SurveyMonkey Analyze - Export - International HPH Network prg reps 2010-tf.pdf · Roderer...

Q1: Name of Task Force Task Force in Mental Health Promotion in Health Care Settings

Q2: Date of Establishment

Date of Establishment 02/05/1998

Q3: Period of Signed Agreement

Expiration of Network Agreement 12/05/2013

Q4: Which of these does the work of your TaskForce focus upon?

Patients, Staff

Q5: Task Force LeaderName Prof. Dr. Hartmut BergerAddress Vitos Philippshospital D-64560 RiedstadtEmail [email protected] 0049-6158-183-216Fax 0049-6158-183-243Task Force Website www.hpps.net

Q6: Period covered by this Progress ReportFrom 2010To 2011

Q7: Coordinating InstitutionName Prof. Dr. Hartmut BergerAddress Vitos Philippshospital D-64560 RiedstadtEmail [email protected] 0049-6158-183-216Fax 0049-6158-183-243Institution Website www.hpps.net

COMPLETECOMPLETECollector:Collector: HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 (Web Link)(Web Link)Started:Started: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:04:32 AMTuesday, March 08, 2011 5:04:32 AMLast Modified:Last Modified: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 6:29:19 AMTuesday, March 08, 2011 6:29:19 AMTime Spent:Time Spent: 01:24:4701:24:47IP Address:IP Address: 217.68.2.185217.68.2.185

PAGE 1: Part A - Administrative Information

#1

1 / 61

HPH TF Progress Reports Online 2010

Q8: Number of hospitals, health services and other members of your Task Force at the time ofreportingCombined Hospital / Health Services 10

Q9: Please provide an updated list of all members ofyour Task Force - including name, contact person,address and contact information as well as the HPHmembership/non-membership status (Note: Can beCopy/Pasted into the field below)

Respondent skipped thisquestion

Q10: Please provide an updated list of all Task Forcemembers (including name and contact information)

1. Thomas Edward Harrison [email protected]

Q11: Has your Task Force delivered, or is itplanning to deliver, material for the online HPHLibrary?

Yes,

If yes, please provide titles and authors1. Berger, H., H. Gunia, K. Nürnberger, A.Teschner (1997) Psychoedukative Gruppen fürFamilien. Erste Erfahrungen. In: Dittmar V.(Hrsg.): Die Behandlung schizophrenerMenschen. Roderer Regensburg 6. Berger, H., R.Paul (1999) The Health Promoting PsychiatricHospital 9. Paul, R., H. Berger, R. Kilian (1996)Health Promotion in a Psychiatric HealthcareInstitution. In: Newsletter Health PromotionHospitals 8, 4 - 59.14. Berger, H. (2003)Gesundheitsförderung - Ein neuer Weg in derPsychiatrie. In: Klug, G. (Hrsg) Dem Menschen inseiner Welt begegnen. Psychiatrische Praxis.Supplement 1 Band 30 S14-2015.

Q12: Has your Task Force described a relation tomission, purpose and objectives of the InternationalHPH Network and the expected impact?

Yes,

If so, please provide here or in attachment emailto the HPH Secretariatsee email to HPH secretariat

Q13: Have you submitted a detailed Task Forcedescription to the International HPH Secretariat?(Including Action Plan, Task Force members, TimeSchedule, Deliverables List and Plan for Evaluation)

Yes

Q14: Have you recruited and supported Task Forcemembers in becoming members of the InternationalHPH Network?

No

Q15: Task Force Growth Respondent skipped thisquestion

2 / 61


Q16: Does your Task Force take part in anypartnerships with other organizations or similar?

Yes,

If so, please provide names of partners and ofcontact personsAktionsbündnis für seelische Gesundheit;Bundesdirektorenkonferenz

Q17: If applicable, please list any furtherinstitutions, enterprises etc. with which your TaskForce has working relations (such as politicalentities, scientific organizations, NGOs, publicinstitutions, private companies, other networks,etc.)


Q18: Briefly describe your Task Force's plan for thenext period

In planning are three studies:

Q19: Has your Task Force reported on HP activitiesin the Online HPH Activity Database?

No

Q20: Organizational structure and way of workingDescribe the organization of your Task Force(coordinating institution, scientific committee, steeringgroup, leadership, etc. If available, please email anorganizational chart along with the rest of theattachments)

The task force on health promotingpsychiatric services was founded in 1998enfolding a working group of varyingmembers from different countries mainlyfrom Ireland, Scotland, Norway, Lithuania,Denmark, Germany, Poland and Italy. Thetask force is managed by a working groupof Vitos Philippshospital, a clinic forpsychiatry and psychotherapy seated in D-64560 Riedstadt Germany. The task forceis partially supported by the stakeholder butthere is no funding by the government orother institutions. Therefore the task forceis not able to recruit and administer acontinuously acting network of psychiatricinstitutions, which was intended in thebeginning. But it was possible to implementworking groups for special themes as wellas a close and continuous scientificcooperation with the universities ofDarmstadt, Frankfurt and thepsychoanalytic institute in Mainz.

Q21: Outcomes and main achievementsPlease describe the main outcomes and achievements At Vitos Philippshospital the following

projects could be realized:Please describe the main problems encountered No appreciable financial support

PAGE 2: Part B - Exchange of Knowledge and Experience

3 / 61


Q22: How is your Task Force financed and managed?Funding of your task Force (sources, amount ofoverall annual budget in Euro etc.)

No funding, but work time spent forcoordination and research together with theuniversities of Darmstadt and Frankfurt

Plan for the next period No possibilities of funding

Q23: Evaluation and monitoringHas any evaluation and monitoring been carried outaccording to implementation of the WHO Standards,projects etc.?

self -assessment-tool for health promotionin mental health services

Q24: Which of the WHO Standards and Sub-Standards relate to the work of your Task Force?Standard 1: Management Policy

The organization identifies responsibilities for healthpromotion

Yes

The organization ensures the availability of proceduresfor collection and evaluation of data in order to monitorthe quality of health promotion activities

Yes

Q25: Standard 2: Patient Assessment

The organization ensures the availability of proceduresfor all patients to assess their need for healthpromotion

Yes

The patient’s needs-assessment reflects informationprovided by others and ensures sensitivity to socialand cultural background

Yes

Q26: Standard 3: Patient Information and Intervention

Based on the health promotion needs assessment, thepatient is informed of factors impacting on their healthand, in partnership with the patient, a plan for relevantactivities for health promotion is agreed

Yes

The organization ensures that all patients, staff andvisitors have access to general information on factorsinfluencing health

Yes

Q27: Standard 4: Promoting a Healthy Workplace

The organization ensures the development andimplementation of a healthy and safe workplace

Yes

The organization ensures the development andimplementation of a comprehensive HumanResources Strategy that includes training anddevelopment of health promotion skills of staff

Yes

The organization ensures availability of procedures todevelop and maintain staff awareness on health issues

Yes

4 / 61


Q28: Standard 5: Continuity and cooperation

The organization ensures the health promotionservices are coherent with current provisions andregional health policy plans

Yes

The organization ensures the availability andimplementation of health promotion activities andprocedures during out-patient visits and after patientdischarge

Yes

Q29: Implementation of international, national, regional or local projectsWhich projects have been given priority? On the basis of the given experience it

seems to be time for a report about whatmental health promotion could be and howto be realized in all day practice. Thereforeit’s planned to fashion the knowledge in amanual and guidelines for mental healthpromotion in psychiatric services afterfinishing the above mentioned and ongoingstudies. This should be done by a finalreport for the general assembly of the HPHnetwork presumably in the year 2013. Withthat report the work of the task force onhealth promoting psychiatric services couldbe finalized.

Q30: Teaching and training

Does the Task Force offer to organize any trainingactivities related to HPH?

No

Has the Task Force participated in any training activityrelated to HPH? (e.g. WHO Summer School, staffexchange program, study tours, national / regionalHPH conferences, etc.)

No

Does the Task Force issue any guidelines onimplementation?

