Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

20
THINKING beyond the canopy Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+? Robert Nasi Workshop on Forest Governance, Decentralization and REDD+ in Latin America and the Caribbean Oaxaca, Mexico. Aug. 31-Sept. 3, 2010

description

Presentation by Robert Nasi. Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+? Oaxaca Workshop Forest Governance, Decentralisation and REDD+ in Latin America and the Caribbean, 31 August – 03 September 2010, Oaxaca, Mexico.

Transcript of Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

Page 1: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Sustainable forest management,biodiversity and carbon:

The case for REDD+?

Robert NasiWorkshop on Forest Governance, Decentralization and

REDD+ in Latin America and the Caribbean

Oaxaca, Mexico. Aug. 31-Sept. 3, 2010

Page 2: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Outline

The international forest “agenda” Biodiversity, tropical forests, degradation Management for multiple values Policy recommendations The REDD+ case

Page 3: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

The international forest agenda

Page 4: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

It is… REDD

Climate change is driving but Fundamental issues remain the

same: Unsustainable use Corruption, weak law enforcement Rights and tenure issues Loss of biodiversity and forest

areas

Compounded by new issues: Carbon-based management? SFM = degradation? Biofuels?

Page 5: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Biodiversity, tropical forests and degradation

Page 6: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Forests: more than timber

…or carbon

Page 7: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Management paradigms evolved…

Sustained yield of multiple goods

Sustainable forest management

Ecosystem approach

Non declining flow of timber

Multiple goods& services

Traditional rural world

Forestry realm

Page 8: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Emphasis is still on non-declining even flow of limited goods

Timber remains the main commodity

Multiple-use management is rare Focus is generally at stand level

with limited attention to larger spatial aspects that affect stand productivity

Ecosystem approach is not an operational concept

Maximizing short term profits remains the “norm”

There is limited attention to capital substitution possibilities

Paradigms have evolved…but:

Page 9: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Forest degradation

Page 10: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

-2 3 8 13 18 23 28 33 380

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Succession secondaire Palmier à huile

Culture itinérante Intensité élevée d'exploitation

Haute qualité de coupe sélective

Période après perturbation ( année)

Biomasse aérienne

(t/ha)

Nasi et al., 2009

Page 11: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

Price Carbon ≥ Opportunity Cost of land Low-hanging fruit seen as opportunity

ha

Enforce Protected Areas

Prevent Conversion to Ranching/Food Crops

Prevent Conversion to Soy/Palm Oil

$2,000

$500

$100

Clarify Land Tenure

Control Fires

Blaser, 2009

Page 12: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Management for multiple values and carbon

Page 13: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Barriers to SFM Governance

• Lack of serious intent by the major stakeholders (governments, industry, communities);

• High opportunity costs of maintaining forests as forests;

• Lack of tenure security or unclear tenure and resource rights. Economy

• Excessive costs and lack of clear financial benefits from improved management vs. Business as usual;

• Inappropriate wage systems for forest workers;

• Inefficiency and waste in the forest and along the market chain. Knowledge and technical guidance

• Inadequate information or knowledge about improved management;

• Improved management regulations appear too complicated or unrealistic;

• Lack of trained staff to implement improved management.

Page 14: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

How to achieve forest management options for triple “E” carbon,

while delivering a variety of other local

and global co-benefits?

Page 15: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Key “lessons”

1. The different components / facets of forests of relevance to human and environment welfare

2. The relevant spatial scales for management of these components / facets

3. The capacity for substitution or damage remediation over different temporal scales

Go beyond the obvious, identify:

Page 16: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Policy recommendations

Use reduced-impact logging techniques

Carry out post-logging silvicultural treatments where necessary

Train forest workers and reward them appropriately

Develop incentives to enhance carbon stocks in over-logged, burned and otherwise degraded forests

Page 17: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Policy recommendations

Increase security of tenure and resource access for forest owners and concessionaires

Increase sector efficiency through appropriate taxation

Develop incentive policies or market-based instruments to improve management

Foster third-party certification

Page 18: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

A case for REDD+?

Management practices leading to sustainability are only likely to be adopted where good governance exists and effective enforcement of management regulations is backed by financial incentives: the case for REDD+

At the same time all the recommendations remain valid even if REDD+ didn’t exist. We need to use the actual agenda and available funding opportunities to foster our SFM goals.

Page 19: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

Pictures: CIFOR, R. Nasi, IRD Iwokrama International Center, D. Sheil, C. Doumenge, D. Wilkie, P. Frost. M. Guariguata, S. Wunder, P. Pacheco

Page 20: Sustainable forest management, biodiversity and carbon: The case for REDD+?

THINKING beyond the canopy

www.cifor.cgiar.orgwww.cifor.cgiar.org