SURESH KALYANASUNDARAM

4
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT CIRCLE 5(3)(2), BANGALORE/ To, SURESH KALYANASUNDARAM B-184, Krishvi Gavakshi , Gear Road, Kaverappa Layout Kadabeesanahalli BANGALORE 560103 ,Karnataka India DIN & Notice No: ITBA/AST/F/143(2)_4/2020- 21/1028iii435{1) Assessment Year: Dated: PAN: 30/09/2020 ALBPK8704H 2016-17 Notice under section 143(2) read with section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Act) Dear Taxpayer, Thank you for filing your return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 in response to notice under section 148 of the Act, vide Ack. no. 301357500090220 on 09/02/2020. 2. While acknowledging the care and diligence you have taken in preparing the return, there are certain issues as mentioned below which need further clarification: Issues as per reasons recorded for reopening The assessee Shri Suresh Kalyansundram has e-filed his return of income for A.Y. 2016-17 on 22/07/2016 vide acknowledgement number 288492700220716 declaring gross total income of Rs. 1,07,46,1744 and total income of Rs. 1,05,72,270- after claiming deduction of Rs. 1,73,901/- under Chapter-VIA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 The gross total income includes Income from Salary of Rs. 75,14,142/-Income from House Property of Rs.2,31,034/, Income from Long Term Capitai Gains Rs. 9,95,990/- and Income from Other Sources Rs. 20,05,008/ Subsequently the assessee filed an application on 05/08/2019 for closure of Capital Gains Account opened under the Capital Gains Account Scheme and issue of Form G in our office. The assessee in his application submitted that he had sold a property at H-204, Rohan Jharokha, Kempapura Main Road, Yamalur, Bangalore- 560037 on 12/08/2015 and the long term capital gains arrived had been offered to tax in return of income filed for A.Y 2016-17. It is noted that the Assessee has arrived at a long term capital gain of Rs. 9,95,990/- based on following computation Note: If digitally signed, the date of digital signature nay be taken as date of document. HMT BHAWAN,NO. 59, BELLARY ROAD,GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU, Karnataka, 560032 ocument identification No.

Transcript of SURESH KALYANASUNDARAM

Page 1: SURESH KALYANASUNDARAM

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE

INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

CIRCLE 5(3)(2), BANGALORE/

To, SURESH KALYANASUNDARAM

B-184, Krishvi Gavakshi , Gear Road, Kaverappa Layout Kadabeesanahalli

BANGALORE 560103 ,Karnataka

India

DIN & Notice No: ITBA/AST/F/143(2)_4/2020-

21/1028iii435{1)

Assessment Year: Dated: PAN:

30/09/2020ALBPK8704H 2016-17

Notice under section 143(2) read with section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 Act)

Dear Taxpayer,

Thank you for filing your return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 in response to notice

under section 148 of the Act, vide Ack. no. 301357500090220 on 09/02/2020.

2. While acknowledging the care and diligence you have taken in preparing the return, there are

certain issues as mentioned below which need further clarification:

Issues as per reasons recorded for reopening

The assessee Shri Suresh Kalyansundram has e-filed his return of income for A.Y.

2016-17 on 22/07/2016 vide acknowledgement number 288492700220716 declaring

gross total income of Rs. 1,07,46,1744 and total income of Rs. 1,05,72,270- after claiming deduction of Rs. 1,73,901/- under Chapter-VIA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 The gross total income includes Income from Salary of Rs. 75,14,142/-Income from House Property of Rs.2,31,034/, Income from Long Term Capitai Gains Rs.

9,95,990/- and Income from Other Sources Rs. 20,05,008/

Subsequently the assessee filed an application on 05/08/2019 for closure of Capital Gains Account opened under the Capital Gains Account Scheme and issue of Form

G in our office. The assessee in his application submitted that he had sold a property

at H-204, Rohan Jharokha, Kempapura Main Road, Yamalur, Bangalore- 560037 on

12/08/2015 and the long term capital gains arrived had been offered to tax in return

of income filed for A.Y 2016-17. It is noted that the Assessee has arrived at a long

term capital gain of Rs. 9,95,990/- based on following computation

Note: If digitally signed, the date of digital signature nay be taken as date of document.HMT BHAWAN, NO. 59, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU, Karnataka, 560032

ocument identification No.

