Sustainment Management Systems
Transcript of Sustainment Management Systems
US Army Corps of EngineersBUILDING STRONG®
Predicting M&R Investments and Outcomes with the BUILDER™Sustainment Management SystemLance MarranoProgram Manager
ERDC-CERL
20 MAR 2012
BUILDING STRONG®
Agenda/OutlineBackgroundInventoryAssessmentPredictionWork PlanningForecastingVisualization & IntegrationSummary & Discussion
BUILDING STRONG®
Facility Managers’ Needs
Provide objective facility investment guidance for:Systematic assessment to identify maintenance requirements for increased reliabilityAnalyze gap between current state and requirements; plan investments to close this gap and optimize return on investmentPrioritize scarce resources according to economic and mission prioritiesPredict the effects/consequences of decisions to ensure mission readiness
EngineeredEngineered Asset Lifecycle Management ToolsAsset Lifecycle Management Tools
BUILDING STRONG®
The GoalInvestment Planning driven by meaningful metrics:► Asset Lifecycle► Return on Investment (ROI)► Mission Assuredness
Supports Installation, Regional, and HQ processes► Tactical Facility Requirements
(Short Term) ► Strategic Facility Requirements
(Long Term)► Objective, Repeatable, & Affordable
Practice proactive rather than reactive maintenance planning at all levels of the organization.
Practice proactive rather than reactive maintenance planning at all levels of the organization.
BUILDING STRONG®
Approach – A New Way of Looking At Assets
Distress Type(s): Deteriorated and CrackedSeverity Level(s): Low and MedQuantity/Density: 200 SF and 12 LFCondition Index (calc.): 72
Distress Type(s): Deteriorated and CrackedSeverity Level(s): Low and MedQuantity/Density: 200 SF and 12 LFCondition Index (calc.): 72
Deficiency: Re-point brick retaining wallWork Quantity: 200 SFScoping Estimate: $4400Urgency/Priority: 3
Deficiency: Re-point brick retaining wallWork Quantity: 200 SFScoping Estimate: $4400Urgency/Priority: 3
Traditional vs. SMS
Work is the inputWork is the input
Work is the outputWork is the output
BUILDING STRONG®
Process
BUILDING STRONG®
InventoryIdentify “building blocks” of facilities that will be independently maintained► Identify components (doors, walls,
windows, roof, etc.), as well as equipment.
► Like equipment may be grouped when managed as one lifecycle group (i.e. set of exhaust fans, overhead doors)
Capture appropriate detail to accurately reflect replacement values and service lives
BUILDING STRONG®
Inventory ResultsInventory models aligned with RPI requirements► RP Site ID► RP UID► (Future) RP Equipment ID
Detailed inventory can be derived from maintenance records*► Quantity► Equipment Type► Age► Etc.
* Need to also include facility assemblies, such as walls, roofs,
BUILDING STRONG®
Process
BUILDING STRONG®
Condition AssessmentStandardized, objective process uses technician-level experience, rather than architects/engineers► Inspector is “human sensor”, doesn’t insert their
opinion/interpretation► Models the rating that would be given by a group of experts.► Increases consistency and quality of information across
organization (apples-to-apples)
Distress Type(s): Deteriorated and CrackedSeverity Level(s): Low and MedQuantity/Density: 200 SF and 12 LFCondition Index (comp.): 72
Distress Type(s): Deteriorated and CrackedSeverity Level(s): Low and MedQuantity/Density: 200 SF and 12 LFCondition Index (comp.): 72
Deficiency: Re-point brick retaining wallWork Quantity: 200 sfScoping Estimate: $4400Urgency/Priority: 3
Deficiency: Re-point brick retaining wallWork Quantity: 200 sfScoping Estimate: $4400Urgency/Priority: 3
Traditional vs. SMS
5
BUILDING STRONG®
Utilize objective, rules-based inspection to capture consistent information setModels the rating that would be given by a panel of expertsExpresses the ability of the component to continue to reliably provide the as-designed function
Good
Failed
Serious
Very Poor
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
0
10
25
40
55
70
85
100
Standard Rating Scale
Condition Index Metric
Ex. Distresses• Animal Dmg• Blisters• Cracking• Displacement• Inoperable• Vibration• Etc.
Distress
xCI(PCI, CSCI, etc.)
Severity (H/M/L)
Quantity
BUILDING STRONG®
Condition Assessment
BUILDING STRONG®
Knowledge Based InspectionAn asset does not require the same level of scrutiny at all points in its lifecycle.All assets do not degrade at the same rate.Focus inspection attention and resources on what’s important, considering risk.Tailor the frequency and level of detail to the purpose and lifecycle condition.
6
BUILDING STRONG®
Knowledge Based Inspection
Inspection costs are ~25% of traditional, deficiency-based inspectionsInspection costs are ~25% of traditional, deficiency-based inspections
BUILDING STRONG®
Functionality AssessmentModernization inspection addresses issues of:► Capacity (too little or too much)► Configuration► Change in user requirements► Technical obsolescence► Regulatory/code compliance► Etc.
