Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

January, 2005

Pfizer Greenhouse Gas Management Program

Experience

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

Agenda

• Rationale for Voluntary Goal

• Lessons Learned from EU Markets

• Feasibility of Trading with Kyoto Signatories

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

Company Profile

• $45 B in global pharmaceutical sales in 2003• $ 7 B biomedical research spend in 2003• Product sales in 150 countries• 81 Manufacturing plants in 32 countries• 122,000 Colleagues (32,000 in mfg.)

– More than 25 languages

• Top-tier Consumer and Animal Health Groups

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

U.S. EPA Climate Leaders • Joined in May, 2002• Established Public Goal May, 2003

• Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSAM) score for Climate Strategy Increased from 47 to 82

Goal1) “By 2007, Reduce CO2 Emissions by 35% Relative to Revenues

Compared to 2000.” 2) Increase Clean Energy Technology by 2010 to 35% of Total Electrical

Requirement

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

2003 Pfizer CO2 Emissions by Region

USA (incl. Puerto Rico)69%

Europe21%

Japan4%Asia Pacific

4%

Africa/MidEast1%

Latin America/Canada1%

•US: High Reliance on Coal, Six of Top Eight Sites in US & PR

•Europe: Greater Nuclear Power, Higher Energy Costs

•% by Group

•PGM 67%

•PGRD 19%

•Fleet 9%

•Capsugel 2%

•Corporate 2%

•TOTAL 2003 EMISSIONS:

•2,791,568 MT CO2

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

Greenhouse Gas Management Strategy and Rationale for Voluntary Program

• Makes Good Business Sense:– Increase Internal Efficiency: Over $15 million recurring

savings and 180,000 MT CO2 Reduction• Low cost/no cost energy conservation projects

• Capital intensive energy projects (with payback)

• Increase capacity utilization (facility consolidations)

• Corporate Responsibility– Proactive response to the issue of climate change

• Alignment with Global Regulatory Trends

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

Pfizer Progress Toward Goal: CO2 Emissions per $1,000,000 Revenue

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Met

ric

To

nn

es C

O2

per

US

Do

llar

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

Experience with EU ETS

• Kyoto Protocol– EC and Member States committed to reduction of 8% below 1990 GHG

levels by 2008 - 2012– Primary driver for EU to develop its regulatory scheme

• EU Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS)– Cap and Trade of CO2 for large facilities – Carbon tax to be imposed on all other facilities – Option for small facilities to join ETS and avoid tax (“opt in” provision)

• Will require detailed financial analysis– Member States developing trading guidelines

• Other “carbon” taxes on fuels being applied by specific Member States, separate from EU ETS

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

EU ETS Regulatory TimetableOctober 25, 2003 • EU issues Emissions Trading Directive

January 1, 2004 • GHG emissions permits submitted for sites subject to Directive

March 31, 2004 • Draft National Allocation Plans (NAPs) for Member States to be submitted to EU (UK, IRE, FIN, NL already in)

January 1, 2005 • Phase I of trading program begins (ends Dec 31, 2007)• €40 per tonne penalty for cap exceedance• Trading only within EU; can avoid penalty by buying credits

January 1, 2008 • Phase II begins; penalties increase to €100 per tonne• Trading outside EU with Kyoto Countries? RGGI?• Possible inclusion of non-CO2 gases

October 31, 2004 • Final allocation to be notified to each installation operator for the Phase 1 period

February 28, 2005 • Final allocation issued to each operator (annual basis)

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

EU ETS key issues:

• Direct vs. Indirect Emissions– Reduction of direct emissions at facilities expensive– Provides no added incentive for demand-side management– Windfall for electric generators?

• How will new entrants be treated? • High indirect costs due to higher energy costs and carbon

taxes (anti-competitive)• Opt-in for unregulated facilities• Guidance on trading limited• No central market clearinghouse established• Unclear if price signal will lead to greater innovation• National Allocation Plans (NAPs) not finalized yet

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

European Union

UK Country 3

Activity 2CombustionInstallations

Chemical Sector 2 Sector 3

Installation 3Sandwich Installation 2

Country 2

GHG Emissions AllocationsCountry allocations determined by Kyoto Protocol.

Sector and entity allocations determined by national governments (NAP)

National Emissions BudgetsMember States assign allocations (expected to be 65%-90% of actual emissions) to each sector that is involved in an activity included in the EU ETS.

Activity

Sector

Installation

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

Carbon Trading Feasibility Outside US

• Active global markets• US firms may purchase credits but may

not sell credits generated in US• Most reduction opportunities for Pfizer in

US• No incentive to participate

Sustainable Energy Roundtable Series

Summary

• Public voluntary GHG goal drives energy conservation and cost savings

• As a global company, commitment to goal shows leadership in climate change issue

• Too early to gauge effectiveness of mandatory programs• Direct vs Indirect emission issue needs to be addressed• No reason for Pfizer to engage in global CO2 markets if

excess reductions cannot be sold in Kyoto signatory countries