SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring Training March 2014. Congratulations – your work has made a difference...
-
Upload
philip-merritt -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring Training March 2014. Congratulations – your work has made a difference...
SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring TrainingMarch 2014
Congratulations – your work has made a difference
Cohort 8
Evaluation and Implementation Reports:
We know you are doing a great job. The data from our evaluation reports, documented by an objective third party (much like a SET does for school and program implementation), helps us differentiate between PBIS training and PBIS implementation.
Statewide Strengths:– The training generally does what it is intended to
do, guide school teams through initial implementation to get to full implementation by the end of the two-year training sequence.
– The majority of schools participating in Cohort 8 maintain up to date school profiles and data sharing. This is essential for school, regional and state implementation data.
Stages of ImplementationFor SW-PBIS Schools
• Exploration• Installation• Initial Implementation• Full Implementation• Sustainability
Implementation occurs in stages:
Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005
2 – 4 Years
or more
Characteristics of Full Implementation
• SW-PBIS School–Presence of key features of PBIS–Measures of fidelity of
implementation–Outcome data and student benefit
Implementation Fidelity
• SET: Expectations Taught is a consistent predictor of high fidelity PBIS implementation • May also be closely associated with ODR
data
• TIC: is an important predictor of PBIS implementation fidelity• NOT the actual TIC scores that predict
success but rather whether or not the school team has a monthly meeting to review PBIS data to make improvements
Source: St. Olaf Student Research Project conducted with Wilder Research using MN PBIS data (2013)
Stages of ImplementationFor SW-PBIS Schools
• Exploration• Installation• Initial Implementation• Full Implementation• Sustainability
Implementation occurs in stages:
Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005
2 – 4 Years
or more
Durable implementation of a practice at a level of fidelity that continues to produce valued outcomes (Han & Weiss, 2005)
PBIS will Sustain IF it remains:
• A priority for faculty, staff and administrators• Effective for ALL students • Efficient for school personnel• Adaptive to change
McIntosh, K. & Kugly, A. (2009).
Elements of Sustainability• Commitment to changing context at all levels• Capacity building by networking with other schools
and districts • Build relationships vertically (school, district, state) • “Deep Learning” through data-based decision making for tough problems (PDSA)• Dual commitment to short and long term goals • “Cyclical Energizing” (Not a linear process!)• Leaders involved at all levels within our schools,
districts, and state
Adapted from Fullen (2005)
Continue using data for decision making…Data Calendar At-A-Glance
Sustaining and Improving Schools
For schools that have completed the team training sequence, including the evaluation elements required in the recognition program
Schedule
Purpose Measure Function Annually
School Information Data-base
School Profile/Contact Form
Provides a data-base for communication, statewide planning and support.
Update in September and as needed
Progress Monitoring-Team level
Team Implementation Checklist (TIC)
A self-assessment tool serves as a multi-level guide for creating School-Wide PBIS Action Plans and evaluating the status of implementation activities.
Completed each year
Progress Monitoring-Staff/Building level
Self-Assessment Survey (SAS)
Used by school staff for initial and annual assessment of effective behavior support systems in their school and to guide Action Planning.
Completed each year
Student Outcomes Office Discipline Referrals (ODR) (SWIS™/Big 5)
Office discipline referrals (ODR) provide data for monthly team reviews and decision making by teachers, administrators, and other staff to guide prevention efforts and Action Planning.
Monthly, based on school calendar
Fidelity of Implementation
School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET)
External evaluation to assess the critical features of school-wide effective behavior support across each academic school year.
Annually until SET score of 80 is established Completed every 3rd year to provide an external evaluation perspective on fidelity of implementation.
Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ)
Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ) are used by teams to identify areas of success, areas for improvement for the sustained implementation of SW-PBIS, and by the MN PBIS Project to identify model PBIS schools. http://pbisevalmn.org/about-the-boq.php
Annually Following the completion of the training sequence and a SET score of 80 Alternate with SET every third year
Website • The website http://pbismn.org/
offers:– Resources
• Training resources • Data collection calendar• Sustainability Information
– Institute Updates– Online Training Opportunities
• SET• Check in Check Out• Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ)• Individual Student Intervention System – coming soon
2014 Minnesota PBIS Institute and Film Festival
• June 19 and 20, at MDE
• Request for Proposals at http://www/pbismn.org
2014 Minnesota PBIS Institute and Film Festival
• Submit PBIS Videos (even if you can’t attend)
PBISPBIS
On the Horizon for Minnesota
PBIS Recognition•Invitations when SET = 80+ or BoQ = 70+
• Once 80+ is reached on SET, BoQ is recommended for two years
• SET required every third year
– 2013 – 16 schools recognized– 2014 – application closed February 28th, 2014
Cohort 8 Graduation
Thanks, for YOUR commitment to…• partnering with us in the process• sharing your successes and challenges• focusing on prevention• working on behalf of ALL students• data-based decision-making• sustaining implementation of PBIS in your school• being an important part of the MN-PBIS
community
Congratulations
PBIS