Sydney Road Assets Performance Contracts...•Introduce you to the SRAP Contracts Service Delivery...
Transcript of Sydney Road Assets Performance Contracts...•Introduce you to the SRAP Contracts Service Delivery...
Sydney Road Assets
Performance Contracts
Acknowledgement of
Country Presented by Tim Hahn
Welcome and AgendaPresented by Tim Hahn
• Introduction to the session – Tim Hahn
• Slido instruction – Tim Hahn
• Probity – Gordon Eastwood
• The Service Delivery Lifecycle – Michael Killeen
• Question and Answers – Rebecca Dean
SRAP ContractsAgenda
• 20 May – How to return the TAMP
• In June a virtual workshop on “how to” return the commercial framework
SRAP ContractsFuture Sessions
A reminder we are looking for a representation of the community we serve
#SRAPC
Slido.com
Presented by Gordon Eastwood
Probity
SRAP ContractsProbity
– Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW) will endeavour to any questions you have
today that are general in nature
– Request for Tender (RfT) questions and responses will be provided through the
approved e-data room channel
Contract Details
Gordon Eastwood
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: 0435 472 352
Request for TenderService Delivery Lifecycle Briefing
Presented by Michael Killeen
Service Delivery Lifecycle BriefingObjectives of the Briefing
• Introduce you to the SRAP Contracts Service Delivery Lifecycle
• Obtain a list of questions and queries for coverage in a future session to be held 20 May
2020 11am to cover the how to return the TAMP.
SRAP ContractsIntroductions to the Service Delivery Lifecycle Briefing
Planning and Program’s Role
• Perform asset management and program management function for Greater Sydney Roads
Network
• Fulfil requirements of NSW Treasury AM Policy1
The role of the Planning and Programs
• Director Sydney Assets
• 10 year Blueprint is asset management objective
• Signatory to the NSW Treasury AM Policy attestation
The Relationship between Planning and Programs to the SRAP Contract
• Set the asset management objectives for each zone and asset category
• Performance monitoring and assurance of service delivery
Service Delivery Lifecycle BriefingThe Service Delivery Lifecycle – an overview
SRAP Contract supports GSRN:
– Financial and business planning
– Asset management
– Compliance with NSW
Treasury AM Policy
• Aligns agencies with ISO
55000
• 3 core requirements
– Asset Management Principles
– Framework
– Attestation
Service Delivery Lifecycle BriefingThe Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP
The Tactical Asset Management Plan
• One submitted for each Zone
• Defines the ‘activities, resources and timescales’1
required to achieve the AM objectives for the Zone
• Expecting alignment of methodology and format to TfNSW standards2
Notes:
1. ISO 55000 Asset management— Overview, principles and terminology
2. T MU AM 01002 MA Maintenance Requirements Analysis Manual, Technical Maintenance Plan T MU AM 01003 ST, TfNSW Enterprise Risk Management (TERM) Standard 30-ST-
164
Service Delivery Lifecycle BriefingThe Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP
– Effectively and transparently convert
ConOps, FMECA and AM objectives
into ‘activity’ and then price
• Transparent methodology
• Consistent prioritisation desired
balance of cost, risk and performance
– No guarantee the resources
requested in the TAMP will be
provided – the balance of cost, risk
and performance needs to be
achieved across GSRN
Notes:
1. ISO 55000 Asset management— Overview, principles and terminology
2. T MU AM 01002 MA Maintenance Requirements Analysis Manual, Technical Maintenance Plan T MU AM 01003 ST, TfNSW Enterprise Risk Management (TERM) Standard 30-ST-
164
Service Delivery Lifecycle BriefingThe Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP
TfNSW road assets are estimated
at $26 billion
– Examples of the range of assets
• five asset categories – pavement,
bridges, tunnels, roadside and traffic
• Broad range from culverts to ITS to
facilities including bus driver facilities
and carparks
• Full list in Asset Definition
Specification.
Asset type Replacement value
Pavement
$15.2 billion, including:
Land under roads:
$1.47 billion
Work in progress:
$1.51 billion
Bridges
Tunnels
Bridges:
$6.7 billion
Tunnels:
$1.5 billion
Roadside
Slope and culverts included with embankment under roads
1.0 billion (noise walls)
Traffic
Traffic Facilities assets comprise ITS assets in all of NSW, and signs and
delineation assets for Greater Sydney Road Network only.
