to form complexes that could
serve as precatalysts for various organic transformations due to their coordination
ability towards metals Here the synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer
arene ligand 35[33b]
through the substitution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
by 13-dilithium
resorcinolate 34 could be achieved in 79 yield Treatment of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
afforded the unexpected silylene-silyl(phenyl)-palladium(II) complex 36[33b]
as orange
crystals in 81 yield
In compound 36 the PdII atom adopts a typical distorted square-planar
configuration defined by the carbon atom C1 two silylene SiII atoms and the silyl
SiIV
atom which is bonded with a hydrogen atom because of hydride shift to Si1 after
C-H activation by Pd Owing to the coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo With the help of theoretical investigation the
Summary
- 95 -
reaction mechanism was explained and the exothermic transformation from 35 to 36
was confirmed This is a new approach in metallylene transition-metal coordination
chemistry with complexes being potentially applicable in catalytic transformation
Figure 47 Molecular structure of 36 tBu and phenyl groups are not shown
Also a type of bis-metallylene with a ferrocendiyl spacer for new bidentate σ-donor
properties was investigated Here the facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and
bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 38 and 40 as well as their corresponding CoI
complexes could be described for the first time By salt metathesis reaction of 11rsquo-
dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorosilylene 26[32b]
or chlorogermylene 39[41]
furnished
bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield or bis-germylene 40[33a]
in 77 yield respectively
Reactions of a suitable CoICp precursor with bis-silylene 38 afforded the bis-silylene
CoI complex 41
[33a] in 30 yield Likewise the bis-germylene Co
I complex 42
[33a]
could be synthesized from 40 with CoICp fragment and isolated in 61 yield
Summary
- 96 -
Figure 48 Molecular structure of 40
Figure 49 Molecular structures of 41 (left) and 42 (right) tBu and phenyl groups
are not shown
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable ferrocene bridged
bis-silylene or bis-germylene respectively The isolated products 41 and 42 are the
first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-silylene or bis-germylene
functioning in a chelating fashion In both complexes cobalt is coordinated on one
side by cyclopentadienyl and on another side by bis-silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40
and contains 18 valence electrons The Co-Si bonds in 41 and the Co-Ge bonds in 42
belong to the shortest Co-E (E = Si Ge) bonds known to date The relatively short EII-
Co bonds in 41 and 42 indicate that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands
in the series of divalent silicon and germanium compounds as yet due to the electron-
rich ferrocene and metallylene segments
In addition in the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3)
cross-coupling[147]
reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-iodo-
benzene was observed evidently The catalytic abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in Co-
Summary
- 97 -
mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile were
probed[148-150]
However complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is
inactive The possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII
donor centers to Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the
substrate coordination
Experimental section
- 98 -
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
51 General section
All experiment and manipulations were carried out under dry oxygen-free nitrogen
using standard Schlenk techniques or in an inert atmosphere of purified nitrogen The
glassware used in all manipulations was dried at 150 degC prior to use cooled to
ambient temperature under high vacuum and flushed with N2 The handling of solid
samples and the preparation of samples for spectroscopic measurements were carried
out inside a glove-box where the O2 and H2O levels were normally kept below 1 ppm
All solvents were purified using conventional procedures and freshly distilled under
N2 atmosphere prior to use They were stored in Schlenk-vessels containing activated
molsieves Benzene toluene n-pentane and n-hexane were purified by distillation
from Nabenzophenone Et2O and THF were initially pre-dried over KOH and then
distilled from Nabenzophenone CH2Cl2 and chloroform were dried by stirring over
CaH2 at ambient temperature
For transfer of solvents or solutions stainless steel cannulas were used which were
stored in the oven at 120 degC The transfer was enabled by the vessel of origin being
left under a positive pressure of protective gas and the receptacle vessel of closed
with a pressure release value By filtration stainless steel cannula containing a filter-
head at one end was utilized Whatman (GFB 25) filters were affixed to the filter end
of the cannula with Teflon tape After use cannulas were cleaned immediately by
thorough rinsing with acetone followed by dilute HCl water acetone and
dichloromethane
In the case of low temperature reactions Dewar vessels were filled with acetone
and dry-ice was added until reaching the desired temperature Ethanol liquid
nitrogen was also employed for reactions in needs of -90 degC
Experimental section
- 99 -
52 Analytical methods
NMR Measurements NMR samples of air andor moisture sensitive compounds were
all prepared under inert atmosphere The deuterated solvents were dried by stirring
over Na (C6D6 THF-d8) or CaH2 (CDCl3) distilled under N2 atmosphere and stored in
Schlenk-vessels containing activated molsieves The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectra were
recorded on ARX 200 (1H 200 MHz
13C 50 MHz) and ARX 400 (
1H 400 MHz
13C
10046 MHz) spectrometers from the Bruker Company The 29
Si-NMR spectra were
recorded only on ARX 400 (29
Si 7949 MHz) spectrometer
The 1H and
13C
1H NMR spectra were calibrated against the residual proton and
natural abundance 13
C resonances of the deuterated solvent relative to
tetramethylsilane (benzene-d6 δH 715 ppm and δC 1280 ppm chloroform-d1 δH 727
ppm and δC 770 ppm THF-d8 δH 173 ppm and δC 253 ppm Heteronuclear spectra
were calibrated as follows 31
P1H external 85 H3PO4
119Sn
1H external SnMe4
Whereby in each case an 1-mm glass capillary tube containing the standard substance
was placed in the appropriate solvent in a 5 mm NMR tube and the spectrum recorded
The abbreviations used to denote the multiplicity of the signals are as follows s =
singlet d = doublet t = triplet q = quartet sept = septet m = multiplet br = broad
Infra-red spectroscopy IR spectra (4000 ndash 400 cm-1
) were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
Spectra 100 FT-IR spectrometer bands were reported in wave-numbers (cm-1
)
Samples of solids were measured as KBr pellets Air or moisture sensitive samples
were prepared in the glove-box and measured immediately The spectra were
processed using the program OMNIC and the abbreviations associated with the
absorptions quoted are vs = very strong s = strong m = medium w = weak br =
broad the intensities of which were assigned on the basis of visual inspection
UV-vis Spectrometry UV-vis spectrophotometric investigations were carried out on a
Specord S 600 spectrophotometer from Analytik Jena AG Pure samples of the
investigated substance were dissolved in dry solvents at suitable concentration The
UV-vis cuvette was filled and closed in a Schlenk tube under N2 atmosphere
Mass Spectrometry Mass spectra were performed at the Chemistry institute of
Experimental section
- 100 -
Technical University Berlin EI spectra were recorded on a 311A Arian MATAMD
spectrometer ESI mass spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap LTQ
XL spectrometer Solid samples were prepared in glove box and the solution of
samples was prepared 15 min before the measurement under N2 atmosphere Mass
spectra are presented in the standard form mz (percent intensity relative to the base
peak)
Elemental analysis The C H N and S analyses of all compounds were carried out on
a Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series instrument Air or moisture sensitive
samples were prepared in ldquotin-boatsrdquo in the glove box Samples with halogen were
filled in the ldquosilver-boatsrdquo for better measuring accuracy
Melting Point determinations A BSGT Apotec II instrument was used for the
determination of melting points Samples were prepared in glass capillary tubes under
N2 atmosphere The melting point was determined while the melded examples had the
same color like the solid before Without melting of samples the color change was
observed was determined as decomposition temperature
Single crystal X-ray structure determinations Crystals suitable to the single crystal
x-ray structure analysis were put on a glass capillary with perfluorinated oil and
measured in a cold nitrogen stream The data of all measurements were collected with
an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur S Saphire diffractometer at 150 K (MoKα radiation λ
= 071073 Aring) The structures were solved by direct methods Refinements were
carried out with the SHELXL-97[151]
software package All thermal displacement
parameters were refined anisotropically for non-H atoms and isotropically for H
atoms All refinements were made by full matrix least-square on F2 In all cases the
graphical representation of the molecular structures was carried out using Ortep32
version 108 The details for the individual structure solutions included in this
dissertation are available in the appendix
Experimental section
- 101 -
53 Starting Materials
Commercially available starting materials were used as received The following
important precursors were prepared according to literature procedures The references
are shown in Table 51
Table 51 Starting materials and references
Compound References Compound References
GeCl2dioxane [27] 15 (HCNtBu)2C [113]
(HSiCl2)2O [117] 19 Ph(Cl)C=N-iPr [112]
1 (nacnac)GeCl [80] 24 tBuN=C=N
tBu [152]
2 (nacnac)GeCl3 [82] 26 aLSiCl [32b]
7 (nacnac)SnCl [80] 32 (Me3Si)2N-SnCl [53]
9 (C5H10)C=N-Dip [111] 39 aLGeCl [41]
11 Ph(Cl)C=N-Dip [112]
Experimental section
- 102 -
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4
To a solution of 1[80]
(133 g 253 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added potassium
(148 g 379 mmol) at room temperature After stirring for 4 h the color of the
solution changed from yellow to brown Volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was first extracted with hexane (60 mL in portions) and then
with diethyl ether (60 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtrated and the filtrate was concentrated
and stored at -20degC for 5 d yielding the first germylene anion 3 as pale yellow crystals
(030 g 083 mmol 33)
C25H44GeKNO2 MW 50236
Properties soluble in THF slightly soluble in Et2O spontaneous
combustion towards air
Melting Point 220 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 108 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 112 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 184 (s 3 H
NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 298 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 618 (s 1 H γ-CH) 691- 698 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 182 (NCMe) 203
(GeCMe) 238 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 1185
(γ-C) 1224-1745 (arom C GeCMe NCMe)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C17H24GeKN(C4H10O)022 C 5797 H 713 N
378 Found C 5764 H 694 N 367
The combined hexane extract was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated and
stored at -20 degC for 2 d yielding the new germylene 4 as yellow crystals (052 g 078
Experimental section
- 103 -
mmol 31)
NHN
GeN
Dip
DipDip
C41H59GeN3 MW 66657
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 192 - 193 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 091 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 109 (d 3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH =
68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 122 (m br 12 H CHMe2) 130 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 162 (s 6 H NCMe) 329-340
(m 6 H CHMe2) 503 (s 1 H γ-CH) 564 (s 1 H NH) 683
ndash 718 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 225 (CHMe) 234 (NCMe)
240 (br CHMe) 245 (CHMe) 247 (CHMe) 256 (CHMe)
288 (CHMe) 292 (CHMe) 964 (γ-C) 1171 ndash 1635 (arom
C NCMe)
EI-MS mz () 6674 (03 [M]+) 4912 (100 [M -
iPr2C6H3NH]
+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C41H59GeN3 C 7388 H 892 N 630 Found
C 7354 H 868 N 613
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5
To a precooled (-78 degC) solution of 2[82]
(097 g 16 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was
added KC8 (094 g 69 mmol) After stirring for 4 h the reaction mixture was allowed
to warm to room temperature and the color of the solution changed from yellow to
brown The reaction mixture was allowed to stir an additional 48 h at room
temperature The signal of compound 1[80]
also disappeared in the 1H-NMR spectrum
of the resulting mixture and compound 3 and 4 were observed as main products
Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was first extracted
with hexane (50 mL in portions) and then with diethyl ether (50 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtered the filtrate was concentrated to 10
Experimental section
- 104 -
mL and stored at -20degC for 48 h yielding 3 as pale yellow crystals (024 g 067 mmol
42) The combined hexane extract was concentrated and stored at -20degC for 24 h
yielding 4 as yellow crystals (042 g 063 mmol 39)
Further concentration of the supernate and cooling at -20degC for 48 h yielded 5 as red
crystals along with colorless crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex
C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 MW 135028
Elemental analysis calcd () for C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 C 7890 H 1003 N 278
Found C 7821 H 999 N 281
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6
C46H65Ge2N3 MW 80531
To a solution of the germylene anion 3 (138 mg 0263 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at -
30 degC was added the solution of the chlorogermylene 1[80]
(93 mg 0263 mmol) in
THF (10 mL) The color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After
stirring for further 2 h at room temperature volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 5 days yielding 6 as dark red crystals (140 mg
017 mmol 66)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt169 degC (decomp)
Experimental section
- 105 -
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 107 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H
CHMe2) 111 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H CHMe2) 120 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 124 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 161 (s
6 H NCMe) 202 (s 3 H NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 301
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 319 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 367 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 518 (s 1 H 6-
ring-γ-CH) 682 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 702- 718 (m 9 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 191 (5-ring-NCMe) 210
(GeCMe) 240 (6-ring-NCMe) 248 (CHMe2) 249 (CHMe2)
250 (CHMe2) 258 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 261 (CHMe2)
279 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 1028 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1238 (5-ring-β-C) 1240 ndash 1694 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
UV-vis λ [nm] = 315 (intense) 358 (intense) 502 (2600)
EI-MS mz () 491 (45 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (15 [M-
(C3N2Ge) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65Ge2N3 C 6861 H 814 N 522 Found
C 6884 H 800 N 516
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8
C46H65GeN3Sn MW 85138
To a suspension of germylene anion 3 (116 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) at -
70 degC was added the solution of 7[80]
(187 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) The
color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After stirring for further 2 h at
room temperature the volatiles of the reaction mixture were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
Experimental section
- 106 -
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 10 days yielding 8 as dark red-black solid (96 mg
011 mmol 34) The solid was solved in Et2O and stored at 0 degC for 24 h building
dark red crystals
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt143 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 085 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 106 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 121 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 127 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 129 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2)
165 (s 6 H SnNCMe) 227 (s 3 H GeNCMe) 300 (s 3 H
GeCMe) 305 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 333 (sept
3JHH
= 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 378 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2)
510 (s 1 H 6-ring-γ-CH) 691 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 705-
721 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 188 (5-ring-NCMe) 207
(GeCMe) 242 (6-ring-NCMe) 246 (CHMe2) 248 (CHMe2)
249 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 260 (CHMe2) 268 (CHMe2)
280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 287 (CHMe2) 1035 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1237 (5-ring-β-C) 1244 ndash 1704 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
119Sn NMR
(C6D6) δ = -197
UV-vis λ [nm] = 314 (15000) 363 (14500) 541 (2800)
EI-MS mz () 537 (8 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (17 [M-
(C3N2Sn) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65GeN3Sn C 6489 H 770 N 494
Found C 6444 H 764 N 477
Experimental section
- 107 -
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12
C37H48N2 MW 52079
To a solution of 9[111]
(200 g 777 mmol) in 200 mL Et2O at -78 degC was added 16
M nBuLi (486 mL 777 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 11[112]
(210 g 700 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h Water free Et3NHCl (108 g 777 mmol) was added to the
reaction mixture and stirred All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 229 g (440 mmol
63 ) of the novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 as colorless crystals
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 148 ~ 150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 117 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 125 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 134 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 164 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 187 (s 1 H NH) 217 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335
(m 4 H CHMe2) 696 (s 3 H arom H) 715- 727 (m 8 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 218 (Cy-CH2) 221
(CHMe2) 236 (CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 256
(CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 285 (Cy-CH2) 286
(Cy-CH2) 977 (Cy-CCN) 1222-1441 (arom C) 1600 (Cy-
CN) 1658 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H49N2+ 5213896 Found 5213878
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48N2 C 8533 H 929 N 538 Found C
8518 H 927 N 547
Experimental section
- 108 -
526 The new chlorogermylene 14
N
N
Ph
Dip
Dip
Cl
Ge
C37H47ClGeN2 MW 62788
nBuLi (881 mL 141 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 12 (720 g 138
mmol) in 80 mL of Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed slowly to warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(330 g 142 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -
30 degC yielding 14 as yellow crystals (710 g 113 mmol 82 )
Properties soluble in hexane toluene sensitive towards air
Melting Point 203 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 097 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 107 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121-127 (m 9 H CHMe2) 128-139 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 144 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 155 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 203-227 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 317
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 327 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 394 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 417 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 680- 739 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 226 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 239 (CHMe2) 245 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
249 (CHMe2) 274 (CHMe2) 277 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
286 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 291 (CHMe2) 293 (CHMe2)
295 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1089 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1476
(arom C) 1651 (Cy-CN) 1688 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47ClGeN2+ 6282640 Found 6282639
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H47ClGeN2 C 7078 H 754 N 446
Found C 7073 H 762 N 457
Experimental section
- 109 -
527 The new germylene 16
C37H46GeN2 MW 59142
Germylene chloride 14 (300 g 479 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-butyl- imidazol-2-
ylidene 15[113]
(091 g 502 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (25 mL) at room
temperature and stirred for 48 h resulting in a white precipitate of the corresponding
NHCmiddotHCl salt The color of the solution changed from yellow to brown-red The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm
hexane two times The combined filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 16 as red crystals (220 g 373 mmol 78 )
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 167 ~ 168 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 115 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 126 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 135 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 12 H CHMe2) 155 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 204 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 221 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 369 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 380 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 415 (t
3JHH =
44 Hz 1 H C=CH) 675- 725 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 226 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 258 (Cy-CH2) 259 (CHMe2) 273 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 987 (Cy-CH)
1117 (Cy-CCN) 1236-1431 (arom C) 1473 1474 (Cy-CN
Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 704 (s) 787 (s) 939 (m) 1104 (s) 1135 (s) 1204 (s) 1248 (s)
1296 (s) 1322 (s) 1365 (s) 1439 (s) 1461 (s) 1535 (m) 1600
(s) 2822 (m) 2865 (s) 2922 (s) 2957 (w) 3022 (w) 3061 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2+ 5932951 Found 5932950
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H46GeN2 C 7514 H 784 N 474 Found
C 7495 H 800 N 484
Experimental section
- 110 -
528 Aminogermylene 17
C37H49GeN3 MW 60845
A red solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (15 mL) was exposed to dry
ammonia gas for 10 min at room temperature The solution turned to a yellow color
and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvent was removed and the
residue was dissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated solution was stored at 0
degC yielding 17 as yellow crystals (560 mg 092 mmol 92 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 173 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 117 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 120-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 142 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
154 (s 2 H NH2) 200-213 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 357 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 363 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 388 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 679- 724 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 214 (CHMe2) 230 (CHMe2)
234 (CHMe2) 237 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
248 (CHMe2) 272 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
285 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
293 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1023 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1462
(arom C) 1643 (Cy-CN) 1669 (Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 704 (s) 752 (s) 796 (s) 839 (m) 922 (s) 1096 (s)
1143 (s) 1174 (s) 1252 (s) 1304 (s) 1360 (s) 1430 (s) 1543
(s) 2865 (m) 2961 (s) 3021 (w) 3048 (m) 3343 (w) 3430
(w)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H49GeN3 C 7304 H 812 N 691 Found
C 7272 H 810 N 683
Experimental section
- 111 -
529 Germylene hydroxide 18
C37H48GeN2O MW 60943
A diluted solution of H2O in THF (179 mL 100 mmol 056 M) was dropped into
a solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) at -30 degC The solution
turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvents
were removed and the residue was redissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated
solution was stored at 0 degC yielding 18 as yellow crystals (580 mg 095 mmol 95 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 188 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 116 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 119-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 139 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
166 (s 1 H OH) 195-221 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 384 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 397 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 675- 726 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 229 (CHMe2)
233 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2) 243 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 281 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
291 (Cy-CH2) 314 (Cy-CH2) 1028 (Cy-CCN) 1233-1464
(arom C) 1647 (Cy-CN) 1666 (Ph-CN)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 713 (s) 743 (s) 770 (s) 791 (s) 839 (s) 926 (m)
1056 (m) 1104 (s) 1148 (s) 1170 (s) 1257 (s) 1313 (s) 1339
(s) 1365 (s) 1430 (s) 1470 (s) 1539 (s) 2861 (s) 2961 (s)
3018 (w) 3057 (m) 3643 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2O+ 6092900 Found 6092901
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48GeN2O C 7292 H 794 N 460
Experimental section
- 112 -
Found C 7300 H 786 N 464
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20
C28H38N2 MW 40230
At -78 degC to a solution of 9[111]
(150 g 583 mmol) in 150 mL Et2O was added 16
M nBuLi (365 mL 584 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 19[112]
(106 g 583 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 141 g (350 mmol
60 ) of 20 as colorless blocks
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 123 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 109 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 132 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 156 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 208 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 214 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 310 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 323 (m 1 H CHMe2) 713- 753 (m 8 H arom H)
1203 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H NH)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 219 (Cy-CH2) 226
(CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (CHMe2) 276
(Cy-CH2) 280 (CHMe2) 300 (Cy-CH2) 459 (CHMe2) 977
(Cy-CCN) 1226 1228 1275 1282 1284 1371 1389
1453 (arom C) 1576 (Cy-CN) 1673 (PhCN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C28H39N2+ 4033113 Found 4033112
Experimental section
- 113 -
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H38N2 C 8353 H 951 N 696 Found C
8270 H 977 N 679
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22
C28H37ClGeN2O MW 52570
nBuLi (16 mL 256 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (100 g 249
mmol) in 15 mL Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed to slowly warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(058 g 250 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 22 as yellow crystals (105 g 200 mmol 80 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 161 ~ 162 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 108 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 134 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 141 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 153 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 189 (m
1 H Cy-CH2) 202 (m 1 H Cy-CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2)
284 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 367 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz
1 H CHMe2) 396 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 688 (m
1 H arom H) 705-724 (m 7 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 222 (CHMe2) 228 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 240 (CHMe2) 241 (CHMe2) 253 (CHMe2)
263 (Cy-CH2) 272 (CHMe2) 283 (CHMe2) 285 (CHMe2)
Experimental section
- 114 -
293 (Cy-CH2) 312 (Cy-CH2) 537 (CHMe2) 1068 (Cy-
CCN) 1239 1250 1267 1271 1288 1294 1388 1410
1446 1469 (arom C) 1620 (Cy-CN) 1654 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H37ClGeN2O C 6397 H 709 N 533
Found C 6426 H 725 N 551
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23
C28H36Cl2GeN2 MW 54415
nBuLi (32 mL 512 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (201 g 500 mmol)
in 30 mL of toluene at -78 degC The solution was allowed to warm to room temperature
and stirred for 4 h To this solution GeCl4 (107 g 500 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-
butylimidazol-2-ylidene 15 (091 g 502 mmol) were added at -78 degC The resulting
suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were removed under
reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm hexane two times The
filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC yielding 23 as yellow crystals (156 g
287 mmol 57 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 126 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 113 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 137 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 146 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 189 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 332 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 361 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 421 (t
3JHH =
42 Hz 1 H C=CH) 701-726 (m 8 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 237 (CHMe2) 243 (Cy-
CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 254 (Cy-CH2) 257 (CHMe2) 286
Experimental section
- 115 -
(CHMe2) 304 (Cy-CH2) 511 (CHMe2) 1036 (Cy-CH)
1125 (Cy-CCN) 1248 1287 1296 1354 1391 1411
1421 1490 (arom C) 1682 (Cy-CN) 1709 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H36Cl2GeN2 C 6180 H 515 N 667
Found C 6203 H 517 N 679
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27
C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 MW 60781
To a solution of tBuN=C=N
tBu
[152] (329 g 213 mmol) in Et2O (80 mL) PhLi (119
mL 214 mmol 18 M) was added at -78 degC The solution was raised to room
temperature and stirred for 2 h To this solution at -90 degC 1133-
tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(230 g 1065 mmol) was added in one minute The
resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with toluene (60 mL)
by 80 degC two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h yielding
27 as colorless crystals (343 g 564 mmol 53)
Properties soluble in toluene sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 175 ~ 177 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 120 (s 36 H CMe3) 598
(s 2 H SiHCl) 733- 746 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 317 (CMe3) 544 (CMe3)
1276 1285 1297 1337 (arom C) 1711 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = -1110
IR(KBr cm-1
) 606 (s) 658 (m) 711 (s) 733 (s) 760 (s) 789 (s) 934 (s)
1068 (s) 1200 (s) 1269 (s) 1378 (s) 1486 (s) 1550 (s) 1566
(s) 1612 (s) 1783 (w) 1826 (w) 1950 (w) 1969 (w) 2000
Experimental section
- 116 -
(w) 2135 (s) 2188 (s) 2909 (s) 2934 (s) 2971 (s) 3232 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C30H49Cl2N4OSi2+ 6072822 Found 6072844
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 C 5928 H 796 N 922
Found C 5971 H 797 N 913
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28
C30H46N4OSi2 MW 53488
Toluene (120 mL) was added to a mixture of 27 (260 g 428 mmol) and
LiN(SiMe3)2 (144 g 856 mmol) at ambient temperature After 2 h the solution turned
to an orange color with the formation of LiCl The resulting mixture was stirred
overnight The solvent was then removed and the residue was extracted with toluene
(100 mL) The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h to yield yellow
crystals of 28 (175 g 327 mmol 76)
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 152 ~ 160 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 692-
731(m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 530 (CMe3)
1277 1291 1299 1349 (arom C) 1623 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -161
IR(KBr cm-1
) 608 (s) 709 (s) 746 (s) 790 (s) 892 (m) 972 (s) 1032 (m)
1070 (m) 1208 (s) 1268 (m) 1359 (s) 1412 (s) 1446 (s)
1476 (s) 1577 (m) 1648 (m) 1778 (w) 1826 (w) 1899 (w)
1970 (w) 2248 (w) 2867 (s) 2902 (s) 2928 (s) 2964 (s)
3065 (m)
Experimental section
- 117 -
ESI-MS mz calcd 5353288 Found 5353227
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H46N4OSi2 C 6736 H 867 N 1047
Found C 6688 H 857 N 1046
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
C38H58N4NiOSi2 MW 70176
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 28 (267 mg 050 mmol) and Ni(cod)2
(1375 mg 050 mmol) at ambient temperature The solution turned to a low-red color
and was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted with
toluene (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield low-red crystals of 29 (319 mg
046 mmol 91) The remaining solid was crystallized from hexane at -30 degC
suitable for single crystal measurement
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 183 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 130 (s 36 H CMe3) 281
(m 4 H CH2) 295 (m 4 H CH2) 504 (s 4 H =CH) 686-
707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 337 (CH2) 535
(CMe3) 760 (=CH) 1277 1293 1296 1335 (arom C)
1690 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 328
IR(KBr cm-1
) 607 (s) 644 (s) 698 (s) 750 (s) 792 (s) 925 (m) 1021 (m)
1075 (s) 1209 (s) 1267 (s) 1320 (m) 1361 (s) 1407 (s)
1444 (s) 1475 (s) 1578 (m) 1647 (m) 1775 (w) 1823 (w)
Experimental section
- 118 -
1902 (w) 1962 (w) 2280 (w) 2791 (s) 2855 (s) 2913 (s)
2975 (s) 3023 (m) 3063 (w)
ESI-MS mz () calcd 7003503 Found 7003577
Elemental analysis calcd () for C38H58N4NiOSi2 C 6504 H 833 N 798
Found C 6387 H 837 N 805
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30
C21H41N2PSi3 MW 43679
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(302 mg 102
mmol) and lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphate (285 mg 103 mmol) at ambient
temperature The solution turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 3 h The solvent
was removed and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30 degC for 24 h yielding 30 as yellow crystals (371 mg
085 mmol 83)
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 149-150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 058 (d
3JP-H = 44 Hz 18 H
SiMe3) 124 (s 18 H CMe3) 681-699 (m 2 H arom H)
734-741 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 44 (d
3JC-P = 100 Hz
SiMe3) 315 (d 4JC-P = 16 Hz CMe3) 540 (CMe3) 1289
1292 1293 1344 (arom C) 1572 (d 3JC-P = 95 Hz
NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 31 (d
1JSi-P = 229 Hz
PSiMe3) 440 (d 1JSi-P = 1943 Hz N2SiP)
31P NMR (81012 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = - 2110
Experimental section
- 119 -
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C21H41N2PSi3 4362315 Found 4362524
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31
C30H46N4P2Si2 MW 58083
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 30 (309 mg 071 mmol) and
triphenylphosphine dichloride (237 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The
solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted
with THF (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield yellow crystals of 31 (148
mg 025 mmol 72)
Properties soluble in THF sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 174 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 705-
733 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 331 (CMe3) 534
(CMe3) 1256 1276 1294 1359 (arom C) 1710 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 267 (t
1JSi-P = 998 Hz)
31P NMR (81012 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = - 1649
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C30H46N4P2Si2 5802736 Found
5802361
Experimental section
- 120 -
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn MW 60944
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(336 mg 114
mmol) and Chloro-amino-stannylene 32[53]
(360 mg 114 mmol) at room temperature
The solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was
extracted with hexane (20 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield colorless
crystals of 33 (343 mg 056 mmol 49)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air decomposed
slowly at room temperature
Melting Point gt 25 degC (slowly decomp)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn C 4139 H 678 N
689 Found C 4195 H 701 N 706
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35
C44H66N4O2Si2 MW 73919
At -78 degC to a solution of 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinol (150 g 675 mmol) in 30 mL
Et2O was added 16 M nBuLi (85 mL 136 mmol) in hexane and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h resulting in white slurry The reaction
mixture was cooled to -78 degC again and added the solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(398 g 135 mmol) in 50 mL toluene After the addition the mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with the warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC 395 g bis-silylene 35 (534
Experimental section
- 121 -
mmol 79 ) as slightly yellow solid
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
174 (s 18 H ArC(CH3)3) 693 - 713 (m 8 H arom H) 754
(s 1 H Ar-H) 787 (s 1 H Ar-H) 802 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (ArC(CH3)3) 318
(NC(CH3)3) 350 (ArC(CH3)3) 530 (NC(CH3)3) 1096
1243 1276 1295 1297 1313 1341 1552 (arom C)
1636 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -240
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C44H66N4O2Si2 C 7049 H 900 N 758
Found C 7075 H 930 N 756
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36
C88H132N8O4PdSi4 MW 158480
Bis-silylene 35 (600 mg 081 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (468 mg 041 mmol) were
mixed in 25 mL hexane at room temperature and stirred for 24 h The hexane solution
was filtrated and the white precipitate was washed with 10 mL hexane one time The
solid product was dried under reduced pressure to yield 520 mg (033 mmol 81 )
white powders The product was dissolved in warm hexane and stored at room
temperature for 10 days giving some orange crystals of 36 The reaction of bis-
Experimental section
- 122 -
silylene 35 with one molar equiv of Pd(PPh3)4 in toluene furnishes the same product
but the isolable yield is only about 30
Properties slightly soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 105 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 108
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 114 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 116 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 131 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 139 (s 9 H C(CH3)3)155
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 168 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 177 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 180 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 185 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 212
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 659 (s 1 H SiH) 686- 789 (m 22 H
arom H) 816 (s 1 H Ar-H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (C(CH3)3) 311
(C(CH3)3) 314 (C(CH3)3) 316 (C(CH3)3) 318 (C(CH3)3)
319 (C(CH3)3) 320 (C(CH3)3) 322 (C(CH3)3) 328
(C(CH3)3) 332 (C(CH3)3) 333 (C(CH3)3) 343 (C(CH3)3)
349 350 351 357 526 527 537 539 540 541 542
561 1112 1225 1236 1243 1256 1258 1271 1285
1287 1289 1291 1293 1294 1302 1303 1318 1323
1324 1326 1340 1342 1378 1380 1381 1409 1430
1533 1559 1585 1613 1622 1654 1731 1742
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -87 (LSi) 397 (Si-H) 623
658 (LSiPd)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 623 (m) 706 (m) 764 (m) 860 (m) 1056 (m) 1108 (m) 1206
(m) 1272 (m) 1365 (m) 1418 (s) 1446 (m) 1476 (m) 1446
(m) 1476 (m) 1495 (m) 1591 (m) 2135 (w) 2875(m) 2906
(s) 2964 (s) 3061 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C88H132N8O4PdSi4 C 6669 H 840 N
707 Found C 6616 H 875 N 676
Experimental section
- 123 -
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38
C40H54FeN4Si2 MW 70290
