SUPPORTING COLLABORATION Andreas Rio, M.Eng. [email protected].

26
SUPPORTING COLLABORATION Andreas Rio, M.Eng. [email protected]

Transcript of SUPPORTING COLLABORATION Andreas Rio, M.Eng. [email protected].

SUPPORTING COLLABORATIONAndreas Rio, [email protected]

Introduction

The Future: Communities The company of the future could be a collection

of online communities some are internal and others reach outside

the organization’s boundaries into one’s business ecosystem;

some are designed and formed completely and others just grow on their own.

The main job of executives and managers is to foster these communities and the collaboration.

A major job of CIOs is to provide the technology to support online communities and online collaboration.

Teams: the basis of organizations

Organizations are becoming information based. It will be organized not like a manufacturing

organization but more like a hospital, which is team based.

Hospitals have specialty units, each with its own knowledge, training, and language;

Work in the units is done by ad hoc teams, assembled to address a patient’s condition and diagnosis.

Teams: the basis of organizations

Systems that contain support groups are important because most people spend 60 to 80 percent of their time working with others.

Yet, people seem to feel they are most productive when they work alone.

Understanding Group

Characteristics of Groups Membership Interaction Hierarchy Location Time

Understanding Group

Not all groups are the same. Some characteristics that differentiate groups include:

Membership – Some groups are open, some are closed.

Interaction – Some groups are loosely coupled (salespeople with their own territories), others work closely together (project team).

Hierarchy – Some groups have a chain of command (tiers of committees).

Location – Some members are co-located, some are dispersed.

Time – Some groups are short-lived, some are ongoing. Some work intensely at times, others do not.

Understanding Group

Types of Groups Authority Groups Intradepartmental Groups Project Teams Interdepartmental Work Groups Committees and Task Forces Business Relationship Groups Peer Groups Networks Electronic Groups Communities of Practice (CoPs) Network Armies

Understanding Group

Authority Groups – These are boss and subordinate.

Intradepartmental Groups – These are where all members do the same type of work.

Project Teams – These usually have members who work full-time to accomplish a goal within a specific schedule.

Interdepartmental Work Groups – Passing work from department to department in a chain, these form a super group.

Committees and Task Forces – These are formed to deal with a subject area or issue.

Understanding Group

Business Relationship Groups – These are relationships with customers, groups of customers, suppliers, and so on.

Peer Groups – These meet to exchange ideas and opinions.

Networks – Groups of people socialize, exchange information, and expand the number of their personal acquaintances.

Electronic Groups – Groups are formed on the Internet to socialize, find information, entertain themselves, gain comfort, or just experiment with the online world.

Understanding Group

Communities of Practice (CoP) – A group of people can work or socialize together for so long that they develop an identifiable way of doing things.

Network Armies – Widely dispersed groups of people form to further a cause.

Community of Practice

CoPs are all about managing knowledge, capturing and spreading know-how, ideas, innovations, and experience.

In some enterprises, CoPs form the foundation of their knowledge management efforts.

Community of Practice

Though informal, some CoPs have had a great effect on their enterprise:

driving strategies, creating new lines of business, spreading best practices, and solving seemingly intractable problems.

CoPs resist being managed. But some enterprises have seen their value

and have learned how to look after them

Community of Practice

Identifying Potential CoPs – Companies can use CoP consultants to help employees interested in forming a CoP.

Providing a CoP Infrastructure – Executives need to give CoPs legitimacy because they lack resources and formal standing in the enterprise.

Measuring CoPs – To measure CoPs appropriately often means measuring their contributions nontraditionally because their effects may only show up in a team member’s department, not in the community’s work.

Network Army

These sets of individuals and communities are aligned by a reason, so they are as permanent as their common agenda.

Their cohesive force is their value system, and their communications are open, taking place in forums that anyone can join.

Network Army

Network armies have existed for a long time, but they can now suddenly appear with a lot of power because of three developments: High-speed information flows due to a common

language (English) and communication system (Internet),

The geometrically expanding power of networks (adding one person geometrically increases the number of interconnections), and

The international visibility now afforded just about any reason.

Hierarchies have a tremendously difficult time fighting network armies because there is no single leader, simply a “hydra with many heads.”

Network Army

Example of Network Army?

Network Army

Network Army

Network Army

System to support collaborations Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS)

have existed for 25 years. Their intent has been to support the

decision making of more than one person, working together to reach a decision.

One framework for categorizing the work of groups has time on one dimension (same time/different time) and place on the other (same place/different place).

System to support collaborations

Supporting same time same place This has generally meant supporting meetings. The Problem with Meetings – Meetings can

have many shortcomings: lack of agenda, people arrive late, the necessary information does not arrive, and so on.

Information Technology Can Help – By eliminating some meetings (using e-mail instead), permitting better preparation (discussing items online beforehand), IT improves the effectiveness and efficiency of meetings.

Supporting same time same placeBenefit: more opportunities for discussion, more equal participation, a permanent record of discussion, improved feedback to presenters, improved learning,

Lack: On the other hand, having people type while

presenters are presenting could distract participants.

Supporting different place

Virtual Workforce

Supporting different place

Virtual Workforce

Virtual Organization

Executives of increasingly virtual organizations should consider adopting a governance structure that fosters self-governance by employees.

While the open source movement appears to have all the trappings of chaos waiting to happen, it is actually very well disciplined because of its self-governance.

Four important governance principles are: 1. managed membership, 2. rules and institutions, 3. monitoring and 4. sanctions.