Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.
-
Upload
alan-baldwin -
Category
Documents
-
view
236 -
download
1
Transcript of Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.
![Page 1: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SyntaxTests for constituent structure
LING 200
Spring 2006
![Page 2: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Constituent structure
phrase structure rule: VP V (NP) (PP)tree: VP V NP PP put Det N P NP the car in Det N the garage
![Page 3: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Constituent structure
• Where do the PS rules come from?
• Some tests– Structural ambiguity – Coordination– Substitution– Movement
![Page 4: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Compositionality
• Meaning of complex expressions is compositional– Meaning of morphologically complex words,
phrases is determined by:• morpheme meaning
• morphological or syntactic structure
![Page 5: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Structurally ambiguous words
Adj Adj un Adj V Adj V Adj un V able fold able fold 2 readings (interpretations) of unfoldable:‘not capable of being folded’ ‘capable of being unfolded’
un- negative: Adj[___Adj[ un- ‘reverse’: V[___V[
![Page 6: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Announcements and reminders• Syntax homework posted after class, due
next Thurs in section
• Clicker data will be tabulated and posted as soon as possible
• Midterm next Friday– multiple choice– material covered in text, lecture, section
through morphology– review in sections next week
![Page 7: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The idea behind compositionality is that
the
mea
ning o
f a c
o...
the
mea
ning o
f a c
o...
the
mea
ning o
f a c
o...
none
of the
abov
e
0% 0%0%0%
1. the meaning of a complex expression is essentially unpredictable
2. the meaning of a complex expression < solely the meaning of its parts
3. the meaning of a complex expression < the meaning of its parts + the way the parts are structured
4. none of the above
![Page 8: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Structurally ambiguous headlines
• DEALERS WILL HEAR CAR TALK AT NOON• 2 SISTERS REUNITED AFTER 18 YEARS AT
CHECKOUT COUNTER• HOSPITALS ARE SUED BY 7 FOOT
DOCTORS • SQUAD HELPS DOG BITE VICTIM • HERSHEY BARS PROTEST • ENRAGED COW ATTACKS MAN WITH AXE
![Page 9: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
‘long vowels or diphthongs in accented syllables have falling tone, high to normal.’
Note: Sahaptin has both long and short diphthongs. Short: [j w iw uj]. Long: [j w iiw uuj].
‘long v
owels
or d
iph...
2 p
ossi
ble m
eanin
gs:...
2 p
ossi
ble m
eanin
gs:...
2 p
ossi
ble m
eanin
gs: ..
.
0% 0%0%0%
1. ‘long vowels or diphthongs’ is not ambiguous
2. 2 possible meanings: ‘long vowels or long diphthongs’, ‘diphthongs or long vowels’
3. 2 possible meanings: ‘vowels or long diphthongs’, ‘diphthongs or long vowels’
4. 2 possible meanings: ‘long vowels or diphthongs’, ‘diphthongs or long vowels’
![Page 10: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Structural ambiguity and constituency
“Enraged cow attacks man with axe.”
the real world reading: S NP VP Adj N V NP enraged cow attacks N PP man P NP with N axe
![Page 11: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
“Enraged cow attacks man with axe.”
the humorous(?) reading: S NP VP Adj N V NP PP enraged cow attacks N P NP man with N axe
![Page 12: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Structural ambiguity and constituency
• “The nomination of Dr. Henry Foster to the Surgeon General’s office appears to be in trouble after he admitted that he had performed at least 39 abortions on TV last night.”
• “he admitted...last night” vs. “he performed abortions…last night”
![Page 13: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• More phrase structure rules
– VP V (NP) (PP) (Adv) (CP)• CP = “Complementizer phrase”
– CP Comp S• Comp = “Complementizer”
– Comp that, if, whether
Structural ambiguity and constituency
![Page 14: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Structural ambiguity and constituency ‘he performed last night’ reading: S NP VP N V CP he admitted Comp S NP VP N V NP Adv that he performed N last night
abortions
![Page 15: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
‘he admitted ... last night’ reading S NP VP N V CP Adv he admitted Comp S last night that NP VP N V NP he performed N abortions
![Page 16: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Structural ambiguity
• Adverb placement– Adverbs are an optional VP constituent– Ambiguity results < 2 VPs in this sentence,
multiple possibilities for Adv placement
![Page 17: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Summary of structural ambiguity
• Meaning is compositional: meaning of whole < meaning of parts + structure of parts
• Structural ambiguity as a test for syntactic structure– Reading1 < Structure1
– Reading2 < Structure2
![Page 18: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Coordination test for constituency
Only identical categories, lexical or phrasal, can be conjoined.
• PS rule schema for conjoined (coordinated) categories– X X Conj X – XP XP Conj XP – Conj (= Conjunction) and, or, but, as well
as, etc.
![Page 19: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Conjoined lexical categories
PP P NP
P Conj P Det N PP above and beyond the call P NP of N duty
![Page 20: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Conjoined phrasal categories
NP NP Conj NPNP (Det) (Adj) N
NP[Adj[so-so] N[coffee]]
NP[Adj[excellent] N[desserts]]
They have NP[NP[Adj[so-so] N[coffee]] Conj[but]
NP[Adj[excellent] N[desserts]]].
