7/28/2019 Syllabus - Law 138, Corporation Law (Jacinto)

1/4

SCHEDULE OF CASESCoRPORATIoX LAW

CHAPTERS I AND IIUnion Glass v. SEC' Abejo v. dela CryzMagalad 'v .PremiereF inanc ingCorporat ion(209SCRA26I )CIR v. Club FiliPinoManuel R. Dulay Ent' v' CA (225 S 6781. i,t-Dc;-philippine Veterans Bank (192 SCRA 257)Pioneer Insuiance v' CA (175 SCRA 668)

CHAPTERrrl: FOR}TATION RGANIZATIONPhilips Export BV ' v' CA (206 S 151) ^Lyceum of th" Phi ls ' v ' CA (219 S 610)P.C. Javier & Sons, Inc' , et al ' v ' CA' et al ' (462 SCRA 36)Malabang v. BenitoHarril v. DavisHall v. PiccioABC v. Standard ProductsCraresonv' Intl Bus' MachinesSa-h'atierra v' Garlitos, et al'Chiang Ka i Shek School v' CA (I72 S 389)Lozano v. d'elos Santos (274 S 452) -Li m Tong ;;". phil. f i"t ir ,g Geai Industries, Inc' (3 17 S

'i 2'3)Intl Expiess Travel v' CA (343 S 674\ .Loyola Grand Villas Homeo'"vnersv' CA (276 S 68 1)Fleischer r' . Botica NoiascoGovernment of the Philippines r'' Ei Hogar

Stockholders of T' Guanzon r'' RDCaram v. CAPalaY, nc ' v' ClaveJ.G. Summit Hold ' ings, nc' v ' CA (450 SCRA 169)Marvel Bldg' v' DavidMagsaysayllabrador v' CA (180 SCRA 266)Indo Phii iexti le Mii ls v' Calica (205 SCRA 698)Jacinto v. CA (198 SCRA 2Il)Concept Bui lders, Inc' v ' NLRC (257 SCRA 149)ClaParols v' CIRVilla ReYTransit v' Ferrersecosa, et al . v. Heirs of Erwin SuarezFrancisco (433 SCRA 2T3lYu v. NLRC (245 S 134)Ceasev. CADelPher Trade v' CAGarnett v. Southern RailwaYJardine Davies, Inc' v' JRB Realtl" Inc' (453 SCRA 555)KoPPel v' YatcoLiddel v' CIRLa Campana Coffee Factory v' Kaisahan

CHAPTER V . PROMOTER'S CONTRACTSMcArthur v' Times PrintingCagaYan Fishing v' SandikoBuilders Duntile v' DunnRizal Light v' PSC and Morong Electric

7/28/2019 Syllabus - Law 138, Corporation Law (Jacinto)

2/4

Quaker Hi1lv. Parro ldDomi ' , io , 'CopperMin ingand.Smel t ingCo.v .B ige iowCTIAPTER VI - CORPORATE POWERS

RP v. Acoje MiningNatl Powlr CorP' v' Vera (170 S 721)Government of the Philippines v' El HogarPirovano v. DelaramaHarden v. Benguet

Ramirez v. Orientalist Co ' & FernandezT'oPezv. ErictaExpert Travel & Tours, Inc' v' CA (459 SCRA 147)Citibank NA v. Chua (220 SCRA 75 )Prime white cement v' iA c (220 scRA 103)BoYer-Roxasv. CA (211 SCRA 470)EP-GConstruction v' CA (2i0 SCRA 2i0)BenguetE lect r icCooperat ivev.NLRC(209SCRA55)woodchild Holding", i.r . . v. Roxas Electric and construction

contpanr''Inc. (436 SCRA 235\

Yu Chuk v. Kong Li PoLapulapu FounJation, Inc' v' CA (421 SCRA 329)Boara of Liquidators v' Heirs of KalawZasrboanga-Transportation v' Bachrach M otorBoard of SMB Workers v' TanJohnston v. JohnstonPonce, et al . v. EncarnacionGokongwei v. SECDetective & Protective Bureau v' CloribelRoxas v. dela RosaCamPbell Y. trse1ar,nc'Dela Rama, et a1.v' Ma-ao SugarIn Re: Giant Portland CementState ex- rel Everett Trust v' Pacific WaxAlejandrino v. de LeonAbercrombie v- DavisEverett v. Asia BankingMackin v. Nicoliet HotelNIDC v. AquinoRingling v. Ringling Bros'E.K. Buck Retail Store v' HarketClark v. DodgeGottschalk v. Avalon RealtYSherman & Eilis r' . Indiana MutualBenintendi v. Kenton Hotel

