Supplementary Materials forSupplementary Materials for T fr cells lack IL-2Rα but express decoy...
Transcript of Supplementary Materials forSupplementary Materials for T fr cells lack IL-2Rα but express decoy...
Supplementary Materials for
Tfr cells lack IL-2Rα but express decoy IL-1R2 and IL-1Ra and
suppress the IL-1–dependent activation of Tfh cells
Paul-Gydeon G. Ritvo, Guillame Churlaud, Valentin Quiniou, Laura Florez,
Faustine Brimaud, Gwladys Fourcade, Encarnita Mariotti-Ferrandiz, David Klatzmann*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Published 8 September 2017, Sci. Immunol. 2, eaan0368 (2017)
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aan0368
The PDF file includes:
Materials and Methods
Fig. S1. Representative flow cytometry gating for Tfol cells.
Fig. S2. IL-2 increases the number of splenic Treg cells.
Fig. S3. Expression of CD25 on Tfr and Tfh cells in three different genetic
backgrounds.
Fig. S4. Tfh and Tfr cells have similar expressions of Bcl6 and CD25.
Fig. S5. Clustering of Treg, Tfr, and Tfh cells based on the expression of the entire
545-gene set from the NanoString mouse immunology panel.
Fig. S6. Cytokines, CD40L, and OX40 expression of Tfr, Treg, and Tfh cells.
Fig. S7. IL-1R2 and OX40 expression of Tfr, Treg, Teff, and Tfh cells.
Fig. S8. IL-1β production in coculture of B and Tfh cells.
Fig. S9. GCB representative gating after INS or OVA immunization.
Table S1. Exact P values of the asterisk symbols shown in figures.
Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following:
(available at immunology.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2/15/eaan0368/DC1)
Source data (Excel file)
immunology.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2/15/eaan0368/DC1
Supplementary Materials
Materials and Methods
Nanostring
Gene expression analysis based on a NanoString immunology panel
RNA extraction and NanoString procedure: Sorted cells were washed in PBS1X and stored in
RNAquous kit Lysis Buffer (Ambion, Inc/Life Technologies) at -80°C. Total RNA was extracted
according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quality was assessed on a bioanalyzer using the Pico
RNA Reagent Kit (Agilent Technologies). Gene expression was analyzed using the NanoString mouse
immunology panel (NanoString, Seattle, USA). 5 ng of total RNA was pre-amplified (5 cycles of
PCR) using the specific multiprobe approaches following the manufacturer’s instructions. Each
sample was analyzed in a separate multiplexed reaction including in each, eight negative probes and
six concentrations of positive control probes. Negative control analysis was performed to determine
the background for each sample.
Data quality control and normalization: Data were imported into NanoString nSolver analysis
software (version 2.5) for quality control and normalization. A preliminary quality control analysis
was performed on raw data as follows: A first normalization step using the internal positive controls
was applied to correct potential sources of technical variations. To do so, we calculated for each
sample the geometric mean of the positive probe counts. A scaling factor for a sample was the ratio of
the average across all geometric means and the geometric mean of the sample. For each sample, we
multiplied all gene counts by the corresponding scaling factor. Next, for each sample and all genes of
interest, non-specific measurements counted in a water sample (No Template Control) were subtracted
from all measurements for all samples. Finally, to take into account biological variation, 14
housekeeping genes were used to normalize all the 545 genes of interest using the same method as in
the positive control normalization step.
Selection of highly discriminant genes: We further analyzed the genes that better separate the cell
subsets. As 100 transcripts per gene represent the limit for a robust detection of expression, we first
selected genes with such expression in at least one sample. We then selected genes whose mean
expression in one subset was at least twice or half the mean expression in the two other subsets,
leading to a set of 81 genes that were used for Tfr, Tfh and Treg functional profile study.
Fig. S1. Representative flow cytometry gating for Tfol cells.
Flow cytometry contour plots identifying CXCR5hiPD-1hi follicular T cells (Tfol cells) within
CD4+CD19- T cells (middle panel) and CXCR5hiPD-1- status of CD4-CD19+ B cells (right panel).
Fig. S2. IL-2 increases the number of splenic Treg cells.
Fig. S3. Expression of CD25 on Tfr and Tfh cells in three different genetic backgrounds.
Fig. S4. Tfh and Tfr cells have similar expressions of Bcl6 and CD25.
Flow cytometry contour plot identifying CD4+Bcl6+Foxp3+ Tfr (red) and CD4+Bcl6+Foxp3- Tfh (blue)
cells within Tfol cells of A (left) and their expression of Bcl6 (middle panel) and CD25 (right panel).
Fig. S5. Clustering of Treg, Tfr, and Tfh cells based on the expression of the entire 545-gene set
from the NanoString mouse immunology panel.
Heat map comparing the gene expression profiles of Treg, Tfr and Tfh cell subsets from two genetic
backgrounds ten days after immunization. High (red) and low (blue) gene expression.
Fig. S6. Cytokines, CD40L, and OX40 expression of Tfr, Treg, and Tfh cells.
Expression of indicated molecules in Treg (white), Tfh (blue) and Tfr (red) cells.
Fig. S7. IL-1R2 and OX40 expression of Tfr, Treg, Teff, and Tfh cells.
IL-1R2 (left) and OX40 (right) protein expression of Tfr, Treg, Teff and Tfh cells.
Fig. S8. IL-1β production in coculture of B and Tfh cells.
Flow cytometry dot plot showing the IL-1 production of PD-1- B cells and PD-1+ Tfh cells (left) and
of CD4- B cells and CD4+ Tfh cells (right) in co-culture of B and Tfh cells. IL-1 was stained using the
IL-1-APC (eBioscience).
Fig. S9. GCB representative gating after INS or OVA immunization.
Bcl6- GL7- B cells and Bcl6+ GL7+ germinal center B cell (GCB cell) proportions within CD19+ B
cells after INS or OVA immunization
Table S1. Exact P values of the asterisk symbols shown in figures.
Figure Comparison Exact p-value
1 throughout *: p=0.0159, **: p =0.0079
2C **: p = 0.0079
2D *: p=0.0159
2E *: p=0.0256
4C throughout *: p=0.0159, **: p =0.0079
4D throughout ****: p<0,0001
4E *** : p=0.0002 except comparison between Tfh and Treg for OX40 MFI, p=0.0006
5A **: p=0.0022
5B *: p=0.0357
5C *: p=0.0286
5D left *: p=0.0159, **: p =0.0079
5D right *: p=0.0286
5E left *: p=0.0159, **: p =0.0079
5E right *: p=0.0286
6A-D **: p=0.0012
6E **: p=0.0043
7B *: p=0.0238, **:p=0.0079
7D *: p =0.0286