16 M nBuLi (423 ml 677 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (600 mg 323 mmol) and TMEDA (937 mg 806 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (30 mL) solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(190 g 645 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
pentane Compound 38 was obtained as deep red crystals in 70 yield (159 g 226
mmol) on storage of a saturated pentane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 117 ~ 119 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 116 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
451 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 472 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 692- 707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 318 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 709 (FeCH) 727 (FeCH) 846 (SiC) 1289
1294 1305 1349 (arom C) 1604 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 433
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeN4Si2 C 6835 H 774 N 797
Found C 6803 H 767 N 778
Experimental section
- 124 -
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40
C40H54FeGe2N4 MW 79201
16 M nBuLi (353 ml 564 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (500 mg 269 mmol) and TMEDA (781 mg 672 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (25 mL) solution of chlorogermylene 39[41]
(183 g 538 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
warm hexane Compound 40 was obtained as orange crystals in 77 yield (163 g
206 mmol) on storage of a saturated hexane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 168 ~ 169 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 461
(t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 471 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 691- 697 (m 6 H arom H) 712- 717 (m 4 H arom
H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 320 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 701 (FeCH) 723 (FeCH) 920 (GeC) 1289
1290 1302 1369 (arom C) 1659 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeGe2N4 C 6666 H 687 N 707 Found
C 6655 H 701 N 707
Experimental section
- 125 -
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeN4Si2 MW 82693
In a glove box CoBr2 (202 mg 092 mmol) NaCp (81 mg 092 mmol) and KC8
(131 mg 097 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent
mixture (41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at
room temperature The bis-silylene 38 (650 mg 092 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 41 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 30 yield (230 mg 028 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 166 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 139 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
440 (t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 461 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 496 (s 5 H CoCH) 680- 684 (m 2 H arom H)
692- 696 (m 6 H arom H) 720- 723 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (NC(CH3)3) 534
(NC(CH3)3) 700 (FeCH) 745 (FeCH) 780 (CoCH) 851
(SiC) 1291 1297 1300 1343 (arom C) 1673 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 820
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFeN4Si2 C 6536 H 719 N 678
Found C 6612 H 724 N 686
Experimental section
- 126 -
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhGe
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Ge
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeGe2N4 MW 91604
In a glove box CoBr2 (83 mg 038 mmol) NaCp (33 mg 038 mmol) and KC8 (54
mg 040 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent mixture
(41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at room
temperature The bis-germylene 40 (300 mg 038 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 42 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 61 yield (210 mg 023 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 309 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 131 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
438 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 459 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 504 (s br 5 H CoCH) 684- 688 (m 2 H arom H)
695- 698 (m 6 H arom H) 714- 718 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 322 (NC(CH3)3) 537
(NC(CH3)3) 699 (FeCH) 737 (FeCH) 759 (CoCH) 891
(GeC) 1287 1296 1300 1361(arom C) 1680 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFe Ge2N4 C 5900 H 649 N 612
Found C 5942 H 664 N 590
Experimental section
- 127 -
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44
C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 MW 100697
To a solution of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (250 mg 036 mmol) in 10 ml hexane
was added a solution of CpCo(CO)2 (130 mg 072 mmol) in 8 ml hexane The
reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All solvents were evaporated
in vacuo The corresponding bis-silylene cobalt(I) complex 44 was isolated as brown
air- and moisture-sensitive solids in 87 yield (310 mg 031 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 293 ~ 295 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
461 (m 4 H FeCH) 476 (m 4 H FeCH) 523 (s 10 H
CoCH) 683- 695 (m 6 H arom H) 702- 706 (m 2 H
arom H) 745- 748 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 313 (NC(CH3)3) 542
(NC(CH3)3) 723 (FeCH) 741 (FeCH) 804 (SiC) 809
(CoCH) 1287 1296 1300 1324 (arom C) 1687 (NCN)
2078 (br CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 857
IR(KBr cm-1
) 500 (m) 539 (w) 564 (m) 628 (s) 703 (m) 757 (s) 792 (m)
825 (w) 1028 (m) 1081 (w) 1146 (m) 1199 (s) 1275 (m)
1360 (m) 1388 (m) 1417 (s) 1438 (w) 1474 (m) 1520 (s)
1641 (s) 1888 (s) 2869 (s) 2901 (m) 2926 (m) 2965 (s)
1520 (s) 3097 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 C 6202 H 641 N
Experimental section
- 128 -
556 Found C 6287 H 630 N 571
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45
C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 MW 103867
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (500 mg
071 mmol) and Fe2(CO)9 (259 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The solution
was stirred for 12 h The solvent was evaporated in vacuo The corresponding bis-
silylene iron(0) complex 45 was isolated as yellow-brown air- and moisture-sensitive
solids in 73 yield (540 mg 052 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 155 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 109 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 483
(s 4 H FeCH) 500 (s 4 H FeCH) 699- 712 (m 8 H arom
H) 736- 739 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 311 (NC(CH3)3) 548
(NC(CH3)3) 735 (FeCH) 742 (FeCH) 771 (SiC) 1210
1287 1303 1308 (arom C) 1704 (NCN) 2169 (CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 1050
IR(KBr cm-1
) 630 (s) 765 (w) 1028 (m) 1035 (m) 1200 (m) 1370 (w)
1400 (m) 1474 (w) 1609 (w) 1648 (w) 1900 (s) 1948 (s)
1996(w) 2026 (s) 2865 (w) 2930 (m) 2965 (m)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 C 5550 H 524 N
539 Found C 5623 H 517 N 566
References
- 129 -
6 REFERENCES
1 P Pyykko Chem Rev 1988 88 563
2 N V Sidgwick Clarendon Oxford 1950 1 287 (b) R S Drago J Phys Chem 1958 62
353
3 P P Power Chem Rev 1999 99 3463 (b) R C Fischer P P Power Chem Rev 2010 110
3877
4 R Janoschek Chemie in unserer Zeit 1988 22 128
5 (a) F S Kipping L L Lloyd Dalton Trans 1901 79 449 (b) N N Greenwood A
Earnshaw Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed) 1997 362
6 (a) L Roumlsch P John R Reitmeier Silicon Compounds Organic In Ullmanns Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH amp Co KGaA 2000 (b) A J O Lenick
Basic Silicone Chemistry ndash A Review 1999
7 S Yao Y Xiong M Brym M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 7268
8 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7562
9 Y Xiong S Yao R Muumlller M Kaupp M Driess Nature Chem 2010 2 577
10 (a) S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4159 (b) S
Yao Y Xiong C Milsmann E Bill S Pfirrmann C Limberg M Driess Chem Eur J
2010 16 436
11 (a) K S Pitzer J Am Chem Soc 1948 70 2140 (b) R S Mulliken J Am Chem Soc
1955 77 884
12 (a) M Asay C Jones M Driess Chem Rev 2011 111 354 (b) S Yao Y Xiong M Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 1748 (c) Y Mizuhata T Sasamori N Tokitoh Chem Rev 2009
109 3479 (d) P P Power Organometallics 2007 26 4362 (e) P P Power Chem Rev 2003
103 789 (f) S Nagendran H W Roesky Organometallics 2008 27 457
13 (a) R West M J Fink J Michl Science 1981 214 1343 (b) M J Fink M J Michalczyk
K J Haller R West J Michl Chem Commun 1983 1010 (c) S Masamune Y Hanzawa
D J Williams J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 6136 (d) D E Goldberg D H Harris M F
Lappert K M Thomas Chem Commun 1976 261 (e) K W Klinkhammer T F Faumlssler H
Gruumltzmacher Angew Chem Int Ed 1998 37 124 (f) J T Snow S Murakami S
Masamune D J Williams Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 4191 (g) M Weidenbruch Angew
Chem Int Ed 2003 42 2222
14 L Pauling J Am Chem Soc 1931 53 1367
15 (a) G Trinquier J P Malrieu P Riviere J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 4529 (b) J P
Malrieu G Trinquier J Am Chem Soc 1989 111 5916 (c) H Jacobsen T Ziegler J Am
Chem Soc 1994 116 3667
16 L Pu B Twamley P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2000 122 3524
17 M Kaupp P V R Schleyer J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 1061
18 A D Phillips R J Wright M M Olmstead P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2002 124 5930
19 N Takagi S Nagase Organometallics 2001 20 5498
20 M Stender A D Phillips R J Wright P P Power Angew Chem Int Ed 2002 41 1785
21 T L Allen W H Fink P P Power Dalton Trans 2000 407
References
- 130 -
22 A Sekiguchi R Kinjo M Ichinohe Science 2004 305 1755
23 D Bourissou O Guerret F P Gabbai G Bertrand Chem Rev 2000 100 39
24 M Denk R Lennon R Hayashi R West A V Belyakov H P Verne A Haaland M
Wagner N Metzler J Am Chem Soc 1994 116 2691
25 M Driess S Yao M Brym C V Wuellen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 6730
26 M Kira S Ishida T Iwamoto C Kabuto J Am Chem Soc 1999 121 9722
27 V Lemierre A Chrostowska A Dargelos P Baylegravere W J Leigh C R Harrington Appl
Organom Chem 2004 18 676
28 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky S Merkel J Henn D Stalke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
5683
29 L Jafarpour E D Stevens S P Nolan J Organomet Chem 2000 606 49
30 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen D Lentz J Am Chem Soc 2006 128 9628
31 (a) C-W So H W Roesky J Magull R B Oswald Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 3948
(b) C-W So H W Roesky P M Gurubasavaraj R B Oswald M T Gamer P G Jones S
Blaurock J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12049
32 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890 (b) S S Sen
H W Roesky D Stern J Henn D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2009 132 1123
33 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167 (b) W
Wang S Inoue E Irran M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691 (c) R Azhakar R
S Ghadwal H W Roesky H Wolf D Stalke Organometallics 2012 31 4588 (d) S S
Sen J Hey R Herbst-Irmer H W Roesky D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 12311
34 R C Fischer L Pu J C Fettinger M A Brynda P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
11366
35 Y Wang Y Xie P Wei R B King H F Schaefer P Von R Schleyer G H Robinson
Science 2008 321 1069
36 S S Sen S Khan S Nagendran H W Roesky Acc Chem Res 2012 45 578
37 S S Sen A Jana H W Roesky C Schulzke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 8536
38 C Jones S J Bonyhady N Holzmann G Frenking A Stasch Inorg Chem 2011 50
12315
39 D Gau R Rodriguez T Kato N Saffon-Merceron A De Coacutezar F P Cossiacuteo A Baceiredo
Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50 1092
40 S P Green C Jones P C Junk K-A Lippert A Stasch Chem Commun 2006 3978
41 S Nagendran S S Sen H W Roesky D Koley H GrubmuLler A Pal R Herbst-Irmer
Organometallics 2008 27 5459
42 W-P Leung W-K Chiu K-H Chong T C W Mak Chem Commun 2009 6822
43 (a) S P Green C Jones A Stasch Science 2007 318 1754 (b) S J Bonyhady S P Green
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 2973 (c) S J Bonyhady
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch A J Edwards G J Mcintyre Chem Eur J 2010 16 938
44 A Sidiropoulos C Jones A Stasch S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
9701
45 Y Peng R C Fischer W A Merrill J Fischer L Pu B D Ellis J C Fettinger R H
Herber P P Power Chemical Science 2010 1 461
46 R Jambor B Kašnaacute K N Kirschner M Schuumlrmann K Jurkschat Angew Chem Int Ed
References
- 131 -
2008 47 1650
47 (a) C D Schaeffer J J Zuckerman J Am Chem Soc 1974 96 7160 (b) M J S Gynane
D H Harris M F Lappert P P Power P Riviere M Riviere-Baudet Dalton Trans 1977
2004 (c) M F Lappert P P Power M J Slade L Hedberg K Hedberg V Schomaker
Chem Commun 1979 369 (d) T Fjeldberg H Hope M F Lappert P P Power A J
Thorne Chem Commun 1983 639 (e) M Veith M Jarczyk V Huch Chem Ber 1988
121 347
48 M Veith R Lisowsky Angew Chem Int Ed 1988 27 1087
49 P B Hitchcock M F Lappert A J Thorne Chem Commun 1990 1587
50 R A Bartlett P P Power J Am Chem Soc 1990 112 3660
51 J-T Ahlemann H W Roesky R Murugavel E Parisini M Noltemeyer H-G Schmidt O
Muumlller R Herbst-Irmer L N Markovskii Y G Shermilovich Chem Ber 1997 130 1113
52 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky K Proumlpper B Dittrich S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem
Int Ed 2011 50 5374
53 R W Chorley P B Hitchock B S Jolly M F Lappert G A Lawless Chem Commun
1991 1302
54 A G Avent C Drost B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem
2004 630 2090
55 M Veith A Rammo Z Anorg Allg Chem 2001 627 662
56 M Veith J Fischer T R Prout M Noetzel P Hobein V Huch Inorg Chem 1991 30
4130
57 H Braunschweig P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem Int Ed
1994 33 1156
58 H Braunschweig C Drost P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem
Int Ed 1997 36 261
59 R E Allan M A Beswick G R Coggan P R Raithby A E H Wheatley D S Wright
Inorg Chem 1997 36 5202
60 (a) C Stanciu S S Hino M Stender A F Richards M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
Chem 2005 44 2774 (b) Y Peng B D Ellis X Wang P P Power J Am Chem Soc
2008 130 12268
61 B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem 2005 631 1383
62 C Cui M M Olmstead J C Fettinger G H Spikes P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 17530
63 X Wang C Ni Z Zhu J C Fettinger P P Power Inorg Chem 2009 48 2464
64 S S Sen D Kratzert D Stern H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2010 49 5786
65 H-X Yeong H-W Xi K H Lim C-W So Chem Eur J 2010 16 12956
66 (a) F E Hahn A V Zabula T Pape A Hepp Eur J Inorg Chem 2007 2007 2405 (b) A
V Zabula F E Hahn T Pape A Hepp Organometallics 2007 26 1972 (c) A V Zabula T
Pape A Hepp F E Hahn Organometallics 2008 27 2756
67 S-H Zhang C-W So Organometallics 2011 30 2059
68 O T Summerscales M M Olmstead P P Power Organometallics 2011 30 3468
69 (a) M Veith W Frank Angew Chem 1985 97 213 (b) M Veith Angew Chem Int Ed
1987 26 1 (c) H Chen R A Bartlett H V R Dias M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
References
- 132 -
Chem 1991 30 3390 (d) R E Allan M A Beswick A J Edwards M A Paver M-A
Rennie P R Raithby D S Wright Dalton Trans 1995 1991 (e) W J Grigsby T Hascall
J J Ellison M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg Chem 1996 35 3254 (f) R E Allan M A
Beswick M K Davies P R Raithby A Steiner D S Wright J Organomet Chem 1998
550 71 (g) M E G Mosquera J S Palmer A D Hopkins D S Wright Phosphorus
Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 1999 150 107 (h) M Veith M Opsoumllder M Zimmer V Huch
Eur J Inorg Chem 2000 2000 1143 (i) D R Armstrong F Benevelli A D Bond N
Feeder E A Harron A D Hopkins M Mcpartlin D Moncrieff D Saacuteez E A Quadrelli
A D Woods D S Wright Inorg Chem 2002 41 1492 (j) T Chivers Timothy j Clark M
Krahn M Parvez G Schatte Eur J Inorg Chem 2003 2003 1857 (k) J F Eichler O Just
W S Rees Inorg Chem 2006 45 6706 (l) D J Eisler T Chivers Chem Eur J 2006 12
233 (m) H Vaňkaacutetovaacute L Broeckaert F De Proft R Olejniacutek J Turek Z Padělkovaacute A
Růžička Inorg Chem 2011 50 9454
70 (a) A Meltzer C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7232 (b) A Meltzer C
Praumlsang C Milsmann M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 3170 (c) H Ogino The
Chemical Record 2002 2 291 (d) S Inoue M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
5614 (e) M Stoelzel C Praumlsang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed
2012 51 399
71 W Yang H Fu H Wang M Chen Y Ding H W Roesky A Jana Inorg Chem 2009 48
5058
72 (a) J Choi A H R Macarthur M Brookhart A S Goldman Chem Rev 2011 111 1761
(b) N Selander K L N J Szaboacute Chem Rev 2011 111 2048 (c) M E Van Der Boom D
Milstein Chem Rev 2003 103 1759
73 W Tang X Zhang Chem Rev 2003 103 3029
74 (a) A P Shaw J R Norton D Buccella L A Sites S S Kleinbach D A Jarem K M
Bocage C Nataro Organometallics 2009 28 3804 (b) L-C Song J-T Liu Q-M Hu G-
F Wang P Zanello M Fontani Organometallics 2000 19 5342 (c) S Shekhar J F
Hartwig J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 13016
75 N A Marinos Modellsysteme fuumlr die [NiFe]-Hydrogenase und Zinkkatalysatoren fuumlr die
Hydrosilylierung Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin Germany 2011
76 (a) C M Jensen D Morales-Morales The Chemistry of Pincer Compounds Elsevier
Science Amsterdam 2007 (b) M Albrecht G Van Koten Angew Chem Int Ed 2001 40
3750 (c) M Albrecht M M Lindner Dalton Trans 2011 40 8733 (d) D Benito-Garagorri
K Kirchner Acc Chem Res 2008 41 201 (e) C Gunanathan D Milstein Acc Chem Res
2011 44 588
77 (a) N Selander K J Szabo Dalton Trans 2009 6267 (b) H Zhang A Lei Dalton Trans
2011 40 8745 (c) J Dupont C S Consorti J Spencer Chem Rev 2005 105 2527
78 Silyl-silylene transition-metal complexes see (a) K Ueno S Seki H Ogino Chem Lett
1993 22 2159 (b) H Tobita H Wada K Ueno H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 2545
(c) K Ueno A Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 5023 (d) H Wada H Tobita
H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 3870 (e) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino
Organometallics 1998 17 2844 (f) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino Organometallics 1998
17 2850 (g) H Wada H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 1998 27 993 (h) K Ueno A
References
- 133 -
Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1999 18 2694 (i) H Tobita T Sato M Okazaki H
Ogino J Organomet Chem 2000 611 314 (j) H Koshikawa M Okazaki S Matsumoto
K Ueno H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 2005 34 1412 (k) K Ueno S Ito K Endo H
Tobita S Inomata H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 3309
79 For reviews on silylene complexes see (a) M S Eisen Transition-Metal Silyl Complexes
In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2003 pp 2037 (b)
M Okazaki H Tobita H Ogino Dalton Trans 2003 493 (c) R Waterman P G Hayes T
D Tilley Acc Chem Res 2007 40 712
80 Y Ding H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt P P Power Organometallics 2001
20 1190
81 L Bourget-Merle M F Lappert J R Severn Chem Rev 2002 102 3031
82 B Raumlke F Zuumllch Y Ding J Prust H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt Z Anorg
Allg Chem 2001 627 836
83 W Wang S Yao C Van WuLlen M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640
84 (a) R West H Sohn D R Powell T Muumlller Y Apeloig Angew Chem Int Ed 1996 35
1002 (b) W P Freeman T D Tilley L M Liable-Sands A L Rheingold J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 10457
85 J Fischer J Baumgartner C Marschner Organometallics 2005 24 1263
86 M Stender A D Phillips P P Power Inorg Chem 2001 40 5314
87 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 4349
88 W D Woodul A F Richards A Stasch M Driess C Jones Organometallics 2010 29
3655
89 W Clegg E K Cope A J Edwards F S Mair Inorg Chem 1998 37 2317
90 (a) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Matsuno M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 5768 (b) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Angew Chem Int Ed
2006 45 3269 (c) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Eur J Inorg Chem
2007 2007 5471 (d) V Y Lee Y Ito H Yasuda K Takanashi A Sekiguchi J Am Chem
Soc 2011 133 5103
91 S P Mallela S Hill R A Geanangel Inorg Chem 1997 36 6247
92 P V R Schleyer C Maerker A Dransfeld H Jiao N J R V E Hommes J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 6317
93 For a review see Z Chen C S Wannere C Corminboeuf R Puchta P V R Schleyer
Chem Rev 2005 105 3842
94 (a) R Ahlrichs M Baumlr M Haumlser H Horn C Koumllmel Chem Phys Lett 1989 162 165 (b)
M Haumlser R Ahlrichs J Comput Chem 1989 10 104
95 O Treutler R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1995 102 346
96 (a) A D Becke Phys Rev A 1988 38 3098 (b) J P Perdew Phys Rev B 1986 33 8822
97 (a) A Schaumlfer C Huber R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1994 100 5829 (b) K Eichkorn F
Weigend O Treutler R Ahlrichs Theor Chem Acc 1997 97 119
98 K Eichkorn O Treutler H Oumlhm M Haumlser R Ahlrichs Chem Phys Lett 1995 242 652
99 U Meier C Van Wuumlllen M Schindler J Comput Chem 1992 13 551
100 (a) C Van Wuumlllen Chem Phys Lett 1994 219 8 (b) C Van Wuumlllen Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2000 2 2137
References
- 134 -
101 (a) P J Stephens F J Devlin C F Chabalowski M J Frisch J Phys Chem 1994 98
11623 (b) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 1372 (c) C T Lee W T Yang R G Parr
Phys Rev 1988 37 785
102 W Kutzelnigg U Fleischer M Schindler NMR basis principles and progress Springer
Berlin 1990 Vol 23 page 169
103 (a) C Corminboeuf T Heine G Seifert P V R Schleyer J Weber Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2004 6 273 (b) P Von Rague Schleyer M Manoharan Z-X Wang B Kiran H Jiao
R Puchta N J R Van Eikema Hommes Org Lett 2001 3 2465
104 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Chem Commun 2009 2661
105 H Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 1999 18 3159
106 Y Sugiyama T Sasamori Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Takagi S Nagase N Tokitoh J Am
Chem Soc 2006 128 1023
107 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 2003 22 215
108 (a) K H Pannell L Parkanyi H Sharma F Cervantes-Lee Inorg Chem 1992 31 522 (b)
A Kawachi Y Tanaka K Tamao J Organomet Chem 1999 590 15
109 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess Chem Asian J 2009 4 1323
110 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Organometallics 2011 30 6490
111 W Keim S Killat C F Nobile G P Suranna U Englert R Wang S Mecking L D
Schroumlder J Organomet Chem 2002 662 150
112 P H M Budzelaar A B Van Ort A G Orpen Eur J Inorg Chem 1998 1485
113 N M Scott R Dorta E D Stevens A Correa L Cavallo S P Nolan J Am Chem Soc
2005 127 3516
114 L W Pineda V Jancik H W Roesky D Neculai A M Neculai Angew Chem Int Ed
2004 43 1419
115 A Jana I Objartel H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2009 48 798
116 S S Sen G Tavcar H W Roesky D Kratzert J Hey D Stalke Organometallics 2010 29
2343
117 R West J Am Chem Soc 1953 75 1002
118 R Drake I Mackinnon R Taylor Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Siloxane Polymers
and Copolymers In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd
2003 pp 2217
119 (a) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 5648 (b) B Miehlich A Savin H Stoll H
Preuss Chem Phys Lett 1989 157 200 (c) Gussian 03 Revision E01 M J Frisch G W
Trucks H B Schlegel G E Scuseria M A Robb J R Cheeseman J A Montgomery Jr
T Vreven K N Kudin J C Burant J M Millam S S Iyengar J Tomasi V Barone B
Mennucci M Cossi G Scalmani N Rega G A Petersson H Nakatsuji M Hada M
Ehara K Toyota R Fukuda J Hasegawa M Ishida T Nakajima Y Honda O Kitao H
Nakai M Klene X Li J E Knox H P Hratchian J B Cross V Bakken C Adamo J
Jaramillo R Gomperts R E Stratmann O Yazyev A J Austin R Cammi C Pomelli J W
Ochterski P Y Ayala K Morokuma G A Voth P Salvador J J Dannenberg V G
Zakrzewski S Dapprich A D Daniels M C Strain O Farkas D K Malick A D Rabuck
K Raghavachari J B Foresman J V Ortiz Q Cui A G Baboul S Clifford J Cioslowski
B B Stefanov G Liu A Liashenko P Piskorz I Komaromi R L Martin D J Fox T
References
- 135 -
Keith M A Al-Laham C Y Peng A Nanayakkara M Challacombe P M W Gill B
Johnson W Chen M W Wong C Gonzalez and J A Pople Gaussian Inc Wallingford
CT 2004
120 M Denk R K Hayashi R West Chem Commun 1994 33
121 L Kong J Zhang H Song C Cui Dalton Trans 2009 5444
122 A Meltzer S Inoue C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 3038
123 P Macchi D M Proserpio A Sironi J Am Chem Soc 1998 120 1447
124 (a) M Regitz O J Scherer Multiple bonds and Low Coordination in Phosphorus Chemistry
New York 1990 p 5 (b) M Driess Coord Chem Rev 1995 145 1 (c) V Y Lee A
Sekiguchi J Escudieacute H Ranaivonjatovo Chem Lett 2010 39 312
125 C N Smit F M Lock F Bickelhaupt Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 3011
126 (a) C N Smit F Bickelhaupt Organometallics 1987 6 1156 (b) E Niecke E Klein M
Nieger Angew Chem Int Ed 1989 28 751 (c) R Corriu G Lanneau C Priou Angew
Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1130 (d) M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1022 (e) H R
G Bender E Niecke M Nieger J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 3314 (f) M Driess S Rell
H Pritzkow Chem Commun 1995 253 (g) M Driess H Pritzkow S Rell U Winkler
Organometallics 1996 15 1845 (h) M Driess S Block M Brym M T Gamer Angew
Chem Int Ed 2006 45 2293 (i) S Yao S Block M Brym M Driess Chem Commun
2007 3844 (j) V Y Lee M Kawai A Sekiguchi H Ranaivonjatovo J Escudieacute
Organometallics 2009 28 6625 (k) B Li T Matsuo D Hashizume H Fueno K Tanaka
K Tamao J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 13222
127 (a) C H Lai M D Su S Y Chu Inorg Chem 2002 41 1320 (b) R Pietschnig A
Orthaber Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4570 (c) C H Chen M D Su Eur J Inorg Chem
2008 1241 (d) V Lattanzi S Thorwirth D T Halfen L A Mueck L M Ziurys P
Thaddeus J Gauss M C Mccarthy Angew Chem Int Ed 2010 49 5661
128 S Inoue W Wang C Praumlsang M Asay E Irran M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2011 133
2868
129 (a) R Appel W A Paulen Angew Chem Int Ed 1981 20 869 (b) V Cappello J
Baumgartner A Dransfeld K Hassler Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4589
130 M Igarashi M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12660
131 F A Cotton G Wilkinson C Murillo M Bochmann Advanced Inorganic Chemistry 1999
132 (a) N Wiberg C M M Finger K Polborn Angew Chem Int Ed 1993 32 1054 (b) M
Ichinohe M Toyoshima R Kinjo A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2003 125 13328
133 (a) A J Arduengo H V R Dias J C Calabrese F Davidson Inorg Chem 1993 32 1541
(b) N Kuhn T Kratz D Blaumlser R Boese Chem Ber 1995 128 245 (c) P A Rupar M C
Jennings K M Baines Organometallics 2008 27 5043 (d) A J Ruddy P A Rupar K J
Bladek C J Allan J C Avery K M Baines Organometallics 2010 29 1362
134 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch H Marsmann G Henkel Chem Ber 1997 130 1733
135 (a) D Morales-Morales C Grause K Kasaoka R O Redoacuten R E Cramer C M Jensen
Inorg Chim Acta 2000 300ndash302 958 (b) T Kimura Y Uozumi Organometallics 2006 25
4883 (c) R B Bedford M Betham J P H Charmant M F Haddow A G Orpen L T
Pilarski S J Coles M B Hursthouse Organometallics 2007 26 6346 (d) J Aydin K S
Kumar L Eriksson K J Szaboacute Adv Syn Catal 2007 349 2585 (e) J-F Gong Y-H
References
- 136 -
Zhang M-P Song C Xu Organometallics 2007 26 6487 (f) R A Baber R B Bedford
M Betham M E Blake S J Coles M F Haddow M B Hursthouse A G Orpen L T
Pilarski P G Pringle R L Wingad Chem Commun 2006 3880 (g) A V Polukeev S A
Kuklin P V Petrovskii S M Peregudova A F Smolyakov F M Dolgushin A A
Koridze Dalton Trans 2011 40 7201 (h) R B Bedford Y-N Chang M F Haddow C L
Mcmullin Dalton Trans 2011 40 9034
136 (a) C Watanabe T Iwamoto C Kabuto M Kira Angew Chem Int Ed 2008 47 5386 (b)
C Watanabe Y Inagawa T Iwamoto M Kira Dalton Trans 2010 39 9414
137 (a) G Tavcar S S Sen R Azhakar A Thorn H W Roesky Inorg Chem 2010 49 10199
(b) R Azhakar S P Sarish H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Inorg Chem 2011 50 5039
138 W Chen P J Mccormack K Mohammed W Mbafor S M Roberts J Whittall Angew
Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4141
139 (a) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Organometallics 2008 27
3325 (b) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Bull Chem Soc Jpn
2009 82 793
140 (a) F Baumann E Dormann Y Ehleiter W Kaim J Kaumlrcher M Kelemen R Krammer D
Saurenz D Stalke C Wachter G Wolmershaumluser H Sitzmann J Organomet Chem 1999
587 267 (b) F Hung-Low C A Bradley Organometallics 2011 30 2636 (c) F Hung-Low
J P Krogman J W Tye C A Bradley Chem Commun 2012 48 368
141 R Azhakar R S Ghadwal H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Chem Asian J 2012 7 528
142 R S Ghadwal R Azhakar K ProPper J J Holstein B Dittrich H W Roesky Inorg
Chem 2011 50 8502
143 J Li S Merkel J Henn K Meindl A DoRing H W Roesky R S Ghadwal D Stalke
Inorg Chem 2010 49 775
144 M Ingleson H Fan M Pink J Tomaszewski K G Caulton J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
1804
145 A Schnepf Z Anorg Allg Chem 2006 632 935
146 (a) M D Rausch R A Genetti J Org Chem 1970 35 3888 (b) F Ungvary A Sisak L
Markoacute J Organomet Chem 1980 188 373
147 (a) E Erdik Tetrahedron 1992 48 9577 (b) P Knochel R D Singer Chem Rev 1993 93
2117 (c) M Rottlaumlnder P Knochel Tetrahedron Lett 1997 38 1749
148 (a) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1978 17 505 (b) K P C Vollhardt Angew Chem
Int Ed 1984 23 539 (c) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1985 24 248 (d) W Hess
J Treutwein G Hilt Synthesis 2008 2008 3537 (e) C J Scheuermann B D Ward New J
Chem 2008 32 1850 (f) T Shibata K Tsuchikama Org Biomol Chem 2008 6 1317 (g)
K Tanaka Chem Asian J 2009 4 508 (h) J A Varela C Saaacute Synlett 2008 2008 2571
149 (a) G Hilt C Hengst W Hess Eur J Org Chem 2008 2008 2293 (b) A Geny N Agenet
L Iannazzo M Malacria C Aubert V Gandon Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 1810 (c)
C C Eichman J P Bragdon J P Stambuli Synlett 2011 2011 1109
150 (a) Y Wakatsuki H Yamazaki Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1985 58 2715 (b) Y B Taarit Y
Diab B Elleuch M Kerkani M Chihaoui Chem Commun 1986 402 (c) H Nehl Chem
Ber 1994 127 2535 (d) C Wang X Li F Wu B Wan Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
7162
References
- 137 -
151 G M Sheldrick SHELX-97 Program for Crystal Structure Determination Universitaumlt
Goumlttingen (Germany) 1997
152 P Schlack G Keil Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1963 661 72
Appendix
- 138 -
7 APPENDIX
71 Abbreviations
Ada adamantanyl MHz Megahertz
Ar aryl min minute(s)
mmol millimole(ar)
MS mass spectrometry
B3LYP Beckersquos three-parameter hybrid
functional using the Lee Yang
and Parr correlation ldquofunctionalrdquo MW molecular weight
BINAP 22rsquo-(Ph2P)2-11rsquo-binaphthyl mz masscharge
br broad nacnac HC(MeC=N-Dip) 2minus
tBu tert-butyl Naph naphthyl
degC Celsius degree NBO natural bond orbital
ca about NHC N-Heterocyclic Carbene
calc calculated NICS nucleus independent chemical shift
CBD cyclobutadiene NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
cod COD 15-cyclooctadiene NPA natural population analysis
Cp cyclopentadienyl Ph phenyl
d doublet ppm parts per million
DCM dichloromethane iPr iso-propyl
DFT density functional theory q quartet
Dip 26-iPr2C6H3 R organic substituent
EI electron impact ionization RT room temperature
equiv equivalent(s) s singlet strong
ESI electrospray ionization sept septet
Et ethyl t triplet
eV electronvolt THF tetrahydrofuran
Fc ferrocendiyl Tip 246-iPr2C6H2
g gram(s) TMEDA tetramethylethyldiamine
h hour(s) TMS tetramethylsilane
HOMO highest occupied molecular orbital TS transition state
Hz Hertz TZVP triple-zeta valence polarization
IR infrared
K Kelvin
TZVDP TZVP two sets of polarization
functions aL PhC(
tBuN)2
minus UV-vis ultraviolet-visible
VE valence electron LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital vs very strong
M Metal VT variable temperature
m multiplet medium w weak
Me methyl WBI Wiberg Bond Index
Mes mesityl 246-Me3-C6H2 δ chemical shift
Appendix
- 139 -
GeN
N
GeN
Dip
Dip
DipCl
N
SnN
Dip
Dip
GeNN
SnN
Dip
DipDip
N
Dip
6 7
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation
1 2 3 4
5 8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22
Appendix
- 140 -
23 24 25 26
27 28 29
30 31 32 33
34 35 36
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph
Si
Cl
37 38 39 40
Appendix
- 141 -
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
41 42 43
44 45 46
47a 47b 48a 48b
Appendix
- 142 -
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details
Table 731 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 3 4 5
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C50 H88 Ge2 K2 N2 O4
100460
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
106989(7) pm
114137(7) pm
122625(8) pm
74158(6) deg
76395(6) deg
83400(5) deg
139807(16)
1
1193
1263
536
028 x 02 x 018
326 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-13lt=klt=13
-14lt=llt=14
12268
4910 [R(int) = 00358]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 094847
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4910 0 281
0940
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00638
R1 = 00538 wR2 = 00666
0456 and -0223
C41 H5 Ge N3
66650
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
91129(6) pm
113531(7) pm
190282(10) pm
100360(5) deg
101854(5) deg
98627(5) deg
185918(19)
2
1191
0855
716
039 x 012 x 007
297 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-13lt=klt=13
-22lt=llt=22
14570
6543 [R(int) = 00560]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
0943 and 0777
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6543 0 420
0785
R1 = 00399 wR2 = 00513
R1 = 00853 wR2 = 00566
0577 and -0317
C66 H102 Ge4 K2 N4 O2
135208
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
12370(3) pm
148433(14) pm
188725(19) pm
90059(8)deg
96311(14)deg
90082(13)deg
34442(10)
2
1304
1892
1416
030 x 025 x 015
292 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-15lt=klt=17
-14lt=llt=22
17371
6032 [R(int) = 00487]
995
Analytical
0807 and 0584
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6032 2 364
0911
R1 = 00424 wR2 = 00801
R1 = 00874 wR2 = 00885
0497 and -0457
Appendix
- 143 -
Table 732 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 6 8 12
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C46 H65 Ge2 N3
80519
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
44536(2) pm
98204(5) pm
218135(10) pm
90deg
116030(4)deg
90deg
85727(7)
8
1248
1436
3408
038 x 024 x 010
305 to 2500deg
-49lt=hlt=52
-10lt=klt=11
-24lt=llt=25
20162
7493 [R(int) = 00954]
992
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 074676
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7493 0 476
0917
R1 = 00559 wR2 = 00778
R1 = 01461 wR2 = 00966
0590 and -0578
C46 H65 Ge N3 Sn
85129
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
867780(10) pm
120514(4) pm
210797(6) pm
96333(2)deg
97393(2)deg
99141(2)deg
213908(10)
2
1322
1320
888
016 x 014 x 012
295 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-14lt=klt=14
-25lt=llt=25
16936
7496 [R(int) = 00251]
994
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099037
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7496 0 495
1001
R1 = 00309 wR2 = 00706
R1 = 00437 wR2 = 00733
1468 and -0424
C37 H48 N2
52077
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108485(5) pm
127284(7) pm
132348(4) pm
65748(4)deg
86290(3)deg
71699(5)deg
157759(12)
2
1096
0063
568
029 x 022 x 018
298 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13428
5541 [R(int) = 00203]
998
None
09888 and 09820
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5541 0 364
1029
R1 = 00439 wR2 = 00900
R1 = 00633 wR2 = 00963
0188 and -0193
Appendix
- 144 -
Table 733 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 14 16 17
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H46 Cl Ge N2
62680
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117621(2) pm
175495(4) pm
166051(3) pm
90deg
107053(2)deg
90deg
327691(11)
4
1270
1044
1324
040 x 032 x 022
342 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-19lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=18
16923
5742 [R(int) = 00250]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 082078
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5742 0 378
1044
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00709
R1 = 00496 wR2 = 00742
0736 and -0362
C37 H46 Ge N2
59135
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108388(6) pm
127885(7) pm
132778(4) pm
66971(4)deg
85749(3)deg
71833(5)deg
160695(13)
2
1222
0980
628
029 x 015 x 007
307 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13501
5636 [R(int) = 00366]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 092510
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5636 0 369
1031
R1 = 00489 wR2 = 01180
R1 = 00691 wR2 = 01242
0539 and -0501
C37 H49 Ge N3
60838
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117714(4) pm
174309(6) pm
166868(6) pm
90deg
106866(4)deg
90deg
32766(2)
4
1233
0964
1296
030 x 023 x 019
342 to 2500deg
-8lt=hlt=13
-10lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=16
12816
5749 [R(int) = 00325]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 095425
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5749 0 378
1060
R1 = 00464 wR2 = 01084
R1 = 00699 wR2 = 01133
1717 and -0738
Appendix
- 145 -
Table 734 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 18 20 22
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H48 Ge N2 O
60936
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117560(3) pm
174116(5) pm
166421(4) pm
90deg
106992(3)deg
90deg
325778(15)
4
1242
0971
1296
031 x 014 x 005
343 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-20lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=19
23624
5720 [R(int) = 00371]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 083390
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5720 0 379
1018
R1 = 00336 wR2 = 00752
R1 = 00516 wR2 = 00789
0521 and -0366
C28 H38 N2
40260
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
94924(4) pm
256583(9) pm
107465(5) pm
90deg
110403(5)deg
90deg
245320(18)
4
1090
0063
880
017 x 015 x 013
343 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=10
-30lt=klt=27
-12lt=llt=11
8561
4313 [R(int) = 00209]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099057
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4313 0 281
1041
R1 = 00476 wR2 = 01015
R1 = 00771 wR2 = 01083
0253 and -0194
C28 H37 Cl Ge N2 O
52564
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
89021(3) pm
107319(4) pm
151176(6) pm
75734(4)deg
74781(3)deg
75311(3)deg
132282(8)
2
1320
1281
552
020 x 012 x 008
354 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-12lt=klt=12
-15lt=llt=17
9246
4654 [R(int) = 00211]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086160
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4654 0 304
0946
R1 = 00274 wR2 = 00579
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00597
0394 and -0264
Appendix
- 146 -
Table 735 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 23 27 28
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C28 H36 Cl2 Ge N2
54408
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
279616(13) pm
113538(3) pm
177729(7) pm
90deg
109718(5)deg
90deg
53115(4)
8
1361
1374
2272
021 x 017 x 015
332 to 2500deg
-25lt=hlt=33
-7lt=klt=13
-21lt=llt=20
10951
4663 [R(int) = 00459]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091223
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4663 0 304
0856
R1 = 00372 wR2 = 00584
R1 = 00684 wR2 = 00620
0589 and -0533
C30 H48 Cl2 N4 O Si2
60780
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121593(5) pm
162045(6) pm
171248(7) pm
90deg
98177(4)deg
90deg
33399(2)
4
1209
0295
1304
030 x 015 x 005
335 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=13
-16lt=klt=19
-20lt=llt=20
23741
5865 [R(int) = 00491]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086688
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5865 172 490
1035
R1 = 00543 wR2 = 01080
R1 = 00905 wR2 = 01194
0310 and -0412
C30 H46 N4 O Si2
53489
150(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Fdd2
31188(2) pm
39120(3) pm
102620(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
125204(14)
16
1135
0141
4640
031 x 011 x 007
334 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=36
-46lt=klt=45
-12lt=llt=12
11517
4372 [R(int) = 00656]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 097469
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4372 1 346
0897
R1 = 00488 wR2 = 00604
R1 = 00754 wR2 = 00650
0328 and -0229
Appendix
- 147 -
Table 736 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 29 30 31
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C38 H58 N4 Ni O Si2
70177
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
98776(8) pm
129530(11) pm
155488(13) pm
81634(7)deg
83316(7)deg
82826(7)deg
19430(3)
2
1200
0594
756
020 x 009 x 007
330 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=11
-15lt=klt=13
-18lt=llt=18
14961
6828 [R(int) = 00414]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091998
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6828 0 474
0948
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00807
R1 = 00605 wR2 = 00853
0407 and -0240
C21 H41 N2 P Si3
43680
173(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Pbca
193556(7) pm
142399(4) pm
199777(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
55063(3)
8
1054
0239
1904
039 x 036 x 016
351 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=23
-16lt=klt=16