Available at building, space, and component levelsCan simulate mission change to determine investment requirements for future occupants
BUILDING STRONG®
Functionality Assessment
BUILDING STRONG®
Assessment ResultsReadiness Reporting (Condition, or Quality)Condition for complete inventory, not just problems Up-to-date scorecard that doesn’t require constant data maintenance
BUILDING STRONG®
Process
BUILDING STRONG®
Condition Prediction
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 20202015Year
60
20
80
40
100
CI
Expected SL = 20
Condition @ Failure
SL = 17 years
Inspection 1Inspection 2
Inspection 3
Weibull distribution used to model risk of component failureWeibull distribution used to model risk of component failure
Construction/Installation
“Economic Sweet Spot”
0
BUILDING STRONG®
Process
BUILDING STRONG®
Work GenerationWork is automatically created based upon rules► Standards define acceptable levels of risk as thresholds to trigger work► Policies apply these differing risk levels to different assets► Mission critical assets require higher condition levels
Cost estimates are automatically calculated based on replacementcosts► Repair vs. Replace calculations automatically performed to maximize
ROIWork is tied to specific assets; establishes traceability and accountability.
Defensible rules enforce consistent investment policies across the enterprise.
Defensible rules enforce consistent investment policies across the enterprise.
2
BUILDING STRONG®
Investment Triggers
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 20202015Year
60
20
80
40
100
CI
Work requirements are automatically generated when condition falls below enterprise policy levels.
Work requirements are automatically generated when condition falls below enterprise policy levels.
SL Gain
CI Gain
0
HVAC (70)
Interior Construction (55)
Repair
Repair
BUILDING STRONG®
Work PrioritizationFunding resources are always constrained► Need prioritization to rank work requirements
Use various parameters including economic, criticality, and geographic factorsFocus work efforts on items most critical to mission accomplishment while reducing lifecycle costs.
Enterprise-defined prioritization allows organization to optimize multiple competing requirements for scarce funding.EnterpriseEnterprise--defineddefined prioritization allows organization to optimizeoptimize multiple competing requirements competing requirements for scarce funding.
2
BUILDING STRONG®
FCI Calculation
BUILDER-derived value is more consistent and repeatable than deficiency-based methods
►Work is now generated using objective ratings AND an defensible set of enterprise policies, rather than subjective judgment
FCI computation is based upon objective assessment methods and consistent work rules.
FCI computation is based upon objective assessment methods and consistent work rules.
5
BUILDING STRONG®
Work Planning ResultsAnnual work planning attached to specific assets (accountability and traceability)Work planning prioritized by mission requirements to direct scarce dollars against mission-critical needs (Mission-Focused Facility Investments)
BUILDING STRONG®
Process
BUILDING STRONG®
ForecastingSame process as annual work planning, but repeated for
multiple years over known inventory, behavior, policies, and funding.Simulate the long-term impact on condition, performance, and estimated backlogEvaluate different scenarios (budgets, policies, prioritization schemes, etc.)
$
$400
$800
$1,200
$1,600
$2,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Total Expenditures and Backlog By YearFor Camp Example (EXMPL) (in $M)
Budget Less 10% ‐ Backlog
Budge Less 10% ‐ Exp.
Budget ‐ Backlog
Budget ‐ Expense
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
CI
Year
CI Trend – 1102 Legal Office
Budget
Budget Less 10%
3
Gain consequence awareness by magnifying the effects of policy decisions over multiple years.
Gain consequence awareness by magnifying the effects of policy decisions over multiple years.
BUILDING STRONG®
Forecasting Results
Budget CreationCOA AnalysisBudget DefenseOut-year strategic condition trends►Will levels meet current or future mission
requirements?
Actionable intelligence built from the installation upActionable intelligence built from the installation up
BUILDING STRONG®
BUILDING STRONG®
GISContains integrated or connected GIS solutions to query and display a variety of facility inventory, condition, and work planning information► CI,► RSL,► Work Costs,► and many more
BUILDING STRONG®
SMS CMMSInventory
PM/SC Performed
PM Schedule
Annual Work Plan
RSL
• Consolidated inventory• Plan inspections (KBI)• Inspection results• Determine condition• Analyze condition• Update RSL• SRM and budget
planning, including project development
• Consequence analysis
Inspection
• Specialized inventory• Plan, schedule, and
execute PM• Inspection needs
analysis• Schedule inspections• Service call history• RCM analysis• Plan, schedule, and
execute specific projects
E/S Call
CMMS IntegrationWork Planning and Work Execution have complementary roles
7
BUILDING STRONG®
BUILDING STRONG®
SMS Applications
Programs are also available to private sector users through multiple licensing partners•Increases availability of services to Federal Users•Lowers support costs through increased availability and broader user base
Programs are also available to private sector users through multiple licensing partners•Increases availability of services to Federal Users•Lowers support costs through increased availability and broader user base
BUILDING STRONG®
DoD Users
* Denotes trial or pilot use, but not yet an enterprise standard
BUILDING STRONG®
THE RESULTSDefensible, engineering-based investment plan
Traceable and executable to the facility component level
• Component-based performance models work with any size portfolio
Aligned with mission requirementsBalances mission and economic prioritiesProvides course of action analysis
• Avoidance of long-term penalties• Awareness of the consequences of today’s decisions
Manage by leading instead of lagging indicatorsManage by leading instead of lagging indicators
BUILDING STRONG®
Summary Discussion
BUILDING STRONG®
More InformationSMS Program ManagerMr. Lance Marrano(217) [email protected]
http://sms.cecer.army.milSMS Resources
http://www.erdc.usace.army.milInstallation Operations (more
products and expertise from the Engineer Research & Development Center)
BUILDING STRONG®
BACKUP SLIDES
BUILDING STRONG®
Good
Failed
Serious
Very Poor
Poor
Fair
Satisfactory
0
10
25
40
55
70
85
100
Standard Rating Scale
Condition Assessment Input
Ex. Distresses• Animal Dam.• Cracking• Effluores.• Vibration• Inoperable• Etc.
Distress
xCI(PCI, BCI, etc.)
Severity (H/M/L)
Quantity