Yes

Q31: How does your Task Force work with HPH Growth? (International HPH Strategy 2009-2010,Priority 1)

Recruit new members No

Advocate own Task Force and the International HPHNetwork

Yes

Invite to participate in Task Force related HPHactivities

Yes

5 / 61


Q32: How does your Task Force work with HPH Partnerships & Alliances? (International HPH Strategy2009-2010, Priority 2)

Task Force related advocacy Yes

Identify Task Force related partners in integratedsetting strategies

Yes

Cooperate in the framework of Task Forceconferences, workshops, projects and other activities

Yes

Q33: How does your Task Force work with HPH Qualitative Growth? (International HPH Strategy 2009-2010, Priority 3)

Describe Task Force's relation to the HPH Constitution Yes

Participate in WHO-HPH Schools, International HPHConference and HPH Newcomers' Workshop

No

Q34: Additional strategy, priorities and focus areasof your Task Force for 2009-2010


Q35: Strategy, priorities and focus areas of yourTask Force for the next period


Q36: Recognition from public authorities, health systems etc.If relevant, then please describe the recognition givento your Task Force - from whom and in what way?

member of Aktionsbündnis für seelischeGesundheit

Q37: Task Force information and internal / external communicationAre key Task Force documents available in any locallanguages? If not, is translation envisaged?

yes

Please list existing strategies and actual activities todisseminate information inside the International HPHNetwork as well as externally to partners etc. (HPHwebsite (discussion forum), HPH Conference, GeneralAssembly, Newsletters, HPH Scientific projects?)

homepage

How is your Task Force advocating itself (regionally,nationally and internationally)?

publications, lectures, workshops (seereport)

Q38: Collaboration with the International HPHNetwork and with WHO


Q39: Publication list of the Task ForcePlease list any publications made by your Task Force see above and given by the report sent by

email

6 / 61


Q1: Name of Task Force Alcohol and Alcohol Interventions



Q3: Period of Signed Agreement Respondent skipped thisquestion


Patients, Staff

Q5: Task Force LeaderName Sverre NesvaagAddress KORFOR, Stavanger University Hospital,

PO.box 8100, 4068 Stavanger, NorwayEmail [email protected] +47 90837431Task Force Website www.sus.no/korfor

Q6: Period covered by this Progress ReportFrom April 2010To March 2011

Q7: Coordinating InstitutionName KORFOR, Stavanger University HospitalAddress PO.box 8100, 4068 Stavanger, NorwayEmail [email protected] +47 48136702Institution Website www.sus.no/korfor

COMPLETECOMPLETECollector:Collector: HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 (Web Link)(Web Link)Started:Started: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:23:19 AMTuesday, March 15, 2011 2:23:19 AMLast Modified:Last Modified: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 6:44:14 AMTuesday, March 15, 2011 6:44:14 AMTime Spent:Time Spent: 04:20:5404:20:54IP Address:IP Address: 161.4.82.7161.4.82.7


#2

7 / 61


Q8: Number of hospitals, health services and other members of your Task Force at the time ofreportingHospitals 11Health Services 3Combined Hospital / Health Services 0Non-Hospital / Health Services 3


[email protected]: Susan Sadiq, Royal Liverpool Hospital. [email protected]: Andre Whitfield, Lead Alcohol Specialist Nurse., [email protected]: Suzanne McDonald, Healthy Hospitals Project Manager, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust., [email protected]: Heli Hätönen, Coordinator of Preventive Mental Health Care Services, Municipality of Imatra. , [email protected]: Denise Comerford, Preventive Medicine, St. Vincents Univerity Hospital, Irland. , [email protected]: Gary Bickerstaffe, Health Improvement Specialist, Bolton Hospitals NHS Trust, Bolton., [email protected]: TsoJen Wang, Director of Adult Psychiatry, Tsao Tun Psychiatric Center, Taiwan. , [email protected]: Lisa Luger, Principal Lecturer and Programme Leader, Substance Use and Misuse Studies, Thames Valley University, Middlesex. , [email protected]: Jean McQueen, AHP Consultant, The Ayr Clinic, Ayr. , [email protected]: Thomas Paparrigopoulos, Ass.prof. of Psychiatry, Athens University Medical School. , [email protected]: Hanne Tønnesen, HPH – CC, Copenhagen, [email protected]: Tim Neumann, Charite, Berlin, [email protected]: Claudia Spies, Charite, Berlin, [email protected]: Oliver Grøne, Barcelona, Spain, [email protected]: Rasmus Sand, Rogaland A-senter, [email protected]: Anders Hellman, Rogaland A-senter, [email protected]: Møyfrid Lode Yndestad, KORFOR, Stavanger University Hospital, [email protected]: Barclay Stevenson, International Research Institute of Stavanger, [email protected]: Jan Tore Daltveit, Haukeland University Hospital, [email protected]: Sverre Nesvaag, KORFOR, Stavanger University Hospital



8 / 61



Yes,

If yes, please provide titles and authorsAlcohol and Alcohol Intervention Manual, WHO-CC, Copenhagen


No


Yes,

CommentsPresented to the General Assembly, April 2010


No

Q15: Task Force GrowthNumber of new members 0Number of withdrawals 0


Yes,

If so, please provide names of partners and ofcontact personsThe UK network of substance misuse liasonnurses, Adrian Brown, St.Marys London


The Norwegian Directorate of Health


1. Dissemination of the Alcohol and Alcohol Intervention Manual. 2. Mapping examples of good policies and intervention, 3. Reviewing the research literature, 4. Workshop at the Turku HPH conference, 5. Initiating new research projects


No


9 / 61



Coordinating committee and five workgroups lead by coordinating committemembers

Q21: Outcomes and main achievementsPlease describe the main outcomes and achievements 1. Prodused the Alcohol and Alcohol

Intervention Manual, 2. Established theframework for the experience database. 3.Collected relevant research literature

Please describe the main facilitators and supportivefactors encountered

Financial support from the NorwegianDirectorate of Health

Please describe the main problems encountered Up til now: not been able to engage thetask force members in a satisfactory degree

What do you think is the limit for more members to jointhe activities of your Task Force?

Engaging new member in the task forcework groups


The Norwegian Directorate of health:Annualy 125.000 Euros

Plan for the next period According to working plan


No

Have any additional analysis or surveys been carriedout?

A prevalence studie in three NorwgianHospitals



Yes

The organization allocates resources for theimplementation of health promotion

Yes


Yes

10 / 61




Yes

The assessment of a patient’s need for healthpromotion is done at first contact with the hospital. Thisis kept under review and adjusted as necessaryaccording to changes in the patient’s clinical conditionor on request

Yes


Yes



Yes


Yes



Yes


Yes


Yes



Yes


Yes

Further comments A new research project regarding the lastpoint has now been started

11 / 61


Q29: Implementation of international, national, regional or local projectsWhich projects have been given priority? Collaboration between hospital and general

practioners after dischargeHow are projects chosen? Are the developed based onformal assessment of need or on international,national or regional policy?

yes

How is the implementation monitored? monthly reportingHow do hospitals and health services follow-up on theresults of the monitoring?

discussed in the project reference group

Concerning the implementation of your projects, whichfactors were most supportive or obstructive?

strong interest from the departmentmanagament



No


Yes


Yes

Anything you would like to add? Alcohol and Alcohol Intervention Manual




Yes


Yes

Invite to make special arrangements involving HPH No

12 / 61



Task Force related advocacy No


No

Initiate new partnerships and develop and continueexisting partnerships

No


Yes

Details, if needed Turku HPH conference workshop




Yes




see over


The importance of the task force has beenrecognised by all national and internationalpartners


will be translated to French and Spanish


workshop, newsletters

Please list meetings and conferences, if applicable(indicating organisers, participants, presentations etc.)

Turku HPH conference


Active networking to Hospitals withimplemented policies and interventions

13 / 61


Q38: Collaboration with the International HPH Network and with WHOHow do you think that the International HPH Network,the GB and the GA could better meet the needs of theTask Forces?

by helping us in the networking process

How do you think your Task Force could bettercontribute to the International HPH Network’s fulfilmentof its objectives?

by disseminating results

If applicable, describe the collaboration between WHOand your Task Force (directly and / or indirectly)

established direct contact with GenevaWHO employees who have been active inthe development of the new WHO GlobalAlcohol Policy

How is your Task Force advocating the InternationalHPH Network and WHO (regionally, nationally andinternationally)?

by expplaing or relationship and role in thenetwork

Q39: Publication list of the Task ForcePlease list any publications made by your Task Force Alcohol and Alcohol Intervention Manual

14 / 61


Q1: Name of Task Force Health Promotion for Children and Adolescents in and by Hospitals and Health Services



Q3: Period of Signed Agreement Respondent skipped thisquestion


Patients

Q5: Task Force LeaderName Ana Isabel Fernandes GuerreiroAddress Sesmarias Cx300H, 8200-385 Albufeira -

PortugalEmail [email protected] +351 91 215 1514Task Force Website hphnet.org

Q6: Period covered by this Progress ReportFrom March 2010To March 2011

Q7: Coordinating InstitutionName Office of the High Commissioner for Health,

Ministry of HealthAddress Av. João Crisóstomo, 9, 1049-062 Lisboa -

PortugalEmail [email protected] +351 21 330 50 11Institution Website http://www.acs.min-saude.pt/

COMPLETECOMPLETECollector:Collector: HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 (Web Link)(Web Link)Started:Started: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 7:00:14 AMTuesday, March 01, 2011 7:00:14 AMLast Modified:Last Modified: Thursday, March 24, 2011 10:10:58 AMThursday, March 24, 2011 10:10:58 AMTime Spent:Time Spent: Over a weekOver a weekIP Address:IP Address: 194.65.151.100194.65.151.100


#3

15 / 61


Q8: Number of hospitals, health services and other members of your Task Force at the time ofreportingHospitals 13Non-Hospital / Health Services 9


