Supporting Classroom Interaction With The Tablet PC: Lessons Learned From Classroom Deployment...
-
Upload
patrick-waddell -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Supporting Classroom Interaction With The Tablet PC: Lessons Learned From Classroom Deployment...
Supporting Classroom Interaction With The Tablet PC:Lessons Learned From Classroom Deployment
Supporting Classroom Interaction With The Tablet PC:Lessons Learned From Classroom Deployment
Richard AndersonProfessor of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Washington
Richard AndersonProfessor of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Washington
Classroom Presenter HistoryClassroom Presenter History
[2001] Development started at MSR as part of DISC (Now ConferenceXP)
[2002] Development continued at UWDeployment as a presentation tool in distance and standard classes
[2003] Extensions to supportclassroom interaction
[2005] Deployment in undergraduate courses as part of regular instruction
[2001] Development started at MSR as part of DISC (Now ConferenceXP)
[2002] Development continued at UWDeployment as a presentation tool in distance and standard classes
[2003] Extensions to supportclassroom interaction
[2005] Deployment in undergraduate courses as part of regular instruction
Today’s TalkToday’s Talk
Big question: Is there potential for fully integrating student devicesinto the classroom?
Classroom Presenter overview(See Classroom Presenter 3.0 at Demofest)
Classroom Deployments
Impact
Thoughts on sustainable deployments
Big question: Is there potential for fully integrating student devicesinto the classroom?
Classroom Presenter overview(See Classroom Presenter 3.0 at Demofest)
Classroom Deployments
Impact
Thoughts on sustainable deployments
What Will The University Classroom Look Like … What Will The University Classroom Look Like …
If all students have computational devicesLaptops, Tablets, Ultra light tablets, PDAs, Cell Phones, Gameboys . . .
If the devices are all connected
If the devices are integrated intoclassroom instruction
If all students have computational devicesLaptops, Tablets, Ultra light tablets, PDAs, Cell Phones, Gameboys . . .
If the devices are all connected
If the devices are integrated intoclassroom instruction
Wide Range Of Potential Classroom ApplicationsWide Range Of Potential Classroom Applications
Presentation
Demonstration
Simulation
Accessing external resources
Note taking
Feedback
Active learning
Peer communication
Presentation
Demonstration
Simulation
Accessing external resources
Note taking
Feedback
Active learning
Peer communication
Device Enabled ClassroomDevice Enabled Classroom
Can the integrated use of student devices in the classroom enhance theeducational experience?
What have we learned from the Classroom Presenter project that will help us understand the broad question?
Can the integrated use of student devices in the classroom enhance theeducational experience?
What have we learned from the Classroom Presenter project that will help us understand the broad question?
Why Ask The QuestionsWhy Ask The Questions
Integrated use of devices in the classroom might improve education or address a collection of challenges
Students are going to be bringing computational devices to class – so lets figure out how to take advantage of them
“Co-opt student devices for an educational purpose”, S. Wolfman
Integrated use of devices in the classroom might improve education or address a collection of challenges
Students are going to be bringing computational devices to class – so lets figure out how to take advantage of them
“Co-opt student devices for an educational purpose”, S. Wolfman
Classroom PresenterClassroom Presenter
Distributed, Tablet PC based applicationInstructor, Display, and Student machines
Synchronized navigation of slide deck
Instructor ink distributed in real timeto all machines
Student SubmissionsSlides used to distribute activities to students
Student work sent to instructor
Instructor shows student work on thepublic display
Distributed, Tablet PC based applicationInstructor, Display, and Student machines
Synchronized navigation of slide deck
Instructor ink distributed in real timeto all machines
Student SubmissionsSlides used to distribute activities to students
Student work sent to instructor
Instructor shows student work on thepublic display
Classroom PresenterClassroom PresenterStudentStudent
StudentStudent
InstructorInstructor
Public Public DisplayDisplay
Classroom Presenter ProjectClassroom Presenter Project
Develop underlying technology around Tablet PC and wireless classroom
Deploy in university courses
Key limitations (wrt broad vision):Focus on instructor presentation and interaction with student devices
Focus on homogeneous device deployment, Tablet PCs
Unsustainable device modelDepartment owned tablets distributed at start of each class
Develop underlying technology around Tablet PC and wireless classroom
Deploy in university courses
Key limitations (wrt broad vision):Focus on instructor presentation and interaction with student devices
Focus on homogeneous device deployment, Tablet PCs
Unsustainable device modelDepartment owned tablets distributed at start of each class
