Survey Objectives
description
Transcript of Survey Objectives
Title Goes Here
Framing the Issues
Summary FindingsHBS/HMS Survey of Executive Sentiment in Healthcare
November 14, 2012
Title Goes Here
Capture senior executive sentiment about key trends in innovation, quality, and cost in healthcare Critical and informative Challenging to measure
Cover a broad range of sectors within the industry Respondents Questions
Frame our discussion for the next two days
Develop a survey approach that can be used going forward
Survey Objectives
Title Goes Here
Questions developed by HBS/HMS faculty organizing committee (Chin, Hamermesh, Huckman, McNeil, Newhouse) with help from HBS survey support (Chase Harrison, Cara Sterling) Abt SRBI (Benjamin Phillips and Stephanie Lawrence)
Cognitive testing by Abt SRBI Participants in HBS healthcare executive program HBS MBA students with healthcare (often clinical) expertise
On-line survey requests sent to 509 invitees to the Forum on Healthcare Innovation 216 responses as of October 10, 2012
Approach
Title Goes Here Academia17%
Provider15%
Payor5%
Pharma/Biotech17%
Devices/Diagnostics4%
Medical Research6%
Healthcare Services/IT7%
Investor8%
Non-Healthcare/Other21%
Respondents by Sector (n=216)
Title Goes Here
Quality Current Trajectory
Quality and Cost Trajectory Overall By Innovation Category
Role of Key Actors in Healthcare Innovation Government Existing Firms New Entrants
Flow of Findings
Title Goes Here
Good33%
Only Fair or Poor29%
Excel-lent or Very Good38%
Pulling Ahead
18%
Keeping Pace44%
Falling Behind
38%
“How would you rate the quality of healthcare for the average person in the US compared to other advanced industrialized countries, such as Canada, England, Germany, and Japan?”
“Is the quality of healthcare in the US falling behind, keeping pace with, or pulling ahead of that in other advanced industrialized countries?”
Quality: Current and Trajectory
Current Quality Quality Trajectory
Title Goes Here
Quality: Current and Trajectory (Positive Sentiment)
Excellent or Very Good /
Keeping Pace
19%
Excellent or Very Good /
Pulling Ahead
14%
Good / Pulling Ahead
3%
CURRENT QUALITY
Excellent or Very Good
Good
Only Fair or Poor
QUALITY TRAJECTORY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Excellent or Very Good /
Keeping Pace
19%Good /
Pulling Ahead
3%
Title Goes Here
Quality: Current and Trajectory (Positive Sentiment)
Excellent or Very Good /
Keeping Pace
19%
Excellent or Very Good /
Pulling Ahead
14%
Good / Pulling Ahead
3%
CURRENT QUALITY
Excellent or Very Good
Good
Only Fair or Poor
QUALITY TRAJECTORY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Good / Pulling Ahead
3%
Title Goes Here
Quality: Current and Trajectory (Positive Sentiment)
Excellent or Very Good /
Keeping Pace
19%
Excellent or Very Good /
Pulling Ahead
14%
Good / Pulling Ahead
3%
CURRENT QUALITY
Excellent or Very Good
Good
Only Fair or Poor
QUALITY TRAJECTORY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Title Goes Here
Quality: Current and Trajectory (Negative Sentiment)
Only Fair or Poor / Falling Behind
20%
Only Fair or Poor / Keeping Pace
8%Good /
Falling Behind
12%CURRENT QUALITY
Excellent or Very Good
Good
Only Fair or Poor
QUALITY TRAJECTORY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Only Fair or Poor / Falling Behind
20%
Good /Falling Behind
12%
Title Goes Here
Quality: Current and Trajectory (Negative Sentiment)
Only Fair or Poor / Falling Behind
20%
Only Fair or Poor / Keeping Pace
8%Good /
Falling Behind
12%CURRENT QUALITY
Excellent or Very Good
Good
Only Fair or Poor
QUALITY TRAJECTORY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Only Fair or Poor / Falling Behind
20%
Title Goes Here
Quality: Current and Trajectory (Negative Sentiment)
Only Fair or Poor / Falling Behind
20%
Only Fair or Poor / Keeping Pace
8%Good /
Falling Behind
12%CURRENT QUALITY
Excellent or Very Good
Good
Only Fair or Poor
QUALITY TRAJECTORY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Title Goes Here
Quality: Current and Trajectory (Mixed Sentiment)
Excellent or Very Good /
Falling Behind
5%Good /
Keeping Pace
18%Only Fair or Poor /
Pulling Ahead
1%
CURRENT QUALITY
Excellent or Very Good
Good
Only Fair or Poor
QUALITY TRAJECTORY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Good / Keeping Pace
18%Only Fair or Poor /
Pulling Ahead
1%
Title Goes Here
Quality: Current and Trajectory (Mixed Sentiment)
Excellent or Very Good /
Falling Behind
5%Good /
Keeping Pace
18%Only Fair or Poor /
Pulling Ahead
1%
CURRENT QUALITY
Excellent or Very Good
Good
Only Fair or Poor
QUALITY TRAJECTORY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Only Fair or Poor /Pulling Ahead
1%
Title Goes Here
Quality: Current and Trajectory (Mixed Sentiment)
Excellent or Very Good /
Falling Behind
5%Good /
Keeping Pace
18%Only Fair or Poor /
Pulling Ahead
1%
CURRENT QUALITY
Excellent or Very Good
Good
Only Fair or Poor
QUALITY TRAJECTORY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Title Goes Here
