SUSTAIN Pilot Study
43
description
SUSTAIN Pilot Study. April 25, 2012 Curtis DeGasperi King County [email protected]. S ystem for U rban S tormwater T reatment and A nalysis IN tegration SUSTAIN. Data Needs. Land Use/Land Cover map in GIS Watershed model Internal model in SUSTAIN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of SUSTAIN Pilot Study
System for Urban Stormwater Treatment and Analysis INtegrationSUSTAIN
Data Needs
• Land Use/Land Cover map in GIS• Watershed model
– Internal model in SUSTAIN– External model (Examples: HSPF, SWMM)
• BMP types, design configurations, costs• Instream targets
$0.0 $10.0 $20.0 $30.0 $40.0 $50.0 $60.0 $70.0 $80.0 $90.0
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
All Solutions
Cost-Effectiveness Curve
Selected Solution
Cost ($ Million)
Effe
ctiv
enes
s (%
Red
uctio
n)Cost-Effectiveness Optimization
Cost in Millions of Dollars
Effec
tiven
ess (
%Re
ducti
on)
0
0.02
4816
18
0.08
5477
940.
0854
7794
0.19
5772
06
0.20
6801
470.
2444
8529
0.24
5404
41
0.32
9963
240.
3299
6324
0.36
7647
060.
3676
4706
0.39
889.
..0.
4126
8382
0.42
5551
470.
4365
8...
0.43
9338
24
0.46
691.
..
0.48
897.
..
0.51
011.
..
0.53
8602
940.
5468
7...
0.54
7794
120.
5487
1324
0.54
8713
24
0.54
963.
..
0.54
963.
..
0.55
0551
47
$0.0
$5.0
$10.0
$15.0
$20.0
$25.0POROUSPAVEMENTBIORETENTIONRAINBARRELWETPONDCISTERNSeries6
Effectiveness (% Reduction)
Cos
t ($
Mill
ion)
Cost-Effectiveness Optimization
Effectiveness (%Reduction)
Cost
in M
illio
ns o
f Dol
lars
30%
63%
7%
SUSTAIN BMP Modeling Assumptions
SUSTAIN Aggregate BMPs• On-site interception
– Rain barrel– Cistern– Green roof
• On-site treatment– Bioretention– Porous pavement– Infiltration trench
• Routing attenuation– Vegetative swale– Conduit
• Regional storage/treatment– Wet Pond– Dry Pond
Land Use-BMP TreatmentsNatural Drainage Design
Land Use-BMP TreatmentsNatural Drainage Design + Gray Infrastructure
50 gallon rain barrel$220 unit cost including construction$ 85.40 per yr I&E O&M assumed negligible
Total Present Value unit cost = $1,533
~3,000 gallon cistern$1,600 unit cost including construction$ 85.40 per yr I&E O&M assumed negligible
Total Present Value unit cost = $2,913
Residential On-site Detention Facilities
30-yr lifecycle cost assuming 5% discount rate
Bioretention Facilities
1 Unit is 100 ft2
$20/ft2 Design, permitting, and construction
Rain Garden$ 1.10/ft2-yr O&M$213.50 per yr I&ETPV cost = $69.73/ft2
Roadside Bioretention$ 1.10/ft2-yr O&M$170 per yr I&ETPV cost = $63.04/ft2 30-yr lifecycle cost assuming 5% discount rate
Porous Parking Areas
1 Unit is 100 ft2
$ 20/ft2 design, permitting, andconstruction$ 0.02/ft2 O&M$427.00 per yr I&E
TPV = $85.95/ft2
30-yr lifecycle cost assuming 5% discount rate
Detention Pond
1 Unit is ~13,000 ft3
$ 3.43/ft3 construction cost$ 1.20/ft3 design and permitting$ 0.01/ft3 O&M
TPV Cost = $ 25.81/ft2
or $ 4.78/ft3
Land cost = $18.25 ft230-yr lifecycle cost assuming 5% discount rate
Questions ?
