Syn Lean and Agile Innovation 1 © The Delos Partnership 2005 Lean and Agile Applying the ideas to...
-
Upload
oswald-knight -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
4
Transcript of Syn Lean and Agile Innovation 1 © The Delos Partnership 2005 Lean and Agile Applying the ideas to...
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
1 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Lean and AgileLean and Agile
Applying the ideas to the Design side
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
2 © The Delos Partnership 2005
The Delos ModelThe Delos Model
VisionVision
StrategyStrategy
PrioritisationPrioritisation
InnovationInnovationDemandDemand
SupportSupport
SupplySupply
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
3 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Impact of Innovation and Impact of Innovation and DesignDesign
T & P has a significant potential on an organisation’s Lean and Agility potential
• Complexity of product and process
• Cost
• Speed of design capability
• Customer responsiveness
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
4 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Value Proposition - DesignValue Proposition - Design
StrategyStrategy
Sales and Marketing
Operations/
Supply Chain
Design/
Development
Operational Operational ExcellenceExcellence
Products that are functional and low cost
Products that can easily be made
Products that do not take long to develop
Customer Customer SolutionsSolutions
Products that meet the customers precise need
Products that have lots of variation
Intimate involvement of customer in design
Product Product LeadershipLeadership
Thinking out of the box
High and leading edge Technology
Novel designs with new materials and processes
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
5 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Integrated Business Plan
Integration of InnovationIntegration of Innovation
Innovation Supply Chain
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
6 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Variety is compoundVariety is compound
Tablet Family
BottleBottle CapCap LabelLabel CaseCase LeafletLeaflet
5 7 10 4 5
= _______variants ?
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
7 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Pack Size
Can Height& Size
Actual Gravity Brew Analysis
Core High Gravity Brews
Variety Funnel - BrewingVariety Funnel - Brewing
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
8 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Glass Process Bulb Form Tube Form Coil Fit
6 6 6 400
Variety funnel Television Variety funnel Television TubesTubes
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
9 © The Delos Partnership 2005
5001505030
SalesUnit
Label Pack Formulation
Variety Funnel - Variety Funnel - AgrochemicalsAgrochemicals
Possible options = 30 X 50 X 150 = ???
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
10 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Lean and Agile DesignLean and Agile Design
Lean Design – fewer parts; less variety• Reduce the number of labels• Make the cap always into a pourer• Reduce the number of pack variantsAgile Design – Build in uniqueness late into
process• Bulk packed product; labelled locally• Label added in Warehouse• Adjuvant sold separately for customer to mix
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
11 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Mass customisationMass customisation
- Hewlett Packard - deskjet printers: power supply module, power cords & manual
mfg D.C.
Factory localisation
D.C.mfg
Distribution Centre localisation
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
12 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Mass customisationMass customisation
- Hewlett Packard - deskjet printers: power supply module, power cords & manual
AI F&P.
Factory localisation
F&PAI
Distribution Centre localisation
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
13 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Product rationalisationProduct rationalisation
Where should the future product focus be?Which products are losing the company
money?
cumulativeunit
productcontribution
100%
products ranked in order of contribution
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
14 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Japanese approachJapanese approach
• 20 % of Products account for 200 % of the profit
• It is the remaining 80 % which account for the -100 % !!!!
• Therefore focus on the 20 % which add 80 % of the value to the customers or redesign the product!