Task Force HPH-CA Members December 2010: Ana Isabel F. Guerreiro Non-HPH Member Task Force Leader Technical Officer Office of the High Commissioner for Health, Portugal Av. João Crisóstomo, nº9 1049-062 Lisbon Portugal www.acs.min-saude.pt [email protected] [email protected] Giuliana Filippazzi Non-HPH Member European Association for Children in Hospital (EACH) Via Tesio 7 20151, Milano, Italy www.each-for-sick-children.org [email protected] Isabelle Aujoulat HPH Member Unité d'éducation pour la santé RESO Health Systems Research Ecole de Santé Publique Université catholique de Louvain Brussels – Belgium [email protected] Klaus Arbeiter HPH Member MD, Paediatrician Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine Medical University of Vienna Waehringer Guertel 18-20 1090 Vienna, Austria http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/index.php?id=372&language=2 [email protected] Kjersti J. Ø. Fløtten HPH Member Coordinator Norsk nettverk for helsefremmende arbeid Norwegian HPH network Centre for health promotion Akershus university hospital P.O.Box 70 1478 LØRENSKOG Norway [email protected] www.ahus.no J. Raquel Mullen HPH Member MD Stanly Pediatrics at Troy 835 Albemarle Rd 27371, Troy, North Carolina, USA [email protected] http://www.stanlymedicalservices.org/ James E. Robinson HPH Member Health Equalities and Inclusion Facilitator Royal Hospital for Sick Children NHS Lothian University Hospitals Sciennes Road EH9 1LF, Edinburgh, United Kingdom [email protected] http://www.nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk/ Lagle Suurorg HPH Member Quality Manager Tallinn Children’s Hospital Tervise, 28 13419,Tallinn, Estonia [email protected] http://www.lastehaigla.ee/ Leonor Santos Non-HPH Member Clinical Psychologist Coordinator, Humanisation Department of the Child Support Institute (IAC) Instituto de Apoio à Criança Largo da Memória, 14 1349-045 Lisbon Portugal [email protected] http://www.iacrianca.pt Les White HPH Member MBBS, FRACP, MRACMA, MHA, AFACHSE John Beveridge Professor of Paediatrics University of NSW & Executive Director Sydney Children's

16 / 61


NSW & Executive Director Sydney Children's Hospital High Street, Randwick NSW 2031, Australia [email protected] http://www.sch.edu.au/ Liz McArthur HPH Member Clinical Nurse Specialist Pain and Sedation service Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Eaton Road Liverpool L12 2AP UK [email protected] http://www.alderhey.com/ Micheline Ste-Marie HPH Member MD, FRCP Associate Director of Professional Services and Academic Affairs Montreal Children’s Hospital McGill University Health Centre [email protected] http://www.thechildren.com/en/ http://www.muhc.ca/ Marija Radonić HPH Member Pediatric Department in General (County) Hospital Dubrovnik Dr. Roka Mišetića, 2 20000, Dubrovnik, Croatia [email protected] http://www.bolnica-du.hr/english/index.php Núria Serrallonga Tintore HPH Member Co-ordinator of DIVER/CHILD-LIFE Programme Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Pg. St Joan de Déu, 2 08950 - Esplugues de Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain [email protected] www.hsjdbcn.org Rosa Gloria Suárez HPH Member Public Health Directorate Government of the Canary Islands Rambla General Franco, 53 38006. Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Canarias, Spain [email protected] www.gobiernodecanarias.org/sanidad/ Stella Tsitoura HPH Member Member, European Society for Social Pediatrics and Child Health (ESSOP) Director, Department of Social Medicine 2nd Paediatric University Clinic “P & A Kyriakou” Children’s Hospital Mesogeion Avenue 24 11527, Athens, Greece [email protected] www.essop.org Zsuzsanna Kovács HPH Member National Institute of Child Health Child Health Main Department Methodology Department Diószegi út 64. 1113, Budapest, Hungary [email protected] www.ogyei.hu , www.sepa-esap.org Andrew Clarke Task Force Partner, non-HPH Member Health Advisor: Practice & Development CWS 32-36 Loman Street Southwark London SE1 0EH 020 7922 8003 London office +44 (0)783 467 9060 UK mobile +977 9804174693 Nepal mobile www.cwsuk.org Liam Cairns Task Force Partner, non-HPH Member Director, Investing in Children Durham, UK [email protected] Sandra Eismann Task Force Partner, non-HPH Member Development Manager Methods Care Quality Commission Finsbury Tower 103 - 105 Bunhill Row London EC1 8TG Direct line: 0207 448 4555 Ext. 3755 [email protected] http://www.cqc.org.uk/ Matthew King Task Force Partner, non-HPH Member UNICEF UK UNICEF

17 / 61


Partner, non-HPH Member UNICEF UK UNICEF House 30a Great Sutton Street London EC1V 0DU Tel: 0207 490 2388 Fax: 0207 250 1733 http://www.unicef.org.uk/




Yes


Yes


Yes


No



Yes,

If so, please provide names of partners and ofcontact personsAttachment will be sent by email




Enhance the work around children's rights in hospitals and health services; develop an assessment tool for children and adolescents to assess the respect of their rights in hospitals and health services; to develop the salutogenic approach in health promotion for children and adolescents in and by hospitals and health services


No

18 / 61



The Task Force Leader coordinates andmonitors the work of Task Force members.In relation to some specific work, somereports are sent by individual members,when requested. Task Force membersengage with HPH members and non-HPHmembers to implement Task Force-relatedactivities.

Q21: Outcomes and main achievementsPlease describe the main outcomes and achievements The work around the Self-evaluation Model

and Tool on the respect of children's rightsin hospital has been the most successfuland effective one by the Task Force, beingthat it has been used and replicated in alarge number of hospitals. Following thiswork, the Task Force has been contactedby WHO, CoE and IOM to engage indifferent activities. The work of the TaskForce has also been published.


There is great motivation in the group andthe achievements reached so far keepreaching further actors and institutions.

Please describe the main problems encountered Financial supportWhat do you think is the limit for more members to jointhe activities of your Task Force?

In countries where there are several peopleworking for the Task Force, such is the casein the UK, professionals coordinatenationally. I believe this is the way forward.


Each member is funded by its owninstitution, including all the activitiespromoted by the Task Force. This is a greatimpediment to push the work even further.

Plan for the next period We have tried to finance the Task Forcethrough European funding or other, so farwithout success, but we will keep trying.


19 / 61



No

Which strategies have been used for evaluation andmonitoring?

Ad hoc reports


No



No


No


Yes



Yes


Yes


Yes



Yes


Yes

20 / 61




No


No


No



No


No

Q29: Implementation of international, national, regional or local projectsWhich projects have been given priority? Respecting Children's Rights in HospitalHow are projects chosen? Are the developed based onformal assessment of need or on international,national or regional policy?

This activity was identified as one priorityarea of the Task Force since the beggining

How is the implementation monitored? The Task Force has developed a Self-evaluation Model and Tool. For itsimplementation, there is a Local Report,which all participants fill out and submit tothe Task Force Leader.

How do hospitals and health services follow-up on theresults of the monitoring?

It depends on the local needs and priorities.


As described before.



Yes


Yes


No

21 / 61





Yes


Yes

Invite to make special arrangements involving HPH No




No


No


Yes


Describe Task Force's relation to the HPH Constitution No


Yes





Q36: Recognition from public authorities, healthsystems etc.


22 / 61



Yes


HPH website and HPH Conference. AnHPH Newsletter number dedicated to theTask Forces has been suggested to theHPH Scientific Committee


The Task Force has presented its work invarious meetings


At all levels


More active support in implementing anddisseminating its activities, i.e. through aNewsletter, which could be managed by theTask Force


In enhacing HP knowledge for children andadolescents


The Task Force has always collaboratedwith various professionals of WHOEuropean and Headquarters' offices

Q39: Publication list of the Task ForcePlease list any publications made by your Task Force - Simonelli F, Guerreiro AIF and Sereni N

(2009) The respect of children’s rights inhospital. A model and tool of self-evaluationby the International Network of HealthPromoting Hospitals; Educazione Sanitariae Promozione della Salute. - Guerreiro AIFet al. (2009) The right of migrant children tohealthcare: the response of hospitals andhealth services; WHO Collaborating Centrefor Health Promotion Capacity Building onChild and Adolescent Health & IOM -Simonelli F and Guerreiro AIF (eds); Therespect of children’s rights in hospital: aninitiative of the International Network onHealth Promoting Hospitals and HealthServices. Final Report on theimplementation process of the Self-evaluation Model and Tool on the respect ofchildren’s rights in hospital. January 2010

23 / 61


Q1: Name of Task Force Migrant-Friendly and Culturally Comptetent Healthcare






Patients, Staff, Community

Q5: Task Force LeaderName Antonio ChiarenzaAddress AUSL of Reggio Emilia - Via Amendola, 2 -

42100 Reggio Emilia, ItalyEmail [email protected] +390522335087Task Force Website http://www.ausl.re.it/HPH/FrontEnd/Home/D

efault.aspx?channel_id=38

Q6: Period covered by this Progress ReportFrom April 2010To March 2011

Q7: Coordinating InstitutionName AUSL of Reggio EmiliaAddress Via Amendola, 2 - 42100 Reggio Emilia -

ItalyEmail [email protected] +390522335087Institution Website Http//www.ausl.re.it