-23lt=llt=22
19912
4836 [R(int) = 00961]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09627 and 09125
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4836 18 287
0906
R1 = 00571 wR2 = 00889
R1 = 01270 wR2 = 01032
0316 and -0214
C44 H60 N4 P2 Si2
76308
173(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
23841(3) pm
101993(12) pm
19369(2) pm
90deg
108346(12)deg
90deg
44703(9)
4
1134
0184
1640
076 x 057 x 055
353 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=28
-12lt=klt=12
-20lt=llt=23
16197
3927 [R(int) = 00447]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09053 and 08725
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
3927 0 251
1034
R1 = 00618 wR2 = 01393
R1 = 00843 wR2 = 01489
0721 and -0649
Appendix
- 148 -
Table 737 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 33 36 40-endo
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C56 H98 Cl4 N6 Si6 Sn2
140312
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
105159(4) pm
127622(6) pm
269391(12) pm
90310(4)deg
90855(3)deg
102927(3)deg
35232(3)
2
1323
1000
1456
013 x 012 x 009
336 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-29lt=llt=32
25757
12396 [R(int) = 00546]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09154 and 08810
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
12396 536 816
2077
R1 = 01231 wR2 = 01906
R1 = 01495 wR2 = 01944
1510 and -4753
C91 H139 N8 O4 Pd Si4
162786
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
145970(8) pm
151441(15) pm
232982(16) pm
71358(8)deg
74666(5)deg
85365(6)deg
47063(6)
2
1149
0298
1750
019 x 013 x 011
327 to 2500deg
-17lt=hlt=17
-17lt=klt=18
-27lt=llt=27
41022
16531 [R(int) = 00735]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09679 and 09455
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
16531 284 1112
0908
R1 = 00558 wR2 = 01021
R1 = 01075 wR2 = 01128
0688 and -0448
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
10532(3) pm
20258(5) pm
18990(5) pm
90deg
10542(3)deg
90deg
39060(19)
4
1347
1927
1648
012 x 008 x 005
322 to 2500deg
-6lt=hlt=12
-22lt=klt=24
-22lt=llt=21
16887
6870 [R(int) = 01353]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 073478
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6870 213 498
1044
R1 = 00912 wR2 = 01786
R1 = 01680 wR2 = 02282
0570 and -1404
Appendix
- 149 -
Table 738 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 40-exo 41 42
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
165582(11) pm
127695(7) pm
198175(12) pm
90deg
107428(7)deg
90deg
39979(4)
4
1316
1883
1648
012 x 011 x 009
337 to 2499deg
-16lt=hlt=19
-15lt=klt=15
-23lt=llt=23
29049
7015 [R(int) = 00329]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 052405
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7015 0 436
1065
R1 = 00263 wR2 = 00574
R1 = 00318 wR2 = 00595
0357 and -0360
C45 H59 Co Fe N4 Si2
82692
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
119176(7) pm
160794(9) pm
220424(13) pm
90deg
94402(5)deg
90deg
42115(4)
4
1304
0831
1752
015 x 013 x 007
323 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=17
-16lt=llt=26
17786
7404 [R(int) = 01111]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 075122
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7404 0 490
1052
R1 = 00717 wR2 = 01045
R1 = 01208 wR2 = 01181
0467 and -0370
C45 H59 Co Fe Ge2 N4
91592
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121662(3) pm
160596(3) pm
220073(5) pm
90deg
93549(2)deg
90deg
429163(16)
4
1418
2134
1896
015 x 011 x 008
336 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=19
-26lt=llt=26
33743
7539 [R(int) = 00521]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 068509
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7539 0 521
1259
R1 = 00400 wR2 = 00965
R1 = 00536 wR2 = 01000
0376 and -0373
Appendix
- 150 -
Atomic coordinates of four unpublished compounds 20 22 23 and 33 are shown in
following tables
Table 739 Atomic coordinates (times10
4) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 20 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
N(1) 1159(1) 1176(1) 6836(1) 20(1)
C(1) 1706(2) 1650(1) 6995(1) 21(1)
N(2) -1293(2) 1547(1) 7057(1) 23(1)
C(2) 789(2) 2089(1) 7078(1) 20(1)
C(3) -626(2) 2021(1) 7158(1) 20(1)
C(4) 3331(2) 1741(1) 7112(2) 29(1)
C(5) 3920(2) 2283(1) 7590(2) 34(1)
C(6) 2795(2) 2681(1) 6772(2) 35(1)
C(7) 1375(2) 2643(1) 7102(2) 27(1)
C(8) -1522(2) 2482(1) 7295(2) 21(1)
C(9) -2759(2) 2643(1) 6227(2) 27(1)
C(10) -3571(2) 3077(1) 6331(2) 33(1)
C(11) -3169(2) 3358(1) 7498(2) 35(1)
C(12) -1948(2) 3199(1) 8573(2) 32(1)
C(13) -1133(2) 2765(1) 8467(2) 27(1)
C(14) -2537(2) 1417(1) 7503(2) 35(1)
C(15) -3250(3) 920(1) 6823(2) 61(1)
C(16) -1974(3) 1344(1) 9002(2) 65(1)
C(17) 2080(2) 741(1) 6834(2) 20(1)
C(18) 2353(2) 597(1) 5670(2) 23(1)
C(19) 3237(2) 160(1) 5724(2) 29(1)
C(20) 3821(2) -131(1) 6867(2) 32(1)
C(21) 3480(2) -1(1) 7977(2) 29(1)
C(22) 2598(2) 427(1) 7984(2) 23(1)
C(23) 2150(2) 562(1) 9174(2) 28(1)
C(24) 2101(2) 91(1) 10028(2) 39(1)
C(25) 3156(2) 987(1) 10029(2) 42(1)
C(26) 1602(2) 885(1) 4374(2) 29(1)
C(27) 2645(3) 974(1) 3586(2) 53(1)
C(28) 195(3) 588(1) 3539(2) 54(1)
Appendix
- 151 -
Table 7310 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 22 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 4751(1) 5279(1) 3913(1) 24(1)
Cl(1) 4863(1) 7474(1) 3443(1) 35(1)
O(1) 2591(1) 5468(1) 4187(1) 20(1)
N(1) 4469(2) 5098(1) 2623(1) 17(1)
C(1) 3006(2) 5278(2) 2582(1) 16(1)
N(2) 1482(2) 7765(2) 2375(1) 20(1)
C(2) 2432(2) 5062(2) 1801(1) 21(1)
C(3) 1144(2) 4228(2) 2174(2) 31(1)
C(4) -158(2) 4793(2) 2933(2) 30(1)
C(5) 534(2) 4844(2) 3741(1) 21(1)
C(6) 1810(2) 5684(2) 3440(1) 17(1)
C(7) 1063(2) 7152(2) 3205(1) 18(1)
C(8) 820(2) 9172(2) 2096(1) 26(1)
C(9) 397(3) 9344(2) 1159(2) 40(1)
C(10) 2058(3) 9950(2) 2035(2) 43(1)
C(11) -95(2) 7719(2) 3998(1) 18(1)
C(12) 434(2) 8108(2) 4652(1) 22(1)
C(13) -648(2) 8637(2) 5376(1) 27(1)
C(14) -2259(2) 8769(2) 5459(2) 30(1)
C(15) -2795(2) 8370(2) 4815(2) 30(1)
C(16) -1724(2) 7845(2) 4085(1) 24(1)
C(17) 5786(2) 4690(2) 1889(1) 19(1)
C(18) 6546(2) 3361(2) 1997(1) 22(1)
C(19) 7868(2) 3005(2) 1310(2) 28(1)
C(20) 8423(2) 3902(2) 552(2) 29(1)
C(21) 7656(2) 5209(2) 464(1) 26(1)
C(22) 6329(2) 5635(2) 1128(1) 21(1)
C(23) 5549(2) 7085(2) 991(2) 26(1)
C(24) 6701(3) 7932(2) 989(2) 41(1)
C(25) 4931(3) 7520(2) 84(2) 40(1)
C(26) 6001(2) 2315(2) 2820(2) 27(1)
C(27) 5775(3) 1139(2) 2495(2) 40(1)
C(28) 7175(3) 1863(2) 3471(2) 38(1)
Appendix
- 152 -
Table 7311 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 23 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 967(1) 7605(1) 1823(1) 18(1)
Cl(1) 1020(1) 9314(1) 2345(1) 29(1)
N(1) 1401(1) 6550(2) 2449(1) 19(1)
C(1) 1534(1) 5601(2) 2029(2) 16(1)
Cl(2) 198(1) 7116(1) 1640(1) 31(1)
N(2) 1101(1) 7630(2) 909(1) 15(1)
C(2) 1548(1) 5691(2) 1285(2) 15(1)
C(3) 1442(1) 6764(2) 777(2) 14(1)
C(4) 1615(1) 6867(2) 172(2) 19(1)
C(5) 1945(1) 5989(2) -42(2) 26(1)
C(6) 2098(1) 4966(2) 547(2) 22(1)
C(7) 1669(1) 4652(2) 844(2) 21(1)
C(8) 1625(1) 4444(2) 2470(2) 17(1)
C(9) 1229(1) 3875(2) 2611(2) 23(1)
C(10) 1291(1) 2785(2) 2983(2) 29(1)
C(11) 1764(2) 2263(3) 3232(2) 32(1)
C(12) 2169(1) 2832(3) 3121(2) 30(1)
C(13) 2101(1) 3920(2) 2737(2) 22(1)
C(14) 1621(1) 6630(2) 3327(2) 20(1)
C(15) 1219(1) 6848(3) 3699(2) 32(1)
C(16) 2052(1) 7524(2) 3583(2) 34(1)
C(17) 833(1) 8395(2) 248(2) 17(1)
C(18) 1019(1) 9542(2) 207(2) 19(1)
C(19) 745(1) 10248(3) -431(2) 29(1)
C(20) 315(1) 9844(3) -1011(2) 36(1)
C(21) 147(1) 8718(3) -973(2) 33(1)
C(22) 399(1) 7960(2) -350(2) 20(1)
C(23) 215(1) 6700(2) -377(2) 23(1)
C(24) 329(1) 6020(3) -1045(2) 34(1)
C(25) -341(1) 6612(3) -475(2) 31(1)
C(26) 1517(1) 10001(2) 789(2) 22(1)
C(27) 1914(1) 10083(3) 375(2) 32(1)
C(28) 1463(1) 11198(2) 1144(2) 36(1)
Appendix
- 153 -
Table 7312 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 33 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Sn(1) 4689(1) 4918(1) 3222(1) 24(1)
Sn(2) 5822(1) 5994(1) 1674(1) 30(1)
Cl(1) 4488(3) 6215(2) 3883(1) 38(1)
Cl(2) 3266(2) 3378(2) 3638(1) 39(1)
Cl(3) 7188(2) 7769(2) 1449(1) 43(1)
Cl(4) 6104(3) 5090(3) 888(1) 57(1)
Si(1) 6825(2) 4259(2) 3587(1) 17(1)
Si(2) 8610(3) 6420(2) 3531(1) 28(1)
Si(3) 9814(2) 4466(2) 3664(1) 26(1)
Si(4) 3648(2) 6680(2) 1375(1) 21(1)
Si(5) 1981(3) 4463(2) 1299(1) 30(1)
Si(6) 649(3) 6348(2) 1247(1) 30(1)
N(1) 6586(7) 2924(5) 3299(3) 20(2)
N(2) 6484(6) 3264(5) 4080(3) 16(2)
N(3) 8389(7) 5001(5) 3582(3) 23(2)
N(4) 3751(7) 7937(6) 1722(3) 22(2)
N(5) 3959(8) 7800(6) 936(3) 27(2)
N(6) 2102(7) 5865(6) 1329(3) 24(2)
C(1) 6258(8) 2470(7) 3742(4) 24(2)
C(2) 5630(8) 1296(7) 3832(3) 20(2)
C(3) 4328(9) 879(7) 3742(4) 30(2)
C(4) 3826(11) -209(8) 3826(4) 44(3)
C(5) 4613(12) -855(8) 3977(4) 47(3)
C(6) 5921(13) -450(9) 4064(4) 54(3)
C(7) 6446(10) 640(8) 3992(4) 36(3)
C(8) 6469(9) 2487(7) 2787(3) 22(2)
C(9) 7183(11) 3385(8) 2465(4) 43(3)
C(10) 5041(10) 2180(9) 2612(4) 44(3)
C(11) 7093(12) 1524(8) 2741(4) 49(3)
C(12) 6251(9) 3286(8) 4625(3) 26(2)
C(13) 4851(10) 2720(9) 4759(4) 48(3)
C(14) 7218(10) 2783(8) 4908(4) 39(3)
C(15) 6455(10) 4474(7) 4759(4) 31(2)
C(16) 7585(10) 6750(8) 3014(4) 43(3)
C(17) 8192(11) 7005(8) 4123(4) 44(3)
C(18) 10317(10) 7108(8) 3367(5) 55(4)
C(19) 10809(9) 4684(9) 3087(4) 39(3)
C(20) 9461(9) 3008(7) 3775(4) 30(2)
Appendix
- 154 -
C(21) 10726(10) 5062(9) 4232(4) 41(3)
C(22) 4144(9) 8514(7) 1315(3) 22(2)
C(23) 4603(10) 9700(7) 1286(3) 30(2)
C(24) 5918(10) 10173(8) 1332(4) 36(3)
C(25) 6315(12) 11289(9) 1292(4) 46(3)
C(26) 5453(14) 11926(9) 1203(4) 50(3)
C(27) 4158(14) 11457(9) 1158(4) 52(3)
C(28) 3726(12) 10336(8) 1194(4) 41(3)
C(29) 3829(9) 8261(7) 2260(3) 24(2)
C(30) 3041(13) 9101(10) 2358(4) 65(4)
C(31) 3223(10) 7251(8) 2537(4) 41(3)
C(32) 5223(10) 8649(10) 2438(4) 59(4)
C(33) 4252(10) 7910(8) 398(3) 30(2)
C(34) 3489(13) 8669(11) 158(4) 67(4)
C(35) 3812(13) 6813(9) 170(4) 60(4)
C(36) 5705(11) 8321(11) 315(4) 63(4)
C(37) 3040(11) 4003(8) 1778(4) 49(3)
C(38) 2431(11) 4059(8) 669(4) 44(3)
C(39) 310(10) 3713(8) 1447(5) 48(3)
C(40) -433(9) 5964(9) 1795(4) 43(3)
C(41) 921(10) 7835(9) 1209(4) 48(3)
C(42) -186(11) 5795(10) 650(4) 57(4)
C(43) -180(17) 209(14) 3445(7) 59(3)
C(44) -1099(17) -417(14) 3132(7) 58(3)
C(45) -949(16) -322(14) 2634(7) 58(2)
C(46) 75(15) 387(13) 2440(7) 58(2)
C(47) 979(17) 1008(14) 2750(6) 60(2)
C(48) 829(17) 908(15) 3251(7) 60(3)
C(49) 210(20) 473(17) 1887(7) 58(3)
C(43A) 798(17) 917(14) 2044(7) 58(3)
C(44A) 1381(17) 1418(14) 2465(7) 59(3)
C(45A) 931(16) 1088(14) 2929(7) 59(3)
C(46A) -134(15) 231(13) 2969(7) 58(2)
C(47A) -748(17) -263(14) 2547(6) 58(2)
C(48A) -289(17) 75(14) 2084(7) 58(2)
C(49A) -640(20) -111(17) 3469(8) 60(3)
C(50) 120(20) -463(18) -179(10) 106(6)
C(51) -640(30) -620(20) 236(10) 106(6)
C(52) -730(20) 250(20) 530(10) 107(6)
C(53) -70(30) 1260(20) 404(11) 109(6)
C(54) 680(20) 1409(19) -10(11) 107(6)
C(55) 780(30) 558(19) -303(11) 106(6)
C(56) 250(30) -1390(20) -499(12) 120(7)
Appendix
- 155 -
C(57) 575(16) 499(14) 4873(6) 52(3)
C(58) 807(18) -512(14) 4941(8) 53(3)
C(59) -138(17) -1326(14) 5128(7) 55(3)
C(60) -1333(18) -1140(15) 5253(8) 57(3)
C(61) -1572(16) -130(15) 5187(7) 56(3)
C(62) -620(17) 686(15) 5000(8) 53(3)
C(63) 1600(20) 1369(17) 4669(9) 59(5)
Appendix
- 156 -
74 Publications in this dissertation
1 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Stephan Enthaler and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167-6171 Angew Chem 2012 124 6271-6275
Bis(silylenyl)- and Bis(germylenyl)-Substituted Ferrocenes Synthesis Structure and Catalytic
Applications of Bidentate Silicon(II)-Cobalt Complex
2 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Elisabeth Irran and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691-3694 Angew Chem 2012 124 3751-3754
Synthesis and unexpected coordination of a silicon(II)-based SiCSi pincerlike arene to
palladium
3 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 6490-6494
Reactivity of N-Heterocyclic germylene toward ammonia and water
4 Shenglai Yao Yun Xiong Wenyuan Wang and Matthias Driess
Chem Eur J 2011 17 4890-4895
Synthesis structure and reactivity of a pyridine-stabilized germanone
5 Shigeyoshi Inoue Wenyuan Wang Carsten Praesang Matthew Asay Elisabeth Irran and
Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 2868ndash2871
An ylide-like phosphasilene and striking formation of a 4π-electron resonance-stabilized 24-
disila-13-diphosphacyclo- butadiene
6 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890ndash15892
An isolable bis-silylene oxide (ldquodisilylenoxanerdquo) and its metal coordination
7 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Chem Commun 2009 2661ndash2663
An unsymmetric substituted digermylene with a Ge(I)ndashGe(I) bond and synthesis of a
germylenendashstannylene with a Ge(I)ndashSn(I) bond
8 Wenyuan Wang Shenglai Yao Christoph van Wuellen and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640ndash9641
A cyclopentadienide analogue containing divalent germanium and a heavy cyclobutadiene-
like dianion with an unusual Ge4 Core
Appendix
- 157 -
75 Curriculum Vitae
Personal Data
Date and Place of Birth 17th
January 1976 in Nei Mongol China
Nationality Chinese
Education
1982-1987 Elementary School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1987-1993 High School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1993-1997 Department of Chemistry Inner Mongolia Normal University (China)
Bachelor Chemistry
071997 Bachelor of Chemistry education
2003-2007 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
Diplom Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
012008 Diplom of Science Degree
2008-2012 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
PhD Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
Herein I affirm that this dissertation was finished independently at the ldquoInstitut fuumlr
Chemierdquo at the ldquoTechnischen Universitaumlt Berlinrdquo under the guidance of
Prof Dr Matthias Driess where all references and additional aid sources have been
appropriately cited
Wenyuan Wang
Berlin Juli 2012
Introduction
- 1 -
1 INTRODUCTION
11 The significance of low-valent group 14 compounds
Generally main-group elements higher than of the third period are classified as
ldquoheavy main-group elementsrdquo some of which show abnormal physical and chemical
properties For example Br(VII) is a stronger oxidant than Cl(VII) This different
behavior of high-valent main-group elements can be attributed to the relativistic
effect[1]
of electrons The contraction of all s-orbitals triggered by the relativistic effect
leads to a greater energy difference between s- and p-orbitals in higher period
elements which increases the difficulty of a sp-hybridation Moreover the energy
difference between s- and p-orbitals for elements in the d-district of the fourth period
and f-district of the sixth period vary unconventionally resulting in the so called
ldquosecondary periodicityrdquo of forth and sixth period elements Therefore ns2 electrons in
the valence shell of heavy main-group elements play an essential role for their
chemical properties[2]
During the organometallic research of main group elements a
series of novel compounds have been discovered and new synthetic methods as well
as theoretical insights in their chemistry have been developed and summarized[3]
In whole periodic table the difference of property in the group 14 elements (tetrels)
is maximal[4]
In comparison to carbon compounds of Si Ge Sn and Pb are very
different referring to the physical properties chemical behavior and structural features
The theory for carbon chemistry cannot be fit for the chemistry of heavy group 14
elements A typical example is the synthesis of compounds with a silicon-oxygen
double bond (Si=O silanone) Beginning last century the english chemist Frederic
Stanley Kipping manufactured many silicon-carbon compounds and discovered
thereby resin-like products which he called ldquosilicone of ketonesrdquo Kipping coined the
word ldquosiliconerdquo in 1901 to describe polydiphenylsiloxane by analogy of its formula
(Ph2SiO) with the formula of the ketone benzophenone (Ph2CO) Kipping was well
Introduction
- 2 -
aware that polydiphenylsiloxane is polymeric whereas benzophenone is monomeric
and noted that ldquosiliconerdquo and Ph2CO had very different chemistry[5]
The german chemist Richard Muumlller and the american chemist Eugene G Rochow
found almost at the same time a possibility for the industrial production of
dimethyldichlorosilane (Me2SiCl2) the most important precursor for the production of
the silicone in the 1940s[6]
The procedure today is called Muumlller Rochow synthesis
(Scheme 11) From that many researchers synthesized various silicone products but
crystallographically characterized complexes with a donor-stabilized Si=O double
bond were published at the beginning of this century by our group These are the
silanoic ester I1[7]
the carbene-coordinated silanone I2[8]
and the ketone-coordinated
silanone I3[9]
(Scheme 12) The Si=O double bond distance (1532 pm) in I3 is shorter
than the ones in I1 (1579 pm) and I2 (1541 pm) and represents the shortest Si-O
distance in all molecular Si=O compounds hitherto reported[10]
Scheme 11 Muumlller Rochow silicone synthesis
Scheme 12 Isolable donor-stabilized silanoic ester I1 and silanone I2 and I3
The hundred-year story of silicones to monomeric species bearing Si=O double
bonds shows that the silicon atom prefers σ-bonds over double bond (σ- and π-bonds)
That means the classical π-bond is not of first choice for heavy main-group
elements[11]
In other words not only E=X (E = heavy main-group elements X = C N
O) but also E=Ersquo (Ersquo = heavy main-group elements) systems are difficult to stabilize
Introduction
- 3 -
because they easily form σ-bonded corresponding polymers Consequently it is very
challenging to study compounds of heavy main group elements in their low oxidation
state Especially the study of divalent Si Ge and Sn compounds with lone pair
electrons (metallylenes) is one of the most attractive research fields in contemporary
organometallic chemistry[3 12]
In the past thirty years numerous thermally stable unsaturated Si Ge Sn
compounds were isolated which show extremely impressive chemistry[12d 13]
The
difference between C-C and Si-Si double bond is now well-understood[3a]
Very
different reaction mechanisms for the formation of such doubly-bonded carbon and
silicon compounds were throughly discussed The classical C-C double bond can
readily be explained by the valence bond theory and hybridization[14]
The bonding
state in those heavier alkene analogues can be explained by two sets of ns2rarrp
0 donor-
acceptor interactions between two metallylene monomers (Scheme 1 3)[3 15]
Similarly heavier alkyne analogues of main-group elements present also two dative
bonds of ns2rarrp
0 donor-acceptor interactions plus a normal σ-bond between two pz
orbitals[3 12d]
(Scheme 13) But the sp-hybridization for heavy main-group elements
is not realized in their low-valent compounds because sp-hybridization does not lead
to strengthing of terminal σ-bonds to the ligands R
Scheme 13 Nonclassical multiple bond features (E = heavy main-group elements)
Introduction
- 4 -
Until the end of the last century the synthesis of heavier alkyne analogues was an
unsolved problem because of the lack of suitable large substituent At the first the
isolation of a diplumbylene I4[16]
ArrsquoPb-PbArrsquo (Arrsquo = 26-(Tip)2C6H3 Tip = 246-
iPr3C6H2) was reported by Power in 2000 (Scheme 14) As is evident from the
structural parameters of ArPb-PbAr the triple bond character has vanished completely
The Pb-Pb distance (319 pm) in ArPb-PbAr is longer even than that of a normal Pb-
Pb single bond (308 pm) and the CAr-Pb bond vectors are perpendicular to the Pb-Pb
axes (943deg) These two facts illustrated a complete lack of hybridization of lead
atoms and almost exclusive use of p-orbitals in σ-bonds[17]
In 2002 Power reported
the distannyne ArSnequivSnAr I5[18]
(Ar = 26-Dip2C6H3 Dip = 26-iPr2C6H3) containing
a SnequivSn bond length of 2668 pm shorter compared to Sn-Sn single bonds[19]
and
with multiple bond character A trans bent configuration was also observed in I5 but
the Sn-Sn-C angle with 1252deg is far from a perpendicular situation as in I4 In the
same year Power described the first digermyne I6[20]
ArGeequivGeAr In this case the
Ge-Ge bond length of 2285 pm was found to be considerably shorter than normal Ge-
Ge single[13f]
(244 pm) and Ge-Ge double bonds (221-246 pm) indicated multiple
bonding character[21]
The trans-bending angle of Ge-Ge-C (1288deg) in digermyne I6
is slightly larger than that in distannyne I5
Scheme 14 The first isolated formal alkyne analogues of group 14
Introduction
- 5 -
With the appearance of the first structurally characterized disilyne I7[22]
reported by
Sekiguchi the series of heavier alkyne congeners was completed in 2004 The SiequivSi
bond length with 2062 pm was considerably shorter than that of typical Si-Si single
bonds (235 pm) and somewhat shorter than that of typical Si-Si double bonds[13b]
(216 pm) The molecular structure of compound I7 with a Si-Si-Silyl angle of 1374deg
reveals a heavily trans-bent configuration indicating the presence of a nonclassical
triple bond The theoretical calculation approved the trans bent structure and a bond
order of three
12 Heavier carbene analogues of group 14 elements
Isolable carbenes and heavier carbene analogues (metallylenes silylenes R2Si
germylenes R2Ge stannylenes R2Sn plumbylenes R2Pb) can be defined as
stabilized divalent monomers of group 14 elements which can impossibly dimerize or
polymerize continuously due to the thermodynamic andor kinetic stabilization As
already mentioned above in contrast to carbon heavier group 14 elements have a low
tendency of sp-hybridization[11]
Accordingly consists of ns2 valence electrons as a
lone pair and use usually three p-valence-orbitals for the formation of their divalent
species[12c]
The ground state of R2E (E = Si Ge Sn Pb) is thereby a singlet while
the ground state of R2C is a triplet (Scheme 15) because two nonbonding electrons
locate in sp-hybrid orbitals[23]
In order to obtain at ambient temperature isolable metallylenes there are today two
particularly effective stabilization methods First of all these unsaturated compounds
can be thermodynamically stabilized by donor electron delocalization to empty p-
orbital as in the case of silylene I8[24]
and silyliumylidene cation I9[25]
(Scheme 16)
In addition the coordination of ns2 electrons to the empty p-orbital of the neighbor
molecule can be kinetically prevented by bulky substituents which was shown by the
Introduction
- 6 -
successful synthesis of the dialkyl silylene I10[26]
that is stabilized only by the steric
hindrance of four large silyl groups and C-SirarrSi hyperconjugation
Scheme 15 Ground states of triplet-carbene and singlet-metallylenes
Scheme 16 Stabilization of silylenes by π-electron delocalization andor steric
hindrance I8 I9 and hyperconjugation I10
The synthesis of heavier carbene analogues depends on suitable starting materials
with oxidation state II Practically in the case of tin and lead the dihalides SnCl2 and
PdCl2 are stable and suitable as starting materials for isolable SnII and Pb
II
organometallic compounds Many germylenes were synthesized employing the known
germanium dichloride complex GeCl2middotdioxane which is easily available[27]
The
carbene-stabilized SiIICl2
[28] (NHCrarrSiCl2 NHC = (HC-NDip)2C
[29]) was reported
recently by Roesky However it is not a trouble-free starting material for silicon(II)
chemistry due to the difficult removing of by-products derivated by the bulky carbene
(NHC) Otherwise divalent compounds of GeII Sn
II and Pb
II are more stable than the
corresponding SiII analogues Therefore the metallylene synthetic chemistry faces the
main difficulty in the synthesis and isolation of functionalized silylene derivates
Accustomed synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes was summarized in
Scheme 17 Their feasibility was also proved by the preparation of new silylenes in
this work
Introduction
- 7 -
Scheme 17 Synthetic approaches of N-heteroleptic silylenes
Usually N-heteroleptic silylenes are accessible from SiIV
-precursors to form SiII-
species using reductants such as Na K or their alloy KC8 lithium or magnesium
naphthalenide etc A usually silylenes[24 26 30]
like I13 with a five- or six-membered
ring system and some three-coordinated silylenes[31]
like I14 are accessible through
the reductive dehalogenation reactions presented in case A Suitable five-coordinated
SiIV
sources I15 could be treated with a non oxygenated strong base resulting in the
corresponding three-coordinated silylenes[32]
I16 The two-coordinated silylene I13
prepared through an acid-base reaction from its four-coordinated precursor was not
observed so far In case C silylenes I18 could be isolated by salt metathesis reaction
during that the halogen atom was substituted by a desired Rsub[33]
With these new
synthetic methods the generation of many imaginable SiII molecules is possible today
Especially more complicated metallylenes for example interconnected or spacer-
separated bis-metallylenes (see next page) can be obtained in good yield Thus more
reactivity will be found in their subsequent reactions
Introduction
- 8 -
13 Bis-metallylenes and metallylenes with several EII cores
The discussion of diplumbylene I4 indicates the strong tendency to transformate a
bis-metallylene instead of triple bond form in the case of lead Scheme 18 shows the
resonance structures of triply bonded I19 and bis-metallylene I20 together with the
donor ligand coordinated interconnected bis-metallylene structure I21 Hitherto the
chemical research in this area made clear that silicon and germanium prefer the type
of structure I19 while the species of lead is more favorable in the state I20[12d]
Corresponding tin species have vacillant structural feature between I19 and I20
depending on the steric demand of R and the packing force in crystals[34]
The donor
ligand coordination with all heavier alkyne analogues leads to the donor-stabilized
bis-metallylene form I21 which possesses an E-E single σ-bond and two ns2 lone
pairs one at each of the E centers[35]
Scheme 18 Resonance structures of nonclassical triple bond and bis-metallylene
According to the bonding state all known bis-metallylenes can be discriminated in
two different types i) ldquointerconnected bis-metallylenesrdquo in which two E atoms are
directly connected by a chemical bond and ii) ldquospacer-separated bis-metallylenesrdquo in
which two EII atoms are separated by bridged atoms or by a broad spacer without an
E-E bond in the molecules[33a 36]
The isolation of bis-metallylenes of heavier group
14 elements has been a major synthetic challenge owing to their tendency to
polymerize Herein a review of this kind of compounds which appeared almost
suddenly just in the last two decades is given
Introduction
- 9 -
Interconnected bis-metallylenes
Interconnected bis-silylenes are shown in Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylene
examples were firstly reported by Robinson in 2008[35]
which are a carbene-stabilized
bis-silylene I22 with a SiI-Si
I bond (2393 pm) and a carbene-stabilized bis-silylene
I23 with a Si0=Si
0 double bond (2229 pm) One year later the Roesky group prepared
an interconnected bis-silylene I24[37]
stabilized by amidinato ligands with a SiI-Si
I
single bond (2413 pm) Compound I24 exhibits a gauche-bent geometry Another
amidinato donor-stabilized bis-silylene I25[38]
which was synthesized in last year by
Jones et al possesses trans-bent structure not the gauche-bent form The SiI-Si
I
distance (2489 pm) in I25 is longer than those in I22 and I24 because of the more
sterically hindered amidinato ligands In the same year the synthesis of the first
phosphine-stabilized bis-silylene I26[39]
could be achieved and fully characterized In
this molecule the Si-Si bond with the bond length of 2331 pm is visibly shorter than
those in related molecules Baceiredo et al described that the Si-Si fragment in I26
presents a certain multiple-bond character
Scheme 19 Interconnected bis-silylenes
Interconnected bis-germylenes are shown in Scheme 110 In 2006 Jones and
coworkers reported the first successful isolation of two stable bis-germylenes I27 and
Introduction
- 10 -
I28[40]
which are stabilized by an amidinate and a guanidinate ligand respectively
Their Ge-Ge distances (2672 and 2638 pm) show normal single bond character Two
years later Roesky prepared the bis-germylenes I29[41]
which exhibits a gauche-bent
geometry Since I29 is stabilized by a less bulky amidinate ligands the Ge-Ge bond
with the length of 2569 pm is shorter than those of examples before A different β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized bis-germylene I30[42]
was presented by the work group
of Leung in which the Ge-Ge bond length (2602 pm) is somewhere in between The
reduction of NHCrarrGeCl2 (NHC see Scheme 110) employing magnesium(I)
reagents[43]
furnished the carbene-stabilized bis-germylene I31[44]
with a Ge0=Ge
0
double bond (2349 pm) which is the homologous compound of I23 Theoretical
analyses of I31 suggest a singlet germanium(0) dimer (Ge=Ge) datively coordinated
by two NHC ligands In the last year Jones again reported a bis-germylene I32[38]
which is structurally comparable with I27 and I28 But the Ge-Ge distance in I32 is
similar with that of I30
Scheme 110 Interconnected bis-germylenes
Interconnected bis-stannylenes are shown in Scheme 111 Very interestingly the
introduction of SiMe3 instead of H at the para-position of the aryl ring in distannyne
I5 induced the first bis-stannylene I33[34]
without alteration of the steric crowding
near the tin center The small Sn-Sn-C angle (993deg) and the long Sn-Sn distance
(3066 pm) in I33 indicate two stannylene moieties connected with a single bond and
Introduction
- 11 -
without the sp-hybridization In the similar work of Power et al in 2010 the
introduction of GeMe3 substituents of aryl rings at the para-position resulted also in
single bonded bis-stannylene I34[45]
with Sn-Sn distances of 3077 pm and ldquosharprdquo
Sn-Sn-C bending angles of 978deg With the bis-stannylene I35[46]
Jambor showed that
without the use of bulky substituents such as 26-disubstituted aryl groups a bis-
stannylene can be stabilized by intramolecular NrarrSn interactions The less bulky
aryls (aryl = 26-(Me2NCH2)2C6H3) in I35 led to the shorter Sn-Sn single bond (2971
pm) and a trans-bent angle of 943deg as in the diplumbylene I4 The first amidinato
coordinated bis-stannylene I36[38]
with a Sn-Sn single bond was reported by Jones et
al last year Its structural features are highly similar to the germanium homologue
compound I32
Scheme 111 Interconnected bis-stannylenes
Spacer-separated bis-metallylenes and species containing several EII cores
Lappert and Veith reported on the isolation of divalent germanium and tin
compounds very early[47]
Many of these from the 1970s and 1980s that were
described without X-ray characterization will not be discussed here The spacer-
separated bis-germylene I37[48]
and bis-stannylene I38[48]
(Scheme 112) appeared
first of all of this compound class in 1988 The work group of Veith introduced a facile
Introduction
- 12 -
synthetic method by which tetralithium amide reacted with two equivalents of
GeCl2middotdioxane or SnCl2 to give the corresponding products in over 60 yield In 1990
two interesting germylenes I39[49]
and I41[50]
were reported by Lappert and Power In
comparison to the isolable isonitrile (R-N+equivC
minus) until now it was not possible to
stabilize its homologous derivates of the heavier group 14 elements Compounds I39
and I41 can be considered as the dimer (I39) and trimer (I41) formed after
oligomerization of the unstable germaisonitrile analogue (R-N+equivGe
minus) Nevertheless
compounds with two germylene moieties at the time could be seen as impressive
achievements in the divalent germanium chemistry Another dimer of germaisonitrile
bis-germylene I40[51]
was reported by Roesky in 1997 After this the first stable
dimeric silaisonitrile I42[52]
generated through the reduction of carbene stabilized
dichlorosilaimine (NHCrarrSi(Cl2)=NAr Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) with KC8 was presented
by the work group of Roesky in 2011 The lengthy synthetic protocol bulky protecting
groups and a low yield (21) of I42 indicate a more difficult synthetic chemistry
necessary for the synthesis of the latter silicon compound However a trimer (tris-
silylene) of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) the silicon analogue of I41 is now just a dream of
synthetic chemists
In 1991 two bis-stannylenes (micro-chlorotin(II) amides (micro-Cl-Sn-NR2)2) I43 (NR2 =
N(CMe2)2(CH2)3) and I44 (R = SiMe3) in which two stannylene moieties are bridged
by two chlorine atoms were synthesized by Lappert et al[53]
Surprisingly X-ray
analyses of the two crystals show that I43 is the cis-isomer but I44 has the trans-
configuration In contrast a new bis-stannylene (ClSn-micro-N(Naph)SiMe3)2 I45[54]
was
characterized with two bridged nitrogen atoms by the same work group The Sn-N
bonds of 2438 pm in I45 are much longer than the terminal Sn-N bonds of 2069 pm
in I44 The Sn-N-Sn-N ring in I45 is slightly puckered and bears trans-Cl atoms
Instead of halogen atoms in bis-germylene I46[55]
two terminal N atoms of the azide
groups bridge two germylene parts forming a planar four-membered Ge2N2 ring
Otherwise the germylene centers of I46 are tetracoordinated due to two additional
OrarrGe dative bonds The N-bridged three-core germylenes I47 and stannylenes I48
Introduction
- 13 -
were prepared by Veith in 1991[56]
For four of six molecules X-ray crystal structure
determinations have been carried out which reveal the molecules to be built of a
diamond-lattice-like skeleton The top N atom coordinates to all three germylene
(stannylene) parts and another N atoms bridge with the neighboring two germylene
(stannylene) parts The chair-form six-membered E3N3 ring contains three N-H bonds
and traps one halogen atom (Cl Br I) with the three hydrogen atoms
Scheme 112 Spacer-separated metallylenes I37-I48
The by 14-diamine molecules separated bis-stannylenes I50 and I51 were prepared
from the chlorostannylene dimer I44 and the corresponding dilithium diamide by
Lappert and co-workers in 1994 (Scheme 113)[57]
Bis-germylene I49 was similarly
prepared by the reaction of the GeII homologous derivate ClGeN(SiMe3)2 of I44 with
dilithium diaminobenzene and marked a new development at that time In 1997
Lappert et al reported a new 13-diamine bridged bis-stannylene I52 and a stannylene
I53 with the three SnII cores employing dilithium meta-diamide
[58] The synthesis of
I52 is similar to I50 while I53 was isolated by treatment of the substituted
Introduction
- 14 -
diaminobenzene with Sn(N(SiMe3)2)2 in a ratio of 23 Evidently the formation of I53
involves unexpected C-H activations of the 2-position of 13-diaminobenzene and
eliminations of amine HN(SiMe3)2 The 32 reaction of Sn(NMe2)2 with sterically
bulky aromatic amines (DipNH2 or MesNH2) in toluene can be controlled giving the
heteroleptic stannylenes I54 and I55[59]
in which sterically less bulky NMe2 groups
serve as bridges and one SnII center between two bulky R groups remains its two-
coordination The isolation of the first GeII and Sn
II amide dimers I56 and I57
bridged by the NH2 groups was presented in 2005[60]
They were synthesized by the
reaction of bulky low-valent organo GeII and Sn
II halides (ArE
IICl E = Ge Sn Ar see
Scheme 113) with dry ammonia The Ge2N2 or Sn2N2 cores in I56 and I57 are planar
with rhombohedral shapes and with acute angles near 80deg at Ge or Sn and wider
angles near 100deg at N
Wright 1997
I54 R = Mes I55 R = Dip
I52 Lappert 1997
SnNMe2
Sn
Me2N
NR
NR
NN
SiMe3
E
(Me3Si)2N
E
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
N
N
SiMe3
Sn
(Me3Si)2N
Sn
Me3Si
N(SiMe3)2
Lappert 1994
I49 E = Ge I50 E = Sn I51 Lappert 1994
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
I53 Lappert 1997
NN
N N
SnSn
SiMe3
SiMe3
Me3Si
Me3Si
Sn
Sn
Power 2005
I56 E = Ge R = Dip
I57 E = Sn R = Tip
R
RE
NH2
E
H2N
R
R
Scheme 113 Spacer-separated metallylenes I49-I57
The discovery of the first spacer-separated bis-silylene I58 (Scheme 114) was
made by Lappert et al in 2005[61]
It was synthesized by reductive dehalogenation of
the bis-dichlorosilane precursor with KC8 With the bis-functionality of I58
eventually a macrocycle metal-complex could be formed but the rigid backbone does
not allow a chelating coordination to a single core In addition Power tried oxidative
Introduction
- 15 -
addition reactions of his Sn and Ge alkyne analogues (I5 and I6 Scheme 114) with
trimethyl silyl azide (Me3SiN3) and adamantanyl azide (Ada-N3) giving the spacer (N-
SiMe3 or N-Ada) separated bis-stannylenes I59[62]
and bis-germylene I60[63]
and with
azobenzene (PhN=NPh) giving the spacer (PhNNPh) separated bis-germylene I61[62]
and bis-stannylene I62[62]
respectively The similar reaction of bis-germylene I29
with azobenzene furnished also the addition product the spacer bridged bis-
germylene I63[64]
with simultaneous cleavage of the Ge-Ge single bond as observed
by Roesky in 2010 At the same time So et al activated the Si-Si single bond of bis-
silylene I24 with phenyl acetylene resulting in the ethylene bridged bis-silylene I64[65]
Many spacer separated bis-germylenes and bis-stannylenes[66]
(I65-I74) were
successfully designed and isolated by Hahn et al for the use as promising chelating
ligands in coordination reactions A few transition-metal complexes of them were
prepared by his research group too (see p 18)
Scheme 114 Spacer-separated metallylenes I58-I74
In 2011 after the synthesis of the first oxygen bridged bis-silylene[32a]
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2
minus) in the course of this PhD work other four analogous were reported
Introduction
- 16 -
which are oxygen bridged bis-germylenes I75[67]
I77[68]
bis-stannylene I78[68]
and
sulfur bridged bis-germylene I76[67]
(Scheme 115) Bis-germylene oxide I75 and
sulfide I76 were synthesized in the work group of So et al by the dehalogenation of
LGeCl (L = amidinate in I75) with KC8 and then the oxidation with trimethylamine
N-oxide (Me3NO) or with elemental sulfur Otherwise Powerrsquos new compounds I77
and I78 were accessible by oxidative addition of alkyne analogues I5 and I6 using the
stoichiometric oxygen transfer reagent pyridine N-oxide (C5H5NO) In the last two
decades several cubanes of attractive tetra-metallylenes with GeII Sn
II Pb
II like I79
were presented[69]
(Scheme 116) Because they are somewhat far from discussed
metallylenes in structural features and synthetic approaches they are not discussed
and shown in detail here The synthesis of the still unknown SiII analogue I80 a
tetramer of silaisonitrile (R-NequivSi) remains as a fascinating challenge
Scheme 115 New bis-metallylenes bridged by a single atom
Scheme 116 Cubane-like tetra-metallylenes of heavier group 14 elements
14 Coordination chemistry of chelating metallylene ligands
The interaction between the central atom and the donor in transition-metal
complexes depends on their electron configuration There are two- and three-
coordinated metallylenes in which the empty np-orbitals are stabilized by
Introduction
- 17 -
intramolecular electron delocalization or by the third donor-ligand donation
respectively Therefore if two types of metallylenes serve as donor-ligands for
transition-metals the interaction of these p-orbitals with the corresponding metal d-
orbitals is essentially different For example two silylenerarrM complexes are shown
in Scheme 117 Complex I81 shows clearly σ-donorπ-acceptor interaction[70]
while
the Fe atom in complex I82[71]
contains only a σ-donor bond from the silylene subunit
In this sense three-coordinate metallylenes as σ-donor ligands are more similar to
isoelectronic triorganophosphine ligands[33a b]
in I83 (Scheme 117) In Table 11 the
difference of three-coordinate silylenes and triorganophosphines are compared and
shown in detail
Scheme 117 The σ-donorπ-acceptor or only σ-donor coordination
Table 11 Comparison of three-coordinate silylenes and phosphines
three-Coordinate silylenes Phosphines (PR3)[72]
Synthesis difficult synthetic approaches well-established synthetic procedures
Embellishment only few scaffolds are known numerous structural transformations
and various substituents of R
Stability air and moisture sensitive normally stable in air
Property easily oxidative addition
much stronger σ-donor ligand
multivariate chemical behavior
seldom oxidative addition
strong σ-donor ligand
predictable chemical behavior
Complex only few transition-metal complexes complexes with numerous metals
State of
Development
underdeveloped chemistry fully established
Introduction
- 18 -
In coordination chemistry the spacer separated bis-metallylenes are at the same
time bidentate chelating ligands despite almost all of them were not or could not be
used as chelating ligands Until 2008 only a few chelated transition-metal complexes
coordinated by isolable spacer separated bis-metallylenes were reported They are the
bis-germylene I65 coordinated Mo(CO)4 complex I65-Mo[66b]
and bis-stannylenes
I73 I74 coordinated Ni0 complexes
[66c] I73-Ni I74-Ni (Scheme 118) reported by
Hahn et al Another bis-germylene complex I29-Fe[64]
with two Fe cores presented
by Roesky in 2010 does not comprise chelating coordination at all The reason for the
lack of representative bis-metallylenes in coordination chemistry is that not only the
formation and isolation of such complexes are very difficult but also the design and
synthesis of bis-metallylenes themself are sometimes infeasible Additionally the air-
and water-sensitivity of these compounds causes many unexpected side-reactions In
general metallylene transition-metal complexes are still limited in using metallylenes
containing single EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn)
Scheme 118 Known complexes of spacer-separated bis-germylenes and stannylenes