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
15 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Lambda Lead AI complexity - Actual 2003
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
# NSUs
# C
ou
ntr
ies
Gross Profit $ Complexity $
Karate 2.5 EC
Karate 5 EC
Icon 10 WP
Karate 10 CS FP
Karate 2.5 CS NFP
Karate 2.5 WGKarate 5 CS NFP
Karate 5 CS
Demand 10 CS
Warrior
K 25 CS
Icon 10 WP
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
16 © The Delos Partnership 2005
2004 BUD Formulation Description - Lambda range UC Form. Sourcing Tons AI Budget Br DATE Budget GP Budget % Sales %Cum. % Margin %Cum.Code Type site 100% in 1000 $ in 1000 $ GP % Sales of total Margin
1 93% of KARATE ZEON 10 CS FP 1004551 CS Seneffe 50 55'159 50'823 92 22% 22% 26% 26%2 total Margin WARRIOR T 1008398 CS ST.Gab. 92 37'193 30'934 83 15% 36% 16% 42%
3 KARATE 2.5 EC 1003647 EC AEV 48 13'193 2006-8 7'044 53 5% 41% 4% 46%4 Above KARATE ZEON 25CS 1004278 CS Seneffe 57 12'273 2006-08 7'827 64 5% 46% 4% 50%5 hurdle rate KARATE 25CS (RED DOT) 1008421 CS ST.Gab. 68 11'985 9'064 76 5% 51% 5% 55%6 5 M$ KARATE 5 EC 106225 EC AEV 59 11'964 6'110 51 5% 55% 3% 58%7 ICON / DEMAND 10 CS 1008640 CS Seneffe 16 11'940 9'519 80 5% 60% 5% 63%8 17 Products KARATE ZEON 2.5CS NFP 1004552 CS Seneffe 21 10'458 2006-08 7'180 69 4% 64% 4% 67%9 KARATE ZEON 5CS NFP 1004539 CS Seneffe 58 10'406 7'232 69 4% 68% 4% 71%
10 KARATE 2.5 WG 1003685 WG STI 11 10'160 2'007 7'211 71 4% 72% 4% 74%11 KARATE ZEON 5 CS FP 1004538 CS Seneffe 20 8'982 6'717 75 4% 76% 3% 78%12 IMPASSE BARRIER FILM 146483 MISC USA Toll NS 8'973 5'075 57 4% 79% 3% 80%13 ICON 10 WP 1004498 WP Paulinia 7 7'992 2'006 5'136 64 3% 82% 3% 83%14 KARATE 50 CS 155036 CS Paulinia 30 7'407 4'786 65 3% 85% 2% 86%15 KARATE 5 WG 1003686 WG STI 9 7'025 5'944 85 3% 88% 3% 89%16 LAMBDA CYHALOTHRIN TECH 1008304 AI Hudersfield 9 5'672 4'942 87 2% 90% 3% 91%17 KARATE K 1003682 EC AEV 2 4'962 2'006 2'538 51 2% 92% 1% 93%
18 Below ICON / DEMAND 2.5 CS 1008641 CS Seneffe 5 4'669 2'963 63 2% 94% 2% 94%19 hurdle rate KARATE 5 EC 1008219 EC AEV 5 4'445 2'005 3'840 86 2% 96% 2% 96%20 5M$ KUNG FU 2.5 EW 166052 EW Nantong 12 3'281 2'275 69 1% 97% 1% 97%21 PP321 1004661 AI Hudersfield NS 1'683 1'353 80 1% 98% 1% 97%22 Below CYHALON-WP KG BULK 1005329 WP Japan Toll NS 1'288 2'008 1'159 90 1% 98% 1% 98%23 hurdle rate KARATE K/PIRIM K 1003642 EC AEV NS 1'013 2'006 670 66 0% 99% 0.35% 97%24 2.5 M$ JURENG 147750 EC Iksan NS 879 2006 513 58 0% 99% 0.27% 97%25 JUREONG 117186 WP Iksan NS 625 2'006 477 76 0% 99% 0.25% 98%26 12 Products KARATE 2 ULV 1004485 ULV AEV NS 580 280 48 0% 99% 0.15% 98%27 PP321 TC 40% (RED) 1004513 EC AEV NS 450 2'004 274 61 0% 100% 0.14% 98%28 KARATE 7% 150761 EC MISC NS 301 2'003 250 83 0% 100% 0.13% 98%29 KARATE 5 EC FR 1003687 EC AEV NS 283 2'004 218 77 0% 100% 0.11% 98%30 KARATE DIMETHOATE 140801 EC Luxan NS 228 2'004 137 60 0% 100% 0.07% 98%31 KARATE 0.8 ULV 1003657 ULV AEV NS 75 2'003 2 3 0% 100% 0.00% 98%32 ICON 10 WP 1003679 WP Gummidipoo NS 26 2'006 19 75 0% 100% 0.01% 98%
LAMBDA-CYHALOTHRIN 255'570 192'514 75
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
17 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Design impactDesign impact
• Lean and Agile Design should look to build in :– Commonality of components to minimise
product differentiation– Uniqueness as late as possible into the
manufacturing/distribution process– Product/components that are easily
available in short lead times
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
18 © The Delos Partnership 2005
Lean and Agile needs Lean and Agile needs integrationintegration
Sales and Marketing
Supply Chain and Operations
Development
Syn Lean and Agile Innovation
19 © The Delos Partnership 2005
WorkshopWorkshop
What changes could be made to the What changes could be made to the design [s] of the current product range design [s] of the current product range
[s] which would simplify the offer to [s] which would simplify the offer to customers without taking anyway any of customers without taking anyway any of
the value proposition to them ?the value proposition to them ?
What changes could be made to the What changes could be made to the design [s] of the current product range design [s] of the current product range
[s] which would simplify the offer to [s] which would simplify the offer to customers without taking anyway any of customers without taking anyway any of
the value proposition to them ?the value proposition to them ?