Quality Sentiment: An Even Split
40%
24% 36%
CURRENT QUALITY
Excellent or Very Good
Good
Only FairOr Poor
QUALITY TRAJECTORY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Title Goes Here
Stay the Same43%
Increase50%
Decrease7%
Next 5 Years: Health Care Costs Relative to Inflation
Title Goes Here
Trajectory: Quality and Cost (Positive Sentiment)
Decreasing Costs / Pulling Ahead
1%
INFLATION-ADJUSTED
COST
Decreasing
Same
Increasing
QUALITY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Same Costs / Pulling Ahead
9%Decreasing Costs /
Keeping Pace
2%
Same Costs / Pulling Ahead
9%Decreasing Costs /
Keeping Pace
2%
Title Goes Here
Trajectory: Quality and Cost (Positive Sentiment)
Decreasing Costs / Pulling Ahead
1%
INFLATION-ADJUSTED
COST
Decreasing
Same
Increasing
QUALITY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Same Costs / Pulling Ahead
9%Decreasing Costs /
Keeping Pace
2%Decreasing Costs /
Keeping Pace
2%
Title Goes Here
Trajectory: Quality and Cost (Positive Sentiment)
Decreasing Costs / Pulling Ahead
1%
INFLATION-ADJUSTED
COST
Decreasing
Same
Increasing
QUALITY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Same Costs / Pulling Ahead
9%Decreasing Costs /
Keeping Pace
2%
Title Goes Here
Trajectory: Quality and Cost (Negative Sentiment)
INFLATION-ADJUSTED
COST
Decreasing
Same
Increasing
QUALITY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Increasing Costs / Falling Behind
22%
Increasing Costs / Keeping Pace
21%
Same Costs / Falling Behind
12%
Increasing Costs / Falling Behind
22%
Increasing Costs / Keeping Pace
21%
Title Goes Here
Trajectory: Quality and Cost (Negative Sentiment)
INFLATION-ADJUSTED
COST
Decreasing
Same
Increasing
QUALITY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Increasing Costs / Falling Behind
22%
Increasing Costs / Keeping Pace
21%
Same Costs / Falling Behind
12%
Increasing Costs / Falling Behind
22%
Title Goes Here
Trajectory: Quality and Cost (Negative Sentiment)
INFLATION-ADJUSTED
COST
Decreasing
Same
Increasing
QUALITY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Increasing Costs / Falling Behind
22%
Increasing Costs / Keeping Pace
21%
Same Costs / Falling Behind
12%
Title Goes Here
INFLATION-ADJUSTED
COST
Decreasing
Same
Increasing
QUALITY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Trajectory: Quality and Cost (Mixed Sentiment)
Decreasing Costs / Falling Behind
3%Same Costs / Keeping Pace
21%Increasing Costs /
Pulling Ahead
8%
Same Costs / Keeping Pace
21%Increasing Costs /
Pulling Ahead
8%
Title Goes Here
INFLATION-ADJUSTED
COST
Decreasing
Same
Increasing
QUALITY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Trajectory: Quality and Cost (Mixed Sentiment)
Decreasing Costs / Falling Behind
3%Same Costs / Keeping Pace
21%Increasing Costs /
Pulling Ahead
8%Increasing Costs /
Pulling Ahead
8%
Title Goes Here
INFLATION-ADJUSTED
COST
Decreasing
Same
Increasing
QUALITY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Trajectory: Quality and Cost (Mixed Sentiment)
Decreasing Costs / Falling Behind
3%Same Costs / Keeping Pace
21%Increasing Costs /
Pulling Ahead
8%
Title Goes Here
Quality and Cost Trajectory: Cause for Concern
55%
33% 12%
INFLATION-ADJUSTED
COST
Decreasing
Same
Increasing
QUALITY
Falling Behind
Keeping Pace
Pulling Ahead
Title Goes Here
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Diagnostics
Pharmaceuticals
Disease man-agement
Process im-provement
Non-physician personnel
Data analytics
Consumer in-centives
Electronic medical records
Alternatives to FFS payment
Basic medical research
End-of-life care
Opportunities for Innovation
Net Quality Impact (%)
Net Cost Control Impact (%)
Title Goes Here
Diagnosti
cs
Pharmace
uticals
Disease
managemen
t
Proce
ss im
provements
Non-physicia
n personnel
Data analyti
cs
Consumer in
centives
EMR
End-of-li
fe care
Altern
atives to FF
S
Basic re
search
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Net
Impo
rtan
ce o
f Priv
ate
Sect
or (%
)More Critical to Foster Innovation: Private Sector or Government?
Government More Critical
Private SectorMore Critical
Title Goes Here
Consumer
incentives
Data analyti
cs
Non-physicia
n personnel
Diagnostics
Altern
atives to FF
S
End-of-li
fe care
Proce
ss im
provement
Disease
manage
ment
Pharmace
uticals
EMR
Basic r
esearch
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Net
Impo
rtan
ce o
f New
Ent
rant
s (%
)More Critical to Lead Innovation: New Entrants or Existing Firms?
Existing FirmsMore Critical
New EntrantsMore Critical
Title Goes Here
Sentiment about quality (current and trajectory) is genuinely mixed
Sentiment about the trajectory for value (quality and cost) is decidedly more negative
Significant opportunities for process innovations to improve value
Within specific innovation categories Consensus about relative importance of private sector and
government Greater debate over relative importance of existing firms and new
entrants
Summary