CII{PI.ERVIII-DUTIESoFDIRECTORS^ONTRoLLINGSTOCKHOLDERSOtis & Co . v. PennsYlvania & Co 'Montelibano v. Bacolod MurciaLitwin v. AllenWalker v. ManSteinberg v. VelascoBarnes v. AndrewsBates v. DresserPalting v. San Jose PetroleumMead v. McCulloughGovernment v. E1 HogarBarreto v. La Previsora

7/28/2019 Syllabus - Law 138, Corporation Law (Jacinto)

3/4

Kerbs v. Cajifornia EasternStrong v. RePideTaYlor v. WrightSinger, et a1.v'Carlisletrving Trust v' Deutsch, et aI 'Litwin v. AllenGlobe Woolen v' Utica GasInsurance Shares v' Northern Fiscal CorporationCHAPTER D( - INSPECTION

Pardo v. Hercules LumberGonzales v. PNBVeragrth v. Isabela Sugar Co 'Gokongrvei v. SECCIIAPTER X - DERTVATNTE SUITS

Evangetsta, et al ' v' SantosRePublic Bank v' CuadernoSMC v. Kahn

Ellingrvood' v. Wolfs Head Oil RefiningHaY v. HaYAugusta Trust v' Augusr-a' et al 'Garcia v. Lim Chu SingWallace v. Eclipse Pocahontas Coal Co'Bayla, et al., v' Silang Tralfic Co'' inc'Benito v. SECStokes v. ContinentaL TrustThom v. Baltimore TrustRoss Tra:rsPort v' CrothersMeritt ChaPman v' New York TrustJordan Co. v. AllenAlladin Hotel v' Bloom

CIIT{I}TER:KII . CONSIDEITATION FOR SHARESTriplex Shoe Co ' v' Rice & Hatchins' Inc'McCartY v. LaregdeauRode v. Dock-hoP Co 'Velasco v. PoizatLingaYen Gulf v' Balt-azatDe Silva v. AboitizNational Exchange v' IB DexterLumanlan v. CuraFua Cun v. SummersBaJtazar v. LingaYen GulfNavav. Peers

CHAIvI'ER Xm - DnTTDENDS pURCHASE BY CORPORATIONS OF SHARESNielson & Co . v. Lepanto ConsolidatedBerks Broadcasting v' CraumerLich v. US RubberKeough v. St . Paul Milk Co 'Dodge v. Ford Motor Co 'Burk v. Otawa Gas & Electric Co 'Mclaran v. Crescent Planning

7/28/2019 Syllabus - Law 138, Corporation Law (Jacinto)

4/4

, t

Marcus v. RH MacYPhiliPPine Trrst Co' v' RiveraCHAPTER XV - TRANFER OF SHARES

Uson v. DiosomotoNautica Canning Corp' v' Yumul (473 SCRA 415)Razon v. IAC (2O7 SCRA 235)Rural Bank oi S,littu's v' CA (2lO SCRA 51 1)Sta. Maria v. HKSBDelos Santos v. AttY' GenChua Guan v. Samahang Magsasaka' Inc'

CHAPTER X\/I - DISSOLUTIONFinancing CorPoration v' TeodoroRP v. BisaYa Land TransPo'Gonzales'u.S,tgut Regulatory Adm' (174 S 377)Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines' Inc' v' CA (443 SCRA 580)National Abaca v. PoreChina Banking v' Michelin & CteRP v. Marsman Dev' Co'Tan Tiong Bio v. CIR

CHAPTER )KVII - CORPORATE COMBINATIONSReYesv. BlouseEdward u. Nellv. Pacific Farms

Marshall Wells v. ElserColumbia Pictures v' CA (261 SCRA 144)General Garments v' Dir' Of PatentsLe Chemise Lacoste v' FernandezMentholatum v. MangilimanAgilent iechnotogies singapore (pte) Ltd. v. Integrated SiliconTechnolog! enilippitr". corporation (427 SCRA 593)Merryl Lynch FJiures v' CA (21 1 SCRA 824)Top Weld' Manufacturing, Inc' v' ECEDAntam v. CA

UPLAW4 / corPo-sched-cases5