The successful usage of bidentate phosphanes in many catalytic transformations
originates from their convenient electronic properties and the variable steric
protection Among those chelating bis-phosphane I84[73]
(BINAP Scheme 119) with
Introduction
- 19 -
backbone chirality can lead to excellent enantioselectivity compared to monodentate
phosphines With ferrocendiyl bridged ligands I85 bimetallic complexes are easily
prepared[74]
Furthermore bis-phosphane ligands like I86 are superior bridges for
heterodinuclear complexes in catalytic hydrogenation[75]
Pincer arenes consisting of
a central aromatic backbone linked to two phosphane parts by different spacers are
particularly attractive because of their feasible structural tuning with many choices of
donor groups[72 76]
Recently the chemistry of pincer-ligated transition-metal
complexes underwent rapid developments and has been used for several intriguing
chemical transformations[72b 77]
The coordination chemistry of the most common
pincer ligands such as NCN- PCP- and SCS-type ligands toward transition-metals in
I87 (Scheme 119) was explored extensively[72b 77]
Pincer arenes with stronger σ-
donor sites E than those provided by group 15 and 16 atoms are very attractive for the
synthesis of more electron-rich transition-metal complexes for activation of small
molecules On the other hand transition-metal complexes with ligands like I84-I87
containing EII cores (E = Si Ge Sn) were scarce before 2009
Scheme 119 Bidentate phosphanes for transition-metal complexes
The challenge of spacer-separated bis-metallylenes as novel bidentate σ-donor
ligands for transition-metal complexes are intriguing because of their unique structure
and their coordination ability Therefore transition-metal complexes with chelating
Introduction
- 20 -
bis-metallylenes which were not throughly uncovered[66b c 78]
have received more
and more attention To date the new development of bis-metallylene synthesis
enables the isolation of their transition-metal complexes containing EII-based
functional groups as chelating ligands These complexes may provide access to their
potential application in which they can play a key role as intermediates in transition-
metal catalyzed transformations[70c 79]
Motivation
- 21 -
2 MOTIVATION
As pointed out in the introduction the metallylene synthetic chemistry is a fast
developing field with a great potential to find novel metallylenes with new
functionalities which would be the basis for the development of new kinds of
transition-metal complexes I am particularly interested in the synthesis of new types
of compounds containing divalent group 14 elements and to study their coordination
properties towards transition-metals New metallylenes could serve as very strong σ-
donor ligands for the generation of transition-metal complexes with unusual high
electron density at the metal site which could possess unique chemical properties
The three reports of transition-metal complexes[66b c]
containing bidentate bis-
germylene (stannylene) ligands were discussed in the ldquoIntroductionrdquo of this work
This potential of bis-metallylenes used as chelating ligands in coordination chemistry
prompted me to investigate new transition-metal complexes along with the
development of a new low-valent Si Ge and Sn chemistry
In this work three main points will be addressed i) the design and synthesis of new
ligand stabilized heavier carbene analogous (metallylenes) and interconnected bis-
metallylenes containing low-valent Si Ge Sn ii) the exploration of synthetic
approaches towards different spacer separated (bridged) bis-metallylenes iii) the
investigation of the properties and coordination abilities of new metallylenes (bis-
metallylenes) to transition-metals
The β-diketiminato and amidinato scaffolds I and II were chosen for the
stabilization of the reactive divalent group 14 units (Scheme 21) The known
metallylene halogenide compounds[31a 32b 80]
III and IV were used as the direct
precursors for the preparation of novel mono- and bis-metallylene derivates
Motivation
- 22 -
Scheme 21 Synthesis of new metallylene derivates from precursors
Scheme 22 Coordination of new spacer-separated bis-metallylene to transition-metals
Using isolated products as precursors complexes with different electronic
configurations and activities can be obtained and further modified through
coordination to transition-metals and varying substituents as ligands (Scheme 22)
This development may provide new divalent group 14 element-based functional
ligands in coordination chemistry towards transition-metals As spacer units for the
bis-metallylenes should serve 13-functionalized arene ferrocene and chalcogen
elements (O S Se) The promising application of new metallylene-metal complexes
will be investigated as the precatalyst in organic reactions
Results and Discussion
- 23 -
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
31 Synthesis of Ge Sn carbene analogues and their derivates
In this PhD work the abbreviation of nacnacmacr is used only for the Dip-substituted β-
diketiminato ligand[81]
(CH[CMe(NDip)]2macr Dip = 26-iPrC6H3) The synthesis of β-
diketiminato ligand stabilized germanium complexes (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
and
(nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
were reported through the reaction of GeCl2sdotdioxane or GeCl4
with the corresponding Li(nacnac) reagent These compounds can be obtained in high
yield after recrystallization and were used as starting materials for new low-valent
germanium derivates
311 Isolation of the first germylene anion salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Treatment of β-diketiminato germylene chloride 1 with excess of elemental
potassium at ambient temperature in THF yielded the first cyclogermylidenide
derivative 3[83]
which was isolated by fractional crystallization from diethylether in
the form of its potassium salt in 33 yield as pale yellow crystals Moreover the
reduction of 1 led also to the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-
Dip which was isolated by fractional crystallization from hexane solution as yellow
crystals in 31 yield (Scheme 31) Both 3 and 4 have been characterized by NMR
spectroscopy (1H
13C) EI-mass spectrometry (only for 3) and correct elemental
analyses
Scheme 31 Synthesis of the germylenide potassium salt 3 and germylene amide 4
Results and Discussion
- 24 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3 displays two sets of doublets for the Dip-
methyl groups in the range from 108 to 112 ppm Two additional singlets at 184 and
262 ppm were assigned to methyl groups of the five-membered ring Resonances for
the CH of iso-propyl appears at 298 ppm as septets The resonance of the β-H proton
at the GeNC3 ring appears at δ = 618 ppm One set of resonances for aromatic
protons of Dip-groups appears in the range of 691-698 ppm In addition the
diethylether molecule was observed by 1H-NMR spectroscopy The molar ratio of
ether was determined by integration of the appropriate resonance signals in the 1H-
NMR spectrum of 3 This amounts to 22mol and the determined composition fits
well with the elemental analytical data
Complex 3 is an Et2O coordinated potassium germylene anion salt according to the
1H- and
13C-NMR spectra Its structure has been established by a single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 31 left) It reveals a dimeric half-sandwich complex
interconnected via intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds In the structure each half-
sandwich moiety consists of a K(OEt2)2 cation η5-coordinated to the anionic five-
membered planar GeNC3 ring The K1-Ge1 distance of 3449(1) pm is shorter than
the intermolecular K1-Ge1rsquo distance of 3573(1) pm It is noteworthy such shorter K-
Ge distances have been observed in a related dipotassium (18-crown-6)
tetraphenylgermol dianion (330 335 pm)[84]
as well as in a (18-crown-6)-solvated
potassium silylgermanides (342 pm) with a tetravalent germanium atom[85]
Accordingly the K-C(ring) distances in 3 (3092(2)-3330(2) pm) are also longer than
those observed in the aforementioned dipotassium germol dianion (288-317 pm) The
Ge1-N1 distance of 1944(2) pm are shorter than those Ge-N distances in 1[80]
but
longer than that corresponding values in a N-heterocyclic 6π aromatic
germyliumylidene cation[86]
(189 pm) and the heterofulvene-like germylene[87]
(186 pm) Additionally the Ge1-C2 distance (1887(2) pm) the endocyclic C-C
distances (C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3) pm) and the C4-N1 bond length (1382(3)
pm) suggest significant π-resonance stabilization within the six-membered GeNC3
ring In line with that the remarkable deshielding of the resonance signal (618 ppm)
Results and Discussion
- 25 -
for the β-H atom in the 1H-NMR spectrum is in agreement with a considerable hetero-
Cpmacr-like resonance stabilization in the five-membered GeNC3 ring (Figure 31 right)
The latter is also supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations (see
section 313) Hereafter the lithium complexes of N-heterocyclic germylidenide and
stannylidenide anions[88]
[(THF)Li-η5-EC(tBu)C(H)C(
tBu)N(Dip) E = Ge Sn] were
presented with a similar reductive reaction
Figure 31 Molecular structure of germylene anion salt 3 (left) and hetero-Cpmacr-like
resonance structure (right) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level
Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg]
Ge1-C2 1887(2) Ge1-N1 1944(2) Ge1-K1 34485(6) Ge1-K1rsquo 35728(7)
K1-C2 3092(2) K1-C3 3122(2) K1-C4 3330(2) K1-N1 3402(2) K1-Ge1rsquo
35728(7) N1-C4 1382(3) C1-C2 1516(3) C2-C3 1411(3) C3-C4 1371(3)
C4-C5 1508(3) C2-Ge1-N1 843(1) C4-N1-Ge1 1130(1) C3-C2-C1 1202(2)
C3-C2-Ge1 1116(2) C1-C2-Ge1 1281(2) C4-C3-C2 1174(2) C3-C4-N1
1135(2) C3-C4-C5 1254(2)
The formulation of the resonance structure clarifies that the nitrogen atom has a
higher affinity to carbon instead to germanium (Scheme 32) The mesomer 3c is
energetically less favorable than 3a and 3b This explains also that the Ge1-C2 bond
(1887(2) pm) is shorter than the Ge1-N1 bond (1944(2) pm) in 3
Results and Discussion
- 26 -
Scheme 32 GeNC3-ring resonance structures of germylenide anion of 3
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 4 shows four sets of doublets and one
multiplet for methyls of Dip-groups in the range from 091 to 130 ppm Resonances
for methyl-groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 162 ppm as one singlet
Multiplets in the range of 329-340 are assigned to CH-groups of iso-propyl groups
The resonance of CH proton at the GeN2C3 ring appears at δ = 503 ppm One singlet
at δ = 564 ppm is assigned to NH-groups One set of resonances for aromatic protons
of Dip-groups appears in the range of 683-718 ppm
Figure 32 Molecular structure of germylene amide 4 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn
at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 2051(2) Ge1-N2 2026(2) Ge1-N3
1905(2) N1-C2 1329(3) N2-C4 1332(3) C1-C2 1518(3) C2-C3 1394(3)
C3-C4 1394(3) C4-C5 1512(3) N3-Ge1-N1 9720(8) N3-Ge1-N2 8876(9)
N2-Ge1-N1 8822(8) C2-N1-Ge1 1229(2) C4-N2-Ge1 1240(2) N1-C2-C3
1227(2) C4-C3-C2 1269(3) N2-C4-C3 1239(3)
Results and Discussion
- 27 -
The structure of compound 4 was established by single crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis (Figure 32) It consists of a slightly puckered six-membered GeN2C3 ring
with geometric parameters similar to the corresponding parameters found in precursor
chlorogermylene 1[80]
The sum of bond angles at Ge atom of 2742deg is comparable to
that of 1 (2815deg) implying the presence of a lone pair of electrons at the Ge center
The Ge-N distances in 4 (2026(2) and 2051(2) ppm) are somewhat longer than those
in chlorogermylene 1 (1988(2) and 1997(3) ppm) In the structure of 4 the terminal
Ge-N distance of 1905(2) pm is significantly shorter than those the endocyclic ones
(2026(2) 2051(2) pm) because it is a common covalent bond and stronger than
dative NrarrGe bonds
A plausible mechanism for the formation of 3 and 4 is proposed as depicted in
Scheme 33 The reduction of (nacnac)GeCl 1 by elemental potassium gives the N-
heterocyclic potassium germylidenide 3d as initial transient species The latter
undergoes a ring contraction to give the transient germylene amide 3e which reacts
with 1 in a salt metathesis reaction affording the Dip-N-bridged bis-germylene 3f
Reductive fission of a Ge-N bond in 3f by elemental potassium leads to the germylene
anion potassium salt 3 and the potassium β-diketiminato-GeII amide (nacnac)Ge-NK-
Dip The formation of 4 from (nacnac)Ge-NK-Dip needs a subsequent protonation
from the solvent in an inert atmosphere
Scheme 33 The mechanism of the formation 3 and 4
Results and Discussion
- 28 -
312 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
This part of the research is the cowork with Shenglai Yao (TU Berlin)
Another reduction experiment of the related β-diketimiate-substituted
organogermanium trichloride 2[82]
(nacnac)GeCl3 with KC8 was investigated The
reaction of 2 with KC8 in THF led to a brown-red mixture from which colorless
crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex K(nacnac)[89]
have been
isolated as side products along with deep-red crystals of the remarkable novel cluster
species 5[83]
in low yield (3 Scheme 34) In contrast reaction of 1 with elemental
potassium in toluene even at 0 degC led merely to the complete replacement of Ge by K
via reduction of GeII to elemental Ge
0 powder and concomitant formation of the
aforementioned β-diketiminato potassium complex
Scheme 34 Reduction of (nacnac)GeCl3 2 with KC8
The X-ray crystal diffraction analysis of 5 revealed a dipotassium salt of the first
ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a Ge4 core (Figure 33)
Remarkably to date only a few metal complexes of ldquoheavyrdquo CBD2-
have been
reported featuring a Si4 and Si2Ge2 core[90]
Compound 5 consists of a planar
Ge4(nacnac)22macr dianion in which the two unusual chelating nacnac-ligands are
attached to the Ge4 core each with terminal Ge-C and Ge-N σ-bonds The dianion is
connected by two η3-coordinated K(OEt2) cations each coordinated to Ge1 Ge2 and
N2 and Ge1rsquo Ge2rsquo and N2rsquo respectively The K-Ge distances of 3355(1) pm (K1-
Ge1) and 3477(1) pm (K1-Ge2) are similar to those K-Ge distances in 3 and in
related potassium germanides[84b 85]
The molecular structure of 5 is also notable for
Results and Discussion
- 29 -
the parallelogram-like configuration of the planar Ge4 moiety The Ge1-Ge2 of
2512(1) pm and Ge1-Ge2rsquo distance of 2553(1) pm are close to the Ge-Ge single
bonds observed in bulky substituted cyclotetragermanes (ca 251 pm)[91]
and longer
than those in Ge4Co complexes[90d]
(235-237 pm) while the transannular Ge2-Ge2rsquo
distance of 2747(1) pm is much longer Interestingly despite of the pyramidal
coordination environment of the Ge atoms the Ge42macr core of 5 shows extremely
strong aromaticity as supported by DFT calculations (see section 313)
Figure 33 Molecular structure of 5 containing a Ge42minus
cluster Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity
Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1rsquo 1932(3) Ge1-Ge2 2512(7)
Ge1-Ge2rsquo 2553(7) Ge2-Ge2rsquo 2747(1) Ge1-K1 3355(12) K1-N2 2814(3)
K1-Ge2 3477(1) N1-C2 1381(4) Ge2-C3rsquo 2019(3) C2-C3 1369(5) C3-C4
1479(5) N2-C4 1296(4) Ge2-Ge1-Ge2rsquo 657(2) Ge1-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 1143(2) Ge1-
Ge2-Ge2rsquo 578(2) Ge1rsquo-Ge2-Ge2rsquo 564(2) N1rsquo-Ge1-Ge2 8716(9) N1rsquo-Ge1-
Ge2rsquo 1026(9) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1 886(1) C3rsquo-Ge2-Ge1rsquo 963(1) C2-N1-Ge1rsquo
1239(2) C3-C2-N1 1205(3) C2-C3-C4 1227(3) C2-C3-Ge2rsquo 1184(3) C4-C3-
Ge2rsquo 1184(3) N2-C4-C3 1220(3)
Scheme 35 shows the assumed mechanism of the formation of Ge42minus
cluster 5 The
product after the first reductive step by KC8 is (nacnac)GeCl 1 which was confirmed
by NMR investigation Chlorogermylene 1 could dimerize by sequential reduction to
Results and Discussion
- 30 -
a bis-germylene 5a Due to the instability of 5a bearing two bulky nacnac ligands a
transformation could be in the ascendant from dimer 5a to stable P4-like Ge4-tetramer
5b Intermediate 5c could be formed after double intramolecular deprotonation and
elimination of ldquofreerdquo (nacnac)H The excessive KC8 could offer two electrons to
molecule orbitals of Ge4-cluster 5c to furnish the isolated product 5 with a Ge42minus
cluster
Scheme 35 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 5
313 DFT calculations and aromaticity of 3 and 5
The structural feature of 3 leads to a discussion of a possible aromatic character of
the GeNC3-ring in comparison to cyclobutadiene anion Aromaticity is also a key
Results and Discussion
- 31 -
concept in describing homo-elemental four-membered rings such as the square planar
cyclobutadiene-like dianion Therefore nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS)
values for the five-membered GeNC3-rings and the four-membered Ge4-ring in
compound 3 and 5 were calculated by Prof Christoph van Wuumlllen (University of
Kaiserslautern) Since their introduction NICS[92]
values have been used as an
aromaticity criterion in numerous applications both for organic and inorganic
compounds[93]
NICS values were computed using the molecular structures of compound 3 and 5
from X-ray diffraction analysis The positions of the non-hydrogen atoms were taken
from the X-ray data and kept fixed while the hydrogen positions were optimized
using the TURBOMOLE program package[94]
and its density functional capabilities[95]
an exchange-correlation functional with gradient corrections to exchange and
correlation[96]
(BP86 functional) and polarized triple-zeta (TZVP) basis sets[97]
The
geometry optimizations used density fitting techniques (also known as the RI
approximation)[98]
to evaluate the matrix elements of the electrostatic Coulomb
potential
NICS tensors are defined for any position as the negative magnetic shielding at
that position The magnetic shielding tensors were obtained using the integral-direct
IGLO program[99]
which has been extended to allow the use of density functional
theory[100]
The B3LYP[96a 101]
functional and a basis of IGLO-III[102]
quality were
employed For Ge this is a 4s11p7d1f primitive basis sets in which only the steepest
five s-functions three p-functions and two d-functions are contracted In lack of
IGLO-type basis sets for potassium a TZVDP (triple zeta two sets of polarization
functions) basis was used which will affect the accuracy of the magnetic shieldings at
the centers of the potassium atoms but not elsewhere
The ring centre for each ring system was calculated first from the Cartesian
coordinates and determined the plane through the ring center for which the sum of the
Results and Discussion
- 32 -
squares of the distance of that plane to the positions of the atoms forming the ring is
minimal This plane was defined as the ring plane A line through the ring center that
is orthogonal to the plane defines the positions of the NICS centers above and
below the ring centers and the local z direction to which the NICS tensors are
transformed to obtain the zz as well as the in plane (mean value of the xx and yy)
tensor components in addition to the isotropic value which is one third of the sum of
the xx yy and zz components The zz component is of particular interest because a
ring current parallel to the ring plane will most strongly be induced if the external
magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane and the magnetic field induced by such a
current will also be in that direction
In addition to the NICS tensor at the ring center (NICS(0) value) its height profile
contains useful additional information[103]
First the height profile discriminates ring
current effects (which are associated with aromaticity) from diatropic contributions
which stem from the proximity of the ring atoms while the latter approach zero
quickly when moving out of the ring plane the former only slowly do so Furthermore
the height profile helps to distinguish π-aromaticity (which is the type of aromaticity
dominant in organic chemistry) from σ-aromaticity (which is found for many
inorganic compounds) if aromaticity only stems from π-electrons which produce no
ring current in the ring plane then the NICS values when moving out of the ring
center first decrease (ie become more negative) before they gradually approach zero
NICS values 100 pm above or below the ring plane (ldquoNICS(1) valuesrdquo)
Table 31 reports NICS results for compound 3 where the region towards to
coordinating K+ ion was denoted as above the plane of the five-membered GeNC3
rings the other side as below Up to 100 pm the results for NICS centers above and
below are quite similar then the results for the positions 150 and 200 pm above the
ring start to be affected by the K+ ion whose distance to the ring plane is 299 pm The
NICS values are negative and the tensors are highly anisotropic the negative isotropic
value stems from the large and negative zz component Furthermore these values fall
Results and Discussion
- 33 -
off quite slowly when moving out of the ring plane This indicates a diamagnetic ring
current indicative of aromatic behavior Furthermore the most negative values are not
found in the ring center but slightly above which indicates π-aromaticity Of course
this is exactly what has to be expected for a heteroatom analogue of a
cyclopentadienyl anion This is interesting however because the NICS values for
compound 5 see Table 32 show a slightly different behavior again Negative NICS
values fall off slowly but the tensors show a substantial negative in-plane component
up to 200 pm above (or below this is the same in this compound) ring plane This can
be explained by diatropic contributions from the Ge-C and Ge-N bonds which are
nearly perpendicular to the ring plane The second difference between compound 3
and compound 5 is that the NICS values (both the isotropic values and the zz tensor
component) fall off monotonically and have no hump at about 1 pm above the ring
plane The aromaticity of the Ge4 ring in compound 5 must therefore have substantial
σ-character
Table 31 NICS values for compound 3 in ppm (the results are the same for both GeNC3 rings)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash77 ndash87 ndash56
50 pm above ndash82 ndash50 ndash144
100 pm above ndash73 +16 ndash251
150 pm abovea)
ndash59 +64 ndash298
200 pm abovea)
ndash116 +36 ndash422
50 pm below ndash82 ndash46 ndash154
100 pm below ndash74 +04 ndash230
150 pm below ndash54 +19 ndash199
200 pm below ndash37 +11 ndash134
a)
Value affected by a close K+ ion coordinated by the GeNC3 ring
Results and Discussion
- 34 -
Table 32 NICS values for compound 5 in ppm (the results are the same at both sides of the Ge4
ring)
isotropic in-plane zz
ring center ndash389 ndash375 ndash417
50 pm above ndash324 ndash286 ndash399
100 pm above ndash215 ndash155 ndash334
150 pm above ndash144 ndash93 ndash248
200 pm above ndash109 ndash82 ndash165
314 Synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylene 6
As a nucleophile the germanium(II) anion in 3 seems a promising precursor for the
synthesis of asymmetric substituted bis-germylenes and of related heterodinuclear bis-
metallylenes Accordingly the coupling reaction of the nucleophilic GeII centre in 3
with the electrophilic GeII site in 1
[80] was examined and the reaction in THF at -30 degC
yielded a dark red solution from which the bis-germylene 6[104]
has been isolated as
air- and moisture-sensitive dark red crystals in 66 yield (Scheme 36) The isolated
bis-germylene 6 was fully characterized including X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 36 Synthesis of bis-germylene 6
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 6 exhibits four sets of doublets in the range from 107
to 124 ppm with the ratio of 121266 which can be assigned to CH3-groups of all
Dip-groups The three singlets in the range of 161-262 ppm can be assigned to the
CH3 groups at the ligand backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear
in the range of δ = 301-367 ppm as three sets of septet The remarkable deshielding
Results and Discussion
- 35 -
of the resonance signal for the ring CH proton of the five-membered GeNC3 ring (δ =
682 ppm) is indicative a stronger 6π-aromatic resonance stabilization compared with
that in the precursor 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The proton resonance signal for the γ-ring
proton in the six-membered GeN2C3 ring of δ = 518 ppm suggests however the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization In the UV-vis spectra of 6 an absorption
band is observed at 501 nm showing blue shifted in comparison to the values
observed for related amidinate- and guanidinate- substituted bis-germylenes[40]
(I27
and I28 in Introduction) with GeI-Ge
I bonds
315 Synthesis of the first germylene-stannylene 8
The reactivity of 3 towards chlorostannylene 7[80]
(nacnac)SnCl was examined
also by a coupling reaction If (nacnac)SnCl 7 was used as electrophile for the
reaction with 3 in diethylether at -70 degC this furnished the corresponding product
germylene-stannylene 8[104]
which was isolated in the form of dark red crystals in
34 yield (Scheme 37) The new compound 8 was fully characterized including
NMR spectroscopy (1H
13C
119Sn) and X-ray diffraction analysis
Scheme 37 Synthesis of germylene-stannylene 8
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 exhibits six sets of doublets in the range from 085 to
129 ppm with the ratio of 666666 for CH3-groups of all Dip-groups The three
singlets in the range of 165-300 ppm can be assigned to the CH3 groups at the ligand
backbones The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear in the range of δ = 305-
378 ppm as three sets of septets
Results and Discussion
- 36 -
A similar situation was observed in the NMR spectra of 8 for the CH moiety at
ligand backbones The deshielding for the ring CH proton of the five-membered
GeNC3 ring in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 8 (δ = 691 ppm) indicates again a stronger
6π-aromatic resonance stabilization than in 3 (δ = 618 ppm) The chemical shift (δ =
510 ppm) for the γ-ring proton in the six-membered SnN2C3 ring of 8 also shows the
absence of aromatic resonance stabilization The 119
Sn chemical shift of 8 at δ -197
ppm in the 119
Sn-NMR spectrum is comparable to the value observed for the precursor
(nacnac)SnCl 7 (δ -224 ppm)[80]
implying a three-coordinated tin atom in solution In
the UV-vis spectrum of 8 an absorption band is observed at 541 nm The latter is
somewhat red shifted in comparison to the values of bis-germylene 6
316 Molecular structures of bis-germylene 6 and germylene-stannylene 8
The new GeI-Ge
I compound 6 represents the first asymmetric substituted bis-
germylene while germylene-stannylene 8 is the first GeI-Sn
I example Their
molecular structures were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis
(Figure 34) Both N2C3 backbones of the chelating six-membered MN2C3 ring (M =
Ge Sn) are essentially planar but the germanium and tin atoms are out of the
respective plane The five-membered GeNC3 rings in both compounds however are
almost planar The most important structural features are the Ge-M distances and
trans-bending angles The Ge-Ge distance of 25498(8) pm in 6 is the shortest GeI-Ge
I
distance among the distances values observed in known bis-germylenes[38 40-42]
(257-
267 pm see Introduction p 10) but significantly longer than those in digermenes[13f
105] (Ge=Ge 221-247 pm) and digermynes
[3b 20 106] (GeequivGe 221-231 pm) This
relatively short Ge1-Ge2 distance was explained with asymmetric structural feature of
6 and some ionic charge distribution between five- and six-membered rings (see
section 317 DFT calculation)
Results and Discussion
- 37 -
Structural features of 6 and 8 are shown in Scheme 38 The torsion angles of the
Ge1-Ge2 bond with Ge1-N1-N2 and Ge2-N3-C31 planes in 6 are 1043deg and 1184deg
respectively (1262deg-1387deg in digermyne[20 106]
) In the structure of 8 the Ge-Sn
distance of 27210(4) pm is longer than that value observed for a Ge=Sn double bond
in a germastannene[107]
and also longer than the Ge-Sn distance in
germylstannanes[105 108]
The torsion angles of the Ge-Sn bond with Sn1-N1-N2 and
Ge1-N3-C31 planes are 939deg and 1006deg respectively (943deg in diplumbylene I4)[16]
Such Ge-M (M = Ge Sn) central bond lengths and trans-bent angles are indicative of
the absence of Ge-M multiple bond character of 6 and 8
Scheme 38 Drawing of torsion angles in 6 and 8
Figure 34 Molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right) Thermal ellipsoids (C1-C5
C30-C34 N1-N3 Ge1 Ge2 and Sn1) are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 6 Ge1-
Ge2 2549(1) Ge1-N1 2015(4) Ge1-N2 2038(4) Ge2-N3 1951(4) Ge2-C31
1903(5) N1-Ge1-N2 8867(15) N1-Ge1-Ge2 10430(11) N2-Ge1-Ge2
Results and Discussion
- 38 -
10149(12) C31-Ge2-N3 8447(19) C31-Ge2-Ge1 11890(15) N3-Ge2-Ge1
9962(12) For 8 Sn1-Ge1 27210(4) Sn1-N1 2233(2) Sn1-N2 2231(2) Ge1-
N3 1964(2) Ge1-C31 1915(3) N2-Sn1-N1 8288(8) N2-Sn1-Ge1 9542(5)
N1-Sn1-Ge1 10368(5) C31-Ge1-N3 8433(12) C31-Ge1-Sn1 11495(9) N3-
Ge1-Sn1 10200(6)
317 DFT calculations and theoretical investigation of compound 6 and 8
In order to clarify the electronic structure and bonding nature in 6 and 8 DFT
calculations were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The simplified
molecules 6a and 8a [6a M = Ge 8a M = Sn (LanL2DZ for Sn)] (scheme 39) in
which the Dip-groups (26-iPr2C6H3) of 6 and 8 were replaced by phenyl groups were
calculated as model compounds DFT calculations of the model compound of 6a was
performed at the B3LYP6-31(d) level and the model compound 8a was performed at
B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set for Ge N C and H atoms and the LANL2DZ
level for the Sn atom
Scheme 39 Computed model compounds 6a and 8a
The computed geometry is in good agreement with the experimental metric
parameters A NBO analysis of 6a and 8a shows that the HOMOrsquos have a large Ge-M
bond character (Figure 35) and the latter derives largely from overlap of Ge and Sn
p-valence orbitals (6a s 1180 p 8820 8a s 978 p 9022) Apparently the
Ge-M bonds possess s character Likewise the Wiberg bond index exhibits Ge-E bond
orders of 08525 (6a) and 07290 (8a) respectively Similar bonding natures have
Results and Discussion
- 39 -
been identified and reported previously for related GeI-Ge
I dimers
[38 40-42] In addition
the nature of the HOMOrsquos and LUMOrsquos of the model compounds 6a and 8a
corresponds to that of a diplumbylene[16]
which again underlines that the Ge-M bond
in 6 and 8 represents a pure σ-bond
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
- 1206
LUMO
- 3911
HOMO
- 1138
LUMO
- 4024
HOMO
E [eV]
6a 8a
Figure 35 Frontier orbitals of model compound 6a and 8a
Interestingly the HOMOrsquos show clearly the presence of p-orbital interaction within
the six-membered MN2C3 ring and a slight interaction with the Ge centre in the
GeN2C3 ring Accordingly the five-membered GeNC3 ring bears a negative net charge
while the six-membered MN2C3 ring has a positive one [NPA charges in the GeN2C3
ring in 6a Ge +065 N (mean) -069 C (mean) 008 vs GeNC3 ring Ge1 +055 N -
066 C (mean) -015 NPA charges in the SnN2C3 ring in 8a Sn +095 N (mean) -
072 C (mean) 007 vs GeNC3 ring Ge +040 N -066 C (mean) -017] Thus the
latter parameters suggest some ionic character of the Ge-M bonds Moreover the
pronounced electron acceptor character of the GeN2C3 ring is also reflected by the
strongly negative values of NICS for 6a and 8a [6a NICS(0) = -88 NICS(1) = -82
8a NICS(0) = -76 NICS(1) = -74] The latter confirms the presence of a 6π-
aromatic stabilization in 6 and 8 as indicated by the 1H-NMR data (see p 34-36)
Results and Discussion
- 40 -
32 Synthesis and reactivity of new N-heterocyclic germylene
321 Design of rigid new β-diketiminato ligands
The β-diketiminato ligands can undergo several side-reactions such as 13-
coordination C-N-exchange ring-contraction and deprotonation (Scheme 310) A
more rigid β-diketiminato ligand with a six-membered C6-ring in the backbone was
envisioned to prevent those side-reactions and possibly enhance the stability of the
products[81-83 109]
Scheme 310 Coordination possibilities of the classical β-diketiminato ligand
The syntheses of new β-diketiminato ligands[110]
12 and 20 are shown in Scheme
311 They are easily accessible from the N-cyclohexylidene-26-diisopropyl-
benzenamine 9[111]
in a two-step procedure First the deprotonation of 9 with nBuLi in
diethylether leads to the corresponding lithium amide 10 Salt metathesis reaction of
10 with (Z)-N-(26-diisopropylphenyl)benzimidoyl chloride 11[112]
or (Z)-N-isopropyl
benzimidoyl chloride[112]
19 in diethylether then afforded the novel β-diketiminato
type ligand 12 and 20[110]
in 63 and 60 yield respectively The new compounds
12 and 20 have been analyzed by NMR spectroscopy ESI-mass spectrometry X-ray
diffraction and elemental analyses
Results and Discussion
- 41 -
Et2O - 78degCnBuLi
Et2O - 78degCN
Dip
9
N
Dip
10
Li
N
Ph Dip
Cl
11
12
N
NH
Ph
Dip
Dip
Et2O - 78degC
N
Ph iPr
Cl
19
20
NH
N
Ph
Dip
iPr
Scheme 311 Synthesis of new β-diketiminato ligands 12 and 20
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 12 displays four sets of doublet for methyl of
Dip-groups in the range from 117 to 134 ppm The multiplets by 164 ppm and 217
ppm are assigned to CH2 of the six-membered ring The resonance of NH proton
appears at δ = 187 ppm Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear at δ = 335 ppm
as multiplet The 1H-NMR spectrum of 20 shows three sets of doublet for the
isopropyl of Dip-groups in the range from 109 to 132 ppm The peaks of four CH2
groups of the six-membered ring appear at δ = 156 208 and 214 ppm as multiplet
The resonances for the CH of iso-propyl appear by 310 and 323 ppm as septet The
resonance of NH group appears at δ = 1203 ppm as doublet because of the 3J-
coupling with neighbor CH group Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-groups
and phenyl appear in the range of 696-727 ppm for 12 and 713-753 ppm for 20
respectively
NH group connecting with iso-propyl in 20 is also confirmed by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 36 and Scheme 312) In compound 12 the N1-C1 bond
length (1360(2) pm) is longer than the N2-C3 bond length (1305(2) pm) due to the
presence of N1-H bond Contrarily the N1-C1 bond length (1309(2) pm) in
compound 20 is shorter than the N2-C3 bond length (1356(2) pm) because of the
presence of N2-H bond
Results and Discussion
- 42 -
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph Dip
Dip
N1C1
C2
C3 N2
Ph iPr
Dip
1356
1386
1445
1309
1377
1360
1305
1452
12 20
HH
Scheme 312 Bonding situation of new ligands 12 and 20 bond length in pm
Figure 36 Molecular structure of compounds 12 (left) and 20 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] for 12 N1-C1 13600(17) N1-
C13 14349(18) C1-C2 13769(19) C1-C4 15136(18) N2-C3 13046(16) N2-
C25 14297(17) C2-C3 14515(18) C2-C7 15257(18) N1-C1-C2 12221(12)
C1-C2-C3 12230(12) N2-C3-C2 12212(12) For 20 N1-C1 1309(2) N1-C17
1418(2) C1-C2 1445(2) C1-C4 1522(2) N2-C3 1356(2) N2-C14 1461(2)
C2-C3 1386(2) C2-C7 1524(2) C3-C8 1495(2) N1-C1-C2 12080(15) C1-
C2-C3 12151(15) N2-C3-C2 12288(15)
322 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and new germylene 16
Scheme 313 shows the synthesis of chlorogermylene 14[110]
and germylene 16[110]
Through lithiation of compound 12 with nBuLi the Lithium complex 13 was formed
quantitatively The subsequent reaction of 13 with the dichlorogermylene dioxane
complex[27]
(GeCl2middotC4H8O2) affords the desired chlorogermylene 14 in 82 yield
Results and Discussion
- 43 -
Furthermore germylene 16 was obtained by dehydrochloration of 14 with 13-di-tert-
butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15[113]
as a base in 78 yield The composition and
constitution of 14 and 16 were fully characterized by elemental analysis IR and
multinuclear NMR spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 313 Synthesis of chlorogermylene 14 and germylene 16
In the 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 14 resonances of 8 methyl moieties of Dip-
groups appear in the range from 097 to 155 ppm as multiplets The multiplets in the
range of δ = 128-139 and 203-227 ppm are assigned to CH2 moieties of the six-
membered ring Four sets of septets by 317 327 394 and 417 ppm are assigned to
methine protons of the iso-propyl groups The 1H-NMR spectrum of 16 displays three
sets of doublet for methyl moieties of the Dip-groups in the range from 115 to 135
ppm The peaks of four CH2 groups of the six-membered C6-ring appear at δ = 155
204 and 221 ppm as multiplet Resonances for the methine protons of the iso-propyl
groups appear by 369 and 380 ppm as septets A triplet at δ = 415 ppm is assigned to
the proton connecting with C=C double bond This resonance confirms the
deprotonation of C-CH2 to a C=CH structure on the ligand backbone Resonances for
aromatic protons of Dip-groups and phenyl appear in the range of 680-739 ppm for
145 and 675-725 ppm for 16 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 14 and 16 are shown in Figure 37 and
Figure 38 In compound 14 the six-membered GeN2C3 ring exhibits a boat-like
Results and Discussion
- 44 -
conformation The C2N2 moiety of the chelating ligand (N1 N2 C1 C3) is nearly
planar and the Ge and C2 atoms are out-of-plane (Ge 37 pm C2 13 pm) In
compound 16 the GeN2C3 ring is almost planar The Ge-N bond lengths in 14
(1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) are longer than those in 16 (1843(3) and 1861(3) pm)
and the N1-Ge1-N2 bond angle (9123deg) in 14 is smaller than that of compound 16
(9509deg) This is probably owing to the dative nature of the Ge-N bonds and the three-
coordinate Ge(II) atom in 14 The Ge-Cl bond length of 2296(1) pm in 14 is
consistent with the value observed in the N-heterocyclic β-diketiminato
chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl[80]
The fused cyclohexyl moiety of 14 is distorted
and the phenyl group is oriented in nearly the same direction as the aryl group on the
N2 atom while the C2 C3 C4 and C7 atoms of the fused C6 ring in 14 are coplanar
with the N2C3 ring (C1 C2 C3 N1 N2) while the C5 and C6 atoms deviate above
the plane of the N2C3 ring This conformation of the cyclohexyl moiety is also
observed in compound 16 It is of note that the buta-13-diene moiety (C1 C2 C3 C4
C32) of compound 16 clearly has alternating C-C distances (C32-C1 1498(4) C1-C2
1359(4) C2-C3 1461(4) and C3-C4 1360(4) pm) which is not the case in known
germylene (nacnac)Ge[87]
published in 2006
Figure 37 Molecular structure of compound 14 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 19760(16) Ge1-N2 19804(17) Ge1-Cl1
22956(7) N1-C1 1342(3) N1-C14 1458(3) C1-C2 1397(3) C1-C8 1502(3)
N2-C3 1333(3) N2-C26 1463(2) C2-C3 1415(3) C2-C7 1522(3) C3-C4
Results and Discussion
- 45 -
1509(3) C4-C5 1522(3) N1-Ge1-N2 9123(7) N1-Ge1-Cl1 9560(5) N2-Ge1-
Cl1 9392(5) C1-N1-Ge1 12568(13) N1-C1-C2 12352(17) C1-C2-C3
12503(19) N2-C3-C2 12440(18) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(13)
Figure 38 Molecular structure of compound 16 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at
30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond
lengths [pm] and angles [deg] Ge1-N1 1843(3) Ge1-N2 1861(3) N1-C3 1426(4)
N1-C8 1442(4) N2-C1 1408(4) N2-C20 1454(4) C1-C2 1359(4) C2-C3
1461(4) C1-C32 1498(4) C2-C7 1525(4) C3-C4 1360(4) N1-Ge1-N2
9509(11) C3-N1-Ge1 300(2) N1-C3-C2 1176(3) C1-C2-C3 1267(3) C2-C1-
N2 1241(3) C1-N2-Ge1 1259(2)
323 Reactivity of N-heterocyclic germylene 16 toward NH3 and H2O
The unusual donor-acceptor properties of the zwitterionic silylene and germylene
were described in our group in 2006[30 87]
In these molecules the exocyclic methylene
group remains more negative charges due to the aromaticity of the center six-
membered ring This implies the presence of two reactivity positions in the molecule
a strong nucleophilic methylene group and a nucleophilic (ns-orbital) and
electrophilic (np-orbital) at the metallylene site Mesomeric structures of zwitterionic
germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties are shown in Scheme 314
Results and Discussion
- 46 -
To probe the donor-acceptor properties of zwitterionic germylene 16 its reactivity
toward ammonia and water was investigated Germylene 16 undergoes controllable
ammonolysis and hydrolysis (Scheme 315) Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas
at room temperature in toluene resulted in the formation of the corresponding
aminogermylene 17[110]
in high yield (92) Likewise germylene 16 also readily
reacts with water to produce germylene hydroxide 18[110]
nearly quantitatively (95)
Scheme 314 Mesomeric structures of germylene 16 and donor-acceptor properties
Scheme 315 Syntheses of aminogermylene 17 and germylene hydroxide 18
The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectroscopic data of 17 and 18 are very similar to the
corresponding resonances of chlorogermylene 14 appearing at or near the same
chemical shifts In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 17 the protons of the NH2 group appear
at δ = 154 ppm This chemical shift is close to that of the dimeric aminogermylene
(ArrsquoGeNH2)2 (Arrsquo = 26-Tip2C6H3) (δ = 162 ppm)[60a]
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 18
displays a singlet for the hydroxide proton at = 166 ppm which is close to the
respective value observed for the dimeric germylene hydroxide [(nacnac)GeOH]2 (δ =
154 ppm)[114]
The IR spectrum of 18 clearly shows two N-H stretching modes of the
NH2 group at v = 3430 and 3343 cmndash1
respectively These values are similar to those
observed for related aminogermylenes (ArGeNH2)2 (Ar = 26-Dip2-C6H3) (3380
and 3308 cmndash1
) and (nacnac)GeNH2 (3431 and 3333 cm-1