The combined replacement value is $1.0 billion
Service Delivery Lifecycle BriefingThe Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP
Prioritisation
– Concept of Operations provides
importance of place, road and
cycleway
– Program prioritisation should be
consistent with network need in the
Concept of operations
Asset
Walk & Place
Cycle Transit General Traffic
Freight ConOps Score
ConOps Tier
Bridge #1234
1 4 1 3 3 12
Minimum Level of Performance
ConOps Score (Rank)
5 to 8 (Rank 1)
9 to 12 (Rank 2)
13 to 16 (Rank 3)
17 to 25 (Rank 4)
Bridge Health Index
90 85 80 75
Service Delivery Lifecycle BriefingThe Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP
Format of response
– Consistent with Transport for New
SW
standards
– Technical Maintenance Plan to be
providedPart Description Format
1 Executive summary MS PowerPoint
2 Narrative MS Word
3 Ten year works program and costings
MS Excel
4 Technical Maintenance Plan
MS Excel
Service Delivery Lifecycle BriefingThe Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP
Scenarios
– Rationalisation requires us to consider
the options to achieve the
desired balance of cost, risk and
performance
– To avoid iterations with Service
Providers
TAMP will contain 4 scenarios:
• Current funding increased at 2.5%
• All funding to deliver Asset Management
objectives
• 5% efficiency reduction
• Recommendation
– Make a recommendation outlining affect
on cost, risk and performance
Scenario Cost 21/22
($000)
Cost 21 to 31
($000)
Key Residual Risk
Performance against Blueprint primary outcomes
Connecting our customers’ whole lives
Successful places for communities
Strong economy and quality of life through transport solutions
Scenario 1: Current Funding including an assumed Opex CPI increase of 2.5%
13240 79500 Backlog is forecast to increase to $ xxx (Category C risk)
Scenario 2: Required Funding to Deliver Current Agreed Outcomes
13240 94963 Program delivery risk (Category D risk)
Scenario 3: Current Funding – 5% Efficiency Reduction
10963 59375 Forecast community satisfaction metrics to decline by xx% due to xxx. (Category B risk)
Scenario 4: Preferred Funding (ie Deliverable)
13520 83545 Backlog is forecast to reduce to $ xxx by 30/31
Service Delivery Lifecycle BriefingThe Service Delivery Lifecycle – The TAMP
The Tactical Asset Management Brief
– One TAMB provided for all
respondents
– The TAMB covers all Zones and all
asset class sets in the:
• Asset management objectives by asset
class and Concept of operations score
• Format of deliverables
• Timing of submissions
Service Delivery Lifecycle BriefingThe Service Delivery Lifecycle – The Asset Management
Transport Asset Management
Objectives
SRAP Contracts
Outcomes
Sustainability, Successful place,
innovation, Safety and
Performance
Sustainability, Innovation
A high performing
transport
system…
Quality asset and efficient networks
managed for the right price
Aligned people working together
in new ways
Responsive
..that evolves in a
meaningful way…
Transport investments and solutions
that serve the people of NSW
Growing people culture and capability
…to achieve great
outcomes for all
Strong economy and quality of life
Thriving people doing meaningful work
Customer Focus, innovation
Safety and performance,
Sustainability, Successful places
Safe and seamless journeys for
people and goodsNew mobility options and experiences
Integrated, resilient and accessible
transport networks and places
Protecting and enhancing communities
and their environments
Connecting our customer’ whole lives
Successful places
Tra
nsp
orts
10 Y
ear B
luep
rint
Tra
nsp
ort 2
056
Questions and
Answers Presented by Rebecca Dean and
responses by the Subject Matter Experts
Close and
Thanks Presented by Rebecca Dean
Questions taken from Sli.doSRAP Contracts Service Delivery Lifecycle Information Session –
21/05/2020
Anonymous 13 May , 2020
Will the Asset Health Index (e.g. Bridge) methodologies be made
available for us to assess with the performance framework
requirements?
Anonymous 13 May , 2020
Will the current funding be made available for scenario assessment
for both tactical and routine maintenance?
Anonymous 13 May , 2020
Are you intending to issue further asset data e.g. condition reports?
Anonymous 13 May , 2020
Will you provide a historical TAMP as a sample?
Anonymous 13 May , 2020
For Tactical Works, are we correct in assuming that we only
address projects within the areas that the proponent has been
shortlisted?
Anonymous 13 May , 2020
It would appear that TfNSW has provided a FWP for the FY22-24
periods. How does TfNSW see proponents taking asset condition
risk based on a provided FWP?
Anonymous 13 May , 2020
Do we develop a price estimate for the tactical projects specified in
10.04.05 - Addendum 1 or for the 3xyear works program we develop
and include in the TAMP?
Anonymous 13 May , 2020
Can TfNSW please confirm the historical spend in the current
contracts?
Anonymous 13 May , 2020
Can TfNSW confirm how the development of the TAMP and the
TAMP outcomes included in the RFT submission will be evaluated
in the tender process?