COMPLETECOMPLETECollector:Collector: HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 (Web Link)(Web Link)Started:Started: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 4:04:15 AMTuesday, March 15, 2011 4:04:15 AMLast Modified:Last Modified: Friday, March 25, 2011 2:04:00 AMFriday, March 25, 2011 2:04:00 AMTime Spent:Time Spent: Over a weekOver a weekIP Address:IP Address: 195.62.185.251195.62.185.251


#4

24 / 61


Q8: Number of hospitals, health services and other members of your Task Force at the time ofreportingHospitals 11Combined Hospital / Health Services 6Non-Hospital / Health Services 13


Nr.; Name; Country; Affiliation; e-mail ; Chiarenza, Antonio; Italy; AUSL of Reggio Emilia - HPH Emilia-Romagna; [email protected] ; Dall’Asta, Ilaria; Italy; AUSL of Reggio Emilia - HPH Emilia-Romagna; Ilaria.dall’[email protected] ; Riboldi, Benedetta; Italy; AUSL of Reggio Emilia - HPH Emilia-Romagna; Benedetta.riboldi#@ausl.re.it ; Nurse, Diana; Ireland; Social Inclusion Health Service, Dublin - HPH Ireland; [email protected] ; McHugh, Laura; Ireland; Social Inclusion Health Service, Dublin - HPH Ireland; [email protected] ; Aambø, Arild; Norway; Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo – HPH Norway; [email protected] ; Spilker, Ragnhild; Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo - HPH Norway; [email protected] ; Cattacin, Sandro; Switzerland; Geneva University, Geneva; [email protected] ; Patrik Hunziker; Switzerland; CP 26 CH-1142 Pampigny - HPH Switzerland; [email protected] ; Domenig, Dagmar; Switzerland; Swiss Red Cross, Bern; [email protected] ; Bischoff, Alexander; Switzerland; Basel University, Basel; [email protected] ; Khan, Dilshad; UK; Bradford Teaching Hospitals, Bradfrord; [email protected] ; Chiu, Lai Fong; UK; TF member, Leeds University, Leeds; [email protected] ; Johnson, Mark; UK; De Montfort University, Leicester; [email protected] ; Robinson, James; Scotland; Lothian University Hospital NHS Trust - HPH Scotland; [email protected] ; Gorman, Dermot; Scotland; NHS Lothian - HPH Scotland; [email protected] ; Glover, James; Scotland; NHS Lothian - - HPH Scotland; [email protected] ; Fernandez, Manuel; Sweden; Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala; [email protected] ; Ammentorp, Jette; Denmark; Kolding Hospital, Kolding; [email protected] ; Sodemann, Morten; Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, Odense Universitetshospital, Odense; '[email protected]' ; Nielsen, Dorthe; Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, Odense Universitetshospital, Odense; [email protected] ; García-Ramírez, Manuel; Spain; Universidad de Sevilla, Seville ; [email protected] ; Mendez, Elvira; Spain; Asociación Salud y Famiglia, Barcelona – HPH

25 / 61


Asociación Salud y Famiglia, Barcelona – HPH Spain; [email protected] ; Juvinyà i Canal, Dolors; Spain; HPH Catalonia, Universitat de Girona, Girona; [email protected] ; Salceda de Alba, Antonio; Spain; Hospital Punta de Europa, Cadiz; [email protected] ; Himel, Susan; Canada; Bridgepoint Health, Toronto - HPH Canada; [email protected] ; Abraham, Elizabeth; Canada; University Health Network , Toronto - HPH Canada; [email protected] ; Serdynska, Marie; Canada; Montreal Children's Hospital, The McGill University Health Centre, Montreal - HPH, Canada; [email protected] ; Gurwinder, Gill; Canada; Brampton Civic Hospital, Brampton ; [email protected] ; Ingleby, David; The Netherlands; Utrecht University , Utrecht; [email protected] ; Karl-Trummer, Ursula; Austria; Danau University, Krems ; [email protected] ; Schmidt, Werner; Germany; Berlin ; [email protected] ; Fawkes, Sally; Australia; La Trobe University, Melbourne - HPH Australia; [email protected] ; Travaglia, Johanna; Australia; New South Wales University, Sydney; [email protected] ; Robertson, Hamish; Australia; Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; [email protected] ; Like, Robert; USA; Center for Healthy Families and Cultural Diversity, Department of Family Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Jersey; [email protected]




No


Yes


Yes


Yes

26 / 61




Yes,

If so, please provide names of partners and ofcontact personsCOST-Action HOME - Prof David Ingleby(University of Utrecht)


University of Geneva, University of Seville, University of Gerona, University of Brighton, University of La Trobe, University of New South Wales, De Monford University, Leeds University, PICUM, Caritas, IOM, Council of Europe (Dept. of Social Cohesion), WHO Venice (Network of Health Regions)


The HPH-TF MFCCH plan for the next period aims at developing a comprehensive framework for measuring and monitoring the capacity of healthcare organisations to improve accessibility to appropriate and effective health services, health promotion and preventive care for migrants and ethnic minorities. The project will represent the main activity of the 2011-2012 work plan of the TF MFCCH and aims at developing specific standards to ensure equity in healthcare. Equity is widely acknowledged as a core element of healthcare quality, yet, inequities in the provision of healthcare are severe and pervasive despite widespread documentation and numerous attempts to address them (See for example the “Solidarity in health: reducing health inequalities in EU, EU Commission 2009). These standards should provide hospitals and health services with a framework to evaluate their practices and to stimulate development. They will provide a real opportunity for staff to question what they do, why they do it and whether it can be done better. Performance indicators complementary to the standards will be added to allow a quantitative monitoring of quality improvement over time.


Yes


27 / 61



Coordinating team (decision making level):to lead and coordinate actions; to decideand organise activities (projects,workshops, conferences).Advisory group(scientific level): to discuss ideas anddevelopmental activities to inform thecoordinator decisions.Working groups(operative level): to collect and developknowledge and practice in the areas ofconcern. Hub of networks (partnershiplevel): to facilitate connections betweenother networks and projects. MFH web-site(communication level): to share ideas andknowledge, to promote and disseminatebest practice.

Q21: Outcomes and main achievementsPlease describe the main outcomes and achievements Implementation of the MFH model at

National/Regional levels. Establishemt offorms of cooperation with EU insitutions:Council of Europe; PICUM, IOM, MFS,...Participation at EU projects: Nowherlandand COST-Action HOME; Organisation ofexpert meetings and workshops (5 in thelast 3 years with an average of participantsbetween 30-50 people)


The establishment fo synergies with othernetwroks and projects.

Please describe the main problems encountered Lack of fundingWhat do you think is the limit for more members to jointhe activities of your Task Force?

Lack of a minimum level of economicsupport that could facilitate the organisationof meetings.


8.000 Euro from Regional funds.Participation to EU funded projects isanother source of funding.

Plan for the next period Support the project for the development ofEquity standards (16.000 in 2 years)


no

28 / 61




Yes


Yes


Yes



Yes


Yes


Yes



Yes


Yes



Yes


Yes


Yes

29 / 61




Yes


Yes

Further comments The TF project aimimg at developingstandards for assessing and monitoring theequity of access and quality of care formigrants will use the same format,terminology and development processadopted by the HPH standards.

Q29: Implementation of international, national, regional or local projectsWhich projects have been given priority? 1. Service policy and quality development.

2. Staff training and development. 3.Intercultural communication. 4. Patient andcommunity empowerment.

How are projects chosen? Are the developed based onformal assessment of need or on international,national or regional policy?

Projects are proposed by the coortinatingteam on the basis of international prioritiesand then agreed upon by the Advisotygroup.

How is the implementation monitored? At national level (each memberrepresenting a national network isresponsible for the implementation andevaluation process)


Both at local (national/regional) level aswell as at the international level for theoverall process.


It's fundamenta the committement of thenational HPH coordinator for facilitating theimplementation at the level of individualorganisations.

Anything you would like to add? It's important also that the internationalnetwork supports the TF plans by includingthem into the overall strategy plan. This willprovide for a more formal committment ofnational networks to a TF workplan.



Yes


No

30 / 61



Recruit new members Yes


Yes


Yes

Invite to make special arrangements involving HPH Yes




Yes


Yes


Yes


Describe Task Force's relation to the HPH Constitution No


No



31 / 61



1. Objective: To conceptualise the notion of equitable healthcare organisations in a document that clarifies the position of the Task Force in the debate on cultural competence. This document will describe the conceptual model to identify and organise standards and measurable elements based on a set of interrelated domains (or primary standards). 2. Objective: To identify the primary domains (5-6 main domains) for measuring and monitoring equity in healthcare. 3. Objective: To develop the structure and content of the standards for equity using the same format, terminology and development process adopted by the HPH standards.Action: Identify, for each primary standard, a set of sub-standards and measurable elements in order to operationalise them, break them down into their principle components and allow for measurement. 4. Objective: To revise the proposed standards and development of preliminary standards. 5. Objective: To pilot test the preliminary standards in order to assess their clarity and actual compliance to people and services’ needs. 6. Objective: To publish final standards.


Invitation received to participate in advisoryor working groups by the Council of Europeor other international bodies active in thefield.