Key ResultsKey Results
Successful classroom deploymentsRegular use throughout term
Computer Science coursesAlgorithms, Data Structures,Software Engineering
Analysis of deployments
Effective tool for achieving instructors’ pedagogical goals
Wide range of use
Successful classroom deploymentsRegular use throughout term
Computer Science coursesAlgorithms, Data Structures,Software Engineering
Analysis of deployments
Effective tool for achieving instructors’ pedagogical goals
Wide range of use
Deployment DetailsDeployment Details
Senior level algorithms class
Approx 20 students
Classroom set of HP TC1100 Tablet PCs
One tablet based lecture per week
Lecture – Activity modelAlternating lecturing with activities
Avg. 4 activities per lecture (50 min. classes)
4 min work time, 2 min discussion timeper activity
50% of class time associated with activities
Senior level algorithms class
Approx 20 students
Classroom set of HP TC1100 Tablet PCs
One tablet based lecture per week
Lecture – Activity modelAlternating lecturing with activities
Avg. 4 activities per lecture (50 min. classes)
4 min work time, 2 min discussion timeper activity
50% of class time associated with activities
Activity ExamplesActivity Examples
Pedagogical ContributionPedagogical Contribution
Incorporation of individual artifactsinto discussion
Contrast with Classroom Networks (“clickers”) which rely on aggregation of responses
Complementary approaches
Individual artifactsFree form answers, exploration
Unanticipated results and misconceptions
Personalization
Ideal with pen based input
Incorporation of individual artifactsinto discussion
Contrast with Classroom Networks (“clickers”) which rely on aggregation of responses
Complementary approaches
Individual artifactsFree form answers, exploration
Unanticipated results and misconceptions
Personalization
Ideal with pen based input
Individual Artifact ExamplesIndividual Artifact Examples
What Technology ProvidesWhat Technology Provides
Digital domainSupport for archiving, distribution, and analysis
Integration with lectureAllows display with data projector
Efficiency Reducing overhead of distribution and collection
SimultaneityAll students work at once to increase contribution rates and to encourage independent contributions
Additional communication channelsEasier to express certain ideas
Overcomes communication barriers
Digital domainSupport for archiving, distribution, and analysis
Integration with lectureAllows display with data projector
Efficiency Reducing overhead of distribution and collection
SimultaneityAll students work at once to increase contribution rates and to encourage independent contributions
Additional communication channelsEasier to express certain ideas
Overcomes communication barriers
Technology ExamplesTechnology Examples
Classroom Presenter As A ToolClassroom Presenter As A Tool
Are lectures better when delivered with a chalk board or with PowerPoint?
Wrong question – both are tools, which can be used well, or badly
Classroom Presenter has been usedin class to achieve specificinstructional goals
It is possible to assess whether or not instructional goals are achieved
Assessing overall impact is muchmore difficult
Are lectures better when delivered with a chalk board or with PowerPoint?
Wrong question – both are tools, which can be used well, or badly
Classroom Presenter has been usedin class to achieve specificinstructional goals
It is possible to assess whether or not instructional goals are achieved
Assessing overall impact is muchmore difficult
Instructional Goals ExamplesInstructional Goals Examples
High Rates Of Student SubmissionsHigh Rates Of Student Submissions
High rates of participation in Algorithms and Data Structures class (60 – 90 %)
No trends in participation rates Time in class or lecture in term
Submission was anonymous, so students weren’t required to participate
One incentive for students to participate was having their work displayed
High rates of participation in Algorithms and Data Structures class (60 – 90 %)
No trends in participation rates Time in class or lecture in term
Submission was anonymous, so students weren’t required to participate
One incentive for students to participate was having their work displayed
Importance Of Good Pedagogical PracticeImportance Of Good Pedagogical Practice
It is absolutely essential to base the use of technology in teaching on soundpedagogical principles
Classroom Presenter lessonsImportance of having specific goals for use of technology and the activities
Value of planning how to work with student results (and anticipating results)
Consideration of learning goalsLearning goals -> Assessing goals -> Activity design -> Lecture content
It is absolutely essential to base the use of technology in teaching on soundpedagogical principles
Classroom Presenter lessonsImportance of having specific goals for use of technology and the activities
Value of planning how to work with student results (and anticipating results)
Consideration of learning goalsLearning goals -> Assessing goals -> Activity design -> Lecture content
Does This Scale To 300?Does This Scale To 300?