)[115]
A sharp absorption at v
Results and Discussion
- 47 -
= 3643 cmndash1
that can be attributed to the O-H stretching frequency was observed in
the IR spectrum of 18 This value resembles that of germylene hydroxide
(nacnac)GeOH (3571 cm-1
)[114]
The structure of 17 and 18 are shown in Figure 39 Both compounds 17 and 18 are
monomeric species The structural features of 17 and 18 are very similar and show
close structural parameters compared with that of chlorogermylene 14 As in 14 the
Ge1 and C2 atoms of 17 and 18 slightly deviate from the N2C2 ring (N1 N2 C1 C3)
plane [17 Ge 46 pm and C2 13 pm 18 Ge 49 pm and C2 13 pm] The Ge-N
(ligand) bond lengths (17 2017(2) and 2021(2) pm 18 20054(17) and 20071(16)
pm) of 17 and 18 are longer than the Ge-N(amide) bond length of 17 (1829(3) pm)
Interestingly the Ge-N distance (1905(2) pm) in (nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip 4[83]
due to the
large Dip-substituent is also 8 ppm longer than that of 17 In each case there is clearly
a difference between the dative bond and covalent bond Compound 18 represents the
first monomeric three-coordinate GeII hydroxide in the solid state (Figure 39) owing
the larger steric congestion around the GeII center in contrast to (nacnac)GeOH
[114]
Figure 39 Molecular structures of compound 17 (left) and 18 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 17 Ge1-N1 2021(2) Ge1-
N2 2017(2) Ge1-N3 1829(3) N1-C1 1349(4) C1-C2 1395(4) N2-C3
1336(4) C2-C3 1417(4) C3-C4 1509(4) N3-Ge1-N2 9503(11) N3-Ge1-N1
9709(13) N2-Ge1-N1 8932(10) C1-N1-Ge1 1253(2) C3-N2-Ge1 1247(2)
For 18 Ge1-O1 18249(18) Ge1-N2 20054(17) Ge1-N1 20071(16) N1-C1
Results and Discussion
- 48 -
1340(3) C1-C2 1402(3) N2-C3 1331(3) C2-C3 1419(3) C3-C4 1509(3)
O1-Ge1-N2 9387(8) O1-Ge1-N1 9529(8) N2-Ge1-N1 8943(7) C1-N1-Ge1
12597(14) C3-N2-Ge1 12515(14)
324 Synthesis of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
In order to understand the coordination behavior of ligand 20 experiments using
germanium precursors GeCl2sdotdioxane and GeCl4 were conducted (Scheme 316) The
reaction of compound 20 with one equivalent of nBuLi resulted directly the lithiated
intermediate 21 The subsequent reaction with GeCl2sdotdioxane in Et2O at -78 degC led to
the unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained
by reaction of 21 with GeCl4 in toluene at -78 degC through dehydrochloration with 13-
di-tert-butyl-imidazol-2-ylidene 15 as a base in 57 yield The composition and
constitution of 22 and 23 were elucidated by elemental analysis multinuclear NMR
spectroscopies and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 316 Syntheses of oxo-chloro-germylene 22 and dichlorogermane 23
The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 22 exhibits 6 sets of doublets for 6 methyls of
iso-propyl Five sets of multiplets in the range of δ = 121-206 ppm are assigned to
the CH2 moieties of the six-membered C6-ring Resonances for the CH of iso-propyl
Results and Discussion
- 49 -
appear at δ = 284 367 and 396 ppm as septet In the 1H-NMR spectrum of 23 peaks
at δ = 113 122 and 137 ppm are for methyls of iso-propyl as doublets Resonances
of three CH2 groups of the six-membered ring on backbone appear at δ = 146 189
and 206 ppm as multiplets Two sets of septets by 332 and 361 ppm are assigned to
the CH of iso-propyl A triplet at δ = 421 ppm is for the proton of C=CH group on
backbone and indicates a dianionic ligand 20 in compound 23 owing to two times
deprotonation with nBuLi and carbene 15 Resonances for aromatic protons of Dip-
groups and phenyl appear in the range of 688-724 ppm for 22 and 701-726 ppm for
23 respectively
The molecular structures of compounds 22 and 23 are shown in Figure 310
Compound 22 represents an imine N-donor stabilized oxo-chloro-germylene and
adopts a pyramidal geometry with the sum of bond angles of 2737deg at the GeII center
The inserted oxygen atom could come in all probability from dioxane molecule in
GeCl2dioxane The cyclohexyl unit on backbone is distorted and the free N2 moiety
is oriented in inverse direction to the cyclohexyl The Ge1-Cl1 bond length of
23073(6) pm in 22 is compatible with the value (2296(1) pm) observed in
chlorogermylene 14 The Ge1-N1 distance of 20908(15) pm is visibly longer than
those of 14 (1980(2) and 1976(2) pm) because of the net NrarrGe coordination bond
without resonance stabilization The Ge1-O1 bond length is normal Ge-O single bond
with a distance of 18265(12) pm Bond lengths of N1-C1 (1284(2) pm) and N2-C7
(1272(2) pm) present clearly C=N double bond while bond lengths of C1-C6
(1525(2) pm) and N6-C7 (1539(2) pm) present normal C-C single bonds
In compound 23 GeIV
atom is tetrahedral coordinated with two nitrogen and two
chlorine atoms All six angles in the range of 1028-1138deg at the GeIV
center are
nearly alike with the angle in methane (1095deg) and indicate a slightly distorted
tetrahedral GeN2Cl2 configuration GeIV
-Cl bond lengths (21339(7) and 21375(9) pm)
in 23 are much shorter than those of germylenes 14 and 22 (229-231 pm) Distances
of the GeIV
-N bonds (1798(2) and 1788(2) pm) in 23 are much shorter than the
Results and Discussion
- 50 -
NrarrGe dative bonds in 14 17 and 18 (198-202 pm) and the net NrarrGe dative bond
(20908(15) pm) in 22 But they are only slightly shorter than GeII-N distances
(1843(3) and 1861(1) pm) in germylene 16 and GeII-NH2 bond length (1829(3) pm)
in germylene 17 Bond lengths of C1-C2 (1339(4) pm) and C3-C4 (1326(4) pm) in
23 illuminate clearly C=C double bond and distances of N1-C1 (1430(3) pm) and
N2-C3 (1441(3) pm) correspond to C-N single bond
Figure 310 Molecular structures of compound 22 (left) and 23 (right) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths [pm] and angles [deg] For 22 Ge1-Cl1 23073(6)
Ge1-O1 18265(12) Ge1-N1 20908(15) O1-C6 1418(2) N1-C1 1284(2) N2-
C7 1272(2) C1-C6 1525(2) C6-C7 1539(2) Cl1-Ge1-O1 9789(4) Cl1-Ge1-
N1 9422(4) O1-Ge1-N1 8158(6) Ge1-N1-C1 11291(12) N1-C1-C6
11484(16) C1-C6-O1 10975(14) C6-O1-Ge1 11838(10) N2-C7-C6
11778(17) For 23 Ge1-Cl1 21339(7) Ge1-Cl2 21375(9) Ge1-N1 1798(2)
Ge1-N2 1788(2) N1-C1 1430(3) C1-C2 1339(4) C2-C3 1486(4) C3-C4
1326(4) N2-C3 1441(3) N2-Ge1-N1 10554(10) N2-Ge1-Cl1 11208(7) N1-
Ge1-Cl1 11381(8) N2-Ge1-Cl2 11201(8) N1-Ge1-Cl2 11082(8) Cl1-Ge1-Cl2
10276(3) C1-C2-C3 1266(2) C4-C3-N2 1209(2) C2-C4-C3 1208(3)
The formation of compound 22 indicates that ligand 20 has a different reactivity to
the derivative ligand 12 due to the exchange of Dip-group with iso-propyl But the
situation of complex 23 shows a possibility of a dianionic chelating coordination[30 87]
Results and Discussion
- 51 -
of ligand 20 Coordination chemistry with ligand 20 is currently being investigated for
its suitability to serve as bidentate donor ligand for complexes with low-valent Si Ge
and also transition-metals
33 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene oxide 28
Since the successful isolation of halogen bonded silylene and germylene[31a 32b 80]
chemists faced the challenge weather compounds like LEII-X-E
IIL [E = Si Ge Sn X
= O S Se] in which two metallylene moieties are bridged by a single X-atom can be
stabilized at room temperature Key points of this assignment are the identification of
effective ligands for the stabilization of metallylenes and a feasible synthetic route
There is a special interest to synthesize this kind of compounds due to their chemical
nature and coordination properties
Previous attempts to synthesize a stable bis-silylene oxide 28b from silylene 28a[30]
has been unsuccessful The isolated product originating from the reaction of water
with the silylene 28a was the stable siloxysilylene 28c[10a]
(a mixed-valent disiloxane)
(Scheme 317) Recently Roesky et al proposed the formation of bis-silylene oxide 28
(aLSi-O-Si
aL
aL = PhC(
tBuN)2macr) as a reactive intermediate in the reaction of the bis-
silylene I24[37]
(aLSi-Si
aL) with N2O However 28 could be neither detected nor
chemically trapped[116]
By addition of water to two molar chlorosilylene 26[31a]
in
toluene the expected disiloxane 27 could not be isolated from a complicated reaction
mixture (Scheme 317 )
In the following the isolation of the first oxygen-bridged bis-silylene 28 by a facile
synthetic protocol using 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(HSiCl2)2O as starting
material will be described
Results and Discussion
- 52 -
Scheme 317 Synthesis of siloxysilylene 28c and hydrolysis of chlorosilylene 26
331 Synthesis of the bis-silylene oxide 28
The reaction of 1133-tetrachlorodisiloxane (HSiCl2)2O with 2 molar equiv of
lithium amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the desired disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield
(Scheme 318) The target bis-silylene oxide 28 was readily available by
dehydrochloration of 27 employing 2 molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene
Recrystallization in toluene afforded pale yellow crystals of 28[32a]
in 76 yield The
molecular structure of new compounds 27 and 28 was characterized by means of
spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography
Scheme 318 Synthesis of disiloxane 27 and bis-silylene oxide 28
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 27 reveals two singlets one for the
tBu groups at δ =
120 ppm and one corresponding to the Si-H protons at δ = 598 ppm as well as one
set of resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of
Results and Discussion
- 53 -
27 shows a singlet resonance at δ = -1110 ppm The 1H-NMR spectra of 28 displays a
singlet of tBu at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for Ph group in aromatic
resonance region The 29
Si-NMR signal of 28 (δ = -161 ppm) appears shifted ca 95
ppm downfield from the precursor 27 This shift is comparable to that reported for the
triply coordinated silylene alkoxides (aLSiO
tBu) (δ = -52 ppm) and (
aLSiO
iPr) (δ = -
135 ppm)[31b]
respectively
The molecular structure of disiloxane 27 is shown in Figure 311 The center Si1-
O1-Si2 part of molecule 27 was extensively disordered Therefore the X-ray data were
not suitable for accurate discussion Even though the nearly unbent Si1-O1-Si2 angle
(1680deg) in 27 shows a very similar bonded character with sp-hybridized oxygen
bridge in comparison to another disiloxane compounds[118]
The molecule of bis-silylene oxide 28 (Figure 312 left) contains two triply
coordinated Si atoms and two lone pairs one at each of the Si centers Those are two
silylene moieties The sum of bond angles at Si1 and Si2 are 27769deg and 27534deg
respectively which is consistent with the presence of lone pairs In the molecular
structure of 28 Si-O distances of 1641(2) and 1652(2) pm are comparable to those of
siloxysilylene 28c (16442(3) pm and 16501(2) pm) and thus typical for silicon-
oxygen single bonds of other disiloxanes[118]
Moreover as expected for an disiloxane-
like system the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent (15988(15)deg) and larger than
that observed for a C-O-C moiety of ethers
DFT calculations of the compound 28 was performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU
Berlin) at the B3LYP level using 6-31G(d) basis set with the GAUSSIAN-03 program
package[101c 119]
The structure obtained by X-ray analysis was used as the input for
these calculation Optimized structure of 28 is shown in Figure 312 (right) DFT
calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small The
Si-O-Si bond angle of optimized structure is 180deg However the energy difference
between the experimental geometry and linear arrangement is only 071 kJsdotmolminus1
The
Results and Discussion
- 54 -
HOMO (-0163 eV) and HOMO-1 (-0178 eV) represent mainly lone pairs at Si atoms
The LUMO (-0020 eV) is located on the phenyl group of the amidinate ligand
(Figure 313)
Figure 311 Molecular structure of 27 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity The center Si1-O1-Si2
part was extensively disordered Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Cl1-Si1
20349(16) Cl2-Si2 22017(11) Si2-O1 1581(8) Si2-N3 1798(2) Si2-N4
1968(2) Si1-O1 1562(8) Si1-N2 1750(10) Si1-N1 1994(6) Si1-O1-Si2
1680(6)
Figure 312 Molecular structure of 28 (left) and optimized structure (right)
Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted
for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) Si1-O1 1641(2) Si2-O1
1652(2) Si1-N1 1896(3) Si1-N2 1902(3) Si2-N3 1888(2) Si2-N4 1908(3)
Si1-O1-Si2 15988(15) O1-Si1-N1 10417(12) O1-Si1-N2 10535(11) O1-Si2-
N3 10196(11) O1-Si2-N4 10481(12) N1-Si1-N2 6815(10) N3-Si2-N4
6855(11)
Results and Discussion
- 55 -
Figure 313 Calculated frontier molecular orbitals of 28
332 Chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to nickel
To probe the chelating coordination ability of 28 its reactivity toward Ni(cod)2
(cod = cycloocta-15-diene) was investigated Toluene was added to a mixture of bis-
silylene oxide 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 at room temperature to furnish an
intensely red-colored reaction solution Recrystallization of the crude product from a
saturated n-hexane solution at -30 degC afforded dark red crystals of the Ni complex
29[32a]
in 91 yield (Scheme 319) The isolated compound 29 is the first bidentate
bis-silylene transition-metal complex This work initiates a significant progress on the
chelating silylene ligand transition-metal coordination chemistry The constitution and
composition of 29 could be determined by NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis
and ESI mass spectrometry
Scheme 319 Synthesis of bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
Results and Discussion
- 56 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one singlet for the
tBu groups at δ = 130
ppm and one set of resonances at δ = 281 295 and 504 ppm for the COD-ligand and
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 29 exhibits one
singlet (δ = 328 ppm) which shows a downfield shift relative to that of the ldquofreerdquo
ligand 28 The observed downfield shift for the 29
SiII nuclei in 29 clearly suggests the
presence of a bis-silylene chelated complex
The chelating coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 to Ni0 is confirmed by X-ray
diffraction analysis The molecular structure of 29 is displayed in Figure 314
Complex 29 containing Ni0 is diamagnetic because of 18 electrons in the valence
shell The two silylene subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are
tetrahedral coordinated to the nickel atom with the Si1-Ni1-Si2 angle at 6890(3)deg
The Si-O bond lengths in 29 [17011 (15) and 17081(17) pm] are longer than that in
28 [1641(2) and 1652(2) pm] while the Si1-O-Si2 angle of 29 (9344(8)deg) is
significantly smaller than that in 28 The Ni-Si bond lengths [21908(7) and 21969(7)
pm] are slightly shorter than those in silylene nickel complex 29a [2207(2) and
2216(2) pm][120]
but longer than those found in silylene nickel complex 29b
(21395(8) pm)[121]
Scheme 320 shows clear bonded prospect of three complexes
Moreover the Ni-Si bond lengths of bis-silylene nickel complex 29 are longer than
those in ylide-like silylene-nickel complexes [20369(6) and 20597(10) pm][70a b 122]
The strong σ-donor character of bis-silylene ligand 28 causes a more electron rich Ni
center It indicates a somewhat stronger π-back-donation from the nickel atom to the
chelating COD-ligand Therefore the Ni-C distances (2070-2090 pm) in 29 are
shorter than those in Ni(cod)2 (211-213 pm)[123]
and silylene nickel complex 29b
(2130-2146 pm)[121]
The coordination of bis-silylene oxide 28 with other transition-metals (for example
Ti Cu) is currently investigated together with the reactivity of these complexes on
their use as molecular catalysts
Results and Discussion
- 57 -
29
[Si][Si]
O
Ni
[Si] [Si]
Ni
CO CO
[Si] [Si]
Ni
N N tButBu
Si
N N DipDip
Si
[Si] = [Si] =
29a 29b
2207 2216
2191 2197689deg
934deg
1084deg 1019deg
1708 1701
2139 2139
Scheme 320 Comparison of bonding state in complexes 29 29a and 29b bond lengths in pm
Figure 314 Molecular structure of 29 (left) Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Si1-Ni1 21969(7) Si2-Ni1 21908(7) Si1-O1 17011(15)
Si1-N1 18929(19) Si1-N2 1875(2) Si2-O1 17081(17) Si2-N3 18776(19)
Si2-N4 1893(2) Si1-O1-Si2 9344(8) Si1-Ni1-Si2 6890(3) N1-Si1-N2
6941(9) N3-Si2-N4 6954(8)
34 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
This part of the research is the cowork with Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)
Due to the unique reactivity and electronic properties compounds with a
heteroleptic multiple bond between heavier main-group elements have attracted
considerable attention particularly those between group 14 and 15 elements this is
Results and Discussion
- 58 -
attributed to the pronounced polarity of the E14-E15 multiple bonds[124]
Phosphasilene
containing Si-P double bonds is an analogous of iminosilane The first isolable
phosphasilene with a three coordinate Si and a two coordinate P atom was reported by
Bickelhaupt and coworkers (Scheme 321) in 1984[125]
and several other similar
species containing localized and delocalized Si=P bonds were synthesized and
structurally characterized in the later period[126]
Their rich chemistry provides new
approaches to functional Si-P compounds
Furthermore the more challenging phosphasilyne with a silicon-phosphorus triple
bond (Scheme 321) is heretofore unknown[127]
this is mainly due to the high
tendency of the highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds to dimerize or even
oligomerize[126c]
However the availability of elusive phosphasilyne species would be
a strongly desired progression with respect to the synthesis of polyfunctional silicon-
phosphorus containing materials from it By spatial protection of a Si-P multiple bond
through the steric hindrance by suitable bulky substituents the oligomerization of the
highly polarized Si-P multiple bonds could be prevented additionally to the benefit of
the donor-acceptor stabilization of Si-P multiple bonds
Scheme 321 The first phosphasilene (left) and phosphasilyne (right)
Imaginable methods to synthesize a phosphasilyne employing corresponding
precursors comprise oxidation of bis-silylene 30a with elemental phosphorus and
elimination of phosphino silane 30b (Scheme 322) Whether the phosphasilyne 30c is
available depends only on the spatial andor donor-acceptor protection of bulky ligand
L Now there are not many choices of silicon compounds with very bulky ligand L
that are suitable for preparation of phosphasilynes Our current attempt was on the
Results and Discussion
- 59 -
way towards phosphasilyne employing amidinato ligand stabilized chlorosilylene
aLSiCl
[31a] However the isolated dimerized product was the unique 24-disila-13-
diphosphacyclobuta-13-diene (aLSiP2Si
aL) 31
[128] starting from the new N-
heterocyclic bis(trimethylsilyl) phosphino silylene precursor 30[128]
Scheme 322 Imaginable methods towards a phosphasilyne
341 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The starting material bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanyl silylene 30[128]
was easily
accessible in 83 yield by salt elimination reaction of N-heterocyclic chlorosilylene
26[31a]
with the corresponding lithium phosphide LiP(SiMe3)2 at room temperature
(Scheme 323) The 1H-NMR spectrum exhibits one singlet at δ = 058 ppm for methyl
of silyl and another singlet at δ = 124 ppm for methyl of NtBu as well as one set of
resonances for the Ph group of the amidinate ligand in the region of 681-741 ppm
The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 30 shows two sets of doublet at δ = 229 ppm for silicon
of silyl and at δ = 1943 ppm for silicon of silylene The latter is much downfield
shifted than that of previously reported aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (562 ppm)
[31b] One
singlet at δ = -221 ppm was found by 31
P-NMR measurement which exhibits a
tremendous upfield shift when compared with that of aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative (-165
ppm)[31b]
Results and Discussion
- 60 -
Scheme 323 Synthesis of N-heterocyclic phosphino silylene 30
The molecular structure of 30 was also substantiated by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis (Figure 315) The molecule 30 contains triply coordinate Si and P
atoms and two lone pairs at the Si and P center respectively The Si and P center
display a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry The sum of bond angles is 33071deg at
the P center and 27762deg at the Si center The latter is consistent with that (2765deg) of
aLSi-P
iPr2 The angle of N(2)-Si(1)-P(1) (10854(8)deg) is larger than that of N(1)-Si(1)-
P(1) (9998(9)deg) Si-N distances of 1877(3) and 1882(2) pm in 30 are comparable to
those (1875(1) pm and 1881(1) pm) of the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative
[31b] The Si1-P1
distance of 30 (22838(12) pm) is slightly shorter than the Si-P bond length (2307(8)
pm) in the aLSi-P
iPr2 derivative and the elongated P1-Si2 and P1-Si3 single bonds in
30 (22264(13) and 22321(12) pm) reflect steric congestion within the P(SiMe3)2
subunit
Figure 315 Molecular structure of 30 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 22838(12) P1-Si2 22264(13) P1-Si3 22321(12)
Si1-N1 1877(3) Si1-N2 1882(2) Si2-P1-Si3 10859(5) Si2-P1-Si1 103905
Results and Discussion
- 61 -
Si3-P1-Si1 11822(5) N1-Si1-N2 6910(11) N1-Si1-P1 9998(9) N2-Si1-P1
10854(8)
342 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Since the phosphanyl silylene 30 was successfully accessed bearing a SiMe3 as
reactive leaving-groups at phosphorus[129]
its suitability as a precursor for the
formation of a phosphasilyne was probed Because of the labile nature of the P-SiMe3
bonds in 30 the compound was exposed to dichlorotriphenylphosphorane Ph3PCl2 as
a promising smooth oxidant for desilylation with the intention to produce the desired
phosphasilyne along with Me3SiCl and PPh3 Surprisingly the reaction of 30 with one
molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 in toluene at room temperature led to the formation of the
unique compound 31[128]
(Scheme 324) which could be isolated as yellow crystals in
72 yield
Scheme 324 Synthesis of Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene 31
Compound 31 represents a dimerized form of the desired phosphasilyne and was
fully characterized by means of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-
ray diffraction analysis The 1H-NMR spectra of 31 displays a singlet for the
tBu
groups at δ = 135 ppm and one set of resonances for the Ph groups in the ldquoaromaticrdquo
region The triplet signal in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 31 at δ = 265 ppm (1JSiP = 998
Hz) indicates that two P atoms are bonded to silicon center Meanwhile the more
deshielded (ca 46 ppm) singlet resonance at δ = -1649 ppm in the 31
P-NMR spectrum
compared to that in 30 is in accordance with the four-membered ring structure of 31
Results and Discussion
- 62 -
bearing two polarized Si-P π-bonds
The result of the X-ray diffraction structure analysis is in accordance with that of
NMR spectroscopy which confirms that 31 is a 24-disila-13-diphosphacyclobuta-
13-diene (Figure 316) The Si2P2 core in 31 has a planar diamond-shaped geometry
and possesses two-coordinated P atoms and four-coordinated Si atoms each with a
dative NrarrSi bond The Si-P bonds lengths in 31 are 21701(12) and 21717(11) pm
respectively which are in the range of a Si=P double bond length (2095(3) pm) in the
Phosphasilene[128]
and the Si-P single bond length of 30 (22838(12) pm) this
indicates σ- and π-electron resonance stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has
been confirmed by theoretical calculations (see p 64) Of note the transannular
Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo (25626 pm) is shorter than the Si-Si distance of disilacyclopropene[130]
(tBu3Si)2SiSi(Si
tBu3)C-Ad (Ad = adamantyl) (25797(8) and 25991(9) pm) and hexa-
tert-butyldisilane tBu3Si-Si
tBu3 (2697(9) pm) and the P1middotmiddotmiddotP1rsquo (3505 pm)
separations in 31 is much larger than that for P-P bonds observed in tetrahedral
elementary phosphorus P4 (221 pm)[131]
Evidently the peculiarly short Si1middotmiddotmiddotSi1rsquo
distance is caused by the geometric constraints of the Si1-P1-Si1rsquo and endocyclic P1-
Si1-P1rsquo angles of 7234(4)deg and 10766(4)deg respectively and not driven by attractive
Si1-Si1rsquo interaction
Figure 316 Molecular structure of 31 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) P1-Si1 21701(12) P1-Si1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-N1 1858(3)
Si1-N2 1856(2) Si1-P1rsquo 21717(11) Si1-Si1rsquo 25626(16) Si1-P1-Si1rsquo 7234(4)
N2-Si1-N1 7078(11) P1-Si1-P1rsquo 10766(4)
Results and Discussion
- 63 -
The formation of 31 in a multistep which is depicted in Scheme 325 was proposed
Firstly formation of the corresponding chloro-(silyl)phosphanyl silylene intermediate
31a is conducted by cleavage of one of the Si-P bonds of the P(SiMe3)2 subunit with
Ph3PCl2 Subsequently elimination of Me3SiCl from 31a occurs to give the reactive
intermediate 31b which could be treated as a silylene-phosphinidene (Scheme 325
right) or a phosphasilyne (Scheme 325 left) further dimerization of intermediate 31b
affords the isolated product 31 A similar dimerization process has been proposed by
Wiberg for disilynes (SiequivSi) as reactive intermediates to produce
tetrasilatetrahedranes[132]
To elucidate the reason for the formation of 31 preferred over its hypothetical Si2P2-
tetrahedranceisomer 31d (Scheme 326) we performed DFT calculations of 31 and
disiladiphosphatetrahedranes 31d The result shows that 31d is much less stable than
compound 31 with 462 kcalmiddotmolminus1
higher in energy which is in agreement with the
experimental result Compound 31 with a planar structure is most likely stabilized by
the dative NrarrSi coordination of the bulky amidinato ligands Meanwhile this also
leads to a shorter Si-N bond length that is 1856(2) and 1858(3) pm in 31 are shooter
than those (1877(3) pm and 1882(2) pm) of in 30 and also those of in chlorosilylene
aLSiCl (1870(2) pm and 1917(2) pm)
[31a] Furthermore this NrarrSi donor
stabilization could demonstrate an ylide-like electronic structure of 31 (Scheme 326)
Scheme 325 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 31
Results and Discussion
- 64 -
Scheme 326 Resonance structures of 31
In order to unravel the electronic configuration of 31 DFT calculations at
B3LYP6-31G(d) level using the parameters obtained from X-ray diffraction as the
initial structure were performed[101c 119]
The optimized structure matched the
experimental data of 31 very well According to the NPA charges each Si atom in the
Si2P2-ring has a large positive net charge (+1204) while as expected P atoms in the
ring bear slight smaller negative charges (-0765) Meanwhile HOMO-5 of 31 shows
a set of Si-P σ-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 left) whereas the HOMO-2 contains
mainly the delocalized two π-bonding orbitals (Figure 317 right) Accordingly a
NBO analysis indicates that the Si2P2-core of 31 bears a Lewis structure with four
occupied σ-bond orbitals for the Si-P bonds (1917e for Si1-P1 1916e for Si1-P1rsquo
1916e for Si1rsquo-P1 and 1918e for Si1rsquo-P1rsquo) along with two filled Si-P π-bond
orbitals with 1770e for the Si1- P1 and Si1rsquo-P1rsquo π-bonding interaction respectively
The latter canonical π-bond orbitals are strongly polarized toward the P atoms
(8753 at the P and 1247 at the Si) Likewise the WBI (Wiberg Bond Index)
values of the Si-P bonds (1142 and 1140) are higher than that of the phosphino
silylene 30 (0920)
Figure 317 Molecular orbitals of 31 representing the presence of σ-electron and π-
electron delocalization within the Si2P2 cycle HOMO-5 (left) and HOMO-2 (right)
Results and Discussion
- 65 -
According to the aforementioned betaine (ylide)-like resonance stabilization 31
totally differs from cyclobuta-13-diene derivatives The calculations of the nucleus
independent chemical shift[92]
(NICS) also supports this conclusion The result of
NICS reveals negative values (NICS(1) = -257 and NICS(0) = -601 ppm) indicating
that 31 has a somewhat aromatic character which is opposite to the properties of
cyclobuta-13-dienes that are antiaromatic As a summary the results of theoretical
calculations are in agreement with the idea to describe 31 as the ylide-like resonance
structure 31c with some contribution of the resonance forms As a result the smaller
endocyclic angle at phosphorus than that at silicon is contributed by the repulsion
between the negatively charged P atoms
35 Isolation of an aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
Nucleophilic and electrophilic properties of Si Ge and Sn metallylenes were
discussed in chapter 32 (see p 46) Due to the strong donor property of the carbene
lone pair in coordination to empty p-orbital of low valent Si Ge Sn atom centers
some carbene stabilized divalent Si Ge Sn halides could be synthesized in the last
twenty years[28 44 133]
There is also a great interest to find mixed Si Ge Sn
metallylene-metallylene complexes in which one metallylene is stabilized through the
lone pair coordination of another one In the following the synthesis of the first
example of a silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex will be shown
The dimeric micro-chlorotin(II) amides 32[53]
(I44 in Introduction) was identified as
useful candidate for the generation of such an example The synthesis of
bis(trimethylsilyl)amino-tin chloride ((Me3Si)2N-SnCl)2 32 is shown in Scheme 327
Bis(bis(trimethylsilyl)amino)2tin(II) ((Me3Si)2N)2Sn 32a could be prepared in good
yield by the double lithioamination of SnCl2 with LiN(SiMe3)2 in a 1 2 ratio[47a]
The
Results and Discussion
- 66 -
same reaction but with one molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 gives the monosubstituted
product 32 It was also easily accessible by amino chlorine exchange between
((Me3Si)2N)2Sn and SnCl2 in a 11 ratio[53]
(Scheme 327)
Scheme 327 Synthesis of micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32
The dimeric structure of 32 can be splited by treatment with Lewis base for
example Si Ge Sn metallylenes In order to synthesize a silylene coordinated
stannylene chlorosilylene 26 was mixed with micro-chlorotin(II) amide 32 in toluene A
logical intermediate 33a is proposed here as an inevitable intermediate (Scheme 328)
At first chloro bridges are opened because of the coordination of silylene 26 to create
33a Then via amino chlorine exchange product 33 becomes accessible From a
saturated hexane solution at low temperature the silylene-stannylene dichloride 33
was isolated as colorless crystals in 49 yield The product 33 was determined by X-
ray diffraction analysis and elemental analysis Owing to the unstable nature of
silylene and tin dichloride coordination bond (Si rarrSn) 33 decomposed in a grey
mixture powder of amino silylene also-N(SiMe3)2
[33d] and SnCl2 after isolation from
solvent in vacuum 1H-NMR spectrum shows only resonances of amino silylene in
good agreement with the reported compound[33d]
Scheme 328 Synthesis of aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
According to X-ray diffraction analysis compound 33 represents the first example
of silylene stabilized SnCl2 complex The molecular structure of 33 (Figure 318)
Results and Discussion
- 67 -
exhibits a trigonal pyramidal geometry on Sn and a distorted tetrahedral configuration
of Si The Cl-Sn-Cl angle is 9400(9)deg and the sum of bond angles at the Sn center is
2820deg The SirarrSn distance (2740(2) pm) is longer than the Si-Sn bond lengths
(2622(2) and 2641(2) pm) in the silyl stannane compound[134]
(Scheme 329) The
Sn-Cl distances of 2468(3) and 2473(3) pm in 33 are comparable to those in a
carbene-stannylene complex (2456(2) and 2458(2) pm) (Scheme 329)[133b]
Si-N
distances of 1832(7) and 1827(7) pm in 33 are somewhat shorter than those of
phosphanyl silylene 30 (1877(3) and 1882(2) pm) and amino silylene (18780(10)
and 18776(10) pm) which is the remaining molecule of 33 without SnCl2[33d]
Scheme 329 A silyl stannane[134]
(left) and a carbene-stannylene complex[133b]
(right)
Figure 318 Molecular structure of 33 Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30
probability level Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths
(pm) and angles (deg) Sn1-Si1 2740(2) Sn1-Cl1 2468(3) Sn1-Cl2 2473(3) Si1-
N1 1832(7) Si1-N2 1827(7) Si1-N3 1705(7) Si2-N3 1780(7) Si3-N3
1791(8) Cl1-Sn1-Cl2 9400(9) Cl1-Sn1-Si1 9886(8) Cl2-Sn1-Si1 8914(7)
Sn1-Si1-N3 1252(3) N2-Si1-N1 722(3) Si1-N3-Si2 1172(4) Si1-N3-Si3
1248(4) Si2-N3-Si3 1179(4)
Results and Discussion
- 68 -
36 Exploration and property of SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 34
Because of the feasible structural tuning with many choices of donor groups a
general overview of pincer arenes was introduced (Introduction p 19) Compounds of
type 35a having a pincer-like skeleton are depicted in Scheme 330 They represent
promising new types of pincer ligands which could coordinate with a metal by facile
C-H activation in the ortho-position Although many bis-metallylenes are accessible
(see Introduction 13) pincer ligands containing divalent heavier group 14 elements
are new in the field of synthetic inorganic chemistry At the same time the desired
pincer arenes 35a could serve as much stronger σ-donor ligand towards transition-
metals than traditional phosphane ligands[70 79b c 122]
Up to now only a few isolable
spacer separated bis-silylenes with two divalent silicon centers are known these
include bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
in this work and bis-silylenes I42[52]
I58[61]
and
I64[65]
(in Introduction p 12-15) Inspired by these results the synthesis of a
silicon(II)-based pincer ligand 35a appeared attractive and its coordination property
towards transition-metals should be investigated
Scheme 330 Low-valent group 14 metallylene-based ECE pincer arenes
361 Synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35
Scheme 331 shows the synthetic route for the first attempt towards a bis-silylene-
based SiCSi pincer arene 35d The phenolation of trichlorosilane was readily
accessible to disilane 35b in hexane Reaction of 35b with two molar equiv of lithium
Results and Discussion
- 69 -
amidinate 25 in diethylether gave the amidinate substituted disilane 35c The bis-
silylene pincer arene 35d was not easily separable by the following dehydrochloration
of 35c employing two molar equiv of LiN(SiMe3)2 in toluene Products seemed a
complicated silylene-LiCl mixture which was not soluble in toluene or diethylether
The desired bis-silylene pincer arene could not be isolated from mixtures
Scheme 331 The first attempt towards a bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer arene 35d
But the synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35 could be achieved through the protocol
in Scheme 332 Dilithiation of 46-di-tert-butylresorcinol with nBuLi furnishes the
corresponding 13-dilithium resorcinolate 34 After a salt metathesis reaction with the
N-donor stabilized chloro silylene 26[32b]
in the molar ratio of 12 the desired
compound 35[33b]
could be isolated as pale yellow crystals in 79 yield The
constitution and composition of SiCSi pincer arene 35 was elucidated by 1H-
13C-
and 29
Si-NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 332 Synthesis of SiCSi pincer arene 35
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 35 exhibits one singlet for the N
tBu groups at δ = 124
ppm and one singlet for CtBu groups at δ = 174 ppm and one set of resonances for the
Ph groups of the amidinate ligands Almost identical variable-temperature (VT) 1H-
NMR spectra of 35 in C7D8 in the temperature range of 210 to 320 K indicate
Results and Discussion
- 70 -
relatively low rotation barriers of the Si-O bonds on the NMR time scale A sharp
singlet in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum at δ = -240 ppm is comparable to that observed for
alkoxy-substituted silylenes aLSiOR (R =
tBu
iPr)
[31b]
The molecular structure of 35 could be confirmed by a preliminary single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis but a discussion of metric parameters was not possible
because of the moderate crystal quality Still it is clear that the two silylene-like
moieties in 35 face in the almost same direction (Figure 319) To get more
information about the molecular structure of 35 DFT calculations [B3LYP6-
31G(d)][101c 119]
were performed by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin) The geometry of 35
obtained by X-ray crystallographic analysis was used as the initial structure The
optimized structure of 35e and 35ersquo is displayed in Figure 320 The Si1-O1-C1 angle
(14179deg) is larger than that of Si2-O2-C3 (13217deg) While the dihedral angle of Si1-
O1-C1-C2 is 2437deg the dihedral angle of Si2-O2-C3-C2 is 039deg
Figure 319 Molecular structure of 35 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity X-
ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The Si-O single bond distances of 17056 and 17190 pm are little longer than those
of bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
(1641(2) and 1652(2) pm) and alkoxysilylenes aLSiOR
(R = tBu
iPr)
[31b] (16442(3) and 16501(2) pm) due to steric hindrance The C2-
Results and Discussion
- 71 -
symmetric rotational isomer 35ersquo was identified as a stable form on the hyperpotential
energy surface with a slightly lower energy of 75 kJsdotmolminus1
Interestingly the Si-O
distance of 35ersquo is little longer than those of 35e The bond rotation barrier of the Si-O
bonds in 35e and 35ersquo is similar and estimated to be +334 kJsdotmolminus1
by theoretical
calculation
Figure 320 Optimized structures of bis-silylene SiCSi pincer ligand 35e (left) and
its rotational isomer 35ersquo (right) at the B3LYP6-31G(d) level Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) of 35e and 35ersquo
compound 35e Si1-O1 17056 Si2-O2 17191 Si1-O1-C1 14179 Si2-O2-C3
13217 compound 35ersquo Si1-O1 17294 Si2-O2 17294 Si1-O1-C1 13028 Si2-
O2-C3 13028
362 Formation of SiCSi pincer arene PdII
complex 36
Although bis-silylene 35 bearing an amidinate ligand may not serve as a π-acceptor
it was a strong σ-donor ligand To investigate the pincer-type coordination ability of
35 its reactivity towards phosphine palladium(0) complexes was evaluated Treatment
of 35 with 05 equiv of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)-palladium Pd(PPh3)4 in hexane
at room temperature afforded the novel silylene-silyl(phenyl)palladium(II) complex
36[33b]
as sole product which could be isolated as orange crystals in 81 yield
(Scheme 333)
Results and Discussion
- 72 -
Scheme 333 Formation of 36 from reaction of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
A different type of silyl-silylene metal complexes has been described by Ogino and
co-workers[66b c 78]
Compound 36 was fully characterized by multinuclear NMR
spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis The structure of 36
indicates that two equivalents of 35 were consumed With a 11 molar ratio of starting
materials the yield of 36 decreased (asymp30) but still no other product or intermediate
could be detected by 1H-NMR spectroscopy
The molecular structure of 36 is shown in Figure 321 Remarkably compound 36
crystallizes as racemic mixture of its R and S enantiomers of which only the S form is
presented here The PdII atom has a typical distorted square-planar configuration
defined by the two silylene SiII atoms Si2 and Si3 the silyl Si
IV atom Si1 and the
carbon atom C1 of the central aryl ring Interestingly there is a 12-hydride shift from
palladium to silicon during the complexation forming a Si-H silyl group which breaks
the former Si1-N2 bond in 35 Due to coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo The bent Si3-Pd1-C1 angle of 16783(12)deg in 36
is contrary to the linear X-Pd-C (X = Cl I Ph 4-fluorophenyl OCOCF3 etc) angles
of reported palladium(II) complexes supported by a PCP type pincer arene ligand[72b
77 135] The Si1-Pd1-Si2 angle of 15503(4)deg deviates from the linear alignment and is
smaller than the respective P-Pd-P angle of the PCP pincer-type palladium
complex[72b 77 135]
The silylene PdII dative bond lengths (Si2-Pd1 23271(12) and
Si3-Pd1 23038(11) pm) of 36 are shorter than that of the Si1-Pd1 distance
Results and Discussion
- 73 -
(23561(12) pm) illustrating the difference between a silyl ligand (Si1) with a SiIV
-Pd
single bond vs a silylene ligand (Si2 and Si3) with a SiII-Pd dative bond However
the Si2-Pd1 and Si3-Pd1 distances in 36 are somewhat longer than those of
silylenerarrpalladium complexes[136]
(224 and 226 pm) from Kira (Scheme 334)
Furthermore Pd1-C1(aryl) bond length of 36 (2125(3) pm) is longer than those of
reported PCP pincer-type palladium(II) complexes (Pd-C distance 197-203 pm)[135a-e
135g] presumably because of steric congestion
Scheme 334 Silylenerarrpalladium complexes from Kira[136]
Figure 321 Molecular structure of 36 Only the S form of racemic mixture is
shown Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity except for the H1 atom Selected bond lengths (pm) and
angles (deg) Pd1-C1 2125(3) Pd1-Si1 23561(12) Pd1-Si2 23271(12) Pd1-Si3
23038(11) Si1-O1 1694(3) Si1-N1 1789(4) Si2-O2 1675(3) Si2-N5 1862(3)
Si2-N6 1840(4) Si3-O3 1662(3) Si3-N7 1888(3) Si3-N8 1860(3) Si4-O4
1704(3) Si4-N3 1893(4) Si4-N4 1892(4) Si1-Pd1-Si2 15503(4) Si1-Pd1-C1
Si2Si1
C1
Pd
Si3
213 pm
233 pm236 pm
230 pm
O1 O2
Results and Discussion
- 74 -
7861(11) Si2-Pd1-C1 7681(11) Si3-Pd1-C1 16783(12)
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 36 shows twelve sets of nonequivalent
tBu groups
which agrees with its crystallographic analysis Moreover the resonance for the Si-H
proton is observed at δ = 659 ppm The 29
Si-NMR spectrum of 36 in C6D6 displays
four signals at δ = minus87 (aLSi Si4) 397 (HSi Si1) 623 and 658 ppm (SirarrPd Si2
and Si3) respectively The chemical shift of the Si1 atom (SiIV
-H) has moved upfield
