Supreme Court judgment in the case of Cheshire West

11
1 Supreme Court judgment in the case of Cheshire West Niall Fry MCA-DoLS Policy Lead, DH [email protected] Care Providers Alliance event Tuesday 28 October 2014

description

Supreme Court judgment in the case of Cheshire West. Care Providers Alliance event Tuesday 28 October 2014. Niall Fry MCA-DoLS Policy Lead, DH [email protected]. Supreme Court judgment - case one. Supreme Court judgment - case two. Supreme Court judgment - case three. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Supreme Court judgment in the case of Cheshire West

Page 1: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

1

Supreme Court judgment in the case of Cheshire West

Niall Fry

MCA-DoLS Policy Lead, DH

[email protected]

Care Providers Alliance event Tuesday 28 October 2014

Page 2: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

2 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Supreme Court judgment- case one

Page 3: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

3 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Supreme Court judgment- case two

Page 4: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

4 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Supreme Court judgment- case three

Page 5: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

5 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Supreme Court judgment- acid test

Page 6: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

6 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Supreme Court judgment- not relevant considerations

Page 7: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

7 Valuing every voice, respecting every right

DH View

• Welcome the judgment w.r.t. its re-statement of the universal nature of human rights – afforded to all on an equal basis

• Recognise this means a significant increase on the numbers now considered to be DoL – HSCIC data shows this

• Compliance won’t occur overnight (ADASS and CQC agree), but must have a plan in place – do nothing not acceptable

• In particular, “bulk assessments” not appropriate – must maintain the individual scrutiny

Page 8: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

8

DH View cont.

• Needs to be an MCA-centred response

• First step should always be, can restrictions be eased to prevent a DoL from occurring?

• Prioritise and risk assess

• Don’t hold back applications

Valuing every voice, respecting ever right

Page 9: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

9

Longer term solution

• Law Commission to fundamentally review legislation – for DoLS and for “community settings”. Aiming for a system that achieves right balance between protecting rights and reducing administrative burdens – integration into normal care planning process will be important

Valuing every voice, respecting every right

Page 10: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

10

Shorter term

• Court of Protection is almost ready to launch its new streamlined system – will allow paper applications for “simple” cases

• DoLS standard forms being revised and updated case law guidance produced

Valuing every right, respecting every right

Page 11: Supreme Court judgment in  the case of Cheshire West

11

Concluding thoughts

• An opportunity but certainly a challenge

• MCA centred response essential

• Keen to hear your major concerns, thoughts for any short-term solutions – to feed into future planning

Valuing every right, respecting every right