IssuesWireless access
Device deployment
Cognitive load Reduce number of submissions
TA Mediation
Sampling
Automatic clustering
Pedagogy scalingMaybe aggregation is appropriate for this scale
IssuesWireless access
Device deployment
Cognitive load Reduce number of submissions
TA Mediation
Sampling
Automatic clustering
Pedagogy scalingMaybe aggregation is appropriate for this scale
What Are The Costs?What Are The Costs?
Infrastructure Wireless + Data Projector
Instructor presentation device
Student devicesMandated student devices
Non-mandated devicesLaptop
Small form factor
Fixed installation
Infrastructure Wireless + Data Projector
Instructor presentation device
Student devicesMandated student devices
Non-mandated devicesLaptop
Small form factor
Fixed installation
What Are The Other Costs?What Are The Other Costs?
Instructor preparationLoss of content coverageStudent idle timeBringing devices to class
PowerCarrying device
Desk real estateDistraction
DoodlingOutside communication
Instructor preparationLoss of content coverageStudent idle timeBringing devices to class
PowerCarrying device
Desk real estateDistraction
DoodlingOutside communication
Assessment Of Costs And BenefitsAssessment Of Costs And Benefits
BenefitsClassroom Feedback
Identified lack of backgroundConfirmed understanding of topic
PedagogyActive learning to convey particular points
EngagementWorking on problem instances to enhance interest
Broad contributionsStudent perceptionsClass structure
BenefitsClassroom Feedback
Identified lack of backgroundConfirmed understanding of topic
PedagogyActive learning to convey particular points
EngagementWorking on problem instances to enhance interest
Broad contributionsStudent perceptionsClass structure
CostsInstructor Device
Low (already in use)
InfrastructureLow (already available)
Student DevicesGrant supported (High)
Instructor PrepHigh (but should drop)
Loss of contentMinor
Idle timeMinor
Devices in classSetup cost for TA/Instr
Doodling and other appsMedium
CostsInstructor Device
Low (already in use)
InfrastructureLow (already available)
Student DevicesGrant supported (High)
Instructor PrepHigh (but should drop)
Loss of contentMinor
Idle timeMinor
Devices in classSetup cost for TA/Instr
Doodling and other appsMedium
Successful Sustainable DeploymentSuccessful Sustainable Deployment
Benefits must exceed costs
Benefits must accrue to those who pay the costs
Most promising deployment modelStudent owned devices
Benefits must exceed costs
Benefits must accrue to those who pay the costs
Most promising deployment modelStudent owned devices
Achieving SustainabilityAchieving Sustainability
Lowering costSupport a wide range of form factors, devices and platforms
Target devices students would otherwise have with them
Increasing benefit to studentsOther classroom applications
Value of having class resources digital
Lowering costSupport a wide range of form factors, devices and platforms
Target devices students would otherwise have with them
Increasing benefit to studentsOther classroom applications
Value of having class resources digital
Classroom ApplicationsClassroom Applications
Note taking
Digital Capture and Replay
Domain specific applicationsSimulations
External resourcesWeb
Documents
Communication
Note taking
Digital Capture and Replay
Domain specific applicationsSimulations
External resourcesWeb
Documents
Communication
Keys For The Device Enabled ClassroomKeys For The Device Enabled Classroom
Tablets will have a major role
Form factor and device cost is critical
Must include wide range of devices and platforms, including non-traditional computing devices
Must provide reliable,consistent connectivity
Low cost of entry
Integration across classroom applications
Tablets will have a major role
Form factor and device cost is critical
Must include wide range of devices and platforms, including non-traditional computing devices
Must provide reliable,consistent connectivity
Low cost of entry
Integration across classroom applications
CLASSROOM PRESENTERCLASSROOM PRESENTER
www.cs.washington.edu/education/dl/presenter
For more information, contact Richard Anderson [email protected]
Acknowledgements;Support from MSR ERP, Collaboration with ConferenceXP group, UW Team, HP, Beth Simon and Ubiquitous Presenter, feedback and ideas from many users
www.cs.washington.edu/education/dl/presenter
For more information, contact Richard Anderson [email protected]
Acknowledgements;Support from MSR ERP, Collaboration with ConferenceXP group, UW Team, HP, Beth Simon and Ubiquitous Presenter, feedback and ideas from many users
© 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries.The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation.Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft,and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation.MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.