comparable to those of a related HSirarrPd complex reported by Kira Iwamoto and co-
workers because of the electronegative N and O atoms bound to the Si1 atom[136a]
The 29
Si resonances of the two SiII atoms (Si2 Si3) coordinated to the palladium
center are similar to those of other amidinate-based silylene transition-metal
complexes[71 137]
and significantly shifted to higher field in comparison to those
reported for donor-free silylene palladium complexes owing to the additional N-donor
coordination of the amidinate ligand to the SiII atom Additionally the infrared
spectrum of 36 shows a weak Si-H stretching vibration band at 2135 cmminus1
The
observed stretching frequency of 36 is higher than those of other reported palladium
hydridosilyl complexes (2008ndash2121 cmminus1
)[135c 135f 136a]
363 DFT calculation for explanation of reaction mechanism
To investigate the uncommon reactivity of 35 towards Pd(PPh3)4 quantum
chemical calculations using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP level using
6-31G(d) basis set for H C N O P and Si atoms and the LANL2DZ level for the Pd
atom with the Gaussian 03 program for model compounds 36andash36e were performed
by Shigeyoshi Inoue (TU Berlin)[101c 119]
A schematic representation of the potential
energy surface of the proposed pathway for the formation of 36 is given in Scheme
335
Results and Discussion
- 75 -
Scheme 335 DFT-derived relative energies of model compounds 35a-35e
From this it was assumed that stepwise dissociation of phosphine ligands of
Pd(PPh3)4 forms 36a as the initial intermediate by the insertion reaction of Pd0 into
the pincer C-H bond of the central aryl ring of 35 Subsequently the 16-valence
electron PdII complex 36a undergoes a 12-hydride shift from palladium to a silicon(II)
donor atom to form the 14-valence electron silylene silyl(aryl)palladium(II) complex
36c as second intermediate The latter process occurs through transition state 36b-TS
with a barrier of +878 kJsdotmolminus1
and 36c is only 67 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36b-TS
The electron-deficient PdII complex 36c readily undergoes coordination with
phosphine ligand or silylene donor moiety of ldquofreerdquo 35 leading to the formation of
more stable 16-electron complexes According to that the calculated relative energies
of PrarrPd complex 36d stabilized by PPh3 and SirarrPd complex 36e stabilized by
methoxy silylene aLSiOMe as model silylene donor are +380 and minus176 kJsdotmol
minus1
respectively Since SiII of intramolecular N-donor stabilized silylenes is a stronger σ-
donor than PIII
of phosphines complex 36e is 556 kJsdotmolminus1
more stable than 36d
Overall the stepwise transformation of 36a into 36e in the presence of PPh3 and the
model silylene aLSiOMe is exothermic by 176 kJsdotmol
minus1
Results and Discussion
- 76 -
37 Bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
After successful isolation of the first bis-silylene oxide 28[32a]
and the first bis-
silylene pincer arene 35[33b]
in order to obtain other new bis-silylene(germylene) as
potential bidentate σ-donor ligands the novel type of bis-silylene(germylene) with a
ferrocendiyl spacer which could result in unique properties was investigated The
facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes
aLSi-Fc-Si
aL 38 (Fc = ferrocendiyl) and
aLGe-Fc-Ge
aL 40 respectively as well as
their corresponding cobalt and iron complexes could be realized in the course of this
PhD thesis[33a]
371 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 and 40
Since the reaction of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
with dilithium resorcinolate 34 afforded
the SiCSi pincer bis-silylene 35 was assumed that chlorosilylene 26 and
chlorogermylene 39[41]
(aLGeCl) could be suitable precursors for the desired bis-
metallylene functionalized ferrocenes Ferrocene with nBuLi and TMEDA
(tetramethylethyldiamine) in hexane gave 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37[138]
quantitatively
Subsequently treatment of chlorosilylene 26 with 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 led to the
formation of bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield (Scheme 336) Similarly
bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40[33a]
could be isolated in 77 yield by salt metathesis
reaction of 11rsquo-dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorogermylene 39 The structures of 38
and 40 were determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy elemental analysis mass
spectrometry and X-ray crystallographic analysis (only for compound 40)
1H-NMR spectra of compound 38 and 40 are very similar They exhibit a singlet for
four tBu groups (38 δ = 116 ppm 40 δ = 111 ppm) Two sets of hyperfine coupled
triplet (38 δ = 451 and 472 ppm 40 δ = 461 and 471 ppm) are assigned to the
protons of ferrocene The resonance of the Ph protons (38 and 40) appears in aromatic
Results and Discussion
- 77 -
resonance region from 690 to 717 ppm Accordingly the 13
C-NMR spectra of 38 and
40 each show three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (38 δ = 709 727 and
846 ppm 40 δ = 701 723 and 920 ppm) Furthermore bis-silylene 38 gives rise to
a singlet at δ = 433 ppm in the 29
Si-NMR spectrum
Scheme 336 Synthesis of bis(silylenyl)- and bis(germylenyl)-ferrocenes 38 40
Single crystals of 40 suitable for an X-ray single crystal analysis were obtained
from hexane solution The crystals of 40 consist of two conformational isomers as
shown in Figure 322 Two molecular structures of 40 confirm that the two N-donor-
stabilized germylene moieties are bonded to C1 and C7 (endo-configuration) or C8
(exo-configuration) of the ferrocendiyl spacer Distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C7 in
40-endo are 1979(9) and 1983(11) pm while distances of Ge1-C1 and Ge2-C8 in 40-
exo are 1991(2) and 19774(19) pm respectively The Ge-N bonds (2006 to 20402
pm) of two isomers are slightly shorter than those of precursor 39[41]
The GeII centers
in 40 adopt a pyramidal geometry with the sums of bond angles of 25593deg and
25669deg for 40-exo 2591deg and 2546deg for 40-endo respectively The structural feature
of the amidinate ligands in 40 is reminiscent of those reported for related bis-
germylenes such as I63[64]
(aLGe-NPh)2 and I75 I76 LGe-X-GeL (X = O S L =
tBuC(N-Dip)2)
[67] The isolation of two conformational isomers of 40-exo and 40-endo
indicates a small rotating energy of the functional ferrocendiyl That means bis-
germylene 40 and bis-silylene 38 don not need more activation energy serving as
bidentate ligand
Results and Discussion
- 78 -
Figure 322 Molecular structures of 40-endo (top) and 40-exo (bottom) Thermal
ellipsoids are drawn at a probability level of 30 Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 40-endo (top) Ge(1)-C(1)
1979(9) Ge(2)-C(7) 1983(11) Ge(1)-N(1) 2027(8) Ge(1)-N(2) 2006(8)
Ge(2)-N(3) 2022(7) Ge(2)-N(4) 2037(7) C(1)-Ge(1)-N(2) 983(3) C(1)-Ge(1)-
N(1) 955(3) N(2)-Ge(1)-N(1) 653(3) C(7)-Ge(2)-N(3) 953(4) C(7)-Ge(2)-
N(4) 941(4) N(3)-Ge(2)-N(4) 652(3) for 40-exo (bottom) Ge1-C1 1991(2)
Ge2-C8 19774(19) Ge1-N1 20261(16) Ge1-N2 20247(17) Ge2-N3
20402(15) Ge2-N4 20162(16) C1-Ge1-N1 9662(7) C1-Ge1-N2 9445(7) N1-
Ge1-N2 6486(7) C8-Ge2-N3 9492(7) C8-Ge2-N4 9716(7) N3-Ge2-N4
6459(6)
The molecular structure of bis-silylene 38 has been ambiguously determined by X-
ray single crystal diffraction The structural feature of 38 is very similar to that of 40-
exo isomer However the X-ray data are not sufficient for any further discussion
(Figure 323)
Results and Discussion
- 79 -
Figure 323 Molecular structure of 38 X-ray data are not sufficient for discussion
The mass spectrometry confirmed the composition of 38 (Figure 324) The (ESI)
mass spectrum of 38 is dominated by a peak at mz 703329 which can be attributed to
the protonated molecular ion [38+H]+ Isotopic distribution of molecular peaks
demonstrates a good agreement with calculated mass composition The comparison of
experiment and calculation confirms the presence of bis-silylenyl substituted
ferrocene molecules
6 9 0 6 9 5 7 0 0 7 0 5 7 1 0 7 1 5 7 2 0
m z
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
Re
lative
Abu
nda
nce
7 0 3 3 2 9
7 0 4 3 3 2
7 0 5 3 3 47 0 1 3 3 4
7 0 6 3 2 96 9 0 2 4 9 6 9 5 2 2 5 7 1 7 3 4 57 1 0 4 7 3
7 0 3 3 3 1
7 0 4 3 3 4
7 0 5 3 3 87 0 1 3 3 6
7 0 6 3 3 17 1 0 3 3 5
N L 3 1 3 E 7
W Y-F e S i2 _ S p ri tze 1 -2 9 R T 0 0 0 -0 7 7 A V 2 9 T F T M S + c E S I F u ll m s [1 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 ]
N L 4 9 7 E 5
C 4 0 H 5 4 F e N 4 S i 2 + H C 4 0 H 5 5 F e 1 N 4 S i 2
p a C hrg 1
Figure 324 Experimental (top) and simulated (bottom) ESI-MS spectra of 38
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable silylene- and
germylene-substituted ferrocenes respectively Alternative example of SiII-ferrocene
Results and Discussion
- 80 -
compound is a disilene-functionalized ferrocene reported by Tokitoh and co-workers
recently[139]
However disilene derivates belong essentially to another type of low-
valent silicon compounds in comparison to triply coordinated silylenes Instead of
conjugated electronic effect of disilene-ferrocene system the ferrocene bridged bis-
silylene or bis-germylene system could have better chelating σ-donor character It is to
confirm in a coordination chemistry of bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 with
transition-metals
372 Formation of CoICp complexes with 38 and 40
In order to investigate the coordination ability of 38 and 40 toward transition-
metals and inspired by the reactivity of bis-silylenes 28 and 35 toward Ni0 and Pd
0[32a
33b] as well as by reports on spacer-separated bis-germylene molybdenum chelated
complex I65-Mo[66b]
(see Introduction p 18) firstly the coordination behavior of
potentially bidentate ligands 38 and 40 towards CoICp complex fragments
[140] was
examined A suitable CoICp source is accessible by treatment of CoBr2 with sodium
cyclopentadienide (NaCp) and potassium graphite (KC8) in tolueneTHF 41 mixture
resulting in the generation of (CpCoILn) (L = toluene or THF) in solution Reaction of
thus-formed CoICp species with bis-silylene 38 yielded the desired bis-silylene Co
I
complex 41[33a]
in 30 yield (Scheme 337) Similarly bis-germylene CoI complex
42[33a]
has been successfully synthesized from 40 and isolated in 61 yield
Scheme 337 Synthesis of bis-silylene and bis-germylene CoICp complexes 41 and 42
Results and Discussion
- 81 -
In comparison to bis-silylene 38 and bis-germylene 40 1H-NMR spectra of
compound 41 and 42 show an additional singlet for protons of CoICp group (41 δ =
496 ppm 42 δ = 504 ppm) A singlet for four tBu-groups appears at δ = 111 ppm by
bis-silylene Co-complex 41 and at δ = 139 ppm by bis-germylene Co-complex 42
Two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (41 δ = 440 and 461 ppm 42 δ = 438 and
459 ppm) are assigned to protons of ferrocene The resonance of phenyl protons (41
and 42) appears in aromatic resonance region In the 13
C-NMR spectra of 41 and 42
each exhibit one resonance for carbons of CoICp (41 δ = 780 ppm 42 δ = 759 ppm)
and three resonances for the ferrocendiyl moieties (41 δ = 700 745 and 851 ppm
42 δ = 699 737 and 891 ppm) In the 29
Si-NMR spectrum the coordination of the
bis-silylene moieties to the Co atom results in a drastic downfield shift of the
resonance of 41 (δ = 820 ppm) in comparison to situation of 42 (δ = 433 ppm)
Isolated products 41 and 42 are first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-
silylene or bis-germylene in a chelating fashion The molecular structures of 41 and
42 (Figure 325) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses In both
complexes cobalt is coordinated one side by cyclopentadienyl and another side by bis-
silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40 and contains 18 valence electrons Angles of Si1-Co1-
Si2 and Ge1-Co1-Ge2 are 9389(5)deg and 9279(2)deg respectively
The silicon atoms in complex 41 and germanium atoms in complex 42 are four
coordinated and show a distorted tetrahedral geometry The Co-Si bond lengths of 41
(21252(14) and 21200(14) pm) are similar to that in chlorosilylene CoICp(CO)
complex 41a[141]
(21143(4) pm) Furthermore the Co-Si bonds of 41 are shorter than
the Co-Si distances in dichlorosilylene-CoICp(CO) complex 41b
[142] (21348(5) pm)
in dichlorosilylene-Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41c
[143] (2228(2) pm) in
chlorosilylene Co(CO)3+ cationic complex 41d
[141] (22060(6) and 22017(6) pm)
respectively The silicon cobalt double bond (Si=CoV) distance (21848(8) pm) in
cobalt(V) complex 41e[144]
is also longer than dative SirarrCoI bond lengths in complex
41 Structures of cited compounds are drawn for clarity in Scheme 338
Results and Discussion
- 82 -
Scheme 338 Structural features of 41 and cited silylene cobalt complexes
Figure 325 Molecular structures of 41 (top) and 42 (bottom) Thermal ellipsoids
are drawn at 30 probability level Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecules are
omitted for clarity Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for 41 (top) Co1-Si1
21252(14) Co1-Si2 21200(14) Si1-C6 1894(5) Si2-C11 1887(5) Si1-N1
1898(4) Si1-N2 1907(4) Si2-N3 1904(4) Si2-N4 1922(4) Si1-Co1-Si2
9389(5) N1-Si1-N2 6847(15) N3-Si2-N4 6866(16) C6-Si1-Co1 13254(14)
for 42 (bottom) Co1-Ge1 21967(6) Co1-Ge2 21979(6) Ge1-C6 1965(4) Ge2-
Results and Discussion
- 83 -
C11 1961(4) Ge1-N1 2020(3) Ge1-N2 2031(3) Ge2-N3 2041(3) Ge2-N4
2029(3) Ge1-Co1-Ge2 9279(2) N1-Ge1-N2 6490(11) N3-Ge2-N4 6485(11)
C6-Ge1-Co1 13280(10) C11-Ge2-Co1 13140(10)
The Co-Ge bonds of 42 (21967(6) and 21979(6) pm) are also shorter than those in
the germylene cobalt(0) complex [((Me3Si)2N)2GerarrCo(CO)3]2[145]
(2262(1) pm) and
the tetragermacyclobutadiene-CoICp complex η
4-((
tBu2MeSi)4Ge4)CoCp (24616(3)
and 25036(3) pm)[90d]
respectively In fact the Co-Ge bonds in 42 are the shortest
Co-Ge bonds known to date The relatively short EII-Co bonds in 41 and 42 suggest
that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands in the series of divalent silicon
and germanium compounds as yet
373 Formation of bis-silylene 38 bridged complex 44 and 45
To test σ-donor ability of bis-(silylene) 38 versus carbonyl a ligand exchange
reaction between 38 and (CO)2CoCp[146]
was explored When 38 was allowed to react
with two molar equivalents of (CO)2CoCp the bis-silylene 41 bridged bimetallic
cobalt complex 44[33a]
could be obtained in 87 yield accompanied by half CO-
elimination of (CO)2CoCp (Scheme 339) The reaction of bis-silylene 38 with one
molar equivalent of (CO)2CoCp furnished the same product but the isolable yield was
low The structure of 44 was determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy
elemental analysis and infrared spectroscopy
Scheme 339 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged CoI(CO)Cp complex 44
Results and Discussion
- 84 -
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 44 exhibits a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
124 ppm A singlet (δ = 523 ppm) and two sets of hyperfine coupled triplet (δ = 461
and 476 ppm) are assigned to protons of CoICp group and ferrocene with the ratio of
1044 The resonance of phenyl protons appears in aromatic resonance region The
29Si-NMR spectrum of 44 shows a singlet resonance at δ = 857 ppm similar to that
of 41 In the 13
C-NMR spectrum of 44 one characteristic signal for the CO ligands
appears at δ = 2078 ppm Furthermore the IR spectrum of 44 exhibits a strong
stretching band at ν = 1888 cmminus1
attributed to the carbonyl groups on the CoI atoms
The observed CO stretching frequency of 44 is much lower than those of 41a
(ν = 1968 cmminus1
)[141]
thus indicating that the bis-silylene substituted ferrocene 38 is a
much stronger σ-donor than chlorosilylene 26[32b]
Another carbonyl-silylene exchange reaction was investigated between bis-
silylene 38 and diiron nonacarbonyl Fe2(CO)9 Toluene was added to a 11 mixture of
38 and Fe2(CO)9 at room temperature to afford a bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4
complex 45 in 73 yield (Scheme 340) The structure of 45 was determined by
multinuclear NMR spectroscopy infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis
Scheme 340 Synthesis of bis-silylene 38 bridged Fe(CO)4 complex 45
The 1H-NMR spectrum of complex 45 shows a singlet for four
tBu groups at δ =
109 ppm Two singlets at δ = 483 and 500 ppm are assigned to protons of ferrocene
Multiplets in the range of 699-739 ppm are resonances of phenyl protons The 29
Si-
NMR spectrum of 45 exhibits a singlet resonance at δ = 1050 ppm It is much more
Results and Discussion
- 85 -
downfield shifted than those in complexes 41 (820 ppm) and 44 (857 ppm) One
characteristic strong signal for the CO ligands appears at δ = 2169 ppm in the 13
C-
NMR spectrum of 45 It is compatible to the resonance (δ = 2167 ppm) of the
silylene-Fe(CO)4 complex aL(
tBuO)SirarrFe(CO)4
[71] In the IR spectrum of 45 the
CO stretching frequencies (2026 1948 1900 cmminusl
) are also quite uniform to those of
this complex (2026 1949 1899 cmminusl
)[71]
Due to the rotation energy of ferrocene and
the symmetric bulky coordination of Fe the second CO-substitution could be more
difficult Consequently a chelated complex 38rarrFe(CO)3 was not observed during the
isolation of products
38 Application of Ni Co complexes as precatalysts
The investigation of the catalytic activity of complexes 28 41 and 42 was carried
out in collaboration with Stephan Enthaler (TU Berlin)[33a]
Nickel or palladium catalyzed cross-coupling reactions between organozinc halides
and aromatic halides constitute an excellent synthetic method for polyfunctional
aromatic compounds[147]
To probe the catalytic activity of bis-silylene oxide Ni0
complex 28 a cross-coupling reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-
iodobenzene was investigated (Scheme 341) The direct iodine substitution of p-
methoxyl-iodobenzene with organometallic compounds was not expected without a
catalyst In the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3) coupling
reaction was observed and product 46 was obtained in 65 yield indicating a
potential application for this kind of complexes
Results and Discussion
- 86 -
Scheme 341 Application of 28 as precatalyst in cross-coupling reactions
Moreover the reactivity of the resulting complexes 41 and 42 as precatalysts for
Co-mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile was
expected[148]
It is known numerous cobalt complexes have been successfully applied
as precatalysts in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions and this becomes a powerful tool in
organic chemistry to form arene and heteroarene moieties[148-149]
Thus the catalytic
abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions were investigated
(Scheme 342)
Scheme 342 Application of 41 and 42 as precatalyst in [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions
A first set of experiments was dedicated to the benchmark trimerization of phenyl
acetylene which resulted in the quantitative formation of isomers 47a and 47b in the
presence of complex 41 To our surprise similar attempts to employ 42 as precatalyst
failed with no product formation presumably due to a stronger coordination of GeII
atoms to the Co center which consequently prevents from the formation of an active
Results and Discussion
- 87 -
site for substrate coordination In another set of experiments the formation of
substituted pyridines 48a and 48b by [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenyl acetylene and
an excess of acetonitrile was detected[150]
The catalytic activity of SiII-Co complex 41
was exhibited distinctly again while no product formation could be observed with
GeII-Co complex 42 To some extent the application of CpCo(CO)2 as precatalyst
gave however substituted pyridines in lower yield (48a (3) and 48b (11))[33a]
Scheme 343 Proposed mechanism of 41 as precatalyst for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition
A possible mechanism for the [2+2+2] cycloaddition of phenylacetylene or nitrile
to obtain 47 and 48 is proposed[149a]
as depicted in Scheme 343 At first bis-silylene
complex 41 could participate in a ligand substitution reaction with the
Results and Discussion
- 88 -
phenylacetylene to form an acetylene side-on complex Co-I The latter undergoes a
ring-formation to give the σ-bonded CoIII
complex Co-II which is saturated in
coordination with bis-silylene 38 Then intermediate Co-III is formed after π-donor
substitution by acetylene The succedent ring-enlargement furnishes the transient σ-
complex Co-IV and a subsequent elimination of products 47 and 48 occurs leading to
the active species Co-I by coordination of two phenylacetylene molecules In this
cobalt catalyzed transformation bis-silylene 38 serves as an important accessorial
ligand making the Co-center with high electron density more active and stabilizing the
intermediates Co-II and Co-IV
Unexpectedly complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is inactive The
possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII donor centers to
Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the substrate coordination
Summary
- 89 -
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
In this work various new metallylenes of Si Ge and Sn and bis-metallylenes
(interconnected and spacer separated) were synthesized The properties and
coordination ability of new metallylenes toward transition-metals including Fe Co
Ni and Pd were studied
The reduction of chlorogermylene (nacnac)GeCl 1[80]
with excess of elemental
potassium furnished the first potassium germylene anionic salt 3[83]
in 33 yield
along with the β-diketiminato germylene amide 4[83]
(nacnac)Ge-NH-Dip in 31
yield 3 consists of a dimeric half-sandwich complex interconnected via
intermolecular GerarrK dative bonds Each half-sandwich moiety consists of a
K(OEt2)2 cation which is η5-coordinated to the anionic five-membered planar GeNC3
ring with a considerable Cpmacr-like aromatic stabilization This is supported by density
functional theory (DFT) calculations The treatment of (nacnac)GeCl3 2[82]
with KC8
gave the same products 3 4 and novel Ge4-cluster compound 5[83]
in very low yield
Compound 5 represents a dipotassium salt of the first ldquoheavyrdquo cyclobutadiene-like
dianion (CBD2-
) consisting of a planar Ge42minus
core
Summary
- 90 -
Figure 41 Central molecular structures of 3 (left) and 5 (right)
The reactivity of compound 3 as nucleophile towards chlorogermylene 1[80]
and
chlorostannylene 7[80]
was examined Coupling reactions of 3 with 1 or 7 led to the
corresponding bis-germylene 6[104]
in 66 yield and germylene-stannylene 8[104]
in
34 yield respectively Compounds 6 and 8 were fully characterized including by X-
ray diffraction analysis The new compound 6 represent the first asymmetric
substituted bis-germylene with the shortest GeI-Ge
I bond length The germylene-
stannylene 8 is the first example with a GeI-Sn
I coupling as yet This novel structural
feature was explained with asymmetric structure and some ionic charge distribution
between 5- and six-membered rings by DFT calculation
Figure 42 Central molecular structures of 6 (left) and 8 (right)
Summary
- 91 -
The synthesis of new ligands 12 or 20[110]
was easily accessible from lithium amide
10 with corresponding benzimidoyl chloride 11 or 19[112]
by salt metathesis reactions
Subsequent reactions of 12 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2middotdioxane furnished
chlorogermylene 14[110]
in 82 yield Germylene 16[110]
was obtained by
dehydrochloration of 14 with carbene 15[113]
in 78 yield The molecule of
zwitterionic germylene 16 bears two reactivity positions a strong nucleophilic
methylene group and a nucleophilic(s-orbital)-electrophilic(p-orbital) germylene site
Thus treatment of 16 with ammonia gas or with water resulted in the formation of
corresponding aminogermylene 17[110]
or germylene hydroxide 18[110]
in high yield
The reaction of compound 20 with nBuLi and then with GeCl2sdotdioxane led to the
unusual oxo-chloro-germylene 22 in 80 yield Dichlorogermane 23 was obtained by
reaction of 21 with GeCl4 through dehydrochloration with carbene 15 as a base in
57 yield All new compounds have been characterized spectroscopically and
crystallographically 12 and 20 are new types of asymmetric β-diketiminato ligands
with a fused six-membered C6-ring to prevent the transformation of ligand backbone
and side-reactions of ligands They are promising ancillary chelating ligand for the
synthesis of novel silylenes and stannylenes The preparation of new germylenes
added significantly to the growing field of GeII-chemistry capable of small molecule
activation
Summary
- 92 -
Figure 43 Molecular structures of 16 (left) and 18 (right)
Figure 44 Molecular structures of 22 (left) and 23 (right)
A new challenge in metallylene synthetic chemistry is the preparation of chalcogen
(O S Se) bridged bis-metallylene species Here the synthesis and isolation of the
oxygen bridged bis-silylene 28[32a]
was achieved for the first time Reaction of
(HSiCl2)2O with lithium amidinate gave disiloxane 27[32a]
in 53 yield The bis-
silylene oxide 28 was available by dehydrochloration of 27 employing LiN(SiMe3)2 in
76 yield The molecule of 28 contains two triply coordinated Si atoms and two lone
pairs one at each of the Si centers The Si1-O-Si2 angle of 28 is slightly bent and
DFT calculations revealed that the Si1-O-Si2 angle deformation energy is very small
Compound 28 with one molar equiv of Ni(cod)2 furnished the Ni0 complex 29
[32a]
in 91 yield which is the first bidentate bis-silylene transition-metal complex with
18 valence electrons at the metal-site In diamagnetic complex 29 the two silylene
Summary
- 93 -
subunits and the two ethylenes of the COD-ligand are tetrahedrally coordinated to the
Ni0 atom The strong σ-donor character of 28 led to a more electron-rich Ni center
This work will lead to new insights into the chelating silylene ligand transition-metal
coordination chemistry
Figure 45 Molecular structures of 28 (left) and 29 (right)
To possibly get access to a phosphasilyne a desilylation reaction that is phosphino
silylene 30[128]
was allowed to react with Ph3PCl2 30 was synthesized by facile
phosphanylation of chlorosilylene 26 with LiP(SiMe3)2 in 83 yield Surprisingly the
reaction of 30 with one molar equiv of Ph3PCl2 led to the formation of the unique
product 31[128]
as yellow crystals in 72 yield
An X-ray crystal structure analysis confirmed that 31 is a dimer of the desired
phosphasilyne Compound 31 is the first 4π-elektron Si2P2-cycloheterobutadiene
derivate with two-coordinated P atoms and a planar Si2P2-ring The Si-P bond lengths
in 31 represent intermediate values between the Si=P bond length and the Si-P bond
length The equal Si-P distances in 31 already indicate σ- and π-electron resonance
stabilization within the Si2P2 cycle which has been confirmed by theoretical
calculations According to DFT investigation each Si atom in the Si2P2-ring bears a
large positive net charge (+1204) while the P atoms in the ring have somewhat
Summary
- 94 -
smaller negative charges (-0765)
Figure 46 Molecular structure of 31
Pincer arenes having divalent heavier group 14 elements are currently
unprecedented in synthetic chemistry but assumed to form complexes that could
serve as precatalysts for various organic transformations due to their coordination
ability towards metals Here the synthesis of the first bis-silylene-based SiCSi pincer
arene ligand 35[33b]
through the substitution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
by 13-dilithium
resorcinolate 34 could be achieved in 79 yield Treatment of 35 with Pd(PPh3)4
afforded the unexpected silylene-silyl(phenyl)-palladium(II) complex 36[33b]
as orange
crystals in 81 yield
In compound 36 the PdII atom adopts a typical distorted square-planar
configuration defined by the carbon atom C1 two silylene SiII atoms and the silyl
SiIV
atom which is bonded with a hydrogen atom because of hydride shift to Si1 after
C-H activation by Pd Owing to the coordinative saturation of the Pd center one
silylene subunit (Si4) remains ldquofreerdquo With the help of theoretical investigation the
Summary
- 95 -
reaction mechanism was explained and the exothermic transformation from 35 to 36
was confirmed This is a new approach in metallylene transition-metal coordination
chemistry with complexes being potentially applicable in catalytic transformation
Figure 47 Molecular structure of 36 tBu and phenyl groups are not shown
Also a type of bis-metallylene with a ferrocendiyl spacer for new bidentate σ-donor
properties was investigated Here the facile synthesis of the first bis(silylenyl)- and
bis(germylenyl)-substituted ferrocenes 38 and 40 as well as their corresponding CoI
complexes could be described for the first time By salt metathesis reaction of 11rsquo-
dilithioferrocene 37 with chlorosilylene 26[32b]
or chlorogermylene 39[41]
furnished
bis-silylene 38[33a]
in 70 yield or bis-germylene 40[33a]
in 77 yield respectively
Reactions of a suitable CoICp precursor with bis-silylene 38 afforded the bis-silylene
CoI complex 41
[33a] in 30 yield Likewise the bis-germylene Co
I complex 42
[33a]
could be synthesized from 40 with CoICp fragment and isolated in 61 yield
Summary
- 96 -
Figure 48 Molecular structure of 40
Figure 49 Molecular structures of 41 (left) and 42 (right) tBu and phenyl groups
are not shown
Compounds 38 and 40 represent the first examples of isolable ferrocene bridged
bis-silylene or bis-germylene respectively The isolated products 41 and 42 are the
first heterobimetallic complexes of CoICp with bis-silylene or bis-germylene
functioning in a chelating fashion In both complexes cobalt is coordinated on one
side by cyclopentadienyl and on another side by bis-silylene 38 or bis-germylene 40
and contains 18 valence electrons The Co-Si bonds in 41 and the Co-Ge bonds in 42
belong to the shortest Co-E (E = Si Ge) bonds known to date The relatively short EII-
Co bonds in 41 and 42 indicate that 38 and 40 are two of the strongest σ-donor ligands
in the series of divalent silicon and germanium compounds as yet due to the electron-
rich ferrocene and metallylene segments
In addition in the presence of Ni0 complex 28 as precatalyst the C(sp
2)-C(sp
3)
cross-coupling[147]
reaction between benzyl zinc chloride and p-methoxyl-iodo-
benzene was observed evidently The catalytic abilities of complexes 41 and 42 in Co-
Summary
- 97 -
mediated [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions of phenylacetylene and acetonitrile were
probed[148-150]
However complex 41 is catalytically active while complex 42 is
inactive The possible reason for this could be a stronger coordination of the GeII
donor centers to Co which hampers the creation of an active site at CoI for the
substrate coordination
Experimental section
- 98 -
5 EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
51 General section
All experiment and manipulations were carried out under dry oxygen-free nitrogen
using standard Schlenk techniques or in an inert atmosphere of purified nitrogen The
glassware used in all manipulations was dried at 150 degC prior to use cooled to
ambient temperature under high vacuum and flushed with N2 The handling of solid
samples and the preparation of samples for spectroscopic measurements were carried
out inside a glove-box where the O2 and H2O levels were normally kept below 1 ppm
All solvents were purified using conventional procedures and freshly distilled under
N2 atmosphere prior to use They were stored in Schlenk-vessels containing activated
molsieves Benzene toluene n-pentane and n-hexane were purified by distillation
from Nabenzophenone Et2O and THF were initially pre-dried over KOH and then
distilled from Nabenzophenone CH2Cl2 and chloroform were dried by stirring over
CaH2 at ambient temperature
For transfer of solvents or solutions stainless steel cannulas were used which were
stored in the oven at 120 degC The transfer was enabled by the vessel of origin being
left under a positive pressure of protective gas and the receptacle vessel of closed
with a pressure release value By filtration stainless steel cannula containing a filter-
head at one end was utilized Whatman (GFB 25) filters were affixed to the filter end
of the cannula with Teflon tape After use cannulas were cleaned immediately by
thorough rinsing with acetone followed by dilute HCl water acetone and
dichloromethane
In the case of low temperature reactions Dewar vessels were filled with acetone
and dry-ice was added until reaching the desired temperature Ethanol liquid
nitrogen was also employed for reactions in needs of -90 degC
Experimental section
- 99 -
52 Analytical methods
NMR Measurements NMR samples of air andor moisture sensitive compounds were
all prepared under inert atmosphere The deuterated solvents were dried by stirring
over Na (C6D6 THF-d8) or CaH2 (CDCl3) distilled under N2 atmosphere and stored in
Schlenk-vessels containing activated molsieves The 1H- and
13C-NMR spectra were
recorded on ARX 200 (1H 200 MHz
13C 50 MHz) and ARX 400 (
1H 400 MHz
13C
10046 MHz) spectrometers from the Bruker Company The 29
Si-NMR spectra were
recorded only on ARX 400 (29
Si 7949 MHz) spectrometer
The 1H and
13C
1H NMR spectra were calibrated against the residual proton and
natural abundance 13
C resonances of the deuterated solvent relative to
tetramethylsilane (benzene-d6 δH 715 ppm and δC 1280 ppm chloroform-d1 δH 727
ppm and δC 770 ppm THF-d8 δH 173 ppm and δC 253 ppm Heteronuclear spectra
were calibrated as follows 31
P1H external 85 H3PO4
119Sn
1H external SnMe4
Whereby in each case an 1-mm glass capillary tube containing the standard substance
was placed in the appropriate solvent in a 5 mm NMR tube and the spectrum recorded
The abbreviations used to denote the multiplicity of the signals are as follows s =
singlet d = doublet t = triplet q = quartet sept = septet m = multiplet br = broad
Infra-red spectroscopy IR spectra (4000 ndash 400 cm-1
) were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
Spectra 100 FT-IR spectrometer bands were reported in wave-numbers (cm-1
)
Samples of solids were measured as KBr pellets Air or moisture sensitive samples
were prepared in the glove-box and measured immediately The spectra were
processed using the program OMNIC and the abbreviations associated with the
absorptions quoted are vs = very strong s = strong m = medium w = weak br =
broad the intensities of which were assigned on the basis of visual inspection
UV-vis Spectrometry UV-vis spectrophotometric investigations were carried out on a
Specord S 600 spectrophotometer from Analytik Jena AG Pure samples of the
investigated substance were dissolved in dry solvents at suitable concentration The
UV-vis cuvette was filled and closed in a Schlenk tube under N2 atmosphere
Mass Spectrometry Mass spectra were performed at the Chemistry institute of
Experimental section
- 100 -
Technical University Berlin EI spectra were recorded on a 311A Arian MATAMD
spectrometer ESI mass spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap LTQ
XL spectrometer Solid samples were prepared in glove box and the solution of
samples was prepared 15 min before the measurement under N2 atmosphere Mass
spectra are presented in the standard form mz (percent intensity relative to the base
peak)
Elemental analysis The C H N and S analyses of all compounds were carried out on
a Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series instrument Air or moisture sensitive
samples were prepared in ldquotin-boatsrdquo in the glove box Samples with halogen were
filled in the ldquosilver-boatsrdquo for better measuring accuracy
Melting Point determinations A BSGT Apotec II instrument was used for the
determination of melting points Samples were prepared in glass capillary tubes under
N2 atmosphere The melting point was determined while the melded examples had the
same color like the solid before Without melting of samples the color change was
observed was determined as decomposition temperature
Single crystal X-ray structure determinations Crystals suitable to the single crystal
x-ray structure analysis were put on a glass capillary with perfluorinated oil and
measured in a cold nitrogen stream The data of all measurements were collected with
an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur S Saphire diffractometer at 150 K (MoKα radiation λ
= 071073 Aring) The structures were solved by direct methods Refinements were
carried out with the SHELXL-97[151]
software package All thermal displacement
parameters were refined anisotropically for non-H atoms and isotropically for H
atoms All refinements were made by full matrix least-square on F2 In all cases the
graphical representation of the molecular structures was carried out using Ortep32
version 108 The details for the individual structure solutions included in this
dissertation are available in the appendix
Experimental section
- 101 -
53 Starting Materials
Commercially available starting materials were used as received The following
important precursors were prepared according to literature procedures The references
are shown in Table 51
Table 51 Starting materials and references
Compound References Compound References
GeCl2dioxane [27] 15 (HCNtBu)2C [113]
(HSiCl2)2O [117] 19 Ph(Cl)C=N-iPr [112]
1 (nacnac)GeCl [80] 24 tBuN=C=N
tBu [152]
2 (nacnac)GeCl3 [82] 26 aLSiCl [32b]
7 (nacnac)SnCl [80] 32 (Me3Si)2N-SnCl [53]
9 (C5H10)C=N-Dip [111] 39 aLGeCl [41]
11 Ph(Cl)C=N-Dip [112]
Experimental section
- 102 -
54 Synthesis and characterization of new compounds
521 The first germylene anion 3 and the germylene 4
To a solution of 1[80]
(133 g 253 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added potassium
(148 g 379 mmol) at room temperature After stirring for 4 h the color of the
solution changed from yellow to brown Volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was first extracted with hexane (60 mL in portions) and then
with diethyl ether (60 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtrated and the filtrate was concentrated
and stored at -20degC for 5 d yielding the first germylene anion 3 as pale yellow crystals
(030 g 083 mmol 33)
C25H44GeKNO2 MW 50236
Properties soluble in THF slightly soluble in Et2O spontaneous
combustion towards air
Melting Point 220 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 108 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 112 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 184 (s 3 H
NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 298 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 618 (s 1 H γ-CH) 691- 698 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 182 (NCMe) 203
(GeCMe) 238 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 1185
(γ-C) 1224-1745 (arom C GeCMe NCMe)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C17H24GeKN(C4H10O)022 C 5797 H 713 N
378 Found C 5764 H 694 N 367
The combined hexane extract was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated and
stored at -20 degC for 2 d yielding the new germylene 4 as yellow crystals (052 g 078
Experimental section
- 103 -
mmol 31)
NHN
GeN
Dip
DipDip
C41H59GeN3 MW 66657
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 192 - 193 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 091 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 109 (d 3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH =
68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 122 (m br 12 H CHMe2) 130 (d
3JHH = 68 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 162 (s 6 H NCMe) 329-340
(m 6 H CHMe2) 503 (s 1 H γ-CH) 564 (s 1 H NH) 683
ndash 718 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 225 (CHMe) 234 (NCMe)
240 (br CHMe) 245 (CHMe) 247 (CHMe) 256 (CHMe)
288 (CHMe) 292 (CHMe) 964 (γ-C) 1171 ndash 1635 (arom
C NCMe)
EI-MS mz () 6674 (03 [M]+) 4912 (100 [M -
iPr2C6H3NH]
+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C41H59GeN3 C 7388 H 892 N 630 Found
C 7354 H 868 N 613
522 Alternative preparation of 3 4 and synthesis of compound 5
To a precooled (-78 degC) solution of 2[82]
(097 g 16 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was
added KC8 (094 g 69 mmol) After stirring for 4 h the reaction mixture was allowed
to warm to room temperature and the color of the solution changed from yellow to
brown The reaction mixture was allowed to stir an additional 48 h at room
temperature The signal of compound 1[80]
also disappeared in the 1H-NMR spectrum
of the resulting mixture and compound 3 and 4 were observed as main products
Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was first extracted
with hexane (50 mL in portions) and then with diethyl ether (50 mL in portions)
The combined diethyl ether extract was filtered the filtrate was concentrated to 10
Experimental section
- 104 -
mL and stored at -20degC for 48 h yielding 3 as pale yellow crystals (024 g 067 mmol
42) The combined hexane extract was concentrated and stored at -20degC for 24 h
yielding 4 as yellow crystals (042 g 063 mmol 39)
Further concentration of the supernate and cooling at -20degC for 48 h yielded 5 as red
crystals along with colorless crystals of the known β-diketiminato potassium complex
C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 MW 135028
Elemental analysis calcd () for C66H100Ge4K2N4O2 C 7890 H 1003 N 278
Found C 7821 H 999 N 281
523 The asymmetric bis-germylene 6
C46H65Ge2N3 MW 80531
To a solution of the germylene anion 3 (138 mg 0263 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at -
30 degC was added the solution of the chlorogermylene 1[80]
(93 mg 0263 mmol) in
THF (10 mL) The color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After
stirring for further 2 h at room temperature volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 5 days yielding 6 as dark red crystals (140 mg
017 mmol 66)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt169 degC (decomp)
Experimental section