Background documents and papers on TFWebsite. Article of the TF on reportpublished by by the Portuguese presidencyof EU 2008


On TF website are available all paperspresented at TF meeting (more then 60).TF activities and projects have beensystematically presented at national as wellat international conferences.

32 / 61



To support the implementation of the TFactivities at the level of HPH networks.


By contributing at the development of theoverall strategy plan.


Including the TF themes in the Summerschools. Continuing to support the flow ofinformation on TF activities on the WHOwebsite.


By presenting the TF activities in theframework of the international HPHnetwork.

Q39: Publication list of the Task ForcePlease list any publications made by your Task Force Publications are available on the TF

website.

33 / 61


Q1: Name of Task Force Task Force on HPH and Environment






Environment

Q5: Task Force LeaderName Shu-Ti ChiouAddress No.2, Changqing St., Xinzhuang Dist, New

Taipei City 24250, TaiwanEmail stchiou@ bhp.doh.gov.tw；

[email protected] +886-2-2997-8616 # 100Fax +886-2-2991-6328Task Force Website http://www.hphnet.org/index.php?

option=com_content&view=article&id=18&Itemid=95

Q6: Period covered by this Progress ReportFrom April 14,2010To January 15,2011

COMPLETECOMPLETECollector:Collector: HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 (Web Link)(Web Link)Started:Started: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 7:34:28 PMWednesday, February 09, 2011 7:34:28 PMLast Modified:Last Modified: Friday, March 25, 2011 4:00:08 AMFriday, March 25, 2011 4:00:08 AMTime Spent:Time Spent: Over a monthOver a monthIP Address:IP Address: 210.241.14.158210.241.14.158


#5

34 / 61


Q7: Coordinating InstitutionName Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of

Health, TaiwanAddress No.2, Changqing St., Xinzhuang Dist, New

Taipei City 24250, TaiwanEmail msc@ bhp.doh.gov.twPhone +886-2-29978616#120Fax +886-4-29945271Institution Website http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw

Q8: Number of hospitals, health services and other members of your Task Force at the time ofreportingHospitals 3Health Services 0Combined Hospital / Health Services 0Non-Hospital / Health Services 2


Name; E-mail; Organization; Position ; HPH membership status Advisor Group; Shu-Ti Chiou ; [email protected]; Bureau of Health Promotion, DOH,Taiwan; Director General; Member Hanne Tonnesen; [email protected]; WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Based Health Promotion in Hospitals & Health Services; Director; Member Jürgen Pelikan; [email protected]; WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion in Hospitals and Health Care; Director; Member Gary Cohen; [email protected]; Health Care Without Harm; President and Co-Founder; Non-member Pendo Maro; [email protected]; Health Care Without Harm; Senior Climate & Energy Advisor; Non-member Susan Wilburn; [email protected]; Occupational and Environmental Health Department of Public Health and Environment, WHO; Technical Officer; Non-member Michael Wong; [email protected]; Department of Family & Community Medicine, Alexandra Hospital; Head and Consultant; Member Chin-Lon Lin; [email protected]; Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital; Chief Executive Officer; Member General Member Paola Antonioli; [email protected]; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara (Universitary Hospital); ; Member

35 / 61



Name; E-mail; Organization; Position ; HPH membership status Advisor Group; Shu-Ti Chiou ; [email protected]; Bureau of Health Promotion, DOH,Taiwan; Director General; Member Hanne Tonnesen; [email protected]; WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Based Health Promotion in Hospitals & Health Services; Director; Member Jürgen Pelikan; [email protected]; WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion in Hospitals and Health Care; Director; Member Gary Cohen; [email protected]; Health Care Without Harm; President and Co-Founder; Non-member Pendo Maro; [email protected]; Health Care Without Harm; Senior Climate & Energy Advisor; Non-member Susan Wilburn; [email protected]; Occupational and Environmental Health Department of Public Health and Environment, WHO; Technical Officer; Non-member Michael Wong; [email protected]; Department of Family & Community Medicine, Alexandra Hospital; Head and Consultant; Member Chin-Lon Lin; [email protected]; Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital; Chief Executive Officer; Member General Member Paola Antonioli; [email protected]; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara (Universitary Hospital); ; Member


Yes,

If yes, please provide titles and authorsTitle: The 2010 International Conference onHealthy Hospital and Healthy Environment.Authors: Shu-Ti Chiou, Bureau of HealthPromotion, Department of Health, Taiwan

36 / 61



Yes,

If so, please provide here or in attachment emailto the HPH SecretariatMission: The Task Force on HPH, Climate, andEnvironment presents the terms of referencesdirectly to the mission of the International HPHNetwork. The proposed Task Force thereby addsto better health gain by promoting the health forpatients, their families, staffs, and theenvironment, as well as improving quality ofhealth care. Purpose: The International HPHNetwork will develop and encourage moreenvironment friendly hospitals and health serviceswithin countries, regions, and internationally.Objectives: 1.To set up norms and standards forenvironment friendly hospitals & health services.2. Advocate evidence-based policy and set upbest practice examples regarding environmentfriendly HPH hospitals. 3. To monitor thedevelopment of health promotion regardingenvironment friendly intervention in hospitals &health services.


No


No



Yes,

If so, please provide names of partners and ofcontact personsHCWH, Gary Cohen, email: [email protected]


Taiwan Green productivity Foundation; Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs, R.O.C (Taiwan); Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan, R.O.C (Taiwan)

37 / 61



1.To finalize the HPH and Environment Manual by appending and integrating more environment friendly facts and best practice examples into sub-standards or explanatory texts. 2.To arrange experience sharing in 2011 Turku conference: workshop, parallel sessions, and poster sessions. 3.To manage the TF website on the HPH new site and collect relevant materials in cooperation with HCWH.


No


Please see detail organizational chart onattachement (email to Jeff Svane:[email protected], TechnicalOfficer of WHO-CC for HPH)


38 / 61


Q21: Outcomes and main achievementsPlease describe the main outcomes and achievements 1.HCWH has been collecting the monitor

tools and information of environment-friendly websites. 2. The 2010 InternationalConference on Healthy Hospitals & HealthyEnvironment was successfully held inTaipei, Taiwan on Oct. 22-23.Representatives from 9 hospitalassociations and 128 hospitals (account formore than 64% of hospital beds in Taiwan)attended the pledge ceremony entitled"Health Sector Leading the Action toReduce CO2 Emissions". They committedto take action toward Environment-FriendlyHospitals by reducing 13% of annual CO2emissions by 2020 compared to the level in2007. The annual amount of CO2 reductionwill be 164,648 tons, equivalent to theannual absorbing capacity by 34 New YorkCentral Parks. 3. The draft Manual of HPHand Environment has proposed by HanneTonnesen, and it was discussed on the 2ndTask Force Meeting on HPH andEnvironment on Oct. 22, 2010.


1.WHO-CC：Provide relevantadministrative resource and platform forinformation exchange. 2.HCWH：AssistTask Force in collecting world wideinformation on health care andenvironment-friendliness, and promotion ofresource and experience sharing. 3.BHP(DOH, Taiwan)：The major financialsponsor, also provide the best practiceexamples and working experience sharedamong Taiwan’s hospitals, experts, andgovernment.

Please describe the main problems encountered Indicators that measuring and monitoringthe effect in climate change are still underdeveloping stage so that it is diverse atdifferent countries. Hence it is difficult to dothe analysis internationally.


No.


The major funding of Task Force is fromBHP, DOH, Taiwan allocated from thepublic funding according to governmentregulation of Taiwan.

Plan for the next period The budget of 2011 is about $62,500EURO.

39 / 61



No.


No.


A self-assessment survey had beenanalyzed from Taiwan’s 128 hospitals aboutthe CO2 emission, which use the data ofoil, gas, water, waste, and electricity in2007 as the indicators to estimate the totalamount of carbon reduction in 2020. Thetotal decreased amount of carbon dioxideemissions will reach 164,648 tons.



Yes


Yes


Yes



Yes


No


No



Yes


Yes

40 / 61




Yes


Yes


Yes



Yes


No

41 / 61


Q29: Implementation of international, national, regional or local projectsWhich projects have been given priority? 1.The symposium on low-carbon hospital

was held on Sep. 15th, 2010 in Taiwan.There were initially 44 hospitals participatedin the workshop and later on, up to 128hospitals joined low carbon hospital, andthey had pledged for reducing CO2emissions on the conference in Oct. 2010.2. The manual of “Green Hospital, GreenLife, Green Planet：Experience Sharing onGreen Hospital” had published by Bureauof Health Promotion, which consists of theenergy saving and carbon reductionexperiences from 12 Taiwan Hospitals andSingapore Alexandra Health Cluster.


The project process is based on the KyotoProtocol and 2009 Copenhagen ClimateSummit, and abided by the goal of carbonemission reduction. It is also in compliantwith the policy of energy saving and carbonreduction currently in Taiwan.

How is the implementation monitored? It is calculated by the amount of carbonreduction, which was based on Oil, Gas,Water, Electricity, and Waste, as theindicator.


Hospitals will continue tracking the effectsby collecting and analyzing the resourceutilization data.