![Page 21: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
“The student wrote a message and to the professor.” Native speakers, is this a grammatical
sentence?
The
sente
nce is
gra
...
The
sente
nce is
un...
0%0%
1. The sentence is grammatical.
2. The sentence is ungrammatical.
![Page 22: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Ungrammatical coordination 1. If conjoined elements do not belong to the same category:
write: V: ___ (NP) (PP)Julia wrote NP[a memo].
Julia wrote PP[to the dean].
*Julia wrote NP[a memo] and PP[to the dean].
![Page 23: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Ungrammatical coordination
2. If conjoined elements are not constituents:
Julia wrote NP[a memo].
Julia wrote PP[to the dean].
*Julia wrote NP[a memo] and *[to the].
![Page 24: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
“John sings badly but plays the guitar beautifully.” Native speakers, is this a
grammatical sentence?
The
sente
nce is
gra
...
The
sente
nce is
un...
0%0%
1. The sentence is grammatical.
2. The sentence is ungrammatical.
![Page 25: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Coordination and constituency
Virginia loves syntax. Virginia listened enthusiastically. Virginia loves syntax and listened enthusiastically.
Conclusion: [loves syntax] and [listened enthusiastically] are the same kind of constituent (VP):
![Page 26: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
VP VP Conj VP V NP and V Adv loves N listened enthusiastically syntax
![Page 27: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Coordination and constituency
• I wanted a green truck.• I wanted the same kind of canopy that Virginia
bought.• I wanted a green truck and the same kind of
canopy that Virginia bought.
• Conclusion: [a green truck] and [the same kind of canopy that Virginia bought] are the same kind of constituent:
![Page 28: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
S NP VP N V NP I wanted NP Conj NP
a green truck and NP CP the same kind of canopy Comp C that Virginia bought
NP NP CP (relative clause)
![Page 29: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Coordination and constituency
Virginia wants dinner.Virginia wants Dave to start cooking. *Virginia wants dinner and Dave to start cooking. Conclusion: [Dave to start cooking] is not an NP
NP[dinner]
CP[Dave to start cooking]
![Page 30: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Summary of coordination test
• Only like categories can be conjoined.
• Coordination test reveals information about– whether a grouping of words is a constituent– what kind of constituent it is
![Page 31: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Substitution test for constituency•Do you know Virginia? No, I haven’t met her yet.
Only constituents can be substituted for with shorter expressions.
•Words that substitute: pro-forms.
![Page 32: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
NP: substitute with pronoun
A: Old Betsy here just won’t start any more and my wife says to get her out of here.B: Why don’t you donate her?A: My wife?
•her is a pronoun (or anaphoric pronoun, or anaphor) that substitutes for the NP Old Betsy. The antecedent of her is Old Betsy.•pronominal substitution normally involves third person pronouns•pronouns are one type of pro-form
![Page 33: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Pronominal paradigms
subject object possessor
1sg I me my
2sg you you your
3sg he, she, it him, her, it his, her, its
1pl we us our
2pl you (guys) you (guys) your (you guys’s)
3pl they them their
![Page 34: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
PP: substitute with there
Last night I dreamed I was in the HUB, but I was the only one there.
Did you check on the memory stick for your file? Yes, and it wasn’t there.
![Page 35: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Adjective Phrase: substitute with so
• Virginia is anxious for Dave to cook dinner and so am I.
• The students are tired of waiting for the projector to work. So are the TAs.
![Page 36: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Sentence (/CP): substitute with it, that, so
•[p] and [ph] are in complementary distribution in English. Can you believe it? (Can you believe that [p] and [ph] are in complementary distribution in English?) •[p] and [ph] are in complementary distribution in English. I understand that. •Are [p] and [ph] in complementary distribution in English? Yes, I think so.
![Page 37: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Verb Phrases and the substitution testVerb phrases: substitute with as, so, and so, do so: Joyce has studied Arabic, as has Julia.Joyce has studied Arabic, and so has Julia.Joyce has studied Arabic. So has Julia.
Joyce has studied Arabic, and Julia has done so as well.
If pro-forms substitute for constituents, then studied Arabic in has studied Arabic must be a constituent.
![Page 38: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Verb Phrases and the substitution testWhat is leftover after VP substitution?
Joyce is studying Arabic, and so is Julia.
Joyce will study Arabic, and so will Julia.
S NP (Aux) VP (textbook: S NP Aux VP)
Aux have, be, will, can/could, may/might, will/would, shall/should
Joyce Aux[is] VP[studying Arabic],
and VP[so] Aux[is] Julia.
![Page 39: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
so substitutes for VP
if so substitutes for entire VP:Joyce Aux[has] VP[studied Arabic],
and VP[so] Aux[has] Julia.
if so substitutes for part of VP:*Joyce has studied Arabic, and so has Stephen
Khmer.