- 105 -
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 107 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H
CHMe2) 111 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 12 H CHMe2) 120 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 124 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 161 (s
6 H NCMe) 202 (s 3 H NCMe) 262 (s 3 H GeCMe) 301
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 319 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 367 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 518 (s 1 H 6-
ring-γ-CH) 682 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 702- 718 (m 9 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 191 (5-ring-NCMe) 210
(GeCMe) 240 (6-ring-NCMe) 248 (CHMe2) 249 (CHMe2)
250 (CHMe2) 258 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 261 (CHMe2)
279 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 1028 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1238 (5-ring-β-C) 1240 ndash 1694 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
UV-vis λ [nm] = 315 (intense) 358 (intense) 502 (2600)
EI-MS mz () 491 (45 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (15 [M-
(C3N2Ge) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65Ge2N3 C 6861 H 814 N 522 Found
C 6884 H 800 N 516
524 The first germylene-stannylene 8
C46H65GeN3Sn MW 85138
To a suspension of germylene anion 3 (116 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) at -
70 degC was added the solution of 7[80]
(187 mg 0328 mmol) in Et2O (15 mL) The
color of the solution changed from yellow to dark red After stirring for further 2 h at
room temperature the volatiles of the reaction mixture were removed under reduced
pressure and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
Experimental section
- 106 -
concentrated and stored at -30degC for 10 days yielding 8 as dark red-black solid (96 mg
011 mmol 34) The solid was solved in Et2O and stored at 0 degC for 24 h building
dark red crystals
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt143 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 085 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 106 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 114 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 121 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 127 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 129 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2)
165 (s 6 H SnNCMe) 227 (s 3 H GeNCMe) 300 (s 3 H
GeCMe) 305 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 333 (sept
3JHH
= 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 378 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2)
510 (s 1 H 6-ring-γ-CH) 691 (s 1 H 5-ring-β-CH) 705-
721 (m 9 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 188 (5-ring-NCMe) 207
(GeCMe) 242 (6-ring-NCMe) 246 (CHMe2) 248 (CHMe2)
249 (CHMe2) 259 (CHMe2) 260 (CHMe2) 268 (CHMe2)
280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 287 (CHMe2) 1035 (6-ring-γ-
C) 1237 (5-ring-β-C) 1244 ndash 1704 (arom C GeCMe
NCMe)
119Sn NMR
(C6D6) δ = -197
UV-vis λ [nm] = 314 (15000) 363 (14500) 541 (2800)
EI-MS mz () 537 (8 [M-(C3NGe) ring fragment]+) 316 (17 [M-
(C3N2Sn) ring fragment]+)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C46H65GeN3Sn C 6489 H 770 N 494
Found C 6444 H 764 N 477
Experimental section
- 107 -
525 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12
C37H48N2 MW 52079
To a solution of 9[111]
(200 g 777 mmol) in 200 mL Et2O at -78 degC was added 16
M nBuLi (486 mL 777 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 11[112]
(210 g 700 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h Water free Et3NHCl (108 g 777 mmol) was added to the
reaction mixture and stirred All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 229 g (440 mmol
63 ) of the novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 12 as colorless crystals
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 148 ~ 150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 117 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 125 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 134 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 164 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 187 (s 1 H NH) 217 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335
(m 4 H CHMe2) 696 (s 3 H arom H) 715- 727 (m 8 H
arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 218 (Cy-CH2) 221
(CHMe2) 236 (CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 256
(CHMe2) 280 (CHMe2) 282 (CHMe2) 285 (Cy-CH2) 286
(Cy-CH2) 977 (Cy-CCN) 1222-1441 (arom C) 1600 (Cy-
CN) 1658 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H49N2+ 5213896 Found 5213878
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48N2 C 8533 H 929 N 538 Found C
8518 H 927 N 547
Experimental section
- 108 -
526 The new chlorogermylene 14
N
N
Ph
Dip
Dip
Cl
Ge
C37H47ClGeN2 MW 62788
nBuLi (881 mL 141 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 12 (720 g 138
mmol) in 80 mL of Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed slowly to warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(330 g 142 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -
30 degC yielding 14 as yellow crystals (710 g 113 mmol 82 )
Properties soluble in hexane toluene sensitive towards air
Melting Point 203 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 097 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 107 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121-127 (m 9 H CHMe2) 128-139 (m
4 H Cy-CH2) 144 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 155 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 203-227 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 317
(sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 327 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 394 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 417 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 680- 739 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 226 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 239 (CHMe2) 245 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
249 (CHMe2) 274 (CHMe2) 277 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
286 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 291 (CHMe2) 293 (CHMe2)
295 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1089 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1476
(arom C) 1651 (Cy-CN) 1688 (Ph-CN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47ClGeN2+ 6282640 Found 6282639
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H47ClGeN2 C 7078 H 754 N 446
Found C 7073 H 762 N 457
Experimental section
- 109 -
527 The new germylene 16
C37H46GeN2 MW 59142
Germylene chloride 14 (300 g 479 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-butyl- imidazol-2-
ylidene 15[113]
(091 g 502 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (25 mL) at room
temperature and stirred for 48 h resulting in a white precipitate of the corresponding
NHCmiddotHCl salt The color of the solution changed from yellow to brown-red The
solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm
hexane two times The combined filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 16 as red crystals (220 g 373 mmol 78 )
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 167 ~ 168 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 115 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 126 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 135 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 12 H CHMe2) 155 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 204 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 221 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 369 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 380 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 415 (t
3JHH =
44 Hz 1 H C=CH) 675- 725 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 226 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 258 (Cy-CH2) 259 (CHMe2) 273 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 987 (Cy-CH)
1117 (Cy-CCN) 1236-1431 (arom C) 1473 1474 (Cy-CN
Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 704 (s) 787 (s) 939 (m) 1104 (s) 1135 (s) 1204 (s) 1248 (s)
1296 (s) 1322 (s) 1365 (s) 1439 (s) 1461 (s) 1535 (m) 1600
(s) 2822 (m) 2865 (s) 2922 (s) 2957 (w) 3022 (w) 3061 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2+ 5932951 Found 5932950
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H46GeN2 C 7514 H 784 N 474 Found
C 7495 H 800 N 484
Experimental section
- 110 -
528 Aminogermylene 17
C37H49GeN3 MW 60845
A red solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (15 mL) was exposed to dry
ammonia gas for 10 min at room temperature The solution turned to a yellow color
and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvent was removed and the
residue was dissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated solution was stored at 0
degC yielding 17 as yellow crystals (560 mg 092 mmol 92 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 173 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 117 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 120-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 142 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
154 (s 2 H NH2) 200-213 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 357 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 363 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 388 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 679- 724 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 214 (CHMe2) 230 (CHMe2)
234 (CHMe2) 237 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
248 (CHMe2) 272 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 284 (CHMe2)
285 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
293 (Cy-CH2) 315 (Cy-CH2) 1023 (Cy-CCN) 1234-1462
(arom C) 1643 (Cy-CN) 1669 (Ph-CN)
IR (KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 704 (s) 752 (s) 796 (s) 839 (m) 922 (s) 1096 (s)
1143 (s) 1174 (s) 1252 (s) 1304 (s) 1360 (s) 1430 (s) 1543
(s) 2865 (m) 2961 (s) 3021 (w) 3048 (m) 3343 (w) 3430
(w)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H49GeN3 C 7304 H 812 N 691 Found
C 7272 H 810 N 683
Experimental section
- 111 -
529 Germylene hydroxide 18
C37H48GeN2O MW 60943
A diluted solution of H2O in THF (179 mL 100 mmol 056 M) was dropped into
a solution of 16 (591 mg 100 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) at -30 degC The solution
turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 6 h at ambient temperature The solvents
were removed and the residue was redissolved in hexane (40 mL) The concentrated
solution was stored at 0 degC yielding 18 as yellow crystals (580 mg 095 mmol 95 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 188 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 116 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 119-136 (m 15
H CHMe2 4 H Cy-CH2) 139 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2)
166 (s 1 H OH) 195-221 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 335 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 346 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 384 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 397 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 675- 726 (m 11 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 213 (CHMe2) 229 (CHMe2)
233 (CHMe2) 234 (Cy-CH2) 243 (CHMe2) 246 (Cy-CH2)
247 (CHMe2) 269 (CHMe2) 276 (CHMe2) 281 (CHMe2)
283 (CHMe2) 288 (CHMe2) 289 (CHMe2) 290 (CHMe2)
291 (Cy-CH2) 314 (Cy-CH2) 1028 (Cy-CCN) 1233-1464
(arom C) 1647 (Cy-CN) 1666 (Ph-CN)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 561 (s) 713 (s) 743 (s) 770 (s) 791 (s) 839 (s) 926 (m)
1056 (m) 1104 (s) 1148 (s) 1170 (s) 1257 (s) 1313 (s) 1339
(s) 1365 (s) 1430 (s) 1470 (s) 1539 (s) 2861 (s) 2961 (s)
3018 (w) 3057 (m) 3643 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C37H47GeN2O+ 6092900 Found 6092901
Elemental analysis calcd () for C37H48GeN2O C 7292 H 794 N 460
Experimental section
- 112 -
Found C 7300 H 786 N 464
5210 The novel β-diketiminato-type ligand 20
C28H38N2 MW 40230
At -78 degC to a solution of 9[111]
(150 g 583 mmol) in 150 mL Et2O was added 16
M nBuLi (365 mL 584 mmol) in hexane and the reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight resulting in slightly yellow slurry The reaction mixture
was cooled to -78 degC again and the solution of 19[112]
(106 g 583 mmol) in Et2O
(100 mL) was added The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
and then refluxed for 1 h All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC to obtain 141 g (350 mmol
60 ) of 20 as colorless blocks
Properties soluble in hexane DCM and Ethanol stable towards air
Melting Point 123 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 109 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 132 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 156 (m 4 H Cy-CH2) 208 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 214 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 310 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H
CHMe2) 323 (m 1 H CHMe2) 713- 753 (m 8 H arom H)
1203 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H NH)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 219 (Cy-CH2) 226
(CHMe2) 238 (Cy-CH2) 244 (CHMe2) 246 (CHMe2) 276
(Cy-CH2) 280 (CHMe2) 300 (Cy-CH2) 459 (CHMe2) 977
(Cy-CCN) 1226 1228 1275 1282 1284 1371 1389
1453 (arom C) 1576 (Cy-CN) 1673 (PhCN)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C28H39N2+ 4033113 Found 4033112
Experimental section
- 113 -
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H38N2 C 8353 H 951 N 696 Found C
8270 H 977 N 679
5211 Oxo-chlorogermylene 22
C28H37ClGeN2O MW 52570
nBuLi (16 mL 256 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (100 g 249
mmol) in 15 mL Et2O at -78 degC The solution was allowed to slowly warm to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h GeCl2middotdioxane[27]
(058 g 250 mmol) was added to
the reaction solution at -78 degC The resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room
temperature Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was
extracted with warm toluene The filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC
yielding 22 as yellow crystals (105 g 200 mmol 80 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 161 ~ 162 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 106 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H
CHMe2) 108 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 116 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 121 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 127 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 134 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 141 (d 3JHH = 7
Hz 3 H CHMe2) 153 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 3 H CHMe2) 189 (m
1 H Cy-CH2) 202 (m 1 H Cy-CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2)
284 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 367 (sept
3JHH = 7 Hz
1 H CHMe2) 396 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H CHMe2) 688 (m
1 H arom H) 705-724 (m 7 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 222 (CHMe2) 228 (CHMe2)
231 (Cy-CH2) 240 (CHMe2) 241 (CHMe2) 253 (CHMe2)
263 (Cy-CH2) 272 (CHMe2) 283 (CHMe2) 285 (CHMe2)
Experimental section
- 114 -
293 (Cy-CH2) 312 (Cy-CH2) 537 (CHMe2) 1068 (Cy-
CCN) 1239 1250 1267 1271 1288 1294 1388 1410
1446 1469 (arom C) 1620 (Cy-CN) 1654 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H37ClGeN2O C 6397 H 709 N 533
Found C 6426 H 725 N 551
5212 β-Diketiminato germanium dichloride 23
C28H36Cl2GeN2 MW 54415
nBuLi (32 mL 512 mmol 16 M) was added to a solution of 20 (201 g 500 mmol)
in 30 mL of toluene at -78 degC The solution was allowed to warm to room temperature
and stirred for 4 h To this solution GeCl4 (107 g 500 mmol) and 13-Bis-tert-
butylimidazol-2-ylidene 15 (091 g 502 mmol) were added at -78 degC The resulting
suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were removed under
reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with warm hexane two times The
filtrate was concentrated and stored at -30 degC yielding 23 as yellow crystals (156 g
287 mmol 57 )
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 126 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 113 (d
3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H
CHMe2) 122 (d 3JHH = 7 Hz 6 H CHMe2) 137 (d
3JHH = 7
Hz 6 H CHMe2) 146 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 189 (m 2 H Cy-
CH2) 206 (m 2 H Cy-CH2) 332 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 1 H
CHMe2) 361 (sept 3JHH = 7 Hz 2 H CHMe2) 421 (t
3JHH =
42 Hz 1 H C=CH) 701-726 (m 8 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 237 (CHMe2) 243 (Cy-
CH2) 247 (CHMe2) 254 (Cy-CH2) 257 (CHMe2) 286
Experimental section
- 115 -
(CHMe2) 304 (Cy-CH2) 511 (CHMe2) 1036 (Cy-CH)
1125 (Cy-CCN) 1248 1287 1296 1354 1391 1411
1421 1490 (arom C) 1682 (Cy-CN) 1709 (Ph-CN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C28H36Cl2GeN2 C 6180 H 515 N 667
Found C 6203 H 517 N 679
5213 Amidinato disiloxane 27
C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 MW 60781
To a solution of tBuN=C=N
tBu
[152] (329 g 213 mmol) in Et2O (80 mL) PhLi (119
mL 214 mmol 18 M) was added at -78 degC The solution was raised to room
temperature and stirred for 2 h To this solution at -90 degC 1133-
tetrachlorodisiloxane[117]
(230 g 1065 mmol) was added in one minute The
resulting suspension was stirred overnight at room temperature Volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with toluene (60 mL)
by 80 degC two times The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h yielding
27 as colorless crystals (343 g 564 mmol 53)
Properties soluble in toluene sensitive towards wet air
Melting Point 175 ~ 177 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 120 (s 36 H CMe3) 598
(s 2 H SiHCl) 733- 746 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 317 (CMe3) 544 (CMe3)
1276 1285 1297 1337 (arom C) 1711 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = -1110
IR(KBr cm-1
) 606 (s) 658 (m) 711 (s) 733 (s) 760 (s) 789 (s) 934 (s)
1068 (s) 1200 (s) 1269 (s) 1378 (s) 1486 (s) 1550 (s) 1566
(s) 1612 (s) 1783 (w) 1826 (w) 1950 (w) 1969 (w) 2000
Experimental section
- 116 -
(w) 2135 (s) 2188 (s) 2909 (s) 2934 (s) 2971 (s) 3232 (m)
ESI-MS mz calcd for C30H49Cl2N4OSi2+ 6072822 Found 6072844
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H48Cl2N4OSi2 C 5928 H 796 N 922
Found C 5971 H 797 N 913
5214 Bis-silylene oxide 28
C30H46N4OSi2 MW 53488
Toluene (120 mL) was added to a mixture of 27 (260 g 428 mmol) and
LiN(SiMe3)2 (144 g 856 mmol) at ambient temperature After 2 h the solution turned
to an orange color with the formation of LiCl The resulting mixture was stirred
overnight The solvent was then removed and the residue was extracted with toluene
(100 mL) The filtrate was concentrated and stored at 0 degC for 24 h to yield yellow
crystals of 28 (175 g 327 mmol 76)
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point 152 ~ 160 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 692-
731(m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 530 (CMe3)
1277 1291 1299 1349 (arom C) 1623 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -161
IR(KBr cm-1
) 608 (s) 709 (s) 746 (s) 790 (s) 892 (m) 972 (s) 1032 (m)
1070 (m) 1208 (s) 1268 (m) 1359 (s) 1412 (s) 1446 (s)
1476 (s) 1577 (m) 1648 (m) 1778 (w) 1826 (w) 1899 (w)
1970 (w) 2248 (w) 2867 (s) 2902 (s) 2928 (s) 2964 (s)
3065 (m)
Experimental section
- 117 -
ESI-MS mz calcd 5353288 Found 5353227
Elemental analysis calcd () for C30H46N4OSi2 C 6736 H 867 N 1047
Found C 6688 H 857 N 1046
5215 Bis-silylene oxide nickel complex 29
C38H58N4NiOSi2 MW 70176
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 28 (267 mg 050 mmol) and Ni(cod)2
(1375 mg 050 mmol) at ambient temperature The solution turned to a low-red color
and was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted with
toluene (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield low-red crystals of 29 (319 mg
046 mmol 91) The remaining solid was crystallized from hexane at -30 degC
suitable for single crystal measurement
Properties slightly soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 183 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 130 (s 36 H CMe3) 281
(m 4 H CH2) 295 (m 4 H CH2) 504 (s 4 H =CH) 686-
707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (CMe3) 337 (CH2) 535
(CMe3) 760 (=CH) 1277 1293 1296 1335 (arom C)
1690 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 328
IR(KBr cm-1
) 607 (s) 644 (s) 698 (s) 750 (s) 792 (s) 925 (m) 1021 (m)
1075 (s) 1209 (s) 1267 (s) 1320 (m) 1361 (s) 1407 (s)
1444 (s) 1475 (s) 1578 (m) 1647 (m) 1775 (w) 1823 (w)
Experimental section
- 118 -
1902 (w) 1962 (w) 2280 (w) 2791 (s) 2855 (s) 2913 (s)
2975 (s) 3023 (m) 3063 (w)
ESI-MS mz () calcd 7003503 Found 7003577
Elemental analysis calcd () for C38H58N4NiOSi2 C 6504 H 833 N 798
Found C 6387 H 837 N 805
5216 Bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphino silylene 30
C21H41N2PSi3 MW 43679
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(302 mg 102
mmol) and lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphate (285 mg 103 mmol) at ambient
temperature The solution turned to a yellow color and was stirred for 3 h The solvent
was removed and the residue was extracted with hexane (30 mL) The filtrate was
concentrated and stored at -30 degC for 24 h yielding 30 as yellow crystals (371 mg
085 mmol 83)
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 149-150 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 058 (d
3JP-H = 44 Hz 18 H
SiMe3) 124 (s 18 H CMe3) 681-699 (m 2 H arom H)
734-741 (m 3 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 44 (d
3JC-P = 100 Hz
SiMe3) 315 (d 4JC-P = 16 Hz CMe3) 540 (CMe3) 1289
1292 1293 1344 (arom C) 1572 (d 3JC-P = 95 Hz
NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 31 (d
1JSi-P = 229 Hz
PSiMe3) 440 (d 1JSi-P = 1943 Hz N2SiP)
31P NMR (81012 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = - 2110
Experimental section
- 119 -
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C21H41N2PSi3 4362315 Found 4362524
5217 24-Disila-13-diphosphacyclobutadiene 31
C30H46N4P2Si2 MW 58083
Toluene (20 mL) was added to a mixture of 30 (309 mg 071 mmol) and
triphenylphosphine dichloride (237 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The
solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was extracted
with THF (30 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield yellow crystals of 31 (148
mg 025 mmol 72)
Properties soluble in THF sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 174 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 135 (s 36 H CMe3) 705-
733 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 331 (CMe3) 534
(CMe3) 1256 1276 1294 1359 (arom C) 1710 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = 267 (t
1JSi-P = 998 Hz)
31P NMR (81012 MHz THF-D8 298K) δ = - 1649
ESI-MS mz () calcd for C30H46N4P2Si2 5802736 Found
5802361
Experimental section
- 120 -
5218 Aminosilylene-stannylene dichloride 33
C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn MW 60944
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(336 mg 114
mmol) and Chloro-amino-stannylene 32[53]
(360 mg 114 mmol) at room temperature
The solution was stirred for 24 h The solvent was removed and the residue was
extracted with hexane (20 mL) The filtrate was concentrated to yield colorless
crystals of 33 (343 mg 056 mmol 49)
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air decomposed
slowly at room temperature
Melting Point gt 25 degC (slowly decomp)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C21H41Cl2N3Si3Sn C 4139 H 678 N
689 Found C 4195 H 701 N 706
5219 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinyl bis-silylene 35
C44H66N4O2Si2 MW 73919
At -78 degC to a solution of 46-Di-tert-butylresorcinol (150 g 675 mmol) in 30 mL
Et2O was added 16 M nBuLi (85 mL 136 mmol) in hexane and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h resulting in white slurry The reaction
mixture was cooled to -78 degC again and added the solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(398 g 135 mmol) in 50 mL toluene After the addition the mixture was stirred at
room temperature overnight All solvents were evaporated in vacuo The residue was
extracted with the warm hexane and crystallized at -30 degC 395 g bis-silylene 35 (534
Experimental section
- 121 -
mmol 79 ) as slightly yellow solid
Properties soluble in hexane very sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
174 (s 18 H ArC(CH3)3) 693 - 713 (m 8 H arom H) 754
(s 1 H Ar-H) 787 (s 1 H Ar-H) 802 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (ArC(CH3)3) 318
(NC(CH3)3) 350 (ArC(CH3)3) 530 (NC(CH3)3) 1096
1243 1276 1295 1297 1313 1341 1552 (arom C)
1636 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -240
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C44H66N4O2Si2 C 7049 H 900 N 758
Found C 7075 H 930 N 756
5220 SiCSi palladium complex 36
C88H132N8O4PdSi4 MW 158480
Bis-silylene 35 (600 mg 081 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (468 mg 041 mmol) were
mixed in 25 mL hexane at room temperature and stirred for 24 h The hexane solution
was filtrated and the white precipitate was washed with 10 mL hexane one time The
solid product was dried under reduced pressure to yield 520 mg (033 mmol 81 )
white powders The product was dissolved in warm hexane and stored at room
temperature for 10 days giving some orange crystals of 36 The reaction of bis-
Experimental section
- 122 -
silylene 35 with one molar equiv of Pd(PPh3)4 in toluene furnishes the same product
but the isolable yield is only about 30
Properties slightly soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 245 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 105 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 108
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 114 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 116 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 131 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 139 (s 9 H C(CH3)3)155
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 168 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 177 (s 9 H
C(CH3)3) 180 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 185 (s 9 H C(CH3)3) 212
(s 9 H C(CH3)3) 659 (s 1 H SiH) 686- 789 (m 22 H
arom H) 816 (s 1 H Ar-H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 309 (C(CH3)3) 311
(C(CH3)3) 314 (C(CH3)3) 316 (C(CH3)3) 318 (C(CH3)3)
319 (C(CH3)3) 320 (C(CH3)3) 322 (C(CH3)3) 328
(C(CH3)3) 332 (C(CH3)3) 333 (C(CH3)3) 343 (C(CH3)3)
349 350 351 357 526 527 537 539 540 541 542
561 1112 1225 1236 1243 1256 1258 1271 1285
1287 1289 1291 1293 1294 1302 1303 1318 1323
1324 1326 1340 1342 1378 1380 1381 1409 1430
1533 1559 1585 1613 1622 1654 1731 1742
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = -87 (LSi) 397 (Si-H) 623
658 (LSiPd)
IR(KBr cm-1
) 623 (m) 706 (m) 764 (m) 860 (m) 1056 (m) 1108 (m) 1206
(m) 1272 (m) 1365 (m) 1418 (s) 1446 (m) 1476 (m) 1446
(m) 1476 (m) 1495 (m) 1591 (m) 2135 (w) 2875(m) 2906
(s) 2964 (s) 3061 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C88H132N8O4PdSi4 C 6669 H 840 N
707 Found C 6616 H 875 N 676
Experimental section
- 123 -
5221 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene 38
C40H54FeN4Si2 MW 70290
16 M nBuLi (423 ml 677 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (600 mg 323 mmol) and TMEDA (937 mg 806 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (30 mL) solution of chlorosilylene 26[32b]
(190 g 645 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
pentane Compound 38 was obtained as deep red crystals in 70 yield (159 g 226
mmol) on storage of a saturated pentane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 117 ~ 119 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 116 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
451 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 472 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 692- 707 (m 10 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 318 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 709 (FeCH) 727 (FeCH) 846 (SiC) 1289
1294 1305 1349 (arom C) 1604 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 433
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeN4Si2 C 6835 H 774 N 797
Found C 6803 H 767 N 778
Experimental section
- 124 -
5222 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene 40
C40H54FeGe2N4 MW 79201
16 M nBuLi (353 ml 564 mmol) was added to a hexane (10 mL) solution of
ferrocene (500 mg 269 mmol) and TMEDA (781 mg 672 mmol) at 0 degC The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 degC for 4 h The reaction mixture was cooled to -78
degC A toluene (25 mL) solution of chlorogermylene 39[41]
(183 g 538 mmol) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture over 5 min After stirring at room temperature
overnight all volatiles were removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with
warm hexane Compound 40 was obtained as orange crystals in 77 yield (163 g
206 mmol) on storage of a saturated hexane solution at 0 degC
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point 168 ~ 169 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 111 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 461
(t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 471 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 691- 697 (m 6 H arom H) 712- 717 (m 4 H arom
H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 320 (NC(CH3)3) 530
(NC(CH3)3) 701 (FeCH) 723 (FeCH) 920 (GeC) 1289
1290 1302 1369 (arom C) 1659 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C40H54FeGe2N4 C 6666 H 687 N 707 Found
C 6655 H 701 N 707
Experimental section
- 125 -
5223 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 41
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeN4Si2 MW 82693
In a glove box CoBr2 (202 mg 092 mmol) NaCp (81 mg 092 mmol) and KC8
(131 mg 097 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent
mixture (41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at
room temperature The bis-silylene 38 (650 mg 092 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 41 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 30 yield (230 mg 028 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 166 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 139 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
440 (t 3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H FeCH) 461 (t
3JHH = 16 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 496 (s 5 H CoCH) 680- 684 (m 2 H arom H)
692- 696 (m 6 H arom H) 720- 723 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 321 (NC(CH3)3) 534
(NC(CH3)3) 700 (FeCH) 745 (FeCH) 780 (CoCH) 851
(SiC) 1291 1297 1300 1343 (arom C) 1673 (NCN)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz CDCl3 298K) δ = 820
ESI-MS mz () calcd for [M++1] 703331 Found 703329
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFeN4Si2 C 6536 H 719 N 678
Found C 6612 H 724 N 686
Experimental section
- 126 -
5224 Bis(germylenyl)-ferrocene CoICp complex 42
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhGe
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Ge
Co
Fe
C45H59CoFeGe2N4 MW 91604
In a glove box CoBr2 (83 mg 038 mmol) NaCp (33 mg 038 mmol) and KC8 (54
mg 040 mmol) were weighed into a Schlenk flask TolueneTHF solvent mixture
(41 15 mL) was added to the mixture and the solution was stirred for 18 h at room
temperature The bis-germylene 40 (300 mg 038 mmol) was added to the solution
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All volatiles were evaporated
in vacuo and the residue was extracted with warm hexane Compound 42 was
obtained as deep red crystals in 61 yield (210 mg 023 mmol) on storage of a
saturated hexane solution at room temperature
Properties soluble in hexane sensitive towards air
Melting Point gt 309 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 131 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
438 (t 3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H FeCH) 459 (t
3JHH = 15 Hz 4 H
FeCH) 504 (s br 5 H CoCH) 684- 688 (m 2 H arom H)
695- 698 (m 6 H arom H) 714- 718 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 322 (NC(CH3)3) 537
(NC(CH3)3) 699 (FeCH) 737 (FeCH) 759 (CoCH) 891
(GeC) 1287 1296 1300 1361(arom C) 1680 (NCN)
Elemental analysis calcd () for C45H59CoFe Ge2N4 C 5900 H 649 N 612
Found C 5942 H 664 N 590
Experimental section
- 127 -
5225 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene carbonyl CoICp complex 44
C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 MW 100697
To a solution of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (250 mg 036 mmol) in 10 ml hexane
was added a solution of CpCo(CO)2 (130 mg 072 mmol) in 8 ml hexane The
reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature All solvents were evaporated
in vacuo The corresponding bis-silylene cobalt(I) complex 44 was isolated as brown
air- and moisture-sensitive solids in 87 yield (310 mg 031 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point 293 ~ 295 degC
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 124 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3)
461 (m 4 H FeCH) 476 (m 4 H FeCH) 523 (s 10 H
CoCH) 683- 695 (m 6 H arom H) 702- 706 (m 2 H
arom H) 745- 748 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 313 (NC(CH3)3) 542
(NC(CH3)3) 723 (FeCH) 741 (FeCH) 804 (SiC) 809
(CoCH) 1287 1296 1300 1324 (arom C) 1687 (NCN)
2078 (br CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 857
IR(KBr cm-1
) 500 (m) 539 (w) 564 (m) 628 (s) 703 (m) 757 (s) 792 (m)
825 (w) 1028 (m) 1081 (w) 1146 (m) 1199 (s) 1275 (m)
1360 (m) 1388 (m) 1417 (s) 1438 (w) 1474 (m) 1520 (s)
1641 (s) 1888 (s) 2869 (s) 2901 (m) 2926 (m) 2965 (s)
1520 (s) 3097 (w)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C52H64Co2FeN4O2Si2 C 6202 H 641 N
Experimental section
- 128 -
556 Found C 6287 H 630 N 571
5226 Bis(silylenyl)-ferrocene Fe(CO)4 complex 45
C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 MW 103867
Toluene (15 mL) was added to a mixture of ferrocenyl bis-silylene 39 (500 mg
071 mmol) and Fe2(CO)9 (259 mg 071 mmol) at room temperature The solution
was stirred for 12 h The solvent was evaporated in vacuo The corresponding bis-
silylene iron(0) complex 45 was isolated as yellow-brown air- and moisture-sensitive
solids in 73 yield (540 mg 052 mmol)
Properties soluble in toluene spontaneous combustion towards air
Melting Point gt 155 degC (decomp)
1H NMR (40013 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 109 (s 36 H NC(CH3)3) 483
(s 4 H FeCH) 500 (s 4 H FeCH) 699- 712 (m 8 H arom
H) 736- 739 (m 2 H arom H)
13C
1H NMR (10061 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 311 (NC(CH3)3) 548
(NC(CH3)3) 735 (FeCH) 742 (FeCH) 771 (SiC) 1210
1287 1303 1308 (arom C) 1704 (NCN) 2169 (CO)
29Si
1H NMR (7949 MHz C6D6 298K) δ = 1050
IR(KBr cm-1
) 630 (s) 765 (w) 1028 (m) 1035 (m) 1200 (m) 1370 (w)
1400 (m) 1474 (w) 1609 (w) 1648 (w) 1900 (s) 1948 (s)
1996(w) 2026 (s) 2865 (w) 2930 (m) 2965 (m)
Elemental analysis mz () calcd for C48H54Fe3N4O8Si2 C 5550 H 524 N
539 Found C 5623 H 517 N 566
References
- 129 -
6 REFERENCES
1 P Pyykko Chem Rev 1988 88 563
2 N V Sidgwick Clarendon Oxford 1950 1 287 (b) R S Drago J Phys Chem 1958 62
353
3 P P Power Chem Rev 1999 99 3463 (b) R C Fischer P P Power Chem Rev 2010 110
3877
4 R Janoschek Chemie in unserer Zeit 1988 22 128
5 (a) F S Kipping L L Lloyd Dalton Trans 1901 79 449 (b) N N Greenwood A
Earnshaw Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed) 1997 362
6 (a) L Roumlsch P John R Reitmeier Silicon Compounds Organic In Ullmanns Encyclopedia
of Industrial Chemistry Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH amp Co KGaA 2000 (b) A J O Lenick
Basic Silicone Chemistry ndash A Review 1999
7 S Yao Y Xiong M Brym M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 7268
8 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7562
9 Y Xiong S Yao R Muumlller M Kaupp M Driess Nature Chem 2010 2 577
10 (a) S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4159 (b) S
Yao Y Xiong C Milsmann E Bill S Pfirrmann C Limberg M Driess Chem Eur J
2010 16 436
11 (a) K S Pitzer J Am Chem Soc 1948 70 2140 (b) R S Mulliken J Am Chem Soc
1955 77 884
12 (a) M Asay C Jones M Driess Chem Rev 2011 111 354 (b) S Yao Y Xiong M Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 1748 (c) Y Mizuhata T Sasamori N Tokitoh Chem Rev 2009
109 3479 (d) P P Power Organometallics 2007 26 4362 (e) P P Power Chem Rev 2003
103 789 (f) S Nagendran H W Roesky Organometallics 2008 27 457
13 (a) R West M J Fink J Michl Science 1981 214 1343 (b) M J Fink M J Michalczyk
K J Haller R West J Michl Chem Commun 1983 1010 (c) S Masamune Y Hanzawa
D J Williams J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 6136 (d) D E Goldberg D H Harris M F
Lappert K M Thomas Chem Commun 1976 261 (e) K W Klinkhammer T F Faumlssler H
Gruumltzmacher Angew Chem Int Ed 1998 37 124 (f) J T Snow S Murakami S
Masamune D J Williams Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 4191 (g) M Weidenbruch Angew
Chem Int Ed 2003 42 2222
14 L Pauling J Am Chem Soc 1931 53 1367
15 (a) G Trinquier J P Malrieu P Riviere J Am Chem Soc 1982 104 4529 (b) J P
Malrieu G Trinquier J Am Chem Soc 1989 111 5916 (c) H Jacobsen T Ziegler J Am
Chem Soc 1994 116 3667
16 L Pu B Twamley P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2000 122 3524
17 M Kaupp P V R Schleyer J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 1061
18 A D Phillips R J Wright M M Olmstead P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2002 124 5930
19 N Takagi S Nagase Organometallics 2001 20 5498
20 M Stender A D Phillips R J Wright P P Power Angew Chem Int Ed 2002 41 1785
21 T L Allen W H Fink P P Power Dalton Trans 2000 407
References
- 130 -
22 A Sekiguchi R Kinjo M Ichinohe Science 2004 305 1755
23 D Bourissou O Guerret F P Gabbai G Bertrand Chem Rev 2000 100 39
24 M Denk R Lennon R Hayashi R West A V Belyakov H P Verne A Haaland M
Wagner N Metzler J Am Chem Soc 1994 116 2691
25 M Driess S Yao M Brym C V Wuellen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 6730
26 M Kira S Ishida T Iwamoto C Kabuto J Am Chem Soc 1999 121 9722
27 V Lemierre A Chrostowska A Dargelos P Baylegravere W J Leigh C R Harrington Appl
Organom Chem 2004 18 676
28 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky S Merkel J Henn D Stalke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
5683
29 L Jafarpour E D Stevens S P Nolan J Organomet Chem 2000 606 49
30 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen D Lentz J Am Chem Soc 2006 128 9628
31 (a) C-W So H W Roesky J Magull R B Oswald Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 3948
(b) C-W So H W Roesky P M Gurubasavaraj R B Oswald M T Gamer P G Jones S
Blaurock J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12049
32 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890 (b) S S Sen
H W Roesky D Stern J Henn D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2009 132 1123
33 (a) W Wang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167 (b) W
Wang S Inoue E Irran M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691 (c) R Azhakar R
S Ghadwal H W Roesky H Wolf D Stalke Organometallics 2012 31 4588 (d) S S
Sen J Hey R Herbst-Irmer H W Roesky D Stalke J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 12311
34 R C Fischer L Pu J C Fettinger M A Brynda P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
11366
35 Y Wang Y Xie P Wei R B King H F Schaefer P Von R Schleyer G H Robinson
Science 2008 321 1069
36 S S Sen S Khan S Nagendran H W Roesky Acc Chem Res 2012 45 578
37 S S Sen A Jana H W Roesky C Schulzke Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 8536
38 C Jones S J Bonyhady N Holzmann G Frenking A Stasch Inorg Chem 2011 50
12315
39 D Gau R Rodriguez T Kato N Saffon-Merceron A De Coacutezar F P Cossiacuteo A Baceiredo
Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50 1092
40 S P Green C Jones P C Junk K-A Lippert A Stasch Chem Commun 2006 3978
41 S Nagendran S S Sen H W Roesky D Koley H GrubmuLler A Pal R Herbst-Irmer
Organometallics 2008 27 5459
42 W-P Leung W-K Chiu K-H Chong T C W Mak Chem Commun 2009 6822
43 (a) S P Green C Jones A Stasch Science 2007 318 1754 (b) S J Bonyhady S P Green
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 2973 (c) S J Bonyhady
C Jones S Nembenna A Stasch A J Edwards G J Mcintyre Chem Eur J 2010 16 938
44 A Sidiropoulos C Jones A Stasch S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48
9701
45 Y Peng R C Fischer W A Merrill J Fischer L Pu B D Ellis J C Fettinger R H
Herber P P Power Chemical Science 2010 1 461
46 R Jambor B Kašnaacute K N Kirschner M Schuumlrmann K Jurkschat Angew Chem Int Ed
References
- 131 -
2008 47 1650
47 (a) C D Schaeffer J J Zuckerman J Am Chem Soc 1974 96 7160 (b) M J S Gynane
D H Harris M F Lappert P P Power P Riviere M Riviere-Baudet Dalton Trans 1977
2004 (c) M F Lappert P P Power M J Slade L Hedberg K Hedberg V Schomaker
Chem Commun 1979 369 (d) T Fjeldberg H Hope M F Lappert P P Power A J
Thorne Chem Commun 1983 639 (e) M Veith M Jarczyk V Huch Chem Ber 1988
121 347
48 M Veith R Lisowsky Angew Chem Int Ed 1988 27 1087
49 P B Hitchcock M F Lappert A J Thorne Chem Commun 1990 1587
50 R A Bartlett P P Power J Am Chem Soc 1990 112 3660
51 J-T Ahlemann H W Roesky R Murugavel E Parisini M Noltemeyer H-G Schmidt O
Muumlller R Herbst-Irmer L N Markovskii Y G Shermilovich Chem Ber 1997 130 1113
52 R S Ghadwal H W Roesky K Proumlpper B Dittrich S Klein G Frenking Angew Chem
Int Ed 2011 50 5374
53 R W Chorley P B Hitchock B S Jolly M F Lappert G A Lawless Chem Commun
1991 1302