Due to the resource utilization datacollected from Environmental ProtectionAdministration and Bureau of Energy,Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taiwan,hospitals do not have to elaborate moredocuments in details, which could enhancehospitals’ willingness to participate in thecarbon reduction activities.

Anything you would like to add? No.



No


Yes


No


42 / 61





Yes


Yes





Yes


Yes


Yes




Yes


1.Visualizing environment-related health promoting issues in existing HPH Models and Tools. 2.Giving examples on best evidence practice related to HPH Models and Tools. 3.Developing tools for monitoring the effect of environment-friendly intervention programs.


1.To finalize the HPH and Environment Manual by appending and integrating more description related to “environment” into sub-standards or explanatory texts. 2.To arrange 3 types of experience sharing in 2011 Turku conference: workshop, parallel sessions, and poster sessions. 3.To set up the new TF webpage on the HPH website and collect information in cooperation with HCWH.

43 / 61



1.Dr. Chiou, General-director of BHP, DOH,Taiwan (R.O.C,) is the chairman of the taskforce, and the TF budget is also supportedby BHP. 2.Taiwan government havedubbed 2010 as the “Year of EnergyConservation and Carbon Reduction”, andannounced the National AppropriateMitigation Actions together with thepromotion of the Master Plan of EnergyConservation and Carbon Mitigation. Bydoing so, the inter-governmental effortsfrom the 5 major dimensions such asenergy, industries, transportation,environment and lifestyle will be gatheredand move residents towards a low-carbonemission society, and to achieve carbonreduction targets systematically. No matterpublic or private hospitals are willing toparticipate in this relevant issue.

44 / 61



Yes.


The task force database website has beenset up which consists of mission &objective, task force members, conferenceinformation, task force meetings,conference presentations, references,publications and relevant links. Thedissemination of the HPH and Environmentinformation are through two differentchannels：1.Through the HPH website topublish pre-conference announcement,conference report, and progress report.2.To communicate by email withNational/Regional HPH coordinators tonotify and invite their network members toparticipate in the activities.


1st meeting: Chair: Shu-Ti, Chiou;Participants: Jeff Svane, Gary Cohen,Pendo Maro, Michael Wong, Chin-Lon Lin;Date: 16th April, 2010 ; Venue: Room 406,Manchester University, UK. 2nd meeting:Chair: Shu-Ti, Chiou; Participants: HanneTonnesen, Jürgen Pelikan, Jeff Svane,Pendo Maro, Peter Orris, Gladys Wong,Chin-Lon Lin; Date: 22nd , October, 2010 ;Venue: Evergreen International ConventionCenter, Taipei, Taiwan. The 2010international conference on healthyhospitals and healthy environment:Organizers: BHP, DOH, Taiwan, theInternational Network of HPH; participants:Hanne Tonnesen, Jeff Svane, Pendo Maro,Jürgen Pelikan, Peter Orris, Gladys Wong,Chin-Lon Lin, Shu-Ti, Chiou, andrepresentatives of 106 Taiwan hospitals,academic, ministries. Date and Time:22nd~23rd , October, 2010 ; Venue:Evergreen International Convention Center,Taipei, Taiwan.


1.To disseminate the Task Force messageand activity report through the HPH websiteand newsletter. 2.Through HCWH expertsdisseminate the information of 2011articlesinvitation to network members. 3.In Taiwan,we have set up a “Promoting Health Careand Environment-Friendly Committee”,which assists the Task Force in promotingthe concept to participants, governmentofficers, and hospitals to gather up moresupports.


45 / 61



The introductory presentation of the TaskForce could be arranged on the plenarysession of the annual InternationalConference. In addition to the conference, itcould also be arranged in the future such asscientific Journal with the thesis and casestudy to explore furthermore on this issue,which leads more members pay muchattention to it.


Through mutual interaction of carbonreduction related activities, we encouragenon-HPH member hospitals to applymembership of International HPH Network.


Susan Wilburn in WHO, is one of theadvisory group of the Task Force.


Yes, by encouraging the participants to jointhe HPH Network while having aninternational conference.


Q39: Publication list of the Task ForcePlease list any publications made by your Task Force Green Hospital, Green Life, Green Plant.

Experience Sharing on Green Hospital.Anything you would like to add? No.

46 / 61


Q1: Name of Task Force Collaborative Taskforce - Tobacco Free United (TFU)






Patients, Staff, Community, Environment

Q5: Task Force LeaderName Ann ORiordanAddress 15 Bellevue Park Avenue, Booterstown,

Blackrock Co. Dublin, IrelandEmail [email protected] +353872447702Task Force Website http://www.facebook.com/group.php?

v=wall&gid=357231931900

Q6: Period covered by this Progress ReportFrom May 2010To May 2011

Q7: Coordinating InstitutionName As above

Q8: Number of hospitals, health services and other members of your Task Force at the time ofreportingCombined Hospital / Health Services 64

COMPLETECOMPLETECollector:Collector: HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 HPH TF Progress Reports 2010 (Web Link)(Web Link)Started:Started: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:08:00 AMTuesday, November 08, 2011 8:08:00 AMLast Modified:Last Modified: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:25:09 AMTuesday, November 08, 2011 8:25:09 AMTime Spent:Time Spent: 00:17:0800:17:08IP Address:IP Address: 130.226.172.129130.226.172.129


#6

47 / 61



Number of TFU participants = 53 from 22 countries


Tiiu Härm, MD Estonian HPH Netrwork/National Institute for Health Development Ülle Ani, MD Estonian HPH Network/ Tartu University Hospital, Clinic of Lung Diseases Milena Kalvachova The Ministry of Health Health Services Quality Unit Milana Sachlova,MD Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute (HPH Hospital) Lenka Stepankova,MD 1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University at the General University Hospital Eva Kralikova,MD. Tobacco Dependence Treatment Centre at the General University Hospital head of the Society for Treatment of Tobacco Dependence Sona Csemyova,MD, University Hospital Motol (HPH Hospital) Eva Gottvaldova The Ministry of Health Unit for the promotion of public health Nicolas Bonnet Réseau Français Hôpital Sans Tabac Ariadni Ouranou Bertrand Dautzenburg European Network for Smoke-free Hospitals Sibylle Fleitmann ENSH Consultant Tobacco Control Dr, Schopper Hildegard Klinikum Memmingen Christa Rustler ENSH-Germany Miriam Gunning HSE/Irish HPH Network Ann O`Riordan Indepentent Consultant Simone Tasso Regional Network of HPH Veneto Cornel Radu Loghin Reteaua Romana Pentru Prevenirea Fumatului Theodor Haratau Reteaua Romana Pentru Prevenirea Fumatului Mihaltan Florin Reteaua Romana Pentru Prevenirea Fumatului Lorna Renwick Health Improvement Programme Manager - NHS, Healthy Sectors Team, NHS Health Scotland David Chalom Doctors Against Tobacco Shu-Ti Chou MD, MSc, PhD Taiwan HPH Network, Institute of Public Health National Yang-Ming University Tai-Yin Wu, M.D. Taipei City Hospital, Renai Branch Lin-Chung Woung, Superintendent Taipei City Hospital, Renai Branch Wenna Tsai China Medical University Beigang Hospital Ying-Ling Kuo Cardinal Tlen Hospital Yung Ho Branch Sinikka Krogerus Central Finland Central hospital Dott.ssa Rosa Stimolo ASL Napoli 1 Dott.ssa Sara Diamaro ASL Napoli 2 Kirsten Doherty Dept. Preventive medicine & Health Promotion Denise Comerford Dept. Preventive medicine & Health Promotion Rudi Gasser Barwon Health Staffcare Esteve Fernandez Institut Catala d'Oncologia Gry Kjevik Dep. Health promotion and Rehab Andrey K. Demin Russian Public Health Society Cristina Martínez Institut Catala d'Oncologia Shou-Jen Kou, Superintendent Changhua Christian Hospital Feng-Cheng Tang, M.D. Changhua Christian Hospital Atsuko Sasaki-Bronnenmayer, M.D.&Ph.D Tokyo Adventist Hospital Dr. Lothar

48 / 61


M.D.&Ph.D Tokyo Adventist Hospital Dr. Lothar Erbenich Krankenhaus Waldfriede Dr. Constantine Vardavas RN, MPH, PhD MDc University of Crete Manja Nehrkorn ENSH-Germany Julia Sahling University Bielefeld Matthew G. Masiello, MD, MPH The Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Dr. Diane Levin-Zamir PhD, MPH, CHES Department of Health Education & Promotion Susan Himel Bridgepoint Health Dr. Wael Safwat abdel mageed Coordinator of Egyptian coalition for tobacco control Esther Carabasa Institut Catala d'Oncologia Paula Wye Hunter New England Population Health/University of Newcastle Shannon Furey, BSW, MSW, RSW Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Sejdefa Bašić Ćatić Partnership for Public Health Nick Kai Schneider Erika Takács Health Services Management Training Centre, Semmelweis University Susann Koalick Klinik Barmelweid Liz Hughes NCSCT CIC


Yes,

If yes, please provide titles and authorsTFU Pact, TFU Charter, shortly ENSH-GlobalGOLD Forum Process leaflet and later Indicatorset for tobacco control in health care settings