(Joyce has studied Arabic, and Stephen Khmer.)
![Page 40: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Some properties of Aux
positive negative negative (contracted form)
has studied has not studied hasn’t studied
is studying is not studying isn’t studying
will study will not study won’t study
studies *studies not *studiesn’t
Aux have, be, will, can/could, may/might, will/would, shall/should
1. Negation follows Aux:
![Page 41: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Some properties of Aux
2. In yes/no questions, only Aux is “moved” to the beginning of the sentence:
Is Joyce studying Arabic?Has Joyce studied Arabic?Will Joyce study Arabic?
result of “moving” Aux and V to beginning of sentence:
*Will study Joyce Arabic?
![Page 42: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
VP substitution test again
• (again) pro-forms which can substitute for VP
Joyce Aux[has] VP[studied Arabic], VP[as] Aux[has] Julia.
Joyce Aux[has] VP[studied Arabic], VP[and so] Aux[has] Julia.
Joyce Aux[has] VP[studied Arabic]. VP[So] Aux[has] Julia.
Joyce Aux[has] VP[studied Arabic], and Julia Aux[has]
VP[done so] as well.
![Page 43: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Aux has structure
Julia Aux[has] VP[studied Arabic],
and Joyce Aux[has] VP[done so] too.
Julia Aux[has been] VP[studying Arabic],
and Joyce Aux[has been] VP[doing so] too.
Julia Aux[must have been] VP[studying Arabic],
and Joyce Aux[must have been] VP[doing so] too.
The do so pro-form again. What can it substitute for?
![Page 44: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Aux-less sentences • “Do-support”: Aux do
Has Aux Lacks Aux
declarative Julia is studying. Julia studies.
Inserted Aux
negative Julia isn’t studying.
Julia doesn’t study.
yes/no question Is Julia studying? Does Julia study?
![Page 45: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Caveat on do: Aux vs. V
do in do the homework is V
declarative Stephen did the homework.
negative Stephen didn’t do the homework.
yes/no question
Did Stephen do the homework?
pro-form He did do so.pro-formAux
V
![Page 46: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Summary of substitution test
• Pro-forms can substitute for other constituents
• Substitution reveals information about constituency– There is a VP constituent.– There is an Aux constituent.
• Properties of Aux, do as Aux
![Page 47: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Movement test Only single constituents can be “moved”.• promise, V: __ NP NP (a ditransitive verb)
S NP VP
V NP NP
|
N Det N
Dave promised Virginia a latte.
• A latte, Dave promised Virginia.
• Virginia, Dave promised a latte.
• *Virginia a latte, Dave promised.
![Page 48: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Aux and movement test
• In questions, Aux is “moved” to the beginning of the sentence.– Aux Modal have be– Aux do– Modal will, can/could, may/might,
will/would, shall/should, must
![Page 49: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Modal vs. non-modal Aux
1. Non-modal Aux require special form of verb
BE + -ing form (‘gerund’): ‘progressive’ constructionis going: present progressivewas going: past progressivewill be going: future progressive
HAVE + -ed form (‘past participle’): ‘perfect’ constructionhas gone: present perfecthad gone: past perfectwill have gone: future perfect
![Page 50: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Modal vs. non-modal Aux
2. Non-modals have 3.sg.present, infinitive, gerund, and past participle forms
has, to have, having, had is, to be, being, been Modals lack these forms:
*shoulds, *to should, *shoulding, *shoulded*musts, *to must, *musting, *musted
![Page 51: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Joyce Aux[Mod[will] have] studied for it by then.[Will]Mod Joyce [have] studied for it by then?
Joyce Aux[Mod[will] have been] studying for it.[Will]Mod Joyce have been studying for it?
*[Will have]Aux Joyce been studying for it?
• In questions, the leftmost constituent of Aux is moved to the beginning of the sentence.
![Page 52: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
More on Aux movement in questions
• In questions, the leftmost constituent of Aux is moved to the beginning of the sentence.
• What about:– The person who is studying Arabic has left the room.– *Is the person who studying Arabic has left the room?– Has the person who is studying Arabic left the room?
• How to predict which Aux?– The person who is studying Arabic has left the room.
1 2
![Page 53: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
The (subject) NP constituent
• In questions, the leftmost constituent of the Aux which follows the (subject/leftmost/highest) NP is moved to the beginning of the sentence.– [The person who is studying Arabic]NP [has]Aux
[left the room]VP
Movement delimits subject NP constituent
![Page 54: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Summary
• Tests for constituency– Structural ambiguity: structure determines meaning
– Coordination test: only constituents of same category can be conjoined
– Substitution test: pro-forms can substitute for constituents
– Movement test: only constituents can be moved
• Using these tests to identify more constituents– VP, Aux, Subject NP
![Page 55: Syntax Tests for constituent structure LING 200 Spring 2006.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022033020/56649eca5503460f94bd8b7f/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
• The Seattle Times, 4-27-06
Gentner et al. (2006) ‘Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds’. Nature 440:1204-1207.
Question: is this evidence that starlings have recursive grammar?