Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

17
Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell,

description

Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner May 11, 2012. Today’s Topics for Teaching and Learning. Teacher Excellence and Support System Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Technology Specs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Page 1: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Supporting Teaching and LearningArkansas Department of Education

Dr. Tom Kimbrell, CommissionerMay 11, 2012

Page 2: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Today’s Topics for Teaching and Learning

1. Teacher Excellence and Support System2. Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for

College and Careers (PARCC)– Technology Specs

3. ESEA Flexibility Request– Targeted Achievement Gap Groups

(TAGG)– Accountability, Reporting & Responding

Page 3: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Teacher Excellence and Support System

• Act 1209 of 2011 – Teacher Excellence and Support System (TESS)

• Rules are out for public comment until May 18• Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching –

Based on 4 Domains and 22 Components• Appropriate external measures of assessment for

teachers of non-tested areas• Incorporate student learning into Danielson’s

framework • Training for 35,000 teachers and administrators

Page 4: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Teacher Excellence and Support System

Measure individual teacher performance. Guide for teachers as they reflect upon and

improve their effectiveness. Serve as the basis for instructional

improvement. Focus the goals and objectives of schools

and districts - support, monitor and evaluate their teachers.

Page 5: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

2014-152012 2012-13 2012 2013 2013 2013-142009 2010-11 2011-12

Regional Meetings held throughout the state to gain input and inform stakeholders.

ARKANSAS TEACHER EXCELLENCE SUPPORT SYSTEM (TESS)

11 Schools Pilot – TESS

Using Teachscape Software and 360° cameras

*Training of Evaluators - 1 day face-to-face training held at co-ops will kick off the 30 hours of on-line training and certification test Jan – May 2013

Pilot YearAll districts will pilot TESS. Committee of stakeholders will obtain input and feedback from pilot

First Year of Full Implementation All districts will implement TESS; Data from 14-15, 15-16, and 16-17 will be published on school report cards in 17-18

Training of Teachers – Half- day face-to-face training held at districts and co-ops will kick off 18 hours on-line training . June – Aug 2013

Train the Trainers 80 to 100 trainers located throughout the state will be trained Fall 2012

4 Schools Pilot New Evaluation

System

Act 1209 Passed in March 2011

Rules and Regsapproved by State Board of EducationSummer 2012.

Teacher Eval. Task Force

Comprised of 36 members representing

all stakeholder groups

*The face-to-face training will take place in January and February 2013 – Evaluators will need to complete the on-line training and certification test by August 2013

Page 6: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

2014-15Spring 2012 2012-13 Fall 2012 Jan 2013 Summer

2013 2013-14 2009 2010-11 2011-12

10 Schools in Principal Evaluation PilotDr. Connie Kamm w/ Doug Reeves Leadership and Learning Center facilitates training

ARKANSAS PRINCIPAL EVALUATION SYSTEM TIMELINE10 Schools Pilot –Year 2Training and Support will continue w/ pilot schools

to obtain feedback, gather data, and

determine professional development needs-

Work will also begin on revising rubrics for asst

prin., curr specialists, etc.

Work w/ Stakeholders and Legislators for legislation of principal evaluation system to mirror TESS

Pilot YearAll districts will pilot principal evaluation system. Committee of stakeholders will obtain input and feedback from pilot

First Year of Full Implementation All districts will fully implement principal evaluation system –Data will be collected on system

Training for Principals and Superintendents All principals and superintendents will be trained on principal evaluation system -

Conduct Meetings with appropriate stakeholders to receive input for principal evaluation system and possible legislation – Explore options for on-line platforms

Act 222 Council develops principal

evaluation system based on ISLLC standards

Revisions made to evaluation rubric, forms, etc., based on feedback from piot

ACT 222 of 2009 School

Leadership Council

Set up Council of Educational Assoc, and Leadership

Groups to aid in development of evaluation tools

Page 7: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers

The PARCC assessments have six priority purposes, which are driving the design of the system: •Determine whether students are college- and career-ready or on track•Assess the full range of the Common Core Standards, including standards that are difficult to measure•Measure the full range of student performance, including the performance high and low performing students•Provide data during the academic year to inform instruction, interventions and professional development•Provide data for accountability, including measures of growth•Incorporate innovative approaches throughout the system

Page 8: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)

PARCC will develop an assessment system comprised of four components.

•Two summative, required assessment components designed to:Make “college- and career-readiness” and “on-track”

determinations, Measure the full range of standards and full performance

continuum, andProvide data for accountability uses, including measures of growth.

•Two non-summative, optional assessment components designed to:Generate timely information for informing instruction, interventions, and professional development during the school year.

•An additional third non-summative component will assess students’ speaking and listening skills

Page 9: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)

Minimum Guidelines for New Hardware Purchases

Page 10: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

ESEA Flexibility RequestWhy ?

Core values•Reduce complexity•Fairness & sensitivity•Measure what is important—proficiency, growth/progress, gap closure•Honor history—use data & lessons learned to improve system•Fairness is not always simple-parsimony vs. simplicity•Infuse incentives & rewards•Credit schools for progress & growth•All efforts support & ensure path to CCR•Anticipate & minimize unintended consequences•Do what is best for Arkansas’s children.

Page 11: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Accountability System and Feedback Loop

Page 12: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

TAGG: Targeted Achievement Gap Group

• Students from low income families;• Students with disabilities; and• English learners

Page 13: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

TAGG: Targeted Achievement Gap Group

• Reduces unintended consequences– Students may belong to several groups, stakeholders have

been concerned this exaggerates school failure.

• Focuses more schools on achievement gaps– 90% of schools have a TAGG– Differentiates accountability and response for students

with lowest performance• AMOs for ESEA subgroups• Reporting ESEA subgroups with N ≥ 10

Page 14: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Accountability, Reporting & Responding

• Accountability: Classification of Schools – 95% tested– Proficiency Gap-Combined Population & TAGG– Growth Gap-Combined Population & TAGG– Graduation Rate Gap-Combined Population & TAGG

• College & Career Ready Indicators developed during transition to PARCC

• Reporting & Responding with Interventions (N ≥ 10)– 95% tested– Proficiency Gap-Combined Population, TAGG & ESEA Subgroups– Growth Gap-Combined Population, TAGG & ESEA Subgroups– Graduation Rate Gap-Combined Population, TAGG & ESEA Subgroups

• College & Career Ready Indicators reported

Page 15: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

ESEA Flexibility Request

• Arkansas is one of 26 states, along with the District of Columbia, in the second round of ESEA Flexibility applications.

• Application was submitted February 28, 2012.• Following peer review, the state has been

involved in an iterative process with the USDE to provide clarification and coherence.

• Has submitted the third revision this week.• Hope to receive approval within next two weeks.

Page 16: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Supporting Teaching and LearningArkansas Department of Education

For more information contact:TESS—Dr. Karen Cushman, Assistant Commissioner Human Resources/LicensurePARCC—Dr. Laura Bednar, Assistant Commissioner Learning ServicesESEA Flexibility—John Hoy, Assistant Commissioner Academic Accountability

Page 17: Supporting Teaching and Learning Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Tom Kimbrell, Commissioner

Questions and Answers?