Yes,

If so, please provide here or in attachment emailto the HPH SecretariatHPH Collaborative Taskforce on Tobacco DraftStrategy Framework Version 4 - 16th July 2008The International Network for Health PromotingHospitals (HPH) and the European Network forSmoke-free Healthcare Services (ENSH) agreethat hospitals and healthcare services haveimportant obligations in the struggle to reduce theuse of tobacco and its deleterious health effects.These obligations include not only a tobacco-freeenvironment, but also the provision of activesupport for smokers in their quitting process. Thisconcerns patients, their relatives as well as allcategories of personnel and the community.Tobacco Free United (TFU) is a collaborativetaskforce initiated by HPH in association withENSH with the aim of gathering healthprofessionals, hospitals and health services withindividuals and organizations to work towards atobacco free society, using the principles ofOttawa Charter, Budapest Declaration and otherWHO health promotion documents and on thebasis of the Code of the European Network forSmoke-free Health Services ENSH. Vision Tostrengthen links and collaborative activity betweenmain partners on tobacco within hospitals andhealth services. Ensure that hospitals and health

49 / 61


health services. Ensure that hospitals and healthservices become settings of good practice itselfand towards a Tobacco Free Society. This meanshospitals and health services work together withPublic Institution, Voluntary Organizations andother community partners for a smoke free world.Hospitals and healthcare services take their rolenot only in ensuring a tobacco-free organizationbut also to offer smoking cessation services forpatients and affiliates, staff and the community. Mission To join first the forces of the two Networks(HPH and ENSH) in a way that strengthensexisting links and synergy between them andsubsequent involves other stakeholders, partnersand experts in the field of tobacco prevention andprotection, training research and cessationservices. Members National/RegionalCoordinators or representatives of HealthPromoting Hospitals and Health (HPH) NetworksNational Coordinator or representatives ofEuropean Network of Smoke-free Hospitals andHealth Services (ENSH) Additional – to be invitedie Professional bodies, NGO’s and otherInterested hospital/health services and relevantexperts in the field of tobacco Working Levels Strategic Level It will be conducted by themembers of the working group with contributionsof experts and colleagues at the operative levels.It consists the following main phases: 1. To createa pathway for synergy of the two networks andconcepts HPH and ENSH 2. to create documentsand guidelines for supporting the operative level(i.e. TFU Charter , the correlation of the HPH &ENSH approach, implementation tools). 3. toidentify and collect models of good practice 4. tosupport the evaluation of tobacco free policiesand the TFU Initiatives/projects. 5. to disseminatethe best information and examples, 6. tocollaborate with and contribute to - as much aspossible- common international actions/initiatives Operative Level It will be conducted in thehospitals and heath services. It consists of thedevelopment of tobacco free policies and actionsfollowing –as much as possible- the guidelinesfrom the strategic level Taskforce GovernanceTobacco Free United (TFU) is a collaborativetaskforce with an elected lead Coordinator, jointchairs from the main partners HPH and ENSH andsupported by sub-group leaders from the keyaction areas and invited other relevant members.Overall support is provided by two associatecoordinators, one from HPH Network and onefrom ENSH Network. Lead Coordinator: Ms.Christa Rustler (HPH +ENSH) Chairs: Prof.Dautzenburg (ENSH), Dr. Simone Tasso (HPH)Support Coordinators: Ariadni Ouranou (ENSH),Ann O’Riordan (HPH) Sub-Groups AdvocacySub-Group Lead: Ariadni Ouranou Support

50 / 61


Sub-Group Lead: Ann O`Riordan, EvaluationSub-Group Lead: David Chalom (expressedinterest to be confirmed) Each subgroup to seek acore of at least 3 active participants Taskforcecoordinators to work across all sub-groupsAdditional Representatives: 3/4 to be invited fromENSH + HPH to ensure broad representation.Prerequisites: Improvements in Tobacco controlrequires a secure foundation in the basicprerequisites described in Ottawa Charter forHealth Promotion: 1. Advocate: Political,economic, social, cultural, environmental,behavioural and biological factors call all influencethe smoking habit and, consequently, the harmsfrom tobacco. Advocacy in all these fields will benecessary to get integrated actions andsustainable results. 2. Enable: Working onTobacco control includes a secure foundation insupportive environment, access to information,life skills and opportunity to making the rightchoices. It will be necessary to work on staff,patients and community to enable people to takecontrol on those things which determine thesmoking habit of a society and to enable healthcare professionals in the best available andevidence based smoking cessation practice. 3.Mediate: The prerequisite and prospects fortobacco control cannot be ensured by the healthsector alone. Professional and health personnelhave a major responsibility to mediate differentinterests in society for the pursuit of it, involvinggovernments, health and other social andeconomic sectors, nongovernmental andvoluntary organizations, local authorities, industryand media. Framework Actions: TFU will have tosupport the following general actions: Build /support a Public Policy against the harms fromtobacco Tobacco control goes beyond healthcare. It means to put it the agenda of policymakers in all the sectors and levels. Tobaccocontrol policy combines diverse butcomplementary approaches including legislation,fiscal measures, taxation and organizationalchange. It requires the identification of theobstacles to adoption of healthy tobacco controlpolicies and the ways of removing them. Createsupportive environments & Strengthen communityactions Hospitals and Health services must besupportive environments for the tobacco controland treatment of tobacco addiction, representinggood examples of tobacco free working placesand engaging with community partners to build atobacco free society. Development personal skillsWorking on tobacco control and smokingcessation means to support personal and socialdevelopment through providing information,education of personnel, patients, individuals forcreating/enhancing correct skills. First of all, this

51 / 61


creating/enhancing correct skills. First of all, thismust be present in hospitals and health careservices but also this has to be facilitated inSchools, home, work and community services.Standards As the HPH Standards are developedas a comprehensive framework in which differenttopics/aims/approaches/ for health promotion,regardless if they address patients, staff or thecommunity can be added and enabled, the ENSHCode with its standards and implementation toolsare seen as helpful concept to achieve thecommon stated mission of hospitals andhealthcare services for a tobacco-free society.Management Policy: for building comprehensivetobacco free policies and treatment for smokersthrough Hospitals and Health care Services intheir organizations and for the community. Patientassessment: for identifying, assessing andmanaging the patient’s who smoker during theirstay in hospital and/or heath services, with theaim to support and assist them quit. Patientinformation and intervention: provide patients,visitors and staff with information on theharmfulness of tobacco and the provide smokerswith opportune interventions to quit. Promoting aHealthy Workplace: work towards a tobaccoenvironment in the hospital and health services aspersonnel have the right to work in smoke freeworkplace. Continuity and cooperation: hospitalsand health services have to guarantee thecontinuity of care from in-patient to out-patientsand vice versa. Following the HPH Standards andSelf Assessment Manual and using the ENSHstandards and self audit tool, TFU will work for thedevelopment of how to best create synergy out ofthe two networks and concepts. STRATEGYACTION PLAN (2008-2012) Action SuccessCriteria Timeframe Monitoring Advocate forstronger tobacco legislation in all the countriesthat can direct and support tobacco free hospitalsand health services and then work towards atobacco free society. 1. Develop a TFU Charterfor hospitals and Health Services in line with theWHO Framework Convention on TobaccoControl; and with the orientation of the synopsis.TFU Charter completed TFU Charter widelydisseminated to all the HPH and ENSH membersUsing existing HPH and ENSH websites haveperiodical updates and reports on TFU activity2009 Number of collected signatures Reports andactions available on Web sites 2.Join with existinginternational efforts aimed at strengtheningTobacco legislation in all the countries in supportof a Tobacco Free Society: creating advocacyinvolving personalities of our communities : singlepersons (journalists/writers, sportive champions,culture people, famous doctors and so on) ; andorganizations In each country find well know

52 / 61


personalities (i.e. sportive champions) giving thetheir image to TFU / or specific initiatives of TFU(i.e. children prevention) ; Presentation to massmedia of the data in World No Tobacco Day(better with the well known personality/(s)Presentation to policy makers (single country andE.U.) of the data to support changing in legislation2009 2010 2011 Database of the names andplace of work of the personnel having signed theCharter Number of News about our initiative inTV, Newspaper, Radio, News internet sites.Tobacco legislation changes in some/all counties:inside hospitals and health services, inworkplaces, in public spaces 3. Strengtheninstitutional visibility of the Task Force andimprove understanding in hospitals and healthservices on the relevant articles of the WHOFramework Convention on Tobacco and throughthe results/good practise of the members of theENSH and HPH networks Writing of article(s)about the initiatives of TFU and writing of a text –book describing all the Project of TFU 2009-2012Publication of article(s) about the initiatives ofTFU Publication of the text-book Enable: supportthe implementation and monitoring tobacco freepolicies in all hospitals and health care servicesand identify best practice actions and activities. 1.Create an overview/synopsis of the correlation ofthe two concepts to give hospitals and healthcareservices best orientation how to implement atobacco free policy to support the development ofthe Health Promoting Hospital. 2.Identify andcollect models of good practice Consensus aboutthe synopsis and positive feed back aboutusability from member of ENSH and HPHnetworks Disseminate and develop a database ofexamples of good models 2010 2011 Publicationof the synopsis in the HPH conferenceNumber/percentage of members who are awareof or piloting /using the synopsis. Uptake andtransfer of best practice across European and atindividual organisation level 3. Reviewimplementation support process bynational/regional coordinators to implementtobacco free policies integrated in healthpromoting programs in their networks Increasingmembers of HPH implement tobacco free policiesIncreasing ENSH members integrate healthpromoting programs 2010 Workshops ininternational conference Increasing number ofdocumented self audits Increasing results inENSH standard 7 4. Review, update anddisseminate materials and guidelines to supportthe implementation of Tobacco Free Policies2012 Realization of the materials Use of thosematerials in hospitals and health services Enable.Support the evaluation of tobacco free policies asimplemented by the HPH Collaborative TFU