54 A G Avent C Drost B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem
2004 630 2090
55 M Veith A Rammo Z Anorg Allg Chem 2001 627 662
56 M Veith J Fischer T R Prout M Noetzel P Hobein V Huch Inorg Chem 1991 30
4130
57 H Braunschweig P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem Int Ed
1994 33 1156
58 H Braunschweig C Drost P B Hitchcock M F Lappert L J M Pierssens Angew Chem
Int Ed 1997 36 261
59 R E Allan M A Beswick G R Coggan P R Raithby A E H Wheatley D S Wright
Inorg Chem 1997 36 5202
60 (a) C Stanciu S S Hino M Stender A F Richards M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
Chem 2005 44 2774 (b) Y Peng B D Ellis X Wang P P Power J Am Chem Soc
2008 130 12268
61 B Gehrhus P B Hitchcock M F Lappert Z Anorg Allg Chem 2005 631 1383
62 C Cui M M Olmstead J C Fettinger G H Spikes P P Power J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 17530
63 X Wang C Ni Z Zhu J C Fettinger P P Power Inorg Chem 2009 48 2464
64 S S Sen D Kratzert D Stern H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2010 49 5786
65 H-X Yeong H-W Xi K H Lim C-W So Chem Eur J 2010 16 12956
66 (a) F E Hahn A V Zabula T Pape A Hepp Eur J Inorg Chem 2007 2007 2405 (b) A
V Zabula F E Hahn T Pape A Hepp Organometallics 2007 26 1972 (c) A V Zabula T
Pape A Hepp F E Hahn Organometallics 2008 27 2756
67 S-H Zhang C-W So Organometallics 2011 30 2059
68 O T Summerscales M M Olmstead P P Power Organometallics 2011 30 3468
69 (a) M Veith W Frank Angew Chem 1985 97 213 (b) M Veith Angew Chem Int Ed
1987 26 1 (c) H Chen R A Bartlett H V R Dias M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg
References
- 132 -
Chem 1991 30 3390 (d) R E Allan M A Beswick A J Edwards M A Paver M-A
Rennie P R Raithby D S Wright Dalton Trans 1995 1991 (e) W J Grigsby T Hascall
J J Ellison M M Olmstead P P Power Inorg Chem 1996 35 3254 (f) R E Allan M A
Beswick M K Davies P R Raithby A Steiner D S Wright J Organomet Chem 1998
550 71 (g) M E G Mosquera J S Palmer A D Hopkins D S Wright Phosphorus
Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 1999 150 107 (h) M Veith M Opsoumllder M Zimmer V Huch
Eur J Inorg Chem 2000 2000 1143 (i) D R Armstrong F Benevelli A D Bond N
Feeder E A Harron A D Hopkins M Mcpartlin D Moncrieff D Saacuteez E A Quadrelli
A D Woods D S Wright Inorg Chem 2002 41 1492 (j) T Chivers Timothy j Clark M
Krahn M Parvez G Schatte Eur J Inorg Chem 2003 2003 1857 (k) J F Eichler O Just
W S Rees Inorg Chem 2006 45 6706 (l) D J Eisler T Chivers Chem Eur J 2006 12
233 (m) H Vaňkaacutetovaacute L Broeckaert F De Proft R Olejniacutek J Turek Z Padělkovaacute A
Růžička Inorg Chem 2011 50 9454
70 (a) A Meltzer C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 7232 (b) A Meltzer C
Praumlsang C Milsmann M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 3170 (c) H Ogino The
Chemical Record 2002 2 291 (d) S Inoue M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
5614 (e) M Stoelzel C Praumlsang S Inoue S Enthaler M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed
2012 51 399
71 W Yang H Fu H Wang M Chen Y Ding H W Roesky A Jana Inorg Chem 2009 48
5058
72 (a) J Choi A H R Macarthur M Brookhart A S Goldman Chem Rev 2011 111 1761
(b) N Selander K L N J Szaboacute Chem Rev 2011 111 2048 (c) M E Van Der Boom D
Milstein Chem Rev 2003 103 1759
73 W Tang X Zhang Chem Rev 2003 103 3029
74 (a) A P Shaw J R Norton D Buccella L A Sites S S Kleinbach D A Jarem K M
Bocage C Nataro Organometallics 2009 28 3804 (b) L-C Song J-T Liu Q-M Hu G-
F Wang P Zanello M Fontani Organometallics 2000 19 5342 (c) S Shekhar J F
Hartwig J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 13016
75 N A Marinos Modellsysteme fuumlr die [NiFe]-Hydrogenase und Zinkkatalysatoren fuumlr die
Hydrosilylierung Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin Germany 2011
76 (a) C M Jensen D Morales-Morales The Chemistry of Pincer Compounds Elsevier
Science Amsterdam 2007 (b) M Albrecht G Van Koten Angew Chem Int Ed 2001 40
3750 (c) M Albrecht M M Lindner Dalton Trans 2011 40 8733 (d) D Benito-Garagorri
K Kirchner Acc Chem Res 2008 41 201 (e) C Gunanathan D Milstein Acc Chem Res
2011 44 588
77 (a) N Selander K J Szabo Dalton Trans 2009 6267 (b) H Zhang A Lei Dalton Trans
2011 40 8745 (c) J Dupont C S Consorti J Spencer Chem Rev 2005 105 2527
78 Silyl-silylene transition-metal complexes see (a) K Ueno S Seki H Ogino Chem Lett
1993 22 2159 (b) H Tobita H Wada K Ueno H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 2545
(c) K Ueno A Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 5023 (d) H Wada H Tobita
H Ogino Organometallics 1997 16 3870 (e) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino
Organometallics 1998 17 2844 (f) H Tobita H Kurita H Ogino Organometallics 1998
17 2850 (g) H Wada H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 1998 27 993 (h) K Ueno A
References
- 133 -
Masuko H Ogino Organometallics 1999 18 2694 (i) H Tobita T Sato M Okazaki H
Ogino J Organomet Chem 2000 611 314 (j) H Koshikawa M Okazaki S Matsumoto
K Ueno H Tobita H Ogino Chem Lett 2005 34 1412 (k) K Ueno S Ito K Endo H
Tobita S Inomata H Ogino Organometallics 1994 13 3309
79 For reviews on silylene complexes see (a) M S Eisen Transition-Metal Silyl Complexes
In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2003 pp 2037 (b)
M Okazaki H Tobita H Ogino Dalton Trans 2003 493 (c) R Waterman P G Hayes T
D Tilley Acc Chem Res 2007 40 712
80 Y Ding H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt P P Power Organometallics 2001
20 1190
81 L Bourget-Merle M F Lappert J R Severn Chem Rev 2002 102 3031
82 B Raumlke F Zuumllch Y Ding J Prust H W Roesky M Noltemeyer H G Schmidt Z Anorg
Allg Chem 2001 627 836
83 W Wang S Yao C Van WuLlen M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640
84 (a) R West H Sohn D R Powell T Muumlller Y Apeloig Angew Chem Int Ed 1996 35
1002 (b) W P Freeman T D Tilley L M Liable-Sands A L Rheingold J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 10457
85 J Fischer J Baumgartner C Marschner Organometallics 2005 24 1263
86 M Stender A D Phillips P P Power Inorg Chem 2001 40 5314
87 M Driess S Yao M Brym C Van Wuumlllen Angew Chem Int Ed 2006 45 4349
88 W D Woodul A F Richards A Stasch M Driess C Jones Organometallics 2010 29
3655
89 W Clegg E K Cope A J Edwards F S Mair Inorg Chem 1998 37 2317
90 (a) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Matsuno M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2005
127 5768 (b) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Angew Chem Int Ed
2006 45 3269 (c) K Takanashi V Y Lee M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi Eur J Inorg Chem
2007 2007 5471 (d) V Y Lee Y Ito H Yasuda K Takanashi A Sekiguchi J Am Chem
Soc 2011 133 5103
91 S P Mallela S Hill R A Geanangel Inorg Chem 1997 36 6247
92 P V R Schleyer C Maerker A Dransfeld H Jiao N J R V E Hommes J Am Chem
Soc 1996 118 6317
93 For a review see Z Chen C S Wannere C Corminboeuf R Puchta P V R Schleyer
Chem Rev 2005 105 3842
94 (a) R Ahlrichs M Baumlr M Haumlser H Horn C Koumllmel Chem Phys Lett 1989 162 165 (b)
M Haumlser R Ahlrichs J Comput Chem 1989 10 104
95 O Treutler R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1995 102 346
96 (a) A D Becke Phys Rev A 1988 38 3098 (b) J P Perdew Phys Rev B 1986 33 8822
97 (a) A Schaumlfer C Huber R Ahlrichs J Chem Phys 1994 100 5829 (b) K Eichkorn F
Weigend O Treutler R Ahlrichs Theor Chem Acc 1997 97 119
98 K Eichkorn O Treutler H Oumlhm M Haumlser R Ahlrichs Chem Phys Lett 1995 242 652
99 U Meier C Van Wuumlllen M Schindler J Comput Chem 1992 13 551
100 (a) C Van Wuumlllen Chem Phys Lett 1994 219 8 (b) C Van Wuumlllen Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2000 2 2137
References
- 134 -
101 (a) P J Stephens F J Devlin C F Chabalowski M J Frisch J Phys Chem 1994 98
11623 (b) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 1372 (c) C T Lee W T Yang R G Parr
Phys Rev 1988 37 785
102 W Kutzelnigg U Fleischer M Schindler NMR basis principles and progress Springer
Berlin 1990 Vol 23 page 169
103 (a) C Corminboeuf T Heine G Seifert P V R Schleyer J Weber Phys Chem Chem
Phys 2004 6 273 (b) P Von Rague Schleyer M Manoharan Z-X Wang B Kiran H Jiao
R Puchta N J R Van Eikema Hommes Org Lett 2001 3 2465
104 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Chem Commun 2009 2661
105 H Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 1999 18 3159
106 Y Sugiyama T Sasamori Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Takagi S Nagase N Tokitoh J Am
Chem Soc 2006 128 1023
107 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch Organometallics 2003 22 215
108 (a) K H Pannell L Parkanyi H Sharma F Cervantes-Lee Inorg Chem 1992 31 522 (b)
A Kawachi Y Tanaka K Tamao J Organomet Chem 1999 590 15
109 Y Xiong S Yao M Driess Chem Asian J 2009 4 1323
110 W Wang S Inoue S Yao M Driess Organometallics 2011 30 6490
111 W Keim S Killat C F Nobile G P Suranna U Englert R Wang S Mecking L D
Schroumlder J Organomet Chem 2002 662 150
112 P H M Budzelaar A B Van Ort A G Orpen Eur J Inorg Chem 1998 1485
113 N M Scott R Dorta E D Stevens A Correa L Cavallo S P Nolan J Am Chem Soc
2005 127 3516
114 L W Pineda V Jancik H W Roesky D Neculai A M Neculai Angew Chem Int Ed
2004 43 1419
115 A Jana I Objartel H W Roesky D Stalke Inorg Chem 2009 48 798
116 S S Sen G Tavcar H W Roesky D Kratzert J Hey D Stalke Organometallics 2010 29
2343
117 R West J Am Chem Soc 1953 75 1002
118 R Drake I Mackinnon R Taylor Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Siloxane Polymers
and Copolymers In The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds John Wiley amp Sons Ltd
2003 pp 2217
119 (a) A D Becke J Chem Phys 1993 98 5648 (b) B Miehlich A Savin H Stoll H
Preuss Chem Phys Lett 1989 157 200 (c) Gussian 03 Revision E01 M J Frisch G W
Trucks H B Schlegel G E Scuseria M A Robb J R Cheeseman J A Montgomery Jr
T Vreven K N Kudin J C Burant J M Millam S S Iyengar J Tomasi V Barone B
Mennucci M Cossi G Scalmani N Rega G A Petersson H Nakatsuji M Hada M
Ehara K Toyota R Fukuda J Hasegawa M Ishida T Nakajima Y Honda O Kitao H
Nakai M Klene X Li J E Knox H P Hratchian J B Cross V Bakken C Adamo J
Jaramillo R Gomperts R E Stratmann O Yazyev A J Austin R Cammi C Pomelli J W
Ochterski P Y Ayala K Morokuma G A Voth P Salvador J J Dannenberg V G
Zakrzewski S Dapprich A D Daniels M C Strain O Farkas D K Malick A D Rabuck
K Raghavachari J B Foresman J V Ortiz Q Cui A G Baboul S Clifford J Cioslowski
B B Stefanov G Liu A Liashenko P Piskorz I Komaromi R L Martin D J Fox T
References
- 135 -
Keith M A Al-Laham C Y Peng A Nanayakkara M Challacombe P M W Gill B
Johnson W Chen M W Wong C Gonzalez and J A Pople Gaussian Inc Wallingford
CT 2004
120 M Denk R K Hayashi R West Chem Commun 1994 33
121 L Kong J Zhang H Song C Cui Dalton Trans 2009 5444
122 A Meltzer S Inoue C Praumlsang M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 3038
123 P Macchi D M Proserpio A Sironi J Am Chem Soc 1998 120 1447
124 (a) M Regitz O J Scherer Multiple bonds and Low Coordination in Phosphorus Chemistry
New York 1990 p 5 (b) M Driess Coord Chem Rev 1995 145 1 (c) V Y Lee A
Sekiguchi J Escudieacute H Ranaivonjatovo Chem Lett 2010 39 312
125 C N Smit F M Lock F Bickelhaupt Tetrahedron Lett 1984 25 3011
126 (a) C N Smit F Bickelhaupt Organometallics 1987 6 1156 (b) E Niecke E Klein M
Nieger Angew Chem Int Ed 1989 28 751 (c) R Corriu G Lanneau C Priou Angew
Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1130 (d) M Driess Angew Chem Int Ed 1991 30 1022 (e) H R
G Bender E Niecke M Nieger J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 3314 (f) M Driess S Rell
H Pritzkow Chem Commun 1995 253 (g) M Driess H Pritzkow S Rell U Winkler
Organometallics 1996 15 1845 (h) M Driess S Block M Brym M T Gamer Angew
Chem Int Ed 2006 45 2293 (i) S Yao S Block M Brym M Driess Chem Commun
2007 3844 (j) V Y Lee M Kawai A Sekiguchi H Ranaivonjatovo J Escudieacute
Organometallics 2009 28 6625 (k) B Li T Matsuo D Hashizume H Fueno K Tanaka
K Tamao J Am Chem Soc 2009 131 13222
127 (a) C H Lai M D Su S Y Chu Inorg Chem 2002 41 1320 (b) R Pietschnig A
Orthaber Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4570 (c) C H Chen M D Su Eur J Inorg Chem
2008 1241 (d) V Lattanzi S Thorwirth D T Halfen L A Mueck L M Ziurys P
Thaddeus J Gauss M C Mccarthy Angew Chem Int Ed 2010 49 5661
128 S Inoue W Wang C Praumlsang M Asay E Irran M Driess J Am Chem Soc 2011 133
2868
129 (a) R Appel W A Paulen Angew Chem Int Ed 1981 20 869 (b) V Cappello J
Baumgartner A Dransfeld K Hassler Eur J Inorg Chem 2006 4589
130 M Igarashi M Ichinohe A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 12660
131 F A Cotton G Wilkinson C Murillo M Bochmann Advanced Inorganic Chemistry 1999
132 (a) N Wiberg C M M Finger K Polborn Angew Chem Int Ed 1993 32 1054 (b) M
Ichinohe M Toyoshima R Kinjo A Sekiguchi J Am Chem Soc 2003 125 13328
133 (a) A J Arduengo H V R Dias J C Calabrese F Davidson Inorg Chem 1993 32 1541
(b) N Kuhn T Kratz D Blaumlser R Boese Chem Ber 1995 128 245 (c) P A Rupar M C
Jennings K M Baines Organometallics 2008 27 5043 (d) A J Ruddy P A Rupar K J
Bladek C J Allan J C Avery K M Baines Organometallics 2010 29 1362
134 A Schaumlfer W Saak M Weidenbruch H Marsmann G Henkel Chem Ber 1997 130 1733
135 (a) D Morales-Morales C Grause K Kasaoka R O Redoacuten R E Cramer C M Jensen
Inorg Chim Acta 2000 300ndash302 958 (b) T Kimura Y Uozumi Organometallics 2006 25
4883 (c) R B Bedford M Betham J P H Charmant M F Haddow A G Orpen L T
Pilarski S J Coles M B Hursthouse Organometallics 2007 26 6346 (d) J Aydin K S
Kumar L Eriksson K J Szaboacute Adv Syn Catal 2007 349 2585 (e) J-F Gong Y-H
References
- 136 -
Zhang M-P Song C Xu Organometallics 2007 26 6487 (f) R A Baber R B Bedford
M Betham M E Blake S J Coles M F Haddow M B Hursthouse A G Orpen L T
Pilarski P G Pringle R L Wingad Chem Commun 2006 3880 (g) A V Polukeev S A
Kuklin P V Petrovskii S M Peregudova A F Smolyakov F M Dolgushin A A
Koridze Dalton Trans 2011 40 7201 (h) R B Bedford Y-N Chang M F Haddow C L
Mcmullin Dalton Trans 2011 40 9034
136 (a) C Watanabe T Iwamoto C Kabuto M Kira Angew Chem Int Ed 2008 47 5386 (b)
C Watanabe Y Inagawa T Iwamoto M Kira Dalton Trans 2010 39 9414
137 (a) G Tavcar S S Sen R Azhakar A Thorn H W Roesky Inorg Chem 2010 49 10199
(b) R Azhakar S P Sarish H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Inorg Chem 2011 50 5039
138 W Chen P J Mccormack K Mohammed W Mbafor S M Roberts J Whittall Angew
Chem Int Ed 2007 46 4141
139 (a) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Organometallics 2008 27
3325 (b) T Sasamori A Yuasa Y Hosoi Y Furukawa N Tokitoh Bull Chem Soc Jpn
2009 82 793
140 (a) F Baumann E Dormann Y Ehleiter W Kaim J Kaumlrcher M Kelemen R Krammer D
Saurenz D Stalke C Wachter G Wolmershaumluser H Sitzmann J Organomet Chem 1999
587 267 (b) F Hung-Low C A Bradley Organometallics 2011 30 2636 (c) F Hung-Low
J P Krogman J W Tye C A Bradley Chem Commun 2012 48 368
141 R Azhakar R S Ghadwal H W Roesky J Hey D Stalke Chem Asian J 2012 7 528
142 R S Ghadwal R Azhakar K ProPper J J Holstein B Dittrich H W Roesky Inorg
Chem 2011 50 8502
143 J Li S Merkel J Henn K Meindl A DoRing H W Roesky R S Ghadwal D Stalke
Inorg Chem 2010 49 775
144 M Ingleson H Fan M Pink J Tomaszewski K G Caulton J Am Chem Soc 2006 128
1804
145 A Schnepf Z Anorg Allg Chem 2006 632 935
146 (a) M D Rausch R A Genetti J Org Chem 1970 35 3888 (b) F Ungvary A Sisak L
Markoacute J Organomet Chem 1980 188 373
147 (a) E Erdik Tetrahedron 1992 48 9577 (b) P Knochel R D Singer Chem Rev 1993 93
2117 (c) M Rottlaumlnder P Knochel Tetrahedron Lett 1997 38 1749
148 (a) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1978 17 505 (b) K P C Vollhardt Angew Chem
Int Ed 1984 23 539 (c) H Boumlnnemann Angew Chem Int Ed 1985 24 248 (d) W Hess
J Treutwein G Hilt Synthesis 2008 2008 3537 (e) C J Scheuermann B D Ward New J
Chem 2008 32 1850 (f) T Shibata K Tsuchikama Org Biomol Chem 2008 6 1317 (g)
K Tanaka Chem Asian J 2009 4 508 (h) J A Varela C Saaacute Synlett 2008 2008 2571
149 (a) G Hilt C Hengst W Hess Eur J Org Chem 2008 2008 2293 (b) A Geny N Agenet
L Iannazzo M Malacria C Aubert V Gandon Angew Chem Int Ed 2009 48 1810 (c)
C C Eichman J P Bragdon J P Stambuli Synlett 2011 2011 1109
150 (a) Y Wakatsuki H Yamazaki Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1985 58 2715 (b) Y B Taarit Y
Diab B Elleuch M Kerkani M Chihaoui Chem Commun 1986 402 (c) H Nehl Chem
Ber 1994 127 2535 (d) C Wang X Li F Wu B Wan Angew Chem Int Ed 2011 50
7162
References
- 137 -
151 G M Sheldrick SHELX-97 Program for Crystal Structure Determination Universitaumlt
Goumlttingen (Germany) 1997
152 P Schlack G Keil Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie 1963 661 72
Appendix
- 138 -
7 APPENDIX
71 Abbreviations
Ada adamantanyl MHz Megahertz
Ar aryl min minute(s)
mmol millimole(ar)
MS mass spectrometry
B3LYP Beckersquos three-parameter hybrid
functional using the Lee Yang
and Parr correlation ldquofunctionalrdquo MW molecular weight
BINAP 22rsquo-(Ph2P)2-11rsquo-binaphthyl mz masscharge
br broad nacnac HC(MeC=N-Dip) 2minus
tBu tert-butyl Naph naphthyl
degC Celsius degree NBO natural bond orbital
ca about NHC N-Heterocyclic Carbene
calc calculated NICS nucleus independent chemical shift
CBD cyclobutadiene NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
cod COD 15-cyclooctadiene NPA natural population analysis
Cp cyclopentadienyl Ph phenyl
d doublet ppm parts per million
DCM dichloromethane iPr iso-propyl
DFT density functional theory q quartet
Dip 26-iPr2C6H3 R organic substituent
EI electron impact ionization RT room temperature
equiv equivalent(s) s singlet strong
ESI electrospray ionization sept septet
Et ethyl t triplet
eV electronvolt THF tetrahydrofuran
Fc ferrocendiyl Tip 246-iPr2C6H2
g gram(s) TMEDA tetramethylethyldiamine
h hour(s) TMS tetramethylsilane
HOMO highest occupied molecular orbital TS transition state
Hz Hertz TZVP triple-zeta valence polarization
IR infrared
K Kelvin
TZVDP TZVP two sets of polarization
functions aL PhC(
tBuN)2
minus UV-vis ultraviolet-visible
VE valence electron LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital vs very strong
M Metal VT variable temperature
m multiplet medium w weak
Me methyl WBI Wiberg Bond Index
Mes mesityl 246-Me3-C6H2 δ chemical shift
Appendix
- 139 -
GeN
N
GeN
Dip
Dip
DipCl
N
SnN
Dip
Dip
GeNN
SnN
Dip
DipDip
N
Dip
6 7
72 Index of compounds discussed in this dissertation
1 2 3 4
5 8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22
Appendix
- 140 -
23 24 25 26
27 28 29
30 31 32 33
34 35 36
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph
Si
Cl
37 38 39 40
Appendix
- 141 -
tBu
N
N
tBu
PhSi
tBu
N
N
tBu
Ph Si
Co
Fe
41 42 43
44 45 46
47a 47b 48a 48b
Appendix
- 142 -
73 Crystal Data and Refinement Details
Table 731 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 3 4 5
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C50 H88 Ge2 K2 N2 O4
100460
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
106989(7) pm
114137(7) pm
122625(8) pm
74158(6) deg
76395(6) deg
83400(5) deg
139807(16)
1
1193
1263
536
028 x 02 x 018
326 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-13lt=klt=13
-14lt=llt=14
12268
4910 [R(int) = 00358]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 094847
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4910 0 281
0940
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00638
R1 = 00538 wR2 = 00666
0456 and -0223
C41 H5 Ge N3
66650
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
91129(6) pm
113531(7) pm
190282(10) pm
100360(5) deg
101854(5) deg
98627(5) deg
185918(19)
2
1191
0855
716
039 x 012 x 007
297 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-13lt=klt=13
-22lt=llt=22
14570
6543 [R(int) = 00560]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
0943 and 0777
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6543 0 420
0785
R1 = 00399 wR2 = 00513
R1 = 00853 wR2 = 00566
0577 and -0317
C66 H102 Ge4 K2 N4 O2
135208
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
12370(3) pm
148433(14) pm
188725(19) pm
90059(8)deg
96311(14)deg
90082(13)deg
34442(10)
2
1304
1892
1416
030 x 025 x 015
292 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-15lt=klt=17
-14lt=llt=22
17371
6032 [R(int) = 00487]
995
Analytical
0807 and 0584
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6032 2 364
0911
R1 = 00424 wR2 = 00801
R1 = 00874 wR2 = 00885
0497 and -0457
Appendix
- 143 -
Table 732 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 6 8 12
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C46 H65 Ge2 N3
80519
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
44536(2) pm
98204(5) pm
218135(10) pm
90deg
116030(4)deg
90deg
85727(7)
8
1248
1436
3408
038 x 024 x 010
305 to 2500deg
-49lt=hlt=52
-10lt=klt=11
-24lt=llt=25
20162
7493 [R(int) = 00954]
992
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 074676
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7493 0 476
0917
R1 = 00559 wR2 = 00778
R1 = 01461 wR2 = 00966
0590 and -0578
C46 H65 Ge N3 Sn
85129
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
867780(10) pm
120514(4) pm
210797(6) pm
96333(2)deg
97393(2)deg
99141(2)deg
213908(10)
2
1322
1320
888
016 x 014 x 012
295 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-14lt=klt=14
-25lt=llt=25
16936
7496 [R(int) = 00251]
994
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099037
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7496 0 495
1001
R1 = 00309 wR2 = 00706
R1 = 00437 wR2 = 00733
1468 and -0424
C37 H48 N2
52077
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108485(5) pm
127284(7) pm
132348(4) pm
65748(4)deg
86290(3)deg
71699(5)deg
157759(12)
2
1096
0063
568
029 x 022 x 018
298 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13428
5541 [R(int) = 00203]
998
None
09888 and 09820
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5541 0 364
1029
R1 = 00439 wR2 = 00900
R1 = 00633 wR2 = 00963
0188 and -0193
Appendix
- 144 -
Table 733 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 14 16 17
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H46 Cl Ge N2
62680
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117621(2) pm
175495(4) pm
166051(3) pm
90deg
107053(2)deg
90deg
327691(11)
4
1270
1044
1324
040 x 032 x 022
342 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-19lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=18
16923
5742 [R(int) = 00250]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 082078
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5742 0 378
1044
R1 = 00328 wR2 = 00709
R1 = 00496 wR2 = 00742
0736 and -0362
C37 H46 Ge N2
59135
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
108388(6) pm
127885(7) pm
132778(4) pm
66971(4)deg
85749(3)deg
71833(5)deg
160695(13)
2
1222
0980
628
029 x 015 x 007
307 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-15lt=llt=15
13501
5636 [R(int) = 00366]
996
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 092510
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5636 0 369
1031
R1 = 00489 wR2 = 01180
R1 = 00691 wR2 = 01242
0539 and -0501
C37 H49 Ge N3
60838
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117714(4) pm
174309(6) pm
166868(6) pm
90deg
106866(4)deg
90deg
32766(2)
4
1233
0964
1296
030 x 023 x 019
342 to 2500deg
-8lt=hlt=13
-10lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=16
12816
5749 [R(int) = 00325]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 095425
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5749 0 378
1060
R1 = 00464 wR2 = 01084
R1 = 00699 wR2 = 01133
1717 and -0738
Appendix
- 145 -
Table 734 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 18 20 22
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C37 H48 Ge N2 O
60936
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
117560(3) pm
174116(5) pm
166421(4) pm
90deg
106992(3)deg
90deg
325778(15)
4
1242
0971
1296
031 x 014 x 005
343 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=13
-20lt=klt=20
-19lt=llt=19
23624
5720 [R(int) = 00371]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 083390
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5720 0 379
1018
R1 = 00336 wR2 = 00752
R1 = 00516 wR2 = 00789
0521 and -0366
C28 H38 N2
40260
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
94924(4) pm
256583(9) pm
107465(5) pm
90deg
110403(5)deg
90deg
245320(18)
4
1090
0063
880
017 x 015 x 013
343 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=10
-30lt=klt=27
-12lt=llt=11
8561
4313 [R(int) = 00209]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 099057
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4313 0 281
1041
R1 = 00476 wR2 = 01015
R1 = 00771 wR2 = 01083
0253 and -0194
C28 H37 Cl Ge N2 O
52564
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
89021(3) pm
107319(4) pm
151176(6) pm
75734(4)deg
74781(3)deg
75311(3)deg
132282(8)
2
1320
1281
552
020 x 012 x 008
354 to 2500deg
-10lt=hlt=10
-12lt=klt=12
-15lt=llt=17
9246
4654 [R(int) = 00211]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086160
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4654 0 304
0946
R1 = 00274 wR2 = 00579
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00597
0394 and -0264
Appendix
- 146 -
Table 735 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 23 27 28
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C28 H36 Cl2 Ge N2
54408
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
279616(13) pm
113538(3) pm
177729(7) pm
90deg
109718(5)deg
90deg
53115(4)
8
1361
1374
2272
021 x 017 x 015
332 to 2500deg
-25lt=hlt=33
-7lt=klt=13
-21lt=llt=20
10951
4663 [R(int) = 00459]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091223
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4663 0 304
0856
R1 = 00372 wR2 = 00584
R1 = 00684 wR2 = 00620
0589 and -0533
C30 H48 Cl2 N4 O Si2
60780
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121593(5) pm
162045(6) pm
171248(7) pm
90deg
98177(4)deg
90deg
33399(2)
4
1209
0295
1304
030 x 015 x 005
335 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=13
-16lt=klt=19
-20lt=llt=20
23741
5865 [R(int) = 00491]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 086688
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
5865 172 490
1035
R1 = 00543 wR2 = 01080
R1 = 00905 wR2 = 01194
0310 and -0412
C30 H46 N4 O Si2
53489
150(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Fdd2
31188(2) pm
39120(3) pm
102620(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
125204(14)
16
1135
0141
4640
031 x 011 x 007
334 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=36
-46lt=klt=45
-12lt=llt=12
11517
4372 [R(int) = 00656]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 097469
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4372 1 346
0897
R1 = 00488 wR2 = 00604
R1 = 00754 wR2 = 00650
0328 and -0229
Appendix
- 147 -
Table 736 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 29 30 31
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C38 H58 N4 Ni O Si2
70177
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
98776(8) pm
129530(11) pm
155488(13) pm
81634(7)deg
83316(7)deg
82826(7)deg
19430(3)
2
1200
0594
756
020 x 009 x 007
330 to 2500deg
-11lt=hlt=11
-15lt=klt=13
-18lt=llt=18
14961
6828 [R(int) = 00414]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 091998
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6828 0 474
0948
R1 = 00386 wR2 = 00807
R1 = 00605 wR2 = 00853
0407 and -0240
C21 H41 N2 P Si3
43680
173(2)
71073
Orthorhombic
Pbca
193556(7) pm
142399(4) pm
199777(6) pm
90deg
90deg
90deg
55063(3)
8
1054
0239
1904
039 x 036 x 016
351 to 2500deg
-13lt=hlt=23
-16lt=klt=16
-23lt=llt=22
19912
4836 [R(int) = 00961]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09627 and 09125
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
4836 18 287
0906
R1 = 00571 wR2 = 00889
R1 = 01270 wR2 = 01032
0316 and -0214
C44 H60 N4 P2 Si2
76308
173(2)
71073
Monoclinic
C2c
23841(3) pm
101993(12) pm
19369(2) pm
90deg
108346(12)deg
90deg
44703(9)
4
1134
0184
1640
076 x 057 x 055
353 to 2500deg
-28lt=hlt=28
-12lt=klt=12
-20lt=llt=23
16197
3927 [R(int) = 00447]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09053 and 08725
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
3927 0 251
1034
R1 = 00618 wR2 = 01393
R1 = 00843 wR2 = 01489
0721 and -0649
Appendix
- 148 -
Table 737 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 33 36 40-endo
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C56 H98 Cl4 N6 Si6 Sn2
140312
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
105159(4) pm
127622(6) pm
269391(12) pm
90310(4)deg
90855(3)deg
102927(3)deg
35232(3)
2
1323
1000
1456
013 x 012 x 009
336 to 2500deg
-12lt=hlt=12
-15lt=klt=15
-29lt=llt=32
25757
12396 [R(int) = 00546]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
09154 and 08810
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
12396 536 816
2077
R1 = 01231 wR2 = 01906
R1 = 01495 wR2 = 01944
1510 and -4753
C91 H139 N8 O4 Pd Si4
162786
150(2)
71073
Triclinic
P-1
145970(8) pm
151441(15) pm
232982(16) pm
71358(8)deg
74666(5)deg
85365(6)deg
47063(6)
2
1149
0298
1750
019 x 013 x 011
327 to 2500deg
-17lt=hlt=17
-17lt=klt=18
-27lt=llt=27
41022
16531 [R(int) = 00735]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
09679 and 09455
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
16531 284 1112
0908
R1 = 00558 wR2 = 01021
R1 = 01075 wR2 = 01128
0688 and -0448
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
10532(3) pm
20258(5) pm
18990(5) pm
90deg
10542(3)deg
90deg
39060(19)
4
1347
1927
1648
012 x 008 x 005
322 to 2500deg
-6lt=hlt=12
-22lt=klt=24
-22lt=llt=21
16887
6870 [R(int) = 01353]
997
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 073478
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
6870 213 498
1044
R1 = 00912 wR2 = 01786
R1 = 01680 wR2 = 02282
0570 and -1404
Appendix
- 149 -
Table 738 Crystal data and refinement
Compound 40-exo 41 42
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (pm)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
a (pm)
b (pm)
c (pm)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
Volume (nm3)
Z
Density (calc) (gcm3)
Absorp Coeffic (mm-1
)
F(000)
Crystal size (mm3)
θ range for data collec
Index ranges
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Completeness to θ = 2500deg
Absorption correction
Max amp min transmission
Refinement method
Data restraints parameters
Goodness of fit on F2
Final R indices [Igt2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest peak amp hole (eAring-3
)
C40 H54 Fe Ge2 N4
79190
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21n
165582(11) pm
127695(7) pm
198175(12) pm
90deg
107428(7)deg
90deg
39979(4)
4
1316
1883
1648
012 x 011 x 009
337 to 2499deg
-16lt=hlt=19
-15lt=klt=15
-23lt=llt=23
29049
7015 [R(int) = 00329]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 052405
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7015 0 436
1065
R1 = 00263 wR2 = 00574
R1 = 00318 wR2 = 00595
0357 and -0360
C45 H59 Co Fe N4 Si2
82692
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
119176(7) pm
160794(9) pm
220424(13) pm
90deg
94402(5)deg
90deg
42115(4)
4
1304
0831
1752
015 x 013 x 007
323 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=17
-16lt=llt=26
17786
7404 [R(int) = 01111]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 075122
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7404 0 490
1052
R1 = 00717 wR2 = 01045
R1 = 01208 wR2 = 01181
0467 and -0370
C45 H59 Co Fe Ge2 N4
91592
150(2)
71073
Monoclinic
P21c
121662(3) pm
160596(3) pm
220073(5) pm
90deg
93549(2)deg
90deg
429163(16)
4
1418
2134
1896
015 x 011 x 008
336 to 2500deg
-14lt=hlt=14
-19lt=klt=19
-26lt=llt=26
33743
7539 [R(int) = 00521]
998
Semi-empirical from equiv
100000 and 068509
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
7539 0 521
1259
R1 = 00400 wR2 = 00965
R1 = 00536 wR2 = 01000
0376 and -0373
Appendix
- 150 -
Atomic coordinates of four unpublished compounds 20 22 23 and 33 are shown in
following tables
Table 739 Atomic coordinates (times10
4) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 20 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
N(1) 1159(1) 1176(1) 6836(1) 20(1)
C(1) 1706(2) 1650(1) 6995(1) 21(1)
N(2) -1293(2) 1547(1) 7057(1) 23(1)
C(2) 789(2) 2089(1) 7078(1) 20(1)
C(3) -626(2) 2021(1) 7158(1) 20(1)
C(4) 3331(2) 1741(1) 7112(2) 29(1)
C(5) 3920(2) 2283(1) 7590(2) 34(1)
C(6) 2795(2) 2681(1) 6772(2) 35(1)
C(7) 1375(2) 2643(1) 7102(2) 27(1)
C(8) -1522(2) 2482(1) 7295(2) 21(1)
C(9) -2759(2) 2643(1) 6227(2) 27(1)
C(10) -3571(2) 3077(1) 6331(2) 33(1)
C(11) -3169(2) 3358(1) 7498(2) 35(1)
C(12) -1948(2) 3199(1) 8573(2) 32(1)
C(13) -1133(2) 2765(1) 8467(2) 27(1)
C(14) -2537(2) 1417(1) 7503(2) 35(1)
C(15) -3250(3) 920(1) 6823(2) 61(1)
C(16) -1974(3) 1344(1) 9002(2) 65(1)
C(17) 2080(2) 741(1) 6834(2) 20(1)
C(18) 2353(2) 597(1) 5670(2) 23(1)
C(19) 3237(2) 160(1) 5724(2) 29(1)
C(20) 3821(2) -131(1) 6867(2) 32(1)
C(21) 3480(2) -1(1) 7977(2) 29(1)
C(22) 2598(2) 427(1) 7984(2) 23(1)
C(23) 2150(2) 562(1) 9174(2) 28(1)
C(24) 2101(2) 91(1) 10028(2) 39(1)
C(25) 3156(2) 987(1) 10029(2) 42(1)
C(26) 1602(2) 885(1) 4374(2) 29(1)
C(27) 2645(3) 974(1) 3586(2) 53(1)
C(28) 195(3) 588(1) 3539(2) 54(1)
Appendix
- 151 -
Table 7310 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 22 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 4751(1) 5279(1) 3913(1) 24(1)
Cl(1) 4863(1) 7474(1) 3443(1) 35(1)
O(1) 2591(1) 5468(1) 4187(1) 20(1)
N(1) 4469(2) 5098(1) 2623(1) 17(1)
C(1) 3006(2) 5278(2) 2582(1) 16(1)
N(2) 1482(2) 7765(2) 2375(1) 20(1)
C(2) 2432(2) 5062(2) 1801(1) 21(1)
C(3) 1144(2) 4228(2) 2174(2) 31(1)
C(4) -158(2) 4793(2) 2933(2) 30(1)
C(5) 534(2) 4844(2) 3741(1) 21(1)
C(6) 1810(2) 5684(2) 3440(1) 17(1)
C(7) 1063(2) 7152(2) 3205(1) 18(1)
C(8) 820(2) 9172(2) 2096(1) 26(1)
C(9) 397(3) 9344(2) 1159(2) 40(1)
C(10) 2058(3) 9950(2) 2035(2) 43(1)
C(11) -95(2) 7719(2) 3998(1) 18(1)
C(12) 434(2) 8108(2) 4652(1) 22(1)
C(13) -648(2) 8637(2) 5376(1) 27(1)
C(14) -2259(2) 8769(2) 5459(2) 30(1)
C(15) -2795(2) 8370(2) 4815(2) 30(1)
C(16) -1724(2) 7845(2) 4085(1) 24(1)
C(17) 5786(2) 4690(2) 1889(1) 19(1)
C(18) 6546(2) 3361(2) 1997(1) 22(1)
C(19) 7868(2) 3005(2) 1310(2) 28(1)
C(20) 8423(2) 3902(2) 552(2) 29(1)
C(21) 7656(2) 5209(2) 464(1) 26(1)
C(22) 6329(2) 5635(2) 1128(1) 21(1)
C(23) 5549(2) 7085(2) 991(2) 26(1)
C(24) 6701(3) 7932(2) 989(2) 41(1)
C(25) 4931(3) 7520(2) 84(2) 40(1)
C(26) 6001(2) 2315(2) 2820(2) 27(1)
C(27) 5775(3) 1139(2) 2495(2) 40(1)
C(28) 7175(3) 1863(2) 3471(2) 38(1)
Appendix
- 152 -
Table 7311 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 23 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Ge(1) 967(1) 7605(1) 1823(1) 18(1)
Cl(1) 1020(1) 9314(1) 2345(1) 29(1)
N(1) 1401(1) 6550(2) 2449(1) 19(1)
C(1) 1534(1) 5601(2) 2029(2) 16(1)
Cl(2) 198(1) 7116(1) 1640(1) 31(1)
N(2) 1101(1) 7630(2) 909(1) 15(1)
C(2) 1548(1) 5691(2) 1285(2) 15(1)
C(3) 1442(1) 6764(2) 777(2) 14(1)
C(4) 1615(1) 6867(2) 172(2) 19(1)
C(5) 1945(1) 5989(2) -42(2) 26(1)
C(6) 2098(1) 4966(2) 547(2) 22(1)
C(7) 1669(1) 4652(2) 844(2) 21(1)
C(8) 1625(1) 4444(2) 2470(2) 17(1)
C(9) 1229(1) 3875(2) 2611(2) 23(1)
C(10) 1291(1) 2785(2) 2983(2) 29(1)
C(11) 1764(2) 2263(3) 3232(2) 32(1)
C(12) 2169(1) 2832(3) 3121(2) 30(1)
C(13) 2101(1) 3920(2) 2737(2) 22(1)
C(14) 1621(1) 6630(2) 3327(2) 20(1)
C(15) 1219(1) 6848(3) 3699(2) 32(1)
C(16) 2052(1) 7524(2) 3583(2) 34(1)
C(17) 833(1) 8395(2) 248(2) 17(1)
C(18) 1019(1) 9542(2) 207(2) 19(1)
C(19) 745(1) 10248(3) -431(2) 29(1)
C(20) 315(1) 9844(3) -1011(2) 36(1)
C(21) 147(1) 8718(3) -973(2) 33(1)
C(22) 399(1) 7960(2) -350(2) 20(1)
C(23) 215(1) 6700(2) -377(2) 23(1)
C(24) 329(1) 6020(3) -1045(2) 34(1)
C(25) -341(1) 6612(3) -475(2) 31(1)
C(26) 1517(1) 10001(2) 789(2) 22(1)
C(27) 1914(1) 10083(3) 375(2) 32(1)
C(28) 1463(1) 11198(2) 1144(2) 36(1)
Appendix
- 153 -
Table 7312 Atomic coordinates (times104) and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Aring
2times10
3)
for 33 U(eq) is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor
x y z U(eq)
Sn(1) 4689(1) 4918(1) 3222(1) 24(1)
Sn(2) 5822(1) 5994(1) 1674(1) 30(1)
Cl(1) 4488(3) 6215(2) 3883(1) 38(1)
Cl(2) 3266(2) 3378(2) 3638(1) 39(1)
Cl(3) 7188(2) 7769(2) 1449(1) 43(1)
Cl(4) 6104(3) 5090(3) 888(1) 57(1)
Si(1) 6825(2) 4259(2) 3587(1) 17(1)
Si(2) 8610(3) 6420(2) 3531(1) 28(1)
Si(3) 9814(2) 4466(2) 3664(1) 26(1)
Si(4) 3648(2) 6680(2) 1375(1) 21(1)
Si(5) 1981(3) 4463(2) 1299(1) 30(1)
Si(6) 649(3) 6348(2) 1247(1) 30(1)
N(1) 6586(7) 2924(5) 3299(3) 20(2)
N(2) 6484(6) 3264(5) 4080(3) 16(2)
N(3) 8389(7) 5001(5) 3582(3) 23(2)
N(4) 3751(7) 7937(6) 1722(3) 22(2)
N(5) 3959(8) 7800(6) 936(3) 27(2)
N(6) 2102(7) 5865(6) 1329(3) 24(2)
C(1) 6258(8) 2470(7) 3742(4) 24(2)
C(2) 5630(8) 1296(7) 3832(3) 20(2)
C(3) 4328(9) 879(7) 3742(4) 30(2)
C(4) 3826(11) -209(8) 3826(4) 44(3)
C(5) 4613(12) -855(8) 3977(4) 47(3)
C(6) 5921(13) -450(9) 4064(4) 54(3)
C(7) 6446(10) 640(8) 3992(4) 36(3)
C(8) 6469(9) 2487(7) 2787(3) 22(2)
C(9) 7183(11) 3385(8) 2465(4) 43(3)
C(10) 5041(10) 2180(9) 2612(4) 44(3)
C(11) 7093(12) 1524(8) 2741(4) 49(3)
C(12) 6251(9) 3286(8) 4625(3) 26(2)
C(13) 4851(10) 2720(9) 4759(4) 48(3)
C(14) 7218(10) 2783(8) 4908(4) 39(3)
C(15) 6455(10) 4474(7) 4759(4) 31(2)
C(16) 7585(10) 6750(8) 3014(4) 43(3)
C(17) 8192(11) 7005(8) 4123(4) 44(3)
C(18) 10317(10) 7108(8) 3367(5) 55(4)
C(19) 10809(9) 4684(9) 3087(4) 39(3)
C(20) 9461(9) 3008(7) 3775(4) 30(2)
Appendix
- 154 -
C(21) 10726(10) 5062(9) 4232(4) 41(3)
C(22) 4144(9) 8514(7) 1315(3) 22(2)
C(23) 4603(10) 9700(7) 1286(3) 30(2)
C(24) 5918(10) 10173(8) 1332(4) 36(3)
C(25) 6315(12) 11289(9) 1292(4) 46(3)
C(26) 5453(14) 11926(9) 1203(4) 50(3)
C(27) 4158(14) 11457(9) 1158(4) 52(3)
C(28) 3726(12) 10336(8) 1194(4) 41(3)
C(29) 3829(9) 8261(7) 2260(3) 24(2)
C(30) 3041(13) 9101(10) 2358(4) 65(4)
C(31) 3223(10) 7251(8) 2537(4) 41(3)
C(32) 5223(10) 8649(10) 2438(4) 59(4)
C(33) 4252(10) 7910(8) 398(3) 30(2)
C(34) 3489(13) 8669(11) 158(4) 67(4)
C(35) 3812(13) 6813(9) 170(4) 60(4)
C(36) 5705(11) 8321(11) 315(4) 63(4)
C(37) 3040(11) 4003(8) 1778(4) 49(3)
C(38) 2431(11) 4059(8) 669(4) 44(3)
C(39) 310(10) 3713(8) 1447(5) 48(3)
C(40) -433(9) 5964(9) 1795(4) 43(3)
C(41) 921(10) 7835(9) 1209(4) 48(3)
C(42) -186(11) 5795(10) 650(4) 57(4)
C(43) -180(17) 209(14) 3445(7) 59(3)
C(44) -1099(17) -417(14) 3132(7) 58(3)
C(45) -949(16) -322(14) 2634(7) 58(2)
C(46) 75(15) 387(13) 2440(7) 58(2)
C(47) 979(17) 1008(14) 2750(6) 60(2)
C(48) 829(17) 908(15) 3251(7) 60(3)
C(49) 210(20) 473(17) 1887(7) 58(3)
C(43A) 798(17) 917(14) 2044(7) 58(3)
C(44A) 1381(17) 1418(14) 2465(7) 59(3)
C(45A) 931(16) 1088(14) 2929(7) 59(3)
C(46A) -134(15) 231(13) 2969(7) 58(2)
C(47A) -748(17) -263(14) 2547(6) 58(2)
C(48A) -289(17) 75(14) 2084(7) 58(2)
C(49A) -640(20) -111(17) 3469(8) 60(3)
C(50) 120(20) -463(18) -179(10) 106(6)
C(51) -640(30) -620(20) 236(10) 106(6)
C(52) -730(20) 250(20) 530(10) 107(6)
C(53) -70(30) 1260(20) 404(11) 109(6)
C(54) 680(20) 1409(19) -10(11) 107(6)
C(55) 780(30) 558(19) -303(11) 106(6)
C(56) 250(30) -1390(20) -499(12) 120(7)
Appendix
- 155 -
C(57) 575(16) 499(14) 4873(6) 52(3)
C(58) 807(18) -512(14) 4941(8) 53(3)
C(59) -138(17) -1326(14) 5128(7) 55(3)
C(60) -1333(18) -1140(15) 5253(8) 57(3)
C(61) -1572(16) -130(15) 5187(7) 56(3)
C(62) -620(17) 686(15) 5000(8) 53(3)
C(63) 1600(20) 1369(17) 4669(9) 59(5)
Appendix
- 156 -
74 Publications in this dissertation
1 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Stephan Enthaler and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 6167-6171 Angew Chem 2012 124 6271-6275
Bis(silylenyl)- and Bis(germylenyl)-Substituted Ferrocenes Synthesis Structure and Catalytic
Applications of Bidentate Silicon(II)-Cobalt Complex
2 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Elisabeth Irran and Matthias Driess
Angew Chem Int Ed 2012 51 3691-3694 Angew Chem 2012 124 3751-3754
Synthesis and unexpected coordination of a silicon(II)-based SiCSi pincerlike arene to
palladium
3 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Organometallics 2011 30 6490-6494
Reactivity of N-Heterocyclic germylene toward ammonia and water
4 Shenglai Yao Yun Xiong Wenyuan Wang and Matthias Driess
Chem Eur J 2011 17 4890-4895
Synthesis structure and reactivity of a pyridine-stabilized germanone
5 Shigeyoshi Inoue Wenyuan Wang Carsten Praesang Matthew Asay Elisabeth Irran and
Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 2868ndash2871
An ylide-like phosphasilene and striking formation of a 4π-electron resonance-stabilized 24-
disila-13-diphosphacyclo- butadiene
6 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2010 132 15890ndash15892
An isolable bis-silylene oxide (ldquodisilylenoxanerdquo) and its metal coordination
7 Wenyuan Wang Shigeyoshi Inoue Shenglai Yao and Matthias Driess
Chem Commun 2009 2661ndash2663
An unsymmetric substituted digermylene with a Ge(I)ndashGe(I) bond and synthesis of a
germylenendashstannylene with a Ge(I)ndashSn(I) bond
8 Wenyuan Wang Shenglai Yao Christoph van Wuellen and Matthias Driess
J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 9640ndash9641
A cyclopentadienide analogue containing divalent germanium and a heavy cyclobutadiene-
like dianion with an unusual Ge4 Core
Appendix
- 157 -
75 Curriculum Vitae
Personal Data
Date and Place of Birth 17th
January 1976 in Nei Mongol China
Nationality Chinese
Education
1982-1987 Elementary School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1987-1993 High School in BaoTou City Nei Mongol China
1993-1997 Department of Chemistry Inner Mongolia Normal University (China)
Bachelor Chemistry
071997 Bachelor of Chemistry education
2003-2007 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
Diplom Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
012008 Diplom of Science Degree
2008-2012 Institut fuumlr Chemie der Technischen Universitaumlt Berlin
PhD Chemistry Prof Dr Matthias Driess
Herein I affirm that this dissertation was finished independently at the ldquoInstitut fuumlr
Chemierdquo at the ldquoTechnischen Universitaumlt Berlinrdquo under the guidance of
Prof Dr Matthias Driess where all references and additional aid sources have been
appropriately cited
Wenyuan Wang
Berlin Juli 2012