Page 2: SURESH KALYANASUNDARAM

Full Value of Consideration received: Rs.1,00,00,000

Cost of Acquisition with Indexation: Rs.89,63,717

Cost of improvement with indexation: Rs.40,293

Long term Capital Gain payable: Rs. 9,95,990

On perusal of the details furnished by the Assessee, it is noticed that the assessee

has sold a residential property being Flat bearing No. H-204, Rohan Jharokha

(Hereinafter "the said property") vide sale deed dated 12/08/2015 for a sale

consideration of Rs. 1,00,00,000/-. The said property has been purchased by the

Assessee from Fern Builders and Developers, Mr. Austin Roach and Rohan Housing Private Limited (Hereinafter, the "Vendors") for a consideration of Rs.11,16,000 vide

a registered sale deed dated on 11/3/2011 (the "Sale Deed").

In support of claim of cost of acquisition, the Assessee has furnished copies of two unregistered agreements dated 05/01/2008 in addition to the Sale Deed. The Sale Deed provides the full and final consideration paid by the Assessee to the Vendors.

The unregistered agreements precede the Sale Deed and the Sale Deed mentions

that pursuant to these unregistered agreements an amount of Rs.11,16,000 has been

paid to the Vendors. No mention of any other amount paid vide the unregistered

agreements is mentioned in the Sale Deed. Furthermore, stamp duty has been paid

only on Rs.11,16,000 by the Assessee. Both the unregistered agreements filed by

the assessee cannot be considered as they do not have any evidentiary value, Since

the agreements to sell were not registered, assessee's claimed that he paid certain

amount in addition to that mentioned in registered sale deed cannot be relied upon. Hence, the claim of assessee qua unregistered documents do not survive.

It is settled law that an assessee would not be entitled to explain the difference

between apparent consideration and fair market value by relying on an agreement of sale unless the agreement is registered. (CITVs. Jumramal Sons (1986) 25 Taxman

242(Allahabad)

It may be separately noted that Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of CIT v. Balbir

Singh Maini (2017) and in Mother Hospital (Private) Limited v. CIT, Trichur (2017) has cautioned against giving effect in law to any unregistered document transferring mmoveable property. In fact, as per Section 17 of Registration Act, it is compulsory to register any document involving immoveable property.

Various tribunals and high courts have also refused to entertain assessee's claim of cOst of acquisition based on unregistered agreements. Please see below a list of these cases:

Page 3: SURESH KALYANASUNDARAM

1. Shagan Lal v. ITO Ward-Il (4), Abohar (2018) 89 taxmann.com 117 (Amritsar Tribunal) (See para 28) 2. CIT v. Jumramal Sons (1986) 25 Taxman 242 (All) 3. Sathyanarayana Gowda [ts-109-1TAT-2018 (Bang)]

Hence, submissions of the Assessee to include the consideration amounts mentioned in the unregistered agreements in the computation of cost of acquisitioncannot be considered.

Therefore, cost of acquisition of the said property has to be adopted only at Rs. 11,16,000/- plus stamp duty Rs. 1,02,346/- and registration fees of Rs.15,230/- Total Rs. 12,33,576/-. The indexed cost of acquisition works out to Rs. 18,24,479/- and long term capital gains at Rs. 81,24,479/-. Out of this the Long term Capital gain of Rs.9,95,990/- is already offered to tax inreturn of income filed for A.Y 2016-17. So

the assessee is liable to declare taxable long term capital gains of Rs. 71,28,489/-. In view of the above, income chargeable to tax which includes taxable long term capital gains of Rs. 71,28,489/- has escaped assessment in Assessee case for A.Y. 2016-17.

Therefore, I have reason to believe that income chargeable to tax amounting to Rs.

71,28,489/- has escaped assessment for the A.Y. 2016-17 in the Assessee's case within the meaning of section 147 of the l.T. Act.

3. In view of the above, you may submit your response with supporting documents (if any) on the above mentioned issues to undersigned electronically in "E-proceedings' facility through your account in e-Filling website(www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in) at your convenience on or before 30/09/2020

4. In course of assessment proceedings, if required specific questionnaire(s) or requisition(s) for information/document may be issued subsequently

5. A brief note on E- Proceeding is enclosed for your kind reference. In case you require any assistance in fling your response, you may contact toll free Call Centre number 1800 103 4215

Encdosure: As above

Yours faithfully,

NABEEL AHMAD SAAD

CIRCLE 5(3)(2), BANGALORE/

(In case the document is digitally signed please

Page 4: SURESH KALYANASUNDARAM

Cu

sto

mer iD

2

00

00

03

67

5

SSP SPEED EK

881500641|N

Oo

. Asst, C

om

mis

sito

r !n

co

me-a

x

T

/Circio.

) H

. 59

, Taet u

s,

t. a

a,

No

. 59

, 4th

Flo

o, H

AT

. Bh

av

an

,

TT

,

¥F

3

50

03

2.

Bela

ry R

oad

, iettg

êt.u

36

0032.