SUSTAIN Pilot Catchment Study Results
Objectives
• Documentation– BMPs to be considered and associated treatment trains– BMP designs used in SUSTAIN– Cost assumptions used in model– Methods used to estimate road, rooftop and parking areas– Application of hydrologic target used in model– Extrapolation methods to biological and water quality
improvements• Describe general approach for expanding modeling
effort beyond pilot catchment
Pilot Catchment Scale Study
Green-Duwamish River Watershed Quality Assessmenthttp://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/watersheds/green-river/watershed-quality-assessment.aspx
Newaukum Urban Sub-basin
Pilot study area
Catchment NEW151
Newaukum Urban Sub-basin
Residential Rooftop and Commercial Parking Area Output
Building Height Model
Land Use/Land Cover
SUSTAIN Aquifers
Effective Impervious HRUs Pervious HRUs
Aggregate BMP
BMP Aquifer (Aquifer 1)
Pervious Aquifer(Aquifer 2)
AssessmentPoint
Surface Runoff
Pervious Subsurface FlowBMP Infiltration
BMP Outlet FlowRelease from BMP Aquifer
Release from Pervious Aquifer
Evaporation Loss
Optimization Decision VariablesHigh Pulse Count
Till Scenarios
Treatment TrainOn-site
Detention Pervious TreatmentAquifer Recession Coefficient (/hr)
Green Rain Barrel 0 0Green Rain Barrel 0 0.1Green Rain Barrel 80 0Green Rain Barrel 80 0.1Green Cistern 0 0Green Cistern 0 0.1Green Cistern 80 0Green Cistern 80 0.1
Green + Gray Rain Barrel 0 0Green + Gray Rain Barrel 0 0.1Green + Gray Rain Barrel 80 0Green + Gray Rain Barrel 80 0.1Green + Gray Cistern 0 0Green + Gray Cistern 0 0.1Green + Gray Cistern 80 0Green + Gray Cistern 80 0.1
Catchment NEW151 Very Poorly Drained Type D Soils
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%
%Effectiveness
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%
%Effectiveness
Rain Barrels Cisterns
EIA only +80% P EIA only +80% P EIA only +80% P EIA only +80% P
Rain Barrels Cisterns
$0.0
$5.0
$10.0
$15.0
$20.0
TPV Cost in $M
$0.00
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
TPV Cost in $M
Green + Gray on Till Scenarios
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20Detention Pond
Roadside BioretentionPorous Parking
Rain Garden
Onsite Detention
BMP Cost BreakdownGreen+Gray Treatment Train on Till
Rain Barrels Cisterns
EIA only +80% P EIA only +80% P
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
Private Capital
Public Capital
O&M
I&E
Green+Gray on Till Cost Breakdown
Rain Barrels Cisterns
EIA only +80% P EIA only +80% P
Cost-Effectiveness CurveGreen+Gray on Till Scenario 15
$0.0 $10.0 $20.0 $30.0 $40.0 $50.0 $60.0 $70.0 $80.0 $90.00
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
All Solutions
Cost-Effectiveness Curve
Selected Solution
Cost ($ Million)
Hig
h P
ulse
Cou
nt
In terms of High Pulse Count
$0.0 $10.0 $20.0 $30.0 $40.0 $50.0 $60.0 $70.0 $80.0 $90.015%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
All Solutions
Cost-Effectiveness Curve
Selected Solution
Cost ($ Million)
%M
axim
um B
-IBI
In terms of Log-Linear Regression Model relating HPC to B-IBI
$0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0 $16.0 $18.0 $20.015%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
All SolutionsCost-Effectiveness CurveSelected Solution80% UCL80% LCL
Cost ($ Million)
%M
axim
um B
-IBI
In terms of %ofMaximum B-IBI including uncertainty bounds (80% CL)
Water Quality Extrapolation
• SUSTAIN model includes TSS• Extrapolate to turbidity, Cu and Zn using 95%
Upper CL regression equations• Calculate TSS, Total Cu and Total Zn load
reductions• Calculate frequency of exceedance of
turbidity, Dissolved Cu and Dissolved Zn standards
Water Quality ExtrapolationSelected “Best” of Best Scenarios
• Up to ~80% reduction in TSS loads• Copper and Zinc loads reduced 30-40%• Frequency of exceedance of turbidity standard
reduced ~85%• Copper was not predicted to exceed standards
under current conditions• A low frequency of exceedance of the Zn
standard was effectively eliminated
Conclusions
• A variety of BMP treatment systems can meet similar targets at a variety of costs
• Generally, Green+Gray treatment trains performed better than Green only
• Effectiveness is highly dependent on assumptions regarding the fate of BMP infiltration
Recommendation
• Extend catchment modeling approach to a number of other catchments with relatively homogeneous land use/land cover
Questions ?
Approach to Scaling Up
Approach to Scaling Up
Questions ?