53 / 61


implemented by the HPH Collaborative TFUmembers to contribute to health improvement andhealth gain outcomes within hospitals and healthservices 1. Establish a sub-group to support thedevelopment and piloting of an evaluation processto measure the health impact of implementedtobacco free policies 2. Identify Healthimprovements indicators in order to monitor theefficacy of tobacco policies in TFU members.3.Develop and seek funding to undertake anEuropean Pilot Project to replicate the Germanevaluation process on a European Level Pilotevaluation process with German Hospital andHealth Service Network Common action of HPHand ENSH to collect data on the quality/impact ofthe implementation of tobacco free policies inhospitals and healthcare services (if possible,common EU-project Funding from EU or onnational level (government, research funds,foundations) 2009 2012 2009 -2012Benchmarking sample of participating members tomonitoring of the efficacy of tobacco free policieswithin hospitals and health services.


Yes


Yes



Yes,

If so, please provide names of partners and ofcontact personsNational Heart Alliance, ENSH, ENSP, Eur MedAssoc, Cancer Societies in countries, ResearchInstitute for Tobacco Free Services, others


As above

54 / 61



Communication: Action: Seek a Joint meeting of the HPH Governance and ENSH-Global Boards for the purpose of: increasing synergy between the actions on tobacco control at International and national/regional network levels, promote collaborative action and activities across the members of both newtorks (a) Advocacy: Sub Group: Actions - development of online databases to collect the signatures globally to TFU Pact and Charter, total number collected to data not available at this time. Output: As the theme of world no tobacco day this year is “Support for the Framework Convention”., TFU intends to present the signatures collected to the conference of the Parities ( Governments who signed the FCTC) to point out the necessicty of implementing article 14!!! (b) Good Practice: Sub group:: Actions - development of synergy paper to promote understanding and common activity (HPH + ENSH). Promote through participation in ENSH-Global GOLD Level Process sharing and learning around models of good practice that support tobacco control within health care services. Training workshop organized within the frame of the 19th International HPH Conference, Turku, Finland. Output: support for the implementation of the ENSH-Global Standards in all health care services and recognition and the sharing of models of good practice through participation in the ENSH-Global GOLD level Forum Process (c) Evaluation: Sub-Group Actions: Tobacco Free Pre-conference in Manchester 2010, promotion of ENSH GOLD Level Award process 2009-2010 across both networks and internationally that result in the first application from HPH and non ENSH member. Initial meeting held in October 20101 with Swedish HPH Network Indicators Group to initiate joint working on the identification of key indicators for tobacco control within health care services. Indicators workshop organized at the ENSH-Global Network – Annual General meeting, TFU Indicator workshop will take place within the 19th International HPH Conference, Turku, Finland. Output: Identify list of and priority indicators that can assist the quality development of the ENSH Gold Level Award process, Influence HPH development on indicators for tobacco control and tobacco management in healthcare services. Achieve a level of international consensus on key indicators for tobacco control policies in healthcare services that will be implemented, collected and monitored by ENSH & HPH members and can be integrated within national and regional performance indicator sets.


No

55 / 61



See TFU Communication Outline

Q21: Outcomes and main achievementsPlease describe the main outcomes and achievements The TFU Task Force met within the

framework of the 17th International HPHConference, Crete 2008 and Core membersmeet again on the 22 August 2009 in Berlinto review actions for 2009/2010. The mostrecent relevant events were: 1. TFUdevelopment and structure Communicationstructure (Aug 2009): updated to reflectfeedback and changes within HPH andENSH networks (see appendix) Report tothe ENSH General Assembly (Oct 2009):TFU activities and results were presented inthe General Assembly in Barcelona. ENSHBoard Meeting (Feb. 2010): Report onactions and development of TFU anddiscussion of further activities of commoninterest. The ENSH Board signed the TFUPact and TFU Charter. HPH GovernanceBoard meeting: Update on TFU actions anddevelopment sent for presentation atGovernance Board meeting with a requestfor Governance Board to endorse TFU Pactand TFU Charter for implementation withinInternational HPH Network members 2.Advocacy Sub-Group (Aug 2009): TFUPact and TFU Charter (Oct 2009): updatedto reflect feedback and are being translatedinto a number of languages (Taiwanese,Italian, Finnish, Swedish, Spanish, German)and they has been presented at nationallevel in a number of countries (i.e. Ireland,Austria, Switzerland, Germany, Finland,Taiwan, Italy). Implementation guide(April 2010): An implementation guide forthe TFU Pact and Charter was developedto support national and regional networks.This guide will be presented in the TFUWorkshop in Manchester. 3. Good PracticeSub –Group (Aug 2009): developed anaction plan to collect examples of bestpractice that meet transferable criteria. Synergy paper (April 2010): A draft of apaper on synergy between both networks


56 / 61


will be presented and discussed in adedicated parallel session in Manchester. Criteria of Good Practice (April 2010):Using the well developed Template forDescription of Good Practices of the TFHPH CA (2007), examples of good practiceof both networks will be presented in theTFU Workshop in Manchester anddiscussed on these criteria. More exampleswill be gathered and shared to supportsynergy and the development of goodpractice. 4. Evaluation Sub-Group (Sept2009): TFU encouraged and supported theenlargement of the ENSH Gold LevelAward Process to be open in 2010 forcandidates from HPH members who arenon ENSH members and also invited allTFU participants to join this process. Fourapplications from four countries were sentto the ENSH coordinating centre, threefrom ENSH and one from a HPH network.The three nominated hospitals will presenttheir implementation process in the Pre-conference on Tobacco FreeHealthservices, April 14th in Manchester.Further exchanges on different nationalvalidation processes in HPH and ENSHnetworks are planned. Website (Nov2009): domain names purchased www.tfu-health.org/ and www.tobaccofreeunited.org.Due to lack of resources the establishmentof a website and online registration ofsignatures for the TFU Pact and TFUCharter for Health Personnel has beenpostponed. TFU on Facebook - your facefor Tobacco Free Health Care Services.(March 2010) As it was not possible to havea website, a TFU group was launched onFacebook and has 20 members in threeweeks.http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=wall&gid=357231931900


As Above

Please describe the main problems encountered Funding, communication, joint GovernanceBoard discussions await


Unlimited


Individual and organization funding, smallamout obtained by provision of training

Plan for the next period Seek sponsorships or funding source

57 / 61



Yes, via PRICES mainly


As Above


Not at the moment



Yes


Yes


Yes



Yes


Yes


Yes



Yes


Yes

58 / 61




Yes


Yes


Yes



Yes


Yes

Q29: Implementation of international, national, regional or local projectsWhich projects have been given priority? Advocacy, Best Practices, Evaluation with

respect to tobacco free activity within healthservices


Upon setting up terms of reference for TF

How is the implementation monitored? PRICES, ENSH self audit, ENSH GOLDForum


Via online resources, mainly on ENSH site


funding, time, other roles



Yes


Yes


No

59 / 61





Yes


Yes





Yes


Yes


Yes




Yes


Continuation of main three focus areas


Actions planned on 2010 Advocacy: Disseminate the implementation guide and support national and regional networks in the implementation process. Synergy and Good Practice: If possible a TFU meeting will be held in Sweden to discuss, share and agree common indicators for good practice in Tobacco Free healthcare./ Hospitals and Health Services. In addition, commence analysis on some identified models of “good practice” against general transferability criteria. Evaluation: A training on validation processes on national level for national, regional coordinators/auditors or project leaders in hospitals will be held in June 2010 in Ireland. Also reviewing the GOLD Level Award process 2010 to integrate experiences and improve the process for 2012.

60 / 61


Q36: Recognition from public authorities, healthsystems etc.



yes some are, more is on the way


HPH subsite, more on the way


EU conf on Tobacco or Health, HPh conf,others


facebook, via hph websitem ensh website


Communicate more with TF


completion of subgroup outputs


- implement and support implementation ofWHO objectives and guidance for healthprofessionals on tobacco


on all docs and communications

Q39: Publication list of the Task ForcePlease list any publications made by your Task Force to come

61 / 61


SurveyMonkey Analyze - Export - International HPH Network prg reps 2010-tf.pdf · Roderer...

Documents

Transcript of SurveyMonkey Analyze - Export - International HPH Network prg reps 2010-tf.pdf · Roderer...